rooster is a 14 karat dumb ass
JRC
on aircraft weighing 12,500
or more------Two threads refined into one right here Ta da 0~;->
Jerry K.
wrote:
>And Jerry K lives in fear the TSA will ban him from large loads like
>on aircraft weighing 12,500
>or more------Two threads refined into one right here
Let's not stop there - how many years you have in skydiving before you
saw that 48way you were on from the ground?
...bsrp
...jlk
JRC
> On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 13:09:48 -0800 (PST), JRC <chung...@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
> >And Jerry K lives in fear the TSA will ban him from large loads like
> >on aircraft weighing 12,500
> >or more------Two threads refined into one right here
>
> Let's not stop there - how many years you have in skydiving before you
> saw that 48way you were on from the ground?
>
> ...bsrp
> ...jlk
Heh get your name off the no fly list and quit harassing the TSA
unless you plan on doing 48 ways out of more than one plane the rest
of your life...Don't see whats wrong with it really, thats the way its
been done for years---Straighten up and fly right booty boy and maybe
I'll put in a good word for you with the Government 0~;-*
JRC
> saw that 48way you were on from the ground?
>
> ...bsrp
> ...jlk
had to be about six, I was always thinking it only took two years for
me to get my D but it may have been four.....ummm by 96 I had had it a
couple of years give or take. I think this is where you got confused
before kid,,,,It can happen I mean reading every post I ever made over
and over again has to cause some kind of brain malfunction---Thinking
thats what you have given yourself down there in the
Archives......Some kind of brain damage or at least a nervous tick or
something Your concerned hero ~Unkle Snuffy~
Jerry K.
wrote:
>On Feb 17, 6:57 pm, Jerry K. <sky...@pdq.net> wrote:
>> On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 13:09:48 -0800 (PST), JRC <chung...@yahoo.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >And Jerry K lives in fear the TSA will ban him from large loads like
>> >on aircraft weighing 12,500
>> >or more------Two threads refined into one right here
>>
>> Let's not stop there - how many years you have in skydiving before you
>> saw that 48way you were on from the ground?
>>
>> ...bsrp
>> ...jlk
>
>Heh get your name off the no fly list and quit harassing the TSA
>unless you plan on doing 48 ways out of more than one plane the rest
>of your life.
But my name was never and has never been on any no fly list, no one is
harassing the TSA, and if the TSA proposals become law, there will not
be a single airplane rated in the United States to carry 48 people to
altitude available for 48 skydivers wishing to skydive out of a single
aircraft.
>..Don't see whats wrong with it really, thats the way its
>been done for years-
No, the way it's been done "for years" is any aircraft owner in this
country who was interested in providing an aircraft for skydiving
could provide his aircraft for skydiving, and any dz in this country
which was interested in having an aircraft for skydiving could have an
aircraft for skydiving, and any skydiver in this country interested in
jumping from a larger aircraft could jump from a larger aircraft -
all without the responsibility for implementing and maintaining
airline level security infrastructure or the requirement to pass
through airline level security screenings before boarding such an
aircraft could occur.
>--Straighten up and fly right booty boy and maybe
>I'll put in a good word for you with the Government
And maybe monkeys will fly out your ass, too, wackjob. But, feel free
to expound on how your relationship with the government is anything
but unexceptional.
...bsrp
...jlk
Jerry K.
wrote:
>On Feb 17, 6:57 pm, Jerry K. <sky...@pdq.net> wrote:
>> Let's not stop there - how many years you have in skydiving before you
>> saw that 48way you were on from the ground?
>>
>> ...bsrp
>> ...jlk
>
>had to be about six,
How could that be since in 1995 you said you had been jumping for two
years. So, starting in 1993, that would mean that it was in 1999 when
you saw that 48way you said you were on from the ground. But that
can't be because you stroked out in 1996. "About six?" Pathetic
lying wackjob.
>I was always thinking it only took two years for
>me to get my D but it may have been four.
But how could that be since in 1995 you said you had been jumping for
two years. So, starting in 1993, that would mean that it was in 1997
you got your D. But that can't be because you stroked out in 1996.
"may have been four?" Pathetic lying wackjob.
>...ummm by 96 I had had it a
>couple of years give or take.
So, you started in 1993 and had your D by 1994.
>I think this is where you got confused
>before kid,
Just going with your own words, Jinnie - but what's confused clearly
is yourself - at least in terms of you reconciling statements which
contradict each other.
>,,,It can happen I mean reading every post I ever made over
>and over again has to cause some kind of brain malfunction-
Where'd you get the idea that I ever read "every post (you) ever made
over and over again, wackjob?
>--Thinking
>thats what you have given yourself down there in the
>Archives.
The time in the archives is very minimal. Simply a function (well,
simple for most people -----> not you) of a keyword search via various
parameters and presto, what you say vs. waht you said and while the
results are never petty, they are often funny as shit - especiallyy
when you go into your requisite chickendance trying to qualify or
rationalize how the clear lies you got going on aren't lies at all -
just taken out of context.
>.....Some kind of brain damage or at least a nervous tick or
>something
You're projecting again, wackjob. Tough luck for you what you said
hasn't been matching what you say. People got a word for people who
stoop so low - liar.
...bsrp
...jlk
the unknown flailer
> On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 18:17:36 -0800 (PST), JRC <chung...@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> >On Feb 17, 6:57 pm, Jerry K. <sky...@pdq.net> wrote:
> >> On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 13:09:48 -0800 (PST), JRC <chung...@yahoo.com>
> >> wrote:
>
> >> >And Jerry K lives in fear the TSA will ban him from large loads like
> >> >on aircraft weighing 12,500
> >> >or more------Two threads refined into one right here
>
>
> >unless you plan on doing 48 ways out of more than one plane the rest
> >of your life.
>
> But my name was never and has never been on any no fly list,
> ...bsrp
> ...jlk- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Won't be long, here you are thwarting Government efforts to protect
the public.
Well shit kid, you might as well go down to the Post Office and
register as
a lobbyist for terrorist rights---And there goes your video scam
chiseler
Jerry K.
<thu...@iwon.com> wrote:
>On Feb 17, 9:34 pm, Jerry K. <sky...@pdq.net> wrote:
>> On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 18:17:36 -0800 (PST), JRC <chung...@yahoo.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >On Feb 17, 6:57 pm, Jerry K. <sky...@pdq.net> wrote:
>> >> On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 13:09:48 -0800 (PST), JRC <chung...@yahoo.com>
>> >> wrote:
>>
>> >> >And Jerry K lives in fear the TSA will ban him from large loads like
>> >> >on aircraft weighing 12,500
>> >> >or more------Two threads refined into one right here
>>
>>
>> >Heh get your name off the no fly list and quit harassing the TSA
>> >unless you plan on doing 48 ways out of more than one plane the rest
>> >of your life.
>>
>> But my name was never and has never been on any no fly list,
>
>> ...bsrp
>> ...jlk- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
>Won't be long,
So, dumbas - first you say I should get my "name off the no fly list"
and I say that it isn't on and never was and now you say it "won't be
long." First, you have contradicted yourself - moron. Said it was on
the list and then acknowledged it wasn't, as you suggested it ~will
be~ on in the future - "won't be long." So, Jinnie - have you even
been on an airliner since 911?
>here you are thwarting Government efforts to protect
>the public.
Cut the crap. wackjob. Spreading awareness of a government proposal,
open to the public for review and comment, is not at all "thwarting
Government efforts to protect the public." Pull your head out your
ass.
>Well shit kid, you might as well go down to the Post Office and
>register as
>a lobbyist for terrorist rights--
There has been no lobbying for a single entity whatsoever, so cut that
crap, too, wackjob. Describing a government proposal and outlining
the potentialities if said proposal is implemented is not lobbying in
the slightest, but on that note, with as stridently as you are
chickendancing your own lobby - the lobby of marginalization so you
feel less marginalized yourself, it is truely remarkable how high,
shrill, and desperate you've been keening as of late.
>-And there goes your video scam
>chiseler
Oh, ~you'll show me~, wackjob. You'll show everyone. The
government's going to get me because you say I'm "lobbyist for
terrorist rights." What happened to the IRS taking me away because
you said I was a tax fraud? What happened to your asisnine suggestion
that I'd pull a suicide? Keep on dreaming for that outside
intervention to pull your dumb ass out of the middle of that hot, oily
fire you made and then subsequently faceplanted yourself into.
Wackjob.
...bsrp
...jlk
the unknown flailer
> On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 11:57:14 -0800 (PST), the unknown flailer
>
> Oh, ~you'll show me~, wackjob. You'll show everyone. The
> government's going to get me because you say I'm "lobbyist for
> terrorist rights." What happened to the IRS taking me away because
> you said I was a tax fraud?
>
> ...bsrp
> ...jlk- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
No matter to me, either way you go down benefits anyone entering the
sport through GU skydiving...One less parasite for novices to deal
with....I see the economy finishing you off around the DZ before the
Government gets a chance to do it though.
Jerry K.
<thu...@iwon.com> wrote:
>On Feb 19, 4:14 pm, Jerry K. <sky...@pdq.net> wrote:
>> On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 11:57:14 -0800 (PST), the unknown flailer
>
>>
>> Oh, ~you'll show me~, wackjob. You'll show everyone. The
>> government's going to get me because you say I'm "lobbyist for
>> terrorist rights." What happened to the IRS taking me away because
>> you said I was a tax fraud?
>>
>> ...bsrp
>> ...jlk- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
>No matter to me,
Jinnie is very open minded when it comes to his fantasies.
>either way you go down benefits anyone entering the
>sport through GU skydiving...
Keep on dreaming, wackjob, and explain how such a self-stroking
fantasy of yours "benefits anyone entering the sport through GU
skydiving."
>One less parasite for novices to deal
>with.
But it is only that you ~say~ that I'm a parasite - it's not the
reality, Tough shit.
>...I see the economy finishing you off around the DZ before the
>Government gets a chance to do it though.
Ah, so now it's dreams of the economy interceding on your behalf that
keeps hope alive? And won't that be sweet for you, Jinnie - the one
who shoves your loads of crap back in your face and laughs as you make
a face and swallow the chewier brown lumps will be finished "off
around the DZ before the Government gets a chance to do it though."
Yeah, <sarcasm, dummy> and monkeys'll be flying out your fat, just
three years in skydiving ass. Wackjob.
...bsrp
...jlk
the unknown flailer
> On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 16:56:44 -0800 (PST), the unknown flailer
> >with.
>
> But it is only that you ~say~ that I'm a parasite - it's not the
> reality, Tough shit.
>
> >...I see the economy finishing you off around the DZ before the
> >Government gets a chance to do it though.
>
> Ah, so now it's dreams of the economy interceding on your behalf that
> keeps hope alive? And won't that be sweet for you, Jinnie - the one
> who shoves your loads of crap back in your face and laughs as you make
> a face and swallow the chewier brown lumps will be finished "off
> around the DZ before the Government gets a chance to do it though."
> Yeah, <sarcasm, dummy> and monkeys'll be flying out your fat, just
> three years in skydiving ass. Wackjob.
>
> ...bsrp
>
> - Show quoted text
The economy is a powerful factor in high maintenance hobby's like
skydiving.
