Re: Snit's Head Buried in the Sand (was Microsoft Lawyer: the world will end in chaos)
High Plains Thumper
> High Plains Thumper stated:
>> Snit wrote:
>>> Peter K�hlmann stated:
>>>
>>>> Snot Michael Glasser is easily even more dishonest than
>>>> you ever managed to be. He will never accept any proof
>>>> of his lying, his dishonesty, his inane trolling and his
>>>> overall being a worthless oxygen thief
>>>
>>> Oh! Oh! Oh!
>>
>> Muahman:
>
> Is not Snit.
What Snit snipped, LOL!
Muahman: "Ahhhh shit, another thread lost to the Snit retard
circus!!! I actually dread seeing Snit reply to a thread because
that automatically means it's in the toilet." 8 Jul 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/92e776d521dfa701
>>> Link to these examples of "proof" and show the world!
>>
>> Thufir:
>
> Is not Snit.
What Snit snipped, LOL!
Thufir: "You can "prove" that no one has disproved your "proof"?
Again, your assertion that no one has done so is even *less*
convincing than your claim that some PDF "proves" whatever point
you're trying to make precisely because I'm familiar with your
MO. That is, you're a dumb-ass who would claim that that
something is proved when it's not, and who would ignore
counter-examples disproving your contention. I don't know what
this *ages old* thread is about, but I know that you're full of
shit." 21 Aug 2008
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/5114623055c01092
>>> Man, that will really humiliate me.
>>
>> 70- mmoore321:
>
> Is not Snit.
What Snit snipped, LOL!
70- mmoore321: "Snit is a human car-accident and we are all
rubbernecking. We know it is bad form, but yet strangely curious.
Treat him the same way, look but just keep moving on." 18 Aug 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/f1c3041d89504c07
>>> What? You cannot find any examples?
What Snit snipped, LOL!
27- Geezer:
Snit: "Steve Carroll has no sense of morality"
Geezer: "Whined the guy who cannot directly address those who
uncover his lies and deceit;)"
Snit: "and no clue about the law."
Geezer: "Said the guy who believes his unsupported opinions are
"proof". LOL! (snip more of Snit's unsupported lies)' 1 Jan 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/d0517ced5134934d
>> Snit: "Steve Carroll has no sense of morality"
>
> Ok, no *reasonable* sense of morality. Is that the best you
> can do to find an example of something *I* have said that was
> not truthful?
Snit caught in a recent lie:
High Plains Thumper: "And to his own chagrin, has verified that
he in fact is the same who posted in 1998. Steve was correct."
Snit wrote: "Actually, I have not said if the post is from me..."
[quote]
Snit: "Yes: Carroll tracked down old posts of mine where I
talked about some health issues I have struggled with."
28 Jul 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/06a403a4ab796fdd
[/quote]
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 23:12:13 -0600
Subject: Re: Steve Carroll and HPT: showing they have no morals.
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/6845a75905efe360
>> Are you so incompetent, Peter, that you simply cannot find
>>> a single one? But aren't there many? Are you really so
>>> incompetent you cannot find them.
Again, what Snit snipped, LOL!
"Only once in a blue moon does he have anything worth reading. I
just got through his circus of repetitive ad hominem crap. I am
surprised that with the stunts he has pulled in COLA and this
newsgroup, that he hasn't suffered a worse fate in real life. If
he hasn't, one of these days he will pull that stunt on the wrong
person, and *B-O-O-M-!*, someone will pull the trigger. One
ought to really pity him (or as Steve Travis stated, "Or perhaps
we should set up a fund to get him more happy glue (and the
appropriate plastic bags)." 8 Jul 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/2666237bba82b97a
>>> Yes. Peter thinks he is incompetent. Completely and
>>> utterly incompetent.
>>
>> 57- Ku Karlovsky (cola):
>
> Is not Snit.
Look what Snit snipped, LOL!
7- Ku Karlovsky (cola): "You repeatedly chastise others for ad
hominem attacks while in the same sentence make your own ad
hominem attacks. You make silly claims and then avoid the subject
of your silliness. You're a liar and a hypocrite and you always
have been." 14 Jul 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/d1e3f9ac5c72c6ee
> Dude... you simply are a complete and total failure - your
> goal is to quote *me* lying, and you keep quoting other
> people. What the heck? Are you really as incompetent as you
> make yourself seem?
Snit buries his head in the sand. Again. It is not my goal to
directly quote Snit. Rather, it is better to quote those with
first hand experience with Snit's trolling. The quotes are
concise summary conclusions. As I stated previously, Snit would
not have to testify in a court. Eye witnesses would. As one can
see, a Snit discussion degrades into his unwarranted ad hominem
attacks, what a luser!
--
HPT
Snit
on 8/22/09 12:31 AM:
> Snit wrote:
>> High Plains Thumper stated:
>>> Snit wrote:
>>>> Peter K�hlmann stated:
>>>>
>>>>> Snot Michael Glasser is easily even more dishonest than
>>>>> you ever managed to be. He will never accept any proof
>>>>> of his lying, his dishonesty, his inane trolling and his
>>>>> overall being a worthless oxygen thief
>>>>
>>>> Oh! Oh! Oh!
>>>
>>> Muahman:
>>
>> Is not Snit.
>
> What Snit snipped, LOL!
>
> Muahman:
Still not me. Whatever other say is irrelevant to your attempt to support
your claims about *me*. You know: you claim I have lied... but quote
*others* instead of me because you know you cannot find a single example.
The only quote of mine you did use was this:
> Snit: "Steve Carroll has no sense of morality"
And, well, clearly I am correct.
...
>> Dude... you simply are a complete and total failure - your
>> goal is to quote *me* lying, and you keep quoting other
>> people. What the heck? Are you really as incompetent as you
>> make yourself seem?
>
> Snit buries his head in the sand. Again. It is not my goal to
> directly quote Snit.
Right: it is not your goal to support your accusations... if it was, well,
you would quote me doing as you say. But you know you cannot. You know you
have already failed in that endeavor. You are a failure... a complete and
utter failure.
And you cannot help but prove it with your every example of lashing out
against me.
> Rather, it is better to quote those with first hand experience with Snit's
> trolling. The quotes are concise summary conclusions. As I stated
> previously, Snit would not have to testify in a court. Eye witnesses would.
> As one can see, a Snit discussion degrades into his unwarranted ad hominem
> attacks, what a luser!
Eye witnesses? The events are fully recorded... and you have *no* evidence.
None. Not a shred. If you did, well, you would be posting it in your every
message... but, as even you admit, your goal is no longer even to do that.
You tried to find evidence. And you failed.
So give it up... as if you could.
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
High Plains Thumper
> High Plains Thumper stated:
>> Snit wrote:
>>> High Plains Thumper stated:
>>>> Snit wrote:
>>>>> Peter K�hlmann stated:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Snot Michael Glasser is easily even more dishonest
>>>>>> than you ever managed to be. He will never accept
>>>>>> any proof of his lying, his dishonesty, his inane
>>>>>> trolling and his overall being a worthless oxygen
>>>>>> thief
>>>>>
>>>>> Oh! Oh! Oh!
>>>>
>>>> Muahman:
>>>
>>> Is not Snit.
>>
>> What Snit snipped, LOL!
>>
>> Muahman:
>
> Still not me.
What Snit snipped, LOL!
Muahman: "Ahhhh shit, another thread lost to the Snit retard
circus!!! I actually dread seeing Snit reply to a thread because
that automatically means it's in the toilet." 8 Jul 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/92e776d521dfa701
> Whatever other say is irrelevant to your attempt to support
> your claims about *me*. You know: you claim I have lied...
> but quote *others* instead of me because you know you cannot
> find a single example.
What Snit snipped, LOL! Snit caught in a recent lie:
High Plains Thumper: "And to his own chagrin, has verified that
he in fact is the same who posted in 1998. Steve was correct."
Snit wrote: "Actually, I have not said if the post is from me..."
[quote]
Snit: "Yes: Carroll tracked down old posts of mine where I
talked about some health issues I have struggled with."
28 Jul 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/06a403a4ab796fdd
[/quote]
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 23:12:13 -0600
Subject: Re: Steve Carroll and HPT: showing they have no morals.
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/6845a75905efe360
> The only quote of mine you did use was this:
>
>> Snit: "Steve Carroll has no sense of morality"
>
> And, well, clearly I am correct.
What Snit snipped, LOL!
27- Geezer:
Snit: "Steve Carroll has no sense of morality"
Geezer: "Whined the guy who cannot directly address those who
uncover his lies and deceit;)"
Snit: "and no clue about the law."
Geezer: "Said the guy who believes his unsupported opinions are
"proof". LOL! (snip more of Snit's unsupported lies)' 1 Jan 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/d0517ced5134934d
> ...
