Nice and quiet in here
wispygalaxy
Don Zeigler
> I hope the trolls stick with their promise!
Ditto! It's nice to be able to browse the group without wading through a bunch
of bullshit.
--
The severity of the itch is proportional to the reach.
Regards,
[dz]
Owner/proprietor, Trollus Amongus, LLC
High Plains Thumper
> wispygalaxy wrote:
>
>> I hope the trolls stick with their promise!
>
> Ditto! It's nice to be able to browse the group without wading
> through a bunch of bullshit.
True.
BTW, both Hadron and Snit seem lost without their buddies, LOL!
--
HPT
Hadron
> I hope the trolls stick with their promise!
Echo .....
Yeah right "Wispy".
Wintrolls Lie
> I hope the trolls stick with their promise!
Yes, COLA is much better without the lying trolls. Hadron is like a fish
out of water without his troll buddies (see his pathetic response to your
post). I expect some new flatfish nyms to appear anytime now. After more
than a decade of trolling this newsgroup I'm sure the withdrawal symptoms
must be really hurting now. :-)
Terry Porter
> I hope the trolls stick with their promise!
I haven't noticed the difference. I'm still seeing followups to hadrongo,
who is still posting.
--
This machine running Gnu/Linux Ubuntu 9.10 and posting via Pan.
Get your Free copy NOW! http://www.ubuntu.com/
William Poaster
say:
> On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 21:23:47 -0500, wispygalaxy wrote:
>
>> I hope the trolls stick with their promise!
>
> I haven't noticed the difference. I'm still seeing followups to hadrongo,
> who is still posting.
Of course it is. Like a dog, the Hadron troll will always return to its
vomit.
--
Linux. The Malicious Software Removal
tool which wipes Windows from your PC in
seconds!
Roy Schestowitz
Hash: SHA1
____/ William Poaster on Wednesday 18 Nov 2009 11:24 : \____
> Above the wailing & moaning of the trolls, Terry Porter was heard to
> say:
>
>> On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 21:23:47 -0500, wispygalaxy wrote:
>>
>>> I hope the trolls stick with their promise!
>>
>> I haven't noticed the difference. I'm still seeing followups to hadrongo,
>> who is still posting.
>
> Of course it is. Like a dog, the Hadron troll will always return to its
> vomit.
I bet the trolls will return with new names*. They can't stand viewing
Linux advocacy that's peaceful. They try to turn it into a brawl.
____
* The hadrongo too has used many names.
- --
~~ Best of wishes
"The equivalent of treating dandruff by decapitation"
- -- Frank Zappa on the Parents Music Resource Center' censorship plans
http://Schestowitz.com | Mandriva Linux | PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
run-level 2 Nov 17 02:36
http://iuron.com - help build a non-profit search engine
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAksD+5sACgkQU4xAY3RXLo4bkQCfWNjwboKt+PVDPjGaNiljDDjM
vhEAnRitf0z0m3Wyry+p5fCS+fZkgqCF
=eIr8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Goblin
is getting a sneak peek in a few days....
Like someone said, if DFS didn't have bad luck, he'd have no luck at all.
I hope Hadron and Snit get extra credit for having to do the fudging job
of all their buddies.
--
Goblin - http://www.openbytes.wordpress.com
"I refute the claim I am one of the Linux unwashed. I take a shower once
a year whether I need to or not"
Also catch me on Twitter: _Goblin
and also in #boycottnovell on freenode!
wispygalaxy
> On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 21:23:47 -0500, wispygalaxy wrote:
>
>> I hope the trolls stick with their promise!
>
> I haven't noticed the difference. I'm still seeing followups to hadrongo,
> who is still posting.
Hadron's been quiet for a while, so I guess you won't see his words in the
quoted material. Maybe Hadron needed a vacation? (I'm on Thanksgiving
vacation right now.)
wispygalaxy
LOL, I see some trolls have nymshifted. I'm not fooled at all!
Hadron is still annoyed with me, I see. :P
wispygalaxy
Why do you keep picking on me??
wispygalaxy
> wispygalaxy wrote:
>
>> I hope the trolls stick with their promise!
>
> Ditto! It's nice to be able to browse the group without wading through a
> bunch of bullshit.
Yep, I can finally read this newsgroup in peace!
Chris Ahlstrom
It's been blissfully quiet, apart from Smith emitting scurrilous nonsense
and Erik emitting boolshit about Linux developers all avoiding checking
return values.
Snit is still on with the verbal diarrhea.
amicus is still here, but he's actually not too bad at the moment.
And you, wispy! You:
--
You fill a much-needed gap.
Snit
11/25/09 2:38 PM:
> wispygalaxy pulled this Usenet boner:
>
>> Terry Porter wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 21:23:47 -0500, wispygalaxy wrote:
>>>
>>>> I hope the trolls stick with their promise!
>>>
>>> I haven't noticed the difference. I'm still seeing followups to hadrongo,
>>> who is still posting.
>>
>> Hadron's been quiet for a while, so I guess you won't see his words in the
>> quoted material. Maybe Hadron needed a vacation? (I'm on Thanksgiving
>> vacation right now.)
>
> It's been blissfully quiet, apart from Smith emitting scurrilous nonsense
> and Erik emitting boolshit about Linux developers all avoiding checking
> return values.
>
> Snit is still on with the verbal diarrhea.
It is called having a conversation. Try it sometime!
> amicus is still here, but he's actually not too bad at the moment.
>
> And you, wispy! You:
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
William Poaster
Oh, I'm sure you're worried about *that*! ;-)
--
Surely you are not comparing the
non-existent Linux (at that time)
with Windows 98?
Hadron: Message-ID: <npk5rvz...@homelinux.net>
Don Zeigler
> Why do you keep picking on me??
Maybe Quack has a crush on you.
--
Regards,
Don Zeigler
Owner/proprietor, Trollus Amongus, LLC
...Isn't having a smoking section in a restaurant like having a peeing
section in a swimming pool?
High Plains Thumper
> It's been blissfully quiet, apart from Smith emitting scurrilous
> nonsense and Erik emitting boolshit about Linux developers all
> avoiding checking return values.
>
> Snit is still on with the verbal diarrhea.
That is an understatement. No one can carry on a decent conversation
with him, that is for sure. He must be one of the loneliest person's on
the planet. Everything degrades to "he lied" with ad hominem
allegations sprinkled in.
--
HPT
Chris Ahlstrom
Well, TomB has been patient enough to get along well enough with Snit in a
recent thread. (I'm not!)
--
You are capable of planning your future.
Rick
... try to stop feeding him. It is hard, I know, but try.
--
Rick
spi...@freenet.co.uk
> wispygalaxy wrote:
>
>> Why do you keep picking on me??
>
> Maybe Quack has a crush on you.
>
He has a crush on a few of us. He's practically fixated on me.
--
| spi...@freenet.co,uk | "Are you pondering what I'm pondering Pinky?" |
| Andrew Halliwell BSc | |
| in | "I think so brain, but this time, you control |
| Computer Science | the Encounter suit, and I'll do the voice..." |
High Plains Thumper
Feeding him like? :-)
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/8549a8118113c4bf
The Snit Circus of Pathological Myths continue. Now in its second
printing, alphabetised except for newest additions, here is what these
132 posters have to say about Snit:
1- Adam Kesher: "Steve, IIRC Sandman's website has a member area and a
login. If you forget your password, you can ask it to e-mail it to you,
and a bot will send an e-mail. *That* is the e-mail Snit got from
Sandman's website, and yes he's that fucked in the head and starved for
attention that he'd claim it to be an e-mail from Sandman himself. So,
don't get sucked into his little circus. The e-mail, in this particular
instance, did probably originate from Sandman.net." 27 Feb 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/dac74355552b4cc7
2- Alan Baker: "People's perceptions of you are *formed* by behaviour
and not withstanding your occasional on topic posts, I wish you'd leave
too. Please note that despite the amazing silliness that is Edwin, I
have never made the same wish of him." 27 Feb 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/4a7c3ebf3fc10221
3- Andrew J. Brehm: "You are not flamed because you speak the truth, you
are flamed because you are a hideous troll and keep disrupting the
newsgroup."
4- AZ Nomad: "The fact that you routinely change your headers to weasel
out of killfiles proves that you're an asshole." 25 Jun 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/51b43d6c9613c9da
5- Andy/news/nospam: "Why do you keep these things up, Snit? Why not
just let them go away and show how responsible a member of CSMA you are?
You could show your enemies up by being better than then, rise above the
low level you so obviously dislike. Anything, just stop...." 26 Apr 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/d6ffb6b06aa237e5
6- B.B.: "Does the From: header contain the string "Snit"? If yes, then
troll. Otherwise, maybe. Dunno why I had my KF on you set to expire, but
it's fixed now." 13 Mar 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/8a98d179b2ff9578
7- BaJoRi:
Snit: "You are, of course, lying."
BaJoRi: "No, I am not. You know it, and I know it, and everyone else who
has read your idiocy knows it. I took your statement, showed it to be
wrong, then added even more, just to be a dick and REALLY show you to be
a fool. You need to judiciously snip out pertinent points because you
are an intellectually dwarfed turd-burglar." 11 Nov 2008
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.vacation.las-vegas/msg/647944511b74b82f
8- bobinnv: "I learned some time ago how much better this group can be
if you kill file Snit. I have never understood why more people don't do
the same.." 5 Aug 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/0706dbef8ce1f903
9- Bob S: "This has always been pretty much a free-for-all group, but
since Snit showed up, its become almost impossible to have a decent
discussion about anything." 27 Dec 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/3d2f1dff196ca190
The solution is to NOT REPLY TO SNIT. But for some reason, some people
just can't stop feeding him."
10- °b° unny: Subject "snit makes me sad", Text "really actually =:-("
9 Oct 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/4e31cb49c1e2d432
11- buzz off: "Snit is obviously mentally ill..."
12- Carlo Coggi: "He must believe he is surrounded by 'trolls' ... in
the groups he trolls in, that is. I wondered if the idiotrollers like
snit would reply to this thread. Of course, I didn't see his posts, only
your reply".
13- chrisv (cola): "No, she called him 'shit', and rightly so, for they
way he was so ignominiously birthed into a toilet at the bus depot, and
simply refused to die, despite repeated flushes. It's now far too late
to *flush* him, but we can still *plonk* him..." 12 Sep 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/18099f8aa067f4a5
14- C Lund: "Snit is not my responsibility. Maybe it's time for you to
learn how to use your kill-filter. I am assuming, of course, that your
Usenet browser has a kill-filter." 5 Mar 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/2c390a34b05b24a9
15- cc (COLA): "Snit posts all the time. You don't have to dig up months
old articles where he brings up years old topics. Just respond to a
current message." 22 Jan 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/5a712e3312ba9f8a
16- Code Orange: "Then why post it? What need is there for you to "win"
an argument? They don't like you, you don't like them. Why must you keep
this up? What results are you expecting?"
17- CozmicDebris: "I'm done with your three year old games. The archives
show my answers and your inability to process them. Keep posting your
list and proving that you are an idiot troll. I will not address it any
further- you being too stupid to realize and accept that is not my
problem". 22 Nov 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.cellular.attws/msg/0aa65b7a132dbfe8
18- Dawg Tail: "You've already apologized for having already misread
what I had previously written. What makes you think that you're
correctly understanding what I'm writting now. You've got a history of
reading into things what you wanted people to have said instead of what
they really said.
