OT: The best Mac Advocate's ideas about being "honest and honorable"

Steve Carroll

unread,

Mar 19, 2007, 11:59:51 PM3/19/07

to

The self professed 'best Mac Advocate in csma' (Snit) has created an
extremely *LARGE* number of threads that have NOTHING to do with the
Mac... here is a very tiny sampling regarding just one poster (me) from
a short period of time:

Steve lies to cover "Evil John" posts
Steve lies to cover his ID theft
Steve Carroll got his flame war.
Steve Carroll claims legal dictionaries are wrong!
Steve Carroll has admitted to being Sigmond
Steve Carroll admits he screws up context.
Steve admits he is Sigmond...
Steve Carroll goofs again - admits to being Sigmond
Steve *finally* answers a question! Will he do it again?
Steve Carroll lies about his own lies!
Wally, are you Steve Carroll's Sock Puppet?
Steve Carroll, can you answer for your lies
Steve Carroll beaten by his own lies
Another clear lie by Steve Carroll
Giving Steve Carroll a chance to explain - and he can't
Steve Carroll Arrested On Multiple Charges
Steve's reading comprehension problem that won't go away...
Steve Carroll's chance to explain #
Steve Carroll's Errors, Accusations and Bigoted Comments
Steve lies to cover his ID theft (and admits to it!)
Steve Carroll talks about Fatherhood
Can Steve Carroll accept responsibility for his actions?
Steve lies to cover the "proof" of his ID theft
Unbelievable accusations by Steve
Why Steve is lying about Snit now
Steve's Math
For future reference for Steve Carroll
Picture of Steve Carroll
Flame: Request for Steve and Elizabot
More accusations Steve Carroll has never backed up
Steve Carroll caught in another lie.
Quotes about Steve
For new posters: some Info on Steve Carroll's trolling
Steve Carroll will *never* back up his accusations
Steve Carroll's admission
Steve's claims of forgery likely a lie.
Steve's "trinity" grows to 4... what shall he do?
Steve Carroll tries to refute a mathematical proof
Steve Carroll's request
Busted, Steve
Steve and Elizabot admit I am right
To Steve and Elizabot
Steve Carroll will *never* honestly respond to this question.
Steve Carroll caught using sock puppets *again*
Will Steve tell the truth about Slaveen?
Steve Carroll sinks lower to impress Elizabot
Consolidated reply to the trolling of Steve Carroll

Snit has written TONS of other troll posts focusing on numerous posters.
Do people that are "honest and honorable" conduct themselves this way?

--
"None of you can be honest... you are all pathetic." - Snit
"I do not KF people" - Snit
"Not only do I lie about what others are claiming,
I show evidence from the records".-Snit
"You should take one of my IT classes some day." - Snit
"Once we see or hear of couples - even a relatively small number - who
engage in legal, consensual,adult incestuous relationships, the whole
idea of incest with minors becomes thinkable." - Snit

Jesus

unread,

Mar 20, 2007, 12:23:26 AM3/20/07

to

You have an amazing talent for being a douche bag.

John

unread,

Mar 20, 2007, 1:02:14 AM3/20/07

to

"Steve Carroll" <no...@nowhere.net> wrote in message
news:noone-DFE0CD....@newsgroups.comcast.net...

> The self professed 'best Mac Advocate in csma' (Snit) has created an
> extremely *LARGE* number of threads that have NOTHING to do with the
> Mac... here is a very tiny sampling regarding just one poster (me) from
> a short period of time:
>
>

Trolling bullshit deleted.

Get some help Steve. Is there 5 minutes of the day that you go without
thinking about your obsession Snit?

John

unread,

Mar 20, 2007, 1:02:43 AM3/20/07

to

"Jesus" <rustybu...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1174364606....@y66g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...

And one crazy sack of shit he is at that!

Sandman

unread,

Mar 20, 2007, 3:29:44 AM3/20/07

to

In article <noone-DFE0CD....@newsgroups.comcast.net>,
Steve Carroll <no...@nowhere.net> wrote:

> The self professed 'best Mac Advocate in csma' (Snit) has created an
> extremely *LARGE* number of threads that have NOTHING to do with the
> Mac... here is a very tiny sampling regarding just one poster (me) from
> a short period of time:
>

> Snit has written TONS of other troll posts focusing on numerous posters.
> Do people that are "honest and honorable" conduct themselves this way?

Here is a more comprehensive list.

For what it's worth - I think being forged is one of the best things
that has happened to Snit. I think it has been made clear to him just
how abusive he's been and has chosen to step back. The trend is pretty
clear when you see the list below. I can't begin to understand why
John has taken it upon himself to defend Snit, but it's not helping
Snit much. :)

This Jesus guy is new or all I can see, and since he came in just when
Snit started to get his act together, I can sort of understand why he
would perceive Snit to be a "target" instead of the most hated and
most killfiled person in the history of csma.