>
>>> Dude... you simply are a complete and total failure - your
>>> goal is to quote *me* lying, and you keep quoting other
>>> people. What the heck? Are you really as incompetent as
>>> you make yourself seem?
>>
>> Snit buries his head in the sand. Again. It is not my goal
>> to directly quote Snit.
>
> Right: it is not your goal to support your accusations...
What Snit snipped, LOL!
Snit buries his head in the sand. Again. It is not my goal to
directly quote Snit. Rather, it is better to quote those with
first hand experience with Snit's trolling. The quotes are
concise summary conclusions. As I stated previously, Snit would
not have to testify in a court. Eye witnesses would. As one can
see, a Snit discussion degrades into his unwarranted ad hominem
attacks, what a luser!
> if it was, well, you would quote me doing as you say.
There is no need to quote Snit, LOL!
> But you know you cannot.
But I did, and this Snitzelist troll snipped it away, LOL! It was
very well stated by:
7- BaJoRi:
Snit: "You are, of course, lying."
BaJoRi: "No, I am not. You know it, and I know it, and everyone
else who has read your idiocy knows it. I took your statement,
showed it to be wrong, then added even more, just to be a dick
and REALLY show you to be a fool. You need to judiciously snip
out pertinent points because you are an intellectually dwarfed
turd-burglar." 11 Nov 2008
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.vacation.las-vegas/msg/647944511b74b82f
> You know you have already failed in that endeavor. You are a
> failure... a complete and utter failure.
Snit continues with his ad hominem attacks.
> And you cannot help but prove it with your every example of
> lashing out against me.
More Snit nonsense.
>> Rather, it is better to quote those with first hand
>> experience with Snit's trolling. The quotes are concise
>> summary conclusions. As I stated previously, Snit would not
>> have to testify in a court. Eye witnesses would. As one can
>> see, a Snit discussion degrades into his unwarranted ad
>> hominem attacks, what a luser!
>
> Eye witnesses? The events are fully recorded... and you have
> *no* evidence.
More Snit lies.
> None. Not a shred. If you did, well, you would be posting it
> in your every message... but, as even you admit, your goal is
> no longer even to do that. You tried to find evidence. And
> you failed. So give it up... as if you could.
Here is evidence in the form of 129 poster quotes on the Snit
Circus of Pathological Lies:
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/a34f1bfd71423274
And here is how Snit interprets it:
1- Adam Kesher: <Not me!>
2- Alan Baker: <Not me!>
3- Andrew J. Brehm: <Not me!>
4- AZ Nomad: <Not me!>
5- Andy/news/nospam: <Not me!>
6- B.B.: <Not me!>
7- BaJoRi: <Not me!>
8- bobinnv: <Not me!>
9- Bob S: <Not me!>
10- �b� unny: <Not me!>
11- buzz off: <Not me!>
12- Carlo Coggi: <Not me!>
13- chrisv (cola): <Not me!>
14- C Lund: <Not me!>
15- cc (COLA): <Not me!>
16- Code Orange: <Not me!>
17- CozmicDebris: <Not me!>
18- Dawg Tail: <Not me!>
19- Dave Fritzinger: <Not me!>
20- Donald L McDaniel: <Not me!>
21- ed: <Not me!>
22- Edward Stanfield: <Not me!>
23- Edwin: <Not me!>
24- Elijah Baley: <Not me!>
25- Elizabot v2.0.2: <Not me!>
26- fibercut: <Not me!>
27- Geezer: <Not me!>
28- Geoff M. Fitton (COLA): <Not me!>
29- George Graves: <Not me!>
30- gimme_this_gimme_t...@yahoo.com: <Not me!>
31- Greycloud: <Not me!>
32- H: <Not me!>
33- Hadron (COLA): <Not me!>
34- Henry Flam: <Not me!>
35- Heywood Mogroot: <Not me!>
36- -hh: <Not me!>
37- High Plains Thumper: <Not me!>
38- Homer (COLA): <Not me!>
39- Jamie Hart (cola): <Not me!>
40- Jason McNorton: <Not me!>
41- JEDIDIAH (cola): <Not me!>
42- Jeff B.: <Not me!>
43- Jeff Hoppe: <Not me!>
44- Jesus: <Not me!>
45- Jim Lee Jr.: <Not me!>
46- Jim Polaski: <Not me!>
47- Jim Richardson (cola): <Not me!>
48- Joey Jojo Junior Shabadoo: <Not me!>
49- John C. Randolph: <Not me!>
50- JohnOfArc (cola): <Not me!>
51- John Q. Public: <Not me!>
52- John Slade: <Not me!>
53- Josh McKee: <Not me!>
54- K E: <Not me!>
55- KK: <Not me!>
56- Kelsey Bjarnason (cola): <Not me!>
57- Ku Karlovsky (cola): <Not me!>
58- Lars Trager: <Not me!>
59- Lefty Bigfoot: <Not me!>
60- Liam Slider (cola): <Not me!>
61- libcrushersmith: <Not me!>
62- libsnightmare: <Not me!>
63- Linonut (cola): <Not me!>
64- Lloyd Parsons: <Not me!>
65- Mark Kent (cola): <Not me!>
66- Mayor of R'lyeh: <Not me!>
67- Michelle Ronn: <Not me!>
68- Mike: <Not me!>
69- Mike Dee: <Not me!>
70- mmoore321: <Not me!>
71- Mojo: <Not me!>
72- Mr. Blonde: <Not me!>
73- MR_ED_of_Course: <Not me!>
74- Muahman: <Not me!>
75- Nashton/Nasht0n: <Not me!>
76- New Bee: <Not me!>
77- Not Important: <Not me!>
78- OldCSMAer: <Not me!>
79- OldSage: <Not me!>
80- Oxford: <Not me!>
81- Patrick Nihill: <Not me!>
82- Pawel Wojciak: <Not me!>
83- PC Guy: <Not me!>
84- Peter: <Not me!>
85- Peter Bjorn Perlso: <Not me!>
86- Peter Hayes: <Not me!>
87- Peter Jensen (cola): <Not me!>
88- Peter Kohlmann (cola): <Not me!>
89- PeterBP: <Not me!>
90- Phil Earnhardt: <Not me!>
91- Rapskat (cola): <Not me!>
92- RichardK: <Not me!>
93- Rick (cola): <Not me!>
94- Rick G.: <Not me!>
95- Robert F.: <Not me!>
96- RonB (COLA): <Not me!>
97- Roy Culley (cola): <Not me!>
98- S'mee (Keith, rec.motorcycles): <Not me!>
99- Sandman: <Not me!>
100- sav: <Not me!>
101- Sean Burke: <Not me!>
102- Sermo Malifer (COLA): <Not me!>
103- spike1: <Not me!>
104- ShutterBugz: <Not me!>
105- Steve Carroll: <Not me!>
106- Steve Mackay: <Not me!>
107- Steven de Mena: <Not me!>
108- Steve Travis: <Not me!>
109- Stuart Krivis: <Not me!>
110- Tattoo Vampire (COLA): <Not me!>
111- The Lost Packet (COLA): <Not me!>
112- TheLetterK: <Not me!>
113-Tim Adams: <Not me!>
114- Tim Crowley: <Not me!>
115- Tim Smith: <Not me!>
116- Timberwoof: <Not me!>
117- Tom Bates: <Not me!>
118- Tommy: <Not me!>
119- TravelinMan: <Not me!>
120- Wally: <Not me!>
121- WhoMe: <Not me!>
122- William Poaster: <Not me!>
123- William R. Walsh: <Not me!>
124- Woofbert: <Not me!>
125- zara: <Not me!>
126- Zaren Ankleweed: <Not me!>
127- Znu: <Not me!>
128- Thufir: <Not me!>
129- Fa-groon: <Not me!>
Basically as Snit sees it, these 129 quoters lied about Snit!
The Snit Circus of Pathological Lies continues, LOL !!!!!
--
HPT
Steve Carroll
> High Plains Thumper stated in post h6o6si$u0...@news.eternal-september.org
> on 8/22/09 12:31 AM:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Snit wrote:
> >> High Plains Thumper stated:
> >>> Snit wrote:
>
> >>>>> Snot Michael Glasser is easily even more dishonest than
> >>>>> you ever managed to be. He will never accept any proof
> >>>>> of his lying, his dishonesty, his inane trolling and his
> >>>>> overall being a worthless oxygen thief
>
> >>>> Oh! Oh! Oh!
>
> >>> Muahman:
>
> >> Is not Snit.
>
> > What Snit snipped, LOL!
>
> > Muahman:
>
> Still not me. Whatever other say is irrelevant to your attempt to support
> your claims about *me*.
So... what you're saying is... if he said that he saw you commit a
murder and he points to other people saying that they also saw you
commit this murder it is, in your opinion, "irrelevant"? Funny how you
hypocritically use this kind of testimony against other posters in
your delusions all the time.
