What a real computer does during a game....
MuahMan
Alan Baker
"MuahMan" <mua...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> http://brandon.omega6.net/RvS/dod/201fps.tga
Pity it wasn't served up by a real server:
"HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 06:21:34 GMT
Server: Apache/1.3.33 (Unix) mod_auth_passthrough/1.8 mod_log_bytes/1.2
mod_bwlimited/1.4 PHP/4.3.11 FrontPage/5.0.2.2635 mod_ssl/2.8.22
OpenSSL/0.9.7a
Last-Modified: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 05:59:43 GMT
ETag: "45c1b5-384012-443c974f"
Accept-Ranges: bytes
Content-Length: 3686418
Content-Type: text/plain"
Then the content type would have been set properly and people with
standards compliant browsers would be able to view it...
--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
"If you raise the ceiling 4 feet, move the fireplace from that wall
to that wall, you'll still only get the full stereophonic effect
if you sit in the bottom of that cupboard."
MuahMan
"Alan Baker" <alang...@telus.net> wrote in message
news:alangbaker-97D35...@news.telus.net...
> In article <doWdnbXDxrY4BqHZ...@adelphia.com>,
> "MuahMan" <mua...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> http://brandon.omega6.net/RvS/dod/201fps.tga
>
> Pity it wasn't served up by a real server:
>
> "HTTP/1.1 200 OK
> Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 06:21:34 GMT
> Server: Apache/1.3.33 (Unix) mod_auth_passthrough/1.8 mod_log_bytes/1.2
> mod_bwlimited/1.4 PHP/4.3.11 FrontPage/5.0.2.2635 mod_ssl/2.8.22
> OpenSSL/0.9.7a
> Last-Modified: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 05:59:43 GMT
> ETag: "45c1b5-384012-443c974f"
> Accept-Ranges: bytes
> Content-Length: 3686418
> Content-Type: text/plain"
>
> Then the content type would have been set properly and people with
> standards compliant browsers would be able to view it...
>
So your Mac can't show .TGA files? Precious!
Snit
doWdnbXDxrY4BqHZ...@adelphia.com on 4/11/06 11:18 PM:
> http://brandon.omega6.net/RvS/dod/201fps.tga
A measly 201 fps. Bug deal! I told you, Sandman can do better:
http://myweb.cableone.net/snit/tmp/half-life.jpg
873 fps. Running on an Apple IIgs if you care.
:)
--
€ Some people do use the term "screen name" in relation to IRC
€ Teaching is a "real job"
€ The tilde in an OS X path does *not* mean "the hard drive only"
Mayor of R'lyeh
chose to bless us with the following wisdom:
>In article <doWdnbXDxrY4BqHZ...@adelphia.com>,
> "MuahMan" <mua...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> http://brandon.omega6.net/RvS/dod/201fps.tga
>
>Pity it wasn't served up by a real server:
>
>"HTTP/1.1 200 OK
>Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 06:21:34 GMT
>Server: Apache/1.3.33 (Unix) mod_auth_passthrough/1.8 mod_log_bytes/1.2
>mod_bwlimited/1.4 PHP/4.3.11 FrontPage/5.0.2.2635 mod_ssl/2.8.22
>OpenSSL/0.9.7a
>Last-Modified: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 05:59:43 GMT
>ETag: "45c1b5-384012-443c974f"
>Accept-Ranges: bytes
>Content-Length: 3686418
>Content-Type: text/plain"
>
>Then the content type would have been set properly and people with
>standards compliant browsers would be able to view it...
IE 7, Firefox and Opera all handle it just fine on Windows.
--
"We believe Internet Explorer is a really good browser.
Internet Explorer is my browser of choice."
Steve Jobs
MuahMan
"Mayor of R'lyeh" <mayor.o...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:d34p32tqg69sgpf56...@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 12 Apr 2006 06:23:13 GMT, Alan Baker <alang...@telus.net>
> chose to bless us with the following wisdom:
>
>>In article <doWdnbXDxrY4BqHZ...@adelphia.com>,
>> "MuahMan" <mua...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>> http://brandon.omega6.net/RvS/dod/201fps.tga
>>
>>Pity it wasn't served up by a real server:
>>
>>"HTTP/1.1 200 OK
>>Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 06:21:34 GMT
>>Server: Apache/1.3.33 (Unix) mod_auth_passthrough/1.8 mod_log_bytes/1.2
>>mod_bwlimited/1.4 PHP/4.3.11 FrontPage/5.0.2.2635 mod_ssl/2.8.22
>>OpenSSL/0.9.7a
>>Last-Modified: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 05:59:43 GMT
>>ETag: "45c1b5-384012-443c974f"
>>Accept-Ranges: bytes
>>Content-Length: 3686418
>>Content-Type: text/plain"
>>
>>Then the content type would have been set properly and people with
>>standards compliant browsers would be able to view it...
>
> IE 7, Firefox and Opera all handle it just fine on Windows.
>
LOL, Hysterical. It's on a Fedora Core server running Apache.
Mayor of R'lyeh
chose to bless us with the following wisdom:
>"MuahMan" <mua...@yahoo.com> stated in post
>doWdnbXDxrY4BqHZ...@adelphia.com on 4/11/06 11:18 PM:
>
>> http://brandon.omega6.net/RvS/dod/201fps.tga
>
>A measly 201 fps. Bug deal! I told you, Sandman can do better:
>
> http://myweb.cableone.net/snit/tmp/half-life.jpg
>
>873 fps. Running on an Apple IIgs if you care.
>
>:)
I didn't know that Mr. Potato Head was in Half Life. 8)
Snit
d34p32tqg69sgpf56...@4ax.com on 4/11/06 11:30 PM:
> On Wed, 12 Apr 2006 06:23:13 GMT, Alan Baker <alang...@telus.net>
> chose to bless us with the following wisdom:
>
>> In article <doWdnbXDxrY4BqHZ...@adelphia.com>,
>> "MuahMan" <mua...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>> http://brandon.omega6.net/RvS/dod/201fps.tga
>>
>> Pity it wasn't served up by a real server:
>>
>> "HTTP/1.1 200 OK
>> Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 06:21:34 GMT
>> Server: Apache/1.3.33 (Unix) mod_auth_passthrough/1.8 mod_log_bytes/1.2
>> mod_bwlimited/1.4 PHP/4.3.11 FrontPage/5.0.2.2635 mod_ssl/2.8.22
>> OpenSSL/0.9.7a
>> Last-Modified: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 05:59:43 GMT
>> ETag: "45c1b5-384012-443c974f"
>> Accept-Ranges: bytes
>> Content-Length: 3686418
>> Content-Type: text/plain"
>>
>> Then the content type would have been set properly and people with
>> standards compliant browsers would be able to view it...
>
> IE 7, Firefox and Opera all handle it just fine on Windows.
I used Firefox to view and download the image. Safari views the image just
fine when I drag it to from my desktop, but from the page it shows it as
gibberish text - it assumes the claimed content type is accurate.
--
€ As of Feb 2006 Apple had no wireless Mighty Mouse
€ If A = B then B = A (known as the "symmetric property of equality")
€ One can be guilty of a crime but neither tried nor convicted
Alan Baker
"MuahMan" <mua...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> "Alan Baker" <alang...@telus.net> wrote in message
> news:alangbaker-97D35...@news.telus.net...
> > In article <doWdnbXDxrY4BqHZ...@adelphia.com>,
> > "MuahMan" <mua...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> >> http://brandon.omega6.net/RvS/dod/201fps.tga
> >
> > Pity it wasn't served up by a real server:
> >
> > "HTTP/1.1 200 OK
> > Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 06:21:34 GMT
> > Server: Apache/1.3.33 (Unix) mod_auth_passthrough/1.8 mod_log_bytes/1.2
> > mod_bwlimited/1.4 PHP/4.3.11 FrontPage/5.0.2.2635 mod_ssl/2.8.22
> > OpenSSL/0.9.7a
> > Last-Modified: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 05:59:43 GMT
> > ETag: "45c1b5-384012-443c974f"
> > Accept-Ranges: bytes
> > Content-Length: 3686418
> > Content-Type: text/plain"
> >
> > Then the content type would have been set properly and people with
> > standards compliant browsers would be able to view it...
> >
>
> So your Mac can't show .TGA files? Precious!
Nope. My Mac can show .TGA files fine. Your server just isn't set to
serve them correctly.
Alan Baker
Mayor of R'lyeh <mayor.o...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Apr 2006 06:23:13 GMT, Alan Baker <alang...@telus.net>
> chose to bless us with the following wisdom:
>
> >In article <doWdnbXDxrY4BqHZ...@adelphia.com>,
> > "MuahMan" <mua...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> >> http://brandon.omega6.net/RvS/dod/201fps.tga
> >
> >Pity it wasn't served up by a real server:
> >
> >"HTTP/1.1 200 OK
> >Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 06:21:34 GMT
> >Server: Apache/1.3.33 (Unix) mod_auth_passthrough/1.8 mod_log_bytes/1.2
> >mod_bwlimited/1.4 PHP/4.3.11 FrontPage/5.0.2.2635 mod_ssl/2.8.22
> >OpenSSL/0.9.7a
> >Last-Modified: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 05:59:43 GMT
> >ETag: "45c1b5-384012-443c974f"
> >Accept-Ranges: bytes
> >Content-Length: 3686418
> >Content-Type: text/plain"
> >
> >Then the content type would have been set properly and people with
> >standards compliant browsers would be able to view it...