So, to Snit; good for you. You have pretty much stopped your trolling,
and that's a welcome change. I have removed you from my killfile and I
hope to see more of this trend.

49 threads mentioning wally
76 threads mentioning steve
99 threads mentioning sandman
53 threads mentioning Adams

--
Sandman[.net]

Peter Hayes

unread,

Mar 20, 2007, 4:49:41 AM3/20/07

to

Steve Carroll <no...@nowhere.net> wrote:

The one thing wrong with MacSOUP is that there's no
"kill-thread-and-never-download-any-headers/bodies-ever-again" command.

--

Immunity is better than innoculation.

Peter

Sandman

unread,

Mar 20, 2007, 5:16:28 AM3/20/07

to

In article <1hv9n2b.izy82z6zqh57N%noti...@btinternet.com>,
noti...@btinternet.com (Peter Hayes) wrote:

> The one thing wrong with MacSOUP is that there's no
> "kill-thread-and-never-download-any-headers/bodies-ever-again" command.

You should switch to MT-NewsWatcher, and add two filters:

Kill if "Message-ID" matches the regular expression "CABLE.NE"
Kill if "References" matches the regular expression "CABLE.NE"

--
Sandman[.net]

Peter Hayes

unread,

Mar 20, 2007, 8:27:51 AM3/20/07

to

Sandman <m...@sandman.net> wrote:

True, but that removes Snit completely, and someti... err.....
occasiona.... errrrr..... once in a blue moon he has something useful to
say.

Patrick Nihill

unread,

Mar 20, 2007, 8:28:47 AM3/20/07

to

Peter Hayes <noti...@btinternet.com> wrote:

> Steve Carroll <no...@nowhere.net> wrote:
>
> > The self professed 'best Mac Advocate in csma' (Snit) has

> The one thing wrong with MacSOUP is that there's no
> "kill-thread-and-never-download-any-headers/bodies-ever-again" command.

That's not true Peter, killing a particular thread in MacSOUP is simple.
Just select the first message in the thread and press the '-' (minus)
key. You'll never see that thread again.

You can also do the same thing with posters. I have filters set up so
that posts from Snit or Jim Lee Jr. are killed, along with all
subthreads that spawn from their messages.

Sandman

unread,

Mar 20, 2007, 9:02:29 AM3/20/07

to

In article <1hv9wr1.190gv311cd7xtzN%noti...@btinternet.com>,
noti...@btinternet.com (Peter Hayes) wrote:

> Sandman <m...@sandman.net> wrote:
>
> > In article <1hv9n2b.izy82z6zqh57N%noti...@btinternet.com>,
> > noti...@btinternet.com (Peter Hayes) wrote:
> >
> > > The one thing wrong with MacSOUP is that there's no
> > > "kill-thread-and-never-download-any-headers/bodies-ever-again" command.
> >
> > You should switch to MT-NewsWatcher, and add two filters:
> >
> > Kill if "Message-ID" matches the regular expression "CABLE.NE"
> > Kill if "References" matches the regular expression "CABLE.NE"
>
> True, but that removes Snit completely, and someti... err.....
> occasiona.... errrrr..... once in a blue moon he has something useful to
> say.

More so lately. I think he is getting better. I thank the "forger", if
there indeed was one, to help him on the way.

--
Sandman[.net]

Peter Hayes

unread,

Mar 20, 2007, 9:37:00 AM3/20/07

to

Patrick Nihill <pa_n...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Peter Hayes <noti...@btinternet.com> wrote:
>
> > Steve Carroll <no...@nowhere.net> wrote:
> >
> > > The self professed 'best Mac Advocate in csma' (Snit) has
>
> <snip nonsense>
>
> > The one thing wrong with MacSOUP is that there's no
> > "kill-thread-and-never-download-any-headers/bodies-ever-again" command.
>
> That's not true Peter, killing a particular thread in MacSOUP is simple.
> Just select the first message in the thread and press the '-' (minus)
> key. You'll never see that thread again.

Only if I select view option 1, and it still downloads the
headers/bodies although that's not really a problem in itself.

> You can also do the same thing with posters. I have filters set up so
> that posts from Snit or Jim Lee Jr. are killed, along with all
> subthreads that spawn from their messages.

--

Patrick Nihill

unread,

Mar 20, 2007, 9:58:55 AM3/20/07

to

Peter Hayes <noti...@btinternet.com> wrote:

> Patrick Nihill <pa_n...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > Peter Hayes <noti...@btinternet.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Steve Carroll <no...@nowhere.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > > The self professed 'best Mac Advocate in csma' (Snit) has
> >
> > <snip nonsense>
> >
> > > The one thing wrong with MacSOUP is that there's no
> > > "kill-thread-and-never-download-any-headers/bodies-ever-again" command.
> >
> > That's not true Peter, killing a particular thread in MacSOUP is simple.
> > Just select the first message in the thread and press the '-' (minus)
> > key. You'll never see that thread again.
>
> Only if I select view option 1, and it still downloads the
> headers/bodies although that's not really a problem in itself.

