Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

STFU you lying Hostler asshole clown!!!

12 views
Skip to first unread message

KUTLOZE SCHEEFGEPOEPTE

unread,
Aug 18, 2011, 4:47:28 PM8/18/11
to
George Hostler AKA HPT AKA High Plains Thumper AKA Rafael AKA Wendy
Toiletwater AKA Willy Wong AKA Wang Mycock AKA Anna Banger AKA Susan
McSquatter AKA Doris Gets Her Oates AKA zyklon_C and many, many, many
others.

STFU you lying Hostler asshole clown, go fuck yourself and then crosspost
the results to:

alt.abuser.george.hostler
alt.assclown.george.hostler
alt.asshole.george.hostler
alt.blowhard.george.hostler
alt.bonehead.george.hostler
alt.buffoon.george.hostler
alt.clown.george.hostler
alt.crackpot.george.hostler
alt.creep.george.hostler
alt.cretin.george.hostler
alt.criminal.george.hostler
alt.crybaby.george.hostler
alt.delusional.george.hostler
alt.deadbeat.george.hostler
alt.dickhead.george.hostler
alt.dumpster-diver.george.hostler
alt.failure.george.hostler
alt.freak.george.hostler
alt.frootloop.george.hostler
alt.fuckhead.george.hostler
alt.fucknozzles.george.hostler
alt.fuKKKhead.george.hostler
alt.idiot.george.hostler
alt.ignoramus.george.hostler
alt.insane.george.hostler
alt.jackass.george.hostler
alt.jerkoff.george.hostler
alt.lame.george.hostler
alt.loon.george.hostler
alt.loser.george.hostler
alt.lunatic.george.hostler
alt.marginalized.george.hostler
alt.misogynist.george.hostler
alt.moron.george.hostler
alt.no-balls.george.hostler
alt.nocem.george.hostler
alt.no-nads.george.hostler
alt.npd.george.hostler
alt.nutcase.george.hostler
alt.plagiarist.george.hostler
alt.puppetboi.george.hostler
alt.screed.george.hostler
alt.screwball.george.hostler
alt.scumbag.george.hostler
alt.shit-for-brains.george.hostler
alt.sociopath.george.hostler
alt.spammer.george.hostler
alt.spankard.george.hostler
alt.spanked-out-of-aamod.george.hostler
alt.spinic.george.hostler
alt.stalker.george.hostler
alt.wanker.george.hostler
alt.whiner.george.hostler
alt.whining-bitch.george.hostler

High Plains Thumper

unread,
Aug 18, 2011, 10:14:03 PM8/18/11
to
KUTLOZE SCHEEFGEPOEPTE (arse-less twisted poop) wrote:

X-RcptDomain: m2n.mixmin.net

Why are you stalking me and demonstrating your cowardice by using
anonymous remailing servers?

> George Hostler AKA HPT AKA High Plains Thumper AKA Rafael AKA Wendy
> Toiletwater AKA Willy Wong AKA Wang Mycock AKA Anna Banger AKA Susan
> McSquatter AKA Doris Gets Her Oates AKA zyklon_C and many, many, many
> others.

Why are you lying about me, attributing flatfish nyms to me with your
spin? Let me guess, a gift from Gary Stewart flatfish left on my door
step, as a grateful cat would to its owner.

> STFU you lying Hostler asshole clown, go fuck yourself and then
> crosspost the results to:

I must have really hurt your sorry butt by replying with the truth about
Snit and you so that you are stalking me.

Snip ad hominem libel.

--
HPT

anus

unread,
Aug 18, 2011, 10:27:51 PM8/18/11
to
High Plains Thumper <h...@invalid.invalid> wrote in news:j2kgtb$qr5$2@dont-
email.me:

Hi flatfish!
posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19VCdhSYKutDukDPLXIQ9koi+3OsNuBQZOGuc76EZwEBg=="

Snit

unread,
Aug 18, 2011, 10:47:50 PM8/18/11
to
High Plains Thumper stated in post j2kgtb$qr5$2...@dont-email.me on 8/18/11
7:14 PM:

> KUTLOZE SCHEEFGEPOEPTE (arse-less twisted poop) wrote:
>
> X-RcptDomain: m2n.mixmin.net
>
> Why are you stalking me and demonstrating your cowardice by using
> anonymous remailing servers?

As if you post your name and address with your every comment!

Hey, just yesterday you talked about coming to my town to "meet" me... with
your biking buddy or whatever. Clearly a veiled threat. One of the jerks
you suck up to has threatened to try to get me fired by contacting my
employer.

Not sharing your real info is fine.

>> George Hostler AKA HPT AKA High Plains Thumper AKA Rafael AKA Wendy
>> Toiletwater AKA Willy Wong AKA Wang Mycock AKA Anna Banger AKA Susan
>> McSquatter AKA Doris Gets Her Oates AKA zyklon_C and many, many, many
>> others.
>
> Why are you lying about me, attributing flatfish nyms to me with your
> spin? Let me guess, a gift from Gary Stewart flatfish left on my door
> step, as a grateful cat would to its owner.

Poor you: the one who lies about me being Joel Crump and a dozen more
folks... now someone is saying something similar about you. Yeah, what a
sad little cowardly victim you are.

>> STFU you lying Hostler asshole clown, go fuck yourself and then
>> crosspost the results to:
>
> I must have really hurt your sorry butt by replying with the truth about
> Snit and you so that you are stalking me.

You have been spewing lies about me for years you sad suckup. Stop whining.

Funny how now that I am finally calling your out so directly on your crap
you are whining about how you are being "verbally abused". Your poor little
lapdog coward... I feel so bad for you... the people you have been lying
about and following for *years* are not being nice to you. Boo hoo.

> Snip ad hominem libel.

--
🙈🙉🙊


Savlan

unread,
Aug 19, 2011, 3:29:28 AM8/19/11
to
What does your stalking of High Plains Thumper have to do with linux,
KUTLOZE SCHEEFGEPOEPTE?


KUTLOZE SCHEEFGEPOEPTE wrote:
> ... High Plains Thumper ...


High Plains Thumper

unread,
Aug 19, 2011, 4:54:16 AM8/19/11
to
Snit wrote:
> High Plains Thumper stated:

>> KUTLOZE SCHEEFGEPOEPTE (arse-less twisted poop) wrote:
>>
>> X-RcptDomain: m2n.mixmin.net
>>
>> Why are you stalking me and demonstrating your cowardice by using
>> anonymous remailing servers?
>
> As if you post your name and address with your every comment!

Thanks for verifying that you approve of this troll's illegal use of my
personal information in posting. You are just as criminal as it.

> Hey, just yesterday you talked about coming to my town to "meet" me...
> with your biking buddy or whatever. Clearly a veiled threat.

Snit Michael Glasser, being the liar that you are, you have just verified
what others have been stating about your quote mangling. What was
actually stated:

HPT: "I'm planning a motorcycle trip to Phoenix, AZ to visit with a fellow
motorcyclist. How about it, Snit? I can stop by and visit with you. You
can talk to me face to face and share with me just what you did just now."

http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/2fe37b961bff54ce

In response to your insult:

Snit: "You are a coward - shaking in your cowards' shoes over actually
having to have a reasoned discussion. So you repeat the same lies over
and over and over just to get attention from me and approval from the
herd. And, as a coward, you run *every* time you are asked to support
your BS. Every single time."

http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/2380ad4fd49f69ba

You have twisted the truth I shared into a lie.

> One of the jerks you suck up to has threatened to try to get me fired
> by contacting my employer.

So, whoever that is, it is now my responsibility?

> Not sharing your real info is fine.

And that is supposed to mean?

>>> George Hostler AKA HPT AKA High Plains Thumper AKA Rafael AKA Wendy
>>> Toiletwater AKA Willy Wong AKA Wang Mycock AKA Anna Banger AKA Susan
>>> McSquatter AKA Doris Gets Her Oates AKA zyklon_C and many, many, many
>>> others.
>>
>> Why are you lying about me, attributing flatfish nyms to me with your
>> spin? Let me guess, a gift from Gary Stewart flatfish left on my door
>> step, as a grateful cat would to its owner.
>
> Poor you: the one who lies about me being Joel Crump and a dozen more
> folks... now someone is saying something similar about you. Yeah, what
> a sad little cowardly victim you are.

I see you justify other's libel, how troll of you. And yes, you nymshifted
as Joel Crump as you have nymshifted as Steve Carroll's Dog and Omar
Murad Asfour.

Soutien du Moderateur: "Following are 132 poster accounts on the Snit
Circus of Pathological Lies:"
Joel Crump: "And that's supposed to convince someone that they are the
good guys? Please. I'll take one decent poster like Snit over a thousand
idiot trolls, any day." 28 Nov 2009

http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/ce419ba75106d6a6

Proof of your nymshift as Steve Carroll's Dog and Omar Murad Asfour:

http://csma.sandman.net/pages/Michael_Digest_New_Sock_Puppet

With your problem of solipsism, you love to praise yourself.