Snit
c9f142a5-6196-4a8d...@m7g2000prd.googlegroups.com on 8/22/09
9:22 AM:
>> Still not me. �Whatever other say is irrelevant to your attempt to support
>> your claims about *me*.
>
> So... what you're saying is... if he said that he saw you commit a
> murder and he points to other people saying that they also saw you
> commit this murder it is, in your opinion, "irrelevant"? Funny how you
> hypocritically use this kind of testimony against other posters in
> your delusions all the time.
What I am saying is if a whole scene is recorded (as CSMA is recorded in the
Google archive) and you make an accusation against someone... and even find
others in the record who share the accusation, that if you cannot actually
show the person doing the deed, even though they are on screen the *whole
time*, then you have some explaining to do.
And you do.
Since neither you nor HPT can find examples of my doing as you say, *even
though my every "move" has been recorded, you have *no* leg to stand on.
You are complete and utter failures.
To bring this point home to you, remember I spent one month collecting
quotes about you... and there were *lots* of damning quotes. You and
Sandman have been collecting quotes about me for over five years... and many
of them are from your sock puppets (Edward Stanfield, for example). Given
that, it would be *bizarre* if there were not derogatory quotes about me.
So we are back to where I said we were: you and HPT are complete and utter
failures. You both have the stated goal of showing me lying, and you both
have failed repeatedly. The *best* you can do is nit pick comments of mine,
mostly ones from years ago, and demand if I do not play your games you have
provided evidence.
With you, on the other hand, I read your posts for just a couple of days and
quoted many, many lies from you. For example, even after I said:
Snit
-----
I consider the support for PPC in Leopard to be a necessary
feature and hence not "bloat". As I noted, and you
snipped:
Are you going to say supporting PPC is "bloat"?
All you had to do was say "Yes"...
Should Apple never have done so once they moved to Intel?
While it makes files bigger, I think there is a huge benefit
to having both Intel and PPC code in one package - users of
the software do not have to worry about getting the "wrong"
one. I think what you call "bloat" is a benefit to users.
This does not mean Apple should go on supporting increasingly
aging hardware forever... and at some point dropping PPC
support makes sense. Apple has decided to do so with Snow
Leopard, and I can both understand why *and* understand why
people would be annoyed that a machine Apple shipped as
recently as three years ago will not be supported by SL.
-----
You spewed the following lies:
Steve Carroll:
-----
in your perfect world OS9 would still be tagging along
for the ride.
...
To some users, sure... but what you're suggesting is that
Apple dumb down to the lowest common denominator by dragging
legacy code around. As an enduser I'm not much interested in
that. There has to be a cutoff point sometime... and their
announcement (of 2X Moore's law) was sufficient in my book.
-----
And more lies from you, about JohnQ:
-----
So, IOW, you're pissed because Apple was not able to
retroactively give you what you "want"?
-----
"Actually"... my accurate description shows how stupid and
narrow minded you are.
Now continue on with your feeble shilling for Snit...
-----
Yeah. Are you too drugged out to remember having pretended
doing it?
-----
You're obviously a pretty poor hobbyist in this field if you
couldn't figure out what Apple's announcement of moving to
Intel architecture meant.
-----
If you even own a PPC... I see no reason to believe you are
telling the truth about it.
-----
Prompt other well known trolls (Snit, Edwin, Pratt) to get in
on the game.
-----
No need for me to dig back years and years or try to nit pick or twist
words. No need to play a yes-you-are no-I'm-not game. You are a liar.
There simply is no doubt. No need to quote anyone but you and the words of
the people you lie about (to show your contradictions to the facts).
You are a liar. And you are a failure. And you are a coward, as will be
proved by your running from the above.
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
Steve Carroll
> 9:22 AM:
>
> >> Still not me. Whatever other say is irrelevant to your attempt to support
> >> your claims about *me*.
>
> > So... what you're saying is... if he said that he saw you commit a
> > murder and he points to other people saying that they also saw you
> > commit this murder it is, in your opinion, "irrelevant"? Funny how you
> > hypocritically use this kind of testimony against other posters in
> > your delusions all the time.
>
> What I am saying is if a whole scene is recorded (as CSMA is recorded in the
> Google archive) and you make an accusation against someone... and even find
> others in the record who share the accusation, that if you cannot actually
> show the person doing the deed, even though they are on screen the *whole
> time*, then you have some explaining to do.
One "scene" that Google has "recorded" is a large and growing number
of people talking about your poor behavior. You are obviously here
trying to sell the idea that they are *all* wrong about you to make
the case you're trying (unsuccessfully) to make. And exactly how do
you propose to make this sale? As proven above, you do it by trying to
pretend evidence derived from eye witness testimony is *all*
"irrelevant". The fact is when someone points to your poor behavior
you deny that it is poor behavior. That's why eye witness testimony
works so well in cases where dishonest people deny their wrongdoings.
In your case, with such an enormous amount of testimony stacked
against you, it's hilarious to watch you pretend it's *all*
"irrelevant"... that *all* those people are lying. LOL!
Snit
10:02 AM:
Carroll's full response:
------
One "scene" that Google has "recorded" is a large and
growing number of people talking about your poor behavior.
You are obviously here trying to sell the idea that they are
*all* wrong about you to make the case you're trying
(unsuccessfully) to make. And exactly how do you propose to
make this sale? As proven above, you do it by trying to
pretend evidence derived from eye witness testimony is *all*
"irrelevant". The fact is when someone points to your poor
behavior you deny that it is poor behavior. That's why eye
witness testimony works so well in cases where dishonest
people deny their wrongdoings. In your case, with such an
enormous amount of testimony stacked against you, it's
hilarious to watch you pretend it's *all* "irrelevant"...
that *all* those people are lying. LOL!
------
Once again, Steve accuses me of poor behavior, but shows he is a complete
and total failure - he does not even reference the behavior, which if true
would be recorded in full - he references his obsessively scavenged and
forged quotes as "evidence" against me... as though his actions are my
fault.
Come on, Steve: I quoted some of your lies. I explained why your
"testimony" BS is absurd. And you just ran like the coward you are.
100% predictable.
And you wonder why I go months at a time of not responding to or even
reading your posts. You are completely predictable in your dishonesty and
your cowardly behavior.
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
High Plains Thumper
<Crickets chirping>
--
HPT
High Plains Thumper
> Snit wrote:
>
>> What I am saying is if a whole scene is recorded (as CSMA is
>> recorded in the Google archive) and you make an accusation
>> against someone... and even find others in the record who
>> share the accusation, that if you cannot actually show the
>> person doing the deed, even though they are on screen the
>> *whole time*, then you have some explaining to do.
>
> One "scene" that Google has "recorded" is a large and growing
> number of people talking about your poor behavior. You are
> obviously here trying to sell the idea that they are *all*
> wrong about you to make the case you're trying
> (unsuccessfully) to make. And exactly how do you propose to
> make this sale? As proven above, you do it by trying to
> pretend evidence derived from eye witness testimony is *all*
> "irrelevant". The fact is when someone points to your poor
> behavior you deny that it is poor behavior. That's why eye
> witness testimony works so well in cases where dishonest
> people deny their wrongdoings. In your case, with such an
> enormous amount of testimony stacked against you, it's
> hilarious to watch you pretend it's *all* "irrelevant"... that
> *all* those people are lying. LOL!
The Snit Circus of Pathological Myths continue. Now in its
second printing, alphabetised except for newest additions, here
is what these 130 posters have to say about Snit:
1- Adam Kesher: "Steve, IIRC Sandman's website has a member area
and a login. If you forget your password, you can ask it to
e-mail it to you, and a bot will send an e-mail. *That* is the
e-mail Snit got from Sandman's website, and yes he's that fucked
in the head and starved for attention that he'd claim it to be an
e-mail from Sandman himself. So, don't get sucked into his little
circus. The e-mail, in this particular instance, did probably
originate from Sandman.net." 27 Feb 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/dac74355552b4cc7
2- Alan Baker: "People's perceptions of you are *formed* by
behaviour and not withstanding your occasional on topic posts, I
wish you'd leave too. Please note that despite the amazing
silliness that is Edwin, I have never made the same wish of him."
27 Feb 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/4a7c3ebf3fc10221
3- Andrew J. Brehm: "You are not flamed because you speak the
truth, you are flamed because you are a hideous troll and keep
disrupting the newsgroup."
4- AZ Nomad: "The fact that you routinely change your headers to
weasel out of killfiles proves that you're an asshole." 25 Jun 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/51b43d6c9613c9da
5- Andy/news/nospam: "Why do you keep these things up, Snit? Why
not just let them go away and show how responsible a member of
CSMA you are? You could show your enemies up by being better than
then, rise above the low level you so obviously dislike.
