83% of companies surveyed plan to move to Win7 within 2-3 years
DFS
run. Though just 17 per cent plan on updating in the next 12 months, 42 per
cent believe that they will be running Windows 7 within 12-24 months, and an
additional 24 per cent plan on updating within the next 24-36 months."
http://www.itnews.com.au/News/100869,study-predicts-bear-market-for-windows-7.aspx
Linux won.
Microsoft is doomed.
High Plains Thumper
Oh, another "independent" study ....
Stated up front: "In a recent survey of 1100 IT professionals,
83 per cent of IT departments are not planning on adopting the
new Windows operating system in the next year."
No one is in any big hurry to adopt Windows 7.
Fortunately, 83% of the COLA posters have DFS kill-filed.
--
HPT
DFS
Lie. 17% plan on adopting it within the next 12 months. That's about
10000x as many companies as have adopted desktop Linux in the past 12 years.
What a beatdown! Why can't Linux compete at all?
Poor HPT is all twisted up inside because he desperately wants to be a real
Linux advocate, but he makes too much money to ever consider leaving his
cushy, comfy Windows job. So he just pretends and plays with Linux at night
(also see Linosuck, Ballard, 7, Kohlmann, Hilliard, etc)
> Fortunately, 83% of the COLA posters have DFS kill-filed.
Coincidentally, 83 of 100 cola Linux "advocates" are nincompoops who can't
support their drooling lies.
Phil Da Lick!
> DFS wrote:
>
>> "Most companies do, however, see themselves adopting Windows 7
>> in the long run. Though just 17 per cent plan on updating in
>> the next 12 months, 42 per cent believe that they will be
>> running Windows 7 within 12-24 months, and an additional 24
>> per cent plan on updating within the next 24-36 months."
>>
>> http://www.itnews.com.au/News/100869,study-predicts-bear-market-for-windows-7.aspx
>
> Oh, another "independent" study ....
>
> Stated up front: "In a recent survey of 1100 IT professionals,
> 83 per cent of IT departments are not planning on adopting the
> new Windows operating system in the next year."
Prolly more to do with XP support being security only than anything else.
High Plains Thumper
And also pro'ly due to the OS maintenance contract requires them
to forcibly upgrade when Windows 7 is out.
--
HPT
amicus_curious
"High Plains Thumper" <highplai...@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:49edad37$0$29136$6e1e...@read.cnntp.org...
>
> No one is in any big hurry to adopt Windows 7.
>
"Pay me now or pay me later," said Steve expectantly.
> Fortunately, 83% of the COLA posters have DFS kill-filed.
>
But will that really protect them from the bad news?
Fox in the COLA Hen House
I suspect that the study is BS. I think that today Vista is being used
more in corporate than what is being reported, particularly after I got
on a USAF base, and I saw Vista being used by base personnel.
So, I think they are saying one thing when the reality is quite
different. Windows Vista and 7 are here to stay, and corporate will
dance to MS's tune, like they always have danced.
Doctor Smith
> High Plains Thumper wrote:
>> DFS wrote:
>>
>>> "Most companies do, however, see themselves adopting Windows 7
>>> in the long run. Though just 17 per cent plan on updating in
>>> the next 12 months, 42 per cent believe that they will be
>>> running Windows 7 within 12-24 months, and an additional 24
>>> per cent plan on updating within the next 24-36 months."
>>>
>>> http://www.itnews.com.au/News/100869,study-predicts-bear-market-for-windows-7.aspx
>>
>> Oh, another "independent" study ....
>>
>> Stated up front: "In a recent survey of 1100 IT professionals,
>> 83 per cent of IT departments are not planning on adopting the
>> new Windows operating system in the next year."
>>
>> No one is in any big hurry to adopt Windows 7.
>
> Lie. 17% plan on adopting it within the next 12 months. That's about
> 10000x as many companies as have adopted desktop Linux in the past 12 years.
> What a beatdown! Why can't Linux compete at all?
Because Linux sucks.
> Poor HPT is all twisted up inside because he desperately wants to be a real
> Linux advocate, but he makes too much money to ever consider leaving his
> cushy, comfy Windows job. So he just pretends and plays with Linux at night
> (also see Linosuck, Ballard, 7, Kohlmann, Hilliard, etc)
HPT has a lot of "issues".
Hypocrisy is the least of his problems.
>
>
>> Fortunately, 83% of the COLA posters have DFS kill-filed.
>
> Coincidentally, 83 of 100 cola Linux "advocates" are nincompoops who can't
> support their drooling lies.
Isn't it hysterical?
They try and discredit everything that is anti-Linux yet they drool when
Spammy Roy refers back to his own blogs for "proof".
It's a riot!
7
> "Most companies do, however, see themselves adopting Windows 7 in the long
> run. Though just 17 per cent plan on updating in the next 12 months, 42
> per cent believe that they will be running Windows 7 within 12-24 months,
> and an additional 24 per cent plan on updating within the next 24-36
> months."
>
> http://www.itnews.com.au
News/100869,study-predicts-bear-market-for-windows-7.aspx
>
>
> Linux won.
> Microsoft is doomed.
Probably the worst prediction ever.
Even as you were typing, Windowops 8 is being announced.
Not one IT Admin is going take the slightest bit of notice
of worthless version hopping mad me too WINDUMMY OSen any more.
Linux is out there
Fox in the COLA Hen House
Stupid, no one is jumping over to Linux because it's there, moron.
7
Hen House wrote on behalf of Half Wits from Micoshaft Appil Department of
Marketing:
> Stupid, no one is jumping over to Linux because it's there, moron.
Wrote the bumtard tool, sock operative retard, net loon and life long
BUM BOYEE for Micoshaft corporation asstrotrufing to get paid to buy some
dope to hallucinate harder and scream personalised abuse on the internet
at strangers and Linux advocates in a Linux** newsgroup. (TM)*
--
Fox in the COLA Hen House
Oh Balmer is my Pappy.
* This message is licensed not sold.
** Linux is now out everywhere (TM)
http://www.livecdlist.com
http://www.distrowatch.com
Fox in the COLA Hen House
<snipped>
Really, 7 you have no class, you have no guts and you're doing stuck in
a rut replies.
Sinister Midget III
> DFS wrote:
>> http://www.itnews.com.au/News/100869,study-predicts-bear-market-for-windows-7.aspx
>
> Oh, another "independent" study ....
>
> Stated up front: "In a recent survey of 1100 IT professionals,
> 83 per cent of IT departments are not planning on adopting the
> new Windows operating system in the next year."
>
> No one is in any big hurry to adopt Windows 7.
>
> Fortunately, 83% of the COLA posters have DFS kill-filed.
And the percentage is rising daily. I'd bet close to 85% of lurkers
have already killfiled the idiot as well.
--
----------------------------------------------------------------
All work and no play, will make you a manager.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Eee PC900 16G SSD 2G RAM Ubuntu 9.04
----------------------------------------------------------------
Fox in the COLA Hen House
> On 2009-04-21, High Plains Thumper <highplai...@invalid.invalid> claimed:
>> DFS wrote:
>
>>> http://www.itnews.com.au/News/100869,study-predicts-bear-market-for-windows-7.aspx
>> Oh, another "independent" study ....
>>
>> Stated up front: "In a recent survey of 1100 IT professionals,
>> 83 per cent of IT departments are not planning on adopting the
>> new Windows operating system in the next year."
>>
>> No one is in any big hurry to adopt Windows 7.
>>
>> Fortunately, 83% of the COLA posters have DFS kill-filed.
>
> And the percentage is rising daily. I'd bet close to 85% of lurkers
> have already killfiled the idiot as well.
>
This idiot seems to think that a lot of people are coming to this NG.
No, no it's the same COLA loons that come to this NG like this nut,
daily. 83% of no body is still no body.
