So Where Is HPT And His "Proof" ?
Chris
That's fine but where is his proof of said accusations?
To date he has done nothing other than run away.
So how about it HPT, why not put up or shut up?
The ball is in your court.
Snit
8:21 PM:
He will do neither. He will never stop repeating his lies... nor try to
defend them.
--
🙈🙉🙊
Chris
Kind of odd that such a troll hammer as HPT refuses to provide proof
of his claims.
Maybe HPT is nothing but a liar?
Yea I think that is correct.
Snit
9:27 PM:
Not odd at all - it is what cowards do. Just as RonB will never provide a
shred of evidence about me being "anti-choice", not Roy Schestowitz for his
accusations of my basing my views on Linux on screenshots and videos, HPT
will never provide a shred of evidence for his many, many accusations
against me.
They are cowards.
> Maybe HPT is nothing but a liar?
>
> Yea I think that is correct.
Completely.
--
🙈🙉🙊
High Plains Thumper
> Chris (flatfish) stated:
>> Snit wrote:
>>> Chris (flatfish) stated:
>>>
>>>> HPT likes to make posts with all kinds of accusations. That's fine
>>>> but where is his proof of said accusations?
Liar.
>>>> To date he has done nothing other than run away.
It's you, flatfish.
>>>> So how about it HPT, why not put up or shut up?
You don't know what gives you away.
>>>> The ball is in your court.
Nope.
>>> He will do neither. He will never stop repeating his lies... nor try
>>> to defend them.
Here, answer to these 155 poster quotes on the Snit Circus of
Pathological Lies, and "Not Michael" is the incorrect reply:
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/e8f6779ca6d385b9
Applicable quote:
75- Lusotec (COLA): "You have started threads on this subject many times,
and many times it has been explained to you how X copy & paste should work
and how bugs in a application are not bugs in the system, but still you
return to this subject and post the same false statements." 09 Mar 2011
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/37032133fbe9db92
>> Kind of odd that such a troll hammer as HPT refuses to provide proof of
>> his claims.
Liar.
> Not odd at all - it is what cowards do. Just as RonB will never provide
> a shred of evidence about me being "anti-choice", not Roy Schestowitz
> for his accusations of my basing my views on Linux on screenshots and
> videos, HPT will never provide a shred of evidence for his many, many
> accusations against me.
>
> They are cowards.
So RonB and Roy Schestowitz are considered cowards? You call me a coward?
7- BaJoRi: "You know it, and I know it, and everyone else who has read
your idiocy knows it. I took your statement, showed it to be wrong, then
added even more, just to be a dick and REALLY show you to be a fool. You
need to judiciously snip out pertinent points because you are an
intellectually dwarfed turd-burglar." 11 Nov 2008
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.vacation.las-vegas/msg/647944511b74b82f
>> Maybe HPT is nothing but a liar?
Hello, flatfish Gary Stewart.
>> Yea I think that is correct.
>
> Completely.
Kissy kissy.
--
HPT
Snit
2:02 AM:
...
>>> Kind of odd that such a troll hammer as HPT refuses to provide proof of
>>> his claims.
>
> Liar.
>
>> Not odd at all - it is what cowards do. Just as RonB will never provide
>> a shred of evidence about me being "anti-choice", not Roy Schestowitz
>> for his accusations of my basing my views on Linux on screenshots and
>> videos, HPT will never provide a shred of evidence for his many, many
>> accusations against me.
>>
>> They are cowards.
>
> So RonB and Roy Schestowitz are considered cowards? You call me a coward?
*Absolutely*.
You are a coward - shaking in your cowards' shoes over actually having to
have a reasoned discussion. So you repeat the same lies over and over and
over just to get attention from me and approval from the herd. And, as a
coward, you run *every* time you are asked to support your BS. Every single
time.
You *know* you cannot back your claims. So you live in fear and try to
cover it with false bravado.
Clear enough for you - you silly little coward who *will* run from all
requests to back your absurd accusations. Pathetic.
--
🙈🙉🙊
High Plains Thumper
> You are a coward - shaking in your cowards' shoes over actually having
> to have a reasoned discussion. So you repeat the same lies over and
> over and over just to get attention from me and approval from the herd.
> And, as a coward, you run *every* time you are asked to support your BS.
> Every single time.
You speak big for a little man. Those words you express are fighting
words. However, you only talk big because you are hiding behind a
keyboard. No man who is a man would express the ugliness that you
express. He doesn't need to because he is a man.
It is obvious you are not a man. I bet you haven't even the guts to
express that straight to my face, one-on-one.
I'm planning a motorcycle trip to Phoenix, AZ to visit with a fellow
motorcyclist. How about it, Snit? I can stop by and visit with you. You
can talk to me face to face and share with me just what you did just now.
How about it, Snit? You man enough?
--
HPT
Snit
3:43 PM:
> Snit wrote:
>
>> You are a coward - shaking in your cowards' shoes over actually having
>> to have a reasoned discussion. So you repeat the same lies over and
>> over and over just to get attention from me and approval from the herd.
>> And, as a coward, you run *every* time you are asked to support your BS.
>> Every single time.
>
> You speak big for a little man. Those words you express are fighting
> words. However, you only talk big because you are hiding behind a
> keyboard. No man who is a man would express the ugliness that you
> express. He doesn't need to because he is a man.
I am speaking of the ugliness you express: the absurd insults and accusation
you know you cannot support, the list of quotes you got from Carroll and
Sandman, etc. And you are right: if you were an adult (a man) you would not
express such... but you are not a real man. You are a little coward who
knows you cannot back your claims. You are a small child who runs every
time you are asked.
And now you try to turn it around because I have had the audacity to call
you what you are: a sniveling little coward who spews insults and
accusations you know you cannot back up.
> It is obvious you are not a man. I bet you haven't even the guts to
> express that straight to my face, one-on-one.
Your face? If you were not hiding behind a keyboard you would not even make
such accusations - certainly not over and over.
> I'm planning a motorcycle trip to Phoenix, AZ to visit with a fellow
> motorcyclist. How about it, Snit? I can stop by and visit with you. You
> can talk to me face to face and share with me just what you did just now.
>
> How about it, Snit? You man enough?
Ah, poor HPT, has to have threats of implied violence just because his
cowardly little BS has been called out.
Yes: HPT, you are a coward and you just proved it again.
And you are too cowardly to *stop* spewing the crap you spew. Too afraid of
how the herd and how Carroll and Sandman would react if you did not act as
their little lapdog. They have you wrapped around their little fingers and
you fear backing away from your BS.
You know it. I know it. They know it. But you are too afraid - too much
of a coward - to change.
And that is how it is. Now bugger off and stop harassing me... unless you
are too much of a coward to stop being the little lapdog you are.
--
🙈🙉🙊
Nigel Ratburn
> I am speaking of the ugliness you express: the absurd insults and accusation
> you know you cannot support, the list of quotes you got from Carroll and
> Sandman, etc. And you are right, if you were an adult (a man) you would not
> express such, but you are not a real man. You are a little coward who
> knows you cannot back your claims. You are a small child who runs every
> time you are asked.
>
> And now you try to turn it around because I have had the audacity to call
> you what you are: a sniveling little coward who spews insults and
> accusations you know you cannot back up.
>
> Your face? If you were not hiding behind a keyboard you would not even make
> such accusations, certainly not over and over.
>
> Ah, poor HPT, has to have threats of implied violence just because his
> cowardly little bullshit has been called out.
>
> Yes, HPT, you are a coward and you just proved it again.
>
> And you are too cowardly to *stop* spewing the crap you spew. Too afraid of
> how the herd and how Carroll and Sandman would react if you did not act as
> their little lapdog. They have you wrapped around their little fingers and
> you fear backing away from your BS.
>
> You know it. I know it. They know it. But you are too afraid, too much
> of a coward, to change.
>
> And that is how it is. Now bugger off and stop harassing me, unless you
> are too much of a coward to stop being the little lapdog you are.
I corrected your grammar, Mr. Incest.
Luke Pennington
> Snit wrote:
>> Chris (flatfish) stated:
>>> Snit wrote:
>>>> Chris (flatfish) stated:
>>>>
>>>>> HPT likes to make posts with all kinds of accusations. That's fine
>>>>> but where is his proof of said accusations?
>
> Liar.
>
>>> Kind of odd that such a troll hammer as HPT refuses to provide proof of
>>> his claims.
>
> Liar.
So in your neck of the woods, making claims then running away while
screaming "Liar" is considered offering proof?
Very interesting.
High Plains Thumper
Yes, indeed, troll.
NNTP-Posting-Host: /y90L4HkjmtAoNwJ/GeWxQ.user.speranza.aioe.org
Another nymshift.
