Who will agree to a one-month "boycott" of posting to cola?
DFS
Hadron
Moshe
Zeke
Tim Smith
amicus_curious
clogwog
Snit
and whoever else wants to join.
I'm serious about this, but I won't do it unless *everyone* in that list of
7 agrees.
Starts Monday 12:00am Nov 16, ends Wed 12:00am Dec 16.
No pressure - if you're not interested just say so.
Ezekiel
"DFS" <nospam@dfs_.com> wrote in message
news:hdjtum$dvq$1...@news.eternal-september.org...
I'll do it - no problem.
My question is what brought this up?
DFS
Well, it's really a devastating psychological blow to the cola idiots.
There's nothing they hate more than having to tell their stupid lies and
"Linux just works" tales to each other. It will basically ruin cola for
them for a month.
Note: I'm not going out of town or anything - if I take vacation I'll be at
home.
Plus the time spent here can probably be used for more productive pursuits.
Thanks Zeke.
Peter Köhlmann
And if those clowns all agreed, we would see a flurry of "new" posters.
All with intimate knowledge about cola.
It is quite simple: Of that list *all* have already nymshifted. Some
*very* often
--
Microsoft's Guide To System Design:
If it starts working, we'll fix it. Pronto.
ray
> This is directed to:
>
> Hadron
> Moshe
> Zeke
> Tim Smith
> amicus_curious
> clogwog
> Snit
>
> and whoever else wants to join.
>
> I'm serious about this, but I won't do it unless *everyone* in that list
> of 7 agrees.
Nice out. You don't have the balls to just do it.
Ezekiel
"Peter K�hlmann" <peter-k...@t-online.de> wrote in message
news:hdjvjo$ad2$02$2...@news.t-online.com...
> DFS wrote:
>
>> This is directed to:
>>
>> Hadron
>> Moshe
>> Zeke
>> Tim Smith
>> amicus_curious
>> clogwog
>> Snit
>>
>> and whoever else wants to join.
>>
>> I'm serious about this, but I won't do it unless *everyone* in that list
>> of 7 agrees.
>>
>> Starts Monday 12:00am Nov 16, ends Wed 12:00am Dec 16.
>>
>> No pressure - if you're not interested just say so.
>
> And if those clowns all agreed, we would see a flurry of "new" posters.
> All with intimate knowledge about cola.
Sounds like High-Plains Rafael Wendy Hypocrite to me.
> It is quite simple: Of that list *all* have already nymshifted.
> Some *very* often
And *you* have also nymshifted - and very often.
John Fuhrer
> And if those clowns all agreed, we would see a flurry of "new" posters.
> All with intimate knowledge about cola.
You mean like "ceed" ?
John Fuhrer
A few years ago, flatfish left for a couple of months and the COLA loons
were asking for her to come back because the group got so boring.
This was back in the good old days before Spamowitz arrived.
IOW the group actually had some decent Linux advocates.
Count me in.....
Ezekiel
"John Fuhrer" <fuhrer_sp...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:qegft2cxb869.h...@40tude.net...
I think he means like wispy_galaxy, spermo mallifer and a host of other
"advocates"
Chris Ahlstrom
> On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 10:29:05 -0500, DFS wrote:
>
>> This is directed to:
>>
>> Hadron
>> Moshe
>> Zeke
>> Tim Smith
>> amicus_curious
>> clogwog
>> Snit
>>
>> and whoever else wants to join.
>>
>> I'm serious about this, but I won't do it unless *everyone* in that list
>> of 7 agrees.
>
> Nice out. You don't have the balls to just do it.
I never thought I'd see the day when DFS would name most of the trolls,
verifying what the rest of us thought about them.
And why just those names? What about the AFKATB? Linux-sux? Ray Lopez?
Has DFS just outed a "cabal" dedicated to disrupting this newsgroup?
Do these guys correspond outside of COLA?
And what about Naomi?
--
Q: What looks like a cat, flies like a bat, brays like a donkey, and
plays like a monkey?
A: Nothing.
Strike that. A Troll.
Peter Köhlmann
>
> "Peter K�hlmann" <peter-k...@t-online.de> wrote in message
> news:hdjvjo$ad2$02$2...@news.t-online.com...
>> DFS wrote:
>>
>>> This is directed to:
>>>
>>> Hadron
>>> Moshe
>>> Zeke
>>> Tim Smith
>>> amicus_curious
>>> clogwog
>>> Snit
>>>
>>> and whoever else wants to join.
>>>
>>> I'm serious about this, but I won't do it unless *everyone* in that
>>> list of 7 agrees.
>>>
>>> Starts Monday 12:00am Nov 16, ends Wed 12:00am Dec 16.
>>>
>>> No pressure - if you're not interested just say so.
>>
>> And if those clowns all agreed, we would see a flurry of "new" posters.
>> All with intimate knowledge about cola.
>
> Sounds like High-Plains Rafael Wendy Hypocrite to me.
No. Sounds like the usual MO of you wintroll scum to me
>
>> It is quite simple: Of that list *all* have already nymshifted.
>> Some *very* often
>
> And *you* have also nymshifted - and very often.
Idiot
--
You're genuinely bogus.
DFS
> On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 10:29:05 -0500, DFS wrote:
>
>> This is directed to:
>>
>> Hadron
>> Moshe
>> Zeke
>> Tim Smith
>> amicus_curious
>> clogwog
>> Snit
>>
>> and whoever else wants to join.
>>
>> I'm serious about this, but I won't do it unless *everyone* in that
>> list of 7 agrees.
>
> Nice out. You don't have the balls to just do it.
Of course I do, but it's a worthless boycott if just one or two does it.
My goal is to see you cola dweebs go into deep withdrawal as this "advocacy"
^^^^^^^^ hate-Microsoft newsgroup melts down and is reduced to liars
babbling to each other.
DFS
Cool.
chrisv
>And why just those names? What about the AFKATB? Linux-sux? Ray Lopez?
>
>Has DFS just outed a "cabal" dedicated to disrupting this newsgroup?
>
>Do these guys correspond outside of COLA?
I was wondering why he just didn't type "all the Wintrolling, lying,
idiot assholes", which covers them all.
cc
> ray pulled this Usenet boner:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 10:29:05 -0500, DFS wrote:
>
> >> This is directed to:
>
> >> Hadron
> >> Moshe
> >> Zeke
> >> Tim Smith
> >> amicus_curious
> >> clogwog
> >> Snit
>
> >> and whoever else wants to join.
>
> >> I'm serious about this, but I won't do it unless *everyone* in that list
> >> of 7 agrees.
>
> > Nice out. You don't have the balls to just do it.
>
> I never thought I'd see the day when DFS would name most of the trolls,
> verifying what the rest of us thought about them.
>
> And why just those names? What about the AFKATB? Linux-sux? Ray Lopez?
>
> Has DFS just outed a "cabal" dedicated to disrupting this newsgroup?
>
> Do these guys correspond outside of COLA?
>
> And what about Naomi?
>
Oh please, it's not like you guys didn't group them together first,
and continue to do so.
cc
I'm not listed, but what the hell. I don't want to get blamed by
anyone for spoiling this experiment if I continue to post, especially
since colatrolls.com or whatever the hell it was groups me up with
everyone on that list anyway.
amicus_curious
"DFS" <nospam@dfs_.com> wrote in message
>
> My goal is to see you cola dweebs go into deep withdrawal as this
> "advocacy" ^^^^^^^^ hate-Microsoft newsgroup melts down and is reduced to
> liars babbling to each other.
>
discuss at the moment anyway. It is doubtful that you will see much of a
change in the behavior of most of the pro-Linux posters, though. For one
thing, Shestowitcz is a robot of sorts, and it is hard to see where any lack
of content will thwart many of the rest since they seem to live off mere hot
air anyway. But I'm willing to see what happens.
You can reach me at gnu.misc.discuss in an emergency.
William Poaster
say:
> ray pulled this Usenet boner:
>
>> On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 10:29:05 -0500, DFS wrote:
>>
>>> This is directed to:
>>>
>>> Hadron
>>> Moshe
>>> Zeke
>>> Tim Smith
>>> amicus_curious
>>> clogwog
>>> Snit
>>>
>>> and whoever else wants to join.
>>>
>>> I'm serious about this, but I won't do it unless *everyone* in that list
>>> of 7 agrees.
>>
>> Nice out. You don't have the balls to just do it.
>
> I never thought I'd see the day when DFS would name most of the trolls,
> verifying what the rest of us thought about them.
>
> And why just those names? What about the AFKATB? Linux-sux? Ray Lopez?
>
> Has DFS just outed a "cabal" dedicated to disrupting this newsgroup?
Yeah, & look who's at the top of the list! :-)
> Do these guys correspond outside of COLA?
Very likely, I'd say.
> And what about Naomi?
Who?
He hasn't got Dopez99 in the list...
--
Linux. The Malicious Software Removal
tool which wipes Windows from your PC in
seconds!
Hadron
"DFS" <nospam@dfs_.com> writes:
I dont think I can do it. I enjoy watching them squirm too much
DFS
Excellent. Thanks for participating, cc.
What will the cola bozos do without us? I bet they turn on each other
within a day.
DFS
OK.
Hold down the fort - I'm going to do it anyway, and several others have
agreed so far.
spi...@freenet.co.uk
> Well, it's really a devastating psychological blow to the cola idiots.
> There's nothing they hate more than having to tell their stupid lies and
> "Linux just works" tales to each other. It will basically ruin cola for
> them for a month.
Stop trying to make it sound like it was your idea.
I'm the one who placed the challenge, remember.
--
| |What to do if you find yourself stuck in a crack|
| spi...@freenet.co.uk |in the ground beneath a giant boulder, which you|
| |can't move, with no hope of rescue. |
| Andrew Halliwell BSc |Consider how lucky you are that life has been |
| in |good to you so far... |
| Computer Science | -The BOOK, Hitch-hiker's guide to the galaxy.|
RayLopez99
>
> Hadron
> Moshe
> Zeke
> Tim Smith
> amicus_curious
> clogwog
> Snit
>
> and whoever else wants to join.
Count me in. I'll check this thread to see when the boycott starts.
Boy will the boycotted be sad, boy! They won't know what to do with
themselves without us frenemies! LOL. Truth be told, the world has
ignored Linux outside a few trivial applications but these guys would
never know it.
RL
cc
I'm guessing lots of messages like:
"I got XX out of XXX messages today, it's awesome having no trolls"
"Oh man isn't it so nice without DFS" (probably 5-10%, but maybe as
much as 50% of the messages that month, here or not here they can't
help but reference you)
1 message threads started by Roy Schestowitz
Almost no posts by anyone not named Roy, except for those celebrating
you not being here by talking about you. Definately no Linux posts.
What's funny is, when questioned about their hypocrisy, a majority of
people claim that they don't read Roy's posts in the first place.
Maybe that's true, but then without threads started by the people on
your list, which by far have the most responses, what is everyone
going to read? This is going to be interesting. I wish Hadron would
join.
Also, for as much talk as there is about killfiles around here, it's
amazing that no one can figure out how to use them. I mean they do
know that they can do the same thing as your one-month boycott, but
forever and ever just by setting up a killfile, right? Right? I mean
no one is so stupid that they would actively read someone's posts when
they didn't want to, right? Right?
Chris Ahlstrom
> On Nov 13, 11:46?am, Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstr...@launchmodem.com> wrote:
>>
>> And why just those names? ?What about the AFKATB? ?Linux-sux? ?Ray Lopez?
>>
>> Has DFS just outed a "cabal" dedicated to disrupting this newsgroup?
>>
>> Do these guys correspond outside of COLA?
>>
>> And what about Naomi?
>
> Oh please, it's not like you guys didn't group them together first,
> and continue to do so.
My prescription for you:
http://www.rd.com/living-healthy/19-ways-to-enhance-your-sense-of-humor/article16125.html
--
FORTUNE PROVIDES QUESTIONS FOR THE GREAT ANSWERS: #5
A: The Halls of Montezuma and the Shores of Tripoli.
Q: Name two families whose kids won't join the Marines.
John Fuhrer
I can see the emails flying now.
IOW they know about it so they will be on their best behavior.
DFS
> On Nov 13, 10:29 am, "DFS" <nospam@dfs_.com> wrote:
>> This is directed to:
>>
>> Hadron
>> Moshe
>> Zeke
>> Tim Smith
>> amicus_curious
>> clogwog
>> Snit
>>
>> and whoever else wants to join.
>
> Count me in. I'll check this thread to see when the boycott starts.
Glad to hear it, RayLopez.
Boycott period is from midnight this Sunday through midnight Tue Dec 15.
> Boy will the boycotted be sad, boy! They won't know what to do with
> themselves without us frenemies! LOL. Truth be told, the world has
> ignored Linux outside a few trivial applications but these guys would
> never know it.
