With *these* rates, Snit *must* be mentally ill
Don Zeigler
businesses and $80/hour for work sites. There is a one hour minimum for
house calls and on-site support.
"Costs for phone support services are $5 for every 5 minutes for individuals
and home businesses and $8 for every 5 minutes for work sites. There is a
twenty minutes minimum charge for support calls."
It's a good thing his spouse has a genuine moneymaking business!
--
Regards,
Don Zeigler
Owner/proprietor, Trollus Amongus, LLC
...If it's Tourist Season, howcum we can't shoot 'em, Pa?
Snit
1:29 PM:
> "Costs for general house calls are $60/hour for individuals and home
> businesses and $80/hour for work sites. There is a one hour minimum for
> house calls and on-site support.
>
> "Costs for phone support services are $5 for every 5 minutes for individuals
> and home businesses and $8 for every 5 minutes for work sites. There is a
> twenty minutes minimum charge for support calls."
>
> It's a good thing his spouse has a genuine moneymaking business!
Why would you go out of your way to *prove* you are an obsessive scumbag?
Are you really that bent out of shape over your self-nuke?
Snit:
Listen, I seriously do not care why you fantasized about me
calling you. Just stop lying about me in public. Thanks!
Don Zeigler
I'm not lying and you can't stop me, asshole.
Snit:
You are not lying *and* I cannot stop you from lying.
You know... a 3 year old might say something like that.
Really... that was *funny*.
And then you freaked out. It was very funny. Really.
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
Snit
1:55 PM:
Hey, just checked my logs - curious why you are using NT6.1. That just
seems odd. Not quite as odd as you spending "6 hours 32 mins 57 secs" on my
site. That is just a bit creepy.
VISITOR ANALYSIS
Referring Link
<http://www.google.com/search?q=prescott computer guy&ie=UTF-8>
Host Name c-76-122-244-228.hsd1.wv.comcast.net
IP Address 76.122.244.228
Country United States
Region West Virginia
City Bluefield
ISP Comcast Cable Communications Inc
Returning Visits 1
Visit Length 6 hours 32 mins 57 secs
VISITOR SYSTEM SPECS
Browser Firefox 3.5.5
Operating System Windows NT6.1
Resolution 1280x1024
Javascript Enabled
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
Snit
1:29 PM:
> "Costs for general house calls are $60/hour for individuals and home
> businesses and $80/hour for work sites. There is a one hour minimum for
> house calls and on-site support.
>
> "Costs for phone support services are $5 for every 5 minutes for individuals
> and home businesses and $8 for every 5 minutes for work sites. There is a
> twenty minutes minimum charge for support calls."
>
> It's a good thing his spouse has a genuine moneymaking business!
Why would you go out of your way to *prove* you are an obsessive scumbag?
Are you really that bent out of shape over your self-nuke?
Snit:
Listen, I seriously do not care why you fantasized about me
calling you. Just stop lying about me in public. Thanks!
Don Zeigler
I'm not lying and you can't stop me, asshole.
Snit:
You are not lying *and* I cannot stop you from lying.
You know... a 3 year old might say something like that.
Really... that was *funny*.
And then you freaked out. It was very funny. Really.
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
Don Zeigler
> Why
Why not?
--
Regards,
Don Zeigler
Owner/proprietor, Trollus Amongus, LLC
...Aim Low, Reach Your Goals, Avoid Disappointment.
Snit
2:06 PM:
> Why not?
LOL! You really are losing it... having a rather public break down. Not a
Carroll-level one, mind you... but still amusing to watch it.
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
Clogwog
news:C71C7FD2.52D1E%use...@gallopinginsanity.com...
Most stalkers are!
You rattled his cage somehow ;-)
Let's wait for his typical lumpish WV foul language!
Don Zeigler
> Not quite as odd as you spending "6 hours 32 mins 57 secs" on my
> site.
Don't flatter yourself. The browser's been open for hours; doesn't mean I'm
using it.
--
Regards,
Don Zeigler
Owner/proprietor, Trollus Amongus, LLC
...Evolution is God's way of issuing upgrades.
Don Zeigler
> Why
Why not?
--
Regards,
Don Zeigler
Owner/proprietor, Trollus Amongus, LLC
...OS/2 VirusScan - "Windows found: Remove it? [Y/y]"
Snit
2:43 PM:
> Snit wrote:
>
>> Not quite as odd as you spending "6 hours 32 mins 57 secs" on my
>> site.
>
> Don't flatter yourself. The browser's been open for hours; doesn't mean I'm
> using it.
And now Don shows he thinks my web stats can show how long his browser has
been open. LOL! No, Don, I have no idea if you rebooted 23 times during
the 6+ hours you were returning to my site.
You really are clueless. Really.
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
Snit
Well, when he outted his own lie about my allegedly having called him after
he spewed that nonsense for so long, clearly he was not very happy. 6+
hours of looking at my site to find dirt... and the best he came up with was
my prices are low. Man, what a horrid thing to say about a business. :)
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
Snit
2:44 PM:
> Snit wrote:
>
>> Why
>
> Why not?
Snit:
Listen, I seriously do not care why you fantasized about me
calling you. Just stop lying about me in public. Thanks!
Don Zeigler
I'm not lying and you can't stop me, asshole.
Snit:
You are not lying *and* I cannot stop you from lying.
You know... a 3 year old might say something like that.
Really... that was *funny*.
You just cannot stand to look at your own self-nuke... you snip it every
time!
Unless you amuse me, though, feel free to get the last word in. You are
boring and, clearly, that is all you want. You gave up any pretense of even
trying to make a point.
And I am laughing.
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
Don Zeigler
> You really are clueless. Really.
Quit projecting.
--
Regards,
Don Zeigler
Owner/proprietor, Trollus Amongus, LLC
...He who takes credit for rain will be blamed for drought.
Sinister Midget III
> "Costs for general house calls are $60/hour for individuals and home
> businesses and $80/hour for work sites. There is a one hour minimum for
> house calls and on-site support.
>
> "Costs for phone support services are $5 for every 5 minutes for individuals
> and home businesses and $8 for every 5 minutes for work sites. There is a
> twenty minutes minimum charge for support calls."
>
> It's a good thing his spouse has a genuine moneymaking business!
He never has to do any of that anyway, as evidenced by his constant
presence and posting to this group. I'm sure she knows the above is a
fantasy by now.
Most likely she's waiting for him to choke on one of the 30 dozen
Twinkies she has to buy for him every week so she can collect the
insurance.
--
Old age is better than the alternative.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Eee PC900 16G SSD 2G RAM Debian testing
Friends don't let friends use Windows
High Plains Thumper
> "Costs for general house calls are $60/hour for individuals and home
> businesses and $80/hour for work sites. There is a one hour minimum
> for house calls and on-site support.
>
> "Costs for phone support services are $5 for every 5 minutes for
> individuals and home businesses and $8 for every 5 minutes for work
> sites. There is a twenty minutes minimum charge for support calls."
>
> It's a good thing his spouse has a genuine moneymaking business!
Post Activity (Google stats)
Sep Oct Nov Dec
2008 619 460 565 1072
2009 1262 1070 299
Seeing that his active posts doubled after he mentioned on August 25
that he wasn't going to be responding much due to school, tells me that
he's not doing much business.
We're now at the end of the 8th day of November and his posts have
already surpassed November 2008's mark.
Figuring that he posts 1/2 the weekly day amount on each weekend day,
means 43 posts per day, or roughly a post every 15 minutes during waking
hours (eating, bathing and sleeping excluded).
Yup, it is a good thing that his wife is keeping the family financially
afloat.
--
HPT
High Plains Thumper
> Don Zeigler wrote:
>> "Costs for general house calls are $60/hour for individuals and home
>> businesses and $80/hour for work sites. There is a one hour minimum
>> for house calls and on-site support.
>>
>> "Costs for phone support services are $5 for every 5 minutes for
>> individuals and home businesses and $8 for every 5 minutes for work
>> sites. There is a twenty minutes minimum charge for support calls."
>>
>> It's a good thing his spouse has a genuine moneymaking business!
>
> Post Activity (Google stats)
>
> Sep Oct Nov Dec
> 2008 619 460 565 1072
> 2009 1262 1070 299
>
> Seeing that his active posts doubled after he mentioned on August 25
> that he wasn't going to be responding much due to school, tells me that
> he's not doing much business.
>
> We're now at the end of the 8th day of November and his posts have
> already surpassed November 2008's mark.
Correction, November 2008's 1/2 way mark.
High Plains Thumper
> Snit wrote:
>
>> Not quite as odd as you spending "6 hours 32 mins 57 secs" on my
>> site.
>
> Don't flatter yourself. The browser's been open for hours; doesn't mean I'm
> using it.
Snit's Post Activity (Google stats)
Sep Oct Nov Dec
2008 619 460 565 1072
2009 1262 1070 299
I am sure Snit has been busy with school, since he doubled his posting
activity from last year, especially after he told Steve Carroll, Wally,
Sandman and I on August 25 that he was going to be busy with school and
not replying to us. We're still waiting for his school to start.
--
HPT
Snit
on 11/9/09 6:55 AM:
Your *only* complaint against me you can support is I post... often in
response to your lies and the lies of others... more than you want.
Poor HPT. Poor, poor HPT. All he wants is for people to ignore his lies.
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
High Plains Thumper
> High Plains Thumper stated:
>> Don Zeigler wrote:
>>> Snit wrote:
>>>
>>>> Not quite as odd as you spending "6 hours 32 mins 57 secs" on my
>>>> site.
>>>
>>> Don't flatter yourself. The browser's been open for hours; doesn't mean I'm
>>> using it.
>>
>> Snit's Post Activity (Google stats)
>>
>> Sep Oct Nov Dec
>> 2008 619 460 565 1072
>> 2009 1262 1070 299
>>
>> I am sure Snit has been busy with school, since he doubled his posting
>> activity from last year, especially after he told Steve Carroll, Wally,
>> Sandman and I on August 25 that he was going to be busy with school and
>> not replying to us. We're still waiting for his school to start.
>
> Your *only* complaint against me you can support is I post... often in
> response to your lies and the lies of others... more than you want.
>
> Poor HPT. Poor, poor HPT. All he wants is for people to ignore his lies.