>>> STFU you lying Hostler asshole clown, go fuck yourself and then
>>> crosspost the results to:
>>
>> I must have really hurt your sorry butt by replying with the truth
>> about Snit and you so that you are stalking me.
>
> You have been spewing lies about me for years you sad suckup. Stop
> whining.

You verify your trolling by concurring with another troll's ad hominem
attack.

> Funny how now that I am finally calling your out so directly on your
> crap you are whining about how you are being "verbally abused". Your
> poor little lapdog coward... I feel so bad for you... the people you
> have been lying about and following for *years* are not being nice to
> you. Boo hoo.

You have demonstrated you are incapable of decent conversation, being the
narcissistic individual you truly are.

Your inability to carry on a reasonable conversation but instead
resorting to personal attacks demonstrates your lack of self control and
respect for others. Your socially maladjusted attitudes and lack of
people skills have no place in a forum dedicated to advocating the
benefits of Linux to other operating systems.

--
HPT

White Spirit

unread,
Aug 19, 2011, 9:00:27 AM8/19/11
to
On 19/08/2011 09:54, High Plains Thumper wrote:

> Snit wrote:

>> Hey, just yesterday you talked about coming to my town to "meet" me...
>> with your biking buddy or whatever. Clearly a veiled threat.

> Snit Michael Glasser, being the liar that you are, you have just verified
> what others have been stating about your quote mangling. What was
> actually stated:

> HPT: "I'm planning a motorcycle trip to Phoenix, AZ to visit with a fellow
> motorcyclist. How about it, Snit? I can stop by and visit with you. You
> can talk to me face to face and share with me just what you did just now."

Why is Snit so incapable of recognising what a pissy, whiny little bitch
he comes across as?

I'd recommend you wash the the dirty pile of Snit from the bottom of
your shoes and henceforth be careful what you step in as it will stick
to you and follow you around if you're not careful.

Snit

unread,
Aug 19, 2011, 10:44:33 AM8/19/11
to
High Plains Thumper stated in post j2l8bn$6sp$1...@dont-email.me on 8/19/11
1:54 AM:

> Snit wrote:
>> High Plains Thumper stated:
>>> KUTLOZE SCHEEFGEPOEPTE (arse-less twisted poop) wrote:
>>>
>>> X-RcptDomain: m2n.mixmin.net
>>>
>>> Why are you stalking me and demonstrating your cowardice by using
>>> anonymous remailing servers?
>>
>> As if you post your name and address with your every comment!
>
> Thanks for verifying that you approve of this troll's illegal use of my
> personal information in posting. You are just as criminal as it.

I do no such thing and have made it clear many times.

But you *love* to lie about me. You lie about me, you post those inane,
meaningless and often forged "quotes" about me and you spew absurd
accusations. And you have done so for years as your role as lapdog coward.

And then you whine about being verbally abused when I finally tell you what
a miserable piece of scum you are... not even scum, given how you suck up to
scum.

Poor little you.

>> Hey, just yesterday you talked about coming to my town to "meet" me...
>> with your biking buddy or whatever. Clearly a veiled threat.
>
> Snit Michael Glasser, being the liar that you are, you have just verified
> what others have been stating about your quote mangling. What was
> actually stated:
>
> HPT: "I'm planning a motorcycle trip to Phoenix, AZ to visit with a fellow
> motorcyclist. How about it, Snit? I can stop by and visit with you. You
> can talk to me face to face and share with me just what you did just now."
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/2fe37b961bff54ce
>
> In response to your insult:
>
> Snit: "You are a coward - shaking in your cowards' shoes over actually
> having to have a reasoned discussion. So you repeat the same lies over
> and over and over just to get attention from me and approval from the
> herd. And, as a coward, you run *every* time you are asked to support
> your BS. Every single time."
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/2380ad4fd49f69ba
>
> You have twisted the truth I shared into a lie.

I twisted nothing. It is not as if anyone was fooled by your veiled threat.
It was like saying "step outside and say it to my face... oh, and let's do
it with my buddy". It was a threat and it was another sign of how much it
bothers you to be told what a cowardly little lapdog you are.

>> One of the jerks you suck up to has threatened to try to get me fired
>> by contacting my employer.
>
> So, whoever that is, it is now my responsibility?

It is your fault for sucking up to the scum. And you do. Repeatedly.

And you can stop pretending you do not know who it is who did so - we both
know that is a lie.

>> Not sharing your real info is fine.
>
> And that is supposed to mean?

It means what it says: you and others have no obligation to share your real
info, even if little suckups such as yourself say otherwise.

>>>> George Hostler AKA HPT AKA High Plains Thumper AKA Rafael AKA Wendy
>>>> Toiletwater AKA Willy Wong AKA Wang Mycock AKA Anna Banger AKA Susan
>>>> McSquatter AKA Doris Gets Her Oates AKA zyklon_C and many, many, many
>>>> others.
>>>
>>> Why are you lying about me, attributing flatfish nyms to me with your
>>> spin? Let me guess, a gift from Gary Stewart flatfish left on my door
>>> step, as a grateful cat would to its owner.
>>
>> Poor you: the one who lies about me being Joel Crump and a dozen more
>> folks... now someone is saying something similar about you. Yeah, what
>> a sad little cowardly victim you are.
>
> I see you justify other's libel, how troll of you. And yes, you nymshifted
> as Joel Crump as you have nymshifted as Steve Carroll's Dog and Omar
> Murad Asfour.

See: out and out lies by you. You just lie about me all the time and then
whine about "verbal abuse" when I tell you what a miserable piece of
lower-than-scum you are.

You have been asked for evidence of this Joel Crump accusation and you fold.
Ever time. And then you repeat it. And then you are asked about your 'Dog
accusation. And you fold every time. You point to Sandman's trolling
website as it if is evidence of anything other than what a cowardly lapdog
you are. And you do it over and over and over.

And then you whine about being "verbally abused" when your repeated BS is
pointed out. This BS you have spewed who knows how many times over the
*years*.

You are a coward and a lapdog to Sandman and other scum. You do not care to
tell the truth, you care to win favor with such scum... making you a suck-up
to the scum. When I say these things I give examples: it is not as though
there is any doubt.

And you are too cowardly to stop sucking up to the scum. You know they
would stop giving you their blessing... their support. And you are so
cowardly and insecure you cannot bear to think of living without it.

Which proves you are a miserable, useless person. That is the role you have
picked for yourself.

> Soutien du Moderateur: "Following are 132 poster accounts on the Snit
> Circus of Pathological Lies:"
> Joel Crump: "And that's supposed to convince someone that they are the
> good guys? Please. I'll take one decent poster like Snit over a thousand
> idiot trolls, any day." 28 Nov 2009
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/ce419ba75106d6a6
>
> Proof of your nymshift as Steve Carroll's Dog and Omar Murad Asfour:
>
> http://csma.sandman.net/pages/Michael_Digest_New_Sock_Puppet
>
> With your problem of solipsism, you love to praise yourself.

See: you repeat the same garbage over and over and over... sucking up to
Carroll and Sandman - two posters you know who are miserable jerks who
cannot tell the truth to save their lives. But you beg for their approval.

This speaks volumes of you... and says *nothing* about me.

>>>> STFU you lying Hostler asshole clown, go fuck yourself and then
>>>> crosspost the results to:
>>>
>>> I must have really hurt your sorry butt by replying with the truth
>>> about Snit and you so that you are stalking me.
>>
>> You have been spewing lies about me for years you sad suckup. Stop
>> whining.
>
> You verify your trolling by concurring with another troll's ad hominem
> attack.

I note what a suck up cowardly lapdog you are. Deal with it.

As if you could.

>> Funny how now that I am finally calling your out so directly on your
>> crap you are whining about how you are being "verbally abused". Your
>> poor little lapdog coward... I feel so bad for you... the people you
>> have been lying about and following for *years* are not being nice to
>> you. Boo hoo.
>
> You have demonstrated you are incapable of decent conversation, being the
> narcissistic individual you truly are.

Poor you - you suck up to the scum of Usenet and spew your lies about me for
years - and now I speak openly and freely about what a miserable turd you
are.

But do realize this - I only do so in response to your actions. If you were
to post as a man - a real man and not a cowardly suck up lapdog - I would
respond to you as such. In other words: if you can rise to presenting
yourself as an adult I would treat you as such. Do not push your weaknesses
on me... as you try above.

It is just another of your games - another distraction because you know I am
right and, being the coward you are, you fear to act differently. You fear
admitting to the truth.

Your masters would frown on you if you did.

