Updated list of facts.
Snit
added a few more:
€ A partial subset is not synonymous with the whole
€ A person's actions speak more about him than what others say
€ Apple doesn't provide as many options as the rest of the PC industry
€ Different viruses are still different even if in the same "family"
€ Dreamweaver and GoLive are professional web development applications
€ Dreamweaver, being the #1 pro web design tool, is used by many pros
€ If A = B then B = A (known as the "symmetric property of equality")
€ Incest and sex are not identical (only a pervert would disagree)
€ One can be actually guilty of a crime but neither tried nor convicted
€ OS X is partially based on BSD (esp. FreeBSD)
€ OS X users are at far less risk of malware then are XP users
€ Photoshop is an image editing application
€ Pros aren't beginners in their field (though there are new pros)
€ Similarly configured Macs and Win machines tend to cost roughly the same
€ Some people do use the term "screen name" in relation to IRC
€ Teaching is a "real job"
€ The path "~/users/username/library/widget" is not common on any OS
€ The term "all widgets" does not specify a specific subgroup of widgets
€ The tilde in an OS X path does *not* mean "the hard drive only"
€ Things which are not the same are not "identical"
Any reasoned disagreement?
--
Look, this is silly. It's not an argument, it's an armor plated walrus with
walnut paneling and an all leather interior.
Mayor of R'lyeh
chose to bless us with the following wisdom:
>Based on feedback I have altered the wording on a few of the points and
>added a few more:
No one cares.
Snit circus dumped on ash heap
--
I got a sweater for Christmas last year. I wanted
a screamer or a moaner, but I got a sweater.
-Steven Wright
Tim Adams
Snit <SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID> wrote:
> Based on feedback
snit' 'Trolling Tuesday' turns into 'Trolling Wednesday'
--
regarding Snit "You are not flamed because you speak the truth,
you are flamed because you are a hideous troll and keep disrupting
the newsgroup." Andrew J. Brehm
Snit
k0n5e210u3e4mvoai...@4ax.com on 8/16/06 1:50 AM:
> On Wed, 16 Aug 2006 00:42:56 -0700, Snit <SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID>
> chose to bless us with the following wisdom:
>
>> Based on feedback I have altered the wording on a few of the points and
>> added a few more:
>
> No one cares.
Clearly some do. Look at how they troll over their disagreement to simple
facts:
€ A partial subset is not synonymous with the whole
€ A person's actions speak more about him than what others say
€ Apple doesn't provide as many options as the rest of the PC industry
€ Different viruses are still different even if in the same "family"
€ Dreamweaver and GoLive are professional web development applications
€ Dreamweaver, being the #1 pro web design tool, is used by many pros
€ If A = B then B = A (known as the "symmetric property of equality")
€ Incest and sex are not identical (only a pervert would disagree)
€ One can be actually guilty of a crime but neither tried nor convicted
€ OS X is partially based on BSD (esp. FreeBSD)
€ OS X users are at far less risk of malware then are XP users
€ Photoshop is an image editing application
€ Pros aren't beginners in their field (though there are new pros)
€ Similarly configured Macs and Win machines tend to cost roughly the same
€ Some people do use the term "screen name" in relation to IRC
€ Teaching is a "real job"
€ The path "~/users/username/library/widget" is not common on any OS
€ The term "all widgets" does not specify a specific subgroup of widgets
€ The tilde in an OS X path does *not* mean "the hard drive only"
€ Things which are not the same are not "identical"
--
€ The term "all widgets" does not specify a specific subgroup of widgets
€ If A = B then B = A (known as the "symmetric property of equality")
€ One can be guilty of a crime but neither tried nor convicted
Steve Carroll
<teadams$2$0$0$3-6537C2.05...@news.west.earthlink.net>,
Tim Adams <teadams$2$0$0$3...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> In article <C1081A90.5A72D%SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID>,
> Snit <SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID> wrote:
>
> > Based on feedback
>
> snit' 'Trolling Tuesday' turns into 'Trolling Wednesday'
Yup... with Snit's *ever changing* list of "facts" ;)
--
Heck, OS X is not even partially based on FreeBSD - Snit
Sandman and Carroll are running around trying to crucify trolls
like myself - Snit
I am a bigger liar than Steve - Snit
Henry Flam
Snit <SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID> wrote:
Who gives a damn about this shit? Snit, once in a while, I make the
mistake in thinking that that you are starting to make sense in your
posts; I tend to agree with your politics. Then you post stuff like this
and it destroys any respect that I have for you.