I suggest you get over this limitation of yours. It's making you look
foolish."
Dawg Tail: "PC advocates, Mac advocates, Linux advocates. Almost all of
them are making similar claims about Snit. When you have so many diverse
people who share a common perception where do you think the problem
lies? With Snit? Or almost everyone else? The answer doesn't require an
advanced degree to figure out." 30 Dec 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/73edac32c3ad530b
19- Dave Fritzinger: "[snip of stuff I really don't care to read] Snit,
please go away. Get a life, meet a woman, do something, but please,
please, please, GO AWAY!!!!" 2 Jun 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/57bb2fc42ec0f290
20- Donald L McDaniel: "Jesus, snit. You're a teacher. I thought you
knew what a metaphor was, and could recognize one when it was presented
to you. I guess I had too much confidence in you." 30 Nov 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/3254ec7af27bfb0f
21- ed: "snit, you continually amaze me with how much of a liar and
loser you are. you may notice a semi-regular pattern with me where i
stop responding to your posts for stretches at a time, then start up
responding as if you were a normal person. i suppose it's tough for the
magnitude of your 'loserdom' to stick, so it loses some of it's
sharpness when i stop responding to you. you almost always start
responding back in a semi normal way, but inevitably degenerate. it's
once again that time. i can only ask that you pass my condolences to
your wife and unborn child for having to put up with such a dishonest
fool as yourself. (well, if your wife is a loser as well, just pass
those condolences to the rug-rat to be; if not, double condolences to
her). " 30 Apr 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/71f74dd6d806ce77
22- Edward Stanfield: "Snit thinks the rules that apply to honest and
honorable people apply to him. That is absurd. He is the biggest liar
in Usenet history. Mackay posted the email to prove Snit was using sock
puppets and he still is. Snit can not give up his socks puppets and
shills. They are the only ones who ever support him." 28 Jan 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/5b52494d96d12229
23- Edwin: "You've got to be out of your mind, Snit. You're the worst
troll this group has ever seen. You're a liar and a forger, and you've
almost destroyed this group single-handedly. For you to post a list of
out of context arguments, and lies, and forgeries about your enemies
labled as a "peace effort" has to be one of the craziest stunts you've
pulled. It's all about your sick need for attention, your need to be
center stage at all times. You'd publicly eat dog turd if you thought it
would make people look at you." 18 May 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/37e4a720619642a0
24- Elijah Baley: "Seriously, Snit, you need psychiatric help. Go see a
doctor." 24 Aug 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/6f6c88356b54fc15
25- Elizabot v2.0.2: "I see you were unable to respond to the points in
my post and you are back to your repetitious regurgitation mode. How
childishly typical of you, Snit." 16 Nov 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/55214ccfb7414fe5
26- Fa-groon: "I don't read Snit period. He's been killfiled since the
first day I posted here. [....] I don't want to 'do like Snit'. As far
as I'm concerned, Snit doesn't even exist." 15 Aug 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/dcfbff305ba8b7f0
27- fibercut: "That is the problem. In the years I have been coming to
CSMA I have seen in the past year a real hatred among people, besides
the typical Mac vs. Windows typical argument. I feel that it is like
being in a room of really young children trying there best to best the
other person. The one common thing among all of this seems to be you. I
hate to be like this, but facts are facts. You seem to be in the middle
of a great percentage of arguments. CSMA has become less about Macs and
more about "look everybody, I think he lied". Is there no end then all
this picking at each other on such a personal level. CSMA has always
been al little adversarial but you have personally crank it up to the
point that this place is no longer fun. Congratulations on stopping CSMA
and making this place your own personal circus." 12 Jan 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/bbe695bbc3424ab6
28- Geezer:
Snit: "Steve Carroll has no sense of morality"
Geezer: "Whined the guy who cannot directly address those who uncover
his lies and deceit;)"
Snit: "and no clue about the law."
Geezer: 'Said the guy who believes his unsupported opinions are "proof".
LOL! (snip more of Snit's unsupported lies)' 1 Jan 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/d0517ced5134934d
29- Geoff M. Fitton (COLA): "The Prescott Computer Guy *still* showing
how stupid he is... What a mar00n". 30 Aug 2008
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/f9401b4b57c59865
30- George Graves: "Jason. You have started an argument with the Snit
(AKA Michael Glasser), this should not be done. He will drive you crazy
with his twisted logic, his deep-rooted need to be ALWAYS right at any
cost. He will move goalposts, set up strawmen, and bore you into
submission with his endless pedanticism. The only way to engage him is
to hit and run. NEVER engage him, it's a futile, empty procedure that
will only anger you and feed him. Take my advice and STAY AWAY!" 27
Oct 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/3d3af33ce25a11fd
31- gimme_this_gimme_t...@yahoo.com: "Hitting the vodka tonight Snit?"
4 Mar 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/b457a7b378264794
32- Greycloud: "You really shouldn't lie like that. Everyone else
notices that you are not honest and you have no honor." 21 Jan 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/3b92f11a1ab00f91
33- H: "Your crappy posts are still showing up in seperate threads, are
you doing this on purpose to piss people off? I dont ever censor people
cause that's just retarded but if you dont fix it I'm gonna have to
cause I dont wanna see your name 40 times in a row. So uh, change your
client or something". 12 Sep 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/f36ee6b458c86499
34- Hadron (COLA):
Snit: "Now why not end your silliness and either just stop your BS or
actually give reasoned comments on the screen shots you keep asking for
and I keep providing?
Hadron: "err, he just did. And you snipped it all you weasel." 30 Jan 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/de49f2b7471d2e1a
Snit: "Sigh: 100% predictable, you will not answer *any* question I just
asked. You will run... your whole goal is to beg for attention, not to
make or support a point."
Hadron: "nice. You made it into my new killfile. Jesus, stop repeating
the same garbage." 6 Apr 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/c86ab53a759ea728
35- Henry Flam: "Who gives a damn about this shit? Snit, once in a
while, I make the mistake in thinking that that you are starting to make
sense in your posts; I tend to agree with your politics. Then you post
stuff like this and it destroys any respect that I have for you." 16
Aug 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/f048bedfe0d67d66
Henry Flam: "You on the other hand must a deeply trouble individual who
has a fragile ego. I needn't agree nor disagree with the points above. I
don't care about them. Your constant complaints, whines, rages, etc.,
wars with the regular Mac advocates, whom you mislabel as trolls, arise
from your sense that any conversation or thread must orbit around you.
People have pointed that out to you but you don't accept that. Snit I
feel sorry for you. Please go and see a doctor about your solipsism.
There must be a cure for you deep psychological travail." 18 Aug 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/b9bb48e6e6da75c8
36- Heywood Mogroot: "*plonk*"
37- -hh: 'Perversion has utterly nothing to do with the definition of
"synonymous". It is, however, a very clear example of how you attempt
to maliciously debase against anyone who disagrees with you. As such, I
consider this to be a purposeful attempt by you to try to libel me.
This is your only warning to consider rescinding your remark, with the
reminder that you, and you alone are responsible for that accusation,
both in the ethical as well as the full legal meaning of the word
"responsible".' 25 Feb 2008
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/5496641a3426293a
38- High Plains Thumper: "I can understand why posters get sick and
tired of your lame ad hominem attacks, your cowardly statements shifting
the goal posts, your continuous rambling drivel of how everyone seems to
be against you. No one cares a wooden nickel about your incessant flame
wars that are self created. You pretend to be an advocate but you
manage to cause everyone's hand to be against you." 6 Jan 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/b27ba196819ad38f
Only once in a blue moon does he have anything worth reading. I just
got through his circus of repetitive ad hominem crap. I am surprised
that with the stunts he has pulled in COLA and this newsgroup, that he
hasn't suffered a worse fate in real life. If he hasn't, one of these
days he will pull that stunt on the wrong person, and *B-O-O-M-!*,
someone will pull the trigger. One ought to really pity him (or as
Steve Travis stated, "Or perhaps we should set up a fund to get him more
happy glue (and the appropriate plastic bags)." 8 Jul 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/2666237bba82b97a
39- Homer (COLA):
HPT: "Snit in a period of 2 minutes has copied a post of mine, posting
the same following message over and over, in false pretense as a Linux
advocate."
Homer: "That kind of behaviour is not normal, to say the least. I don't
mean this as a personal insult, but I'm perfectly serious when I say
'Snit' (Michael Glasser) is obviously mentally ill, and needs help. I
was going to suggest that someone alerts his wife to the problem, but I
have to assume she's already aware of his condition, if she is in fact
still living with him. It's possible, I suppose, that he's already
undergoing counselling and/or on medication, but if he is then it
doesn't seem to be helping much. Maybe he just missed his 'meds' today
(again, I mean that sincerely). 26 Jan 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/e061874ea94e9ce8
40- hophead: "I have been reading and occasionally posting to CSMA for a
long time now, since 1995 at least. There have always been trolls and
morons, but I've never seen anything quite so disruptive as the Snit
circus. Snit will *never* back down or stop, and neither will most of
his opponents. A good kill file is your only hope." 20 Aug 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/3161a78667e299eb
hophead: "It's best to killfile snit, and if you can, set up a filter to
kill any responses to snit. Or (as I've been forced to do) killfile
those who insist on responding to him. Yes, you do miss some advocacy
from some of those people, but the joy of not seeing snit or any
responses to him far outweighs the cost. Of course, snit also uses
sockpuppets. They are pretty easy to identify fortunately and are easily
killed as well." 19 Aug 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/d0cb5d4f4d1cba91
41- Jamie Hart (cola): "It seems that since you are unable to offer
support for your statements, you're reduced to personal attacks on me.
Incidentally, anyone reading this post can see that I have offered no
straw men, and have only asked you to explain how the things you state
as facts can be true. I'm really sorry that you're taking this attitude,
the topic is an interesting one and I thought you might have some
insights. I've snipped the rest, since you dislike long posts and avoid
answering any of the questions I asked by saying everything was just
repeated." 6 Dec 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/8e07cde31f4eecf6
42- Jason McNorton: "You're one of the many, many paranoid people on
usenet that should be confined most likely. You sit there and refresh
your screen endlessly. You post the same nonsense over and over. Either
you're a super troll, or you're a super mess." 1 Nov 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/7a8e091c0b248eb0
43- JEDIDIAH (cola): "You're simply full of shit."
44- Jeff B.: "Yo, Snit. We're not pals. I think you're a git." 23 Dec 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/0ec649345d433a2d
45- Jeff Hoppe: "This is a Macintosh Advocacy newsgroup. Not a 12-step
recovery plan. Your medical problems or conditions won't help me achieve
a greater understanding of my Mac. In fact, it detracts from it and
those kinds of discussions have no place in a newsgroup such as this."
18 Nov 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/947a2cc0301a2862
46- Jesus: "Really, Snit. It's annoying. What are you accomplishing
besides being annoying? Is that your goal?" 25 Apr 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/e3d5029d34cde243
47- Jim Lee Jr.: "Snit, read the thread's title, is Bush mentioned in
it? You (and Carroll) ought to learn to stay on topic and not hijack
threads."