They will soon :-)
Just 8 of them, telling tall tales to each other. The Spamowitz-bot might
even blow a gasket...
John Fuhrer
Good one!
My prediction is they will all start replying to Schestowitz's garbage.
But,,,,, how that be you ask?
They have him kill filed?
Well, when there isn't anyone else to talk to even Spamowitz will look
good.
Chris Ahlstrom
> On Nov 13, 1:48?pm, "DFS" <nospam@dfs_.com> wrote:
>> Excellent. ?Thanks for participating, cc.
>>
>> What will the cola bozos do without us? ?I bet they turn on each other
>> within a day.
>
> I'm guessing lots of messages like:
>
> "I got XX out of XXX messages today, it's awesome having no trolls"
> "Oh man isn't it so nice without DFS" (probably 5-10%, but maybe as
Maybe Chrisv wasn't so off-base with the moniker-insult "ccretin".
--
The countdown had stalled at 'T' minus 69 seconds when Desiree, the first
female ape to go up in space, winked at me slyly and pouted her thick,
rubbery lips unmistakably -- the first of many such advances during what
would prove to be the longest, and most memorable, space voyage of my
career.
-- Winning sentence, 1985 Bulwer-Lytton bad fiction contest.
John Fuhrer
Should be a riot!!
Get ready for Schestowitz's pal "Twatter" to arrive with a couple dozen
nyms.
I believe he may be over 50 identified nyms on slashdot.
cc
> cc pulled this Usenet boner:
>
> > On Nov 13, 1:48?pm, "DFS" <nospam@dfs_.com> wrote:
> >> Excellent. ?Thanks for participating, cc.
>
> >> What will the cola bozos do without us? ?I bet they turn on each other
> >> within a day.
>
> > I'm guessing lots of messages like:
>
> > "I got XX out of XXX messages today, it's awesome having no trolls"
> > "Oh man isn't it so nice without DFS" (probably 5-10%, but maybe as
>
> Maybe Chrisv wasn't so off-base with the moniker-insult "ccretin".
>
Well there will be an entire month to prove me wrong, won't there?
cc
> cc pulled this Usenet boner:
>
> > On Nov 13, 11:46?am, Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstr...@launchmodem.com> wrote:
>
> >> And why just those names? ?What about the AFKATB? ?Linux-sux? ?Ray Lopez?
>
> >> Has DFS just outed a "cabal" dedicated to disrupting this newsgroup?
>
> >> Do these guys correspond outside of COLA?
>
> >> And what about Naomi?
>
> > Oh please, it's not like you guys didn't group them together first,
> > and continue to do so.
>
> My prescription for you:
>
>
Mine for you:
http://www.amazon.com/Complete-Idiots-Guide-Comedy-Writing/dp/1592572316
Be funny and I'll have a sense of humor about it.
DFS
ha!
> Get ready for Schestowitz's pal "Twatter" to arrive with a couple
> dozen nyms.
>
> I believe he may be over 50 identified nyms on slashdot.
Scary.
On that note, I want to be clear on something - to be effective, our boycott
means absolutely no cola posting under any nym.
Lurking is fine of course.
Hadron
I see that little suck up Liarmutt is now sucking up to the useless
"chrisv". His behaviour makes me cringe.
John Fuhrer
Understood....
John Fuhrer
Get ready for the COLA vermin to create some nyms and blame it on us
though.
That's the way they operate.
DFS
> "DFS" <nospam@dfs_.com> wrote in message
> news:hdk3oe$6k8$1...@news.eternal-september.org...
>>
>> My goal is to see you cola dweebs go into deep withdrawal as this
>> "advocacy" ^^^^^^^^ hate-Microsoft newsgroup melts down and is
>> reduced to liars babbling to each other.
>>
> Well we could start right now for that matter, there is nothing to
> really discuss at the moment anyway.
But there will be every time Win7 shatters new adoption records.
> It is doubtful that you will
> see much of a change in the behavior of most of the pro-Linux
> posters, though. For one thing, Shestowitcz is a robot of sorts, and
> it is hard to see where any lack of content will thwart many of the
> rest since they seem to live off mere hot air anyway. But I'm
> willing to see what happens.
> You can reach me at gnu.misc.discuss in an emergency.
Thanks amicus!
I expect a cola suicide or two as their lies and babble fail to get any
reaction for 30 days.
Clogwog
news:hdk470$b58$1...@news.eternal-september.org...
Me too
>
>
> Cool.
>
And I'm *not* Willy "filters" Boaster nymshifting as Clogwog! ;-)
DFS
> Me too
Sweet!
Thanks Clogwog.
Chris Ahlstrom
Who knows? The whole premise is ridiculous.
--
You will be honored for contributing your time and skill to a worthy cause.
Chris Ahlstrom
>> My prescription for you:
>>
>> ? ?http://www.rd.com/living-healthy/19-ways-to-enhance-your-sense-of-hum...
>
> Mine for you:
>
> http://www.amazon.com/Complete-Idiots-Guide-Comedy-Writing/dp/1592572316
>
> Be funny and I'll have a sense of humor about it.
Okay. How's this:
<capers around the room, two fingers above lips and goose-stepping
like John Cleese>
--
Q: What do you have when you have a lawyer buried up to his neck in sand?
A: Not enough sand.
Don Zeigler
> I dont think I can do it. I enjoy trolling them too much
Fixed.
--
Regards,
Don Zeigler
Owner/proprietor, Trollus Amongus, LLC
...He does the work of 3 Men...Moe, Larry & Curly
Chris Ahlstrom
> I dont think I can do it. I enjoy watching them squirm too much
LOL. In your dreams, troll.
--
You will experience a strong urge to do good; but it will pass.
7
pounding the sock DFS wrote on behalf of Half Wits from Micoshaft Appil
Department of Marketing:
>>> This is directed to:
Such directing requires spurious invoices to be made out to micoshaft for
work beyond call of asstroturfing duty.
Have you prepared any?
>>> Hadron
>>> Moshe
>>> Zeke
>>> Tim Smith
>>> amicus_curious
>>> clogwog
>>> Snit
>>>
>>> and whoever else wants to join.
So how come you know all the COLA trolls by their nyms?
And collate them with precision into a list.
Are you sure there is no collusion between you and the other dum dums?
You are giving all the secrets away indirectly!
>>> I'm serious about this, but I won't do it unless *everyone* in that
>>> list of 7 agrees.
I'm agreeing with any agreement not covered in any non-agreements.
HTH.
>>> Starts Monday 12:00am Nov 16, ends Wed 12:00am Dec 16.
>>>
>>> No pressure - if you're not interested just say so.
>>>
>>
>> I dont think I can do it. I enjoy watching them squirm too much
>
> OK.
>
> Hold down the fort - I'm going to do it anyway, and several others have
> agreed so far.
Shove it up your doofi my friend!
You know you want to troll till you drop!
Homer
> I'm serious about this
Aw, whasamatter DooFy, has your "evangelism" juice dried up?
Poor DooFy.
--
K.
http://slated.org
.----
| "What's the point of supporting a large, faceless corporation that
| doesn't give you the good service you should get? We have MS for
| that..." ~ DFS, http://tinyurl.com/doofy-admits-truth-about-ms
`----
Fedora release 8 (Werewolf) on sky, running kernel 2.6.31.5
02:08:33 up 5 days, 12:30, 4 users, load average: 0.00, 0.03, 0.04
William Poaster
> Verily I say unto thee, that DooFy spake thusly:
>
>> I'm serious about this
>
> Aw, whasamatter DooFy, has your "evangelism" juice dried up?
>
> Poor DooFy.
Oooh! Does this mean the wintrolls aren't getting paid to astroturf for a
month? ;-)
--
Linux. The Malicious Software Removal
tool which wipes Windows from your PC in
seconds!
cc
> Above the wailing & moaning of the trolls, Homer was heard to say:
>
> > Verily I say unto thee, that DooFy spake thusly:
>
> >> I'm serious about this
>
> > Aw, whasamatter DooFy, has your "evangelism" juice dried up?
>
> > Poor DooFy.
>
> Oooh! Does this mean the wintrolls aren't getting paid to astroturf for a
> month? ;-)
>
Just read those two posts. You don't have to respond, just read them
to yourself a couple of times. Then I think you'll understand
perfectly, although I'm not expecting you to admit it.
Chris Ahlstrom
> On Nov 14, 7:12?am, William Poaster <w...@kubuntu-karmic.org> wrote:
>> Above the wailing & moaning of the trolls, Homer was heard to say:
>>
>> > Verily I say unto thee, that DooFy spake thusly:
>>
>> >> I'm serious about this
>>
>> > Aw, whasamatter DooFy, has your "evangelism" juice dried up?
>>
>> > Poor DooFy.
>>
>> Oooh! Does this mean the wintrolls aren't getting paid to astroturf for a
>> month? ?;-)
>
> Just read those two posts. You don't have to respond, just read them
> to yourself a couple of times. Then I think you'll understand
> perfectly, although I'm not expecting you to admit it.
One troll complaining about two lesser trolls capering about.
Boo hoo hoo.
--
No group of professionals meets except to conspire against the public at large.
-- Mark Twain
William Poaster
say:
> cc pulled this Usenet boner:
>
>> On Nov 14, 7:12?am, William Poaster <w...@kubuntu-karmic.org> wrote:
>>> Above the wailing & moaning of the trolls, Homer was heard to say:
>>>
>>> > Verily I say unto thee, that DooFy spake thusly:
>>>
>>> >> I'm serious about this
>>>
>>> > Aw, whasamatter DooFy, has your "evangelism" juice dried up?
>>>
>>> > Poor DooFy.
>>>
>>> Oooh! Does this mean the wintrolls aren't getting paid to astroturf for a
>>> month? ?;-)
>>
>> Just read those two posts. You don't have to respond, just read them
>> to yourself a couple of times. Then I think you'll understand
>> perfectly, although I'm not expecting you to admit it.
>
> One troll complaining about two lesser trolls capering about.
>
> Boo hoo hoo.
And if was responding to me, it's too dumb to realise it's been in
/dev/null for a loooooong time.
RayLopez99
> >> and whoever else wants to join.
>
> > Count me in. I'll check this thread to see when the boycott starts.
>
> Glad to hear it, RayLopez.
>
> Boycott period is from midnight this Sunday through midnight Tue Dec 15.
> They will soon :-)
>
> Just 8 of them, telling tall tales to each other. The Spamowitz-bot might
> even blow a gasket...
Yeah, I also 'troll' (Devil's Advocate) at the alt.global-warming
site. My speculative and provocative posts from years ago actually
anticipated (quite by luck of course) a couple of scientific papers in
the field (while I don't deny AGW, I think its effects are overblown
by the tree hugging, people hating, environmental crowd, which reminds
me of Linux users). Then I noticed I was the catalyst for discussion--
without my posts, these people would cease to have a reason to exist
at that forum, not unlike the famous scene from the Clint Eastwood
film Good, Bad, Ugly where but for the bridge the two armies would not
even be fighting. So blow up the bridge, and the fighting stops. Not
unlike Iraq/Afghanistan IMO but I digress.
Anyway, I predict these freetard freaks will whither on the vine and
atrophy after a month of not having us around.
Great idea DFS--I've marked my calendar.
RL
Clogwog
news:aj5rf5t51esrrbhge...@4ax.com...
> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>
>>And why just those names? What about the AFKATB? Linux-sux? Ray Lopez?
>>
>>Has DFS just outed a "cabal" dedicated to disrupting this newsgroup?
>>
>>Do these guys correspond outside of COLA?
>
> idiot assholes", which covers them all.
>
Poor chrisv, nothing to post about for 1 month, nobody to *plonk*, just a
few "me too" posts in cola remain, scary isn't it chris?
<aside>
I bet this mad plonk-tard will pop up in other NG's more frequently,
ignorant of the fact that 90% of the people on Usenet have plonked him by
now. How ironic!
<chuckle>
Clogwog
for one month. The poor useless fucker has nothing else to post on Usenet
than his silly bogus Faq's.
I'm sure however that he's going to nymshift immediately to one of us and
post rants to himself. Never seen a more useless cola loon than HPT!
Hadron
Dumb Willy is more useless.
John Fuhrer
Yep.
That's exactly what he is going to do.
Clogwog
news:hdmim1$jka$3...@news.eternal-september.org...
Nah, the difference is trivial!
1. HPT: useless
2. Dumb Willy: useless
3. Terry Porter: useless
4. 7: useless
Fuck me dead!, most cola loons are pretty useless!
sqool
> Hadron wrote:
>
>> I dont think I can do it. I enjoy trolling them too much
>
> Fixed.
