--
Yes, you're right. Unfortunately, I don't really care.
[tv]
> The poor thing feels neglected so he's resorted to snarling when posters try
> to have a little fun.
Screw Michael Snit Glasser, & the horse he rode in on. :-)
--
A bad random number generator: 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 4.33e+67, 1, 1, 1
"Microsoft has vast resources, literally billions of dollars in cash, or liquid assets reserves.
Microsoft is an incredibly successful empire built on the premise of market dominance with low-quality goods."
-- Former White House adviser Richard A. Clarke --
> The poor thing feels neglected so he's resorted to snarling when posters
> try to have a little fun.
NOOOooooooooooo.....
However, if snot sends a $15 cheque, I see what I can do.
This service has been GPL'd and is available free as in freedom not price.
> The poor thing feels neglected so he's resorted to snarling when posters try
> to have a little fun.
Heh heh, heh heh... you said "snarling". Heh heh huh huh huh heh heh.
--
Where it is a duty to worship the sun it is pretty sure to be a crime to
examine the laws of heat.
-- Christopher Morley
Okay.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychology#Criticism
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Science_wars
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_feynman
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cargo_cult_science
"The term cargo cult science was first used by the physicist Richard
Feynman during his commencement address at the California Institute of
Technology, United States, in 1974, to negatively characterize
research in the soft sciences (psychology and psychiatry in
particular) - arguing that they have the semblance of being
scientific, but are missing 'a kind of scientific integrity, a
principle of scientific thought that corresponds to a kind of utter
honesty'."
> In reply to Tattoo Vampire who posted:
>
>> The poor thing feels neglected so he's resorted to snarling when posters try
>> to have a little fun.
>
> Screw Michael Snit Glasser, & the horse he rode in on. :-)
Staaaaaaampeeeeeeeed!!!!!
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
> The poor thing feels neglected so he's resorted to snarling when posters try
> to have a little fun.
Staaaaaaampeeeeeeeed!!!!!
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
> Tattoo Vampire wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>
>> The poor thing feels neglected so he's resorted to snarling when posters try
>> to have a little fun.
>
> Heh heh, heh heh... you said "snarling". Heh heh huh huh huh heh heh.
Staaaaaaampeeeeeeeed!!!!!
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
Hooooorraaayyyyy!!! I'm riiicchhh!!!!
>Hooooorraaayyyyy!!! I'm riiicchhh!!!!
Umm.... beef.
--
"PDF has only recently taken on and many people still refuse to use
it." - Hadron Quark, July 2009
ummm - go fsck yourself you useless piece of shit.
"chrisv" is a liar. "chrisv" is a useless piece of shit
> The poor thing feels neglected so he's resorted to snarling when posters try
> to have a little fun.
I payed enough intention to Snit IMHO. I killlfiled him the very first
month I started lurking COLA.
I find his nitpicking and immature behavior extremely annoying. I am not
going to torture myself reading his bullshit.
Snit is also a proven liar. Remember his retarted exif debacle.
In comparison to the rest of the trolls, he is quite polite and
pleasant. Yet he is still a boring nitpicker, narcissist and liar and
thus a waste of precious bandwidth.
--
|_|0|_| Marti T. van Lin, alias ML2MST
|_|_|0| Registered GNU/Linux user 513040
|0|0|0| http://www.soundclick.com/martivanlin
------- sip:marti...@ekiga.net
> On 08-07-11 13:02, Tattoo Vampire wrote:
>
>> The poor thing feels neglected so he's resorted to snarling when posters try
>> to have a little fun.
>
> I payed enough intention to Snit IMHO. I killlfiled him the very first
> month I started lurking COLA.
>
> I find his nitpicking and immature behavior extremely annoying. I am not
> going to torture myself reading his bullshit.
>
> Snit is also a proven liar. Remember his retarted exif debacle.
Ah, so quote some of these lies.
Oops.
And off you run! Oh, that is right... you will claim to have me in a KF...
In other words: Staaaaaaampeeeeeeeed!!!!!
> In comparison to the rest of the trolls, he is quite polite and
> pleasant. Yet he is still a boring nitpicker, narcissist and liar and
> thus a waste of precious bandwidth.
This is the type of low quality post I have been talking about - lots of
accusations with *no* support. And none will ever be provided.
KF who you wish - but please stop lying about me. Thanks!
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
> In comparison to the rest of the trolls, he is quite polite and
> pleasant. Yet he is still a boring nitpicker, narcissist and liar and
> thus a waste of precious bandwidth.
You shouldn't be so "hard" on Roy Schestowitz.
--
7/8/2011 12:05:23 PM
Gary Stewart
Please visit our hall of Linux idiots.
http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/
Watching Linux Fail:
http://limuxwatch.blogspot.com/
Linux's dismal desktop market share:
http://royal.pingdom.com/2011/05/12/the-top-20-strongholds-for-desktop-linux/
Desktop Linux: The Dream Is Dead
"By the time Microsoft released the Windows 7 beta
in January 2009, Linux had clearly lost its chance at desktop
glory."
http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/207999/desktop_linux_the_dream_is_dead.html
Desktop Linux on Life Support:
http://www.techradar.com/news/software/operating-systems/is-linux-on-the-desktop-dead--961508
When I use the term Linux I am speaking of desktop Linux unless
otherwise stated.