48- Jim Polaski: "Why is it that nearly every thread you're involved in
seems like it turns into some tit-for-tat, dozens of responses to OT
things and garbage? Cmon there Snit. Someone has to take the lead and
stop this crap. Try. How about it?" 25 Apr 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/5b5c22490ab9649b
49- Jim Richardson (cola): "And yet again, Snit runs away, rather than
actually provide evidence for his claims. Par for the course I suppose."
"Evasion noted. Snit runs away again rather than produce evidence for
his claims. At least come up with some original insults Snit! I mean,
you *are* capable of original thoughts! Right? Snit?" 8 Feb 2008
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/e33321cc3343fc44
50- Joey Jojo Junior Shabadoo: "and Snithead has even farther to fall -
in a few weeks he'll be out on the street after midnight, yelling at
passersby 'sucky sucky, $2...'" 23 Mar 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/57cf69f66571a5a7
51- John C. Randolph: "You're nothing but a troll yourself. What are you
bitching about?"
52- JohnOfArc (cola): "I'm not sure "troll" does it justice- more like a
black hole! But hey, if we all promise to never again even entertain an
unkind thought re Apple, will you take it back and lock it up? Please??"
11 Mar 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/e2891b1f3984e121
53- John Q. Public: "I have not been bothered to read Snit's postings
since I figured out who he is. I don't bother to filter his posts, I
just consider the source and skip to the next one when I see his name."
7 Jan 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/7d34c1bd05c877d2
54- John Slade: "I don't get posts from Snit. I wouldn't be shocked that
he has some kind of disorder. He made up stuff about being a computer
repairman and teacher. He's just plain loony and best ignored. Let him
deal with his disorder by medication. He's here to do one thing, get
attention from people. He says the crazy stuff just to get a reaction.
You say you like to beat him over the head. Well that's what he's
counting on, he says stuff he knows isn't true in hopes to get a rise
out of people like you. Ignore him, you won't regret it." 3 Apr 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/394a53a65c28d314
"Snit, you have a enough problems as it is without adding drinking booze
to the list. How the hell did you manage to get out of my killfile? Oh
well back into the cage you go, PLONK." 13 Oct 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.food.wine/msg/992a796786a541d8
55- Josh McKee: "Snit, I assume there was some point to this posting?
Because I certainly cannot find it."
56- K E: "I haven't read this board for awhile but I see that even
though the trolls still roam free at least the worst troll of the lot is
mostly being ignored by readers on this bb. If the few stragglers that
keep replying to him would just stop responding to Snit at all this
place could be worth coming back to. There's a good chance he'll pack up
and take his trolling to more fertile ground." 22 Oct 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/0b9dca7df1f677f4
57- KK: 'Whoa there, ad hominem man. You started off your sentence with
"Ah" like you'd just realized something profound.' 29 Oct 2008
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.fan.howard-stern/msg/6a89029a5b5be5f8
58- Kelsey Bjarnason (cola): "Funny how you simply don't bother reading
the posts that rip your entire thesis to bleeding gobbets of putrid
excrescence. Maybe some day you'll learn how to support your position,
instead of sticking your fingers in your ears and humming, hoping it'll
all go away." 7 Mar 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/96d064a7a5c6074a
59- Ku Karlovsky (cola): "You repeatedly chastise others for ad hominem
attacks while in the same sentence make your own ad hominem attacks. You
make silly claims and then avoid the subject of your silliness. You're a
liar and a hypocrite and you always have been." 14 Jul 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/d1e3f9ac5c72c6ee
60- Lars Trager: "Yes, you are stupid." 7 Jan 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/a9bedf6689f9a54f
61- Lefty Bigfoot: "Okay, I tried to put up with it for a long time, but
the few times you post something worth reading just aren't worth it
anymore. *plonk*" 16 Dec 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/5520adae01120e83
62- Liam Slider (cola): "Maybe he's responding to the fact you've been
an annoying little fuckwit lately. You started out with the pretense of
trying to be fair, but lately all there is from you in COLA is trashtalk
about Linux and you acting every bit the troll." 16 Jul 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/ad7d6c42c5e4cf2f
63-libcrushersmith: "Snit also thinks Dan Rather still anchors CBS News
and that Gitmo terrorists are innocent! Any time Snit is cornered, he
changes the subject and will never admit he's wrong." 28 Jan 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/fbc516717f3b7ccf
64- libsnightmare:
Snit: "Who said Bush did not flip flop?"
libsnightmare: "Never said that. I put back in what you cut out. He
never flip-flopped on the war, even when it was unpopular, like "Kerry
and all the other libs" did. You're a sore loser who has resorted to
fifth grade tactics. How fucking sad - all this clown has left is to
edit posts and post fake bullshit. You can't debate... so you lie. Once
again, you have proved Steve Carroll right about you. Sad..." 4 May 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/a80c93f80bd6bc3e
65- Linonut (cola): "Snit is a Tholenoid."
"Indeed. Snit may be the first retraction of my general killfile
amnesty. The volume of cavilling, whining, foot-stomping,
back-tracking, goal-post shifting, and petulance generated by that
effete candy-ass beggars belief". 30 Aug 2008
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/cc4827fd7e8ad574
66- Lloyd Parsons: "Well, I don't know if Oxford is the most cretinous,
I would think that would be reserved for Snit! ;-)" 18 Mar 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/b6cd3ac4bf1e08d6
67- Mark Kent (cola): "The problem with someone like Mr Glasser is the
same as it is with Mr Wong, even if he were to be honest now, it would
be impossible to determine where the honesty starts and the usual
dishonesty ends. In my primary school, one of the teachers was very keen
on proverbs, and I recall her going over the "cry wolf" story. Mr
Glasser could "cry wolf" over and over now, and I would not come to help
him with his sheep, because I do not know any way of determining if he's
ever telling the truth, or indeed, if he ever has." 2 Dec 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/3f30aa1b65a972b3
68- Mayor of R'lyeh: "The fact is that he's probably pulling it to this
post since its all about him and he managed to make me think about him
today. A friend of mine has a toddler. I went over to her house and
videotaped her kid doing a bunch of cute toddler stuff then burned a DVD
of it for her. While we were watching the DVD her kid got mad. He got
mad because we quit making him the center of attention and made that kid
on the tv the center of attention. He even ran up to the tv and tried to
block our view of it. That's how Snit lives his whole life." 30 Sep 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/9935f4154d5a290b
69- Michelle Ronn: "The real topic here is that one someone refutes your
'facts', you run away and ignore them. Refuting your 'facts' is easily
done in this case. I did it, and you ignored it." 9 Feb 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/c050c82720737b32
70- Mike: "Nonsense. I never see you "advocate" anything. All I see you
doing is engage in endless semantic arguments with everyone. You're the
TholenBot of CSMA. BTW, that's *not* a compliment!" 8 Jul 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/7c5b72d70b87ffbd
71- Mike Dee: "I will no longer accuse you of lying here. Instead I can
only say that you are a complete and delusional kook that happens to
inhabit CSMA for the time being. That you are unaware of how deranged
you actually behave further reinforces this notion. Please seek
professional help."
"The point that keeps whooshing over your head Snit, is Elizabot made no
threat to you before you went to the police. She made a promise.
Admittedly, to your delusional spaced out paranoiac view point, Elizabot
was suddenly "threatening" to you. In so much as you had to take your
kooky self down to your local police shop and blub on their shoulders
about how much in danger you were in [sob, whine], and they had to waste
valuable policing time consoling you over your stupidity. I bet they
have Kook with a capital "K" written at the top of your profile, Snit."
2 Sep 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/9cf45bc88a324f40
72- mmoore321: "Snit is a human car-accident and we are all
rubbernecking. We know it is bad form, but yet strangely curious. Treat
him the same way, look but just keep moving on." 18 Aug 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/f1c3041d89504c07
73- Mojo: "Actually, these facts piss everybody off because they are
off-topic, unnecessarily confrontational, extremely boring and clearly
show that you are crying out for attention." 20 Sep 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/a38f07b9a4811a80
74- Mr. Blonde: "Lastly, I can't help but comment on the fact that your
obsession with Sandman has actually grown since you claimed to KF him.
Killfilling someone generally implies you're ignoring that person, yet
you piggyback onto virtually every reply to him here and and check his
website's validation status more often than most people check their
e-mail. These are not the actions of a mentally balanced individual."
19 Jan 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/2b005666ab303e2b
75- MR_ED_of_Course: "Seriously, spend half a day at any pre-school or
kindergarten and see if the kids there can't teach you a thing or two
about social behavior." 16 May 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/55c03a6a0b7813a4
76- Muahman: "Ummm, dude you post 1000 posts a day. 999 of them are
trolls, if anyone here has issues it's not me." 24 Sep 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/ad9daff74ee1e0bd
Muahman: "LOL, everyone hates Snit. I know I'd push him in front of a
bus if I could." 15 May 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/e5ee46bf5bf04d00
Muahman: "Ahhhh shit, another thread lost to the Snit retard circus!!!
I actually dread seeing Snit reply to a thread because that
automatically means it's in the toilet." 8 Jul 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/92e776d521dfa701
77- Nashton/Nasht0n: "Oh for crying out loud, if I wasn't convinced that
snit is a total loser, and I rarely call people losers, I certainly am
now. Why bother responding to his stupidities anyway?" 29 Nov 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/be1a326a81441508
78- New Bee: "Honest and honorable? You? You've either got a wry sense
of humor, or you're completely nuts. Either way you're just a waste of
time, and you've done more than anybody to make this group a cesspool.
Then you revel in wallowing in your own filth." 14 May 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/2856277b085d0274
79- Not Important: "I get this mental image of you and a sibling as
children in the back seat of the family car saying:
Mom, 'snits' touching me ... and you responding much as you do now ...
I'm not touching you, you're touching me! The problem is that by now you
should've grown out of that type of poke and complain interaction with
others. But, of course, you've haven't learned how to interact with
others in a more 'constructive' and mutually beneficial manner even
now." 03 Jul 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/d16279e9003ca8f4
80- OldCSMAer: "What's he been doing? Am I going to be sorry I killfiled
him?" 27 Nov 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/23b808d9646cd257
81- OldSage: "What drives me nuts is your unrelenting ability and desire
to argue on the head of a pin about the most trivial of things." 2 Oct 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/88457f8e7c25273e
82- Oxford: "If you are using MT-Newswatcher: Select offending Author,
example Snit... Go to the Filters Menu, Choose 'Kill this Author'
Click 'OK' Then Repeat with each annoying Author of your choice. Then
to see your work... Choose the Filter Menu again, Then 'Refilter
Articles'... Bam! No more boring, pointless bickering about nothing.
Enjoy!!!!!" 14 Aug 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/1d7f9181e95ed9ec
83- Patrick Nihill: "I mean, honestly, who would you rather discuss
something with; Dan, or someone like Zara? Or, for that matter, Snit,
for whom the work 'troll' seems so painfully inadequate?" 13 Aug 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/f93db68e683ad769
84- Pawel Wojciak: "Jesus Christ, snit... <plonk> "
85- PC Guy: "Forget it Snit, you're a waste of time. For someone who
talks about everyone else not being "honest and honorable" you appear to
be the least honest and honorable of anyone here." 22 Apr 2007
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/36bf51df2a2662a4
86- Peter: "I've never felt the need to use the filters in Newswatcher
but I thought Id try the Kill this Author.. option with Snit. Ten
seconds later and he's gone! Amazing." 30 Dec 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/011eef01d7bcd56c
87- Peter Bjorn Perlso: "Plonked for 60 days. Now stfu and take your
argument with sandman into the private room." 13 Dec 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/ae4651ec99be3c77
88- Peter Hayes: "True, but that removes Snit completely, and someti...
err..... occasiona.... errrrr..... once in a blue moon he has something
useful to say."