I dunno what the wintroll had originally posted, but your correction
probably nearer the truth. :-)
--
About the Hadron troll:
The man is a contradiction in terms, and just has he has no idea
whatsoever about the workings of the operating system he pretends to be
a guru at. He hates everything, himself included, although he manages
to disguise the latter very well via a virtually impenetrable cloak of
arrogance.
cc
> cc pulled this Usenet boner:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Nov 14, 7:12?am, William Poaster <w...@kubuntu-karmic.org> wrote:
> >> Above the wailing & moaning of the trolls, Homer was heard to say:
>
> >> > Verily I say unto thee, that DooFy spake thusly:
>
> >> >> I'm serious about this
>
> >> > Aw, whasamatter DooFy, has your "evangelism" juice dried up?
>
> >> > Poor DooFy.
>
> >> Oooh! Does this mean the wintrolls aren't getting paid to astroturf for a
> >> month? ?;-)
>
> > Just read those two posts. You don't have to respond, just read them
> > to yourself a couple of times. Then I think you'll understand
> > perfectly, although I'm not expecting you to admit it.
>
> One troll complaining about two lesser trolls capering about.
>
> Boo hoo hoo.
>
Well it wasn't a complaint so much as a statement, but at least you
admit they're trolls.
cc
You're seriously too dumb to read a subject line?
Chris Ahlstrom
Narcissism and self-loathing in one bilious package.
--
The Debian crowd now claim synaptic is crap (as is apt-get) and only
Aptitude is the way to go. Google it up.
A total fuck fest of disagreements and petty jealousies.
"Hadron" <gvi89q$g6q$7...@news.eternal-september.org>
John Fuhrer
> Narcissism and self-loathing in one bilious package.
A perfect description of Spamowitz.
Chris Ahlstrom
> On Nov 14, 9:39?am, Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstr...@launchmodem.com> wrote:
>> cc pulled this Usenet boner:
>>
>> > Just read those two posts. You don't have to respond, just read them
>> > to yourself a couple of times. Then I think you'll understand
>> > perfectly, although I'm not expecting you to admit it.
>>
>> One troll complaining about two lesser trolls capering about.
>>
>> Boo hoo hoo.
>
> Well it wasn't a complaint so much as a statement, but at least you
> admit they're trolls.
The difference is, most of the time they do not troll. Few people can
approach the trolling frequency of "Hadron", Snit, DFS, and the flatliner.
As they say in the sewer, water is thicker than blood.
--
Why is it that we rejoice at a birth and grieve at a funeral? It is because we
are not the person involved.
-- Mark Twain, "Pudd'nhead Wilson's Calendar"
Hadron
> sqool pulled this Usenet boner:
>
>> On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 18:59:58 -0500, Don Zeigler wrote:
>>
>>> Hadron wrote:
>>>
>>>> I dont think I can do it. I enjoy trolling them too much
>>>
>>> Fixed.
>>
>> I dunno what the wintroll had originally posted, but your correction
>> probably nearer the truth. :-)
>>
>> --
>> About the Hadron troll:
>> The man is a contradiction in terms, and just has he has no idea
>> whatsoever about the workings of the operating system he pretends to be
>> a guru at. He hates everything, himself included, although he manages
>> to disguise the latter very well via a virtually impenetrable cloak of
>> arrogance.
>
> Narcissism and self-loathing in one bilious package.
Self loathing? What on earth are you talking about? Correcting you and
pointing out your lies is not bilious or an example of self loathing :
rather it's a public service. Why do you think so many posters laugh at
you these days and call you a slimy suck up? Could it be that you are?
Shilling 7 and Dumb Willy for example? Come off it.
All your post did was, once more, to highlight your desire to be
accepted by the COLA "advocates" and the lengths you will go to achieve
your goal.
DFS
> And verily, didst DFS <nospam@dfs_.com> hastily babble thusly:
>> Well, it's really a devastating psychological blow to the cola
>> idiots. There's nothing they hate more than having to tell their
>> stupid lies and "Linux just works" tales to each other. It will
>> basically ruin cola for them for a month.
>
> Stop trying to make it sound like it was your idea.
> I'm the one who placed the challenge, remember.
I've said the same thing for years, long before you piped up.
Without us "trolls" cola is dead boring and not worth reading.
Now we'll prove it.
John Fuhrer
Hahaha.
The new nyms are appearing already.
I'll bet HPT has an entire stack of them all primed and ready!
Snit
11/15/09 8:40 AM:
He has run off to lick his wounds... at least under his HPT name.
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
Don Zeigler
> He has run off to lick his wounds... at least under his HPT name.
How has he "run off"???
--
Regards,
Don Zeigler
Owner/proprietor, Trollus Amongus, LLC
...Evolution is God's way of issuing upgrades.
John Fuhrer
> Snit wrote:
>
>> He has run off to lick his wounds... at least under his HPT name.
>
> How has he "run off"???
Good point.
If his cock is as big as he claims, it must be difficult to walk, much less
run!
<bg>!
Peter Köhlmann
> Snit wrote:
>
>> He has run off to lick his wounds... at least under his HPT name.
>
> How has he "run off"???
>
A typical Snot Michael Glasser delusion
When completely beaten to stinking pulp, claim bullshit like that and hope
that the resident filth like Hadron Quark or flatfish chime in to deflect
his humilation
Must be very annoying for that POS to be constantly reminded what posters
think of that dishonest cretin Glasser
--
Modern man is the missing link between apes and human beings.
Snit
10:14 AM:
> Don Zeigler wrote:
>
>> Snit wrote:
>>
>>> He has run off to lick his wounds... at least under his HPT name.
>>
>> How has he "run off"???
>>
>
> A typical Snot Michael Glasser delusion
>
> When completely beaten to stinking pulp, claim bullshit like that and hope
> that the resident filth like Hadron Quark or flatfish chime in to deflect
> his humilation
>
> Must be very annoying for that POS to be constantly reminded what posters
> think of that dishonest cretin Glasser
Oh! Oh! Quote the alleged lies you refer to.
LOL!
As if you could... there are none.
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
Snit
10:08 AM:
> Snit wrote:
>
>> He has run off to lick his wounds... at least under his HPT name.
>
> How has he "run off"???
He claimed he had kill filed me and was no longer going to even read my
quoting of his lies... that was right after he insisted his "strategy" was
that of a "luser". He self-nuked and broke down.
And then he ran off. But he will be back... hopefully not lying about me.
If he does, of course, I shall feel free to quote his lies back at him and
shove his face in his own mess again. And you will claim it is my fault...
or that I am begging for his attention. Oh well.
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
cc
> Peter Köhlmann stated in post hdpct0$cao$0...@news.t-online.com on 11/15/09
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/32659ebc860c699a?hl=en&dmode=source
Complete lie and idiocy wrapped up into one post. At least you
admitted to the lie later in the thread, but that doesn't stop it from
being a stupid stupid lie when you wrote it.
Snit
c3ca5690-faf7-4e1d...@f10g2000vbl.googlegroups.com on
11/15/09 11:02 AM:
> On Nov 15, 12:33�pm, Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>> Peter K�hlmann stated in post hdpct0$cao$0...@news.t-online.com on 11/15/09
You quoted me talking about your failure to provide evidence for your grade
school insults.
And I was 100% correct.
Seriously - you failed. Oh well. Move on. You are simply not that
interesting of a topic. Why not try to talk about technology and not your
pathetic, embarrassing, miserable failures?
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
Don Zeigler
> And then he ran off.
How has he "run off"?
--
Regards,
Don Zeigler
Owner/proprietor, Trollus Amongus, LLC
...Infinity is just time on an ego trip.
Snit
11/15/09 11:33 AM:
> Snit wrote:
>
>> And then he ran off.
>
> How has he "run off"?
Curious... how many times are you going to ask that same question... while
not responding to the answer you have been given.
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
Don Zeigler
> Curious... how many times are you going to ask that same question... while
> not responding to the answer you have been given.
You've given no answer, you just claim he's "run off".
--
Regards,
Don Zeigler
Owner/proprietor, Trollus Amongus, LLC
...Blessed are the censors; they shall inhibit the earth.
Snit
12:23 PM:
> Snit wrote:
>
>> Curious... how many times are you going to ask that same question... while
>> not responding to the answer you have been given.
>
> You've given no answer, you just claim he's "run off".
From a past post:
He claimed he had kill filed me and was no longer going to
even read my quoting of his lies... that was right after he
insisted his "strategy" was that of a "luser". He self-nuked
and broke down.
And then he ran off. But he will be back... hopefully not
lying about me. If he does, of course, I shall feel free to
quote his lies back at him and shove his face in his own mess
again. And you will claim it is my fault... or that I am
begging for his attention. Oh well.
Your welcome.
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
Don Zeigler
> And then he ran off.
You've given no answer, you just claim he's "run off".
Seriously.... do you have some type of comprehension disability? Or do you
simply enjoy pretending to be a thickheaded fuckstaff?
--
Regards,
Don Zeigler
Owner/proprietor, Trollus Amongus, LLC
...This tagline is umop apisdn
Snit
12:56 PM:
> Snit wrote:
>
>> And then he ran off.
>
> You've given no answer, you just claim he's "run off".
>
> Seriously.... do you have some type of comprehension disability? Or do you
> simply enjoy pretending to be a thickheaded fuckstaff?
Read the post you responded to. You know, the parts you snipped.
Or is five words the maximum you can handle at one time?
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
High Plains Thumper
> Snit wrote:
>
>> And then he ran off.
>
> You've given no answer, you just claim he's "run off".
>
> Seriously.... do you have some type of comprehension disability? Or
Snit has yet to give an adequate answer as to why these 132 posters have
similar opinions of Snit regarding the troll's idiocy, immaturity and
nastiness:
1- Adam Kesher: "Steve, IIRC Sandman's website has a member area and a
login. If you forget your password, you can ask it to e-mail it to you,
and a bot will send an e-mail. *That* is the e-mail Snit got from
Sandman's website, and yes he's that fucked in the head and starved for
attention that he'd claim it to be an e-mail from Sandman himself. So,
don't get sucked into his little circus. The e-mail, in this particular
instance, did probably originate from Sandman.net." 27 Feb 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/dac74355552b4cc7
2- Alan Baker: "People's perceptions of you are *formed* by behaviour
and not withstanding your occasional on topic posts, I wish you'd leave
too. Please note that despite the amazing silliness that is Edwin, I
have never made the same wish of him." 27 Feb 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/4a7c3ebf3fc10221
3- Andrew J. Brehm: "You are not flamed because you speak the truth, you
are flamed because you are a hideous troll and keep disrupting the
newsgroup."
4- AZ Nomad: "The fact that you routinely change your headers to weasel
out of killfiles proves that you're an asshole." 25 Jun 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/51b43d6c9613c9da
5- Andy/news/nospam: "Why do you keep these things up, Snit? Why not
just let them go away and show how responsible a member of CSMA you are?
You could show your enemies up by being better than then, rise above the
low level you so obviously dislike. Anything, just stop...." 26 Apr 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/d6ffb6b06aa237e5
6- B.B.: "Does the From: header contain the string "Snit"? If yes, then
troll. Otherwise, maybe. Dunno why I had my KF on you set to expire, but
it's fixed now." 13 Mar 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/8a98d179b2ff9578
7- BaJoRi:
Snit: "You are, of course, lying."
BaJoRi: "No, I am not. You know it, and I know it, and everyone else who
has read your idiocy knows it. I took your statement, showed it to be
wrong, then added even more, just to be a dick and REALLY show you to be
a fool. You need to judiciously snip out pertinent points because you
are an intellectually dwarfed turd-burglar." 11 Nov 2008
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.vacation.las-vegas/msg/647944511b74b82f
8- bobinnv: "I learned some time ago how much better this group can be
if you kill file Snit. I have never understood why more people don't do
the same.." 5 Aug 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/0706dbef8ce1f903
9- Bob S: "This has always been pretty much a free-for-all group, but
since Snit showed up, its become almost impossible to have a decent
discussion about anything." 27 Dec 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/3d2f1dff196ca190
The solution is to NOT REPLY TO SNIT. But for some reason, some people
just can't stop feeding him."
10- °b° unny: Subject "snit makes me sad", Text "really actually =:-("
9 Oct 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/4e31cb49c1e2d432
11- buzz off: "Snit is obviously mentally ill..."
12- Carlo Coggi: "He must believe he is surrounded by 'trolls' ... in
the groups he trolls in, that is. I wondered if the idiotrollers like
snit would reply to this thread. Of course, I didn't see his posts, only
your reply".
13- chrisv (cola): "No, she called him 'shit', and rightly so, for they
way he was so ignominiously birthed into a toilet at the bus depot, and
simply refused to die, despite repeated flushes. It's now far too late
to *flush* him, but we can still *plonk* him..." 12 Sep 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/18099f8aa067f4a5
14- C Lund: "Snit is not my responsibility. Maybe it's time for you to
learn how to use your kill-filter. I am assuming, of course, that your
Usenet browser has a kill-filter." 5 Mar 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/2c390a34b05b24a9
15- cc (COLA): "Snit posts all the time. You don't have to dig up months
old articles where he brings up years old topics. Just respond to a
current message." 22 Jan 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/5a712e3312ba9f8a
16- Code Orange: "Then why post it? What need is there for you to "win"
an argument? They don't like you, you don't like them. Why must you keep
this up? What results are you expecting?"
