Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.

Dismiss

@@ Interdicting proliferation potential @@

2 views

Skip to first unread message

Arash

unread,

Jul 1, 2006, 7:16:46 AM7/1/06

AntiWar

July 1, 2006

Interdicting Proliferation Potential

Dr. James Gordon Prather
Nuclear weapons physicist
Former Nuclear bomb tester at Lawrence Livermore
Former Technical director of nuclear bomb testings at Sandia
Former Chief scientist of the U.S. Army
U.S. Navy veteran

The Treaty on the Nonproliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) involves three principal undertakings on the part of the signatories:

1) to prevent further proliferation of nuclear weapons
2) to pursue negotiations on a treaty of general and complete disarmament
3) to facilitate the fullest possible exchange of equipment, materials, and technological information for the peaceful uses of nuclear energy. [1]

To prevent further proliferation of nukes, signatories not already having nukes agreed to make all "source" and "special nuclear materials" – and all activities involving their physical or chemical transformation – subject to the safeguards regime [2] of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) for the exclusive purpose of verifying for other NPT signatories that no safeguarded materials have been used to further any military purpose.

The rationale for focusing on the purposes to which "source" and "special nuclear materials" is that no one can make a nuclear weapon without possessing tens of kilograms of fissile material – almost pure uranium-235, uranium-233, or plutonium-239.

Hence, the NPT not only allows, it even encourages the fullest possible transfer – and use, subject to IAEA Safeguards – of equipment that can be used to produce fissile material.

However, President Bush refuses to abide by the letter or spirit of the NPT.

In particular, he has no intention of ever entering into negotiations leading to nuke disarmament. [3]

Furthermore, according to his National Security Strategy (NSS), "the best way to block aspiring nuclear weapons states or nuclear terrorists" is to prevent their acquiring even the capability to produce fissile material. [4]

Therefore, Bush set out to close what he calls a "loophole" in the NPT that not only allows Iran (for example) to acquire such a capability but requires him to facilitate that acquisition.

Alas, the attendees at the 2005 NPT Review Conference (RevCon) not only refused to modify the NPT to suit Bush, but castigated the "nuclear weapons states" for refusing to pursue the 13 "practical steps" to TOTAL nuke disarmament they committed themselves to at the 2000 NPT Review Conference (6th RevCon). [5]

What to do? Scrap the NPT and replace it with the Proliferation Security Initiative, PSI [6] – developed by Bonkers Bolton from Bush's National Security Strategy.

Quoth Bonkers;

"We aim ultimately not just to prevent the spread of WMD, but also to eliminate or 'roll back' such weapons from rogue states and terrorist groups that already possess them or are close to doing so.

"While we stress peaceful and diplomatic solutions to the proliferation threat, as President Bush has said repeatedly, we rule out no options.

"While we pursue diplomatic dialogue wherever possible, the United States and its allies must be willing to employ more robust techniques, such as (1) economic sanctions, (2) interdiction and seizure, and (3) as the case of Iraq demonstrates, preemptive military force where required".

Great Zot!

Interdiction and seizure?

Preemptive military force?

As "solutions" to what dire "proliferation threat"?

Well, according to Bonkers Bolton, the principal proliferation threat we're facing now is Iran.

"We now know that Iran is developing a uranium mine, a uranium conversion facility, a massive uranium enrichment facility designed to house tens of thousands of centrifuges, and a heavy water production plant.

"This costly infrastructure would support the production of both highly enriched uranium and plutonium for nuclear weapons.

"While Iran claims that its nuclear program is peaceful and transparent, we are convinced it is otherwise".

Never mind that under the NPT, Iran has an "INALIENABLE RIGHT" to acquire, develop, and employ everything that so alarms Bolton. Never mind that all these facilities are safeguarded. And in the case of the facility built to ultimately house gas-centrifuges, the Iranians weren't even required to tell the IAEA about the existence of the centrifuges and facility until six months prior to their introducing "source" or "special nuclear materials" into them.

Well, last week, PSI "partners" all met in Warsaw, Poland, to receive a few atta-boys from Bush. [7]

"The PSI is dedicated to stopping all aspects of the proliferation trade and to denying terrorists, rogue states, and their supplier networks access to WMD-related materials and delivery systems.

"Together, we are working to disrupt the financial activities of networks that support proliferation, as called for in United Nations Security Council Resolutions 1540 and 1673.

"Together, we are shutting down front companies and proliferation networks and interdicting cargo carrying these dangerous materials, whether transported by land, air, or sea".

The principal PSI success claimed? The illegal (under international law) confiscation back in 2003 of a shipment of equipment that potentially could have been used to illegally (under the NPT) physically transform Libyan undeclared "source" material.

Notes:

--------

[1] Text of the Treaty on Non-Proliferation of Nuclear weapons (NPT)
http://www.un.org/events/npt2005/npttreaty.html

[2] IAEA Safeguards and Verification

http://www.iaea.org/OurWork/SV/Safeguards/index.html

[3] NPT disarmament provisions: "13 practical steps" toward TOTAL GLOBAL nuclear disarmament
The 13 Practical Steps for the implementation of "Article VI" adopted by the 2000 NPT Review Conference to nuclear disarmament. In light of the rules of treaty interpretation set forth in Articles 31 and 32 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, the Practical Steps lay down criteria, principles, and measures for compliance with Article VI. They constitute subsequent agreement and practice authoritatively applying and interpreting Article VI. Accordingly, to implement the Practical Steps is to move towards complete fulfillment of the legal obligations set forth in Article VI. To fail to do so in essential respects is to demonstrate a lack of good faith and to breach the Article VI obligations.
http://disarmament.un.org/wmd/npt/nptrevdocuments.html
http://www.lcnp.org/disarmament/npt/13stepspaper.htm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/13_steps

