Consolidated reply to CSMA trolls: 8 Feb 2005
Snit
trolling today... just the ol' repeat the old trolls and hope someone takes
notice. If they are going to troll, and they are, I hope they have a more
creative day tomorrow. Better yet, why don't they simply stop trolling.
That, however, is damned unlikely.
The best trolling of the day comes from Steve Carroll, with the oh-so-clever
play on words with the name "snit" (article 8). Can you guess what he came
up with. Yeah, I know... nothing really clever, but the best the trolls
could do today.
Hey trolls, when Steve Carroll comes up with the most clever flame of the
day, you really need to work on your shtick. What an embarrassment for the
rest of you!
********** ARTICLE ONE *********
"Elizabot v2.0.2" <Eliz...@NsOpSyPmAaMc.com> wrote in post
4208518d$0$98001$7586...@news.frii.net on 2/7/05 10:43 PM:
> Snit wrote:
>> Tim Adams, Steve Carroll, Elizabot, Steve Mackay
>
> Just thought you'd like to know that I didn't read that. Maybe I will
> tomorrow. I like a good laugh to start off the morning.
>
> You are also getting to be as kooky as Tholen. He makes posts similar to
> that. Perhaps you should study one of his digests that he posts in
> rec.music.classical so you can get some pointers.
>
> <snip elephant dung>
Ever see a brat in elementary school who would put his fingers in his ears
and scream "La! La! La! I can't hear you!"? Elizabot just did the Usenet
equivalent. She must be proud.
********** ARTICLE TWO *********
"Wally" <wa...@wally.world.net> wrote in post
po3Od.1472157$f47.2...@news.easynews.com on 2/8/05 6:45 AM:
> ----------
> In article <teadams$2$0$0$3-C82E71.07...@news1.east.earthlink.net>,
> Tim Adams <teadams$2$0$0$3...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
>> In article <BE2D9C21.1F434%SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID>,
>> Snit <SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID> wrote:
>>
>>> Tim Adams, Steve Carroll, Elizabot, Steve Mackay
>>
>> ~ snipped the lies and distortions of snit
>>
>> Wonder if he'll ever figure out how to keep all his garbage in one
>> thread?
>>
>> --
>> Tim
>
> Now, Now Tim, You know as well as I that Snit does not/cannot operate in
> that way, all the while people have the audacity to ask Snit for
> verification of what he says, or are able to supply proof of what they say,
> then Snit can't afford to sit still very long, his daily digest allows him
> the freedom to ignore the previous one and any rebuttals that follow it as
> though they never happened, he can regurgitate the same old BS, much the
> same as he has had to regurgitate the story in modified form about the PC
> Floppy *Yawn*, BS is all he has, but it is interesting to see in how many
> different ways he can deliver it! ;=)
Wally. Accusations. No Support. Boring.
********** ARTICLE THREE *********
"Tim Adams" <teadams$2$0$0$3...@earthlink.net> wrote in post
teadams$2$0$0$3-C82E71.07...@news1.east.earthlink.net on 2/8/05
5:01 AM:
> In article <BE2D9C21.1F434%SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID>,
> Snit <SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID> wrote:
>
>> Tim Adams, Steve Carroll, Elizabot, Steve Mackay
>
> ~ snipped the lies and distortions of snit
>
> Wonder if he'll ever figure out how to keep all his garbage in one
> thread?
Tim Adams. Dishonest snipping. Whines. Lies. Boring.
********** ARTICLE FOUR *********
"Tim Adams" <teadams$2$0$0$3...@earthlink.net> wrote in post
teadams$2$0$0$3-F85677.06...@news1.east.earthlink.net on 2/8/05
4:54 AM:
> In article <uqZNd.2904$ZZ....@newssvr23.news.prodigy.net>,
> "John Slade" <hitm...@pacbell.net> wrote:
>
>> "Wally" <wa...@wally.world.net> wrote in message
>> news:V52Nd.897262$B07.1...@news.easynews.com...
>>>
>>>
>>> ----------
>>> In article <BE295AF6.1ED89%SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID>, Snit
>>> <SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Nope. You are lying, Slade.
>>>
>>> "LOL... coming from you... yeah" Snit...
>>>
>>>> You made biased and absurd allegations without support.