LOL, Snit can't explain why his postings increased, especially after
promising several of us. Figures. Obviously.
--
HPT
Snit
11/10/09 8:35 AM:
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
High Plains Thumper
Crickets chirping .... LOL!
--
HPT
Don Zeigler
> Crickets chirping .... LOL!
Note that Snit has vanished again. He must have a client's computer to work
on, finally.
--
Regards,
Don Zeigler
Owner/proprietor, Trollus Amongus, LLC
...Do not make whisky in private, or water in public.
High Plains Thumper
> High Plains Thumper wrote:
>
>> Crickets chirping .... LOL!
>
> Note that Snit has vanished again. He must have a client's computer
> to work on, finally.
Or school has finally started for Spanky Da Measekite, LOL!
Snit: "Soon my semester starts again and I will not be responding to
Steve Carroll, Sandman, HPT, Wally, or Tim Adams... at least for a
little while." 24 Aug 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/9e71e9d48624e1d7
Snit's Post Activity (Google stats)
Sep Oct Nov Dec
2008 619 460 565 1072
2009 1262 1070 416
--
HPT
Snit
6:01 AM:
>>>> Your *only* complaint against me you can support is I post...
>>>> often in response to your lies and the lies of others... more
>>>> than you want.
>>>>
>>>> Poor HPT. Poor, poor HPT. All he wants is for people to ignore
>>>> his lies.
>>> LOL, Snit can't explain why his postings increased, especially
>>> after promising several of us. Figures. Obviously.
>
> Crickets chirping .... LOL!
See above.
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
High Plains Thumper
Yup, Snit has run away. Again.
--
HPT
Snit
on 11/12/09 6:01 PM:
How many times are you hoping I respond to your same idiocy before you do
not consider it "running"? Just curious?
LOL!
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
Don Zeigler
> How many times are you hoping I respond to your same idiocy before you do
> not consider it "running"? Just curious?
You sure beg for his attention a lot.
--
Regards,
Don Zeigler
Owner/proprietor, Trollus Amongus, LLC
...PMS - Periodic Monster Syndrome
Snit
11/12/09 7:10 PM:
> Snit wrote:
>
>> How many times are you hoping I respond to your same idiocy before you do
>> not consider it "running"? Just curious?
>
> You sure beg for his attention a lot.
LOL! I respond to his idiocy and he repeats it over and over and over...
whining I am "running"... and you, making one of the most absurd
claims you possibly could, decide *I* want attention from *him*! LOL!
I would love to have him stop. Are you just begging for attention or are
you an idiot?
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
Don Zeigler
> I would love to have him stop. Are you just begging for attention or are
> you an idiot?
You sure beg for my attention a lot.
--
Regards,
Don Zeigler
Owner/proprietor, Trollus Amongus, LLC
...I wish Noah had swatted those two mosquitoes.....
High Plains Thumper
> Don Zeigler stated:
>> Snit wrote:
>>
>>> How many times are you hoping I respond to your same idiocy before you do
>>> not consider it "running"? Just curious?
>>
>> You sure beg for his attention a lot.
>
> LOL! I respond to his idiocy and he repeats it over and over and over...
> whining I am "running"... and you, making one of the most absurd
> claims you possibly could, decide *I* want attention from *him*! LOL!
Repeats it over and over? Like Snit mangling my quotes and posting
the same in:
1. Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: Ubuntu 9.10
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 14:22:33 -0700
Message-ID: <C711F8A9.5149D%use...@gallopinginsanity.com>
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/8c2265c1027b4e1c
2. Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: Ubuntu 9.10
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 17:50:44 -0700
Message-ID: <C7122974.5150E%use...@gallopinginsanity.com>
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/dad0a994f00d10ae
3. Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: Ubuntu 9.10
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 20:58:40 -0700
Message-ID: <C7125580.5156D%use...@gallopinginsanity.com>
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/f3e31b0c929d5068
4. Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: Ubuntu 9.10
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 21:05:10 -0700
Message-ID: <C7125706.51571%use...@gallopinginsanity.com>
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/c8c9cecece4c63ef
5. Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.advocacy
Subject: Re: HPT Proves, again, he is a loser
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 22:17:42 -0700
Message-ID: <C7126806.5158B%use...@gallopinginsanity.com>
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/94d10d3737b0073c
6. Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.advocacy
Subject: Re: Pathological Lies Quoter Latest Addition
Date: Sun, 01 Nov 2009 07:02:08 -0700
Message-ID: <C712E2F0.51665%use...@gallopinginsanity.com>
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/7897eaa10c35cd55
7. Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.advocacy
Subject: Re: OT: Tim Adams "very likely" licks doorknobs
Date: Sun, 01 Nov 2009 07:02:17 -0700
Message-ID: <C712E2F9.51666%use...@gallopinginsanity.com>
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/8b442c6440facc03
8. Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.advocacy
Subject: Re: "Snit" goes postal once more (was Linux
"advocates" ...)
Date: Sun, 01 Nov 2009 07:13:10 -0700
Message-ID: <C712E586.51680%use...@gallopinginsanity.com>
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/3342c8b4c875035a
9. Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.advocacy
Subject: Re: HPT whines his lies have been called out too many
times.
Date: Sun, 01 Nov 2009 19:01:52 -0700
Message-ID: <C7138BA0.51926%use...@gallopinginsanity.com>
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/d787093ededa3c93
10. Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.advocacy
Subject: Re: HPT Proves, again, he is a loser
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 22:17:42 -0700
Message-ID: <C7126806.5158B%use...@gallopinginsanity.com>
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/94d10d3737b0073c
11. Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.advocacy
Subject: Re: HPT is a liar. Period.
Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2009 19:01:27 -0700
Message-ID: <C7162E87.51FBD%use...@gallopinginsanity.com>
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/12687e071396f0e8
12. Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.advocacy
Subject: OT: HPT's lies quoted again
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2009 18:45:22 -0700
Message-ID: <C7177C42.5229F%use...@gallopinginsanity.com>
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/fccfe270217a8dd7
> I would love to have him stop. Are you just begging for attention or are
> you an idiot?
Yup, Snit confirms both.
--
HPT
High Plains Thumper
> Snit wrote:
>
>> I would love to have him stop. Are you just begging for attention
>> or are you an idiot?
>
> You sure beg for my attention a lot.
Snit continues to beg for everyone's attention, including these 132
posters regarding the Snit Luser Circus of Pathological Myths:
1- Adam Kesher: "Steve, IIRC Sandman's website has a member area and a
login. If you forget your password, you can ask it to e-mail it to you,
and a bot will send an e-mail. *That* is the e-mail Snit got from
Sandman's website, and yes he's that fucked in the head and starved for
attention that he'd claim it to be an e-mail from Sandman himself. So,
don't get sucked into his little circus. The e-mail, in this particular
instance, did probably originate from Sandman.net." 27 Feb 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/dac74355552b4cc7
2- Alan Baker: "People's perceptions of you are *formed* by behaviour
and not withstanding your occasional on topic posts, I wish you'd leave
too. Please note that despite the amazing silliness that is Edwin, I
have never made the same wish of him." 27 Feb 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/4a7c3ebf3fc10221
3- Andrew J. Brehm: "You are not flamed because you speak the truth, you
are flamed because you are a hideous troll and keep disrupting the
newsgroup."
4- AZ Nomad: "The fact that you routinely change your headers to weasel
out of killfiles proves that you're an asshole." 25 Jun 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/51b43d6c9613c9da
5- Andy/news/nospam: "Why do you keep these things up, Snit? Why not
just let them go away and show how responsible a member of CSMA you are?
You could show your enemies up by being better than then, rise above the
low level you so obviously dislike. Anything, just stop...." 26 Apr 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/d6ffb6b06aa237e5
6- B.B.: "Does the From: header contain the string "Snit"? If yes, then
troll. Otherwise, maybe. Dunno why I had my KF on you set to expire, but
it's fixed now." 13 Mar 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/8a98d179b2ff9578
7- BaJoRi:
Snit: "You are, of course, lying."
BaJoRi: "No, I am not. You know it, and I know it, and everyone else who
has read your idiocy knows it. I took your statement, showed it to be
wrong, then added even more, just to be a dick and REALLY show you to be
a fool. You need to judiciously snip out pertinent points because you
are an intellectually dwarfed turd-burglar." 11 Nov 2008
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.vacation.las-vegas/msg/647944511b74b82f
8- bobinnv: "I learned some time ago how much better this group can be
if you kill file Snit. I have never understood why more people don't do
the same.." 5 Aug 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/0706dbef8ce1f903
9- Bob S: "This has always been pretty much a free-for-all group, but
since Snit showed up, its become almost impossible to have a decent
discussion about anything." 27 Dec 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/3d2f1dff196ca190
The solution is to NOT REPLY TO SNIT. But for some reason, some people
just can't stop feeding him."
10- °b° unny: Subject "snit makes me sad", Text "really actually =:-("
9 Oct 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/4e31cb49c1e2d432
11- buzz off: "Snit is obviously mentally ill..."
12- Carlo Coggi: "He must believe he is surrounded by 'trolls' ... in
the groups he trolls in, that is. I wondered if the idiotrollers like
snit would reply to this thread. Of course, I didn't see his posts, only
your reply".
13- chrisv (cola): "No, she called him 'shit', and rightly so, for they
way he was so ignominiously birthed into a toilet at the bus depot, and
simply refused to die, despite repeated flushes. It's now far too late
to *flush* him, but we can still *plonk* him..." 12 Sep 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/18099f8aa067f4a5
14- C Lund: "Snit is not my responsibility. Maybe it's time for you to
learn how to use your kill-filter. I am assuming, of course, that your
Usenet browser has a kill-filter." 5 Mar 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/2c390a34b05b24a9
15- cc (COLA): "Snit posts all the time. You don't have to dig up months
old articles where he brings up years old topics. Just respond to a
current message." 22 Jan 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/5a712e3312ba9f8a
16- Code Orange: "Then why post it? What need is there for you to "win"
an argument? They don't like you, you don't like them. Why must you keep
this up? What results are you expecting?"