> On Fri, 08 Jul 2011 18:01:14 +0200, Marti Van Lin wrote:
>
>
>> In comparison to the rest of the trolls, he is quite polite and
>> pleasant. Yet he is still a boring nitpicker, narcissist and liar and
>> thus a waste of precious bandwidth.
>
> You shouldn't be so "hard" on Roy Schestowitz.
This whole hubbub is over the fact I noted the BSD license allows great
freedoms.
How dare I!
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
> On Fri, 08 Jul 2011 18:01:14 +0200, Marti Van Lin wrote:
>
>
>> In comparison to the rest of the trolls, he is quite polite and
>> pleasant. Yet he is still a boring nitpicker, narcissist and liar and
>> thus a waste of precious bandwidth.
>
> You shouldn't be so "hard" on Roy Schestowitz.
We where not discussing Dr. Roy S. Schestowitz, we where discussing
Michael "Snit" Glasser.
Bye bye!
You corrected Roy Schestowitz?
Oh no!
He doesn't like to be corrected and behaves like a cornered rat when
his is. He really needs to grow up.
--
7/8/2011 12:24:03 PM
> On 08-07-11 18:06, Gary Stewart wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 08 Jul 2011 18:01:14 +0200, Marti Van Lin wrote:
>>
>>
>>> In comparison to the rest of the trolls, he is quite polite and
>>> pleasant. Yet he is still a boring nitpicker, narcissist and liar and
>>> thus a waste of precious bandwidth.
>>
>> You shouldn't be so "hard" on Roy Schestowitz.
>
> We where not discussing Dr. Roy S. Schestowitz, we where discussing
> Michael "Snit" Glasser.
>
> Bye bye!
Are you planning on taking a trip?
Where are you "headed" sMarti ?
--
7/8/2011 12:26:45 PM
shut the fsck up you silly little ass monkey.
- "I have never penetrated another man and I never will. If my lifestyle is
"deviant" then each and every Heterosexual woman is equally "deviant".
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/7bf142e6fb54081c?hl=en
"I live in a nice apartment where I am very happy and the men are standing
in line for me."
Marti T. van Lin
Sep 15 2007, 6:34 pm
At least Gerard fucked my brains out. Which you silly sissies can't
accomplish :-p
Girly boyz (yak) :-(
Marti T. van Lin
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.os.windows-xp/msg/9d8024a298dee592?hl=end8024a298dee592
*************************************************************
Let us inspect what was really said.
- "At least Gerard fucked my brains out."
Clearly Gerard was the /pitcher/ and Marti is the /catcher/ in this
relationship. Gerard being the dominant one in this relationship would have
Marti get down on his hands and knees and take it up the @ss like a little
bitch.
- "Girly boyz (yak) :-("
Marti is the female in the relationship likes to be dominated. Marti is not
looking for some girly boy who is weak and timid like he is. Marti likes it
when a big hairy dude takes control and pounds his ass til he can't walk
anymore. None of that gentle shit - Marti wants a real man to treat him like
the helpless little bitch that he is.
> "Marti Van Lin" <ml2...@dontevenbother.invalid> wrote in message
> news:iv7au1$nu2$1...@news.albasani.net...
>> On 08-07-11 18:06, Gary Stewart wrote:
>
> shut the fsck up you silly little ass monkey.
>
> - "I have never penetrated another man and I never will. If my lifestyle is
> "deviant" then each and every Heterosexual woman is equally "deviant".
>
Smarti thinks himself fellating other men is the same thing as Women
doing it? Crikey. That's pushing it a little.
> On Fri, 08 Jul 2011 09:12:19 -0700, Snit wrote:
>
>> Gary Stewart stated in post aip304lfvcpo$.1isg4m3f...@40tude.net on
>> 7/8/11 9:06 AM:
>>
>>> On Fri, 08 Jul 2011 18:01:14 +0200, Marti Van Lin wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> In comparison to the rest of the trolls, he is quite polite and
>>>> pleasant. Yet he is still a boring nitpicker, narcissist and liar and
>>>> thus a waste of precious bandwidth.
>>>
>>> You shouldn't be so "hard" on Roy Schestowitz.
>>
>> This whole hubbub is over the fact I noted the BSD license allows great
>> freedoms.
>>
>> How dare I!
>
> You corrected Roy Schestowitz?
> Oh no!
>
> He doesn't like to be corrected and behaves like a cornered rat when
> his is. He really needs to grow up.
Did Spamowitz ever have the cojones to reply to respected UK IT
journalist Jack Schofield who basically pointed out that Roy was a
crackpot posting malicious lies and increasing his hit count by hurting
peoples families with unfounded accusations about MS being responsible
for their loved ones deaths?
> On Fri, 08 Jul 2011 09:12:19 -0700, Snit wrote:
>
>> Gary Stewart stated in post aip304lfvcpo$.1isg4m3f...@40tude.net on
>> 7/8/11 9:06 AM:
>>
>>> On Fri, 08 Jul 2011 18:01:14 +0200, Marti Van Lin wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> In comparison to the rest of the trolls, he is quite polite and
>>>> pleasant. Yet he is still a boring nitpicker, narcissist and liar and
>>>> thus a waste of precious bandwidth.
