Re: Gary Stewart killed in earthquake
High Plains Thumper
> High Plains Thumper stated:
>> cc wrote:
>>
>>> I just received word that the person known as Gary Stewart was
>>> killed today. Apparently an earthquake on the east coast caused
>>> no damage, but managed to kill Amanda none the less. Her daughter
>>> sent out an email using Amanda's contact list which I am part of.
>>> Amanda (Gary's real name) was killed when a Linux server (the
>>> only thing Linsux was good for, according to Amanda) wobbled and
>>> fell of the shelf, smashing his face. His last words were
>>> reportedly "Roy Schestowitz." I haven't posted in years but lurk
>>> and then so I just thought I would let anyone who knew her know.
>>
>> Yeah, I know, and my motorcycle gang busted Snit.
>>
>> [quote]
>> Yeah, I got with my group, the "Sons of Thumper". We dropped by
>> Snit's pad, kicked the door down. Then Snit's wife grabbed the kids
>> and exited. (Left in a soccer mom SUV, she invited us. Snit's been
>> living off her hard earned cash whilst trolling Usenet.)
>>
>> We then grabbed Snit. Every time he whined, the big fat guy sat on
>> Snit's head and farted. We laughed our guts out. Snit was
>> entertaining. Elizabot Biker Chick dropped her chaps and pee'd on
>> him. That made us laugh even harder. Then Steve Carroll, who rode
>> in on his Harley Soft-tail, told us about Snit's history of socks,
>> Rhino Plastee, Brock McNuggetts, Steve Carroll's Dog, Omar Murad
>> Asfour, etc. He had us rolling on the floor, we laughed so hard it
>> hurt.
>> [/quote]
>>
>> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/2984f3dd96f2d30c
>>
>> (to be continued ....)
>
> The fact is I called you on your BS:
>
> * You repeatedly accuse me of having forged the video on copying and
> pasting (and others videos and images)
You lie. Yes, you forged / tampered with evidence on your web site, then
returned to post them as genuine. I told you and countless others told
you what was wrong. Yet you continue to repeat the same lies, Snit.
Lusotec (COLA): "You have started threads on this subject many times,
and many times it has been explained to you how X copy & paste should
work and how bugs in a application are not bugs in the system, but still
you return to this subject and post the same false statements." 09 Mar
2011
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/37032133fbe9db92
> * You repeatedly accuse me of posting as Joel Crumpp (and other
> names).
Again, you lie. Yes, you have posted as other socks, and yes, you have
been busted just not by me but by countless others. Yet you repeat the
same lies.
Tim Adams: "is snit's still posting that same old lie of his? Funny how
he has admitted using socks (Sigmund and Brock MacNugget come to mind)."
HPT: "Yup. "Big Crotch on a Small Fish" is a Snit sock, which Snit
vehemently denies, follows in the footsteps of other Snit socks, i.e.,
Joel Crump, Rhino Plastee, ceed, Omar Murad Asfour, Steve Carroll's Dog
and ad nauseum. Snit can't exist without sock puppets. They are the only
ones who console him. Sandman did thorough research to prove Snit uses
socks:
http://csma.sandman.net/pages/Michael_Digest_New_Sock_Puppet
" 13 Feb 2011
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.education.distance/msg/1af320f3f1fb3f08
> * You repeatedly quote the obsessively scavenged and forged quotes
> of the lowest scum of CSMA and dishonestly pretend they represent
> something about me.
Again, you lie. You call them scum, because they busted you repeatedly.
You've been caught too many times with your hands in the cookie jar, Snit.
> You have been doing this for years; completely unable to stop
> yourself from sucking up to utter scum.
Again you lie. You keep egging responses on by your attacks on the
advocacy posting communities, insulting the posters, posting tampered
data egging on those to recognise it then you berate them for telling
the truth.
> You are a lapdog coward...
Again you spout your idiocy, your insults.
> and you cry about "verbal abuse" when you are told how pathetic you
> are.
You hang around the worst trolls in COLA and you support them for their
illegal actions as a fellow criminal butt buddy.
none of your buisiness (COLA): "I am sorry, but I am going to have to
send you to the bin. You're perpetrating the Snit circus by responding
to all of his assinine posts. He is only here for one reason, to disrupt
this group, & you are helping him, as well as flatfish." 04 Jan 2011
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/a9b40ce46612fdc4
> I have repeatedly asked you to cease your abuse and you refuse.
Yet you continually reply including your ad hominem responses, egging on
acrimonious responses from those you've provoked, me included.
> I will repeat the request now - please stop harassing me.
You seem to forget Snit, that it is you harassing me with your vile, ad
hominem replies, false accusations of lying, ad hominem acrimonious
insults. It is you begging for attention, and now you feign you are
being harassed. Has it never dawned on you, that you are simply reaping
what you have sowed? Google Groups is my witness.
Even flatfish admitted this to you:
John Downs: "If somewhere along the line you have antagonized hpt and
caused this kind of reaction then shame on you and you reap what you sow
and hpt has my sympathy as well. Just my farts in the wind and you can
either sniff them or run away."
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/6f10dc023aded110
Also, you are forgetting that:
[quote]
There are limits to the First Amendment – The old adage “free speech
doesn’t mean that you can shout “fire” in a crowded theater” applies
here. You cannot just preface a libel with “in my opinion” (i.e. IMHO,
John murdered three people). The most common defense in a false light
action is to claim First Amendment freedom of speech, but the courts are
quite clear about offering no protection for false speech:
"false speech, even political speech, does not merit constitutional
protection if the speaker knows of the falsehood or recklessly
disregards the truth."
[/quote]
http://www.dba-oracle.com/internet_defamation_privacy_libel_laws.htm
You have cried "fire" enough with your lies, your ad hominem insults
toward posters, then expect them to stop posting the truth about your
very actions, calling it harassment. If there were merit to your claims,
it would be a different story. You have created yourself enough harm
through your troll-like acts that you would unlikely gather any sympathy
from law enforcement.
Because you have demonstrated yourself to be nothing more than a hideous
troll, you have shown me that there is no further point in directly
replying to you.
--
HPT
Snit
on 8/23/11 6:07 PM:
sucking up to utter scum. You are a lapdog coward... and you cry about
"verbal abuse" when you are told how pathetic you are.
I have repeatedly asked you to cease your abuse and you refuse. I will
repeat the request now - please stop harassing me.
--
🙈🙉🙊
White Spirit
> Because you have demonstrated yourself to be nothing more than a hideous
> troll, you have shown me that there is no further point in directly
> replying to you.
Snit deserves a good beat-down, Rodney King style. I have had to plonk
the worthless piece of Snit to prevent my monitor being defiled with the
presence of his idiotic, narcissistic tripe.
Hadron
You did indeed run and hide like hpt did when your general cluelessness
and idiocy and moral hypocrisy was held up for all to see.
hpt is a special case though. I challenge you to post a link to him
talking intelligibly about ANY feature of a Gnu/Linux desktop that he
actually uses. He once posted a link to his private account for some
cheap pirated Windows SOFTWARE hosted on y warez by mistake. LOL! Did he
look stupid! (well, stupider).
High Plains Thumper
> White Spirit writes:
>> High Plains Thumper wrote:
>>
>>> Because you have demonstrated yourself to be nothing more than a
>>> hideous troll, you have shown me that there is no further point in
>>> directly replying to you.
>>
>> Snit deserves a good beat-down, Rodney King style. I have had to plonk
>> the worthless piece of Snit to prevent my monitor being defiled with
>> the presence of his idiotic, narcissistic tripe.
>
> You did indeed run and hide like hpt did when your general cluelessness
> and idiocy and moral hypocrisy was held up for all to see.
>
> hpt is a special case though. I challenge you to post a link to him
> talking intelligibly about ANY feature of a Gnu/Linux desktop that he
> actually uses.
As in Debian Stable is one of the most widely used distros for mission
critical applications and where one wants minimal impact to production
work. Very few require bleeding edge software to be productive. Yet
Hadron insists that Debian Stable is full of bugs and too backward for
usage:
[quote]
> Hadron has an apparent inability to recognise how more consistent usage
> of Debian Stable will only help his usage of the product, preferring
> unstable versions of Debian; if not for the only reason as an
> opportunity to attack Linux/OSS.
Once more for the hard of brain power : I use testing. Not unstable. And
I use it for a reason - Debian Stable is simply too buggy and backward
and I cant be arsed to manage pinning or selectively monitoring backports.
[/quote]
Subject: Re: [News] Sister OS to Linux, OS-X Has Better TCO than
Microsoft Windows
Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 09:50:07 +0100
Message-ID: <fr08c1$9e1$2...@registered.motzarella.org>
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/3364e9f972538fd9
--
HPT
White Spirit
> Hadron wrote:
>> You did indeed run and hide like hpt did when your general cluelessness
>> and idiocy and moral hypocrisy was held up for all to see.
A hilarious claim coming from the fool who thinks curses is a type of
application, refers to filling in a bug report form as being involved
with kernel development and would struggle to compile a 'Hello World'
programme even if he used cut and paste.
> [quote]
>> Hadron has an apparent inability to recognise how more consistent usage
>> of Debian Stable will only help his usage of the product, preferring
>> unstable versions of Debian; if not for the only reason as an
>> opportunity to attack Linux/OSS.
> Once more for the hard of brain power : I use testing. Not unstable. And
> I use it for a reason - Debian Stable is simply too buggy and backward
> and I cant be arsed to manage pinning or selectively monitoring backports.
> [/quote]
*chortle*
chrisv
> High Plains Thumper wrote:
>
>> Hadron wrote:
>
>>> You did indeed run and hide like hpt did when your general cluelessness
>>> and idiocy and moral hypocrisy was held up for all to see.
:-D
This is the kind of gem that those of us who have the Quack asshole
kill-filed so-often don't see. A ridiculous *lie*, attacking an
advocate of FOSS.
If you're an attacker of FOSS, "Hadron" will *never* attack you, no
matter how much an idiot asshole you are!
>A hilarious claim coming from the fool who thinks curses is a type of
>application, refers to filling in a bug report form as being involved
>with kernel development and would struggle to compile a 'Hello World'
>programme even if he used cut and paste.
"EVERYONE knows that having "." on your path is a HUGE security risk
since you might inadvertently pick up a rogue script called "ls" for
example in the dir you are browsing." - "Linux expert" Hadron Quark
Snit
2:52 AM:
HPT has *nothing* of value to say. He is a clueless cowardly lapdog who
lives to serve his masters.
--
🙈🙉🙊
Snit
Poor you... so incredibly immature and insecure.
I pity you. Really.
--
🙈🙉🙊
cc
> Hadron stated in post lwwre3p24o....@news.eternal-september.org on 8/24/11
Stampeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeddddddddddddde!!!!
--
"Yes Hadron, I will marry you." - Snit
Snit
7494f976-0a57-4538...@y4g2000vbx.googlegroups.com on 8/24/11
6:14 AM:
If I could not back that up you might have a point... but I repeatedly have
talked about his BS and shown examples.
But, hey, if you have a counter example of him actually offering value and
not just sucking up to his masters, then by all means do share it.
cc runs in 3... 2... 1...
100% predictable.
--
🙈🙉🙊
cc
> cc stated in post
> 7494f976-0a57-4538-9788-169e9bb99...@y4g2000vbx.googlegroups.com on 8/24/11
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/6fb069955ec51e97?hl=en&dmode=source
Value is relative, but he's not talking about trolls. I love when you
and Hadron start defending each other and "me too"ing each others
posts. It's cute.
> cc runs in 3... 2... 1...
>
> 100% predictable.
>
TomB: Can you ask Snit to provide evidence that I've run.
--
"I forge posts." - Snit
White Spirit
> Value is relative, but he's not talking about trolls. I love when you
> and Hadron start defending each other and "me too"ing each others
> posts. It's cute.
It's also hypocritical, particularly when the vile piece of Snit accuses
us of overlooking advocates' faults but accepts assistance from a Nazi
like flatfish.
Snit
75c17103-45f9-4d2e...@c19g2000yqe.googlegroups.com on 8/24/11
6:30 AM:
...
>>>>> hpt is a special case though. I challenge you to post a link to him
>>>>> talking intelligibly about ANY feature of a Gnu/Linux desktop that he
>>>>> actually uses. He once posted a link to his private account for some
>>>>> cheap pirated Windows SOFTWARE hosted on y warez by mistake. LOL! Did he
>>>>> look stupid! (well, stupider).