[quote]
The flatfish troll nyms shifts an extraordinary amount often using the
nyms as sock puppets. Here is a list of some of the nyms the flatfish
troll has used (NB: flatfish will often use the names of other posters as
nyms):
1.ball.willy, Abbie Diaz, achmed.jones, Aftab Singh, alan.yunick, Alicia
Hunt, Allen Cusimano, Allie Perkins, allison_hunt1969, Allison Juergans,
Amy Fisher, Ana Thema, andyschipowitz, Anna Banger, anonymous, Archie,
Archie Moss Bunker, Archie Watermann, arkady.duntov, Attila,
baaaaabaaaaboooeee, Baba Booey, Babcock Johnson, babcock.latreen, Babu
Singh, ball.cock.the.plumber, banjo.boy69, Bart, Bart Bushey,
bill.gates.loves.me, Bill Softie, Bill Thomson, Billy, Billy , BingoBongo,
bison, Bjarne Jensen, bjornstad8800, BklynBoy, Bob Sickle, bones4jones,
bonobo magilla, Boyce Mabri, Brother John, BSEE, Bunsen Burner, Buster,
c.baumstumpff, CBFalconer, Charles C.DuPlessey, Charles Griggs, Charles
LeGrand, Charlie, Choppers McGee, Chris Thomas, Christine Abernathy,
Claire Lynn, Clippy, Clock King, collie4roy, Collie Entragion, Colon
Singh, common cold, compton.plaines_kid, Connie Hines, Corrie, Corrie
Titlaand, corry.lebeu, Cory Dyvik, Crystal Meth Rulez, Curtis Wilson,
cymon.says, Damian O'Leary, Damian O'Leary , Dana Bush, Danny Kwong,
Darren Whisper, dbx_boy, Deadpenguin, Debbie, detective48, Devon Dawson,
dismoqualifetch, Doctor Smith, Donald, donna.bunting_tv, Donn Carlsbad,
dont.pullout, doris.gets.her.oates, Doug Richardson, Dragon.Boy, Dr.Long
John Jones, dy.sector, echo.valley_26809, Eddy Carter, Elliot Zimmermann,
Elwin Winters, Emmanuel Arias, Erin Mungan, eunuch.roy, Eyeball, Fanny
Crackwell, Fawn Lebowitz, flatfish+++, foamy, FoxyKnoxy, frank boson,
Franz Klammer, Fred Simmons, gabriele howorth, Gary M. Stewart, Gary
Stewart, GayClod, George Barca, George Cotton, George Littlefield,
Gilbert, Gilbert Goiter, Gilbert Hochaim, gilligan, goldfarb44, gooseborg,
Graham, Greg Finnigan, Greg Laplante, Hamilcar Barca, Hank, Hans Kimm,
Hans Lister, Hans Tomlinson, Harry Hilton, Harvey Fogel, Heather,
Heather69, heather.banger, Heather Trax, Heddy Seafield, Heidi van Wong,
helmut.ginter, hepcat, high_pain_humper, Hugh Himless, hymen.the.jew,
Ishmeal Hafizi, itchy balls, IvanaB, Ivan Mctavish, Jason, jeff.smiley,
Jeff Szarka, jjwassermann, Joe Josephson, John, John Fuhrer, John King,
johnnyscotrun, John Shelton, John Smith, jolt.n.pizza, Jorge Jorgensen,
jorge_shillingford, Jose Lopez, Juan, juke_joint, kaptain kaput, Karel
Olish, karen.bullfinch, Karen Hill, Karen Watson , Karla Snodgress,
kathy_krantz, Kaylie Solomon, Kendra, Ken Johnson, Kenneth Downs, Kenny
Dugan, Kent Dorfman, Kevin Wilcox, Kimba, Kim Coinop, Kinglen Wang,
Kristen, kumba killington, Kurt Janker, Kyle Cadet, lafferty6, Laura
Shillingford, L Didio, Leaking Onion, Le Farter, Leo Diaz, Leroy
Jefferson, Les Cramer, les.crippen, Leslie Bassman, lester, Les Turner,
Les Walton, Le Yammy, Lilly, Lindy, linux.curious, Linux Exposer,
linux.freak.detector, Lisa Cottmann, Lisa Shavas, llanalott, Lois Hunt,
Long, long_tong_ling, luisortizhome, Lukumi Babalu Aye, Luna Lane, M0she,
Magnus Boyle, Major Mynor, Manny, Mario Fermin, mark.kent.is.owned,
McSwain, mista twista, Mogumbo, Mooshoo Bong Singh, Morris Tripper,
Moses, Moshe Goldfarb , mr.macfeelme, Ms Pixee Dust, mycarisfast,
narrows_whitefish, nate_mcspook, Navid Shakibapour, Ofeelya Pratt,
oh.bama.da.rack, okto_pussy, One Shot. One Kill, opensource.sucks,
organ.creep, OSS KDE User, Paddy McCrockett, Paddy McCrockett, Paris
Marriot, Patricia, Patrick Finney, Patrick Landrum, Patty LeGrange, patty
pippins, Patty Poppins, Paul Wannamaker, percy samson, Peter Gluckman,
Peter Kohlmann, Peter Kränkwonov, peter.traphagen, Phil, Phillip
Cornwall, Philo P. Shagnasty, phoung, phoung quoak, pickle_pete, Piss
Clam, Polly Ester, Poopy Pants McGee, pus.boy99, pyles69, Quimby, Quinton
Magee, Quizno Backer, Ratter, Ray Schitzmepantz, Reporter, Rich, Richard
P. Johnson, Richie, Richie O'Toole, Richie Spano, Rick Young ,
right.wanger, Robert Strunk, Rod, rodolfo.garcia44, Roland Whitson,
rothstein_ivan, Roy_Pestowitz, Roy.Schakemetitz, Roy.Schavedmenutz,
Roy.Schavesmewankz, Roy.Schitzowitz, roy.shysterwitz, roys.testicles,
roy.the.spam.king, RP Modell, RyanMcCoskrie, ryebra, Sally Vadi, Sammy,
Sammy Whalen, Sandeep Kumar, Saul Goldblatt, schavemetitz, Schestertitz,
schestowitz, schestowizzle, schisterwitz, schitzmepantz, Schlomo
Rabinowitz, Schlomo Smykowski, Sean, Sean Fitzhenry, Sean Macpherson,
sewer_clown, Sewer Rat, Sharon Cackle, Sharon Hubbasland, Shelly K.,
Sherlock Holmes, simian.knucklescraper, Simon, Simon Lewis, simply.lisa,
Singer, sista sledgehammer, slacker.mcspritze, Spammy_Davis, spanny_davis,
Stefan Karstensen, Stephanie, Stephanie Mannerz, Stephan Simonsen,
Stephen, Stephen Olsen, Stephen Townshend, StinkPot, stomach.pump, SuckyB,
Sue, sue quinterra, sully1999, SunnyB, Susan, Susan Bladder, Susan
Lapinski, Susan Wong, suzie.linux, Suzie Wong, Suzi Wong, Swampee,
swing.cock, sylvano12tegriorgriach, Ted Bennington, Terri Sorensen, Terry
Porter, The Beaver, The Linux Destroyer, Thorsten, Thorsten Thigpen,
Throckmorton E. Pouch, Timmy Luncford , Toby Rastus Roosovelt III,
toe.mein, Tomas Bicsak, tomas.bozak, Tomas Dunton, Tomas Lucatorto, Tori,
Tori Wassermann, Torre Stanslaand, Trace Dennison, Tracee, Traci,
traci.alicock, traci.manicotti, traci.pusey, Traci Spritzendrainer,
trailerpark, Trina Swallows, Trolly, Trudi Simpkins, Tryxie Lustern,
Ubuntu Sucks, Uday Shankar, udayshankar29, victimizedb, victimizedbyms,
Vince Fontain, Vladimir Yepifano, Walter Bubniak, Wang Mycock, Wasser,
Waterskidoo, wendy, Wendy Duzz, Wendy Toiletwater, Whizzer, Wilbur J,
willy watkins jr, Willy Wong, wiltons_pypes, Winnie Septos, wizard.shot,
wm_walsh, Wobbles, wylbur.horseman, Yanick Schmuley and zyklon_C.
Plus many, many, many more.
[/quote]
http://colatrolls.blogspot.com/
--
HPT
Luke Pennington
> Luke Pennington (flatfish) wrote:
>> High Plains Thumper said:
>>> Snit wrote:
>>>> Chris (flatfish) stated:
>>>>> Snit wrote:
>>>>>> Chris (flatfish) stated:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> HPT likes to make posts with all kinds of accusations. That's fine
>>>>>>> but where is his proof of said accusations?
>>>
>>> Liar.
>>>
>>>>> Kind of odd that such a troll hammer as HPT refuses to provide proof
>>>>> of his claims.
>>>
>>> Liar.
>>
>> So in your neck of the woods, making claims then running away while
>> screaming "Liar" is considered offering proof?
>> Very interesting.
>
> Yes, indeed, troll.
Since you have no actual response you resort to Ad Hominen attacks
against the messenger.
Evidently you have nothing better to do with your life but to
cyber-stalk this individual and collect some silly list of names.
So let's just pick three names at complete random:
Sewer Rat, Tomas Dunton, RP Modell. Since *you* made the accusation
can you offer proof that this person used these names?
Or will you simply run away again like a helpless little girl yelling
" liar - liar " at the top of your lungs as you did in your previous
post?
High Plains Thumper
> High Plains Thumper said:
> Evidently you have nothing better to do with your life but to
> cyber-stalk this individual and collect some silly list of names.
> So let's just pick three names at complete random:
> Sewer Rat, Tomas Dunton, RP Modell. Since *you* made the accusation can
> you offer proof that this person used these names?
> Or will you simply run away again like a helpless little girl yelling "
> liar - liar " at the top of your lungs as you did in your previous post?
It's you, flatfish. Let's talk about your buddy, Snit, whose trolling you
defend. Here, Snit falsely accuses someone of being a "proven child
molester":
Snit: "Heck, you can even post a few PDF files and blurry JPGs if
you really want to prove your case, right? :)"
Steve Mackay: "Hey, and you can modify multiple times, post them
on your site, and claim they are the 'originals'. Oh wait...
You've done that already. Wow... more accusations from you
posted with -*gasp*- absolutely no support. You do that a lot..."
Snit: "Oh, wait - you were just trolling."
Steve Mackay: "Naah. I leave that to the experts like you."
Snit: "Er? I have just shown you to be lying, above, and then
you make more baseless accusation. Well, then, as long as you
are making baseless accusation, you *are* a proven child
molester. Keep in mind that the baseless accusation game is the
one *you* are pushing, so you should have no problem with my
referring to you as a 'proven child molester'."
Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2005 18:26:06 -0700
Message-ID: <BF23EBBE.29362%S...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID>
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/87031a1655f235c2
--
HPT
Chris
> On 2011-08-17 21:08:17 -0400, High Plains Thumper said:
>
>> Luke Pennington (flatfish) wrote:
>>> High Plains Thumper said:
>>>> Snit wrote:
>>>>> Chris (flatfish) stated:
>>>>>> Snit wrote:
>>>>>>> Chris (flatfish) stated:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> HPT likes to make posts with all kinds of accusations. That's fine
>>>>>>>> but where is his proof of said accusations?
>>>>
>>>> Liar.
>>>>
>>>>>> Kind of odd that such a troll hammer as HPT refuses to provide proof
>>>>>> of his claims.
>>>>
>>>> Liar.
>>>
>>> So in your neck of the woods, making claims then running away while
>>> screaming "Liar" is considered offering proof?
>>> Very interesting.
>>
>> Yes, indeed, troll.
>
> Since you have no actual response you resort to Ad Hominen attacks
> against the messenger.
Poor HPT has been making these claims for years and for years he has
yet to back them up with any sort of evidence.
His latest tactic is to spout a header line that he wrongly believes
identifies certain posters as being the same.
He has been offered proof as to why that is not the case and is not
even close to being the case but he just keeps babbling the same
stuff over and over again like a leaky toilet flapper valve.
>> nie Septos, wizard.shot,
>> wm_walsh, Wobbles, wylbur.horseman, Yanick Schmuley and zyklon_C.
>> Plus many, many, many more.
>> [/quote]
>>
>>
>
>
>
> Evidently you have nothing better to do with your life but to
> cyber-stalk this individual and collect some silly list of names.
He certainly has met the legal definition of a cyber stalker that's
for sure.
Couple it with his threats of violence, like putting a cap in some
people and he could really get himself in some hot water if he
happened to antagonize the wrong person especially since evidently
he uses his real name which means it is trivial to track him down so
not only is he violent he is also ignorant at the same time.
Not a very healthy combination IMHO.
> So let's just pick three names at complete random:
>
> Sewer Rat, Tomas Dunton, RP Modell. Since *you* made the accusation
> can you offer proof that this person used these names?
>
> Or will you simply run away again like a helpless little girl yelling
> " liar - liar " at the top of your lungs as you did in your previous
> post?
He's already used his header line trick in an attempt to prove you
are Flatfish. It's his method of denial. We will soon see a rash of
posts from anonymous re mailers by him.
Something is just not right with that clown. I'll bet he piss's off
people no matter where he goes. Maybe he'll crash into an 18 wheeler
on his motorcycle trip to Arizona. We can only hope.
Snit
6:08 PM:
> Luke Pennington (flatfish) wrote:
>> High Plains Thumper said:
>>> Snit wrote:
>>>> Chris (flatfish) stated:
>>>>> Snit wrote:
>>>>>> Chris (flatfish) stated:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> HPT likes to make posts with all kinds of accusations. That's fine
>>>>>>> but where is his proof of said accusations?
>>>
>>> Liar.
>>>
>>>>> Kind of odd that such a troll hammer as HPT refuses to provide proof
>>>>> of his claims.
>>>
>>> Liar.
>>
>> So in your neck of the woods, making claims then running away while
>> screaming "Liar" is considered offering proof?
>> Very interesting.
>
> Yes, indeed, troll.
...
See: you spew accusations like the little lapdog you are. You are a coward
afraid to admit you have *no* evidence, no support, no... anything.
Except a desire for your masters to throw you a bone. So go run off like a
good dog and do whatever you do with your master's bone.
But never forget for a second that the "advocates" and those you lie about
all know you are a sniveling little coward. It is all you are... and you
show no desire to rise up and be more.
--
🙈🙉🙊
Snit
6:15 PM:
HPT is too much of a coward to stop playing with his master's bone. He
lives to please them... and fears actually standing up on his own and
admitting he has no support. What a little milquetoast.
--
🙈🙉🙊
Snit
6:26 PM:
> It's you, flatfish. Let's talk about your buddy, Snit, whose trolling you
> defend. Here, Snit falsely accuses someone of being a "proven child
> molester":
>
> Snit: "Heck, you can even post a few PDF files and blurry JPGs if
> you really want to prove your case, right? :)"
>
> Steve Mackay: "Hey, and you can modify multiple times, post them
> on your site, and claim they are the 'originals'. Oh wait...
> You've done that already. Wow... more accusations from you
> posted with -*gasp*- absolutely no support. You do that a lot..."