17- CozmicDebris: "I'm done with your three year old games. The archives
show my answers and your inability to process them. Keep posting your
list and proving that you are an idiot troll. I will not address it any
further- you being too stupid to realize and accept that is not my
problem". 22 Nov 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.cellular.attws/msg/0aa65b7a132dbfe8
18- Dawg Tail: "You've already apologized for having already misread
what I had previously written. What makes you think that you're
correctly understanding what I'm writting now. You've got a history of
reading into things what you wanted people to have said instead of what
they really said.
I suggest you get over this limitation of yours. It's making you look
foolish."
Dawg Tail: "PC advocates, Mac advocates, Linux advocates. Almost all of
them are making similar claims about Snit. When you have so many diverse
people who share a common perception where do you think the problem
lies? With Snit? Or almost everyone else? The answer doesn't require an
advanced degree to figure out." 30 Dec 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/73edac32c3ad530b
19- Dave Fritzinger: "[snip of stuff I really don't care to read] Snit,
please go away. Get a life, meet a woman, do something, but please,
please, please, GO AWAY!!!!" 2 Jun 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/57bb2fc42ec0f290
20- Donald L McDaniel: "Jesus, snit. You're a teacher. I thought you
knew what a metaphor was, and could recognize one when it was presented
to you. I guess I had too much confidence in you." 30 Nov 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/3254ec7af27bfb0f
21- ed: "snit, you continually amaze me with how much of a liar and
loser you are. you may notice a semi-regular pattern with me where i
stop responding to your posts for stretches at a time, then start up
responding as if you were a normal person. i suppose it's tough for the
magnitude of your 'loserdom' to stick, so it loses some of it's
sharpness when i stop responding to you. you almost always start
responding back in a semi normal way, but inevitably degenerate. it's
once again that time. i can only ask that you pass my condolences to
your wife and unborn child for having to put up with such a dishonest
fool as yourself. (well, if your wife is a loser as well, just pass
those condolences to the rug-rat to be; if not, double condolences to
her). " 30 Apr 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/71f74dd6d806ce77
22- Edward Stanfield: "Snit thinks the rules that apply to honest and
honorable people apply to him. That is absurd. He is the biggest liar
in Usenet history. Mackay posted the email to prove Snit was using sock
puppets and he still is. Snit can not give up his socks puppets and
shills. They are the only ones who ever support him." 28 Jan 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/5b52494d96d12229
23- Edwin: "You've got to be out of your mind, Snit. You're the worst
troll this group has ever seen. You're a liar and a forger, and you've
almost destroyed this group single-handedly. For you to post a list of
out of context arguments, and lies, and forgeries about your enemies
labled as a "peace effort" has to be one of the craziest stunts you've
pulled. It's all about your sick need for attention, your need to be
center stage at all times. You'd publicly eat dog turd if you thought it
would make people look at you." 18 May 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/37e4a720619642a0
24- Elijah Baley: "Seriously, Snit, you need psychiatric help. Go see a
doctor." 24 Aug 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/6f6c88356b54fc15
25- Elizabot v2.0.2: "I see you were unable to respond to the points in
my post and you are back to your repetitious regurgitation mode. How
childishly typical of you, Snit." 16 Nov 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/55214ccfb7414fe5
26- Fa-groon: "I don't read Snit period. He's been killfiled since the
first day I posted here. [....] I don't want to 'do like Snit'. As far
as I'm concerned, Snit doesn't even exist." 15 Aug 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/dcfbff305ba8b7f0
27- fibercut: "That is the problem. In the years I have been coming to
CSMA I have seen in the past year a real hatred among people, besides
the typical Mac vs. Windows typical argument. I feel that it is like
being in a room of really young children trying there best to best the
other person. The one common thing among all of this seems to be you. I
hate to be like this, but facts are facts. You seem to be in the middle
of a great percentage of arguments. CSMA has become less about Macs and
more about "look everybody, I think he lied". Is there no end then all
this picking at each other on such a personal level. CSMA has always
been al little adversarial but you have personally crank it up to the
point that this place is no longer fun. Congratulations on stopping CSMA
and making this place your own personal circus." 12 Jan 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/bbe695bbc3424ab6
28- Geezer:
Snit: "Steve Carroll has no sense of morality"
Geezer: "Whined the guy who cannot directly address those who uncover
his lies and deceit;)"
Snit: "and no clue about the law."
Geezer: 'Said the guy who believes his unsupported opinions are "proof".
LOL! (snip more of Snit's unsupported lies)' 1 Jan 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/d0517ced5134934d
29- Geoff M. Fitton (COLA): "The Prescott Computer Guy *still* showing
how stupid he is... What a mar00n". 30 Aug 2008
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/f9401b4b57c59865
30- George Graves: "Jason. You have started an argument with the Snit
(AKA Michael Glasser), this should not be done. He will drive you crazy
with his twisted logic, his deep-rooted need to be ALWAYS right at any
cost. He will move goalposts, set up strawmen, and bore you into
submission with his endless pedanticism. The only way to engage him is
to hit and run. NEVER engage him, it's a futile, empty procedure that
will only anger you and feed him. Take my advice and STAY AWAY!" 27
Oct 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/3d3af33ce25a11fd
31- gimme_this_gimme_t...@yahoo.com: "Hitting the vodka tonight Snit?"
4 Mar 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/b457a7b378264794
32- Greycloud: "You really shouldn't lie like that. Everyone else
notices that you are not honest and you have no honor." 21 Jan 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/3b92f11a1ab00f91
33- H: "Your crappy posts are still showing up in seperate threads, are
you doing this on purpose to piss people off? I dont ever censor people
cause that's just retarded but if you dont fix it I'm gonna have to
cause I dont wanna see your name 40 times in a row. So uh, change your
client or something". 12 Sep 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/f36ee6b458c86499
34- Hadron (COLA):
Snit: "Now why not end your silliness and either just stop your BS or
actually give reasoned comments on the screen shots you keep asking for
and I keep providing?
Hadron: "err, he just did. And you snipped it all you weasel." 30 Jan 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/de49f2b7471d2e1a
Snit: "Sigh: 100% predictable, you will not answer *any* question I just
asked. You will run... your whole goal is to beg for attention, not to
make or support a point."
Hadron: "nice. You made it into my new killfile. Jesus, stop repeating
the same garbage." 6 Apr 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/c86ab53a759ea728
35- Henry Flam: "Who gives a damn about this shit? Snit, once in a
while, I make the mistake in thinking that that you are starting to make
sense in your posts; I tend to agree with your politics. Then you post
stuff like this and it destroys any respect that I have for you." 16
Aug 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/f048bedfe0d67d66
Henry Flam: "You on the other hand must a deeply trouble individual who
has a fragile ego. I needn't agree nor disagree with the points above. I
don't care about them. Your constant complaints, whines, rages, etc.,
wars with the regular Mac advocates, whom you mislabel as trolls, arise
from your sense that any conversation or thread must orbit around you.
People have pointed that out to you but you don't accept that. Snit I
feel sorry for you. Please go and see a doctor about your solipsism.
There must be a cure for you deep psychological travail." 18 Aug 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/b9bb48e6e6da75c8
36- Heywood Mogroot: "*plonk*"
37- -hh: 'Perversion has utterly nothing to do with the definition of
"synonymous". It is, however, a very clear example of how you attempt
to maliciously debase against anyone who disagrees with you. As such, I
consider this to be a purposeful attempt by you to try to libel me.
This is your only warning to consider rescinding your remark, with the
reminder that you, and you alone are responsible for that accusation,
both in the ethical as well as the full legal meaning of the word
"responsible".' 25 Feb 2008
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/5496641a3426293a
38- High Plains Thumper: "I can understand why posters get sick and
tired of your lame ad hominem attacks, your cowardly statements shifting
the goal posts, your continuous rambling drivel of how everyone seems to
be against you. No one cares a wooden nickel about your incessant flame
wars that are self created. You pretend to be an advocate but you
manage to cause everyone's hand to be against you." 6 Jan 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/b27ba196819ad38f
Only once in a blue moon does he have anything worth reading. I just
got through his circus of repetitive ad hominem crap. I am surprised
that with the stunts he has pulled in COLA and this newsgroup, that he
hasn't suffered a worse fate in real life. If he hasn't, one of these
days he will pull that stunt on the wrong person, and *B-O-O-M-!*,
someone will pull the trigger. One ought to really pity him (or as
Steve Travis stated, "Or perhaps we should set up a fund to get him more
happy glue (and the appropriate plastic bags)." 8 Jul 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/2666237bba82b97a
39- Homer (COLA):
HPT: "Snit in a period of 2 minutes has copied a post of mine, posting
the same following message over and over, in false pretense as a Linux
advocate."
Homer: "That kind of behaviour is not normal, to say the least. I don't
mean this as a personal insult, but I'm perfectly serious when I say
'Snit' (Michael Glasser) is obviously mentally ill, and needs help. I
was going to suggest that someone alerts his wife to the problem, but I
have to assume she's already aware of his condition, if she is in fact
still living with him. It's possible, I suppose, that he's already
undergoing counselling and/or on medication, but if he is then it
doesn't seem to be helping much. Maybe he just missed his 'meds' today
(again, I mean that sincerely). 26 Jan 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/e061874ea94e9ce8
40- hophead: "I have been reading and occasionally posting to CSMA for a
long time now, since 1995 at least. There have always been trolls and
morons, but I've never seen anything quite so disruptive as the Snit
circus. Snit will *never* back down or stop, and neither will most of
his opponents. A good kill file is your only hope." 20 Aug 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/3161a78667e299eb
hophead: "It's best to killfile snit, and if you can, set up a filter to
kill any responses to snit. Or (as I've been forced to do) killfile
those who insist on responding to him. Yes, you do miss some advocacy
from some of those people, but the joy of not seeing snit or any
responses to him far outweighs the cost. Of course, snit also uses
sockpuppets. They are pretty easy to identify fortunately and are easily
killed as well." 19 Aug 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/d0cb5d4f4d1cba91
41- Jamie Hart (cola): "It seems that since you are unable to offer
support for your statements, you're reduced to personal attacks on me.
Incidentally, anyone reading this post can see that I have offered no
straw men, and have only asked you to explain how the things you state
as facts can be true. I'm really sorry that you're taking this attitude,
the topic is an interesting one and I thought you might have some
insights. I've snipped the rest, since you dislike long posts and avoid
answering any of the questions I asked by saying everything was just
repeated." 6 Dec 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/8e07cde31f4eecf6
42- Jason McNorton: "You're one of the many, many paranoid people on
usenet that should be confined most likely. You sit there and refresh
your screen endlessly. You post the same nonsense over and over. Either
you're a super troll, or you're a super mess." 1 Nov 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/7a8e091c0b248eb0
43- JEDIDIAH (cola): "You're simply full of shit."
44- Jeff B.: "Yo, Snit. We're not pals. I think you're a git." 23 Dec 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/0ec649345d433a2d
45- Jeff Hoppe: "This is a Macintosh Advocacy newsgroup. Not a 12-step
recovery plan. Your medical problems or conditions won't help me achieve
a greater understanding of my Mac. In fact, it detracts from it and
those kinds of discussions have no place in a newsgroup such as this."
18 Nov 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/947a2cc0301a2862
46- Jesus: "Really, Snit. It's annoying. What are you accomplishing
besides being annoying? Is that your goal?" 25 Apr 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/e3d5029d34cde243
47- Jim Lee Jr.: "Snit, read the thread's title, is Bush mentioned in
it? You (and Carroll) ought to learn to stay on topic and not hijack
threads."
48- Jim Polaski: "Why is it that nearly every thread you're involved in
seems like it turns into some tit-for-tat, dozens of responses to OT
things and garbage? Cmon there Snit. Someone has to take the lead and
stop this crap. Try. How about it?" 25 Apr 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/5b5c22490ab9649b
49- Jim Richardson (cola): "And yet again, Snit runs away, rather than
actually provide evidence for his claims. Par for the course I suppose."
"Evasion noted. Snit runs away again rather than produce evidence for
his claims. At least come up with some original insults Snit! I mean,
you *are* capable of original thoughts! Right? Snit?" 8 Feb 2008
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/e33321cc3343fc44
50- Joey Jojo Junior Shabadoo: "and Snithead has even farther to fall -
in a few weeks he'll be out on the street after midnight, yelling at
passersby 'sucky sucky, $2...'" 23 Mar 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/57cf69f66571a5a7
51- John C. Randolph: "You're nothing but a troll yourself. What are you
bitching about?"