>>>
>>> Perhaps he realized, correctly, that had he provided support, you would
>>> simply have snipped it and claimed it didn't exist....that is after
>>> all....Your way!
>>
>> I'm surprised Snit has time to do anything. You see Snit repairs PCs for
>> a living and he teaches classes for a living
>
> At least this is what he claims. Apparently the classes are for the
> mentally challenged, as they have problems reading error messages.
>
>> all while having time to post
>> numerous messages to this newsgroup all day long.
>>
>> John
Tim Adams. Meaningless attacks. Boring.
********** ARTICLE FIVE *********
"Elizabot v2.0.2" <Eliz...@NsOpSyPmAaMc.com> wrote in post
42086e8c$0$97998$7586...@news.frii.net on 2/8/05 12:47 AM:
> John Slade wrote:
>> "Elizabot v2.0.2" <Eliz...@NsOpSyPmAaMc.com> wrote in message
>> news:4206825d$0$97997$7586...@news.frii.net...
>>
>>> John Slade wrote:
>>>
>>>> "Elizabot v2.0.2" <Eliz...@NsOpSyPmAaMc.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:42056cef$0$97996$7586...@news.frii.net...
>>>>
>>>
>>>>> No, that's the sort of cheap trolling antic that Snit's done. In late
>>>>> August/early September last year, Snit had quite a number of email
>>>>> addresses:
>>>>>
>>>>> CSMA...@HOTMAIL.COM
>>>>>
>>>>> te...@test.edu
>>>>>
>>>>> snit-...@CABLE0NE.NET
>>>>>
>>>>> SN...@CABLE0NE.NET
>>>>>
>>>>> sn...@hotmail.com
>>>>>
>>>>> sn...@CABLE0NE.NET
>>>>>
>>>>> SN...@CABLE0NE.NET
>>>>>
>>>>> snit....@cable1.net
>>>>>
>>>>> snit-...@cableone.net
>>>>
>>>> LOL! That's pretty pathetic. Snit was also posting using the name of a
>>>> casino owner in Vegas I think. It's pretty easy to spot a Snit post even if
>>>> he actually knew how to hide himself. Why would anyone go through the
>>>> trouble of changing their name. Usenet must be a really big part of their
>>>> lives. They need for people to hear them to feel validated.
>>>
>>> Indeed. Also fits in why Snit teaches classes at the community college:
>>> teachers have a captive audience!
>>>
>>> Oh, and Snit is currenly fantasizing that I am jealous of you because
>>> you get more responses from him than I get from him. Thought you'd
>>> appreciate the humor in that.
>>
>> Snit is pretty kooky. However I just killfiled another one of Snit's
>> kook pals. Georgie Graves claims he's going to hound me out of this
>> newsgroup. He said he would get his pals to hound me until I left. After I
>> stopped laughing, I realized that Snit is the only friend this nut has in
>> here. I guess since I killfiled both these fools, their plan to "hound me
>> out of the newsgroup" has gone up in smoke.
>>
>> John
>
> lol Snit thinks he can humiliate me out of the newsgroup. I think it's
> very funny that a senseless kook like Snit thinks he has the capability
> to do that. You can tell by how nasty he gets in his responses to me
> that I've really gotten to him.
>
> Are you jealous that Snit doesn't include you when he's trolling in his
> consolidated posts? ;-) He still follows you around the newsgroup
> responding to your posts. I guess he's trying to humiliate you too. He
> is one stupid troll.
Elizabot. Obsessive. Delusional. Boring.
********** ARTICLE SIX *********
"Sandman" <m...@sandman.net> wrote in post
mr-35A81B.11...@individual.net on 2/8/05 3:16 AM:
> In article <4208518d$0$98001$7586...@news.frii.net>,
> "Elizabot v2.0.2" <Eliz...@NsOpSyPmAaMc.com> wrote:
>
>>> Tim Adams, Steve Carroll, Elizabot, Steve Mackay
>>
>> Just thought you'd like to know that I didn't read that. Maybe I will
>> tomorrow. I like a good laugh to start off the morning.
>>
>> You are also getting to be as kooky as Tholen. He makes posts similar to
>> that. Perhaps you should study one of his digests that he posts in
>> rec.music.classical so you can get some pointers.
>
> Dave and Michael has a lot in common. Both want to insist that when the
> majority of people call them idiots or trolls, they are all idiots and/or
> trolls.