Tim Smith
That reminds me of the stat that was popular in OS/2 advocacy circles
once that something like 90% of IBM's revenue came from customers who
used OS/2. That stat was probably correct--most of IBM's big clients
had an OS/2 machine or two--along with thousands of machines that ran
Windows or Unix. Only a very small amount of that 90% of revenue was
actually attributable to OS/2.
--
--Tim Smith
High Plains Thumper
> HPT has a lot of "issues".
Actually, only one. You are a troll.
> Hypocrisy is the least of his problems.
But a major one of yours.
Gary M. Stewart AKA Flatfish nymshifts using Dutch nym:
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/15886e781615d893
http://colatrolls.blogspot.com/2007/09/clogwog-troll.html
http://colatrolls.blogspot.com/2007/01/flatfish-troll.html
http://colatrolls.blogspot.com/2008/01/moshe-goldfarb-troll.html
http://colatrolls.blogspot.com/2008/11/sandeep-kumar.html
http://colatrolls.blogspot.com/2008/12/gary-m-stewart.html
http://colatrolls.blogspot.com/2009/02/doctor-smith.html
--
HPT
Snit
4/21/09 9:24 PM:
> Doctor Smith wrote:
>
>> HPT has a lot of "issues".
>
> Actually, only one. You are a troll.
What do you call yourself? You accuse me of forging data when I show you
videos such as:
<http://tmp.gallopinginsanity.com/UbuntuCP.mov>
The fact is you were not able to follow simple cut and paste instructions so
you lied about me. Now you are seeking favor with those who lie libel
others with the term "child molester" when they are proved wrong.
Do you not see what is wrong with this? If not, ask your religious leader.
But you will not: you know you are in the wrong.
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
High Plains Thumper
> High Plains Thumper stated:
>> Doctor Smith wrote:
>>
>>> HPT has a lot of "issues".
>>
>> Actually, only one. You are a troll.
>
> What do you call yourself? You accuse me of forging data when
> I show you videos such as:
> <http://tmp.gallopinginsanity.com/UbuntuCP.mov> The fact is
> you were not able to follow simple cut and paste instructions
> so you lied about me.
Steve Mackay: "Hey, and you can modify multiple times, post them
on your site, and claim they are the 'originals'. Oh wait...
You've done that already. Wow... more accusations from you
posted with -*gasp*- absolutely no support. You do that a
lot..." 13 Aug 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/87031a1655f235c2
HPT: "Why do I want to look at some 'new evidence' you have come
up with, when so far you fail to post truth. You were doing this
5 years ago. Steve Mackay expressed it very well in the above
quote. You have no credibility." 22 Apr 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/480976cfb9521cc6
> Now you are seeking favor with those who lie libel others with
> the term "child molester" when they are proved wrong.
Snit: "Er? I have just shown you to be lying, above, and then
you make more baseless accusation. Well, then, as long as you
are making baseless accusation, you *are* a proven child
molester. Keep in mind that the baseless accusation game is the
one *you* are pushing, so you should have no problem with my
referring to you as a 'proven child molester'." 13 Aug 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/87031a1655f235c2
> Do you not see what is wrong with this? If not, ask your
> religious leader.
>
> But you will not: you know you are in the wrong.
65- Mark Kent (cola): "The problem with someone like Mr Glasser
is the same as it is with Mr Wong, even if he were to be honest
now, it would be impossible to determine where the honesty starts
and the usual dishonesty ends. In my primary school, one of the
teachers was very keen on proverbs, and I recall her going over
the "cry wolf" story. Mr Glasser could "cry wolf" over and over
now, and I would not come to help him with his sheep, because I
do not know any way of determining if he's ever telling the
truth, or indeed, if he ever has." 2 Dec 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/3f30aa1b65a972b3
--
HPT
Chris Ahlstrom
this bit o' wisdom:
> Snit wrote:
>
>> Do you not see what is wrong with this? If not, ask your
>> religious leader.
>>
>> But you will not: you know you are in the wrong.
>
> 65- Mark Kent (cola): "The problem with someone like Mr Glasser
> is the same as it is with Mr Wong, even if he were to be honest
> now, it would be impossible to determine where the honesty starts
> and the usual dishonesty ends. In my primary school, one of the
> teachers was very keen on proverbs, and I recall her going over
> the "cry wolf" story. Mr Glasser could "cry wolf" over and over
> now, and I would not come to help him with his sheep, because I
> do not know any way of determining if he's ever telling the
> truth, or indeed, if he ever has." 2 Dec 2006
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/3f30aa1b65a972b3
Indeed, Snit found a productive troll to fit your beliefs!
--
A morgue is a morgue is a morgue. They can paint the walls with aggressively
cheerful primary colors and splashy bold graphics, but it's still a holding
place for the dead until they can be parted out to organ banks. Not that I
would have cared normally but my viewpoint was skewed. The relentless
pleasance of the room I sat in seemed only grotesque.
-- Pat Cadigan, "Mindplayers"
chrisv
>Indeed, Snit found a productive troll to fit your beliefs!
Someone should inform Shit that being agnostic does not make his
serial-lying any less reprehensible.
Chris Ahlstrom
this bit o' wisdom:
> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
Well, at least he won't go to Hell for it! Maybe. ;->
--
The human race has one really effective weapon, and that is laughter.
-- Mark Twain
Snit
4/22/09 4:30 AM:
You keep repeating yourself. But you have never acknowledged that Tim
Adams' libel is wrong... and repeated the accusations of others... even
extended them when you accused me of forging data simply because you could
not follow simple copy and paste directions.
Seriously: how can you not be ashamed of yourself? Have you printed your
posts and shown them to your religious leader? Of course not! You know you
are not acting like the Christian you like to think of yourself as... you
are not acting in a moral way. You are lashing out and making a mockery of
yourself - and, by extension, your religion - in a public forum.
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
Gregory Shearman
> After takin' a swig o' grog, chrisv belched out
> this bit o' wisdom:
>
>> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>
>>>Indeed, Snit found a productive troll to fit your beliefs!
>>
>> Someone should inform Shit that being agnostic does not make his
>> serial-lying any less reprehensible.
>
> Well, at least he won't go to Hell for it! Maybe. ;->
It's already in hell. Nothing else could account for its actions.
--
Regards,
Gregory.
Gentoo Linux - Penguin Power
High Plains Thumper
> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>> chrisv belched out:
>>> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>>
>>>> Indeed, Snit found a productive troll to fit your
>>>> beliefs!
>>>
>>> Someone should inform Shit that being agnostic does not
>>> make his>> serial-lying any less reprehensible.
>>
>> Well, at least he won't go to Hell for it! Maybe. ;->
>
> It's already in hell. Nothing else could account for its
> actions.
Snit's inspiration:
Snit: "Satan lives for my sins... now *that* is dedication!"
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/73d2b0d8eaaabc89
--
HPT
Snit
on 4/22/09 6:02 PM:
See! There you are actually quoting me! Much better than your normal BS.
Now if you can only find something better than a joke to try to show where I
am so wrong. If only you could... but, of course, you cannot.
I, on the other hand, can easily point to you insisting I forged data
because you could not follow a simple copy and paste procedure and you
wanted to gain the praise of some of the lowest of the low of Usenet.
Not exactly what your "God" would want you to do, eh? Sad how you cannot
live up to my standards of morality... I, the one who wrote:
Satan lives for my sins... now *that* is dedication!
I am sure your religious leaders would be proud of you. Snicker.
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
DFS
> Snit: "Satan lives for my sins... now *that* is dedication!"
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/73d2b0d8eaaabc89
You going from High Plains Thumper to Bible Thumper on us, fella?
Snit
8:48 PM:
LOL! I have been pointing out how HPT, who likes to think of himself as a
Christian, acts in ways that nobody who believed in God would really act.
It has been somewhat effective in getting him to think: he is quoting others
unsupported accusations and is actually quoting me. He thinks his quoting
of that from me will put me in a bad light... but most people will just
chuckle and move on.
