HPT = One Shot One Kill. Caught nym shitting again.
Cager
You really have to turn off the automatic signature append function
HPT.
It's giving you away every time.
On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 20:57:57 -0500, One Shot. One Kill. wrote:
> "Roy Schestowitz" <newsgro...@schestowitz.com> wrote in message
> news:1859433.n...@schestowitz.com...
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>> ____/ Sinister Midget on Monday 30 Nov 2009 11:01 : \____
>>> On 2009-11-30, Erik Funkenbusch <e...@despam-funkenbusch.com> claimed:
>>>> On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 02:42:32 +0000, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>>>> "Conspiracy theory" is one of those terms used to describe ideas
>>>>> people
>>>>> dislike.
>>>> No, "Conspiracy theory" is a term used to descibe theories about
>>>> conspiracies.
>>>> If it's not proven, it's a theory. If it's not proven and it it's
>>>> about a
>>>> conspiracy, it's a conspiracy theory.
>>> If someone doesn't like something said or done, they often attach
>>> "conspiracy theory" as a pejorative when describing it. If you didn't
>>> know that, you should. If you didn't understand the context, that's
>>> your problem.
>>>> You see, Roy, you seem to be incapable of distinguishing between fact
>>>> and
>>>> heresay, so to you, anything that agrees with your agenda is fact.
>>> Irony.
>> They derailed this discussion. I was referring to "conspiracy", not a
>> "theory"
>> By the way, 3 hours ago I was contacted by Swiss television. They are
>> filming a
>> documentary and I was invited to be in it,
> there are documentaries on freaks, mental patients, murderers, rapists,
> generic all around losers and social misfits who are rejected by society.
> you should fit right in.
Wait till they discover that he is some kind of a eunuch freak who had
his
balls cut off. That should really open up a can of worms for the
maggot.
--
HPT
Justin
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/fdc69a68a421d527?hl=en
>
>
> You really have to turn off the automatic signature append function
> HPT.
> It's giving you away every time.
>
sphincter says what?
High Plains Thumper
It's Flatfish.
--
HPT
William Poaster
heard to say:
It's a puerile attempt by the troll to discredit you.
--
Linux. The Malicious Software Removal
tool which wipes Windows from your PC in
seconds!
High Plains Thumper
> High Plains Thumper was heard:
>> Justin wrote:
>>> Cager wrote:
>>>
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/fdc69a68a421d527?hl=en
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You really have to turn off the automatic signature
>>>> append function HPT.
>>>> It's giving you away every time.
>>>
>>> sphincter says what?
>>
>> It's Flatfish.
>
> It's a puerile attempt by the troll to discredit you.
Yup, and rather lame.
--
HPT
Joel
>William Poaster wrote:
>>
>> It's a puerile attempt by the troll to discredit you.
>
>Yup, and rather lame.
Unlike when you do the same crap, you hypocrite of a coward?
--
Joel Crump
High Plains Thumper
> High Plains Thumper wrote:
>> William Poaster wrote:
>>
>>> It's a puerile attempt by the troll to discredit you.
>>
>> Yup, and rather lame.
>
> Unlike when you do the same crap, you hypocrite of a coward?
Well, well, well, if you are not Snit, you adhere to the same
type ad hominem attacks Snit had always engaged in.
[quote]
Name: snit
Traits:
* MAC troll
* Cross posts to maximize newsgroup disruption
* Despised by many on COLA and COMA (comp.os.mac.advocacy)
* Proves the saying 'those that can do, those that can't teach'
* Idiot
[/quote]
http://colatrolls.blogspot.com/2007/01/snit-troll.html
Elizabot brings up disturbing evidence on Snit:
[quote]
We have Michael Glasser running around talking about incest,
necrophiliaand other perversions, who constantly makes sexually
disparaging remarks about me and claims to be a teacher. You
really need to get some serious mental help, Mike.
Recent posts were you have made sexually disparaging about me:
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/7f5397fdf6df713b
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/b49296249bca028f
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/573160f9aa3d3728
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/300914068add7477
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/85a66e6d09ea409d
Here is another "interesting" fact about your posting to csma....
Before your daughter was born, you wrote 25,400 posts here.
http://groups.google.com/groups/search?q=group%3Acomp.sys.mac.advocacy+author%3Asnit&start=0&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&num=10&as_drrb=b&as_mind=1&as_minm=1&as_miny=1981&as_maxd=9&as_maxm=6&as_maxy=2005&filter=0
447 of these posts had either (sex OR incest) in them.
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=(sex+OR+incest)+group%3Acomp.sys.mac.advocacy+author%3Asnit&start=0&num=10&hl=en&lr=&as_drrb=b&as_mind=1&as_minm=1&as_miny=1981&as_maxd=9&as_maxm=6&as_maxy=2005&safe=off&filter=0
In the nine months after your daughter was born, you wrote 7940
posts.
http://groups.google.com/groups/search?q=group%3Acomp.sys.mac.advocacy+author%3Asnit&start=0&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&num=10&as_drrb=b&as_mind=9&as_minm=6&as_miny=2005&as_maxd=8&as_maxm=3&as_maxy=2006&filter=0
2060 of those posts had either (sex OR incest) in them.
http://groups.google.com/groups/search?q=(sex+OR+incest)+group%3Acomp.sys.mac.advocacy+author%3Asnit&start=0&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&num=10&as_drrb=b&as_mind=9&as_minm=6&as_miny=2005&as_maxd=8&as_maxm=3&as_maxy=2006&filter=0
That's over 25% of your posts, Mike. What the hell is wrong with
you?
[/quote]
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/232929ce1d450342
Snit is a narcissistic personality that only talks trash to piss
people off.
Here is an example of a very deep and ugly harassment towards a
female who is concerned that Snit might be stalking her
physically (Below discussions is very disturbing!):
Snit: "In the course of the discussion you felt the "need" to
start telling me about your private life."
Elizabot v2.0.2: "Liar. I mentioned receiving strange phone calls
from your home area and how I'm considering contacting the police."
Snit: "Are these calls not a part of your private life? I
suppose not, at least not any more, now that you have made them
public. Again, let me be very clear: I do not want to know about
your private life even if you make it public. I do not care who
calls you. I do not care who you call. I do not care what you
do for entertainment - what movies you go to, who you 'hang out'
with, what you do for a living... I do not care. I do not want
to know. I do not want you to discuss any of this with me."
Elizabot v2.0.2: "If I find that the phone number that I'm
getting these phone calls is from someone who knows you or can be
associated with you somehow, you'll hear from your local police."
Snit: "And if I get a hemorrhoid shaped like your face my
proctologist will contact you (not that I care what you even look
like or what gender you really are)."
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.advocacy
From: Snit <S...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID>
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 22:32:40 -0700
Subject: Re: Steve Carroll v. Justice Black
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/e9f816395e34b755
Here, Snit falsely accused someone of being a "proven child
molester":
Snit: "Heck, you can even post a few PDF files and blurry JPGs if
you really want to prove your case, right? :)"
Steve Mackay: "Hey, and you can modify multiple times, post them
on your site, and claim they are the 'originals'. Oh wait...
You've done that already. Wow... more accusations from you
posted with -*gasp*- absolutely no support. You do that a lot..."
Snit: "Oh, wait - you were just trolling."
Steve Mackay: "Naah. I leave that to the experts like you."
Snit: "Er? I have just shown you to be lying, above, and then
you make more baseless accusation. Well, then, as long as you
are making baseless accusation, you *are* a proven child
molester. Keep in mind that the baseless accusation game is the
one *you* are pushing, so you should have no problem with my
referring to you as a 'proven child molester'."
Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2005 18:26:06 -0700
Message-ID: <BF23EBBE.29362%S...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID>
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/87031a1655f235c2
This is your hero, if you aren't a sock puppet of Snit.
--
HPT
Snit
on 12/1/09 7:06 PM:
> Joel wrote:
>> High Plains Thumper wrote:
>>> William Poaster wrote:
>>>
>>>> It's a puerile attempt by the troll to discredit you.
>>>
>>> Yup, and rather lame.
>>
>> Unlike when you do the same crap, you hypocrite of a coward?
>
> Well, well, well, if you are not Snit, you adhere to the same
> type ad hominem attacks Snit had always engaged in.