>
> I would assume that Dave is the most hated person in cooa just as Michael is
> the most hated person in csma.
Sandman. Notes that trolls hate me. He hates me. Sandman misses the
point. Again. Boring.
********** ARTICLE SEVEN *********
"Steve Carroll" <no...@nowhere.com> wrote in post
noone-F839B5....@comcast.dca.giganews.com on 2/8/05 9:03 AM:
> In article <BE2D9C21.1F434%SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID>,
> Snit <SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID> wrote:
>
>>>> If this offends you to the point where you feel the need to KF me, then so
>>>> be it. It is clear, however, that my method is working - shortly after I
>>>> went to this method Steve Carroll stopped posting,
>>>
>>>
>>> I did? For how long? Say... was it the length of time used to define a
>>> vacation? LOL!
>>
>> Does anyone know what Steve is talking about here? Anyone at all? Is Steve
>> about to deny that he stopped posting for a couple days?
>
> This points out your inability to comprehend what you've read as well as
> anything in your entire delusional tirade here. Care to define 'stopped
> posting', Snit? BTW, your original text didn't say anything about "a
> couple days". You've shown that you've had trouble with this in the
> past:) In any event, care to link the period of time I paused from
> posting to csma to anything having to do with any of your glue induced
> delusions? I didn't think so :) It was funny, though, wasn't it?
>
> "It is clear, however, that my method is working - shortly after I went
> to this method Steve Carroll stopped posting,"
>
>
> The only thing that is "clear" is your glue... which means it hasn't
> dried up yet (like we didn't notice;)
Steve Carroll. Angry rants. Poor comprehension skills. Illegal drug
references. Boring.
********** ARTICLE EIGHT *********
"Steve Carroll" <no...@nowhere.com> wrote in post
noone-C708F5....@comcast.dca.giganews.com on 2/8/05 9:32 AM:
> In article <4207b7c9$0$98002$7586...@news.frii.net>,
> "Elizabot v2.0.2" <Eliz...@NsOpSyPmAaMc.com> wrote:
>
>> Steve Carroll wrote:
>>> In article <BE295C28.1ED8C%SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID>,
>>> Snit <SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> "John Slade" <hitm...@pacbell.net> wrote in post
>>>> 1XTMd.563$lz5...@newssvr24.news.prodigy.net on 2/4/05 4:54 PM:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> "George Graves" <gmgra...@pacbell.net> wrote in message
>>>>> news:gmgravesnos-6372...@newssvr23-ext.news.prodigy.com...
>>>>>
>>>>>> In article <S6QMd.225609$Np3.9...@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>,
>>>>>> Nashton <n...@nah.ton> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://hardware.silicon.com/desktops/0,39024645,39127567,00.htm
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sounds very familiar. Just look at how the Mackooks behave in this ng;)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Nicolas
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Before your new online persona joins the rest of your net aliases in my
>>>>>> killfile, I just want to say that while there are many Mac users who
>>>>>> think that Apple and Steve Jobs can do no wrong, there are really damned
>>>>>> few of them here, and if you think otherwise, you need a perspective
>>>>>> checkup.
>>>>>
>>>>> ROTFLMAO! Look who this is coming from. Isn't this the guy who wanted to
>>>>> hound me out of the newsgroup for speaking bad about Macs and Apple? This
>>>>> is the guy, Goergie Graves who quickly resorts to gutter language. If
>>>>> anyone is a total kook who needs to get checked by a shrink it's Georgie
>>>>> here. I nearly hit the floor when he started trying to point the finger at
>>>>> others after he read this article.
>>>>
>>>> What about you, Slade. Have you forgotten your moments of insanity,
>>>> trolling or just plain being wrong and refusing to admit it? Here are just
>>>> a few:
>>>>
>>>> - Your claims about needing to log in as root to install software on OS X
>>>>
>>>> - Your claims that the hack a Mac contests were rigged
>>>>
>>>> - Your lack of knowledge in understanding thread drift on Usenet
>>>>
>>>> - Your claims that you can point to a set of XP applications that are
>>>> roughly equal to and as good as iLife on OS X. You never have.
>>>>
>>>> - Your claim that the Mac Mini is all about size... and even your lies
>>>> that the Mac web site only looks at that.