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
High Plains Thumper
> LOL! I have been pointing out how HPT, who likes to think of
> himself as a Christian, acts in ways that nobody who believed
> in God would really act.
You claim to be an atheist and according to your statement above,
claim to know how a Christian should truly act. How should they,
Snit?
> It has been somewhat effective in getting him to think: he is
> quoting others unsupported accusations and is actually quoting
> me.
Think about what Snit? Are they unsupported? No, you have quite
a vivid imagination. And as stated previously, there is no need
to directly quote you, as other's conclusions about your trolling
are quite profound.
> He thinks his quoting of that from me will put me in a bad
> light... but most people will just chuckle and move on.
No, rather the laugh is on Snit, who continually ignores people's
comments of disapproval toward his trolling. Following is but a
small snippet of sad commentaries from 127 Posters regarding the
Snit Circus of Pathological Lies. Links have been provided on
nearly all, if one cares to research:
1- Adam Kesher: "Steve, IIRC Sandman's website has a member area
and a login. If you forget your password, you can ask it to
e-mail it to you, and a bot will send an e-mail. *That* is the
e-mail Snit got from Sandman's website, and yes he's that fucked
in the head and starved for attention that he'd claim it to be an
e-mail from Sandman himself. So, don't get sucked into his little
circus. The e-mail, in this particular instance, did probably
originate from Sandman.net." 27 Feb 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/dac74355552b4cc7
2- Alan Baker: "People's perceptions of you are *formed* by
behaviour and not withstanding your occasional on topic posts, I
wish you'd leave too. Please note that despite the amazing
silliness that is Edwin, I have never made the same wish of him."
27 Feb 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/4a7c3ebf3fc10221
3- Andrew J. Brehm: "You are not flamed because you speak the
truth, you are flamed because you are a hideous troll and keep
disrupting the newsgroup."
4- AZ Nomad: "The fact that you routinely change your headers to
weasel out of killfiles proves that you're an asshole." 25 Jun 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/51b43d6c9613c9da
5- Andy/news/nospam: "Why do you keep these things up, Snit? Why
not just let them go away and show how responsible a member of
CSMA you are? You could show your enemies up by being better than
then, rise above the low level you so obviously dislike.
Anything, just stop...." 26 Apr 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/d6ffb6b06aa237e5
6- B.B.: "Does the From: header contain the string "Snit"? If
yes, then troll. Otherwise, maybe. Dunno why I had my KF on you
set to expire, but it's fixed now." 13 Mar 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/8a98d179b2ff9578
7- BaJoRi:
Snit: "You are, of course, lying."
BaJoRi: "No, I am not. You know it, and I know it, and everyone
else who has read your idiocy knows it. I took your statement,
showed it to be wrong, then added even more, just to be a dick
and REALLY show you to be a fool. You need to judiciously snip
out pertinent points because you are an intellectually dwarfed
turd-burglar." 11 Nov 2008
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.vacation.las-vegas/msg/647944511b74b82f
8- bobinnv: "I learned some time ago how much better this group
can be if you kill file Snit. I have never understood why more
people don't do the same.." 5 Aug 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/0706dbef8ce1f903
9- Bob S: "This has always been pretty much a free-for-all group,
but since Snit showed up, its become almost impossible to have a
decent discussion about anything." 27 Dec 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/3d2f1dff196ca190
The solution is to NOT REPLY TO SNIT. But for some reason, some
people just can't stop feeding him."
10- °b° unny: Subject "snit makes me sad", Text "really actually
=:-(" 9 Oct 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/4e31cb49c1e2d432
11- buzz off: "Snit is obviously mentally ill..."
12- Carlo Coggi: "He must believe he is surrounded by 'trolls'
... in the groups he trolls in, that is. I wondered if the
idiotrollers like snit would reply to this thread. Of course, I
didn't see his posts, only your reply".
13- chrisv (cola): "No, she called him 'shit', and rightly so,
for they way he was so ignominiously birthed into a toilet at the
bus depot, and simply refused to die, despite repeated flushes.
It's now far too late to *flush* him, but we can still *plonk*
him..." 12 Sep 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/18099f8aa067f4a5
14- C Lund: "Snit is not my responsibility. Maybe it's time for
you to learn how to use your kill-filter. I am assuming, of
course, that your Usenet browser has a kill-filter." 5 Mar 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/2c390a34b05b24a9
15- cc (COLA): "Snit posts all the time. You don't have to dig up
months old articles where he brings up years old topics. Just
respond to a current message." 22 Jan 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/5a712e3312ba9f8a
16- Code Orange: "Then why post it? What need is there for you to
"win" an argument? They don't like you, you don't like them. Why
must you keep this up? What results are you expecting?"
17- CozmicDebris: "I'm done with your three year old games. The
archives show my answers and your inability to process them. Keep
posting your list and proving that you are an idiot troll. I will
not address it any further- you being too stupid to realize and
accept that is not my problem". 22 Nov 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.cellular.attws/msg/0aa65b7a132dbfe8
18- Dawg Tail: "You've already apologized for having already
misread what I had previously written. What makes you think that
you're correctly understanding what I'm writting now. You've got
a history of reading into things what you wanted people to have
said instead of what they really said.
I suggest you get over this limitation of yours. It's making you
look foolish."
Dawg Tail: "PC advocates, Mac advocates, Linux advocates. Almost
all of them are making similar claims about Snit. When you have
so many diverse people who share a common perception where do you
think the problem lies? With Snit? Or almost everyone else? The
answer doesn't require an advanced degree to figure out." 30 Dec
2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/73edac32c3ad530b
19- Dave Fritzinger: "[snip of stuff I really don't care to read]
Snit, please go away. Get a life, meet a woman, do something,
but please, please, please, GO AWAY!!!!" 2 Jun 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/57bb2fc42ec0f290
20- Donald L McDaniel: "Jesus, snit. You're a teacher. I thought
you knew what a metaphor was, and could recognize one when it was
presented to you. I guess I had too much confidence in you." 30
Nov 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/3254ec7af27bfb0f
21- ed: "snit, you continually amaze me with how much of a liar
and loser you are. you may notice a semi-regular pattern with me
where i stop responding to your posts for stretches at a time,
then start up responding as if you were a normal person. i
suppose it's tough for the magnitude of your 'loserdom' to stick,
so it loses some of it's sharpness when i stop responding to you.
you almost always start responding back in a semi normal way, but
inevitably degenerate. it's once again that time. i can only ask
that you pass my condolences to your wife and unborn child for
having to put up with such a dishonest fool as yourself. (well,
if your wife is a loser as well, just pass those condolences to
the rug-rat to be; if not, double condolences to her). " 30 Apr 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/71f74dd6d806ce77
22- Edward Stanfield: "Snit thinks the rules that apply to honest
and honorable people apply to him. That is absurd. He is the
biggest liar in Usenet history. Mackay posted the email to prove
Snit was using sock puppets and he still is. Snit can not give
up his socks puppets and shills. They are the only ones who ever
support him." 28 Jan 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/5b52494d96d12229
23- Edwin: "You've got to be out of your mind, Snit. You're the
worst troll this group has ever seen. You're a liar and a forger,
and you've almost destroyed this group single-handedly. For you
to post a list of out of context arguments, and lies, and
forgeries about your enemies labled as a "peace effort" has to be
one of the craziest stunts you've pulled. It's all about your
sick need for attention, your need to be center stage at all
times. You'd publicly eat dog turd if you thought it would make
people look at you." 18 May 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/37e4a720619642a0
24- Elijah Baley: "Seriously, Snit, you need psychiatric help. Go
see a doctor." 24 Aug 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/6f6c88356b54fc15
25- Elizabot v2.0.2: "I see you were unable to respond to the
points in my post and you are back to your repetitious
regurgitation mode. How childishly typical of you, Snit." 16 Nov
2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/55214ccfb7414fe5
26- fibercut: "That is the problem. In the years I have been
coming to CSMA I have seen in the past year a real hatred among
people, besides the typical Mac vs. Windows typical argument. I
feel that it is like being in a room of really young children
trying there best to best the other person. The one common thing
among all of this seems to be you. I hate to be like this, but
facts are facts. You seem to be in the middle of a great
percentage of arguments. CSMA has become less about Macs and more
about "look everybody, I think he lied". Is there no end then all
this picking at each other on such a personal level. CSMA has
always been al little adversarial but you have personally crank
it up to the point that this place is no longer fun.