52- JohnOfArc (cola): "I'm not sure "troll" does it justice- more like a
black hole! But hey, if we all promise to never again even entertain an
unkind thought re Apple, will you take it back and lock it up? Please??"
11 Mar 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/e2891b1f3984e121
53- John Q. Public: "I have not been bothered to read Snit's postings
since I figured out who he is. I don't bother to filter his posts, I
just consider the source and skip to the next one when I see his name."
7 Jan 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/7d34c1bd05c877d2
54- John Slade: "I don't get posts from Snit. I wouldn't be shocked that
he has some kind of disorder. He made up stuff about being a computer
repairman and teacher. He's just plain loony and best ignored. Let him
deal with his disorder by medication. He's here to do one thing, get
attention from people. He says the crazy stuff just to get a reaction.
You say you like to beat him over the head. Well that's what he's
counting on, he says stuff he knows isn't true in hopes to get a rise
out of people like you. Ignore him, you won't regret it." 3 Apr 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/394a53a65c28d314
"Snit, you have a enough problems as it is without adding drinking booze
to the list. How the hell did you manage to get out of my killfile? Oh
well back into the cage you go, PLONK." 13 Oct 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.food.wine/msg/992a796786a541d8
55- Josh McKee: "Snit, I assume there was some point to this posting?
Because I certainly cannot find it."
56- K E: "I haven't read this board for awhile but I see that even
though the trolls still roam free at least the worst troll of the lot is
mostly being ignored by readers on this bb. If the few stragglers that
keep replying to him would just stop responding to Snit at all this
place could be worth coming back to. There's a good chance he'll pack up
and take his trolling to more fertile ground." 22 Oct 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/0b9dca7df1f677f4
57- KK: 'Whoa there, ad hominem man. You started off your sentence with
"Ah" like you'd just realized something profound.' 29 Oct 2008
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.fan.howard-stern/msg/6a89029a5b5be5f8
58- Kelsey Bjarnason (cola): "Funny how you simply don't bother reading
the posts that rip your entire thesis to bleeding gobbets of putrid
excrescence. Maybe some day you'll learn how to support your position,
instead of sticking your fingers in your ears and humming, hoping it'll
all go away." 7 Mar 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/96d064a7a5c6074a
59- Ku Karlovsky (cola): "You repeatedly chastise others for ad hominem
attacks while in the same sentence make your own ad hominem attacks. You
make silly claims and then avoid the subject of your silliness. You're a
liar and a hypocrite and you always have been." 14 Jul 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/d1e3f9ac5c72c6ee
60- Lars Trager: "Yes, you are stupid." 7 Jan 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/a9bedf6689f9a54f
61- Lefty Bigfoot: "Okay, I tried to put up with it for a long time, but
the few times you post something worth reading just aren't worth it
anymore. *plonk*" 16 Dec 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/5520adae01120e83
62- Liam Slider (cola): "Maybe he's responding to the fact you've been
an annoying little fuckwit lately. You started out with the pretense of
trying to be fair, but lately all there is from you in COLA is trashtalk
about Linux and you acting every bit the troll." 16 Jul 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/ad7d6c42c5e4cf2f
63-libcrushersmith: "Snit also thinks Dan Rather still anchors CBS News
and that Gitmo terrorists are innocent! Any time Snit is cornered, he
changes the subject and will never admit he's wrong." 28 Jan 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/fbc516717f3b7ccf
64- libsnightmare:
Snit: "Who said Bush did not flip flop?"
libsnightmare: "Never said that. I put back in what you cut out. He
never flip-flopped on the war, even when it was unpopular, like "Kerry
and all the other libs" did. You're a sore loser who has resorted to
fifth grade tactics. How fucking sad - all this clown has left is to
edit posts and post fake bullshit. You can't debate... so you lie. Once
again, you have proved Steve Carroll right about you. Sad..." 4 May 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/a80c93f80bd6bc3e
65- Linonut (cola): "Snit is a Tholenoid."
"Indeed. Snit may be the first retraction of my general killfile
amnesty. The volume of cavilling, whining, foot-stomping,
back-tracking, goal-post shifting, and petulance generated by that
effete candy-ass beggars belief". 30 Aug 2008
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/cc4827fd7e8ad574
66- Lloyd Parsons: "Well, I don't know if Oxford is the most cretinous,
I would think that would be reserved for Snit! ;-)" 18 Mar 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/b6cd3ac4bf1e08d6
67- Mark Kent (cola): "The problem with someone like Mr Glasser is the
same as it is with Mr Wong, even if he were to be honest now, it would
be impossible to determine where the honesty starts and the usual
dishonesty ends. In my primary school, one of the teachers was very keen
on proverbs, and I recall her going over the "cry wolf" story. Mr
Glasser could "cry wolf" over and over now, and I would not come to help
him with his sheep, because I do not know any way of determining if he's
ever telling the truth, or indeed, if he ever has." 2 Dec 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/3f30aa1b65a972b3
68- Mayor of R'lyeh: "The fact is that he's probably pulling it to this
post since its all about him and he managed to make me think about him
today. A friend of mine has a toddler. I went over to her house and
videotaped her kid doing a bunch of cute toddler stuff then burned a DVD
of it for her. While we were watching the DVD her kid got mad. He got
mad because we quit making him the center of attention and made that kid
on the tv the center of attention. He even ran up to the tv and tried to
block our view of it. That's how Snit lives his whole life." 30 Sep 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/9935f4154d5a290b
69- Michelle Ronn: "The real topic here is that one someone refutes your
'facts', you run away and ignore them. Refuting your 'facts' is easily
done in this case. I did it, and you ignored it." 9 Feb 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/c050c82720737b32
70- Mike: "Nonsense. I never see you "advocate" anything. All I see you
doing is engage in endless semantic arguments with everyone. You're the
TholenBot of CSMA. BTW, that's *not* a compliment!" 8 Jul 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/7c5b72d70b87ffbd
71- Mike Dee: "I will no longer accuse you of lying here. Instead I can
only say that you are a complete and delusional kook that happens to
inhabit CSMA for the time being. That you are unaware of how deranged
you actually behave further reinforces this notion. Please seek
professional help."
"The point that keeps whooshing over your head Snit, is Elizabot made no
threat to you before you went to the police. She made a promise.
Admittedly, to your delusional spaced out paranoiac view point, Elizabot
was suddenly "threatening" to you. In so much as you had to take your
kooky self down to your local police shop and blub on their shoulders
about how much in danger you were in [sob, whine], and they had to waste
valuable policing time consoling you over your stupidity. I bet they
have Kook with a capital "K" written at the top of your profile, Snit."
2 Sep 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/9cf45bc88a324f40
72- mmoore321: "Snit is a human car-accident and we are all
rubbernecking. We know it is bad form, but yet strangely curious. Treat
him the same way, look but just keep moving on." 18 Aug 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/f1c3041d89504c07
73- Mojo: "Actually, these facts piss everybody off because they are
off-topic, unnecessarily confrontational, extremely boring and clearly
show that you are crying out for attention." 20 Sep 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/a38f07b9a4811a80
74- Mr. Blonde: "Lastly, I can't help but comment on the fact that your
obsession with Sandman has actually grown since you claimed to KF him.
Killfilling someone generally implies you're ignoring that person, yet
you piggyback onto virtually every reply to him here and and check his
website's validation status more often than most people check their
e-mail. These are not the actions of a mentally balanced individual."
19 Jan 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/2b005666ab303e2b
75- MR_ED_of_Course: "Seriously, spend half a day at any pre-school or
kindergarten and see if the kids there can't teach you a thing or two
about social behavior." 16 May 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/55c03a6a0b7813a4
76- Muahman: "Ummm, dude you post 1000 posts a day. 999 of them are
trolls, if anyone here has issues it's not me." 24 Sep 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/ad9daff74ee1e0bd
Muahman: "LOL, everyone hates Snit. I know I'd push him in front of a
bus if I could." 15 May 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/e5ee46bf5bf04d00
Muahman: "Ahhhh shit, another thread lost to the Snit retard circus!!!
I actually dread seeing Snit reply to a thread because that
automatically means it's in the toilet." 8 Jul 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/92e776d521dfa701
77- Nashton/Nasht0n: "Oh for crying out loud, if I wasn't convinced that
snit is a total loser, and I rarely call people losers, I certainly am
now. Why bother responding to his stupidities anyway?" 29 Nov 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/be1a326a81441508
78- New Bee: "Honest and honorable? You? You've either got a wry sense
of humor, or you're completely nuts. Either way you're just a waste of
time, and you've done more than anybody to make this group a cesspool.
Then you revel in wallowing in your own filth." 14 May 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/2856277b085d0274
79- Not Important: "I get this mental image of you and a sibling as
children in the back seat of the family car saying:
Mom, 'snits' touching me ... and you responding much as you do now ...
I'm not touching you, you're touching me! The problem is that by now you
should've grown out of that type of poke and complain interaction with
others. But, of course, you've haven't learned how to interact with
others in a more 'constructive' and mutually beneficial manner even
now." 03 Jul 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/d16279e9003ca8f4
80- OldCSMAer: "What's he been doing? Am I going to be sorry I killfiled
him?" 27 Nov 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/23b808d9646cd257
81- OldSage: "What drives me nuts is your unrelenting ability and desire
to argue on the head of a pin about the most trivial of things." 2 Oct 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/88457f8e7c25273e
82- Oxford: "If you are using MT-Newswatcher: Select offending Author,
example Snit... Go to the Filters Menu, Choose 'Kill this Author'
Click 'OK' Then Repeat with each annoying Author of your choice. Then
to see your work... Choose the Filter Menu again, Then 'Refilter
Articles'... Bam! No more boring, pointless bickering about nothing.
Enjoy!!!!!" 14 Aug 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/1d7f9181e95ed9ec
83- Patrick Nihill: "I mean, honestly, who would you rather discuss
something with; Dan, or someone like Zara? Or, for that matter, Snit,
for whom the work 'troll' seems so painfully inadequate?" 13 Aug 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/f93db68e683ad769
84- Pawel Wojciak: "Jesus Christ, snit... <plonk> "
85- PC Guy: "Forget it Snit, you're a waste of time. For someone who
talks about everyone else not being "honest and honorable" you appear to
be the least honest and honorable of anyone here." 22 Apr 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/36bf51df2a2662a4
86- Peter: "I've never felt the need to use the filters in Newswatcher
but I thought Id try the Kill this Author.. option with Snit. Ten
seconds later and he's gone! Amazing." 30 Dec 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/011eef01d7bcd56c
87- Peter Bjorn Perlso: "Plonked for 60 days. Now stfu and take your
argument with sandman into the private room." 13 Dec 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/ae4651ec99be3c77
88- Peter Hayes: "True, but that removes Snit completely, and someti...
err..... occasiona.... errrrr..... once in a blue moon he has something
useful to say."
89- Peter Jensen (cola): "Where has he ever said that they were not
different windowing environments? Message-ID, please. Experience has
told me not to trust you on anything without backing evidence."
90- Peter Kohlmann (cola): "Snot is a hideous troll. Nobody is as
dishonest as that piece of unadultered garbage. There are csma posters
even more stupid than Snot. Oxford comes to mind. There are certainly
other csma posters who lie nearly as much. But no others are so intent
on trolling in whatever way possible as Snot" 15 Mar 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/3409d9582dcebd25
91- PeterBP: "Oh will you stfu".
92- Phil Earnhardt: "You're only interested in trying to get superficial
snipes and extrapolate inappropriate conclusions." 1 Nov 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/ad24a97d5dc86277
93- Rapskat (cola): "For instance, your sig you reference a long
standing war you have going with some person from csma. It's like you
single out persons to target your attentions upon and then continuously
berate them with constant barbs and goads to perpetuate their
acrimonious responses, which in turn you respond in kind, etc. ad
infinitum. Above all things, your affinity for Macs and your overbearing
pompous nature aside, this is what convinces me that your primary
purpose for frequenting this and other groups is to troll." 07 Sep 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/a09c6b8e3e63f42d
94- RichardK: "Just killfile him already."
95- Rick (cola): "Snit, you are a liar. And an ignorant one. You trash
people that are trying their level best to cope with a horrendous
situation. And you do it without the slightest idea of what is going
on." 06 Sep 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/fcad2955ac5cb03b
96- Rick G.: "Just to be plain here, I have no doubt that he is a troll.
I am tolerant of his nature, not blind to it. However, as a troll, he is
... somewhat clumsy." 22 Mar 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/198b88e3d0064a92
97- Robert F.: "Um, perhaps you misunderstand. I don't care if you quote
Mayor McCheese claiming the Earth is a flat plate perched on the shell
of a tortoise, I was merely pointing out that you run the risk of
looking ridiculous when you quote something patently stupid. If that's
your goal, you're on the right track, and more power to you." 11 Jan 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/4dc22433eae8803d
98- RonB (COLA): "Snit is a crank fixated on one issue, who's thing is
twisting your words so he can win an argument against a straw man.