Your obsession with me is not flattering.
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
High Plains Thumper
Oh, and I wanted to add, Joel who is a new comer to COLA and CSMA
all of a sudden has prior knowledge of COLA trolls' false
accusations, attributing messages posted by them as coming from me.
Joel: "As I thought, you failed to show Snit forging anyone's
email address in a From header on Usenet. That's the allegation
I'm interested in (even though I'm quite sure he never did it,
but in theory I *would* be interested if he actually *had*)
Wally: "By your own admission you *must* know that Snit has
forged headers because you claim that he has posted one which
shows the poster called "Steve Carroll's Dog" using the same IP
as Steve Carroll ... If such a post exists then it *will* be a
forgery, or perhaps your statement above simply proves that you
have not seen such a post and your assertion that Snit has
supplied it is exactly what I consider it to be ..... Simply BS
by a simple minded poster called Joel!."
HPT: "By a simple minded poster called Joel Crump AKA Rhino
Plastee AKA Snit."
Joel "No wonder you keep getting accused of nymshifting - it's
bad karma for making such stupid accusations, yourself. Or in
simpler terms, say it to my face, if you don't like your neck the
way it is. But you'd rather be a little pussyhole, and talk shit
online. You fucking geek."
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/d4975b373ed9aed6
Same agreement with Snit in Snit's creation of "Steve Carroll's
Dog" sock, which Sandman gave evidence by IP address as Snit,
same trashy language as Snit's sock Rhino Plastee.
Yup, it's Snit.
--
HPT
chrisv
>Joel "No wonder you keep getting accused of nymshifting - it's
>bad karma for making such stupid accusations, yourself. Or in
>simpler terms, say it to my face, if you don't like your neck the
>way it is. But you'd rather be a little pussyhole, and talk shit
>online. You fucking geek."
>
>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/d4975b373ed9aed6
>
>Same agreement with Snit in Snit's creation of "Steve Carroll's
>Dog" sock, which Sandman gave evidence by IP address as Snit,
>same trashy language as Snit's sock Rhino Plastee.
>
>Yup, it's Snit.
Joel the Troel is Sn^Hhit? Whatever, they're both filtered. 8)
Steve Carroll
<highplainsthum...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> High Plains Thumper wrote:
> > Elizabot v2.0.2: "If I find that the phone number that I'm
> > getting these phone calls is from someone who knows you or can
> > be associated with you somehow, you'll hear from your local
> > police."
>
> > Snit: "And if I get a hemorrhoid shaped like your face my
> > proctologist will contact you (not that I care what you even
> > look like or what gender you really are)."
>
> > Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.advocacy
> > From: Snit <S...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID>
> > Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 22:32:40 -0700
> > Subject: Re: Steve Carroll v. Justice Black
>
>
> > Here, Snit falsely accused someone of being a "proven child
> > molester":
>
> > Snit: "Heck, you can even post a few PDF files and blurry JPGs
> > if you really want to prove your case, right? :)"
>
> > Steve Mackay: "Hey, and you can modify multiple times, post
> > them on your site, and claim they are the 'originals'. Oh
> > wait... You've done that already. Wow... more accusations
> > from you posted with -*gasp*- absolutely no support. You do
> > that a lot..."
>
> > Snit: "Oh, wait - you were just trolling."
>
> > Steve Mackay: "Naah. I leave that to the experts like you."
>
> > Snit: "Er? I have just shown you to be lying, above, and then
> > you make more baseless accusation. Well, then, as long as you
> > are making baseless accusation, you *are* a proven child
> > molester. Keep in mind that the baseless accusation game is
> > the one *you* are pushing, so you should have no problem with
> > my referring to you as a 'proven child molester'."
>
> > Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2005 18:26:06 -0700
> > Message-ID: <BF23EBBE.29362%S...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID>
>
>
> > This is your hero, if you aren't a sock puppet of Snit.
>
> Oh, and I wanted to add, Joel who is a new comer to COLA and CSMA
> all of a sudden has prior knowledge of COLA trolls' false
> accusations, attributing messages posted by them as coming from me.
>
> Joel: "As I thought, you failed to show Snit forging anyone's
> email address in a From header on Usenet. That's the allegation
> I'm interested in (even though I'm quite sure he never did it,
> but in theory I *would* be interested if he actually *had*)
>
> Wally: "By your own admission you *must* know that Snit has
> forged headers because you claim that he has posted one which
> shows the poster called "Steve Carroll's Dog" using the same IP
> as Steve Carroll ... If such a post exists then it *will* be a
> forgery, or perhaps your statement above simply proves that you
> have not seen such a post and your assertion that Snit has
> supplied it is exactly what I consider it to be ..... Simply BS
> by a simple minded poster called Joel!."
>
> HPT: "By a simple minded poster called Joel Crump AKA Rhino
> Plastee AKA Snit."
>
> Joel "No wonder you keep getting accused of nymshifting - it's
> bad karma for making such stupid accusations, yourself. Or in
> simpler terms, say it to my face, if you don't like your neck the
> way it is. But you'd rather be a little pussyhole, and talk shit
> online. You fucking geek."
>
>
> Same agreement with Snit in Snit's creation of "Steve Carroll's
> Dog" sock, which Sandman gave evidence by IP address as Snit,
> same trashy language as Snit's sock Rhino Plastee.
>
> Yup, it's Snit.
It's long been well established that Snit has used socks, nymshifted
to avoid killfilters, forged posting IDs, etc. - he's essentially done
everything with identities that can be done in a newsgroup with a
disingenuous motive. As any sane individual knows, if this Joel guy
isn't a sock/shill then he should be questioning why he's getting the
hard sell from Snit the way he has. If he's not questioning it... then
he's very likely a sock/shill. Joel obviously isn't questioning it so
we have a very good indicator of what he's all about. That he is seen
spending as much time defending Snit's crap as he has is another solid
indicator. That he overlooks all evidence presented to him that Snit
is a disingenuous, lying POS is another solid indicator. That he
believes Snit's lies without verifying them is another one. IOW,
there's really no mystery in Joel's case, whether he be a sock or
shill it doesn't much matter... the end result is the same, he will
get steamrolled by reality the same way Snit has.
Here's an example of Joel being either extremely disingenuous or
completely incapable of comprehending what he's read:
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/c4414f2f2c39ff22?dmode=source
Snit
on 12/2/09 4:19 AM:
> Oh, and I wanted to add, Joel who is a new comer to COLA and CSMA
> all of a sudden has prior knowledge of COLA trolls' false
> accusations, attributing messages posted by them as coming from me.
He is able to read. And understand. Completely outside of your realm of
experience, eh?
..
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
Snit
6:40 AM:
HPT's "evidence" is that Joel can read. *And understand*. It is completely
outside of HPT's capabilities, so he assumes Joel is a sock.
From his standpoint, well, I guess it makes sense.
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
Steve Carroll
> High Plains Thumper stated in post 4b164d51$0$9750$6e1ed...@read.cnntp.org
> on 12/2/09 4:19 AM:
>
> > Oh, and I wanted to add, Joel who is a new comer to COLA and CSMA
> > all of a sudden has prior knowledge of COLA trolls' false
> > accusations, attributing messages posted by them as coming from me.
>
> He is able to read. And understand.
Maybe... maybe not...
On Nov 30, 9:09 pm Joel responds to the post I linked to where you are
admitting (to Sandman) to having engaged in forgery:
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/2ec549e95385ae5e?d=
mode=3Dsource
Notably, in his reply, Joel tries to excuse your forgery by zeroing in
on the lie you told while you made your admission of forgery. Your
lie, of course, is that you were dared (by me) to forge posts using my
name.
On Dec 1, 8:43 pm, within 24 hours after having replied to my post
that linked to your forgery admission, Joel claimed:
"I never saw his alleged admission."
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/e9ab1aec57776a05?dmode=source
Irrefutable proof that "Joel" is either:
1 - A disingenuous liar
2 - Unable to comprehend what he reads
3 - A disingenuous liar who is unable to comprehend what he reads
See how "actual" reality works YET, "Snit"? LOL!
Joel
>Oh, and I wanted to add, Joel who is a new comer to COLA and CSMA
>all of a sudden has prior knowledge of COLA trolls' false
>accusations, attributing messages posted by them as coming from me.