Congratulations on stopping CSMA and making this place your own
personal circus." 12 Jan 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/bbe695bbc3424ab6
27- Geezer:
Snit: "Steve Carroll has no sense of morality"
Geezer: "Whined the guy who cannot directly address those who
uncover his lies and deceit;)"
Snit: "and no clue about the law."
Geezer: 'Said the guy who believes his unsupported opinions are
"proof". LOL! (snip more of Snit's unsupported lies)' 1 Jan 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/d0517ced5134934d
28- Geoff M. Fitton (COLA): "The Prescott Computer Guy *still*
showing how stupid he is... What a mar00n". 30 Aug 2008
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/f9401b4b57c59865
29- George Graves: "Jason. You have started an argument with the
Snit (AKA Michael Glasser), this should not be done. He will
drive you crazy with his twisted logic, his deep-rooted need to
be ALWAYS right at any cost. He will move goalposts, set up
strawmen, and bore you into submission with his endless
pedanticism. The only way to engage him is to hit and run. NEVER
engage him, it's a futile, empty procedure that will only anger
you and feed him. Take my advice and STAY AWAY!" 27 Oct 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/3d3af33ce25a11fd
30- gimme_this_gimme_t...@yahoo.com: "Hitting the vodka tonight
Snit?" 4 Mar 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/b457a7b378264794
31- Greycloud: "You really shouldn't lie like that. Everyone else
notices that you are not honest and you have no honor." 21 Jan 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/3b92f11a1ab00f91
32- H: "Your crappy posts are still showing up in seperate
threads, are you doing this on purpose to piss people off? I dont
ever censor people cause that's just retarded but if you dont fix
it I'm gonna have to cause I dont wanna see your name 40 times in
a row. So uh, change your client or something". 12 Sep 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/f36ee6b458c86499
33- Hadron (COLA):
Snit: "Now why not end your silliness and either just stop your
BS or actually give reasoned comments on the screen shots you
keep asking for and I keep providing?
Hadron: "err, he just did. And you snipped it all you weasel."
30 Jan 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/de49f2b7471d2e1a
Snit: "Sigh: 100% predictable, you will not answer *any* question
I just asked. You will run... your whole goal is to beg for
attention, not to make or support a point."
Hadron: "nice. You made it into my new killfile. Jesus, stop
repeating the same garbage." 6 Apr 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/c86ab53a759ea728
34- Henry Flam: "Who gives a damn about this shit? Snit, once in
a while, I make the mistake in thinking that that you are
starting to make sense in your posts; I tend to agree with your
politics. Then you post stuff like this and it destroys any
respect that I have for you." 16 Aug 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/f048bedfe0d67d66
35- Heywood Mogroot: "*plonk*"
36- -hh: 'Perversion has utterly nothing to do with the
definition of "synonymous". It is, however, a very clear example
of how you attempt to maliciously debase against anyone who
disagrees with you. As such, I consider this to be a purposeful
attempt by you to try to libel me. This is your only warning to
consider rescinding your remark, with the reminder that you, and
you alone are responsible for that accusation, both in the
ethical as well as the full legal meaning of the word
"responsible".' 25 Feb 2008
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/5496641a3426293a
37- High Plains Thumper: "I can understand why posters get sick
and tired of your lame ad hominem attacks, your cowardly
statements shifting the goal posts, your continuous rambling
drivel of how everyone seems to be against you. No one cares a
wooden nickel about your incessant flame wars that are self
created. You pretend to be an advocate but you manage to cause
everyone's hand to be against you." 6 Jan 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/b27ba196819ad38f
38- Homer (COLA):
HPT: "Snit in a period of 2 minutes has copied a post of mine,
posting the same following message over and over, in false
pretense as a Linux advocate."
Homer: "That kind of behaviour is not normal, to say the least.
I don't mean this as a personal insult, but I'm perfectly serious
when I say 'Snit' (Michael Glasser) is obviously mentally ill,
and needs help. I was going to suggest that someone alerts his
wife to the problem, but I have to assume she's already aware of
his condition, if she is in fact still living with him. It's
possible, I suppose, that he's already undergoing counselling
and/or on medication, but if he is then it doesn't seem to be
helping much. Maybe he just missed his 'meds' today (again, I
mean that sincerely). 26 Jan 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/e061874ea94e9ce8
39- Jamie Hart (cola): "It seems that since you are unable to
offer support for your statements, you're reduced to personal
attacks on me. Incidentally, anyone reading this post can see
that I have offered no straw men, and have only asked you to
explain how the things you state as facts can be true. I'm really
sorry that you're taking this attitude, the topic is an
interesting one and I thought you might have some insights. I've
snipped the rest, since you dislike long posts and avoid
answering any of the questions I asked by saying everything was
just repeated." 6 Dec 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/8e07cde31f4eecf6
40- Jason McNorton: "You're one of the many, many paranoid people
on usenet that should be confined most likely. You sit there and
refresh your screen endlessly. You post the same nonsense over
and over. Either you're a super troll, or you're a super mess."
1 Nov 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/7a8e091c0b248eb0
41- JEDIDIAH (cola): "You're simply full of shit."
42- Jeff B.: "Yo, Snit. We're not pals. I think you're a git."
23 Dec 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/0ec649345d433a2d
43- Jeff Hoppe: "This is a Macintosh Advocacy newsgroup. Not a
12-step recovery plan. Your medical problems or conditions won't
help me achieve a greater understanding of my Mac. In fact, it
detracts from it and those kinds of discussions have no place in
a newsgroup such as this." 18 Nov 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/947a2cc0301a2862
44- Jesus: "Really, Snit. It's annoying. What are you
accomplishing besides being annoying? Is that your goal?" 25 Apr
2007
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/e3d5029d34cde243
45- Jim Lee Jr.: "Snit, read the thread's title, is Bush
mentioned in it? You (and Carroll) ought to learn to stay on
topic and not hijack threads."
46- Jim Polaski: "Why is it that nearly every thread you're
involved in seems like it turns into some tit-for-tat, dozens of
responses to OT things and garbage?" 25 Apr 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/5b5c22490ab9649b
47- Jim Richardson (cola): "And yet again, Snit runs away, rather
than actually provide evidence for his claims. Par for the course
I suppose."
"Evasion noted. Snit runs away again rather than produce evidence
for his claims. At least come up with some original insults
Snit! I mean, you *are* capable of original thoughts! Right?
Snit?" 8 Feb 2008
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/e33321cc3343fc44
48- Joey Jojo Junior Shabadoo: "and Snithead has even farther to
fall - in a few weeks he'll be out on the street after midnight,
yelling at passersby 'sucky sucky, $2...'" 23 Mar 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/57cf69f66571a5a7
49- John C. Randolph: "You're nothing but a troll yourself. What
are you bitching about?"
50- JohnOfArc (cola): "I'm not sure "troll" does it justice- more
like a black hole! But hey, if we all promise to never again even
entertain an unkind thought re Apple, will you take it back and
lock it up? Please??" 11 Mar 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/e2891b1f3984e121
51- John Q. Public: "I have not been bothered to read Snit's
postings since I figured out who he is. I don't bother to filter
his posts, I just consider the source and skip to the next one
when I see his name."
52- John Slade: "I don't get posts from Snit. I wouldn't be
shocked that he has some kind of disorder. He made up stuff about
being a computer repairman and teacher. He's just plain loony and
best ignored. Let him deal with his disorder by medication. He's
here to do one thing, get attention from people. He says the
crazy stuff just to get a reaction.