It doesn't download the bodies, though it does download the headers
alright. Still, I never see them, so I don't even notice that.

<snip>

Steve Carroll

unread,

Mar 20, 2007, 10:02:31 AM3/20/07

to

In article <3pydnXVkze5D92LY...@netlojix.com>,
"John" <nos...@nospam.com> wrote:

Does the reality that Snit has done what he has done bother you that
much?

Steve Carroll

unread,

Mar 20, 2007, 10:42:55 AM3/20/07

to

In article <mr-0E8F25.08...@News.Individual.NET>,
Sandman <m...@sandman.net> wrote:

> In article <noone-DFE0CD....@newsgroups.comcast.net>,
> Steve Carroll <no...@nowhere.net> wrote:
>
> > The self professed 'best Mac Advocate in csma' (Snit) has created an
> > extremely *LARGE* number of threads that have NOTHING to do with the
> > Mac... here is a very tiny sampling regarding just one poster (me) from
> > a short period of time:
> >
> > Snit has written TONS of other troll posts focusing on numerous posters.
> > Do people that are "honest and honorable" conduct themselves this way?
>
> Here is a more comprehensive list.
>
> For what it's worth - I think being forged is one of the best things
> that has happened to Snit. I think it has been made clear to him just
> how abusive he's been and has chosen to step back. The trend is pretty
> clear when you see the list below. I can't begin to understand why
> John has taken it upon himself to defend Snit, but it's not helping
> Snit much. :)

I agree... John and the forger both deserve thanks.

> This Jesus guy is new or all I can see, and since he came in just when
> Snit started to get his act together, I can sort of understand why he
> would perceive Snit to be a "target" instead of the most hated and
> most killfiled person in the history of csma.

He has to overlook an awful lot of reality to get there... a thing he
appears quite willing to do.

> So, to Snit; good for you. You have pretty much stopped your trolling,
> and that's a welcome change. I have removed you from my killfile and I
> hope to see more of this trend.

We'll see. Snit really wants to be the best Mac advocate in town... if
he can learn that he can't really stand toe to toe with reality while it
bludgeons him repeatedly he might get a chance to see if he's up to it.
Pretending that he hasn't forged ID's, forged documents, used
sockpuppets, nymshifted, lied endlessly, created tons of trolling
threads etc. hasn't exactly turned him into the csma version of an
eagle scout;)

And that's culled from less than a year's worth of posting. I wonder
what it would look like from the time Snit started posting regularly in
csma (late 2003)? How did you generate this list? Does it get the
threads which have had their names changed?

John

unread,

Mar 20, 2007, 10:53:04 AM3/20/07

to

"Steve Carroll" <no...@nowhere.net> wrote in message

news:noone-3E6EC4....@newsgroups.comcast.net...

> In article <3pydnXVkze5D92LY...@netlojix.com>,
> "John" <nos...@nospam.com> wrote:
>
>> "Steve Carroll" <no...@nowhere.net> wrote in message
>> news:noone-DFE0CD....@newsgroups.comcast.net...
>> > The self professed 'best Mac Advocate in csma' (Snit) has created an
>> > extremely *LARGE* number of threads that have NOTHING to do with the
>> > Mac... here is a very tiny sampling regarding just one poster (me) from
>> > a short period of time:
>> >
>> >
>>
>> Trolling bullshit deleted.
>>
>>
>> Get some help Steve. Is there 5 minutes of the day that you go without
>> thinking about your obsession Snit?
>
> Does the reality that Snit has done what he has done bother you that
> much?
>

When you're gone ZERO problems on this group!

Snit

unread,

Mar 20, 2007, 11:15:39 AM3/20/07

to

"Sandman" <m...@sandman.net> stated in post
mr-0E8F25.08...@News.Individual.NET on 3/20/07 12:29 AM:

> In article <noone-DFE0CD....@newsgroups.comcast.net>,
> Steve Carroll <no...@nowhere.net> wrote:
>
>> The self professed 'best Mac Advocate in csma' (Snit) has created an
>> extremely *LARGE* number of threads that have NOTHING to do with the
>> Mac... here is a very tiny sampling regarding just one poster (me) from
>> a short period of time:
>>
>> Snit has written TONS of other troll posts focusing on numerous posters.
>> Do people that are "honest and honorable" conduct themselves this way?
>
> Here is a more comprehensive list.
>
> For what it's worth - I think being forged is one of the best things
> that has happened to Snit. I think it has been made clear to him just
> how abusive he's been and has chosen to step back. The trend is pretty
> clear when you see the list below. I can't begin to understand why
> John has taken it upon himself to defend Snit, but it's not helping
> Snit much. :)
>
> This Jesus guy is new or all I can see, and since he came in just when
> Snit started to get his act together, I can sort of understand why he
> would perceive Snit to be a "target" instead of the most hated and
> most killfiled person in the history of csma.
>
> So, to Snit; good for you. You have pretty much stopped your trolling,
> and that's a welcome change. I have removed you from my killfile and I
> hope to see more of this trend.