>>>>
>>>> - Your claims that there are no new video cards (not new models, mind you)
>>>> with only 32 MB of Ram. You even claimed they were probably not
>>>> covered under warranty, even after you were given links to cards that
>>>> were!
>>>>
>>>> - Your belittling of the lowest end Mac based on the fact that it is not
>>>> a high end machine.
>>>>
>>>> - Your sinking to personal attacks when I asked you what made you think
>>>> two chips you said were comparable were as you claimed.
>>>
>>>
>>> There's that ol' obsession again :)
>>
>> Wow! It would be an extensive task to track down in Google all of Snit's
>> obsessive lists, wouldn't it?
>>
>
> It'd be a helluva job... far easier than searching on his delusions. For
> that, just search on the names in your Snit-list and you're done.
> Hmmm... Snit-list...
>
> Cool it, or I'll put you on my Snit-list!
>
> Has a familiar ring to it:)
>
>> Congratulations on humiating Snit out of the newsgroup this morning. It
>> is not often that he takes this much time off between postings!
Wow! Steve Carroll *tries* to be clever.
Operative word: tries.
Still, Steve manages to make the most creative trolling of the day. I am
sure the other trolls will be happy with him.
********** ARTICLE NINE *********
"Steve Carroll" <no...@nowhere.com> wrote in post
noone-60000C....@comcast.dca.giganews.com on 2/8/05 9:52 AM:
> In article <uqZNd.2904$ZZ....@newssvr23.news.prodigy.net>,
> "John Slade" <hitm...@pacbell.net> wrote:
>
>> "Wally" <wa...@wally.world.net> wrote in message
>> news:V52Nd.897262$B07.1...@news.easynews.com...
>>>
>>>
>>> ----------
>>> In article <BE295AF6.1ED89%SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID>, Snit
>>> <SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Nope. You are lying, Slade.
>>>
>>> "LOL... coming from you... yeah" Snit...
>>>
>>>> You made biased and absurd allegations without support.
>>>
>>> Perhaps he realized, correctly, that had he provided support, you would
>>> simply have snipped it and claimed it didn't exist....that is after
>>> all....Your way!
>>
>> I'm surprised Snit has time to do anything.
>
> Not a problem... glue fumes have that miraculous quality Snit needs to
> lead the kind of life he talks about in csma.
>
>> You see Snit repairs PCs for
>> a living and he teaches classes for a living all while having time to post
>> numerous messages to this newsgroup all day long.
>
>
> Hang around long enough and you'll notice that whenever someone points
> that out, Snit will take breaks from posting as often as he usually
> does... but only for awhile. Before long, he's back to his padded room
> schedule of 24/7 and all is well again (as well as it can be for a fume
> weary delusional).
Steve Carroll. Angry rants. Poor comprehension skills. Illegal drug
references. Boring.
********** ARTICLE TEN *********
"Steve Carroll" <no...@nowhere.com> wrote in post
noone-171F02....@comcast.dca.giganews.com on 2/8/05 10:09 AM:
> In article <BE2D2327.1F370%SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID>,
> Snit <SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID> wrote:
>
>> "George Graves" <gmgra...@pacbell.net> wrote in post
>> gmgravesnos-2F00...@newssvr23-ext.news.prodigy.com on 2/7/05
>> 1:44 PM:
>>
>>> In article <noone-073D95....@comcast.dca.giganews.com>,
>>> Steve Carroll <no...@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> In article <BE295C28.1ED8C%SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID>,
>>>> Snit <SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID> wrote:
>>
>>>>> What about you, Slade. Have you forgotten your moments of insanity,
>>>>> trolling or just plain being wrong and refusing to admit it? Here are
>>>>> just a few:
>>>>>
>>>>> - Your claims about needing to log in as root to install software on OS X
>>>>>
>>>>> - Your claims that the hack a Mac contests were rigged
>>>>>
>>>>> - Your lack of knowledge in understanding thread drift on Usenet
>>>>>
>>>>> - Your claims that you can point to a set of XP applications that are
>>>>> roughly equal to and as good as iLife on OS X. You never have.
>>>>>
>>>>> - Your claim that the Mac Mini is all about size... and even your lies
>>>>> that the Mac web site only looks at that.
>>>>>
>>>>> - Your claims that there are no new video cards (not new models, mind you)
>>>>> with only 32 MB of Ram. You even claimed they were probably not covered
>>>>> under warranty, even after you were given links to cards that were!
