My Scenario - Part 11b

[Ben Holmes]

My Scenario Part 11b

Does anyone sense any pattern of evidence here? Is there any believer
willing to say the words "white shirt?" Is there a *SINGLE* honest
believer who will publicly admit what the evidence here shows? Can
*any* believer admit that Oswald doesn't fit this description?

Johnny Brewer peeked through the curtains and pointed to a man wearing
a long-sleeved brown shirt and told Westbrook, "The man in the 4th row
from the back in the middle aisle is the man." But the suspect sitting
at the rear of the semi-darkened theater did not fit the description
of the man who shot Tippit. From the statements of eyewitnesses the
police dispatcher reported the suspect was wearing a white jacket
(discarded at the Texaco station) and a white T-shirt, yet the man
pointed out by Brewer to Captain Westbrook was wearing a long-sleeved,
dark brown shirt.

Does anyone sense a conflict between how all the witnesses described
the murderer and the actual person arrested? Will any honest believer
publicly acknowledge this?

I know it requires absolutely basic thinking skills to recognize that
Oswald wasn't wearing a white shirt, and that he simply didn't fit the
mass of eyewitness descriptions.

Amusingly, the suspect in a white shirt **WAS** arrested at the
theater... as the website "Kennedyandking.com" notes: Bernard Haire,
owner of a hobby shop two doors from the theater, walked out the rear
of his shop shortly before 2:00 PM and saw police cars backed up to
Madison Street. He watched as the police escorted a man from the rear
of the Texas Theater wearing a "white pullover shirt." They placed the
man in a squad car and drove away. He noticed the man was very "flush"
in the face as though he had been in a struggle. Haire's description
of this man-"white shirt" with a "flush face"-is consistent with
witness statements of Tippit's killer before, during and after the
shooting. For 25 years Mr. Haire and other witnesses thought they had
witnessed the arrest of Oswald behind the Texas Theater in the alley.
When told Oswald was brought out the front of the theater Haire asked
"Then who was the person I saw police take out the rear of the
theater, put in a police car, and drive off?"

No wonder the witness list from the theater disappeared... there were
24 witnesses there who might have been able to clear Oswald (perhaps
able to testify that Oswald arrived at the theater too early to have
shot Tippit?) or to have seen multiple arrests. Either scenario plays
havoc with the Warren Commission's theory.

So far, I've shown how the Warren Commission lied about the evidence
for at *least* two assassins - I've shown how there was some
hanky-panky going on during Oswald's arrest - and shown how evidence
is missing in this case.

Once it's been demonstrated that evidence was lied about - and
evidence simply "disappeared" in this case - the Warren Commission is
finished.

It then is no longer the "default" position by which everything else
needs to be judged. And unless believers can credibly explain the
facts I've thus far presented - they've lost.

For you cannot use lies as the foundation of anything at all.