That's enough to killfile him." 1 Jan 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.usenet.kooks/msg/ce8550d4cc5b1b42
99- Rotten Apple:
Snit: "The truth? Carroll has openly admitted he does what he accuses
others of... now there is evidence he is committing identity theft - the
very thing he accuses me of based on his claiming I am not the person he
has tracked me down to be."
Rotten Apple: "You make trolls like me look like choir boys." 14 Sep 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/7a92988bcbce8fdb
Snit: "No need for him to worry - unlike him, I would not even threaten
to contact his wife. I simply will not sink to his level. I suspect
his wife will find out anyway - people are not as stupid as he wants
them to be."
Rotten Apple: "Your meds are really kicking your ass!" 15 Sep 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/5e414c27d6357a4a
100- Roy Culley (cola): "You appear to be in the latter category.
Starting crossposted threads for the simple purpose of hoping to
generate a flame war. If you truly want to learn more about Linux and
how it can help you and your supposed users why aren't you requesting
help from a more technical Linux newsgroup than an advocacy group? As
the old saying goes, those who can do, those who can't teach. Your posts
seem to confirm that saying IMHO." 12 Mar 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/d521a80051e24d08
101- S'mee (Keith, rec.motorcycles): "Liar...forger and worthless. You
must be related to our resident racist troll, he lies as much as you."
29 Dec 2008
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/ab08c00330c8b58d
102- Sandman: "He is by far the most killfiled person in the -HISTORY-
of csma. I've never seen someone so disliked, almost hated, in a news
group before. He has the ability to turn just about any person against
him in just a few posts. On usenet, trolls do this daily, but the funny
part with Michael is that I actually think he DOESN'T consider himself
be a troll - damn what -EVERYONE ELSE- is calling him. Obviously they
are wrong. Only Tholen himself can match this behaviour." 18 Mar 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/51c0735c774215c2
103- sav: "You really need to take a rest somewhere nice. Honestly, even
the nutters who hang out down on Brighton seafront made more sense than
this. You been doing drugs or something?" 25 May 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/1b251baa5c641370
104- Sean Burke: If you're dumb enough to respond to snit, you're
probably dumb enough to click on a spam attachment that promises to
remove smut from your harddrive." 21 Jan 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/e166032d8959c0e1
105- Sermo Malifer (COLA):
Snit: "Why do so many people in COLA argue *against* me..."
Sermo Malifer: "Because you're a narcissistic troll who posts trash just
to get people talking about you." 21 Jan 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/5ddf14f502e9b3f1
106- spike1: "The thought is probably to show everyone here just how bad
a troll snit is".
107- ShutterBugz: "so snit-zel has some kind of problem expressing
anger, i guess. he has to vent his frustrations in other ways. and he
thinks he's making sense: well the syntax is there and he figures he's
pretty smart. indeed, he tells us, he's done the personality tests and
the iq tests and he's okay! aaaaahhhhh, you see he's soooooooo well
adjusted." 3 Mar 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/7f9fa1cf90490298
108- Steve Carroll: "The only things we are sure about Snit is that he has:
* a monumental reading comprehension problem.
* nym-shifted numerous times to avoid kill-files.
* built too many straw-men to count... some, the size of small cities.
* been labeled a disingenuous liar/troll(or worse) by the vast majority.
* used numerous sock-puppets and admitted to it.
* stolen IDs and admitted to it.
* gotten booted off by ISPs for his behavior.
* twisted more context than all csma posters combined.
* made more unsupported accusations than all csma posters combined.
* virtually no life outside of csma."
109- Steve Mackay: "Just killfile Snit, the dishonest piece of elephant
dung, and all would go away. Sure, I got caught up in the "Snit Circus",
but then the cotton candy began to sour, and CSMA begun to smell like
elephant dung." 18 Aug 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/9fc11094133dfcdf
Welcome to the Snit circus, where the popcorn and cotton candy are
stale, and the smell of elephant dung is everywhere. 27 Dec 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/614daf295b50413f
110- Steven de Mena: "Sorry, you have now lost all credibility with me
for your rediculous argument regarding this." 26 Sep 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/1c8777d39c34e293
111- Steve Travis: "Oh oh... Now look what we've done. Snit has lost
all self respect and has sunk to the point of using words like 'asses'
when referring to others. Oh, how could the morally superior snit have
fallen so low.. Please take a moment out of your busy schedule to feel
embarassed for him. Or perhaps we should set up a fund to get him more
happy glue (and the appropriate plastic bags)." 27 Mar 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/3edd9ab69425a6c5
112- Stuart Krivis: "You might as well just give up and plonk him then.
A snit is a snit is a snit and always will be." 15 Aug 2006 (post not
available except in reply)
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/5b382420a696f140
113- Tattoo Vampire (COLA): "In other words, in another attempt to
troll, you made yourself look like a fool. Again". 28 Aug 2008
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/b2676d3540e09f38
114- The Lost Packet (COLA): "well, he's found a seat in my killbin, I
can't be doing with him." 27 Jan 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/2007526a552b3322
115- TheLetterK: "That is merely your perception, Shit. You're the one
lacking counter evidence, and your arguments basically amount to "I'm
right, nya nya nya." No matter how many examples someone points at to
demonstrate their claim, you blindly continue to insist that they
provide no evidence, or that the evidence given is irrelevant. Worse
still, you fall back on straw men and disingenuous quote mangling to
portray the argument in your favor. You are one of the worst trolls that
inhabit CSMA, Shit. *Edwin* is more prone to fits of reason than you
are." 23 Sep 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/d488596b57132124
116- Thufir: "It's based on *your* MO that I, at least, have no problem
in stating that you're full of shit on nearly any topic. I've observed
your bullshit, and based on that pattern of bullshit, infer that you're
full of it. Your MO is the evidence, the logic is an inference based on
the evidence." 21 Aug 2008
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/c89d3cf79e806e5f
Thufir: "You can "prove" that no one has disproved your "proof"? Again,
your assertion that no one has done so is even *less* convincing than
your claim that some PDF "proves" whatever point you're trying to make
precisely because I'm familiar with your MO. That is, you're a dumb-ass
who would claim that that something is proved when it's not, and who
would ignore counter-examples disproving your contention. I don't know
what this *ages old* thread is about, but I know that you're full of
shit." 21 Aug 2008
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/5114623055c01092
117-Tim Adams: "I'd kill file you but then I'd miss the fun. you see,
you never cease to amaze me at just how stupid you really are. Why just
the other day I had a great laugh when I saw you, the king of liars (in
this NG anyway) calling somebody else a liar." 13 Nov 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/40c7f9407179ff2a
118- Tim Crowley: "I don't know - I think you might have more
compassion. Snit is sick. He needs help. This is the only way the poor
sick fool can get attention. My fucking God, he's taken to hanging out
with and supporting racist pig fuckers like MuahMuah. It is true that
no-one likes him and those that pretend they do are just using him or
don't know him - but come on- it's not his fault. He's sick. Have some
compassion, eh? All these idiot trolls, Zara, Stew, Tommy,
MuaaaahMuaaah, and Snit - they are all so alike. I pity each and every
one of them" 19 Apr 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/67f0f174110bfa0a
119- Tim Smith: "No, he didn't, and there is no reasonable way you could
actually believe he lied. You are purely trying to troll here." 14 Apr 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/6e3cfd9240ac4871
120- Timberwoof: "*Plonk!*"
121- Tom Bates: "Do you have to turn any thread you post in into one of
your Circus acts?" 20 Feb 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/25f0e481b605e71f
122- Tommy: "In case you did not get it, I think the moral was: Stop
polluting the world with your infantile and obsessive "writings". You
give Mac advocacy a bad name. If that was your goal you have succeeded!
That also goes for all that bullshit on your website" 11 Jun 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/03610d2080321d33
123- TravelinMan: "I still can't figure out what's wrong with Snit. Most
people have him kill-filed and the few who don't mostly restrict their
responses to 'why don't you go away, no one wants you here'. Just what
would keep someone in this group with all of that animosity? Must be
some kind of severe mental illness." 17 Mar 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/45197fbb46d491df
124- Wally: "Because by your own admission "honor and honesty" are
nothing more than a "game" to you, as such not only do you wish to
define the rules, but no doubt you will also attempt to alter or bend
the rules when inevitably things do not go to your liking, for this
reason I doubt anyone would be foolish enough to play your game." 16
May 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/b9b3ed1ee20e5220
125- WhoMe: "F michael IS a teacher, it's no wonder he's home more than
he's anywhere near a classroom".
126- William Poaster: "Good grief. If anyone's having a mental breakdown
it's the Prescott Computer Guy, Michael Snit Glasser. What a f#cked up
mess he is." 29 Aug 2008
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/914d1e74855fb461
127- William R. Walsh: "Now, if you'll excuse me, and accept my sincere
apologies for this, PLONK! Feel proud about that. You're the first
person to be plonked from my new computer! :-) " 10 Feb 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/313c7368f6369c49
128- Woofbert: "*Plonk*"
129- zara: "Look - I'm not into combing through thousands of posts, to
prove what was said or not said - I leave stuff like that to people
without lives, like Snit. But it is assuredly, in the record. Ping Snit
to do a search - you will flatter him, and give meaning to his tawdry
little life." 25 Oct 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/a1d4fc7120a6a538
130- Zaren Ankleweed: "And with that, Snit goes in the global killfile.
No subject, no author, no nothing. Buh-bye". 11 Sep 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/12f7c34f24d43624
131- Znu: "I think your 'I'll go start a new thread to try to draw more
people into the debate I'm currently having with Steve/Elizabot/etc'
tactic is fairly trollish."
132- Mutley (AUK):
Snit: "None are supportable. None are real. HPT made them up and is
scared to even try to support them. He knows he cannot. He knows his
lies are being shoved in his face and that people are laughing at his
failure. I know I am. He is a sad pathetic little man."
Mutley: "For the record ... I'll be done when I decide that there's more
shit on your face than there is on the sole of my shoe." 01 Nov 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/1802ad3aa000098b
--
HPT
Snit
on 11/15/09 2:24 PM:
> Don Zeigler wrote:
>> Snit wrote:
>>
>>> And then he ran off.
>>
>> You've given no answer, you just claim he's "run off".
>>
>> Seriously.... do you have some type of comprehension disability? Or
>> do you simply enjoy pretending to be a thickheaded f**kstaff?
>
> Snit has yet to give an adequate answer
You already said that repeating the same BS as you do is a "luser" method.
Why do you call yourself a "luser"? Is it just because you are unable to
defend your lies... and you are just too ashamed?
� � Also, Snit has falsified data in his videos.
� � Looks like you resized the dialogue box
� � You moved and dragged the task bar, aligned
� � vertical with the side of the screen.
� � I just told you a personal observation that YOU
� � ALTERED THAT SLIDE!
� � Snit again altered that data!
� � Altered video wizardry? �There is nothing wrong with
� � Ubuntu copy and paste.
� � No, rather it is another example of Snit moving the
� � goal posts, creating problems that do not exist except
� � for an invention of his own mind.
Well, you should be ashamed. You are a liar, HPT. And your reaction is to
call people names who point out your lies and to self-nuke as you call
yourself a "luser".
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
cc
> cc stated in post
> c3ca5690-faf7-4e1d-9ae9-7869b4c87...@f10g2000vbl.googlegroups.com on> >> Peter Köhlmann stated in post hdpct0$cao$0...@news.t-online.com on 11/15/09
> >> 10:14 AM:
>
> >>> Don Zeigler wrote:
>
> >>>> Snit wrote:
>
> >>>>> He has run off to lick his wounds... at least under his HPT name.
>
> >>>> How has he "run off"???
>
> >>> A typical Snot Michael Glasser delusion
>
> >>> When completely beaten to stinking pulp, claim bullshit like that and hope
> >>> that the resident filth like Hadron Quark or flatfish chime in to deflect
> >>> his humilation
>
> >>> Must be very annoying for that POS to be constantly reminded what posters
> >>> think of that dishonest cretin Glasser
>
> >> Oh! Oh! Quote the alleged lies you refer to.
>
> >> LOL!
>
> >> As if you could... there are none.
>
> > en&dmode=source
>
> > Complete lie and idiocy wrapped up into one post. At least you
> > admitted to the lie later in the thread, but that doesn't stop it from
> > being a stupid stupid lie when you wrote it.
>
> You quoted me
Your haunting failure to answer any questions blows my mind. Do you
not want to provide proof that you are smart? Can you provide proof?
The lack of an answer from you is telling. Maybe you don't understand
the questions?
You have acknowledged that the following quotes/paraphrases are
correct by failing to provide any support against them.
cc:
Snit is an idiot.
Snit:
Prove it.
cc:
[link to Snit's entire posting history] There's your proof.