>
> IE 7, Firefox and Opera all handle it just fine on Windows.
Whatever...
They're not following the standard.
Snit
584p32pralto82oct...@4ax.com on 4/11/06 11:32 PM:
> On Tue, 11 Apr 2006 23:29:43 -0700, Snit <SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID>
> chose to bless us with the following wisdom:
>
>> "MuahMan" <mua...@yahoo.com> stated in post
>> doWdnbXDxrY4BqHZ...@adelphia.com on 4/11/06 11:18 PM:
>>
>>> http://brandon.omega6.net/RvS/dod/201fps.tga
>>
>> A measly 201 fps. Bug deal! I told you, Sandman can do better:
>>
>> http://myweb.cableone.net/snit/tmp/half-life.jpg
>>
>> 873 fps. Running on an Apple IIgs if you care.
>>
>> :)
>
> I didn't know that Mr. Potato Head was in Half Life. 8)
Hmmm, does sort of look that way.
--
€ Incest is so different from sex as to not be considered synonymous
by anyone other than perverts
€ OS X is partially based on BSD (esp. FreeBSD)
Alan Baker
"MuahMan" <mua...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> "Mayor of R'lyeh" <mayor.o...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:d34p32tqg69sgpf56...@4ax.com...
> > On Wed, 12 Apr 2006 06:23:13 GMT, Alan Baker <alang...@telus.net>
> > chose to bless us with the following wisdom:
> >
> >>In article <doWdnbXDxrY4BqHZ...@adelphia.com>,
> >> "MuahMan" <mua...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> http://brandon.omega6.net/RvS/dod/201fps.tga
> >>
> >>Pity it wasn't served up by a real server:
> >>
> >>"HTTP/1.1 200 OK
> >>Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 06:21:34 GMT
> >>Server: Apache/1.3.33 (Unix) mod_auth_passthrough/1.8 mod_log_bytes/1.2
> >>mod_bwlimited/1.4 PHP/4.3.11 FrontPage/5.0.2.2635 mod_ssl/2.8.22
> >>OpenSSL/0.9.7a
> >>Last-Modified: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 05:59:43 GMT
> >>ETag: "45c1b5-384012-443c974f"
> >>Accept-Ranges: bytes
> >>Content-Length: 3686418
> >>Content-Type: text/plain"
> >>
> >>Then the content type would have been set properly and people with
> >>standards compliant browsers would be able to view it...
> >
> > IE 7, Firefox and Opera all handle it just fine on Windows.
> >
>
> LOL, Hysterical. It's on a Fedora Core server running Apache.
Set up by you? Because that would explain it.
MuahMan
> In article <yoednVV8mMqyA6HZ...@adelphia.com>,
> "MuahMan" <mua...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> "Alan Baker" <alang...@telus.net> wrote in message
>> news:alangbaker-97D35...@news.telus.net...
>> > In article <doWdnbXDxrY4BqHZ...@adelphia.com>,
>> > "MuahMan" <mua...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> http://brandon.omega6.net/RvS/dod/201fps.tga
>> >
>> > Pity it wasn't served up by a real server:
>> >
>> > "HTTP/1.1 200 OK
>> > Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 06:21:34 GMT
>> > Server: Apache/1.3.33 (Unix) mod_auth_passthrough/1.8 mod_log_bytes/1.2
>> > mod_bwlimited/1.4 PHP/4.3.11 FrontPage/5.0.2.2635 mod_ssl/2.8.22
>> > OpenSSL/0.9.7a
>> > Last-Modified: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 05:59:43 GMT
>> > ETag: "45c1b5-384012-443c974f"
>> > Accept-Ranges: bytes
>> > Content-Length: 3686418
>> > Content-Type: text/plain"
>> >
>> > Then the content type would have been set properly and people with
>> > standards compliant browsers would be able to view it...
>> >
>>
>> So your Mac can't show .TGA files? Precious!
>
> Nope. My Mac can show .TGA files fine. Your server just isn't set to
> serve them correctly.
>
Yet everyone seems to be able to display it fine. Maybe we're all LYING!
BWahahahaha
Alan Baker
"MuahMan" <mua...@yahoo.com> wrote:
No. I'm sure you're not.
Your image is just being served incorrectly. That's apparent from
looking at the HTTP headers.
MuahMan
> In article <d34p32tqg69sgpf56...@4ax.com>,
> Mayor of R'lyeh <mayor.o...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 12 Apr 2006 06:23:13 GMT, Alan Baker <alang...@telus.net>
>> chose to bless us with the following wisdom:
>>
>> >In article <doWdnbXDxrY4BqHZ...@adelphia.com>,
>> > "MuahMan" <mua...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> http://brandon.omega6.net/RvS/dod/201fps.tga
>> >
>> >Pity it wasn't served up by a real server:
>> >
>> >"HTTP/1.1 200 OK
>> >Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 06:21:34 GMT
>> >Server: Apache/1.3.33 (Unix) mod_auth_passthrough/1.8 mod_log_bytes/1.2
>> >mod_bwlimited/1.4 PHP/4.3.11 FrontPage/5.0.2.2635 mod_ssl/2.8.22
>> >OpenSSL/0.9.7a
>> >Last-Modified: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 05:59:43 GMT
>> >ETag: "45c1b5-384012-443c974f"
>> >Accept-Ranges: bytes
>> >Content-Length: 3686418
>> >Content-Type: text/plain"
>> >
>> >Then the content type would have been set properly and people with
>> >standards compliant browsers would be able to view it...
>>
>> IE 7, Firefox and Opera all handle it just fine on Windows.
>
> Whatever...
>
> They're not following the standard.
>
It works on Windows. It's standard.
Alan Baker
"MuahMan" <mua...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Sorry. Once again your grasp on reality is tenuous at best.
MuahMan
"Snit" <SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID> wrote in message
news:C061EE0F.4BB99%SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID...
> "Mayor of R'lyeh" <mayor.o...@gmail.com> stated in post
> 584p32pralto82oct...@4ax.com on 4/11/06 11:32 PM:
>
>> On Tue, 11 Apr 2006 23:29:43 -0700, Snit <SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID>
>> chose to bless us with the following wisdom:
>>
>>> "MuahMan" <mua...@yahoo.com> stated in post
>>> doWdnbXDxrY4BqHZ...@adelphia.com on 4/11/06 11:18 PM:
>>>
>>>> http://brandon.omega6.net/RvS/dod/201fps.tga
>>>
>>> A measly 201 fps. Bug deal! I told you, Sandman can do better:
>>>
>>> http://myweb.cableone.net/snit/tmp/half-life.jpg
>>>
>>> 873 fps. Running on an Apple IIgs if you care.
>>>
>>> :)
>>
>> I didn't know that Mr. Potato Head was in Half Life. 8)
>
> Hmmm, does sort of look that way.
>
BTW they cost of the computer putting up those numbers. $1134 @ New
Egg.
> --
> ? Incest is so different from sex as to not be considered synonymous
> by anyone other than perverts
> ? OS X is partially based on BSD (esp. FreeBSD)
>
Jim Lee Jr.
Mayor of R'lyeh <mayor.o...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Apr 2006 06:23:13 GMT, Alan Baker <alang...@telus.net>
> chose to bless us with the following wisdom:
>
> >In article <doWdnbXDxrY4BqHZ...@adelphia.com>,
> > "MuahMan" <mua...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> >> http://brandon.omega6.net/RvS/dod/201fps.tga
> >
> >Pity it wasn't served up by a real server:
> >
> >"HTTP/1.1 200 OK
> >Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 06:21:34 GMT
> >Server: Apache/1.3.33 (Unix) mod_auth_passthrough/1.8 mod_log_bytes/1.2
> >mod_bwlimited/1.4 PHP/4.3.11 FrontPage/5.0.2.2635 mod_ssl/2.8.22
> >OpenSSL/0.9.7a
> >Last-Modified: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 05:59:43 GMT
> >ETag: "45c1b5-384012-443c974f"
> >Accept-Ranges: bytes
> >Content-Length: 3686418
> >Content-Type: text/plain"
> >
> >Then the content type would have been set properly and people with
> >standards compliant browsers would be able to view it...
>
> IE 7, Firefox and Opera all handle it just fine on Windows.
Big whoop, Clyde, ask us if we care.
--
Microsoft and Windoze: The combination that made computing dangerous.
Apple and OS X: The combination that made computing insanely great.
"VISTA" an acronym for the top five Windows problems: Viruses,
Intrusions, Spyware, Trojans and Adware.
As long as the OS was from Apple and not MS I wouldn't care
Jim Lee Jr.
Fantasizing again, Clyde?