The only real difference in my posting is that I have reduced my taking of
the bait of Carroll... and that Jesus and John have shown that they are
honest and honorable and have been telling Steve just how absurd his
trolling is. Adams and Wally have, wisely, decided that they are not going
to even toss any bait at me... though Adams *still* cannot stop himself from
flaming me in his .sig. Someday, I suspect, even he will grow up.

As far as you taking me out of your kill file because you think I am posting
differently... if you really *had* me in your kill file how did you see my
posts to even know that? Oops. LOL!

Remember, Sandman, I have shown where you have been copying my posts to your
own server... which I notice I still am not blocked on. :) Currently you
have 116 references to me on your site, at least according to Google:
<http://www.google.com/search?q=site:sandman.net+snit+OR+glasser>

--
I am currently being "targeted" by a forger.
Check the headers to make sure this is not from Individual.net

--
€ A partial subset is not synonymous with the whole
€ A person's actions speak more about him than what others say
€ Apple doesn't provide as many options as the rest of the PC industry

Sandman

unread,

Mar 20, 2007, 11:15:54 AM3/20/07

to

In article <noone-B9601C....@newsgroups.comcast.net>,
Steve Carroll <no...@nowhere.net> wrote:

> <snip>

>
> And that's culled from less than a year's worth of posting. I wonder
> what it would look like from the time Snit started posting regularly in
> csma (late 2003)? How did you generate this list? Does it get the
> threads which have had their names changed?

The list is generated by a script that looks the data up from my
database of csma posts. It does not show posts that have had the
subject line changed, only original new topics.

--
Sandman[.net]

Snit

unread,

Mar 20, 2007, 11:19:26 AM3/20/07

to

"Peter Hayes" <noti...@btinternet.com> stated in post
1hv9wr1.190gv311cd7xtzN%noti...@btinternet.com on 3/20/07 5:27 AM:

A better bet for kill filing me is to just kill file based on "snit". That
part stays consistent... the rest might change when I change Usenet clients
or even services or whatever.

--
I am currently being "targeted" by a forger.
Check the headers to make sure this is not from Individual.net

--
€ If A = B then B = A (known as the "symmetric property of equality")
€ Incest and sex are not identical (only a pervert would disagree)
€ One can be actually guilty of a crime but neither tried nor convicted

Peter Hayes

unread,

Mar 20, 2007, 2:20:59 PM3/20/07

to

Snit <SN...@CABLEONE.NET.lNVALID> wrote:

> "Peter Hayes" <noti...@btinternet.com> stated in post
> 1hv9wr1.190gv311cd7xtzN%noti...@btinternet.com on 3/20/07 5:27 AM:
>
> > Sandman <m...@sandman.net> wrote:
> >
> >> In article <1hv9n2b.izy82z6zqh57N%noti...@btinternet.com>,
> >> noti...@btinternet.com (Peter Hayes) wrote:
> >>
> >>> The one thing wrong with MacSOUP is that there's no
> >>> "kill-thread-and-never-download-any-headers/bodies-ever-again" command.
> >>
> >> You should switch to MT-NewsWatcher, and add two filters:
> >>
> >> Kill if "Message-ID" matches the regular expression "CABLE.NE"
> >> Kill if "References" matches the regular expression "CABLE.NE"
> >
> > True, but that removes Snit completely, and someti... err.....
> > occasiona.... errrrr..... once in a blue moon he has something useful to
> > say.
>
> A better bet for kill filing me is to just kill file based on "snit". That
> part stays consistent... the rest might change when I change Usenet clients
> or even services or whatever.

The only posters I've ever killfiled are a few of the more notorious
denziens of Windows newsgroups.

Sandman

unread,

Mar 20, 2007, 2:46:35 PM3/20/07

to

In article <C22548AB.7B24C%SN...@CABLEONE.NET.lNVALID>,
Snit <SN...@CABLEONE.NET.lNVALID> wrote:

> <snip troll bait>

I am going to let that one slip, Snit. But if you continue to drag up
your old trollings you will go back into the killfile. You have
explicitly stated that you wish old grudges to be in the past, yet on
your very first reply to me, you try to drag up things from the past.