>
> Snit: "Oh, wait - you were just trolling."
>
> Steve Mackay: "Naah. I leave that to the experts like you."
>
> Snit: "Er? I have just shown you to be lying, above, and then
> you make more baseless accusation. Well, then, as long as you
> are making baseless accusation, you *are* a proven child
> molester. Keep in mind that the baseless accusation game is the
> one *you* are pushing, so you should have no problem with my
> referring to you as a 'proven child molester'."
>
> Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2005 18:26:06 -0700
> Message-ID: <BF23EBBE.29362%S...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID>
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/87031a1655f235c2
Wow... you are not just a coward but an illiterate coward. Now we both know
you are too spineless to ever admit that your above accusation about me is
in no way supported by the text you quote.
Sad: you will never know what it means to grow up. You are a man-child who
the "advocates" toy with, just as Carroll and Sandman toy with you and use
you to play their games. And you too cowardly to ever stand up to them and
stop being their lapdog.
--
🙈🙉🙊
Chris
But you claim I am Flatfish, which I am not, so which one is it?
Are we all Flatfish?
If so, why not prove it?
You would be a hero amongst the unwashed.
I'm not defending anyone. I'm watching snit unravel your web of lies
which are mostly similar to the lies you say about anyone who
disagrees with you and your views.
You dug the hole by making the claims so now you can prove them.
Now as for child molesting, sorry but that topic is so far off base
for a public forum, even with regards to RMS and his somewhat odd
statements, that I will not even involve myself in it other than to
say it doesn't surprise me to see you bringing it up.
Chris
The smart advocates have thrown him under the bus because they know
all about him and his bull shit.
Only the true suck ups are agreeing with him and even they are a
bite lukewarm about it.
Luke Pennington
> Luke Pennington (flatfish) wrote:
>> High Plains Thumper said:
>>> Snit wrote:
>>>> Chris (flatfish) stated:
>>>>> Snit wrote:
>>>>>> Chris (flatfish) stated:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> HPT likes to make posts with all kinds of accusations. That's fine
>>>>>>> but where is his proof of said accusations?
>>>
>>> Liar.
>>>
>>>>> Kind of odd that such a troll hammer as HPT refuses to provide proof
>>>>> of his claims.
>>>
>>> Liar.
>>
>> So in your neck of the woods, making claims then running away while
>> screaming "Liar" is considered offering proof?
>> Very interesting.
>
> Yes, indeed, troll.
>
> NNTP-Posting-Host: /y90L4HkjmtAoNwJ/GeWxQ.user.speranza.aioe.org
>
> Another nymshift.
>
Ah right - now I see what you're saying. You deducted that since my
"posting-host" (aka - IP address) matches someone that I must somehow
be that person.
The problem with your little theory is that I'm posting this from work
as I work late tonight. There are probably 250-300 employees on this
floor alone so each and every one of us will appear to originate from
the same IP address thanks to the miracle of NAT. (That's Network
Address Translation for those who don't understand this sort of thing.)
To make matters worse for you we likely have another 100 or so external
employees who VPN into this building to any one of them posting would
also originate from the same IP-Address.
Pooof ! That's the sound of your theory going up in smoke.
Snit
6:30 PM:
HPT will do or say anything to suck up to the lowest of the low of Usenet.
In COLA he sucked up to Carroll and Sandman - and still does when he uses
their pathetic list of quotes they have been scavenging and forging since
2004. In COLA he sucks up to the "advocates". A lapdog - it is all he
aspires to be.
The funny thing with the scavenged and forged quotes - HPT also accuses me
of being some of the people he claims to have quoted saying bad things about
me... thus refuting his own pathetic claims. He does not care - his masters
will never call him on it and he does not care what a fool he makes of
himself as long as they throw him an occasional bone.
--
🙈🙉🙊
Chris Ahlstrom
> Luke Pennington (flatfish) wrote:
>> High Plains Thumper said:
Use the Killfile, Luke.
--
Use other side for additional listings.
High Plains Thumper
Chris and Luke Pennington.
Chris (flatfish) wrote:
Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org;
posting-host="YWsGPOoh/tpqtaCqoxPiBA
> Luke Pennington (flatfish) wrote:
NNTP-Posting-Host: /y90L4HkjmtAoNwJ/GeWxQ.user.speranza.aioe.org
>> High Plains Thumper said:
>>> Luke Pennington (flatfish) wrote:
>>>> High Plains Thumper said:
>>>>>> Chris (flatfish) stated:
>>>>>>>> Chris (flatfish) stated:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> HPT likes to make posts with all kinds of
>>>>>>>>> accusations. That's fine but where is his proof of
>>>>>>>>> said accusations?
>>>>>
>>>>> Liar.
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Kind of odd that such a troll hammer as HPT refuses to
>>>>>>> provide proof of his claims.
>>>>>
>>>>> Liar.
>>>>
>>>> So in your neck of the woods, making claims then running away
>>>> while screaming "Liar" is considered offering proof? Very
>>>> interesting.
>>>
>>> Yes, indeed, troll.
>>
>> Since you have no actual response you resort to Ad Hominen attacks
>> against the messenger.
>
> Poor HPT has been making these claims for years and for years he has
> yet to back them up with any sort of evidence.
>
> His latest tactic is to spout a header line that he wrongly believes
> identifies certain posters as being the same.
>
> He has been offered proof as to why that is not the case and is not
> even close to being the case but he just keeps babbling the same
> stuff over and over again like a leaky toilet flapper valve.
Please explain stalker why you nymshifted as Rick and posted your same
tripe while stalking me on rec.audio.pro:
Rick: "You must be pretty ignorant. Every post, including your own,
from aioe includes that line. So now every poster from aioe is your
flatfish? Are you mentally retarded or just plain ignorant?" 19 Apr
2011, Subject: Re: TROLL ALERT Migrating From Protools To Linux. Advice
Needed. Message-ID: <9t083niv1ndf.1i...@40tude.net>
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.audio.pro/msg/74601f26619366b0
>>> nie Septos, wizard.shot, wm_walsh, Wobbles, wylbur.horseman,
>>> Yanick Schmuley and zyklon_C. Plus many, many, many more.
>>> [/quote]
>>
>> Evidently you have nothing better to do with your life but to
>> cyber-stalk this individual and collect some silly list of names.
>
> He certainly has met the legal definition of a cyber stalker that's
> for sure.
Same spin, eh, Gary? Accusing the victim of one's own crime is a mark of
a stalker.
> Couple it with his threats of violence, like putting a cap in some
> people and he could really get himself in some hot water if he
> happened to antagonize the wrong person especially since evidently he
> uses his real name which means it is trivial to track him down so not
> only is he violent he is also ignorant at the same time. Not a very
> healthy combination IMHO.
Please explain stalker why you are intimately familiar with my reply to
your sock Moshe Goldfarb (nymthief of a Jewish Holocaust victim
survivor) in response to your false homophobic rant several years ago:
Moshe Goldfarb: "Go take your meds mjcr.... High Plains Thumper is a
flaming homosexual."
HPT: "Well Gary (flatfish), you are kidding no one. You are lucky no
one has popped a flaming cap in your mofo. If someone were to simply
punch your lights out, I would say justice was served." 14 Jul 2008,
Subject: Re: Nomen Nescio Woman Trolls COLA
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.os.windows-xp/msg/f530bffa8431440b
>> So let's just pick three names at complete random:
>>
>> Sewer Rat, Tomas Dunton, RP Modell. Since *you* made the
>> accusation can you offer proof that this person used these names?
>>
>> Or will you simply run away again like a helpless little girl
>> yelling " liar - liar " at the top of your lungs as you did in your
>> previous post?
>
> He's already used his header line trick in an attempt to prove you
> are Flatfish. It's his method of denial. We will soon see a rash of
> posts from anonymous re mailers by him.
Explain your nymshifting from Chris to Baltic to stalk Roy Schestowitz:
[quote]
He's not mistaken, he's a liar and the sooner you settle down and
admit to yourself that's the case the sooner your blood pressure
will drop.
Why you even want to be involved with a cretin like Roy Schestowitz
is being reason. He is like a typhoid Mary and at some point he will
flame out and be forgotten. Don't let your good name and that of
your family and business be contaminated in the net due to dealing
with a scumbag like Roy. He fools a lot of people but he doesn't
fool the people who are credible like Jack Schofield who regularly
rips Roy Schestowitz apart by using Roy's own words against him and
like you do, asking for proof of his claims.
The result is cookbook and pretty much what you've experienced.
Roy tries to dance around it but without his army to protect him he
gets backed into a corner when he can't provide any data to
substantiate his claims. Then he runs away claiming he is too busy
to argue. Usually about 10 minutes later, his shills like Twitter,
Tessier, oiaohm and the rest of the social misfits will show up and
flood the comments section of whatever blog Roy got grilled on.
It's all very predictable.
My advice is to stay as far away from that maniac as possible.
[/quote]
From: Baltic <baltics...@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Why Doesn't Roy Schestowitz Back Up His Claims?
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 14:42:24 -0400
Message-ID: <sxb5b9ua5el1$.plloiyqdu780$.d...@40tude.net>
Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org;
posting-host="YWsGPOoh/tpqtaCqoxPiBA";
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/d2755cd936cb65fe
> Something is just not right with that clown. I'll bet he piss's off
> people no matter where he goes. Maybe he'll crash into an 18 wheeler
> on his motorcycle trip to Arizona. We can only hope.
Please explain why you stalked me on rec.motorcycles by impersonating me
then returning to the scene of the crime with your alleged find, stalker:
One Shot. One Kill. <f...@gmail.com>: "Wait till they discover that he
is some kind of a eunuch freak who had his balls cut off. That should
really open up a can of worms for the maggot. -- HPT" 30 Nov 2009,
Subject: Re: GIMP not dropped from Ubuntu
NNTP-Posting-Host: 5H06/HkDJ4KgFo0gnKm6kg.user.aioe.org
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/fdc69a68a421d527
Then after planting his so-called "evidence" nymshifted again and
falsely accused me of posting as "One Shot One Kill":
Cager <dirtbikerider91...@hotmail.com>: "You really have to turn off the
automatic signature append function HPT. It's giving you away every
time." 30 Nov 2009, Subject: HPT = One Shot One Kill. Caught nym
shitting again.
NNTP-Posting-Host: 5H06/HkDJ4KgFo0gnKm6kg.user.aioe.org
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/0c2c86b16aa7af55
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/253cb3904412d778
Please seek serious psychiatric counselling, you really need it.
--
HPT
High Plains Thumper
> High Plains Thumper said:
>
>> NNTP-Posting-Host: /y90L4HkjmtAoNwJ/GeWxQ.user.speranza.aioe.org
>>
>> Another nymshift.
>
> Ah right - now I see what you're saying. You deducted that since my
> "posting-host" (aka - IP address) matches someone that I must somehow be
> that person.
>
> The problem with your little theory is that I'm posting this from work
> as I work late tonight. There are probably 250-300 employees on this
> floor alone so each and every one of us will appear to originate from
> the same IP address thanks to the miracle of NAT. (That's Network
> Address Translation for those who don't understand this sort of thing.)
Why are you trolling COLA from work? Why are you posting NNTP when it is
not a work requirement? (Unless it regards Microsoft evangelism and you
are their employee or a contractor hired by them or through them.) If I
were your boss I'd fire you.
> To make matters worse for you we likely have another 100 or so external
> employees who VPN into this building to any one of them posting would
> also originate from the same IP-Address.
>
> Pooof ! That's the sound of your theory going up in smoke.
Oh, so according to "your explanation" there are more than one employee
trolling COLA.
This is FUD. Geeze, what a story. This is an example of:
[quote]
7.6 Trespasser Disinformation Tactics
17. Don't substantiate your claims
Refuse to present evidence to support your invalid claims. Repeat
your invalid claims and have your anti-Linux propagandist comrades do the
same. Do the same for any invalid claims that you have notice your anti-
Linux propagandists comrades make.