Snit:
You can have the last word.
You have agreed that this is how the thread went. Why not back your
claims that I am not providing support that you are dumb? Just answer
the following questions:
Did the link I posted not show your entire posting history?
Why do you think that your posting history does not prove that you
arestupid?
What evidence is out there that proves unequivocally that you are
notdumb?
High Plains Thumper
> Snit wrote:
>
>> And then he ran off.
>
> You've given no answer, you just claim he's "run off". Seriously....
> do you have some type of comprehension disability? Or do you simply
Snit hasn't been able to provide a correct answer since 29 Jan 2009.
Following is the condensed version of 15 May 2009:
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/8d2150cde4f151a9
[quote]
Snit: "Here are some of the inconsistencies (and other oddities)
I have documented in a relatively recent versions of desktop
Linux: From PCLOS: Poorly done menus
<http://tmp.gallopinginsanity.com/PCLOS-menu.pdf>
HPT: "Very nit picky, making a mountain out of a mole hill.
"Exit" versus "Quit"? You're kidding."
Snit: "Poorly done dialogs:
<http://tmp.gallopinginsanity.com/PCLOS.pdf>"
HPT: "Dialogs cut off? There is a slider bar at the bottom, and
one can resize the dialogue box. Looks like you resized the
dialogue box to suit your anti-Linux agenda."
Snit: "Poorly done and Inconsistent dialogs:
<http://tmp.gallopinginsanity.com/PCLOS2.pdf>"
HPT: "You moved and dragged the task bar, aligned vertical with
the side of the screen. That is freedom and for you it is a
problem? Buttons cut off by default? I did what you did by
shinking the window. FireFox shows ">>", which shows the
remainder of that favourites toolbar menu, not as you show."
Snit: "Mouse pointers that do not do as they say:
<http://tmp.gallopinginsanity.com/PCLOS.mov>"
HPT: "In this case, file window dialogue box did not stretch, but
all text items are visible, fully functional. Windows XP does
the same. This is okay for Microsoft software but not okay for
Linux? Who are you kidding?"
Snit: "Even Ubuntu has its share of quirks - though it is clearly
done much better: <http://tmp.gallopinginsanity.com/ubuntu-menu.pdf>"
HPT: "What is unusal about individual expression of how menus are
set up in applications? I see the same thing with Windows
software. Adobe's menu items differ from Corel's, differ from Ulead."
Snit: "And the more recent one showing copy and paste oddities
and weird text behavior on selection:
<http://tmp.gallopinginsanity.com/copy-paste.mov> It is not like
such examples are hard to find - or are not obvious."
HPT: "Oh, really? I just copied in FireFox, pasted in gedit, it
works fine. This is with Ubuntu 8.04 LTS and FireFox 3.0.5.
Here it is again, same text you highlighted:
[paste]
Prescott Computer Guy is a family run business located in
Prescott, Arizona. My wife, Anne, does most of the "behind the
scenes" work and I, Michael, get to do the fun part: working with
the public and playing with fun toys. Don't tell her, but I think
I get the better end of the deal!
[/paste]
Altered video wizardry? There is nothing wrong with Ubuntu copy
and paste."
George Barca: "I suppose you could say Gimp vs Photoshop however
people using either of those programs are most likely
professionals and will take the time to learn the differences if
they need to move between the two.
Snit: "It is not a question of learning the difference... no
doubt people can use, for example, any of the different Save
dialogs I show in my above links. Still leads to lost work,
frustration, and lost time."
HPT: "No, rather it is another example of Snit moving the goal
posts, creating problems that do not exist except for an
invention of his own mind." 29 Jan 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/4489dbf4844832e5
Re: <http://tmp.gallopinginsanity.com/UbuntuCP.mov>
Alias: "Copying and pasting or cutting and pasting is a bit
different in Ubuntu. Note that the lamer who made this video
didn't know that you can select something and then just click the
wheel on your mouse and it will paste, something you can't do
with Windows and is much quicker than the lame Windows way in the
video." 19 Apr 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/9abb006c689c9e62
Thus Snit demonstrates his only purpose in COLA is to FUD Linux.
[/quote]
and that still remains an understatement.
--
HPT
Snit
b59ef108-2578-4f34...@p19g2000vbq.googlegroups.com on
11/15/09 2:56 PM:
> On Nov 15, 1:16�pm, Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>> cc stated in post
>> c3ca5690-faf7-4e1d-9ae9-7869b4c87...@f10g2000vbl.googlegroups.com on
>> 11/15/09 11:02 AM:
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Nov 15, 12:33�pm, Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>>> Peter K�hlmann stated in post hdpct0$cao$0...@news.t-online.com on 11/15/09
>>>> 10:14 AM:
>>
>>>>> Don Zeigler wrote:
>>
>>>>>> Snit wrote:
>>
>>>>>>> He has run off to lick his wounds... at least under his HPT name.
>>
>>>>>> How has he "run off"???
>>
>>>>> A typical Snot Michael Glasser delusion
>>
>>>>> When completely beaten to stinking pulp, claim bullshit like that and hope
>>>>> that the resident filth like Hadron Quark or flatfish chime in to deflect
>>>>> his humilation
>>
>>>>> Must be very annoying for that POS to be constantly reminded what posters
>>>>> think of that dishonest cretin Glasser
>>
>>>> Oh! �Oh! �Quote the alleged lies you refer to.
>>
>>>> LOL!
>>
>>>> As if you could... there are none.
>>
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/32659ebc860...
>>> en&dmode=source
>>
>>> Complete lie and idiocy wrapped up into one post. At least you
>>> admitted to the lie later in the thread, but that doesn't stop it from
>>> being a stupid stupid lie when you wrote it.
>>
>> You quoted me
>
>
>
> Your
But run from everything but the first couple of words and re-paste your same
failed efforts.
Seriously, what is wrong with you?
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
Snit
11/15/09 2:59 PM:
You have been called out on your lies.
Your reaction... refuse to comment on them other than to repeat them.
No wonder you call yourself a "luser". Really. That is a very good
description of you.
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
cc
> 11/15/09 2:56 PM:
>
>
>
> > On Nov 15, 1:16 pm, Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> >> cc stated in post
> >> c3ca5690-faf7-4e1d-9ae9-7869b4c87...@f10g2000vbl.googlegroups.com on
> >> 11/15/09 11:02 AM:
>
> >>> On Nov 15, 12:33 pm, Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> >>>> 10:14 AM:
>
> >>>>> Don Zeigler wrote:
>
> >>>>>> Snit wrote:
>
> >>>>>>> He has run off to lick his wounds... at least under his HPT name.
>
> >>>>>> How has he "run off"???
>
> >>>>> A typical Snot Michael Glasser delusion
>
> >>>>> When completely beaten to stinking pulp, claim bullshit like that and hope
> >>>>> that the resident filth like Hadron Quark or flatfish chime in to deflect
> >>>>> his humilation
>
> >>>>> Must be very annoying for that POS to be constantly reminded what posters
> >>>>> think of that dishonest cretin Glasser
>
> >>>> Oh! Oh! Quote the alleged lies you refer to.
>
> >>>> LOL!
>
> >>>> As if you could... there are none.
>
> >>>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/32659ebc860...
> >>> en&dmode=source
>
> >>> Complete lie and idiocy wrapped up into one post. At least you
> >>> admitted to the lie later in the thread, but that doesn't stop it from
> >>> being a stupid stupid lie when you wrote it.
>
> >> You quoted me
>
> > Your
>
> But run from everything but the first couple of words and re-paste your same
> failed efforts.
>
> Seriously, what is wrong with you?
Nothing. See how easy it is to answer a question?
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/67032056cf7f7c62?hl=en&dmode=source
"Get the last word in"
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/5f20e761d289bd5b?hl=en&dmode=source
"[G]et the last [indisputably correct] word"
Two more lies filled with idiocy.
Snit
447b55ea-2d6c-44f7...@e31g2000vbm.googlegroups.com on
11/15/09 5:02 PM:
> Did the link I posted not show your entire posting history?
Yes. But you never even tried to support your grade school insults.
You made insults you could not support. You then posted a straw man where
you pretended I was trying to claim something I was not claiming... and I
still was able to show it.
In other words, you made an ass out of yourself. Repeatedly.
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
Snit
> cc:
> Snit is an idiot.
> Snit:
> Prove it.
> cc:
> [link to Snit's entire posting history] There's your proof.
> Snit:
> You can have the last word.
>
> You have agreed that this is how the thread went. Why not back your
> claims that I am not providing support that you are dumb? Just answer
> the following questions:
>
> Did the link I posted not show your entire posting history?
> Why do you think that your posting history does not prove that you are
> stupid?
> What evidence is out there that proves unequivocally that you are not
> dumb?
The question is not *anything* about me. It is if you are able to show
support for your claim.
And you are not.
And you are too stupid to even realize that. Hence, you are proved to be an
idiot... ironic, given that you wanted to prove I was like you.
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
cc
> 11/15/09 5:02 PM:
>
>
>
> > cc:
> > Snit is an idiot.
> > Snit:
> > Prove it.
> > cc:
> > [link to Snit's entire posting history] There's your proof.
> > Snit:
> > You can have the last word.
>
> > You have agreed that this is how the thread went. Why not back your
> > claims that I am not providing support that you are dumb? Just answer
> > the following questions:
>
> > Did the link I posted not show your entire posting history?
> > Why do you think that your posting history does not prove that you are
> > stupid?
> > What evidence is out there that proves unequivocally that you are not
> > dumb?
>
> The question is not *anything* about me. It is if you are able to show
> support for your claim.
>
That is absolute rubbish that you're trying to pass off as English. It
makes absolutely no sense. You've absolutely failed again. Try to
answer the questions. At least you've admitted that you're a liar now.
Your haunting failure to answer any questions blows my mind. Do you
not want to provide proof that you are smart? Can you provide proof?
The lack of an answer from you is telling. Maybe you don't understand
the questions?
You have acknowledged that the following quotes/paraphrases are
correct by failing to provide any support against them.
cc:
Don Zeigler
> self-nuke self-nuke self-nuke self-nuke self-nuke
Snit giggles and claps his hands as he gets an opportunity to use the new
phrase he has learned.
--
Regards,
Don Zeigler
Owner/proprietor, Trollus Amongus, LLC
...White dwarf seeks red giant for binary relationship
cc
> 11/15/09 5:02 PM:
>
> > Did the link I posted not show your entire posting history?
>
> Yes. But you never even tried to support your grade school insults.
>
Absolute rubbish again. If I were in a court of law testifying to the
fact that you're an idiot, my main support would be everything you've
ever done or said. I would hand the judge a complete printout of all
your posts and he/she would rule in my favor. Maybe I'd have the
laughable results of your IQ test as well.
I'm sorry you're so upset over being proven an idiot in such a public
forum. These things happen from time to time in Usenet. You've
acknowledged that you're an idiot and a liar, and for that you should
be applauded. But at the same time, it's obvious that you need to get
some smarts somehow. Going through life dumb as shit is no way to
live. I'm here to help. I'll be posting some videos to YouTube
shortly. The tentative title: "Snit's An Idiot, But We Can Change
That."
Your haunting failure to answer any questions blows my mind. Do you
not want to provide proof that you are smart? Can you provide proof?
The lack of an answer from you is telling. Maybe you don't understand
the questions?
You have acknowledged that the following quotes/paraphrases are
correct by failing to provide any support against them.
cc:
Snit is an idiot.
Snit:
Prove it.
cc:
[link to Snit's entire posting history] There's your proof.
Snit:
You can have the last word.
You have agreed that this is how the thread went. Why not back your
claims that I am not providing support that you are dumb? Just answer
the following questions:
Did the link I posted not show your entire posting history?
Snit
7:09 PM:
> Snit droned on and on, putting COLA to sleep:
>
>> self-nuke self-nuke self-nuke self-nuke self-nuke
>
>
> Snit giggles and claps his hands as he gets an opportunity to use the new
> phrase he has learned.
Seriously, are you just begging for attention or are you trying to say
something of value. If the former - congrats. If the latter - sorry you
failed so badly.
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
Snit
4d78a705-64fd-46ba...@m20g2000vbp.googlegroups.com on
11/15/09 7:19 PM:
> On Nov 15, 7:14�pm, Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>> cc stated in post
>> 447b55ea-2d6c-44f7-9d9b-7535a0d5c...@e31g2000vbm.googlegroups.com on
>> 11/15/09 5:02 PM:
>>
>>> Did the link I posted not show your entire posting history?
>>
>> Yes. �But you never even tried to support your grade school insults.
>>
>
> Absolute rubbish again.
Well, if you tried you failed. Horribly failed... to the point where you
showed you are intellectually challenged. Severely.
> If I were in a court of law testifying to the fact that you're an idiot, my
> main support would be everything you've ever done or said. I would hand the
> judge a complete printout of all your posts and he/she would rule in my favor.