The sport had a quick spurt of growth in the late 80's because of a
strong ecconomy...Econnomy can build or tear down, it plays no
favorites. Best
get to work on those grass cutting and toilet cleaning skills to make
yourself useful around the DZ if you plan to keep the jump numbers
climbing fancy lad. ;->
rooster
>
> - Show quoted text -
BOO!
the unknown flailer
> On Feb 19, 11:52 pm, the unknown flailer <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Feb 19, 7:04 pm, Jerry K. <sky...@pdq.net> wrote:
>
> > > On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 16:56:44 -0800 (PST), the unknown flailer
> > > >One less parasite for novices to deal
> > > >with.
>
> > > But it is only that you ~say~ that I'm a parasite - it's not the
> > > reality, Tough shit.
>
> > > >...I see the economy finishing you off around the DZ before the
> > > >Government gets a chance to do it though.
>
> > > Ah, so now it's dreams of the economy interceding on your behalf that
> > > keeps hope alive? And won't that be sweet for you, Jinnie - the one
> > > who shoves your loads of crap back in your face and laughs as you make
> > > a face and swallow the chewier brown lumps will be finished "off
> > > around the DZ before the Government gets a chance to do it though."
> > > Yeah, <sarcasm, dummy> and monkeys'll be flying out your fat, just
> > > three years in skydiving ass. Wackjob.
>
> > > ...bsrp
> > > ...jlk- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text
>
> > The economy is a powerful factor in high maintenance hobby's like
> > skydiving.
> > The sport had a quick spurt of growth in the late 80's because of a
> > favorites. Best
> > get to work on those grass cutting and toilet cleaning skills to make
> > yourself useful around the DZ if you plan to keep the jump numbers
> > climbing fancy lad. ;->- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
>
> - Show quoted text -
boo? The ecconomy is not my fault.....It was caused by several
factors: Greed & over extending personal credit being the primary
ones. Now its come back to bite you hedonistic bitch's-----Yeah no way
it can't affect skydiving because its gone past the middle class and
reached into scuppie world. Thats what yawl get for 8 years of Cheny/
Bush tsk tsk tsk
the unknown flailer
> On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 16:56:44 -0800 (PST), the unknown flailer
>
> >...I see the economy finishing you off around the DZ before the
> >Government gets a chance to do it though.
>
> Ah, so now it's dreams of the economy interceding on your behalf that
> keeps hope alive? And won't that be sweet for you, Jinnie - the one
> who shoves your loads of crap back in your face and laughs as you make
> a face and swallow the chewier brown lumps will be finished "off
> around the DZ before the Government gets a chance to do it though."
> ...jlk- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Actually no, you are my excuse to post.....Biggy Jim is to weak to
carry the load you have over the years. This mutual kill file plan of
yours? It was destined for failure. I don't care how many kill files
I'm in, never have....Regular skydivers
just out there paying for their jumps and looking to have some fun &
blow off a little weekly pressure? Or people out there teaching or
rigging because they love the sport? I hope I am in their kill
file-----They are not what I'm preaching about.
T
the unknown flailer
>
> - Show quoted text -
Acknowledgment of street theater is one thing but throwing money is
better! Waaaaaaahahahahahahahaha
Jerry K.
<thu...@iwon.com> wrote:
>On Feb 19, 7:04 pm, Jerry K. <sky...@pdq.net> wrote:
>> On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 16:56:44 -0800 (PST), the unknown flailer
>> >One less parasite for novices to deal
>> >with.
>>
>> But it is only that you ~say~ that I'm a parasite - it's not the
>> reality, Tough shit.
>>
>> >...I see the economy finishing you off around the DZ before the
>> >Government gets a chance to do it though.
>>
>> Ah, so now it's dreams of the economy interceding on your behalf that
>> keeps hope alive? And won't that be sweet for you, Jinnie - the one
>> who shoves your loads of crap back in your face and laughs as you make
>> a face and swallow the chewier brown lumps will be finished "off
>> around the DZ before the Government gets a chance to do it though."
>> Yeah, <sarcasm, dummy> and monkeys'll be flying out your fat, just
>> three years in skydiving ass. Wackjob.
>>
>> ...bsrp
>> ...jlk- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text
>
>The economy is a powerful factor in high maintenance hobby's like
>skydiving.
>The sport had a quick spurt of growth in the late 80's because of a
>strong ecconomy.
Not that you were there skydiving in the 80's ~at all~, mind you.
>..Econnomy can build or tear down, it plays no
>favorites. Best
>get to work on those grass cutting and toilet cleaning skills to make
>yourself useful around the DZ if you plan to keep the jump numbers
>climbing fancy lad.
Heh - when I need suggestions - particularly on how to keep jump
numbers climbing <sheesh> you'd be the ~last~ person I'd consult,
wackjob. It's probably best you not think about it, Jinnie, but
skydiving continues on without your participation (or input, thank
God) and as Mike wisely said, it's pretty much recession proof - that
was the time you lost control or got confused and called Mike a punk,
remember? And on that note, I too work in a profession which is also
pretty much recession proof, so don't you worry your pointy, little
head about my means for skydiving - which equates to pretty much
whenever I want to.
...bsrp
...jlk
Jerry K.
<thu...@iwon.com> wrote:
>On Feb 19, 7:04 pm, Jerry K. <sky...@pdq.net> wrote:
>> On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 16:56:44 -0800 (PST), the unknown flailer
>
>>
>> >...I see the economy finishing you off around the DZ before the
>> >Government gets a chance to do it though.
>>
>> Ah, so now it's dreams of the economy interceding on your behalf that
>> keeps hope alive? And won't that be sweet for you, Jinnie - the one
>> who shoves your loads of crap back in your face and laughs as you make
>> a face and swallow the chewier brown lumps will be finished "off
>> around the DZ before the Government gets a chance to do it though."
>
>> ...jlk- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
>Actually no, you are my excuse to post..
Cut that crap, too - you were posting your lines of crap long before I
showed up, but there you go, wackjob, you just keep on looking for
excuses to explain your wackjob behaviour and anyone other than
yourself to blame your retardedness on.
>...Biggy Jim is to weak to
>carry the load you have over the years.
Cut the crap, wackjob. The BigE posts when he feels like - just like
anyone else, but this is no carried "load," - this is throwing matches
at an over- inflated sack of methane.
>This mutual kill file plan of
>yours? It was destined for failure.
No, it was designed specifically to take advantage of your weaknesses
and isolate you in quickly recognizable threads. Further, with your
weakness to retreat to the same tired excuses and finger-pointing in
the face of the regular exposure of your lines of crap and your lies
for the intellectually dishonest and self-serving garbage that it is,
it cannot do anything but bore people in its repetivity- and thus your
footprint becomes that much smaller. And then, with as pedantically
complete the deconstruction of your lines of crap and the exposure of
your lies and the boredom this elicits, further dismissals of such
threads and the reduction of people who might post to them comes into
play. Where have all your "sheep" gone over the years, wackjob? Maybe
they're just lurking...
> I don't care how many kill files
>I'm in, never have....Regular skydivers
>just out there paying for their jumps and looking to have some fun &
>blow off a little weekly pressure? Or people out there teaching or
>rigging because they love the sport? I hope I am in their kill
>file-----They are not what I'm preaching about.
Of course they aren't as neither of those two groups of people you
describe represent you in any way, shape, or form and what you have to
say boils quickly down to it being all about you. But, it's not about
the numbers of killfiles, bonehead, but about the numbers who are
still reading your tripe and engaging you, and in so doing, affording
you opportunities to tell more lies and brag about yourself - and it
has been very few for a good while and in time it will become less
than very few. But, credit where credit's due - it never would have
worked so well without your enthusiastic, even obsessive
participation.
...bsrp
...jlk
JRC
> On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 20:52:05 -0800 (PST), the unknown flailer
>
>
>
>
>
> <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote:
> >On Feb 19, 7:04 pm, Jerry K. <sky...@pdq.net> wrote:
> >> On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 16:56:44 -0800 (PST), the unknown flailer
> >> >One less parasite for novices to deal
> >> >with.
>
> >> But it is only that you ~say~ that I'm a parasite - it's not the
> >> reality, Tough shit.
>
> >> >...I see the economy finishing you off around the DZ before the
> >> >Government gets a chance to do it though.
>
>
> >> ...bsrp
> >> ...jlk- Hide quoted text -
>
> >> - Show quoted text
>
> >The economy is a powerful factor in high maintenance hobby's like
> >skydiving.
> >The sport had a quick spurt of growth in the late 80's because of a
>
> Not that you were there skydiving in the 80's ~at all~, mind you.
>
nope but their were plenty of AFF grads left around for me to dissect
in the early 90's....Its my studied opinion they would not have
started if hanging strut was
the only option to learn...booming stock market.....raving greed and a
couple of movies gave the sport a boost in the late 80's. "The Last
Fandango" and "Point Break." Don't expect a life line like that to
come along again.....hone your DZ toilet scrubbing and grass mowing
skills Jerry
JRC
> On Fri, 20 Feb 2009 05:49:19 -0800 (PST), the unknown flailer
>
>
>
> showed up, but there you go, wackjob, you just keep on looking for
> excuses to explain your wackjob behaviour and anyone other than
> yourself to blame your retardedness on.
>
> >...Biggy Jim is to weak to
> >carry the load you have over the years.
>
> Cut the crap, wackjob.
> ...bsrp
> ...jlk- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
No you cut the grass and scrub the crapper....See I knew your skills
around the DZ needed correction
Jerry K.
wrote:
>On Feb 22, 8:47 pm, Jerry K. <sky...@pdq.net> wrote:
>> On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 20:52:05 -0800 (PST), the unknown flailer
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote:
>> >On Feb 19, 7:04 pm, Jerry K. <sky...@pdq.net> wrote:
>> >> On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 16:56:44 -0800 (PST), the unknown flailer
>> >> >One less parasite for novices to deal
>> >> >with.
>>
>> >> But it is only that you ~say~ that I'm a parasite - it's not the
>> >> reality, Tough shit.
>>
>> >> >...I see the economy finishing you off around the DZ before the
>> >> >Government gets a chance to do it though.
>>
> >>>>snip the JK bitching & crying part<<<<
Because you didn't have an answer for it, any of it, did you? You're
just ill-equipped, is all. Why do you spin fantasies like the
government is going to intercede on your behalf?
>>
>> >> ...bsrp
>> >> ...jlk- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> >> - Show quoted text
>>
>> >The economy is a powerful factor in high maintenance hobby's like
>> >skydiving.
>> >The sport had a quick spurt of growth in the late 80's because of a
>> >strong economy.
>>
>> Not that you were there skydiving in the 80's ~at all~, mind you.
>>
>
>nope but their were plenty of AFF grads left around for me to dissect
>in the early 90's.
Which would be 1993 at the earliest and not that a neophyte like you
could dissect much of anything at the time...or even later.
>...Its my studied opinion they would not have
>started if hanging strut was
>the only option to learn.
Which is relevant today how? I mean, there's static liners still
jumping, AFF grads still jumping - lots of people still jumping. But
you yourself have admitted that if you only had the choice of tandem
or AFF for a FJ, you wouldn't have done it - something about ~comfort~
level which is just a short step away from what...fear?
>..booming stock market.....raving greed and a
>couple of movies gave the sport a boost in the late 80's.
What movies do you mean?
>"The Last
>Fandango"
There was never such a movie called that but there was a film called
"Fandango" and it was released not so much in the "late 80's" but in
early 1985.
>and "Point Break."
There actually was a movie called "Point Break" (congratulations,
Jinnie - you didn't veer off the tracks on that one) but it came out
not so much in the "late 80's" but ~1991~.