23. Lie
Lie, lie, lie, lie. If you do it often enough you may create the
appearance of truth.
[/quote]
http://www.faqs.org/faqs/linux/advocacy/faq-and-primer/
--
HPT
Hadron
> High Plains Thumper wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>
>> Luke Pennington (flatfish) wrote:
>>> High Plains Thumper said:
>
> Use the Killfile, Luke.
How sweet! Creepy Chris Ahlstrom thinks he's in charge and is sucking up
to HPT of all people!
LOL!
--
Emacs outshines all other editing software in approximately the same way
that the noonday sun does the stars. It is not just bigger and brighter;
it simply makes everything else vanish - Neal Stephenson
High Plains Thumper
I gave Snit the opportunity to express to my face what he insulting
states hiding behind his keyboard. He referred to that as a violent
gesture. What a spineless candy ass.
He has yet to answer why these 155 poster quotes on the Snit circus of
pathological lies come to similar conclusions about Snit Michael Glasser:
1- Adam Kesher: "Steve, IIRC Sandman's website has a member area and a
login. If you forget your password, you can ask it to e-mail it to you,
and a bot will send an e-mail. *That* is the e-mail Snit got from
Sandman's website, and yes he's that fucked in the head and starved for
attention that he'd claim it to be an e-mail from Sandman himself. So,
don't get sucked into his little circus. The e-mail, in this particular
instance, did probably originate from Sandman.net." 27 Feb 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/dac74355552b4cc7
2- Alan Baker: "People's perceptions of you are *formed* by behaviour and
not withstanding your occasional on topic posts, I wish you'd leave too.
Please note that despite the amazing silliness that is Edwin, I have
never made the same wish of him." 27 Feb 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/4a7c3ebf3fc10221
3- Andrew J. Brehm: "You are not flamed because you speak the truth, you
are flamed because you are a hideous troll and keep disrupting the
newsgroup." 27 Feb 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/52eab53a559e00ce
4- AZ Nomad: "The fact that you routinely change your headers to weasel
out of killfiles proves that you're an asshole." 25 Jun 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/51b43d6c9613c9da
5- Andy/news/nospam: "Why do you keep these things up, Snit? Why not just
let them go away and show how responsible a member of CSMA you are? You
could show your enemies up by being better than them, rise above the low
level you so obviously dislike. Anything, just stop...." 26 Apr 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/d6ffb6b06aa237e5
6- B.B.: "Does the From: header contain the string "Snit"? If yes, then
troll. Otherwise, maybe. Dunno why I had my KF on you set to expire, but
it's fixed now." 13 Mar 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/8a98d179b2ff9578
7- BaJoRi: "You know it, and I know it, and everyone else who has read
your idiocy knows it. I took your statement, showed it to be wrong, then
added even more, just to be a dick and REALLY show you to be a fool. You
need to judiciously snip out pertinent points because you are an
intellectually dwarfed turd-burglar." 11 Nov 2008
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.vacation.las-vegas/msg/647944511b74b82f
8- bobinnv: "I learned some time ago how much better this group can be if
you kill file Snit. I have never understood why more people don't do the
same.." 5 Aug 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/0706dbef8ce1f903
9- Bob B.: "This has always been pretty much a free-for-all group, but
since Snit showed up, its become almost impossible to have a decent
discussion about anything. The solution is to NOT REPLY TO SNIT. But for
some reason, some people just can't stop feeding him." 27 Dec 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/3d2f1dff196ca190
10- °b° unny: Subject "snit makes me sad", Text "really actually =:-("
9 Oct 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/4e31cb49c1e2d432
11- Brian: "LOL, Has anyone ever been more universally hated on the
USENET than Snit? Too bad he craves the hatred and negative attention. We
will read about him in the news some day soon going on a shooting
rampage. Somebody should get the pychopath some help before he VT's a
bunch of people. 29 May 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/66a89e4f5c89f489
12- buzz off: "Snit is obviously mentally ill, but you and Steve don't
help. You encourage him to post, which he doesn't need to do. We would
all be better off if you just ignore him. 17 Nov 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/2ed879f256677548
13- Carlo Coggi: "He must believe he is surrounded by 'trolls' ... in the
groups he trolls in, that is. I wondered if the idiotrollers like snit
would reply to this thread. Of course, I didn't see his posts, only your
reply". 07 Aug 2006 (available only in reply)
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/5ea48f7a84115fd1
14- C Lund: "Snit is not my responsibility. Maybe it's time for you to
learn how to use your kill-filter. I am assuming, of course, that your
Usenet browser has a kill-filter." 5 Mar 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/2c390a34b05b24a9
15- cc (COLA): "You are incapable of letting anything go. In fact, I
guarantee you will respond to this post in under 3 hours. Hell, I'd be
surprised if it takes longer than 30 minutes. If I really wanted to, I
could make this little side topic go on forever, because you are a
complete moron who just has to respond to anything written about or to
you, even if it just means repeating yourself." 1 Feb 2010
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/3712090033411605
16- Chance Furlong: "HPT, Wally, Sandman, C Lund, Steve Carroll and Tim
Adams are not trolls and do not troll. You, on the other hand, are a
troll." 27 Aug 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/28c267f26965b43f
17- Chris Ahlstrom (COLA): "I try to go more by the contents of the
posts. Although some clowns (e.g. Snit) spew out so much chaff it is not
worth the effort." 14 Feb 2010
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/8b6a982957c7c9d5
Chris Ahlstrom (COLA): "Actually, many of the advocates are sick to death
of Snit's never-ending puerile blather about trivialities. The
occasional reasonable conversations are too few and far between." 6 Mar
2011
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/811326833ba71864
18- Chris Clement: "ugh....geez man.....let it go" 5 Jul 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/ed093996df6547b2
19- chrisv (cola): "No, she called him 'shit', and rightly so, for they
way he was so ignominiously birthed into a toilet at the bus depot, and
simply refused to die, despite repeated flushes. It's now far too late
to *flush* him, but we can still *plonk* him..." 12 Sep 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/18099f8aa067f4a5
20- Code Orange: "Then why post it? What need is there for you to "win"
an argument? They don't like you, you don't like them. Why must you keep
this up? What results are you expecting?"
21- CozmicDebris: "I'm done with your three year old games. The archives
show my answers and your inability to process them. Keep posting your
list and proving that you are an idiot troll. I will not address it any
further- you being too stupid to realize and accept that is not my
problem". 22 Nov 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.cellular.attws/msg/0aa65b7a132dbfe8
22- cshenk: "I happen to believe him over you... and I doubt I'd be the
only person in this ng to do so. You have given people a lot of
'evidence' that you are dishonest... as 'evidenced' by the quotes
list." .... "Why stop with Jonas? Why not call the entire list of people
on your quotes list 'liars'? After all, they have all labeled you a liar,
troll or worse." 27 Nov 2010
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/909a59de04850ef5
23- Dave Fritzinger: "[snip of stuff I really don't care to read] Snit,
please go away. Get a life, meet a woman, do something, but please,
please, please, GO AWAY!!!!" 2 Jun 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/57bb2fc42ec0f290
24- Dawg Tail: "PC advocates, Mac advocates, Linux advocates. Almost all
of them are making similar claims about Snit. When you have so many
diverse people who share a common perception where do you think the
problem lies? With Snit? Or almost everyone else? The answer doesn't
require an advanced degree to figure out." 30 Dec 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/73edac32c3ad530b
25- Donald L McDaniel: "Jesus, snit. You're a teacher. I thought you knew
what a metaphor was, and could recognize one when it was presented to
you. I guess I had too much confidence in you." 30 Nov 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/3254ec7af27bfb0f
26- ed: "snit, you continually amaze me with how much of a liar and loser
you are. you may notice a semi-regular pattern with me where i stop
responding to your posts for stretches at a time, then start up
responding as if you were a normal person. i suppose it's tough for the
magnitude of your 'loserdom' to stick, so it loses some of it's sharpness
when i stop responding to you. you almost always start responding back in
a semi normal way, but inevitably degenerate. it's once again that time.
i can only ask that you pass my condolences to your wife and unborn child
for having to put up with such a dishonest fool as yourself. (well, if
your wife is a loser as well, just pass those condolences to the rug-rat
to be; if not, double condolences to her). " 30 Apr 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/71f74dd6d806ce77
27- Edward Stanfield: "Snit thinks the rules that apply to honest and
honorable people apply to him. That is absurd. He is the biggest liar
in Usenet history. Mackay posted the email to prove Snit was using sock
puppets and he still is. Snit can not give up his socks puppets and
shills. They are the only ones who ever support him." 28 Jan 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/5b52494d96d12229
28- Edwin: "You've got to be out of your mind, Snit. You're the worst
troll this group has ever seen. You're a liar and a forger, and you've
almost destroyed this group single-handedly. For you to post a list of
out of context arguments, and lies, and forgeries about your enemies
labled as a "peace effort" has to be one of the craziest stunts you've
pulled. It's all about your sick need for attention, your need to be
center stage at all times. You'd publicly eat dog turd if you thought it
would make people look at you." 18 May 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/37e4a720619642a0
29- Elijah Baley: "Seriously, Snit, you need psychiatric help. Go see a
doctor." 24 Aug 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/6f6c88356b54fc15
30- Elizabot v2.0.2: "I see you were unable to respond to the points in
my post and you are back to your repetitious regurgitation mode. How
childishly typical of you, Snit." 16 Nov 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/55214ccfb7414fe5
31- Fa-groon: "I don't read Snit period. He's been killfiled since the
first day I posted here. [....] I don't want to 'do like Snit'. As far as
I'm concerned, Snit doesn't even exist." 15 Aug 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/dcfbff305ba8b7f0
32- fibercut: "That is the problem. In the years I have been coming to
CSMA I have seen in the past year a real hatred among people, besides the
typical Mac vs. Windows typical argument. I feel that it is like being in
a room of really young children trying there best to best the other
person. The one common thing among all of this seems to be you. I hate to
be like this, but facts are facts. You seem to be in the middle of a
great percentage of arguments. CSMA has become less about Macs and more
about "look everybody, I think he lied". Is there no end then all this
picking at each other on such a personal level. CSMA has always been al
little adversarial but you have personally crank it up to the point that
this place is no longer fun. Congratulations on stopping CSMA and making
this place your own personal circus." 12 Jan 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/bbe695bbc3424ab6
33- Geezer:
Snit: "Steve Carroll has no sense of morality"
Geezer: "Whined the guy who cannot directly address those who uncover his
lies and deceit;)"
Snit: "and no clue about the law."
Geezer: 'Said the guy who believes his unsupported opinions are "proof".