17- CozmicDebris: "I'm done with your three year old games. The archives
show my answers and your inability to process them. Keep posting your
list and proving that you are an idiot troll. I will not address it any
further- you being too stupid to realize and accept that is not my
problem". 22 Nov 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.cellular.attws/msg/0aa65b7a132dbfe8
18- Dawg Tail: "You've already apologized for having already misread
what I had previously written. What makes you think that you're
correctly understanding what I'm writting now. You've got a history of
reading into things what you wanted people to have said instead of what
they really said.
I suggest you get over this limitation of yours. It's making you look
foolish."
Dawg Tail: "PC advocates, Mac advocates, Linux advocates. Almost all of
them are making similar claims about Snit. When you have so many diverse
people who share a common perception where do you think the problem
lies? With Snit? Or almost everyone else? The answer doesn't require an
advanced degree to figure out." 30 Dec 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/73edac32c3ad530b
19- Dave Fritzinger: "[snip of stuff I really don't care to read] Snit,
please go away. Get a life, meet a woman, do something, but please,
please, please, GO AWAY!!!!" 2 Jun 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/57bb2fc42ec0f290
20- Donald L McDaniel: "Jesus, snit. You're a teacher. I thought you
knew what a metaphor was, and could recognize one when it was presented
to you. I guess I had too much confidence in you." 30 Nov 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/3254ec7af27bfb0f
21- ed: "snit, you continually amaze me with how much of a liar and
loser you are. you may notice a semi-regular pattern with me where i
stop responding to your posts for stretches at a time, then start up
responding as if you were a normal person. i suppose it's tough for the
magnitude of your 'loserdom' to stick, so it loses some of it's
sharpness when i stop responding to you. you almost always start
responding back in a semi normal way, but inevitably degenerate. it's
once again that time. i can only ask that you pass my condolences to
your wife and unborn child for having to put up with such a dishonest
fool as yourself. (well, if your wife is a loser as well, just pass
those condolences to the rug-rat to be; if not, double condolences to
her). " 30 Apr 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/71f74dd6d806ce77
22- Edward Stanfield: "Snit thinks the rules that apply to honest and
honorable people apply to him. That is absurd. He is the biggest liar
in Usenet history. Mackay posted the email to prove Snit was using sock
puppets and he still is. Snit can not give up his socks puppets and
shills. They are the only ones who ever support him." 28 Jan 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/5b52494d96d12229
23- Edwin: "You've got to be out of your mind, Snit. You're the worst
troll this group has ever seen. You're a liar and a forger, and you've
almost destroyed this group single-handedly. For you to post a list of
out of context arguments, and lies, and forgeries about your enemies
labled as a "peace effort" has to be one of the craziest stunts you've
pulled. It's all about your sick need for attention, your need to be
center stage at all times. You'd publicly eat dog turd if you thought it
would make people look at you." 18 May 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/37e4a720619642a0
24- Elijah Baley: "Seriously, Snit, you need psychiatric help. Go see a
doctor." 24 Aug 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/6f6c88356b54fc15
25- Elizabot v2.0.2: "I see you were unable to respond to the points in
my post and you are back to your repetitious regurgitation mode. How
childishly typical of you, Snit." 16 Nov 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/55214ccfb7414fe5
26- Fa-groon: "I don't read Snit period. He's been killfiled since the
first day I posted here. [....] I don't want to 'do like Snit'. As far
as I'm concerned, Snit doesn't even exist." 15 Aug 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/dcfbff305ba8b7f0
27- fibercut: "That is the problem. In the years I have been coming to
CSMA I have seen in the past year a real hatred among people, besides
the typical Mac vs. Windows typical argument. I feel that it is like
being in a room of really young children trying there best to best the
other person. The one common thing among all of this seems to be you. I
hate to be like this, but facts are facts. You seem to be in the middle
of a great percentage of arguments. CSMA has become less about Macs and
more about "look everybody, I think he lied". Is there no end then all
this picking at each other on such a personal level. CSMA has always
been al little adversarial but you have personally crank it up to the
point that this place is no longer fun. Congratulations on stopping CSMA
and making this place your own personal circus." 12 Jan 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/bbe695bbc3424ab6
28- Geezer:
Snit: "Steve Carroll has no sense of morality"
Geezer: "Whined the guy who cannot directly address those who uncover
his lies and deceit;)"
Snit: "and no clue about the law."
Geezer: 'Said the guy who believes his unsupported opinions are "proof".
LOL! (snip more of Snit's unsupported lies)' 1 Jan 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/d0517ced5134934d
29- Geoff M. Fitton (COLA): "The Prescott Computer Guy *still* showing
how stupid he is... What a mar00n". 30 Aug 2008
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/f9401b4b57c59865
30- George Graves: "Jason. You have started an argument with the Snit
(AKA Michael Glasser), this should not be done. He will drive you crazy
with his twisted logic, his deep-rooted need to be ALWAYS right at any
cost. He will move goalposts, set up strawmen, and bore you into
submission with his endless pedanticism. The only way to engage him is
to hit and run. NEVER engage him, it's a futile, empty procedure that
will only anger you and feed him. Take my advice and STAY AWAY!" 27
Oct 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/3d3af33ce25a11fd
31- gimme_this_gimme_t...@yahoo.com: "Hitting the vodka tonight Snit?"
4 Mar 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/b457a7b378264794
32- Greycloud: "You really shouldn't lie like that. Everyone else
notices that you are not honest and you have no honor." 21 Jan 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/3b92f11a1ab00f91
33- H: "Your crappy posts are still showing up in seperate threads, are
you doing this on purpose to piss people off? I dont ever censor people
cause that's just retarded but if you dont fix it I'm gonna have to
cause I dont wanna see your name 40 times in a row. So uh, change your
client or something". 12 Sep 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/f36ee6b458c86499
34- Hadron (COLA):
Snit: "Now why not end your silliness and either just stop your BS or
actually give reasoned comments on the screen shots you keep asking for
and I keep providing?
Hadron: "err, he just did. And you snipped it all you weasel." 30 Jan 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/de49f2b7471d2e1a
Snit: "Sigh: 100% predictable, you will not answer *any* question I just
asked. You will run... your whole goal is to beg for attention, not to
make or support a point."
Hadron: "nice. You made it into my new killfile. Jesus, stop repeating
the same garbage." 6 Apr 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/c86ab53a759ea728
35- Henry Flam: "Who gives a damn about this shit? Snit, once in a
while, I make the mistake in thinking that that you are starting to make
sense in your posts; I tend to agree with your politics. Then you post
stuff like this and it destroys any respect that I have for you." 16
Aug 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/f048bedfe0d67d66
Henry Flam: "You on the other hand must a deeply trouble individual who
has a fragile ego. I needn't agree nor disagree with the points above. I
don't care about them. Your constant complaints, whines, rages, etc.,
wars with the regular Mac advocates, whom you mislabel as trolls, arise
from your sense that any conversation or thread must orbit around you.
People have pointed that out to you but you don't accept that. Snit I
feel sorry for you. Please go and see a doctor about your solipsism.
There must be a cure for you deep psychological travail." 18 Aug 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/b9bb48e6e6da75c8
36- Heywood Mogroot: "*plonk*"
37- -hh: 'Perversion has utterly nothing to do with the definition of
"synonymous". It is, however, a very clear example of how you attempt
to maliciously debase against anyone who disagrees with you. As such, I
consider this to be a purposeful attempt by you to try to libel me.
This is your only warning to consider rescinding your remark, with the
reminder that you, and you alone are responsible for that accusation,
both in the ethical as well as the full legal meaning of the word
"responsible".' 25 Feb 2008
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/5496641a3426293a
38- High Plains Thumper: "I can understand why posters get sick and
tired of your lame ad hominem attacks, your cowardly statements shifting
the goal posts, your continuous rambling drivel of how everyone seems to
be against you. No one cares a wooden nickel about your incessant flame
wars that are self created. You pretend to be an advocate but you
manage to cause everyone's hand to be against you." 6 Jan 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/b27ba196819ad38f
Only once in a blue moon does he have anything worth reading. I just
got through his circus of repetitive ad hominem crap. I am surprised
that with the stunts he has pulled in COLA and this newsgroup, that he
hasn't suffered a worse fate in real life. If he hasn't, one of these
days he will pull that stunt on the wrong person, and *B-O-O-M-!*,
someone will pull the trigger. One ought to really pity him (or as
Steve Travis stated, "Or perhaps we should set up a fund to get him more
happy glue (and the appropriate plastic bags)." 8 Jul 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/2666237bba82b97a
39- Homer (COLA):
HPT: "Snit in a period of 2 minutes has copied a post of mine, posting
the same following message over and over, in false pretense as a Linux
advocate."
Homer: "That kind of behaviour is not normal, to say the least. I don't
mean this as a personal insult, but I'm perfectly serious when I say
'Snit' (Michael Glasser) is obviously mentally ill, and needs help. I
was going to suggest that someone alerts his wife to the problem, but I
have to assume she's already aware of his condition, if she is in fact
still living with him. It's possible, I suppose, that he's already
undergoing counselling and/or on medication, but if he is then it
doesn't seem to be helping much. Maybe he just missed his 'meds' today
(again, I mean that sincerely). 26 Jan 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/e061874ea94e9ce8
40- hophead: "I have been reading and occasionally posting to CSMA for a
long time now, since 1995 at least. There have always been trolls and
morons, but I've never seen anything quite so disruptive as the Snit
circus. Snit will *never* back down or stop, and neither will most of
his opponents. A good kill file is your only hope." 20 Aug 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/3161a78667e299eb
hophead: "It's best to killfile snit, and if you can, set up a filter to
kill any responses to snit. Or (as I've been forced to do) killfile
those who insist on responding to him. Yes, you do miss some advocacy
from some of those people, but the joy of not seeing snit or any
responses to him far outweighs the cost. Of course, snit also uses
sockpuppets. They are pretty easy to identify fortunately and are easily
killed as well." 19 Aug 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/d0cb5d4f4d1cba91
41- Jamie Hart (cola): "It seems that since you are unable to offer
support for your statements, you're reduced to personal attacks on me.
