Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Steve Carroll's admission

5 views
Skip to first unread message

Snit

unread,
Jul 5, 2006, 10:31:25 AM7/5/06
to
Steve Carroll has admitted:

"Nah... he's earned it. I like to make them realize that they aren't the
only ones that can play their silly word games and what-not so I hand
them back the crap they spew."

"I plainly said I'd hand you back the crap you hand out."

"I didn't flip flop... I tricked you"

"sometimes you need to appear illogical to catch someone that truly is"

"Forget about the trick I was forced to use to trap a slippery weasel."

"He's undoubtedly seen me own up to doing this for the reason
I said I did... to give you a taste of your own medicine."

"You're getting what you deserve and you'll continue to get it"

"I authored a quote... to give you a taste of the purposeful
misquoting you did."

Steve makes it very clear that he openly commits the sins he *perceives*
others do. Steve is a self declared "troll hunter" who not only thinks
others "deserve" to be trolled and flamed, not only believes he has some
special obligation to be the one to "hand them back the crap they spew", but
is so delusional he believes he is "forced" to do this "crap"!

I rarely use all caps, but this is worth giving special emphasis:
_________________________________________________________________
| |
| STEVE CARROLL HAS SHOWN HE NOT ONLY POSSESSES AN EXTREME VICTIM |
| MENTALITY, HE SUFFERS FROM A DELUSIONAL BELIEF THAT HE HAS SOME |
| SPECIAL OBLIGATION TO EXACT REVENGE BY COMMITTING THE VERY ACTS |
| HE IMAGINES OTHERS USE TO VICTIMIZE HIM. EVERY WORD STEVE SAYS |
| IN CSMA SHOULD BE UNDERSTOOD TO BE COMING FROM SOMEONE WITH THE |
| DELUSIONS AND OBSESSIONS HE HAS NOW CLEARLY ADMITTED TO HAVING! |
|_________________________________________________________________|
[Note how my claim is fully justified]

Steve has made the following accusations (rarely with any support):
* abusing prescription drugs
* altering and misattributing quotes, taking things out of context
* being hypocritical and "posting irrelevant BS"
* bullying people, being an "anal retentive, hypocritical asshole"
* doing anything they can to get the last word in
* having sex with farm animals, committing incest and adultery
* lying, being disingenuous, denying factual evidence, deluding themselves
* making ad hominem attacks
* making inappropriate sexual comments and advances
* posting bigoted and ignorant attacks
* sniffing glue, popping multi-colored pills, drinking excessively
* stealing ID's, forging posts, avoiding kill filters (nymshifting)
* using sock puppets, outright forgeries

Being that Steve does many of those things on a regular basis in CSMA (and
other groups he cross posts to), and being that Steve thinks it is his
obligation to do those things, there is *no* reason to think that Steve does
not commit all of the acts on that list - even the ones that cannot be seen
in a text-based public forum.
_________________________________________________________________
| |
| WHEN STEVE CARROLL ACCUSES PEOPLE OF WRONGDOING IT IS HIS CLEAR |
| ADMISSION THAT HE IS DOING (OR WANTS TO DO) THE ACT IN QUESTION |
|_________________________________________________________________|

Watch for Steve's accusations: he is doing nothing more than creating
delusional excuses for doing the very things he blames others for.

--
€ Things which are not the same are not "identical"
€ Incest and sex are not identical (only a pervert would disagree)
€ OS X is partially based on BSD (esp. FreeBSD)

Chris Clement

unread,
Jul 5, 2006, 10:43:11 AM7/5/06
to
ugh....geez man.....let it go

Edwin

unread,
Jul 5, 2006, 12:09:32 PM7/5/06
to

Snit wrote:
> Steve Carroll has admitted:

Nothing. Steve admitted absolutely nothing.

[glue-induced hallucinations snipped]

Sandman

unread,
Jul 6, 2006, 3:29:06 AM7/6/06
to
In article <C0D11B4D.5416D%SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID>,
Snit <SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID> wrote:

> <snip Snit Circus>

Snit Objective Troll Criteria Summary
----------------------------------------------------------------------
1 [ ] Obfuscation
2 [X] Antagonizing threads
3 [ ] Ignoring evidence
4 [ ] Antagonizing through other media
5 [ ] Quote-scavanging
6 [ ] Thread hijacking
7 [ ] Projection
8 [ ] Unsubstantiated accusations
9 [ ] Unsubstantiated "refutations"
10 [ ] Forging posts and material
11 [ ] Insults
12 [ ] Role Reversal
13 [ ] Lying
14 [ ] Having an agenda
15 [ ] Diversion
----------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Antagonizing threads
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Remember, a troll needs attention to his trolling, so whenever he is
in a lengthy thread arguing only with this one poster, the troll is
likely to break out of that thread and start another thread that will
be one way to evade the first thread and also draw more attention from
more people. An example of this is this thread [1] where Michael
creates a completely new thread which is totally off topic and an
off-spring of a length discussion he's had with Steve and Elizabot.

1:<http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/ba8f510705b
642d3>


----------------------------------------------------------------------
The Objective Troll Criteria
http://csma.sandman.net/TrollCriteria
----------------------------------------------------------------------

--
Sandman[.net]

0 new messages