89- Peter Jensen (cola): "Where has he ever said that they were not
different windowing environments? Message-ID, please. Experience has
told me not to trust you on anything without backing evidence."
90- Peter Kohlmann (cola): "Snot is a hideous troll. Nobody is as
dishonest as that piece of unadultered garbage. There are csma posters
even more stupid than Snot. Oxford comes to mind. There are certainly
other csma posters who lie nearly as much. But no others are so intent
on trolling in whatever way possible as Snot" 15 Mar 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/3409d9582dcebd25
91- PeterBP: "Oh will you stfu".
92- Phil Earnhardt: "You're only interested in trying to get superficial
snipes and extrapolate inappropriate conclusions." 1 Nov 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/ad24a97d5dc86277
93- Rapskat (cola): "For instance, your sig you reference a long
standing war you have going with some person from csma. It's like you
single out persons to target your attentions upon and then continuously
berate them with constant barbs and goads to perpetuate their
acrimonious responses, which in turn you respond in kind, etc. ad
infinitum. Above all things, your affinity for Macs and your overbearing
pompous nature aside, this is what convinces me that your primary
purpose for frequenting this and other groups is to troll." 07 Sep 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/a09c6b8e3e63f42d
94- RichardK: "Just killfile him already."
95- Rick (cola): "Snit, you are a liar. And an ignorant one. You trash
people that are trying their level best to cope with a horrendous
situation. And you do it without the slightest idea of what is going
on." 06 Sep 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/fcad2955ac5cb03b
96- Rick G.: "Just to be plain here, I have no doubt that he is a troll.
I am tolerant of his nature, not blind to it. However, as a troll, he is
... somewhat clumsy." 22 Mar 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/198b88e3d0064a92
97- Robert F.: "Um, perhaps you misunderstand. I don't care if you quote
Mayor McCheese claiming the Earth is a flat plate perched on the shell
of a tortoise, I was merely pointing out that you run the risk of
looking ridiculous when you quote something patently stupid. If that's
your goal, you're on the right track, and more power to you." 11 Jan 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/4dc22433eae8803d
98- RonB (COLA): "Snit is a crank fixated on one issue, who's thing is
twisting your words so he can win an argument against a straw man.
That's enough to killfile him." 1 Jan 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.usenet.kooks/msg/ce8550d4cc5b1b42
99- Rotten Apple:
Snit: "The truth? Carroll has openly admitted he does what he accuses
others of... now there is evidence he is committing identity theft - the
very thing he accuses me of based on his claiming I am not the person he
has tracked me down to be."
Rotten Apple: "You make trolls like me look like choir boys." 14 Sep 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/7a92988bcbce8fdb
Snit: "No need for him to worry - unlike him, I would not even threaten
to contact his wife. I simply will not sink to his level. I suspect
his wife will find out anyway - people are not as stupid as he wants
them to be."
Rotten Apple: "Your meds are really kicking your ass!" 15 Sep 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/5e414c27d6357a4a
100- Roy Culley (cola): "You appear to be in the latter category.
Starting crossposted threads for the simple purpose of hoping to
generate a flame war. If you truly want to learn more about Linux and
how it can help you and your supposed users why aren't you requesting
help from a more technical Linux newsgroup than an advocacy group? As
the old saying goes, those who can do, those who can't teach. Your posts
seem to confirm that saying IMHO." 12 Mar 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/d521a80051e24d08
101- S'mee (Keith, rec.motorcycles): "Liar...forger and worthless. You
must be related to our resident racist troll, he lies as much as you."
29 Dec 2008
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/ab08c00330c8b58d
102- Sandman: "He is by far the most killfiled person in the -HISTORY-
of csma. I've never seen someone so disliked, almost hated, in a news
group before. He has the ability to turn just about any person against
him in just a few posts. On usenet, trolls do this daily, but the funny
part with Michael is that I actually think he DOESN'T consider himself
be a troll - damn what -EVERYONE ELSE- is calling him. Obviously they
are wrong. Only Tholen himself can match this behaviour." 18 Mar 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/51c0735c774215c2
103- sav: "You really need to take a rest somewhere nice. Honestly, even
the nutters who hang out down on Brighton seafront made more sense than
this. You been doing drugs or something?" 25 May 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/1b251baa5c641370
104- Sean Burke: If you're dumb enough to respond to snit, you're
probably dumb enough to click on a spam attachment that promises to
remove smut from your harddrive." 21 Jan 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/e166032d8959c0e1
105- Sermo Malifer (COLA):
Snit: "Why do so many people in COLA argue *against* me..."
Sermo Malifer: "Because you're a narcissistic troll who posts trash just
to get people talking about you." 21 Jan 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/5ddf14f502e9b3f1
106- spike1: "The thought is probably to show everyone here just how bad
a troll snit is".
107- ShutterBugz: "so snit-zel has some kind of problem expressing
anger, i guess. he has to vent his frustrations in other ways. and he
thinks he's making sense: well the syntax is there and he figures he's
pretty smart. indeed, he tells us, he's done the personality tests and
the iq tests and he's okay! aaaaahhhhh, you see he's soooooooo well
adjusted." 3 Mar 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/7f9fa1cf90490298
108- Steve Carroll: "The only things we are sure about Snit is that he has:
* a monumental reading comprehension problem.
* nym-shifted numerous times to avoid kill-files.
* built too many straw-men to count... some, the size of small cities.
* been labeled a disingenuous liar/troll(or worse) by the vast majority.
* used numerous sock-puppets and admitted to it.
* stolen IDs and admitted to it.
* gotten booted off by ISPs for his behavior.
* twisted more context than all csma posters combined.
* made more unsupported accusations than all csma posters combined.
* virtually no life outside of csma."
109- Steve Mackay: "Just killfile Snit, the dishonest piece of elephant
dung, and all would go away. Sure, I got caught up in the "Snit Circus",
but then the cotton candy began to sour, and CSMA begun to smell like
elephant dung." 18 Aug 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/9fc11094133dfcdf
Welcome to the Snit circus, where the popcorn and cotton candy are
stale, and the smell of elephant dung is everywhere. 27 Dec 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/614daf295b50413f
110- Steven de Mena: "Sorry, you have now lost all credibility with me
for your rediculous argument regarding this." 26 Sep 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/1c8777d39c34e293
111- Steve Travis: "Oh oh... Now look what we've done. Snit has lost
all self respect and has sunk to the point of using words like 'asses'
when referring to others. Oh, how could the morally superior snit have
fallen so low.. Please take a moment out of your busy schedule to feel
embarassed for him. Or perhaps we should set up a fund to get him more
happy glue (and the appropriate plastic bags)." 27 Mar 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/3edd9ab69425a6c5
112- Stuart Krivis: "You might as well just give up and plonk him then.
A snit is a snit is a snit and always will be." 15 Aug 2006 (post not
available except in reply)
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/5b382420a696f140
113- Tattoo Vampire (COLA): "In other words, in another attempt to
troll, you made yourself look like a fool. Again". 28 Aug 2008
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/b2676d3540e09f38
114- The Lost Packet (COLA): "well, he's found a seat in my killbin, I
can't be doing with him." 27 Jan 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/2007526a552b3322
115- TheLetterK: "That is merely your perception, Shit. You're the one
lacking counter evidence, and your arguments basically amount to "I'm
right, nya nya nya." No matter how many examples someone points at to
demonstrate their claim, you blindly continue to insist that they
provide no evidence, or that the evidence given is irrelevant. Worse
still, you fall back on straw men and disingenuous quote mangling to
portray the argument in your favor. You are one of the worst trolls that
inhabit CSMA, Shit. *Edwin* is more prone to fits of reason than you
are." 23 Sep 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/d488596b57132124
116- Thufir: "It's based on *your* MO that I, at least, have no problem
in stating that you're full of shit on nearly any topic. I've observed
your bullshit, and based on that pattern of bullshit, infer that you're
full of it. Your MO is the evidence, the logic is an inference based on
the evidence." 21 Aug 2008
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/c89d3cf79e806e5f
Thufir: "You can "prove" that no one has disproved your "proof"? Again,
your assertion that no one has done so is even *less* convincing than
your claim that some PDF "proves" whatever point you're trying to make
precisely because I'm familiar with your MO. That is, you're a dumb-ass
who would claim that that something is proved when it's not, and who
would ignore counter-examples disproving your contention. I don't know
what this *ages old* thread is about, but I know that you're full of
shit." 21 Aug 2008
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/5114623055c01092
117-Tim Adams: "I'd kill file you but then I'd miss the fun. you see,
you never cease to amaze me at just how stupid you really are. Why just
the other day I had a great laugh when I saw you, the king of liars (in
this NG anyway) calling somebody else a liar." 13 Nov 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/40c7f9407179ff2a
118- Tim Crowley: "I don't know - I think you might have more
compassion. Snit is sick. He needs help. This is the only way the poor
sick fool can get attention. My fucking God, he's taken to hanging out
with and supporting racist pig fuckers like MuahMuah. It is true that
no-one likes him and those that pretend they do are just using him or
don't know him - but come on- it's not his fault. He's sick. Have some
compassion, eh? All these idiot trolls, Zara, Stew, Tommy,
MuaaaahMuaaah, and Snit - they are all so alike. I pity each and every
one of them" 19 Apr 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/67f0f174110bfa0a
119- Tim Smith: "No, he didn't, and there is no reasonable way you could
actually believe he lied. You are purely trying to troll here." 14 Apr 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/6e3cfd9240ac4871
120- Timberwoof: "*Plonk!*"
121- Tom Bates: "Do you have to turn any thread you post in into one of
your Circus acts?" 20 Feb 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/25f0e481b605e71f
122- Tommy: "In case you did not get it, I think the moral was: Stop
polluting the world with your infantile and obsessive "writings". You
give Mac advocacy a bad name. If that was your goal you have succeeded!
That also goes for all that bullshit on your website" 11 Jun 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/03610d2080321d33
123- TravelinMan: "I still can't figure out what's wrong with Snit. Most
people have him kill-filed and the few who don't mostly restrict their
responses to 'why don't you go away, no one wants you here'. Just what
would keep someone in this group with all of that animosity? Must be
some kind of severe mental illness." 17 Mar 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/45197fbb46d491df
124- Wally: "Because by your own admission "honor and honesty" are
nothing more than a "game" to you, as such not only do you wish to
define the rules, but no doubt you will also attempt to alter or bend
the rules when inevitably things do not go to your liking, for this
reason I doubt anyone would be foolish enough to play your game." 16
May 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/b9b3ed1ee20e5220
125- WhoMe: "F michael IS a teacher, it's no wonder he's home more than
he's anywhere near a classroom".
