Where's Gil?

John Corbett

unread,

Aug 8, 2023, 10:34:03 AM8/8/23

to

He hasn't posted anything since he stormed out of his latest thread in a huff.
He threw a real hissy fit after I posted several links to legal websites showing
his concept of chain of custody rules don't hold water.

When the McAdams group was still in business, Bob Harris used to drop in
occasionally. People who frequent other groups told me he would bounce
around from one forum to another, then leave after somebody refuted his
latest offering. Is that Gil's game too? I know he posts to other forums and
I wonder if he has decided to bail out of this one for a while and spread his
nonsense elsewhere.

Chuck Schuyler

unread,

Aug 8, 2023, 11:08:42 AM8/8/23

to

Gil is what I call a "drive by" poster. He careens up to a particular thread and sprays a few poorly aimed shots that ricochet around, and then he lurches away in his pick-up truck, transmission groaning, back to the safety of mommy's basement, occasionally poking his head out to see if the coast is clear.

As Gil has admitted, he's not real interested in what happened historically. He's the self-appointed Johnny "If the glove don't fit, you must acquit!" Cochrane of the JFK assassination, obsessed with creating reasonable doubt for a mythical trial that will never happen.

John Corbett

unread,

Aug 8, 2023, 12:28:38 PM8/8/23

to

I suppose it's the most harmless way for him to deal with the voices in his head.

Ben Holmes

unread,

Aug 8, 2023, 12:37:12 PM8/8/23

to

Answering a post from a decade ago, and not realizing his error...
Such STUPIDITY!!!

Chuck Schuyler

unread,

Aug 8, 2023, 8:49:41 PM8/8/23

to

How old is your "Mark Lane" series? You've been posting the same stuff for two decades.

You know what you won't post? Your version of what happened on 11/22/63. Nothing from you. And sorry, your multi-segment Magnum Opus doesn't cut it. Nothing in it about how many shots were fired, how JFK's body was kidnapped, etc.

You literally can't explain what happened that day with any specificity.

As Trump would say, "Sad!"

BT George

unread,

Aug 9, 2023, 10:10:59 AM8/9/23

to

One suspects for some of these folks, that it is also perhaps the most therapeutic treatment for their particular psychosis.

BT George

unread,

Aug 9, 2023, 10:13:56 AM8/9/23

to

I think he did post his "scenario" a few years back if you can call such disconnected doubts and ramblings that. But you topped him by featuring a large (yet small enough to only be a statistical sampling of madness) number of the silly things he has said or positions he has embraced over time. Contradictions and manifest absurdities abounded.

Ben Holmes

unread,

Aug 9, 2023, 10:16:40 AM8/9/23

to

On Tue, 8 Aug 2023 17:49:39 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Schuyler
<chucksch...@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Tuesday, August 8, 2023 at 11:37:12?AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
>> On Tue, 8 Aug 2023 07:34:01 -0700 (PDT), John Corbett
>> <geowri...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >He hasn't posted anything since he stormed out of his latest thread in a huff.
>> >He threw a real hissy fit after I posted several links to legal websites showing
>> >his concept of chain of custody rules don't hold water.
>> >
>> >When the McAdams group was still in business, Bob Harris used to drop in
>> >occasionally. People who frequent other groups told me he would bounce
>> >around from one forum to another, then leave after somebody refuted his
>> >latest offering. Is that Gil's game too? I know he posts to other forums and
>> >I wonder if he has decided to bail out of this one for a while and spread his
>> >nonsense elsewhere.
>
>> Answering a post from a decade ago, and not realizing his error...
>> Such STUPIDITY!!!
>
>How old is your "Mark Lane" series? You've been posting the same stuff for two decades.

Yep. It's never been answered.

>You know what you won't post? Your version of what happened on 11/22/63.

Chuck Schuyler

unread,

Aug 9, 2023, 1:10:17 PM8/9/23

to

No, his "explanation" is what I call his "Magnum Opus," which he has helpfully cut-and-pasted at this thread. None of the things he claimed happened that day are explained. (LBJ ordered the "hit" and later was behind RFK's murder, a shot was fired through the front windshield of the limo, JFK's corpse was diverted for a secret autopsy, etc.) He can't pinpoint what happened, he doesn't link to any tests or recreations for what he alleges, etc.

His entire Magnum Opus is just a series of begged questions, burden shifting, and other assorted logical fallacies, based off of his own subjective opinions and personal biases.

