info
Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
There Isn't A Single Believer...
93 views
Skip to first unread message
Ben Holmes
Jun 10, 2019, 6:48:16 PM6/10/19
to
There isn't a *SINGLE* believer who will publicly state that this is
correct:
1. There is a large irregular defect of the scalp and skull on the
right involving chiefly the parietal bone but extending somewhat into
the temporal and occipital regions. In this region there is an actual
absence of scalp and bone producing a defect which measures
approximately 13 cm. in greatest diameter.
Indeed, believers prefer to blatantly LIE about this statement.
This is all you need to know... if you're trying to decide whether a
lone assassin or a conspiracy took the life of JFK.
Nothing else is needed.
Bud
Jun 10, 2019, 7:00:07 PM6/10/19
to
On Monday, June 10, 2019 at 6:48:16 PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
> There isn't a *SINGLE* believer who will publicly state that this is
> correct:
>
> 1. There is a large irregular defect of the scalp and skull on the
> right involving chiefly the parietal bone but extending somewhat into
> the temporal and occipital regions. In this region there is an actual
> absence of scalp and bone producing a defect which measures
> approximately 13 cm. in greatest diameter.
https://youtu.be/n1f2TR19fDk
> There isn't a *SINGLE* believer who will publicly state that this is
> correct:
>
> 1. There is a large irregular defect of the scalp and skull on the
> right involving chiefly the parietal bone but extending somewhat into
> the temporal and occipital regions. In this region there is an actual
> absence of scalp and bone producing a defect which measures
> approximately 13 cm. in greatest diameter.
> Indeed, believers prefer to blatantly LIE about this statement.
>
> This is all you need to know... if you're trying to decide whether a
> lone assassin or a conspiracy took the life of JFK.
>
> Nothing else is needed.
borisba...@gmail.com
Jun 10, 2019, 7:08:14 PM6/10/19
to
> >
> > 1. There is a large irregular defect of the scalp and skull on the
> > right involving chiefly the parietal bone but extending somewhat into
> > the temporal and occipital regions. In this region there is an actual
> > absence of scalp and bone producing a defect which measures
> > approximately 13 cm. in greatest diameter.
>
> https://youtu.be/n1f2TR19fDk
Great video, brah. If you look closely, you can almost see Boswell's hand holding up that back flap.
> > 1. There is a large irregular defect of the scalp and skull on the
> > right involving chiefly the parietal bone but extending somewhat into
> > the temporal and occipital regions. In this region there is an actual
> > absence of scalp and bone producing a defect which measures
> > approximately 13 cm. in greatest diameter.
>
> https://youtu.be/n1f2TR19fDk
Bethesda should have known was bub knows, lurkers: you don't need an autopsy report when you have a slow-mo copy of the Z-film.
Ben Holmes
Jun 10, 2019, 7:21:41 PM6/10/19
to
On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 16:00:06 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
>On Monday, June 10, 2019 at 6:48:16 PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
>> There isn't a *SINGLE* believer who will publicly state that this is
>> correct:
>>
>> 1. There is a large irregular defect of the scalp and skull on the
>> right involving chiefly the parietal bone but extending somewhat into
>> the temporal and occipital regions. In this region there is an actual
>> absence of scalp and bone producing a defect which measures
>> approximately 13 cm. in greatest diameter.
>
> https://youtu.be/n1f2TR19fDk
Anyone notice that "Chickenshit" is using film to contradict the
official Autopsy Report? Next time "Chickenshit" whines that there's
no alien life, I'll hit him with this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oR1-UFrcZ0k
>> Indeed, believers prefer to blatantly LIE about this statement.
>>
>> This is all you need to know... if you're trying to decide whether a
>> lone assassin or a conspiracy took the life of JFK.
>>
>> Nothing else is needed.
>
> You have nothing.
Au contraire, I made a prediction - and you're the first to prove the
accuracy of my prediction.
"Chickenshit" absolutely REFUSED to publicly acknowledge the accuracy
of the Autopsy Report - the very foundation he uses to argue for a
lone assassin from the rear.