LOL! (snip more of Snit's unsupported lies)' 1 Jan 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/d0517ced5134934d
34- Geoff M. Fitton (COLA): "The Prescott Computer Guy *still* showing
how stupid he is... What a mar00n". 30 Aug 2008
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/f9401b4b57c59865
35- George Graves: "Jason. You have started an argument with the Snit
(AKA Michael Glasser), this should not be done. He will drive you crazy
with his twisted logic, his deep-rooted need to be ALWAYS right at any
cost. He will move goalposts, set up strawmen, and bore you into
submission with his endless pedanticism. The only way to engage him is to
hit and run. NEVER engage him, it's a futile, empty procedure that will
only anger you and feed him. Take my advice and STAY AWAY!" 27 Oct 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/3d3af33ce25a11fd
36- gimme_this_gimme_that: "Hitting the vodka tonight Snit?" 4 Mar 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/b457a7b378264794
37- Glenn Hall (COLA): "That person is like a constantly running toilet
that won't stop. Does he ever stop talking about UI consistency? No
matter what anyone replies, he adds a few more branches to the spider web
as it grows and grows. It's a waste of time." 31 Oct 2010
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/c8dd8a244fe1eb2c
38- Greycloud: "You really shouldn't lie like that. Everyone else notices
that you are not honest and you have no honor." 21 Jan 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/3b92f11a1ab00f91
39- H: "Your crappy posts are still showing up in seperate threads, are
you doing this on purpose to piss people off? I dont ever censor people
cause that's just retarded but if you dont fix it I'm gonna have to cause
I dont wanna see your name 40 times in a row. So uh, change your client
or something". 12 Sep 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/f36ee6b458c86499
40- Hadron (COLA): "Would you please stop the whining. FFS he has you
jumping to his every post. How many more fucking times are you going to
post the same repetitive garbage? Please ..at least change the record
sometimes!!!!!!!" 13 Aug 2010
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/1e0ecbb776623473
41- Henry Flam: "You on the other hand must be a deeply troubled
individual who has a fragile ego. I needn't agree nor disagree with the
points above. I don't care about them. Your constant complaints, whines,
rages, etc., wars with the regular Mac advocates, whom you mislabel as
trolls, arise from your sense that any conversation or thread must orbit
around you. People have pointed that out to you but you don't accept
that. Snit I feel sorry for you. Please go and see a doctor about your
solipsism. There must be a cure for you deep psychological travail." 18
Aug 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/b9bb48e6e6da75c8
42- Heywood Mogroot: "*plonk*" Aug 19 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/d8afd909a308b97f
43- -hh: 'Perversion has utterly nothing to do with the definition of
"synonymous". It is, however, a very clear example of how you attempt to
maliciously debase against anyone who disagrees with you. As such, I
consider this to be a purposeful attempt by you to try to libel me. This
is your only warning to consider rescinding your remark, with the
reminder that you, and you alone are responsible for that accusation,
both in the ethical as well as the full legal meaning of the word
"responsible".' 25 Feb 2008
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/5496641a3426293a
44- High Plains Thumper: "Agreed except for Snit and socks (Joe Crump and
ad nauseum). I've got Snit kill binned, because he is the classic ad
hominem troll. At first he seems reasonable, but then it always degrades
into name calling bullying, the responder is a liar, etc. AKA the Snit
Circus of Pathological Lies. Perhaps the times he seems reasonable are
when he is properly controlled by medication." 21 Sep 2010
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/249a598ec5aafe85
45- Homer (COLA): "I don't mean this as a personal insult, but I'm
perfectly serious when I say 'Snit' (Michael Glasser) is obviously
mentally ill, and needs help. I was going to suggest that someone alerts
his wife to the problem, but I have to assume she's already aware of his
condition, if she is in fact still living with him. It's possible, I
suppose, that he's already undergoing counselling and/or on medication,
but if he is then it doesn't seem to be helping much. Maybe he just
missed his 'meds' today (again, I mean that sincerely)." 26 Jan 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/e061874ea94e9ce8
Homer: "Word of advice for anyone concerned: don't be tempted to get
drawn into a Snit circus, it's literally a waste of time. He's just an
attention seeker who'll keep stringing you along, in a never-ending
circle of obtuse questions, for which he has no genuine interest in the
answers." 14 Oct 2010
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/0d06eb2e900e3058
46- hophead: "I have been reading and occasionally posting to CSMA for a
long time now, since 1995 at least. There have always been trolls and
morons, but I've never seen anything quite so disruptive as the Snit
circus. Snit will *never* back down or stop, and neither will most of his
opponents. A good kill file is your only hope." 20 Aug 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/3161a78667e299eb
47- Jamie Hart (cola): "It seems that since you are unable to offer
support for your statements, you're reduced to personal attacks on me.
Incidentally, anyone reading this post can see that I have offered no
straw men, and have only asked you to explain how the things you state as
facts can be true. I'm really sorry that you're taking this attitude, the
topic is an interesting one and I thought you might have some insights.
I've snipped the rest, since you dislike long posts and avoid answering
any of the questions I asked by saying everything was just repeated." 6
Dec 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/8e07cde31f4eecf6
48- Jason McNorton: "You're one of the many, many paranoid people on
usenet that should be confined most likely. You sit there and refresh
your screen endlessly. You post the same nonsense over and over. Either
you're a super troll, or you're a super mess." 1 Nov 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/7a8e091c0b248eb0
49- JEDIDIAH (cola): "You're simply full of shit." 27 Feb 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/cdddf5fd04d9afcb
50- Jeff B.: "Yo, Snit. We're not pals. I think you're a git." 23 Dec
2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/0ec649345d433a2d
51- Jeff Hoppe: "This is a Macintosh Advocacy newsgroup. Not a 12-step
recovery plan. Your medical problems or conditions won't help me achieve
a greater understanding of my Mac. In fact, it detracts from it and those
kinds of discussions have no place in a newsgroup such as this." 18 Nov
2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/947a2cc0301a2862
52- Jesus: "Really, Snit. It's annoying. What are you accomplishing
besides being annoying? Is that your goal?" 25 Apr 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/e3d5029d34cde243
53- Jim Lee Jr.: "Snit, read the thread's title, is Bush mentioned in it?
You (and Carroll) ought to learn to stay on topic and not hijack threads."
54- Jim Polaski: "Why is it that nearly every thread you're involved in
seems like it turns into some tit-for-tat, dozens of responses to OT
things and garbage? Cmon there Snit. Someone has to take the lead and
stop this crap. Try. How about it?" 25 Apr 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/5b5c22490ab9649b
55- Jim Richardson (cola): "And yet again, Snit runs away, rather than
actually provide evidence for his claims. Par for the course I suppose."
"Evasion noted. Snit runs away again rather than produce evidence for his
claims. At least come up with some original insults Snit! I mean, you
*are* capable of original thoughts! Right? Snit?" 8 Feb 2008
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/e33321cc3343fc44
56- Joey Jojo Junior Shabadoo: "and Snithead has even farther to fall -
in a few weeks he'll be out on the street after midnight, yelling at
passersby 'sucky sucky, $2...'" 23 Mar 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/57cf69f66571a5a7
57- John C. Randolph: "You're nothing but a troll yourself. What are you
bitching about?" 1 Dec 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/12ba528be5ad2665
58- JohnOfArc (cola): "I'm not sure "troll" does it justice- more like a
black hole! But hey, if we all promise to never again even entertain an
unkind thought re Apple, will you take it back and lock it up? Please??"
11 Mar 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/e2891b1f3984e121
59- John Q. Public: "I have not been bothered to read Snit's postings
since I figured out who he is. I don't bother to filter his posts, I just
consider the source and skip to the next one when I see his name." 7 Jan
2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/7d34c1bd05c877d2
60- John Slade: "I don't get posts from Snit. I wouldn't be shocked that
he has some kind of disorder. He made up stuff about being a computer
repairman and teacher. He's just plain loony and best ignored. Let him
deal with his disorder by medication. He's here to do one thing, get
attention from people. He says the crazy stuff just to get a reaction.
You say you like to beat him over the head. Well that's what he's
counting on, he says stuff he knows isn't true in hopes to get a rise out
of people like you. Ignore him, you won't regret it." 3 Apr 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/394a53a65c28d314
John Slade: "Snit, you have a enough problems as it is without adding
drinking booze to the list. How the hell did you manage to get out of my
killfile? Oh well back into the cage you go, PLONK." 13 Oct 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.food.wine/msg/992a796786a541d8
61- Josh McKee: "I have no strawman so therefore it has to be in your
mind. .... What is obnoxious are your posts." 26 Jul 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/3665b9e002d27c44
62- K E: "I haven't read this board for awhile but I see that even though
the trolls still roam free at least the worst troll of the lot is mostly
being ignored by readers on this bb. If the few stragglers that keep
replying to him would just stop responding to Snit at all this place
could be worth coming back to. There's a good chance he'll pack up and
take his trolling to more fertile ground." 22 Oct 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/0b9dca7df1f677f4
63- KK: 'Whoa there, ad hominem man. You started off your sentence with
"Ah" like you'd just realized something profound.' 29 Oct 2008
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.fan.howard-stern/msg/6a89029a5b5be5f8
64- Kelsey Bjarnason (cola): "Funny how you simply don't bother reading
the posts that rip your entire thesis to bleeding gobbets of putrid
excrescence. Maybe some day you'll learn how to support your position,
instead of sticking your fingers in your ears and humming, hoping it'll
all go away." 7 Mar 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/96d064a7a5c6074a
65- Ku Karlovsky (cola): "You repeatedly chastise others for ad hominem
attacks while in the same sentence make your own ad hominem attacks. You
make silly claims and then avoid the subject of your silliness. You're a
liar and a hypocrite and you always have been." 14 Jul 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/d1e3f9ac5c72c6ee
66- Lars Trager: "Yes, you are stupid." 7 Jan 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/a9bedf6689f9a54f
67- Lawrence D'Oliveiro (COLA): "You seem to be full of complaints about
your inability to hold up your end
of the argument, aren’t you?" 16 Mar 2011
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/8ca5f48099696228
68- Lefty Bigfoot: "Okay, I tried to put up with it for a long time, but
the few times you post something worth reading just aren't worth it
anymore. *plonk*" 16 Dec 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/5520adae01120e83
69- Liam Slider (cola): "Maybe he's responding to the fact you've been an
annoying little fuckwit lately. You started out with the pretense of
trying to be fair, but lately all there is from you in COLA is trashtalk
about Linux and you acting every bit the troll." 16 Jul 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/ad7d6c42c5e4cf2f
70-libcrushersmith: "Snit also thinks Dan Rather still anchors CBS News
and that Gitmo terrorists are innocent! Any time Snit is cornered, he
changes the subject and will never admit he's wrong." 28 Jan 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/fbc516717f3b7ccf
71- libsnightmare: "You're a sore loser who has resorted to fifth grade
tactics. How fucking sad - all this clown has left is to edit posts and
post fake bullshit. You can't debate... so you lie. Once again, you have
proved Steve Carroll right about you. Sad..." 4 May 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/a80c93f80bd6bc3e
72- Linonut (cola): "Snit may be the first retraction of my general
killfile amnesty. The volume of cavilling, whining, foot-stomping, back-
tracking, goal-post shifting, and petulance generated by that effete
candy-ass beggars belief". 30 Aug 2008
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/cc4827fd7e8ad574
73- Lloyd Parsons: "Well, I don't know if Oxford is the most cretinous, I
would think that would be reserved for Snit! ;-)" 18 Mar 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/b6cd3ac4bf1e08d6
74- Lewis: "hasn't this fight been going on for like 8 years now? I don't
think anything is ever going to fix snit." 02 Mar 2010
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/98ef8bca6b3a9b34
75- Lusotec (COLA): "You have started threads on this subject many times,
and many times it has been explained to you how X copy & paste should
work and how bugs in a application are not bugs in the system, but still
you return to this subject and post the same false statements." 09 Mar
2011
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/37032133fbe9db92
76- Marious Barrier (COLA): "I must recognize that it is the first time I
see that kind of troll, once that start asking moderately serious
questions and since the first answer, gradually starts to degenerate it
by, in many failed attempts of being sarcastic, inserting various
indirect insults and calling all people ignorant and unable to answer
what he asks for." 14 Oct 2010
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/c6607ea64f436821
77- Mark Kent (cola): "The problem with someone like Mr Glasser is the
same as it is with Mr Wong, even if he were to be honest now, it would be
impossible to determine where the honesty starts and the usual dishonesty
ends. In my primary school, one of the teachers was very keen on
proverbs, and I recall her going over the "cry wolf" story. Mr Glasser
could "cry wolf" over and over now, and I would not come to help him with
his sheep, because I do not know any way of determining if he's ever
telling the truth, or indeed, if he ever has." 2 Dec 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/3f30aa1b65a972b3
78- Mayor of R'lyeh: "The fact is that he's probably pulling it to this
post since its all about him and he managed to make me think about him
today. A friend of mine has a toddler. I went over to her house and
videotaped her kid doing a bunch of cute toddler stuff then burned a DVD
of it for her. While we were watching the DVD her kid got mad. He got mad
because we quit making him the center of attention and made that kid on
the tv the center of attention. He even ran up to the tv and tried to
block our view of it. That's how Snit lives his whole life." 30 Sep 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/9935f4154d5a290b
79- McGarnagle: "And you know when Snit is endorsed by two of the biggest
nutjobs in AGA - RichL and El Kabong - you know he's not very bright and
a loon." 31 Oct 2008
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.guitar.amps/msg/e60a33341bff1309
80- Michelle Ronn: "The real topic here is that one someone refutes your
'facts', you run away and ignore them. Refuting your 'facts' is easily
done in this case. I did it, and you ignored it." 9 Feb 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/c050c82720737b32
81- Mike: "Nonsense. I never see you "advocate" anything. All I see you
doing is engage in endless semantic arguments with everyone. You're the
TholenBot of CSMA. BTW, that's *not* a compliment!" 8 Jul 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/7c5b72d70b87ffbd
82- Mike Dee: "I will no longer accuse you of lying here. Instead I can
only say that you are a complete and delusional kook that happens to
inhabit CSMA for the time being. That you are unaware of how deranged you
actually behave further reinforces this notion. Please seek professional
help."