Here it is:

The only thing Ben has figured out is that on 11/22/63, some people did something. For Ben, it's all a head-scratching, shoulder-shrugging mystery, and sixty years later, we know almost as little about what happened that day as we did on 11/22/63.

Ben Holmes

unread,

Aug 9, 2023, 1:30:28 PM8/9/23

to

On Wed, 9 Aug 2023 10:10:15 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Schuyler
<chucksch...@gmail.com> wrote:

> No, his "explanation" is what I call his "Magnum Opus," which he has
> helpfully cut-and-pasted at this thread. None of the things he claimed
> happened that day are explained. (LBJ ordered the "hit" and later was
> behind RFK's murder, a shot was fired through the front windshield of
> the limo, JFK's corpse was diverted for a secret autopsy, etc.) He
> can't pinpoint what happened, he doesn't link to any tests or
> recreations for what he alleges, etc.

Notice that Chuckles can't quote me saying ANY of these things he
claims I've stated... so no-one can judge the accuracy of Chuckles'
claims.

Nor can Chuckles state what *HE* thinks happened on 11/22/63 - he's
refused each time I've asked.

Chuckles is a kook. He actually BELIEVES that if someone saw you
reading a newspaper, then months later denied that he'd seen you
reading a newspaper - THAT IT'S EVIDENCE THAT YOU'RE A MURDERER!

Chuckles can't deny it... watch folks!!

> His entire Magnum Opus is just a series of begged questions, burden
> shifting, and other assorted logical fallacies, based off of his own
> subjective opinions and personal biases.

You can say it... you can't prove it.

That is, of course, PROVABLY a lie on your part, Chuckles.

A lie that no lurker could ever accept. So you're simply proving
yourself to be a moron.

> For Ben, it's all a head-scratching, shoulder-shrugging mystery, and
> sixty years later, we know almost as little about what happened that
> day as we did on 11/22/63.

And again, you're simply lying.

And this fact tells the tale - for if you *could*, you'd use the truth
to debate. But you can't.

And you STILL refuse to give your scenario. WHAT COWARDICE!!!

John Corbett

unread,

Aug 9, 2023, 1:45:05 PM8/9/23

to

Yes, he did, but there were so many holes in it that refuting it was like shooting fish in a
barrel. It made absolutely zero sense and didn't fit any of the evidence. It demonstrated
why CTs are so reluctant to ever post their own scenario. If I really gave a shit what Benny
thinks I'd go to the trouble of finding it, but he doesn't matter so why bother. He's dead to me.

Ben Holmes

unread,

Aug 9, 2023, 1:52:50 PM8/9/23

to

On Wed, 9 Aug 2023 10:45:02 -0700 (PDT), John Corbett
<geowri...@gmail.com> wrote:

>Yes, he did, but there were so many holes in it that refuting it was like shooting fish in a
>barrel.

Yet you can't explain why not a *SINGLE* believer responded to a
SINGLE post in the entire series.

Nor can you quote a *SINGLE* "hole" - and defend it.

You're simply lying...

> It made absolutely zero sense and didn't fit any of the evidence.

And again, you're lying. You can't quote even so much as a SINGLE
statement I made that isn't supported by evidence.

Are you stupid enough to think you're convincing ANYONE with these
blatant lies?

>It demonstrated why CTs are so reluctant to ever post their own scenario.

Au contraire - it's **ONLY** critics that post their scenarios.
Believers are TERRIFIED of doing so - you certainly haven't.

Neither has Chuckles.

Neither has Chickenshit.

Neither has Huckster Sienzant.

Neither has Von Penis.

Neither has Steven....

So tell us moron - why would anyone believe your obvious lies?

> If I really gave a shit what Benny thinks I'd go to the trouble of
> finding it, but he doesn't matter so why bother. He's dead to me.

Try harder... no-one is going to believe you when you keep bringing me
up.

David Healy

unread,

Aug 9, 2023, 11:45:04 PM8/9/23

to

projecting again, brainfart? lmfao!