What the fuck are you smoking, you idiot? The point is that I found
it rather ironic on your part, to accuse Snit and I of what you were
being accused of. I had actually felt bad for you, until you accused
us of the same thing, dumb fuck. Get a fucking clue.
>HPT: "By a simple minded poster called Joel Crump AKA Rhino
>Plastee AKA Snit."
>
>Joel "No wonder you keep getting accused of nymshifting - it's
>bad karma for making such stupid accusations, yourself. Or in
>simpler terms, say it to my face, if you don't like your neck the
>way it is. But you'd rather be a little pussyhole, and talk shit
>online. You fucking geek."
>
>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/d4975b373ed9aed6
>
>Same agreement with Snit in Snit's creation of "Steve Carroll's
>Dog" sock, which Sandman gave evidence by IP address as Snit,
>same trashy language as Snit's sock Rhino Plastee.
>
>Yup, it's Snit.
You've done some blotter acid in your life, that's for sure.
--
Joel Crump
Joel
>On Dec 1, 8:43 pm, within 24 hours after having replied to my post
>that linked to your forgery admission, Joel claimed:
>
>"I never saw his alleged admission."
I still haven't. Maybe you posted something you *felt* was an
admission, but I either didn't read your post, or didn't agree that it
was an admission. The thread has gone on way too long to follow every
message carefully. I'm in these groups to discuss operating systems.
--
Joel Crump
Joel
>Joel the Troel is Sn^Hhit? Whatever, they're both filtered. 8)
Faggot.
--
Joel Crump
Snit
11:30 AM:
> High Plains Thumper <highplai...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>
>> Oh, and I wanted to add, Joel who is a new comer to COLA and CSMA
>> all of a sudden has prior knowledge of COLA trolls' false
>> accusations, attributing messages posted by them as coming from me.
>
>
> What the fuck are you smoking, you idiot? The point is that I found
> it rather ironic on your part, to accuse Snit and I of what you were
> being accused of. I had actually felt bad for you, until you accused
> us of the same thing, dumb fuck. Get a fucking clue.
The fact you both read *and* understood what you read is beyond HPT's
capabilities to understand. His only explanation is that you must be one of
the people who have this "magical" ability he lacks.
>> HPT: "By a simple minded poster called Joel Crump AKA Rhino
>> Plastee AKA Snit."
>>
>> Joel "No wonder you keep getting accused of nymshifting - it's
>> bad karma for making such stupid accusations, yourself. Or in
>> simpler terms, say it to my face, if you don't like your neck the
>> way it is. But you'd rather be a little pussyhole, and talk shit
>> online. You fucking geek."
>>
>> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/d4975b373ed9aed6
>>
>> Same agreement with Snit in Snit's creation of "Steve Carroll's
>> Dog" sock, which Sandman gave evidence by IP address as Snit,
>> same trashy language as Snit's sock Rhino Plastee.
>>
>> Yup, it's Snit.
>
>
> You've done some blotter acid in your life, that's for sure.
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
Joel
>The fact you both read *and* understood what you read is beyond HPT's
>capabilities to understand. His only explanation is that you must be one of
>the people who have this "magical" ability he lacks.
I guess so, but he really did come up with some paranoid shit. I'd
actually be impressed that anyone still thinks that way in 2009, if it
weren't such an unneeded nuisance, with all the other troll bullshit
going on lately.
--
Joel Crump
Snit
2:51 PM:
It really is rather amazing how insane some people present themselves to be
online.
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
Hadron
HPT is not insane. He is merely inexperienced and somewhat stupid. Willy
Poaster is probably insane because he makes claims despite being shown
evidence to the contrary. His comments about the NVidia driver are some
such or that he thinks Linus was ready for the corporate desktop 12
years ago.
Koehlmann would be insane if he weren't a mere troll. I mean, NO
programmer that likes to profess the level of experience that he and
his lacky Chris Ahlstrom claimed would then go onto humiliate themselves
so publicly by claiming its perfectly OK to dereference a NULL pointer
in C for example. Or that one can not anti alias a static image or that
Tripwire can not be part of an anti virus approach.
Snit
3:00 PM:
> Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> writes:
>
>> Joel stated in post p8odh59j53cv7siub...@4ax.com on 12/2/09
>> 2:51 PM:
>>
>>> Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> The fact you both read *and* understood what you read is beyond HPT's
>>>> capabilities to understand. His only explanation is that you must be one
>>>> of
>>>> the people who have this "magical" ability he lacks.
>>>
>>>
>>> I guess so, but he really did come up with some paranoid shit. I'd
>>> actually be impressed that anyone still thinks that way in 2009, if it
>>> weren't such an unneeded nuisance, with all the other troll bullshit
>>> going on lately.
>>
>> It really is rather amazing how insane some people present themselves to be
>> online.
>
> HPT is not insane. He is merely inexperienced and somewhat stupid. Willy
> Poaster is probably insane because he makes claims despite being shown
> evidence to the contrary.
As does HPT... note his BS accusations of forgery.
> His comments about the NVidia driver are some such or that he thinks Linus was
> ready for the corporate desktop 12 years ago.
>
> Koehlmann would be insane if he weren't a mere troll. I mean, NO
> programmer that likes to profess the level of experience that he and
> his lacky Chris Ahlstrom claimed would then go onto humiliate themselves
> so publicly by claiming its perfectly OK to dereference a NULL pointer
> in C for example. Or that one can not anti alias a static image or that
> Tripwire can not be part of an anti virus approach.
I did say they present themselves as insane. They might just be having a
little fun doing so to see how people will react. I suspect that is the
case with many... if they really were as stupid as the present themselves
they could not function in society.
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
Steve Carroll
> Steve Carroll <fretw...@comcast.net> wrote:
> >On Dec 1, 8:43 pm, within 24 hours after having replied to my post
> >that linked to your forgery admission, Joel claimed:
>
> >"I never saw his alleged admission."
>
> I still haven't.
Unfortunately, for you, Google proves you have seen it.
Steve Carroll
> >On Dec 1, 8:43 pm, within 24 hours after having replied to my post
> >that linked to your forgery admission, Joel claimed:
>
> >"I never saw his alleged admission."
>
> I still haven't. Maybe you posted something you *felt* was an
> admission,
(poor "Joel" needs another language lesson... I'll now pause while I
teach Joel the meaning of the word "yeah", the word Snit used when
asked if he engaged in forgery).
Sandman wrote to Snit:
"The objective criterias of being a troll to which you fit and I do
not:"
Sandman then listed several things, one of them was regarding Snit's
forgery using my name:
"Attempting to forge a NNTP-posting-host in an attempt to antagonize
another poster"
Snit replied (and lied while doing so by claiming I 'dared' him) with
an admission of having engaged in forgery:
"Well, he did dare me... but yeah..."
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/cd4bef585f94b998?hl=en&dmode=source
Here ya go, "Joel":
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/yeah
I have shown you Snit's admission of forgery several times now... are
you going to pretend you still haven't seen it, a thing that can only
be based on your inability to comprehend what you read or based on a
flat out lie by you? Which is it, "Joel", are you even more stupid
than Snit or are you also just a piss poor liar? I vote for the combo
pack.
> but I either didn't read your post,
As I just proved, Google shows you responded to my post. My money says
you don't even realize that you just admitted you're responding to
posts without reading them.
> or didn't agree that it was an admission.
Again... Snit was asked if he engaged in forgery and he said "yeah"...
to any sane, honest and honorable person who can comprehend what they
read that is an admission.
See how reality is just kicking your ass here, "Joel"? The funniest
part in all of this is that it doesn't seem to occur to you that
you're admitting you're either tremendously stupid, you're an
extremely poor liar or both.
> The thread has gone on way too long to follow every
> message carefully. I'm in these groups to discuss operating systems.
Sure... and the detour of 10,000 posts that surround Snit and all his
disingenuous crap was just an accident on your part... a "mistake"
<eyeroll>. Like Snit is, you are also mistaken in your belief that
people are as stupid as you need them to be. One thing is beyond
question... follow Snit around and you can plan on spending the vast
majority of your time having your head dragged through the many turds
Snit has taken in this ng. Of course, if you're just another Snit sock
or shill of some sort this won't matter to you... it'll only matter if
you are sane, honest, honorable and not affiliated with Snit in any
way.