Snit
hflam-64320B....@news.telus.net on 8/16/06 10:14 AM:
Several people: Wally, Sandman, Tim Adams, Steve Carroll - the trolls who
nip at my heels.
What I have done is summarized the debates I have had with them from the
last few years; and in doing so completely crushed their lies about me.
Some examples:
* They claim I am mostly off topic - look at the topics I debate, most *on*
topic to computers and OS X specifically. There are a few that look at
general logic, which can apply to almost any debate, and some that are
off topic (politics).
* They claim I have illogical or irrational ideas. Well, the above lists
my views. If people disagree, fine... but I think it is pretty clear to
reasonable people that the things I claim make a hell of a lot more sense
than the contrary claims that the trolls make.
Here is my challenge to the trolls: feel free to come up with a list of
things *they* believe in... things they think might even offend me if they
care to. I would love to see their lists. Would amuse the hell out of me.
> Snit, once in a while, I make the mistake in thinking that that you are
> starting to make sense in your posts; I tend to agree with your politics. Then
> you post stuff like this and it destroys any respect that I have for you.
Which of the above do you disagree with - or do you just disagree with my
forcing the trolls to either shut up or make it very, very clear they
disagree with such common sense views?
--
€ Some people do use the term "screen name" in relation to IRC
€ Teaching is a "real job"
Snit
2KKEg.11822$ID1....@bignews2.bellsouth.net on 8/17/06 12:56 PM:
> Steve Carroll wrote:
>> In article
>> <teadams$2$0$0$3-6537C2.05...@news.west.earthlink.net>,
>> Tim Adams <teadams$2$0$0$3...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>>
>>> In article <C1081A90.5A72D%SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID>,
>>> Snit <SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Based on feedback
>>> snit' 'Trolling Tuesday' turns into 'Trolling Wednesday'
>>
>> Yup... with Snit's *ever changing* list of "facts" ;)
>>
>
> Any ideas on the abuse Snit has had to endure as a child to create such
> a dishonest and stubborn troll?
Ah, are you going to join the other trolls in whining about such a simple
list of facts:
€ A partial subset is not synonymous with the whole
€ A person's actions speak more about him than what others say
€ Apple doesn't provide as many options as the rest of the PC industry
€ Different viruses are still different even if in the same "family"
€ Dreamweaver and GoLive are professional web development applications
€ Dreamweaver, being the #1 pro web design tool, is used by many pros
€ If A = B then B = A (known as the "symmetric property of equality")
€ Incest and sex are not identical (only a pervert would disagree)
€ One can be actually guilty of a crime but neither tried nor convicted
€ OS X is partially based on BSD (esp. FreeBSD)
€ OS X users are at far less risk of malware then are XP users
€ Photoshop is an image editing application
€ Pros aren't beginners in their field (though there are new pros)
€ Similarly configured Macs and Win machines tend to cost roughly the same
€ Some people do use the term "screen name" in relation to IRC
€ Teaching is a "real job"
€ The path "~/users/username/library/widget" is not common on any OS
€ The term "all widgets" does not specify a specific subgroup of widgets
€ The tilde in an OS X path does *not* mean "the hard drive only"
€ Things which are not the same are not "identical"
I love watching as Tim and Steve whine about how it is so awful to explain
things better over time. They simply do not see growth and learning as a
sign of strength. Well, they are just whining when I make their trolling
harder to push with any semblance of reason. They simply have lost all
grip.
I would *still* love to see any list of facts you or the other trolls can
come up with that would be things you think a reasoned person would agree
with but I don't. Betcha you can't.
--
€ A partial subset is not synonymous with the whole
€ Not all people who are actually guilty are tried and convicted
Steve Carroll
Henry Flam <hf...@telus.net> wrote:
Not terribly difficult to do... Snit takes at least two opposing sides
to most arguments.
> Then you post stuff like this and it destroys any respect that I have
> for you.