>>>>>
>>>>> - Your belittling of the lowest end Mac based on the fact that it is not a
>>>>> high end machine.
>>>>>
>>>>> - Your sinking to personal attacks when I asked you what made you think
>>>>> two chips you said were comparable were as you claimed.
>>>>>
>>>> There's that ol' obsession again :)
>>>
>>> Just so you know. I didn't post the above points made against Slade.
>>
>> Even if you had, Steve Carroll would not have posted a trolling attack
>> against you.
>
> I doubt I'd be alone when I say I've never seen George troll to the
> degree I've seen you do it. While everyone might troll occasionally, you
> ARE a troll... bit of a difference, really.
>
>> Steve Carroll trolls me... and occasionally posts about music.
>>
>> He offers very little else to CSMA.
>
> I'll bite... what is it that you think you offer that can't be had with
> FAR less trouble than you are worth? Do you still entertain the delusion
> that your website is some sort of invaluable service... found no where
> else on the net? Or the delusion that you are a fountain of Mac
> knowledge, the holder of those particular bits of information possessed
> by no other? Tell me, bagface... to what heights have the fumes taken
> you today? Snit, you couldn't even set up your router... for crisakkes.
> Get fucking real, will ya :)
Steve Carroll. Angry rants. Poor comprehension skills. Illegal drug
references. Boring.
********** ARTICLE ELEVEN *********
"Tim Adams" <teadams$2$0$0$3...@earthlink.net> wrote in post
teadams$2$0$0$3-1259FB.12...@news1.east.earthlink.net on 2/8/05
10:18 AM:
> In article <BE2E30AD.1F49D%SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID>,
> Snit <SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID> wrote:
>
>> "Mike" <a...@def.ghi> wrote in post
>> abc-D6C6A2.1...@28-76.newscene.com on 2/8/05 8:46 AM:
>>
>>> In article <mr-35A81B.11...@individual.net>,
>>> Sandman <m...@sandman.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I would assume that Dave is the most hated person in cooa just as Michael
>>>> is
>>>> the most hated person in csma.
>>>
>>> I would say that those are both good assumptions!
>>
>> I piss off a lot of trolls in CSMA.
>
> there's another lie from snit.
>
> Worded properly it would read 'I'm a troll that pisses off many CSMA
> regulars'.
>
> ~snip
Tim Adams. Meaningless attacks. Dishonest snipping. Boring.
********** ARTICLE TWELVE *********
"Steve Carroll" <no...@nowhere.com> wrote in post
noone-46F2E7....@comcast.dca.giganews.com on 2/8/05 10:30 AM:
> In article <BE2E30AD.1F49D%SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID>,
> Snit <SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID> wrote:
>
>> "Mike" <a...@def.ghi> wrote in post
>> abc-D6C6A2.1...@28-76.newscene.com on 2/8/05 8:46 AM:
>>
>>> In article <mr-35A81B.11...@individual.net>,
>>> Sandman <m...@sandman.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I would assume that Dave is the most hated person in cooa just as Michael
>>>> is
>>>> the most hated person in csma.
>>>
>>> I would say that those are both good assumptions!
>>
>> I piss off a lot of trolls in CSMA.
>
>
> Ahem... perhaps you missed what the poster was referring to:
>
>
> "Both want to insist that when the majority of people call them idiots
> or trolls, they are all idiots and/or trolls."
>
> --and--
>
> "I would assume that Dave is the most hated person in cooa just as
> Michael is the most hated person in csma."
>
>
>
> For most people, R&R means rest and relaxation. Apparently, for you, it
> means refusal (of the truth) and regurgitation (of your delusions).
Steve Carroll. Angry rants. Poor comprehension skills. Hey! No illegal
drug references - a slight change for Steve. Still, even with the slight
change... boring.
********** ARTICLE THIRTEEN *********
"Elizabot v2.0.2" <Eliz...@NsOpSyPmAaMc.com> wrote in post
42092ee4$0$97997$7586...@news.frii.net on 2/8/05 2:28 PM:
> Snit wrote:
>> "Timberwoof" <timbe...@stimpberawoofm.com> wrote in post
>> timberwoof-63202...@typhoon.sonic.net on 2/8/05 1:15 PM:
>>
>>
>>> In article <jpolaski-A8A411...@netnews.comcast.net>,
>>> Jim Polaski <jpol...@NOSpaMync.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> In article <110gdff...@corp.supernews.com>,
>>>> "Crystal Gringo" <Th...@Legend.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> I am the Crystal Gringo! I am here to help you - if you show me respect.
