Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Observations on PCG

4 views
Skip to first unread message

Anonymous

unread,
Jan 6, 2009, 9:30:01 AM1/6/09
to
Here is something of interest about Snit. I did a brief search in
Prescott Better Business Bureau (for reputation as a business),
whitepages.com and yellowpages.com. There is no Prescott
Computer Guy. Then I looked at

http://prescottcomputerguy.org/contact.php

"My office is in my home and I answer calls from about 8 AM to
about 6 PM."

He operates from his residence. Given how he spends copious
amounts of time trolling the Usenet in the various forums, I
seriously doubt he solicits much computer work. Therefore, it is
no wonder that he has little concern for workplace reputation.
No decent small business would risk tainting their business
reputation by posting the pathological myths he does.

I hypothesize that PCG is nothing more than a store front
activity. Hints are provided in the webpage

http://prescottcomputerguy.org/prices.html

The design is poor; no business would put graphics of US monetary
notes with service costs. This implies greed, not value toward
the customer. There is also a lack of seriousness with the words
at the bottom, "No computers or bears were hurt making this
website." The PayPal link at the bottom is suspect. There is
IMHO, a greater motive as to why it is there.

The only way it would seem to make sense is that perhaps this is
a method for a sponsor to pay him to troll the Usenet,
particularly CSMA and COLA.

chrisv

unread,
Jan 6, 2009, 10:23:31 AM1/6/09
to
Anonymous wrote:

>He operates from his residence.

Oh, just leave the poor fsckwit alone.

George Orwell

unread,
Jan 6, 2009, 10:35:18 AM1/6/09
to

http://prescottcomputerguy.org/contact.php

http://prescottcomputerguy.org/prices.html


Il mittente di questo messaggio|The sender address of this
non corrisponde ad un utente |message is not related to a real
reale ma all'indirizzo fittizio|person but to a fake address of an
di un sistema anonimizzatore |anonymous system
Per maggiori informazioni |For more info
https://www.mixmaster.it

Hadron

unread,
Jan 6, 2009, 10:39:18 AM1/6/09
to

Anonymous <cri...@ecn.org> writes:

> Here is something of interest about Snit. I did a brief search in
> Prescott Better Business Bureau (for reputation as a business),
> whitepages.com and yellowpages.com. There is no Prescott
> Computer Guy. Then I looked at

Here is something else interesting.

Around the time that this was posted and allowing for time differences a
Knode user from the UK. A Mr Robin T Cox was posting tests followed by
someone "else" using the same Version of KNode through dizum and then
this comes through dizum minus agent header.

Coincidence?

Only you can decide.

Just to be clear : posting any link to peoples private work and life is
below the belt and should be condemned on all sides.

Hadron

unread,
Jan 6, 2009, 10:41:38 AM1/6/09
to
Hadron <hadro...@gmail.com> writes:

Oh well, then that's confirmed then. Since George Orwell was posting tests
too but with the agent removed on dizum.

So Robin T Cox == Anonymous == George Orwell.

--
"Who are you, fuckknob?"
-- Tattoo Vampire <sit...@this.computer> in alt.realestate, alt.real-estate, alt.real-estate-agents,

Message has been deleted

Steve Carroll

unread,
Jan 6, 2009, 12:14:40 PM1/6/09
to
On Jan 6, 8:35 am, George Orwell <nob...@mixmaster.it> wrote:
> Here is something of interest about Snit.  I did a brief search in
> Prescott Better Business Bureau (for reputation as a business),
> whitepages.com and yellowpages.com.  There is no Prescott
> Computer Guy.  Then I looked at
>
> http://prescottcomputerguy.org/contact.php
>
> "My office is in my home and I answer calls from about 8 AM to
> about 6 PM."
>
> He operates from his residence.  Given how he spends copious
> amounts of time trolling the Usenet in the various forums, I
> seriously doubt he solicits much computer work.  Therefore, it is
> no wonder that he has little concern for workplace reputation.
> No decent small business would risk tainting their business
> reputation by posting the pathological myths  he does.
>
> I hypothesize that PCG is nothing more than a store front
> activity.  Hints are provided in the webpage
>
> http://prescottcomputerguy.org/prices.html
>
> The design is poor; no business would put graphics of US monetary
> notes with service costs.  This implies greed, not value toward
> the customer.

Interesting point on the greed issue. This brings to mind a dishonest
thread about "XP Woes" that Snit created and trolled with where he
made it clear that he found nailing the customer with an 'emergency'
rate was acceptable in an instance where all that was required was
that a floppy disk needed removal. Snit *claimed* that his customer
told him:

"nobody ever uses the drive"

Full paragraph shown here here:

"So yes, you are right... they should have listened. When I asked
them why
they did not, they told me nobody ever uses the drive, and so even
though I
repeatedly told them to check (and they told me they had!) nobody
really
had. Grrrr... I should charge a dishonesty fee! :) "
<BDEB5B6F.17C74%SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID>

It took Snit many posts and several people pointing out his initial
lie about XP for him to finally admit:

"Nobody has suggested it is not a BIOS issue. Sure, the subject line
is
nit-pickable... OK... you got me on that one... my subject line could
have
made it more clear I was talking about the experience of an XP user
and not
the OS itself. Oh my!"
<BDEB5C99.17C81%SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID>

Of course, after this admission, Snit tries to pretend that it never
happened... that he never lied about XP in the first place.

Later in the thread the greedy Snit is found essentially gloating over
his 'emergency' job:

"For the user, it was a problem.

For me, it was some extra cash. :) "
<BDEB7238.17CC2%SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID>


Several of the posters had some rather interesting replies to Snit in
that thread...

"Actually, its a clear indication of the troll snit, posting more
lies,
that those of us in the real world, Mac users and Window users alike,
recognize as just that - a total lie".
--
"Yea right. You're either lying or a ripoff artist. I wouldn't let
you
within 20 feet of my PC or Mac. It's people like you who cause the
high
costs. You don't know what you're doing, you screw something up and
then
they have to call guys like me to clean up your mistakes. The customer
gets
screwed any way you cut it".
--
"Snit will say that he has no way to know what motherboard the OEM
used
because they change all the time. He will say that the 'customer' is
too far away to go over there just to check on such a thing.
When we tell him about Everest Home Edition he will switch on a dime
from not having a clue as to what it does to declaring that he tried
it and it didn't work".
--
"I have already addressed that XP was irrelevant and that your thread
title is
misleading and as I'm sure you would insist was it not your thread -
"dishonest".