>>>
>>> You shouldn't be so "hard" on Roy Schestowitz.
>>
>> This whole hubbub is over the fact I noted the BSD license allows great
>> freedoms.
>>
>> How dare I!
>
> You corrected Roy Schestowitz?
> Oh no!
>
> He doesn't like to be corrected and behaves like a cornered rat when
> his is. He really needs to grow up.
Pretty much. That and the herd was pushing him to KF me... so he did, and
then bad mouthed me to make sure he stayed in their favor.
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
Not that I am aware of.
Spamowitz is a real piece of work he is.
When he gets challenged, he ultimately deems the topic not worthy
and runs and hides.
Jack regularly exposes Roy's slimy tactics.
Things like using links that refer back to his own posts and sites
lying by omission, false conjecture, mixing opinion with facts and
so forth are just the tip of the iceberg.
It's entertaining to watch the Roy's peanut gallery, oiaohm, msb,
madhatter, twitter, trmanco and others come slithering over to
whatever blog Roy is currently getting exposed on. They just add
credence to what Jack or other journalists are saying about Roy's
dishonesty.
It's like the Polish on horse back confronting the Germans in tanks.
Admirable, but futile.
I think it's great that he is back in COLA because he is the poster
child for the seamy underbelly of Linux zealotry and "advocacy".
He is every stereotype all rolled into one!
Things have been slow on his sites so he needed some place to get
the hit count up again. COLA is that place.
Have you seen his videos on YouTube?
You gotta check them out.
OMG he looks and sounds like he is mentally retarded.
Check out the interface he uses to do the screen capture!
It looks like a blast from the past circa 1995!
Seems to work about as well too.
Apologies to the real mentally challenged BTW.
I notice Liarmutt / Chris Ahlstrom attached himself to Roy within
minutes of Roy's first post!
Liarmutt must be exuberant now that his first, and only true master,
Roy Schestowitz is back!
Go get em Liarmutt!
Heel!
Heel I say!
Good, Liarmutt!
Good doggy!
--
7/8/2011 12:47:02 PM
He doesn't KF anyone.
He says he does and then proceeds to talk about you behind your back
over on his irc.
His bots pull daily posts from COLA.
Fact.
--
7/8/2011 1:00:38 PM
Lovely.
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
Hi there "Gary".
Are you really *the* Gary Stewart - the one and only original?
- or are you just some pre-adolescent wannabe yank juvenile?
- or is that the same thing?
If so, are you really the same person as that flatfish woman?
- or are you an idiot in your own right?
- oh, and tell me, in either case, for how long and for why, and to what
effect, have you been polluting this group?
... and finally, why are you so afraid of Linux.... and of Roy S.?
> I notice Liarmutt / Chris Ahlstrom attached himself to Roy within
> minutes of Roy's first post!
>
> Liarmutt must be exuberant now that his first, and only true master,
> Roy Schestowitz is back!
>
> Go get em Liarmutt!
> Heel!
> Heel I say!
> Good, Liarmutt!
> Good doggy!
Creepy's sucking up is quite nauseating.
Yep.
He gets some sort of twisted satisfaction having his peanut gallery
pat him on the back as if he has somehow unearthed the missing
sections of the Dead Sea Scrolls.
--
7/8/2011 1:16:34 PM
Especially if he is swallowing it all which apparently he is.
--
7/8/2011 1:22:15 PM
>I payed enough intention to Snit IMHO. I killlfiled him the very first
>month I started lurking COLA.
>
>I find his nitpicking and immature behavior extremely annoying. I am not
>going to torture myself reading his bullshit.
>
>Snit is also a proven liar. Remember his retarted exif debacle.
>
>In comparison to the rest of the trolls, he is quite polite and
>pleasant. Yet he is still a boring nitpicker, narcissist and liar and
>thus a waste of precious bandwidth.
Most of the above is obviously correct, but I'll say that I find
nothing polite nor pleasant about attacking people with idiocy and
lies.
--
"Now we know why you could not find the EXIF data on your images until
I pointed it out. :)" - Shit
> Marti Van Lin wrote:
>
>> I payed enough intention to Snit IMHO. I killlfiled him the very first
>> month I started lurking COLA.
>>
>> I find his nitpicking and immature behavior extremely annoying. I am not
>> going to torture myself reading his bullshit.
>>
>> Snit is also a proven liar. Remember his retarted exif debacle.
>>
>> In comparison to the rest of the trolls, he is quite polite and
>> pleasant. Yet he is still a boring nitpicker, narcissist and liar and
>> thus a waste of precious bandwidth.
>
> Most of the above is obviously correct, but I'll say that I find
> nothing polite nor pleasant about attacking people with idiocy and
> lies.
So why do you do so? Do you need examples of where you have done so (other
than your implication, above)?
And chrisv, in reaction, will run. 100% predictable. He makes insults and
accusations even he knows he cannot support. It is such behavior I am in
reference to when I speak of the low quality of dialog in COLA.
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
so quit doing it you mentally ill piece of shit.