> Your inability to carry on a reasonable conversation but instead
> resorting to personal attacks demonstrates your lack of self control and
> respect for others. Your socially maladjusted attitudes and lack of
> people skills have no place in a forum dedicated to advocating the
> benefits of Linux to other operating systems.

Wah wah wah! The person you have lied about for years and been attacking
endlessly is not being nice to you.

Poor you... poor "verbally abused" you... poor you who is not being spoken
to in a "reasonable" way... poor you.

Get the hell over it. You are a suck up to scum and a lapdog coward. Rise
above that and you will be treated as more than that. Until then your
whining about my not being nice to you just spurs me on - I have no desire
to be nice to someone who lies about me repeatedly and sucks up to the scum
of Usenet. None at all.


--
🙈🙉🙊


Snit

unread,
Aug 19, 2011, 10:48:23 AM8/19/11
to
White Spirit stated in post j2lmpo$8rm$1...@dont-email.me on 8/19/11 6:00 AM:

I am - finally - calling HPT out on what he is. A suck up to the scum of
Usenet... Usenet's very own lapdog coward.

And he is.


--
🙈🙉🙊


Clogwog

unread,
Aug 19, 2011, 11:46:29 AM8/19/11
to
"High Plains Thumper" <h...@invalid.invalid> schreef in bericht
news:j2kgtb$qr5$2...@dont-email.me...
Do your employers at Cannon AFB know about your vicious ad hominem threats,
libel (in your database), towards Snit and his family?, you sociopath.
Maybe someone should inform them: 27sowpubl...@cannon.af.mil

TomB

unread,
Aug 19, 2011, 1:14:18 PM8/19/11
to
On 2011-08-19, the following emerged from the brain of High Plains Thumper:
> Snit wrote:

8<

>> Hey, just yesterday you talked about coming to my town to "meet"
>> me... with your biking buddy or whatever. Clearly a veiled threat.
>
> Snit Michael Glasser, being the liar that you are, you have just
> verified what others have been stating about your quote mangling.
> What was actually stated:
>
> HPT: "I'm planning a motorcycle trip to Phoenix, AZ to visit with a
> fellow motorcyclist. How about it, Snit? I can stop by and visit
> with you. You can talk to me face to face and share with me just
> what you did just now."

Now /that/ was quite a twisting of words!

--
When Chuck Norris falls in water, Chuck Norris doesn't get wet. Water
gets Chuck Norris.

Snit

unread,
Aug 19, 2011, 3:22:26 PM8/19/11
to
TomB stated in post 201108191...@usenet.drumscum.be on 8/19/11 10:14
AM:

> On 2011-08-19, the following emerged from the brain of High Plains Thumper:
>> Snit wrote:
>
> 8<
>
>>> Hey, just yesterday you talked about coming to my town to "meet"
>>> me... with your biking buddy or whatever. Clearly a veiled threat.
>>
>> Snit Michael Glasser, being the liar that you are, you have just
>> verified what others have been stating about your quote mangling.
>> What was actually stated:
>>
>> HPT: "I'm planning a motorcycle trip to Phoenix, AZ to visit with a
>> fellow motorcyclist. How about it, Snit? I can stop by and visit
>> with you. You can talk to me face to face and share with me just
>> what you did just now."
>
> Now /that/ was quite a twisting of words!

TomB: can you ask yourself to actually back that accusation?

Of course not...


--
🙈🙉🙊


TomB

unread,
Aug 19, 2011, 6:22:18 PM8/19/11
to
On 2011-08-19, the following emerged from the brain of TomB:

> On 2011-08-19, the following emerged from the brain of High Plains
> Thumper:
>> Snit wrote:
>
> 8<
>
>>> Hey, just yesterday you talked about coming to my town to "meet"
>>> me... with your biking buddy or whatever. Clearly a veiled
>>> threat.
>>
>> Snit Michael Glasser, being the liar that you are, you have just
>> verified what others have been stating about your quote mangling.
>> What was actually stated:
>>
>> HPT: "I'm planning a motorcycle trip to Phoenix, AZ to visit with a
>> fellow motorcyclist. How about it, Snit? I can stop by and visit
>> with you. You can talk to me face to face and share with me just
>> what you did just now."
>
> Now /that/ was quite a twisting of words!

Dear TomB,

Can you please show us exactly how Snit is twisting words here?

Thank you.

--
Van m'n erf!!!
~ Boer Teunis.

TomB

unread,
Aug 19, 2011, 6:35:01 PM8/19/11
to

Why of course, good fellow. Here goes.

Mr. Thumper, High Plains states that he will be in Phoenix, AZ soon to
visit a fellow motorcyclist. He then notes that he could /stop by/ to
pay Mr. Nit, S. a visit.

Note how Mr. Thumper, High Plains never says he's going to bring his
fellow motorcyclist.

Mr. Nit, S. then claims that Mr. Thumper, High Plains said that Mr.
Thumper was coming to Mr. Nit's town to meet him, together with a
'biker buddy'.

The twists in Mr. Nit's words are the following:

* Mr. Nit's words suggest that Mr. Thumper will go to Phoenix, AZ with
the sole purpose of meeting Mr. Nit. That is not true: the main
reason of Mr. Thumper's visit to Phoenix, AZ is to meet his fellow
motorcyclist.

* Mr. Nit's then calls the 'fellow motorcyclist' a 'biker'. The word
'biker' has a rather negative connotation, suggesting a big strong
guy with long hair, a rough beard and many tatoos and other body
adornments, and perhaps even armed (you know how those pesky bikers
are).

I hope this helps.

--
If we could perpetually do blowjobs to every guy on earth, we would
own the world. And at the same time have our hands free.
~ Samantha

High Plains Thumper

unread,
Aug 19, 2011, 7:47:51 PM8/19/11
to

After an encounter with Snit, I left the shoes in the trash bin and I
felt so dirty I had to thoroughly bathe. Snit permeated every skin pore.

It was worse a worse stench than the unwashed Win-troll masses in COLA,
sock puppets included.

No wonder why he is never anywhere near a classroom.

--
HPT

Snit

unread,
Aug 19, 2011, 8:29:30 PM8/19/11
to
TomB stated in post 201108200...@usenet.drumscum.be on 8/19/11 3:35
PM:

> On 2011-08-19, the following emerged from the brain of TomB:

The concept of a "veiled" threat completely escapes you. He was clearly
angry with me that I was calling him out in his BS (the very BS he has been
spewing for *years* that you have never called him out on) and then he, in
reaction to that, said he would be in my town with a biker buddy and wanted
to come "talk" to me.

It is like someone getting their BS called out in a bar and then them saying
"Let's step outside... I am going out there to meet with a buddy". The
*obvious* implication is physical violence.

Now HPT has backed away from that - *HARD*. When he realized his threat was
being called out, he went to whining that I will not entertain a complete
and total lapdog coward such as himself. Poor guy.

And now you jump in to side with him - in a completely irrational display of
support for his completely reprehensible behavior (yes, when you make such
claims about me in a discussion about his BS, you tacitly are supporting his
BS). So, as predicted, at least one of the "advocates" is coming in to
irrationally support him.

Frankly I expected more to - and Sandman and Carroll. The fact they are not
proves how low they see him. He sucks up to the lowest of the low and they
will not say "boo" to back him when his BS is called out.

--
🙈🙉🙊


High Plains Thumper

unread,
Aug 19, 2011, 8:33:44 PM8/19/11
to
TomB wrote:

> The twists in Mr. Nit's words are the following:
>
> * Mr. Nit's words suggest that Mr. Thumper will go to Phoenix, AZ with
> the sole purpose of meeting Mr. Nit. That is not true: the main reason
> of Mr. Thumper's visit to Phoenix, AZ is to meet his fellow
> motorcyclist.
>
> * Mr. Nit's then calls the 'fellow motorcyclist' a 'biker'. The word
> 'biker' has a rather negative connotation, suggesting a big strong guy
> with long hair, a rough beard and many tatoos and other body
> adornments, and perhaps even armed (you know how those pesky bikers
> are).
>
> I hope this helps.

Yeah, I got with my group, the "Sons of Thumper". We dropped by Snit's
pad, kicked the door down. Then Snit's wife grabbed the kids and exited.
(Left in a soccer mom SUV, she invited us. Snit's been living off her
hard earned cash whilst trolling Usenet.)

We then grabbed Snit. Every time he whined, the big fat guy sat on Snit's
head and farted. We laughed our guts out. Snit was entertaining. Elizabot
Biker Chick dropped her chaps and pee'd on him. That made us laugh even
harder. Then Steve Carroll, who rode in on his Harley Soft-tail, told us
about Snit's history of socks, Rhino Plastee, Brock McNuggetts, Steve
Carroll's Dog, Omar Murad Asfour, etc. He had us rolling on the floor, we
laughed so hard it hurt.