Anything, just stop...." 26 Apr 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/d6ffb6b06aa237e5
6- B.B.: "Does the From: header contain the string "Snit"? If
yes, then troll. Otherwise, maybe. Dunno why I had my KF on you
set to expire, but it's fixed now." 13 Mar 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/8a98d179b2ff9578
7- BaJoRi:
Snit: "You are, of course, lying."
BaJoRi: "No, I am not. You know it, and I know it, and everyone
else who has read your idiocy knows it. I took your statement,
showed it to be wrong, then added even more, just to be a dick
and REALLY show you to be a fool. You need to judiciously snip
out pertinent points because you are an intellectually dwarfed
turd-burglar." 11 Nov 2008
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.vacation.las-vegas/msg/647944511b74b82f
8- bobinnv: "I learned some time ago how much better this group
can be if you kill file Snit. I have never understood why more
people don't do the same.." 5 Aug 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/0706dbef8ce1f903
9- Bob S: "This has always been pretty much a free-for-all group,
but since Snit showed up, its become almost impossible to have a
decent discussion about anything." 27 Dec 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/3d2f1dff196ca190
The solution is to NOT REPLY TO SNIT. But for some reason, some
people just can't stop feeding him."
10- �b� unny: Subject "snit makes me sad", Text "really actually
=:-(" 9 Oct 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/4e31cb49c1e2d432
11- buzz off: "Snit is obviously mentally ill..."
12- Carlo Coggi: "He must believe he is surrounded by 'trolls'
... in the groups he trolls in, that is. I wondered if the
idiotrollers like snit would reply to this thread. Of course, I
didn't see his posts, only your reply".
13- chrisv (cola): "No, she called him 'shit', and rightly so,
for they way he was so ignominiously birthed into a toilet at the
bus depot, and simply refused to die, despite repeated flushes.
It's now far too late to *flush* him, but we can still *plonk*
him..." 12 Sep 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/18099f8aa067f4a5
14- C Lund: "Snit is not my responsibility. Maybe it's time for
you to learn how to use your kill-filter. I am assuming, of
course, that your Usenet browser has a kill-filter." 5 Mar 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/2c390a34b05b24a9
15- cc (COLA): "Snit posts all the time. You don't have to dig up
months old articles where he brings up years old topics. Just
respond to a current message." 22 Jan 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/5a712e3312ba9f8a
16- Code Orange: "Then why post it? What need is there for you to
"win" an argument? They don't like you, you don't like them. Why
must you keep this up? What results are you expecting?"
17- CozmicDebris: "I'm done with your three year old games. The
archives show my answers and your inability to process them. Keep
posting your list and proving that you are an idiot troll. I will
not address it any further- you being too stupid to realize and
accept that is not my problem". 22 Nov 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.cellular.attws/msg/0aa65b7a132dbfe8
18- Dawg Tail: "You've already apologized for having already
misread what I had previously written. What makes you think that
you're correctly understanding what I'm writting now. You've got
a history of reading into things what you wanted people to have
said instead of what they really said.
I suggest you get over this limitation of yours. It's making you
look foolish."
Dawg Tail: "PC advocates, Mac advocates, Linux advocates. Almost
all of them are making similar claims about Snit. When you have
so many diverse people who share a common perception where do you
think the problem lies? With Snit? Or almost everyone else? The
answer doesn't require an advanced degree to figure out." 30 Dec
2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/73edac32c3ad530b
19- Dave Fritzinger: "[snip of stuff I really don't care to read]
Snit, please go away. Get a life, meet a woman, do something,
but please, please, please, GO AWAY!!!!" 2 Jun 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/57bb2fc42ec0f290
20- Donald L McDaniel: "Jesus, snit. You're a teacher. I thought
you knew what a metaphor was, and could recognize one when it was
presented to you. I guess I had too much confidence in you." 30
Nov 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/3254ec7af27bfb0f
21- ed: "snit, you continually amaze me with how much of a liar
and loser you are. you may notice a semi-regular pattern with me
where i stop responding to your posts for stretches at a time,
then start up responding as if you were a normal person. i
suppose it's tough for the magnitude of your 'loserdom' to stick,
so it loses some of it's sharpness when i stop responding to you.
you almost always start responding back in a semi normal way, but
inevitably degenerate. it's once again that time. i can only ask
that you pass my condolences to your wife and unborn child for
having to put up with such a dishonest fool as yourself. (well,
if your wife is a loser as well, just pass those condolences to
the rug-rat to be; if not, double condolences to her). " 30 Apr 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/71f74dd6d806ce77
22- Edward Stanfield: "Snit thinks the rules that apply to honest
and honorable people apply to him. That is absurd. He is the
biggest liar in Usenet history. Mackay posted the email to prove
Snit was using sock puppets and he still is. Snit can not give
up his socks puppets and shills. They are the only ones who ever
support him." 28 Jan 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/5b52494d96d12229
23- Edwin: "You've got to be out of your mind, Snit. You're the
worst troll this group has ever seen. You're a liar and a forger,
and you've almost destroyed this group single-handedly. For you
to post a list of out of context arguments, and lies, and
forgeries about your enemies labled as a "peace effort" has to be
one of the craziest stunts you've pulled. It's all about your
sick need for attention, your need to be center stage at all
times. You'd publicly eat dog turd if you thought it would make
people look at you." 18 May 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/37e4a720619642a0
24- Elijah Baley: "Seriously, Snit, you need psychiatric help. Go
see a doctor." 24 Aug 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/6f6c88356b54fc15
25- Elizabot v2.0.2: "I see you were unable to respond to the
points in my post and you are back to your repetitious
regurgitation mode. How childishly typical of you, Snit." 16 Nov
2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/55214ccfb7414fe5
26- fibercut: "That is the problem. In the years I have been
coming to CSMA I have seen in the past year a real hatred among
people, besides the typical Mac vs. Windows typical argument. I
feel that it is like being in a room of really young children
trying there best to best the other person. The one common thing
among all of this seems to be you. I hate to be like this, but
facts are facts. You seem to be in the middle of a great
percentage of arguments. CSMA has become less about Macs and more
about "look everybody, I think he lied". Is there no end then all
this picking at each other on such a personal level. CSMA has
always been al little adversarial but you have personally crank
it up to the point that this place is no longer fun.
Congratulations on stopping CSMA and making this place your own
personal circus." 12 Jan 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/bbe695bbc3424ab6
27- Geezer:
Snit: "Steve Carroll has no sense of morality"
Geezer: "Whined the guy who cannot directly address those who
uncover his lies and deceit;)"
Snit: "and no clue about the law."
Geezer: 'Said the guy who believes his unsupported opinions are
"proof". LOL! (snip more of Snit's unsupported lies)' 1 Jan 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/d0517ced5134934d
28- Geoff M. Fitton (COLA): "The Prescott Computer Guy *still*
showing how stupid he is... What a mar00n". 30 Aug 2008
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/f9401b4b57c59865
29- George Graves: "Jason. You have started an argument with the
Snit (AKA Michael Glasser), this should not be done. He will
drive you crazy with his twisted logic, his deep-rooted need to
be ALWAYS right at any cost. He will move goalposts, set up
strawmen, and bore you into submission with his endless
pedanticism. The only way to engage him is to hit and run. NEVER
engage him, it's a futile, empty procedure that will only anger
you and feed him. Take my advice and STAY AWAY!" 27 Oct 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/3d3af33ce25a11fd
30- gimme_this_gimme_t...@yahoo.com: "Hitting the vodka tonight
Snit?" 4 Mar 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/b457a7b378264794
31- Greycloud: "You really shouldn't lie like that. Everyone else
notices that you are not honest and you have no honor." 21 Jan 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/3b92f11a1ab00f91
32- H: "Your crappy posts are still showing up in seperate
threads, are you doing this on purpose to piss people off? I dont
ever censor people cause that's just retarded but if you dont fix
it I'm gonna have to cause I dont wanna see your name 40 times in
a row. So uh, change your client or something". 12 Sep 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/f36ee6b458c86499
33- Hadron (COLA):
Snit: "Now why not end your silliness and either just stop your
BS or actually give reasoned comments on the screen shots you
keep asking for and I keep providing?
Hadron: "err, he just did. And you snipped it all you weasel."
30 Jan 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/de49f2b7471d2e1a
Snit: "Sigh: 100% predictable, you will not answer *any* question
I just asked. You will run... your whole goal is to beg for
attention, not to make or support a point."