[4] U.S. National Security Strategy 2006

http://www.whitehouse.gov/nsc/nss/2006/

[5] Bush has often said he wants to "STRENGTHEN" the NPT. Obviously, that is a big LIE. In fact, there had been entirely too much "strengthening" of the NPT at the Sixth Review Conference (Sixth RevCon), held six years ago (2000), to suit Bush. The final report of the Sixth RevCon (http://www.basicint.org/nuclear/NPT/2000revcon/finaltext.htm) began by reaffirming the recommendations contained in the final report of the Fifth Revcon (http://www.reachingcriticalwill.org/legal/npt/1995dec.html). But it took delegates to the Seventh RevCon (http://www.un.org/events/npt2005) two weeks to even agree on an agenda because Bush "REFUSED" to allow the final report of the "Sixth RevCon" to even be discussed (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/13_steps), much less be reaffirmed. Among other things, the Sixth RevCon Report affirmed: "An unequivocal undertaking by the nuclear-weapon states to accomplish the total elimination of their nuclear arsenals leading to nuclear disarmament to which all states parties are committed under Article VI". Disarm? "The importance and urgency of signatures and ratifications, without delay and without conditions and in accordance with constitutional processes, to achieve the early entry into force of the Comprehensive Nuclear Test-Ban Treaty" (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CTBT). Ratify the CTBT? "The Sixth Conference reaffirms that IAEA is the competent authority responsible for verifying and assuring … compliance with its safeguards agreements … with a view to preventing diversion of nuclear energy from peaceful uses to nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices.… It is the conviction of the Conference that nothing should be done to undermine the authority of IAEA in this regard". Don't challenge the authority of the IAEA? "The Sixth Conference notes the reaffirmation by the nuclear-weapon states of their commitment to the United Nations Security Council resolution 984 in 1995 (http://www.un.org/Docs/scres/1995/scres95.htm) on security assurances for non-nuclear-weapon states parties to the Treaty on the Nonproliferation of Nuclear Weapons". Give assurances to IRAN that we won't attack them with nuclear weapons? You've got to be kidding. Bush would never agree to do any of those things, now required of us by the NPT.

[6] Proliferation Security Initiative (PSI)

http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/nuke/RS21881.pdf [PDF-40KB]

[7] President's statement on PSI (June 23, 2006)

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2006/06/20060623.html

* Physicist James Gordon Prather has served as a policy implementing official for national security-related technical matters in the Federal Energy Agency, the Energy Research and Development Administration, the Department of Energy, the Office of the Secretary of Defense and the Department of the Army. Dr. Prather also served as legislative assistant for national security affairs to U.S. Senator Henry Bellmon, R-Okla. --ranking member of the Senate Budget Committee and member of the Senate Energy Committee and Appropriations Committee. Dr. Prather had earlier worked as a nuclear weapons physicist at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (http://www.llnl.gov) in California and Sandia National Laboratory (http://www.sandia.gov) in New Mexico. http://www.antiwar.com/prather

Interviews with nuclear weapons physicist Dr. James Gordon Prather:
September 17, 2005
http://www.weekendinterviewshow.com/audio/prather6.mp3
July 23, 2005
http://www.weekendinterviewshow.com/audio/prather5.mp3
May 7, 2005
http://www.weekendinterviewshow.com/audio/prather4.mp3
April 9, 2005
http://www.weekendinterviewshow.com/audio/prather3.mp3
February 5, 2005
http://www.weekendinterviewshow.com/audio/prather2.mp3
December 4, 2004
http://www.weekendinterviewshow.com/audio/prather.mp3

West has kept billions of Iran's EURODIF investments for 30 years In 1975, Iran took a very costly 10% financial participation in EURODIF uranium enrichment plant being built in France. Iran paid $1 billion towards the purchase of a 10% share of ownership in EURODIF and agreed to buy a quota from the new plant. But after the Iranian revolution in 1979, neither was Iran given any enriched uranium nor did it get back its investment from EURODIF. The U.S. was also paid to deliver new fuel and upgrade its power in accordance with a contract signed before the revolution. U.S. gave neither the fuel nor the billions of dollars it had received for it. Germany was paid for in full, billions of dollars for the two nuclear facilities in Busher, but after three decades, Germany has refused to export any equipments or refund the money.
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/0540800f7314f7b0

Nuclear program of Iran
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_program_of_Iran

IAEA and Iran
http://www.iaea.org/NewsCenter/Focus/IaeaIran/index.shtml

Setting the Record Straight about Iran's Nuclear Program
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/a19f89b941a33707

U.S. endorsed Iranian plans to build massive nuclear energy industry
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/9b0a04b1107d7171

Washington: The Biggest NPT Violator
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/e2233bcb812ca246

IAEA Chief Invalidates the NPT
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/3e2365eddc3bd0ff

Time to shut-down the UN
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/50134d0a62fb448f

Even threatening to use nuclear weapons is a violation of international law
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/5bd9a41bf89f3f1d

Paris Accord – the sequel

http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/3448d91b7ba08ba1

Changing 'Criminal' Regimes

http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/79d458bdaff67040

Iran's nuclear-energy rights

http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/0d538a44ababd820

Nuke-Free Zone

http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/063968fda38b19be

More Condi diplomacy?

http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/8f9036be580f2151

Hijacked by the Neocrazies
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/030051c0a5a88c65

Iranian crisis resolved

http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/d23242f3f62d3746

Kudos to Congress From Israel

http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/2edc97abd03b99e4

The best U.S. Congress money can buy
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/585faaf4d2e9eb74

Another 'Coalition of the Willing'?

http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/f696f2a3a401850f

Judy-Baby vs TIME
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/2080d3c61b904992

Iran was not ordered to Stop Enrichment
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/f4731d785c554085

Western-Style Democracy – No!
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/466cae8cbc38307d

Media liars exposed
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/7f34f4e6346a9bb5

Dolts – or liars?
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/7eb4595173cae97d

Kavik Kang

unread,

Jul 1, 2006, 7:42:50 AM7/1/06

***
AntiWar
July 1, 2006

Interdicting Proliferation Potential

***

Translation: Either a guy Arash has made up, or some actual American kook.

***

The Treaty on the Nonproliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) involves three
principal undertakings on the part of the signatories:

1) to prevent further proliferation of nuclear weapons
2) to pursue negotiations on a treaty of general and complete disarmament
3) to facilitate the fullest possible exchange of equipment, materials, and
technological information for the peaceful uses of nuclear energy. [1]

***

You actually managed to post 4 entire lines of accurate text, I'm stunned...

***

To prevent further proliferation of nukes, signatories not already having

nukes agreed to make all "source" and "special nuclear materials" - and all
activities involving their physical or chemical transformation - subject to

the safeguards regime [2] of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
for the exclusive purpose of verifying for other NPT signatories that no
safeguarded materials have been used to further any military purpose.

The rationale for focusing on the purposes to which "source" and "special
nuclear materials" is that no one can make a nuclear weapon without

possessing tens of kilograms of fissile material - almost pure uranium-235,
uranium-233, or plutonium-239.
***

Which is what Iran is trying to do...

***

Hence, the NPT not only allows, it even encourages the fullest possible

transfer - and use, subject to IAEA Safeguards - of equipment that can be

used to produce fissile material.

However, President Bush refuses to abide by the letter or spirit of the NPT.