Poor "Joel" ;)
Joel
>Unfortunately, for you, Google proves you have seen it.
Seeing a post, and agreeing with you about what it means in this
discussion, are two different things, dipshit.
--
Joel Crump
Joel
>I did say they present themselves as insane. They might just be having a
>little fun doing so to see how people will react. I suspect that is the
>case with many... if they really were as stupid as the present themselves
>they could not function in society.
Exactly. Hence my outbursts in reply to some people. I'm not going
to pretend that people are just crazy, when they're intentionally
fucking with me.
--
Joel Crump
Snit
4:25 PM:
True... I take a different tact and just (generally) refuse to sink to their
name-calling grade school level. I will note when someone has lied, but I
do not (generally) just respond in kind.
It really pisses them off. :)
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
Steve Carroll
> Steve Carroll <fretw...@comcast.net> wrote:
> >Unfortunately, for you, Google proves you have seen it.
>
> Seeing a post, and agreeing with you about what it means in this
> discussion, are two different things, dipshit.
Sandman wrote to Snit:
"The objective criterias of being a troll to which you fit and I do
not:"
Sandman then listed several things, one of them was regarding Snit's
forgery using my name:
"Attempting to forge a NNTP-posting-host in an attempt to antagonize
another poster"
Snit replied (and lied while doing so by claiming I 'dared' him) with
an admission of having engaged in forgery:
"Well, he did dare me... but yeah..."
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/yeah
If you need any further help jus' lemme know;)
John
Have not heard from her in awhile. Did she get arrested?
Steve Carroll
>
> Have not heard from her in awhile. Did she get arrested?
Do you still beat your boyfriend?
Snit
5:21 PM:
> Have not heard from her in awhile. Did she get arrested?
Based on Steve Carroll's Google links (posted with his dog sock) - she moved
to be closer to Steve (Steve claimed "six minutes", though Google now shows
five). Shortly after Steve posted the evidence for this, though, her
address info was removed from Google.
<http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/29b04bd9cdfa3f93>
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
Snit
4:25 PM:
> Steve Carroll <fret...@comcast.net> wrote:
Carroll's proof is for him to point to a comment of mine and both believe it
*and* believe his claim that I lied when I made the claim.
He really needs to make up his mind... does he want you to believe or *not*
believe the quote he pulled out of context?
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
Steve Carroll
> John stated in post ILKdnc7NSucMmYrWnZ2dnUVZ_s9i4...@giganews.com on 12/2/09
> 5:21 PM:
>
> > Have not heard from her in awhile. Did she get arrested?
>
> Based on Steve Carroll's Google links (posted with his dog sock)
A sock Sandman proved belongs to you.
http://csma.sandman.net/pages/Michael_Digest_New_Sock_Puppet
(snip Snit's delusions)
Snit
11:30 AM:
> Steve Carroll <fret...@comcast.net> wrote:
Steve pointed to an out-of-context quote of mine from several years ago and
simultaneously wants you to both believe it *and* trust him that it is a
lie. If you can hold both contradictory beliefs in your head at the same
time with as much comfort as Steve does, you might conclude that long ago I
did something similar to what Steve has been doing on a regular basis for
years.
Yeah, I must be the devil. :)
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
Steve Carroll
> Joel stated in post iptdh5pm8oqfnkrin5jv3m939ag07ks...@4ax.com on 12/2/09
> 4:25 PM:
>
> > Steve Carroll <fretw...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> >> Unfortunately, for you, Google proves you have seen it.
>
> > Seeing a post, and agreeing with you about what it means in this
> > discussion, are two different things, dipshit.
>
> Carroll's proof is for him to point to
... you saying "yeah" when asked if you engaged in forgery.
Sandman wrote to you:
"The objective criterias of being a troll to which you fit and I do
not:"
Sandman then listed several things, one of them was regarding your
forgery using my name:
"Attempting to forge a NNTP-posting-host in an attempt to antagonize
another poster"
You replied (and lied while doing so by claiming I 'dared' you) with
an admission of having engaged in forgery:
"Well, he did dare me... but yeah..."
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/cd4bef585f94b998?hl=en&dmode=source
Joel
>this won't matter to you
Now you're getting it.
--
Joel Crump
Snit
7:26 PM:
> Steve Carroll <fret...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>> this won't matter to you
>
>
> Now you're getting it.
LOL!
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
High Plains Thumper
> High Plains Thumper wrote:
>
>
> Joel the Troel is Sn^Hhit? Whatever, they're both filtered.
> 8)
Good for you, and both are worthy of it, having nothing
worthwhile to contribute.
--
HPT
High Plains Thumper
> That he is seen spending as much time defending Snit's crap as
> he has is another solid indicator. That he overlooks all
> evidence presented to him that Snit is a disingenuous, lying
> POS is another solid indicator. That he believes Snit's lies
> without verifying them is another one. IOW, there's really no
> mystery in Joel's case, whether he be a sock or shill it
> doesn't much matter... the end result is the same, he will get
> steamrolled by reality the same way Snit has.
>
> Here's an example of Joel being either extremely disingenuous
> or completely incapable of comprehending what he's read:
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/c4414f2f2c39ff22?dmode=source
Just like Snit, he has a reading comprehension problem. Yup,
it's Snit alright, bummer for Snit.
--
HPT
High Plains Thumper
> John wrote:
>> Steve Carroll wrote:
>>
>>> Here's an example of Joel being either extremely
>>> disingenuous or completely incapable of comprehending what
>>> he's read:
>>
>> Have not heard from her in awhile. Did she get arrested?
>
> Do you still beat your boyfriend?
LOL! John is another Snit nymshift?
--
HPT
High Plains Thumper
BTW, here is proof that Joel the Troel is Snit (date time zone
field varies from post to post, depending on what proxy the troll
is posting from):
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.advocacy
From: Joel <joelcr...@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 00:59:34 -0500
Subject: Re: Glasser Pathological Liar Compilation
[quote]
> Following are 132 poster accounts on the Snit Circus of
> Pathological Lies:
And that's supposed to convince someone that they are the good
guys? Please. I'll take one decent poster like Snit over a
thousand idiot trolls, any day.
[/quote]
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/ce419ba75106d6a6
--
HPT
chrisv
>On 12/2/2009 7:32 AM, Steve Carroll wrote:
*plonk*
chrisv
>BTW, here is proof that Joel the Troel is Snit (date time zone
>field varies from post to post, depending on what proxy the troll
>is posting from):
>
>Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.advocacy
>From: Joel <joelcr...@gmail.com>
>Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 00:59:34 -0500
>Subject: Re: Glasser Pathological Liar Compilation
>
>[quote]
>> Following are 132 poster accounts on the Snit Circus of
>> Pathological Lies:
>
>And that's supposed to convince someone that they are the good
>guys? Please. I'll take one decent poster like Snit over a
>thousand idiot trolls, any day.
>[/quote]
>
>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/ce419ba75106d6a6
"One decent poster like Shit". That *is* hilarious.
Steve Carroll
Now? Google shows I was one of the posters that 'got' you were a
sock/shill right off the bat.
Snit
on 12/3/09 4:12 AM:
Explain your proof.
This should be gooooood! LOL!
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
Snit
on 12/3/09 3:41 AM:
Carroll has admitted to posting under John's name before (as a "defense" of
his other actions, he bizarrely claimed), but he has not been caught doing
that in a long time.
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
Snit
7:30 AM:
Gee, you really make yourself seem like the good guy with your alteration of
his quote to fit your grade-school insults.
Steve Carroll
> High Plains Thumper stated in post hf84l5$5k...@news.eternal-september.org
> on 12/3/09 3:41 AM:
>
> > Steve Carroll wrote:
> >> John wrote:
> >>> Steve Carroll wrote:
>
> >>>> Here's an example of Joel being either extremely
> >>>> disingenuous or completely incapable of comprehending what
> >>>> he's read:
>
> >>> Have not heard from her in awhile. Did she get arrested?
>
> >> Do you still beat your boyfriend?
>
> > LOL! John is another Snit nymshift?