"The point that keeps whooshing over your head Snit, is Elizabot made no
threat to you before you went to the police. She made a promise.
Admittedly, to your delusional spaced out paranoiac view point, Elizabot
was suddenly "threatening" to you. In so much as you had to take your
kooky self down to your local police shop and blub on their shoulders
about how much in danger you were in [sob, whine], and they had to waste
valuable policing time consoling you over your stupidity. I bet they have
Kook with a capital "K" written at the top of your profile, Snit." 2 Sep
2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/9cf45bc88a324f40
83- mmoore321: "Snit is a human car-accident and we are all
rubbernecking. We know it is bad form, but yet strangely curious. Treat
him the same way, look but just keep moving on." 18 Aug 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/f1c3041d89504c07
84- Mojo: "Actually, these facts piss everybody off because they are off-
topic, unnecessarily confrontational, extremely boring and clearly show
that you are crying out for attention." 20 Sep 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/a38f07b9a4811a80
85- Mr. Blonde: "Lastly, I can't help but comment on the fact that your
obsession with Sandman has actually grown since you claimed to KF him.
Killfilling someone generally implies you're ignoring that person, yet
you piggyback onto virtually every reply to him here and and check his
website's validation status more often than most people check their e-
mail. These are not the actions of a mentally balanced individual." 19
Jan 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/2b005666ab303e2b
86- MR_ED_of_Course: "Seriously, spend half a day at any pre-school or
kindergarten and see if the kids there can't teach you a thing or two
about social behavior." 16 May 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/55c03a6a0b7813a4
87- Muahman: "Ahhhh shit, another thread lost to the Snit retard
circus!!! I actually dread seeing Snit reply to a thread because that
automatically means it's in the toilet." 8 Jul 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/92e776d521dfa701
88- Mutley (AUK): "For the record ... I'll be done when I decide that
there's more shit on your face than there is on the sole of my shoe." 01
Nov 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/1802ad3aa000098b
89- Nashton/Nasht0n: "Oh for crying out loud, if I wasn't convinced that
snit is a total loser, and I rarely call people losers, I certainly am
now. Why bother responding to his stupidities anyway?" 29 Nov 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/be1a326a81441508
90- New Bee: "Honest and honorable? You? You've either got a wry sense of
humor, or you're completely nuts. Either way you're just a waste of time,
and you've done more than anybody to make this group a cesspool. Then you
revel in wallowing in your own filth." 14 May 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/2856277b085d0274
91- none of your buisiness (COLA): "I am sorry, but I am going to have to
send you to the bin. You're perpetrating the Snit circus by responding to
all of his assinine posts. He is only here for one reason, to disrupt
this group, & you are helping him, as well as flatfish." 04 Jan 2011
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/a9b40ce46612fdc4
92- Not Important: "I get this mental image of you and a sibling as
children in the back seat of the family car saying:
Mom, 'snits' touching me ... and you responding much as you do now ...
I'm not touching you, you're touching me! The problem is that by now you
should've grown out of that type of poke and complain interaction with
others. But, of course, you've haven't learned how to interact with
others in a more 'constructive' and mutually beneficial manner even
now." 03 Jul 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/d16279e9003ca8f4
93- notlisted (COLA): "I actually like Apple. But I see you as an
asshole who spends an embarassing percentage of your life posting
derogatory comments about a computer operating system you obviously
detest, and insulting those who defend it in a newsgroup dedicated its
advocacy. That's almost the definition of being an asshole, and you have
half a dozen buddies who do the same thing. You excuse what you do by
pretending that you're merely pointing out problems in the hope that the
system will be improved, but that's an obvious lie whether it's you
saying it or one of your buds. You do it because you enjoy the feeling
it gives you, whatever that is." 07 Mar 2011
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/90b57eaa796e8b14
94- OldCSMAer: "What's he been doing? Am I going to be sorry I killfiled
him?" 27 Nov 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/23b808d9646cd257
95- OldSage: "What drives me nuts is your unrelenting ability and desire
to argue on the head of a pin about the most trivial of things." 2 Oct
2007
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/88457f8e7c25273e
96- Oxford: "If you are using MT-Newswatcher: Select offending Author,
example Snit... Go to the Filters Menu, Choose 'Kill this Author' Click
'OK' Then Repeat with each annoying Author of your choice. Then to see
your work... Choose the Filter Menu again, Then 'Refilter Articles'...
Bam! No more boring, pointless bickering about nothing. Enjoy!!!!!" 14
Aug 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/1d7f9181e95ed9ec
97- Owl (COLA): "You have interacted with me often enough to know that I
never initiate personal attacks. I generally respond in kind. It is you
who usually fall off the civility wagon first, with your ironically
condescending canned responses that do nothing for your argument and
generally shine a spotlight on the desperation that you are so fearful of
projecting." 5 Mar 2011
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/8debf93e05da4d26
Owl (COLA): "You are a complete idiot and extremely dishonest. Consider
yourself permanently plonked." 29 Mar 2011
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/ba7797c5108b3c10
98- Patrick Nihill: "I mean, honestly, who would you rather discuss
something with; Dan, or someone like Zara? Or, for that matter, Snit, for
whom the work 'troll' seems so painfully inadequate?" 13 Aug 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/f93db68e683ad769
99- Pawel Wojciak: "Jesus Christ, snit... <plonk> " 27 Jun 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/93afdfea4d4f491a
100- PC Guy: "Forget it Snit, you're a waste of time. For someone who
talks about everyone else not being "honest and honorable" you appear to
be the least honest and honorable of anyone here." 22 Apr 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/36bf51df2a2662a4
101- Peter: "I've never felt the need to use the filters in Newswatcher
but I thought Id try the Kill this Author.. option with Snit. Ten seconds
later and he's gone! Amazing." 30 Dec 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/011eef01d7bcd56c
102- Peter Bjorn Perlso: "Plonked for 60 days. Now stfu and take your
argument with sandman into the private room." 13 Dec 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/ae4651ec99be3c77
103- Peter Hayes: "True, but that removes Snit completely, and someti...
err..... occasiona.... errrrr..... once in a blue moon he has something
useful to say." 20 Mar 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/8a31a47e26c5f5b7
104- Peter Jensen (cola): "Where has he ever said that they were not
different windowing environments? Message-ID, please. Experience has told
me not to trust you on anything without backing evidence." 30 Jun 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/cfd5de2006d42fdc
105- Peter Kohlmann (cola): "Snot Glasser is invading this group with his
inane drivel, so he has to bear what people think about that dishonest
retard. And just for the record: You *are* a Glasser sock" 30 Jan 2010
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/f3166f6fda92641b
106- PeterBP: "Oh will you stfu". 30 Mar 2008
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/3e88e9a86cb5483e
107- Phil Earnhardt: "You're only interested in trying to get superficial
snipes and extrapolate inappropriate conclusions." 1 Nov 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/ad24a97d5dc86277
108- Rapskat (cola): "For instance, your sig you reference a long
standing war you have going with some person from csma. It's like you
single out persons to target your attentions upon and then continuously
berate them with constant barbs and goads to perpetuate their acrimonious
responses, which in turn you respond in kind, etc. ad infinitum. Above
all things, your affinity for Macs and your overbearing pompous nature
aside, this is what convinces me that your primary purpose for
frequenting this and other groups is to troll." 07 Sep 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/a09c6b8e3e63f42d
109- RichardK: "Just killfile him already." 20 Jun 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/1c9e7ded2e95a582
110- Rick (cola): "Snit, you are a liar. And an ignorant one. You trash
people that are trying their level best to cope with a horrendous
situation. And you do it without the slightest idea of what is going
on." 06 Sep 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/fcad2955ac5cb03b
111- Rick G.: "Just to be plain here, I have no doubt that he is a troll.
I am tolerant of his nature, not blind to it. However, as a troll, he
is ... somewhat clumsy." 22 Mar 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/198b88e3d0064a92
112- Robert F.: "Um, perhaps you misunderstand. I don't care if you quote
Mayor McCheese claiming the Earth is a flat plate perched on the shell of
a tortoise, I was merely pointing out that you run the risk of looking
ridiculous when you quote something patently stupid. If that's your goal,
you're on the right track, and more power to you." 11 Jan 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/4dc22433eae8803d
113- RonB (COLA): "Snit is a crank fixated on one issue, who's thing is
twisting your words so he can win an argument against a straw man. That's
enough to killfile him." 1 Jan 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.usenet.kooks/msg/ce8550d4cc5b1b42
RonB: (COLA): "Why do you bother responding to Snit? He makes no point,
he simply gainsays whatever you say. Just another version of Hadron's
'you're a liar' mantra, which is about all he can muster nowadays." 27
May 2010
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/279210dd877d7aa0
RonB (COLA): "Original subject line now killfiled. You can only talk
about the freaking clipboard for so many million freaking messages. As I
said, Snit has no common-sense, STOP mechanism. He's a mechanically
obsessive super crank and will go on forever. I'm not kidding about this,
he will *NEVER* *ever* stop." 6 Mar 2011
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/0df1e0164a8b586e
114- Rotten Apple: "You make trolls like me look like choir boys." 14 Sep
2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/7a92988bcbce8fdb
115- Roy Culley (cola): "You appear to be in the latter category.
Starting crossposted threads for the simple purpose of hoping to generate
a flame war. If you truly want to learn more about Linux and how it can
help you and your supposed users why aren't you requesting help from a
more technical Linux newsgroup than an advocacy group? As the old saying
goes, those who can do, those who can't teach. Your posts seem to confirm
that saying IMHO." 12 Mar 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/d521a80051e24d08
116- S'mee (Keith, rec.motorcycles): "Liar...forger and worthless. You
must be related to our resident racist troll, he lies as much as you."
29 Dec 2008
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/ab08c00330c8b58d
117- Sandman: "He is by far the most killfiled person in the -HISTORY- of
csma. I've never seen someone so disliked, almost hated, in a news group
before. He has the ability to turn just about any person against him in
just a few posts. On usenet, trolls do this daily, but the funny part
with Michael is that I actually think he DOESN'T consider himself be a
troll - damn what -EVERYONE ELSE- is calling him. Obviously they are
wrong. Only Tholen himself can match this behaviour." 18 Mar 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/51c0735c774215c2
118- sav: "You really need to take a rest somewhere nice. Honestly, even
the nutters who hang out down on Brighton seafront made more sense than
this. You been doing drugs or something?" 25 May 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/1b251baa5c641370
119- Sean Burke: If you're dumb enough to respond to snit, you're
probably dumb enough to click on a spam attachment that promises to
remove smut from your harddrive." 21 Jan 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/e166032d8959c0e1
120- Sermo Malifer (COLA):
Snit: "Why do so many people in COLA argue *against* me..."