126- William Poaster: "Good grief. If anyone's having a mental breakdown
it's the Prescott Computer Guy, Michael Snit Glasser. What a f#cked up
mess he is." 29 Aug 2008
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/914d1e74855fb461
127- William R. Walsh: "Now, if you'll excuse me, and accept my sincere
apologies for this, PLONK! Feel proud about that. You're the first
person to be plonked from my new computer! :-) " 10 Feb 2005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/313c7368f6369c49
128- Woofbert: "*Plonk*"
129- zara: "Look - I'm not into combing through thousands of posts, to
prove what was said or not said - I leave stuff like that to people
without lives, like Snit. But it is assuredly, in the record. Ping Snit
to do a search - you will flatter him, and give meaning to his tawdry
little life." 25 Oct 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/a1d4fc7120a6a538
130- Zaren Ankleweed: "And with that, Snit goes in the global killfile.
No subject, no author, no nothing. Buh-bye". 11 Sep 2004
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/12f7c34f24d43624
131- Znu: "I think your 'I'll go start a new thread to try to draw more
people into the debate I'm currently having with Steve/Elizabot/etc'
tactic is fairly trollish."
132- Mutley (AUK):
Snit: "None are supportable. None are real. HPT made them up and is
scared to even try to support them. He knows he cannot. He knows his
lies are being shoved in his face and that people are laughing at his
failure. I know I am. He is a sad pathetic little man."
Mutley: "For the record ... I'll be done when I decide that there's more
shit on your face than there is on the sole of my shoe." 01 Nov 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/1802ad3aa000098b
--
HPT
Steve Carroll
> Rick wrote:
> > High Plains Thumper wrote:
> >> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>
> >>> It's been blissfully quiet, apart from Smith emitting scurrilous
> >>> nonsense and Erik emitting boolshit about Linux developers all avoiding
> >>> checking return values.
>
> >>> Snit is still on with the verbal diarrhea.
>
> >> That is an understatement. No one can carry on a decent conversation
> >> with him, that is for sure. He must be one of the loneliest person's on
> >> the planet. Everything degrades to "he lied" with ad hominem
> >> allegations sprinkled in.
>
> > ... try to stop feeding him. It is hard, I know, but try.
>
> Feeding him like? :-)
>
>
> The Snit Circus of Pathological Myths continue. Now in its second
> printing, alphabetised except for newest additions, here is what these
> 132 posters have to say about Snit:
>
> 1- Adam Kesher: "Steve, IIRC Sandman's website has a member area and a
> login. If you forget your password, you can ask it to e-mail it to you,
> and a bot will send an e-mail. *That* is the e-mail Snit got from
> Sandman's website, and yes he's that fucked in the head and starved for
> attention that he'd claim it to be an e-mail from Sandman himself. So,
> don't get sucked into his little circus. The e-mail, in this particular
> instance, did probably originate from Sandman.net." 27 Feb 2007
>
>
> 2- Alan Baker: "People's perceptions of you are *formed* by behaviour
> and not withstanding your occasional on topic posts, I wish you'd leave
> too. Please note that despite the amazing silliness that is Edwin, I
> have never made the same wish of him." 27 Feb 2005
>
>
> 3- Andrew J. Brehm: "You are not flamed because you speak the truth, you
> are flamed because you are a hideous troll and keep disrupting the
> newsgroup."
>
> 4- AZ Nomad: "The fact that you routinely change your headers to weasel
> out of killfiles proves that you're an asshole." 25 Jun 2007
>
>
> 5- Andy/news/nospam: "Why do you keep these things up, Snit? Why not
> just let them go away and show how responsible a member of CSMA you are?
> You could show your enemies up by being better than then, rise above the
> low level you so obviously dislike. Anything, just stop...." 26 Apr 2007
>
>
> 6- B.B.: "Does the From: header contain the string "Snit"? If yes, then
> troll. Otherwise, maybe. Dunno why I had my KF on you set to expire, but
> it's fixed now." 13 Mar 2005
>
>
> 7- BaJoRi:
> Snit: "You are, of course, lying."
> BaJoRi: "No, I am not. You know it, and I know it, and everyone else who
> has read your idiocy knows it. I took your statement, showed it to be
> wrong, then added even more, just to be a dick and REALLY show you to be
> a fool. You need to judiciously snip out pertinent points because you
> are an intellectually dwarfed turd-burglar." 11 Nov 2008
>
>
> 8- bobinnv: "I learned some time ago how much better this group can be
> if you kill file Snit. I have never understood why more people don't do
> the same.." 5 Aug 2006
>
>
> 9- Bob S: "This has always been pretty much a free-for-all group, but
> since Snit showed up, its become almost impossible to have a decent
> discussion about anything." 27 Dec 2004
>
>
> The solution is to NOT REPLY TO SNIT. But for some reason, some people
> just can't stop feeding him."
>
> 10- °b° unny: Subject "snit makes me sad", Text "really actually =:-("
> 9 Oct 2004
>
>
> 11- buzz off: "Snit is obviously mentally ill..."
>
> 12- Carlo Coggi: "He must believe he is surrounded by 'trolls' ... in
> the groups he trolls in, that is. I wondered if the idiotrollers like
> snit would reply to this thread. Of course, I didn't see his posts, only
> your reply".
>
> 13- chrisv (cola): "No, she called him 'shit', and rightly so, for they
> way he was so ignominiously birthed into a toilet at the bus depot, and
> simply refused to die, despite repeated flushes. It's now far too late
> to *flush* him, but we can still *plonk* him..." 12 Sep 2005
>
>
> 14- C Lund: "Snit is not my responsibility. Maybe it's time for you to
> learn how to use your kill-filter. I am assuming, of course, that your
> Usenet browser has a kill-filter." 5 Mar 2005
>
>
> 15- cc (COLA): "Snit posts all the time. You don't have to dig up months
> old articles where he brings up years old topics. Just respond to a
> current message." 22 Jan 2009
>
>
> 16- Code Orange: "Then why post it? What need is there for you to "win"
> an argument? They don't like you, you don't like them. Why must you keep
> this up? What results are you expecting?"
>
> 17- CozmicDebris: "I'm done with your three year old games. The archives
> show my answers and your inability to process them. Keep posting your
> list and proving that you are an idiot troll. I will not address it any
> further- you being too stupid to realize and accept that is not my
> problem". 22 Nov 2007
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.cellular.attws/msg/0aa65b7a132dbfe8
>
> 18- Dawg Tail: "You've already apologized for having already misread
> what I had previously written. What makes you think that you're
> correctly understanding what I'm writting now. You've got a history of
> reading into things what you wanted people to have said instead of what
> they really said.
>
> I suggest you get over this limitation of yours. It's making you look
> foolish."
>
> Dawg Tail: "PC advocates, Mac advocates, Linux advocates. Almost all of
> them are making similar claims about Snit. When you have so many diverse
> people who share a common perception where do you think the problem
> lies? With Snit? Or almost everyone else? The answer doesn't require an
> advanced degree to figure out." 30 Dec 2004
>
>
> 19- Dave Fritzinger: "[snip of stuff I really don't care to read] Snit,
> please go away. Get a life, meet a woman, do something, but please,
> please, please, GO AWAY!!!!" 2 Jun 2006
>
>
> 20- Donald L McDaniel: "Jesus, snit. You're a teacher. I thought you
> knew what a metaphor was, and could recognize one when it was presented
> to you. I guess I had too much confidence in you." 30 Nov 2006
>
>
> 21- ed: "snit, you continually amaze me with how much of a liar and
> loser you are. you may notice a semi-regular pattern with me where i
> stop responding to your posts for stretches at a time, then start up
> responding as if you were a normal person. i suppose it's tough for the
> magnitude of your 'loserdom' to stick, so it loses some of it's
> sharpness when i stop responding to you. you almost always start
> responding back in a semi normal way, but inevitably degenerate. it's
> once again that time. i can only ask that you pass my condolences to
> your wife and unborn child for having to put up with such a dishonest
> fool as yourself. (well, if your wife is a loser as well, just pass
> those condolences to the rug-rat to be; if not, double condolences to
> her). " 30 Apr 2005
>
>
> 22- Edward Stanfield: "Snit thinks the rules that apply to honest and
> honorable people apply to him. That is absurd. He is the biggest liar
> in Usenet history. Mackay posted the email to prove Snit was using sock
> puppets and he still is. Snit can not give up his socks puppets and
> shills. They are the only ones who ever support him." 28 Jan 2009
>
>
> 23- Edwin: "You've got to be out of your mind, Snit. You're the worst
> troll this group has ever seen. You're a liar and a forger, and you've
> almost destroyed this group single-handedly. For you to post a list of
> out of context arguments, and lies, and forgeries about your enemies
> labled as a "peace effort" has to be one of the craziest stunts you've
> pulled. It's all about your sick need for attention, your need to be
> center stage at all times. You'd publicly eat dog turd if you thought it
> would make people look at you." 18 May 2007
>
>
> 24- Elijah Baley: "Seriously, Snit, you need psychiatric help. Go see a
> doctor." 24 Aug 2006
>
>
> 25- Elizabot v2.0.2: "I see you were unable to respond to the points in
> my post and you are back to your repetitious regurgitation mode. How
> childishly typical of you, Snit." 16 Nov 2004
>
>
> 26- Fa-groon: "I don't read Snit period. He's been killfiled since the
> first day I posted here. [....] I don't want to 'do like Snit'. As far
> as I'm concerned, Snit doesn't even exist." 15 Aug 2009
>
>
> 27- fibercut: "That is the problem. In the years I have been coming to
> CSMA I have seen in the past year a real hatred among people, besides
> the typical Mac vs. Windows typical argument. I feel that it is like
> being in a room of really young children trying there best to best the
> other person. The one common thing among all of this seems to be you. I
> hate to be like this, but facts are facts. You seem to be in the middle
> of a great percentage of arguments. CSMA has become less about Macs and
> more about "look everybody, I think he lied". Is there no end then all
> this picking at each other on such a personal level. CSMA has always
> been al little adversarial but you have personally crank it up to the
> point that this place is no longer fun. Congratulations on stopping CSMA
> and making this place your own personal circus." 12 Jan 2006
>
>
> 28- Geezer:
> Snit: "Steve Carroll has no sense of morality"
> Geezer: "Whined the guy who cannot directly address those who uncover
> his lies and deceit;)"
> Snit: "and no clue about the law."
> Geezer: 'Said the guy who believes his unsupported opinions are "proof".
> LOL! (snip more of Snit's unsupported lies)' 1 Jan 2009
>
>
> 29- Geoff M. Fitton (COLA): "The Prescott Computer Guy *still* showing
> how stupid he is... What a mar00n". 30 Aug 2008
>
>
> 30- George Graves: "Jason. You have started an argument with the Snit
> (AKA Michael Glasser), this should not be done. He will drive you crazy
> with his twisted logic, his deep-rooted need to be ALWAYS right at any
> cost. He will move goalposts, set up strawmen, and bore you into
> submission with his endless pedanticism. The only way to engage him is
> to hit and run. NEVER engage him, it's a futile, empty procedure that
> will only anger you and feed him. Take my advice and STAY AWAY!" 27
> Oct 2004
>
>
> 32- Greycloud: "You really shouldn't lie like that. Everyone else
> notices that you are not honest and you have no honor." 21 Jan 2006
>
>
> 33- H: "Your crappy posts are still showing up in seperate threads, are
> you doing this on purpose to piss people off? I dont ever censor people
> cause that's just retarded but if you dont fix it I'm gonna have to
> cause I dont wanna see your name 40 times in a row. So uh, change your
> client or something". 12 Sep 2004
>
>
> 34- Hadron (COLA):
> Snit: "Now why not end your silliness and either just stop your BS or
> actually give reasoned comments on the screen shots you keep asking for
> and I keep providing?