>
> Carroll has admitted to posting under John's name before (as a "defense" of
> his other actions, he bizarrely claimed), but he has not been caught doing
> that in a long time.
These people have shown they don't believe any of your other lies...
so why do you think they're stupid enough to believe this one?
Joel
>Now? Google shows I was one of the posters that 'got' you were a
>sock/shill right off the bat.
You were wrong, so who cares?
--
Joel Crump
Snit
11:26 AM:
How long until Steve acknowledged his mistake? My guess - never. Steve is
very, very bad at admitting when he makes an error.
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
Joel
He's obviously having a lot of fun being a lying troll, so you're
probably right.
--
Joel Crump
Snit
12:34 PM:
Nobody can be serious when they make as contradictory claims as Steve
does... you see, I am the most hated person ever... but I also have every
other CSMA poster as my "shill"... so many people doing my bidding. And
this is without any type of force or coercion (you see, anyone who is honest
is my "shill" according to Steve). How does he reconcile this? He points
to posts from 2004 and whines about the posts involving the woman he denies
is his ex. It really is far, far past time he let go of his anger. It has
completely consumed him.
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
Steve Carroll
> Steve Carroll <fretw...@comcast.net> wrote:
> >Now? Google shows I was one of the posters that 'got' you were a
> >sock/shill right off the bat.
>
> You were wrong, so who cares?
WOW, what a compelling argument! And it's so much more evidence packed
than all the evidence you've provided thus far that you're just
another cheap troll.
LOL!
High Plains Thumper
> High Plains Thumper wrote:
>
>>> Following are 132 poster accounts on the Snit Circus of
>>> Pathological Lies:
>>
>> And that's supposed to convince someone that they are the
>> good guys? Please. I'll take one decent poster like Snit
>> over a thousand idiot trolls, any day. [/quote]
>>
>> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/ce419ba75106d6a6
>
> "One decent poster like Shit". That *is* hilarious.
Yes, very hilarious, very obvious, very Snittish, LOL! Very
incapable of fooling even "some of the people, some of the time",
LOL!
--
HPT
High Plains Thumper
> Snit wrote:
>> High Plains Thumper stated:
>>> Steve Carroll wrote:
>>>> John wrote:
>>>>> Steve Carroll wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Here's an example of Joel being either extremely
>>>>>> disingenuous or completely incapable of
>>>>>> comprehending what he's read:
>>>>>
>>>>> Have not heard from her in awhile. Did she get
>>>>> arrested?
>>>>
>>>> Do you still beat your boyfriend?
>>>
>>> LOL! John is another Snit nymshift?
>>
>> Carroll has admitted to posting under John's name before (as
>> a "defense" of his other actions, he bizarrely claimed), but
>> he has not been caught doing that in a long time.
>
> These people have shown they don't believe any of your other
> lies... so why do you think they're stupid enough to believe
> this one?
Snit is so obvious, it is rather entertaining, LOL! He has
difficultly nymshifting, rather than COLA and CSMA being a 12
step recovery plan for him, may be he ought to take up something
less stressful, like knitting:
http://www.librarything.com/work/1426379
--
HPT
High Plains Thumper
> Snit wrote:
>
>> The fact you both read *and* understood what you read is
>> beyond HPT's capabilities to understand. His only
>> explanation is that you must be one of the people who have
>> this "magical" ability he lacks.
>
> I guess so, but he really did come up with some paranoid shit.
> I'd actually be impressed that anyone still thinks that way in
> 2009, if it weren't such an unneeded nuisance, with all the
> other troll bullshit going on lately.
Paranoid like?
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.advocacy
From: Joel <joelcr...@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 00:59:34 -0500
Subject: Re: Glasser Pathological Liar Compilation
[quote]
> Following are 132 poster accounts on the Snit Circus of
> Pathological Lies:
And that's supposed to convince someone that they are the good
guys? Please. I'll take one decent poster like Snit over a
thousand idiot trolls, any day.
[/quote]
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/ce419ba75106d6a6
Yup, same lie, all others are trolls but Snit is not. Snit is a
decent posters, bwaahaahaahaahaa!
Joel Crump is Snit, no doubt, bummer for Snit, LOL!
--
HPT
Snit
on 12/3/09 4:48 PM:
>>> Carroll has admitted to posting under John's name before (as
>>> a "defense" of his other actions, he bizarrely claimed), but
>>> he has not been caught doing that in a long time.
>>
>> These people have shown they don't believe any of your other
>> lies... so why do you think they're stupid enough to believe
>> this one?
>
> Snit is so obvious, it is rather entertaining, LOL!
Honestly usually is rather obvious. And, yes, you clearly are entertained
by contradicting truth.
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
Joel
>> >Now? Google shows I was one of the posters that �'got' �you were a
>> >sock/shill right off the bat.
>>
>> You were wrong, so who cares?
>
>WOW, what a compelling argument! And it's so much more evidence packed
>than all the evidence you've provided thus far that you're just
>another cheap troll.
>
>LOL!
You're the one who needs to provide "evidence" for all your outrageous
claims. I don't need to "argue" for why your unproven bullshit is
wrong.
And, you're a dipshit of a jack-off, and I don't give a crap about
you. You're just another pathetic loser on the Internet.
--
Joel Crump
Tim Adams
Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> High Plains Thumper stated in post hf84l5$5k1$2...@news.eternal-september.org
> on 12/3/09 3:41 AM:
>
> > Steve Carroll wrote:
> >> John wrote:
> >>> Steve Carroll wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Here's an example of Joel being either extremely
> >>>> disingenuous or completely incapable of comprehending what
> >>>> he's read:
> >>>> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/c4414f2f2c39ff22
> >>>
> >>> Have not heard from her in awhile. Did she get arrested?
> >>
> >> Do you still beat your boyfriend?
> >
> > LOL! John is another Snit nymshift?
>
> Carroll has admitted to posting under John's name before
Oh look - more LIES from snit that he can't and won't support.
> (as a "defense" of
> his other actions, he bizarrely claimed), but he has not been caught doing
> that in a long time.
--
regarding Snit "You are not flamed because you speak the truth,
you are flamed because you are a hideous troll and keep disrupting
the newsgroup." Andrew J. Brehm
Snit
teadams$2$0$0$3-285104.21...@70-3-168-216.pools.spcsdns.net on
12/3/09 7:13 PM:
> In article <C73D4484.5735E%use...@gallopinginsanity.com>,
> Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>
>> High Plains Thumper stated in post hf84l5$5k1$2...@news.eternal-september.org
>> on 12/3/09 3:41 AM:
>>
>>> Steve Carroll wrote:
>>>> John wrote:
>>>>> Steve Carroll wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Here's an example of Joel being either extremely
>>>>>> disingenuous or completely incapable of comprehending what
>>>>>> he's read:
>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/c4414f2f2c39ff22
>>>>>
>>>>> Have not heard from her in awhile. Did she get arrested?
>>>>
>>>> Do you still beat your boyfriend?
>>>
>>> LOL! John is another Snit nymshift?
>>
>> Carroll has admitted to posting under John's name before
>
> Oh look - more LIES from snit that he can't and won't support.
Your denial of seeing the quote where Steve said he was posting as a John as
a defense against being called on other BS shows your memory is shot.
>> (as a "defense" of
>> his other actions, he bizarrely claimed), but he has not been caught doing
>> that in a long time.
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
Snit
7:05 PM:
Steve is a special case. Sure, others (such as HPT) act as whacked as
Steve, or nearly so... but Steve has been obsessed and consumed with anger
for year after year after year - since at least 2004. It really is amazing
how irrational he has become... he used to be able to at least come close to
making rational arguments from time to time - he now is just completely
incapable. It has been interesting watching his decline. John and others
have noted it and written about it in the past... and the trend continues.
It got worse when Bush left office and not only did a Democrat get in, but
Steve freaked out that it was a black man, posting racist trash and emailing
me with his bigoted garbage.
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
Joel
>It got worse when Bush left office and not only did a Democrat get in, but
>Steve freaked out that it was a black man, posting racist trash and emailing
>me with his bigoted garbage.
Are you serious? I can't believe I wasted any time on a piece of
garbage like that. Jeez.