Wow... tough room;)
Henry Flam
Snit <SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID> wrote:
Snit, I will say this once and then try not to repeat this. I'm just a
user, who has no, or little technical knowledge regarding computers.
I've been reading the messages on this group for many years and usually
I am happy to remain a lurker.
Even though this group is, by design, the sewer for for mac groups, I
find the debates, flamewars, etc., fascinating. I'm even interested in
what people like John Slade says because although he is an irritating
troll, there is sometimes interesting content in the heated debates in
the PC vs Mac religious war.
You on the other hand must a deeply trouble individual who has a
fragile ego. I needed agree nor disagree with the points above. I don't
care about them. Your constant complaints, whines, rages, etc., wars
with the regular Mac advocates, whom you mislabel as trolls, arise from
your sense that any conversation or thread must orbit around you. People
have pointed that out to you but you don't accept that.
Snit I feel sorry for you. Please go and see a doctor about your
solipsism. There must be a cure for you deep psychological travail.
maybe then you will go away and then this group will return to being the
honest sewer for mac groups. Not a Snit toilet.
Now I retire to the shadows and to become a lurker again.
Snit
You are not alone.
> Even though this group is, by design, the sewer for for mac groups, I
> find the debates, flamewars, etc., fascinating.
Odd. But OK.
> I'm even interested in what people like John Slade says because although he is
> an irritating troll, there is sometimes interesting content in the heated
> debates in the PC vs Mac religious war.
He got the Intel switch right while most everyone else was wrong. Me
included. OK.
>
> You on the other hand must a deeply trouble individual who has a fragile ego.
Amazingly incorrect, but I can accept that you believe this. If it were
correct, though, what would that say about the cretins who target someone
like that... how pathetic of them!
> I needed agree nor disagree with the points above. I don't care about them.
I can appreciate that, though there are some I find it hard to understand
how you would not agree with.
> Your constant complaints, whines, rages, etc., wars with the regular Mac
> advocates, whom you mislabel as trolls, arise from your sense that any
> conversation or thread must orbit around you. People have pointed that out to
> you but you don't accept that.
I welcome examples. Do you have any?
> Snit I feel sorry for you. Please go and see a doctor about your solipsism.
You use the term in a way that does not fit.
> There must be a cure for you deep psychological travail. maybe then you will
> go away and then this group will return to being the honest sewer for mac
> groups. Not a Snit toilet.
I speak in an honest and honorable way. That does tend to make me a target
for the sh*t of many.
> Now I retire to the shadows and to become a lurker again.
I wish you well. I bet, for what it is worth, that though you are an
infrequent poster that since you spoke poorly of me the trolls shall accept
your words... when infrequent posters speak poorly of them they deem those
folks sock puppets. You will serve to show their double standard. Thanks!
--
mmoore321
As a fellow lurker, I understand your view. Trying to express a point
of view to Snit is the same as speaking Spanish to someone who only
understands English. He hears words, but doesn't comprehend what you
are saying.
He has an agenda and no replies in the world; sensible or non-sensible
will deter him from his goal.
The ongoing Snit vs the world threads are sometime amusing. And some of
the people in this group perpetuate by continuing pointless arguments.
The thing that always amazes me is that even though there are others in
the group not liked overall (i.e. Zara, Muahman), the disdain for one
person by many posters (over 40) is overwhelming.
I guess by making this reply, he will need to defend whatever
"reputation" he thinks he has. Snit is a human car-accident and we are
all rubbernecking. We know it is bad form, but yet strangely curious.
Treat him the same way, look but just keep moving on.
Snit
1155955755.6...@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com on 8/18/06 7:49 PM:
>> Now I retire to the shadows and to become a lurker again.
>
> As a fellow lurker, I understand your view. Trying to express a point
> of view to Snit is the same as speaking Spanish to someone who only
> understands English. He hears words, but doesn't comprehend what you
> are saying.
>
> He has an agenda and no replies in the world; sensible or non-sensible
> will deter him from his goal.
My agenda is honor and honesty. Do you have another?
>
> The ongoing Snit vs the world threads are sometime amusing. And some of
> the people in this group perpetuate by continuing pointless arguments.
> The thing that always amazes me is that even though there are others in
> the group not liked overall (i.e. Zara, Muahman), the disdain for one
> person by many posters (over 40) is overwhelming.