>>
>>>> HPT has *nothing* of value to say. He is a clueless cowardly lapdog who
>>>> lives to serve his masters.
>>
>>> Stampeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeddddddddddddde!!!!
>>
>> If I could not back that up you might have a point... but I repeatedly have
>> talked about his BS and shown examples.
>>
>> But, hey, if you have a counter example of him actually offering value and
>> not just sucking up to his masters, then by all means do share it.
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/6fb069955ec51e97?hl=
> en&dmode=source
>
> Value is relative, but he's not talking about trolls. I love when you
> and Hadron start defending each other and "me too"ing each others
> posts. It's cute.
>
>> cc runs in 3... 2... 1...
>>
>> 100% predictable.
>>
>
> TomB: Can you ask Snit to provide evidence that I've run.
Oh, you got me. By digging back to *2006* you found a post by HPT where he
was not spewing utter useless BS just to please his masters.
2006.
LOL!
--
🙈🙉🙊
Snit
Yeah, I agreed that HPT posts only useless attacks and insults... and cc
showed that in a post in 2006 HPT actually did something different.
I am *so* humiliated to be proved so wrong.
LOL!
Seriously, by having to dig back to 2006 to find a single non-trolling post
from HPT, cc has pretty much proved Hadron and I right.
--
🙈🙉🙊
Hadron
>
> Value is relative, but he's not talking about trolls. I love when you
> and Hadron start defending each other and "me too"ing each others
> posts. It's cute.
Except I dont "me too" his posts. But I do recognise a bullshitter when
I see one. And you were bullshitting about UIs and obviously knew
nothing about it and just mobilised yourself to troll Snit who repeats
himself far too often for my liking. I have never seen him lie or post
something that is clearly completely wrong without a retraction
however. I have seen you post bullshit about UIs and the development of
such where you clearly were out of your depth and zero idea of the
research and money and effort put into the science.
chrisv
All Wintrolls are major hypocrites. Like "Ezekiel" *leaping* to claim
an advocate "lied" when there is *no way* for him to know any such
thing (indeed, when the advocate is telling the truth), but somehow
not noticing his buddy Larry's clear and obvious lies.
Snit
7:09 AM:
A completely fair assessment of both cc and myself.
--
🙈🙉🙊
Snit
7:07 AM:
Just to be clear: are you denying that the COLA "advocates" act as a herd?
Do you need to see *more* evidence?
--
🙈🙉🙊
cc
> 6:30 AM:
>
> ...
>
>
>
>
>
> >>>>> hpt is a special case though. I challenge you to post a link to him
> >>>>> talking intelligibly about ANY feature of a Gnu/Linux desktop that he
> >>>>> actually uses. He once posted a link to his private account for some
> >>>>> cheap pirated Windows SOFTWARE hosted on y warez by mistake. LOL! Did he
> >>>>> look stupid! (well, stupider).
>
> >>>> HPT has *nothing* of value to say. He is a clueless cowardly lapdog who
> >>>> lives to serve his masters.
>
> >>> Stampeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeddddddddddddde!!!!
>
> >> If I could not back that up you might have a point... but I repeatedly have
> >> talked about his BS and shown examples.
>
> >> But, hey, if you have a counter example of him actually offering value and
> >> not just sucking up to his masters, then by all means do share it.
>
> > en&dmode=source
>
> > Value is relative, but he's not talking about trolls. I love when you
> > and Hadron start defending each other and "me too"ing each others
> > posts. It's cute.
>
> >> cc runs in 3... 2... 1...
>
> >> 100% predictable.
>
> > TomB: Can you ask Snit to provide evidence that I've run.
>
> Oh, you got me. By digging back to *2006* you found a post by HPT where he
> was not spewing utter useless BS just to please his masters.
>
> 2006.
>
> LOL!
>
I did not dig. I know how to use a search engine. It took literally
two seconds. But I must have missed in your original post where you
specified either explicitly or implicitly that it had to come from
more recently than 2006. My apologies. Can you quote the part of your
post where you specified that for me again so I can meet your
requirements?
--
"I don't understand the difference between opinion and fact." - Snit
cc
> White Spirit stated in post j32ukg$c6...@dont-email.me on 8/24/11 6:33 AM:
I never said HPT wasn't a douchebag. I just commented on the love
affair between you and Hadron and how cute it is to see you two come
to each others defense.
--
"I will marry that man someday." - Snit
cc
Except I wasn't bullshitting, and the fact that you refused to answer
any serious questions about it, and knew nothing about important
aspects of UI development like critical parameters proves that you're
the bullshitter. You don't see him lie because your face is buried in
his crotch. Yum.
Snit
13e28633-1b64-4966...@h7g2000yqm.googlegroups.com on 8/24/11
7:25 AM:
...
>>>>> Stampeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeddddddddddddde!!!!
>>
>>>> If I could not back that up you might have a point... but I repeatedly have
>>>> talked about his BS and shown examples.
>>
>>>> But, hey, if you have a counter example of him actually offering value and
>>>> not just sucking up to his masters, then by all means do share it.
>>
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/6fb069955ec...
>>> en&dmode=source
>>
>>> Value is relative, but he's not talking about trolls. I love when you
>>> and Hadron start defending each other and "me too"ing each others
>>> posts. It's cute.
>>
>>>> cc runs in 3... 2... 1...
>>
>>>> 100% predictable.
>>
>>> TomB: Can you ask Snit to provide evidence that I've run.
>>
>> Oh, you got me. By digging back to *2006* you found a post by HPT where he
>> was not spewing utter useless BS just to please his masters.
>>
>> 2006.
>>
>> LOL!
>
> I did not dig.
Right! You just happened to have a post of his from 2006 real handy...
maybe printed on a note card in your back pocket.
> I know how to use a search engine. It took literally two seconds. But I must
> have missed in your original post where you specified either explicitly or
> implicitly that it had to come from more recently than 2006. My apologies. Can
> you quote the part of your post where you specified that for me again so I can
> meet your requirements?
Hey, I admitted you were right: HPT does not *always* post useless junk...
there is a post from 2006 where he did otherwise. Egg on my face and all
that.
LOL!
Realistically, there are some where he does something other than just act
the direct lapdog. But they are rare. Here, let's look at his last 20
posts:
j32i6f$dru$3...@dont-email.me on 8/24/11 3:01 AM:
A fairly reasonable post.
j32hfj$dru$2...@dont-email.me on 8/24/11 2:49 AM:
A complete lapdog suck up post.
j32fd2$dru$1...@dont-email.me on 8/24/11 2:14 AM:
A bit of humor... nothing wrong with that.
j31r10$d0r$1...@dont-email.me on 8/23/11 8:26 PM:
A complete lapdog suck up post.
j31k60$9if$1...@dont-email.me on 8/23/11 6:29 PM:
A bit of humor... nothing wrong with that.
4e544ede$0$4152$6e1e...@read.cnntp.org on 8/23/11 6:07 PM:
A complete lapdog suck up post.
j31fhu$ia2$2...@dont-email.me on 8/23/11 5:10 PM:
A bit of a suckup, but can count as just humor. No harm.
j31eir$ia2$1...@dont-email.me on 8/23/11 4:54 PM:
An actual post where he speaks well of Linux. Amazing.
j318aq$a9k$1...@dont-email.me on 8/23/11 3:07 PM:
A complete lapdog suck up post.
j3132m$6mc$1...@dont-email.me on 8/23/11 1:37 PM:
A complete lapdog suck up post.
j2vqla$2rq$1...@dont-email.me on 8/23/11 2:07 AM:
A complete lapdog suck up post.
j2v4qr$hd7$1...@dont-email.me on 8/22/11 7:55 PM:
A complete lapdog suck up post.
j2ut8v$tpl$2...@dont-email.me on 8/22/11 5:46 PM:
A complete lapdog suck up post.
j2ut3o$tpl$1...@dont-email.me on 8/22/11 5:43 PM:
An actual post where he speaks well of Linux. Amazing.
j2rcb4$f4i$2...@dont-email.me on 8/21/11 9:39 AM:
A complete lapdog suck up post.
j2rbba$f4i$1...@dont-email.me on 8/21/11 9:22 AM:
An actual post where he speaks well of Linux. Amazing.
j2r45t$pck$4...@dont-email.me on 8/21/11 7:19 AM:
A bit of a suckup, but mostly just views on OSS.
j2r32h$pck$3...@dont-email.me on 8/21/11 7:00 AM:
A complete lapdog suck up post.
j2r2rs$pck$2...@dont-email.me on 8/21/11 6:57 AM:
A complete lapdog suck up post.
j2r1hr$pck$1...@dont-email.me on 8/21/11 6:34 AM:
A complete lapdog suck up post.
In that sample we have 12 suckup "lapdog" posts from him. To be fair,
Hadron implied 100% or darn close to it, and - at least in this sample - he
is only at 60% suckup "lapdog" posts.
When I am wrong I admit to it. HPT does not post only suckup lapdog posts,
though those are clearly his most common type of post (the majority of his
posts). There - fair enough?
--
🙈🙉🙊
Snit
ab9799bb-7e52-41d9...@a7g2000yqb.googlegroups.com on 8/24/11
7:23 AM:
The fact you felt the need to make up stories about what Carroll said, going
so far as to forge quotes (as you *still* are doing from both Carroll and
myself) shows not even you believe your BS.
Remember, in the end I posted info that ripped you apart *completely*, to
the point where you ended up making *absurd* claims that this book:
<http://tmp.gallopinginsanity.com/CUIfC.png> supported your denial of the
very topic the book was written to support and assist with the
implementation of. It was a complete and total destruction of any slight
semblance of knowledge you claimed to have. Of course, you denied you had
enough knowledge to be able to figure out why *obviously* miserable UI
examples were so bad. But, hey, we can re-hash your humiliation forever...
that seems to be your goal (look at your dishonest sigs... I mean, really...
get the hell over your embarrassment already).
In the end, it was clear you focus on column 1 and ignore column 3:
<http://pages.cpsc.ucalgary.ca/~saul/481/process_diagram.html>. When this
became so clear not even you could deny it you made up "quotes" from me and
from Carroll, your self-selected expert, and completely folded.
--
🙈🙉🙊
cc
I don't know how we got so far sidetracked on HPT. I couldn't care
less about his last twenty posts. He's an idiot. HPT was never the
point. Hadron coming to the rescue and you fondling his balls
immediately after was the point.
Snit
45915312-4207-4776...@p10g2000yqi.googlegroups.com on 8/24/11
7:26 AM:
> On Aug 24, 9:56 am, Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>> White Spirit stated in post j32ukg$c6...@dont-email.me on 8/24/11 6:33 AM:
>>
>>> On 24/08/2011 14:30, cc wrote:
>>
>>>> Value is relative, but he's not talking about trolls. I love when you
>>>> and Hadron start defending each other and "me too"ing each others
>>>> posts. It's cute.
>>
>>> It's also hypocritical, particularly when the vile piece of Snit accuses
>>> us of overlooking advocates' faults but accepts assistance from a Nazi
>>> like flatfish.
>>
>> Yeah, I agreed that HPT posts only useless attacks and insults... and cc
>> showed that in a post in 2006 HPT actually did something different.
>>
>> I am *so* humiliated to be proved so wrong.
>>
>> LOL!
>>
>> Seriously, by having to dig back to 2006 to find a single non-trolling post
>> from HPT, cc has pretty much proved Hadron and I right.
>>
>
> I never said HPT wasn't a douchebag.
And he is... good to see you do not deny that.
> I just commented on the love
> affair between you and Hadron and how cute it is to see you two come
> to each others defense.
But, of course, you have *no* support that we *ever* defend each other in
any way that is not completely reasonable. Heck, do you have any evidence
we defend each other at all?
In the end: you made an accusation you will fail to support.
--
🙈🙉🙊
Snit
d3dec354-c433-4df7...@b11g2000vbz.googlegroups.com on 8/24/11
7:58 AM:
...
>>> I did not dig.
>>>
>> Right! You just happened to have a post of his from 2006 real handy... maybe
>> printed on a note card in your back pocket.
>>
>>> I know how to use a search engine. It took literally two seconds. But I must
>>> have missed in your original post where you specified either explicitly or
>>> implicitly that it had to come from more recently than 2006. My apologies.