Hadron: "nice. You made it into my new killfile. Jesus, stop
repeating the same garbage." 6 Apr 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/c86ab53a759ea728
34- Henry Flam: "Who gives a damn about this shit? Snit, once in
a while, I make the mistake in thinking that that you are
starting to make sense in your posts; I tend to agree with your
politics. Then you post stuff like this and it destroys any
respect that I have for you." 16 Aug 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/f048bedfe0d67d66
35- Heywood Mogroot: "*plonk*"
36- -hh: 'Perversion has utterly nothing to do with the
definition of "synonymous". It is, however, a very clear example
of how you attempt to maliciously debase against anyone who
disagrees with you. As such, I consider this to be a purposeful
attempt by you to try to libel me. This is your only warning to
consider rescinding your remark, with the reminder that you, and
you alone are responsible for that accusation, both in the
ethical as well as the full legal meaning of the word
"responsible".' 25 Feb 2008
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/5496641a3426293a
37- High Plains Thumper: "I can understand why posters get sick
and tired of your lame ad hominem attacks, your cowardly
statements shifting the goal posts, your continuous rambling
drivel of how everyone seems to be against you. No one cares a
wooden nickel about your incessant flame wars that are self
created. You pretend to be an advocate but you manage to cause
everyone's hand to be against you." 6 Jan 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/b27ba196819ad38f
Only once in a blue moon does he have anything worth reading. I
just got through his circus of repetitive ad hominem crap. I am
surprised that with the stunts he has pulled in COLA and this
newsgroup, that he hasn't suffered a worse fate in real life. If
he hasn't, one of these days he will pull that stunt on the wrong
person, and *B-O-O-M-!*, someone will pull the trigger. One
ought to really pity him (or as Steve Travis stated, "Or perhaps
we should set up a fund to get him more happy glue (and the
appropriate plastic bags)." 8 Jul 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/2666237bba82b97a
38- Homer (COLA):
HPT: "Snit in a period of 2 minutes has copied a post of mine,
posting the same following message over and over, in false
pretense as a Linux advocate."
Homer: "That kind of behaviour is not normal, to say the least.
I don't mean this as a personal insult, but I'm perfectly serious
when I say 'Snit' (Michael Glasser) is obviously mentally ill,
and needs help. I was going to suggest that someone alerts his
wife to the problem, but I have to assume she's already aware of
his condition, if she is in fact still living with him. It's
possible, I suppose, that he's already undergoing counselling
and/or on medication, but if he is then it doesn't seem to be
helping much. Maybe he just missed his 'meds' today (again, I
mean that sincerely). 26 Jan 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/e061874ea94e9ce8
39- Jamie Hart (cola): "It seems that since you are unable to
offer support for your statements, you're reduced to personal
attacks on me. Incidentally, anyone reading this post can see
that I have offered no straw men, and have only asked you to
explain how the things you state as facts can be true. I'm really
sorry that you're taking this attitude, the topic is an
interesting one and I thought you might have some insights. I've
snipped the rest, since you dislike long posts and avoid
answering any of the questions I asked by saying everything was
just repeated." 6 Dec 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/8e07cde31f4eecf6
40- Jason McNorton: "You're one of the many, many paranoid people
on usenet that should be confined most likely. You sit there and
refresh your screen endlessly. You post the same nonsense over
and over. Either you're a super troll, or you're a super mess."
1 Nov 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/7a8e091c0b248eb0
41- JEDIDIAH (cola): "You're simply full of shit."
42- Jeff B.: "Yo, Snit. We're not pals. I think you're a git."
23 Dec 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/0ec649345d433a2d
43- Jeff Hoppe: "This is a Macintosh Advocacy newsgroup. Not a
12-step recovery plan. Your medical problems or conditions won't
help me achieve a greater understanding of my Mac. In fact, it
detracts from it and those kinds of discussions have no place in
a newsgroup such as this." 18 Nov 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/947a2cc0301a2862
44- Jesus: "Really, Snit. It's annoying. What are you
accomplishing besides being annoying? Is that your goal?" 25 Apr
2007
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/e3d5029d34cde243
45- Jim Lee Jr.: "Snit, read the thread's title, is Bush
mentioned in it? You (and Carroll) ought to learn to stay on
topic and not hijack threads."
46- Jim Polaski: "Why is it that nearly every thread you're
involved in seems like it turns into some tit-for-tat, dozens of
responses to OT things and garbage? Cmon there Snit. Someone has
to take the lead and stop this crap. Try. How about it?" 25 Apr 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/5b5c22490ab9649b
47- Jim Richardson (cola): "And yet again, Snit runs away, rather
than actually provide evidence for his claims. Par for the course
I suppose."
"Evasion noted. Snit runs away again rather than produce evidence
for his claims. At least come up with some original insults
Snit! I mean, you *are* capable of original thoughts! Right?
Snit?" 8 Feb 2008
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/e33321cc3343fc44
48- Joey Jojo Junior Shabadoo: "and Snithead has even farther to
fall - in a few weeks he'll be out on the street after midnight,
yelling at passersby 'sucky sucky, $2...'" 23 Mar 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/57cf69f66571a5a7
49- John C. Randolph: "You're nothing but a troll yourself. What
are you bitching about?"
50- JohnOfArc (cola): "I'm not sure "troll" does it justice- more
like a black hole! But hey, if we all promise to never again even
entertain an unkind thought re Apple, will you take it back and
lock it up? Please??" 11 Mar 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/e2891b1f3984e121
51- John Q. Public: "I have not been bothered to read Snit's
postings since I figured out who he is. I don't bother to filter
his posts, I just consider the source and skip to the next one
when I see his name." 7 Jan 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/7d34c1bd05c877d2
52- John Slade: "I don't get posts from Snit. I wouldn't be
shocked that he has some kind of disorder. He made up stuff about
being a computer repairman and teacher. He's just plain loony and
best ignored. Let him deal with his disorder by medication. He's
here to do one thing, get attention from people. He says the
crazy stuff just to get a reaction.
You say you like to beat him over the head. Well that's what he's
counting on, he says stuff he knows isn't true in hopes to get a
rise out of people like you. Ignore him, you won't regret it." 3
Apr 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/394a53a65c28d314
"Snit, you have a enough problems as it is without adding
drinking booze to the list. How the hell did you manage to get
out of my killfile? Oh well back into the cage you go, PLONK."
13 Oct 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.food.wine/msg/992a796786a541d8
53- Josh McKee: "Snit, I assume there was some point to this
posting? Because I certainly cannot find it."
54- K E: "I haven't read this board for awhile but I see that
even though the trolls still roam free at least the worst troll
of the lot is mostly being ignored by readers on this bb. If the
few stragglers that keep replying to him would just stop
responding to Snit at all this place could be worth coming back
to. There's a good chance he'll pack up and take his trolling to
more fertile ground." 22 Oct 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/0b9dca7df1f677f4
55- KK: 'Whoa there, ad hominem man. You started off your
sentence with "Ah" like you'd just realized something profound.'
29 Oct 2008
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.fan.howard-stern/msg/6a89029a5b5be5f8
56- Kelsey Bjarnason (cola): "Funny how you simply don't bother
reading the posts that rip your entire thesis to bleeding gobbets
of putrid excrescence. Maybe some day you'll learn how to support
your position, instead of sticking your fingers in your ears and
humming, hoping it'll all go away." 7 Mar 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/96d064a7a5c6074a
57- Ku Karlovsky (cola): "You repeatedly chastise others for ad
hominem attacks while in the same sentence make your own ad
hominem attacks. You make silly claims and then avoid the subject
of your silliness. You're a liar and a hypocrite and you always
have been." 14 Jul 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/d1e3f9ac5c72c6ee
58- Lars Trager: "Yes, you are stupid." 7 Jan 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/a9bedf6689f9a54f
59- Lefty Bigfoot: "Okay, I tried to put up with it for a long
time, but the few times you post something worth reading just
aren't worth it anymore. *plonk*" 16 Dec 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/5520adae01120e83
60- Liam Slider (cola): "Maybe he's responding to the fact you've
been an annoying little fuckwit lately. You started out with the
pretense of trying to be fair, but lately all there is from you
in COLA is trashtalk about Linux and you acting every bit the
troll." 16 Jul 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/ad7d6c42c5e4cf2f
61-libcrushersmith: "Snit also thinks Dan Rather still anchors
CBS News and that Gitmo terrorists are innocent! Any time Snit
is cornered, he changes the subject and will never admit he's
wrong." 28 Jan 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/fbc516717f3b7ccf
62- libsnightmare:
Snit: "Who said Bush did not flip flop?"
libsnightmare: "Never said that. I put back in what you cut out.
He never flip-flopped on the war, even when it was unpopular,
like "Kerry and all the other libs" did. You're a sore loser who
has resorted to fifth grade tactics. How fucking sad - all this
clown has left is to edit posts and post fake bullshit. You can't
debate... so you lie. Once again, you have proved Steve Carroll
right about you. Sad..." 4 May 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/a80c93f80bd6bc3e
63- Linonut (cola): "Snit is a Tholenoid."