>
> I guess by making this reply, he will need to defend whatever
> "reputation" he thinks he has. Snit is a human car-accident and we are
> all rubbernecking. We know it is bad form, but yet strangely curious.
> Treat him the same way, look but just keep moving on.
>
If you have a concern about my actions please provide an example. Just
whining does not allow for any relevant discussion or growth by anyone.
If I were like those who nip at my heels I would conclude you were their
sock puppet. Just thought you should know.
--
€ A partial subset is not synonymous with the whole
mmoore321
Snit wrote:
> "mmoore321" <mmoo...@gmail.com> stated in post
> 1155955755.6...@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com on 8/18/06 7:49 PM:
>
> >> Now I retire to the shadows and to become a lurker again.
> >
> > As a fellow lurker, I understand your view. Trying to express a point
> > of view to Snit is the same as speaking Spanish to someone who only
> > understands English. He hears words, but doesn't comprehend what you
> > are saying.
> >
> > He has an agenda and no replies in the world; sensible or non-sensible
> > will deter him from his goal.
>
> My agenda is honor and honesty. Do you have another?
Ah, right on cue. Snit must justify his motives. Yet, for some reason,
no one believes it. Why is that? If it is honor and honesty why does no
one else defend you? Why do they persecute you will such zeal.
My agenda for my post was to point out that you are a disruptive poster
in this group, but there is little that can be done. There are certain
times you post on-topic discussions and debate, but it is drowned in
your endless "Snit vs Trolls (who before you starting posting in CSMA
weren't) Summaries".
> >
> > The ongoing Snit vs the world threads are sometime amusing. And some of
> > the people in this group perpetuate by continuing pointless arguments.
> > The thing that always amazes me is that even though there are others in
> > the group not liked overall (i.e. Zara, Muahman), the disdain for one
> > person by many posters (over 40) is overwhelming.
> >
> > I guess by making this reply, he will need to defend whatever
> > "reputation" he thinks he has. Snit is a human car-accident and we are
> > all rubbernecking. We know it is bad form, but yet strangely curious.
> > Treat him the same way, look but just keep moving on.
> >
> If you have a concern about my actions please provide an example. Just
> whining does not allow for any relevant discussion or growth by anyone.
Whining? I do not have concerns about your actions. I am merely stating
my opinion of your postings. Anything address about your "actions"
would be promptly ignored by you as they have no bearing on your
intent.
>
> If I were like those who nip at my heels I would conclude you were their
> sock puppet. Just thought you should know.
Wow. Talk about a disclaimer statement. You concluded that I am a sock
puppet, but bury it with added non-sense to disavow yourself. Bravo!
You certainly are the most creative troll I have ever read. You make
Tholen look like an amateur.
Please continue with your little dance.
Snit
>
> Snit wrote:
>> "mmoore321" <mmoo...@gmail.com> stated in post
>> 1155955755.6...@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com on 8/18/06 7:49 PM:
>>
>>>> Now I retire to the shadows and to become a lurker again.
>>>
>>> As a fellow lurker, I understand your view. Trying to express a point
>>> of view to Snit is the same as speaking Spanish to someone who only
>>> understands English. He hears words, but doesn't comprehend what you
>>> are saying.
>>>
>>> He has an agenda and no replies in the world; sensible or non-sensible
>>> will deter him from his goal.
>>
>> My agenda is honor and honesty. Do you have another?
>
> Ah, right on cue. Snit must justify his motives.
If you are going to make accusations against me you should support them. It
is an easy thing to understand.
> Yet, for some reason, no one believes it.
What makes you think that?
> Why is that? If it is honor and honesty why does no one else defend you? Why
> do they persecute you will such zeal.
Who is "they"?
>
> My agenda for my post was to point out that you are a disruptive poster
> in this group, but there is little that can be done. There are certain
> times you post on-topic discussions and debate, but it is drowned in
> your endless "Snit vs Trolls (who before you starting posting in CSMA
> weren't) Summaries".
You have posted accusations against me. I ask for you to support them. So
far your "support" is that others say it. So? Many people say many things.
That does not make it so.
>>> The ongoing Snit vs the world threads are sometime amusing. And some of
>>> the people in this group perpetuate by continuing pointless arguments.