(to be continued ....)

--
HPT


Snit

unread,
Aug 19, 2011, 8:44:52 PM8/19/11
to
High Plains Thumper stated in post j2msn7$6iu$1...@dont-email.me on 8/19/11
4:47 PM:

You feel sick because of your own repulsive behaviors. I, on the other
hand, feel great and sleep great - unlike you I have nothing to be ashamed
of.

To be specific: you are the one who repeats the same obsessively scavenged
and forged quotes about me... the "quotes" which are *meaningless* for any
purpose other than trolling. You are the one who repeatedly and falsely
accuses me of being, for example, Joel Crump (to name just one of the many
you blame me of being). You are the one who repeatedly and falsely accuses
me of forging the video on cutting and pasting (and many more).

You know you have no support for these accusations. You know those "quotes"
are meaningless. You know you are simply lying and sucking up to the
lowlife you strive to be like. You know you are a cowardly lapdog.

That is why you feel dirty - because you are a dirty, miserable excuse for a
human. A lowly man-child who is too mentally weak to stand up for the
truth... you instead pander to scum. You work to please scum.

Now go take a shower.


--
🙈🙉🙊


Snit

unread,
Aug 19, 2011, 8:45:59 PM8/19/11
to
High Plains Thumper stated in post j2mvd8$6iu$2...@dont-email.me on 8/19/11
5:33 PM:

Right: you will post all sorts of BS to suck up to the above mentioned scum.

You are pathetic... so much you admit you feel dirty after you spew your BS
about me.

Chance Furlong

unread,
Aug 19, 2011, 9:05:07 PM8/19/11
to
On 8/19/11 7:45 PM, Snit wrote:
> High Plains Thumper stated in post j2mvd8$6iu$2...@dont-email.me on 8/19/11
> 5:33 PM:
>
>> TomB wrote:
>>
>>> The twists in Mr. Nit's words are the following:
>>>
>>> * Mr. Nit's words suggest that Mr. Thumper will go to Phoenix, AZ with
>>> the sole purpose of meeting Mr. Nit. That is not true: the main reason
>>> of Mr. Thumper's visit to Phoenix, AZ is to meet his fellow
>>> motorcyclist.
>>>
>>> * Mr. Nit's then calls the 'fellow motorcyclist' a 'biker'. The word
>>> 'biker' has a rather negative connotation, suggesting a big strong guy
>>> with long hair, a rough beard and many tatoos and other body
>>> adornments, and perhaps even armed (you know how those pesky bikers
>>> are).
>>>
>>> I hope this helps.
>>
>> Yeah, I got with my group, the "Sons of Thumper". We dropped by Snit's
>> pad, kicked the door down. Then Snit's wife grabbed the kids and exited.
>> (Left in a soccer mom sport utility vehicle, she invited us. Snit's been living off her

>> hard earned cash whilst trolling Usenet.)
>>
>> We then grabbed Snit. Every time he whined, the big fat guy sat on Snit's
>> head and farted. We laughed our guts out. Snit was entertaining. Elizabot
>> Biker Chick dropped her chaps and peed on him. That made us laugh even

>> harder. Then Steve Carroll, who rode in on his Harley Soft-tail, told us
>> about Snit's history of socks, Rhino Plastee, Brock McNuggetts, Steve
>> Carroll's Dog, Omar Murad Asfour, etc. He had us rolling on the floor, we
>> laughed so hard it hurt.
>>
>> (To be continued.)
>
> Right, you will post all sorts of bullshit to suck up to the above mentioned scum.
>
> You are pathetic, so much you admit you feel dirty after you spew your bullshit

> about me.
>
> Now go take a shower.

What is wrong, Mr. Incest, did High Plains Thumper tell the truth about
your lame assed self?

High Plains Thumper

unread,
Aug 20, 2011, 9:59:36 AM8/20/11
to
Snit wrote:
> TomB stated:
>> the brain of TomB:
>>> the brain of TomB:

What was actually stated:

http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/2fe37b961bff54ce

In response to your insult:

Snit: "You are a coward - shaking in your cowards' shoes over actually
having to have a reasoned discussion. So you repeat the same lies over
and over and over just to get attention from me and approval from the
herd. And, as a coward, you run *every* time you are asked to support
your BS. Every single time."

http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/2380ad4fd49f69ba

> It is like someone getting their BS called out in a bar and then them


> saying "Let's step outside... I am going out there to meet with a
> buddy". The *obvious* implication is physical violence.

Fight you? Being the pansy you really are, you aren't even worth the
effort. You couldn't fight your way out of a brown paper sack if someone
wetted it.

Remember Snit, it was you who provoked the situation with your insulting
words. It is you seeking a fight. It is you with the bar room talk.

> Now HPT has backed away from that - *HARD*. When he realized his threat
> was being called out, he went to whining that I will not entertain a
> complete and total lapdog coward such as himself. Poor guy.

I said nothing of the sort. My offer is still good. I drop by your house.
You can tell me the insulting words to my face that you do hiding behind
your keyboard. Chances are you can't, because you are a coward. Simple.

> And now you jump in to side with him - in a completely irrational
> display of support for his completely reprehensible behavior (yes, when
> you make such claims about me in a discussion about his BS, you tacitly
> are supporting his BS). So, as predicted, at least one of the
> "advocates" is coming in to irrationally support him.

All TomB do was clarify. Can't you read Snit? Can't you comprehend? I
only see one irrational person - YOU.

> Frankly I expected more to - and Sandman and Carroll. The fact they are
> not proves how low they see him. He sucks up to the lowest of the low
> and they will not say "boo" to back him when his BS is called out.

Sandman does a thorough unbiased research on your trolling as stated on
his website and now he is scum? Steve Carroll responds to your
acrimonious responses and now he is scum?

You don't seem to get it, Snit. All people want is you to stop trolling
the advocacy groups, COLA included.

--
HPT

Snit

unread,
Aug 20, 2011, 11:49:16 AM8/20/11
to
High Plains Thumper stated in post j2oek8$4no$1...@dont-email.me on 8/20/11
6:59 AM:

Stop proving me right, you silly lapdog coward.


--
🙈🙉🙊


TomB

unread,
Aug 20, 2011, 12:00:53 PM8/20/11
to
On 2011-08-20, the following emerged from the brain of High Plains Thumper:
> Snit wrote:

8<

>> And now you jump in to side with him - in a completely irrational
>> display of support for his completely reprehensible behavior (yes,
>> when you make such claims about me in a discussion about his BS,
>> you tacitly are supporting his BS). So, as predicted, at least one
>> of the "advocates" is coming in to irrationally support him.
>

> All TomB do was clarify. (...)

At his own request!

--
Meisjes, ze zijn toch zo bizaar, meneer.
Ze komen zelden klaar, meneer. Meisjes.
~ Raymond vhG

Snit

unread,
Aug 20, 2011, 12:20:03 PM8/20/11
to
TomB stated in post 201108201...@usenet.drumscum.be on 8/20/11 9:00
AM:

> On 2011-08-20, the following emerged from the brain of High Plains Thumper:
>> Snit wrote:
>
> 8<
>
>>> And now you jump in to side with him - in a completely irrational
>>> display of support for his completely reprehensible behavior (yes,
>>> when you make such claims about me in a discussion about his BS,
>>> you tacitly are supporting his BS). So, as predicted, at least one
>>> of the "advocates" is coming in to irrationally support him.
>>
>> All TomB do was clarify. (...)
>
> At his own request!

And then you ignored why your answer was laughable. Again:

-----


The concept of a "veiled" threat completely escapes you. He
was clearly angry with me that I was calling him out in his
BS (the very BS he has been spewing for *years* that you have
never called him out on) and then he, in reaction to that,
said he would be in my town with a biker buddy and wanted to
come "talk" to me.

It is like someone getting their BS called out in a bar and


then them saying "Let's step outside... I am going out there
to meet with a buddy". The *obvious* implication is physical
violence.

Now HPT has backed away from that - *HARD*. When he realized


his threat was being called out, he went to whining that I
will not entertain a complete and total lapdog coward such as
himself. Poor guy.

And now you jump in to side with him - in a completely


irrational display of support for his completely
reprehensible behavior (yes, when you make such claims about
me in a discussion about his BS, you tacitly are supporting
his BS). So, as predicted, at least one of the "advocates"
is coming in to irrationally support him.

Frankly I expected more to - and Sandman and Carroll. The


fact they are not proves how low they see him. He sucks up
to the lowest of the low and they will not say "boo" to back
him when his BS is called out.

-----

And yet you continue to side with the lapdog coward.

Funny how you and he cannot help but prove me right.