When first pressed for this, you claimed that you hadn't mentioned XP,
which
was a lie of course. You had mentioned XP in the title. That is, if
forgetting
or overseeing something constitutes a lie - which you so often want to
claim it
does".
--
"Damn right you can't! I'm not paying overtime rates to a swindler
like you".
--
Poster 1 - "You charged someone big money to eject a floppy disk. My
conscience would be eating me alive if I did a thing like that".

Poster 2 - "Are you assuming that Snit has a conscience?"
--

You get the idea;)

Steve Carroll

unread,
Jan 6, 2009, 12:27:37 PM1/6/09
to

Computer related work in a computer related forum is not "private
work" when you had advertised that you do such work in that forum.

If people believe that Snit is dishonest, greedy, unethical or any of
the several other negative things that might apply with Snit they have
every right to state their opinions in a public forum that Snit is
well known for trolling in. Despite Snit's repeated denials it's not
like Snit has given them no reason for their beliefs.

Snit

unread,
Jan 6, 2009, 12:51:09 PM1/6/09
to
"George Orwell" <nob...@mixmaster.it> stated in post
c03a0212aaf8c450...@mixmaster.it on 1/6/09 8:35 AM:

> Here is something of interest about Snit.

You are obsessing over my personal and professional life because you have
nothing better to do with your life.

Whatever.


--
Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take, but by the moments
that take our breath away.

Snit

unread,
Jan 6, 2009, 12:52:05 PM1/6/09
to
"chrisv" <chr...@nospam.invalid> stated in post
tqt6m45bhhpjp7a4d...@4ax.com on 1/6/09 8:23 AM:

> Anonymous wrote:
>
>> He operates from his residence.
>
> Oh, just leave the poor fsckwit alone.

I simply do not get the concept of being as lacking in morality as the
person who started this thread.


--
What do you call people who are afraid of Santa Claus? Claustrophobic.

Snit

unread,
Jan 6, 2009, 12:59:35 PM1/6/09
to
"Hadron" <hadro...@gmail.com> stated in post
gjvtvd$c0d$1...@hadronquark.motzarella.org on 1/6/09 8:39 AM:

Not by all... look at who celebrates it in COLA and CSMA. I simply do not
understand sinking to such moral lows... but when you give people a certain
level of anonymity on Usenet they will act like total cretins, doing things
like starting this thread.


--
Satan lives for my sins... now *that* is dedication!

Steve Carroll

unread,
Jan 6, 2009, 1:08:09 PM1/6/09
to
On Jan 6, 10:59 am, Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> "Hadron" <hadronqu...@gmail.com> stated in post
> gjvtvd$c0...@hadronquark.motzarella.org on 1/6/09 8:39 AM:

Fact: Even people willing to post without any "level of anonymity" say
the same kinds of things about you... and much, much worse.

High Plains Thumper

unread,
Jan 6, 2009, 5:55:52 PM1/6/09
to
Steve Carroll wrote:
> Snit wrote:
>> Hadron stated:

>>> Anonymous <cri...@ecn.org> writes:
>>>
>>>> Here is something of interest about Snit. I did a brief
>>>> search in Prescott Better Business Bureau (for
>>>> reputation as a business), whitepages.com and
>>>> yellowpages.com. There is no Prescott Computer Guy.
>>>> Then I looked at
>>>
>>> Here is something else interesting. Around the time that
>>> this was posted and allowing for time differences a Knode
>>> user from the UK. A Mr Robin T Cox was posting tests
>>> followed by someone "else" using the same Version of KNode
>>> through dizum and then this comes through dizum minus
>>> agent header. Coincidence? Only you can decide.
>>>
>>> Just to be clear : posting any link to peoples private
>>> work and life is below the belt and should be condemned on
>>> all sides.
>>
>> Not by all... look at who celebrates it in COLA and CSMA. I
>> simply do not understand sinking to such moral lows... but
>> when you give people a certain level of anonymity on Usenet
>> they will act like total cretins, doing things like starting
>> this thread.
>
> Fact: Even people willing to post without any "level of
> anonymity" say the same kinds of things about you... and much,
> much worse.

I read through this thread with a sense of amusement. Hadron
must be following Snit's own set theory, IYKWIM. Anon posts
using certain agent. Robin T. Cox (RTC) uses same agent.
Therefore, Anon is RTC. Since agent is missing, RTC is HPT.

Snit's set theory: HPT posts a truth. Snit snips away truth and
rants, "you have no proof". HPT posts further truth. Snit snips
away and rants, "you have yet to provide proof. You embarrass
yourself." HPT posts truth. Snit rants, "You have accidentally
quoted others but failed to quote me."

Corollary: Idiocy has no bounds, whereas truth does.

Lest we forget, these 121 posters have all the same basic gripe
about Snit's Circus of pathological lies:

http://tinyurl.com/9858jv

Latest complaint, Jan 1, 2009:

121- RonB: "Snit is a crank fixated on one issue, who's thing is
twisting your words so he can win an argument against a straw
man. That's enough to killfile him."

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.usenet.kooks/msg/ce8550d4cc5b1b42

Regarding your observation of those without anonymity willing to
post similar things:

http://tinyurl.com/8rt2fv

--
HPT
Quando omni flunkus moritati
(If all else fails, play dead)
- "Red" Green

Snit

unread,
Jan 6, 2009, 6:52:52 PM1/6/09
to
"High Plains Thumper" <highplai...@invalid.invalid> stated in post
4963e17a$0$17067$6e1e...@read.cnntp.org on 1/6/09 3:55 PM:

...


> Snit's set theory: HPT posts a truth.

What proof?

> Snit snips away truth and rants, "you have no proof".

When? What post? I know you recently jumped onto Wally's moronic bandwagon
where he claimed that since I quoted him and later referred to the quote
being an accurate quote that this meant I was using a sock puppet, as -
apparently - you have been.

Is that what you are in reference to?

> HPT posts further truth. Snit snips away and rants, "you have yet to provide
> proof. You embarrass yourself." HPT posts truth. Snit rants, "You have
> accidentally quoted others but failed to quote me."

What do you think you posted proof of?

I bet you run like a scared bunny from that question. But I am giving you
attention for merely making the vague accusation, and that encourages trolls
such as yourself. You will never actually grow a backbone and try to
support this vague accusation you are sort of referring to.


--
Picture of a tuna milkshake: http://snipurl.com/f34z
Feel free to ask for the recipe.