"Indeed. Snit may be the first retraction of my general killfile
amnesty. The volume of cavilling, whining, foot-stomping,
back-tracking, goal-post shifting, and petulance generated by
that effete candy-ass beggars belief". 30 Aug 2008
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/cc4827fd7e8ad574
64- Lloyd Parsons: "Well, I don't know if Oxford is the most
cretinous, I would think that would be reserved for Snit! ;-)"
18 Mar 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/b6cd3ac4bf1e08d6
65- Mark Kent (cola): "The problem with someone like Mr Glasser
is the same as it is with Mr Wong, even if he were to be honest
now, it would be impossible to determine where the honesty starts
and the usual dishonesty ends. In my primary school, one of the
teachers was very keen on proverbs, and I recall her going over
the "cry wolf" story. Mr Glasser could "cry wolf" over and over
now, and I would not come to help him with his sheep, because I
do not know any way of determining if he's ever telling the
truth, or indeed, if he ever has." 2 Dec 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/3f30aa1b65a972b3
66- Mayor of R'lyeh: "The fact is that he's probably pulling it
to this post since its all about him and he managed to make me
think about him today. A friend of mine has a toddler. I went
over to her house and videotaped her kid doing a bunch of cute
toddler stuff then burned a DVD of it for her. While we were
watching the DVD her kid got mad. He got mad because we quit
making him the center of attention and made that kid on the tv
the center of attention. He even ran up to the tv and tried to
block our view of it. That's how Snit lives his whole life." 30
Sep 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/9935f4154d5a290b
67- Michelle Ronn: "The real topic here is that one someone
refutes your 'facts', you run away and ignore them. Refuting your
'facts' is easily done in this case. I did it, and you ignored
it." 9 Feb 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/c050c82720737b32
68- Mike: "Nonsense. I never see you "advocate" anything. All I
see you doing is engage in endless semantic arguments with
everyone. You're the TholenBot of CSMA. BTW, that's *not* a
compliment!" 8 Jul 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/7c5b72d70b87ffbd
69- Mike Dee: "I will no longer accuse you of lying here. Instead
I can only say that you are a complete and delusional kook that
happens to inhabit CSMA for the time being. That you are unaware
of how deranged you actually behave further reinforces this
notion. Please seek professional help."
"The point that keeps whooshing over your head Snit, is Elizabot
made no threat to you before you went to the police. She made a
promise. Admittedly, to your delusional spaced out paranoiac view
point, Elizabot was suddenly "threatening" to you. In so much as
you had to take your kooky self down to your local police shop
and blub on their shoulders about how much in danger you were in
[sob, whine], and they had to waste valuable policing time
consoling you over your stupidity. I bet they have Kook with a
capital "K" written at the top of your profile, Snit." 2 Sep 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/9cf45bc88a324f40
70- mmoore321: "Snit is a human car-accident and we are all
rubbernecking. We know it is bad form, but yet strangely curious.
Treat him the same way, look but just keep moving on." 18 Aug 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/f1c3041d89504c07
71- Mojo: "Actually, these facts piss everybody off because they
are off-topic, unnecessarily confrontational, extremely boring
and clearly show that you are crying out for attention." 20 Sep 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/a38f07b9a4811a80
72- Mr. Blonde: "Lastly, I can't help but comment on the fact
that your obsession with Sandman has actually grown since you
claimed to KF him. Killfilling someone generally implies you're
ignoring that person, yet you piggyback onto virtually every
reply to him here and and check his website's validation status
more often than most people check their e-mail. These are not the
actions of a mentally balanced individual." 19 Jan 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/2b005666ab303e2b
73- MR_ED_of_Course: "Seriously, spend half a day at any
pre-school or kindergarten and see if the kids there can't teach
you a thing or two about social behavior." 16 May 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/55c03a6a0b7813a4
74- Muahman: "Ummm, dude you post 1000 posts a day. 999 of them
are trolls, if anyone here has issues it's not me." 24 Sep 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/ad9daff74ee1e0bd
Muahman: "LOL, everyone hates Snit. I know I'd push him in front
of a bus if I could." 15 May 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/e5ee46bf5bf04d00
Muahman: "Ahhhh shit, another thread lost to the Snit retard
circus!!! I actually dread seeing Snit reply to a thread because
that automatically means it's in the toilet." 8 Jul 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/92e776d521dfa701
75- Nashton/Nasht0n: "Oh for crying out loud, if I wasn't
convinced that snit is a total loser, and I rarely call people
losers, I certainly am now. Why bother responding to his
stupidities anyway?" 29 Nov 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/be1a326a81441508
76- New Bee: "Honest and honorable? You? You've either got a wry
sense of humor, or you're completely nuts. Either way you're just
a waste of time, and you've done more than anybody to make this
group a cesspool. Then you revel in wallowing in your own filth."
14 May 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/2856277b085d0274
77- Not Important: "I get this mental image of you and a sibling
as children in the back seat of the family car saying:
Mom, 'snits' touching me ... and you responding much as you do
now ... I'm not touching you, you're touching me! The problem is
that by now you should've grown out of that type of poke and
complain interaction with others. But, of course, you've haven't
learned how to interact with others in a more 'constructive' and
mutually beneficial manner even now." 03 Jul 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/d16279e9003ca8f4
78- OldCSMAer: "What's he been doing? Am I going to be sorry I
killfiled him?" 27 Nov 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/23b808d9646cd257
79- OldSage: "What drives me nuts is your unrelenting ability and
desire to argue on the head of a pin about the most trivial of
things." 2 Oct 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/88457f8e7c25273e
80- Oxford: "If you are using MT-Newswatcher: Select offending
Author, example Snit... Go to the Filters Menu, Choose 'Kill
this Author' Click 'OK' Then Repeat with each annoying Author
of your choice. Then to see your work... Choose the Filter Menu
again, Then 'Refilter Articles'... Bam! No more boring,
pointless bickering about nothing. Enjoy!!!!!" 14 Aug 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/1d7f9181e95ed9ec
81- Patrick Nihill: "I mean, honestly, who would you rather
discuss something with; Dan, or someone like Zara? Or, for that
matter, Snit, for whom the work 'troll' seems so painfully
inadequate?" 13 Aug 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/f93db68e683ad769
82- Pawel Wojciak: "Jesus Christ, snit... <plonk> "
83- PC Guy: "Forget it Snit, you're a waste of time. For someone
who talks about everyone else not being "honest and honorable"
you appear to be the least honest and honorable of anyone here."
22 Apr 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/36bf51df2a2662a4
84- Peter: "I've never felt the need to use the filters in
Newswatcher but I thought Id try the Kill this Author.. option
with Snit. Ten seconds later and he's gone! Amazing." 30 Dec 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/011eef01d7bcd56c
85- Peter Bjorn Perlso: "Plonked for 60 days. Now stfu and take
your argument with sandman into the private room." 13 Dec 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/ae4651ec99be3c77
86- Peter Hayes: "True, but that removes Snit completely, and
someti... err..... occasiona.... errrrr..... once in a blue moon
he has something useful to say."
87- Peter Jensen (cola): "Where has he ever said that they were
not different windowing environments? Message-ID, please.
Experience has told me not to trust you on anything without
backing evidence."
88- Peter Kohlmann (cola): "Snot is a hideous troll. Nobody is as
dishonest as that piece of unadultered garbage. There are csma
posters even more stupid than Snot. Oxford comes to mind. There
are certainly other csma posters who lie nearly as much. But no
others are so intent on trolling in whatever way possible as
Snot" 15 Mar 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/3409d9582dcebd25
89- PeterBP: "Oh will you stfu".
90- Phil Earnhardt: "You're only interested in trying to get
superficial snipes and extrapolate inappropriate conclusions." 1
Nov 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/ad24a97d5dc86277
91- Rapskat (cola): "For instance, your sig you reference a long
standing war you have going with some person from csma. It's like
you single out persons to target your attentions upon and then
continuously berate them with constant barbs and goads to
perpetuate their acrimonious responses, which in turn you respond
in kind, etc. ad infinitum. Above all things, your affinity for
Macs and your overbearing pompous nature aside, this is what
convinces me that your primary purpose for frequenting this and
other groups is to troll." 07 Sep 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/a09c6b8e3e63f42d
92- RichardK: "Just killfile him already."