Sermo Malifer: "Because you're a narcissistic troll who posts trash just
to get people talking about you." 21 Jan 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/5ddf14f502e9b3f1
121- spike1: "As for the original post, there's plenty of reason thought
and criteria. The reason is snit's here. The thought is probably to show
everyone here just how bad a troll snit is." 03 Dec 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/c797d640e3b9fc12
122- ShutterBugz: "so snit-zel has some kind of problem expressing anger,
i guess. he has to vent his frustrations in other ways. and he thinks
he's making sense: well the syntax is there and he figures he's pretty
smart. indeed, he tells us, he's done the personality tests and the iq
tests and he's okay! aaaaahhhhh, you see he's soooooooo well adjusted."
3 Mar 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/7f9fa1cf90490298
123- Steel (COLA): "You may not like the game, but nevertheless, it's
just a game. You play a game yourself don't kid yourself." 14 Oct 2010
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/be1f49165984c350
124- Steve Carroll: "Snit isn't much more than a one trick pony and not
telling the whole story is one of his two main tricks. His other main
trick is to outright lie. Sprinkle in a bit of denial and you've gone a
long way towards defining his MO. The idea that Snit admits to his
errors is one of the biggest jokes on usenet." 28 Feb 2010
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/0cc84ece10726aac
125- Steve Mackay: "Just killfile Snit, the dishonest piece of elephant
dung, and all would go away. Sure, I got caught up in the "Snit Circus",
but then the cotton candy began to sour, and CSMA begun to smell like
elephant dung." 18 Aug 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/9fc11094133dfcdf
126- Steven de Mena: "Sorry, you have now lost all credibility with me
for your rediculous argument regarding this." 26 Sep 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/1c8777d39c34e293
127- Steve Travis: "Oh oh... Now look what we've done. Snit has lost
all self respect and has sunk to the point of using words like 'asses'
when referring to others. Oh, how could the morally superior snit have
fallen so low.. Please take a moment out of your busy schedule to feel
embarassed for him. Or perhaps we should set up a fund to get him more
happy glue (and the appropriate plastic bags)." 27 Mar 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/3edd9ab69425a6c5
128- Stuart Krivis: "You might as well just give up and plonk him then. A
snit is a snit is a snit and always will be." 15 Aug 2006 (post not
available except in reply)
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/5b382420a696f140
129- Tattoo Vampire (COLA): "In other words, in another attempt to troll,
you made yourself look like a fool. Again". 28 Aug 2008
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/b2676d3540e09f38
130- thanatoid: "Is business/personal life/etc. SO bad that you had to
create Snit? I really thought higher of you until Snit came in here, in
fact I find your site very nice and wish there was a shop like yours
where I live (well, I /think/...) Or is Snit really just someone whose HD
you accidentally wiped? Either way, it seems to have created a lot of,
for lack of a better word, unpleasantness - just from looking at today's
headers." 02 Jul 2008
http://groups.google.com/group/24hoursupport.helpdesk/msg/1c43a7415c97bfa1
131- The Lost Packet (COLA): "well, he's found a seat in my killbin, I
can't be doing with him." 27 Jan 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/2007526a552b3322
132- TheLetterK: "That is merely your perception, Shit. You're the one
lacking counter evidence, and your arguments basically amount to "I'm
right, nya nya nya." No matter how many examples someone points at to
demonstrate their claim, you blindly continue to insist that they provide
no evidence, or that the evidence given is irrelevant. Worse still, you
fall back on straw men and disingenuous quote mangling to portray the
argument in your favor. You are one of the worst trolls that inhabit CSMA,
Shit. *Edwin* is more prone to fits of reason than you are." 23 Sep 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/d488596b57132124
133- Thufir: "You can "prove" that no one has disproved your "proof"?
Again, your assertion that no one has done so is even *less* convincing
than your claim that some PDF "proves" whatever point you're trying to
make precisely because I'm familiar with your MO. That is, you're a dumb-
ass who would claim that that something is proved when it's not, and who
would ignore counter-examples disproving your contention. I don't know
what this *ages old* thread is about, but I know that you're full of
shit." 21 Aug 2008
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/5114623055c01092
134-Tim Adams: "I'd kill file you but then I'd miss the fun. you see, you
never cease to amaze me at just how stupid you really are. Why just the
other day I had a great laugh when I saw you, the king of liars (in this
NG anyway) calling somebody else a liar." 13 Nov 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/40c7f9407179ff2a
135- Tim Crowley: "I don't know - I think you might have more compassion.
Snit is sick. He needs help. This is the only way the poor sick fool can
get attention. My fucking God, he's taken to hanging out with and
supporting racist pig fuckers like MuahMuah. It is true that no-one likes
him and those that pretend they do are just using him or don't know him -
but come on- it's not his fault. He's sick. Have some compassion, eh? All
these idiot trolls, Zara, Stew, Tommy, MuaaaahMuaaah, and Snit - they are
all so alike. I pity each and every one of them" 19 Apr 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/67f0f174110bfa0a
136- Tim Smith: "No, he didn't, and there is no reasonable way you could
actually believe he lied. You are purely trying to troll here." 14 Apr
2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/6e3cfd9240ac4871
137- Timberwoof: "Plonk, Snit." 23 Apr 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/40c8df070c3e776c
138- tom_elam: "Killfile Steve C. and Snit" 07 Jul 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/b50d0c973d21d995
139- TomB (COLA): "No Snit, you were flat out lying in an attempt to make
me look bad. Do you really have to sink to that level in order to 'be
right'? If so, you're pathetic. And I don't say this because I like to
say it." 07 Feb 2010
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/43263f575ac40353
140- Tom Bates: "Do you have to turn any thread you post in into one of
your Circus acts?" 20 Feb 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/25f0e481b605e71f
141- Tommy: "In case you did not get it, I think the moral was: Stop
polluting the world with your infantile and obsessive "writings". You
give Mac advocacy a bad name. If that was your goal you have succeeded!
That also goes for all that bullshit on your website" 11 Jun 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/03610d2080321d33
142- Tony(UK) (COLA): "Your email address in your headers just about sums
the Linux world up. Nothing to do with the OS, it is the *uckwits
involved in the whole arena and have posted before on this. If in doubt,
deride, insult and attack. Look inwardly carefully before judging me."
10 Dec 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/533042ed18cefba3
143- TravelinMan: "I still can't figure out what's wrong with Snit. Most
people have him kill-filed and the few who don't mostly restrict their
responses to 'why don't you go away, no one wants you here'. Just what
would keep someone in this group with all of that animosity? Must be some
kind of severe mental illness." 17 Mar 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/45197fbb46d491df
144- Wally: "Because by your own admission "honor and honesty" are
nothing more than a "game" to you, as such not only do you wish to define
the rules, but no doubt you will also attempt to alter or bend the rules
when inevitably things do not go to your liking, for this reason I doubt
anyone would be foolish enough to play your game." 16 May 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/b9b3ed1ee20e5220
145- WhoMe: "F michael IS a teacher, it's no wonder he's home more than
he's anywhere near a classroom".
146- William Poaster: "Good grief. If anyone's having a mental breakdown
it's the Prescott Computer Guy, Michael Snit Glasser. What a f#cked up
mess he is." 29 Aug 2008
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/914d1e74855fb461
147- William R. Walsh: "Now, if you'll excuse me, and accept my sincere
apologies for this, PLONK! Feel proud about that. You're the first person
to be plonked from my new computer! :-) " 10 Feb 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/313c7368f6369c49
148- Woofbert: "*Plonk*" 14 Jun 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/436e6b5333d747e0
149- zara: "Look - I'm not into combing through thousands of posts, to
prove what was said or not said - I leave stuff like that to people
without lives, like Snit. But it is assuredly, in the record. Ping Snit
to do a search - you will flatter him, and give meaning to his tawdry
little life." 25 Oct 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/a1d4fc7120a6a538
150- Zaren Ankleweed: "And with that, Snit goes in the global killfile.
No subject, no author, no nothing. Buh-bye". 11 Sep 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/12f7c34f24d43624
151- Znu: "The Snit Circus has gotten particularly bad as of late. When I
set up my filters to kill all of Snit's posts, plus direct replies to
them (which is how I'm keeping things from now on), nearly 40% of the
most recent 1000 articles in CSMA go out the window. .... In all,
something like 50% of the traffic in this group is now related to Snit
insanity. .... I killfile Edwin because I don't have a patience to have
discussions with someone who deliberately tries to waste my time. But
watching *other people* tie him knots can be entertaining. The Snit-
related posts are not like this. They are endless repetitions of the
exact same material and/or arguments dating back *years* about who said
what." 20 Apr 2008
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/9244dd79c682b2d6
152- amicus_curious (COLA): "Where on earth do you get the idea that I am
arguing with you, little man? Is your name "Hadron"? Shoo! Go back to
your mail order business!" 29 May 2011
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/00ee203fe6183b1b
153- nessuno (COLA):
Chris Ahlstrom: "Have you ever noticed that threads involving Snit, [...]
are a basically a waste of time?
nessuno: "Yep. I don't read them." 29 May 2011
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/2f997598f0e25f9d
154- Marti Van Lin (COLA): "I paid enough attention to Snit IMHO. I
killfiled him the very first month I started lurking COLA. I find his
nitpicking and immature behavior extremely annoying. I am not going to
torture myself reading his bullshit. Snit is also a proven liar. Remember
his retarded exif debacle." 08 Jul 2011
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/d12622df3671359b
155- White Spirit (COLA): "It would interest me a lot more if both the
participants were honest and intelligent. Snit is lacking at least one
of those characteristics." 25 Jul 2011
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/ba8beed91bca6bfa
--
HPT
Snit
11:17 PM:
Have I *not* been clear enough? Are you really going to say you are so daft
you cannot understand? You, you sniveling whiner, are a coward - a sad
little lapdog of your masters. See my other comments for more details and
support.
In the end: you will not change - you *cannot* change. You are not capable
of growing past your lapdog status. You *will* keep pandering to the
"advocates" and the lowest of the low of Usenet.
> He referred to that as a violent gesture. What a spineless candy ass.
Ah, how cute: after HPT's cowardly behavior has been focused on so much he
calls me names and tries to turn things around.
Useless - HPT is completely useless.
Oh, and I snipped your pandering to Carroll and Sandman. You cannot help
but prove me right about you!
--
🙈🙉🙊
High Plains Thumper
> High Plains Thumper stated:
You are a verbally abusive person. You are the one who is verbally
assaulting me. In your little tirade, you have revealed considerably your
character, which is seriously lacking. Verbal abuse leads to physical
abuse. You are the one incapable of self control. I feel sorry for your
spouse, if indeed you still remain married to her, and any siblings that
are within your control.
>> He referred to that as a violent gesture. What a spineless candy ass.
>
> Ah, how cute: after HPT's cowardly behavior has been focused on so much
> he calls me names and tries to turn things around.
>
> Useless - HPT is completely useless.
>
> Oh, and I snipped your pandering to Carroll and Sandman. You cannot
> help but prove me right about you!
You are a fool, an idiot. That list of 155 of poster quotes, individuals
is nothing more than a testimonial regarding your pointless trolling and
abusive posting in Usenet computer operating system advocacy groups and a
few others over the past nine years.
You are incapable of handling hints from these 155 people, which are only
a small handful of those who tried to get you to change or decease, let
alone your inability to handle a personal encounter. I offered to you, to
travel to your domain and visit with you, so you had the opportunity to
express the depraved insults that you have insulted me with herein.
You declined, which illustrates your cowardice. You have a serious
character flaw, the inability to control yourself. You are an
unreasonable person. You need serious psychological counselling and
possibly therapy to overcome your narcissism.
It is you that owe me an apology for your obsessive compulsive
abusiveness and lies you expressed toward me. However, you have indicated
to me that you are incapable of a simple apology, let alone controlling
your language in a public forum.