>>> Can you quote the part of your post where you specified that for me again so
>>> I can meet your requirements?
>>
> I don't know how we got so far sidetracked on HPT.
Hadron made a comment about HPT. I agreed with it. You claimed the comment
was incorrect... and when asked for support you dug back to 2006 to find a
counter example. I noted the absurdity of your doing so - but to be
completely fair to you and HPT looked at his most recent posts to see if
Hadron (and myself) were right.
I found that Hadron's comments were not completely accurate and rescinded my
support - HPT does not post *only* suckup lapdog posts, he merely posts
*mostly* suckup lapdog posts (mostly ones where he is clearly harassing
people).
> I couldn't care less about his last twenty posts. He's an idiot. HPT was never
> the point. Hadron coming to the rescue and you fondling his balls immediately
> after was the point.
Ah, so you are making a "point" that you not only cannot support but is tied
to Hadron's noting what a complete and total idiot you made of yourself when
you discussed UI issues.
Got it: you are still humiliated about your BS in that thread so you are
lashing out. This also explains why you still dishonestly misquote me and
Carroll in your sig. You just cannot get over how pathetic your claims were
in that ongoing debate.
Well, let me give you some advice: you dug a hole for yourself and made a
complete fool of yourself... but the way out of your hole is not to keep
digging down.
Throw out your shovel, climb out of the ever-deepening hole, and get over
it. So you made a fool of yourself in a Usenet debate... so what? Move the
hell on.
--
🙈🙉🙊
Hadron
I'm not coming to the rescue of anyone. I have Snit killfiled for his
repeated reposts of the same text time and time again. What I did was
point out that you were totally out of your depth and didnt have the
minerals to own and up and/or extract yourself before it becoming
pretty to anyone that bothered reading that tedious thread that you know
nothing about R&D in the UI field.
Snit
8:16 AM:
>>>> I know how to use a search engine. It took literally two seconds. But I
>>>> must
>>>> have missed in your original post where you specified either explicitly or
>>>> implicitly that it had to come from more recently than 2006. My apologies.
>>>> Can
>>>> you quote the part of your post where you specified that for me again so I
>>>> can
>>>> meet your requirements?
>>>
>>> Hey,
>>
>> I don't know how we got so far sidetracked on HPT. I couldn't care
>> less about his last twenty posts. He's an idiot. HPT was never the
>> point. Hadron coming to the rescue and you fondling his balls
>> immediately after was the point.
>
> I'm not coming to the rescue of anyone. I have Snit killfiled for his
> repeated reposts of the same text time and time again. What I did was
> point out that you were totally out of your depth and didnt have the
> minerals to own and up and/or extract yourself before it becoming
> pretty to anyone that bothered reading that tedious thread that you know
> nothing about R&D in the UI field.
And for that cc insists you blindly supported me.
Complete insanity.
--
🙈🙉🙊
cc
> 7:58 AM:
>
> ...
>
>
>
>
>
> >>> I did not dig.
>
> >> Right! You just happened to have a post of his from 2006 real handy... maybe
> >> printed on a note card in your back pocket.
>
> >>> I know how to use a search engine. It took literally two seconds. But I must
> >>> have missed in your original post where you specified either explicitly or
> >>> implicitly that it had to come from more recently than 2006. My apologies.
> >>> Can you quote the part of your post where you specified that for me again so
> >>> I can meet your requirements?
>
> >> Hey, I admitted you were right: HPT does not *always* post useless junk...
> >> there is a post from 2006 where he did otherwise. Egg on my face and all
> >> that.
>
> >> LOL!
>
> >> Realistically, there are some where he does something other than just act the
> >> direct lapdog. But they are rare. Here, let's look at his last 20 posts:
>
> >> A fairly reasonable post.
>
> >> j32hfj$dr...@dont-email.me on 8/24/11 2:49 AM:
> >> A complete lapdog suck up post.
>
> >> A bit of humor... nothing wrong with that.
>
> >> A complete lapdog suck up post.
>
> >> A bit of humor... nothing wrong with that.
>
> >> A complete lapdog suck up post.
>
> >> A bit of a suckup, but can count as just humor. No harm.
>
> >> An actual post where he speaks well of Linux. Amazing.
>
> >> A complete lapdog suck up post.
>
> >> A complete lapdog suck up post.
>
> >> A complete lapdog suck up post.
>
> >> A complete lapdog suck up post.
>
> >> A complete lapdog suck up post.
>
> >> An actual post where he speaks well of Linux. Amazing.
>
> >> A complete lapdog suck up post.
>
> >> An actual post where he speaks well of Linux. Amazing.
>
> >> A bit of a suckup, but mostly just views on OSS.
>
> >> A complete lapdog suck up post.
>
> >> A complete lapdog suck up post.
>
> >> A complete lapdog suck up post.
>
> >> In that sample we have 12 suckup "lapdog" posts from him. To be fair, Hadron
> >> implied 100% or darn close to it, and - at least in this sample - he is only
> >> at 60% suckup "lapdog" posts.
>
> >> When I am wrong I admit to it. HPT does not post only suckup lapdog posts,
> >> though those are clearly his most common type of post (the majority of his
> >> posts). There - fair enough?
>
> > I don't know how we got so far sidetracked on HPT.
>
> Hadron made a comment about HPT. I agreed with it. You claimed the comment
> was incorrect...
>
I did no such thing.
--
"I do not understand the difference between opinion and fact." - Snit
cc
You didn't do shit, so let's just end that right there. Although Snit
may have answered with nonsense, he at least was responding. You piped
up every now and again to say I didn't know what I was talking about,
yet when questioned, you ran back to Snit's taint region. The fact
that you and Snit didn't know jack shit about any of it until I posted
the terms for you to google, and the fact that you think it was
somehow about R&D is mildly amusing. So let's get this straight, you
pointed out I was out of my depth by not contributing anything, and
learning about things like scenario based design and critical
parameters from my posts. Got it.
--
"Hadron is literally a genius and knows everything." - Snit
Snit
6701cd8f-a702-4f97...@m38g2000vbn.googlegroups.com on 8/24/11
9:27 AM:
Ah, so you whined about my agreeing with a comment you did not disagree
with.
Whatever. Really... you are really bad at making a point. But, hey, let's
give you another chance. Make a point and offer support.
Do your best. Don't do your normal BS of running.
And don't trip over your laces.
--
🙈🙉🙊
cc
I wasn't discussing the contents of the post at all, merely your
affinity for Hadron and vice versa. Are you too stupid to understand
that?
--
"There are no general principles in HCI." - John M. Carroll
Snit
c635f361-1f39-482f...@h9g2000vbr.googlegroups.com on 8/24/11
9:32 AM:
>>> I don't know how we got so far sidetracked on HPT. I couldn't care
>>> less about his last twenty posts. He's an idiot. HPT was never the
>>> point. Hadron coming to the rescue and you fondling his balls
>>> immediately after was the point.
>>
>> I'm not coming to the rescue of anyone. I have Snit killfiled for his
>> repeated reposts of the same text time and time again. What I did was
>> point out that you were totally out of your depth
>
> You didn't do shit, so let's just end that right there.
If you believed what you were claiming you would not feel the need to snip
as you did.
I'm not coming to the rescue of anyone. I have Snit killfiled
for his repeated reposts of the same text time and time
again. What I did was point out that you were totally out of
your depth and didnt have the minerals to own and up and/or
extract yourself before it becoming pretty to anyone that
bothered reading that tedious thread that you know nothing
about R&D in the UI field.
> Although Snit may have answered with nonsense, he at least was responding. You
> piped up every now and again to say I didn't know what I was talking about,
> yet when questioned, you ran back to Snit's taint region.
See how you start spewing nonsense when you know you have no point to make.
> The fact that you and Snit didn't know jack shit about any of it until I
> posted the terms for you to google, and the fact that you think it was somehow
> about R&D is mildly amusing. So let's get this straight, you pointed out I was
> out of my depth by not contributing anything, and learning about things like
> scenario based design and critical parameters from my posts. Got it.
We noted you know very little about UI development and HCI. Your whole
focus is on column 1 stuff and you deny the other columns are important:
<http://pages.cpsc.ucalgary.ca/~saul/481/process_diagram.html>. You went so
far as to not only ignore items from other columns, you denied items from
column 3 even existed in HCI. Out and out denied what was shown to you.
But this is no longer even really about HCI and GUI development - nor even
your humiliation in how you acted in that ongoing debate - it is now about
your reaction to your humiliation... you just keep forging quotes and
attributing them to me and to Carroll.
You are not able to be honest. Your every post proves it.
--
🙈🙉🙊
Snit
40c1156d-cd6f-4b4e...@t29g2000vby.googlegroups.com on 8/24/11
9:57 AM:
>>>> Hadron made a comment about HPT. I agreed with it. You claimed the
>>>> comment
>>>> was incorrect...
>>
>>> I did no such thing.
>>
>> Ah, so you whined about my agreeing with a comment you did not disagree
>> with.
>>
>> Whatever. Really... you are really bad at making a point. But, hey, let's
>> give you another chance. Make a point and offer support.
>
> I wasn't discussing the contents of the post at all, merely your
> affinity for Hadron and vice versa. Are you too stupid to understand
> that?
Ah, so you made up a story and now pretend it had nothing to do even with
the topic being discussed... that the topic and actions in the thread are
not even support for your silly story.
Great.
So do you have anything to support your off topic insults and accusations?
You know, like actual quotes from either of us doing as you accuse?
Oh... you have *many* such quotes: you just make them up and lie about them.
You see, at this point you have tossed any last bit of credibility you had -
that is what happens when you forge quotes in your every post. And you do.
All because you humiliated yourself in a Usenet debate. How pathetic.
--
🙈🙉🙊
cc
cc: "Stampeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeddddddddddddde!!!!"
Snit: "If I could not back that up you might have a point... But, hey,
if you have a counter example of him actually offering value and not
just sucking up to his masters, then by all means do share it."
cc: http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/6fb069955ec51e97?hl=en&dmode=source
Snit: "Hey, I admitted you were right"
Therefore, since I backed it up, I have a point and you and Hadron
love each other. Congratulations to you both. Although my original
comment had nothing to do with HPT and everything to do with you two.
Only you're such an idiot, you don't understand that. It doesn't
matter though, you have admitted that me pointing out your torrid love
affair with Hadron was completely valid and accurate. Thanks.
Snit
2e0001df-87fd-46d4...@br5g2000vbb.googlegroups.com on 8/24/11
10:03 AM:
>>>> Hadron made a comment about HPT. I agreed with it. You claimed the
>>>> comment
>>>> was incorrect...
>>
>>> I did no such thing.
>>
>> Ah, so you made up a story and now pretend it had nothing to do even with the
>> topic being discussed... that the topic and actions in the thread are not
>> even support for your silly story.
>>
>> Great.
>>
>> So do you have anything to support your off topic insults and accusations?
>> You know, like actual quotes from either of us doing as you accuse?
Note: not only did you not find any such quotes - quotes to back up your
claims - you snipped the very request.
Even you know you are just lying and trolling... you show now sign of
believing a word you say.
>> Oh... you have *many* such quotes: you just make them up and lie about them.
>> You see, at this point you have tossed any last bit of credibility you had -
>> that is what happens when you forge quotes in your every post. And you do.
>>
>> All because you humiliated yourself in a Usenet debate. How pathetic.
>
> cc: "Stampeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeddddddddddddde!!!!"
>
> Snit: "If I could not back that up you might have a point... But, hey,
> if you have a counter example of him actually offering value and not
> just sucking up to his masters, then by all means do share it."
>
> cc:
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/6fb069955ec51e97?hl=
> en&dmode=source
>
> Snit: "Hey, I admitted you were right"
I admitted you were right about something you now deny you even said.
> Therefore, since I backed it up, I have a point and you and Hadron
> love each other.
Ah, word twisting from you. I admit you were right to say Hadron was wrong
- in other words I *agree* Hadron was wrong (only in that he exaggerated,
but still, he was wrong) and you twist that to say it is proof he and I
"love" each other.
In other words: you fold. You know you have no point so you feel the need
to lie. Again.
> Congratulations to you both. Although my original comment had nothing to do
> with HPT and everything to do with you two. Only you're such an idiot, you
> don't understand that. It doesn't matter though, you have admitted that me
> pointing out your torrid love affair with Hadron was completely valid and
> accurate. Thanks.