>>>>> Your meaningless troll wars offer you no legacy. Help each other and you
>>>>> may earn the right to walk in my shadow!
>>>>
>>>> What can you tell us about string theory?
>>>
>>> Hah! When he was two, he proved Newton wrong. When he was eight he
>>> discovered
>>> the fatal flaw in Einstein's Spatial Relativity and Generic Relativity. And
>>> he
>>> has discovered the central problem in all the current string theories, but
>>> he
>>> knows that since he's the only smartest person in the world, no one will
>>> understand his proof, so he can't waste his time to tell us.
>>
>>
>> You mean string theory does not deal with mozzarella sticks?
>
> Looks like I can add physics to the dumb-snit-list.
>
> Why don't you ask them here, troll:
>
> news:sci.physics.strings
Other than to show off her trolling to get my attention, what possible value
does Elizabot's trolling have here? None. Boring.
********** ARTICLE FOURTEEN *********
"Steve Carroll" <no...@nowhere.com> wrote in post
noone-CD5E95....@comcast.dca.giganews.com on 2/8/05 2:31 PM:
> In article <BE2E625C.1F4F2%SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID>,
> Snit <SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID> wrote:
>
>> "George Graves" <gmgra...@pacbell.net> wrote in post
>> gmgravesnos-3B68...@newssvr22-ext.news.prodigy.com on 2/8/05
>> 12:23 PM:
>>
>>>> You haven't answered the question. You said that Mac OS X Server was in
>>>> some way different from Mac OS X that it was suitable for use in a
>>>> supercomputing cluster where Mac OS X was not. Now: do you know what
>>>> you're talking about, or don't you?
>>>
>>> Never having used either, he's guessing.
>>
>> It is fine that Slade does not know... nobody knows everything.
>>
>> But for Slade to troll the way he does, and then act surprised when he is
>> called on it... just bizarre. I don't understand people who do that.
>
> Are you using superglue in that bag now, Snit? Or should I be asking: Do
> you heat the trichloroethylene before inhaling it?
Steve Carroll. Angry rants. Poor comprehension skills. Illegal drug
references. Boring.
********** ARTICLE FIFTEEN *********
"Elizabot v2.0.2" <Eliz...@NsOpSyPmAaMc.com> wrote in post
4209356c$0$97999$7586...@news.frii.net on 2/8/05 2:55 PM:
> Snit wrote:
>> "C Lund" <cl...@notam02SPAMBLOCK.no> wrote in post
>> clund-8515B9....@amstwist00.chello.com on 2/8/05 2:22 PM:
>>
>>
>>> In article <2005020809554931456%createbeforeyouhate@itsjustabookcom>,
>>> Kind of Blue27 <createbef...@itsjustabook.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Finally it exists!! IF YOU PLAY GUITAR, YOU NEED THIS BOOK!! Listen
>>>> to my story:
>>>
>>> Is it just me or has the amount of usenet spam increased lately?
>>
>>
>> Yes, Steve Carroll has been posting more. :)
>
> Why don't you post your consolidated replies in alt.flame.macintosh, Snit?
Ahhh, poor Elizabot does not like my consolidated replies. Poor her. If it
pisses her off to see her posts in here she should stop trolling.
********** ARTICLE SIXTEEN *********
"Steve Carroll" <no...@nowhere.com> wrote in post
noone-12CCA5....@comcast.dca.giganews.com on 2/8/05 3:31 PM:
> In article <4209356c$0$97999$7586...@news.frii.net>,
> "Elizabot v2.0.2" <Eliz...@NsOpSyPmAaMc.com> wrote:
>
>> Snit wrote:
>>> "C Lund" <cl...@notam02SPAMBLOCK.no> wrote in post
>>> clund-8515B9....@amstwist00.chello.com on 2/8/05 2:22 PM:
>>>
>>>
>>>> In article <2005020809554931456%createbeforeyouhate@itsjustabookcom>,
>>>> Kind of Blue27 <createbef...@itsjustabook.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Finally it exists!! IF YOU PLAY GUITAR, YOU NEED THIS BOOK!! Listen
>>>>> to my story:
>>>>
>>>> Is it just me or has the amount of usenet spam increased lately?