And that tells the tale.
wrote:
>On Monday, June 10, 2019 at 6:48:16 PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
>> There isn't a *SINGLE* believer who will publicly state that this is
>> correct:
>>
>> 1. There is a large irregular defect of the scalp and skull on the
>> right involving chiefly the parietal bone but extending somewhat into
>> the temporal and occipital regions. In this region there is an actual
>> absence of scalp and bone producing a defect which measures
>> approximately 13 cm. in greatest diameter.
>
> https://youtu.be/n1f2TR19fDk
official Autopsy Report? Next time "Chickenshit" whines that there's
no alien life, I'll hit him with this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oR1-UFrcZ0k
>> Indeed, believers prefer to blatantly LIE about this statement.
>>
>> This is all you need to know... if you're trying to decide whether a
>> lone assassin or a conspiracy took the life of JFK.
>>
>> Nothing else is needed.
>
> You have nothing.
accuracy of my prediction.
"Chickenshit" absolutely REFUSED to publicly acknowledge the accuracy
of the Autopsy Report - the very foundation he uses to argue for a
lone assassin from the rear.
And that tells the tale.
Bud
Jun 10, 2019, 7:41:54 PM6/10/19
to
On Monday, June 10, 2019 at 7:21:41 PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 16:00:06 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
> wrote:
>
> >On Monday, June 10, 2019 at 6:48:16 PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
> >> There isn't a *SINGLE* believer who will publicly state that this is
> >> correct:
> >>
> >> 1. There is a large irregular defect of the scalp and skull on the
> >> right involving chiefly the parietal bone but extending somewhat into
> >> the temporal and occipital regions. In this region there is an actual
> >> absence of scalp and bone producing a defect which measures
> >> approximately 13 cm. in greatest diameter.
> >
> > https://youtu.be/n1f2TR19fDk
>
>
> Anyone notice that "Chickenshit" is using film to contradict the
> official Autopsy Report?
How so?
> On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 16:00:06 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
> wrote:
>
> >On Monday, June 10, 2019 at 6:48:16 PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
> >> There isn't a *SINGLE* believer who will publicly state that this is
> >> correct:
> >>
> >> 1. There is a large irregular defect of the scalp and skull on the
> >> right involving chiefly the parietal bone but extending somewhat into
> >> the temporal and occipital regions. In this region there is an actual
> >> absence of scalp and bone producing a defect which measures
> >> approximately 13 cm. in greatest diameter.
> >
> > https://youtu.be/n1f2TR19fDk
>
>
> Anyone notice that "Chickenshit" is using film to contradict the
> official Autopsy Report?
> Next time "Chickenshit" whines that there's
> no alien life, I'll hit him with this:
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oR1-UFrcZ0k
>
>
> >> Indeed, believers prefer to blatantly LIE about this statement.
> >>
> >> This is all you need to know... if you're trying to decide whether a
> >> lone assassin or a conspiracy took the life of JFK.
> >>
> >> Nothing else is needed.
> >
> > You have nothing.
>
>
> Au contraire, I made a prediction - and you're the first to prove the
> accuracy of my prediction.
>
>
> "Chickenshit" absolutely REFUSED to publicly acknowledge the accuracy
> of the Autopsy Report - the very foundation he uses to argue for a
> lone assassin from the rear.
borisba...@gmail.com
Jun 10, 2019, 8:23:56 PM6/10/19
to
>
> The autopsy found Kennedy was shot twice from behind, stupid.
Where's Boswell's hand?
Bud
Jun 10, 2019, 8:29:40 PM6/10/19
to
On Monday, June 10, 2019 at 8:23:56 PM UTC-4, borisba...@gmail.com wrote:
> >
> > The autopsy found Kennedy was shot twice from behind, stupid.
>
> Good of you to point out, because your other cited "source", the Z-film, looks nothing like that.
Why do you say the wound seen can`t be "a large irregular defect of the scalp and skull on the right involving chiefly the parietal bone but extending somewhat into the temporal and occipital regions."?
> >
> > The autopsy found Kennedy was shot twice from behind, stupid.