See how you just out and out lie. Pathetic.
Seriously, why can't you stop lying? Why do you snip all references to your
forged quotes of myself and Carroll. Why do you keep beating yourself up
over your lack of knowledge of UI development and design?
Let it go... you just keep making a bigger and bigger fool of yourself.
--
🙈🙉🙊
cc
>
> you just keep forging quotes and
> attributing them to me and to Carroll.
>
> You are not able to be honest. Your every post proves it.
>
Email Dr. Carroll for confirmation.
Snit
86535ec7-56f5-4cfd...@s2g2000vby.googlegroups.com on 8/24/11
10:05 AM:
I do not need to email anyone to know you forge quotes... mine (above) and
others (Carroll - when you claimed he emailed you rescinding his public
claims).
Let me guess: you want me to believe that while you forge quotes and
attribute them to me I am the only one you do this to. Buggers belief. Not
even worth considering.
You lied about me. You lied about Carroll. You ran from simple things such
as noted in column 3 of this:
<http://pages.cpsc.ucalgary.ca/~saul/481/process_diagram.html>
You lied about material peer reviewed articles (calling it merely a student
worksheet) and you lied about books from experts (claiming the book about
the importance of following GUI principles supported your BS denials of
their existence). You even went so far as to admit your inability to figure
out what was wrong with some screenshots of *obviously* poorly done UIs.
You never got around to supporting your views... and when you were pushed
you just made things up - including the "quote" you made up from Carroll.
Utter rubbish. You lied. Period.
--
🙈🙉🙊
cc
> 10:05 AM:
>
> > On Aug 24, 12:59 pm, Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>
> >> you just keep forging quotes and
> >> attributing them to me and to Carroll.
>
> >> You are not able to be honest. Your every post proves it.
>
> > Email Dr. Carroll for confirmation.
>
> > --
> > "I forge posts." - Snit
>
> I do not need to email anyone to know you forge quotes... mine (above) and
> others (Carroll - when you claimed he emailed you rescinding his public
> claims).
>
> Let me guess: you want me to believe that while you forge quotes and
> attribute them to me I am the only one you do this to. Buggers belief. Not
> even worth considering.
>
I have paraphrased some of your statements, and quoted directly for
others. None are forged (you on the otherhand forged posts from me, as
you can see in the headers of those posts. Nice try though, but
perhaps you were too rushed to do it properly). You won't email Dr.
Carroll because that would provide confirmation that you are wrong,
and we can't have that. So instead of firing off a two line email, you
will spend all your time posting bullshit that you don't understand
over and over again. Of course, this is getting tedious again. You and
Hadron can continue your homosexual relationship, giving each other
hand jobs and whatnot, and believe that you were correct without
taking the quarter of a second it would take to verify it, while the
rest of us live here in the real world.
--
"I don't understand." - Snit
Snit
dd3c9571-d2b6-4a75...@a12g2000yqi.googlegroups.com on 8/24/11
10:39 AM:
What you mostly snipped - because you know I am completely right:
---------
I do not need to email anyone to know you forge quotes... mine (above) and
others (Carroll - when you claimed he emailed you rescinding his public
claims).
Let me guess: you want me to believe that while you forge quotes and
attribute them to me I am the only one you do this to. Buggers belief. Not
even worth considering.
You lied about me. You lied about Carroll. You ran from simple things such
as noted in column 3 of this:
<http://pages.cpsc.ucalgary.ca/~saul/481/process_diagram.html>
You lied about material peer reviewed articles (calling it merely a student
worksheet) and you lied about books from experts (claiming the book about
the importance of following GUI principles supported your BS denials of
their existence). You even went so far as to admit your inability to figure
out what was wrong with some screenshots of *obviously* poorly done UIs.
You never got around to supporting your views... and when you were pushed
you just made things up - including the "quote" you made up from Carroll.
Utter rubbish. You lied. Period.
--------
All you can do is snip and go back to begging I email others who might be
able to support the claims you failed to be able to support and spewed lies
about to try to obfuscate your ignorance.
And of course this is tedious - you keep snipping and running and lying.
Did you expect that to suddenly become exciting?
--
🙈🙉🙊
Steve Carroll
> > 6:14 AM:
>
> > > On Aug 24, 8:46 am, Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> > >> Hadron stated in post lwwre3p24o....@news.eternal-september.org on 8/24/11
> > >> 2:52 AM:
>
> > >>> White Spirit <wspi...@homechoice.co.uk> writes:
>
> > >>>> On 24/08/2011 02:07, High Plains Thumper wrote:
>
> > >>>>> Because you have demonstrated yourself to be nothing more than a hideous
> > >>>>> troll, you have shown me that there is no further point in directly
> > >>>>> replying to you.
>
> > >>>> Snit deserves a good beat-down, Rodney King style. I have had to plonk the
> > >>>> worthless piece of Snit to prevent my monitor being defiled with the
> > >>>> presence
> > >>>> of
> > >>>> his idiotic, narcissistic tripe.
>
> > >>> You did indeed run and hide like hpt did when your general cluelessness
> > >>> and idiocy and moral hypocrisy was held up for all to see.
>
> > >>> hpt is a special case though. I challenge you to post a link to him
> > >>> talking intelligibly about ANY feature of a Gnu/Linux desktop that he
> > >>> actually uses. He once posted a link to his private account for some
> > >>> cheap pirated Windows SOFTWARE hosted on y warez by mistake. LOL! Did he
> > >>> look stupid! (well, stupider).
>
> > >> HPT has *nothing* of value to say. He is a clueless cowardly lapdog who
> > >> lives to serve his masters.
>
> > > Stampeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeddddddddddddde!!!!
>
> > talked about his BS and shown examples.
>
> > not just sucking up to his masters, then by all means do share it.
>
>
> Value is relative, but he's not talking about trolls. I love when you
> and Hadron start defending each other and "me too"ing each others
> posts. It's cute.
>
> > cc runs in 3... 2... 1...
>
> > 100% predictable.
>
> TomB: Can you ask Snit to provide evidence that I've run.
If you don't drool along with Snit on one of his many delusions he
considers you having 'run'.
> --
> "I forge posts." - Snit
No question he forges posts... but it's nice to see him admit it
again... as he has in the past (not that he needed to).
Steve Carroll
> A fairly reasonable post.
>
> j32hfj$dr...@dont-email.me on 8/24/11 2:49 AM:
> A complete lapdog suck up post.
>
> A bit of humor... nothing wrong with that.
>
> A complete lapdog suck up post.
>
> A bit of humor... nothing wrong with that.
>
> A complete lapdog suck up post.
>
> A bit of a suckup, but can count as just humor. No harm.
>
> An actual post where he speaks well of Linux. Amazing.
>
> A complete lapdog suck up post.
>
> A complete lapdog suck up post.
>
> A complete lapdog suck up post.
>
> A complete lapdog suck up post.
>
> A complete lapdog suck up post.
>
> An actual post where he speaks well of Linux. Amazing.
>
> A complete lapdog suck up post.
>
> An actual post where he speaks well of Linux. Amazing.
>
> A bit of a suckup, but mostly just views on OSS.
>
> A complete lapdog suck up post.
>
> A complete lapdog suck up post.
>
> A complete lapdog suck up post.
>
> In that sample we have 12 suckup "lapdog" posts from him. To be fair,
> Hadron implied 100% or darn close to it, and - at least in this sample - he
> is only at 60% suckup "lapdog" posts.
>
> When I am wrong I admit to it. HPT does not post only suckup lapdog posts,
> though those are clearly his most common type of post (the majority of his
> posts). There - fair enough?
>
Putting your 'Master's Degree' to good use again, Snit?
p.s. Did you ever get that refund on your 'Psych Degree'?
High Plains Thumper
> Hey, I admitted you were right: HPT does not *always* post useless
> junk... there is a post from 2006 where he did otherwise. Egg on my
> face and all that.
54- Jim Polaski: "Why is it that nearly every thread you're involved in
seems like it turns into some tit-for-tat, dozens of responses to OT
things and garbage? Cmon there Snit. Someone has to take the lead and
stop this crap. Try. How about it?" 25 Apr 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/5b5c22490ab9649b
<SNIP>
> When I am wrong I admit to it. HPT does not post only suckup lapdog
> posts, though those are clearly his most common type of post (the
> majority of his posts). There - fair enough?
Stampeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeddddddddddddde!!!!
--
HPT
Snit
on 8/24/11 7:37 PM:
The fact is I called you on your BS:
* You repeatedly accuse me of having forged the video on copying and pasting
(and others videos and images)
* You repeatedly accuse me of posting as Joel Crumpp (and other names).
* You repeatedly quote the obsessively scavenged and forged quotes of
the lowest scum of CSMA and dishonestly pretend they represent something
about me.
You have been doing this for years; completely unable to stop yourself from
sucking up to utter scum. You are a lapdog coward... and you cry about
"verbal abuse" when you are told how pathetic you are.
I have repeatedly asked you to cease your abuse and you refuse. I will
repeat the request now - please stop harassing me.
--
🙈🙉🙊
High Plains Thumper
> High Plains Thumper stated:
>> Snit wrote:
>>
>>> When I am wrong I admit to it. HPT does not post only suckup
>>> lapdog posts, though those are clearly his most common type of
>>> post (the majority of his posts). There - fair enough?
>>
>> Stampeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeddddddddddddde!!!!
>
you have no facts. I already replied to you,
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/46d069afabaa07ba
and you keep copying and pasting the same lies.
40- Hadron (COLA): "I'm not coming to the rescue of anyone. I have Snit
killfiled for his repeated reposts of the same text time and time
again." 24 Aug 2011
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/e99833d90612ee35
--
HPT
Snit
on 8/24/11 8:27 PM:
The fact is I called you on your BS:
High Plains Thumper
> High Plains Thumper stated:
>> Snit wrote:
>>> High Plains Thumper stated:
>>>> Snit wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> When I am wrong I admit to it. HPT does not post only suckup
>>>>> lapdog posts, though those are clearly his most common type
>>>>> of post (the majority of his posts). There - fair enough?
>>>>
>>>> Stampeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeddddddddddddde!!!!
>>>
>>> The fact is [snip]
>>
>> you have no facts. I already replied to you,
>>
>> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/46d069afabaa07ba
>>
>>and you keep copying and pasting the same lies.
>>
>> 40- Hadron (COLA): "I'm not coming to the rescue of anyone. I have
>> Snit killfiled for his repeated reposts of the same text time and
>> time again." 24 Aug 2011
>>
>> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/e99833d90612ee35
>
>>
You keep copying and pasting the same reply, your reply instead of
responding to my points, ad hominem attacking my character. How troll
and childish of you.
I respond with a sense of humour, posting your familiar
Stampeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeddddddddddddde!!!! that you oddly respond to people
who state something you don't like, calling the posting community
disrespectfully as the "herd".
Aren't you capable of original thought, Snit? Can't you analyse what
people are saying to you, and respond accordingly, instead of repeating
the same reply over and over and over?
The fact you keep doing these unproductive and childish tactics only
further illustrates your intent to troll COLA (and CSMA).
--
HPT
Snit
on 8/25/11 4:21 AM:
> On 08/24/2011 09:34 PM, Snit wrote:
>> High Plains Thumper stated:
>>> Snit wrote:
>>>> High Plains Thumper stated:
>>>>> Snit wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> When I am wrong I admit to it. HPT does not post only suckup
>>>>>> lapdog posts, though those are clearly his most common type
>>>>>> of post (the majority of his posts). There - fair enough?
>>>>>
>>>>> Stampeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeddddddddddddde!!!!
>>>>
>>>> The fact is [snip]
>>>
>>> you have no facts. I already replied to you,
>>>
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/46d069afabaa07ba
>>>
>>> and you keep copying and pasting the same lies.
>>>
>>> 40- Hadron (COLA): "I'm not coming to the rescue of anyone. I have
>>> Snit killfiled for his repeated reposts of the same text time and
>>> time again." 24 Aug 2011
>>>
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/e99833d90612ee35
>>
>>>
>> The fact is [snip]
>
> You keep copying and pasting the same reply, your reply instead of
> responding to my points, ad hominem attacking my character. How troll
> and childish of you.