Mayor of R'lyeh
chose to bless us with the following wisdom:
>In article <d34p32tqg69sgpf56...@4ax.com>,
> Mayor of R'lyeh <mayor.o...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 12 Apr 2006 06:23:13 GMT, Alan Baker <alang...@telus.net>
>> chose to bless us with the following wisdom:
>>
>> >In article <doWdnbXDxrY4BqHZ...@adelphia.com>,
>> > "MuahMan" <mua...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> http://brandon.omega6.net/RvS/dod/201fps.tga
>> >
>> >Pity it wasn't served up by a real server:
>> >
>> >"HTTP/1.1 200 OK
>> >Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 06:21:34 GMT
>> >Server: Apache/1.3.33 (Unix) mod_auth_passthrough/1.8 mod_log_bytes/1.2
>> >mod_bwlimited/1.4 PHP/4.3.11 FrontPage/5.0.2.2635 mod_ssl/2.8.22
>> >OpenSSL/0.9.7a
>> >Last-Modified: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 05:59:43 GMT
>> >ETag: "45c1b5-384012-443c974f"
>> >Accept-Ranges: bytes
>> >Content-Length: 3686418
>> >Content-Type: text/plain"
>> >
>> >Then the content type would have been set properly and people with
>> >standards compliant browsers would be able to view it...
>>
>> IE 7, Firefox and Opera all handle it just fine on Windows.
>
>Whatever...
>
>They're not following the standard.
I keep hearing that Opera is the most standards compatible browser
around.
Alan Baker
Be fair, Jim.
That particular bit of fantasizing is Pratt-fall's.
It goes along with his fantasies about having gone to a decent
university when in fact he went to the equivalent of a Canadian
community college, and his fantasies about having one a national
debating championship when all we "won" was the ranking that came from
avoiding the good schools by entering only weaker tournaments.
MuahMan
"Jim Lee Jr." <peejs...@insightbb.com> wrote in message
news:peejster01-9CF90...@netnews.asp.att.net...
Who's Clyde. Try to keep up.
Alan Baker
Well now you've learned something. That must be a pretty rare experience
for you, so cherish it.
Snit
>
> "Snit" <SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID> wrote in message
> news:C061EE0F.4BB99%SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID...
>> "Mayor of R'lyeh" <mayor.o...@gmail.com> stated in post
>> 584p32pralto82oct...@4ax.com on 4/11/06 11:32 PM:
>>
>>> On Tue, 11 Apr 2006 23:29:43 -0700, Snit <SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID>
>>> chose to bless us with the following wisdom:
>>>
>>>> "MuahMan" <mua...@yahoo.com> stated in post
>>>> doWdnbXDxrY4BqHZ...@adelphia.com on 4/11/06 11:18 PM:
>>>>
>>>>> http://brandon.omega6.net/RvS/dod/201fps.tga
>>>>
>>>> A measly 201 fps. Bug deal! I told you, Sandman can do better:
>>>>
>>>> http://myweb.cableone.net/snit/tmp/half-life.jpg
>>>>
>>>> 873 fps. Running on an Apple IIgs if you care.
>>>>
>>>> :)
>>>
>>> I didn't know that Mr. Potato Head was in Half Life. 8)
>>
>> Hmmm, does sort of look that way.
>>
>
> BTW they cost of the computer putting up those numbers. $1134 @ New
> Egg.
For me such gaming is a non-issue, I simply do not enjoy it. But, for folks
who do like such gaming enough to have it be a determining factor in their
computer purchasing decisions, the Mac is likely not the way to go. I know
I suggest Windows machines to such folks.
Mayor of R'lyeh
<peejs...@insightbb.com> chose to bless us with the following
wisdom:
>In article <d34p32tqg69sgpf56...@4ax.com>,
> Mayor of R'lyeh <mayor.o...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 12 Apr 2006 06:23:13 GMT, Alan Baker <alang...@telus.net>
>> chose to bless us with the following wisdom:
>>
>> >In article <doWdnbXDxrY4BqHZ...@adelphia.com>,
>> > "MuahMan" <mua...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> http://brandon.omega6.net/RvS/dod/201fps.tga
>> >
>> >Pity it wasn't served up by a real server:
>> >
>> >"HTTP/1.1 200 OK
>> >Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 06:21:34 GMT
>> >Server: Apache/1.3.33 (Unix) mod_auth_passthrough/1.8 mod_log_bytes/1.2
>> >mod_bwlimited/1.4 PHP/4.3.11 FrontPage/5.0.2.2635 mod_ssl/2.8.22
>> >OpenSSL/0.9.7a
>> >Last-Modified: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 05:59:43 GMT
>> >ETag: "45c1b5-384012-443c974f"
>> >Accept-Ranges: bytes
>> >Content-Length: 3686418
>> >Content-Type: text/plain"
>> >
>> >Then the content type would have been set properly and people with
>> >standards compliant browsers would be able to view it...
>>
>> IE 7, Firefox and Opera all handle it just fine on Windows.
>
>Big whoop, Clyde, ask us if we care.
And yet, here you are, replying just like you did.
Mayor of R'lyeh
I didn't learn anything I didn't already know about you.
Alan Baker
Wow.
So you already knew that I understand more about these things than you
do!
LOL
MuahMan
"Snit" <SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID> wrote in message
Of course any non-Kool-Aid guzzler understands this.
All these little things ad up to an unusable system.
www.powercommander.com
Can you get this work on any Mac? Intel/Power Mac, or VPC? Nope.
I have to use it daily
http://www.textpad.com/
Still nothing close to the functionality of this on OSX. I mean they
can't get a simple TextEditor to hyperlink URL's properly.
> --
> ? Some people do use the term "screen name" in relation to IRC
> ? Teaching is a "real job"
> ? The tilde in an OS X path does *not* mean "the hard drive only"
>
>
>
Alan Baker
"MuahMan" <mua...@yahoo.com> wrote:
You have to retune your motorcycle daily?
Maybe if you did it right in the first place.
>
> http://www.textpad.com/
> Still nothing close to the functionality of this on OSX. I mean they
> can't get a simple TextEditor to hyperlink URL's properly.
LOL
BBEdit, TextWrangler, how many others would you like?
> > --
>
>
> > ? Some people do use the term "screen name" in relation to IRC
> > ? Teaching is a "real job"
> > ? The tilde in an OS X path does *not* mean "the hard drive only"
> >
> >
> >
--
MuahMan
It's funny. A bunch of the guys from my gaming server checked out this
thread....
The first thing they said on coms: "How old is this guy Alan kid, 12? He has
to get the last word in like a little child" Precious!
Alan Baker
"MuahMan" <mua...@yahoo.com> wrote:
A bunch of guys from the pimply-faced, geek squad said that, did they?
I'm crushed...
Of course, for me to get the last word, you'd have to...
...stop trying to get the last word, wouldn't you? So according to your
little buddies, you're 12!
MuahMan
Nah, I just slap mods on and then don't redo the curves. LOL
Doesn't eveyone just tune their Bikes once and leave it. Bwahaha
>
>>
>> http://www.textpad.com/
>> Still nothing close to the functionality of this on OSX. I mean they
>> can't get a simple TextEditor to hyperlink URL's properly.
>
> LOL
>
>
> BBEdit, TextWrangler, how many others would you like?
>
Those two won't do. I said i need one with the same functionality as above.
MuahMan
Says the guy that's never played a sport in his life.
Alan Baker
"MuahMan" <mua...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Riiiiiiight.
And you "slap mods on" every day, do you?
LOL
Once again, I'm sure you are a credit to the LU debate squad; a true
exemplar.
>
>
> Doesn't eveyone just tune their Bikes once and leave it. Bwahaha
>
>
>
> >
> >>
> >> http://www.textpad.com/
> >> Still nothing close to the functionality of this on OSX. I mean they
> >> can't get a simple TextEditor to hyperlink URL's properly.
> >
> > LOL
> >
> >
> > BBEdit, TextWrangler, how many others would you like?
> >
> Those two won't do. I said i need one with the same functionality as above.
Specifically, what functionality? Opening a URL?
LOL
Alan Baker
"MuahMan" <mua...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Says the guy who watch you run like a scared, pimply-faced 12 year old,
when I showed you that I play more sports now than you ever did.
Still trying to get the last word?
MuahMan
No, I'm lying Alan.
Why would I change the A/F ratio and then check the RPM curves again. Why
waste the time. You don't really the extra .100 of a second. It's
meaningless at 160mph. LOL
MuahMan
A picture of your highschool hockey team that you weren't on doesn't count.
You can't play a sport.
You should stick with telling me how to tune the power curves on a
motorcycle on the first
try. Hell do that and you can get a job on the AMA circuit making well over
a 1mm a year.
Alan Baker
"MuahMan" <mua...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Sorry. Didn't play hockey in high school. I was a ski racer then.
>
> You can't play a sport.
LOL
Which is why you ran away the last time we discussed this.
> You should stick with telling me how to tune the power curves on a
> motorcycle on the first
> try. Hell do that and you can get a job on the AMA circuit making well over
> a 1mm a year.
So now the truth comes out: you have to use PowerCommander every day
because you can't get it right.
MuahMan
on them.
Besides holding onto the tow rope and snow plowing down a bunny hill doesn't
qualify as racing.
>>
>> You can't play a sport.
>
>
>
Alan Baker
"MuahMan" <mua...@yahoo.com> wrote:
<snip>
Any time you want to try and show me your moves. I'm at least twice your
age and I'll still kick your ass.
>
>
> >>
> >> You can't play a sport.
> >
> >
> >
> > Which is why you ran away the last time we discussed this.
> >
> >> You should stick with telling me how to tune the power curves on a
> >> motorcycle on the first
> >> try. Hell do that and you can get a job on the AMA circuit making well
> >> over
> >> a 1mm a year.