--
Joel Crump
High Plains Thumper
> Snit wrote:
>> High Plains Thumper stated:
>>> Steve Carroll wrote:
>>>> John wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Have not heard from her in awhile. Did she get
>>>>> arrested?
>>>>
>>>> Do you still beat your boyfriend?
>>>
>>> LOL! John is another Snit nymshift?
>>
>> Carroll has admitted to posting under John's name before
>
> Oh look - more LIES from snit that he can't and won't support.
Yup, very obvious, the excuses, the deflections, the lie. Yes,
it is Snit alright.
--
HPT
High Plains Thumper
> Steve Carroll <fret...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>> WOW, what a compelling argument! And it's so much more
>> evidence packed than all the evidence you've provided thus
>> far that you're just another cheap troll. LOL!
>
> You're the one who needs to provide "evidence" for all your
> outrageous claims. I don't need to "argue" for why your
> unproven bullshit is wrong.
>
> And, you're a dipshit of a jack-off, and I don't give a crap
> about you. You're just another pathetic loser on the
> Internet.
Yup, the wording, the hostility, the ad hominem attacks, it's
Snit alright.
--
HPT
Snit
on 12/3/09 7:51 PM:
Curious: who do you think you are fooling? Name, say, three people stupid
enough to believe you.
1.
2.
3.
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
Snit
7:41 PM:
Removed from Google, but still quoted by others:
<7179b0a5-23e5-4faa...@v5g2000prm.googlegroups.com>
Steve Carroll:
-----
Subject: Steve Jobs 1955-2008. RIP.
Apple is keeping it from the news, but last night at a few
minutes before midnight Steve P. Jobs passed away in his
sleep. Foul play is possible. Barack Obama was in the area
and may be involved.
-----
Steve also sent me an email with the picture shown here:
<http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/airforceone.asp>
And the text "Yes I am laughing". He later claimed his emails to me were a
"mistake" he did not mean to do - it was the fault of Google. Really.
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
Joel
>>> It got worse when Bush left office and not only did a Democrat get in, but
>>> Steve freaked out that it was a black man, posting racist trash and emailing
>>> me with his bigoted garbage.
>>
>> Are you serious? I can't believe I wasted any time on a piece of
>> garbage like that. Jeez.
>
>Removed from Google, but still quoted by others:
>
><7179b0a5-23e5-4faa...@v5g2000prm.googlegroups.com>
> Steve Carroll:
> -----
> Subject: Steve Jobs 1955-2008. RIP.
> Apple is keeping it from the news, but last night at a few
> minutes before midnight Steve P. Jobs passed away in his
> sleep. Foul play is possible. Barack Obama was in the area
> and may be involved.
> -----
What a funny guy ...
>Steve also sent me an email with the picture shown here:
>
> <http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/airforceone.asp>
>
>And the text "Yes I am laughing". He later claimed his emails to me were a
>"mistake" he did not mean to do - it was the fault of Google. Really.
Un-fucking-believable. What a piece of work.
--
Joel Crump
Snit
8:45 PM:
> Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>
>>>> It got worse when Bush left office and not only did a Democrat get in, but
>>>> Steve freaked out that it was a black man, posting racist trash and
>>>> emailing
>>>> me with his bigoted garbage.
>>>
>>> Are you serious? I can't believe I wasted any time on a piece of
>>> garbage like that. Jeez.
>>
>> Removed from Google, but still quoted by others:
>>
>> <7179b0a5-23e5-4faa...@v5g2000prm.googlegroups.com>
>> Steve Carroll:
>> -----
>> Subject: Steve Jobs 1955-2008. RIP.
>> Apple is keeping it from the news, but last night at a few
>> minutes before midnight Steve P. Jobs passed away in his
>> sleep. Foul play is possible. Barack Obama was in the area
>> and may be involved.
>> -----
>
> What a funny guy ...
This type of BS is not typical of Steve... under his regular name. He
quickly removed it - I suspect he meant to post it with a sock and goofed.
>> Steve also sent me an email with the picture shown here:
>>
>> <http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/airforceone.asp>
>>
>> And the text "Yes I am laughing". He later claimed his emails to me were a
>> "mistake" he did not mean to do - it was the fault of Google. Really.
>
>
> Un-fucking-believable. What a piece of work.
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
Tim Adams
Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> Tim Adams stated in post
> teadams$2$0$0$3-285104.21...@70-3-168-216.pools.spcsdns.net on
> 12/3/09 7:13 PM:
>
> > In article <C73D4484.5735E%use...@gallopinginsanity.com>,
> > Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> >
> >> High Plains Thumper stated in post hf84l5$5k1$2...@news.eternal-september.org
> >> on 12/3/09 3:41 AM:
> >>
> >>> Steve Carroll wrote:
> >>>> John wrote:
> >>>>> Steve Carroll wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Here's an example of Joel being either extremely
> >>>>>> disingenuous or completely incapable of comprehending what
> >>>>>> he's read:
> >>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/c4414f2f2c39ff
> >>>>>> 22
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Have not heard from her in awhile. Did she get arrested?
> >>>>
> >>>> Do you still beat your boyfriend?
> >>>
> >>> LOL! John is another Snit nymshift?
> >>
> >> Carroll has admitted to posting under John's name before
> >
> > Oh look - more LIES from snit that he can't and won't support.
>
> Your denial of seeing the quote where Steve said he was posting as a John as
> a defense against being called on other BS shows your memory is shot.
As expected, snit just offers up more of his BS but not any support for his LIE.
so typical. run snit run.
>
> >> (as a "defense" of
> >> his other actions, he bizarrely claimed), but he has not been caught doing
> >> that in a long time.
--
Steve Carroll
> Steve Carroll <fretw...@comcast.net> wrote:
> >> >Now? Google shows I was one of the posters that 'got' you were a
> >> >sock/shill right off the bat.
>
> >> You were wrong, so who cares?
>
> >WOW, what a compelling argument! And it's so much more evidence packed
> >than all the evidence you've provided thus far that you're just
> >another cheap troll.
>
> >LOL!
>
> You're the one who
... provided the concrete proof that Snit admitted to forgery, made
private emails public without consent of the other party, used an
automated password he asked for as a tool to troll Sandman with, puked
up his disgusting beliefs about incest, and much more... all to your
repeated denials?
Yes, I'm one of many people that has done so. What about it?
Steve Carroll
> Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> >It got worse when Bush left office and not only did a Democrat get in, but
> >Steve freaked out that it was a black man, posting racist trash and emailing
> >me with his bigoted garbage.
>
> Are you
... lying? Of course he's lying, it's Snit.
Steve Carroll
> Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> >>> It got worse when Bush left office and not only did a Democrat get in, but
> >>> Steve freaked out that it was a black man, posting racist trash and emailing
> >>> me with his bigoted garbage.
>
> >> Are you serious? I can't believe I wasted any time on a piece of
> >> garbage like that. Jeez.
>
> >Removed from Google, but still quoted by others:
>
> > Steve Carroll:
> > -----
> > Subject: Steve Jobs 1955-2008. RIP.
> > Apple is keeping it from the news, but last night at a few
> > minutes before midnight Steve P. Jobs passed away in his
> > sleep. Foul play is possible. Barack Obama was in the area
> > and may be involved.
> > -----
>
> What a funny guy ...
>
> >Steve also sent me an email with the picture shown here:
>
> > <http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/airforceone.asp>
>
> >And the text "Yes I am laughing". He later claimed his emails to me were a
> >"mistake" he did not mean to do - it was the fault of Google. Really.
>
> Un-fucking-believable.
Of course... and that's why no one believes such lies by Snit. By the
way... you need to work on your feigning;)
Snit
12/4/09 4:43 AM:
Your record is stuck on: "wah wah wah wah he is lying... I cannot show how
nor give an example but wah wah wah liar liar liar!"
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
Joel
>Of course... and that's why no one believes such lies by Snit.
I have no reason to doubt him.
--
Joel Crump
Joel
>... lying? Of course he's lying, it's Snit.
I trust him a lot more than I would ever trust you. I guess there's
no way he can *prove* it, but as I said, I have no reason to doubt
him.
--
Joel Crump
Snit
12:15 PM:
> Steve Carroll <fret...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>> Of course... and that's why no one believes such lies by Snit.
>
>
> I have no reason to doubt him.