> Maybe I'd have the laughable results of your IQ test as well.
Ah, if you were judge and jury you would rule against me. Wow. Man, that
is powerful.
If you were to use logic and rationality as the standard, and not just your
made up BS where you are judge and jury, you would clearly fail.
See: you are a moron. You have proved it. You argue *against* logic and
rationality. Repeatedly.
> I'm sorry you're so upset over being proven an idiot in such a public
> forum.
You are calling me a name without a shred of evidence. That is not "proof"
of anything other than your own immaturity.
> These things happen from time to time in Usenet. You've acknowledged that
> you're an idiot and a liar, and for that you should be applauded. But at the
> same time, it's obvious that you need to get some smarts somehow. Going
> through life dumb as shit is no way to live. I'm here to help. I'll be posting
> some videos to YouTube shortly. The tentative title: "Snit's An Idiot, But We
> Can Change That."
You are insane.
> Your haunting failure to answer any questions blows my mind. Do you
> not want to provide proof that you are smart? Can you provide proof?
What I am is not the question. You providing evidence for your claim is.
And you have failed. But, as has been shown in this thread, I am clearly
smarter than you are. You are a moron.
> The lack of an answer from you is telling. Maybe you don't understand
> the questions?
The fact you are a moron is well established.
> You have acknowledged that the following quotes/paraphrases are
> correct by failing to provide any support against them.
>
> cc:
> Snit is an idiot.
> Snit:
> Prove it.
> cc:
> [link to Snit's entire posting history] There's your proof.
> Snit:
> You can have the last word.
>
> You have agreed that this is how the thread went. Why not back your
> claims that I am not providing support that you are dumb? Just answer
> the following questions:
>
> Did the link I posted not show your entire posting history?
> Why do you think that your posting history does not prove that you are
> stupid?
> What evidence is out there that proves unequivocally that you are not
> dumb?
You copy and paste nonsense a lot. And fail to offer any support... just as
one would expect from a moron.
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
Snit
54f46e0e-9d6e-4ab3...@g31g2000vbr.googlegroups.com on
11/15/09 7:08 PM:
Why do you keep showing off what a moron you are? Really. What is the
point?
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
Don Zeigler
> Seriously, are you just begging for attention or are you trying to say
> something of value. If the former - congrats. If the latter - sorry you
> failed so badly.
Considering you have called me "boring", it's amusing to watch you jump
through hoops in order to reply to my posts promptly.
Are cc and HPT ignoring you?
--
Regards,
Don Zeigler
Owner/proprietor, Trollus Amongus, LLC
...Think of it as evolution in action.
cc
> 11/15/09 7:19 PM:
>
> > On Nov 15, 7:14 pm, Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> >> cc stated in post
> >> 447b55ea-2d6c-44f7-9d9b-7535a0d5c...@e31g2000vbm.googlegroups.com on
> >> 11/15/09 5:02 PM:
>
> >>> Did the link I posted not show your entire posting history?
>
> >> Yes. But you never even tried to support your grade school insults.
>
> > Absolute rubbish again.
>
> Well, if you tried you failed. Horribly failed... to the point where you
> showed you are intellectually challenged. Severely.
>
> > If I were in a court of law testifying to the fact that you're an idiot, my
> > main support would be everything you've ever done or said. I would hand the
> > judge a complete printout of all your posts and he/she would rule in my favor.
> > Maybe I'd have the laughable results of your IQ test as well.
>
> Ah, if you were judge and jury you would rule against me. Wow. Man, that
> is powerful.
Nice self-nuke. I explicitly said that I was not the judge, and
implicitly stated that I was not the jury. An impartial jury of your
peers, armed with all your Usenet posts, would have no option but to
convict you of idiocy. Should we put it to the test?
> If you were to use logic and rationality as the standard, and not just your
> made up BS where you are judge and jury, you would clearly fail.
Self-nuke again. Please point to where I said I was judge and jury.
You cannot. Absolute fail.
> See: you are a moron. You have proved it. You argue *against* logic and
> rationality. Repeatedly.
Look, I understand that you don't understand logic and reason, because
you're a moron. Which is exactly what I proved with logic and reason.
But I was arguing with an idiot, so it's not like it was hard.
> > I'm sorry you're so upset over being proven an idiot in such a public
> > forum.
>
> You are calling me a name without a shred of evidence. That is not "proof"
> of anything other than your own immaturity.
I gave you evidence. You can't understand the evidence. Which is even
more evidence. Every time you type a sentence, you reinforce my point.
> > These things happen from time to time in Usenet. You've acknowledged that
> > you're an idiot and a liar, and for that you should be applauded. But at the
> > same time, it's obvious that you need to get some smarts somehow. Going
> > through life dumb as shit is no way to live. I'm here to help. I'll be posting
> > some videos to YouTube shortly. The tentative title: "Snit's An Idiot, But We
> > Can Change That."
>
> You are insane.
>
Prove it.
Snit
432c9475-b48c-45dc...@j9g2000vbp.googlegroups.com on 11/15/09
7:36 PM:
> On Nov 15, 9:29�ｿｽpm, Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>> cc stated in post
>> 4d78a705-64fd-46ba-84b0-a9b35173d...@m20g2000vbp.googlegroups.com on
>> 11/15/09 7:19 PM:
>>
>>> On Nov 15, 7:14�ｿｽpm, Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>>> cc stated in post
>>>> 447b55ea-2d6c-44f7-9d9b-7535a0d5c...@e31g2000vbm.googlegroups.com on
>>>> 11/15/09 5:02 PM:
>>
>>>>> Did the link I posted not show your entire posting history?
>>
>>>> Yes. �ｿｽBut you never even tried to support your grade school insults.
>>
>>> Absolute rubbish again.
>>
>> Well, if you tried you failed. �ｿｽHorribly failed... to the point where you
>> showed you are intellectually challenged. �ｿｽSeverely.
>>
>>> If I were in a court of law testifying to the fact that you're an idiot, my
>>> main support would be everything you've ever done or said. I would hand the
>>> judge a complete printout of all your posts and he/she would rule in my
>>> favor.
>>> Maybe I'd have the laughable results of your IQ test as well.
>>
>> Ah, if you were judge and jury you would rule against me. �ｿｽWow. �ｿｽMan, that
>> is powerful.
>
> Nice self-nuke. I explicitly said that I was not the judge, and
> implicitly stated that I was not the jury. An impartial jury of your
> peers, armed with all your Usenet posts, would have no option but to
> convict you of idiocy. Should we put it to the test?
>
>
>> If you were to use logic and rationality as the standard, and not just your
>> made up BS where you are judge and jury, you would clearly fail.
>
> Self-nuke again. Please point to where I said I was judge and jury.
> You cannot. Absolute fail.
>
>> See: you are a moron. �ｿｽYou have proved it. �ｿｽYou argue *against* logic and
>> rationality. �ｿｽRepeatedly.
>
> Look, I understand that you don't understand logic and reason, because
> you're a moron. Which is exactly what I proved with logic and reason.
> But I was arguing with an idiot, so it's not like it was hard.
>
>
>>> I'm sorry you're so upset over being proven an idiot in such a public
>>> forum.
>>
>> You are calling me a name without a shred of evidence. �ｿｽThat is not "proof"
>> of anything other than your own immaturity.
>
>
> I gave you evidence. You can't understand the evidence. Which is even
> more evidence. Every time you type a sentence, you reinforce my point.
>
>>> These things happen from time to time in Usenet. You've acknowledged that
>>> you're an idiot and a liar, and for that you should be applauded. But at the
>>> same time, it's obvious that you need to get some smarts somehow. Going
>>> through life dumb as shit is no way to live. I'm here to help. I'll be
>>> posting
>>> some videos to YouTube shortly. The tentative title: "Snit's An Idiot, But
>>> We
>>> Can Change That."
>>
>> You are insane.
>>
>
>
> Prove it.
The fact you speak for judge and jury as you deny you are doing so, and the
fact you say it would be easy to prove something you have made clear you
cannot shows you are a moron. The fact you keep bragging about how stupid
you are shows you are insane.
And, yes, I know the facts will go over your head. You are an insane
moron... and you have nothing of value to say. Here: you will prove it with
your response and I will merely note you did so. 100% predictable.
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
cc
> 7:36 PM:
>
>
>
> > On Nov 15, 9:29 pm, Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> >> cc stated in post
> >> 4d78a705-64fd-46ba-84b0-a9b35173d...@m20g2000vbp.googlegroups.com on
> >> 11/15/09 7:19 PM:
>
> >>>> cc stated in post
> >>>> 447b55ea-2d6c-44f7-9d9b-7535a0d5c...@e31g2000vbm.googlegroups.com on
> >>>> 11/15/09 5:02 PM:
>
> >>>>> Did the link I posted not show your entire posting history?
>
>
> >>> Absolute rubbish again.
>
> >> Well, if you tried you failed. Horribly failed... to the point where you
> >> showed you are intellectually challenged. Severely.
>
> >>> If I were in a court of law testifying to the fact that you're an idiot, my
> >>> main support would be everything you've ever done or said. I would hand the
> >>> judge a complete printout of all your posts and he/she would rule in my
> >>> favor.
> >>> Maybe I'd have the laughable results of your IQ test as well.
>
> >> is powerful.
>
> > Nice self-nuke. I explicitly said that I was not the judge, and
> > implicitly stated that I was not the jury. An impartial jury of your
> > peers, armed with all your Usenet posts, would have no option but to
> > convict you of idiocy. Should we put it to the test?
>
> >> If you were to use logic and rationality as the standard, and not just your
> >> made up BS where you are judge and jury, you would clearly fail.
>
> > Self-nuke again. Please point to where I said I was judge and jury.
> > You cannot. Absolute fail.
>
> >> rationality. Repeatedly.
>
> > Look, I understand that you don't understand logic and reason, because
> > you're a moron. Which is exactly what I proved with logic and reason.
> > But I was arguing with an idiot, so it's not like it was hard.
>
> >>> I'm sorry you're so upset over being proven an idiot in such a public
> >>> forum.
>
> >> of anything other than your own immaturity.
>
> > I gave you evidence. You can't understand the evidence. Which is even
> > more evidence. Every time you type a sentence, you reinforce my point.
>
> >>> These things happen from time to time in Usenet. You've acknowledged that
> >>> you're an idiot and a liar, and for that you should be applauded. But at the
> >>> same time, it's obvious that you need to get some smarts somehow. Going
> >>> through life dumb as shit is no way to live. I'm here to help. I'll be
> >>> posting
> >>> some videos to YouTube shortly. The tentative title: "Snit's An Idiot, But
> >>> We
> >>> Can Change That."
>
> >> You are insane.
>
> > Prove it.
>
> The fact you speak for judge and jury as you deny you are doing so, and the
> fact you say it would be easy to prove something you have made clear you
You're a fucking moron who doesn't know what a hypothetical situation
is.
> cannot shows you are a moron. The fact you keep bragging about how stupid
> you are shows you are insane.
>
You have admitted that I proved you are a moron many times. Now you
cannot provide proof that I am insane. Absolute failure.
> And, yes, I know the facts will go over your head. You are an insane
> moron... and you have nothing of value to say. Here: you will prove it with
> your response and I will merely note you did so. 100% predictable.
>
What facts? The fact that you don't know what a hypothetical situation
is? The fact that you can't answer any questions? The fact that you
continue to run away when faced with simple questions? I am 100%
predictable to you because you simply cannot understand what has been
placed in front of you. It's all just a jumble of words to your pea-
sized brain, and therefore it always looks the same. Here's a
prediction: you will not answer the following questions because you
are a simpleton.
Did the link I posted not show your entire posting history?
Why do you think that your posting history does not prove that you are
stupid?
What evidence is out there that proves unequivocally that you are not
dumb?
Do you know what a hypothetical situation is?
Do you know why they are used?
Snit
42924b96-50a9-4c54...@o13g2000vbl.googlegroups.com on
11/15/09 9:24 PM:
See. You proved me correct. You have *nothing* of value to say and cannot
even figure out that you spoke for judge and jury in your asinine
hypothetical scenario you created to run from logic and rationality.
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
chrisv
>Hadron pulled this Usenet boner:
>
>> I dont think I can do it. I enjoy watching them squirm too much
>
>LOL. In your dreams, troll.
Well, he is kind of creepy...
He doesn't make me squirm, but I have to admit that sometimes I can
feel chunks rising in my throat...
--
"Oddly enough Linux Torvalds himself would most likely be called a
wintroll here in COLA" - Larry "message ID" Qualig, AKA Hadron Quack
Hadron
> Hadron pulled this Usenet boner:
>
>> I dont think I can do it. I enjoy watching them squirm too much
>
> LOL. In your dreams, troll.
The funny thing about your yipping is that your reaction time and time
again gives yourself away.