Incidentally, anyone reading this post can see that I have offered no
straw men, and have only asked you to explain how the things you state
as facts can be true. I'm really sorry that you're taking this attitude,
the topic is an interesting one and I thought you might have some
insights. I've snipped the rest, since you dislike long posts and avoid
answering any of the questions I asked by saying everything was just
repeated." 6 Dec 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/8e07cde31f4eecf6
42- Jason McNorton: "You're one of the many, many paranoid people on
usenet that should be confined most likely. You sit there and refresh
your screen endlessly. You post the same nonsense over and over. Either
you're a super troll, or you're a super mess." 1 Nov 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/7a8e091c0b248eb0
43- JEDIDIAH (cola): "You're simply full of shit."
44- Jeff B.: "Yo, Snit. We're not pals. I think you're a git." 23 Dec 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/0ec649345d433a2d
45- Jeff Hoppe: "This is a Macintosh Advocacy newsgroup. Not a 12-step
recovery plan. Your medical problems or conditions won't help me achieve
a greater understanding of my Mac. In fact, it detracts from it and
those kinds of discussions have no place in a newsgroup such as this."
18 Nov 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/947a2cc0301a2862
46- Jesus: "Really, Snit. It's annoying. What are you accomplishing
besides being annoying? Is that your goal?" 25 Apr 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/e3d5029d34cde243
47- Jim Lee Jr.: "Snit, read the thread's title, is Bush mentioned in
it? You (and Carroll) ought to learn to stay on topic and not hijack
threads."
48- Jim Polaski: "Why is it that nearly every thread you're involved in
seems like it turns into some tit-for-tat, dozens of responses to OT
things and garbage? Cmon there Snit. Someone has to take the lead and
stop this crap. Try. How about it?" 25 Apr 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/5b5c22490ab9649b
49- Jim Richardson (cola): "And yet again, Snit runs away, rather than
actually provide evidence for his claims. Par for the course I suppose."
"Evasion noted. Snit runs away again rather than produce evidence for
his claims. At least come up with some original insults Snit! I mean,
you *are* capable of original thoughts! Right? Snit?" 8 Feb 2008
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/e33321cc3343fc44
50- Joey Jojo Junior Shabadoo: "and Snithead has even farther to fall -
in a few weeks he'll be out on the street after midnight, yelling at
passersby 'sucky sucky, $2...'" 23 Mar 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/57cf69f66571a5a7
51- John C. Randolph: "You're nothing but a troll yourself. What are you
bitching about?"
52- JohnOfArc (cola): "I'm not sure "troll" does it justice- more like a
black hole! But hey, if we all promise to never again even entertain an
unkind thought re Apple, will you take it back and lock it up? Please??"
11 Mar 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/e2891b1f3984e121
53- John Q. Public: "I have not been bothered to read Snit's postings
since I figured out who he is. I don't bother to filter his posts, I
just consider the source and skip to the next one when I see his name."
7 Jan 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/7d34c1bd05c877d2
54- John Slade: "I don't get posts from Snit. I wouldn't be shocked that
he has some kind of disorder. He made up stuff about being a computer
repairman and teacher. He's just plain loony and best ignored. Let him
deal with his disorder by medication. He's here to do one thing, get
attention from people. He says the crazy stuff just to get a reaction.
You say you like to beat him over the head. Well that's what he's
counting on, he says stuff he knows isn't true in hopes to get a rise
out of people like you. Ignore him, you won't regret it." 3 Apr 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/394a53a65c28d314
"Snit, you have a enough problems as it is without adding drinking booze
to the list. How the hell did you manage to get out of my killfile? Oh
well back into the cage you go, PLONK." 13 Oct 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.food.wine/msg/992a796786a541d8
55- Josh McKee: "Snit, I assume there was some point to this posting?
Because I certainly cannot find it."
56- K E: "I haven't read this board for awhile but I see that even
though the trolls still roam free at least the worst troll of the lot is
mostly being ignored by readers on this bb. If the few stragglers that
keep replying to him would just stop responding to Snit at all this
place could be worth coming back to. There's a good chance he'll pack up
and take his trolling to more fertile ground." 22 Oct 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/0b9dca7df1f677f4
57- KK: 'Whoa there, ad hominem man. You started off your sentence with
"Ah" like you'd just realized something profound.' 29 Oct 2008
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.fan.howard-stern/msg/6a89029a5b5be5f8
58- Kelsey Bjarnason (cola): "Funny how you simply don't bother reading
the posts that rip your entire thesis to bleeding gobbets of putrid
excrescence. Maybe some day you'll learn how to support your position,
instead of sticking your fingers in your ears and humming, hoping it'll
all go away." 7 Mar 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/96d064a7a5c6074a
59- Ku Karlovsky (cola): "You repeatedly chastise others for ad hominem
attacks while in the same sentence make your own ad hominem attacks. You
make silly claims and then avoid the subject of your silliness. You're a
liar and a hypocrite and you always have been." 14 Jul 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/d1e3f9ac5c72c6ee
60- Lars Trager: "Yes, you are stupid." 7 Jan 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/a9bedf6689f9a54f
61- Lefty Bigfoot: "Okay, I tried to put up with it for a long time, but
the few times you post something worth reading just aren't worth it
anymore. *plonk*" 16 Dec 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/5520adae01120e83
62- Liam Slider (cola): "Maybe he's responding to the fact you've been
an annoying little fuckwit lately. You started out with the pretense of
trying to be fair, but lately all there is from you in COLA is trashtalk
about Linux and you acting every bit the troll." 16 Jul 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/ad7d6c42c5e4cf2f
63-libcrushersmith: "Snit also thinks Dan Rather still anchors CBS News
and that Gitmo terrorists are innocent! Any time Snit is cornered, he
changes the subject and will never admit he's wrong." 28 Jan 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/fbc516717f3b7ccf
64- libsnightmare:
Snit: "Who said Bush did not flip flop?"
libsnightmare: "Never said that. I put back in what you cut out. He
never flip-flopped on the war, even when it was unpopular, like "Kerry
and all the other libs" did. You're a sore loser who has resorted to
fifth grade tactics. How fucking sad - all this clown has left is to
edit posts and post fake bullshit. You can't debate... so you lie. Once
again, you have proved Steve Carroll right about you. Sad..." 4 May 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/a80c93f80bd6bc3e
65- Linonut (cola): "Snit is a Tholenoid."
"Indeed. Snit may be the first retraction of my general killfile
amnesty. The volume of cavilling, whining, foot-stomping,
back-tracking, goal-post shifting, and petulance generated by that
effete candy-ass beggars belief". 30 Aug 2008
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/cc4827fd7e8ad574
66- Lloyd Parsons: "Well, I don't know if Oxford is the most cretinous,
I would think that would be reserved for Snit! ;-)" 18 Mar 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/b6cd3ac4bf1e08d6
67- Mark Kent (cola): "The problem with someone like Mr Glasser is the
same as it is with Mr Wong, even if he were to be honest now, it would
be impossible to determine where the honesty starts and the usual
dishonesty ends. In my primary school, one of the teachers was very keen
on proverbs, and I recall her going over the "cry wolf" story. Mr
Glasser could "cry wolf" over and over now, and I would not come to help
him with his sheep, because I do not know any way of determining if he's
ever telling the truth, or indeed, if he ever has." 2 Dec 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/3f30aa1b65a972b3
68- Mayor of R'lyeh: "The fact is that he's probably pulling it to this
post since its all about him and he managed to make me think about him
today. A friend of mine has a toddler. I went over to her house and
videotaped her kid doing a bunch of cute toddler stuff then burned a DVD
of it for her. While we were watching the DVD her kid got mad. He got
mad because we quit making him the center of attention and made that kid
on the tv the center of attention. He even ran up to the tv and tried to
block our view of it. That's how Snit lives his whole life." 30 Sep 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/9935f4154d5a290b
69- Michelle Ronn: "The real topic here is that one someone refutes your
'facts', you run away and ignore them. Refuting your 'facts' is easily
done in this case. I did it, and you ignored it." 9 Feb 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/c050c82720737b32
70- Mike: "Nonsense. I never see you "advocate" anything. All I see you
doing is engage in endless semantic arguments with everyone. You're the
TholenBot of CSMA. BTW, that's *not* a compliment!" 8 Jul 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/7c5b72d70b87ffbd
71- Mike Dee: "I will no longer accuse you of lying here. Instead I can
only say that you are a complete and delusional kook that happens to
inhabit CSMA for the time being. That you are unaware of how deranged
you actually behave further reinforces this notion. Please seek
professional help."
"The point that keeps whooshing over your head Snit, is Elizabot made no
threat to you before you went to the police. She made a promise.
Admittedly, to your delusional spaced out paranoiac view point, Elizabot
was suddenly "threatening" to you. In so much as you had to take your
kooky self down to your local police shop and blub on their shoulders
about how much in danger you were in [sob, whine], and they had to waste
valuable policing time consoling you over your stupidity. I bet they
have Kook with a capital "K" written at the top of your profile, Snit."
2 Sep 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/9cf45bc88a324f40
72- mmoore321: "Snit is a human car-accident and we are all
rubbernecking. We know it is bad form, but yet strangely curious. Treat
him the same way, look but just keep moving on." 18 Aug 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/f1c3041d89504c07
73- Mojo: "Actually, these facts piss everybody off because they are
off-topic, unnecessarily confrontational, extremely boring and clearly
show that you are crying out for attention." 20 Sep 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/a38f07b9a4811a80
74- Mr. Blonde: "Lastly, I can't help but comment on the fact that your
obsession with Sandman has actually grown since you claimed to KF him.
Killfilling someone generally implies you're ignoring that person, yet
you piggyback onto virtually every reply to him here and and check his
website's validation status more often than most people check their
e-mail. These are not the actions of a mentally balanced individual."
19 Jan 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/2b005666ab303e2b
75- MR_ED_of_Course: "Seriously, spend half a day at any pre-school or
kindergarten and see if the kids there can't teach you a thing or two
about social behavior." 16 May 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/55c03a6a0b7813a4
76- Muahman: "Ummm, dude you post 1000 posts a day. 999 of them are
trolls, if anyone here has issues it's not me." 24 Sep 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/ad9daff74ee1e0bd
Muahman: "LOL, everyone hates Snit. I know I'd push him in front of a
bus if I could." 15 May 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/e5ee46bf5bf04d00
Muahman: "Ahhhh shit, another thread lost to the Snit retard circus!!!