> >
> > So now the truth comes out: you have to use PowerCommander every day
> > because you can't get it right.
What? No snappy comeback?
LOL
MuahMan
Hahahahahahahahahahaha. Precious! I live in FL and only get to ski twice a
year and
your old ass wouldn't present a serious challenge on the sticks or a
snowboard.
You'd have to venture off the green square slopes, don't be scerrred.
Alan Baker
"MuahMan" <mua...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Please. Spare me your sad little attempts at insults.
Next time you try your hand on the slopes, make it Whistler, BC and I'll
school you.
John C. Randolph
> That particular bit of fantasizing is Pratt-fall's.
>
> It goes along with his fantasies about having gone to a decent
> university when in fact he went to the equivalent of a Canadian
> community college,
Oh, be fair. Community colleges in Canada may have their problems, but
comparing them to Jerry Falwell's Institution of Codified Ignorance is
a bit harsh.
-jcr
MuahMan
Why? Swapping insults is what you seem to be at least average at. Too bad
you can't ski as well
>
> Next time you try your hand on the slopes, make it Whistler, BC and I'll
> school you.
>
Whistler, good hill. Been there done that. No way to prove what a
un-coordianted chump loser you
are from the keyboard though.
Alan Baker
"MuahMan" <mua...@yahoo.com> wrote:
LOL
I'm the one with the *facts*, Pratt-fall.
As for skiing, you have no idea how far out of your league you are.
> >
> > Next time you try your hand on the slopes, make it Whistler, BC and I'll
> > school you.
> >
> Whistler, good hill. Been there done that. No way to prove what a
> un-coordianted chump loser you
> are from the keyboard though.
Just the best hill in North America.
And when I showed you this last time, you ran like the scared little
chump you are:
<http://www3.telus.net/bakermedia/AtPlay.html>
MuahMan
When you make it up, it's not a *fact*. You are Mac Jihad so I know you have
a
hard time understanding that.
>
> As for skiing, you have no idea how far out of your league you are.
You're pretty far out of my league, at skiing, hockey, or any other sport.
Anything
that takes athletic coordination at all, I would crush you at in under 10
minutes.
Golf, Hockey, Baseball, Soccer, Badmitton, Ping Pong, Pool, Lacrosse,
surfing,
swimming,
It would be a treat watching you cry as you stop half way down the slope
after hitting a couple of moguls, "waaaaaaaaaaaaaaah my thighs are buring!
Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa"
You must be good at something besides childish insults. Photography? You
are mac jihad, you must be good at that.
Anyway you were good relief while I working on my high volume email
deployment tonight, but I gotta get some sleep. We can try and bump this up
to 800 childish posts tomorrow afternoon. I gotta hit this in the morning
when the winds die down:
http://www.surfline.com/surfline/livecams/report.cfm?alias=jupiter
We're gonna video the session if it's over 6 feet. The wave models are
showing 8' that's huge for beach break. I'll be sure to give you double bird
while telling you what a pussy you are as proof.
Enjoy editing your photos and playing with iTunes. LOL
Alan Baker
"MuahMan" <mua...@yahoo.com> wrote:
I didn't make up the facts about ranking of Liberty U. Nor about the
actual specs of the Sony MP3 player.
> >
> > As for skiing, you have no idea how far out of your league you are.
>
> You're pretty far out of my league, at skiing, hockey, or any other sport.
> Anything
> that takes athletic coordination at all, I would crush you at in under 10
> minutes.
> Golf,
What's your handicap?
> Hockey,
Not a chance. You are talking *real* hockey, right? You do know how to
skate, right?
> Baseball, Soccer,
A soccer player has the balls to call anyone else a "pussy"?
LOL
> Badmitton, Ping Pong, Pool,
Try snooker. Not that silly game on an eight foot table with wide open
pockets.
> Lacrosse,
> surfing,
> swimming,
Not really my things.
>
> It would be a treat watching you cry as you stop half way down the slope
> after hitting a couple of moguls, "waaaaaaaaaaaaaaah my thighs are buring!
> Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa"
LOL
Like I said, any time you're in the neighbour hood.
>
> You must be good at something besides childish insults. Photography? You
> are mac jihad, you must be good at that.
>
> Anyway you were good relief while I working on my high volume email
> deployment tonight, but I gotta get some sleep. We can try and bump this up
> to 800 childish posts tomorrow afternoon. I gotta hit this in the morning
> when the winds die down:
>
> http://www.surfline.com/surfline/livecams/report.cfm?alias=jupiter
>
> We're gonna video the session if it's over 6 feet. The wave models are
> showing 8' that's huge for beach break. I'll be sure to give you double bird
> while telling you what a pussy you are as proof.
Again. The guy surfing in Florida shouldn't be calling anyone "pussy".
LOL
>
>
> Enjoy editing your photos and playing with iTunes. LOL
> >
> >> >
> >> > Next time you try your hand on the slopes, make it Whistler, BC and
> >> > I'll
> >> > school you.
> >> >
> >> Whistler, good hill. Been there done that. No way to prove what a
> >> un-coordianted chump loser you
> >> are from the keyboard though.
> >
> > Just the best hill in North America.
> >
> > And when I showed you this last time, you ran like the scared little
> > chump you are:
> >
> > <http://www3.telus.net/bakermedia/AtPlay.html>
What? No snappy comeback?
LOL
--
John Slade
"MuahMan" <mua...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:doWdnbXDxrY4BqHZ...@adelphia.com...
> http://brandon.omega6.net/RvS/dod/201fps.tga
>
>
>
>
What game is that?
John
Sandman
> http://brandon.omega6.net/RvS/dod/201fps.tga
Hahahaha! The guy gets 201 fps in a game that's based on a game engine
from *1998*
That's so impressive! How many polygons you think there are on that
screenshot, 12? :-D
My god you're such a loser, Brian.
--
Sandman[.net]
MuahMan
"John Slade" <hhit...@pacbell.net> wrote in message
news:3t3%f.10438$4L1....@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com...
Day of Defeat Source.
MuahMan
"Sandman" <m...@sandman.net> wrote in message
news:mr-C50883.11...@individual.net...
Hahahahahaha, Show us a screen shot of you running Day Of Defeat Source at
these speeds then.
After all, it's from 1998 as you say.... Ooooops:
http://www.gamespot.com/pc/action/dayofdefeatsource/index.html
I'm sorry it's less than 6 months old and is the highest rank FPS game.
Hell, pick any game with HDR and Shader 3.0 and try and get 25% of where a
real computer is at on your Mac. Bwahahahaah
> --
> Sandman[.net]
MuahMan
11
>
>> Hockey,
>
> Not a chance. You are talking *real* hockey, right? You do know how to
> skate, right?
The kind where your old ass thinks you are crossing the blue line with the
puck and I bury
your croctchdy old ass in the boards with a tremendous crashing sound. You
pick up
your helmet, puke it and wobble back to the bench.
>
>> Baseball, Soccer,
>
> A soccer player has the balls to call anyone else a "pussy"?
>
Yep, you're a pussy. I'll play any sport.
Anyone know what the most popular sport on planet earth is? Oh yeah,
soccer.
But a Canadian says were pussies so it must be so! Bwahahaha
> LOL
>
>> Badmitton, Ping Pong, Pool,
>
> Try snooker. Not that silly game on an eight foot table with wide open
> pockets.
>
>> Lacrosse,
>> surfing,
>> swimming,
>
> Not really my things.
Of course not.
>
>>
>> It would be a treat watching you cry as you stop half way down the slope
>> after hitting a couple of moguls, "waaaaaaaaaaaaaaah my thighs are
>> buring!
>> Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa"
>
> LOL
>
> Like I said, any time you're in the neighbour hood.
>
>>
>> You must be good at something besides childish insults. Photography? You
>> are mac jihad, you must be good at that.
>>
>> Anyway you were good relief while I working on my high volume email
>> deployment tonight, but I gotta get some sleep. We can try and bump this
>> up
>> to 800 childish posts tomorrow afternoon. I gotta hit this in the morning
>> when the winds die down:
>>
>> http://www.surfline.com/surfline/livecams/report.cfm?alias=jupiter
>>
>> We're gonna video the session if it's over 6 feet. The wave models are
>> showing 8' that's huge for beach break. I'll be sure to give you double
>> bird
>> while telling you what a pussy you are as proof.
>
> Again. The guy surfing in Florida shouldn't be calling anyone "pussy".
Hahahaha, you couldn't even paddle out on a 3' foot day. "Where's Alan?"
"He washed down the beach"
I would love to see you call Laird Hamilton a pussy. That would be a hoot.
>
> LOL
>
>>
>>
>> Enjoy editing your photos and playing with iTunes. LOL
>> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Next time you try your hand on the slopes, make it Whistler, BC and
>> >> > I'll
>> >> > school you.
>> >> >
>> >> Whistler, good hill. Been there done that. No way to prove what a
>> >> un-coordianted chump loser you
>> >> are from the keyboard though.
>> >
>> > Just the best hill in North America.
debateable..
>> >
>> > And when I showed you this last time, you ran like the scared little
>> > chump you are:
>> >
>> > <http://www3.telus.net/bakermedia/AtPlay.html>
LOL So you're cousin plays hockey. That could be Rick Middleton for all I
know. I mean you
call all my pics and screen shots fake so why should I take your word for
anything.