In particular, he has no intention of ever entering into negotiations
leading to nuke disarmament. [3]

***

It has nothing to do with your boogeyman "Bush". No US or Russian leader
has ever had any intention of doing that, and it is certainly not a secret
or anything. The US and Russia will, very obviously, possess "world
killing" global nuclear arsenals for as long as the technology remains
effective. Somebody is going to have the ability to destroy the planet, you
can't put the nuclear genie back into the bottle, and only a complete moron
would expect the US or Russia to simply disarm and allow other nations to
rule the world through nuclear dominance. Exactly how stupid are you?

Nuclear weapons will exist until some currently unforseeable new technology
renders them obsolete. As long as nulcear weapons exist, the US and Russia
will remain the "holders of the keys". Everybody who actually knows what
they are talking about already knows this, and has known it for like 50
years. It has nothing to do with your boogeyman "Bush".

***

Furthermore, according to his National Security Strategy (NSS), "the best
way to block aspiring nuclear weapons states or nuclear terrorists" is to
prevent their acquiring even the capability to produce fissile material. [4]

***

Obviously...

***

Therefore, Bush set out to close what he calls a "loophole" in the NPT that
not only allows Iran (for example) to acquire such a capability but requires
him to facilitate that acquisition.

***

Well, following those rules allowed North Korea to just build nuclear
weapons, so obviously those rules don't work, do they? Why would we use the
same rules that allowed North Korea to build nuclear weapons to stop Iran
from doing it? North Korea proved that the current "NPT" does not work.
Iran will never have a global nuclear arsenal, which word is it that you
don't understand?

***

Alas, the attendees at the 2005 NPT Review Conference (RevCon) not only
refused to modify the NPT to suit Bush, but castigated the "nuclear weapons
states" for refusing to pursue the 13 "practical steps" to TOTAL nuke
disarmament they committed themselves to at the 2000 NPT Review Conference
(6th RevCon). [5]

***

Nobody ever agreed to get rid of all nuclear weapons, you moron. Read it
again, slowly...

The NPT isn't relevant. Iran has been given an order. They will follow it
or suffer the consequences. Nuclear weapons are not a game. Do what we say
or die, the choice is yours.

***

What to do? Scrap the NPT and replace it with the Proliferation Security

Initiative, PSI [6] - developed by Bonkers Bolton from Bush's National
Security Strategy.
***

Yes, we might just have to, and start over with something that actually
works. Your precious "NPT" is obviously a complete disaster, North Korea
built nuclear weapons under it's rules and now Iran attempts to use it to do
the same thing, the NPT is obviously a complete and total failure. It is
doing the exact opposite of what it was intended to do. Welcome back to
reality, enemy propagandist.

بنام خداوند٥ بخشندە و مهربان ;-(╠۞╣Ǚ∑§â€IÐ_SBR_X|||)-:‎

unread,

Jul 1, 2006, 8:04:49 AM7/1/06

Interdicting Proliferation Potential

> ------=_NextPart_000_000C_01C69CDE.4FD94670
> Content-Type: text/html; charset=Windows-1252
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> X-Google-AttachSize: 44033
>
> <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
> <HTML><HEAD>
> <META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=windows-1252">
> <META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.2912" name=GENERATOR>
> <STYLE></STYLE>
> </HEAD>
> <BODY bgColor=#ffffff background="">
> <DIV>AntiWar</DIV>
> <DIV>July 1, 2006</DIV>
> <DIV> </DIV>
> <DIV>Interdicting Proliferation Potential</DIV>
> <DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
> <DIV> </DIV>
> <DIV>Dr. James Gordon Prather<BR>Nuclear weapons physicist<BR>Former Nuclear
> bomb tester at Lawrence Livermore<BR>Former Technical director of nuclear bomb
> testings at Sandia<BR>Former Chief scientist of the U.S. Army<BR>U.S. Navy
> veteran<BR></DIV>
> <DIV> </DIV>
> <DIV>The Treaty on the Nonproliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) involves three
> principal undertakings on the part of the signatories:</DIV>
> <DIV><BR>1) to prevent further proliferation of nuclear
> weapons<BR>2) to pursue negotiations on a treaty of general and complete
> disarmament <BR>3) to facilitate the fullest possible exchange of

> equipment, materials, and technological information for the peaceful uses of

> nuclear energy. [1]</DIV>
> <DIV><BR>To prevent further proliferation of nukes, signatories not already

> having nukes agreed to make all "source" and "special nuclear materials" – and
> all activities involving their physical or chemical transformation – subject to
> the safeguards regime [2] of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) for
> the exclusive purpose of verifying for other NPT signatories that no safeguarded

> materials have been used to further any military purpose.</DIV>
> <DIV><BR>The rationale for focusing on the purposes to which "source" and

> "special nuclear materials" is that no one can make a nuclear weapon without
> possessing tens of kilograms of fissile material – almost pure uranium-235,

> uranium-233, or plutonium-239.</DIV>
> <DIV><BR>Hence, the NPT not only allows, it even encourages the fullest possible

> transfer – and use, subject to IAEA Safeguards – of equipment that can be used

> to produce fissile material.</DIV>
> <DIV><BR>However, President Bush refuses to abide by the letter or spirit of the
> NPT.</DIV>
> <DIV><BR>In particular, he has no intention of ever entering into negotiations
> leading to nuke disarmament. [3]</DIV>
> <DIV><BR>Furthermore, according to his National Security Strategy (NSS), "the

> best way to block aspiring nuclear weapons states or nuclear terrorists" is to
> prevent their acquiring even the capability to produce fissile material.

> [4]</DIV>
> <DIV><BR>Therefore, Bush set out to close what he calls a "loophole" in the NPT

> that not only allows Iran (for example) to acquire such a capability but

> requires him to facilitate that acquisition.</DIV>
> <DIV><BR>Alas, the attendees at the 2005 NPT Review Conference (RevCon) not only

> refused to modify the NPT to suit Bush, but castigated the "nuclear weapons
> states" for refusing to pursue the 13 "practical steps" to TOTAL nuke
> disarmament they committed themselves to at the 2000 NPT Review Conference (6th

> RevCon). [5]</DIV>
> <DIV><BR>What to do? Scrap the NPT and replace it with the Proliferation
> Security Initiative, PSI [6] – developed by Bonkers Bolton from Bush's
> National Security Strategy. </DIV>
> <DIV> </DIV>
> <DIV>Quoth Bonkers;</DIV>
> <DIV><BR>     "We aim ultimately not just to prevent the

> spread of WMD, but also to eliminate or 'roll back' such weapons from rogue
> states and terrorist groups that already possess them or are close to doing