Steve has made it clear he is a liar and has admitted his goal is to ruin my
reputation (and, obviously, that of others). Now he does not understand why
his word is not taken seriously.
My weakness is giving people too many chances - I do not generally hold
someone's past against them. To me, if someone *now* makes a reasoned claim
and can hold a reasoned discussion, with few exceptions I will take them at
their word. Steve is proud to have exploited that. I no longer let him and
he whines about how I am looking at his personality and not just the
argument.
He has spent years working on making sure he is not to be trusted... then he
whines when people do not trust him. It is bizarre.
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
Steve Carroll
> Steve Carroll <fretw...@comcast.net> wrote:
> >Of course... and that's why no one believes such lies by Snit.
>
> I have no reason to doubt him.
Of course you have a reason to doubt him... reality is always a reason
to doubt non-reality. Of course, you've proven you're willing to
ignore reality so you, talking about "reason", is ludicrous on its
face. Funny how it works;)
Steve Carroll
> Steve Carroll <fretw...@comcast.net> wrote:
> >... lying? Of course he's lying, it's Snit.
>
> I trust him
A lot of people on that Snit 'quotes' list that circulates once
trusted him, too. Hehe;)
Joel
>> >... lying? Of course he's lying, it's Snit.
>>
>> I trust him
>
>A lot of people on that Snit 'quotes' list that circulates once
>trusted him, too. Hehe;)
Then I'll just have to take that chance, won't I?
--
Joel Crump
Snit
1:47 PM:
Interesting how Steve claims that long after he stopped trusting me his
socks did. :)
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
Tim Adams
Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
Then stop posting LIES. It's that simple. You won't, but then that is the best
option available for you.
Snit
12/4/09 3:22 PM:
>> Your record is stuck on: "wah wah wah wah he is lying... I cannot show how
>> nor give an example but wah wah wah liar liar liar!"
>
> Then stop posting LIES. It's that simple. You won't, but then that is the best
> option available for you.
You just proved me right. Just thought you should know. :)
Here is a hint for you - if you believed your BS you would *quote* a comment
of mine that was at least not correct. You know, like I do with you all of
the time. :)
After you had repeatedly been shown Steve Carroll saying:
I wasn't there but I'm pretty sure my dog got up to the
keyboard and created an entry.
You said... and keep insisting:
Steve made the post. His statement did NOT say the _POST_ was from
his dog
See, Tim, that is showing you to be a liar. Easy to do. You also said:
A third party posted with a handle 'Steve Carroll's Dog' and
Steve, tongue in cheek, ran with it.
And that has been shown to be wrong on multiple levels - first, you got the
order of events wrong (which makes your claim demonstrably contrary to
reality), and second, you claimed a post was from a "third party" though you
have *no* evidence to back this up.
See, Tim - *That* is how you show someone to be a liar. You are a liar.
Easy to show.
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
Steve Carroll
> Steve Carroll <fretw...@comcast.net> wrote:
> >> >... lying? Of course he's lying, it's Snit.
>
> >> I trust him
>
> >A lot of people on that Snit 'quotes' list that circulates once
> >trusted him, too. Hehe;)
>
> Then I'll just have to take that chance, won't I?
You already have... and Snit's lies and BS have proven why you're a
fool for doing so. That you're too stupid to realize it doesn't change
a thing;)
Steve Carroll
> Joel stated in post t9tih5pqrgecrnpoactain3vsqej0ct...@4ax.com on 12/4/09
> 1:47 PM:
>
> > Steve Carroll <fretw...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> >>>> ... lying? Of course he's lying, it's Snit.
>
> >>> I trust him
>
> >> A lot of people on that Snit 'quotes' list that circulates once
> >> trusted him, too. Hehe;)
>
> > Then I'll just have to take that chance, won't I?
>
> Interesting how Steve claims that long after he stopped trusting me his
> socks did. :)
The only thing interesting about your delusions is the human car wreck
factor. I'd love to be a fly on the wall of the perspective employer
of yours down the road, you know, if and when you get cured;)
Tim Adams
Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> Tim Adams stated in post
> teadams$2$0$0$3-6E6A0E.17...@70-3-168-216.pools.spcsdns.net on
> 12/4/09 3:22 PM:
>
> >> Your record is stuck on: "wah wah wah wah he is lying... I cannot show how
> >> nor give an example but wah wah wah liar liar liar!"
> >
> > Then stop posting LIES. It's that simple. You won't, but then that is the
> > best
> > option available for you.
>
> You just proved me right.
that snit's a LIAR - no need to prove that, you do it with virtually every post
you make.
Snit
12/4/09 8:01 PM:
> In article <C73EDCE3.57718%use...@gallopinginsanity.com>,
> Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>
>> Tim Adams stated in post
>> teadams$2$0$0$3-6E6A0E.17...@70-3-168-216.pools.spcsdns.net on
>> 12/4/09 3:22 PM:
>>
>>>> Your record is stuck on: "wah wah wah wah he is lying... I cannot show how
>>>> nor give an example but wah wah wah liar liar liar!"
>>>
>>> Then stop posting LIES. It's that simple. You won't, but then that is the
>>> best
>>> option available for you.
>>
>> You just proved me right.
>
> that snit's a LIAR - no need to prove that, you do it with virtually every
> post
> you make.
Your record is stuck on: "wah wah wah wah he is lying... I cannot show how
nor give an example but wah wah wah liar liar liar!"
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
Tim Adams
Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> Tim Adams stated in post
> teadams$2$0$0$3-C67BB2.22...@70-3-168-216.pools.spcsdns.net on
> 12/4/09 8:01 PM:
>
> > In article <C73EDCE3.57718%use...@gallopinginsanity.com>,
> > Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Tim Adams stated in post
> >> teadams$2$0$0$3-6E6A0E.17...@70-3-168-216.pools.spcsdns.net on
> >> 12/4/09 3:22 PM:
> >>
> >>>> Your record is stuck on: "wah wah wah wah he is lying... I cannot show
> >>>> how
> >>>> nor give an example but wah wah wah liar liar liar!"
> >>>
> >>> Then stop posting LIES. It's that simple. You won't, but then that is the
> >>> best
> >>> option available for you.
> >>
> >> You just proved me right.
> >
> > that snit's a LIAR - no need to prove that, you do it with virtually every
> > post
> > you make.
>
> Your record is stuck on:
yes snit, your record of constantly lying is stuck.
Snit
12/6/09 6:33 PM:
>> Your record is stuck on:
>
> yes snit, your record of constantly lying is stuck.
Your record is stuck on: "wah wah wah wah he is lying... I cannot show how
nor give an example but wah wah wah liar liar liar!"
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
Steve Carroll
> 12/6/09 6:33 PM:
>
> >> Your record is stuck on:
>
> > yes snit, your record of constantly lying is stuck.
>
> Your record
... consists of proving you are a lying, disingenuous dungheap of a
troll? Yes, he's good at that... of course, you make it rather easy
because you're so stupid;)
Tim Adams
Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> Tim Adams stated in post
> teadams$2$0$0$3-E5B999.20...@70-3-168-216.pools.spcsdns.net on
> 12/6/09 6:33 PM:
>
> >> Your record is stuck on:
> >
> > yes snit, your record of constantly lying is stuck.
>
> Your record is stuck on: "wah wah wah wah he is lying... I cannot show how
> nor give an example
yet I have both show your LIES and pointed to example of your LIES! keep running
from reality snit.
Hadron
> In article <C741B558.57D36%use...@gallopinginsanity.com>,
> Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>
>> Tim Adams stated in post
>> teadams$2$0$0$3-E5B999.20...@70-3-168-216.pools.spcsdns.net on
>> 12/6/09 6:33 PM:
>>
>> >> Your record is stuck on:
>> >
>> > yes snit, your record of constantly lying is stuck.
>>
>> Your record is stuck on: "wah wah wah wah he is lying... I cannot show how
>> nor give an example
>
> yet I have both show your LIES and pointed to example of your LIES! keep running
> from reality snit.
Please repost them. I haven't seen them and would love to if he is
lying.