David Healy

unread,

Aug 10, 2023, 12:00:54 AM8/10/23

to

On Wednesday, August 9, 2023 at 10:10:17 AM UTC-7, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
> On Wednesday, August 9, 2023 at 9:13:56 AM UTC-5, BT George wrote:
> > On Tuesday, August 8, 2023 at 7:49:41 PM UTC-5, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, August 8, 2023 at 11:37:12 AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 8 Aug 2023 07:34:01 -0700 (PDT), John Corbett
> > > > <geowri...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >He hasn't posted anything since he stormed out of his latest thread in a huff.
> > > > >He threw a real hissy fit after I posted several links to legal websites showing
> > > > >his concept of chain of custody rules don't hold water.
> > > > >
> > > > >When the McAdams group was still in business, Bob Harris used to drop in
> > > > >occasionally. People who frequent other groups told me he would bounce
> > > > >around from one forum to another, then leave after somebody refuted his
> > > > >latest offering. Is that Gil's game too? I know he posts to other forums and
> > > > >I wonder if he has decided to bail out of this one for a while and spread his
> > > > >nonsense elsewhere.
> > >
> > > > Answering a post from a decade ago, and not realizing his error...
> > > > Such STUPIDITY!!!
> > > How old is your "Mark Lane" series? You've been posting the same stuff for two decades.
> > >
> > > You know what you won't post? Your version of what happened on 11/22/63. Nothing from you. And sorry, your multi-segment Magnum Opus doesn't cut it. Nothing in it about how many shots were fired, how JFK's body was kidnapped, etc.
> > >
> > I think he did post his "scenario" a few years back if you can call such disconnected doubts and ramblings that. But you topped him by featuring a large (yet small enough to only be a statistical sampling of madness) number of the silly things he has said or positions he has embraced over time. Contradictions and manifest absurdities abounded.
> No, his "explanation" is what I call his "Magnum Opus," which he has helpfully cut-and-pasted at this thread. None of the things he claimed happened that day are explained. (LBJ ordered the "hit" and later was behind RFK's murder, a shot was fired through the front windshield of the limo, JFK's corpse was diverted for a secret autopsy, etc.) He can't pinpoint what happened, he doesn't link to any tests or recreations for what he alleges, etc.
>
> His entire Magnum Opus is just a series of begged questions, burden shifting, and other assorted logical fallacies, based off of his own subjective opinions and personal biases.

his "magnum opus" cleans your Marquette failed education clock... not to mention giving .john mcmadman extreme gas AND ran from this place on numerous occasions...
do you realize you, YOU have never posted a scenario of events concerning the assassination of JFK! And you been posting trash to ACJ for what 20+ years now? Total disgrace...

next

[...]

diverting to Trump is a non-starter, Einstein... lying about case acts by commission or omission for 25+ years does leave a mark on ones soul...

Chuck Schuyler

unread,

Aug 10, 2023, 12:30:07 AM8/10/23

to

((!!**HICCUP**!!))

Chuck Schuyler

unread,

Aug 10, 2023, 12:37:40 AM8/10/23

to

On Wednesday, August 9, 2023 at 12:30:28 PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Aug 2023 10:10:15 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Schuyler
> <chucksch...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> > No, his "explanation" is what I call his "Magnum Opus," which he has
> > helpfully cut-and-pasted at this thread. None of the things he claimed
> > happened that day are explained. (LBJ ordered the "hit" and later was
> > behind RFK's murder, a shot was fired through the front windshield of
> > the limo, JFK's corpse was diverted for a secret autopsy, etc.) He
> > can't pinpoint what happened, he doesn't link to any tests or
> > recreations for what he alleges, etc.

> Notice that Chuckles can't quote me saying ANY of these things he
> claims I've stated...

Being the slippery, slithery, soil slug slime skank that you are, I need to be careful how I answer you, because I can't quote you SAYING these things, but you have WRITTEN these things.

so no-one can judge the accuracy of Chuckles'
> claims.
>
> Nor can Chuckles state what *HE* thinks happened on 11/22/63 - he's
> refused each time I've asked.

I don't have a different scenario than the historically accepted scenario; Oswald alone, no KNOWN help.

>
> Chuckles is a kook. He actually BELIEVES that if someone saw you
> reading a newspaper, then months later denied that he'd seen you
> reading a newspaper - THAT IT'S EVIDENCE THAT YOU'RE A MURDERER!

I specifically do not believe that.

Nah.