So basically you only play sport where you can prop your old wrinkled ass up
with some sort of stick.
Tim Smith
>>Then the content type would have been set properly and people with
>>standards compliant browsers would be able to view it...
>
> IE 7, Firefox and Opera all handle it just fine on Windows.
If they show it as an image, then they are NOT handling it just fine. His
web server is telling the browser that it is plain text, and so if the
browser is not displaying it as plain text, the browser is not handling it
fine.
--
--Tim Smith
Mayor of R'lyeh
<reply_i...@mouse-potato.com> chose to bless us with the following
wisdom:
>In article <d34p32tqg69sgpf56...@4ax.com>, Mayor of R'lyeh
What I get is a dialogue box asking me if I want to open the file or
save it. If I say open ACDSee opens and displays the image. If I say
save I get the standard dialogue box asking me for a location to save
it to.
--
"We believe Internet Explorer is a really good browser.
Internet Explorer is my browser of choice."
Steve Jobs
Tim Crowley
> > In article <doWdnbXDxrY4BqHZ...@adelphia.com>,
> > "MuahMan" <mua...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> >> http://brandon.omega6.net/RvS/dod/201fps.tga
> >
> > Pity it wasn't served up by a real server:
> >
> > "HTTP/1.1 200 OK
> > Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 06:21:34 GMT
> > Server: Apache/1.3.33 (Unix) mod_auth_passthrough/1.8 mod_log_bytes/1.2
> > mod_bwlimited/1.4 PHP/4.3.11 FrontPage/5.0.2.2635 mod_ssl/2.8.22
> > OpenSSL/0.9.7a
> > Last-Modified: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 05:59:43 GMT
> > ETag: "45c1b5-384012-443c974f"
> > Accept-Ranges: bytes
> > Content-Length: 3686418
> > Content-Type: text/plain"
> >
> > standards compliant browsers would be able to view it...
> >
>
Poor little retard. You didn't understand a word he said. PS: this
windows box doesn't show that file either.
Tim Smith
"MuahMan" <mua...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > Hahahaha! The guy gets 201 fps in a game that's based on a game engine
> > from *1998*
>
> After all, it's from 1998 as you say.... Ooooops:
>
> http://www.gamespot.com/pc/action/dayofdefeatsource/index.html
>
> I'm sorry it's less than 6 months old and is the highest rank FPS game.
Read more carefully.
--
--Tim Smith
William R. Walsh
> It works on Windows. It's standard.
Uhhh....no.
It's closer to a "standard" when all sorts of different operating systems
(OS/2, DOS, Linux, BSD, and many others) and the applications you can use
with them can make use of the file and do so correctly.
William
William R. Walsh
> 873 fps. Running on an Apple IIgs if you care.
But don't the disk swaps get annoying after a while? :-)
William
MuahMan
"Tim Smith" <reply_i...@mouse-potato.com> wrote in message
news:reply_in_group-7E6...@news.east.earthlink.net...
By: Valve Software
Genre: Historic First-Person Shooter
Release Date: Sep 26, 2005 (more)
http://www.gamespot.com/pc/action/dayofdefeatsource/index.html
Tim Smith
"MuahMan" <mua...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> > Hahahaha! The guy gets 201 fps in a game that's based on a game engine
> >> > from *1998*
> > ...
> >>
> >> After all, it's from 1998 as you say.... Ooooops:
> >>
> >> http://www.gamespot.com/pc/action/dayofdefeatsource/index.html
> >>
> >> I'm sorry it's less than 6 months old and is the highest rank FPS game.
> >
> > Read more carefully.
>
> By: Valve Software
> Genre: Historic First-Person Shooter
> Release Date: Sep 26, 2005 (more)
>
> http://www.gamespot.com/pc/action/dayofdefeatsource/index.html
No, read this more carefully:
"Hahahaha! The guy gets 201 fps in a game that's based on a game
engine from *1998*"
--
--Tim Smith
Sandman
> After all, it's from 1998 as you say....
Yeah, I thought it was the original DoD. Oops.
--
Sandman[.net]
Sandman
> > My god you're such a loser, Brian.
>
> Hahahahahaha, Show us a screen shot of you running Day Of Defeat Source at
> these speeds then.
I'm at work now, so you'll have to do with a screenshot of my Dell XPS
GenII latop with only a GeForce 6800 GFX card:
http://www.sandman.net/files/dod_argentan0000.jpg
I'll take a screenshot of my dual X1900XTX system when I get home.
--
Sandman[.net]
MuahMan
6800. They are about 150 FPS high. (3d Benchmarks FPS video cards max
rates)
2.) It has to be an in-game screen shot and should be a TGA file and
unedited. (like this: http://brandon.omega6.net/RvS/dod/229fps.tga)
3.)Your ping is 0. You aren't even online. Find a server with 32 people
in it like my screenshot.
Sandman
"MuahMan" <mua...@gmail.com> wrote:
> One. Those frame rates are simply NOT possible on a laptop running a
> 6800. They are about 150 FPS high. (3d Benchmarks FPS video cards max
> rates)
Sorry, you're the liar here, not I.
> 2.) It has to be an in-game screen shot and should be a TGA file and
> unedited. (like this: http://brandon.omega6.net/RvS/dod/229fps.tga)
It is in-game, and it is unedited. It's the result of the in-game
screenshot function which saves the screenshots to
SteamApps/<email>/Day of Defeat/Screen Shots/ or something.
> 3.)Your ping is 0. You aren't even online. Find a server with 32 people
> in it like my screenshot.
FPS isn't dependant on the number of players, but rather the number of
polygons. You're really totally clueless about games.
You've been humiliated by a laptop. :)
--
Sandman[.net]
Snit
mr-1A8687.18...@individual.net on 4/13/06 9:03 AM:
> In article <1144920224.8...@g10g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>,
> "MuahMan" <mua...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> One. Those frame rates are simply NOT possible on a laptop running a
>> 6800. They are about 150 FPS high. (3d Benchmarks FPS video cards max
>> rates)
>
> Sorry, you're the liar here, not I.
"I continued to be the biggest troll in the group during tyhe
time period in question. Lying, failing to support my accusations,
obfuscating. You name it, I did it." - Sandman
What evidence do you have that you have changed your tune?
>> 2.) It has to be an in-game screen shot and should be a TGA file and
>> unedited. (like this: http://brandon.omega6.net/RvS/dod/229fps.tga)
>
> It is in-game, and it is unedited. It's the result of the in-game
> screenshot function which saves the screenshots to
> SteamApps/<email>/Day of Defeat/Screen Shots/ or something.
>
>> 3.)Your ping is 0. You aren't even online. Find a server with 32 people
>> in it like my screenshot.
>
> FPS isn't dependant on the number of players, but rather the number of
> polygons. You're really totally clueless about games.
>
>
> You've been humiliated by a laptop. :)
You have been humiliated by your lies.
--
€ Incest is so different from sex as to not be considered synonymous
by anyone other than perverts
€ OS X is partially based on BSD (esp. FreeBSD)
Snit
You play such games at *work*? Oh my.
In any case, my guess that you would post a screenshot was correct. :)
Is your screenshot any less contrived than your videos?
--
€ Some people do use the term "screen name" in relation to IRC
€ Teaching is a "real job"
€ The tilde in an OS X path does *not* mean "the hard drive only"
Snit
1144920224.8...@g10g2000cwb.googlegroups.com on 4/13/06 2:23 AM:
I am not a gamer, but I am curious - are you saying that Sandman's images
are outright lies or, at least, somehow dishonestly contrived?
--
€ As of Feb 2006 Apple had no wireless Mighty Mouse
€ If A = B then B = A (known as the "symmetric property of equality")
€ One can be guilty of a crime but neither tried nor convicted
MuahMan
This from the guy that thought DOD Source was from 1998. Bwahahahahaha, now
suddenly he has it installed on his laptop. LOLZ So you bought it
yestereday?
>
Bwhahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha. Are you fuken serious. DOD Source is the
most CPU intensive game. You will drop 20-30 FPS per person that joins the
server.
Dude, post your frames rates TWL. You have the fastest 6800 in the world.
They will get a good laugh.
MuahMan
"Snit" <SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID> wrote in message
news:C063CB3C.4BD59%SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID...
> "MuahMan" <mua...@gmail.com> stated in post
> 1144920224.8...@g10g2000cwb.googlegroups.com on 4/13/06 2:23 AM:
>
>> One. Those frame rates are simply NOT possible on a laptop running a
>> 6800. They are about 150 FPS high. (3d Benchmarks FPS video cards max
>> rates)
>> 2.) It has to be an in-game screen shot and should be a TGA file and
>> unedited. (like this: http://brandon.omega6.net/RvS/dod/229fps.tga)
>> 3.)Your ping is 0. You aren't even online. Find a server with 32 people
>> in it like my screenshot.
>>
> I am not a gamer, but I am curious - are you saying that Sandman's images
> are outright lies or, at least, somehow dishonestly contrived?
>
Yes, it's not physically possible to get those frame rates with a laptop and
a regular 6800.
The average FPS for that game at high settings according to literally of
hundreds of thousands of legit posted scores
on the 3d Benchmarks site is around 33fps. LOL
Plus yesterday he didn't know what the game was. No suddenly he has, and has
it running faster on a laptop than some do with
Nitrogen Cooling.... LOL, you be the judge.