>Don't expect a life line like that to
>come along again.....hone your DZ toilet scrubbing and grass mowing
>skills Jerry
Let's see now, so far you've ruminated on the IRS and/or Homeland
Security hauling me off, me offing myself, DZO's kicking me off, other
skydivers giving me the cold shoulder and running me off, and now it
is the economy which will come to your rescue and will give me my
comeuppance and keep me from skydiving for kicking your loads of crap
back into your slack, drooling rictus - plus exposing your lies. So,
with this soothing economy thing you got going where me and thousands
skydivers aren't able to skydive, you saying again you disagree with
Mike, a long time and very experienced skydiver who has voiced an
opinion concerning skydiving and recessions? Keep the answer to
yourself if you can't answer without calling Mike a punk again.
...bsrp
...jlk
Jerry K.
wrote:
>On Feb 22, 10:39 pm, Jerry K. <sky...@pdq.net> wrote:
Hell, I've helped clean the pool and wash the otter but trust Jinnie
to place paramount importance in what he knows - cleaning shitters and
watching the grass grow.
But, just to review what you snipped because you didn't have an answer
for it :
You tried to use me as an excuse for your posts but had no answer when
that got refuted.
You called the BigE "weak" for not posting or some such - that got
refuted.
You asserted the Mutuallty Assured Killfile was "destined for
failure," when the fact of the matter, as it was explained, it has
already succeeded in great degrees and will continue succeeding.
You asserted the number of kill files you were in wasn't an issue to
you but of course, it was explained to you, it's not so much the
number of killfiles you are in but the number of people remaining who
~haven't~ killfiled either you, myself, or both. And it's a small
number going south.
...bsrp
...jlk
JRC
> On Sun, 22 Feb 2009 20:53:45 -0800 (PST), JRC <chung...@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >> >> >...I see the economy finishing you off around the DZ before the
> >> >> >Government gets a chance to do it though.
>
> > >>>>snip the JK bitching & crying part<<<<
>
> Because you didn't have an answer for it, any of it, did you? You're
> just ill-equipped, is all. Why do you spin fantasies like the
> government is going to intercede on your behalf?
Not my behalf on behalf of the public
>
>
>
>
> >> >The economy is a powerful factor in high maintenance hobby's like
> >> >skydiving.
> >> >The sport had a quick spurt of growth in the late 80's because of a
> >> >strong economy.
>
> >> Not that you were there skydiving in the 80's ~at all~, mind you.
>
> >nope but their were plenty of AFF grads left around for me to dissect
> >in the early 90's.
>
> Which would be 1993 at the earliest and not that a neophyte like you
> could dissect much of anything at the time...or even later.
>
> >...Its my studied opinion they would not have
> >started if hanging strut was
> >the only option to learn.
>
> Which is relevant today how? I mean, there's static liners still
> jumping, AFF grads still jumping - lots of people still jumping.
All the frightened assholes went AFF cuz they were and are candy ass's
Mike a punk.
...bsrp
...jlk- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
WOW you sure like to call Mike punk a lot kid
Jerry K.
wrote:
>On Feb 22, 11:49 pm, Jerry K. <sky...@pdq.net> wrote:
>> On Sun, 22 Feb 2009 20:53:45 -0800 (PST), JRC <chung...@yahoo.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >> >> >...I see the economy finishing you off around the DZ before the
>> >> >> >Government gets a chance to do it though.
>>
>> > >>>>snip the JK bitching & crying part<<<<
>>
>> Because you didn't have an answer for it, any of it, did you? You're
>> just ill-equipped, is all. Why do you spin fantasies like the
>> government is going to intercede on your behalf?
>
>Not my behalf on behalf of the public
What al load of crap. You're a scared chicken clucking in a corner.
Lying to yourself. Three years and a couple hundred jumps. Wishing
you had experience and willing to lie to pretend that you did.
Wackjob.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >> >The economy is a powerful factor in high maintenance hobby's like
>> >> >skydiving.
>> >> >The sport had a quick spurt of growth in the late 80's because of a
>> >> >strong economy.
>>
>> >> Not that you were there skydiving in the 80's ~at all~, mind you.
>>
>> >nope but their were plenty of AFF grads left around for me to dissect
>> >in the early 90's.
>>
>> Which would be 1993 at the earliest and not that a neophyte like you
>> could dissect much of anything at the time...or even later.
>>
>> >...Its my studied opinion they would not have
>> >started if hanging strut was
>> >the only option to learn.
>>
>> Which is relevant today how? I mean, there's static liners still
>> jumping, AFF grads still jumping - lots of people still jumping.
>
>
>All the frightened assholes went AFF cuz they were and are candy ass's
Whereas you''re too chickenshit to even go to a dropzone.
>
>
> Mike a punk.
>
> ...bsrp
> ...jlk- Hide quoted text -
But I didn't wirte that - you still can't get it right.
>>
>> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
>WOW you sure like to call Mike punk a lot kid
How can that be since I never have - you on the otherhand...you still
can't get it right.
...bsrp
...jlk
JRC
> On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 07:09:27 -0800 (PST), JRC <chung...@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> >On Feb 22, 11:49 pm, Jerry K. <sky...@pdq.net> wrote:
> >> On Sun, 22 Feb 2009 20:53:45 -0800 (PST), JRC <chung...@yahoo.com>
> >> wrote:
>
> >> >> >> >...I see the economy finishing you off around the DZ before the
> >> >> >> >Government gets a chance to do it though.
>
> >> > >>>>snip the JK bitching & crying part<<<<
>
>
> >> >> >skydiving.
> >> >> >The sport had a quick spurt of growth in the late 80's because of a
> >> >> >strong economy.
>
> >> >> Not that you were there skydiving in the 80's ~at all~, mind you.
>
> >> >nope but their were plenty of AFF grads left around for me to dissect
> >> >in the early 90's.
>
> >> Which would be 1993 at the earliest and not that a neophyte like you
> >> could dissect much of anything at the time...or even later.
>
> >> >...Its my studied opinion they would not have
> >> >started if hanging strut was
> >> >the only option to learn.
>
> >> Which is relevant today how? I mean, there's static liners still
> >> jumping, AFF grads still jumping - lots of people still jumping.
>
> >All the frightened assholes went AFF cuz they were and are candy ass's
>
>
>
> >
> > Mike a punk.
>
> > ...bsrp
> > ...jlk- Hide quoted text -
>
> But I didn't wirte that - you still can't get it right.
>
make out Mike
is one to......He's no dummy, got more USPA ratings than you could lie
cheat or steal. tsk tsk tsk
>
>
> >> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> >> - Show quoted text -
>
> >WOW you sure like to call Mike punk a lot kid
>
> How can that be since I never have - you on the otherhand...you still
> can't get it right.
>
> ...bsrp
> ...jlk- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
I got it right, lets see 93 to 96 would be three years.....don't seem
like enough time to get a D win that medal and see, I'd have to had
made more jumps a year than you give me credit for, see what counting
on your toes
gets you....can't spell, can't write, can't count...What a dummy
Jerry K.
wrote:
>On Feb 23, 1:52 pm, Jerry K. <sky...@pdq.net> wrote:
No, I didn't. Show where I did. Let's see the post. Cite it.
Substantiate. Just changing around shit and reposting it is lame,
loserboy. Now, here's substantiation of either how dififcult it is
for you to keep track or what you think of Mike:
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.skydiving/msg/5cc71d9f8f440812
> On Fri, 18 Jul 2008 17:44:31 -0700, Mike Spurgeon <m...@spurgeon.net>
> wrote:
> >We're like the bar business, recession proof.
<<<and what you wrote in response, Jinnie>>>
Nothing is ression proof punk
* * *
>not satisfied to be the lone dummy, you are trying to
>make out Mike
>is one to..
That's a load of crap, wackjob, but keep on prostrating yourself lower
and lower - maybe you'll find the right sewer to squirm through.
>....He's no dummy, got more USPA ratings than you could lie
>cheat or steal. tsk tsk tsk
Certainly more than you, hypocrite. Is that why you were putting
words in Miker's mouth - syuggesting he said what he didn't? Or were
you just confused?
>
>>
>>
>> >> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> >> - Show quoted text -
>>
>> >WOW you sure like to call Mike punk a lot kid
>>
>> How can that be since I never have - you on the otherhand...you still
>> can't get it right.
>>
>> ...bsrp
>> ...jlk- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
>I got it right,
No, you didn't.
>lets see 93 to 96 would be three years.....don't seem
>like enough time to get a D win that medal and see,
And here we have confirmation, from your own fat mouth, all thiose
times you said you starting skydiving in the "late 80's" or "89 or
90," times you said you skydived for "seven or eight years?" Just
big, fat posing lies. Because you thought it would equate to some
sort of street cred. Just retarded. Teams win medals in team
competition, wackjob.
> I'd have to had
>made more jumps a year than you give me credit for,
Still a piss poor number of jumper/year. Couple hundred jumps over
three years. Do the math.
>see what counting
>on your toes
>gets you.
Sure , if I include my toes with my fingers that comes to
apporximately 10% of the jumps you ever made, 25% of the number of
jumps it took you to stand up a single landing, and close to seven
times the number of years you skydived, neophyte.
>...can't spell, can't write, can't count...What a dummy
That you have difficulties in all those three has been long ducmented
and all easily citable with undeniable proof. That you are a
hypocrite you demonstrate every day. Wackjob.
...bsrp
...jlk
JRC
> On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 12:18:03 -0800 (PST), JRC <chung...@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> >> >> >> >The economy is a powerful factor in high maintenance hobby's like
> >> >> >> >skydiving.
> >> >> >> >The sport had a quick spurt of growth in the late 80's because of a
> >> >> >> >strong economy.
>
> >> >
>
> >> > ...bsrp
> >> > ...jlk- Hide quoted text -
>
> >> But I didn't wirte that - you still can't get it right.
>
> >Yes you did,
>
> No, I didn't. Show where I did.
right above, I built my post around it....countless others BTW yo seem
se on associating Mike with the word punk....I finally took issue with
it and am exposing you
> * * *
>
> >not satisfied to be the lone dummy, you are trying to
> >make out Mike
> >is one to..
>
> That's a load of crap, wackjob, but keep on prostrating yourself lower
> and lower - maybe you'll find the right sewer to squirm through.
>
> >....He's no dummy, got more USPA ratings than you could lie
> >cheat or steal. tsk tsk tsk
>
> Certainly more than you, hypocrite.
>
>
I was strictly a fun jumper, making union scale.....no need to
supplement my jump costs
>
> >> >> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> >> >> - Show quoted text -
>
> >> >WOW you sure like to call Mike punk a lot kid
>
> >> How can that be since I never have - you on the otherhand...you still
> >> can't get it right.
>
> >> ...bsrp
> >> ...jlk- Hide quoted text -
>
> >> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> >> - Show quoted text -
>
> >I got it right,
>
> No, you didn't.
>
> >lets see 93 to 96 would be three years.....don't seem
> >like enough time to get a D win that medal and see,
>
> And here we have confirmation, from your own fat mouth, all thiose
> times you said you starting skydiving in the "late 80's" or "89 or
> 90," times you said you skydived for "seven or eight years?" Just
> big, fat posing lies. Because you thought it would equate to some
> sort of street cred. Just retarded. Teams win medals in team
> competition, wackjob.
It was a team competition
>
> > I'd have to had
> >made more jumps a year than you give me credit for,
>
> Still a piss poor number of jumper/year. Couple hundred jumps over
> three years. Do the math.