"chrisv" is a bald faced liar. "chrisv" is a piece of shit.
> Marti Van Lin wrote:
>
>>I payed enough intention to Snit IMHO. I killlfiled him the very first
>>month I started lurking COLA.
>>
>>I find his nitpicking and immature behavior extremely annoying. I am not
>>going to torture myself reading his bullshit.
>>
>>Snit is also a proven liar. Remember his retarted exif debacle.
>>
>>In comparison to the rest of the trolls, he is quite polite and
>>pleasant. Yet he is still a boring nitpicker, narcissist and liar and
>>thus a waste of precious bandwidth.
>
> Most of the above is obviously correct, but I'll say that I find
> nothing polite nor pleasant about attacking people with idiocy and
> lies.
Or attempted blackmail.
--
The world will end in 5 minutes. Please log out.
"Microsoft has vast resources, literally billions of dollars in cash, or liquid assets reserves.
Microsoft is an incredibly successful empire built on the premise of market dominance with low-quality goods."
-- Former White House adviser Richard A. Clarke --
ROFL
--
You have to be an intellectual to believe such nonsense. No ordinary
man could be such a fool.
~ George Orwell
How old is this fuckwit Gary Spewart? 10 years old?
It's obvious that the troll has serious issues with its own sexuality.
How pathetically transparent.
--
Regards,
Gregory.
Gentoo Linux - Penguin Power
Looks like another one has crawled out of the woodpile.
You seem to be the one who keeps bringing up sexuality Gregory
Shearman.
--
7/8/2011 7:45:55 PM
> This whole hubbub is over the fact I noted the BSD license allows great
> freedoms.
No, it's over your little hissy fit in the "plonk" thread. You bitched
because no one was making a serious post.
Snit can't be serious, after all:
Snit: "You cannot support any of those accusations, HPT. You lied. You
lied because you were humiliated about your inability to follow simple
copy and paste steps you saw in a video. You are not just a loser, you are
a loser who cannot help but push your failures into a public forum over
and over. You are pathetic... as your above self-nuke demonstrates."
HPT: "The above repetitive mangled quote rant is number 13 for Snit:
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/2a19c80c24564247
Same repetitive crap as these other 12:
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/8c2265c1027b4e1c
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/dad0a994f00d10ae
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/f3e31b0c929d5068
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/c8c9cecece4c63ef
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/94d10d3737b0073c
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/7897eaa10c35cd55
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/8b442c6440facc03
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/3342c8b4c875035a
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/d787093ededa3c93
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/94d10d3737b0073c
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/12687e071396f0e8
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/fccfe270217a8dd7
Strategy of a luser, IMO." 13 Nov 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/be602bfce6422b7f
Yup, Snit still has a strategy of a luser, IMO, as supported by these 153
poster quotes on the Snit Circus of Pathological Lies:
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/41cf935ccb9b37de
--
HPT
I was noting the depth of the discussions in COLA.
You reacted poorly - because you know I am right and it bothers you...
bothers you that you and your friends cannot rise to a higher level of
discourse.
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
So now you are stalking snit, George Hostler?
Man you really are a piece of work.
--
7/8/2011 7:59:49 PM
> Tattoo Vampire wrote:
>> Snit wrote:
>>
>>> This whole hubbub is over the fact I noted the BSD license allows great
>>> freedoms.
>>
>> No, it's over your little hissy fit in the "plonk" thread. You bitched
>> because no one was making a serious post.
>
> Snit can't be serious, after all:
I pointed out your insane accusations:
Also, Snit has falsified data in his videos.
Looks like you resized the dialogue box
You moved and dragged the task bar, aligned
vertical with the side of the screen.
I just told you a personal observation that YOU
ALTERED THAT SLIDE!
Snit again altered that data!
Altered video wizardry? There is nothing wrong with
Ubuntu copy and paste.
No, rather it is another example of Snit moving the
goal posts, creating problems that do not exist except
for an invention of his own mind.
And you never were able to support *any* of them. Not one.
Then you called me a "luser" because I repeatedly noted your failings. Poor
you.
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
He is whining that I pointed out his false accusations a lot... while he
failed to even try to support any of them. The fact I repeatedly pointed
out his failings made me a "luser"... which means he thinks he is a luser,
given how often he posts his absurd and meaningless quotes.
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
Could be 154:
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/d12622df3671359b
His quotes? If any one person could take sole ownership of these
quotes it'd be *you*.
Why do you consider quotes where people are posting their opinion
about your usenet behavior to be "absurd"? To whom are they
"meaningless"? If you disagree with why people have labeled you what
they have why don't you refute their findings? Or are you afraid to
look at the history between you and each one of these posters because
doing so will prove HPT's reasons for regularly posting them are
valid?
Snit must be handled by a "professional"... there are only a few of us
who possess the digital straight jacket the fits him;)
> You reacted poorly - because you know I am right and it bothers you...
> bothers you that you and your friends cannot rise to a higher level of
> discourse.
When it comes to a "higher level of discourse" you're not just in the
basement, you're buried 30 feet below it.
--
Before they invented drawing boards, what did they go back to?