I gave you one chance, and I have now let one slip. We'll see if you
can control yourself.

--
Sandman[.net]

Snit

unread,

Mar 20, 2007, 3:17:13 PM3/20/07

to

"Peter Hayes" <noti...@btinternet.com> stated in post

1hvadah.16abyradaxxs1N%noti...@btinternet.com on 3/20/07 11:20 AM:

I do respond a lot to the trolls... and some folks prefer to not see that,
so I never get offended when someone says they wish to kill file me.

At least for now I am giving the trolls less responses... so the reasons for
putting me in a KF are reduced, but, hey, to each their own.

--
I am currently being "targeted" by a forger.
Check the headers to make sure this is not from Individual.net

--

Snit

unread,

Mar 20, 2007, 3:22:37 PM3/20/07

to

"Sandman" <m...@sandman.net> stated in post

mr-1B7494.19...@News.Individual.NET on 3/20/07 11:46 AM:

> In article <C22548AB.7B24C%SN...@CABLEONE.NET.lNVALID>,
> Snit <SN...@CABLEONE.NET.lNVALID> wrote:
>

>> The only real difference in my posting is that I have reduced my taking of
>> the bait of Carroll... and that Jesus and John have shown that they are
>> honest and honorable and have been telling Steve just how absurd his trolling
>> is. Adams and Wally have, wisely, decided that they are not going to even
>> toss any bait at me... though Adams *still* cannot stop himself from flaming
>> me in his .sig. Someday, I suspect, even he will grow up.
>>
>> As far as you taking me out of your kill file because you think I am posting
>> differently... if you really *had* me in your kill file how did you see my
>> posts to even know that? Oops. LOL!
>>
>> Remember, Sandman, I have shown where you have been copying my posts to your
>> own server... which I notice I still am not blocked on. :) Currently you
>> have 116 references to me on your site, at least according to Google:
>> <http://www.google.com/search?q=site:sandman.net+snit+OR+glasser>
>

> I am going to let that one slip, Snit. But if you continue to drag up
> your old trollings you will go back into the killfile. You have
> explicitly stated that you wish old grudges to be in the past, yet on
> your very first reply to me, you try to drag up things from the past.
>
> I gave you one chance, and I have now let one slip. We'll see if you
> can control yourself.

Just spew some nasty dishonest insults, blame me, and kill file me already.
Do not drag CSMA through your games until you get to that point. Or, better
yet, just stop trolling and flaming. Frankly I would prefer the latter.

--
I am currently being "targeted" by a forger.
Check the headers to make sure this is not from Individual.net

--
€ Nuclear arms are arms
€ OS X's Command+Scroll wheel function does not exist in default XP
€ Technical competence and intelligence are not the same thing

Sandman

unread,

Mar 20, 2007, 3:56:09 PM3/20/07

to

In article <C2258149.7B290%SN...@CABLEONE.NET.lNVALID>,
Snit <SN...@CABLEONE.NET.lNVALID> wrote:

> > The only posters I've ever killfiled are a few of the more notorious
> > denziens of Windows newsgroups.
>
> I do respond a lot to the trolls... and some folks prefer to not see that,
> so I never get offended when someone says they wish to kill file me.

Why don't they killfile the trolls instead? Why would they killfile
you?

--
Sandman[.net]

Sandman

unread,

Mar 20, 2007, 3:56:50 PM3/20/07

to

In article <C225828D.7B294%SN...@CABLEONE.NET.lNVALID>,
Snit <SN...@CABLEONE.NET.lNVALID> wrote:

> <snip troll bait>

I'm not biting. Sorry.

--
Sandman[.net]

Snit

unread,

Mar 20, 2007, 4:11:15 PM3/20/07

to

"Sandman" <m...@sandman.net> stated in post

mr-ED6C26.20...@News.Individual.NET on 3/20/07 12:56 PM:

You have claimed to have kill filed me in the past... and have said you will
likely do so again soon. The reason you did so recently was because I was
pointing out comments of yours that were not honest... comments I shall not
bring up right now. :)

--
I am currently being "targeted" by a forger.
Check the headers to make sure this is not from Individual.net

--
€ It is OK to email yourself files and store them there for a few weeks
€ No legislation supercedes the Constitution (unless it amends it)
€ Apple's video format is not far from NTSC DVD and good enough for most

Snit

unread,

Mar 20, 2007, 4:20:33 PM3/20/07

to

"Sandman" <m...@sandman.net> stated in post

mr-5F4939.20...@News.Individual.NET on 3/20/07 12:56 PM:

> In article <C225828D.7B294%SN...@CABLEONE.NET.lNVALID>,
> Snit <SN...@CABLEONE.NET.lNVALID> wrote:
>