Snit
12/8/09 4:39 AM:
> In article <C741B558.57D36%use...@gallopinginsanity.com>,
> Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>
>> Tim Adams stated in post
>> teadams$2$0$0$3-E5B999.20...@70-3-168-216.pools.spcsdns.net on
>> 12/6/09 6:33 PM:
>>
>>>> Your record is stuck on:
>>>
>>> yes snit, your record of constantly lying is stuck.
>>
>> Your record is stuck on: "wah wah wah wah he is lying... I cannot show how
>> nor give an example
>
> yet I have both show your LIES and pointed to example of your LIES! keep
> running
> from reality snit.
Your record is stuck on: "wah wah wah wah he is lying... I cannot show how
Snit
4:45 AM:
LOL! And Tim will run in 3... 2... 1...
100% predictable.
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
Snit
12/8/09 4:39 AM:
> In article <C741B558.57D36%use...@gallopinginsanity.com>,
> Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>
>> Tim Adams stated in post
>> teadams$2$0$0$3-E5B999.20...@70-3-168-216.pools.spcsdns.net on
>> 12/6/09 6:33 PM:
>>
>>>> Your record is stuck on:
>>>
>>> yes snit, your record of constantly lying is stuck.
>>
>> Your record is stuck on: "wah wah wah wah he is lying... I cannot show how
>> nor give an example
>
> yet I have both show your LIES and pointed to example of your LIES! keep
> running
> from reality snit.
Hadron has asked for an example. Why won't you provide one?
Oh, yes: you are lying. Oh well.
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
Tim Adams
Hadron<hadro...@gmail.com> wrote:
One of the more recent - snit claimed that both Steve Carroll and a poster using
the handle 'Steve Carroll's Dog' posted from the same IP address. After a
coucple fo weeks, snit finally has admitted that the poster using the handle
'Steve Carroll's Dog' has been posting via an anonymous account where the IP is
not shown. While it's been covered in several threads in CSME, with '10.6.2
Fabulous' being one of them.
Tim Adams
Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> Tim Adams stated in post
> teadams$2$0$0$3-E9E9E8.06...@70-3-168-216.pools.spcsdns.net on
> 12/8/09 4:39 AM:
>
> > In article <C741B558.57D36%use...@gallopinginsanity.com>,
> > Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Tim Adams stated in post
> >> teadams$2$0$0$3-E5B999.20...@70-3-168-216.pools.spcsdns.net on
> >> 12/6/09 6:33 PM:
> >>
> >>>> Your record is stuck on:
> >>>
> >>> yes snit, your record of constantly lying is stuck.
> >>
> >> Your record is stuck on: "wah wah wah wah he is lying... I cannot show how
> >> nor give an example
> >
> > yet I have both show your LIES and pointed to example of your LIES! keep
> > running
> > from reality snit.
>
> Your record is stuck on:
pointing out how snit is running from reality. yes I know.
keep running snit.
Tim Adams
Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> Tim Adams stated in post
> teadams$2$0$0$3-E9E9E8.06...@70-3-168-216.pools.spcsdns.net on
> 12/8/09 4:39 AM:
>
> > In article <C741B558.57D36%use...@gallopinginsanity.com>,
> > Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Tim Adams stated in post
> >> teadams$2$0$0$3-E5B999.20...@70-3-168-216.pools.spcsdns.net on
> >> 12/6/09 6:33 PM:
> >>
> >>>> Your record is stuck on:
> >>>
> >>> yes snit, your record of constantly lying is stuck.
> >>
> >> Your record is stuck on: "wah wah wah wah he is lying... I cannot show how
> >> nor give an example
> >
> > yet I have both show your LIES and pointed to example of your LIES! keep
> > running
> > from reality snit.
>
> Hadron has asked for an example. Why won't you provide one?
already done michael. Now you can start running away again.
>
> Oh, yes: you are lying. Oh well.
The only one lying is snit. keep running snit.
Hadron
> In article <hfle8h$3fc$3...@hadron.eternal-september.org>,
> Hadron<hadro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Tim Adams <teadams$2$0$0$3...@earthlink.net> writes:
>>
>> > In article <C741B558.57D36%use...@gallopinginsanity.com>,
>> > Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Tim Adams stated in post
>> >> teadams$2$0$0$3-E5B999.20...@70-3-168-216.pools.spcsdns.net on
>> >> 12/6/09 6:33 PM:
>> >>
>> >> >> Your record is stuck on:
>> >> >
>> >> > yes snit, your record of constantly lying is stuck.
>> >>
>> >> Your record is stuck on: "wah wah wah wah he is lying... I cannot show how
>> >> nor give an example
>> >
>> > yet I have both show your LIES and pointed to example of your LIES! keep
>> > running
>> > from reality snit.
>>
>> Please repost them. I haven't seen them and would love to if he is
>> lying.
>
> One of the more recent - snit claimed that both Steve Carroll and a poster using
> the handle 'Steve Carroll's Dog' posted from the same IP address. After a
> coucple fo weeks, snit finally has admitted that the poster using the handle
> 'Steve Carroll's Dog' has been posting via an anonymous account where the IP is
> not shown. While it's been covered in several threads in CSME, with '10.6.2
> Fabulous' being one of them.
Err, and the proof? Sounds like HPT making things up to me.
But even if that were true its not the same as actively lying about
facts relevant to the group.
Snit
7:48 PM:
...
>> One of the more recent - snit claimed that both Steve Carroll and a poster
>> using the handle 'Steve Carroll's Dog' posted from the same IP address. After
>> a coucple fo weeks, snit finally has admitted that the poster using the
>> handle 'Steve Carroll's Dog' has been posting via an anonymous account where
>> the IP is not shown. While it's been covered in several threads in CSME, with
>> '10.6.2 Fabulous' being one of them.
>>
> Err, and the proof? Sounds like HPT making things up to me.
>
> But even if that were true its not the same as actively lying about facts
> relevant to the group.
I proved - and Tim Adams agreed - that the post Steve forged text an then
absurdly attributed that to his dog was really Steve posting. Of course.
Steve Carroll forged text. It is in that "episode" where there is IP
evidence.
With Steve's sock, Steve used an account with no IP showing. Gee, there is
no direct IP evidence. But there is *plenty* of support it is Steve who
posted with that sock. From past info:
<http://tmp.gallopinginsanity.com/posting_paws.png>
and:
I just spent a few minutes looking at Steve's posts... and
his "dog's":
9:44 - 10:10 Steve Carroll: Four posts... not tracking/linking
10:11 Steve's Dog: Tracks/links to a Joel in Google Groups
10:13 Steve Carroll: Pulls up link from 2007
10:14 Steve Carroll: Accusing Snit as posting as his dog
10:22 Steve Carroll: Accusing Snit, again, of the same thing
10:35 Steve Carroll: Pulls up different link from 2007
10:49 Steve Carroll: Accusing Snit of forging PDFs
10:51 Steve Carroll: Pulling up link from 2006
10:56 Steve Carroll: Pulling up different link from 2006
10:58 Steve Carroll: Pulling up link from May 2009
Funny how whoever posted as Steve Carroll's Dog not only did
so as Steve Carroll was posting (but Snit and Joel were not)
but *also* predicted that Steve would start tracking ancient
claims down... obviously digging through the Google record.
Notice that Steve's "dog" did that first... then Steve
started doing so. Sure, Steve is predictable, but I never
knew he was *that* predictable.
But Steve denies he is the one posting as his dog... even
though before he claimed it was his dog posting from his IP
address (before he started posting with the "dog" sock).
Steve even went so far as to accuse the very person he was
accusing of everything else under the sun (in an effort to
change the topic from his recent and obvious quote forgery).
Is there *anyone* who wants to claim to be stupid enough to
believe Steve? Anyone? Wally... Tim... I am looking at you.
:)
Oh, on a side note, I decided to do a bit of tracking
myself... here is a picture of Steve Carroll if you want to
see what he looks like:
<http://www.stefanoparis.com/stefmedia/petsdotcom/718080093750.jpg>
:)
Tim Adams is pretending he has a reasoned counter to that. He does not. His
"counter" is to just cry and whine and make accusations. Oh well. Tim Adams
is a whiney liar. Seems he and I can both live with that.
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
Snit
12/8/09 7:27 PM:
Link? Quote? Message ID?
You know... why not actually *try* to do something other than look like the
lying little scumbag you are? Really... why not at least try?
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]