[tv]
> Snit must be handled by a "professional"... there are only a few of us
> who possess the digital straight jacket the fits him;)
Then you guys need to truss him up and haul him back to the looney bin he
escaped from. =)
> Snit wrote:
>
>> You reacted poorly - because you know I am right and it bothers you...
>> bothers you that you and your friends cannot rise to a higher level of
>> discourse.
>
> When it comes to a "higher level of discourse" you're not just in the
> basement, you're buried 30 feet below it.
Ok, I admit I sorta sank a bit tonight when I noted Carroll's complete lack
of logic - not that it was bad to do, but I did not give him the info he
needed to even try to understand his error (not that he has the ability or
ever would admit to it anyway) *and* I did so with the intention of pushing
him over the edge so I could enjoy watching him fall.
Yeah, not my greatest moment perhaps - but even then I did not sink to any
dishonest or other such silliness - just accurately noting his inability to
use logic. So even then, at a "low" moment for me, I was *far* above the
general BS of lying, name calling, spewing silly insults and the like. Far
above.
Kinda funny: at my "worst" I am still far better than most of the COLA
"advocates" at their norms.
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
> Kinda funny: at my "worst" I am still far better than most of the COLA
> "advocates" at their norms.
Suffer from an inferiority complex much, Mikey? Anyone who has to boast
about being "better" usually does...
--
"Bother," said Pooh, as he sacrificed Tigger to Satan.
[tv]
> Snit wrote:
>
>> Kinda funny: at my "worst" I am still far better than most of the COLA
>> "advocates" at their norms.
>
> Suffer from an inferiority complex much, Mikey? Anyone who has to boast
> about being "better" usually does...
Read what you snipped to find your error.
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
Professional what? Professional bouncer? The man doesn't need a digital
straight jacket, he needs a digital muzzle over his mouth. No matter how
much the truth is shown him, he snips it completely away, insults the
poster and continues his disruptive Snit Circus agenda. No wonder why most
have Snit kill filed and those that don't just ignore him.
Key observations:
75- Lusotec (COLA): "You have started threads on this subject many times,
and many times it has been explained to you how X copy & paste should work
and how bugs in a application are not bugs in the system, but still you
return to this subject and post the same false statements." 09 Mar 2011
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/37032133fbe9db92
76- Marious Barrier (COLA): "I must recognize that it is the first time I
see that kind of troll, once that start asking moderately serious
questions and since the first answer, gradually starts to degenerate it
by, in many failed attempts of being sarcastic, inserting various indirect
insults and calling all people ignorant and unable to answer what he asks
for." 14 Oct 2010
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/c6607ea64f436821
There is no wonder why these remaining 152 posters stated what they did
regarding Snit's annoying trolling.
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/d45c380531d6da4d
--
HPT
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
> Steve Carroll wrote:
>> Tattoo Vampire wrote:
>>
>>> The poor thing feels neglected so he's resorted to snarling when
>>> posters try to have a little fun.
>>
>> Snit must be handled by a "professional"... there are only a few of us
>> who possess the digital straight jacket the fits him;)
>
> Professional what? Professional bouncer? The man doesn't need a digital
> straight jacket, he needs a digital muzzle over his mouth. No matter how
> much the truth is shown him, he snips it completely away, insults the
> poster and continues his disruptive Snit Circus agenda. No wonder why most
> have Snit kill filed and those that don't just ignore him.
Staaaaaaampeeeeeeeed!!!!!
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
Classic Shit lie - claiming that we are complaining about something
that we are not.
> Classic Shit lie - claiming that we are complaining about something
> that we are not.
Snit can't help it. It's all part of the mentality of his herd. =)
--
Are you a Klingon, or is that a turtle on your head?
[tv]
> chrisv wrote:
>
>> Classic Shit lie - claiming that we are complaining about something
>> that we are not.
>
> Snit can't help it. It's all part of the mentality of his herd. =)
A herd of one!
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
> A herd of one!
LOL....
> Shit wrote:
>
>> A herd of one!
>
>LOL....
An IQ of one, I might believe.
--
'What part of "there is no advantage if they do not ever use the
source" confuses you?' - "True Linux advocate" Hadron Quark,
claiming that FOSS is of no advantage to anyone but programmers
SLURP.
what a useless fscking turd.
"chrisv" is a liar. "chrisv" is a piece of shit.
> Tattoo Vampire wrote:
>
>> Shit wrote:
>>
>>> A herd of one!
>>
>> LOL....
>
> An IQ of one, I might believe.
Staaaaaaampeeeeeeeed!!!!!
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
Message filters are wonderful
Most of us, even the Mac advocates in
comp.sys.mac.advocacy have Snot, I mean Snit, killfiled. He's a
nut who lives to start arguments over nothing to get attention.
Seems his whole social life is tied up in USENET. So I guess
he's found some more people to respond in this newsgroup because
he's virtually ignored in the Mac group. Snot, oops, Snit should
just be ignored.
John
Poor John: still pissed he lost some Usenet debates.
Poor guy.
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
John, most in COLA as well as CSMA have Snit kill filed. Those who don't
just ignore him. Occasionally I'll respond, but it is in kind. Snit cannot
live without attention. Problem is his continual seeding with lies, half
truths, spins, insults. He doesn't know how to give up an argument.