High Plains Thumper

unread,
Jan 6, 2009, 9:52:44 PM1/6/09
to
Snit wrote:
> High Plains Thumper wrote:
>> Clogwog (Rick Mather) nymthief of High Plains Thumper,
>> chrisv, AKA Kutloze Scheefgepoepte, Chelatobacter Ariomus,
>> John Holmes, [long list of nyms snipped] schreef:
>>> Snit schreef...
>>>> Clogwog stated:
>>>>
>>>>> And Robin T Cox is a known HPT nym! -- Hi[Knip
>>>>> krankzinnig raast en tieren]
>>
>> Lie. RTC and I are two different posters.
>>
>>>> Aha... so High Plains Thumper is mad I helped him make a
>>>> complete fool of himself... I repeatedly pointed out
>>>> his inability to support his accusations of dishonesty
>>>> and even openly taunted him... making it *very, very*
>>>> obvious that if he could back up his claims he would.
>>
>> Only one person has made a fool of itself, Michael. Why is
>> it that all have the same basic complaint about your lying
>> nature? Like these 121 posters?
>>
>> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/9ce006aed08b0aeb
>>
>> or http://tinyurl.com/9858jv

>>
>> Latest complaint, Jan 1, 2009:
>>
>> 121- RonB: "Snit is a crank fixated on one issue, who's
>> thing is twisting your words so he can win an argument
>> against a straw man. That's enough to killfile him."
>>
>> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.usenet.kooks/msg/ce8550d4cc5b1b42
>
> Worry about yourself.
>
> Why did you lie and claim that when I note a quote I posted
> was accurately quoted you insisted that meant I was using a
> sock? You have run from this question a great deal.

This is an example of:

http://www.faqs.org/faqs/linux/advocacy/faq-and-primer/

[quote]
7.6 Trespasser Disinformation Tactics

43. Citing vapor postings. Cite the statements that you had
"intended" to include but never actual written into your past
posting. Gamble on the possibility that nobody will remember what
you posted and that nobody will do the research to determine what
you have posted. If you loose that bet, use another
disinformation tactic to deflect the results of your using this
tactic.
[/quote]

> And now, from what I have been told, you are using a sock to
> lash out at me.

This is an example of:

[quote]
7.6 Trespasser Disinformation Tactics [continued]

[6.] When your tactics are turned on you, call you opponents
trolls. Do not accept the fact that by calling someone using
your tactics a troll that makes you the real troll.
[/quote]

> You ruined your own credibility, so your denial means
> *nothing*, though I will acknowledge I do not know for certain
> it is you.

This is an example of:

[quote]
7.6 Trespasser Disinformation Tactics [continued]

12. Blame your stupidity and lies on your opponent. Blame
your own stupidity on the Linux advocate you are dealing with.
Such as when you have made an unsupportable claim that suggest a
list of details and your are asked to present your non-existent
list reply with, "I don't have to list them for you; you aren't
bright enough to know what you're missing by using X instead of a
real Y, I'm not going to explain it to you." Then hope that
nobody reading the thread realizes that your statement translates
as, "I lack the knowledge or facts needed to counter your
position or your position is too complete and accurate to be
refuted. So, I will say things to sound superior to avoid
admitting you are right."
[/quote]

> I have reason to suspect but no certainty.

Your point?

> You have no reason to suspect but claim certainty.

Your point?

> You are not a rational person.

More Snit set theory. A is suspicious and uncertain. B is not
suspicious and certain. Therefore B is crazy. Boy, what a
conclusion from an academic.

--
HPT

Snit

unread,
Jan 6, 2009, 11:39:53 PM1/6/09
to
"High Plains Thumper" <h...@invalid.invalid> stated in post
gk15e1$mkm$1...@reader.motzarella.org on 1/6/09 7:52 PM:

--
... something I'm committed to work on, focusing increasing amounts of
resources of Canonical on figuring out on how we actually move the desktop
experience forward to compete with Mac OS X.
- Mark Shuttleworth (founded Canonical Ltd. / Ubuntu Linux)

Snit

unread,
Jan 6, 2009, 11:41:05 PM1/6/09
to
"High Plains Thumper" <h...@invalid.invalid> stated in post
gk15e1$mkm$1...@reader.motzarella.org on 1/6/09 7:52 PM:

>>> Only one person has made a fool of itself, Michael. Why is


>>> it that all have the same basic complaint about your lying
>>> nature? Like these 121 posters?
>>>
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/9ce006aed08b0aeb
>>>
>>> or http://tinyurl.com/9858jv
>>>
>>> Latest complaint, Jan 1, 2009:
>>>
>>> 121- RonB: "Snit is a crank fixated on one issue, who's
>>> thing is twisting your words so he can win an argument
>>> against a straw man. That's enough to killfile him."
>>>
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.usenet.kooks/msg/ce8550d4cc5b1b42
>>
>> Worry about yourself.
>>
>> Why did you lie and claim that when I note a quote I posted
>> was accurately quoted you insisted that meant I was using a
>> sock? You have run from this question a great deal.
>
> This is an example of:
>
> http://www.faqs.org/faqs/linux/advocacy/faq-and-primer/
>
> [quote]
> 7.6 Trespasser Disinformation Tactics

You always run from questions where you know the answer will humiliate you.

Why?

Please, try to grow a backbone!


--
You really have to give credit to Apple for driving innovation.

Snit

unread,
Jan 6, 2009, 11:41:47 PM1/6/09
to
"High Plains Thumper" <h...@invalid.invalid> stated in post
gk15e1$mkm$1...@reader.motzarella.org on 1/6/09 7:52 PM:

>> I have reason to suspect but no certainty.


>
> Your point?
>
>> You have no reason to suspect but claim certainty.
>
> Your point?
>
>> You are not a rational person.
>
> More Snit set theory. A is suspicious and uncertain. B is not
> suspicious and certain. Therefore B is crazy. Boy, what a
> conclusion from an academic.

You make accusations you cannot support.

You are a liar.

Was that simple enough for you to understand?


--
Picture of a tuna soda: http://snipurl.com/f351

High Plains Thumper

unread,
Jan 7, 2009, 12:39:31 AM1/7/09
to
Steve Carroll wrote:

> Hadron wrote:
>
>> Just to be clear : posting any link to peoples private work
>> and life is below the belt and should be condemned on all
>> sides.
>
> Computer related work in a computer related forum is not
> "private work" when you had advertised that you do such work
> in that forum.
>
> If people believe that Snit is dishonest, greedy, unethical or
> any of the several other negative things that might apply
> with Snit they have every right to state their opinions in a
> public forum that Snit is well known for trolling in. Despite
> Snit's repeated denials it's not like Snit has given them no
> reason for their beliefs.

Oh, I've got the popcorn and soda pop out watching the Snit
Circus in action. I can tell when a post has gotten under his
skin. He posts several replies in succession. For example,

Now I can understand the Snit set theory:

http://tinyurl.com/8rls3p

[quote]


> I have reason to suspect but no certainty.

Your point?

> You have no reason to suspect but claim certainty.

Your point?

> You are not a rational person.

More Snit set theory. A is suspicious and uncertain. B is not
suspicious and certain. Therefore B is crazy. Boy, what a
conclusion from an academic.