> so.</DIV>
> <DIV><BR>     "While we stress peaceful and diplomatic

> solutions to the proliferation threat, as President Bush has said repeatedly, we

> rule out no options.</DIV>
> <DIV><BR>     "While we pursue diplomatic dialogue wherever

> possible, the United States and its allies must be willing to employ more robust
> techniques, such as (1) economic sanctions, (2) interdiction and seizure, and
> (3) as the case of Iraq demonstrates, preemptive military force where

> required".</DIV>
> <DIV><BR>Great Zot!</DIV>
> <DIV><BR>Interdiction and seizure?</DIV>
> <DIV><BR>Preemptive military force?</DIV>
> <DIV><BR>As "solutions" to what dire "proliferation threat"?</DIV>
> <DIV><BR>Well, according to Bonkers Bolton, the principal proliferation threat
> we're facing now is Iran.</DIV>
> <DIV><BR>     "We now know that Iran is developing a uranium

> mine, a uranium conversion facility, a massive uranium enrichment facility
> designed to house tens of thousands of centrifuges, and a heavy water production

> plant.</DIV>
> <DIV><BR>     "This costly infrastructure would support the

> production of both highly enriched uranium and plutonium for nuclear

> weapons.</DIV>
> <DIV><BR>     "While Iran claims that its nuclear program is
> peaceful and transparent, we are convinced it is otherwise".</DIV>
> <DIV><BR>Never mind that under the NPT, Iran has an "INALIENABLE RIGHT" to

> acquire, develop, and employ everything that so alarms Bolton. Never mind that
> all these facilities are safeguarded. And in the case of the facility built to
> ultimately house gas-centrifuges, the Iranians weren't even required to tell the
> IAEA about the existence of the centrifuges and facility until six months prior

> to their introducing "source" or "special nuclear materials" into them.</DIV>
> <DIV><FONT size=2></FONT><BR>Well, last week, PSI "partners" all met in Warsaw,
> Poland, to receive a few atta-boys from Bush. [7]</DIV>
> <DIV><FONT size=2></FONT><BR>     "The PSI is dedicated to

> stopping all aspects of the proliferation trade and to denying terrorists, rogue
> states, and their supplier networks access to WMD-related materials and delivery

> systems.</DIV>
> <DIV><BR>     "Together, we are working to disrupt the

> financial activities of networks that support proliferation, as called for in

> United Nations Security Council Resolutions 1540 and 1673.</DIV>
> <DIV><BR>     "Together, we are shutting down front

> companies and proliferation networks and interdicting cargo carrying these

> dangerous materials, whether transported by land, air, or sea".</DIV>
> <DIV><FONT size=2></FONT><BR>The principal PSI success claimed? The illegal

> (under international law) confiscation back in 2003 of a shipment of equipment
> that potentially could have been used to illegally (under the NPT) physically

> transform Libyan undeclared "source" material.</DIV>
> <DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
> <DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
> <DIV><FONT size=2>Notes:</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT size=2>--------</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT size=2>[1] Text of the Treaty on Non-Proliferation of Nuclear weapons
> (NPT)<BR></FONT><A href="http://www.un.org/events/npt2005/npttreaty.html"><FONT
> size=2>http://www.un.org/events/npt2005/npttreaty.html</FONT></A></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
> <DIV><FONT size=2>[2] IAEA Safeguards and Verification</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><A href="http://www.iaea.org/OurWork/SV/Safeguards/index.html"><FONT
> size=2>http://www.iaea.org/OurWork/SV/Safeguards/index.html</FONT></A></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
> <DIV><FONT size=2>[3] NPT disarmament provisions: "13 practical steps" toward
> TOTAL GLOBAL nuclear disarmament<BR>The 13 Practical Steps for the

> implementation of "Article VI" adopted by the 2000 NPT Review Conference to
> nuclear disarmament. In light of the rules of treaty interpretation set forth in
> Articles 31 and 32 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, the
> Practical Steps lay down criteria, principles, and measures for compliance with
> Article VI. They constitute subsequent agreement and practice authoritatively
> applying and interpreting Article VI. Accordingly, to implement the Practical
> Steps is to move towards complete fulfillment of the legal obligations set forth
> in Article VI. To fail to do so in essential respects is to demonstrate a lack

> of good faith and to breach the Article VI obligations.<BR></FONT><A
> href=""><FONT
> size=2>http://disarmament.un.org/wmd/npt/nptrevdocuments.html</FONT></A><BR><A
> href="http://www.lcnp.org/disarmament/npt/13stepspaper.htm"><FONT
> size=2>http://www.lcnp.org/disarmament/npt/13stepspaper.htm</FONT></A></DIV>
> <DIV><A href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/13_steps"><FONT
> size=2>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/13_steps</FONT></A><BR></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
> <DIV><FONT size=2>[4] U.S. National Security Strategy 2006</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><A href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/nsc/nss/2006/"><FONT
> size=2>http://www.whitehouse.gov/nsc/nss/2006/</FONT></A></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
> <DIV><FONT size=2>[5] Bush has often said he wants to "STRENGTHEN" the NPT.
> Obviously, that is a big LIE. In fact, there had been entirely too much

> "strengthening" of the NPT at the Sixth Review Conference (Sixth RevCon),

> held six years ago (2000), to suit Bush. The final report of the Sixth
> RevCon (</FONT><A href=""><FONT
> size=2>http://www.basicint.org/nuclear/NPT/2000revcon/finaltext.htm</FONT></A><FONT
> size=2>) began by reaffirming the recommendations contained in the final report
> of the Fifth Revcon (</FONT><A href=""><FONT
> size=2>http://www.reachingcriticalwill.org/legal/npt/1995dec.html</FONT></A><FONT
> size=2>). But it took delegates to the Seventh RevCon (</FONT><A href=""><FONT
> size=2>http://www.un.org/events/npt2005</FONT></A><FONT size=2>) two weeks to

> even agree on an agenda because Bush "REFUSED" to allow the final report of the

> "Sixth RevCon" to even be discussed (</FONT><A href=""><FONT
> size=2>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/13_steps</FONT></A><FONT size=2>), much less

> be reaffirmed. Among other things, the Sixth RevCon Report affirmed: "An
> unequivocal undertaking by the nuclear-weapon states to accomplish the total
> elimination of their nuclear arsenals leading to nuclear disarmament to which
> all states parties are committed under Article VI". Disarm? "The importance and
> urgency of signatures and ratifications, without delay and without conditions
> and in accordance with constitutional processes, to achieve the early entry into

> force of the Comprehensive Nuclear Test-Ban Treaty" (</FONT><A
> href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CTBT"><FONT
> size=2>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CTBT</FONT></A><FONT size=2>). Ratify the