Ben Holmes

unread,

Aug 10, 2023, 11:22:33 AM8/10/23

to

On Wed, 9 Aug 2023 21:37:38 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Schuyler
<chucksch...@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Wednesday, August 9, 2023 at 12:30:28?PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
>> On Wed, 9 Aug 2023 10:10:15 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Schuyler
>> <chucksch...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> No, his "explanation" is what I call his "Magnum Opus," which he has
>>> helpfully cut-and-pasted at this thread. None of the things he claimed
>>> happened that day are explained. (LBJ ordered the "hit" and later was
>>> behind RFK's murder, a shot was fired through the front windshield of
>>> the limo, JFK's corpse was diverted for a secret autopsy, etc.) He
>>> can't pinpoint what happened, he doesn't link to any tests or
>>> recreations for what he alleges, etc.
>
>> Notice that Chuckles can't quote me saying ANY of these things he
>> claims I've stated...
>
> Being the slippery, slithery, soil slug slime skank that you are, I
> need to be careful how I answer you, because I can't quote you SAYING
> these things, but you have WRITTEN these things.

Notice folks, that Chuckles can't QUOTE what I wrote that matches his
claims.

Notice that the person being "a slippery, slithery, soil slug slime
skank" is clearly the one who STILL refuses to support his claims.

>> so no-one can judge the accuracy of Chuckles'
>> claims.
>>
>> Nor can Chuckles state what *HE* thinks happened on 11/22/63 - he's
>> refused each time I've asked.
>

> I don't have...

Indeed.

More importantly, you simply *CAN'T* post what you believe.

And support it.

>> Chuckles is a kook. He actually BELIEVES that if someone saw you
>> reading a newspaper, then months later denied that he'd seen you
>> reading a newspaper - THAT IT'S EVIDENCE THAT YOU'RE A MURDERER!
>
>I specifically do not believe that.

Then you're clearly quite dishonest. You've read that exact claim
from Bugliosi, and remained silent.

You saw Chickenshit defending that assertion... and said nothing.

You saw David Von Penis accepting that assertion, and said nothing.

>> Chuckles can't deny it... watch folks!!

And now that he has - we see even more clearly his dishonesty.

>>> His entire Magnum Opus is just a series of begged questions, burden
>>> shifting, and other assorted logical fallacies, based off of his own
>>> subjective opinions and personal biases.
>>
>> You can say it... you can't prove it.

Dead silence...

As you won't take **ANY** authority outside of yourself on this issue,
you're simply a liar.

>> A lie that no lurker could ever accept. So you're simply proving
>> yourself to be a moron.

Notice the silence here...

>>> For Ben, it's all a head-scratching, shoulder-shrugging mystery, and
>>> sixty years later, we know almost as little about what happened that
>>> day as we did on 11/22/63.
>>
>> And again, you're simply lying.
>>
>> And this fact tells the tale - for if you *could*, you'd use the truth
>> to debate. But you can't.
>>
>> And you STILL refuse to give your scenario. WHAT COWARDICE!!!

Again, more silence from the coward.

Chuck Schuyler

unread,

Aug 10, 2023, 1:09:51 PM8/10/23

to

Your fallacy here is a fallacy of over precision. You absolutely believe LBJ was one of the assassination masterminds. You absolutely believe he was behind the RFK hit to keep a future president RFK from exposing LBJ's corruption and role in JFK's death. You absolutely believe a shot was fired from perhaps the so-called "south knoll" that pierced the front of the limo windshield. You absolutely believe a sort of "secret" pre-autopsy autopsy was performed to have JFK's wounds conform to the sniper-from-behind scenario.

The fact that I can't quote a specific passage (which you'd squirm out of) isn't relevant. Your critics here know your hobby point positions very well.

Have you changed your mind about LBJ's involvement? About a shot penetrating the limo windshield fired from in front? Shenanigans with JFK's body/coffin being diverted for a pre-autopsy autopsy? If so, let me know. Otherwise, my summary of some of your hobby points--and the fact that your Magnum Opus doesn't address any of them--remains accurate.

Sorry Ben. You'll need to do much, much better to convince your critics that you have a position worthy of consideration. Get busy, lazy bones.

Bud

unread,

Aug 10, 2023, 1:15:38 PM8/10/23

to

I`ve explained this to you several times now. It was the change in pattern. Oswald was known to read the paper in the morning in the domino room. Not so on the day of the assassination.