I actually dread seeing Snit reply to a thread because that
automatically means it's in the toilet." 8 Jul 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/92e776d521dfa701
77- Nashton/Nasht0n: "Oh for crying out loud, if I wasn't convinced that
snit is a total loser, and I rarely call people losers, I certainly am
now. Why bother responding to his stupidities anyway?" 29 Nov 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/be1a326a81441508
78- New Bee: "Honest and honorable? You? You've either got a wry sense
of humor, or you're completely nuts. Either way you're just a waste of
time, and you've done more than anybody to make this group a cesspool.
Then you revel in wallowing in your own filth." 14 May 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/2856277b085d0274
79- Not Important: "I get this mental image of you and a sibling as
children in the back seat of the family car saying:
Mom, 'snits' touching me ... and you responding much as you do now ...
I'm not touching you, you're touching me! The problem is that by now you
should've grown out of that type of poke and complain interaction with
others. But, of course, you've haven't learned how to interact with
others in a more 'constructive' and mutually beneficial manner even
now." 03 Jul 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/d16279e9003ca8f4
80- OldCSMAer: "What's he been doing? Am I going to be sorry I killfiled
him?" 27 Nov 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/23b808d9646cd257
81- OldSage: "What drives me nuts is your unrelenting ability and desire
to argue on the head of a pin about the most trivial of things." 2 Oct 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/88457f8e7c25273e
82- Oxford: "If you are using MT-Newswatcher: Select offending Author,
example Snit... Go to the Filters Menu, Choose 'Kill this Author'
Click 'OK' Then Repeat with each annoying Author of your choice. Then
to see your work... Choose the Filter Menu again, Then 'Refilter
Articles'... Bam! No more boring, pointless bickering about nothing.
Enjoy!!!!!" 14 Aug 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/1d7f9181e95ed9ec
83- Patrick Nihill: "I mean, honestly, who would you rather discuss
something with; Dan, or someone like Zara? Or, for that matter, Snit,
for whom the work 'troll' seems so painfully inadequate?" 13 Aug 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/f93db68e683ad769
84- Pawel Wojciak: "Jesus Christ, snit... <plonk> "
85- PC Guy: "Forget it Snit, you're a waste of time. For someone who
talks about everyone else not being "honest and honorable" you appear to
be the least honest and honorable of anyone here." 22 Apr 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/36bf51df2a2662a4
86- Peter: "I've never felt the need to use the filters in Newswatcher
but I thought Id try the Kill this Author.. option with Snit. Ten
seconds later and he's gone! Amazing." 30 Dec 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/011eef01d7bcd56c
87- Peter Bjorn Perlso: "Plonked for 60 days. Now stfu and take your
argument with sandman into the private room." 13 Dec 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/ae4651ec99be3c77
88- Peter Hayes: "True, but that removes Snit completely, and someti...
err..... occasiona.... errrrr..... once in a blue moon he has something
useful to say."
89- Peter Jensen (cola): "Where has he ever said that they were not
different windowing environments? Message-ID, please. Experience has
told me not to trust you on anything without backing evidence."
90- Peter Kohlmann (cola): "Snot is a hideous troll. Nobody is as
dishonest as that piece of unadultered garbage. There are csma posters
even more stupid than Snot. Oxford comes to mind. There are certainly
other csma posters who lie nearly as much. But no others are so intent
on trolling in whatever way possible as Snot" 15 Mar 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/3409d9582dcebd25
91- PeterBP: "Oh will you stfu".
92- Phil Earnhardt: "You're only interested in trying to get superficial
snipes and extrapolate inappropriate conclusions." 1 Nov 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/ad24a97d5dc86277
93- Rapskat (cola): "For instance, your sig you reference a long
standing war you have going with some person from csma. It's like you
single out persons to target your attentions upon and then continuously
berate them with constant barbs and goads to perpetuate their
acrimonious responses, which in turn you respond in kind, etc. ad
infinitum. Above all things, your affinity for Macs and your overbearing
pompous nature aside, this is what convinces me that your primary
purpose for frequenting this and other groups is to troll." 07 Sep 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/a09c6b8e3e63f42d
94- RichardK: "Just killfile him already."
95- Rick (cola): "Snit, you are a liar. And an ignorant one. You trash
people that are trying their level best to cope with a horrendous
situation. And you do it without the slightest idea of what is going
on." 06 Sep 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/fcad2955ac5cb03b
96- Rick G.: "Just to be plain here, I have no doubt that he is a troll.
I am tolerant of his nature, not blind to it. However, as a troll, he is
... somewhat clumsy." 22 Mar 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/198b88e3d0064a92
97- Robert F.: "Um, perhaps you misunderstand. I don't care if you quote
Mayor McCheese claiming the Earth is a flat plate perched on the shell
of a tortoise, I was merely pointing out that you run the risk of
looking ridiculous when you quote something patently stupid. If that's
your goal, you're on the right track, and more power to you." 11 Jan 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/4dc22433eae8803d
98- RonB (COLA): "Snit is a crank fixated on one issue, who's thing is
twisting your words so he can win an argument against a straw man.
That's enough to killfile him." 1 Jan 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.usenet.kooks/msg/ce8550d4cc5b1b42
99- Rotten Apple:
Snit: "The truth? Carroll has openly admitted he does what he accuses
others of... now there is evidence he is committing identity theft - the
very thing he accuses me of based on his claiming I am not the person he
has tracked me down to be."
Rotten Apple: "You make trolls like me look like choir boys." 14 Sep 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/7a92988bcbce8fdb
Snit: "No need for him to worry - unlike him, I would not even threaten
to contact his wife. I simply will not sink to his level. I suspect
his wife will find out anyway - people are not as stupid as he wants
them to be."
Rotten Apple: "Your meds are really kicking your ass!" 15 Sep 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/5e414c27d6357a4a
100- Roy Culley (cola): "You appear to be in the latter category.
Starting crossposted threads for the simple purpose of hoping to
generate a flame war. If you truly want to learn more about Linux and
how it can help you and your supposed users why aren't you requesting
help from a more technical Linux newsgroup than an advocacy group? As
the old saying goes, those who can do, those who can't teach. Your posts
seem to confirm that saying IMHO." 12 Mar 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/d521a80051e24d08
101- S'mee (Keith, rec.motorcycles): "Liar...forger and worthless. You
must be related to our resident racist troll, he lies as much as you."
29 Dec 2008
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/ab08c00330c8b58d
102- Sandman: "He is by far the most killfiled person in the -HISTORY-
of csma. I've never seen someone so disliked, almost hated, in a news
group before. He has the ability to turn just about any person against
him in just a few posts. On usenet, trolls do this daily, but the funny
part with Michael is that I actually think he DOESN'T consider himself
be a troll - damn what -EVERYONE ELSE- is calling him. Obviously they
are wrong. Only Tholen himself can match this behaviour." 18 Mar 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/51c0735c774215c2
103- sav: "You really need to take a rest somewhere nice. Honestly, even
the nutters who hang out down on Brighton seafront made more sense than
this. You been doing drugs or something?" 25 May 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/1b251baa5c641370
104- Sean Burke: If you're dumb enough to respond to snit, you're
probably dumb enough to click on a spam attachment that promises to
remove smut from your harddrive." 21 Jan 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/e166032d8959c0e1
105- Sermo Malifer (COLA):
Snit: "Why do so many people in COLA argue *against* me..."
Sermo Malifer: "Because you're a narcissistic troll who posts trash just
to get people talking about you." 21 Jan 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/5ddf14f502e9b3f1
106- spike1: "The thought is probably to show everyone here just how bad
a troll snit is".
107- ShutterBugz: "so snit-zel has some kind of problem expressing
anger, i guess. he has to vent his frustrations in other ways. and he
thinks he's making sense: well the syntax is there and he figures he's
pretty smart. indeed, he tells us, he's done the personality tests and
the iq tests and he's okay! aaaaahhhhh, you see he's soooooooo well
adjusted." 3 Mar 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/7f9fa1cf90490298
108- Steve Carroll: "The only things we are sure about Snit is that he has:
* a monumental reading comprehension problem.
* nym-shifted numerous times to avoid kill-files.
* built too many straw-men to count... some, the size of small cities.
* been labeled a disingenuous liar/troll(or worse) by the vast majority.
* used numerous sock-puppets and admitted to it.
* stolen IDs and admitted to it.
* gotten booted off by ISPs for his behavior.
* twisted more context than all csma posters combined.
* made more unsupported accusations than all csma posters combined.
* virtually no life outside of csma."
109- Steve Mackay: "Just killfile Snit, the dishonest piece of elephant
dung, and all would go away. Sure, I got caught up in the "Snit Circus",
but then the cotton candy began to sour, and CSMA begun to smell like
elephant dung." 18 Aug 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/9fc11094133dfcdf
Welcome to the Snit circus, where the popcorn and cotton candy are
stale, and the smell of elephant dung is everywhere. 27 Dec 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/614daf295b50413f
110- Steven de Mena: "Sorry, you have now lost all credibility with me
for your rediculous argument regarding this." 26 Sep 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/1c8777d39c34e293
111- Steve Travis: "Oh oh... Now look what we've done. Snit has lost
all self respect and has sunk to the point of using words like 'asses'
when referring to others. Oh, how could the morally superior snit have
fallen so low.. Please take a moment out of your busy schedule to feel
embarassed for him. Or perhaps we should set up a fund to get him more
happy glue (and the appropriate plastic bags)." 27 Mar 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/3edd9ab69425a6c5
112- Stuart Krivis: "You might as well just give up and plonk him then.