> CTBT? "The Sixth Conference reaffirms that IAEA is the competent authority
> responsible for verifying and assuring … compliance with its safeguards
> agreements … with a view to preventing diversion of nuclear energy from peaceful
> uses to nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices.… It is the
> conviction of the Conference that nothing should be done to undermine the
> authority of IAEA in this regard". Don't challenge the authority of the IAEA?
> "The Sixth Conference notes the reaffirmation by the nuclear-weapon states of
> their commitment to the United Nations Security Council resolution 984 in 1995

> (</FONT><A href=""><FONT
> size=2>http://www.un.org/Docs/scres/1995/scres95.htm</FONT></A><FONT size=2>) on

> security assurances for non-nuclear-weapon states parties to the Treaty on the
> Nonproliferation of Nuclear Weapons". Give assurances to IRAN that we won't
> attack them with nuclear weapons? You've got to be kidding. Bush would never

> agree to do any of those things, now required of us by the NPT.<BR></FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
> <DIV><FONT size=2>[6] Proliferation Security Initiative (PSI)</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><A href="http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/nuke/RS21881.pdf"><FONT
> size=2>http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/nuke/RS21881.pdf</FONT></A><FONT
> size=2> [PDF-40KB]</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
> <DIV><FONT size=2>[7] President's statement on PSI (June 23,
> 2006)</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><A
> href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2006/06/20060623.html"><FONT
> size=2>http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2006/06/20060623.html</FONT></A></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
> <DIV>
> <DIV>
> <DIV>
> <DIV><FONT size=2></FONT><BR><FONT size=2>* Physicist James Gordon Prather has

> served as a policy implementing official for national security-related technical
> matters in the Federal Energy Agency, the Energy Research and Development
> Administration, the Department of Energy, the Office of the Secretary of Defense
> and the Department of the Army. Dr. Prather also served as legislative assistant
> for national security affairs to U.S. Senator Henry Bellmon, R-Okla. --ranking
> member of the Senate Budget Committee and member of the Senate Energy Committee
> and Appropriations Committee. Dr. Prather had earlier worked as a nuclear

> weapons physicist at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (</FONT><A
> href=""><FONT size=2>http://www.llnl.gov</FONT></A><FONT size=2>) in California
> and Sandia National Laboratory (</FONT><A href=""><FONT
> size=2>http://www.sandia.gov</FONT></A><FONT size=2>) in New Mexico. </FONT><A
> href=""><FONT size=2>http://www.antiwar.com/prather</FONT></A></DIV>
> <DIV>
> <DIV>
> <DIV><BR><FONT size=2>Interviews with nuclear weapons physicist Dr. James Gordon
> Prather:<BR>September 17, 2005<BR></FONT><A href=""><FONT
> size=2>http://www.weekendinterviewshow.com/audio/prather6.mp3</FONT></A><BR><FONT
> size=2>July 23, 2005<BR></FONT><A href=""><FONT
> size=2>http://www.weekendinterviewshow.com/audio/prather5.mp3</FONT></A><BR><FONT
> size=2>May 7, 2005<BR></FONT><A href=""><FONT
> size=2>http://www.weekendinterviewshow.com/audio/prather4.mp3</FONT></A><BR><FONT
> size=2>April 9, 2005<BR></FONT><A href=""><FONT
> size=2>http://www.weekendinterviewshow.com/audio/prather3.mp3</FONT></A><FONT
> size=2><BR>February 5, 2005<BR></FONT><A href=""><FONT
> size=2>http://www.weekendinterviewshow.com/audio/prather2.mp3</FONT></A><BR><FONT
> size=2>December 4, 2004<BR></FONT><A href=""><FONT
> size=2>http://www.weekendinterviewshow.com/audio/prather.mp3</FONT></A><BR><BR><FONT
> size=2>West has kept billions of Iran's EURODIF investments for 30 years In

> 1975, Iran took a very costly 10% financial participation in EURODIF uranium
> enrichment plant being built in France. Iran paid $1 billion towards the
> purchase of a 10% share of ownership in EURODIF and agreed to buy a quota from
> the new plant. But after the Iranian revolution in 1979, neither was Iran given
> any enriched uranium nor did it get back its investment from EURODIF. The U.S.
> was also paid to deliver new fuel and upgrade its power in accordance with a
> contract signed before the revolution. U.S. gave neither the fuel nor the
> billions of dollars it had received for it. Germany was paid for in full,
> billions of dollars for the two nuclear facilities in Busher, but after three
> decades, Germany has refused to export any equipments or refund the