I feel sorry for you, not just for you but for your spouse if indeed you
are married and any siblings from a marital relationship. You have
revealed to all who read your writings here publicly the type of abusive
person that your truly are.
--
HPT
chrisv
>I feel sorry for you,
Yeah, well, I'm filtering you for a while - don't want to see the Shit
circus.
chrisv
>So
*plonk*
Chris
Me too.
I'm sorry I've contributed to it.
Doesn't matter much though as I am off to school this Saturday and
trolling cola isn't on my list of classes although I'll bet I could
get an A in it!
Best wishes, I'm 'outta' here.
Kari Laine
Hash: SHA1
NotDashEscaped: You need GnuPG to verify this message
I am wondering how these trolls seems to co-operate. When Flat stopped
others took up the task. It is like there is some controlling entity...
--
Kari Laine
PICs, Displays,Relays - USB-SPI-I2C http://www.byvac.com
USB and FPGA boards http://www.ztex.de
I am just a happy customer
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJOTRtEAAoJEPjW/Kjfref2dUYH/RxUqNSlXfFrmA+6P68onFea
a6OrL4I9ldgi+iUpZNaFaWhMQebgP4nqCntlEAIekKkJJaAUBfKiyfPrBO4Dw5qK
CZyx0S6BtwEflXxKpjCLh3H6pf60TZNtmECy+MfnOeOIiGQl4y8Ydz1r6Qgt9AU7
BNY9B4OpN5ohEruFAFqNW6ERCc2U40taHnZwtEMa4LNm/vWupxoLWa5PjuTmnVGo
27KZATqtmJgaMyP5jnNzOW3RkURpPQuvTORw+C4a3rzTbhonCt/MlCBZuZSKY7Ee
2M950552+GjXcM5/+w4NIhGiwGqzE1wpig9DdZeUOafoq16jo76G5Z7tRKESE4k=
=vSOj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Peter Köhlmann
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> NotDashEscaped: You need GnuPG to verify this message
>
> On 08/18/2011 04:49 PM, Chris wrote:
>> On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 07:17:51 -0500, chrisv wrote:
>>
>>> High Plains Thumper wrote:
>>>
>>>> I feel sorry for you,
>>>
>>> Yeah, well, I'm filtering you for a while - don't want to see the Shit
>>> circus.
>>
>> Me too.
>> I'm sorry I've contributed to it.
>> Doesn't matter much though as I am off to school this Saturday and
>> trolling cola isn't on my list of classes although I'll bet I could
>> get an A in it!
>> Best wishes, I'm 'outta' here.
>
> I am wondering how these trolls seems to co-operate. When Flat stopped
> others took up the task. It is like there is some controlling entity...
>
Those "others" were mostly flatfish
After all, that lying swine can't leave Snit Michael Glasser without "help"
in a thread.
Scum like those will always try to disrupt a NG as much as possible, and
combined they can do it "better"
Presidente Santos
stupid rat shit "chrisv" <chr...@nospam.invalid> wrote in message
news:6o0q47hsqbq8r9db3...@4ax.com...
> Luke Pennington wrote:
>
>>So
>
> *plonk*
plonk - is that the sound you made when your whore mother shat you out into
the toilet?
the filthy bitch did not flush because if she did a useless piece of shit
like you would not be here today.
"chrisv" is a liar. "chrisv" is a piece of shit.
Snit
4:21 AM:
...
>>> I gave Snit the opportunity to express to my face what he insulting
>>> states hiding behind his keyboard.
>>
>> Have I *not* been clear enough? Are you really going to say you are so
>> daft you cannot understand? You, you sniveling whiner, are a coward - a
>> sad little lapdog of your masters. See my other comments for more
>> details and support.
>>
>> In the end: you will not change - you *cannot* change. You are not
>> capable of growing past your lapdog status. You *will* keep pandering
>> to the "advocates" and the lowest of the low of Usenet.
>
> You are a verbally abusive person.
Oh, poor you... being "verbally abused" after you have been lying about me
for *years* and spewing the same unsupportable accusations the whole time.
Poor, poor HPT, being "verbally abused" after you repeat the same
meaningless yet obsessively scavenged and forged quotes about me hundreds of
time.
Wah, wah.
Stop whining you silly little lapdog coward.
> You are the one who is verbally assaulting me. In your little tirade, you have
> revealed considerably your character, which is seriously lacking. Verbal abuse
> leads to physical abuse. You are the one incapable of self control. I feel
> sorry for your spouse, if indeed you still remain married to her, and any
> siblings that are within your control.
Poor you... just whining because I have called you the little lapdog coward
you are. Years of your attacks and I am finally responding. Yeah, you are
just a sad little victim here.
Utter rubbish. But, as the coward you are, you will *never* admit to your
actions.
You will never admit you have been spewing the same false
accusations against me for years.
You will never admit you have been repeating the same
meaningless yet obsessively scavenged and forged quotes
that whole time.
You cannot admit to *reality*. To do so would take some level of honesty
and even courage - and you possess none of either.
>>> He referred to that as a violent gesture. What a spineless candy ass.
>>
>> Ah, how cute: after HPT's cowardly behavior has been focused on so much
>> he calls me names and tries to turn things around.
>>
>> Useless - HPT is completely useless.
>>
>> Oh, and I snipped your pandering to Carroll and Sandman. You cannot
>> help but prove me right about you!
>
> You are a fool, an idiot.
Ah, the little lapdog coward called me a name.
> That list of 155 of poster quotes, individuals is nothing more than a
> testimonial regarding your pointless trolling and abusive posting in Usenet
> computer operating system advocacy groups and a few others over the past nine
> years.
Nope: you repeat it over and over and over because you are sucking up to
Carroll and Sandman. The quotes are *meaningless*. Many are forged and of
those which are not, they have been obsessively scavenged since 2004. Your
posting of them says *nothing* of me but *everything* of your lapdog status
to those you adopted the list from.
You are playing their fool. You are sucking up to them - and they are
clearly utter scum. You suck up to the lowest of the low of Usenet. And
you do it with your cowardly little tail between your legs - always afraid
of not pleasing your masters. You did it in CSMA and you do it now in COLA -
living in fear of not pleasing the herd. And you know the best way to
please such folks is to attack those who they attack. So you do.
> You are incapable of handling hints from these 155 people, which are only
> a small handful of those who tried to get you to change or decease, let
> alone your inability to handle a personal encounter. I offered to you, to
> travel to your domain and visit with you, so you had the opportunity to
> express the depraved insults that you have insulted me with herein.
Poor you: I have no desire to entertain such a miserable little lapdog as
yourself. How sad for you!
No matter how much you lie about your adopted list of quotes saying
something about me - the only quotes which represent me are *mine*. Not
yours. Not Carroll's. Not Carroll's socks. Mine. So you can shove your
BS accusations where the sun don't shine.
And you can back in your lapdog status all night... do not worry, your
master's will jump in to offer you some small amount of defense soon. They
better - they owe you! You have been their good little doggie for years...
> You declined, which illustrates your cowardice. You have a serious
> character flaw, the inability to control yourself. You are an
> unreasonable person. You need serious psychological counselling and
> possibly therapy to overcome your narcissism.
I declined to entertain someone who is as miserable and offensive as you.
Yeah, I am horrible. Get over yourself you sad little sap.
> It is you that owe me an apology for your obsessive compulsive
> abusiveness and lies you expressed toward me. However, you have indicated
> to me that you are incapable of a simple apology, let alone controlling
> your language in a public forum.
You spew the same crap against me for *years*... sucking up to utter scum
and lashing out against me to please them. And you expect that I owe you an
apology.
You are delusional. I am merely telling you what you are: a sad little lap
dog afraid to stand up against them and think for yourself. And you are.
And you do not even deny it. Quite telling.
> I feel sorry for you, not just for you but for your spouse if indeed you
> are married and any siblings from a marital relationship. You have
> revealed to all who read your writings here publicly the type of abusive
> person that your truly are.
Poor you... being so heavily "abused" after all these years of spewing your
vile BS for your sick little masters.
--
🙈🙉🙊
High Plains Thumper
> Kari Laine wrote:
>> Chris (flatfish) wrote:
>>> chrisv wrote:
>>>> High Plains Thumper wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I feel sorry for you,
>>>>
>>>> Yeah, well, I'm filtering you for a while - don't want to see the
>>>> Shit circus.
>>>
>>> Me too.
>>> I'm sorry I've contributed to it.
>>> Doesn't matter much though as I am off to school this Saturday and
>>> trolling cola isn't on my list of classes although I'll bet I could
>>> get an A in it!
>>> Best wishes, I'm 'outta' here.
Message-ID: <1pnb8y9pfcz9y.3zcdqozhc6iz$.d...@40tude.net>
Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org;
posting-host="YWsGPOoh/tpqtaCqoxPiBA";
Yup, flatfish. As sorry as he is, he'll be back as another nymshift.
>> I am wondering how these trolls seems to co-operate. When Flat stopped
>> others took up the task. It is like there is some controlling entity...
>
> Those "others" were mostly flatfish
Yes, the controlling entity was flatfish with sock puppets. Add Snit, and
it became a pathological circus. For the following reason:
[quote]
We want to place selection pressure on the companies and individuals that
show a genetic weakness for competitor's technologies, to make the
industry increasingly resistant to such unhealthy strains, over time.
[/quote]
PDF page 55
Microsoft Evangelism
Comes vs. Microsoft court case
http://www.groklaw.net/pdf/Comes-3096.pdf
> After all, that lying swine can't leave Snit Michael Glasser without
> "help" in a thread.
They suffer from the same narcissistic mental illness, no doubt.
> Scum like those will always try to disrupt a NG as much as possible, and
> combined they can do it "better"
Yup. I don't know about doing it better. It is more like it became a
black hole.
--
HPT
Snit
7:07 PM:
>>> I am wondering how these trolls seems to co-operate. When Flat stopped
>>> others took up the task. It is like there is some controlling entity...
>>
>> Those "others" were mostly flatfish
>
> Yes, the controlling entity was flatfish with sock puppets. Add Snit, and
> it became a pathological circus. For the following reason:
>
> [quote]
> We want to place selection pressure on the companies and individuals that
> show a genetic weakness for competitor's technologies, to make the
> industry increasingly resistant to such unhealthy strains, over time.
> [/quote]
>
> PDF page 55
> Microsoft Evangelism
> Comes vs. Microsoft court case
That has *nothing* to do with me.
You are just including my names in your insults to please your masters. As
I have said, you are a sad, cowardly little lapdog.
And you cannot help but prove it over and over and over.
--
🙈🙉🙊
anus
news:j2kgh0$qr5$1...@dont-email.me:
> Peter Köhlmann wrote:
>> Kari Laine wrote:
>>> Chris (flatfish) wrote:
>>>> chrisv wrote:
>>>>> High Plains Thumper wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I feel sorry for you,
>>>>>
>>>>> Yeah, well, I'm filtering you for a while - don't want to see the
>>>>> Shit circus.
>>>>
>>>> Me too.
>>>> I'm sorry I've contributed to it.
>>>> Doesn't matter much though as I am off to school this Saturday and
>>>> trolling cola isn't on my list of classes although I'll bet I could
>>>> get an A in it!
>>>> Best wishes, I'm 'outta' here.
>
> Message-ID: <1pnb8y9pfcz9y.3zcdqozhc6iz$.d...@40tude.net>
> Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org;
> posting-host="YWsGPOoh/tpqtaCqoxPiBA";
>
> Yup, flatfish. As sorry as he is, he'll be back as another nymshift.
>
>>> I am wondering how these trolls seems to co-operate. When Flat
>>> stopped others took up the task. It is like there is some
>>> controlling entity...
>>
>> Those "others" were mostly flatfish
>
> Yes, the controlling entity was flatfish with sock puppets. Add Snit,
> and it became a pathological circus. For the following reason:
posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19VCdhSYKutDukDPLXIQ9koi+
3OsNuBQZOGuc76EZwEBg=="
Hello flatfish!