[/quote]

He posted 3 replies in quick succession.

1st, he left no answer, but left my reply intact.

http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/a43465ffc4460fe8

2nd posted 2 minutes later, he completely snips away my replies,
only leaving the link I posted and 2 lines, with following reply
(ala Hadron):

[quote]


You always run from questions where you know the answer will
humiliate you.

Why?
Please, try to grow a backbone!

[/quote]

http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/34f6c27e59cae586

See, the reply turns to an ad hominem attack. (Next he or one of
the other trolls will retort that I haven't the foggiest clue
what ad hominem means, which is an ad hominem attack of itself.)

3rd, shortly after he posts:

[quote]


> More Snit set theory. A is suspicious and uncertain. B is
> not suspicious and certain. Therefore B is crazy. Boy, what
> a conclusion from an academic.

You make accusations you cannot support.

You are a liar.

Was that simple enough for you to understand?

[/quote]

http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/fd7a099fdabb0999

I simply restated what he said, which did not make sense in the
first place, then he goes off like a sky rocket, accusing me of
lying. The text of his actions are all there plain for all to see.

Yup, the Michael Glasser Snit Circus of pathological lies
continues ....

--
HPT

Snit

unread,
Jan 7, 2009, 12:52:37 AM1/7/09
to
"High Plains Thumper" <highplai...@invalid.invalid> stated in post
gk1f6l$hs2$1...@news.albasani.net on 1/6/09 10:39 PM:

You babbled about Set Theory. Why?

> Yup, the Michael Glasser Snit Circus of pathological lies
> continues ....

You babble.

A lot.

Why not grow a back bone and offer support for your BS accusations? Are you
really as much of a coward as you act like?

And why not learn what an ad hominem is? Why do you use a phrase so much
when you clearly do not know what it means?

High Plains Thumper

unread,
Jan 7, 2009, 12:55:43 AM1/7/09
to
Snit wrote:
> High Plains Thumper stated

>
> ...
>> Snit's set theory: HPT posts a truth.
>
> What proof?
>
>> Snit snips away truth and rants, "you have no proof".
>
> When? What post? I know you recently jumped onto Wally's
> moronic bandwagon where he claimed that since I quoted him and
> later referred to the quote being an accurate quote that this
> meant I was using a sock puppet, as - apparently - you have
> been.
>
> Is that what you are in reference to?
>
>> HPT posts further truth. Snit snips away and rants, "you
>> have yet to provide proof. You embarrass yourself." HPT
>> posts truth. Snit rants, "You have accidentally quoted
>> others but failed to quote me."
>
> What do you think you posted proof of?
>
> I bet you run like a scared bunny from that question. But I
> am giving you attention for merely making the vague
> accusation, and that encourages trolls such as yourself. You
> will never actually grow a backbone and try to support this
> vague accusation you are sort of referring to.

I can understand why posters get sick and tired of your lame ad
hominem attacks, your cowardly statements shifting the goal
posts, your continuous rambling drivel of how everyone seems to
be against you. No one cares a wooden nickel about your
incessant flames wars that are self created. You pretend to be
an advocate but you manage to cause everyone's hand to be against
you.

These 121 posters have the same thing to say about why Michael
Glasser AKA Snit, Rhino Plastee, and other nyms are so repulsive:
And no, they are not figments of Steve Carroll's imagination as
Snit alledges, they are garnered from actual Usenet quotes:

http://tinyurl.com/9858jv

1- Adam Kesher: "Steve, IIRC Sandman's website has a member area
and a login. If you forget your password, you can ask it to
e-mail it to you, and a bot will send an e-mail.

*That* is the e-mail Snit got from Sandman's website, and yes
he's that fucked in the head and starved for attention that he'd
claim it to be an e-mail from Sandman himself. So, don't get
sucked into his little circus.

The e-mail, in this particular instance, did probably originate
from Sandman.net."

2- Alan Baker: "People's perceptions of you are *formed* by
behaviour and not withstanding your occasional on topic posts, I
wish you'd leave too. Please note that despite the amazing
silliness that is Edwin, I have never made the same wish of him."

http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/4a7c3ebf3fc10221

3- Andrew J. Brehm: "You are not flamed because you speak the
truth, you are flamed because you are a hideous troll and keep
disrupting the newsgroup."

4- AZ Nomad: "The fact that you routinely change your headers to
weasel out of killfiles proves that you're an asshole."

5- Andy/news/nospam: "Why do you keep these things up, Snit? Why
not just let them go away and show how responsible a member of
CSMA you are? You could show your enemies up by being better than
then, rise above the low level you so obviously dislike.
Anything, just stop...."

6- B.B.: "Does the From: header contain the string "Snit"? If
yes, then troll. Otherwise, maybe. Dunno why I had my KF on you
set to expire, but it's fixed now."

7- bobinnv: "I learned some time ago how much better this group
can be if you kill file Snit. I have never understood why more
people don't do the same.."

8- Bob S: "This has always been pretty much a free-for-all group,
but since Snit showed up, its become almost impossible to have a
decent discussion about anything.

The solution is to NOT REPLY TO SNIT. But for some reason, some
people just can't stop feeding him."

9- [b]unny: "snit makes me sad."

10- buzz off: "Snit is obviously mentally ill..."

11- chrisv (cola): "No, she called him "shit", and rightly so,
for they way he was so ignominiously birthed into a toilet at the
bus depot, and simply refused to die, despite repeated flushes.

It's now far too late to *flush* him, but we can still *plonk*
him..."

12- C Lund: "Snit is not my responsibility. Maybe it's time for
you to learn how to use your kill-filter. I am assuming, of
course, that your Usenet browser has a kill-filter."

13- Code Orange: "Then why post it? What need is there for you to
"win" an argument? They don't like you, you don't like them. Why
must you keep this up? What results are you expecting?"

14- Dawg Tail: "You've already apologized for having already
misread what I had previously written. What makes you think that
you're correctly understanding what I'm writting now. You've got
a history of reading into things what you wanted people to have
said instead of what they really said.

I suggest you get over this limitation of yours. It's making you
look foolish."

Dawg Tail: "PC advocates, Mac advocates, Linux advocates. Almost
all of them are making similar claims about Snit. When you have
so many diverse people who share a common perception where do you
think the problem lies? With Snit? Or almost everyone else? The
answer doesn't require an advanced degree to figure out."

15- Dave Fritzinger: "Snit, please go away. Get a life, meet a
woman, do something, but please, please, please, GO AWAY!!!!"

16- Donald L McDaniel: "Jesus, snit. You're a teacher. I thought
you knew what a metaphor was, and could recognize one when it was
presented to you. I guess I had too much confidence in you."