> money.<BR></FONT><A href=""><FONT
> size=2>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/0540800f7314f7b0</FONT></A><BR><BR><FONT
> size=2>Nuclear program of Iran<BR></FONT><A href=""><FONT
> size=2>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_program_of_Iran</FONT></A><BR><BR><FONT
> size=2>IAEA and Iran<BR></FONT><A href=""><FONT
> size=2>http://www.iaea.org/NewsCenter/Focus/IaeaIran/index.shtml</FONT></A><BR><BR><FONT
> size=2>Setting the Record Straight about Iran's Nuclear Program<BR></FONT><A
> href=""><FONT
> size=2>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/a19f89b941a33707</FONT></A><BR><BR><FONT
> size=2>U.S. endorsed Iranian plans to build massive nuclear energy
> industry<BR></FONT><A href=""><FONT
> size=2>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/9b0a04b1107d7171</FONT></A><BR><BR><FONT
> size=2>Washington: The Biggest NPT Violator<BR></FONT><A href=""><FONT
> size=2>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/e2233bcb812ca246</FONT></A><BR><BR><FONT
> size=2>IAEA Chief Invalidates the NPT<BR></FONT><A href=""><FONT
> size=2>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/3e2365eddc3bd0ff</FONT></A><BR><BR><FONT
> size=2>Time to shut-down the UN<BR></FONT><A href=""><FONT
> size=2>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/50134d0a62fb448f</FONT></A><BR><BR><FONT
> size=2>Even threatening to use nuclear weapons is a violation of international
> law<BR></FONT><A
> href="http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/5bd9a41bf89f3f1d"><FONT
> size=2>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/5bd9a41bf89f3f1d</FONT></A></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
> <DIV><FONT size=2>Paris Accord – the sequel</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><A
> href="http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/3448d91b7ba08ba1"><FONT
> size=2>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/3448d91b7ba08ba1</FONT></A></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
> <DIV><FONT size=2>Changing 'Criminal' Regimes</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><A href=""><FONT
> size=2>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/79d458bdaff67040</FONT></A></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
> <DIV><FONT size=2>Iran's nuclear-energy rights</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><A href=""><FONT
> size=2>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/0d538a44ababd820</FONT></A></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
> <DIV><FONT size=2>Nuke-Free Zone</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><A href=""><FONT
> size=2>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/063968fda38b19be</FONT></A></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
> <DIV><FONT size=2>More Condi diplomacy?</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><A href=""><FONT
> size=2>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/8f9036be580f2151</FONT></A></DIV>
> <DIV>
> <DIV>
> <DIV>
> <DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
> <DIV><FONT size=2>Hijacked by the Neocrazies<BR></FONT><A href=""><FONT
> size=2>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/030051c0a5a88c65</FONT></A></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
> <DIV><FONT size=2>Iranian crisis resolved</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><A href=""><FONT
> size=2>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/d23242f3f62d3746</FONT></A></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
> <DIV><FONT size=2>Kudos to Congress From Israel</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><A href=""><FONT
> size=2>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/2edc97abd03b99e4</FONT></A></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
> <DIV><FONT size=2>The best U.S. Congress money can buy<BR></FONT><A
> href=""><FONT
> size=2>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/585faaf4d2e9eb74</FONT></A></DIV>
> <DIV>
> <DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
> <DIV><FONT size=2>Another 'Coalition of the Willing'?</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><A href=""><FONT
> size=2>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/f696f2a3a401850f</FONT></A><BR><BR><FONT
> size=2>Judy-Baby vs TIME<BR></FONT><A href=""><FONT
> size=2>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/2080d3c61b904992</FONT></A><BR><BR><FONT
> size=2>Iran was not ordered to Stop Enrichment<BR></FONT><A href=""><FONT
> size=2>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/f4731d785c554085</FONT></A><BR><BR><FONT
> size=2>Western-Style Democracy – No!<BR></FONT><A href=""><FONT
> size=2>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/466cae8cbc38307d</FONT></A><BR><BR><FONT
> size=2>Media liars exposed<BR></FONT><A href=""><FONT
> size=2>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/7f34f4e6346a9bb5</FONT></A></DIV>
> <DIV><BR><FONT size=2>Dolts – or liars?<BR></FONT><A href=""><FONT
> size=2>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/7eb4595173cae97d</FONT></A></DIV>
> <DIV><BR><FONT size=2>Building Confidence<BR></FONT><A href=""><FONT
> size=2>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/0dd402ac446ee232</FONT></A><BR><BR><FONT
> size=2>Mad Cow<BR></FONT><A href=""><FONT
> size=2>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/f902060affbdcc91</FONT></A><BR><BR><FONT
> size=2>The Security Council deadline myth<BR></FONT><A href=""><FONT
> size=2>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/b3171b2cb36e2b2e</FONT></A><BR><BR><FONT
> size=2>Nuke Bunker Busters<BR></FONT><A href=""><FONT
> size=2>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/4f7dafc3c78dd739</FONT></A><BR><BR><FONT
> size=2>Nuking bunkers<BR></FONT><A href=""><FONT
> size=2>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/9dc9ce91f9bcf3e3</FONT></A><BR><BR><FONT
> size=2>Busting empty bunkers<BR></FONT><A href=""><FONT
> size=2>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/253c9c64c2dd6c18</FONT></A><BR><BR><FONT
> size=2>Neo-Crazy Plans for Iran<BR></FONT><A href=""><FONT
> size=2>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/506e80358deb039f</FONT></A><BR><BR><FONT
> size=2>Our new strategic partner<BR></FONT><A href=""><FONT
> size=2>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/9a7ef5b10d47d2fe</FONT></A><BR><BR><FONT
> size=2>Why we're at war<BR></FONT><A href=""><FONT
> size=2>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/9ea108bb35c75f74</FONT></A><BR><BR><FONT
> size=2>Bolton really is bonkers<BR></FONT><A href=""><FONT
> size=2>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/2c1a96d4c134d621</FONT></A><BR><BR><FONT
> size=2>Security Council defies Bolton<BR></FONT><A href=""><FONT
> size=2>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/458659c7a027672c</FONT></A><BR><BR><FONT
> size=2>More Failed Diplomacy<BR></FONT><A href=""><FONT
> size=2>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/98315d3290a4e50d</FONT></A><BR><BR><FONT
> size=2>Bush's unilateral agenda<BR></FONT><A href=""><FONT
> size=2>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/e6529af3e37bbe9f</FONT></A><BR><BR><FONT
> size=2>Preventing International Crimes<BR></FONT><A href=""><FONT
> size=2>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/c5b5d6990b410373</FONT></A><BR><BR><FONT
> size=2>More Bushlet
> Diplomacy<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/01c8abcbcafe1f06<BR><BR>IAEA
> pleads
> incompetence<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/e905a0589dead19d<BR><BR>Time

> to scrap the Nuclear Non-Proliferation

> Treaty<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/756e263c959d9a1f<BR><BR>Iran

> would be better off ignoring the ineffectual maneuverings of the

> UN<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/50a02e8e5191ae35<BR><BR>C'est
> la
> Guerre<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/97b90ec731ea1dcc<BR><BR>Bush

> thwarted by China super nuke

> plant?<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/79e452925dbc970a<BR><BR>Placating
> the
> Greenies<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/b101f3daf0619848<BR><BR>March
> madness<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/1192d194d1a1d127<BR><BR>Sanction
> the IAEA Board, not
> Iran<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/e5c6919c2946fcb5<BR><BR>Currency
> War<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/1052ca7782c2caba<BR><BR>Iran

> Has an 'Inalienable Right' to Nuclear

> Energy<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/e1d0c2ffc2437794<BR><BR>What
> "noncompliance"? And defying
> whom?<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/93043e2f0b11527b<BR><BR>WWIII

> or Bust: Implications of a U.S. attack on

> Iran<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/d1cc075e951bd131<BR><BR>Why

> America will reap the worst in

> Iran<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/a7c2da20a0bc69df<BR><BR>Smoking
> Laptop<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/911beee32e40791b<BR><BR>Iran
> 'gravest' threat?
> Hardly<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/54c6b1686dc22b90<BR><BR>President
> Bonkers
> Bolton<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/c91ec1c0b68f223c<BR><BR>'Disarming'
> Tehran<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/0863698fee1502c2<BR><BR>More

> neo-crazy media sycophant lies about

> Iran<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/b16081acddbb8739<BR><BR>CIA-IAEA
> planting
> evidence!<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/921c386f2446cb6e<BR><BR>Iranian
> nuke
> warheads<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/9d475a1b45c388d5<BR><BR>AIPAC