> --
> ? As of Feb 2006 Apple had no wireless Mighty Mouse
> ? If A = B then B = A (known as the "symmetric property of equality")
> ? One can be guilty of a crime but neither tried nor convicted
>
>
Sandman
Snit <SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID> wrote:
> >> One. Those frame rates are simply NOT possible on a laptop running a
> >> 6800. They are about 150 FPS high. (3d Benchmarks FPS video cards max
> >> rates)
> >
> > Sorry, you're the liar here, not I.
>
> What evidence do you have that you have changed your tune?
I haven't. I never lie. Why?
--
Sandman[.net]
"I continued to be the biggest troll in the group during tyhe time
period in question. Lying, failing to support my accusations,
obfuscating. You name it, I did it." - Snit
Sandman
"MuahMan" <mua...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> 3.)Your ping is 0. You aren't even online. Find a server with 32 people
> >> in it like my screenshot.
> >
> > FPS isn't dependant on the number of players, but rather the number of
> > polygons. You're really totally clueless about games.
>
> This from the guy that thought DOD Source was from 1998.
No, from the guy that knew the HL engine is from 98, and read your
post wrong and owed up to his mistake. As opposed to all the mistakes
and humiliation you've suffered in this thread.
> Bwahahahahaha, now suddenly he has it installed on his laptop. LOLZ
> So you bought it yestereday?
I pre-ordered the gold package of HL2 when it was announec, in which
DOD:S was included when it would be released.
I've never been a DOD player though.
> Bwhahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha. Are you fuken serious. DOD Source is the
> most CPU intensive game. You will drop 20-30 FPS per person that joins the
> server.
Your ignorance about online games is noted.
> Dude, post your frames rates TWL. You have the fastest 6800 in the world.
> They will get a good laugh.
Brian, humiliated by a laptop. How's that imaginary dual X1900XTX
doing? :-D
--
Sandman[.net]
Sandman
Snit <SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID> wrote:
> >>> My god you're such a loser, Brian.
> >>
> >> Hahahahahaha, Show us a screen shot of you running Day Of Defeat Source at
> >> these speeds then.
> >
> > I'm at work now, so you'll have to do with a screenshot of my Dell XPS
> > GenII latop with only a GeForce 6800 GFX card:
> >
> > http://www.sandman.net/files/dod_argentan0000.jpg
> >
> > I'll take a screenshot of my dual X1900XTX system when I get home.
>
> You play such games at *work*? Oh my.
Well, no, not really. But I am the owner of www.gameconnect.se which
is an online gaming community and I administer several game servers
(including ranked Bf2 servers).
Having easy access to the games I host is a must, which is why I
ordered this gaming laptop.
> In any case, my guess that you would post a screenshot was correct. :)
I posted what I was requested to post.
> Is your screenshot any less contrived than your videos?
No less, no more - i.e. not at all.
--
Sandman[.net]
Sandman
"MuahMan" <mua...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > I am not a gamer, but I am curious - are you saying that Sandman's images
> > are outright lies or, at least, somehow dishonestly contrived?
>
> Yes, it's not physically possible to get those frame rates with a laptop and
> a regular 6800.
Says the guy that's totally ignorant about gaming :)
> The average FPS for that game at high settings according to literally of
> hundreds of thousands of legit posted scores
> on the 3d Benchmarks site is around 33fps. LOL
Indeed.
> Plus yesterday he didn't know what the game was.
Incorrect.
> No suddenly he has, and has it running faster on a laptop than some
> do with Nitrogen Cooling.... LOL, you be the judge.
fact is that I never lie and you always lie. Go figure. :)
--
Sandman[.net]
Snit
> In article <C063C760.4BD4F%SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID>,
> Snit <SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID> wrote:
>
>>>> One. Those frame rates are simply NOT possible on a laptop running a
>>>> 6800. They are about 150 FPS high. (3d Benchmarks FPS video cards max
>>>> rates)
>>>
>>> Sorry, you're the liar here, not I.
>>
>> What evidence do you have that you have changed your tune?
>
> I haven't.
Ok, then you still lie. And you even give an example:
> I never lie.
Thanks!
> Why?
Because you are a lying troll.
Right now you are in the midst of a discussion about games. It is your word
against others about your possible fps. So far there is no reason to
believe your images are not contrived. Heck, you could have just used the
one I offered you: <http://myweb.cableone.net/snit/tmp/half-life.jpg>. :)
--
€ As of Feb 2006 Apple had no wireless Mighty Mouse
€ If A = B then B = A (known as the "symmetric property of equality")
€ One can be guilty of a crime but neither tried nor convicted
Snit
> In article <C063CAC8.4BD55%SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID>,
> Snit <SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID> wrote:
>
>>>>> My god you're such a loser, Brian.
>>>>
>>>> Hahahahahaha, Show us a screen shot of you running Day Of Defeat Source at
>>>> these speeds then.
>>>
>>> I'm at work now, so you'll have to do with a screenshot of my Dell XPS
>>> GenII latop with only a GeForce 6800 GFX card:
>>>
>>> http://www.sandman.net/files/dod_argentan0000.jpg
>>>
>>> I'll take a screenshot of my dual X1900XTX system when I get home.
>>
>> You play such games at *work*? Oh my.
>
> Well, no, not really.
Ok, so your image is not really from work. You lied.
MuahMan
> In article <cuqdnU6Fn4Pz4qPZ...@adelphia.com>,
> "MuahMan" <mua...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> > I am not a gamer, but I am curious - are you saying that Sandman's
>> > images
>> > are outright lies or, at least, somehow dishonestly contrived?
>>
>> Yes, it's not physically possible to get those frame rates with a laptop
>> and
>> a regular 6800.
>
> Says the guy that's totally ignorant about gaming :)
Says the guy with the world fasted 6800 and thinks online gaming doesn't
affect FPS because the
video card renders the polygons. LOL That's good stuff.
Yesterday you didn't game online. Today he administers ranked BF2 Servers.
LOL
>
>> The average FPS for that game at high settings according to literally of
>> hundreds of thousands of legit posted scores
>> on the 3d Benchmarks site is around 33fps. LOL
>
> Indeed.
So at least explain how you get 5x the performance then professional
tweakers do. We need the secrets.
>
>> Plus yesterday he didn't know what the game was.
>
> Incorrect.
>
>> No suddenly he has, and has it running faster on a laptop than some
>> do with Nitrogen Cooling.... LOL, you be the judge.
>
> fact is that I never lie and you always lie. Go figure. :)
>
You just did, and edited your screen shot. The screen shot should be TGA
like the game saves. For matching purposes no other format is allowed. You
own all these gaming servers, file size shouldn't be an issue.
>
>
> --
> Sandman[.net]
Snit
cuqdnU6Fn4Pz4qPZ...@adelphia.com on 4/13/06 9:42 AM:
>
> "Snit" <SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID> wrote in message
> news:C063CB3C.4BD59%SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID...
>> "MuahMan" <mua...@gmail.com> stated in post
>> 1144920224.8...@g10g2000cwb.googlegroups.com on 4/13/06 2:23 AM:
>>
>>> One. Those frame rates are simply NOT possible on a laptop running a
>>> 6800. They are about 150 FPS high. (3d Benchmarks FPS video cards max
>>> rates)
>>> 2.) It has to be an in-game screen shot and should be a TGA file and
>>> unedited. (like this: http://brandon.omega6.net/RvS/dod/229fps.tga)
>>> 3.)Your ping is 0. You aren't even online. Find a server with 32 people
>>> in it like my screenshot.
>>>
>> I am not a gamer, but I am curious - are you saying that Sandman's images
>> are outright lies or, at least, somehow dishonestly contrived?
>>
>
> Yes, it's not physically possible to get those frame rates with a laptop and
> a regular 6800.
Sandman has stated he got the screenshot at work but also that he does not
play the game at work - perhaps he found the screenshot online at work?
>
> The average FPS for that game at high settings according to literally of
> hundreds of thousands of legit posted scores
> on the 3d Benchmarks site is around 33fps. LOL
For the non-gamer it is, at this point, your word against his. Do you have
links to support that?
>
> Plus yesterday he didn't know what the game was. No suddenly he has, and has
> it running faster on a laptop than some do with
> Nitrogen Cooling.... LOL, you be the judge.
And not only does he now know what the game is, he is "the owner of
www.gameconnect.se which is an online gaming community". Yet, for some
reason, he cannot find anyone to play online.
Something is a bit fishy with his story.
Sandman
"MuahMan" <mua...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > Says the guy that's totally ignorant about gaming :)
>
> Says the guy with the world fasted 6800 and thinks online gaming doesn't
> affect FPS because the video card renders the polygons. LOL That's good stuff.
Welcome to real life.
> Yesterday you didn't game online.
As today.
> Today he administers ranked BF2 Servers.
I've done so for a long time.
> >> The average FPS for that game at high settings according to literally of
> >> hundreds of thousands of legit posted scores
> >> on the 3d Benchmarks site is around 33fps. LOL
> >
> > Indeed.
>
> So at least explain how you get 5x the performance then professional
> tweakers do-
1. Professional tweakers don't get 33fps in DOD:S
2. You're claiming to get >200 fps yoursel, and now you want to claim
it is impossible?