Ben Holmes

unread,

Aug 10, 2023, 1:36:47 PM8/10/23

to

On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 10:09:48 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Schuyler
<chucksch...@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 10:22:33?AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
>> On Wed, 9 Aug 2023 21:37:38 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Schuyler
>> <chucksch...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>On Wednesday, August 9, 2023 at 12:30:28?PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 9 Aug 2023 10:10:15 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Schuyler
>>>> <chucksch...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> No, his "explanation" is what I call his "Magnum Opus," which he has
>>>>> helpfully cut-and-pasted at this thread. None of the things he claimed
>>>>> happened that day are explained. (LBJ ordered the "hit" and later was
>>>>> behind RFK's murder, a shot was fired through the front windshield of
>>>>> the limo, JFK's corpse was diverted for a secret autopsy, etc.) He
>>>>> can't pinpoint what happened, he doesn't link to any tests or
>>>>> recreations for what he alleges, etc.
>>>
>>>> Notice that Chuckles can't quote me saying ANY of these things he
>>>> claims I've stated...
>>>
>>> Being the slippery, slithery, soil slug slime skank that you are, I
>>> need to be careful how I answer you, because I can't quote you SAYING
>>> these things, but you have WRITTEN these things.
>>
>> Notice folks, that Chuckles can't QUOTE what I wrote that matches his
>> claims.

And even when it's pointed out again - HE STILL RUNS LIKE THE
SLIPPERY, SLITHERY, SOIL SLUG SLIME SKANK THAT HE IS!

>> Notice that the person being "a slippery, slithery, soil slug slime
>> skank" is clearly the one who STILL refuses to support his claims.
>>
>>>> so no-one can judge the accuracy of Chuckles'
>>>> claims.
>>>>
>>>> Nor can Chuckles state what *HE* thinks happened on 11/22/63 - he's
>>>> refused each time I've asked.
>>>
>>> I don't have...
>>
>> Indeed.
>>
>> More importantly, you simply *CAN'T* post what you believe.
>>
>> And support it.

Of course, Chuckles ran AGAIN!!!

>>>> Chuckles is a kook. He actually BELIEVES that if someone saw you
>>>> reading a newspaper, then months later denied that he'd seen you
>>>> reading a newspaper - THAT IT'S EVIDENCE THAT YOU'RE A MURDERER!
>>>
>>>I specifically do not believe that.
>>
>> Then you're clearly quite dishonest. You've read that exact claim
>> from Bugliosi, and remained silent.
>>
>> You saw Chickenshit defending that assertion... and said nothing.
>>
>> You saw David Von Penis accepting that assertion, and said nothing.

And you're DOING IT AGAIN!!!

You surely don't believe that someone was shot **BEHIND** JFK with
that same SBT bullet - yet you've remained silent.

Such an AMAZING coward!!!

>>>> Chuckles can't deny it... watch folks!!
>>
>> And now that he has - we see even more clearly his dishonesty.

Particularly with a new claim of Bugs that he's running from...

>>>>> His entire Magnum Opus is just a series of begged questions, burden
>>>>> shifting, and other assorted logical fallacies, based off of his own
>>>>> subjective opinions and personal biases.
>>>>
>>>> You can say it... you can't prove it.
>>
>> Dead silence...

Chuckles got spanked!

Spanked AGAIN!

>>>> A lie that no lurker could ever accept. So you're simply proving
>>>> yourself to be a moron.
>>
>> Notice the silence here...

Spanked AGAIN!!

>>>>> For Ben, it's all a head-scratching, shoulder-shrugging mystery, and
>>>>> sixty years later, we know almost as little about what happened that
>>>>> day as we did on 11/22/63.
>>>>
>>>> And again, you're simply lying.
>>>>
>>>> And this fact tells the tale - for if you *could*, you'd use the truth
>>>> to debate. But you can't.
>>>>
>>>> And you STILL refuse to give your scenario. WHAT COWARDICE!!!
>>
>> Again, more silence from the coward.
>

>Your fallacy here ...

Nope.

You lose!

David Healy

unread,

Aug 10, 2023, 10:22:42 PM8/10/23

to

mom didn't burp your ass, so we have to do it, and you STILL shit on the rug...

BT George

unread,

Aug 11, 2023, 10:53:11 AM8/11/23

to

Hey quick time out. Didn't you say a few months ago you were dealing with some health issues? If so, is everything going OK, or at least better, for the moment?

John Corbett

unread,

Aug 11, 2023, 11:06:11 AM8/11/23

to

On Friday, August 11, 2023 at 10:53:11 AM UTC-4, BT George wrote:

> Hey quick time out. Didn't you say a few months ago you were dealing with some health issues? If so, is everything going OK, or at least better, for the moment?