>
No need I've got the log book, looks like it took me 4 years to earn
the D, I jumped a couple of more years and suffered a stroke....Make
your choice
punk----three years/high jump numbers per year or twice the three with
average jump numbers those six.....Do the math, try using a calculator
rather than your toes
> Sure , if I include my toes with my fingers that comes to
> apporximately 10% of the jumps you ever made, 25% of the number of
> jumps it took you to stand up a single landing, and close to seven
> times the number of years you skydived, neophyte.
What ever it was its enough to piss you off----And that works for me
>
> >...can't spell, can't write, can't count...What a dummy
>
> Wackjob.
>
> ...bsrp
> ...jlk- Hide quoted text -
Whacking Jerry with a lower D number & flaunting my National POPS
Bronze just to hear him cry 0~;->
Jerry K.
wrote:
>On Feb 23, 3:19 pm, Jerry K. <sky...@pdq.net> wrote:
>> On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 12:18:03 -0800 (PST), JRC <chung...@yahoo.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >> >> >> >The economy is a powerful factor in high maintenance hobby's like
>> >> >> >> >skydiving.
>> >> >> >> >The sport had a quick spurt of growth in the late 80's because of a
>> >> >> >> >strong economy.
>>
>> >> >
>> >> > Mike a punk.
>>
>> >> > ...bsrp
>> >> > ...jlk- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> >> But I didn't wirte that - you still can't get it right.
>>
>> >Yes you did,
>>
>> No, I didn't. Show where I did.
>
>right above, I built my post around it....countless others BTW yo seem
>se on associating Mike with the word punk....I finally took issue with
>it and am exposing you
Cut the crap, wackjob. You also built the sentence in the first
place. You still can't get it right.
>
>
>> * * *
>>
>> >not satisfied to be the lone dummy, you are trying to
>> >make out Mike
>> >is one to..
>>
>> That's a load of crap, wackjob, but keep on prostrating yourself lower
>> and lower - maybe you'll find the right sewer to squirm through.
>>
>> >....He's no dummy, got more USPA ratings than you could lie
>> >cheat or steal. tsk tsk tsk
>>
>> Certainly more than you, hypocrite.
>>
>>
>I was strictly a fun jumper, making union scale.....no need to
>supplement my jump costs
So, on the one hand you suggest that to be with ratings is laudable -
as in Mike's case and to be without is to be found lacking, but in
your case, it's okay - even though you are still without and are
therefore lacking. That, wackjob, is hugely inconsistant.
>>
>> >> >> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> >> >> - Show quoted text -
>>
>> >> >WOW you sure like to call Mike punk a lot kid
>>
>> >> How can that be since I never have - you on the otherhand...you still
>> >> can't get it right.
>>
>> >> ...bsrp
>> >> ...jlk- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> >> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> >> - Show quoted text -
>>
>> >I got it right,
>>
>> No, you didn't.
>>
>> >lets see 93 to 96 would be three years.....don't seem
>> >like enough time to get a D win that medal and see,
>>
>> And here we have confirmation, from your own fat mouth, all thiose
>> times you said you starting skydiving in the "late 80's" or "89 or
>> 90," times you said you skydived for "seven or eight years?" Just
>> big, fat posing lies. Because you thought it would equate to some
>> sort of street cred. Just retarded. Teams win medals in team
>> competition, wackjob.
>
>It was a team competition
Yet you said above "win that medal." You didn't win it, the team did
- and they earned it holding you stable on that one single (scrambles)
competition jump you ever made, ever.
>>
>> > I'd have to had
>> >made more jumps a year than you give me credit for,
>>
>> Still a piss poor number of jumper/year. Couple hundred jumps over
>> three years. Do the math.
>>
>No need I've got the log book, looks like it took me 4 years to earn
>the D,
So, as you started in 1993, this would suggest it took you until 1997
to "earn the D." Which says you are in deep denial as you stroked out
and couldn't skydive after early 1996 - aside from one piss poorly
planned attempt in late 1999.
>I jumped a couple of more years and suffered a stroke.
You jumped for a total of three years and stroked out - unless you're
saying it took you only a year to get a D license.
>...Make
>your choice
>punk----three years/high jump numbers per year or twice the three with
>average jump numbers those six.....Do the math, try using a calculator
>rather than your toes
I choose the truth - you jumped for three years and made between two
hundred and three hundred jumps in that time. Between fifty and a
hundred jumps a year is not what I would call cranking out the
skydives - but it is more jumps/year than between two hundred and
three hundred jumps over six or seven years. I've known skydivers
that do thousands every year, and except for my first year in
skydiving when I did just under 200, I've done more jumps every year
than you ever made in your three years jumping or in even your lying
pretense that you jumped six or seven years. It doesn't make me
special, but it does put your puny numbers, no matter how you slice
it, into perspective - especially when you are bragging because you
only jumped three years and made X number of jumps, your jump ratio is
higher than it was over a six or seven year period. You still
crashed your dumb ass out of skydiving having never gained major
league experience. Wackjob.
>
>
>> Sure , if I include my toes with my fingers that comes to
>> apporximately 10% of the jumps you ever made, 25% of the number of
>> jumps it took you to stand up a single landing, and close to seven
>> times the number of years you skydived, neophyte.
>
>What ever it was its enough to piss you off----And that works for me
And back we merrily come to where Jinnie is cornered by reality and
truth - it's the regular bail that he must be "riling" or some such.
No matter how you slice it, you made only two hundred to three hundred
jumps. And there's skdivers out there who crank that few jumps over
the course of a couple months or less. Neophyte
>>
>> >...can't spell, can't write, can't count...What a dummy
>>
>> Wackjob.
>>
>> ...bsrp
>> ...jlk- Hide quoted text -
>Whacking Jerry with a lower D number & flaunting my National POPS
>Bronze just to hear him cry 0~;->
Which D, Jinnie - the one you dropped the first of five digits on? As
for a "National POPS Bronze," is that the pathetic state you're in -
that you want to make it a pissing contest over medals and numbers? As
if those are relevant and are the measure of a person? You just keep
on mining it, Jinnie - if that's all you got anymore - sure beats
skydiving, eh, wackjob?
...bsrp
...jlk
JRC
> On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 14:43:21 -0800 (PST), JRC <chung...@yahoo.com>
students or paying customers in the air you should have as much
experience and as many ratings as possible- - -you hadn't caught on to
that yet? Well the recession is going to effect the sport and stiffer
competition for a buck around the DZ is going to kick your ass I'm
afraid- -Hope you are ready to pay top dollar for your jump tickets
punk.
JRC
> On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 14:43:21 -0800 (PST), JRC <chung...@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
>
> >> >I got it right,
>
> >> No, you didn't.
>
> >> >lets see 93 to 96 would be three years.....don't seem
> >> >like enough time to get a D win that medal and see,
>
> >> And here we have confirmation, from your own fat mouth, all thiose
> >> times you said you starting skydiving in the "late 80's" or "89 or
> >> 90," times you said you skydived for "seven or eight years?" Just
> >> big, fat posing lies. Because you thought it would equate to some
> >> sort of street cred. Just retarded. Teams win medals in team
> >> competition, wackjob.
>
> >It was a team competition
>
> Yet you said above "win that medal." You didn't win it, the team did
> - and they earned it holding you stable on that one single (scrambles)
> competition jump you ever made, ever.
>
>
that had never jumped together or even seen each other before the
event eh? Eats your ass up don't it, just like my D number being lower
than yours does don't it?
>
> >> > I'd have to had
> >> >made more jumps a year than you give me credit for,
>
> >> Still a piss poor number of jumper/year. Couple hundred jumps over
> >> three years. Do the math.
>
> >No need I've got the log book, looks like it took me 4 years to earn
> >the D,
>
> So, as you started in 1993, this would suggest it took you until 1997
> to "earn the D." Which says you are in deep denial as you stroked out
> and couldn't skydive after early 1996 - aside from one piss poorly
> planned attempt in late 1999.
So this means I must have started in 90 or 91 which throws all of your
calculations out the door...Just like Chuck I have you so
discombobulated
your down to making shit up....Whats your D # punk, I want to see how
many thousands I am below you...Ya know, give you something else to
grind your teeth over....Here let me help your confusion, I went thru
FJC in the late Spring so I only got 40 or so jumps in the first
year------>What year did I start? Make it as short as you want because
the shorter it is the more talented it makes me look
being a over 55, overweight middle aged man like I was at the
time.....The bronze?
at 316 jumps I believe and around Easter of the next year I had a
stroke----calculate punk I want to smell smoke coming off that feeble
thing you think with
Jerry K.
wrote:
>On Feb 23, 5:12 pm, Jerry K. <sky...@pdq.net> wrote:
>> On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 14:43:21 -0800 (PST), JRC <chung...@yahoo.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> >> >I got it right,
>>
>> >> No, you didn't.
>>
>> >> >lets see 93 to 96 would be three years.....don't seem
>> >> >like enough time to get a D win that medal and see,
>>
>> >> And here we have confirmation, from your own fat mouth, all thiose
>> >> times you said you starting skydiving in the "late 80's" or "89 or
>> >> 90," times you said you skydived for "seven or eight years?" Just
>> >> big, fat posing lies. Because you thought it would equate to some
>> >> sort of street cred. Just retarded. Teams win medals in team
>> >> competition, wackjob.
>>
>> >It was a team competition
>>
>> Yet you said above "win that medal." You didn't win it, the team did
>> - and they earned it holding you stable on that one single (scrambles)
>> competition jump you ever made, ever.
>>
>>
>pretty good for first attempt at competition, and on a make up team
>that had never jumped together or even seen each other before the
>event eh? Eats your ass up don't it, just like my D number being lower
>than yours does don't it?
Actually, near as I can tell you're so eat up for being exposed as a
pathetic liar that now you're squirming into the sewer of having a
pissing contest over medals and D numbers. As for medals, I got 'em -
plural. Regional and National. Whoopty shit - medals just show a
particular team took the test and had a good day. Of course, a couple
of my medals I got to transport across state lines - that was kinda
fun. D number? Makes no difference to me in terms of those with any
numbes lose credibility as soon as they try to use said number as an
item to brag about. I know (and in some cases knew) some of the real
old timers, wackjob. They didn't give a crap about numbers - they
didn't have to - they'd rather listen to a good skydiving story than
compare dogtags. Like rooster said, the real deals don't have to go
around proclaiming how real they are. It's wisdom you've never
learned.
>>
>> >> > I'd have to had
>> >> >made more jumps a year than you give me credit for,
>>
>> >> Still a piss poor number of jumper/year. Couple hundred jumps over
>> >> three years. Do the math.
>>
>> >No need I've got the log book, looks like it took me 4 years to earn
>> >the D,
>>
>> So, as you started in 1993, this would suggest it took you until 1997
>> to "earn the D." Which says you are in deep denial as you stroked out
>> and couldn't skydive after early 1996 - aside from one piss poorly
>> planned attempt in late 1999.
>
>So this means I must have started in 90 or 91
No, it categorically does not mean that but it's not surprising you're
still not getting right something so simple.
>which throws all of your
>calculations out the door.
No, the calculations are spot on. You started in 1993, was a mediocre
jumper for two to three years until you stroked out in early 1996.
>..Just like Chuck I have you so
>discombobulated
>your down to making shit up..
Nope, been going on what you have admitted, actuallly. You lie about
shit, the lies get exposed to reality and what you've may have said
earlier, you lie some more, and further lies are exposed. Nothing new
there.
>..Whats your D # punk, I want to see how
>many thousands more
Exactly homw many skydives you have, junior? I want to see how many
thosands more I am on top of of you.
>I am below you..