>>>> The only real difference in my posting is that I have reduced my taking of
>>>> the bait of Carroll... and that Jesus and John have shown that they are
>>>> honest and honorable and have been telling Steve just how absurd his
>>>> trolling is. Adams and Wally have, wisely, decided that they are not going
>>>> to even toss any bait at me... though Adams *still* cannot stop himself
>>>> from flaming me in his .sig. Someday, I suspect, even he will grow up.
>>>>
>>>> As far as you taking me out of your kill file because you think I am
>>>> posting differently... if you really *had* me in your kill file how did you
>>>> see my posts to even know that? Oops. LOL!
>>>>
>>>> Remember, Sandman, I have shown where you have been copying my posts to
>>>> your own server... which I notice I still am not blocked on. :) Currently
>>>> you have 116 references to me on your site, at least according to Google:
>>>> <http://www.google.com/search?q=site:sandman.net+snit+OR+glasser>
>>>>
>>> I am going to let that one slip, Snit. But if you continue to drag up your
>>> old trollings you will go back into the killfile. You have explicitly stated
>>> that you wish old grudges to be in the past, yet on your very first reply to
>>> me, you try to drag up things from the past.
>>>
>>> I gave you one chance, and I have now let one slip. We'll see if you can
>>> control yourself.
>>>
>> Just spew some nasty dishonest insults, blame me, and kill file me already.
>> Do not drag CSMA through your games until you get to that point. Or, better
>> yet, just stop trolling and flaming. Frankly I would prefer the latter.
>

> I'm not biting. Sorry.

I encourage you to take a big, healthy bite of reality, Sandman, which is
all have asked of you. If you can stop your trolling and flaming then
great! If not, well, consider this the last post you will get from me in
this thread... or at least this sub-thread for the pedantic trolls who would
miss that. :)

--
I am currently being "targeted" by a forger.
Check the headers to make sure this is not from Individual.net

--
€ Pros aren't beginners in their field (though there are new pros)
€ Similarly configured Macs and Win machines tend to cost roughly the same
€ Some people do use the term "screen name" in relation to IRC

Tim Adams

unread,

Mar 20, 2007, 5:06:50 PM3/20/07

to

In article <mr-1B7494.19...@News.Individual.NET>,
Sandman <m...@sandman.net> wrote:

As you noted, snit continues to post his same old trolling crap at every chance
he gets, and continues to bitch about my signature file. to bad his memory os so
bad as I've told him just what he needs to do for me to change it, and he even
responded to that post. As it is, he still has 6 months or so before it gets
changed.

--
regarding Snit "You are not flamed because you speak the truth,
you are flamed because you are a hideous troll and keep disrupting
the newsgroup." Andrew J. Brehm

Jesus

unread,

Mar 20, 2007, 5:10:35 PM3/20/07

to

On Mar 20, 10:02 am, Steve Carroll <n...@nowhere.net> wrote:
> In article <3pydnXVkze5D92LYnZ2dnUVZ_oavn...@netlojix.com>,
>
> "John" <nos...@nospam.com> wrote:
> > "Steve Carroll" <n...@nowhere.net> wrote in message

You piss me off. You've posted that same line over and over and you
don't answer questions.

Jesus

unread,

Mar 20, 2007, 5:19:41 PM3/20/07

to

On Mar 20, 4:20 pm, Snit <S...@CABLEONE.NET.lNVALID> wrote:
> "Sandman" <m...@sandman.net> stated in post

> mr-5F4939.20565020032...@News.Individual.NET on 3/20/07 12:56 PM:
>
>
>
> > In article <C225828D.7B294%S...@CABLEONE.NET.lNVALID>,

Snit, it looks like Sandman's trying to work toward peace as well.
Please do try to work towards the same goal by not posting provocative
replies to his posts, even if you do think he lied in the past. The
past is the past... let's move on. You don't want to be like Steve,
do you? :-P

Steve Carroll

unread,

Mar 20, 2007, 6:15:13 PM3/20/07

to

In article <C2258DF3.7B29D%SN...@CABLEONE.NET.lNVALID>,
Snit <SN...@CABLEONE.NET.lNVALID> wrote:

> "Sandman" <m...@sandman.net> stated in post
> mr-ED6C26.20...@News.Individual.NET on 3/20/07 12:56 PM:
>
> > In article <C2258149.7B290%SN...@CABLEONE.NET.lNVALID>,
> > Snit <SN...@CABLEONE.NET.lNVALID> wrote:
> >
> >>> The only posters I've ever killfiled are a few of the more notorious
> >>> denziens of Windows newsgroups.
> >>
> >> I do respond a lot to the trolls... and some folks prefer to not see that,
> >> so I never get offended when someone says they wish to kill file me.
> >
> > Why don't they killfile the trolls instead? Why would they killfile
> > you?
> >
> You have claimed to have kill filed me in the past...