>>>
>>>
>>> Yes, Steve Carroll has been posting more. :)
>>
>> Why don't you post your consolidated replies in alt.flame.macintosh, Snit?
>
>
> "Internet spam is one or more unsolicited messages, sent or posted as
> part of a larger collection of messages, all having substantially
> identical content."
>
>
> Gee... sounds much more like Snit's posts to csma than it does mine.
Steve Carroll. Angry rants. Poor comprehension skills. Again Steve forgot
to include illegal drug references. Boring.
Also, when you think about it, ironic. The reason why, however, will go
*way* over Steve's head.
********** ARTICLE SEVENTEEN *********
"Elizabot v2.0.2" <Eliz...@NsOpSyPmAaMc.com> wrote in post
420954f0$0$97996$7586...@news.frii.net on 2/8/05 5:10 PM:
> Wally wrote:
>>
>> ----------
>> In article <teadams$2$0$0$3-C82E71.07...@news1.east.earthlink.net>,
>> Tim Adams <teadams$2$0$0$3...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> In article <BE2D9C21.1F434%SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID>,
>>> Snit <SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Tim Adams, Steve Carroll, Elizabot, Steve Mackay
>>>
>>> ~ snipped the lies and distortions of snit
>>>
>>> Wonder if he'll ever figure out how to keep all his garbage in one
>>> thread?
>>>
>>> --
>>> Tim
>>
>>
>> Now, Now Tim, You know as well as I that Snit does not/cannot operate in
>> that way, all the while people have the audacity to ask Snit for
>> verification of what he says, or are able to supply proof of what they say,
>> then Snit can't afford to sit still very long, his daily digest allows him
>> the freedom to ignore the previous one and any rebuttals that follow it as
>> though they never happened, he can regurgitate the same old BS, much the
>> same as he has had to regurgitate the story in modified form about the PC
>> Floppy *Yawn*, BS is all he has, but it is interesting to see in how many
>> different ways he can deliver it! ;=)
>
> Hmm, let me replace "snit" with "Tholen" and see how that reads:
>
> "Now, Now Tim, You know as well as I that Tholen does not/cannot operate
> in that way, all the while people have the audacity to ask Tholen for
> verification of what he says, or are able to supply proof of what they
> say, then Tholen can't afford to sit still very long, his daily digest
> allows him the freedom to ignore the previous one and any rebuttals that
> follow it as though they never happened, he can regurgitate the same old
> BS, much the same as he has had to regurgitate the story in modified
> form about the PC Floppy *Yawn*, BS is all he has, but it is interesting
> to see in how many different ways he can deliver it! ;=)"
>
>
> Snit is well on the same track as Tholen. All he needs now is to win a
> kook award.
Elizabot. Obsessive. Delusional. Boring.
********** ARTICLE EIGHTEEN *********
"Elizabot v2.0.2" <Eliz...@NsOpSyPmAaMc.com> wrote in post
42095365$0$97996$7586...@news.frii.net on 2/8/05 5:03 PM:
> Tim Adams wrote:
>> In article <4209356c$0$97999$7586...@news.frii.net>,
>> "Elizabot v2.0.2" <Eliz...@NsOpSyPmAaMc.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Snit wrote:
>>>
>>>> "C Lund" <cl...@notam02SPAMBLOCK.no> wrote in post
>>>> clund-8515B9....@amstwist00.chello.com on 2/8/05 2:22 PM:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> In article <2005020809554931456%createbeforeyouhate@itsjustabookcom>,
>>>>> Kind of Blue27 <createbef...@itsjustabook.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Finally it exists!! IF YOU PLAY GUITAR, YOU NEED THIS BOOK!! Listen
>>>>>> to my story:
>>>>>
>>>>> Is it just me or has the amount of usenet spam increased lately?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yes, Steve Carroll has been posting more. :)
>>>
>>> Why don't you post your consolidated replies in alt.flame.macintosh, Snit?
>>
>>
>> They don't let him in that group anymore.
>
> It doesn't look like they let him post in his anxiety support group either.
Elizabot. Obsessive. Delusional. Boring.