You say you like to beat him over the head. Well that's what he's
counting on, he says stuff he knows isn't true in hopes to get a
rise out of people like you. Ignore him, you won't regret it." 3
Apr 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/394a53a65c28d314
"Snit, you have a enough problems as it is without adding
drinking booze to the list. How the hell did you manage to get
out of my killfile? Oh well back into the cage you go, PLONK."
13 Oct 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.food.wine/msg/992a796786a541d8
53- Josh McKee: "Snit, I assume there was some point to this
posting? Because I certainly cannot find it."
54- K E: "I haven't read this board for awhile but I see that
even though the trolls still roam free at least the worst troll
of the lot is mostly being ignored by readers on this bb. If the
few stragglers that keep replying to him would just stop
responding to Snit at all this place could be worth coming back
to. There's a good chance he'll pack up and take his trolling to
more fertile ground." 22 Oct 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/0b9dca7df1f677f4
55- KK: 'Whoa there, ad hominem man. You started off your
sentence with "Ah" like you'd just realized something profound.'
29 Oct 2008
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.fan.howard-stern/msg/6a89029a5b5be5f8
56- Kelsey Bjarnason (cola): "Funny how you simply don't bother
reading the posts that rip your entire thesis to bleeding gobbets
of putrid excrescence. Maybe some day you'll learn how to support
your position, instead of sticking your fingers in your ears and
humming, hoping it'll all go away." 7 Mar 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/96d064a7a5c6074a
57- Ku Karlovsky (cola): "You repeatedly chastise others for ad
hominem attacks while in the same sentence make your own ad
hominem attacks. You make silly claims and then avoid the subject
of your silliness. You're a liar and a hypocrite and you always
have been." 14 Jul 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/d1e3f9ac5c72c6ee
58- Lars Trager: "Yes, you are stupid." 7 Jan 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/a9bedf6689f9a54f
59- Lefty Bigfoot: "Okay, I tried to put up with it for a long
time, but the few times you post something worth reading just
aren't worth it anymore. *plonk*" 16 Dec 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/5520adae01120e83
60- Liam Slider (cola): "Maybe he's responding to the fact you've
been an annoying little fuckwit lately. You started out with the
pretense of trying to be fair, but lately all there is from you
in COLA is trashtalk about Linux and you acting every bit the
troll." 16 Jul 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/ad7d6c42c5e4cf2f
61-libcrushersmith: "Snit also thinks Dan Rather still anchors
CBS News and that Gitmo terrorists are innocent! Any time Snit
is cornered, he changes the subject and will never admit he's
wrong." 28 Jan 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/fbc516717f3b7ccf
62- libsnightmare: "Excellent checkmate and end game for Snit.
He will always be running scared and welcoming to any stranger
willing to listen to his lies." 12 Mar 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.guitar.amps/msg/6d137223b0f392e7
63- Linonut (cola): "Snit is a Tholenoid."
"Indeed. Snit may be the first retraction of my general killfile
amnesty. The volume of cavilling, whining, foot-stomping,
back-tracking, goal-post shifting, and petulance generated by
that effete candy-ass beggars belief". 30 Aug 2008
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/cc4827fd7e8ad574
64- Lloyd Parsons: "Well, I don't know if Oxford is the most
cretinous, I would think that would be reserved for Snit! ;-)"
18 Mar 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/b6cd3ac4bf1e08d6
65- Mark Kent (cola): "The problem with someone like Mr Glasser
is the same as it is with Mr Wong, even if he were to be honest
now, it would be impossible to determine where the honesty starts
and the usual dishonesty ends. In my primary school, one of the
teachers was very keen on proverbs, and I recall her going over
the "cry wolf" story. Mr Glasser could "cry wolf" over and over
now, and I would not come to help him with his sheep, because I
do not know any way of determining if he's ever telling the
truth, or indeed, if he ever has." 2 Dec 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/3f30aa1b65a972b3
66- Mayor of R'lyeh: "The fact is that he's probably pulling it
to this post since its all about him and he managed to make me
think about him today. A friend of mine has a toddler. I went
over to her house and videotaped her kid doing a bunch of cute
toddler stuff then burned a DVD of it for her. While we were
watching the DVD her kid got mad. He got mad because we quit
making him the center of attention and made that kid on the tv
the center of attention. He even ran up to the tv and tried to
block our view of it. That's how Snit lives his whole life." 30
Sep 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/9935f4154d5a290b
67- Michelle Ronn: "The real topic here is that one someone
refutes your 'facts', you run away and ignore them. Refuting your
'facts' is easily done in this case. I did it, and you ignored
it." 9 Feb 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/c050c82720737b32
68- Mike: "Nonsense. I never see you "advocate" anything. All I
see you doing is engage in endless semantic arguments with
everyone. You're the TholenBot of CSMA. BTW, that's *not* a
compliment!" 8 Jul 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/7c5b72d70b87ffbd
69- Mike Dee: "I will no longer accuse you of lying here. Instead
I can only say that you are a complete and delusional kook that
happens to inhabit CSMA for the time being. That you are unaware
of how deranged you actually behave further reinforces this
notion. Please seek professional help."
"The point that keeps whooshing over your head Snit, is Elizabot
made no threat to you before you went to the police. She made a
promise. Admittedly, to your delusional spaced out paranoiac view
point, Elizabot was suddenly "threatening" to you. In so much as
you had to take your kooky self down to your local police shop
and blub on their shoulders about how much in danger you were in
[sob, whine], and they had to waste valuable policing time
consoling you over your stupidity. I bet they have Kook with a
capital "K" written at the top of your profile, Snit." 2 Sep 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/9cf45bc88a324f40
70- mmoore321: "Snit is a human car-accident and we are all
rubbernecking. We know it is bad form, but yet strangely curious.
Treat him the same way, look but just keep moving on." 18 Aug 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/f1c3041d89504c07
71- Mojo: "Actually, these facts piss everybody off because they
are off-topic, unnecessarily confrontational, extremely boring
and clearly show that you are crying out for attention." 20 Sep 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/a38f07b9a4811a80
72- Mr. Blonde: "Lastly, I can't help but comment on the fact
that your obsession with Sandman has actually grown since you
claimed to KF him. Killfilling someone generally implies you're
ignoring that person, yet you piggyback onto virtually every
reply to him here and and check his website's validation status
more often than most people check their e-mail. These are not the
actions of a mentally balanced individual." 19 Jan 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/2b005666ab303e2b
73- MR_ED_of_Course: "Seriously, spend half a day at any
pre-school or kindergarten and see if the kids there can't teach
you a thing or two about social behavior." 16 May 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/55c03a6a0b7813a4
74- Muahman: "Ummm, dude you post 1000 posts a day. 999 of them
are trolls, if anyone here has issues it's not me." 24 Sep 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/ad9daff74ee1e0bd
"LOL, everyone hates Snit. I know I'd push him in front of a bus
if I could." 15 May 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/e5ee46bf5bf04d00
75- Nashton/Nasht0n: "Oh for crying out loud, if I wasn't
convinced that snit is a total loser, and I rarely call people
losers, I certainly am now. Why bother responding to his
stupidities anyway?"
76- New Bee: "Honest and honorable? You? You've either got a wry
sense of humor, or you're completely nuts. Either way you're just
a waste of time, and you've done more than anybody to make this
group a cesspool. Then you revel in wallowing in your own filth."
14 May 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/2856277b085d0274
77- Not Important: "I get this mental image of you and a sibling
as children in the back seat of the family car saying:
Mom, 'snits' touching me ... and you responding much as you do
now ... I'm not touching you, you're touching me! The problem is
that by now you should've grown out of that type of poke and
complain interaction with others. But, of course, you've haven't
learned how to interact with others in a more 'constructive' and
mutually beneficial manner even now." 03 Jul 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/d16279e9003ca8f4
78- OldCSMAer: "What's he been doing? Am I going to be sorry I
killfiled him?"