> statement on the U.S. administration's policy on

> Iran<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/0c5663f63d76e5c0<BR><BR>IAEA
> is doing Israel's
> bidding<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/953912efce75cbd9<BR><BR>Stuff
> and
> Nonsense<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/009482f7d2fcd131<BR><BR>Without
> Discrimination<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/e2a592e4c4c6fcf8<BR><BR>Nuclear
> terrorism<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/7254647c13390f5a<BR><BR>Happy
> New Year,
> EU/E3<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/1ed90b8d2c1efd2d<BR><BR>Why

> shouldn't Iran seek nuclear weapons? - It's the U.S. which is violating

> the<BR>"Article VI" of the
> NPT<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/7d7b7340575738dd<BR><BR>Will

> U.S. honor its NPT commitments? Yeah right, when pigs

> fly!<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/6ef0373af2f93171<BR><BR>To
> MOX or not to
> MOX<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/6cc28c13604c1c5c<BR><BR>Islamic
> back-scratching<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/1f44f9a9ab778418<BR><BR>Those
> Crazy
> Mullahs<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/7a8e501fa56ff9d3<BR><BR>Neo-Crazies
> Already Planning Beyond
> Iran<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/470563f4bdf3cb36<BR><BR>Authoritative
> mis-information on
> Iran<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/66bbad26c0f03d49<BR><BR>"Stolen

> Iranian Laptop", GLADIO's new campaign of

> 2 years of intrusive go-anywhere see-anything ask-anybody

> inspections!<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/a545047699722ca7<BR><BR>Nobel's
> peaceful kick to the
> groin<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/22f9662d106ce9c4<BR><BR>Bolton
> the
> Peacemaker<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/de17232f52db3933<BR><BR>Saving
> Face<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/7da8706c13c8a059<BR><BR>West

> does not seek the elimination of nukes, but rather the establishment of

> nuclear<BR>monopoly<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/502efbdfaa7622f7<BR><BR>Unratified
> additional
> protocol<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/1b2b77819b38d9e3<BR><BR>The
> high price of hounding
> Iran<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/7c854d944d6e061d<BR><BR>Such
> a
> Blot<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/43ee2e2149e17310<BR><BR>Weapons
> of Mass
> Murder<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/0f3f87b645a72fde<BR><BR>Neocrazies
> Foiled<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/86df9c0e9c38d475<BR><BR>Iran
> knocks Europe
> out<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/497a81cb3c315c65<BR><BR>UN

> opens a Pandora's Box of "Iran

> exceptionalism"<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/24bfe5a318d9a222<BR><BR>There

> is Nothing to refer to UN Security

> Council<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/76824d9387903d4a<BR><BR>WMD
> Postmortem<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/0d02537756cafca8<BR><BR>No

> wonder the West is so mad at

> Iran<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/83e63797f1a1af3b<BR><BR>Bolton
> in a China
> Shop<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/9927bb4f65924e34<BR><BR>JEW
> media sycophants & 36% HEU - IRAN told the truth, yet JEW keeps
> lying<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/f90a6eef507f10a0<BR><BR>Past

> Arguments Don't Square With Current Iran

> Policy<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/f53d3a05bc5403c1<BR><BR>The

> fuel behind Iran's nuclear

> drive<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/2fcf81313deb4ae0<BR><BR>The

> U.S. and Iran: Democracy, Terrorism, and Nuclear

> Weapons<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/0d0dcf76abbaafb1<BR><BR>NO
> Nuclear double
> standards<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/8e41f4a8a1a3e04c<BR><BR>Backlash

> Builds Against Cheney's 'Guns of

> August'<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/8286b2b389247d0a<BR><BR>An
> offer Iran MUST
> refuse<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/743b96400831f8a1<BR><BR>Zero
> Tolerance<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/1641ae424fde5b89<BR><BR>Sino-Russian
> Guarantees?<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/bd8f5389ab0e8956<BR><BR>More

> neo-crazy media sycophant LIES about

> Iran<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/d3fe84a9b64d20bc<BR><BR>What
> The Neo-Crazies
> Knew<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/6b45fabf57726a03<BR><BR>EU

> vs. Iran - Who's

> Right?<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/cbce70a3093360fb<BR><BR>Iran

> should refer U.S. to Security Council for violating

> UNSCR-984<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/0d54ef8e41b971bf<BR><BR>Castration
> of NPT - U.S. instantly tore up NPT for India, so why should Iran obey a<BR>torn
> up
> agreement!<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/2c234f4a148cd298<BR><BR>U.S.

> ripped NPT into pieces; Iran must withdraw from this annulled

> treaty<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/fbf55e939908b2c2<BR><BR>U.S.
> proliferation rhetoric and
> reality<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/7d8c268ee51c07be<BR><BR>Ambassador
> Bolton's
> Agenda<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/1ca916601b7a7bc8<BR><BR>Iran's
> INALIENABLE RIGHT to uranium
> enrichment<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/245f6081b4e3d019<BR><BR>A
> Palliative for Neo-Crazy
> Lies<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/1b7968f98173938d<BR><BR>Inalienable
> right without
> discrimination<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/5012a673328fa044<BR><BR>U.S.

> doesn't want to disarm even though it promised to do

> so<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/c0b86cad11cb9413<BR><BR>UN
> Referral –
> Not<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/bddc928154c8c96a<BR><BR>What

> Iranian obligations? What breaches? America's lies, lies,

> lies...<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/9535c4a90df98471<BR><BR>Memo
> to slimy
> senators<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/7065ffd57b51a959<BR><BR> U.S.

> promised in 2000, to get rid of it's

> nukes!<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/1e23bafecdac9e82<BR><BR>U.S.

> has violated Iran's NPT

> rights!<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/02f1f48fafcac2b6<BR><BR>Iran's
> diplomatic
> masterpiece<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/f532352654efee1d<BR><BR>Bush
> to sabotage
> NPT<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/6386adef83860d3e<BR><BR>West's
> repeated violations of "Article IV & I" against
> Iran<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/0123ceb12dd47321<BR><BR>Israel
> guns for Iran -
> Why?<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/2c0274540f3957b7<BR><BR>U.S.