--
🙈🙉🙊


High Plains Thumper

unread,
Aug 20, 2011, 5:00:59 PM8/20/11
to
TomB wrote:
> the brain of High Plains Thumper:
>> Snit wrote:
>>
>>> And now you jump in to side with him - in a completely irrational
>>> display of support for his completely reprehensible behavior (yes,
>>> when you make such claims about me in a discussion about his BS, you
>>> tacitly are supporting his BS). So, as predicted, at least one of the
>>> "advocates" is coming in to irrationally support him.

87- Muahman: "Ahhhh shit, another thread lost to the Snit retard circus!!!
I actually dread seeing Snit reply to a thread because that automatically
means it's in the toilet." 8 Jul 2009

http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/92e776d521dfa701

>> All TomB do was clarify. (...)
>
> At his own request!

37- Glenn Hall (COLA, regarding Snit): "That person is like a constantly
running toilet that won't stop. Does he ever stop talking about UI
consistency? No matter what anyone replies, he adds a few more branches
to the spider web as it grows and grows. It's a waste of time." 31 Oct
2010

http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/c8dd8a244fe1eb2c

--
HPT

High Plains Thumper

unread,
Aug 20, 2011, 5:02:51 PM8/20/11
to
Snit wrote:

> TomB stated in post 201108201...@usenet.drumscum.be on 8/20/11
> 9:00 AM:
>
>> On 2011-08-20, the following emerged from the brain of High Plains
>> Thumper:
>>> Snit wrote:
>>
>> 8<
>>
>>>> And now you jump in to side with him - in a completely irrational
>>>> display of support for his completely reprehensible behavior (yes,
>>>> when you make such claims about me in a discussion about his BS, you
>>>> tacitly are supporting his BS). So, as predicted, at least one of
>>>> the "advocates" is coming in to irrationally support him.
>>>
>>> All TomB do was clarify. (...)
>>
>> At his own request!
>

> And [snip]

30- Elizabot v2.0.2: "I see you were unable to respond to the points in my
post and you are back to your repetitious regurgitation mode. How
childishly typical of you, Snit." 16 Nov 2004

http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/55214ccfb7414fe5

--
HPT

Snit

unread,
Aug 20, 2011, 5:08:54 PM8/20/11
to
High Plains Thumper stated in post j2p7dr$5k7$2...@dont-email.me on 8/20/11
2:02 PM:

You have become a parody of yourself - unable to do anything other than be
the lapdog coward I noted you are. Look: repeating the same meaningless
quotes that say *nothing* about me but a lot about you. I mean, really, if
you thought *I* had said something wrong you would quote that.

You do not even pretend to have evidence against me - you just lash out to
suck up to your masters. How pathetic. How many times will you use this
same dishonest trolling tactic and get the same response?


--
🙈🙉🙊


High Plains Thumper

unread,
Aug 20, 2011, 5:23:34 PM8/20/11
to
Snit wrote:
> High Plains Thumper stated:
>> Snit wrote:
>>
>>> And [snip]
>>
>> 30- Elizabot v2.0.2: "I see you were unable to respond to the points in
>> my post and you are back to your repetitious regurgitation mode. How
>> childishly typical of you, Snit." 16 Nov 2004
>>
>>
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/55214ccfb7414fe5
>
> You have become a parody of yourself -

58- JohnOfArc (COLA, regarding Snit): "I'm not sure "troll" does it
justice- more like a black hole! But hey, if we all promise to never
again even entertain an unkind thought re Apple, will you take it back
and lock it up? Please??" 11 Mar 2005

http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/e2891b1f3984e121

> unable to do anything other than be the lapdog coward I noted you are.

28- Edwin: "You've got to be out of your mind, Snit. You're the worst
troll this group has ever seen. You're a liar and a forger, and you've
almost destroyed this group single-handedly. For you to post a list of out
of context arguments, and lies, and forgeries about your enemies labled as
a "peace effort" has to be one of the craziest stunts you've pulled. It's
all about your sick need for attention, your need to be center stage at
all times. You'd publicly eat dog turd if you thought it would make people
look at you." 18 May 2007

http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/37e4a720619642a0

> Look: repeating the same meaningless quotes that say *nothing* about me
> but a lot about you.

46- hophead: "I have been reading and occasionally posting to CSMA for a
long time now, since 1995 at least. There have always been trolls and
morons, but I've never seen anything quite so disruptive as the Snit
circus. Snit will *never* back down or stop, and neither will most of his
opponents. A good kill file is your only hope." 20 Aug 2009

http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/3161a78667e299eb


> I mean, really, if you thought *I* had said something wrong you would
> quote that.

133- Thufir: "You can "prove" that no one has disproved your "proof"?
Again, your assertion that no one has done so is even *less* convincing
than your claim that some PDF "proves" whatever point you're trying to
make precisely because I'm familiar with your MO. That is, you're a
dumb-ass who would claim that that something is proved when it's not, and
who would ignore counter-examples disproving your contention. I don't know
what this *ages old* thread is about, but I know that you're full of
shit." 21 Aug 2008

http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/5114623055c01092

> You do not even pretend to have evidence against me - you just lash out
> to suck up to your masters. How pathetic.

139- TomB (COLA): "No Snit, you were flat out lying in an attempt to make
me look bad. Do you really have to sink to that level in order to 'be
right'? If so, you're pathetic. And I don't say this because I like to say
it." 07 Feb 2010

http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/43263f575ac40353

> How many times will you use this same dishonest trolling tactic and get
> the same response?

144- Wally: "Because by your own admission "honor and honesty" are nothing
more than a "game" to you, as such not only do you wish to define the
rules, but no doubt you will also attempt to alter or bend the rules when
inevitably things do not go to your liking, for this reason I doubt anyone
would be foolish enough to play your game." 16 May 2004

http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/b9b3ed1ee20e5220

--
HPT

Snit

unread,
Aug 20, 2011, 5:35:10 PM8/20/11
to
High Plains Thumper stated in post j2p8km$5k7$3...@dont-email.me on 8/20/11
2:23 PM:

You have become a parody of yourself - unable to do anything other than be
the lapdog coward I noted you are. Look: repeating the same meaningless
quotes that say *nothing* about me but a lot about you. I mean, really, if


you thought *I* had said something wrong you would quote that.

You do not even pretend to have evidence against me - you just lash out to
suck up to your masters. How pathetic. How many times will you use this


same dishonest trolling tactic and get the same response?

--
🙈🙉🙊


High Plains Thumper

unread,
Aug 20, 2011, 9:09:20 PM8/20/11
to

Yeah, on second thought you were correct. Wading through Snit really
dirtied my nickers, now that stench follows me everywhere. It just does
not know how to die.

--
HPT
120- Sermo Malifer (COLA): Snit: "Why do so many people in COLA argue
*against* me..." Sermo Malifer: "Because you're a narcissistic troll who
posts trash just to get people talking about you." 21 Jan 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/5ddf14f502e9b3f1

Snit

unread,
Aug 20, 2011, 9:15:14 PM8/20/11
to
High Plains Thumper stated in post j2pls0$d2$1...@dont-email.me on 8/20/11 6:09
PM:

> White Spirit wrote:
>> High Plains Thumper wrote:
>>> Snit wrote:
>>
>>>> Hey, just yesterday you talked about coming to my town to "meet" me...
>>>> with your biking buddy or whatever. Clearly a veiled threat.
>>
>>> Snit Michael Glasser, being the liar that you are, you have just
>>> verified what others have been stating about your quote mangling. What
>>> was actually stated:
>>
>>> HPT: "I'm planning a motorcycle trip to Phoenix, AZ to visit with a
>>> fellow motorcyclist. How about it, Snit? I can stop by and visit with
>>> you. You can talk to me face to face and share with me just what you
>>> did just now."
>>
>> Why is Snit so incapable of recognising what a pissy, whiny little bitch
>> he comes across as?
>>
>> I'd recommend you wash the the dirty pile of Snit from the bottom of
>> your shoes and henceforth be careful what you step in as it will stick
>> to you and follow you around if you're not careful.
>
> Yeah, on second thought you were correct. Wading through Snit really
> dirtied my nickers, now that stench follows me everywhere. It just does
> not know how to die.

The fact is I called you on your BS:

* You repeatedly accuse me of having forged the video on copying and pasting
(and others videos and images)
* You repeatedly accuse me of posting as Joel Crumpp (and other names).
* You repeatedly quote the obsessively scavenged and forged quotes of
the lowest scum of CSMA and dishonestly pretend they represent something
about me.

You have been doing this for years; completely unable to stop yourself from
sucking up to utter scum. You are a lapdog coward... and you cry about
"verbal abuse" when you are told how pathetic you are.

--
🙈🙉🙊


High Plains Thumper

unread,
Aug 20, 2011, 11:08:35 PM8/20/11
to
Clogwog wrote:
> "High Plains Thumper" schreef...