Heheheheh.
>.Ya know, give you something else to
>grind your teeth over....Here let me help your confusion, I went thru
>FJC in the late Spring so I only got 40 or so jumps in the first
>year---
Fourty in at least six months? Slacker.
>--->What year did I start?
Two years before 1995 - at least according to you.
>Make it as short as you want because
>the shorter it is the more talented it makes me look
>being a over 55, overweight middle aged man like I was at the
>time..
This is rich - Jinnie, having been exposed for lying about his time in
skydiving and bragging on its duration - a duration now less than half
than what he was lying on - has now determined to brag about the
number of jumps he made in his short stint. To think, Jinnie - if you
hadn't been so pathetic to lie in the first place, you could have been
working the
JRC
> On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 19:15:57 -0800 (PST), JRC <chung...@yahoo.com>
All I got to say about medals is, mine was on a lark-----Not something
I would have done again, not much fun blocking & creeping dives until
midnight or later while everybody else is setting around relaxing
while drinking beer...I was a fun jumper- -Trying for medals seemed
like to much work & not enough fun to me....If I had went the next
year it wouldn't have been to compete again, it would have been to
enjoy the meet, jump all day with people from across the country and
drink beer and relax at night. People chasing medals or big formations
and boo coo points are driven people often out right miserable it
seems to me and that ain't my personality type- - -Skydiving was about
relaxation and fun to me
> Of course, a couple of my medals I got to transport across state lines -
>. D number? Makes no difference to me in terms of those with any
> numbes lose credibility as soon as they try to use said number as an
> item to brag about. I know (and in some cases knew) some of the real
> old timers, wackjob. They didn't give a crap about numbers -
Yes they do, I remember one that was pissed off because his D wasn't
low enough, somebody else got one thru five, the old boy signed with
his C number for that very reason as people will often do- - -Its
human nature even though the numbers are for administrative purposes
only to keep track of numbers issued.
I've seen the same behavior in other associations even down to postal
mail box numbers that tell how long customers have been with a mail
drop company. You are a young dumb fool if you think anybody thats
current don't care about numbers
>they didn't have to - they'd rather listen to a good skydiving story than
> compare dogtags. Like rooster said, the real deals don't have to go
> around proclaiming how real they are. It's wisdom you've never
> learned.
>
>
>
The real deals are probably not on here torturing punks either heh--I
AM
>
>
>
> >> >> > I'd have to had
> >> >> >made more jumps a year than you give me credit for,
>
> >> >> Still a piss poor number of jumper/year. Couple hundred jumps over
> >> >> three years. Do the math.
>
> >> >No need I've got the log book, looks like it took me 4 years to earn
> >> >the D,
>
> >> So, as you started in 1993, this would suggest it took you until 1997
> >> to "earn the D." Which says you are in deep denial as you stroked out
> >> and couldn't skydive after early 1996 - aside from one piss poorly
> >> planned attempt in late 1999.
>
> >So this means I must have started in 90 or 91
>
> No, it categorically does not mean that but it's not surprising you're
> still not getting right something so simple.
>
> >which throws all of your
> >calculations out the door.
>
> No, the calculations are spot on. You started in 1993, was a mediocre
> jumper for two to three years until you stroked out in early 1996.
>
> >..Just like Chuck I have you so
> >discombobulated
> >your down to making shit up..
>
> Nope, been going on what you have admitted, actuallly. You lie about
> shit, the lies get exposed to reality and what you've may have said
> earlier, you lie some more, and further lies are exposed. Nothing new
> there.
Not lies....a little false trail here and there, it pays off later.
Like right now
having you all confused and making shit up gets me off...See I can
gage
the effect I'm having on your mind when you start believing your own
fantasy's
of who and what I am...Your not as insane over it as Chuck was yet but
your getting there.
>
> >..Whats your D # punk, I want to see how
> >many thousands more
>
> Exactly homw many skydives you have, junior? I want to see how many
> thosands more I am on top of of you.
>
> >I am below you..
>
> Heheheheh.
Doubt it, I had a D before you started...You didn't get rolling till I
retired, then you had to get a gimmick to pay for your jumps and to
get anybody to jump with someone as dumb as you perhaps
>
> >.Ya know, give you something else to
> >grind your teeth over....Here let me help your confusion, I went thru
> >FJC in the late Spring so I only got 40 or so jumps in the first
> >year---
>
> Fourty in at least six months? Slacker.
I was a cross country driver until offered a Dock Foreman's job with a
40 hour week. That came a few years after I started skydiving so I
took it because it was easier to get out and jump on the weekend
>
> >--->What year did I start?
>
> Two years before 1995 - at least according to you.
>
nope wrong again, it too me 4 years to get the D....That would make it
1991
or there abouts, I went to the POPS Nationals and was on the bronze
team in 1995--A D was needed to compete, thats also the year I did
Quincy---You will never get it right because like Chuck I have twisted
your mind and emotions
so badly, thrown in disinformation here and there----You hallucinate
stuff you think you know...Ahhhh the power. the power...You have been
brain fucked kid
Big Jim
relaxation and fun to me>>
Buffo's idea of fun and relaxation:
1. First 80 jumps, 80 crash landings
2. Proably crashes 100 times in the other 140 or so jumps he made
3. Going to to drop zone, where none of the "anal, stuck up skydivers" liked
him, he was barely tolerated
4. Nobody would jump with him because he was dangerous and (see 3 above), so
he made flailing solos in his sit suit
5. Had to slink off the dz in the evening so he wouln't have his ass kicked
by girls
6. Did I say nobody at the dz liked his fat' smelly, flailing loud mouth
ass
7. Finally got hauled off on a gurney with a face full of tarmac
8. Came to the wreck where he is constanly exposed as a liar and openly
ridiculed
9. Those that don't openly bash him urge others to do or not do certain
things to make him go away
10. Kill filed by most everyone
Now thats big time, serious fun. Have to wonder what his idea of a bad day
is.
Winsor Naugler III
For some of us, skydiving is not a past-tense activity.
Someone who feels they have something to contribute to the sport need not be
fit to jump to make said contribution. As Woody Allen said, "90% of success
is showing up."
If Jimmy Smith ever actually shows up at one of the Houston DZs, whether he
can (or ever could) jump or not, perhaps he can do something to the benefit
of skydiving in general.
As a nonjumper who is not part of the community, however, I can not see the
basis of any opinion he may choose to hold.
Blue skies,
Winsor
JRC
Tough shit I'm giving opinions anyway, just get over it- - -you have
no moderation power over here. Get back over on goody goody two shoes
dot com where you belong! 0~;)P
Jerry K.
wrote:
>On Feb 24, 2:48 pm, "Winsor Naugler III" <dog...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>> "Skydiving was about relaxation and fun to me"
>>
>> For some of us, skydiving is not a past-tense activity.
>>
>> Someone who feels they have something to contribute to the sport need not be
>> fit to jump to make said contribution. As Woody Allen said, "90% of success
>> is showing up."
>>
>> If Jimmy Smith ever actually shows up at one of the Houston DZs, whether he
>> can (or ever could) jump or not, perhaps he can do something to the benefit
>> of skydiving in general.
>>
>> As a nonjumper who is not part of the community, however, I can not see the
>> basis of any opinion he may choose to hold.
>>
>> Blue skies,
>>
>> Winsor
>
>Tough shit I'm giving opinions anyway,
Ignorant, self-serving, and intellectually dishonest opinions. For
some of us, skydiving is not a past tense activity.
>just get over it- - -you have
>no moderation power over here.
Neither do you.
>Get back over on goody goody two shoes
>dot com where you belong!
You still can't get it right.
...bsrp
...jlk
JRC
1 some truth there, I was so old my vision was shot...Once I got my
own canopy and quit jumping those rental rags, things improved
considerably
3 & 4 totally false, deguello types were fighting to get in on my SCR/
SCS...probably to knock me into a funnel to get even for all the times
I blew them out of the formation passing through
The rest mostly untrue, I was well liked because what you saw you got,
thats refreshing in a phony sport, plus I could set a fast base-----no
one went low on my watch......The chicks? Yeah Christie wanted to
bitch slap me when I had about 42 jumps------possibly a PMS problem
mixed with RW Queen temperament heh
10.......Except the punks like you and Jerry K. You can't get enough
of it
>
> Now thats big time, serious fun. Have to wonder what his idea of a bad day
> is.
The day the grim reaper comes a knocking but I'm going to ask for a wi
fi connection and ghost computer so I can still haunt USPA crybabies ;)
P
JRC
> On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 13:54:37 -0800 (PST), JRC <chung...@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> >On Feb 24, 2:48 pm, "Winsor Naugler III" <dog...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> >> "Skydiving was about relaxation and fun to me"
>
> >> For some of us, skydiving is not a past-tense activity.
>
> >> Someone who feels they have something to contribute to the sport need not be
> >> fit to jump to make said contribution. As Woody Allen said, "90% of success
> >> is showing up."
>
> >> If Jimmy Smith ever actually shows up at one of the Houston DZs, whether he
> >> can (or ever could) jump or not, perhaps he can do something to the benefit
> >> of skydiving in general.
>
> >> As a nonjumper who is not part of the community, however, I can not see the
> >> basis of any opinion he may choose to hold.
>
> >> Blue skies,
>
> >> Winsor
>
> >Tough shit I'm giving opinions anyway,
>
> Ignorant, self-serving, and intellectually dishonest opinions. For
> some of us, skydiving is not a past tense activity.
>
It will be someday but you will never be as good at this as I am ;-*
Jerry K.
wrote:
>On Feb 24, 4:04 pm, Jerry K. <sky...@pdq.net> wrote:
Wooo - go out on a limb Poserdamus
>but you will never be as good at this as I am
Lying and ego-centric blathering is not what many people, including
myself, would ever aspire to - it's the wackjobs who find affirmation
in how "good" they are at it. Wackjob.
...bsrp
...jlk
Jerry K.
wrote:
>On Feb 23, 9:48 pm, Jerry K. <sky...@pdq.net> wrote:
~And~ "pretty good for first attempt at competition" among dozens of
other things. So, ~not~ "All (you) got to say about medals," but I'll
keep this in mind the next time you start gassing about that scrambles
medal.
>--Not something
>I would have done again, not much fun blocking & creeping dives until
>midnight or later while everybody else is setting around relaxing
>while drinking beer...I was a fun jumper- -Trying for medals seemed
>like to much work & not enough fun to me.
And yet you were there and later bragging about the medal ~you~ won,
not the team, ad naseum.
>...If I had went the next
>year it wouldn't have been to compete again, it would have been to
>enjoy the meet, jump all day with people from across the country and
>drink beer and relax at night. People chasing medals or big formations
>and boo coo points are driven people often out right miserable it
>seems to me
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.skydiving/msg/4fdfd1c426815e5e
"gold wings and the silver falcon were the only two goals I had left"
* * *
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.skydiving/msg/1e9e069f5e8b06ec
"I prolly wudda collected my gold wings, 36 way falcon certificate and
retired"
* * *
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.skydiving/msg/9b180be08af64c7d
"I'll git gold wings before its over"
* * *
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.skydiving/msg/dc15e3c1ad408dcc
"just tell them to fuk off you got gold wings"
* * *
Cheer up, Jinnie - you don't jump anymore.