>>> The thing that always amazes me is that even though there are others in
>>> the group not liked overall (i.e. Zara, Muahman), the disdain for one
>>> person by many posters (over 40) is overwhelming.
>>>
>>> I guess by making this reply, he will need to defend whatever
>>> "reputation" he thinks he has. Snit is a human car-accident and we are
>>> all rubbernecking. We know it is bad form, but yet strangely curious.
>>> Treat him the same way, look but just keep moving on.
>>>
>> If you have a concern about my actions please provide an example. Just
>> whining does not allow for any relevant discussion or growth by anyone.
>
> Whining? I do not have concerns about your actions. I am merely stating
> my opinion of your postings. Anything address about your "actions"
> would be promptly ignored by you as they have no bearing on your
> intent.
Not sure what you mean.
>> If I were like those who nip at my heels I would conclude you were their
>> sock puppet. Just thought you should know.
>
> Wow. Talk about a disclaimer statement. You concluded that I am a sock
> puppet
No. I did not. For you to say so is dishonest.
> , but bury it with added non-sense to disavow yourself. Bravo! You certainly
> are the most creative troll I have ever read. You make Tholen look like an
> amateur.
>
> Please continue with your little dance.
So far you have made a number of accusations against me and, above, posted a
direct lie about me, and all I have done is ask for support. You have none
- that much is clear. Thank you.
--
Snit
added a few more:
01 A partial subset is not synonymous with the whole
02 A person's actions speak more about him than what others say
03 Apple doesn't provide as many options as the rest of the PC industry
04 Different viruses are still different even if in the same "family"
05 Dreamweaver and GoLive are professional web development applications
06 Dreamweaver, being the #1 pro web design tool, is used by many pros
07 If A = B then B = A (known as the "symmetric property of equality")
08 Incest and sex are not identical (only a pervert would disagree)
09 One can be actually guilty of a crime but neither tried nor convicted
10 OS X is partially based on BSD (esp. FreeBSD)
11 OS X users are at far less risk of malware then are XP users
12 Photoshop is an image editing application
13 Pros aren't beginners in their field (though there are new pros)
14 Similarly configured Macs and Win machines tend to cost roughly the same
15 Some people do use the term "screen name" in relation to IRC
16 Teaching is a "real job"
17 The path "~/users/username/library/widget" is not common on any OS
18 The term "all widgets" does not specify a specific subgroup of widgets
19 The tilde in an OS X path does *not* mean "the hard drive only"
20 Things which are not the same are not "identical"
21 The word "ouch" is not a sure sign of agreement.
Any reasoned disagreement?
--
"If a million people believe a foolish thing, it is still a foolish thing."
- Anatole France
Steve Carroll
Snit <SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID> wrote:
Hey! You forgot the the Constitution "tells" you that you can own
nuclear "arms";)
Snit
noone-40E4C7....@comcast.dca.giganews.com on 8/28/06 7:44 AM:
Do you deny that nuclear arms are arms?
--
€ The tilde in an OS X path does *not* mean "the hard drive only"
€ Things which are not the same are not "identical"
€ The word "ouch" is not a sure sign of agreement.
Steve Carroll
Snit <SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID> wrote:
Do you deny that Congress can legislate?
So, are you going to put it in your list or not?
Snit
Please stay on topic, Steve:
Do you deny that nuclear arms are arms?
That is the question. Can you answer it.
--
€ OS X is partially based on BSD (esp. FreeBSD)
€ OS X users are at far less risk of malware then are XP users
€ Photoshop is an image editing application
Steve Carroll
Snit <SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID> wrote:
^^^^
> Please stay on topic, Steve:
I was on topic... look at the thread's title for the big clue, gluehead.
> Do you deny that nuclear arms are arms?
>
> That is the question.
Only if a person is an idiot who doesn't understand the Constitutional
process... which is why you are found asking it. LOL!
Snit
>> Do you deny that nuclear arms are arms?
>>
>> That is the question.
>
> Only if a person is an idiot who doesn't understand the Constitutional
> process... which is why you are found asking it. LOL!
So you *do* deny that some arms are arms. OK.