93- Rick (cola): "Snit, you are a liar. And an ignorant one. You
trash people that are trying their level best to cope with a
horrendous situation. And you do it without the slightest idea of
what is going on." 06 Sep 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/fcad2955ac5cb03b
94- Rick G.: "Just to be plain here, I have no doubt that he is a
troll. I am tolerant of his nature, not blind to it. However, as
a troll, he is ... somewhat clumsy." 22 Mar 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/198b88e3d0064a92
95- Robert F.: "Um, perhaps you misunderstand. I don't care if
you quote Mayor McCheese claiming the Earth is a flat plate
perched on the shell of a tortoise, I was merely pointing out
that you run the risk of looking ridiculous when you quote
something patently stupid. If that's your goal, you're on the
right track, and more power to you." 11 Jan 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/4dc22433eae8803d
96- RonB (COLA): "Snit is a crank fixated on one issue, who's
thing is twisting your words so he can win an argument against a
straw man. That's enough to killfile him." 1 Jan 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.usenet.kooks/msg/ce8550d4cc5b1b42
97- Roy Culley (cola): "You appear to be in the latter category.
Starting crossposted threads for the simple purpose of hoping to
generate a flame war. If you truly want to learn more about Linux
and how it can help you and your supposed users why aren't you
requesting help from a more technical Linux newsgroup than an
advocacy group? As the old saying goes, those who can do, those
who can't teach. Your posts seem to confirm that saying IMHO."
12 Mar 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/d521a80051e24d08
98- S'mee (Keith, rec.motorcycles): "Liar...forger and worthless.
You must be related to our resident racist troll, he lies as much
as you." 29 Dec 2008
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/ab08c00330c8b58d
99- Sandman: "He is by far the most killfiled person in the
-HISTORY- of csma. I've never seen someone so disliked, almost
hated, in a news group before. He has the ability to turn just
about any person against him in just a few posts. On usenet,
trolls do this daily, but the funny part with Michael is that I
actually think he DOESN'T consider himself be a troll - damn what
-EVERYONE ELSE- is calling him. Obviously they are wrong. Only
Tholen himself can match this behaviour." 18 Mar 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/51c0735c774215c2
100- sav: "You really need to take a rest somewhere nice.
Honestly, even the nutters who hang out down on Brighton seafront
made more sense than this. You been doing drugs or something?"
25 May 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/1b251baa5c641370
101- Sean Burke: If you're dumb enough to respond to snit, you're
probably dumb enough to click on a spam attachment that promises
to remove smut from your harddrive." 21 Jan 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/e166032d8959c0e1
102- Sermo Malifer (COLA):
Snit: "Why do so many people in COLA argue *against* me..."
Sermo Malifer: "Because you're a narcissistic troll who posts
trash just to get people talking about you." 21 Jan 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/5ddf14f502e9b3f1
103- spike1: "The thought is probably to show everyone here just
how bad a troll snit is".
104- ShutterBugz: "so snit-zel has some kind of problem
expressing anger, i guess. he has to vent his frustrations in
other ways. and he thinks he's making sense: well the syntax is
there and he figures he's pretty smart. indeed, he tells us, he's
done the personality tests and the iq tests and he's okay!
aaaaahhhhh, you see he's soooooooo well adjusted." 3 Mar 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/7f9fa1cf90490298
105- Steve Carroll: "The only things we are sure about Snit is
that he has:
* a monumental reading comprehension problem.
* nym-shifted numerous times to avoid kill-files.
* built too many straw-men to count... some, the size of small
cities.
* been labeled a disingenuous liar/troll(or worse) by the vast
majority.
* used numerous sock-puppets and admitted to it.
* stolen IDs and admitted to it.
* gotten booted off by ISPs for his behavior.
* twisted more context than all csma posters combined.
* made more unsupported accusations than all csma posters combined.
* virtually no life outside of csma."
106- Steve Mackay: "Just killfile Snit, the dishonest piece of
elephant dung, and all would go away. Sure, I got caught up in
the "Snit Circus", but then the cotton candy began to sour, and
CSMA begun to smell like elephant dung." 18 Aug 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/9fc11094133dfcdf
Welcome to the Snit circus, where the popcorn and cotton candy
are stale, and the smell of elephant dung is everywhere. 27 Dec 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/614daf295b50413f
107- Steven de Mena: "Sorry, you have now lost all credibility
with me for your rediculous argument regarding this." 26 Sep 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/1c8777d39c34e293
108- Steve Travis: "Oh oh... Now look what we've done. Snit has
lost all self respect and has sunk to the point of using words
like 'asses' when referring to others. Oh, how could the morally
superior snit have fallen so low.. Please take a moment out of
your busy schedule to feel embarassed for him. Or perhaps we
should set up a fund to get him more happy glue (and the
appropriate plastic bags)." 27 Mar 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/3edd9ab69425a6c5
109- Stuart Krivis: "You might as well just give up and plonk him
then. A snit is a snit is a snit and always will be." 15 Aug
2006 (post not available except in reply)
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/5b382420a696f140
110- Tattoo Vampire (COLA): "In other words, in another attempt
to troll, you made yourself look like a fool. Again". 28 Aug 2008
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/b2676d3540e09f38
111- The Lost Packet (COLA): "well, he's found a seat in my
killbin, I can't be doing with him." 27 Jan 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/2007526a552b3322
112- TheLetterK: "That is merely your perception, Shit. You're
the one lacking counter evidence, and your arguments basically
amount to "I'm right, nya nya nya." No matter how many examples
someone points at to demonstrate their claim, you blindly
continue to insist that they provide no evidence, or that the
evidence given is irrelevant. Worse still, you fall back on straw
men and disingenuous quote mangling to portray the argument in
your favor. You are one of the worst trolls that inhabit CSMA,
Shit. *Edwin* is more prone to fits of reason than you are." 23
Sep 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/d488596b57132124
113-Tim Adams: "I'd kill file you but then I'd miss the fun. you
see, you never cease to amaze me at just how stupid you really
are. Why just the other day I had a great laugh when I saw you,
the king of liars (in this NG anyway) calling somebody else a
liar." 13 Nov 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/40c7f9407179ff2a
114- Tim Crowley: "I don't know - I think you might have more
compassion. Snit is sick. He needs help. This is the only way the
poor sick fool can get attention. My fucking God, he's taken to
hanging out with and supporting racist pig fuckers like MuahMuah.
It is true that no-one likes him and those that pretend they do
are just using him or don't know him - but come on- it's not his
fault. He's sick. Have some compassion, eh? All these idiot
trolls, Zara, Stew, Tommy, MuaaaahMuaaah, and Snit - they are all
so alike. I pity each and every one of them" 19 Apr 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/67f0f174110bfa0a
115- Tim Smith: "No, he didn't, and there is no reasonable way
you could actually believe he lied. You are purely trying to
troll here." 14 Apr 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/6e3cfd9240ac4871
116- Timberwoof: "*Plonk!*"
117- Tom Bates: "Do you have to turn any thread you post in into
one of your Circus acts?" 20 Feb 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/25f0e481b605e71f
118- Tommy: "In case you did not get it, I think the moral was:
Stop polluting the world with your infantile and obsessive
"writings". You give Mac advocacy a bad name. If that was your
goal you have succeeded! That also goes for all that bullshit on
your website" 11 Jun 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/03610d2080321d33
119- TravelinMan: "I still can't figure out what's wrong with
Snit. Most people have him kill-filed and the few who don't
mostly restrict their responses to 'why don't you go away, no one
wants you here'. Just what would keep someone in this group with
all of that animosity? Must be some kind of severe mental
illness." 17 Mar 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/45197fbb46d491df
120- Wally: "Because by your own admission "honor and honesty"
are nothing more than a "game" to you, as such not only do you
wish to define the rules, but no doubt you will also attempt to
alter or bend the rules when inevitably things do not go to your
liking, for this reason I doubt anyone would be foolish enough to
play your game." 16 May 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/b9b3ed1ee20e5220
121- WhoMe: "F michael IS a teacher, it's no wonder he's home
more than he's anywhere near a classroom".
122- William Poaster: "Good grief. If anyone's having a mental
breakdown it's the Prescott Computer Guy, Michael Snit Glasser.
What a f#cked up mess he is." 29 Aug 2008
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/914d1e74855fb461
123- William R. Walsh: "Now, if you'll excuse me, and accept my
sincere apologies for this, PLONK! Feel proud about that. You're
the first person to be plonked from my new computer! :-) " 10
Feb 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/313c7368f6369c49
124- Woofbert: "*Plonk*"
125- zara: "Look - I'm not into combing through thousands of
posts, to prove what was said or not said - I leave stuff like
that to people without lives, like Snit. But it is assuredly, in
the record. Ping Snit to do a search - you will flatter him, and
give meaning to his tawdry little life." 25 Oct 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/a1d4fc7120a6a538
126- Zaren Ankleweed: "And with that, Snit goes in the global
killfile. No subject, no author, no nothing. Buh-bye". 11 Sep 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/12f7c34f24d43624
127- Znu: "I think your 'I'll go start a new thread to try to
draw more people into the debate I'm currently having with
Steve/Elizabot/etc' tactic is fairly trollish."
128- Thufir: "It's based on *your* MO that I, at least, have no
problem in stating that you're full of shit on nearly any topic.