Even when he is wrong, which is most of the time, he continues his
diatribe. He does not know how to let go, brings up things from the past
that most have forgotten.
If if were an article of interest though past, most would not object. His
agenda is simply to disrupt any meaning posting and turn it into a
slugfest circus.
You are correct, overall, to answer Snit is a waste of time.
--
HPT
> John Slade wrote:
>> Tattoo Vampire wrote:
>>
>>> The poor thing feels neglected so he's resorted to snarling when
>>> posters try to have a little fun.
>>
>> Most of us, even the Mac advocates in comp.sys.mac.advocacy have Snot, I
>> mean Snit, killfiled. He's a nut who lives to start arguments over
>> nothing to get attention. Seems his whole social life is tied up in
>> USENET. So I guess he's found some more people to respond in this
>> newsgroup because he's virtually ignored in the Mac group. Snot, oops,
>> Snit should just be ignored.
>
> John, most in COLA as well as CSMA have Snit kill filed. Those who don't
> just ignore him. Occasionally I'll respond, but it is in kind. Snit cannot
> live without attention. Problem is his continual seeding with lies, half
> truths, spins, insults. He doesn't know how to give up an argument.
I just keep asking you to supply evidence of your accusations. And watch
you run away. Scared.
Petrified.
And then I point out your inconsistencies and hypocrisies... such as when
you suck up to Carroll and then whine about others who do minor versions of
his BS. Poor you.
> Even when he is wrong, which is most of the time, he continues his
> diatribe. He does not know how to let go, brings up things from the past
> that most have forgotten.
Oh! Oh! Can you give an example of when I was wrong and brought something
up?
No.
Of course you cannot.
> If if were an article of interest though past, most would not object. His
> agenda is simply to disrupt any meaning posting and turn it into a
> slugfest circus.
Nope... but I do like mocking scum such as you.
> You are correct, overall, to answer Snit is a waste of time.
Yet you obsess over me... just like those you suck up to.
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
An observation Marti has stated correctly is Snit Michael Glasser is a
narcissist.
Here is an explanation of how a narcissist behaves:
[quote]
How To Deal With A Narcissist
Learn how to recognize and deal with a narcissist
Published on August 27, 2010
by Judith Orloff, M.D. in Emotional Freedom
As a psychiatrist, I strongly believe that it is important to know about
the narcissistic personality so you can have realistic expectations when
dealing with coworkers, friends, or family members who may have some of
these qualities.
In my new book I describe how to recognize a narcissist. Here are some
ways: Their motto is “Me first!” Everything’s all about them. They
have a grandiose sense of self-importance and entitlement, crave
admiration and attention. A legend in their own mind, the world is
reflected in their image. They’ll corner you at a party, recount their
life saga. Some narcissists are unlikable, flagrant egotists. Others can
be charming, intelligent, caring--that is, until their guru-status is
threatened. When you stop stroking their ego or beg to disagree, they can
turn on you and become punishing. Once you catch onto this pattern, a
narcissist seems about as charming as a banana peel.
These people are so dangerous because they lack empathy, have a limited
capacity for unconditional love. Sadly, their hearts either haven’t
developed or have been shut down due to early psychic trauma, such as
being raised by narcissistic parents, a crippling handicap both
emotionally and spiritually. (The damage of narcissistic parenting is
outstandingly detailed in Alice Miller’s Drama of the Gifted Child).
Hard as it may be to comprehend, these people have little insight into
their actions, nor do they regret them. Though often highly intuitive,
they mainly use intuition for self-interest and manipulation. As the
Hassidic proverb cautions, “There is no room for God in him that is full
of himself.”
To find out if you’re dealing with a narcissist, ask yourself the
following questions from “Emotional Freedom.”
QUIZ: AM I IN A RELATIONSHIP WITH A NARCISSIST?
* Does the person act as if life revolves around him?
* Do I have to compliment him to get his attention or approval?
* Does he constantly steer the conversation back to himself?
* Does he downplay my feelings or interests?
* If I disagree, does he become cold or withholding?
[/quote]
http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/emotional-freedom/201008/how-deal-narcissist
Let's see how Snit stacks up in the quiz:
* Does the person act as if life revolves around him?
28- Edwin: "You've got to be out of your mind, Snit. You're the worst
troll this group has ever seen. You're a liar and a forger, and you've
almost destroyed this group single-handedly. For you to post a list of out
of context arguments, and lies, and forgeries about your enemies labled as
a "peace effort" has to be one of the craziest stunts you've pulled. It's
all about your sick need for attention, your need to be center stage at
all times. You'd publicly eat dog turd if you thought it would make people
look at you." 18 May 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/37e4a720619642a0
* Do I have to compliment him to get his attention or approval?
149- zara: "Look - I'm not into combing through thousands of posts, to
prove what was said or not said - I leave stuff like that to people
without lives, like Snit. But it is assuredly, in the record. Ping Snit to
do a search - you will flatter him, and give meaning to his tawdry little
life." 25 Oct 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/a1d4fc7120a6a538
* Does he constantly steer the conversation back to himself?