> wants definition of NPT 'noncompliance'

> changed!!!<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/2abab5a7b8bce4c5<BR><BR>NTP
> for
> dummies<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/f317bb918ca244da<BR><BR>CNN's
> Wolf Blitzer & David Albright: Jews global campaign against
> Iran<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/44fcd2a53218eb52<BR><BR>The
> Real Threat From John
> Bolton<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/16fb61c3cca32703<BR><BR>81-mm
> smoking
> rockets<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/fb2c580ba00d79a6<BR><BR> U.S.
> plans to destroy
> NPT<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/760abaff1d8ac7c2<BR><BR>Nuts
> to
> Bush<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/de936f823b4dfb11<BR><BR>Iran's

> logic proven correct to the entire

> World<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/a5798de678dad2a9<BR><BR>Sandbagging
> the NSG (Nuclear Suppliers
> Group)<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/238000abe8fe032e<BR><BR>What
> Noncompliance?<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/32f537772749ecc2<BR><BR>Sandbagging
> the
> EU<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/bb437d1ee00ad1e9<BR><BR>Bye-Bye,
> NPT<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/eb8e9f617d0e0867<BR><BR>Jew

> tells Bush to lie about

> Iran<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/c96849f55f92353e<BR><BR>Targeting
> Non-existent
> Nukes?<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/e25e86754767e3ef<BR><BR>Blindly
> Backing Israel Against
> Iran<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/ca49370dcc1f41a4<BR><BR>Condi

> Desperate to Stop EU-China-Iran Chain

> Reaction<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/26e6a24b43339654<BR><BR>The

> Impossible Dream in the State of the Union

> Address<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/74938ea7958d0764<BR><BR>Targeting
> Iran<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/dbb46af7ff3f0b66<BR><BR>Bay
> of Pigs part 2,
> CIA-Israeli-MEK<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/b58f2a1d8b2290ff<BR><BR>Threatening
> Iran - despite the
> evidence<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/ce6e09919da68cbb<BR><BR>Virtual
> Nukes<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/c245e595ad17ae57<BR><BR>Iran's

> having the capability to enrich uranium is not even tantamount to having

> the<BR>capability to produce the essentially pure uranium-235 required to make a
> nuke<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/303c3ca53b67c0a7<BR><BR>Dangerous
> Delusions About
> Iran<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/42c57f2ae0cdb3b0<BR><BR>Thwarting
> the
> Neo-Crazies<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/66c79d721fd588d4<BR><BR>Trashing
> the IAEA
> Again<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/f8c610f6cc9e1fda<BR><BR>U.S.
> keeps lying about Iran again &
> again<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/e9f480b192bd425e<BR><BR>Iran's
> Stealthy
> Nukes<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/e47cc87d2b268368<BR><BR>Uranium-Enrichment
> Myths
> Busted<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/f7ebc6f4bed9d13a<BR><BR>Iran

> Plays by the Rules - No

> Fair!<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/25be300601cc8984<BR><BR>Nuclear
> Bait and
> Switch<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/0a0dc80ca3b8e98f<BR><BR>The
> myth of Iranian
> nukes<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/bf78503a661673e9<BR><BR>North
> Korea has what Iraq
> didn't<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/56f613221080276e<BR><BR>Iran

> has absolute right to enrich

> has the right to acquire

> nukes<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/664f46964003d83e<BR><BR>Iran:
> Nukes déjà
> vu<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/fced1128ee813b38<BR><BR>Iran

> neglected to say, Mother, may

> I?<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/d3db6e1427363550<BR><BR>Sharon's
> duplicity<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/bc938d8b31de9900<BR><BR>Israeli
> paranoia on Iran
> 'nukes'<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/4c3a0d2537b9fff2<BR><BR>Bush
> hawks foiled
> again<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/d27bc80916f53519<BR><BR>Western

> propaganda offensive intended to arouse public opinion against

> Iran<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/c79ce28a0f05752e<BR><BR>Liar,
> liar, pants on
> fire<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/e7b5368ddf652188<BR><BR>Britain

> test launch of new Trident nuclear

> missile<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/03b7ff82237f6ec0<BR><BR>Waiting

> for justice in Iran - Evil West and their forgotten

> victims<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/2ea99c1affdcef26<BR><BR>A
> nuke-free Middle
> East?<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/f8c04bf773e569e2<BR><BR>Poetic

> justice - White House "spin" spins out of

> control<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/e9a5be43e43bcc2f<BR><BR>Irv

> Lewis "Scooter" Libby exposed in White House leak

> case<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/cb23692845e9d2d0<BR><BR>Cover-Up

> Issue Is Seen as Focus in Leak

> Inquiry<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/f8a438a900ef766e<BR><BR>Larry
> Franklin-Plame
> connection<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/cbc77a30a4b0072f<BR><BR>Secrets,
> Evasions and Classified
> Reports<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/e9da14f43b85eeba<BR><BR>The

> Exorcism of the New York

> Times<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/4bb62103d6c6f358<BR><BR>Irv
> Lewis 'Scooter' Libby
> indicted<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/66853cb8c2a9e981<BR><BR>SISMI-CIA-MI6-Mossad
> and fake nuke
> documents<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/c482c86bb25b8e9c<BR><BR>The
> Yellowcake Forgery
> Gang<BR>http://www.prospect.org/web/page.ww?section=root&name=Repubblica+Translation<BR><BR>Who
> Forged the Niger
> Documents?<BR>http://www.alternet.org/waroniraq/21704<BR><BR>Michael "P2"

> Ledeen’s fingers in the yellowcake

> forgery<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/0a8e9166c36eb579<BR><BR>Michael
> "P2" Ledeen; faster,
> please!<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/d8d134f253c6702d<BR><BR>Indict
> Michael "P2"
> Ledeen<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/a9756c05493c05cf<BR><BR>Grand
> Strategy For the Middle
> East<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/bec2fec22e9ebf7a<BR><BR>Turkish-Israeli
> espionage in
> America<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/d6c6099bc646741b<BR><BR>Turkey,

> Israel and the U.S. (The Axis of

> Satan)<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/4315a88c84ef1278<BR><BR>Ledeen-SISMI-Mossad
> axis<BR>http://www.antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=7776<BR><BR>Fitzgerald's
> historic
> ppportunity<BR>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/a13e9901a9e9b597<BR><BR>GLADIO
> denies everything!<BR></FONT><A
> href="http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/5ca8ae9855cf61db"><FONT
> size=2>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/5ca8ae9855cf61db</FONT></A></DIV></DIV></DIV></DIV></DIV></DIV></DIV></DIV></DIV></DIV></BODY></HTML>
>
> ------=_NextPart_000_000C_01C69CDE.4FD94670--

Message has been deleted

0 new messages

@@ Interdicting proliferation potential @@

Arash

Kavik Kang

بنام خداوند٥ بخشندە و مهربان ;-(╠۞╣Ǚ∑§â€IÐ_SBR_­X|||)-:‎

بنام خداوند٥ بخشندە و مهربان ;-(╠۞╣Ǚ∑§â€IÐ_SBR_X|||)-:‎