79- OldSage: "What drives me nuts is your unrelenting ability and
desire to argue on the head of a pin about the most trivial of
things."
80- Oxford: "If you are using MT-Newswatcher: Select offending
Author, example Snit... Go to the Filters Menu, Choose 'Kill
this Author' Click 'OK' Then Repeat with each annoying Author
of your choice. Then to see your work... Choose the Filter Menu
again, Then 'Refilter Articles'... Bam! No more boring,
pointless bickering about nothing. Enjoy!!!!!" 14 Aug 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/1d7f9181e95ed9ec
81- Patrick Nihill: "I mean, honestly, who would you rather
discuss something with; Dan, or someone like Zara? Or, for that
matter, Snit, for whom the work 'troll' seems so painfully
inadequate?"
82- Pawel Wojciak: "Jesus Christ, snit... <plonk> "
83- PC Guy: "Forget it Snit, you're a waste of time. For someone
who talks about everyone else not being "honest and honorable"
you appear to be the least honest and honorable of anyone here."
84- Peter: "I've never felt the need to use the filters in
Newswatcher but I thought Id try the Kill this Author.. option
with Snit. Ten seconds later and he's gone! Amazing." 30 Dec 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/011eef01d7bcd56c
85- Peter Bjorn Perlso: "Plonked for 60 days. Now stfu and take
your argument with sandman into the private room." 13 Dec 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/ae4651ec99be3c77
86- Peter Hayes: "True, but that removes Snit completely, and
someti... err..... occasiona.... errrrr..... once in a blue moon
he has something useful to say."
87- Peter Jensen (cola): "Where has he ever said that they were
not different windowing environments? Message-ID, please.
Experience has told me not to trust you on anything without
backing evidence."
88- Peter Kohlmann (cola): "Snot is a hideous troll. Nobody is as
dishonest as that piece of unadultered garbage. There are csma
posters even more stupid than Snot. Oxford comes to mind. There
are certainly other csma posters who lie nearly as much. But no
others are so intent on trolling in whatever way possible as
Snot" 15 Mar 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/3409d9582dcebd25
89- PeterBP: "Oh will you stfu".
90- Phil Earnhardt: "You're only interested in trying to get
superficial snipes and extrapolate inappropriate conclusions." 1
Nov 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/ad24a97d5dc86277
91- Rapskat (cola): "For instance, your sig you reference a long
standing war you have going with some person from csma. It's like
you single out persons to target your attentions upon and then
continuously berate them with constant barbs and goads to
perpetuate their acrimonious responses, which in turn you respond
in kind, etc. ad infinitum. Above all things, your affinity for
Macs and your overbearing pompous nature aside, this is what
convinces me that your primary purpose for frequenting this and
other groups is to troll." 07 Sep 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/a09c6b8e3e63f42d
92- RichardK: "Just killfile him already."
93- Rick (cola): "Snit, you are a liar. And an ignorant one. You
trash people that are trying their level best to cope with a
horrendous situation. And you do it without the slightest idea of
what is going on." 06 Sep 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/fcad2955ac5cb03b
94- Rick G.: "Just to be plain here, I have no doubt that he is a
troll. I am tolerant of his nature, not blind to it. However, as
a troll, he is ... somewhat clumsy."
95- Robert F.: "Um, perhaps you misunderstand. I don't care if
you quote Mayor McCheese claiming the Earth is a flat plate
perched on the shell of a tortoise, I was merely pointing out
that you run the risk of looking ridiculous when you quote
something patently stupid. If that's your goal, you're on the
right track, and more power to you." 11 Jan 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/4dc22433eae8803d
96- RonB (COLA): "Snit is a crank fixated on one issue, who's
thing is twisting your words so he can win an argument against a
straw man. That's enough to killfile him." 1 Jan 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.usenet.kooks/msg/ce8550d4cc5b1b42
97- Roy Culley (cola): "You appear to be in the latter category.
Starting crossposted threads for the simple purpose of hoping to
generate a flame war. If you truly want to learn more about Linux
and how it can help you and your supposed users why aren't you
requesting help from a more technical Linux newsgroup than an
advocacy group? As the old saying goes, those who can do, those
who can't teach. Your posts seem to confirm that saying IMHO."
12 Mar 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/d521a80051e24d08
98- S'mee (Keith, rec.motorcycles): "Liar...forger and worthless.
You must be related to our resident racist troll, he lies as much
as you." 29 Dec 2008
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/ab08c00330c8b58d
99- Sandman: "He is by far the most killfiled person in the
-HISTORY- of csma. I've never seen someone so disliked, almost
hated, in a news group before. He has the ability to turn just
about any person against him in just a few posts. On usenet,
trolls do this daily, but the funny part with Michael is that I
actually think he DOESN'T consider himself be a troll - damn what
-EVERYONE ELSE- is calling him. Obviously they are wrong. Only
Tholen himself can match this behaviour." 18 Mar 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/51c0735c774215c2
100- sav: "You really need to take a rest somewhere nice.
Honestly, even the nutters who hang out down on Brighton seafront
made more sense than this. You been doing drugs or something?"
25 May 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/1b251baa5c641370
101- Sean Burke: If you're dumb enough to respond to snit, you're
probably dumb enough to click on a spam attachment that promises
to remove smut from your harddrive." 21 Jan 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/e166032d8959c0e1
102- Sermo Malifer (COLA):
Snit: "Why do so many people in COLA argue *against* me..."
Sermo Malifer: "Because you're a narcissistic troll who posts
trash just to get people talking about you." 21 Jan 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/5ddf14f502e9b3f1
103- spike1: "The thought is probably to show everyone here just
how bad a troll snit is".
104- ShutterBugz: "so snit-zel has some kind of problem
expressing anger, i guess. he has to vent his frustrations in
other ways. and he thinks he's making sense: well the syntax is
there and he figures he's pretty smart. indeed, he tells us, he's
done the personality tests and the iq tests and he's okay!
aaaaahhhhh, you see he's soooooooo well adjusted." 3 Mar 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/7f9fa1cf90490298
105- Steve Carroll: "The only things we are sure about Snit is
that he has:
* a monumental reading comprehension problem.
* nym-shifted numerous times to avoid kill-files.
* built too many straw-men to count... some, the size of small
cities.
* been labeled a disingenuous liar/troll(or worse) by the vast
majority.
* used numerous sock-puppets and admitted to it.
* stolen IDs and admitted to it.
* gotten booted off by ISPs for his behavior.
* twisted more context than all csma posters combined.
* made more unsupported accusations than all csma posters combined.
* virtually no life outside of csma."