>and that ain't my personality type- - -Skydiving was about
>relaxation and fun to me
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.skydiving/msg/bbb57840b33604d8
"came out of creeper pits...Dirt dives seemed to lead
to a lotta foprmation blow ups for people with under 3/400
jumps---shit as A's we would dirt dive on the climb to altitude on the
SPX otter"
* * *
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.skydiving/msg/a41ce9ea86f0e8c9
Do it the old fashioned way hard work sweat & bobo's. Jump, jump,
jump, jump, jump, jump till ewe puke & take yer lumps till ewe learn
to contol yer canopy.
* * *
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.skydiving/msg/5b530cfb837b0886
HEY we were busy packing, creeping and discussing team stragity
durning the meet often till midnight-
>
>> Of course, a couple of my medals I got to transport across state lines - that was fun.
>>. D number? Makes no difference to me in terms of those with any
>> numbes lose credibility as soon as they try to use said number as an
>> item to brag about. I know (and in some cases knew) some of the real
>> old timers, wackjob. They didn't give a crap about numbers -
>
>Yes they do, I remember one that was pissed off because his D wasn't
>low enough,
He was joking.
>somebody else got one thru five, the old boy signed with
>his C number for that very reason as people will often do-
Sure, Sinclair's done that - and he's an exception with every right -
but Bob's never tried to pull rank via gargling about some number.
Deeds speak louder.
>- -Its
>human nature even though the numbers are for administrative purposes
>only to keep track of numbers issued.
It's a shallow pretense of a superficial pecking order. I got great
respect for the early skydivers, low numbers and all - but if anyone
ever waved a number in front of me as a substitute to legitimize
whatever, it's just a number. Deeds speak louder.
>I've seen the same behavior in other associations even down to postal
>mail box numbers that tell how long customers have been with a mail
>drop company.
Just because you've seen it doesn't make it any less superficial. I'm
one of only a hundred people who've jumped at Kill Devil Hills. Got a
number and everything - whoopty shit - doesn't mean a thing except to
say I was there with some great people, jump of a lifetime, and we
planned the dive and dived the plan - and if anyone ever tried to wave
a number at me as a substitution for legitimacy, I'd just laugh at
them. Like that tarmac coming up cares about freaking numbers.
>You are a young dumb fool if you think anybody thats
>current don't care about numbers
And you're a disconnected moron, long removed from skydiving - numbers
mean different things to different people but if anyone pulls a number
as an excuse or a substitution for legitimacy, it's usually as prelude
for ironic and sarcastic satire. It's funny at the campfire and
pathetic in the packing area.
>
>>they didn't have to - they'd rather listen to a good skydiving story than
>> compare dogtags. Like rooster said, the real deals don't have to go
>> around proclaiming how real they are. It's wisdom you've never
>> learned.
>>
>>
>>
>The real deals are probably not on here torturing punks either heh--I
>AM
You're not a real deal. Never were, aren't now, and never will be.
Just a poser with truth issues and a pathetic little troll. Nothing
more.
What a load of crap. About that 48way you lied about - how's that
been paying off for ya? I mean, it's not like you were being
ridiculed for that lie before you got caught in it - now that you have
been, that's some <saracasm, dummy> "pay off." And to think you told
that lie all those years ago just for how it "pays off later."
>Like right now
>having you all confused and making shit up gets me off.
Haven't made up a single thing - that's been your department for a
good long time now.
>..See I can
>gage
>the effect I'm having on your mind when you start believing your own
>fantasy's
Your projecting again, wackjob. Want to fantasize a little more about
the IRS busting me? How about Homeland Security? Or where I off
myself? Or lately where an economic recession, while adding burdens
to thousands of skydivers, also adds burdens to myself. They're your
fantasies, wackjob.
>of who and what I am...Your not as insane over it as Chuck was yet but
>your getting there.
Nope, Chuck's been entirely lucid in his deconstructions of your lies
concerning whatever military background you were gargling about. Got
the goods on and watched you spazz out over it. Who and what you are
is a pathetic loser so wrapped up in himself that you're willing tell
really dumb and remarkably easy referenceable lies to make yourself
out to be what you aren't - to strangers on an electronic newsgroup,
no less. You're a stupid little troll, a poser, and a wannabe with
truth issues. Wackjob, too.
>>
>> >..Whats your D # punk, I want to see how
>> >many thousands more
>>
>> Exactly homw many skydives you have, junior? I want to see how many
>> thosands more I am on top of of you.
>>
>> >I am below you..
>>
>> Heheheheh.
>
>Doubt it, I had a D before you started...You didn't get rolling till I
>retired,
Wrong. I started a couple years after you made your FJ.
>then you had to get a gimmick to pay for your jumps and to
>get anybody to jump with someone as dumb as you perhaps
People asking me if I am available all weekend to jump with them - or
if I just wanted to go up and turns some points or do some CRW. No
one chasing me up a tree after a skydive, Jinnie. No sit suit solos
for me, either. Feel the burn. But then, I have a distinct advantage
over you, I admit - I wasn't a moron with affirmation issues. You
were, and remain so to this day.
>>
>> >.Ya know, give you something else to
>> >grind your teeth over....Here let me help your confusion, I went thru
>> >FJC in the late Spring so I only got 40 or so jumps in the first
>> >year---
>>
>> Fourty in at least six months? Slacker.
>
>I was a cross country driver until offered a Dock Foreman's job with a
>40 hour week. That came a few years after I started skydiving so I
>took it because it was easier to get out and jump on the weekend
Excuses, excuses - when I started jumping I was doing 60-80 hours a
week, no guarrantee I'd have the weekend. I went and jumped during
the week. By the time you stroked out, I had roughly half the jumps
you ever made, ever - it's a lot more than that now. Slacker.
>>
>> >--->What year did I start?
>>
>> Two years before 1995 - at least according to you.
>>
>nope wrong again, it too me 4 years to get the D....That would make it
>1991
>or there abouts,
We've been over this before, dumbass. You still can't get it right.
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.skydiving/msg/734305368e9cdffa
< Oct 26 1995, 1:00 am>
"Just started two years ago "
Snuffy D-17105
>I went to the POPS Nationals and was on the bronze
>team in 1995--A D was needed to compete, thats also the year I did
>Quincy---You will never get it right because like Chuck I have twisted
>your mind and emotions
>so badly, thrown in disinformation here and there-
Riiiiiiiiight <sarcasm, dummy> Back in October 1995 you had "thrown
in disinformation here and there" for the expressed purpose of using
it thirteen and a half years later down the line to play "mind games."
What a truckload of crap. Lying's one thing - and it reeks - but now
telling bold face ~lies about your lies~ so utterly ridiculous they
defy proper description beyond a really amped up example of Pathetic
on Steroids. You're a major league loserboy, Jinnie, caught up in
your own lies, brags, and pretenses, - and I'll be happy to remind you
of this clear and proven fact for just as long as you feel the need to
maintain your own personal fiction in a public venue.
>---You hallucinate
>stuff you think you know.
Not at all and you're projecting again, mister "Mike Spurgeon wrote:
what he did not actually in reality write," - the "stuff" is merely
your own words, often contradictory to each other, thrown back in your
face with reality and truth which has a tendency to make you spazz
out.
>..Ahhhh the power. the power...You have been
>brain fucked kid
Keep on maintaining the fiction, wackjob, and revel in that "power" to
tell big fat, stupid lies and in so doing, illustrate yourself to be a
big, fat, and stupid liar. Where the mantle proudly, wackjob - it's
all you got.
...bsrp
...jlk
JRC
> On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 14:11:38 -0800 (PST), JRC <chung...@yahoo.com>
>
? bruised ego......I think your idea of moderating me by getting us in
world wide kill files is better than Winsors incessant crying. The
only reason yours has failed
is: Like I said before, skydivers out there just jumping, having fun
and minding their own business I got no problem with----let them kill
me. TM/JM and other JM's
Riggers, Pilots, DZ staff even DZO's quietly going about their
business by teaching
training, providing drop zones and aircraft to keep the sport going or
building it up----I got no problem with, may I rest in their kill
files. The very punks I'm after. Like you are unable to kill file me,
those I hump unmercifully. Winsor? Dunno whats up with that boy,
control issues I would guess....He may be like some women, if they
ain't happy or getting their way they nag men....Apparently all is not
well with him, used to being in charge, saddled with a narrow
Engineering education he feels the need to lash out because he's not
the center of attention like one of my 14 karat punks (you know who
you are) there is more than one. Now these few punks? They can't kill
file me, hate that I have any opinion at all, hate that they can't
control me or beat me down and basically hate their selves because of
the preceding issues I listed.....I'm accused of trolling...Got no
hook on the line
they just clamp the line between their jaws and shinny right on up to
the pole using their lips----Funny thing is I'm not trolling, I'm as
serious as a Judge with
my evaluations of them ROFLMAO.......Stick bitter pill down your
throat and swallow it Jerry, I know its tough---Thats why you need to
gulp it 0~;-*
JRC
> On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 23:32:12 -0800 (PST), JRC <chung...@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >> >> >> >I got it right,
>
> >> >> >> No, you didn't.
>
> >> >> >> >lets see 93 to 96 would be three years.....don't seem
> >> >> >> >like enough time to get a D win that medal and see,
>
> >> >> >> And here we have confirmation, from your own fat mouth, all thiose
> >> >> >> times you said you starting skydiving in the "late 80's" or "89 or
> >> >> >> 90," times you said you skydived for "seven or eight years?" Just
> >> >> >> big, fat posing lies. Because you thought it would equate to some
> >> >> >> sort of street cred. Just retarded. Teams win medals in team
> >> >> >> competition, wackjob.
>
> >> >> >It was a team competition
>
> >> >> Yet you said above "win that medal." You didn't win it, the team did
> >> >> - and they earned it holding you stable on that one single (scrambles)
> >> >> competition jump you ever made, ever.
We each got a medal, I was part of the team---All its good for really
is to wave at you like a matador waving a red cape at some dumb young
bull...It makes you bellow and that alone makes it worth something
> >> >pretty good for first attempt at competition, and on a make up team
> >> >that had never jumped together or even seen each other before the
> >> >event eh? Eats your ass up don't it, >
> > Whoopty shit - medals just show a
> >> particular team took the test and had a good day.
>
> >All I got to say about medals is, mine was on a lark---
>
> ~And~ "pretty good for first attempt at competition" among dozens of
> other things. So, ~not~ "All (you) got to say about medals," but I'll
> keep this in mind the next time you start gassing about that scrambles
> medal.
>
long as that medal piss's you off I'm happy
> >--Not something
> >I would have done again, not much fun blocking & creeping dives until
> >midnight or later while everybody else is setting around relaxing
> >while drinking beer...I was a fun jumper- -Trying for medals seemed
> >like to much work & not enough fun to me.
>
> And yet you were there and later bragging about the medal ~you~ won,
> not the team, ad naseum.
>
Yeah thats it ad nauseous, I'm going to jam that bronze down your
throat till you vomit...I often regretted competing because it wasn't
fun, it was work but now
I'm happy I did because that one medal sticks in your craw....It
counters your claim I was no good at RW....Chaps your ass don't it
kid?
> >...If I had went the next
> >year it wouldn't have been to compete again, it would have been to
> >enjoy the meet, jump all day with people from across the country and
> >drink beer and relax at night. People chasing medals or big formations
> >and boo coo points are driven people often out right miserable it
> >seems to me
>
Yes perhaps it was oppertune....I could have ended up corrupted by the
system
but like a rose cut at first bud...I have lost none of my purity
>
> >and that ain't my personality type- - -Skydiving was about
> >relaxation and fun to me
.
