@@ Dr. Prather exposes Jew-SA lies @@
Arash
December 4, 2004
Trashing the IAEA Again
Dr. James Gordon Prather
Nuclear weapons physicist
When asked about the passage last week of the International Atomic Energy
Agency Resolution on the implementation of its Safeguards agreement with
Iran, President Bush replied
"The Iranians agreed to suspend - but not terminate - their !!!nuclear
weapons program!!!. Our position is they ought to terminate their nuclear
weapons program."
What nuclear weapons program???
The Iranians vehemently deny that they have - or ever had or intend to
have - a nuclear weapons program.
Nevertheless, the "neo-crazies" - in and out of government - have been
working overtime to convince you that Iran does have an active nuke program.
The neo-crazies all hope that you don't know that the IAEA has just finished
a two-year go-anywhere, see-anything search - similar to the one they were
conducting in Iraq in the months before Bush "preemptively" launched Gulf
War II - for evidence of a nuke program.
The IAEA search was intrusive and exhaustive. They investigated every
intelligence tip made to them, no matter how unreliable the source. They
even investigated tips passed on to them by the Pentagon. The whole world
now knows how unreliable those tips can be.
Result in Iran? The IAEA found no evidence whatsoever of a nuke program.
The IAEA came close to thwarting the neo-crazies in Iraq, giving the lie to
their reports of a revitalized Iraqi nuke program. The IAEA may well thwart
them in Iran.
So, Bush is continuing the propaganda campaign to discredit the IAEA - with
respect to the effectiveness of their Safeguarded programs in North Korea,
Iraq, and now Iran - that the neo-crazies began shortly after the end of the
Gulf War I.
Perhaps it would help you decide whether Bush is attempting to deceive you -
or is simply illiterate - to read, for yourself, excerpts from that IAEA
resolution: http://www.mehrnews.com/en/NewsDetail.aspx?NewsID=134842
"(c) Noting specifically the Director General's assessment that Iranian
practices up to October 2003 resulted in many breaches of Iran's obligations
to comply with its Safeguards Agreement, but that good progress has been
made since that time in Iran's correction of those breaches and in the
Agency's ability to confirm certain aspects of Iran's current declarations,
"(d) Also noting specifically the Director General's assessment that all the
declared nuclear material in Iran has been accounted for, and that such
material is not diverted to prohibited activities, but that the Agency is
not yet in a position to conclude that there are no undeclared nuclear
materials or activities in Iran,
"(e) Recalling the Board's previous requests to Iran to suspend all
enrichment related and reprocessing activities as a voluntary confidence
building measure, [...]
"(h) Recognizing that this suspension is a voluntary confidence building
measure, not a legal obligation,
"(i) Recognizing the right of states to the development and practical
application of atomic energy for peaceful purposes, including the production
of electric power, consistent with their Treaty obligations, with due
consideration for the needs of the developing countries,
"(j) Stressing the need for effective safeguards to prevent nuclear material
being used for prohibited purposes, in contravention of agreements, and
underlining the vital importance of effective safeguards for facilitating
cooperation in the field of nuclear energy, [...]
"1. Welcomes the fact that Iran has decided to continue and extend its
suspension of all enrichment related and reprocessing activities, and
underlines that the full and sustained implementation of this suspension,
which is a voluntary, non-legally-binding, confidence building measure, to
be verified by the Agency, is essential to addressing outstanding issues;
"2. Welcomes the Director General's statements of 25 and 29 November 2004
that the above decision has been put into effect, and requests the Director
General to continue verifying that the suspension remains in place and to
inform Board members should the suspension not be fully sustained, or should
the Agency be prevented from verifying all elements of the suspension, for
as long as the suspension is in force;
"3. Welcomes Iran's continuing voluntary commitment to act in accordance
with the provisions of the Additional Protocol, as a confidence building
measure that facilitates the resolution of the questions that have arisen,
and calls on Iran once again to ratify its Protocol soon. ..."
Bush to the contrary, there is no mention anywhere in the Resolution of a
"nuclear weapons program," either in Iran or elsewhere. And there is no
suggestion that Iran is not now in full compliance with its existing
Safeguards Agreement.
On the contrary, the resolution acknowledges that Iran has voluntarily
suspended - as a confidence-building measure - activities that it has an
inalienable right to pursue under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.
* Physicist James Gordon Prather has served as a policy implementing
official for national security-related technical matters in the Federal
Energy Agency, the Energy Research and Development Administration, the
Department of Energy, the Office of the Secretary of Defense and the
Department of the Army. Dr. Prather also served as legislative assistant for
national security affairs to U.S. Sen. Henry Bellmon, R-Okla. -- ranking
member of the Senate Budget Committee and member of the Senate Energy
Committee and Appropriations Committee. Dr. Prather had earlier worked as a
nuclear weapons physicist at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in
California and Sandia National Laboratory in New Mexico.
http://www.antiwar.com/prather
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/archives.asp?AUTHOR_ID=35
Kavik Kang
news:rvjsd.198$Kf6....@newscontent-01.sprint.ca...
> AntiWar
> December 4, 2004
>
>
> Trashing the IAEA Again
>
>
> Dr. James Gordon Prather
> Nuclear weapons physicist
>
>
> When asked about the passage last week of the International Atomic Energy
> Agency Resolution on the implementation of its Safeguards agreement with
> Iran, President Bush replied
>
> "The Iranians agreed to suspend - but not terminate - their !!!nuclear
> weapons program!!!. Our position is they ought to terminate their nuclear
> weapons program."
>
> What nuclear weapons program???
The one that both us and the Russians know with absolute certainty that they
have due to the existance of their long range missiles. That's how stupid
and childish the Iranians are about this, they don't even realize that long
range missiles are absolute proof of a nuclear weapons program. They are
exactly like a 5-year-old trying to fool his parents. It would be funny if
it wasn't threatening to force us to nuke Iran's nuclear facilities...
--
22: 40. Permission to take up arms is given to those against whom war is
made, because they have been wronged and Allah, indeed, has power to help
them. - Holy Qur'an