17- ed: "snit, you continually amaze me with how much of a liar
and loser you are. you may notice a semi-regular pattern with me
where i stop responding to your posts for stretches at a time,
then start up responding as if you were a normal person. i
suppose it's tough for the magnitude of your 'loserdom' to stick,
so it loses some of it's sharpness when i stop responding to you.
you almost always start responding back in a semi normal way, but
inevitably degenerate. it's once again that time. i can only ask
that you pass my condolences to your wife and unborn child for
having to put up with such a dishonest fool as yourself. (well,
if your wife is a loser as well, just pass those condolences to
the rug-rat to be; if not, double condolences to her). "

18- Edwin: "You've got to be out of your mind, Snit. You're the
worst troll this group has ever seen. You're a liar and a forger,
and you've almost destroyed this group single-handedly. For you
to post a list of out of context arguments, and lies, and
forgeries about your enemies labled as a "peace effort" has to be
one of the craziest stunts you've pulled. It's all about your
sick need for attention, your need to be center stage at all
times. You'd publicly eat dog turd if you thought it would make
people look at you."

http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/37e4a720619642a0

19- Elijah Baley: "Seriously, Snit, you need psychiatric help. Go
see a doctor."

20- Elizabot v2.0.2: "I see you were unable to respond to the
points in my post and you are back to your repetitious
regurgitation mode. How childishly typical of you, Snit."

21- fibercut: "That is the problem. In the years I have been
coming to CSMA I have seen in the past year a real hatred among
people, besides the typical Mac vs. Windows typical argument. I
feel that it is like being in a room of really young children
trying there best to best the other person. The one common thing
among all of this seems to be you. I hate to be like this, but
facts are facts. You seem to be in the middle of a great
percentage of arguments. CSMA has become less about Macs and more
about "look everybody, I think he lied". Is there no end then all
this picking at each other on such a personal level. CSMA has
always been al little adversarial but you have personally crank
it up to the point that this place is no longer fun.
Congratulations on stopping CSMA and making this place your own
personal circus."

22- George Graves: "Jason. You have started an argument with the
Snit (AKA Michael Glasser), this should not be done. He will
drive you crazy with his twisted logic, his deep-rooted need to
be ALWAYS right at any cost. He will move goalposts, set up
strawmen, and bore you into submission with his endless
pedanticism. The only way to engage him is to hit and run. NEVER
engage him, it's a futile, empty procedure that will only anger
you and feed him. Take my advice and STAY AWAY!"

23- gimme_this_gimme_t...@yahoo.com: "Hitting the vodka tonight
Snit?"

24- Greycloud: "You really shouldn't lie like that. Everyone else
notices that you are not honest and you have no honor."

25- Henry Flam: "Who gives a damn about this shit? Snit, once in
a while, I make the mistake in thinking that that you are
starting to make sense in your posts; I tend to agree with your
politics. Then you post stuff like this and it destroys any
respect that I have for you."

26- Heywood Mogroot: "*plonk*"

27- Jamie Hart (cola): "It seems that since you are unable to
offer support for your statements, you're reduced to personal
attacks on me. Incidentally, anyone reading this post can see
that I have offered no straw men, and have only asked you to
explain how the things you state as facts can be true. I'm really
sorry that you're taking this attitude, the topic is an
interesting one and I thought you might have some insights. I've
snipped the rest, since you dislike long posts and avoid
answering any of the questions I asked by saying everything was
just repeated. "

28- Jason McNorton: "You're one of the many, many paranoid people
on usenet that should be confined most likely. You sit there and
refresh your screen endlessly. You post the same nonsense over
and over. Either you're a super troll, or you're a super mess."

29- JEDIDIAH (cola): "You're simply full of shit."

30- Jeff B.: "Yo, Snit. We're not pals. I think you're a git."

31- Jeff Hoppe: "This is a Macintosh Advocacy newsgroup. Not a
12-step recovery plan. Your medical problems or conditions won't
help me achieve a greater understanding of my Mac. In fact, it
detracts from it and those kinds of discussions have no place in
a newsgroup such as this."

32- Jesus: "Really, Snit. It's annoying. What are you
accomplishing besides being annoying? Is that your goal?"

33- Jim Lee Jr.: "Snit, read the thread's title, is Bush
mentioned in it? You (and Carroll) ought to learn to stay on
topic and not hijack threads."

34- Jim Polaski: "Why is it that nearly every thread you're
involved in seems like it turns into some tit-for-tat, dozens of
responses to OT things and garbage?"

35- Jim Richardson (cola): "And yet again, Snit runs away, rather
than actually provide evidence for his claims. Par for the course
I suppose."

36- Joey Jojo Junior Shabadoo: "and Snithead has even farther to
fall - in a few weeks he'll be out on the street after midnight,
yelling at passersby 'sucky sucky, $2...'"

37- John C. Randolph: "You're nothing but a troll yourself. What
are you bitching about?"

38- JohnOfArc (cola): "I'm not sure "troll" does it justice- more
like a black hole! But hey, if we all promise to never again even
entertain an unkind thought re Apple, will you take it back and
lock it up? Please??"

39- John Q. Public: "I have not been bothered to read Snit's
postings since I figured out who he is. I don't bother to filter
his posts, I just consider the source and skip to the next one
when I see his name."

40- John Slade: "I don't get posts from Snit. I wouldn't be
shocked that he has some kind of disorder. He made up stuff about
being a computer repairman and teacher. He's just plain loony and
best ignored. Let him deal with his disorder by medication. He's
here to do one thing, get attention from people. He says the
crazy stuff just to get a reaction.
You say you like to beat him over the head. Well that's what he's
counting on, he says stuff he knows isn't true in hopes to get a
rise out of people like you. Ignore him, you won't regret it."

John Slade: "Snit, you have a enough problems as it is without
adding drinking booze to the list. How the hell did you manage to
get out of my killfile? Oh well back into the cage you go, PLONK."

41- Josh McKee: "Snit, I assume there was some point to this
posting? Because I certainly cannot find it."

42- K E: "I haven't read this board for awhile but I see that
even though the trolls still roam free at least the worst troll
of the lot is mostly being ignored by readers on this bb. If the
few stragglers that keep replying to him would just stop
responding to Snit at all this place could be worth coming back
to. There's a good chance he'll pack up and take his trolling to
more fertile ground."

43- Kelsey Bjarnason (cola): "Funny how you simply don't bother
reading the posts that rip your entire thesis to bleeding gobbets
of putrid excrescence. Maybe some day you'll learn how to support
your position, instead of sticking your fingers in your ears and
humming, hoping it'll all go away."