> >>. D number? Makes no difference to me in terms of those with any
> >> numbes lose credibility as soon as they try to use said number as an
> >> item to brag about. I know (and in some cases knew) some of the real
> >> old timers, wackjob. They didn't give a crap about numbers -
>
> >Yes they do, I remember one that was pissed off because his D wasn't
> >low enough,
>
> He was joking.
No he wasn't, after all of those years he was still pissed about it. I
sat out in his old gray bus and patiently listened to him rail on
about it for 15 or 20 minutes and knowing how skydiving politics work
I'm sure he's right....he was screwed out of a lower number for
whatever reason, who knows thats just the way shit works in a shallow
world like the USPA....Sometimes people with power fuck you just
because they have the power and they want you to understand they have
it, nothing personal about it, its just politics
> >somebody else got one thru five, the old boy signed with
> >his C number for that very reason as people will often do-
> >- -Its
> >human nature even though the numbers are for administrative purposes
> >only to keep track of numbers issued.
>
> It's a shallow pretense of a superficial pecking order. I got great
> respect for the early skydivers, low numbers and all - but if anyone
> ever waved a number in front of me as a substitute to legitimize
> whatever, it's just a number. Deeds speak louder.
>
> >I've seen the same behavior in other associations even down to postal
> >mail box numbers that tell how long customers have been with a mail
> >drop company.
>
> Just because you've seen it doesn't make it any less superficial.
You just described the USPA & urban culture its built from to a tee----
>Superficial Thank you
JRC
> On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 14:11:38 -0800 (PST), JRC <chung...@yahoo.com>
>
> - Show quoted text -
No way you could be as good, you are untrained in the mental art of
war not to mention you write like a third grader, all breathless and
excited....There is no poetry or rhythm in your prose----You suck,
should have took the Navy up on its offer kid, maybe you could have
gotten squared away----Now? No chance, you are going to live without
honor the rest of your life and write sulky prose ;-P
Jerry K.
wrote:
It's not just killfiles but simple recognition of a thread with your
brown fingerprints all over raises the brown flag indicating - Same
Lame Shit - Waste of Time, and people move on. The measure is the
significant comparative lack of anyone chiming in - certainly in
comparison to even a few years ago.
>is better than Winsors incessant crying.
Incessant? He's made 110 posts since ~2003~.
>The
>only reason yours has failed
>is: Like I said before, skydivers out there just jumping, having fun
>and minding their own business I got no problem with-
>---let them kill
>me. TM/JM and other JM's
>Riggers, Pilots, DZ staff even DZO's quietly going about their
>business by teaching
>training, providing drop zones and aircraft to keep the sport going or
>building it up----I got no problem with, may I rest in their kill
>files.
In other words, people not posting to the newsgroup or at least not
directly confronting you and reminding you your loads of crap are
exactly that.
>The very punks I'm after. Like you are unable to kill file me,
Sure I could killfile you - easy steps, a few clicks away. The
reality is, closing one's eyes or sticking one's head in the sand
won't change the dynamic. And the dynamic here is a self-centered and
very needy troll >>>you<<< willing to abuse a public newsgroup and the
people who post to it for attention. In normal circumstances this is
just one of those things that come with the territory but the ~fact~
that you're willing employ overt and unapologetic racism, to lie about
yourself and make bold faced false assertions about other people and
for that matter, skydiving in general, and do it all simply for the
attention it gets you indicates a dead end loser of the lowest order -
but also a dead end loser that would allow itself be isolated because
it's only interested in attention and something to "hunch," as opposed
to contributing to the newsgroup in any constructive fashion.
>those I hump unmercifully. Winsor? Dunno whats up with that boy,
>control issues I would guess..
Of course you would guess that - it feeds the self-affirming rhetoric.
Someone is trying to "control" you, so you tell yourself, so in naming
it, you are trying to exhibit your own "control" over it.
>..He may be like some women, if they
>ain't happy or getting their way they nag men....Apparently all is not
>well with him, used to being in charge, saddled with a narrow
>Engineering education he feels the need to lash out because he's not
>the center of attention like one of my 14 karat punks (you know who
>you are) there is more than one. Now these few punks? They can't kill
>file me, hate that I have any opinion at all, hate that they can't
>control me or beat me down and basically hate their selves because of
>the preceding issues I listed.....I'm accused of trolling...Got no
>hook on the line
>they just clamp the line between their jaws and shinny right on up to
>the pole using their lips----Funny thing is I'm not trolling, I'm as
>serious as a Judge with
>my evaluations of them ROFLMAO.......Stick bitter pill down your
>throat and swallow it Jerry, I know its tough---Thats why you need to
>gulp it
And that rambling load of crap boils down to ~you simply meant to do
that~. That people express on a public newsgroup essentially how
asinine is your opinion and as your opinion is a reflection of you,
what an ass you are, that you are "after" people who call your loads
of crap for what it is and you for what you are - ~you meant to do
that.~ As I've likened it before - you've been squeezing out turds,
smearing yourself with it, and when some people might comment that
your shit stinks and so do you, all you got is basically, "I may be
covered in shit but I got you to notice and "I'm after" such people
who notice such things. You smear yourself in your own feces for the
attention it gets you and experience has shown that there's no bottom
to the depths that you will prostrate yourself down to, if only to get
this attention. I'm happy to give you that attention, wackjob,
because as I've already said, direct confrontation with your lines of
crap isolates you and in the greater scheme, renders you essentially
mute. The more you hunch and bawl, the more deafening the silence to
it.
...bsrp
...jlk
Jerry K.
wrote:
>On Feb 24, 11:14 am, "Big Jim" <lisaj...@the-beach.net> wrote:
>> <<Skydiving was about
>> relaxation and fun to me>>
>>
>> Buffo's idea of fun and relaxation:
>>
>> 1. First 80 jumps, 80 crash landings
>> 2. Proably crashes 100 times in the other 140 or so jumps he made
>> 3. Going to to drop zone, where none of the "anal, stuck up skydivers" liked
>> him, he was barely tolerated
>> 4. Nobody would jump with him because he was dangerous and (see 3 above), so
>> he made flailing solos in his sit suit
>> 5. Had to slink off the dz in the evening so he wouln't have his ass kicked
>> by girls
>> 6. Did I say nobody at the dz liked his fat' smelly, flailing loud mouth
>> ass
>> 7. Finally got hauled off on a gurney with a face full of tarmac
>> 8. Came to the wreck where he is constanly exposed as a liar and openly
>> ridiculed
>> 9. Those that don't openly bash him urge others to do or not do certain
>> things to make him go away
>> 10. Kill filed by most everyone
>
>1 some truth there, I was so old my vision was shot...Once I got my
>own canopy and quit jumping those rental rags, things improved
>considerably
"So old..." You were middle aged, in your 50's. Now, with the 40
jumps you've admitted for1993, plus another 40 to finally stand one up
(under a canopy used by many dropzones for their AFF operations, I
might add) - this suggests you went a very good amount of time, six
months plus if not longer, before you actually bought your own gear,
as well as a demonstration of a striking lack of learning ability.
>
>3 & 4 totally false, deguello types were fighting to get in on my SCR/
>SCS.
Got news for you wackjob, it was because they already had SCR's and
SCS's, for the sake of the beer and in Bob Bucquor's memory - not
specifically because you were the candidate. And I remember back in
the day they frowned upon cheating your way to the SCS by doing a
release and redock on the SCR dive. There was greater stock put in it
being a seperate dive where the candidate had to hang out and lurk
while the formation built until he could dock 8th or later.
>..probably to knock me into a funnel to get even for all the times
>I blew them out of the formation passing through
No, for Bob, beer, and because they already had their SCR's and S's.
>The rest mostly untrue, I was well liked because what you saw you got,
Of course what you came to realize is what they couldn't see, they
couldn't get - hence you hiding up the tree and burning rubber out the
parking lot when the coast was clear.
>thats refreshing in a phony sport,
You're projecting again, poserboy. The sport stands on its own merits
and the people who are a part of it. If you want to call it "phony"
from the distance you're at, colored by time, prejudice, and it being
forever beyond your reach, that's your opinion, but it's a blinkered
opinion shaped by false constructs.
>plus I could set a fast base-----no
>one went low on my watch....
Translation, no one went low(er) than you had already gone low.
>..The chicks? Yeah Christie wanted to
>bitch slap me when I had about 42 jumps------possibly a PMS problem
>mixed with RW Queen temperament heh
Not for nothing had she been jumping since 1969, least of all out of
control neophytes with their heads in their ass. It was due to your
boneheaded maneuver to chase after a formation out ahead of you
without forewarning them of your intent or their permission for you
to, with malice and forethough I might add - you've admitted as much,
open in their direct vicinity. No need to quibble and rationalize it
again, wackjob - we've been over it many times - just the same, it
wasn't the girls picking on you for arbitrary reasons.
>10.......Except the punks like you and Jerry K. You can't get enough
>of it
Never giving a sucker an even break, sucker.
>> Now thats big time, serious fun. Have to wonder what his idea of a bad day
>> is.
>
>The day the grim reaper comes a knocking but I'm going to ask for a wi
>fi connection and ghost computer so I can still haunt USPA crybabies
You'd likely still dump another Zima on it and short it out.
...bsrp
...jlk
JRC
> On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 18:21:47 -0800 (PST), JRC <chung...@yahoo.com>
>
> - Show quoted text -
keep thinking of yourself as a hero kid, I will keep bending you over
and breaking it off in you and we will both be happy....A perfect
match. ;)
JRC
> On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 18:21:47 -0800 (PST), JRC <chung...@yahoo.com>
actually reading every word of every post and gleaning Snuffy psycho
babble like "ego centric" and yet you are naive enough to think I a
CIT graduate would actually help a person with less than honorable
intentions.
I treat you no different than we treated the commies----lay false
trails, provide information that is actually disinformation to throw
them into a state of confusion.
Set them up then spring a ambush, The D number thing was actually a
sticky key, the (1) one was dropped. The 89 thing was more like
disinformation.....90 or 91, just a slight fudge and it becomes 89
This throws anal retentive adversary's into a tizzy. "What? This guy
actually ain't going to help me?" How dare him be underhanded, I'm a
hero of the front!" God they hated us, we showed a strong hand when
weak by counter attacking to keep them honest...Showed a weak hand
when strong to suck them into the kill zone. Is there any wonder the
front commanders of both the PLF and NLF had $5,000 in gold on each of
our heads? I mean we were trained to be chicken shit----GET OVER IT
> >> ...bsrp
> >> ...jlk- Hide quoted text -
>
> >> - Show quoted text -
>
> >? bruised ego......I think your idea of moderating me by getting us in
> >world wide kill files
>
> It's not just killfiles but simple recognition of a thread with your
> brown fingerprints all over raises the brown flag indicating - Same
> Lame Shit - Waste of Time, and people move on. The measure is the
> significant comparative lack of anyone chiming in - certainly in
> comparison to even a few years ago.
>
> ...bsrp
> ...jlk- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
kill file or kill a thread---no difference to me, the same truth
stands....let the fun jumpers, JM's, riggers, pilots, honest DZO's and
their staff go in peace. The punks
I'm trailing are unable to kill file me. You are living proof of this,
bend over punk! ;)
Jerry K.
wrote:
>On Feb 23, 5:12 pm, Jerry K. <sky...@pdq.net> wrote:
Nope - the reality is I fly camera for fun and profit and sometimes
it's shooting students and paying customers and sometimes not - and
there's nothing you can do about it - except bitch about what "should"
be - not that you're willing to take any steps to bring about what
"should" be. Nope - Mary Worth would just rather bitch because she
likes the sound of her voice so much.