A snit is a snit is a snit and always will be." 15 Aug 2006 (post not
available except in reply)
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/5b382420a696f140
113- Tattoo Vampire (COLA): "In other words, in another attempt to
troll, you made yourself look like a fool. Again". 28 Aug 2008
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/b2676d3540e09f38
114- The Lost Packet (COLA): "well, he's found a seat in my killbin, I
can't be doing with him." 27 Jan 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/2007526a552b3322
115- TheLetterK: "That is merely your perception, Shit. You're the one
lacking counter evidence, and your arguments basically amount to "I'm
right, nya nya nya." No matter how many examples someone points at to
demonstrate their claim, you blindly continue to insist that they
provide no evidence, or that the evidence given is irrelevant. Worse
still, you fall back on straw men and disingenuous quote mangling to
portray the argument in your favor. You are one of the worst trolls that
inhabit CSMA, Shit. *Edwin* is more prone to fits of reason than you
are." 23 Sep 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/d488596b57132124
116- Thufir: "It's based on *your* MO that I, at least, have no problem
in stating that you're full of shit on nearly any topic. I've observed
your bullshit, and based on that pattern of bullshit, infer that you're
full of it. Your MO is the evidence, the logic is an inference based on
the evidence." 21 Aug 2008
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/c89d3cf79e806e5f
Thufir: "You can "prove" that no one has disproved your "proof"? Again,
your assertion that no one has done so is even *less* convincing than
your claim that some PDF "proves" whatever point you're trying to make
precisely because I'm familiar with your MO. That is, you're a dumb-ass
who would claim that that something is proved when it's not, and who
would ignore counter-examples disproving your contention. I don't know
what this *ages old* thread is about, but I know that you're full of
shit." 21 Aug 2008
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/5114623055c01092
117-Tim Adams: "I'd kill file you but then I'd miss the fun. you see,
you never cease to amaze me at just how stupid you really are. Why just
the other day I had a great laugh when I saw you, the king of liars (in
this NG anyway) calling somebody else a liar." 13 Nov 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/40c7f9407179ff2a
118- Tim Crowley: "I don't know - I think you might have more
compassion. Snit is sick. He needs help. This is the only way the poor
sick fool can get attention. My fucking God, he's taken to hanging out
with and supporting racist pig fuckers like MuahMuah. It is true that
no-one likes him and those that pretend they do are just using him or
don't know him - but come on- it's not his fault. He's sick. Have some
compassion, eh? All these idiot trolls, Zara, Stew, Tommy,
MuaaaahMuaaah, and Snit - they are all so alike. I pity each and every
one of them" 19 Apr 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/67f0f174110bfa0a
119- Tim Smith: "No, he didn't, and there is no reasonable way you could
actually believe he lied. You are purely trying to troll here." 14 Apr 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/6e3cfd9240ac4871
120- Timberwoof: "*Plonk!*"
121- Tom Bates: "Do you have to turn any thread you post in into one of
your Circus acts?" 20 Feb 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/25f0e481b605e71f
122- Tommy: "In case you did not get it, I think the moral was: Stop
polluting the world with your infantile and obsessive "writings". You
give Mac advocacy a bad name. If that was your goal you have succeeded!
That also goes for all that bullshit on your website" 11 Jun 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/03610d2080321d33
123- TravelinMan: "I still can't figure out what's wrong with Snit. Most
people have him kill-filed and the few who don't mostly restrict their
responses to 'why don't you go away, no one wants you here'. Just what
would keep someone in this group with all of that animosity? Must be
some kind of severe mental illness." 17 Mar 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/45197fbb46d491df
124- Wally: "Because by your own admission "honor and honesty" are
nothing more than a "game" to you, as such not only do you wish to
define the rules, but no doubt you will also attempt to alter or bend
the rules when inevitably things do not go to your liking, for this
reason I doubt anyone would be foolish enough to play your game." 16
May 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/b9b3ed1ee20e5220
125- WhoMe: "F michael IS a teacher, it's no wonder he's home more than
he's anywhere near a classroom".
126- William Poaster: "Good grief. If anyone's having a mental breakdown
it's the Prescott Computer Guy, Michael Snit Glasser. What a f#cked up
mess he is." 29 Aug 2008
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/914d1e74855fb461
127- William R. Walsh: "Now, if you'll excuse me, and accept my sincere
apologies for this, PLONK! Feel proud about that. You're the first
person to be plonked from my new computer! :-) " 10 Feb 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/313c7368f6369c49
128- Woofbert: "*Plonk*"
129- zara: "Look - I'm not into combing through thousands of posts, to
prove what was said or not said - I leave stuff like that to people
without lives, like Snit. But it is assuredly, in the record. Ping Snit
to do a search - you will flatter him, and give meaning to his tawdry
little life." 25 Oct 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/a1d4fc7120a6a538
130- Zaren Ankleweed: "And with that, Snit goes in the global killfile.
No subject, no author, no nothing. Buh-bye". 11 Sep 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/12f7c34f24d43624
131- Znu: "I think your 'I'll go start a new thread to try to draw more
people into the debate I'm currently having with Steve/Elizabot/etc'
tactic is fairly trollish."
132- Mutley (AUK):
Snit: "None are supportable. None are real. HPT made them up and is
scared to even try to support them. He knows he cannot. He knows his
lies are being shoved in his face and that people are laughing at his
failure. I know I am. He is a sad pathetic little man."
Mutley: "For the record ... I'll be done when I decide that there's more
shit on your face than there is on the sole of my shoe." 01 Nov 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/1802ad3aa000098b
Snit
on 11/12/09 8:46 PM:
> Don Zeigler wrote:
>> Snit wrote:
>>
>>> I would love to have him stop. Are you just begging for attention
>>> or are you an idiot?
>>
>> You sure beg for my attention a lot.
>
> Snit continues to beg for everyone's attention,
By somehow forcing you to lie about me. Damn, I must be good. :)
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
Snit
8:38 PM:
> Snit wrote:
>> Don Zeigler stated:
>>> Snit wrote:
>>>
>>>> How many times are you hoping I respond to your same idiocy before you do
>>>> not consider it "running"? Just curious?
>>>
>>> You sure beg for his attention a lot.
>>
>> LOL! I respond to his idiocy and he repeats it over and over and over...
>> whining I am "running"... and you, making one of the most absurd
>> claims you possibly could, decide *I* want attention from *him*! LOL!
>
> Repeats it over and over?
Yes.
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
Steve Carroll
> High Plains Thumper stated in post hdikre$9p...@news.eternal-september.org
> on 11/12/09 8:46 PM:
>
> > Don Zeigler wrote:
> >> Snit wrote:
>
> >>> I would love to have him stop. Are you just begging for attention
> >>> or are you an idiot?
>
> >> You sure beg for my attention a lot.
>
> > Snit continues to beg for everyone's attention,
>
> By somehow forcing you to lie about me.
Good luck showing that 132 quotes are *his* lies.
> Damn, I must be good. :)
When it comes to being delusional you have no equal.
cc
>
> 15- cc (COLA): "Snit posts all the time. You don't have to dig up months
> old articles where he brings up years old topics. Just respond to a
> current message." 22 Jan 2009
16- cc (COLA): "High Plains Thumper is a fucking moron." 13 Nov 2009
High Plains Thumper
> High Plains Thumper wrote:
>
>> 15- cc (COLA): "Snit posts all the time. You don't have to dig up
>> months old articles where he brings up years old topics. Just
>> respond to a current message." 22 Jan 2009
>
> 16- cc (COLA): "High Plains Thumper is a fucking moron." 13 Nov 2009
17- Erik (COLA): "Name: cc scat...@hotmail.com Traits: * Microsoft
apologist * Pretends to be OS neutral - fails miserably" 29 Jan 2007
http://colatrolls.blogspot.com/2007/01/cc-troll_29.html
--
HPT
Snit
11/13/09 5:20 PM:
Now we know the kind of people you hold up as "experts". You pretend it
means something when someone speaks poorly of me... but deny it means
something when the same person speaks poorly of you.
This is why it is important - imperative - to actually point to a person's
behavior when you speak about them... not useless quotes. Here, some quotes
from you - making accusations you will *never* support:
Also, Snit has falsified data in his videos.
Looks like you resized the dialogue box
You moved and dragged the task bar, aligned
vertical with the side of the screen.
I just told you a personal observation that YOU
ALTERED THAT SLIDE!
Snit again altered that data!
Altered video wizardry? There is nothing wrong with
Ubuntu copy and paste.
No, rather it is another example of Snit moving the
goal posts, creating problems that do not exist except
for an invention of his own mind.
You cannot support any of those accusations, HPT. You lied. You lied
because you were humiliated about your inability to follow simple copy and
paste steps you saw in a video.
You are not just a loser, you are a loser who cannot help but push your
failures into a public forum over and over. You are pathetic... as your
above self-nuke demonstrates.
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
cc
wrote:
> cc wrote:
> > High Plains Thumper wrote:
>
> >> 15- cc (COLA): "Snit posts all the time. You don't have to dig up
> >> months old articles where he brings up years old topics. Just
> >> respond to a current message." 22 Jan 2009
>
> > 16- cc (COLA): "High Plains Thumper is a fucking moron." 13 Nov 2009
>
> apologist * Pretends to be OS neutral - fails miserably" 29 Jan 2007
>
> http://colatrolls.blogspot.com/2007/01/cc-troll_29.html
>
How about you take me off that stupid fucking list then? If you want
to attack Snit, do it with your own words (hell it's not like it's
hard).
Snit
eb974c44-dd29-4936...@t18g2000vbj.googlegroups.com on
11/13/09 7:48 PM:
He quotes others because he is a complete and utter failure at actually
finding any evidence of my saying things as absurd, dishonest, and ignorant
as he says on a regular basis.
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
High Plains Thumper
> High Plains Thumper stated:
>>> High Plains Thumper wrote:
>>>
>>>> 15- cc (COLA): "Snit posts all the time. You don't have to
>>>> dig up months old articles where he brings up years old
>>>> topics. Just respond to a current message." 22 Jan 2009
>>>
>>> 16- cc (COLA): "High Plains Thumper is a fucking moron."
>>> 13 Nov 2009
>>
The above repetitive mangled quote rant is number 13 for Snit:
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/2a19c80c24564247
Same repetitive crap as these other 12:
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/8c2265c1027b4e1c
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/dad0a994f00d10ae
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/f3e31b0c929d5068
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/c8c9cecece4c63ef
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/94d10d3737b0073c
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/7897eaa10c35cd55
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/8b442c6440facc03
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/3342c8b4c875035a
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/d787093ededa3c93
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/94d10d3737b0073c
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/12687e071396f0e8
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/fccfe270217a8dd7
Strategy of a luser, IMO.
--
HPT
Snit
11/13/09 9:21 PM:
Another self-nuke by HPT... as he admits his repeated BS is a sign he is a
"luser".
Amazing to watch you self-destruct HPT. Really.