> >> No suddenly he has, and has it running faster on a laptop than some
> >> do with Nitrogen Cooling.... LOL, you be the judge.
> >
> > fact is that I never lie and you always lie. Go figure. :)
>
> You just did
Nopes.
> , and edited your screen shot.
No editing took place.
> The screen shot should be TGA
> like the game saves.
The game saves JPG. Don't kknow were you got the TGA file from.
> For matching purposes no other format is allowed.
So why did you edit it?
> You own all these gaming servers, file size shouldn't be an issue.
It isn't. If you want me to change it to a TGA file, sure - but what's
the point?
--
Sandman[.net]
Sandman
Snit <SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID> wrote:
> >> You play such games at *work*? Oh my.
> >
> > Well, no, not really.
>
> Ok, so your image is not really from work.
Where is it from, then?
> You lied.
I never lie.
--
Sandman[.net]
Sandman
Snit <SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID> wrote:
> I continued to be the biggest troll in the group during tyhe time
> period in question. Lying, failing to support my accusations,
> obfuscating. You name it, I did it.
Agreed.
--
Sandman[.net]
MuahMan
> In article <c4GdnZLDRe65FqPZ...@adelphia.com>,
> "MuahMan" <mua...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> > Says the guy that's totally ignorant about gaming :)
>>
>> Says the guy with the world fasted 6800 and thinks online gaming doesn't
>> affect FPS because the video card renders the polygons. LOL That's good
>> stuff.
>
> Welcome to real life.
>
>> Yesterday you didn't game online.
>
> As today.
>
>> Today he administers ranked BF2 Servers.
>
> I've done so for a long time.
>
>> >> The average FPS for that game at high settings according to literally
>> >> of
>> >> hundreds of thousands of legit posted scores
>> >> on the 3d Benchmarks site is around 33fps. LOL
With a 6800 they do.... on low settings.
>> >
>> > Indeed.
>>
>> So at least explain how you get 5x the performance then professional
>> tweakers do-
>
> 1. Professional tweakers don't get 33fps in DOD:S
>
> 2. You're claiming to get >200 fps yoursel, and now you want to claim
> it is impossible?
I'm not running a 6800 on a laptop.
>
>> >> No suddenly he has, and has it running faster on a laptop than some
>> >> do with Nitrogen Cooling.... LOL, you be the judge.
>> >
>> > fact is that I never lie and you always lie. Go figure. :)
>>
>> You just did
>
> Nopes.
>
>> , and edited your screen shot.
>
> No editing took place.
>
>> The screen shot should be TGA
>> like the game saves.
>
> The game saves JPG. Don't kknow were you got the TGA file from.
>
From play on CAL ladder, Team Warfare ladder.... ya know for money.
Where you can't just post up a random doctored jpg. All RCON
screenshots are in TGA format. Look at the fucking manual.
You are a horrible fucking liar! JESUS!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Sandman
"MuahMan" <mua...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> > Says the guy that's totally ignorant about gaming :)
> >>
> >> Says the guy with the world fasted 6800 and thinks online gaming doesn't
> >> affect FPS because the video card renders the polygons. LOL That's good
> >> stuff.
> >
> > Welcome to real life.
> >
> >> Yesterday you didn't game online.
> >
> > As today.
> >
> >> Today he administers ranked BF2 Servers.
> >
> > I've done so for a long time.
> >
> >> >> The average FPS for that game at high settings according to literally
> >> >> of
> >> >> hundreds of thousands of legit posted scores
> >> >> on the 3d Benchmarks site is around 33fps. LOL
>
> With a 6800 they do.... on low settings.
Says Mr Ignorant. In actual life, a 6800 can push 190fps in dod:s as
shown.
> >> > Indeed.
> >>
> >> So at least explain how you get 5x the performance then professional
> >> tweakers do-
> >
> > 1. Professional tweakers don't get 33fps in DOD:S
> >
> > 2. You're claiming to get >200 fps yoursel, and now you want to claim
> > it is impossible?
>
> I'm not running a 6800 on a laptop.
No, you're imaginary system being slapped around by one. You're so
humiliated that you're almost crying.
> >> The screen shot should be TGA
> >> like the game saves.
> >
> > The game saves JPG. Don't kknow were you got the TGA file from.
>
> Where you can't just post up a random doctored jpg. All RCON
> screenshots are in TGA format. Look at the fucking manual.
The built in screenshot functions produces JPG images. Live with it,
Brian. You're a lousy loser.
> >> For matching purposes no other format is allowed.
> >
> > So why did you edit it?
Well?
> >> You own all these gaming servers, file size shouldn't be an issue.
> >
> > It isn't. If you want me to change it to a TGA file, sure - but what's
> > the point?
Well?
--
Sandman[.net]
Snit
> In article <C063D88B.4BD6C%SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID>,
> Snit <SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID> wrote:
>
>>>> You play such games at *work*? Oh my.
>>>
>>> Well, no, not really.
>>
>> Ok, so your image is not really from work.
>
> Where is it from, then?
I have no desire to play your stupid guessing games. You lied. You have
been caught. Deal with it.
>
>> You lied.
>
> I never lie.
>
Gee, Sandman the liar says he does not lie. So?
"I continued to be the biggest troll in the group during tyhe time period in
question. Lying, failing to support my accusations, obfuscating. You name
it, I did it." - Sandman
MuahMan
"Alan Baker" <alang...@telus.net> wrote in message
news:alangbaker-DB929...@news.telus.net...
> In article <D7KdncpeMPe...@adelphia.com>,
> "MuahMan" <mua...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> "Alan Baker" <alang...@telus.net> wrote in message
>> news:alangbaker-1EAA0...@news.telus.net...
>> > In article <cdKdnb4ytYm...@adelphia.com>,
>> > "MuahMan" <mua...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> "Snit" <SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID> wrote in message
>> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >> "Snit" <SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID> wrote in message
>> >> >>> "Mayor of R'lyeh" <mayor.o...@gmail.com> stated in post
>> >> >>> 584p32pralto82oct...@4ax.com on 4/11/06 11:32 PM:
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>> On Tue, 11 Apr 2006 23:29:43 -0700, Snit
>> >> >>>> <SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID>
>> >> >>>> chose to bless us with the following wisdom:>> >> >>>>> doWdnbXDxrY4BqHZ...@adelphia.com on 4/11/06 11:18
>> >> >>>>> PM:
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>>> http://brandon.omega6.net/RvS/dod/201fps.tga
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>> A measly 201 fps. Bug deal! I told you, Sandman can do better:
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>> http://myweb.cableone.net/snit/tmp/half-life.jpg
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>> 873 fps. Running on an Apple IIgs if you care.
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>> :)
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> I didn't know that Mr. Potato Head was in Half Life. 8)
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Hmmm, does sort of look that way.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> BTW they cost of the computer putting up those numbers. $1134
>> >> >> @
>> >> >> New
>> >> >> Egg.
>> >> >
>> >> > For me such gaming is a non-issue, I simply do not enjoy it. But,
>> >> > for
>> >> > folks
>> >> > who do like such gaming enough to have it be a determining factor in
>> >> > their
>> >> > computer purchasing decisions, the Mac is likely not the way to go.
>> >> > I
>> >> > know
>> >> > I suggest Windows machines to such folks.
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Of course any non-Kool-Aid guzzler understands this.
>> >>
>> >> All these little things ad up to an unusable system.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> www.powercommander.com
>> >> Can you get this work on any Mac? Intel/Power Mac, or VPC? Nope.
>> >>
>> >> I have to use it daily
>> >
>> > You have to retune your motorcycle daily?
>> >
>> > Maybe if you did it right in the first place.
>>
>> Nah, I just slap mods on and then don't redo the curves. LOL
>
> Riiiiiiight.
>
> And you "slap mods on" every day, do you?
>
> LOL
>
> Once again, I'm sure you are a credit to the LU debate squad; a true
> exemplar.
>
>>
>>
>> Doesn't eveyone just tune their Bikes once and leave it. Bwahaha
>>
>>
>>
>> >
>> >>
>> >> http://www.textpad.com/
>> >> Still nothing close to the functionality of this on OSX. I mean they
>> >> can't get a simple TextEditor to hyperlink URL's properly.
>> >
>> > LOL
>> >
>> >
>> > BBEdit, TextWrangler, how many others would you like?
>> >
>> Those two won't do. I said i need one with the same functionality as
>> above.
>
> Specifically, what functionality? Opening a URL?
>
> LOL
>
> --
> Alan Baker
> Vancouver, British Columbia
> "If you raise the ceiling 4 feet, move the fireplace from that wall
> to that wall, you'll still only get the full stereophonic effect
> if you sit in the bottom of that cupboard."
Alan u quitter
Snit
You never even watched a real debate, Sandman, no less partook in one. Your
skills in debating are horrid!
MuahMan
"Tim Smith" <reply_i...@mouse-potato.com> wrote in message
news:reply_in_group-474...@news.east.earthlink.net...
> In article <K9SdnV_3BOzcQqDZ...@adelphia.com>,
> "MuahMan" <mua...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >> > Hahahaha! The guy gets 201 fps in a game that's based on a game
>> >> > engine
>> >> > from *1998*
>> > ...