Gee, it was a pretty simple question, how'd you get so lost so quickly?

(snip crap)

Sandman

unread,

Mar 20, 2007, 6:17:46 PM3/20/07

to

In article <C2258DF3.7B29D%SN...@CABLEONE.NET.lNVALID>,
Snit <SN...@CABLEONE.NET.lNVALID> wrote:

> >> I do respond a lot to the trolls... and some folks prefer to not see that,
> >> so I never get offended when someone says they wish to kill file me.
> >
> > Why don't they killfile the trolls instead? Why would they killfile
> > you?
>
> You have claimed to have kill filed me in the past... and have said you will
> likely do so again soon. The reason you did so recently was because I was
> pointing out comments of yours that were not honest...

Why are you trying to tell me the reason I killfiled you? Are you
under the impression that I am not the sole authority for the reason
of the killfile?

--
Sandman[.net]

Steve Carroll

unread,

Mar 20, 2007, 6:18:00 PM3/20/07

to

In article <1174425035....@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>,
"Jesus" <rustybu...@gmail.com> wrote:

And?

Sandman

unread,

Mar 20, 2007, 6:19:07 PM3/20/07

to

In article <C2259021.7B29E%SN...@CABLEONE.NET.lNVALID>,
Snit <SN...@CABLEONE.NET.lNVALID> wrote:

> > I'm not biting. Sorry.
>
> I encourage you to take a big, healthy bite of reality, Sandman

Thank you. That was the reason I snipped your troll bait. It didn't
conform to reality.

Thanks again.

--
Sandman[.net]

Steve Carroll

unread,

Mar 20, 2007, 6:19:31 PM3/20/07

to

In article <8tidnR6Lzbpm92LY...@netlojix.com>,
"John" <nos...@nospam.com> wrote:

> "Jesus" <rustybu...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1174364606....@y66g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...

> > On Mar 19, 11:59 pm, Steve Carroll <n...@nowhere.net> wrote:
> >> The self professed 'best Mac Advocate in csma' (Snit) has created an
> >> extremely *LARGE* number of threads that have NOTHING to do with the
> >> Mac... here is a very tiny sampling regarding just one poster (me) from
> >> a short period of time:
> >>

> >> Steve lies to cover "Evil John" posts
> >> Steve lies to cover his ID theft
> >> Steve Carroll got his flame war.
> >> Steve Carroll claims legal dictionaries are wrong!
> >> Steve Carroll has admitted to being Sigmond
> >> Steve Carroll admits he screws up context.
> >> Steve admits he is Sigmond...
> >> Steve Carroll goofs again - admits to being Sigmond
> >> Steve *finally* answers a question! Will he do it again?
> >> Steve Carroll lies about his own lies!
> >> Wally, are you Steve Carroll's Sock Puppet?
> >> Steve Carroll, can you answer for your lies
> >> Steve Carroll beaten by his own lies
> >> Another clear lie by Steve Carroll
> >> Giving Steve Carroll a chance to explain - and he can't
> >> Steve Carroll Arrested On Multiple Charges
> >> Steve's reading comprehension problem that won't go away...
> >> Steve Carroll's chance to explain #
> >> Steve Carroll's Errors, Accusations and Bigoted Comments
> >> Steve lies to cover his ID theft (and admits to it!)
> >> Steve Carroll talks about Fatherhood
> >> Can Steve Carroll accept responsibility for his actions?
> >> Steve lies to cover the "proof" of his ID theft
> >> Unbelievable accusations by Steve
> >> Why Steve is lying about Snit now
> >> Steve's Math
> >> For future reference for Steve Carroll
> >> Picture of Steve Carroll
> >> Flame: Request for Steve and Elizabot
> >> More accusations Steve Carroll has never backed up
> >> Steve Carroll caught in another lie.
> >> Quotes about Steve
> >> For new posters: some Info on Steve Carroll's trolling
> >> Steve Carroll will *never* back up his accusations
> >> Steve Carroll's admission
> >> Steve's claims of forgery likely a lie.
> >> Steve's "trinity" grows to 4... what shall he do?
> >> Steve Carroll tries to refute a mathematical proof
> >> Steve Carroll's request
> >> Busted, Steve
> >> Steve and Elizabot admit I am right
> >> To Steve and Elizabot
> >> Steve Carroll will *never* honestly respond to this question.
> >> Steve Carroll caught using sock puppets *again*
> >> Will Steve tell the truth about Slaveen?
> >> Steve Carroll sinks lower to impress Elizabot
> >> Consolidated reply to the trolling of Steve Carroll

> >>
> >> Snit has written TONS of other troll posts focusing on numerous posters.
> >> Do people that are "honest and honorable" conduct themselves this way?
> >>

> >> --
> >> "None of you can be honest... you are all pathetic." - Snit
> >> "I do not KF people" - Snit
> >> "Not only do I lie about what others are claiming,
> >> I show evidence from the records".-Snit
> >> "You should take one of my IT classes some day." - Snit
> >> "Once we see or hear of couples - even a relatively small number - who
> >> engage in legal, consensual,adult incestuous relationships, the whole
> >> idea of incest with minors becomes thinkable." - Snit
> >

> > You have an amazing talent for being a douche bag.
> >
>
>
> And one crazy sack of shit he is at that!