I've observed your bullshit, and based on that pattern of
bullshit, infer that you're full of it. Your MO is the evidence,
the logic is an inference based on the evidence." 21 Aug 2008
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/c89d3cf79e806e5f
Thufir: "You can "prove" that no one has disproved your "proof"?
Again, your assertion that no one has done so is even *less*
convincing than your claim that some PDF "proves" whatever point
you're trying to make precisely because I'm familiar with your
MO. That is, you're a dumb-ass who would claim that that
something is proved when it's not, and who would ignore
counter-examples disproving your contention. I don't know what
this *ages old* thread is about, but I know that you're full of
shit." 21 Aug 2008
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/5114623055c01092
129- Fa-groon: "I don't read Snit period. He's been killfiled
since the first day I posted here. [....] I don't want to 'do
like Snit'. As far as I'm concerned, Snit doesn't even exist."
15 Aug 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/dcfbff305ba8b7f0
130- hophead: "I have been reading and occasionally posting to
CSMA for a long time now, since 1995 at least. There have always
been trolls and morons, but I've never seen anything quite so
disruptive as the Snit circus. Snit will *never* back down or
stop, and neither will most of his opponents. A good kill file
is your only hope." 20 Aug 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/3161a78667e299eb
hophead: "It's best to killfile snit, and if you can, set up a
filter to kill any responses to snit. Or (as I've been forced to
do) killfile those who insist on responding to him. Yes, you do
miss some advocacy from some of those people, but the joy of not
seeing snit or any responses to him far outweighs the cost. Of
course, snit also uses sockpuppets. They are pretty easy to
identify fortunately and are easily killed as well." 19 Aug 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/d0cb5d4f4d1cba91
--
HPT
Snit
on 8/22/09 9:12 PM:
> <Crickets chirping>
Poor HPT... his life goal is to catch me in a lie.
And he has failed.
How pathetic.
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
Snit
on 8/22/09 9:21 PM:
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
High Plains Thumper
Snit hit the reply button with no response. <Crickets still
chirping>.
--
HPT
Snit
on 8/23/09 6:02 AM:
> Snit hit the reply button with no response. <Crickets still
> chirping>.
Everything that was needed to be said was said in the subject line.
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
Tim Murray
You forgot mine. I've had a couple of them of the short knock-it-off nature,
and at least one that said "and so it begins".
Snit
on 8/23/09 6:31 AM:
*Anyone* who posts a lot can be quote scavenged... especially whenso many of
the quotes are from Carroll's socks.
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
High Plains Thumper
> High Plains Thumper wrote:
>
>> The Snit Circus of Pathological Myths continue. Now in its
>> second printing, alphabetised except for newest additions,
>> here is what these 130 posters have to say about Snit:
>>
>> 130 items snipped
>
> You forgot mine. I've had a couple of them of the short
> knock-it-off nature, and at least one that said "and so it
> begins".
Correction noted, update in next edition. :-)
However, Snit will claim you're a Steve Carroll sock (like the
other 129 (less Steve). :-)
--
HPT
High Plains Thumper
> Tim Murray stated:
>> High Plains Thumper wrote:
>>
>>> The Snit Circus of Pathological Myths continue. Now in
>>> its second printing, alphabetised except for newest
>>> additions, here is what these 130 posters have to say
>>> about Snit:
>>>
>>> 130 items snipped
>>
>> You forgot mine. I've had a couple of them of the short
>> knock-it-off nature, and at least one that said "and so it
>> begins".
>
> *Anyone* who posts a lot can be quote scavenged... especially
> whenso many of the quotes are from Carroll's socks.
Oh yeah, I can see it now (Snitinator simulation):
1- Adam Kesher: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
2- Alan Baker: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
3- Andrew J. Brehm: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
4- AZ Nomad: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
5- Andy/news/nospam: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
6- B.B.: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
7- BaJoRi: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
8- bobinnv: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
9- Bob S: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
10- �b� unny: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
11- buzz off: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
12- Carlo Coggi: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
13- chrisv (cola): [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
14- C Lund: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
15- cc (COLA): [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
16- Code Orange: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
17- CozmicDebris: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
18- Dawg Tail: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
19- Dave Fritzinger: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
20- Donald L McDaniel: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
21- ed: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
22- Edward Stanfield: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
23- Edwin: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
24- Elijah Baley: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
25- Elizabot v2.0.2: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
26- fibercut: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
27- Geezer: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
28- Geoff M. Fitton (COLA): [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
29- George Graves: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
30- gimme_this_gimme_t...@yahoo.com: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
31- Greycloud: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
32- H: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
33- Hadron (COLA): [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
34- Henry Flam: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
35- Heywood Mogroot: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
36- -hh: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
37- High Plains Thumper: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
38- Homer (COLA): [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
39- Jamie Hart (cola): [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
40- Jason McNorton: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
41- JEDIDIAH (cola): [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
42- Jeff B.: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
43- Jeff Hoppe: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
44- Jesus: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
45- Jim Lee Jr.: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
46- Jim Polaski: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
47- Jim Richardson (cola): [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
48- Joey Jojo Junior Shabadoo: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
49- John C. Randolph: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
50- JohnOfArc (cola): [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
51- John Q. Public: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
52- John Slade: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
53- Josh McKee: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
54- K E: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
55- KK: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
56- Kelsey Bjarnason (cola): [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
57- Ku Karlovsky (cola): [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
58- Lars Trager: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
59- Lefty Bigfoot: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
60- Liam Slider (cola): [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
61- libcrushersmith: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
62- libsnightmare: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
63- Linonut (cola): [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
64- Lloyd Parsons: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
65- Mark Kent (cola): [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
66- Mayor of R'lyeh: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
67- Michelle Ronn: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
68- Mike: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
69- Mike Dee: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
70- mmoore321: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
71- Mojo: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
72- Mr. Blonde: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
73- MR_ED_of_Course: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
74- Muahman: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
75- Nashton/Nasht0n: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
76- New Bee: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
77- Not Important: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
78- OldCSMAer: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
79- OldSage: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
80- Oxford: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
81- Patrick Nihill: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
82- Pawel Wojciak: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
83- PC Guy: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
84- Peter: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
85- Peter Bjorn Perlso: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
86- Peter Hayes: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
87- Peter Jensen (cola): [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
88- Peter Kohlmann (cola): [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
89- PeterBP: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
90- Phil Earnhardt: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
91- Rapskat (cola): [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
92- RichardK: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
93- Rick (cola): [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
94- Rick G.: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
95- Robert F.: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
96- RonB (COLA): [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
97- Roy Culley (cola): [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
98- S'mee (Keith, rec.motorcycles): [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
99- Sandman: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
100- sav: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
101- Sean Burke: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
102- Sermo Malifer (COLA): [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
103- spike1: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
104- ShutterBugz: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
105- Steve Carroll:
106- Steve Mackay: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
107- Steven de Mena: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
108- Steve Travis: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
109- Stuart Krivis: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
110- Tattoo Vampire (COLA): [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
111- The Lost Packet (COLA): [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
112- TheLetterK: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
113- Tim Adams: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
114- Tim Crowley: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
115- Tim Smith: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
116- Timberwoof: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
117- Tom Bates: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
118- Tommy: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
119- TravelinMan: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
120- Wally: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
121- WhoMe: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
122- William Poaster: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
123- William R. Walsh: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
124- Woofbert: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
125- zara: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
126- Zaren Ankleweed: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
127- Znu: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
128- Thufir: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
129- Fa-groon: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
130- hophead: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
131- Tim Murray: [Is a Steve Carroll sock]
--
HPT
Snit
on 8/23/09 8:40 AM:
You have now made this erroneous claim at least twice.
Hey, if you get 130 people to claim I said what you attribute to me, do you
think it will prove I did... even though you cannot quote me doing so?
LOL!
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
Snit
on 8/23/09 8:46 AM:
> Snit wrote:
>> Tim Murray stated:
>>> High Plains Thumper wrote:
>>>
>>>> The Snit Circus of Pathological Myths continue. Now in
>>>> its second printing, alphabetised except for newest
>>>> additions, here is what these 130 posters have to say
>>>> about Snit:
>>>>
>>>> 130 items snipped
>>>
>>> You forgot mine. I've had a couple of them of the short
>>> knock-it-off nature, and at least one that said "and so it
>>> begins".
>>
>> *Anyone* who posts a lot can be quote scavenged... especially
>> whenso many of the quotes are from Carroll's socks.
>
> Oh yeah, I can see it now (Snitinator simulation):
Funny how you run from my point. Remember, I have shown you my collection
of quotes about Steve from *one* month.
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
Steve Carroll
> High Plains Thumper stated in post h6ro94$nr...@news.eternal-september.org
And I'm sure he's still laughing at it;)