These are examples of:

[quote]
Cyberstalking is the use of the Internet or other electronic means to
stalk or harass an individual, a group of individuals, or an
organization. It may include false accusations, monitoring, making
threats, identity theft, damage to data or equipment, the solicitation of
minors for sex, or gathering information in order to harass. The
definition of "harassment" must meet the criterion that a reasonable
person, in possession of the same information, would regard it as
sufficient to cause another reasonable person distress.[1] Cyberstalking
is different from spatial or offline stalking, however it sometimes leads
to it, or is accompanied by it.[2]

[...]

A number of key factors have been identified:

* False accusations. Many cyberstalkers try to damage the reputation
of their victim and turn other people against them. They post false
information about them on websites. They may set up their own websites,
blogs or user pages for this purpose. They post allegations about the
victim to newsgroups, chat rooms or other sites that allow public
contributions, such as Wikipedia or Amazon.com.[5]
* Attempts to gather information about the victim. Cyberstalkers may
approach their victim's friends, family and work colleagues to obtain
personal information. They may advertise for information on the Internet,
or hire a private detective. They often will monitor the victim's online
activities and attempt to trace their IP address in an effort to gather
more information about their victims. [6]
* Encouraging others to harass the victim. Many cyberstalkers try to
involve third parties in the harassment. They may claim the victim has
harmed the stalker or his/her family in some way, or may post the
victim's name and telephone number in order to encourage others to join
the pursuit.
* False victimization. The cyberstalker will claim that the victim is
harassing him/her. Bocij writes that this phenomenon has been noted in a
number of well-known cases.
[/quote]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyberstalking

Why have you been cyber stalking me for the past half decade, Mr.
anonymous coward Clogwog? Why have you been posting my employment
information against my wishes, troll?

--
HPT

Snit

unread,
Aug 21, 2011, 12:43:48 AM8/21/11
to
High Plains Thumper stated in post j2psrj$3v3$1...@dont-email.me on 8/20/11
8:08 PM:

And you have been doing this. Using quotes from 2004, many of them forged.
Speaking of knowing where I live. Lying about me repeatedly. Those are all
forms of harassment. You are putting pressure on me so I will do as your
masters wish.

So, yes, HPT, you are harassing me. And I have asked you many times to
stop. You refuse.

> It may include false accusations

Such as your accusations I posted falsified videos about cutting and pasting
- and more.

>, monitoring,

Such as repeating quotes about me from 2004 and since.

> making threats,

Such as saying you will come visit a "biker" friend near me and stop by to
say hello

> identity theft, damage to data or equipment, the solicitation of
> minors for sex, or gathering information in order to harass.

The quotes are a form of data gathering. So, yes, again - you are harassing
me.

> The definition of "harassment" must meet the criterion that a reasonable
> person, in possession of the same information, would regard it as sufficient
> to cause another reasonable person distress.

I have repeatedly told you I do not like you lying about me. I do not like
you repeating meaningless derogatory quotes. I do not like your harassment.

So stop.

> [1] Cyberstalking is different from spatial or offline stalking, however it
> sometimes leads to it, or is accompanied by it.[2]
>
> [...]
>
> A number of key factors have been identified:
>
> * False accusations. Many cyberstalkers try to damage the reputation
> of their victim and turn other people against them. They post false
> information about them on websites. They may set up their own websites,
> blogs or user pages for this purpose. They post allegations about the
> victim to newsgroups, chat rooms or other sites that allow public
> contributions, such as Wikipedia or Amazon.com.[5]

As you have been doing. For year.

False accusations of forgery, such as with the copy/paste video.

False accusations of sock usage, such as with Joel Crumpp

You have been harassing me for years and I have asked you to stop.

> * Attempts to gather information about the victim. Cyberstalkers may
> approach their victim's friends, family and work colleagues to obtain
> personal information. They may advertise for information on the Internet,
> or hire a private detective. They often will monitor the victim's online
> activities and attempt to trace their IP address in an effort to gather
> more information about their victims. [6]

You repeat quotes that are many years old. Clearly you and your masters
track me and comments about me.

You have been harassing me for years and I have asked you to stop.

> * Encouraging others to harass the victim. Many cyberstalkers try to
> involve third parties in the harassment. They may claim the victim has
> harmed the stalker or his/her family in some way, or may post the
> victim's name and telephone number in order to encourage others to join
> the pursuit.

You and your masters work in groups... involving others. You also make
false accusations against me claiming I have harmed you or others.

You have been harassing me for years and I have asked you to stop.

> * False victimization. The cyberstalker will claim that the victim is
> harassing him/her. Bocij writes that this phenomenon has been noted in a
> number of well-known cases.
> [/quote]
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyberstalking

You have done so against me many times.

You have been harassing me for years and I have asked you to stop.

> Why have you been cyber stalking me for the past half decade, Mr.
> anonymous coward Clogwog? Why have you been posting my employment
> information against my wishes, troll?

In post 498b8ed9$0$3339$6e1e...@read.cnntp.org you made references to my
employer and talked about contacting him and telling him lies, with the
clear intent to affect my work life.

You did much the same in posts 49d93f5e$0$3336$6e1e...@read.cnntp.org,
grbucv$e1u$1...@news.albasani.net, 49e1fc4a$0$29140$6e1e...@read.cnntp.org,
gs9h6s$i8a$1...@news.motzarella.org, gu999g$stj$1...@news.motzarella.org,
d3bf3529-4d5d-4950...@p23g2000vbl.googlegroups.com,
hlvtio$ucr$1...@news.eternal-september.org,
4d48ada9$0$4319$6e1e...@read.cnntp.org, and more.

In posts 4a9f2cd6$0$4424$6e1e...@read.cnntp.org and many of the above (and
others) you backed others as they did much the same... showing how you
encourage others to harass me as well.

You have been harassing me for years and I have asked you to stop.

Will you please do so now?

--
🙈🙉🙊


High Plains Thumper

unread,
Aug 21, 2011, 6:51:05 AM8/21/11
to
Snit wrote:
> High Plains Thumper stated:

Horse poop, simply rubbish. It is you, Snit, that provoke people into
unending dialogues provoked by you that turn into a Snit circus of
pathological lies. Those quotes are not forged. They are archived in
Google Groups, links are provided so those can research your trolling.
You don't seem to understand that all the posting community of advocacy
groups want is for you to stop your trolling.

The list of 155 individual poster quotes on the Snit Circus of
Pathological Lies may be found here:

HTTP://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/e8f6779ca6d385b9

>> It may include false accusations
>
> Such as your accusations I posted falsified videos about cutting and
> pasting - and more.

Liar. You did forge evidence. Lusotec and RonB summarised your trolling
so precisely here:

75- Lusotec (COLA): "You have started threads on this subject many times,
and many times it has been explained to you how X copy & paste should
work and how bugs in a application are not bugs in the system, but still
you return to this subject and post the same false statements." 09 Mar
2011

http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/37032133fbe9db92

RonB (COLA): "Original subject line now killfiled. You can only talk
about the freaking clipboard for so many million freaking messages. As I
said, Snit has no common-sense, STOP mechanism. He's a mechanically
obsessive super crank and will go on forever. I'm not kidding about this,
he will *NEVER* *ever* stop." 6 Mar 2011

http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/0df1e0164a8b586e

>>, monitoring,
>
> Such as repeating quotes about me from 2004 and since.

Posting of your abuses, off-topic rants is not monitoring, it is
discovery.

>> making threats,
>
> Such as saying you will come visit a "biker" friend near me and stop by
> to say hello

Now, you are really off your rocker with your lie. I have explained this
several times to counter your FUD, you still continue with the same lie.
You verbally assaulted me with:

Snit: "You are a coward - shaking in your cowards' shoes over actually
having to have a reasoned discussion. So you repeat the same lies over
and over and over just to get attention from me and approval from the
herd. And, as a coward, you run *every* time you are asked to support
your BS. Every single time."

http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/2380ad4fd49f69ba

To which I responded:

HPT: "I'm planning a motorcycle trip to Phoenix, AZ to visit with a fellow
motorcyclist. How about it, Snit? I can stop by and visit with you. You
can talk to me face to face and share with me just what you did just now."

http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/2fe37b961bff54ce

Then you added your lie, your spin:

Snit: "The concept of a "veiled" threat completely escapes you. He was

clearly angry with me that I was calling him out in his BS (the very BS
he has been spewing for *years* that you have never called him out on)
and then he, in reaction to that, said he would be in my town with a
biker buddy and wanted to come 'talk' to me. It is like someone getting
their BS called out in a bar and then them saying 'Let's step outside...
I am going out there to meet with a buddy'. The *obvious* implication is
physical violence."

http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/26dd310cfb6486a1

To which I responded:

HPT: "Fight you? Being the pansy you really are, you aren't even worth the


effort. You couldn't fight your way out of a brown paper sack if someone
wetted it. Remember Snit, it was you who provoked the situation with your
insulting words. It is you seeking a fight. It is you with the bar room
talk."

http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/80492b88621a9f29

You stated a lie, then ad hominem attacked me with your insult:

Snit: "Now HPT has backed away from that - *HARD*. When he realized his

threat was being called out, he went to whining that I will not entertain
a complete and total lapdog coward such as himself. Poor guy."

http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/26dd310cfb6486a1

To which I responded:

HPT: "I said nothing of the sort. My offer is still good. I drop by your

house. You can tell me the insulting words to my face that you do hiding
behind your keyboard. Chances are you can't, because you are a coward.
Simple."

http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/80492b88621a9f29

It is you Snit, that show the marks of a cyberstalker, not me.