44- Ku Karlovsky (cola): "You repeatedly chastise others for ad
hominem attacks while in the same sentence make your own ad
hominem attacks.You make silly claims and then avoid the subject
of your silliness. You're a liar and a hypocrite and you always
have been."

45- Lars Trager: "Yes, you are stupid."

46- Lefty Bigfoot: "Okay, I tried to put up with it for a long
time, but the few times you post something worth reading just
aren't worth it anymore. *plonk*"

47- Liam Slider (cola): "Maybe he's responding to the fact you've
been an annoying little fuckwit lately. You started out with the
pretense of trying to be fair, but lately all there is from you
in COLA is trashtalk about Linux and you acting every bit the troll."

48- Linonut (cola): "Snit is a Tholenoid."

"Indeed. Snit may be the first retraction of my general killfile
amnesty. The volume of cavilling, whining, foot-stomping,
back-tracking, goal-post shifting, and petulance generated by
that effete candy-ass beggars belief".

49- Lloyd Parsons: "Well, I don't know if Oxford is the most
cretinous, I would think that would be reserved for Snit! ;-)"

50- Mark Kent (cola): "The problem with someone like Mr Glasser
is the same as it is with Mr Wong, even if he were to be honest
now, it would be impossible to determine where the honesty starts
and the usual dishonesty ends. In my primary school, one of the
teachers was very keen on proverbs, and I recall her going over
the "cry wolf" story. Mr Glasser could "cry wolf" over and over
now, and I would not come to help him with his sheep, because I
do not know any way of determining if he's ever telling the
truth, or indeed, if he ever has."

51- Mayor of R'lyeh: "The fact is that he's probably pulling it
to this post since its all about him and he managed to make me
think about him today. A friend of mine has a toddler. I went
over to her house and videotaped her kid doing a bunch of cute
toddler stuff then burned a DVD of it for her. While we were
watching the DVD her kid got mad. He got mad because we quit
making him the center of attention and made that kid on the tv
the center of attention. He even ran up to the tv and tried to
block our view of it. That's how Snit lives his whole life."

52- Michelle Ronn: "The real topic here is that one someone
refutes your "facts", you run away and ignore them. Refuting your
"facts" is easily done in this case. I did it, and you ignored it. "

53- Mike: "Nonsense. I never see you "advocate" anything. All I
see you doing is engage in endless semantic arguments with
everyone. You're the TholenBot of CSMA. BTW, that's *not* a
compliment!"

54- Mike Dee: "I will no longer accuse you of lying here. Instead
I can only say that you are a complete and delusional kook that
happens to inhabit CSMA for the time being. That you are unaware
of how deranged you actually behave further reinforces this
notion. Please seek professional help."

55- mmoore321: "Snit is a human car-accident and we are all
rubbernecking. We know it is bad form, but yet strangely curious.
Treat him the same way, look but just keep moving on."

56- Mojo: "Actually, these facts piss everybody off because they
are off-topic, unnecessarily confrontational, extremely boring
and clearly show that you are crying out for attention."

57- Mr. Blonde: "Lastly, I can't help but comment on the fact
that your obsession with Sandman has actually grown since you
claimed to KF him. Killfilling someone generally implies you're
ignoring that person, yet you piggyback onto virtually every
reply to him here and and check his website's validation status
more often than most people check their e-mail. These are not the
actions of a mentally balanced individual."

58- MR_ED_of_Course: "Seriously, spend half a day at any
pre-school or kindergarten and see if the kids there can't teach
you a thing or two about social behavior."

59- Muahman: "Ummm, dude you post 1000 posts a day. 999 of them
are trolls, if anyone here has issues it's not me."

60- Nashton/Nasht0n: "Oh for crying out loud, if I wasn't
convinced that snit is a total loser, and I rarely call people
losers, I certainly am now. Why bother responding to his
stupidities anyway?"

61- New Bee: "Honest and honorable? You? You've either got a wry
sense of humor, or you're completely nuts. Either way you're just
a waste of time, and you've done more than anybody to make this
group a cesspool. Then you revel in wallowing in your own filth."

62- Not Important: "I get this mental image of you and a sibling
as children in the back seat of the family car saying:
Mom, 'snits' touching me ... and you responding much as you do
now ... I'm not touching you, you're touching me! The problem is
that by now you should've grown out of that type of poke and
complain interaction with others. But, of course, you've haven't
learned how to interact with others in a more 'constructive' and
mutually beneficial manner even now."

63- OldCSMAer: "What's he been doing? Am I going to be sorry I
killfiled him?"

64- OldSage: "What drives me nuts is your unrelenting ability and
desire to argue on the head of a pin about the most trivial of
things."

65- Oxford: "If you are using MT-Newswatcher:
Select offending Author, example Snit...
Go to the Filters Menu, Choose "Kill this Author"
Click "OK"
Then Repeat with each annoying Author of your choice.
Then to see your work...
Choose the Filter Menu again,
Then "Refilter Articles"...
Bam! No more boring, pointless bickering about nothing.
Enjoy!!!!!"

66- Patrick Nihill: "I mean, honestly, who would you rather
discuss something with; Dan, or someone like Zara? Or, for that
matter, Snit, for whom the work 'troll' seems so painfully
inadequate?"

67- Pawel Wojciak: "Jesus Christ, snit... <plonk> "

68- PC Guy: "Forget it Snit, you're a waste of time. For someone
who talks about everyone else not being "honest and honorable"
you appear to be the least honest and honorable of anyone here."

69- Peter: "I've never felt the need to use the filters in
Newswatcher but I thought Id try the Kill this Author.. option
with Snit. Ten seconds later and he's gone! Amazing."

70- Peter Bjorn Perlso: "Plonked for 60 days. Now stfu and take
your argument with sandman into the private room."

71- Peter Hayes: "True, but that removes Snit completely, and
someti... err..... occasiona.... errrrr..... once in a blue moon
he has something useful to say."

72- Peter Jensen (cola): "Where has he ever said that they were
not different windowing environments? Message-ID, please.
Experience has told me not to trust you on anything without
backing evidence."

73- Peter Kohlmann (cola): "Snot is a hideous troll. Nobody is as
dishonest as that piece of unadultered garbage. There are csma
posters even more stupid than Snot. Oxford comes to mind. There
are certainly other csma posters who lie nearly as much. But no
others are so intent on trolling in whatever way possible as Snot"

74- Phil Earnhardt: "You're only interested in trying to get
superficial snipes and extrapolate inappropriate conclusions."

75- Rapskat (cola): "For instance, your sig you reference a long
standing war you have going with some person from csma. It's like
you single out persons to target your attentions upon and then
continuously berate them with constant barbs and goads to
perpetuate their acrimonious responses, which in turn you respond
in kind, etc. ad infinitum. Above all things, your affinity for
Macs and your overbearing pompous nature aside, this is what
convinces me that your primary purpose for frequenting this and
other groups is to troll."