106- Steve Mackay: "Just killfile Snit, the dishonest piece of
elephant dung, and all would go away. Sure, I got caught up in
the "Snit Circus", but then the cotton candy began to sour, and
CSMA begun to smell like elephant dung." 18 Aug 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/9fc11094133dfcdf
Welcome to the Snit circus, where the popcorn and cotton candy
are stale, and the smell of elephant dung is everywhere. 27 Dec 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/614daf295b50413f
107- Steven de Mena: "Sorry, you have now lost all credibility
with me for your rediculous argument regarding this." 26 Sep 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/1c8777d39c34e293
108- Steve Travis: "Oh oh... Now look what we've done. Snit has
lost all self respect and has sunk to the point of using words
like 'asses' when referring to others. Oh, how could the morally
superior snit have fallen so low.. Please take a moment out of
your busy schedule to feel embarassed for him. Or perhaps we
should set up a fund to get him more happy glue (and the
appropriate plastic bags)." 27 Mar 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/3edd9ab69425a6c5
109- Stuart Krivis: "You might as well just give up and plonk him
then. A snit is a snit is a snit and always will be." 15 Aug
2006 (post not available except in reply)
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/5b382420a696f140
110- Tattoo Vampire (COLA): "In other words, in another attempt
to troll, you made yourself look like a fool. Again". 28 Aug 2008
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/b2676d3540e09f38
111- The Lost Packet (COLA): "well, he's found a seat in my
killbin, I can't be doing with him." 27 Jan 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/2007526a552b3322
112- TheLetterK: "That is merely your perception, Shit. You're
the one lacking counter evidence, and your arguments basically
amount to "I'm right, nya nya nya." No matter how many examples
someone points at to demonstrate their claim, you blindly
continue to insist that they provide no evidence, or that the
evidence given is irrelevant. Worse still, you fall back on straw
men and disingenuous quote mangling to portray the argument in
your favor. You are one of the worst trolls that inhabit CSMA,
Shit. *Edwin* is more prone to fits of reason than you are." 23
Sep 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/d488596b57132124
113-Tim Adams: "I'd kill file you but then I'd miss the fun. you
see, you never cease to amaze me at just how stupid you really
are. Why just the other day I had a great laugh when I saw you,
the king of liars (in this NG anyway) calling somebody else a
liar." 13 Nov 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/40c7f9407179ff2a
114- Tim Crowley: "I don't know - I think you might have more
compassion. Snit is sick. He needs help. This is the only way the
poor sick fool can get attention. My fucking God, he's taken to
hanging out with and supporting racist pig fuckers like MuahMuah.
It is true that no-one likes him and those that pretend they do
are just using him or don't know him - but come on- it's not his
fault. He's sick. Have some compassion, eh? All these idiot
trolls, Zara, Stew, Tommy, MuaaaahMuaaah, and Snit - they are all
so alike. I pity each and every one of them" 19 Apr 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/67f0f174110bfa0a
115- Tim Smith: "No, he didn't, and there is no reasonable way
you could actually believe he lied. You are purely trying to
troll here." 14 Apr 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/6e3cfd9240ac4871
116- Timberwoof: "*Plonk!*"
117- Tom Bates: "Do you have to turn any thread you post in into
one of your Circus acts?" 20 Feb 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/25f0e481b605e71f
118- Tommy: "In case you did not get it, I think the moral was:
Stop polluting the world with your infantile and obsessive
"writings". You give Mac advocacy a bad name. If that was your
goal you have succeeded! That also goes for all that bullshit on
your website" 11 Jun 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/03610d2080321d33
119- TravelinMan: "I still can't figure out what's wrong with
Snit. Most people have him kill-filed and the few who don't
mostly restrict their responses to 'why don't you go away, no one
wants you here'. Just what would keep someone in this group with
all of that animosity? Must be some kind of severe mental
illness." 17 Mar 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/45197fbb46d491df
120- Wally: "Because by your own admission "honor and honesty"
are nothing more than a "game" to you, as such not only do you
wish to define the rules, but no doubt you will also attempt to
alter or bend the rules when inevitably things do not go to your
liking, for this reason I doubt anyone would be foolish enough to
play your game." 16 May 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/b9b3ed1ee20e5220
121- WhoMe: "F michael IS a teacher, it's no wonder he's home
more than he's anywhere near a classroom".
122- William Poaster: "Good grief. If anyone's having a mental
breakdown it's the Prescott Computer Guy, Michael Snit Glasser.
What a f#cked up mess he is." 29 Aug 2008
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/914d1e74855fb461
123- William R. Walsh: "Now, if you'll excuse me, and accept my
sincere apologies for this, PLONK! Feel proud about that. You're
the first person to be plonked from my new computer! :-) " 10
Feb 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/313c7368f6369c49
124- Woofbert: "*Plonk*"
125- zara: "Look - I'm not into combing through thousands of
posts, to prove what was said or not said - I leave stuff like
that to people without lives, like Snit. But it is assuredly, in
the record. Ping Snit to do a search - you will flatter him, and
give meaning to his tawdry little life." 25 Oct 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/a1d4fc7120a6a538
126- Zaren Ankleweed: "And with that, Snit goes in the global
killfile. No subject, no author, no nothing. Buh-bye". 11 Sep 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/12f7c34f24d43624
127- Znu: "I think your 'I'll go start a new thread to try to
draw more people into the debate I'm currently having with
Steve/Elizabot/etc' tactic is fairly trollish."
--
HPT
High Plains Thumper
> High Plains Thumper stated:
>
>>
>> Snit: "Satan lives for my sins... now *that* is dedication!"
>>
>> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/73d2b0d8eaaabc89
>
> See! There you are actually quoting me! Much better than
> your normal BS.
>
> Now if you can only find something better than a joke to try
> to show where I am so wrong. If only you could... but, of
> course, you cannot.
5 years ago:
69- Mike Dee: "I will no longer accuse you of lying here. Instead
I can only say that you are a complete and delusional kook that
happens to inhabit CSMA for the time being. That you are unaware
of how deranged you actually behave further reinforces this
notion. Please seek professional help."
"The point that keeps whooshing over your head Snit, is Elizabot
made no threat to you before you went to the police. She made a
promise. Admittedly, to your delusional spaced out paranoiac view
point, Elizabot was suddenly "threatening" to you. In so much as
you had to take your kooky self down to your local police shop
and blub on their shoulders about how much in danger you were in
[sob, whine], and they had to waste valuable policing time
consoling you over your stupidity. I bet they have Kook with a
capital "K" written at the top of your profile, Snit." 2 Sep 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/9cf45bc88a324f40
Snit's kooky posts regarding Elizabot:
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/813c5da1e9f3fc05
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.test/msg/7fc94ffa0e9c05c0
Now:
Snit: "High Plains Thumper has shown himself to be a potential
danger - he has repeatedly threatened to contact my employer and
make false accusations of libel. If anyone has any examples of
HPT doing this in other instances, please send me information in
email. I have contacted the police and they are looking into
this, but added information could only help. I will not,
of course, speak of details in this forum. Any information might
be of benefit." 5 Apr 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/5e3777e23abcb880
Snit's kookiness hasn't changed.
> I, on the other hand, can easily point to you insisting I
> forged data because you could not follow a simple copy and
> paste procedure and you wanted to gain the praise of some of
> the lowest of the low of Usenet.
Steve Mackay: "Hey, and you can modify multiple times, post them
on your site, and claim they are the 'originals'. Oh wait...
You've done that already. Wow... more accusations from you
posted with -*gasp*- absolutely no support. You do that a
lot..." 13 Aug 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/87031a1655f235c2
HPT: "Why do I want to look at some 'new evidence' you have come
up with, when so far you fail to post truth. You were doing this
5 years ago. Steve Mackay expressed it very well in the above
quote. You have no credibility." 22 Apr 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/480976cfb9521cc6
> Not exactly what your "God" would want you to do, eh? Sad how
> you cannot live up to my standards of morality... I, the one
> who wrote: Satan lives for my sins... now *that* is
> dedication!
Yes, he must be mighty proud of you.
--
HPT
Snit
4/23/09 4:22 AM:
On and on you go, HPT, all because I pointed to you insisting I forged data
because you could not follow a simple copy and paste procedure and you
wanted to gain the praise of some of the lowest of the low of Usenet.
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
Snit
4/23/09 3:50 AM:
> Snit wrote:
>
>> LOL! I have been pointing out how HPT, who likes to think of
>> himself as a Christian, acts in ways that nobody who believed
>> in God would really act.
>
> You claim to be an atheist and according to your statement above,
> claim to know how a Christian should truly act. How should they,
> Snit?
They should not do as you do: insist I forged data as you pander to the
lowest of the low of Usenet. Face it: your actions are completely
inexcusable.
>> It has been somewhat effective in getting him to think: he is
>> quoting others unsupported accusations and is actually quoting
>> me.
>
> Think about what Snit? Are they unsupported? No, you have quite
> a vivid imagination. And as stated previously, there is no need
> to directly quote you, as other's conclusions about your trolling
> are quite profound.