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
Snit
11/13/09 9:21 PM:
> Snit wrote:
Interesting that you:
1) Are keeping track of the number of times you run from your own dishonest
accusations being shoved in your face. Really getting to you that your lies
are so easily pointed out. Good.
2) That you call your actions of posting the same stuff over and over the
"strategy of a luser".
You really are good at self-nuking: whining about how little you believe the
people you quote, showing you are obsessing over your lies being pointed
out, and calling your own actions the "strategy of a luser".
Gotta love when folks who troll, such as yourself, have such public
breakdowns. You are losing it, HPT... going so batty you cannot even get
your grade school insults correct.
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
High Plains Thumper
> High Plains Thumper stated in post
> c7c91774-4bd5-49d2-ae67-d0182b02e...@j19g2000yqk.googlegroups.com on
> 11/13/09 9:21 PM:
>
>>> You are not just a loser, you are a loser who cannot help but push
>>> your failures into a public forum over and over. You are
>>> pathetic... as your above self-nuke demonstrates.
>>
>> The above repetitive mangled quote rant is number 13 for Snit:
>>
>> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/2a19c80c24564247
>>
>> Same repetitive crap as these other 12:
>>
>> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/8c2265c1027b4e1c
>> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/dad0a994f00d10ae
>> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/f3e31b0c929d5068
>>
>> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/c8c9cecece4c63ef
>> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/94d10d3737b0073c
>> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/7897eaa10c35cd55
>>
>> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/8b442c6440facc03
>> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/3342c8b4c875035a
>> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/d787093ededa3c93
>>
>> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/94d10d3737b0073c
>> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/12687e071396f0e8
>> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/fccfe270217a8dd7
>>
>> Strategy of a luser, IMO.
>
>
> 1) Are keeping track of the number of times
That Snit keeps repeating the same old crap? Yes.
> you run from your own dishonest accusations being shoved in your face.
Except that Snit's cowardice would not enable him to say that directly
to my face in person.
> Really getting to you that your lies are so easily pointed out. Good.
No, Snit still shows himself to be the same wicked person he was 5
years ago.
> 2) That you call your actions of posting the same stuff over and over
> the "strategy of a luser".
No, you mangle quoted my words. The fact is that you can only come
back with the same repetitive crap, because that is the only defence
you can provide. This is a strategy of a luser. Plain and simple.
> You really are good at self-nuking: whining about how little you believe
> the people you quote, showing you are obsessing over your lies being
> pointed out, and calling your own actions the "strategy of a luser".
Snit is good at projecting himself. Snit begs for attention.
> Gotta love when folks who troll, such as yourself, have such public
> breakdowns. You are losing it, HPT... going so batty you cannot even
> get your grade school insults correct.
Problem is, Snit considers all those who counter his trolling as
trolls. Snit still has not been able to answer why these 132 posters
have come to the conclusion that Snit is one of the worst trolls to
inhabit the Usenet with his pathological lies:
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/dac74355552b4cc7
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/4a7c3ebf3fc10221
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/51b43d6c9613c9da
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/d6ffb6b06aa237e5
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/8a98d179b2ff9578
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.vacation.las-vegas/msg/647944511b74b82f
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/0706dbef8ce1f903
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/3d2f1dff196ca190
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/4e31cb49c1e2d432
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/18099f8aa067f4a5
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/2c390a34b05b24a9
15- cc (COLA): "Snit posts all the time. You don't have to dig up
months old articles where he brings up years old topics. Just respond
to a current message." 22 Jan 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/5a712e3312ba9f8a
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.cellular.attws/msg/0aa65b7a132dbfe8
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/73edac32c3ad530b
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/57bb2fc42ec0f290
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/3254ec7af27bfb0f
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/71f74dd6d806ce77
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/5b52494d96d12229
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/37e4a720619642a0
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/6f6c88356b54fc15
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/55214ccfb7414fe5
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/dcfbff305ba8b7f0
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/bbe695bbc3424ab6
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/d0517ced5134934d
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/f9401b4b57c59865
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/3d3af33ce25a11fd
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/b457a7b378264794
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/3b92f11a1ab00f91
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/f36ee6b458c86499
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/de49f2b7471d2e1a
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/c86ab53a759ea728
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/f048bedfe0d67d66
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/b9bb48e6e6da75c8
36- Heywood Mogroot: "*plonk*"
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/5496641a3426293a
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/b27ba196819ad38f
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/2666237bba82b97a
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/e061874ea94e9ce8
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/3161a78667e299eb
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/d0cb5d4f4d1cba91
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/8e07cde31f4eecf6
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/7a8e091c0b248eb0
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/0ec649345d433a2d
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/947a2cc0301a2862
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/e3d5029d34cde243
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/5b5c22490ab9649b
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/e33321cc3343fc44
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/57cf69f66571a5a7
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/e2891b1f3984e121
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/7d34c1bd05c877d2
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/394a53a65c28d314
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.food.wine/msg/992a796786a541d8
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/0b9dca7df1f677f4
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.fan.howard-stern/msg/6a89029a5b5be5f8
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/96d064a7a5c6074a
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/d1e3f9ac5c72c6ee
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/a9bedf6689f9a54f
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/5520adae01120e83
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/ad7d6c42c5e4cf2f
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/fbc516717f3b7ccf
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/a80c93f80bd6bc3e
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/cc4827fd7e8ad574
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/b6cd3ac4bf1e08d6
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/3f30aa1b65a972b3
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/9935f4154d5a290b
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/c050c82720737b32
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/7c5b72d70b87ffbd
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/9cf45bc88a324f40
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/f1c3041d89504c07
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/a38f07b9a4811a80
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/2b005666ab303e2b
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/55c03a6a0b7813a4
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/ad9daff74ee1e0bd
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/e5ee46bf5bf04d00
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/92e776d521dfa701
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/be1a326a81441508
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/2856277b085d0274
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/d16279e9003ca8f4
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/23b808d9646cd257
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/88457f8e7c25273e
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/1d7f9181e95ed9ec
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/f93db68e683ad769
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/36bf51df2a2662a4
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/011eef01d7bcd56c
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/ae4651ec99be3c77
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/3409d9582dcebd25
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/ad24a97d5dc86277
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/a09c6b8e3e63f42d
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/fcad2955ac5cb03b
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/198b88e3d0064a92
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/4dc22433eae8803d
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.usenet.kooks/msg/ce8550d4cc5b1b42
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/7a92988bcbce8fdb
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/5e414c27d6357a4a
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/d521a80051e24d08
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/ab08c00330c8b58d
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/51c0735c774215c2
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/1b251baa5c641370
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/e166032d8959c0e1
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/5ddf14f502e9b3f1
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/7f9fa1cf90490298
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/9fc11094133dfcdf
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/614daf295b50413f
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/1c8777d39c34e293
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/3edd9ab69425a6c5
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/5b382420a696f140
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/b2676d3540e09f38
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/2007526a552b3322
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/d488596b57132124
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/c89d3cf79e806e5f
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/5114623055c01092
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/40c7f9407179ff2a
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/67f0f174110bfa0a
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/6e3cfd9240ac4871
120- Timberwoof: "*Plonk!*"
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/25f0e481b605e71f
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/03610d2080321d33
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/45197fbb46d491df
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/b9b3ed1ee20e5220
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/914d1e74855fb461
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/313c7368f6369c49
128- Woofbert: "*Plonk*"
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/a1d4fc7120a6a538
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/12f7c34f24d43624
etc' tactic is fairly trollish."
132- Mutley (AUK):
Snit: "None are supportable. None are real. HPT made them up and is
scared to even try to support them. He knows he cannot. He knows his
lies are being shoved in his face and that people are laughing at his
failure. I know I am. He is a sad pathetic little man."
Mutley: "For the record ... I'll be done when I decide that there's
more shit on your face than there is on the sole of my shoe." 01 Nov
2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/1802ad3aa000098b
--
HPT
--
HPT
Snit
2:54 PM:
>> Interesting that you:
>>
>> 1) Are keeping track of the number of times
>
> That Snit keeps repeating the same old crap? Yes.
>
>> you run from your own dishonest accusations being shoved in your face.
>
> Except that Snit's cowardice would not enable him to say that directly
> to my face in person.
>
>> �Really getting to you that your lies are so easily pointed out. Good.
>
> No, Snit still shows himself to be the same wicked person he was 5
> years ago.
How "wicked" of me - I keep quoting your lies:
� � Also, Snit has falsified data in his videos.
� � Looks like you resized the dialogue box
� � You moved and dragged the task bar, aligned
� � vertical with the side of the screen.
� � I just told you a personal observation that YOU
� � ALTERED THAT SLIDE!
� � Snit again altered that data!
� � Altered video wizardry? �There is nothing wrong with
� � Ubuntu copy and paste.
� � No, rather it is another example of Snit moving the
� � goal posts, creating problems that do not exist except
� � for an invention of his own mind.
Your response: make thinly veiled threats of violence and show you are not
enough of an adult to actually deal with your own comments. Seriously, what
a coward you are. To be so fearful to face your own dishonesty. You are
pathetic.
>> 2) That you call your actions of posting the same stuff over and over
>> the "strategy of a luser".
>
> No, you mangle quoted my words. The fact is that you can only come
> back with the same repetitive crap, because that is the only defence
> you can provide. This is a strategy of a luser. Plain and simple.
You are the one who claimed that the behavior you repeatedly show, to post
the same irrelevant BS you do over and over, is the "strategy of a luser".
Your words. You think you are a "luser".
And, in that, you are right. You are also a liar and a coward.
>> You really are good at self-nuking: whining about how little you believe
>> the people you quote, showing you are obsessing over your lies being
>> pointed out, and calling your own actions the "strategy of a luser".
>
> Snit is good at projecting himself. Snit begs for attention.
Ah, I point out your lies. I quote them. And you cry. Poor HPT.
Really... you are pathetic.
>> Gotta love when folks who troll, such as yourself, have such public
>> breakdowns. �You are losing it, HPT... going so batty you cannot even
>> get your grade school insults correct.
>
> Problem is, Snit considers all those who counter his trolling as
> trolls. Snit still has not been able to answer why these 132 posters
> have come to the conclusion that Snit is one of the worst trolls to
> inhabit the Usenet with his pathological lies:
See: you simply cannot face your own lies. You self-nuke, whine, quote
others and run. You are a joke. A coward. A liar. You work hard to hide
any redeeming qualities you might have.