76- RichardK: "Just killfile him already."

77- Rick (cola): "Snit, you are a liar. And an ignorant one. You
trash people that are trying their level best to cope with a
horrendous situation. And you do it without the slightest idea of
what is going on."

http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/fcad2955ac5cb03b

78- Rick G.: "Just to be plain here, I have no doubt that he is a
troll. I am tolerant of his nature, not blind to it. However, as
a troll, he is ... somewhat clumsy."

79- Robert F.: "Um, perhaps you misunderstand. I don't care if
you quote Mayor McCheese claiming the Earth is a flat plate
perched on the shell of a tortoise, I was merely pointing out
that you run the risk of looking ridiculous when you quote
something patently stupid. If that's your goal, you're on the
right track, and more power to you."

80- Roy Culley (cola): "You appear to be in the latter category.
Starting crossposted threads for the simple purpose of hoping to
generate a flame war. If you truly want to learn more about Linux
and how it can help you and your supposed users why aren't you
requesting help from a more technical Linux newsgroup than an
advocacy group? As the old saying goes, those who can do, those
who can't teach. Your posts seem to confirm that saying IMHO."

http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/d521a80051e24d08

81- Sandman: "He is by far the most killfiled person in the
-HISTORY- of csma. I've never seen someone so disliked, almost
hated, in a news group before. He has the ability to turn just
about any person against him in just a few posts. On usenet,
trolls do this daily, but the funny part with Michael is that I
actually think he DOESN'T consider himself be a troll - damn what
-EVERYONE ELSE- is calling him. Obviously they are wrong. Only
Tholen himself can match this behaviour."

82- sav: "You really need to take a rest somewhere nice.
Honestly, even the nutters who hang out down on Brighton seafront
made more sense than this. You been doing drugs or something?"

83- Sean Burke: If you're dumb enough to respond to snit, you're
probably dumb enough to click on a spam attachment that promises
to remove smut from your harddrive."

84- ShutterBugz: "so snit-zel has some kind of problem expressing
anger, i guess. he has to vent his frustrations in other ways.
and he thinks he's making sense: well the syntax is there and he
figures he's pretty smart. indeed, he tells us, he's done the
personality tests and the iq tests and he's okay! aaaaahhhhh, you
see he's soooooooo well adjusted."

85- Steve Carroll: "The only things we are sure about Snit is
that he has:
* a monumental reading comprehension problem.
* nym-shifted numerous times to avoid kill-files.
* built too many straw-men to count... some, the size of small
cities.
* been labeled a disingenuous liar/troll(or worse) by the vast
majority.
* used numerous sock-puppets and admitted to it.
* stolen IDs and admitted to it.
* gotten booted off by ISPs for his behavior.
* twisted more context than all csma posters combined.
* made more unsupported accusations than all csma posters combined.
* virtually no life outside of csma."

86- Steve Mackay: "Just killfile Snit, the dishonest piece of
elephant dung, and all would go away. Sure, I got caught up in
the "Snit Circus", but then the cotton candy began to sour, and
CSMA begun to smell like elephant dung."

87- Steven de Mena: "Sorry, you have now lost all credibility with me
for your rediculous argument regarding this."

88- Steve Travis: "Oh oh... Now look what we've done. Snit has
lost all self respect and has sunk to the point of using words
like 'asses' when referring to others. Oh, how could the morally
superior snit have fallen so low.. Please take a moment out of
your busy schedule to feel embarassed for him. Or perhaps we
should set up a fund to get him more happy glue (and the
appropriate plastic bags)."

89- Stuart Krivis: "You might as well just give up and plonk him
then. A snit is a snit is a snit and always will be."

90- TheLetterK: "That is merely your perception, Shit. You're the
one lacking counter evidence, and your arguments basically amount
to "I'm right, nya nya nya." No matter how many examples someone
points at to demonstrate their claim, you blindly continue to
insist that they provide no evidence, or that the evidence given
is irrelevant. Worse still, you fall back on straw men and
disingenuous quote mangling to portray the argument in your
favor. You are one of the worst trolls that inhabit CSMA, Shit.
*Edwin* is more prone to fits of reason than you are. "

91-Tim Adams: "I'd kill file you but then I'd miss the fun. you
see, you never cease to amaze me at just how stupid you really
are. Why just the other day I had a great laugh when I saw you,
the king of liars (in this NG anyway) calling somebody else a liar."

92- Tim Crowley: "I don't know - I think you might have more
compassion. Snit is sick. He needs help. This is the only way the
poor sick fool can get attention. My fucking God, he's taken to
hanging out with and supporting racist pig fuckers like MuahMuah.
It is true that no-one likes him and those that pretend they do
are just using him or don't know him - but come on- it's not his
fault. He's sick. Have some compassion, eh? All these idiot
trolls, Zara, Stew, Tommy, MuaaaahMuaaah, and Snit - they are all
so alike. I pity each and every one of them"

93- Tim Smith: "No, he didn't, and there is no reasonable way you
could actually believe he lied. You are purely trying to troll here."

94- Timberwoof: "*Plonk!*"

95- Tom Bates: "Do you have to turn any thread you post in into
one of your Circus acts?"

96- Tommy: "In case you did not get it, I think the moral was:
Stop polluting the world with your infantile and obsessive
"writings". You give Mac advocacy a bad name. If that was your
goal you have succeeded! That also goes for all that bullshit on
your website"

97- TravelinMan: "I still can't figure out what's wrong with
Snit. Most people have him kill-filed and the few who don't
mostly restrict their responses to 'why don't you go away, no one
wants you here'. Just what would keep someone in this group with
all of that animosity? Must be some kind of severe mental illness."

98- Wally: "Because by your own admission "honor and honesty" are
nothing more than a "game" to you, as such not only do you wish
to define the rules, but no doubt you will also attempt to alter
or bend the rules when inevitably things do not go to your
liking, for this reason I doubt anyone would be foolish enough to
play your game."

99- William R. Walsh: "Now, if you'll excuse me, and accept my
sincere apologies for this, PLONK! Feel proud about that. You're
the first person to be plonked from my new computer! :-) "

100- Woofbert: "*Plonk*"

101- zara: "Look - I'm not into combing through thousands of
posts, to prove what was said or not said - I leave stuff like
that to people without lives, like Snit. But it is assuredly, in
the record. Ping Snit to do a search - you will flatter him, and
give meaning to his tawdry little life."

http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/a1d4fc7120a6a538

102- Znu: "I think your 'I'll go start a new thread to try to
draw more people into the debate I'm currently having with
Steve/Elizabot/etc' tactic is fairly trollish."