15- cc (COLA): "You are incapable of letting anything go. In fact, I
guarantee you will respond to this post in under 3 hours. Hell, I'd be
surprised if it takes longer than 30 minutes. If I really wanted to, I
could make this little side topic go on forever, because you are a
complete moron who just has to respond to anything written about or to
you, even if it just means repeating yourself." 1 Feb 2010
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/3712090033411605
* Does he downplay my feelings or interests?
97- Owl (COLA): "You have interacted with me often enough to know that I
never initiate personal attacks. I generally respond in kind. It is you
who usually fall off the civility wagon first, with your ironically
condescending canned responses that do nothing for your argument and
generally shine a spotlight on the desperation that you are so fearful of
projecting." 5 Mar 2011
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/8debf93e05da4d26
* If I disagree, does he become cold or withholding?
76- Marious Barrier (COLA): "I must recognize that it is the first time I
see that kind of troll, once that start asking moderately serious
questions and since the first answer, gradually starts to degenerate it
by, in many failed attempts of being sarcastic, inserting various indirect
insults and calling all people ignorant and unable to answer what he asks
for." 14 Oct 2010
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/c6607ea64f436821
True, Snit Michael Glasser is a narcissist.
--
HPT
Of you? Pffft. You couldn't fight your way out of a paperbag if someone
prewetted it.
> Petrified.
Of you? For someone who has a big ego, you are such a little man. I bet
Elizabeth Basset could easily knock the "snot" out of you, not to mention
also your hard working wife could belt you one.
> And then I point out your inconsistencies and hypocrisies... such as
> when you suck up to Carroll and then whine about others who do minor
> versions of his BS. Poor you.
No, poor Snit. Care to reply to why these 154 people disagree with you?
154- Marti Van Lin (COLA): "I paid enough attention to Snit IMHO. I
killfiled him the very first month I started lurking COLA. I find his
nitpicking and immature behavior extremely annoying. I am not going to
torture myself reading his bullshit. Snit is also a proven liar. Remember
his retarded exif debacle." 08 Jul 2011
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/d12622df3671359b
The other 153:
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/41cf935ccb9b37de
>> Even when he is wrong, which is most of the time, he continues his
>> diatribe. He does not know how to let go, brings up things from the
>> past that most have forgotten.
>
> Oh! Oh! Can you give an example of when I was wrong and brought
> something up?
>
> No.
>
> Of course you cannot.
Here, 13 times:
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/f0617d6bdeace7b5
>> If if were an article of interest though past, most would not object.
>> His agenda is simply to disrupt any meaning posting and turn it into a
>> slugfest circus.
>
> Nope... but I do like mocking scum such as you.
So, you are going to hit me with your purse?
>> You are correct, overall, to answer Snit is a waste of time.
>
> Yet you obsess over me... just like those you suck up to.
Obsess over you? Why do you continually seek my attention, Snit? Or that
of Homer? Roy Schestowitz? Please seek professional counselling, this
type help is not available in a Linux advocacy forum. We can't help you.
--
HPT
> Snit wrote:
>> High Plains Thumper stated:
>>> John Slade wrote:
>>>> Tattoo Vampire wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> The poor thing feels neglected so he's resorted to snarling when
>>>>> posters try to have a little fun.
>>>>
>>>> Most of us, even the Mac advocates in comp.sys.mac.advocacy have Snot,
>>>> I mean Snit, killfiled. He's a nut who lives to start arguments over
>>>> nothing to get attention. Seems his whole social life is tied up in
>>>> USENET. So I guess he's found some more people to respond in this
>>>> newsgroup because he's virtually ignored in the Mac group. Snot, oops,
>>>> Snit should just be ignored.
>>>
>>> John, most in COLA as well as CSMA have Snit kill filed. Those who
>>> don't just ignore him. Occasionally I'll respond, but it is in kind.
>>> Snit cannot live without attention. Problem is his continual seeding
>>> with lies, half truths, spins, insults. He doesn't know how to give up
>>> an argument.
>>
>> I just keep asking you to supply evidence of your accusations. And
>> watch you run away. Scared.
>
> Of you? Pffft. You couldn't fight your way out of a paperbag if someone
> prewetted it.
Your insults have nothing to do with your complete and total inability to
support your accusations. Nothing.
And you cannot. You know it. I know it. If not, you would provide
examples of what you accuse.
You never do.
Worse than that: you try over and over and over. And fail. Heck, when you
try to quote me you end up quoting others - including many of Carroll's
socks.
You are a complete and utter failure. A loser. A jerk who is used as a toy
by Carroll and others. You are laughed at by him and by me - you are the
fool child Carroll abuses for his own amusement.
And you are, frankly, too stupid to see this on your own.
Now have a good day.
...
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
> You are a complete and utter failure. A loser.
Physician, heal thyself.
> Snit wrote:
>
>> You are a complete and utter failure. A loser.
>
> Physician, heal thyself.
I share none of the traits I described in HPT.
I mean, sure, you are just trolling me... and it is not uncommon for folks
to do that in COLA. Lovely. But HPT just allows himself to be a puppet of
the worst of the worst - such as when he repeats Carroll scavenged and
forged list of quotes. Then he bitches about someone who does a small
example of what Carroll did to me is just flat out wrong - as HPT cannot
even get it right who posted his info.