> Hadron: "err, he just did. And you snipped it all you weasel." 30 Jan 2009
>
>
> Snit: "Sigh: 100% predictable, you will not answer *any* question I just
> asked. You will run... your whole goal is to beg for attention, not to
> make or support a point."
> Hadron: "nice. You made it into my new killfile. Jesus, stop repeating
> the same garbage." 6 Apr 2009
>
>
> 35- Henry Flam: "Who gives a damn about this shit? Snit, once in a
> while, I make the mistake in thinking that that you are starting to make
> sense in your posts; I tend to agree with your politics. Then you post
> stuff like this and it destroys any respect that I have for you." 16
> Aug 2006
>
>
> Henry Flam: "You on the other hand must a deeply trouble individual who
> has a fragile ego. I needn't agree nor disagree with the points above. I
> don't care about them. Your constant complaints, whines, rages, etc.,
> wars with the regular Mac advocates, whom you mislabel as trolls, arise
> from your sense that any conversation or thread must orbit around you.
> People have pointed that out to you but you don't accept that. Snit I
> feel sorry for you. Please go and see a doctor about your solipsism.
> There must be a cure for you deep psychological travail." 18 Aug 2006
>
>
> 36- Heywood Mogroot: "*plonk*"
>
> 37- -hh: 'Perversion has utterly nothing to do with the definition of
> "synonymous". It is, however, a very clear example of how you attempt
> to maliciously debase against anyone who disagrees with you. As such, I
> consider this to be a purposeful attempt by you to try to libel me.
> This is your only warning to consider rescinding your remark, with the
> reminder that you, and you alone are responsible for that accusation,
> both in the ethical as well as the full legal meaning of the word
> "responsible".' 25 Feb 2008
>
>
> 38- High Plains Thumper: "I can understand why posters get sick and
> tired of your lame ad hominem attacks, your cowardly statements shifting
> the goal posts, your continuous rambling drivel of how everyone seems to
> be against you. No one cares a wooden nickel about your incessant flame
> wars that are self created. You pretend to be an advocate but you
> manage to cause everyone's hand to be against you." 6 Jan 2009
>
>
> Only once in a blue moon does he have anything worth reading. I just
> got through his circus of repetitive ad hominem crap. I am surprised
> that with the stunts he has pulled in COLA and this newsgroup, that he
> hasn't suffered a worse fate in real life. If he hasn't, one of these
> days he will pull that stunt on the wrong person, and *B-O-O-M-!*,
> someone will pull the trigger. One ought to really pity him (or as
> Steve Travis stated, "Or perhaps we should set up a fund to get him more
> happy glue (and the appropriate plastic bags)." 8 Jul 2009
>
>
> 39- Homer (COLA):
> HPT: "Snit in a period of 2 minutes has copied a post of mine, posting
> the same following message over and over, in false pretense as a Linux
> advocate."
> Homer: "That kind of behaviour is not normal, to say the least. I don't
> mean this as a personal insult, but I'm perfectly serious when I say
> 'Snit' (Michael Glasser) is obviously mentally ill, and needs help. I
> was going to suggest that someone alerts his wife to the problem, but I
> have to assume she's already aware of his condition, if she is in fact
> still living with him. It's possible, I suppose, that he's already
> undergoing counselling and/or on medication, but if he is then it
> doesn't seem to be helping much. Maybe he just missed his 'meds' today
> (again, I mean that sincerely). 26 Jan 2009
>
>
> 40- hophead: "I have been reading and occasionally posting to CSMA for a
> long time now, since 1995 at least. There have always been trolls and
> morons, but I've never seen anything quite so disruptive as the Snit
> circus. Snit will *never* back down or stop, and neither will most of
> his opponents. A good kill file is your only hope." 20 Aug 2009
>
>
> hophead: "It's best to killfile snit, and if you can, set up a filter to
> kill any responses to snit. Or (as I've been forced to do) killfile
> those who insist on responding to him. Yes, you do miss some advocacy
> from some of those people, but the joy of not seeing snit or any
> responses to him far outweighs the cost. Of course, snit also uses
> sockpuppets. They are pretty easy to identify fortunately and are easily
> killed as well." 19 Aug 2009
>
>
> 41- Jamie Hart (cola): "It seems that since you are unable to offer
> support for your statements, you're reduced to personal attacks on me.
> Incidentally, anyone reading this post can see that I have offered no
> straw men, and have only asked you to explain how the things you state
> as facts can be true. I'm really sorry that you're taking this attitude,
> the topic is an interesting one and I thought you might have some
> insights. I've snipped the rest, since you dislike long posts and avoid
> answering any of the questions I asked by saying everything was just
> repeated." 6 Dec 2006
>
>
> 42- Jason McNorton: "You're one of the many, many paranoid people on
> usenet that should be confined most likely. You sit there and refresh
> your screen endlessly. You post the same nonsense over and over. Either
> you're a super troll, or you're a super mess." 1 Nov 2004
>
>
> 43- JEDIDIAH (cola): "You're simply full of shit."
>
> 44- Jeff B.: "Yo, Snit. We're not pals. I think you're a git." 23 Dec 2005
>
>
> 45- Jeff Hoppe: "This is a Macintosh Advocacy newsgroup. Not a 12-step
> recovery plan. Your medical problems or conditions won't help me achieve
> a greater understanding of my Mac. In fact, it detracts from it and
> those kinds of discussions have no place in a newsgroup such as this."
> 18 Nov 2004
>
>
> 46- Jesus: "Really, Snit. It's annoying. What are you accomplishing
> besides being annoying? Is that your goal?" 25 Apr 2007
>
>
> 47- Jim Lee Jr.: "Snit, read the thread's title, is Bush mentioned in
> it? You (and Carroll) ought to learn to stay on topic and not hijack
> threads."
>
> 48- Jim Polaski: "Why is it that nearly every thread you're involved in
> seems like it turns into some tit-for-tat, dozens of responses to OT
> things and garbage? Cmon there Snit. Someone has to take the lead and
> stop this crap. Try. How about it?" 25 Apr 2006
>
>
> 49- Jim Richardson (cola): "And yet again, Snit runs away, rather than
> actually provide evidence for his claims. Par for the course I suppose."
>
> "Evasion noted. Snit runs away again rather than produce evidence for
> his claims. At least come up with some original insults Snit! I mean,
> you *are* capable of original thoughts! Right? Snit?" 8 Feb 2008
>
>
> 50- Joey Jojo Junior Shabadoo: "and Snithead has even farther to fall -
> in a few weeks he'll be out on the street after midnight, yelling at
> passersby 'sucky sucky, $2...'" 23 Mar 2005
>
>
> 51- John C. Randolph: "You're nothing but a troll yourself. What are you
> bitching about?"
>
> 52- JohnOfArc (cola): "I'm not sure "troll" does it justice- more like a
> black hole! But hey, if we all promise to never again even entertain an
> unkind thought re Apple, will you take it back and lock it up? Please??"
> 11 Mar 2005
>
>
> 53- John Q. Public: "I have not been bothered to read Snit's postings
> since I figured out who he is. I don't bother to filter his posts, I
> just consider the source and skip to the next one when I see his name."
> 7 Jan 2004
>
>
> 54- John Slade: "I don't get posts from Snit. I wouldn't be shocked that
> he has some kind of disorder. He made up stuff about being a computer
> repairman and teacher. He's just plain loony and best ignored. Let him
> deal with his disorder by medication. He's here to do one thing, get
> attention from people. He says the crazy stuff just to get a reaction.
> You say you like to beat him over the head. Well that's what he's
> counting on, he says stuff he knows isn't true in hopes to get a rise
> out of people like you. Ignore him, you won't regret it." 3 Apr 2007
>
>
> "Snit, you have a enough problems as it is without adding drinking booze
> to the list. How the hell did you manage to get out of my killfile? Oh
> well back into the cage you go, PLONK." 13 Oct 2007
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.food.wine/msg/992a796786a541d8
>
> 55- Josh McKee: "Snit, I assume there was some point to this posting?
> Because I certainly cannot find it."
>
> 56- K E: "I haven't read this board for awhile but I see that even
> though the trolls still roam free at least the worst troll of the lot is
> mostly being ignored by readers on this bb. If the few stragglers that
> keep replying to him would just stop responding to Snit at all this
> place could be worth coming back to. There's a good chance he'll pack up
> and take his trolling to more fertile ground." 22 Oct 2006
>
>
> 57- KK: 'Whoa there, ad hominem man. You started off your sentence with
> "Ah" like you'd just realized something profound.' 29 Oct 2008
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.fan.howard-stern/msg/6a89029a5b5be5f8
>
> 58- Kelsey Bjarnason (cola): "Funny how you simply don't bother reading
> the posts that rip your entire thesis to bleeding gobbets of putrid
> excrescence. Maybe some day you'll learn how to support your position,
> instead of sticking your fingers in your ears and humming, hoping it'll
> all go away." 7 Mar 2006
>
>
> 59- Ku Karlovsky (cola): "You repeatedly chastise others for ad hominem
> attacks while in the same sentence make your own ad hominem attacks. You
> make silly claims and then avoid the subject of your silliness. You're a
> liar and a hypocrite and you always have been." 14 Jul 2005
>
>
> 60- Lars Trager: "Yes, you are stupid." 7 Jan 2006
>
>
> 61- Lefty Bigfoot: "Okay, I tried to put up with it for a long time, but
> the few times you post something worth reading just aren't worth it
> anymore. *plonk*" 16 Dec 2006
>
>
> 62- Liam Slider (cola): "Maybe he's responding to the fact you've been
> an annoying little fuckwit lately. You started out with the pretense of
> trying to be fair, but lately all there is from you in COLA is trashtalk
> about Linux and you acting every bit the troll." 16 Jul 2005
>
>
> 63-libcrushersmith: "Snit also thinks Dan Rather still anchors CBS News
> and that Gitmo terrorists are innocent! Any time Snit is cornered, he
> changes the subject and will never admit he's wrong." 28 Jan 2009
>
>
> 64- libsnightmare:
> Snit: "Who said Bush did not flip flop?"
> libsnightmare: "Never said that. I put back in what you cut out. He
> never flip-flopped on the war, even when it was unpopular, like "Kerry
> and all the other libs" did. You're a sore loser who has resorted to
> fifth grade tactics. How fucking sad - all this clown has left is to
> edit posts and post fake bullshit. You can't debate... so you lie. Once
> again, you have proved Steve Carroll right about you. Sad..." 4 May 2009
>
>
> 65- Linonut (cola): "Snit is a Tholenoid."