103- High Plains Thumper: "Well, for one who is trolling this
group, those were extremely poorly done examples, making problems
that do not exist except an invention of Snit's own mind."

104- Geoff M. Fitton: "The Prescott Computer Guy *still* showing
how stupid he is... What a mar00n".

105- William Poaster: "Good grief. If anyone's having a mental
breakdown it's the Prescott Computer Guy, Michael Snit Glasser.
What a f#cked up mess he is'.

106- Tattoo Vampire: "In other words, in another attempt to
troll, you made yourself look like a fool. Again".

107- Mr. Blonde: "Lastly, I can't help but comment on the fact
that your obsession with Sandman has actually grown since you
claimed to KF him. Killfilling someone generally implies you're
ignoring that person, yet you piggyback onto virtually every
reply to him here and and check his website's validation status
more often than most people check their e-mail. These are not the
actions of a mentally balanced individual".

108- CozmicDebris: "I'm done with your three year old games. The
archives show my answers and your inability to process them. Keep
posting your list and proving that you are an idiot troll. I will
not address it any further- you being too stupid to realize and
accept that is not my problem".

109- WhoMe: "F michael IS a teacher, it's no wonder he's home
more than he's anywhere near a classroom".

110- spike1: "The thought is probably to show everyone here just
how bad a troll snit is".

111- Carlo Coggi: "He must believe he is surrounded by 'trolls'
... in the groups he trolls in, that is. I wondered if the
idiotrollers like snit would reply to this thread. Of course, I
didn't see his posts, only your reply".

112- bobinv: "I learned some time ago how much better this group
can be if you kill file Snit. I have never understood why more
people don't do the same".

113- Zaren Ankleweed: "And with that, Snit goes in the global
killfile. No subject, no author, no nothing. Buh-bye".

114- H: "Your crappy posts are still showing up in seperate
threads, are you doing this on purpose to piss people off? I dont
ever censor people cause that's just retarded but if you dont fix
it I'm gonna have to cause I dont wanna see your
name 40 times in a row. So uh, change your client or something".

115- PeterBP: "Oh will you stfu".

116- S'mee (Keith, rec.motorcycles): "Liar...forger and
worthless. You must be related to our resident racist troll, he
lies as much as you."

http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/ab08c00330c8b58d

117- BaJoRi:
Snit: "You are, of course, lying."
BaJoRi: "No, I am not. You know it, and I know it, and everyone
else who has read your idiocy knows it. I took your statement,
showed it to be wrong, then added even more, just to be a dick
and REALLY show you to be a fool. You need to judiciously snip
out pertinent points because you are an intellectually dwarfed
turd-burglar."

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.vacation.las-vegas/msg/647944511b74b82f

118- KK: 'Whoa there, ad hominem man. You started off your
sentence with "Ah" like you'd just realized something profound.'

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.fan.howard-stern/msg/6a89029a5b5be5f8

119- -hh: 'Perversion has utterly nothing to do with the
definition of "synonymous". It is, however, a very clear example
of how you attempt to maliciously debase against anyone who
disagrees with you. As such, I consider this to be a purposeful
attempt by you to try to libel me. This is your only warning to
consider rescinding your remark, with the reminder that you, and
you alone are responsible for that accusation, both in the
ethical as well as the full legal meaning of the word "responsible".'

http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/5496641a3426293a

120- Geezer:
Snit: "Steve Carroll has no sense of morality"
Geezer: "Whined the guy who cannot directly address those who
uncover his lies and deceit;)"
Snit: "and no clue about the law."
Geezer: 'Said the guy who believes his unsupported opinions are
"proof". LOL! (snip more of Snit's unsupported lies)'

http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/d0517ced5134934d

121- RonB: "Snit is a crank fixated on one issue, who's thing is
twisting your words so he can win an argument against a straw
man. That's enough to killfile him."

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.usenet.kooks/msg/ce8550d4cc5b1b42

--
HPT

Snit

unread,
Jan 7, 2009, 1:08:51 AM1/7/09
to
"High Plains Thumper" <h...@invalid.invalid> stated in post
gk1g51$9r$1...@news.motzarella.org on 1/6/09 10:55 PM:

> Snit wrote:
>> High Plains Thumper stated
>>
>> ...
>>> Snit's set theory: HPT posts a truth.
>>
>> What proof?

Note: High Plains Thumper has no answer for this.

He simply made up a story.

>>> Snit snips away truth and rants, "you have no proof".
>>
>> When? What post? I know you recently jumped onto Wally's
>> moronic bandwagon where he claimed that since I quoted him and
>> later referred to the quote being an accurate quote that this
>> meant I was using a sock puppet, as - apparently - you have
>> been.
>>
>> Is that what you are in reference to?

Note: High Plains Thumper has no answer for this.

He simply made up a story.



>>> HPT posts further truth. Snit snips away and rants, "you
>>> have yet to provide proof. You embarrass yourself." HPT
>>> posts truth. Snit rants, "You have accidentally quoted
>>> others but failed to quote me."
>>
>> What do you think you posted proof of?

Note: High Plains Thumper has no answer for this.

He simply made up a story.

>> I bet you run like a scared bunny from that question. But I
>> am giving you attention for merely making the vague
>> accusation, and that encourages trolls such as yourself. You
>> will never actually grow a backbone and try to support this
>> vague accusation you are sort of referring to.

And High Plains Thumper proves me right.

Again.

> I can understand why posters get sick and tired of your lame ad
> hominem attacks, your cowardly statements shifting the goal
> posts, your continuous rambling drivel of how everyone seems to
> be against you. No one cares a wooden nickel about your
> incessant flames wars that are self created. You pretend to be
> an advocate but you manage to cause everyone's hand to be against
> you.

You are boring. Too much of a coward to even try to support your absurd
lies about me.

You will need to think of a more clever trolling method if you want to keep
getting my attention. You are boring this "fish" away. Sure, I take almost
any bait, but you have managed to be one of the most boring trolls I have
ever had the misfortune of have a "discussion" with.

--
I think we [the folks who make Linux desktops] don't yet deliver a good
enough user experience.

Snit

unread,
Jan 7, 2009, 1:10:21 AM1/7/09
to
"High Plains Thumper" <h...@invalid.invalid> stated in post
gk1g51$9r$1...@news.motzarella.org on 1/6/09 10:55 PM:

> These 121 posters have the same thing to say about why Michael


> Glasser AKA Snit, Rhino Plastee

Being that you do not have a shred of support for this accusation, why do
you keep repeating it? Are you so desperate for attention you have no
problem humiliating yourself like that just to get a reply?


--
The answer to the water shortage is to dilute it.

0 new messages