>> identity theft, damage to data or equipment, the solicitation of minors
>> for sex, or gathering information in order to harass.
>
> The quotes are a form of data gathering. So, yes, again - you are
> harassing me.

Liar. You don't seem to get it. The quote list of 155 posters are
complaints about your trolling, your unreasonableness as a poster, your
harassments, you abuses.

HTTP://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/e8f6779ca6d385b9

>> The definition of "harassment" must meet the criterion that a
>> reasonable person, in possession of the same information, would regard
>> it as sufficient to cause another reasonable person distress.
>
> I have repeatedly told you I do not like you lying about me. I do not
> like you repeating meaningless derogatory quotes. I do not like your
> harassment. So stop.

It is you Snit, that doesn't know when to stop. It is you Snit, that
cause others distress.

108- Rapskat (cola): "For instance, your sig you reference a long
standing war you have going with some person from csma. It's like you
single out persons to target your attentions upon and then continuously
berate them with constant barbs and goads to perpetuate their acrimonious
responses, which in turn you respond in kind, etc. ad infinitum. Above
all things, your affinity for Macs and your overbearing pompous nature
aside, this is what convinces me that your primary purpose for
frequenting this and other groups is to troll." 07 Sep 2005

http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/a09c6b8e3e63f42d

93- notlisted (COLA): "I actually like Apple. But I see you as an
asshole who spends an embarassing percentage of your life posting
derogatory comments about a computer operating system you obviously
detest, and insulting those who defend it in a newsgroup dedicated its
advocacy. That's almost the definition of being an asshole, and you have
half a dozen buddies who do the same thing. You excuse what you do by
pretending that you're merely pointing out problems in the hope that the
system will be improved, but that's an obvious lie whether it's you
saying it or one of your buds. You do it because you enjoy the feeling
it gives you, whatever that is." 07 Mar 2011

http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/90b57eaa796e8b14

>> [1] Cyberstalking is different from spatial or offline stalking,
>> however it sometimes leads to it, or is accompanied by it.[2]
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> A number of key factors have been identified:
>>
>> * False accusations. Many cyberstalkers try to damage the
>> reputation of their victim and turn other people against them. They
>> post false information about them on websites. They may set up their
>> own websites, blogs or user pages for this purpose. They post
>> allegations about the victim to newsgroups, chat rooms or other sites
>> that allow public contributions, such as Wikipedia or Amazon.com.[5]
>
> As you have been doing. For year.

No Snit, I posted the truth, something you are incapable of.

> False accusations of forgery, such as with the copy/paste video.

I have posted the truth about this and you continue with the same lies.

> False accusations of sock usage, such as with Joel Crumpp

You are a liar. I posted the truth, Sandman, Tim Adams, Wally, Peter
Kohlmann, Steve MacKay, and Steve Carroll to name a few posted the truth
about your sock usage, which you continue to deny.

27- Edward Stanfield: "Snit thinks the rules that apply to honest and
honorable people apply to him. That is absurd. He is the biggest liar
in Usenet history. Mackay posted the email to prove Snit was using sock
puppets and he still is. Snit can not give up his socks puppets and
shills. They are the only ones who ever support him." 28 Jan 2009

http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/5b52494d96d12229

105- Peter Kohlmann (cola): "Snot Glasser is invading this group with his
inane drivel, so he has to bear what people think about that dishonest
retard. And just for the record: You *are* a Glasser sock" 30 Jan 2010

http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/f3166f6fda92641b

> You have been harassing me for years and I have asked you to stop.

Why are you harassing me, Snit? You don't know how to stop. It is you who
exhibit the characteristics of a stalker.

>> * Attempts to gather information about the victim. Cyberstalkers
>> may approach their victim's friends, family and work colleagues to
>> obtain personal information. They may advertise for information on the
>> Internet, or hire a private detective. They often will monitor the
>> victim's online activities and attempt to trace their IP address in an
>> effort to gather more information about their victims. [6]
>
> You repeat quotes that are many years old. Clearly you and your masters
> track me and comments about me.
>
> You have been harassing me for years and I have asked you to stop.

Why do you keep attacking posters with acrimonious comments and goading
them on, Snit?

>> * Encouraging others to harass the victim. Many cyberstalkers try
>> to involve third parties in the harassment. They may claim the victim
>> has harmed the stalker or his/her family in some way, or may post the
>> victim's name and telephone number in order to encourage others to join
>> the pursuit.
>
> You and your masters work in groups... involving others. You also make
> false accusations against me claiming I have harmed you or others.
> You have been harassing me for years and I have asked you to stop.

See my next comment.

>> * False victimization. The cyberstalker will claim that the victim
>> is harassing him/her. Bocij writes that this phenomenon has been noted
>> in a number of well-known cases.
>> [/quote]
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyberstalking
>
> You have done so against me many times.

Except that it is you, Snit that carry on this tirade of false
victimisation. It is you, Snit that attack others, like you have me. It
is you Snit that stalk individuals, posting your acrimonious ad hominem
insults without provocation. I find this summary most apt about you:

[quote]
I haven't paid too much interest in his political views. What caught my
attention was his trolling in COLA. At first it started out as a normal
conversation, then quickly degraded into Snit making ad hominem attacks
and claiming that everyone he encounters is a liar.

Then I found out about his trolling CSMA similar to COLA, and the poster
quotes. About the time I found out, 2 or 3 years ago, it was at about
100 quotes. Now it has grown to nearly 140. 40 new posters.

What I find weird is his supporting worst known COLA trolls such as
flatfish, Hadron, etc. It just goes to show that he is nothing more
than a troll himself, destined for the kill bin.

I found it interesting how he posted disrespectfully with Elizabot to
include stalking, his false accusations about your alleged girl friend,
etc.

I find this rule most apt:

31- George Graves: "Jason. You have started an argument with the Snit
(AKA Michael Glasser), this should not be done. He will drive you crazy
with his twisted logic, his deep-rooted need to be ALWAYS right at any
cost. He will move goalposts, set up strawmen, and bore you into
submission with his endless pedanticism. The only way to engage him is
to hit and run. NEVER engage him, it's a futile, empty procedure that
will only anger you and feed him. Take my advice and STAY AWAY!"
27 Oct 2004

http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/3d3af33ce25a11fd

Rarely now do I directly reply to Snit. It is just not worth it,
because nothing will penetrate the thick wax in his ears.
[/quote]

Subject: Re: ZnU's Bane: Dreamwever for professional development
Date: Sat, 06 Mar 2010 22:47:39 -0700

http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/80c0418ccc864773

You still haven't answered why you stalked Elizabot:

Snit: "In the course of the discussion you felt the "need" to start
telling me about your private life."

Elizabot v2.0.2: "Liar. I mentioned receiving strange phone calls from
your home area and how I'm considering contacting the police."

Snit: "Are these calls not a part of your private life? I suppose
not, at least not any more, now that you have made them public.
Again, let me be very clear: I do not want to know about your private
life even if you make it public. I do not care who calls you. I do
not care who you call. I do not care what you do for entertainment -
what movies you go to, who you 'hang out' with, what you do for a
living... I do not care. I do not want to know. I do not want you to
discuss any of this with me."

Elizabot v2.0.2: "If I find that the phone number that I'm getting
these phone calls is from someone who knows you or can be associated
with you somehow, you'll hear from your local police."

Snit: "And if I get a hemorrhoid shaped like your face my proctologist
will contact you (not that I care what you even look like or what
gender you really are)."

Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.advocacy
From: Snit <SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID>
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 22:32:40 -0700
Subject: Re: Steve Carroll v. Justice Black

http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/e9f816395e34b755

You are nothing but a hideous troll whose end goals are to disrupt this
newsgroup.