William R. Walsh
45K and 30K posts are not courteous or necessary. Now, please stop this
nonsense.
William
Snit
post MugOd.57731$EG1.47609@attbi_s53 on 2/8/05 9:40 PM:
> Do you not understand what "STOP" means?
You assume that I am under some obligation to follow your directives.
>
> 45K and 30K posts are not courteous or necessary. Now, please stop this
> nonsense.
If you do not want to read them, don't.
I enjoy taunting the trolls. Call it a hobby. :)
I used to respond to each of their flames individually - now I post one big
consolidated reply (and occasional smaller replies, as I see fit). It makes
it so that the impact of my empowering them to troll is minimized.
Tell you what, though, if you can get the trolls who flame me to do so less,
or to do so in shorter posts, my consolidated replies will be shorter.
--
"If a million people believe a foolish thing, it is still a foolish thing."
- Anatole France
Sandman
Snit <SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID> wrote:
> I enjoy taunting the trolls. Call it a hobby.
Cool, when will you begin?
--
Sandman[.net]
Tim Adams
Snit <SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID> wrote:
> Elizabot, Wally, Tim Adams, and Sandman were not able to do much with their
> trolling today... just the ol' repeat the old trolls and hope someone takes
> notice. If they are going to troll, and they are, I hope they have a more
> creative day tomorrow. Better yet, why don't they simply stop trolling.
>
Better still, since you're the troll, why don't you simply stop posting
or does your doctor call this therapy for your problems?
~snipped elephant dung, circus elements, garbage, lies and distortions
posted by snit
--
Tim
Tim Adams
You've done it now William. You'll be labeled a 'Troll' and snit will
start making up all sorts of lies about you, going so far as to distort
posts you've made in the past changing your position on virtually evedry
topic you might have posted on.
--
Tim
Elizabot v2.0.2
> Do you not understand what "STOP" means?
No, Snit does not understand. All he sees is you trying to boss him
around. He doesn't understand courtesy.
Now that I've intervened, there is a good chance that Snit will modify
his behavior because he hates it when I'm right. We could have a win-win
situation!
> 45K and 30K posts are not courteous or necessary. Now, please stop this
> nonsense.
Good luck. Snit's under the impression that these posts of his are
upsetting and humiliating to the posters that he considers trolls. It's
unlikely they will stop for a while.
--
By responding to Elizabot v2.0.2 you implicitly agree to the TOS at:
http://elizabot.spymac.net/
William R. Walsh
> You assume that I am under some obligation to follow your directives.
<haunting music>You are. You just don't know it yet.</haunting music>
:-)
> I enjoy taunting the trolls. Call it a hobby. :)
It doesn't do you any good--it wastes bandwidth and it irritates people like
me that don't really care and would really rather not know.
Why don't you just e-mail them personally? I hear that sending mass e-mail
is easy and cheap these days...and I'm sure it will go over *very* well.
> Tell you what, though, if you can get the trolls who flame me to do so
less,
> or to do so in shorter posts, my consolidated replies will be shorter.
I don't make deals. That's not my job. But I can offer a suggestion--don't
reply to them! You leave them alone, and I'm sure they will return the
favor.
Now, if you'll excuse me, and accept my sincere apologies for this, PLONK!
Feel proud about that. You're the first person to be plonked from my new
computer! :-)
William
Steve Carroll
Snit <SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID> wrote:
> "William R. Walsh" <newsg...@saveyourspam.walshcomptech.com> wrote in
> post MugOd.57731$EG1.47609@attbi_s53 on 2/8/05 9:40 PM:
>
> > Do you not understand what "STOP" means?
>
> You assume that I am under some obligation to follow your directives.
> >
> > 45K and 30K posts are not courteous or necessary. Now, please stop this
> > nonsense.
> If you do not want to read them, don't.
>
> I enjoy taunting the trolls. Call it a hobby. :)
>
> I used to respond to each of their flames individually - now I post one big
> consolidated reply (and occasional smaller replies, as I see fit). It makes
> it so that the impact of my empowering them to troll is minimized.
>
> Tell you what, though, if you can get the trolls who flame me to do so less,
> or to do so in shorter posts, my consolidated replies will be shorter.
And once again we have... the two faces of Snit. One claims to enjoy it,
the other seeks to engage posters to make his creation stop. That you
make it this evident in one post is where the comedy lives:)