You make no points. You repeat the same BS over and over and over... and
now you whine that I reply to it with the same facts. The facts:
The fact is I called you on your BS:
* You repeatedly accuse me of having forged the video on copying and pasting
(and others videos and images)
* You repeatedly accuse me of posting as Joel Crumpp (and other names).
* You repeatedly quote the obsessively scavenged and forged quotes of
the lowest scum of CSMA and dishonestly pretend they represent something
about me.
You have been doing this for years; completely unable to stop yourself from
sucking up to utter scum. You are a lapdog coward... and you cry about
"verbal abuse" when you are told how pathetic you are.
I have repeatedly asked you to cease your abuse and you refuse. I will
repeat the request now - please stop harassing me.
> I respond with a sense of humour, posting your familiar
> Stampeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeddddddddddddde!!!! that you oddly respond to people
> who state something you don't like, calling the posting community
> disrespectfully as the "herd".
I do not respond that way to people who merely say something I do not like.
That is completely inaccurate.
> Aren't you capable of original thought, Snit? Can't you analyse what
> people are saying to you, and respond accordingly, instead of repeating
> the same reply over and over and over?
Empty insults and accusations from you. Boring.
> The fact you keep doing these unproductive and childish tactics only
> further illustrates your intent to troll COLA (and CSMA).
Poor you: I respond to your trolling in ways you do not like.
Hey, you said you would KF me. I guess that did not please your masters.
What a cowardly suckup lapdog you are.
--
🙈🙉🙊
High Plains Thumper
make no points. You repeat the same BS over and over and over... and now
you whine that I reply to it with the same facts. The facts:
The fact is I called you on your BS:
* You snip evidence on you and run repeatedly accusing me of having no
evidence, when in fact you forged the evidence on your website on copying
and pasting (and your other strawmen evidence)
* You repeatedly snip evidence that shows you did post as Joel Crump (and
other names).
* You repeatedly call actual observations, the truth, quotes by others of
your trolling as obsessively scavenged and forged quotes, calling them
the lowest scum of CSMA because they busted you and in your dishonestly
pretend they don't represent something about Michael Glasser.
You have been doing this for years; completely unable to stop yourself
from sucking up to utter scum like flatfish and Hadron. You are a lapdog
coward... and you cry about "verbal abuse" when you are told how pathetic
you are.
I have repeatedly asked you to cease your abuse and you refuse. I will
repeat the request now - please stop harassing me.
>> I respond with a sense of humour, posting your familiar
>> Stampeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeddddddddddddde!!!! that you oddly respond to people
>> who state something you don't like, calling the posting community
>> disrespectfully as the "herd".
>
> I [snip]
Snit respond that way to people who merely say something I do not like. I
make statements that are completely inaccurate.
>> Aren't you capable of original thought, Snit? Can't you analyse what
>> people are saying to you, and respond accordingly, instead of repeating
>> the same reply over and over and over?
>
> Empty [snip]
insults and accusations as Snit I do. I know I am boring.
>> The fact you keep doing these unproductive and childish tactics only
>> further illustrates your intent to troll COLA (and CSMA).
>
> Poor [snip]
Snit: "I trolling in ways you do not like."
> Hey,
join the Snit herd, and I can be your master.
> What [snip]
Yeah, I know. As Snit, a cowardly suckup lapdog am I.
--
HPT
Snit
5:51 AM:
* You repeatedly accuse me of having forged the video on copying and pasting
(and others videos and images)
* You repeatedly accuse me of posting as Joel Crumpp (and other names).
* You repeatedly quote the obsessively scavenged and forged quotes of
the lowest scum of CSMA and dishonestly pretend they represent something
about me.
You have been doing this for years; completely unable to stop yourself from
sucking up to utter scum. You are a lapdog coward... and you cry about
"verbal abuse" when you are told how pathetic you are.
I have repeatedly asked you to cease your abuse and you refuse. I will
repeat the request now - please stop harassing me.
--
🙈🙉🙊
High Plains Thumper
replying to Snit is a waste of oxygen as demonstrated by these 155
poster quotes on the Snit Circus of Pathological Lies. Now in its sixth
printing, alphabetised and with substantial links, here are what these
155 posters have to say about Snit:
1- Adam Kesher: "Steve, IIRC Sandman's website has a member area and a
login. If you forget your password, you can ask it to e-mail it to you,
and a bot will send an e-mail. *That* is the e-mail Snit got from
Sandman's website, and yes he's that fucked in the head and starved for
attention that he'd claim it to be an e-mail from Sandman himself. So,
don't get sucked into his little circus. The e-mail, in this particular
instance, did probably originate from Sandman.net." 27 Feb 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/dac74355552b4cc7
2- Alan Baker: "People's perceptions of you are *formed* by behaviour
and not withstanding your occasional on topic posts, I wish you'd leave
too. Please note that despite the amazing silliness that is Edwin, I
have never made the same wish of him." 27 Feb 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/4a7c3ebf3fc10221
3- amicus_curious (COLA): "Where on earth do you get the idea that I am
arguing with you, little man? Is your name "Hadron"? Shoo! Go back to
your mail order business!" 29 May 2011
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/00ee203fe6183b1b
4- Andrew J. Brehm: "You are not flamed because you speak the truth, you
are flamed because you are a hideous troll and keep disrupting the
newsgroup." 27 Feb 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/52eab53a559e00ce
5- AZ Nomad: "The fact that you routinely change your headers to weasel
out of killfiles proves that you're an asshole." 25 Jun 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/51b43d6c9613c9da
6- Andy/news/nospam: "Why do you keep these things up, Snit? Why not
just let them go away and show how responsible a member of CSMA you are?
You could show your enemies up by being better than them, rise above the
low level you so obviously dislike. Anything, just stop...." 26 Apr 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/d6ffb6b06aa237e5
7- B.B.: "Does the From: header contain the string "Snit"? If yes, then
troll. Otherwise, maybe. Dunno why I had my KF on you set to expire, but
it's fixed now." 13 Mar 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/8a98d179b2ff9578
8- BaJoRi: "You know it, and I know it, and everyone else who has read
your idiocy knows it. I took your statement, showed it to be wrong, then
added even more, just to be a dick and REALLY show you to be a fool. You
need to judiciously snip out pertinent points because you are an
intellectually dwarfed turd-burglar." 11 Nov 2008
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.vacation.las-vegas/msg/647944511b74b82f
9- bobinnv: "I learned some time ago how much better this group can be
if you kill file Snit. I have never understood why more people don't do
the same.." 5 Aug 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/0706dbef8ce1f903
10- Bob B.: "This has always been pretty much a free-for-all group, but
since Snit showed up, its become almost impossible to have a decent
discussion about anything. The solution is to NOT REPLY TO SNIT. But for
some reason, some people just can't stop feeding him." 27 Dec 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/3d2f1dff196ca190
11- °b° unny: Subject "snit makes me sad", Text "really actually =:-("
9 Oct 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/4e31cb49c1e2d432
12- Brian: "LOL, Has anyone ever been more universally hated on the
USENET than Snit? Too bad he craves the hatred and negative attention.
We will read about him in the news some day soon going on a shooting
rampage. Somebody should get the pychopath some help before he VT's a
bunch of people. 29 May 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/66a89e4f5c89f489
13- buzz off: "Snit is obviously mentally ill, but you and Steve don't
help. You encourage him to post, which he doesn't need to do. We would
all be better off if you just ignore him. 17 Nov 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/2ed879f256677548
14- Carlo Coggi: "He must believe he is surrounded by 'trolls' ... in
the groups he trolls in, that is. I wondered if the idiotrollers like
snit would reply to this thread. Of course, I didn't see his posts, only
your reply". 07 Aug 2006 (available only in reply)
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/5ea48f7a84115fd1
15- C Lund: "Snit is not my responsibility. Maybe it's time for you to
learn how to use your kill-filter. I am assuming, of course, that your
Usenet browser has a kill-filter." 5 Mar 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/2c390a34b05b24a9
16- cc (COLA): "You are incapable of letting anything go. In fact, I
guarantee you will respond to this post in under 3 hours. Hell, I'd be
surprised if it takes longer than 30 minutes. If I really wanted to, I
could make this little side topic go on forever, because you are a
complete moron who just has to respond to anything written about or to
you, even if it just means repeating yourself." 1 Feb 2010
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/3712090033411605
17- Chance Furlong: "HPT, Wally, Sandman, C Lund, Steve Carroll and Tim
Adams are not trolls and do not troll. You, on the other hand, are a
troll." 27 Aug 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/28c267f26965b43f
18- Chris Ahlstrom (COLA): "I try to go more by the contents of the
posts. Although some clowns (e.g. Snit) spew out so much chaff it is not
worth the effort." 14 Feb 2010
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/8b6a982957c7c9d5
Chris Ahlstrom (COLA): "Actually, many of the advocates are sick to
death of Snit's never-ending puerile blather about trivialities. The
occasional reasonable conversations are too few and far between." 6 Mar
2011
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/811326833ba71864
19- Chris Clement: "ugh....geez man.....let it go" 5 Jul 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/ed093996df6547b2
20- chrisv (cola): "No, she called him 'shit', and rightly so, for they
way he was so ignominiously birthed into a toilet at the bus depot, and
simply refused to die, despite repeated flushes. It's now far too late
to *flush* him, but we can still *plonk* him..." 12 Sep 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/18099f8aa067f4a5
21- Code Orange: "Then why post it? What need is there for you to "win"
an argument? They don't like you, you don't like them. Why must you keep
this up? What results are you expecting?"
22- CozmicDebris: "I'm done with your three year old games. The archives
show my answers and your inability to process them. Keep posting your
list and proving that you are an idiot troll. I will not address it any
further- you being too stupid to realize and accept that is not my
problem". 22 Nov 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.cellular.attws/msg/0aa65b7a132dbfe8
23- cshenk: "I happen to believe him over you... and I doubt I'd be the
only person in this ng to do so. You have given people a lot of
'evidence' that you are dishonest... as 'evidenced' by the quotes list."
.... "Why stop with Jonas? Why not call the entire list of people on
your quotes list 'liars'? After all, they have all labeled you a liar,
troll or worse." 27 Nov 2010
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/909a59de04850ef5
24- Dave Fritzinger: "[snip of stuff I really don't care to read] Snit,
please go away. Get a life, meet a woman, do something, but please,
please, please, GO AWAY!!!!" 2 Jun 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/57bb2fc42ec0f290
25- Dawg Tail: "PC advocates, Mac advocates, Linux advocates. Almost all
of them are making similar claims about Snit. When you have so many
diverse people who share a common perception where do you think the
problem lies? With Snit? Or almost everyone else? The answer doesn't
require an advanced degree to figure out." 30 Dec 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/73edac32c3ad530b
26- Donald L McDaniel: "Jesus, snit. You're a teacher. I thought you
knew what a metaphor was, and could recognize one when it was presented
to you. I guess I had too much confidence in you." 30 Nov 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/3254ec7af27bfb0f
27- ed: "snit, you continually amaze me with how much of a liar and
loser you are. you may notice a semi-regular pattern with me where i
stop responding to your posts for stretches at a time, then start up
responding as if you were a normal person. i suppose it's tough for the
magnitude of your 'loserdom' to stick, so it loses some of it's
sharpness when i stop responding to you. you almost always start
responding back in a semi normal way, but inevitably degenerate. it's
once again that time. i can only ask that you pass my condolences to
your wife and unborn child for having to put up with such a dishonest
fool as yourself. (well, if your wife is a loser as well, just pass
those condolences to the rug-rat to be; if not, double condolences to
her). " 30 Apr 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/71f74dd6d806ce77
28- Edward Stanfield: "Snit thinks the rules that apply to honest and
honorable people apply to him. That is absurd. He is the biggest liar
in Usenet history. Mackay posted the email to prove Snit was using sock
puppets and he still is. Snit can not give up his socks puppets and
shills. They are the only ones who ever support him." 28 Jan 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/5b52494d96d12229
29- Edwin: "You've got to be out of your mind, Snit. You're the worst
troll this group has ever seen. You're a liar and a forger, and you've
almost destroyed this group single-handedly. For you to post a list of
out of context arguments, and lies, and forgeries about your enemies
labled as a "peace effort" has to be one of the craziest stunts you've
pulled. It's all about your sick need for attention, your need to be
center stage at all times. You'd publicly eat dog turd if you thought it
would make people look at you." 18 May 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/37e4a720619642a0
30- Elijah Baley: "Seriously, Snit, you need psychiatric help. Go see a
doctor." 24 Aug 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/6f6c88356b54fc15
31- Elizabot v2.0.2: "I see you were unable to respond to the points in
my post and you are back to your repetitious regurgitation mode. How
childishly typical of you, Snit." 16 Nov 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/55214ccfb7414fe5
32- Fa-groon: "I don't read Snit period. He's been killfiled since the
first day I posted here. [....] I don't want to 'do like Snit'. As far
as I'm concerned, Snit doesn't even exist." 15 Aug 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/dcfbff305ba8b7f0
33- fibercut: "That is the problem. In the years I have been coming to
CSMA I have seen in the past year a real hatred among people, besides
the typical Mac vs. Windows typical argument. I feel that it is like
being in a room of really young children trying there best to best the
other person. The one common thing among all of this seems to be you. I
hate to be like this, but facts are facts. You seem to be in the middle
of a great percentage of arguments. CSMA has become less about Macs and
more about "look everybody, I think he lied". Is there no end then all
this picking at each other on such a personal level. CSMA has always
been al little adversarial but you have personally crank it up to the
point that this place is no longer fun. Congratulations on stopping CSMA
and making this place your own personal circus." 12 Jan 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/bbe695bbc3424ab6
34- Geezer:
Snit: "Steve Carroll has no sense of morality"
Geezer: "Whined the guy who cannot directly address those who uncover
his lies and deceit;)"
Snit: "and no clue about the law."