> - -you hadn't caught on to
>that yet? Well the recession is going to effect the sport and stiffer
>competition for a buck around the DZ is going to kick your ass I'm
>afraid-
The reality is, there's never enough consistant cameraflyers - just
the way it is. But, by all means keep on praying for thousands of
skydivers to be aversly affected by the recession, Jinnie - it's clear
that you're cool with it, just as long as it affects me. It won't.
>-Hope you are ready to pay top dollar for your jump tickets
>punk.
And that will teach me, eh wackjob? Man, <sarcasm, dummy> I
shouldn't have shoved all of Jinnie's loads of crap back in his face
and exposed him for all that shamefull lying he was doing because now
I'm paying "top dollar" for lift tickets! Woe. Of course, I'd still
be jumping, "top dollar" or not, but you keep on dreaming for that
recession that'll give me my comeuppance, wackjob.
...bsrp
...jlk
Jerry K.
On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 19:15:57 -0800 (PST), JRC <chun...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
>On Feb 23, 5:12 pm, Jerry K. <sky...@pdq.net> wrote:
>> On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 14:43:21 -0800 (PST), JRC <chung...@yahoo.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> >> >I got it right,
>>
>> >> No, you didn't.
>>
>> >> >lets see 93 to 96 would be three years.....don't seem
>> >> >like enough time to get a D win that medal and see,
>>
>> >> And here we have confirmation, from your own fat mouth, all thiose
>> >> times you said you starting skydiving in the "late 80's" or "89 or
>> >> 90," times you said you skydived for "seven or eight years?" Just
>> >> big, fat posing lies. Because you thought it would equate to some
>> >> sort of street cred. Just retarded. Teams win medals in team
>> >> competition, wackjob.
>>
>> >It was a team competition
>>
>> Yet you said above "win that medal." You didn't win it, the team did
>> - and they earned it holding you stable on that one single (scrambles)
>> competition jump you ever made, ever.
>>
>>
>pretty good for first attempt at competition, and on a make up team
>that had never jumped together or even seen each other before the
>event eh? Eats your ass up don't it, just like my D number being lower
>than yours does don't it?
Actually, near as I can tell you're so eat up for being exposed as a
pathetic liar that now you're squirming into the sewer of having a
pissing contest over medals and D numbers. As for medals, I got 'em -
plural. Regional and National. Whoopty shit - medals just show a
particular team took the test and had a good day. Of course, a couple
of my medals I got to transport across state lines - that was kinda
fun. D number? Makes no difference to me in terms of those with any
number lose credibility as soon as they try to use said number as an
item to brag about. I know (and in some cases knew) some of the real
old timers, wackjob. They didn't give a crap about numbers - they
didn't have to - they'd rather listen to a good skydiving story or
leave it all in the air than compare dogtags. Like rooster said, the
real deals don't have to go around proclaiming how real they are. They
don't, Punks do. It's wisdom you've never learned.
>>
>> >> > I'd have to had
>> >> >made more jumps a year than you give me credit for,
>>
>> >> Still a piss poor number of jumper/year. Couple hundred jumps over
>> >> three years. Do the math.
>>
>> >No need I've got the log book, looks like it took me 4 years to earn
>> >the D,
>>
>> So, as you started in 1993, this would suggest it took you until 1997
>> to "earn the D." Which says you are in deep denial as you stroked out
>> and couldn't skydive after early 1996 - aside from one piss poorly
>> planned attempt in late 1999.
>
>So this means I must have started in 90 or 91
No, it categorically does not mean that but it's not surprising you're
still not getting right something so simple.
>which throws all of your
>calculations out the door.
No, the calculations are spot on. You started in 1993, were a
mediocre jumper for two to three years until you stroked out in early
1996.
>..Just like Chuck I have you so
>discombobulated
>your down to making shit up..
Nope, been going on what you have admitted, actuallly. You lie about
shit, the lies get exposed to reality and what you've may have said
earlier, you lie some more, and further lies are exposed. Nothing new
there.
>..Whats your D # punk, I want to see how
>many thousands more
Exactly how many skydives you have, junior? I want to see how many
thosands more I am on top of you.
>I am below you..
Heheheheh.
>.Ya know, give you something else to
>grind your teeth over....Here let me help your confusion, I went thru
>FJC in the late Spring so I only got 40 or so jumps in the first
>year---
Fourty in at least six months? Slacker.
>--->What year did I start?
Two years before 1995 - at least according to you.
>Make it as short as you want because
>the shorter it is the more talented it makes me look
>being a over 55, overweight middle aged man like I was at the
>time..
This is rich - Jinnie, having been exposed for lying about his time in
skydiving and bragging on its duration - a duration now less than half
than what he was lying on - has now determined to brag about the
number of jumps he made in his short stint. To think, Jinnie - if you
hadn't been so pathetic to lie in the first place, you could have been
working that lame bragging angle from the get go! Ah, if only...
>...The bronze?
>at 316 jumps I believe and around Easter of the next year I had a
>stroke----calculate punk I want to smell smoke coming off that feeble
>thing you think with
You started in the "late spring" of 1993 and you say you had "316
jumps" prior to Easter of the year following (1996) when you stroked
out. This would suggest you had "316 jumps" by whenever that pops
scrambles throw-together occurred in 1995 - we'll call it the end of
June, 1995. So, two years and change to make a supposed 316 jumps and
with slack jumping of 40 jumps in 1993, it would be 276 over the
course of 1994 into the first half of 1995. Now, this all is dubious
as there's no confirmation, one way or the other, on your actual jump
numbers so let's see some documentation, Jinnie. At very least
perhaps you can order a logbook online and fill some of that shit in
and at least make an effort. How ever it all falls out, there's
jumpers out there with multiple times the number of jumps you ever
made, ever. Get over it.
...bsrp
...jlk
Jerry K.
wrote:
>On Feb 24, 10:56 pm, Jerry K. <sky...@pdq.net> wrote:
I think you're reading far too much into it and faking yourself out of
your pants...again.
>I treat you no different than we treated the commies----lay false
>trails, provide information that is actually disinformation to throw
>them into a state of confusion.
What a load of crap. Tell lies, get busted, tell lies about the lies,
get busted, call the lies something else, get laughed at. The idea
that you would tell lies years ago which would be contradicted by what
you say years later - that you were lying then so you're not lying now
is high comedy of the lowest order. So, sure, Jinnie <sarcasm, dummy>
you just go ahead and suggest that when you said in 1995 you had
started jumping two years previous that this was "disinformation"
planted back then to "confuse" others now and don't worry about what
judgements to your present claim that it was simply "disinformation"
anyone reading this crap might make. Further, for another
inconvienent example, don't you worry about anyone not buying that
when you said the biggest formation you ever saw was a 48way and you
saw it from the ground that this was merely "disinformation" you
planted years ago to "confuse" anyone who later read a later post of
yours that said you were actually on some 48way. Occam's razor has
you bleeding out the butt, wackjob.
>Set them up then spring a ambush, The D number thing was actually a
>sticky key, the (1) one was dropped.
I'd actually buy it if you weren't so ready to play pissing contest
games over license numbers and other stupid crap, wackjob. But then,
there's your demonstrated habit of making a pretense, no matter how
low you'd stoop to make it - such as pretending your license wasn't
what it was - and then quick with the excuses if anyone busts you for
it - and, of course, if you weren't such a pathetic and proven liar.
>The 89 thing was more like
>disinformation.....90 or 91, just a slight fudge and it becomes 89
Nevermind the "disinformation" where in 1995 you said you had started
two years earlier.
>This throws anal retentive adversary's into a tizzy.
Only a wackjob like you, Jinnie, would attempt to marginalize a
realistic grasp of truth as "anal retentive," while attempting to
rationalize what are simply your own big, fat lies.
<Jinnie's One Time in Bandcamp Flute Solo snipped>
> we were trained to be chicken shit----GET OVER IT
Classic Jinnie - "Yeah, I'm chickenshit but it ain't my fault." What
a load of crap. The reality is, you're simply willing to prostrate
yourself down low as you attempt to reationalize what is just plain
pathetic. Like I've said, lying stinks and indicative of someone with
serious issues, one way or the other - but telling lies about your
lies to attempt to rationalize the lies is a pathetic stink. You keep
on breathing it in and keeping telling yourself the fragrance is
pleasant, and try not to think about anyone wrinkling their nose at
clearly a pathetic loser with truth issues.
>
>
>> >> ...bsrp
>> >> ...jlk- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> >> - Show quoted text -
>>
>> >? bruised ego......I think your idea of moderating me by getting us in
>> >world wide kill files
>>
>> It's not just killfiles but simple recognition of a thread with your
>> brown fingerprints all over raises the brown flag indicating - Same
>> Lame Shit - Waste of Time, and people move on. The measure is the
>> significant comparative lack of anyone chiming in - certainly in
>> comparison to even a few years ago.
>>
>> ...bsrp
>> ...jlk- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
>
>kill file or kill a thread---no difference to me, the same truth
>stands....let the fun jumpers, JM's, riggers, pilots, honest DZO's and
>their staff go in peace. The punks
>I'm trailing are unable to kill file me. You are living proof of this,
>bend over punk!
Which just proves several of my earlier points. You could killfile
but you'd be worried about what other people might say that you could
not see, and it would mean you'd get less direct attention, and as you
value attention - even the caustic derisive kind - that also is a
non-starter. That you say you are "training" is just another lame
canard - just another rationalization you've made which you can lean
on and tell yourself that even now, as exposed for a liar and pathetic
troll who pissed away any and all credibility years ago, that you have
some relevance left. Not to skydiving you don't. Where the rubber
meets that road is either beyond your ability or beyond your own
selfish interests. And scant ability coupled with selfish illusion
has been your hallmark for a good, long time now. Bend over, Jinnie -
that's oblivion kicking your ass.
...bsrp
...jlk
Jerry K.
wrote:
That is a assignation of "good" stretched to a remarkably stupid low.
>you are untrained in the mental art of
>war
Keeping in mind your demonstration of "the mental art of
war" boils down to baseless brags and false assertions, unapologetic
lying, and essentially just spewing loads of crap while calling it
something else - in its present iterration, "the mental art of
war." Mentally challenged, more like.
>not to mention you write like a third grader, all breathless and
>excited.
Said the poser who "creatively misspells" and appends girly chatroom
hieroglyphs as a matter of presenting some half-assed "countrified"
personna with an emotional undercurrent for anyone who recognizes such
grade school keystroking.
>...There is no poetry or rhythm in your prose----You suck,
Whereas there's no truth or reason to your "prose" ------You blow.
>should have took the Navy up on its offer kid, maybe you could have
>gotten squared away--
"Squared away" like you? God protect me from such an ignominious dead
end.
>--Now? No chance, you are going to live without
>honor the rest of your life and write sulky prose
You, on the other hand are a demonstrated and proven liar - such an
"honor" <sarcasm, dummy> for you. What's the chatroom hieroglyph for
truth be told?
...bsrp
...jlk
Jerry K.
wrote:
>On Feb 24, 10:56 pm, Jerry K. <sky...@pdq.net> wrote:
Not a hero - pragmatic - and the more you convince yourself how
perfect it is that you've found the attention you crave, the more
isolated you become and that much smaller is your footprint. It begs
the question, if Jinnie squeezes out a wet fart in the middle of
nowhere, does it make a sound? For now it's just you trying to
convince yourself that you are somehow still relevant to skydiving.
You're not.
...bsrp
...jlk