>
> "Indeed. Snit may be the first retraction of my general killfile
> amnesty. The volume of cavilling, whining, foot-stomping,
> back-tracking, goal-post shifting, and petulance generated by that
> effete candy-ass beggars belief". 30 Aug 2008
>
>
> 66- Lloyd Parsons: "Well, I don't know if Oxford is the most cretinous,
> I would think that would be reserved for Snit! ;-)" 18 Mar 2005
>
>
> 67- Mark Kent (cola): "The problem with someone like Mr Glasser is the
> same as it is with Mr Wong, even if he were to be honest now, it would
> be impossible to determine where the honesty starts and the usual
> dishonesty ends. In my primary school, one of the teachers was very keen
> on proverbs, and I recall her going over the "cry wolf" story. Mr
> Glasser could "cry wolf" over and over now, and I would not come to help
> him with his sheep, because I do not know any way of determining if he's
> ever telling the truth, or indeed, if he ever has." 2 Dec 2006
>
>
> 68- Mayor of R'lyeh: "The fact is that he's probably pulling it to this
> post since its all about him and he managed to make me think about him
> today. A friend of mine has a toddler. I went over to her house and
> videotaped her kid doing a bunch of cute toddler stuff then burned a DVD
> of it for her. While we were watching the DVD her kid got mad. He got
> mad because we quit making him the center of attention and made that kid
> on the tv the center of attention. He even ran up to the tv and tried to
> block our view of it. That's how Snit lives his whole life." 30 Sep 2006
>
>
> 69- Michelle Ronn: "The real topic here is that one someone refutes your
> 'facts', you run away and ignore them. Refuting your 'facts' is easily
> done in this case. I did it, and you ignored it." 9 Feb 2007
>
>
> 70- Mike: "Nonsense. I never see you "advocate" anything. All I see you
> doing is engage in endless semantic arguments with everyone. You're the
> TholenBot of CSMA. BTW, that's *not* a compliment!" 8 Jul 2006
>
>
> 71- Mike Dee: "I will no longer accuse you of lying here. Instead I can
> only say that you are a complete and delusional kook that happens to
> inhabit CSMA for the time being. That you are unaware of how deranged
> you actually behave further reinforces this notion. Please seek
> professional help."
>
> "The point that keeps whooshing over your head Snit, is Elizabot made no
> threat to you before you went to the police. She made a promise.
> Admittedly, to your delusional spaced out paranoiac view point, Elizabot
> was suddenly "threatening" to you. In so much as you had to take your
> kooky self down to your local police shop and blub on their shoulders
> about how much in danger you were in [sob, whine], and they had to waste
> valuable policing time consoling you over your stupidity. I bet they
> have Kook with a capital "K" written at the top of your profile, Snit."
> 2 Sep 2005
>
>
> 72- mmoore321: "Snit is a human car-accident and we are all
> rubbernecking. We know it is bad form, but yet strangely curious. Treat
> him the same way, look but just keep moving on." 18 Aug 2006
>
>
> 73- Mojo: "Actually, these facts piss everybody off because they are
> off-topic, unnecessarily confrontational, extremely boring and clearly
> show that you are crying out for attention." 20 Sep 2006
>
>
> 74- Mr. Blonde: "Lastly, I can't help but comment on the fact that your
> obsession with Sandman has actually grown since you claimed to KF him.
> Killfilling someone generally implies you're ignoring that person, yet
> you piggyback onto virtually every reply to him here and and check his
> website's validation status more often than most people check their
> e-mail. These are not the actions of a mentally balanced individual."
> 19 Jan 2007
>
>
> 75- MR_ED_of_Course: "Seriously, spend half a day at any pre-school or
> kindergarten and see if the kids there can't teach you a thing or two
> about social behavior." 16 May 2004
>
>
> 76- Muahman: "Ummm, dude you post 1000 posts a day. 999 of them are
> trolls, if anyone here has issues it's not me." 24 Sep 2004
>
>
> Muahman: "LOL, everyone hates Snit. I know I'd push him in front of a
> bus if I could." 15 May 2007
>
>
> Muahman: "Ahhhh shit, another thread lost to the Snit retard circus!!!
> I actually dread seeing Snit reply to a thread because that
> automatically means it's in the toilet." 8 Jul 2009
>
>
> 77- Nashton/Nasht0n: "Oh for crying out loud, if I wasn't convinced that
> snit is a total loser, and I rarely call people losers, I certainly am
> now. Why bother responding to his stupidities anyway?" 29 Nov 2004
>
>
> 78- New Bee: "Honest and honorable? You? You've either got a wry sense
> of humor, or you're completely nuts. Either way you're just a waste of
> time, and you've done more than anybody to make this group a cesspool.
> Then you revel in wallowing in your own filth." 14 May 2007
>
>
> 79- Not Important: "I get this mental image of you and a sibling as
> children in the back seat of the family car saying:
> Mom, 'snits' touching me ... and you responding much as you do now ...
> I'm not touching you, you're touching me! The problem is that by now you
> should've grown out of that type of poke and complain interaction with
> others. But, of course, you've haven't learned how to interact with
> others in a more 'constructive' and mutually beneficial manner even
> now." 03 Jul 2007
>
>
> 80- OldCSMAer: "What's he been doing? Am I going to be sorry I killfiled
> him?" 27 Nov 2006
>
>
> 81- OldSage: "What drives me nuts is your unrelenting ability and desire
> to argue on the head of a pin about the most trivial of things." 2 Oct 2007
>
>
> 82- Oxford: "If you are using MT-Newswatcher: Select offending Author,
> example Snit... Go to the Filters Menu, Choose 'Kill this Author'
> Click 'OK' Then Repeat with each annoying Author of your choice. Then
> to see your work... Choose the Filter Menu again, Then 'Refilter
> Articles'... Bam! No more boring, pointless bickering about nothing.
> Enjoy!!!!!" 14 Aug 2004
>
>
> 83- Patrick Nihill: "I mean, honestly, who would you rather discuss
> something with; Dan, or someone like Zara? Or, for that matter, Snit,
> for whom the work 'troll' seems so painfully inadequate?" 13 Aug 2006
>
>
> 84- Pawel Wojciak: "Jesus Christ, snit... <plonk> "
>
> 85- PC Guy: "Forget it Snit, you're a waste of time. For someone who
> talks about everyone else not being "honest and honorable" you appear to
> be the least honest and honorable of anyone here." 22 Apr 2007
>
>
> 86- Peter: "I've never felt the need to use the filters in Newswatcher
> but I thought Id try the Kill this Author.. option with Snit. Ten
> seconds later and he's gone! Amazing." 30 Dec 2004
>
>
> 87- Peter Bjorn Perlso: "Plonked for 60 days. Now stfu and take your
> argument with sandman into the private room." 13 Dec 2006
>
>
> 88- Peter Hayes: "True, but that removes Snit completely, and someti...
> err..... occasiona.... errrrr..... once in a blue moon he has something
> useful to say."
>
> 89- Peter Jensen (cola): "Where has he ever said that they were not
> different windowing environments? Message-ID, please. Experience has
> told me not to trust you on anything without backing evidence."
>
> 90- Peter Kohlmann (cola): "Snot is a hideous troll. Nobody is as
> dishonest as that piece of unadultered garbage. There are csma posters
> even more stupid than Snot. Oxford comes to mind. There are certainly
> other csma posters who lie nearly as much. But no others are so intent
> on trolling in whatever way possible as Snot" 15 Mar 2006
>
>
> 91- PeterBP: "Oh will you stfu".
>
> 92- Phil Earnhardt: "You're only interested in trying to get superficial
> snipes and extrapolate inappropriate conclusions." 1 Nov 2004
>
>
> 93- Rapskat (cola): "For instance, your sig you reference a long
> standing war you have going with some person from csma. It's like you
> single out persons to target your attentions upon and then continuously
> berate them with constant barbs and goads to perpetuate their
> acrimonious responses, which in turn you respond in kind, etc. ad
> infinitum. Above all things, your affinity for Macs and your overbearing
> pompous nature aside, this is what convinces me that your primary
> purpose for frequenting this and other groups is to troll." 07 Sep 2005
>
>
> 94- RichardK: "Just killfile him already."
>
> 95- Rick (cola): "Snit, you are a liar. And an ignorant one. You trash
> people that are trying their level best to cope with a horrendous
> situation. And you do it without the slightest idea of what is going
> on." 06 Sep 2005
>
>
> 96- Rick G.: "Just to be plain here, I have no doubt that he is a troll.
> I am tolerant of his nature, not blind to it. However, as a troll, he is
> ... somewhat clumsy." 22 Mar 2005
>
>
> 97- Robert F.: "Um, perhaps you misunderstand. I don't care if you quote
> Mayor McCheese claiming the Earth is a flat plate perched on the shell
> of a tortoise, I was merely pointing out that you run the risk of
> looking ridiculous when you quote something patently stupid. If that's
> your goal, you're on the right track, and more power to you." 11 Jan 2006
>
>
> 98- RonB (COLA): "Snit is a crank fixated on one issue, who's thing is
> twisting your words so he can win an argument against a straw man.
> That's enough to killfile him." 1 Jan 2009
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.usenet.kooks/msg/ce8550d4cc5b1b42
>
> 99- Rotten Apple:
> Snit: "The truth? Carroll has openly admitted he does what he accuses
> others of... now there is evidence he is committing identity theft - the
> very thing he accuses me of based on his claiming I am not the person he
> has tracked me down to be."
> Rotten Apple: "You make trolls like me look like choir boys." 14 Sep 2009
>
>
> Snit: "No need for him to worry - unlike him, I would not even threaten
> to contact his wife. I simply will not sink to his level. I suspect
> his wife will find out anyway - people are not as stupid as he wants
> them to be."
> Rotten Apple: "Your meds are really kicking your ass!" 15 Sep 2009
>
>
> 100- Roy Culley (cola): "You appear to be in the latter category.
> Starting crossposted threads for the simple purpose of hoping to
> generate a flame war. If you truly want to learn more about Linux and
> how it can help you and your supposed users why aren't you requesting
> help from a more technical Linux newsgroup than an advocacy group? As
> the old saying goes, those who can do, those who can't teach. Your posts
> seem to confirm that saying IMHO." 12 Mar 2005
>
>
> 101- S'mee (Keith, rec.motorcycles): "Liar...forger and worthless. You
> must be related to our resident racist troll, he lies as much as you."
> 29 Dec 2008
>
>
> 102- Sandman: "He is by far the most killfiled person in the -HISTORY-
> of csma. I've never seen someone so disliked, almost hated, in a news
> group before. He has the ability to turn just about any person against
> him in just a few posts. On usenet, trolls do this daily, but the funny
> part with Michael is that I actually think he DOESN'T consider himself
> be a troll - damn what -EVERYONE ELSE- is calling him. Obviously they
> are wrong. Only Tholen himself can match this behaviour." 18 Mar 2005
>
>
> 103- sav: "You really need to take a rest somewhere nice. Honestly, even
> the nutters who hang out down on Brighton seafront made more sense than
> this. You been doing drugs or something?" 25 May 2006
>
>
> 104- Sean Burke: If you're dumb enough to respond to snit, you're
> probably dumb enough to click on a spam attachment that promises to
> remove smut from your harddrive." 21 Jan 2005
>
>
> 105- Sermo Malifer (COLA):
> Snit: "Why do so many people in COLA argue *against* me..."