Geezer: 'Said the guy who believes his unsupported opinions are "proof".
LOL! (snip more of Snit's unsupported lies)' 1 Jan 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/d0517ced5134934d
35- Geoff M. Fitton (COLA): "The Prescott Computer Guy *still* showing
how stupid he is... What a mar00n". 30 Aug 2008
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/f9401b4b57c59865
36- George Graves: "Jason. You have started an argument with the Snit
(AKA Michael Glasser), this should not be done. He will drive you crazy
with his twisted logic, his deep-rooted need to be ALWAYS right at any
cost. He will move goalposts, set up strawmen, and bore you into
submission with his endless pedanticism. The only way to engage him is
to hit and run. NEVER engage him, it's a futile, empty procedure that
will only anger you and feed him. Take my advice and STAY AWAY!" 27
Oct 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/3d3af33ce25a11fd
37- gimme_this_gimme_that: "Hitting the vodka tonight Snit?" 4 Mar 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/b457a7b378264794
38- Glenn Hall (COLA): "That person is like a constantly running toilet
that won't stop. Does he ever stop talking about UI consistency? No
matter what anyone replies, he adds a few more branches to the spider
web as it grows and grows. It's a waste of time." 31 Oct 2010
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/c8dd8a244fe1eb2c
39- Greycloud: "You really shouldn't lie like that. Everyone else
notices that you are not honest and you have no honor." 21 Jan 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/3b92f11a1ab00f91
40- H: "Your crappy posts are still showing up in seperate threads, are
you doing this on purpose to piss people off? I dont ever censor people
cause that's just retarded but if you dont fix it I'm gonna have to
cause I dont wanna see your name 40 times in a row. So uh, change your
client or something". 12 Sep 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/f36ee6b458c86499
41- Hadron (COLA): "Would you please stop the whining. FFS he has you
jumping to his every post. How many more fucking times are you going to
post the same repetitive garbage? Please ..at least change the record
sometimes!!!!!!!" 13 Aug 2010
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/1e0ecbb776623473
41- Hadron (COLA): "I'm not coming to the rescue of anyone. I have Snit
killfiled for his repeated reposts of the same text time and time
again." 24 Aug 2011
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/e99833d90612ee35
42- Henry Flam: "You on the other hand must be a deeply troubled
individual who has a fragile ego. I needn't agree nor disagree with the
points above. I don't care about them. Your constant complaints, whines,
rages, etc., wars with the regular Mac advocates, whom you mislabel as
trolls, arise from your sense that any conversation or thread must orbit
around you. People have pointed that out to you but you don't accept
that. Snit I feel sorry for you. Please go and see a doctor about your
solipsism. There must be a cure for you deep psychological travail." 18
Aug 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/b9bb48e6e6da75c8
43- Heywood Mogroot: "*plonk*" Aug 19 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/d8afd909a308b97f
44- -hh: 'Perversion has utterly nothing to do with the definition of
"synonymous". It is, however, a very clear example of how you attempt
to maliciously debase against anyone who disagrees with you. As such, I
consider this to be a purposeful attempt by you to try to libel me.
This is your only warning to consider rescinding your remark, with the
reminder that you, and you alone are responsible for that accusation,
both in the ethical as well as the full legal meaning of the word
"responsible".' 25 Feb 2008
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/5496641a3426293a
45- High Plains Thumper: "Agreed except for Snit and socks (Joe Crump
and ad nauseum). I've got Snit kill binned, because he is the classic ad
hominem troll. At first he seems reasonable, but then it always degrades
into name calling bullying, the responder is a liar, etc. AKA the Snit
Circus of Pathological Lies. Perhaps the times he seems reasonable are
when he is properly controlled by medication." 21 Sep 2010
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/249a598ec5aafe85
46- Homer (COLA): "I don't mean this as a personal insult, but I'm
perfectly serious when I say 'Snit' (Michael Glasser) is obviously
mentally ill, and needs help. I was going to suggest that someone
alerts his wife to the problem, but I have to assume she's already aware
of his condition, if she is in fact still living with him. It's
possible, I suppose, that he's already undergoing counselling and/or on
medication, but if he is then it doesn't seem to be helping much. Maybe
he just missed his 'meds' today (again, I mean that sincerely)." 26 Jan
2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/e061874ea94e9ce8
Homer: "Word of advice for anyone concerned: don't be tempted to get
drawn into a Snit circus, it's literally a waste of time. He's just an
attention seeker who'll keep stringing you along, in a never-ending
circle of obtuse questions, for which he has no genuine interest in the
answers." 14 Oct 2010
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/0d06eb2e900e3058
47- hophead: "I have been reading and occasionally posting to CSMA for a
long time now, since 1995 at least. There have always been trolls and
morons, but I've never seen anything quite so disruptive as the Snit
circus. Snit will *never* back down or stop, and neither will most of
his opponents. A good kill file is your only hope." 20 Aug 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/3161a78667e299eb
48- Jamie Hart (cola): "It seems that since you are unable to offer
support for your statements, you're reduced to personal attacks on me.
Incidentally, anyone reading this post can see that I have offered no
straw men, and have only asked you to explain how the things you state
as facts can be true. I'm really sorry that you're taking this attitude,
the topic is an interesting one and I thought you might have some
insights. I've snipped the rest, since you dislike long posts and avoid
answering any of the questions I asked by saying everything was just
repeated." 6 Dec 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/8e07cde31f4eecf6
49- Jason McNorton: "You're one of the many, many paranoid people on
usenet that should be confined most likely. You sit there and refresh
your screen endlessly. You post the same nonsense over and over. Either
you're a super troll, or you're a super mess." 1 Nov 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/7a8e091c0b248eb0
50- JEDIDIAH (cola): "You're simply full of shit." 27 Feb 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/cdddf5fd04d9afcb
51- Jeff B.: "Yo, Snit. We're not pals. I think you're a git." 23 Dec 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/0ec649345d433a2d
52- Jeff Hoppe: "This is a Macintosh Advocacy newsgroup. Not a 12-step
recovery plan. Your medical problems or conditions won't help me achieve
a greater understanding of my Mac. In fact, it detracts from it and
those kinds of discussions have no place in a newsgroup such as this."
18 Nov 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/947a2cc0301a2862
53- Jesus: "Really, Snit. It's annoying. What are you accomplishing
besides being annoying? Is that your goal?" 25 Apr 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/e3d5029d34cde243
54- Jim Lee Jr.: "Snit, read the thread's title, is Bush mentioned in
it? You (and Carroll) ought to learn to stay on topic and not hijack
threads."
55- Jim Polaski: "Why is it that nearly every thread you're involved in
seems like it turns into some tit-for-tat, dozens of responses to OT
things and garbage? Cmon there Snit. Someone has to take the lead and
stop this crap. Try. How about it?" 25 Apr 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/5b5c22490ab9649b
56- Jim Richardson (cola): "And yet again, Snit runs away, rather than
actually provide evidence for his claims. Par for the course I suppose."
"Evasion noted. Snit runs away again rather than produce evidence for
his claims. At least come up with some original insults Snit! I mean,
you *are* capable of original thoughts! Right? Snit?" 8 Feb 2008
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/e33321cc3343fc44
57- Joey Jojo Junior Shabadoo: "and Snithead has even farther to fall -
in a few weeks he'll be out on the street after midnight, yelling at
passersby 'sucky sucky, $2...'" 23 Mar 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/57cf69f66571a5a7
58- John C. Randolph: "You're nothing but a troll yourself. What are you
bitching about?" 1 Dec 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/12ba528be5ad2665
59- JohnOfArc (cola): "I'm not sure "troll" does it justice- more like a
black hole! But hey, if we all promise to never again even entertain an
unkind thought re Apple, will you take it back and lock it up? Please??"
11 Mar 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/e2891b1f3984e121
60- John Q. Public: "I have not been bothered to read Snit's postings
since I figured out who he is. I don't bother to filter his posts, I
just consider the source and skip to the next one when I see his name."
7 Jan 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/7d34c1bd05c877d2
61- John Slade: "I don't get posts from Snit. I wouldn't be shocked that
he has some kind of disorder. He made up stuff about being a computer
repairman and teacher. He's just plain loony and best ignored. Let him
deal with his disorder by medication. He's here to do one thing, get
attention from people. He says the crazy stuff just to get a reaction.