--
€ Different viruses are still different even if in the same "family"
€ Dreamweaver and GoLive are professional web development applications
€ Dreamweaver, being the #1 pro web design tool, is used by many pros
Steve Carroll
Snit <SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID> wrote:
> "Steve Carroll" <no...@nowhere.net> stated in post
> noone-E4EADA....@comcast.dca.giganews.com on 8/28/06 11:58 AM:
>
> >> Do you deny that nuclear arms are arms?
> >>
> >> That is the question.
> >
> > Only if a person is an idiot who doesn't understand the Constitutional
> > process... which is why you are found asking it. LOL!
>
> So you *do* deny that some arms are arms. OK.
I clearly said that is only the question for an idiot like yourself.
You really don't need to prove your reading comprehension problem on
*every* post you make;)
So are you going to add this to your list or not? You certainly don't
seem too convinced of your position here. LOL!
Snit
> In article <C1189044.5D2D9%SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID>,
> Snit <SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID> wrote:
>
>> "Steve Carroll" <no...@nowhere.net> stated in post
>> noone-E4EADA....@comcast.dca.giganews.com on 8/28/06 11:58 AM:
>>
>>>> Do you deny that nuclear arms are arms?
>>>>
>>>> That is the question.
>>>
>>> Only if a person is an idiot who doesn't understand the Constitutional
>>> process... which is why you are found asking it. LOL!
>>
>> So you *do* deny that some arms are arms. OK.
>
> I clearly said that
Ok.
--
€ OS X is partially based on BSD (esp. FreeBSD)
€ OS X users are at far less risk of malware then are XP users
€ Photoshop is an image editing application
Steve Carroll
Snit <SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID> wrote:
> "Steve Carroll" <no...@nowhere.net> stated in post
> noone-D78EAF....@comcast.dca.giganews.com on 8/28/06 1:52 PM:
>
> > In article <C1189044.5D2D9%SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID>,
> > Snit <SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID> wrote:
> >
> >> "Steve Carroll" <no...@nowhere.net> stated in post
> >> noone-E4EADA....@comcast.dca.giganews.com on 8/28/06 11:58 AM:
> >>
> >>>> Do you deny that nuclear arms are arms?
> >>>>
> >>>> That is the question.
> >>>
> >>> Only if a person is an idiot who doesn't understand the Constitutional
> >>> process... which is why you are found asking it. LOL!
> >>
> >> So you *do* deny that some arms are arms. OK.
> >
> > I clearly said that
>
> Ok.
I do deny that "some arms" are "arms". Of course, once you learn the
concept of subset you'll understand that "some arms" are merely "some
arms" and not "arms". LOL!
Snit
> In article <C118C8EF.5D3A7%SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID>,
> Snit <SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID> wrote:
>
>> "Steve Carroll" <no...@nowhere.net> stated in post
>> noone-D78EAF....@comcast.dca.giganews.com on 8/28/06 1:52 PM:
>>
>>> In article <C1189044.5D2D9%SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID>,
>>> Snit <SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID> wrote:
>>>
>>>> "Steve Carroll" <no...@nowhere.net> stated in post
>>>> noone-E4EADA....@comcast.dca.giganews.com on 8/28/06 11:58 AM:
>>>>
>>>>>> Do you deny that nuclear arms are arms?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That is the question.
>>>>>
>>>>> Only if a person is an idiot who doesn't understand the Constitutional
>>>>> process... which is why you are found asking it. LOL!
>>>>
>>>> So you *do* deny that some arms are arms. OK.
>>>
>>> I clearly said that
>>
>> Ok.
>
> I do deny that "some arms" are "arms".
would you agree that any subset of "arms" are "arms"?
> Of course, once you learn the concept of subset you'll understand that "some
> arms" are merely "some arms" and not "arms". LOL!
I am not interested in your semantic games, Steve. By the way, you never
gave a direct answer to the question:
Do you deny that nuclear arms are arms?
Please note, the question has nothing to do with the Constitution... but
your trolling games made you jump to it in your answer. Come on, Steve,
isn't it time you learn that:
A partial subset is not synonymous with the whole
And:
A partial subset is a subset of the hole
Please do not show that you have problems with *both* of those concepts.
--
€ If A = B then B = A (known as the "symmetric property of equality")
€ Incest and sex are not identical (only a pervert would disagree)
€ One can be actually guilty of a crime but neither tried nor convicted