* PLINQUE *

--
HPT

Snit

unread,
Aug 21, 2011, 10:39:02 AM8/21/11
to
High Plains Thumper stated in post j2qnup$f38$1...@dont-email.me on 8/21/11
3:51 AM:

The fact is I called you on your BS:

* You repeatedly accuse me of having forged the video on copying and pasting
(and others videos and images)
* You repeatedly accuse me of posting as Joel Crumpp (and other names).
* You repeatedly quote the obsessively scavenged and forged quotes of
the lowest scum of CSMA and dishonestly pretend they represent something

about me.

You have been doing this for years; completely unable to stop yourself from


sucking up to utter scum. You are a lapdog coward... and you cry about
"verbal abuse" when you are told how pathetic you are.

I have repeatedly asked you to cease your abuse and you refuse. I will
repeat the request now - please stop harassing me.


--
🙈🙉🙊


Clogwog

unread,
Aug 21, 2011, 4:25:56 PM8/21/11
to
"High Plains Thumper" <h...@invalid.invalid> schreef in bericht
news:j2psrj$3v3$1...@dont-email.me...

Your sensibilities are so noted, you brainless whining pansy-arsed
cunt-wipe.

> Why have you been posting my employment
> information against my wishes, troll?
>

I don't need your "permission" to post information that's available on the
Internet, you whining pussy! (Kuttekop)
In fact I post whatever I want.
b.t.w.
You are one of the filthiest whining sociopaths I've ever encountered on
usenet.
And you have quite some competition in that regard, having sewer filth like
Peter Kuntmann, "turd" chrisv, Willy Boaster or [H]omer AKA [M]oron as
competing scum.
--
HPT - Netnanny, the final boss of the internet:
http://tinyurl.com/I-PWN-TEH-USENETS

High Plains Thumper

unread,
Aug 22, 2011, 10:55:23 PM8/22/11
to

Why the vile, uncalled for ad hominem attack directed toward me, Clogwog?

>> Why have you been posting my employment information against my wishes,
>> troll?
>>
> I don't need your "permission" to post information that's available on
> the Internet, you whining pussy! (Kuttekop) In fact I post whatever I
> want.

But not legally. And the Dutch are the first to comply with cracking
anonymisation:

[quote]
Interception of communications is regulated by the criminal code and
requires a court order. [fn 61] In November 1997, XS4ALL, a Dutch ISP,
refused to conduct a broad wiretap of electronic communications of one of
their subscribers. A bill to expand wiretapping powers to require that
all telecommunications services make their systems wiretap capable was
approved by the Lower Chamber of the Dutch Parliament in April 1998.
[/quote]

http://gilc.org/privacy/survey/surveylz.html

> b.t.w.
> You are one of the filthiest whining sociopaths I've ever encountered on
> usenet.

This is FUD. It describes you perfectly.

> And you have quite some competition in that regard, having sewer filth
> like Peter Kuntmann, "turd" chrisv, Willy Boaster or [H]omer AKA [M]oron
> as competing scum.

[quote]
There are limits to the First Amendment – The old adage “free speech
doesn’t mean that you can shout “fire” in a crowded theater” applies
here. You cannot just preface a libel with “in my opinion” (i.e. IMHO,
John murdered three people). The most common defense in a false light
action is to claim First Amendment freedom of speech, but the courts are
quite clear about offering no protection for false speech:

"false speech, even political speech, does not merit constitutional
protection if the speaker knows of the falsehood or recklessly disregards
the truth."
[/quote]

http://www.dba-oracle.com/internet_defamation_privacy_libel_laws.htm

EU has similar laws regarding reckless disregard for the truth, which you
so criminally disdain.

--
HPT

Snit

unread,
Aug 22, 2011, 11:03:36 PM8/22/11
to
High Plains Thumper stated in post j2v4qr$hd7$1...@dont-email.me on 8/22/11
7:55 PM:

>> And you have quite some competition in that regard, having sewer filth
>> like Peter Kuntmann, "turd" chrisv, Willy Boaster or [H]omer AKA [M]oron
>> as competing scum.
>
> [quote]
> There are limits to the First Amendment – The old adage “free speech
> doesn’t mean that you can shout “fire” in a crowded theater” applies
> here. You cannot just preface a libel with “in my opinion” (i.e. IMHO,
> John murdered three people). The most common defense in a false light
> action is to claim First Amendment freedom of speech, but the courts are
> quite clear about offering no protection for false speech:
>
> "false speech, even political speech, does not merit constitutional
> protection if the speaker knows of the falsehood or recklessly disregards
> the truth."
> [/quote]

And yet you lie about me often. How do you defend that action?


--
🙈🙉🙊


William Poaster

unread,
Aug 23, 2011, 6:48:25 AM8/23/11
to
High Plains Thumper wrote:

> Clogwog wrote:
>> "High Plains Thumper" schreef...
>>> Clogwog wrote:
>>>> "High Plains Thumper" schreef...
>>>>> KUTLOZE SCHEEFGEPOEPTE (arse-less twisted poop) wrote:

<snip>

>> b.t.w.
>> You are one of the filthiest whining sociopaths I've ever encountered on
>> usenet.
>
> This is FUD. It describes you perfectly.

Sure does.

>> And you have quite some competition in that regard, having sewer filth
>> like Peter Kuntmann, "turd" chrisv, Willy Boaster or [H]omer AKA [M]oron
>> as competing scum.

Coming from the " Clogwog" troll, that's funny, when the trolling f#ckwit
has flatfish, Snit, Hadron, & various other jerks for company.

Hey! He's even mangled my nym wrong,
that should be "Dumb Willy Boaster". ;-)


> [quote]
> There are limits to the First Amendment – The old adage “free speech
> doesn’t mean that you can shout “fire” in a crowded theater” applies
> here. You cannot just preface a libel with “in my opinion” (i.e. IMHO,
> John murdered three people). The most common defense in a false light
> action is to claim First Amendment freedom of speech, but the courts are
> quite clear about offering no protection for false speech:
>
> "false speech, even political speech, does not merit constitutional
> protection if the speaker knows of the falsehood or recklessly disregards
> the truth."
> [/quote]
>
> http://www.dba-oracle.com/internet_defamation_privacy_libel_laws.htm
>
> EU has similar laws regarding reckless disregard for the truth, which you
> so criminally disdain.
>

--
In the professional world of astronomy
Linux is ubiquitous.
Nick Howes - Royal Astronomical Society.
& technical consultant to GEO (Spain).

chrisv

unread,
Aug 23, 2011, 7:51:45 AM8/23/11
to
William Poaster wrote:

> High Plains Thumper wrote:


>>
>> ToiletClog wrote:
>>>
>>> You are one of the filthiest whining sociopaths I've ever encountered on
>>> usenet.
>>
>> This is FUD. It describes you perfectly.
>
>Sure does.

It's trolling 101 - call the other guy exactly what you are. So, the
mentally-ill, pathological liar Flatshit calls us "pathlogical liars",
the biggest hypocrite in here, "Ezekiel", calls us "hypocrites", etc.

>>> And you have quite some competition in that regard, having sewer filth
>>> like Peter Kuntmann, "turd" chrisv, Willy Boaster or [H]omer AKA [M]oron
>>> as competing scum.
>
>Coming from the " Clogwog" troll, that's funny, when the trolling f#ckwit
>has flatfish, Snit, Hadron, & various other jerks for company.

Their mothers would be quite "proud" to know exactly what kind of
lying scum they have raised...

Snit

unread,
Aug 23, 2011, 10:10:01 AM8/23/11
to
chrisv stated in post io4757d252qcivhov...@4ax.com on 8/23/11
4:51 AM:

Staaaaaaampeeeeeeeed!!!!!


--
🙈🙉🙊


Snit

unread,
Aug 23, 2011, 10:15:14 AM8/23/11
to
William Poaster stated in post p4dci8-...@linuxnetwork.alpha.org on
8/23/11 3:48 AM:

> High Plains Thumper wrote:
>
>> Clogwog wrote:
>>> "High Plains Thumper" schreef...
>>>> Clogwog wrote:
>>>>> "High Plains Thumper" schreef...
>>>>>> KUTLOZE SCHEEFGEPOEPTE (arse-less twisted poop) wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
>>> b.t.w.
>>> You are one of the filthiest whining sociopaths I've ever encountered on
>>> usenet.
>>
>> This is FUD. It describes you perfectly.
>
> Sure does.
>
>>> And you have quite some competition in that regard, having sewer filth
>>> like Peter Kuntmann, "turd" chrisv, Willy Boaster or [H]omer AKA [M]oron
>>> as competing scum.
>
> Coming from the " Clogwog" troll, that's funny, when the trolling f#ckwit
> has flatfish, Snit, Hadron, & various other jerks for company.
>
> Hey! He's even mangled my nym wrong,
> that should be "Dumb Willy Boaster". ;-)

Staaaaaaampeeeeeeeed!!!!!


--
🙈🙉🙊


0 new messages