You say you like to beat him over the head. Well that's what he's
counting on, he says stuff he knows isn't true in hopes to get a rise
out of people like you. Ignore him, you won't regret it." 3 Apr 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/394a53a65c28d314
John Slade: "Snit, you have a enough problems as it is without adding
drinking booze to the list. How the hell did you manage to get out of my
killfile? Oh well back into the cage you go, PLONK." 13 Oct 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.food.wine/msg/992a796786a541d8
62- Josh McKee: "I have no strawman so therefore it has to be in your
mind. .... What is obnoxious are your posts." 26 Jul 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/3665b9e002d27c44
63- K E: "I haven't read this board for awhile but I see that even
though the trolls still roam free at least the worst troll of the lot is
mostly being ignored by readers on this bb. If the few stragglers that
keep replying to him would just stop responding to Snit at all this
place could be worth coming back to. There's a good chance he'll pack up
and take his trolling to more fertile ground." 22 Oct 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/0b9dca7df1f677f4
64- KK: 'Whoa there, ad hominem man. You started off your sentence with
"Ah" like you'd just realized something profound.' 29 Oct 2008
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.fan.howard-stern/msg/6a89029a5b5be5f8
65- Kelsey Bjarnason (cola): "Funny how you simply don't bother reading
the posts that rip your entire thesis to bleeding gobbets of putrid
excrescence. Maybe some day you'll learn how to support your position,
instead of sticking your fingers in your ears and humming, hoping it'll
all go away." 7 Mar 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/96d064a7a5c6074a
66- Ku Karlovsky (cola): "You repeatedly chastise others for ad hominem
attacks while in the same sentence make your own ad hominem attacks. You
make silly claims and then avoid the subject of your silliness. You're a
liar and a hypocrite and you always have been." 14 Jul 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/d1e3f9ac5c72c6ee
67- Lars Trager: "Yes, you are stupid." 7 Jan 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/a9bedf6689f9a54f
68- Lawrence D'Oliveiro (COLA): "You seem to be full of complaints about
your inability to hold up your end
of the argument, aren’t you?" 16 Mar 2011
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/8ca5f48099696228
69- Lefty Bigfoot: "Okay, I tried to put up with it for a long time, but
the few times you post something worth reading just aren't worth it
anymore. *plonk*" 16 Dec 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/5520adae01120e83
70- Liam Slider (cola): "Maybe he's responding to the fact you've been
an annoying little fuckwit lately. You started out with the pretense of
trying to be fair, but lately all there is from you in COLA is trashtalk
about Linux and you acting every bit the troll." 16 Jul 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/ad7d6c42c5e4cf2f
71-libcrushersmith: "Snit also thinks Dan Rather still anchors CBS News
and that Gitmo terrorists are innocent! Any time Snit is cornered, he
changes the subject and will never admit he's wrong." 28 Jan 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/fbc516717f3b7ccf
72- libsnightmare: "You're a sore loser who has resorted to fifth grade
tactics. How fucking sad - all this clown has left is to edit posts and
post fake bullshit. You can't debate... so you lie. Once again, you have
proved Steve Carroll right about you. Sad..." 4 May 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/a80c93f80bd6bc3e
73- Linonut (cola): "Snit may be the first retraction of my general
killfile amnesty. The volume of cavilling, whining, foot-stomping,
back-tracking, goal-post shifting, and petulance generated by that
effete candy-ass beggars belief". 30 Aug 2008
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/cc4827fd7e8ad574
74- Lloyd Parsons: "Well, I don't know if Oxford is the most cretinous,
I would think that would be reserved for Snit! ;-)" 18 Mar 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/b6cd3ac4bf1e08d6
75- Lewis: "hasn't this fight been going on for like 8 years now? I
don't think anything is ever going to fix snit." 02 Mar 2010
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/98ef8bca6b3a9b34
76- Lusotec (COLA): "You have started threads on this subject many
times, and many times it has been explained to you how X copy & paste
should work and how bugs in a application are not bugs in the system,
but still you return to this subject and post the same false
statements." 09 Mar 2011
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/37032133fbe9db92
77- Marious Barrier (COLA): "I must recognize that it is the first time
I see that kind of troll, once that start asking moderately serious
questions and since the first answer, gradually starts to degenerate it
by, in many failed attempts of being sarcastic, inserting various
indirect insults and calling all people ignorant and unable to answer
what he asks for." 14 Oct 2010
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/c6607ea64f436821
78- Mark Kent (cola): "The problem with someone like Mr Glasser is the
same as it is with Mr Wong, even if he were to be honest now, it would
be impossible to determine where the honesty starts and the usual
dishonesty ends. In my primary school, one of the teachers was very keen
on proverbs, and I recall her going over the "cry wolf" story. Mr
Glasser could "cry wolf" over and over now, and I would not come to help
him with his sheep, because I do not know any way of determining if he's
ever telling the truth, or indeed, if he ever has." 2 Dec 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/3f30aa1b65a972b3
79- Marti Van Lin (COLA): "I paid enough attention to Snit IMHO. I
killfiled him the very first month I started lurking COLA. I find his
nitpicking and immature behavior extremely annoying. I am not going to
torture myself reading his bullshit. Snit is also a proven liar.
Remember his retarded exif debacle." 08 Jul 2011
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/d12622df3671359b
80- Mayor of R'lyeh: "The fact is that he's probably pulling it to this
post since its all about him and he managed to make me think about him
today. A friend of mine has a toddler. I went over to her house and
videotaped her kid doing a bunch of cute toddler stuff then burned a DVD
of it for her. While we were watching the DVD her kid got mad. He got
mad because we quit making him the center of attention and made that kid
on the tv the center of attention. He even ran up to the tv and tried to
block our view of it. That's how Snit lives his whole life." 30 Sep 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/9935f4154d5a290b
81- McGarnagle: "And you know when Snit is endorsed by two of the
biggest nutjobs in AGA - RichL and El Kabong - you know he's not very
bright and a loon." 31 Oct 2008
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.guitar.amps/msg/e60a33341bff1309
82- Michelle Ronn: "The real topic here is that one someone refutes your
'facts', you run away and ignore them. Refuting your 'facts' is easily
done in this case. I did it, and you ignored it." 9 Feb 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/c050c82720737b32
83- Mike: "Nonsense. I never see you "advocate" anything. All I see you
doing is engage in endless semantic arguments with everyone. You're the
TholenBot of CSMA. BTW, that's *not* a compliment!" 8 Jul 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/7c5b72d70b87ffbd
84- Mike Dee: "I will no longer accuse you of lying here. Instead I can
only say that you are a complete and delusional kook that happens to
inhabit CSMA for the time being. That you are unaware of how deranged
you actually behave further reinforces this notion. Please seek
professional help."
"The point that keeps whooshing over your head Snit, is Elizabot made no
threat to you before you went to the police. She made a promise.
Admittedly, to your delusional spaced out paranoiac view point, Elizabot
was suddenly "threatening" to you. In so much as you had to take your
kooky self down to your local police shop and blub on their shoulders
about how much in danger you were in [sob, whine], and they had to waste
valuable policing time consoling you over your stupidity. I bet they
have Kook with a capital "K" written at the top of your profile, Snit."
2 Sep 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/9cf45bc88a324f40
85- mmoore321: "Snit is a human car-accident and we are all
rubbernecking. We know it is bad form, but yet strangely curious. Treat
him the same way, look but just keep moving on." 18 Aug 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/f1c3041d89504c07
86- Mojo: "Actually, these facts piss everybody off because they are
off-topic, unnecessarily confrontational, extremely boring and clearly
show that you are crying out for attention." 20 Sep 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/a38f07b9a4811a80
87- Mr. Blonde: "Lastly, I can't help but comment on the fact that your
obsession with Sandman has actually grown since you claimed to KF him.
Killfilling someone generally implies you're ignoring that person, yet
you piggyback onto virtually every reply to him here and and check his
website's validation status more often than most people check their
e-mail. These are not the actions of a mentally balanced individual."
19 Jan 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/2b005666ab303e2b
88- MR_ED_of_Course: "Seriously, spend half a day at any pre-school or
kindergarten and see if the kids there can't teach you a thing or two
about social behavior." 16 May 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/55c03a6a0b7813a4
89- Muahman: "Ahhhh shit, another thread lost to the Snit retard
circus!!! I actually dread seeing Snit reply to a thread because that
automatically means it's in the toilet." 8 Jul 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/92e776d521dfa701
90- Mutley (AUK): "For the record ... I'll be done when I decide that
there's more shit on your face than there is on the sole of my shoe."
01 Nov 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/1802ad3aa000098b
91- Nashton/Nasht0n: "Oh for crying out loud, if I wasn't convinced that
snit is a total loser, and I rarely call people losers, I certainly am
now. Why bother responding to his stupidities anyway?" 29 Nov 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/be1a326a81441508
92- nessuno (COLA):
Chris Ahlstrom: "Have you ever noticed that threads involving Snit,
[...] are a basically a waste of time?
nessuno: "Yep. I don't read them." 29 May 2011
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/2f997598f0e25f9d
93- New Bee: "Honest and honorable? You? You've either got a wry sense
of humor, or you're completely nuts. Either way you're just a waste of
time, and you've done more than anybody to make this group a cesspool.
Then you revel in wallowing in your own filth." 14 May 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/2856277b085d0274
94- none of your buisiness (COLA): "I am sorry, but I am going to have
to send you to the bin. You're perpetrating the Snit circus by
responding to all of his assinine posts. He is only here for one reason,
to disrupt this group, & you are helping him, as well as flatfish." 04
Jan 2011
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/a9b40ce46612fdc4
95- Not Important: "I get this mental image of you and a sibling as
children in the back seat of the family car saying:
Mom, 'snits' touching me ... and you responding much as you do now ...
I'm not touching you, you're touching me! The problem is that by now you
should've grown out of that type of poke and complain interaction with
others. But, of course, you've haven't learned how to interact with
others in a more 'constructive' and mutually beneficial manner even
now." 03 Jul 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/d16279e9003ca8f4
96- notlisted (COLA): "I actually like Apple. But I see you as an
asshole who spends an embarassing percentage of your life posting
derogatory comments about a computer operating system you obviously
detest, and insulting those who defend it in a newsgroup dedicated its
advocacy. That's almost the definition of being an asshole, and you
have half a dozen buddies who do the same thing. You excuse what you do
by pretending that you're merely pointing out problems in the hope that
the system will be improved, but that's an obvious lie whether it's you
saying it or one of your buds. You do it because you enjoy the feeling
it gives you, whatever that is." 07 Mar 2011
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/90b57eaa796e8b14
97- OldCSMAer: "What's he been doing? Am I going to be sorry I killfiled
him?" 27 Nov 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/23b808d9646cd257
98- OldSage: "What drives me nuts is your unrelenting ability and desire
to argue on the head of a pin about the most trivial of things." 2 Oct
2007
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/88457f8e7c25273e
99- Oxford: "If you are using MT-Newswatcher: Select offending Author,
example Snit... Go to the Filters Menu, Choose 'Kill this Author'
Click 'OK' Then Repeat with each annoying Author of your choice. Then
to see your work... Choose the Filter Menu again, Then 'Refilter
Articles'... Bam! No more boring, pointless bickering about nothing.
Enjoy!!!!!" 14 Aug 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/1d7f9181e95ed9ec
100- Owl (COLA): "You have interacted with me often enough to know that
I never initiate personal attacks. I generally respond in kind. It is
you who usually fall off the civility wagon first, with your ironically
condescending canned responses that do nothing for your argument and
generally shine a spotlight on the desperation that you are so fearful
of projecting." 5 Mar 2011
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/8debf93e05da4d26
Owl (COLA): "You are a complete idiot and extremely dishonest. Consider
yourself permanently plonked." 29 Mar 2011
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/ba7797c5108b3c10
101- Patrick Nihill: "I mean, honestly, who would you rather discuss
something with; Dan, or someone like Zara? Or, for that matter, Snit,
for whom the work 'troll' seems so painfully inadequate?" 13 Aug 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/f93db68e683ad769
102- Pawel Wojciak: "Jesus Christ, snit... <plonk> " 27 Jun 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/93afdfea4d4f491a
103- PC Guy: "Forget it Snit, you're a waste of time. For someone who
talks about everyone else not being "honest and honorable" you appear to
be the least honest and honorable of anyone here." 22 Apr 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/36bf51df2a2662a4
104- Peter: "I've never felt the need to use the filters in Newswatcher
but I thought Id try the Kill this Author.. option with Snit. Ten
seconds later and he's gone! Amazing." 30 Dec 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/011eef01d7bcd56c
105- Peter Bjorn Perlso: "Plonked for 60 days. Now stfu and take your
argument with sandman into the private room." 13 Dec 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/ae4651ec99be3c77
106- Peter Hayes: "True, but that removes Snit completely, and someti...
err..... occasiona.... errrrr..... once in a blue moon he has something
useful to say." 20 Mar 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/8a31a47e26c5f5b7
107- Peter Jensen (cola): "Where has he ever said that they were not
different windowing environments? Message-ID, please. Experience has
told me not to trust you on anything without backing evidence." 30 Jun
2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/cfd5de2006d42fdc
108- Peter Kohlmann (cola): "Snot Glasser is invading this group with
his inane drivel, so he has to bear what people think about that
dishonest retard. And just for the record: You *are* a Glasser sock" 30
Jan 2010
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/f3166f6fda92641b
109- PeterBP: "Oh will you stfu". 30 Mar 2008
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/3e88e9a86cb5483e
110- Phil Earnhardt: "You're only interested in trying to get
superficial snipes and extrapolate inappropriate conclusions." 1 Nov 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/ad24a97d5dc86277
111- Rapskat (cola): "For instance, your sig you reference a long
standing war you have going with some person from csma. It's like you
single out persons to target your attentions upon and then continuously
berate them with constant barbs and goads to perpetuate their
acrimonious responses, which in turn you respond in kind, etc. ad
infinitum. Above all things, your affinity for Macs and your overbearing
pompous nature aside, this is what convinces me that your primary
purpose for frequenting this and other groups is to troll." 07 Sep 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/a09c6b8e3e63f42d
112- RichardK: "Just killfile him already." 20 Jun 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/1c9e7ded2e95a582
113- Rick (cola): "Snit, you are a liar. And an ignorant one. You trash
people that are trying their level best to cope with a horrendous
situation. And you do it without the slightest idea of what is going
on." 06 Sep 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/fcad2955ac5cb03b
114- Rick G.: "Just to be plain here, I have no doubt that he is a
troll. I am tolerant of his nature, not blind to it. However, as a
troll, he is ... somewhat clumsy." 22 Mar 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/198b88e3d0064a92
115- Robert F.: "Um, perhaps you misunderstand. I don't care if you
quote Mayor McCheese claiming the Earth is a flat plate perched on the
shell of a tortoise, I was merely pointing out that you run the risk of
looking ridiculous when you quote something patently stupid. If that's
your goal, you're on the right track, and more power to you." 11 Jan 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/4dc22433eae8803d
116- RonB (COLA): "Snit is a crank fixated on one issue, who's thing is
twisting your words so he can win an argument against a straw man.