And I laugh at you. Knowing full well that any objective person who reads
this knows for a fact you are exactly what I say. And they know for a fact
you cannot support your lies. Heck, you know it... hence the reason you act
like the child you are acting like.
How is that for honest, HPT. Too much honesty for you to handle you little
coward.
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
High Plains Thumper
> High Plains Thumper stated:
>
>> Following is provided for permanent archiving in Google Groups,
>> since the originating
>> webpagehttp://www.hyphenologist.co.uk/killfileis no longer
>> available. - HPT
>>
>> Anti Troll FAQ Michael Hearne 04-27-06 12:24 PM
>>
>> Anti Troll FAQ.
>>
>> Subtitled What is a troll, what do they do, why do they do it, and
>> what can one do about them?
>>
>> Last modified 29/9/2002
>
> How many of the categories do you fit, HPT? You have done many of
> the things listed. Easy to show if you want me to.
[quote]
Snit: "See: you simply cannot face your own lies. You self-nuke, whine,
quote others and run. You are a joke. A coward. A liar. You work
hard to hide any redeeming qualities you might have. And I laugh at
you. Knowing full well that any objective person who reads this knows
for a fact you are exactly what I say. And they know for a fact you
cannot support your lies. Heck, you know it... hence the reason you act
like the child you are acting like. How is that for honest, HPT. Too
much honesty for you to handle you little coward."
14th repetitive crap Snit post including the above ad hominem rant:
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/ba4c292cc15a27ca
The above rant is intended to bring one to extreme anger to the point
one would if possible cause harm, possibly even death to the writer of
such. It is an indicator of a luser strategy, such language no doubt
has lead to criminal impulsive activity. One only need read the papers.
It surprises me that Snit hasn't similarly angered someone verbally in
person, to the extent that some sort of violence erupted, or spoken in
such a manner to an undercover LEO, to result in some form of detention.
It is only a matter of time. One can't keep sowing without some day
reaping worse.
It would behove Snit to quit while ahead. Else, I sense just as others
have hinted, some worse fate may happen to Snit. It won't be from any
of the advocates nor I. There are a lot of crazy people in the world,
all it is going to take is one illicit outburst, then *BOOM!* No more Snit.
Such as is one in posted thought here, so is one in real thought also.
Snit must be a really awful person to live with.
--
HPT
Snit
on 11/14/09 7:12 PM:
You sure are mad I have quoted your lies:
� � Also, Snit has falsified data in his videos.
� � Looks like you resized the dialogue box
� � You moved and dragged the task bar, aligned
� � vertical with the side of the screen.
� � I just told you a personal observation that YOU
� � ALTERED THAT SLIDE!
� � Snit again altered that data!
� � Altered video wizardry? �There is nothing wrong with
� � Ubuntu copy and paste.
� � No, rather it is another example of Snit moving the
� � goal posts, creating problems that do not exist except
� � for an invention of his own mind.
You have called my doing so - and noting your complete lack of ability to
even try to support your lies, as "wicked". You have said you want me to
note your lies to your face and have now indicated that some worse fate will
come to me for merely noting the lies of liars such as yourself.
Poor HPT, just crying that his lies have been quoted... and then all mad
that he has been called out using what *he* calls a "luser stratagy". HPT is
a "luser" by his own admission and a liar, as shown in the quotes above.
Funny how often he snips his lies... he cannot even stand to see them - that
is how ashamed he is. HPT acts in a shameful way and he is ashamed...
embarrassed... humiliated by how much of a sniveling coward he has become.
And I laugh. Does anyone think HPT can respond with anything other than
snipping his own lies, crying, lying more, and calling me names? Anyone
think HPT can rise above his current broken-down behavior?
I do not. HPT has self-nuked and self-destructed. He is a shadow of his
former miserable self. Almost makes one feel bad for the poor sap.
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
Steve Carroll
> High Plains Thumper stated in post hdno2a$ck...@news.eternal-september.org
> on 11/14/09 7:12 PM:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Snit wrote:
> >> High Plains Thumper stated:
>
> >>> Following is provided for permanent archiving in Google Groups,
> >>> since the originating
> >>> available. - HPT
>
> >>> Anti Troll FAQ Michael Hearne 04-27-06 12:24 PM
>
> >>> Anti Troll FAQ.
>
> >>> Subtitled What is a troll, what do they do, why do they do it, and
> >>> what can one do about them?
>
> >>> Last modified 29/9/2002
>
> >> How many of the categories do you fit, HPT? You have done many of
> >> the things listed. Easy to show if you want me to.
>
> > [quote]
> > Snit: "See: you simply cannot face your own lies. You self-nuke, whine,
> > quote others and run. You are a joke. A coward. A liar. You work
> > hard to hide any redeeming qualities you might have. And I laugh at
> > you. Knowing full well that any objective person who reads this knows
> > for a fact you are exactly what I say. And they know for a fact you
> > cannot support your lies. Heck, you know it... hence the reason you act
> > like the child you are acting like. How is that for honest, HPT. Too
> > much honesty for you to handle you little coward."
>
> > 14th repetitive crap Snit post including the above ad hominem rant:
>
>
> > The above rant is intended to bring one to extreme anger to the point
> > one would if possible cause harm, possibly even death to the writer of
> > such. It is an indicator of a luser strategy, such language no doubt
> > has lead to criminal impulsive activity. One only need read the papers.
>
> > It surprises me that Snit hasn't similarly angered someone verbally in
> > person, to the extent that some sort of violence erupted, or spoken in
> > such a manner to an undercover LEO, to result in some form of detention.
> > It is only a matter of time. One can't keep sowing without some day
> > reaping worse.
>
> > It would behove Snit to quit while ahead. Else, I sense just as others
> > have hinted, some worse fate may happen to Snit. It won't be from any
> > of the advocates nor I. There are a lot of crazy people in the world,
> > all it is going to take is one illicit outburst, then *BOOM!* No more Snit.
>
> > Such as is one in posted thought here, so is one in real thought also.
> > Snit must be a really awful person to live with.
>
> You sure are mad I have quoted your lies:
Telling people how they "feel" again, Snit?
(snip more of Snit's delusions)
Don Zeigler
> Telling people how they "feel" again, Snit?
>
> (snip more of Snit's delusions)
Snit's new favorite phrase is "self-nuke". Expect to see it in the subject
lines of his posts for the next several months.
--
Regards,
Don Zeigler
Owner/proprietor, Trollus Amongus, LLC
...White dwarf seeks red giant for binary relationship
High Plains Thumper
> High Plains Thumper wrote:
>> cc wrote:
>>> High Plains Thumper wrote:
>>>
>>>> 15- cc (COLA): "Snit posts all the time. You don't have to dig up
>>>> months old articles where he brings up years old topics. Just
>>>> respond to a current message." 22 Jan 2009
>>>
>>> 16- cc (COLA): "High Plains Thumper is a fucking moron." 13 Nov 2009
>>
>> 17- Erik (COLA): "Name: cc scatnu...@hotmail.com Traits: * Microsoft
>> apologist * Pretends to be OS neutral - fails miserably" 29 Jan 2007
>
>> http://colatrolls.blogspot.com/2007/01/cc-troll_29.html
>
> How about you take me off that stupid fucking list then? If you want
> to attack Snit, do it with your own words (hell it's not like it's
> hard).
Oh, but you said it so well. It is rather amusing when a troll
lambasts Snit's trolling, LOL! For example:
cc: "Did the link I posted not show your entire posting history?"
Snit: "Yes. But you never even tried to support your grade school
insults."
cc: "Absolute rubbish again. If I were in a court of law testifying to
the fact that you're an idiot, my main support would be everything
you've ever done or said. I would hand the judge a complete printout
of all your posts and he/she would rule in my favor. Maybe I'd have
the laughable results of your IQ test as well."
cc: "I'm sorry you're so upset over being proven an idiot in such a
public forum. These things happen from time to time in Usenet. You've
acknowledged that you're an idiot and a liar, and for that you should
be applauded. But at the same time, it's obvious that you need to get
some smarts somehow. Going through life dumb as shit is no way to
live. I'm here to help. I'll be posting some videos to YouTube
shortly. The tentative title: 'Snit's An Idiot, But We Can Change
That.'"
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/d2d8aa9b2b69c896
and
Snit: "Ah, if you were judge and jury you would rule against me. Wow.
Man, that is powerful."
cc: "Nice self-nuke. I explicitly said that I was not the judge, and
implicitly stated that I was not the jury. An impartial jury of your
peers, armed with all your Usenet posts, would have no option but to
convict you of idiocy. Should we put it to the test?"
Snit: "If you were to use logic and rationality as the standard, and
not just your made up BS where you are judge and jury, you would
clearly fail."
cc: "Self-nuke again. Please point to where I said I was judge and
jury. You cannot. Absolute fail."
Snit: "See: you are a moron. You have proved it. You argue *against*
logic and rationality. Repeatedly."
cc: "Look, I understand that you don't understand logic and reason,
because you're a moron. Which is exactly what I proved with logic and
reason. But I was arguing with an idiot, so it's not like it was
hard."
cc: "I'm sorry you're so upset over being proven an idiot in such a
public forum."
Snit: "You are calling me a name without a shred of evidence. That is
not 'proof' of anything other than your own immaturity."
cc: "I gave you evidence. You can't understand the evidence. Which is
even more evidence. Every time you type a sentence, you reinforce my
point."
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/647c8553e97fffc3
and
Snit: "And, yes, I know the facts will go over your head. You are an
insane moron... and you have nothing of value to say. Here: you will
prove it with your response and I will merely note you did so. 100%
predictable."
cc: "What facts? The fact that you don't know what a hypothetical
situation is? The fact that you can't answer any questions? The fact
that you continue to run away when faced with simple questions? I am
100% predictable to you because you simply cannot understand what has
been placed in front of you. It's all just a jumble of words to your
pea-sized brain, and therefore it always looks the same."
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/f6ce4429806e9de6
Snit may dance and hide, but he cannot refute without confirming that
which is spoken of him, LOL!
--
HPT
Snit
11/17/09 1:48 AM:
I wonder if you can humiliate yourself more than you just did. Unlikely, I
would think, for anyone other than you.
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]