> Sermo Malifer: "Because you're a narcissistic troll who posts trash just
> to get people talking about you." 21 Jan 2009
>
>
> 106- spike1: "The thought is probably to show everyone here just how bad
> a troll snit is".
>
> 107- ShutterBugz: "so snit-zel has some kind of problem expressing
> anger, i guess. he has to vent his frustrations in other ways. and he
> thinks he's making sense: well the syntax is there and he figures he's
> pretty smart. indeed, he tells us, he's done the personality tests and
> the iq tests and he's okay! aaaaahhhhh, you see he's soooooooo well
> adjusted." 3 Mar 2004
>
>
> 108- Steve Carroll: "The only things we are sure about Snit is that he has:
> * a monumental reading comprehension problem.
> * nym-shifted numerous times to avoid kill-files.
> * built too many straw-men to count... some, the size of small cities.
> * been labeled a disingenuous liar/troll(or worse) by the vast majority.
> * used numerous sock-puppets and admitted to it.
> * stolen IDs and admitted to it.
> * gotten booted off by ISPs for his behavior.
> * twisted more context than all csma posters combined.
> * made more unsupported accusations than all csma posters combined.
> * virtually no life outside of csma."
>
> 109- Steve Mackay: "Just killfile Snit, the dishonest piece of elephant
> dung, and all would go away. Sure, I got caught up in the "Snit Circus",
> but then the cotton candy began to sour, and CSMA begun to smell like
> elephant dung." 18 Aug 2004
>
>
> Welcome to the Snit circus, where the popcorn and cotton candy are
> stale, and the smell of elephant dung is everywhere. 27 Dec 2004
>
>
> 110- Steven de Mena: "Sorry, you have now lost all credibility with me
> for your rediculous argument regarding this." 26 Sep 2006
>
>
> 111- Steve Travis: "Oh oh... Now look what we've done. Snit has lost
> all self respect and has sunk to the point of using words like 'asses'
> when referring to others. Oh, how could the morally superior snit have
> fallen so low.. Please take a moment out of your busy schedule to feel
> embarassed for him. Or perhaps we should set up a fund to get him more
> happy glue (and the appropriate plastic bags)." 27 Mar 2005
>
>
> 112- Stuart Krivis: "You might as well just give up and plonk him then.
> A snit is a snit is a snit and always will be." 15 Aug 2006 (post not
> available except in reply)
>
>
> 113- Tattoo Vampire (COLA): "In other words, in another attempt to
> troll, you made yourself look like a fool. Again". 28 Aug 2008
>
>
> 114- The Lost Packet (COLA): "well, he's found a seat in my killbin, I
> can't be doing with him." 27 Jan 2009
>
>
> 115- TheLetterK: "That is merely your perception, Shit. You're the one
> lacking counter evidence, and your arguments basically amount to "I'm
> right, nya nya nya." No matter how many examples someone points at to
> demonstrate their claim, you blindly continue to insist that they
> provide no evidence, or that the evidence given is irrelevant. Worse
> still, you fall back on straw men and disingenuous quote mangling to
> portray the argument in your favor. You are one of the worst trolls that
> inhabit CSMA, Shit. *Edwin* is more prone to fits of reason than you
> are." 23 Sep 2006
>
>
> 116- Thufir: "It's based on *your* MO that I, at least, have no problem
> in stating that you're full of shit on nearly any topic. I've observed
> your bullshit, and based on that pattern of bullshit, infer that you're
> full of it. Your MO is the evidence, the logic is an inference based on
> the evidence." 21 Aug 2008
>
>
> Thufir: "You can "prove" that no one has disproved your "proof"? Again,
> your assertion that no one has done so is even *less* convincing than
> your claim that some PDF "proves" whatever point you're trying to make
> precisely because I'm familiar with your MO. That is, you're a dumb-ass
> who would claim that that something is proved when it's not, and who
> would ignore counter-examples disproving your contention. I don't know
> what this *ages old* thread is about, but I know that you're full of
> shit." 21 Aug 2008
>
>
> 117-Tim Adams: "I'd kill file you but then I'd miss the fun. you see,
> you never cease to amaze me at just how stupid you really are. Why just
> the other day I had a great laugh when I saw you, the king of liars (in
> this NG anyway) calling somebody else a liar." 13 Nov 2004
>
>
> 118- Tim Crowley: "I don't know - I think you might have more
> compassion. Snit is sick. He needs help. This is the only way the poor
> sick fool can get attention. My fucking God, he's taken to hanging out
> with and supporting racist pig fuckers like MuahMuah. It is true that
> no-one likes him and those that pretend they do are just using him or
> don't know him - but come on- it's not his fault. He's sick. Have some
> compassion, eh? All these idiot trolls, Zara, Stew, Tommy,
> MuaaaahMuaaah, and Snit - they are all so alike. I pity each and every
> one of them" 19 Apr 2006
>
>
> 119- Tim Smith: "No, he didn't, and there is no reasonable way you could
> actually believe he lied. You are purely trying to troll here." 14 Apr 2006
>
>
> 120- Timberwoof: "*Plonk!*"
>
> 121- Tom Bates: "Do you have to turn any thread you post in into one of
> your Circus acts?" 20 Feb 2006
>
>
> 122- Tommy: "In case you did not get it, I think the moral was: Stop
> polluting the world with your infantile and obsessive "writings". You
> give Mac advocacy a bad name. If that was your goal you have succeeded!
> That also goes for all that bullshit on your website" 11 Jun 2004
>
>
> 123- TravelinMan: "I still can't figure out what's wrong with Snit. Most
> people have him kill-filed and the few who don't mostly restrict their
> responses to 'why don't you go away, no one wants you here'. Just what
> would keep someone in this group with all of that animosity? Must be
> some kind of severe mental illness." 17 Mar 2005
>
>
> 124- Wally: "Because by your own admission "honor and honesty" are
> nothing more than a "game" to you, as such not only do you wish to
> define the rules, but no doubt you will also attempt to alter or bend
> the rules when inevitably things do not go to your liking, for this
> reason I doubt anyone would be foolish enough to play your game." 16
> May 2004
>
>
> 125- WhoMe: "F michael IS a teacher, it's no wonder he's home more than
> he's anywhere near a classroom".
>
> 126- William Poaster: "Good grief. If anyone's having a mental breakdown
> it's the Prescott Computer Guy, Michael Snit Glasser. What a f#cked up
> mess he is." 29 Aug 2008
>
>
> 127- William R. Walsh: "Now, if you'll excuse me, and accept my sincere
> apologies for this, PLONK! Feel proud about that. You're the first
> person to be plonked from my new computer! :-) " 10 Feb 2005
>
>
> 128- Woofbert: "*Plonk*"
>
> 129- zara: "Look - I'm not into combing through thousands of posts, to
> prove what was said or not said - I leave stuff like that to people
> without lives, like Snit. But it is assuredly, in the record. Ping Snit
> to do a search - you will flatter him, and give meaning to his tawdry
> little life." 25 Oct 2006
>
>
> 130- Zaren Ankleweed: "And with that, Snit goes in the global killfile.
> No subject, no author, no nothing. Buh-bye". 11 Sep 2004
>
>
> 131- Znu: "I think your 'I'll go start a new thread to try to draw more
> people into the debate I'm currently having with Steve/Elizabot/etc'
> tactic is fairly trollish."
>
> 132- Mutley (AUK):
> Snit: "None are supportable. None are real. HPT made them up and is
> scared to even try to support them. He knows he cannot. He knows his
> lies are being shoved in his face and that people are laughing at his
> failure. I know I am. He is a sad pathetic little man."
> Mutley: "For the record ... I'll be done when I decide that there's more
> shit on your face than there is on the sole of my shoe." 01 Nov 2009
>
>
> --
> HPT
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/42e09b39f983b417?dmode=source
Snit
11/26/09 5:06 AM:
HPT is just mad that I quote his lies:
� � Also, Snit has falsified data in his videos.
� � Looks like you resized the dialogue box
� � You moved and dragged the task bar, aligned
� � vertical with the side of the screen.
� � I just told you a personal observation that YOU
� � ALTERED THAT SLIDE!
� � Snit again altered that data!
� � Altered video wizardry? �There is nothing wrong with
� � Ubuntu copy and paste.
� � No, rather it is another example of Snit moving the
� � goal posts, creating problems that do not exist except
� � for an invention of his own mind.
He does not get the fact that if he wants to not be called a liar he should
just stop lying. HPT is not capable of that though, or so it seems.
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
Snit
on 11/26/09 2:01 AM:
Here are some of your recent lies:
� � Also, Snit has falsified data in his videos.
� � Looks like you resized the dialogue box
� � You moved and dragged the task bar, aligned
� � vertical with the side of the screen.
� � I just told you a personal observation that YOU
� � ALTERED THAT SLIDE!
� � Snit again altered that data!
� � Altered video wizardry? �There is nothing wrong with
� � Ubuntu copy and paste.
� � No, rather it is another example of Snit moving the
� � goal posts, creating problems that do not exist except
� � for an invention of his own mind.
If you do not want to be called a liar - stop lying. Really, HPT, this is
not complex.
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
Snit
on 11/26/09 7:07 AM:
> Rick wrote:
>> High Plains Thumper wrote:
>>> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>>
>>>> It's been blissfully quiet, apart from Smith emitting scurrilous
>>>> nonsense and Erik emitting boolshit about Linux developers all avoiding
>>>> checking return values.
>>>>
>>>> Snit is still on with the verbal diarrhea.
>>>
>>> That is an understatement. No one can carry on a decent conversation
>>> with him, that is for sure. He must be one of the loneliest person's on
>>> the planet. Everything degrades to "he lied" with ad hominem
>>> allegations sprinkled in.
>>
>> ... try to stop feeding him. It is hard, I know, but try.
>
> Feeding him like? :-)
You sure are angry that your lies have been called out:
� � Also, Snit has falsified data in his videos.
� � Looks like you resized the dialogue box
� � You moved and dragged the task bar, aligned
� � vertical with the side of the screen.
� � I just told you a personal observation that YOU
� � ALTERED THAT SLIDE!
� � Snit again altered that data!
� � Altered video wizardry? �There is nothing wrong with
� � Ubuntu copy and paste.
� � No, rather it is another example of Snit moving the
� � goal posts, creating problems that do not exist except
� � for an invention of his own mind.
Why not just stop lashing out over your lies being called out, HPT?
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
Snit
11/26/09 5:30 AM:
HPT is outraged I pointed out his lies and other BS when he made it clear he
was too incompetent to follow simple copy and paste steps. Really... is
this so hard to replicate:
<http://tmp.gallopinginsanity.com/UbuntuCP.mov>
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
High Plains Thumper
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/42e09b39f983b417
Interesting.
C Lund: "You posted on a public forum, so don't whine when you get
answers you don't like."
Snit: "Answers to what question?"
Tim Murray: "Comments to posted opinions. Don't be a dick. You knew what
he meant."
Snit: "Why would it not be OK to note the absurdity of replies?"
Tim Murray: "Gimme a break. You're being a pedantic dick. Go ahead, copy
and paste all you want to show there was no actual question if it makes
you feel better. That's not the point and everyone here knows it." 21
Aug 2009
Yup, a definite changing of goal posts and ignoring what was stated, but
then what does one expect of a T34CH3R?
--
HPT