That's enough to killfile him." 1 Jan 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.usenet.kooks/msg/ce8550d4cc5b1b42
RonB: (COLA): "Why do you bother responding to Snit? He makes no point,
he simply gainsays whatever you say. Just another version of Hadron's
'you're a liar' mantra, which is about all he can muster nowadays." 27
May 2010
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/279210dd877d7aa0
RonB (COLA): "Original subject line now killfiled. You can only talk
about the freaking clipboard for so many million freaking messages. As I
said, Snit has no common-sense, STOP mechanism. He's a mechanically
obsessive super crank and will go on forever. I'm not kidding about
this, he will *NEVER* *ever* stop." 6 Mar 2011
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/0df1e0164a8b586e
117- Rotten Apple: "You make trolls like me look like choir boys." 14
Sep 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/7a92988bcbce8fdb
118- Roy Culley (cola): "You appear to be in the latter category.
Starting crossposted threads for the simple purpose of hoping to
generate a flame war. If you truly want to learn more about Linux and
how it can help you and your supposed users why aren't you requesting
help from a more technical Linux newsgroup than an advocacy group? As
the old saying goes, those who can do, those who can't teach. Your posts
seem to confirm that saying IMHO." 12 Mar 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/d521a80051e24d08
119- S'mee (Keith, rec.motorcycles): "Liar...forger and worthless. You
must be related to our resident racist troll, he lies as much as you."
29 Dec 2008
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/ab08c00330c8b58d
120- Sandman: "He is by far the most killfiled person in the -HISTORY-
of csma. I've never seen someone so disliked, almost hated, in a news
group before. He has the ability to turn just about any person against
him in just a few posts. On usenet, trolls do this daily, but the funny
part with Michael is that I actually think he DOESN'T consider himself
be a troll - damn what -EVERYONE ELSE- is calling him. Obviously they
are wrong. Only Tholen himself can match this behaviour." 18 Mar 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/51c0735c774215c2
121- sav: "You really need to take a rest somewhere nice. Honestly, even
the nutters who hang out down on Brighton seafront made more sense than
this. You been doing drugs or something?" 25 May 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/1b251baa5c641370
122- Sean Burke: If you're dumb enough to respond to snit, you're
probably dumb enough to click on a spam attachment that promises to
remove smut from your harddrive." 21 Jan 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/e166032d8959c0e1
123- Sermo Malifer (COLA):
Snit: "Why do so many people in COLA argue *against* me..."
Sermo Malifer: "Because you're a narcissistic troll who posts trash just
to get people talking about you." 21 Jan 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/5ddf14f502e9b3f1
124- spike1: "As for the original post, there's plenty of reason thought
and criteria. The reason is snit's here. The thought is probably to show
everyone here just how bad a troll snit is." 03 Dec 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/c797d640e3b9fc12
125- ShutterBugz: "so snit-zel has some kind of problem expressing
anger, i guess. he has to vent his frustrations in other ways. and he
thinks he's making sense: well the syntax is there and he figures he's
pretty smart. indeed, he tells us, he's done the personality tests and
the iq tests and he's okay! aaaaahhhhh, you see he's soooooooo well
adjusted." 3 Mar 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/7f9fa1cf90490298
126- Steel (COLA): "You may not like the game, but nevertheless, it's
just a game. You play a game yourself don't kid yourself." 14 Oct 2010
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/be1f49165984c350
127- Steve Carroll: "Snit isn't much more than a one trick pony and not
telling the whole story is one of his two main tricks. His other main
trick is to outright lie. Sprinkle in a bit of denial and you've gone a
long way towards defining his MO. The idea that Snit admits to his
errors is one of the biggest jokes on usenet." 28 Feb 2010
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/0cc84ece10726aac
128- Steve Mackay: "Just killfile Snit, the dishonest piece of elephant
dung, and all would go away. Sure, I got caught up in the "Snit Circus",
but then the cotton candy began to sour, and CSMA begun to smell like
elephant dung." 18 Aug 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/9fc11094133dfcdf
129- Steven de Mena: "Sorry, you have now lost all credibility with me
for your rediculous argument regarding this." 26 Sep 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/1c8777d39c34e293
130- Steve Travis: "Oh oh... Now look what we've done. Snit has lost
all self respect and has sunk to the point of using words like 'asses'
when referring to others. Oh, how could the morally superior snit have
fallen so low.. Please take a moment out of your busy schedule to feel
embarassed for him. Or perhaps we should set up a fund to get him more
happy glue (and the appropriate plastic bags)." 27 Mar 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/3edd9ab69425a6c5
131- Stuart Krivis: "You might as well just give up and plonk him then.
A snit is a snit is a snit and always will be." 15 Aug 2006 (post not
available except in reply)
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/5b382420a696f140
132- Tattoo Vampire (COLA): "In other words, in another attempt to
troll, you made yourself look like a fool. Again". 28 Aug 2008
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/b2676d3540e09f38
133- thanatoid: "Is business/personal life/etc. SO bad that you had to
create Snit? I really thought higher of you until Snit came in here, in
fact I find your site very nice and wish there was a shop like yours
where I live (well, I /think/...) Or is Snit really just someone whose
HD you accidentally wiped? Either way, it seems to have created a lot
of, for lack of a better word, unpleasantness - just from looking at
today's headers." 02 Jul 2008
http://groups.google.com/group/24hoursupport.helpdesk/msg/1c43a7415c97bfa1
134- The Lost Packet (COLA): "well, he's found a seat in my killbin, I
can't be doing with him." 27 Jan 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/2007526a552b3322
135- TheLetterK: "That is merely your perception, Shit. You're the one
lacking counter evidence, and your arguments basically amount to "I'm
right, nya nya nya." No matter how many examples someone points at to
demonstrate their claim, you blindly continue to insist that they
provide no evidence, or that the evidence given is irrelevant. Worse
still, you fall back on straw men and disingenuous quote mangling to
portray the argument in your favor. You are one of the worst trolls that
inhabit CSMA, Shit. *Edwin* is more prone to fits of reason than you
are." 23 Sep 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/d488596b57132124
136- Thufir: "You can "prove" that no one has disproved your "proof"?
Again, your assertion that no one has done so is even *less* convincing
than your claim that some PDF "proves" whatever point you're trying to
make precisely because I'm familiar with your MO. That is, you're a
dumb-ass who would claim that that something is proved when it's not,
and who would ignore counter-examples disproving your contention. I
don't know what this *ages old* thread is about, but I know that you're
full of shit." 21 Aug 2008
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/5114623055c01092
137-Tim Adams: "I'd kill file you but then I'd miss the fun. you see,
you never cease to amaze me at just how stupid you really are. Why just
the other day I had a great laugh when I saw you, the king of liars (in
this NG anyway) calling somebody else a liar." 13 Nov 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/40c7f9407179ff2a
138- Tim Crowley: "I don't know - I think you might have more
compassion. Snit is sick. He needs help. This is the only way the poor
sick fool can get attention. My fucking God, he's taken to hanging out
with and supporting racist pig fuckers like MuahMuah. It is true that
no-one likes him and those that pretend they do are just using him or
don't know him - but come on- it's not his fault. He's sick. Have some
compassion, eh? All these idiot trolls, Zara, Stew, Tommy,
MuaaaahMuaaah, and Snit - they are all so alike. I pity each and every
one of them" 19 Apr 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/67f0f174110bfa0a
139- Tim Smith: "No, he didn't, and there is no reasonable way you could
actually believe he lied. You are purely trying to troll here." 14 Apr
2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/6e3cfd9240ac4871
140- Timberwoof: "Plonk, Snit." 23 Apr 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/40c8df070c3e776c
141- tom_elam: "Killfile Steve C. and Snit" 07 Jul 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/b50d0c973d21d995
142- TomB (COLA): "No Snit, you were flat out lying in an attempt to
make me look bad. Do you really have to sink to that level in order to
'be right'? If so, you're pathetic. And I don't say this because I like
to say it." 07 Feb 2010
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/43263f575ac40353
143- Tom Bates: "Do you have to turn any thread you post in into one of
your Circus acts?" 20 Feb 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/25f0e481b605e71f
144- Tommy: "In case you did not get it, I think the moral was: Stop
polluting the world with your infantile and obsessive "writings". You
give Mac advocacy a bad name. If that was your goal you have succeeded!
That also goes for all that bullshit on your website" 11 Jun 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/03610d2080321d33
145- Tony(UK) (COLA): "Your email address in your headers just about
sums the Linux world up. Nothing to do with the OS, it is the *uckwits
involved in the whole arena and have posted before on this. If in doubt,
deride, insult and attack. Look inwardly carefully before judging me."
10 Dec 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/533042ed18cefba3
146- TravelinMan: "I still can't figure out what's wrong with Snit. Most
people have him kill-filed and the few who don't mostly restrict their
responses to 'why don't you go away, no one wants you here'. Just what
would keep someone in this group with all of that animosity? Must be
some kind of severe mental illness." 17 Mar 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/45197fbb46d491df
147- Wally: "Because by your own admission "honor and honesty" are
nothing more than a "game" to you, as such not only do you wish to
define the rules, but no doubt you will also attempt to alter or bend
the rules when inevitably things do not go to your liking, for this
reason I doubt anyone would be foolish enough to play your game." 16
May 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/b9b3ed1ee20e5220
148- White Spirit (COLA): "Snit deserves a good beat-down, Rodney King
style. I have had to plonk the worthless piece of Snit to prevent my
monitor being defiled with the presence of his idiotic, narcissistic
tripe." 24 Aug 2011
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/2e3adbaae4bfb91d
149- WhoMe: "F michael IS a teacher, it's no wonder he's home more than
he's anywhere near a classroom".
150- William Poaster: "Good grief. If anyone's having a mental breakdown
it's the Prescott Computer Guy, Michael Snit Glasser. What a f#cked up
mess he is." 29 Aug 2008
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/914d1e74855fb461
151- William R. Walsh: "Now, if you'll excuse me, and accept my sincere
apologies for this, PLONK! Feel proud about that. You're the first
person to be plonked from my new computer! :-) " 10 Feb 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/313c7368f6369c49
152- Woofbert: "*Plonk*" 14 Jun 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/436e6b5333d747e0
153- zara: "Look - I'm not into combing through thousands of posts, to
prove what was said or not said - I leave stuff like that to people
without lives, like Snit. But it is assuredly, in the record. Ping Snit
to do a search - you will flatter him, and give meaning to his tawdry
little life." 25 Oct 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/a1d4fc7120a6a538
154- Zaren Ankleweed: "And with that, Snit goes in the global killfile.
No subject, no author, no nothing. Buh-bye". 11 Sep 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/12f7c34f24d43624
155- Znu: "The Snit Circus has gotten particularly bad as of late. When
I set up my filters to kill all of Snit's posts, plus direct replies to
them (which is how I'm keeping things from now on), nearly 40% of the
most recent 1000 articles in CSMA go out the window. .... In all,
something like 50% of the traffic in this group is now related to Snit
insanity. .... I killfile Edwin because I don't have a patience to have
discussions with someone who deliberately tries to waste my time. But
watching *other people* tie him knots can be entertaining. The
Snit-related posts are not like this. They are endless repetitions of
the exact same material and/or arguments dating back *years* about who
said what." 20 Apr 2008
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/9244dd79c682b2d6
--
HPT
Snit
on 8/26/11 7:56 AM:
* You repeatedly accuse me of having forged the video on copying and pasting
(and others videos and images)
* You repeatedly accuse me of posting as Joel Crumpp (and other names).
* You repeatedly quote the obsessively scavenged and forged quotes of
the lowest scum of CSMA and dishonestly pretend they represent something
about me.
You have been doing this for years; completely unable to stop yourself from
sucking up to utter scum. You are a lapdog coward... and you cry about
"verbal abuse" when you are told how pathetic you are.
I have repeatedly asked you to cease your abuse and you refuse. I will
repeat the request now - please stop harassing me.
--
🙈🙉🙊