Just last night I was watching The Godfather II for the umpteenth time. In one scene Michael
Corleone observed, "Hyman Roth has been dying from the same heart attack for 20 years.".
Maybe that's the case with Healy.

Ben Holmes

unread,

Aug 11, 2023, 11:20:13 AM8/11/23

to

On Fri, 11 Aug 2023 08:06:09 -0700 (PDT), John Corbett
<geowri...@gmail.com> wrote:

>Just last night I was watching The Godfather II for the umpteenth time. In one scene Michael
>Corleone observed, "Hyman Roth has been dying from the same heart attack for 20 years.".

Logical fallacy removed... you're incapable of naming it anyway...

Ben Holmes

unread,

Aug 11, 2023, 5:23:02 PM8/11/23

to

On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 10:15:36 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:

And I've refuted you each time.

> It was the change in pattern.

No, there was no change in pattern. The EARLIEST evidence shows that
Oswald did what he normally did.

You're going to have to deal with Chuckles... **HE** doesn't accept
what you're saying.

Bud

unread,

Aug 11, 2023, 6:01:39 PM8/11/23

to

And then you woke up.

> > It was the change in pattern.
> No, there was no change in pattern. The EARLIEST evidence shows that
> Oswald did what he normally did.

Produce this "earliest evidence" that shows Oswald read the paper in the Domino room on the day of the assassination first thing when he came to work like he usually did.

You won`t, because you are lying.

> You're going to have to deal with Chuckles... **HE** doesn't accept
> what you're saying.

Is that what the voices in your head told you?

Ben Holmes

unread,

Aug 11, 2023, 6:08:25 PM8/11/23

to

So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

Bud

unread,

Aug 11, 2023, 6:10:51 PM8/11/23

to

On Friday, August 11, 2023 at 6:08:25 PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:

Non sequitur removed.

The post that frightened Ben...

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/BI_ZOaLh-30/m/0i8l2hePAAAJ

Ben thinks if someone always does something at a certain time and then does it at a different time, this is not a change of pattern.

Ben Holmes

unread,

Aug 11, 2023, 6:16:25 PM8/11/23

to

Bud

unread,

Aug 11, 2023, 7:05:11 PM8/11/23

to

On Friday, August 11, 2023 at 6:16:25 PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:

Non sequitur removed.

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/BI_ZOaLh-30/m/0i8l2hePAAAJ

Ben Holmes

unread,

Aug 11, 2023, 7:08:32 PM8/11/23

to

Hans

unread,

Aug 11, 2023, 9:43:07 PM8/11/23

to

On Tuesday, August 8, 2023 at 9:34:03 AM UTC-5, John Corbett wrote:
> He hasn't posted anything since he stormed out of his latest thread in a huff.
> He threw a real hissy fit after I posted several links to legal websites showing
> his concept of chain of custody rules don't hold water.
>
> When the McAdams group was still in business, Bob Harris used to drop in
> occasionally. People who frequent other groups told me he would bounce
> around from one forum to another, then leave after somebody refuted his
> latest offering. Is that Gil's game too? I know he posts to other forums and
> I wonder if he has decided to bail out of this one for a while and spread his
> nonsense elsewhere.

⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣤⣶⣶⣤⡀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡄⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠹⣿⣿⣿⣿⡿⠁⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⠉⠉⠉⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣰⣿⣿⣿⣦⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣰⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢰⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⢠⣿⣿⣿⣿⡿⣿⣿⣧⣀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⢺⣿⣿⣿⣿⣧⣬⣻⢿⣿⣿⡦
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠙⠻⠿⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡏⠛⠁
⠀⠀⠀⣀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣽⣿⡿⠁⠀⠀
⠀⢀⡠⣿⣷⣤⡀⠀⠀⢸⣿⣿⠃⠀⠀⠀
⠰⠿⠿⠿⠿⠿⠇⠀⠠⠿⠿⠏⠀⠀⠀⠀

凸( •̀_•́ )凸

Bud

unread,

Aug 11, 2023, 9:51:00 PM8/11/23

to

On Friday, August 11, 2023 at 7:08:32 PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:

Non sequitur removed.

Ben Holmes

unread,

Aug 14, 2023, 11:25:44 AM8/14/23

to

On Fri, 11 Aug 2023 18:50:58 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:

>On Friday, August 11, 2023 at 7:08:32?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
>
> Non sequitur removed.