Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Message from discussion NOVEMBER 22, 1963 --- "LN" FACTS AND COMMON SENSE, INSTEAD OF "CT" FICTION AND NONSENSE
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
David VP  
View profile  
 More options May 26 2006, 10:59 pm
Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy.jfk
From: "David VP" <davevonp...@aol.com>
Date: 26 May 2006 19:59:19 -0700
Local: Fri, May 26 2006 10:59 pm
Subject: Re: NOVEMBER 22, 1963 --- "LN" FACTS AND COMMON SENSE, INSTEAD OF "CT" FICTION AND NONSENSE

>> "You're probably referring to either Mal Couch or Robert Jackson."

And then, too, there's also NBC-TV cameraman Dave Wiegman....who
captured MOTION PICTURE film of the scene right as the last shots were
being fired (and immediately after). Wiegman even filmed the limo as it
goes beneath the underpass. He could have quite easily, and
inadvertently, captured a conspirator or two in his film.

So why wasn't Wiegman's potentially-plot-blowing film seized (somehow)
by the plotters? Or couldn't they risk offending the National
Broadcasting Company?

Of course, there are many CT-Kooks who think that Wiegman's film DOES
capture elements of "The Conspiracy"....via the so-called "smoke"
that's drifting down from the Knoll here......

http://216.122.129.112/dc/user_files/3448.jpg

http://www.geocities.com/shotonelm/Zapruder/weigmansmoke.jpg

.....Of course there's no proof that that is "smoke" from a rifle shot.
And, furthermore, the idea that THAT MUCH smoke would still be
lingering near the Knoll several seconds AFTER the shot was fired seems
a tad far-fetched (as is the idea of these "pro" assassins even
utilizing ammunition which produces THAT MUCH SMOKE in the first place,
to potentially be seen by gobs of witnesses and blow the whole Patsy
Plot/Conspiracy Plot).

There's also the CT-Kook assertion (via some CTers) that has a person
riding in one of the press busses (at the REAR of the motorcade) who
claims that "smoke" ("gunsmoke" per the CT set) was STILL visible near
street level as the bus passed through Dealey Plaza....which HAD to
have been at LEAST a full minute (or even two minutes) after the
shooting occurred. Come now.

Such an assertion (if true re. "smoke" still being visible MINUTES
later in DP) actually only serves to bolster the idea that ANY "smoke"
that was seen by Holland, Dodd, etc., had come from some OTHER source
other than rifle fire.

But those things don't matter in CT Kooksville. They see
"GUNsmoke"...so, by God..."GUNsmoke" it's gonna be.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google