>> >>
>> >> After all, it's from 1998 as you say.... Ooooops:
>> >>
>> >> http://www.gamespot.com/pc/action/dayofdefeatsource/index.html
>> >>
>> >> I'm sorry it's less than 6 months old and is the highest rank FPS
>> >> game.
>> >
>> > Read more carefully.
> ...
>>
>> By: Valve Software
>> Genre: Historic First-Person Shooter
>> Release Date: Sep 26, 2005 (more)
>>
>> http://www.gamespot.com/pc/action/dayofdefeatsource/index.html
>
> No, read this more carefully:
>
> "Hahahaha! The guy gets 201 fps in a game that's based on a game
> engine from *1998*"
>
And? You think DOD:S uses the same engines the the 1998 version of DOD?
Ugh. Just drop gaming. I guess you Mac Jihad really don't game. You guys are
so retarded
on this subject it's just annoying.
> --
> --Tim Smith
MuahMan
How old are you again?
>
>
>
>
> --
> Sandman[.net]
Snit
Sandman is old enough to know better. Heck, how old does he need to be to
know that when he alters my post it still exists in the Google record. I do
not understand whe the trolls who play his silly game think they are
fooling.
Tim Smith
Snit <SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID> wrote:
>
No, he didn't, and there is no reasonable way you could actually believe
he lied. You are purely trying to troll here.
--
--Tim Smith
Snit
reply_in_group-B78...@news.east.earthlink.net on 4/13/06 7:45
PM:
He first said his image was from work. Then he denied that he plays games
at work. How do you reconcile his comments? Maybe he downloaded the image
at work... maybe he is just lying - would not be the first time he has done
so in this conversation.
Sandman
Snit <SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID> wrote:
> Sandman is old enough to know better. Heck, how old does he need to be to
> know that when he alters my post it still exists in the Google record. I do
> not understand whe the trolls who play his silly game think they are
> fooling.
I've never understood that about you. You forge PDF's, posting ids and
use sock puppets even though the google records saves all this.
Why is that? Glutton for punishment?
--
Sandman[.net]
Sandman
Snit <SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID> wrote:
> >>>> You play such games at *work*? Oh my.
> >>>
> >>> Well, no, not really.
> >>
> >> Ok, so your image is not really from work.
> >
> > Where is it from, then?
>
> I have no desire to play your stupid guessing games.
So why did you start your games then?
> You lied.
I never lie.
> You have been caught.
When?
> Deal with it.
I am - making fun of your lies is fun!
> >> You lied.
> >
> > I never lie.
>
> Gee, Sandman the liar says he does not lie. So?
I never lie.
--
Sandman[.net]
Sandman
Snit <SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID> wrote:
> > fact is that I never lie and you always lie. Go figure. :)
>
> You never even watched a real debate, Sandman, no less partook in one. Your
> skills in debating are horrid!
Stop talking to yourself, Michael. Or, please continue, but keep it to
yourself.
--
Sandman[.net]
Sandman
Snit <SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID> wrote:
> >> Ok, so your image is not really from work. You lied.
> >
> > No, he didn't, and there is no reasonable way you could actually believe
> > he lied. You are purely trying to troll here.
>
> He first said his image was from work.
Which is true.
> Then he denied that he plays games at work.
Pretty much.
> How do you reconcile his comments?
Starting up a game to take a screenshot hardly constitutes playing
said game.
> Maybe he downloaded the image
> at work... maybe he is just lying - would not be the first time he has done
> so in this conversation.
Actually, it would. BUt I didn't. You're just trolling as usual.
--
Sandman[.net]
Snit
Thank you, Sandman, for proving my point.
Your ability to *fail* to make a point is astonishing.
Snit
> In article <C0645E42.4BE2B%SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID>,
> Snit <SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID> wrote:
>
>>>> Ok, so your image is not really from work. You lied.
>>>
>>> No, he didn't, and there is no reasonable way you could actually believe
>>> he lied. You are purely trying to troll here.
>>
>> He first said his image was from work.
>
> Which is true.
>
>> Then he denied that he plays games at work.
>
> Pretty much.
Pretty much? Will you admit you denied it or not?
>
>> How do you reconcile his comments?
>
> Starting up a game to take a screenshot hardly constitutes playing
> said game.
Do you deny you posted a screenshot of you playing the game?
>> Maybe he downloaded the image
>> at work... maybe he is just lying - would not be the first time he has done
>> so in this conversation.
>
> Actually, it would. BUt I didn't. You're just trolling as usual.
Your denials of your lying mean nothing.
"I continued to be the biggest troll in the group during tyhe time period in
question. Lying, failing to support my accusations, obfuscating. You name
it, I did it." - Sandman
Sandman
Snit <SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID> wrote:
> >>>> Ok, so your image is not really from work. You lied.
> >>>
> >>> No, he didn't, and there is no reasonable way you could actually believe
> >>> he lied. You are purely trying to troll here.
> >>
> >> He first said his image was from work.
> >
> > Which is true.
> >
> >> Then he denied that he plays games at work.
> >
> > Pretty much.
>
> Pretty much? Will you admit you denied it or not?
On the question whether I play games at work, the answer it "No, not
really" which implies that it can and does happen, but as a general
rules, I dont' have the time to play games. You had do dishonestly
snip my sentence in order to lie, of course.
This is what you had to dishonestly snip in order to start up the Snit
Circus. Your response is invalidated by this quote, so you will
probably snip it again:
Well, no, not really. But I am the owner of www.gameconnect.se
which is an online gaming community and I administer several game
servers (including ranked Bf2 servers).
Having easy access to the games I host is a must, which is why I
ordered this gaming laptop.
> >> How do you reconcile his comments?
> >
> > Starting up a game to take a screenshot hardly constitutes playing
> > said game.
>
> Do you deny you posted a screenshot of you playing the game?
Of course not, since starting up a game to take a screenshot hardly
constitutes playing said game.
> >> Maybe he downloaded the image
> >> at work... maybe he is just lying - would not be the first time he has done
> >> so in this conversation.
> >
> > Actually, it would. BUt I didn't. You're just trolling as usual.
>
> Your denials of your lying mean nothing.
Since they never took place, since I never lie.
--
Sandman[.net]
Snit
> In article <C064A3BD.4BE61%SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID>,
> Snit <SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID> wrote:
>
>>>>>> Ok, so your image is not really from work. You lied.
>>>>>
>>>>> No, he didn't, and there is no reasonable way you could actually believe
>>>>> he lied. You are purely trying to troll here.
>>>>
>>>> He first said his image was from work.
>>>
>>> Which is true.
>>>
>>>> Then he denied that he plays games at work.
>>>
>>> Pretty much.
>>
>> Pretty much? Will you admit you denied it or not?
>
> On the question whether I play games at work, the answer it "No, not
> really" which implies that it can and does happen, but as a general
> rules, I dont' have the time to play games. You had do dishonestly
> snip my sentence in order to lie, of course.
To you when you say an answer is not just "no" but "really" no, or "not
really" then it implies that you mean yes, at least sometimes. Gotcha.
Clearly you are least sometimes play games at work. Really. Not "not
really" or "no".
"I continued to be the biggest troll in the group during tyhe time period in
question. Lying, failing to support my accusations, obfuscating. You name
it, I did it." - Sandman
--
Sandman
Snit <SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID> wrote:
> >>>>>> Ok, so your image is not really from work. You lied.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> No, he didn't, and there is no reasonable way you could actually believe
> >>>>> he lied. You are purely trying to troll here.
> >>>>
> >>>> He first said his image was from work.
> >>>
> >>> Which is true.
> >>>
> >>>> Then he denied that he plays games at work.
> >>>
> >>> Pretty much.
> >>
> >> Pretty much? Will you admit you denied it or not?
> >
> > On the question whether I play games at work, the answer it "No, not
> > really" which implies that it can and does happen, but as a general
> > rules, I dont' have the time to play games. You had do dishonestly
> > snip my sentence in order to lie, of course.
>
> To you when you say an answer is not just "no" but "really" no, or "not
> really" then it implies that you mean yes, at least sometimes. Gotcha.
Exactly - "Not really" is not the same as "No".
> Clearly you are least sometimes play games at work. Really. Not "not
> really"
I'm not really playing games at work.
--
Sandman[.net]
Snit
> In article <C064A800.4BE71%SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID>,
> Snit <SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID> wrote:
>
>>>>>>>> Ok, so your image is not really from work. You lied.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No, he didn't, and there is no reasonable way you could actually believe
>>>>>>> he lied. You are purely trying to troll here.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> He first said his image was from work.
>>>>>
>>>>> Which is true.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Then he denied that he plays games at work.
>>>>>
>>>>> Pretty much.
>>>>
>>>> Pretty much? Will you admit you denied it or not?
>>>
>>> On the question whether I play games at work, the answer it "No, not
>>> really" which implies that it can and does happen, but as a general
>>> rules, I dont' have the time to play games. You had do dishonestly
>>> snip my sentence in order to lie, of course.
>>
>> To you when you say an answer is not just "no" but "really" no, or "not
>> really" then it implies that you mean yes, at least sometimes. Gotcha.
>
> Exactly - "Not really" is not the same as "No".
So when you said "no" and "not really" which did you mean?
>
>> Clearly you are least sometimes play games at work. Really. Not "not
>> really"
>
> I'm not really playing games at work.
No?