Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

@@ Bush & the three Persian Magi @@

4 views
Skip to first unread message

Arash

unread,
Jul 3, 2004, 10:59:24 PM7/3/04
to
AntiWar
July 3, 2004


The Herod Doctrine

Persia is next.

By Dr. James Gordon Prather
Nuclear weapons physicist
gpra...@worldnetdaily.com


You remember how King Herod of Judea dealt with a suspected threat to his
rule, don't you?

According to Matthew, three Magi - Persian priests - showed up in Jerusalem,
and told Herod they had seen a "sign in the heavens" signifying the birth in
Bethlehem of a child destined to become "King of the Jews."

Imagine how happy Herod was to hear this. So happy, he encouraged the Magi
to go find this child, and report back to him the child's identity and
location so Herod could go "worship him."

Well, the Magi found Jesus, worshipped him, presented gifts of gold,
frankincense and myrrh, and then returned to Iran without providing Herod
their "intelligence." We don't call the Magi "The Three Wise Men" for
nothing.

According to Matthew, Herod realized a few months later that the Magi must
have divined his evil intentions. So to remove the potential threat to his
rule, he ordered the assassination of all boys in Bethlehem up to two years
of age. But by then, Joseph and his family had already fled to Egypt -
tipped off by the Magi, an "angel," or both.

What has the Herod Doctrine - the preemptive assassination of everyone who
might conceivably be a threat - got to do with the price of oil?

Well, on September 22, 2002, George W. Bush released some unclassified
details of his administration's brand new National Security Strategy - which
codifies the Bush Doctrine. http://www.whitehouse.gov/nsc/nss.html

The NSS envisions the establishment - through employment of overwhelming
military and economic power - of an American hegemony

Henceforth, America will never allow its military supremacy to be
challenged, even - for example - by China in the Straits of Taiwan.

Henceforth, when the president "determines" - as he subsequently did in
Iraq - that America's vital interests are at stake, he will act -
unilaterally, if necessary.

Henceforth, America will rely on preemption to deal with rogue states and
terrorists suspected of possessing - or seeking to possess - "weapons of
mass destruction."

Furthermore, America will exploit its hegemony to establish "free and open
societies" - whether they want them or not.

Bush's National Security Strategy owes much to the Defense Guidance prepared
a decade earlier by Paul Wolfowitz - then Undersecretary of Defense for
Policy - for Dick Cheney - then Secretary of Defense.

Defense Guidance "informs" the Pentagon's planning, programming and
budgeting process. The ultimate objective of the process is to provide the
operational commanders-in-chief the best attainable mix of
forces-equipment-support to meet perceived threats to our national security.

Defense Guidance is supposed to be "informed" by National Security
Strategies and National Security Decision Directives - not the other way
around. In 1992, Undersecretary Wolfowitz - a neo-crazy if ever there was
one - attempted to have it the other way around.
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/nsa/publications/presidentusa/presidential.html

Wolfowitz's 1992 Defense Guidance states,

"The number one objective of U.S. post-Cold War political and military
strategy should be preventing the emergence of a rival superpower.

"Another major U.S. objective should be to safeguard U.S. interests and
promote American values.

"If necessary, the United States must be prepared to take unilateral
action."

It also provided several scenarios - the primary ones involving Iraq and
North Korea - in which U.S. interests could be threatened by regional
conflict. The "guidance" was for the military departments, defense agencies
and military commanders to be ready to meet those threats.

Of course, Bush (Elder) was voted out of office in 1992, and with him went
Cheney, Wolfowitz and their cart-before-the-horse Defense Guidance.

But the neocrazies didn't give up. Here are excerpts from a letter they sent
President Clinton in 1998:

"The only acceptable strategy is one that eliminates the possibility that
Iraq will be able to use or threaten to use weapons of mass destruction.

"In the near term, this means a willingness to undertake military action as
diplomacy is clearly failing. In the long term, it means removing Saddam
Hussein and his regime from power.

"That now needs to become the aim of American foreign policy.

"We urge you to articulate this aim, and to turn your Administration's
attention to implementing a strategy for removing Saddam's regime from
power."

They weren't able to convince Clinton that killing Saddam Hussein ought to
be the principal objective of American foreign policy.

However, the neocrazies were able to "hijack" - on September 12, 2001 - Bush
's War on Terror to justify invasions of Iraq and other countries considered
to be threats to the modern-day Kingdom of Judea.

According to Undersecretary John Bolton, Persia is next.

* Physicist James Gordon Prather has served as a policy implementing
official for national security-related technical matters in the Federal
Energy Agency, the Energy Research and Development Administration, the
Department of Energy, the Office of the Secretary of Defense and the
Department of the Army. Dr. Prather also served as legislative assistant for
national security affairs to U.S. Sen. Henry Bellmon, R-Okla. -- ranking
member of the Senate Budget Committee and member of the Senate Energy
Committee and Appropriations Committee. Dr. Prather had earlier worked as a
nuclear weapons physicist at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in
California and Sandia National Laboratory in New Mexico.

http://www.antiwar.com/orig/prather.php?articleid=2932


xYmassyXmass:=~#*

unread,
Jul 4, 2004, 5:55:49 AM7/4/04
to
"Arash" <A7...@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:eoKFc.8569$_L5....@newscontent-01.sprint.ca...

Dear Sir,

Please Refrain from Calling Iran, Persia...It OFFENDS
____ALL__TRUE_IRANIANS___ and it is a Tactic used by the
Aforementioned, Jesus Killers...the Jews, when They Attempt to
Patronise *US*...its a Pathetic Attempt, by "good" Jews and Their
American Mouth Pieces and The Dr. Kelly types of characers....

Of course, not suggesting that You are Like Dr Kelly Was to the
British...and His Cover was Exposed in an Act of Treason, by Geof
Hoon, which Forbids, the Publication of The Names of Seniour
Intelligent Officers (Covert) from the Enemies of Britain...But, as an
elected Member of the Government, somehow, he Got away with it..

Herrod, was a Criminal and Brutal Murderer, Very much like the Likud
Party Members...Where a Serial Killer, and a WAR CRIMINAL in any Non
Hebrew language...

Fuck Jesus..>said harrod...

Then, Arsholes Came and SAID "Jesus DIED for *OUR* Sins".....

Who Are YOU??

Christinas!!! :<><

Were you there Before He died?

No!

Was He Jewish?

I am Christian

Was Jesus?

No He was Jewish!!

So *OUR* Sins...Does That Mean JEWSIH PEOPLE's SINs!!?!!

Yes!

So, Why do You Say OUR SINS, when NONE OTHER THAN JEWiSH PEOPLE, was
on HIS MIND WHEN HE SAID IT..

Pope...Before You DIE, COORECT YOUR STUPID PRAYERS....

Jesus WAS MURDERED by the SINFULL Herrod's Children, and They Tried to
Frame Romans and DID and TOOK over ROME...and

Now, Lets KILL JEWS for THEIR SINS, Then, and NOW


God Bless America and Nazis....

God PISS on JEWS

Jesus, Get a LIFE!

gr...@internet.charitydays.uk.co

unread,
Jul 5, 2004, 2:49:17 PM7/5/04
to
0 new messages