Carroll loves to get the weak-minded (Tim Adams, Wally and now HPT) to be
his lapdogs. Can't these fools see past the BS? What the hell is wrong
with them when they allow themselves to be so heavily manipulated by scum?
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
> Snit wrote:
>
>> You are a complete and utter failure. A loser.
>
> Physician, heal thyself.
127- Steve Travis: "Oh oh... Now look what we've done. Snit has lost
all self respect and has sunk to the point of using words like 'asses'
when referring to others. Oh, how could the morally superior snit have
fallen so low.. Please take a moment out of your busy schedule to feel
embarassed for him. Or perhaps we should set up a fund to get him more
happy glue (and the appropriate plastic bags)." 27 Mar 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/3edd9ab69425a6c5
TV, I've got the appropriate plastic bags, get the happy glue ready. :-P
--
HPT
> Tattoo Vampire wrote:
>
>> Snit wrote:
>>
>>> You are a complete and utter failure. A loser.
>>
>> Physician, heal thyself.
>
> 127- Steve Travis:
Is not Snit.
>
> TV, I've got the appropriate plastic bags, get the happy glue ready. :-P
And you just keep on proving me right... as you suck up to Carroll and
Sandman.
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
> I share none of the traits I described in HPT.
No, Snit, you are perfect in every way. In your mind, anyhow.
You also believe people are plotting against you.
You also believe that you're never wrong.
I can't decide if you're a narcissist or a paranoiac.
> TV, I've got the appropriate plastic bags, get the happy glue ready. :-P
I think Snit sniffed it all. :-)
Best quote in a nutshell from someone who still posts here:
60- John Slade: "I don't get posts from Snit. I wouldn't be shocked that
he has some kind of disorder. He made up stuff about being a computer
repairman and teacher. He's just plain loony and best ignored. Let him
deal with his disorder by medication. He's here to do one thing, get
attention from people. He says the crazy stuff just to get a reaction. You
say you like to beat him over the head. Well that's what he's counting on,
he says stuff he knows isn't true in hopes to get a rise out of people
like you. Ignore him, you won't regret it." 3 Apr 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/394a53a65c28d314
Perhaps this is why Steve Carroll calls him "Gluey"? :-)
--
HPT
States the pathological liar.
16- Chance Furlong: "HPT, Wally, Sandman, C Lund, Steve Carroll and Tim
Adams are not trolls and do not troll. You, on the other hand, are a
troll." 27 Aug 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/28c267f26965b43f
> No, Snit, you are perfect in every way. In your mind, anyhow.
122- ShutterBugz: "so snit-zel has some kind of problem expressing anger,
i guess. he has to vent his frustrations in other ways. and he thinks he's
making sense: well the syntax is there and he figures he's pretty smart.
indeed, he tells us, he's done the personality tests and the iq tests and
he's okay! aaaaahhhhh, you see he's soooooooo well adjusted." 3 Mar 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/7f9fa1cf90490298
> You also believe people are plotting against you.
41- Henry Flam: "You on the other hand must be a deeply troubled
individual who has a fragile ego. I needn't agree nor disagree with the
points above. I don't care about them. Your constant complaints, whines,
rages, etc., wars with the regular Mac advocates, whom you mislabel as
trolls, arise from your sense that any conversation or thread must orbit
around you. People have pointed that out to you but you don't accept that.
Snit I feel sorry for you. Please go and see a doctor about your
solipsism. There must be a cure for you deep psychological travail."
18 Aug 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/b9bb48e6e6da75c8
> You also believe that you're never wrong.
70-libcrushersmith: "Snit also thinks Dan Rather still anchors CBS News
and that Gitmo terrorists are innocent! Any time Snit is cornered, he
changes the subject and will never admit he's wrong." 28 Jan 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/fbc516717f3b7ccf
> I can't decide if you're a narcissist or a paranoiac.
Paranoid narcissist. :-P
120- Sermo Malifer (COLA):
Snit: "Why do so many people in COLA argue *against* me..."
Sermo Malifer: "Because you're a narcissistic troll who posts trash just
to get people talking about you." 21 Jan 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/5ddf14f502e9b3f1
--
HPT
> Tattoo Vampire wrote:
>> Snit wrote:
>>
>>> I share none of the traits I described in HPT.
>
> States the pathological liar.
Ah! Excellent! Here you are making a specific claim about me... one that
implies you can quote *me* lying.
So do it.
Or do you prefer to just be Carroll and Sandman's lapdog?
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
> Snit wrote:
>
>> I share none of the traits I described in HPT.
>
> No, Snit, you are perfect in every way. In your mind, anyhow.
Nope. Never said that. I do not, however, sink anywhere near the level of
HPT or his masters (Carroll and Sandman).
> You also believe people are plotting against you.
Who? And why. Be specific!
> You also believe that you're never wrong.
You already said that.
> I can't decide if you're a narcissist or a paranoiac.
You can't decide anything other than how much you want to snip, run, and
troll.
But at least you admit you are just trolling for attention.
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
That is unherd of, LOL!
--
HPT
Confirmed:
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/eaa8bdd83f6fe383
;)
--
HPT