Wow, the reality that Snit is what he is really gets to you guys,
doesn't it? Interesting...

Snit

unread,

Mar 20, 2007, 4:50:13 PM3/20/07

to

"Jesus" <rustybucket...@gmail.com> stated in post
<1174425581....@y80g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> on 03/20/07 10:19 PM:

> > I encourage you to take a big, healthy bite of reality, Sandman, which is
> > all have asked of you. If you can stop your trolling and flaming then
> > great! If not, well, consider this the last post you will get from me in
> > this thread... or at least this sub-thread for the pedantic trolls who
> > would miss that. :)
>

> Snit, it looks like Sandman's trying to work toward peace as well.
> Please do try to work towards the same goal by not posting provocative
> replies to his posts, even if you do think he lied in the past. The
> past is the past... let's move on. You don't want to be like Steve,
> do you? :-P

Sandman does not deserve any peace. He has lied so much about me and my actions
in the past that I will treat him however I wish to. There is nothing I can do
that will be half as bad as what he has done to me. I know you're new here and
may not have seen Sandman in "action", but that's not an excuse to believe his
lies.

--
I am currently being "targeted" by a forger.

Please look in the headers for "NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.116.164.129"

--
€ Deleting from a *Save* dialog is not a sign of well done design
€ A personal computer without an OS is crippled by that lacking

Jesus

unread,

Mar 20, 2007, 6:35:09 PM3/20/07

to

On Mar 20, 4:50 pm, Snit <S...@CABLEONE.NET.lNVALID> wrote:
> "Jesus" <rustybucket...@gmail.com> stated in post

> <1174425581.323225.70...@y80g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> on 03/20/07 10:19 PM:

Suck it, Snit-2.

Jesus

unread,

Mar 20, 2007, 6:35:52 PM3/20/07

to

On Mar 20, 6:18 pm, Steve Carroll <n...@nowhere.net> wrote:
> In article <1174425035.345950.69...@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>,

...and you snipped the rest of what I said just so you could have an
excuse to write another asshole post?

Snit

unread,

Mar 20, 2007, 7:02:54 PM3/20/07

to

"Jesus" <rustybu...@gmail.com> stated in post
1174425581....@y80g2000hsf.googlegroups.com on 3/20/07 2:19 PM:

Fair enough... though I am disagree that he is trying to work toward peace.
I would welcome, however, being shown to be wrong on that. I will give him
another chance... and I do not mind if he claims it is he giving *me* a
chance.

--
I am currently being "targeted" by a forger.
Check the headers to make sure this is not from Individual.net

--
• A partial subset is not synonymous with the whole

Steve Carroll

unread,

Mar 20, 2007, 7:39:31 PM3/20/07

to

In article <C225B62E.7B2D7%SN...@CABLEONE.NET.lNVALID>,
Snit <SN...@CABLEONE.NET.lNVALID> wrote:

(snip)

> > Snit, it looks like Sandman's trying to work toward peace as well.
> > Please do try to work towards the same goal by not posting provocative
> > replies to his posts, even if you do think he lied in the past. The
> > past is the past... let's move on. You don't want to be like Steve,
> > do you? :-P
> >
> Fair enough... though I am disagree that he is trying to work toward peace.
> I would welcome, however, being shown to be wrong on that. I will give him
> another chance... and I do not mind if he claims it is he giving *me* a
> chance.

LOL! Do you really think people buy this kind of shit? You're the troll,
if anyone is being given a chance here, it's you. Yes, Snit... it's
*that* obvious that you are merely engaging in yet another trolling
tactic... and a very tired one, at that.

OT: The best Mac Advocate's ideas about being "honest and honorable" - part 3

Steve Carroll

Jesus

John

John

Sandman

Peter Hayes

Sandman

Peter Hayes

Patrick Nihill

Sandman

Peter Hayes

Patrick Nihill

Steve Carroll

Steve Carroll

John

Snit

Sandman

Snit

Peter Hayes

Sandman

Snit

Snit

Sandman

Sandman

Snit

Snit

Tim Adams

Jesus

Jesus

Steve Carroll

Sandman

Steve Carroll

Sandman

Steve Carroll

Snit

Jesus

Jesus

Snit

Steve Carroll