No need to directly quote me? Of course there is, if your goal is to show
something about *me*. If you merely want to lower yourself to pandering to
the lowest of the low by using Carroll's scavenged and forged quotes, then
so be it... but let us not pretend your immoral behavior is *my* fault or
somehow says something bad about me.
>> He thinks his quoting of that from me will put me in a bad
>> light... but most people will just chuckle and move on.
>
> No, rather the laugh is on Snit, who continually ignores people's
> comments of disapproval toward his trolling. Following is but a
> small snippet of sad commentaries from 127 Posters regarding the
> Snit Circus of Pathological Lies. Links have been provided on
> nearly all, if one cares to research:
On and on you go, HPT, all because I pointed to you insisting I forged data
High Plains Thumper
> High Plains Thumper stated:
>>
>>> LOL! I have been pointing out how HPT, who likes to think
>>> of himself as a Christian, acts in ways that nobody who
>>> believed in God would really act.
>>
>> You claim to be an atheist and according to your statement
>> above, claim to know how a Christian should truly act. How
>> should they, Snit?
>
> They should not do as you do: insist I forged data as you
> pander to the lowest of the low of Usenet. Face it: your
> actions are completely inexcusable.
23- Edwin: "You've got to be out of your mind, Snit. You're the
worst troll this group has ever seen. You're a liar and a forger,
and you've almost destroyed this group single-handedly. For you
to post a list of out of context arguments, and lies, and
forgeries about your enemies labled as a "peace effort" has to be
one of the craziest stunts you've pulled. It's all about your
sick need for attention, your need to be center stage at all
times. You'd publicly eat dog turd if you thought it would make
people look at you." 18 May 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/37e4a720619642a0
>>> It has been somewhat effective in getting him to think: he
>>> is quoting others unsupported accusations and is actually
>>> quoting me.
>>
>> Think about what Snit? Are they unsupported? No, you have
>> quite a vivid imagination. And as stated previously, there
>> is no need to directly quote you, as other's conclusions
>> about your trolling are quite profound.
>
> No need to directly quote me? Of course there is, if your
> goal is to show something about *me*. If you merely want to
> lower yourself to pandering to the lowest of the low by using
> Carroll's scavenged and forged quotes, then so be it... but
> let us not pretend your immoral behavior is *my* fault or
> somehow says something bad about me.
119- TravelinMan: "I still can't figure out what's wrong with
Snit. Most people have him kill-filed and the few who don't
mostly restrict their responses to 'why don't you go away, no one
wants you here'. Just what would keep someone in this group with
all of that animosity? Must be some kind of severe mental
illness." 17 Mar 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/45197fbb46d491df
>>> He thinks his quoting of that from me will put me in a bad
>>> light... but most people will just chuckle and move on.
>>
>> No, rather the laugh is on Snit, who continually ignores
>> people's comments of disapproval toward his trolling.
>> Following is but a small snippet of sad commentaries from
>> 127 Posters regarding the Snit Circus of Pathological Lies.
>> Links have been provided on nearly all, if one cares to
>> research:
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/bac3625f53023522
> On and on you go, HPT, all because I pointed to you insisting
> I forged data because you could not follow a simple copy and
> paste procedure and you wanted to gain the praise of some of
> the lowest of the low of Usenet.
112- TheLetterK: "That is merely your perception, Shit. You're
the one lacking counter evidence, and your arguments basically
amount to "I'm right, nya nya nya." No matter how many examples
someone points at to demonstrate their claim, you blindly
continue to insist that they provide no evidence, or that the
evidence given is irrelevant. Worse still, you fall back on straw
men and disingenuous quote mangling to portray the argument in
your favor. You are one of the worst trolls that inhabit CSMA,
Shit. *Edwin* is more prone to fits of reason than you are." 23
Sep 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/d488596b57132124
--
HPT
Snit
4/23/09 7:56 PM:
All that from you: but you cannot explain why you pander to the lowest of
the low of Usenet and dishonestly accuse me of forgery simply because you
cannot follow simple copy and paste procedures.
Come on, HPT, your BS is getting repetitive.
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
High Plains Thumper
Repetitive and a lie.
> Come on, HPT, your BS is getting repetitive.
Snit: "It hardly explains some of Edwin's oddest problems, based
on his own quotes:
'I am wrong... ... AGAIN.' - Edwin
'why was I born with a coat hanger embedded in my skull?' - Edwin
'I am just getting hungry or looking for attention: I eat dog
shit to get attention.' - Edwin
'Thank you all for giving me attention... does anybody have
some mouthwash?' - Edwin
'I can stop thinking about having sex with monkeys' - Edwin
Edwin clearly has many, many problems."
Edwin: "Once again you post forgeries to satisfy your sick need
for constant attention."
Snit: "LOL! I post what even *you* call your 'forgeries'"
Edwin: "No, you posted forgeries of me. I didn't call them my
forgeries. You know this. You're just after attention because
you're sick in the head, and you don't care what you do to get
that attention."
Snit: "and you whine about how this says something about me."
Edwin: "You're a sick man."
Snit: "Tell you what, Edwin, if you apologize for spewing your
sick, attention-begging forgeries I will stop shoving them in
your face. Until then, Edwin, it is fair game to remind you of
your immature and pathetic behavior."
Edwin: "Those are your forgeries, not mine. You're forging quotes
from me again. You're eating dog shit in public again, just to
get attention." 17 Nov 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/122fcb9364313265
--
HPT
Snit
4/24/09 1:31 AM:
>> All that from you: but you cannot explain why you pander to
>> the lowest of the low of Usenet and dishonestly accuse me of
>> forgery simply because you cannot follow simple copy and paste
>> procedures.
>
> Repetitive and a lie.
Of course you pander to the lowest of the low - repeating their moronic
claims (accusations of forgery based on... *nothing*, accusations of sock
puppetry based on... my noting I quoted someone correctly, etc.). And, of
course, you have repeatedly denied you could replicate the problems I show
in this video: <http://tmp.gallopinginsanity.com/UbuntuCP.mov>... in fact,
based on your denial you have claimed I *forged* the data. Your denial does
not change the fact it is true.
...
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
High Plains Thumper
> Of course you pander to the lowest of the low - repeating
> their moronic claims (accusations of forgery based on...
> *nothing*, accusations of sock puppetry based on... my noting
> I quoted someone correctly, etc.). And, of course, you have
> repeatedly denied you could replicate the problems I show in
> this video: <http://tmp.gallopinginsanity.com/UbuntuCP.mov>...
> in fact, based on your denial you have claimed I *forged* the
> data. Your denial does not change the fact it is true.
[WEB] Proverbs 26:11
As a dog that returns to his vomit,
So is a fool who repeats his folly.
http://colatrolls.blogspot.com/2007/01/snit-troll.html
--
HPT
Snit
4/24/09 2:35 AM:
> Snit lied:
>
>> Of course you pander to the lowest of the low - repeating
>> their moronic claims (accusations of forgery based on...
>> *nothing*, accusations of sock puppetry based on... my noting
>> I quoted someone correctly, etc.). And, of course, you have
>> repeatedly denied you could replicate the problems I show in
>> this video: <http://tmp.gallopinginsanity.com/UbuntuCP.mov>...
>> in fact, based on your denial you have claimed I *forged* the
>> data. Your denial does not change the fact it is true.
Notice you have *nothing* to counter this with. Nothing. You know it is
true.
Getting boring just pointing out what a pathetic human being you are...
frankly you have nothing of value to say. You are acting like scum and even
you know it, hence the reason you will *never* tell your religious leaders
how you are acting.
But now we know that neither you nor I believe in God - but you pretend to
so you can pander to those who actually might. How sad.
> [WEB] Proverbs 26:11
> As a dog that returns to his vomit,
> So is a fool who repeats his folly.
>
> http://colatrolls.blogspot.com/2007/01/snit-troll.html
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]