>
> Good of you to point out, because your other cited "source", the Z-film, looks nothing like that.
borisba...@gmail.com
Jun 10, 2019, 8:35:49 PM6/10/19
to
>
> Why do you say the wound seen
Confusing me with the 25 medical expert witnesses again?
> Why do you say the wound seen
>
> can`t be "a large irregular defect of the scalp and skull on the right involving chiefly the parietal bone but extending somewhat into the temporal and occipital regions."?
And...where's Boswell's hand in the Z-film?
Bud
Jun 10, 2019, 8:45:16 PM6/10/19
to
borisba...@gmail.com
Jun 10, 2019, 8:48:59 PM6/10/19
to
Ben Holmes
Jun 11, 2019, 10:51:51 AM6/11/19
to
On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 17:48:58 -0700 (PDT), borisba...@gmail.com
Amusingly, "Chickenshit" has not once asserted that the Autopsy Report
is correct.
As I stated originally:
There isn't a *SINGLE* believer who will publicly state that this is
correct:
1. There is a large irregular defect of the scalp and skull on the
is correct.
As I stated originally:
There isn't a *SINGLE* believer who will publicly state that this is
correct:
right involving chiefly the parietal bone but extending somewhat into
the temporal and occipital regions. In this region there is an actual
absence of scalp and bone producing a defect which measures
approximately 13 cm. in greatest diameter.
absence of scalp and bone producing a defect which measures
approximately 13 cm. in greatest diameter.
Bud
Jun 11, 2019, 2:59:46 PM6/11/19
to
On Tuesday, June 11, 2019 at 10:51:51 AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 17:48:58 -0700 (PDT), borisba...@gmail.com
> wrote:
>
> >On Monday, June 10, 2019 at 8:45:16 PM UTC-4, Bud wrote:
> >> On Monday, June 10, 2019 at 8:35:49 PM UTC-4, borisba...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > Why do you say the wound seen
> >> >
> >> > Confusing me with the 25 medical expert witnesses again?
> >> >
> >> > >
> >> > > can`t be "a large irregular defect of the scalp and skull on the right involving chiefly the parietal bone but extending somewhat into the temporal and occipital regions."?
> >> >
> >> > Consult a diagram and compare it with the BOH photo if you're too dumb to answer this one yourself.
> >> >
> >> > And...where's Boswell's hand in the Z-film?
> >>
> >> Thanks for the reminder that you only play silly games. Back to "ignore" with you.
> >
> ><snicker> The retard pretends to ignore me rather than address the points I made, lurkers.
>
> Amusingly, "Chickenshit" has not once asserted that the Autopsy Report
> is correct.
What reason have you given to believe otherwise?
> On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 17:48:58 -0700 (PDT), borisba...@gmail.com
> wrote:
>
> >On Monday, June 10, 2019 at 8:45:16 PM UTC-4, Bud wrote:
> >> On Monday, June 10, 2019 at 8:35:49 PM UTC-4, borisba...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > Why do you say the wound seen
> >> >
> >> > Confusing me with the 25 medical expert witnesses again?
> >> >
> >> > >
> >> > > can`t be "a large irregular defect of the scalp and skull on the right involving chiefly the parietal bone but extending somewhat into the temporal and occipital regions."?
> >> >
> >> > Consult a diagram and compare it with the BOH photo if you're too dumb to answer this one yourself.
> >> >
> >> > And...where's Boswell's hand in the Z-film?
> >>
> >> Thanks for the reminder that you only play silly games. Back to "ignore" with you.
> >
> ><snicker> The retard pretends to ignore me rather than address the points I made, lurkers.
>
> Amusingly, "Chickenshit" has not once asserted that the Autopsy Report
> is correct.
> As I stated originally:
>
> There isn't a *SINGLE* believer who will publicly state that this is
> correct:
>
> 1. There is a large irregular defect of the scalp and skull on the
> right involving chiefly the parietal bone but extending somewhat into
> the temporal and occipital regions. In this region there is an actual
> absence of scalp and bone producing a defect which measures
> approximately 13 cm. in greatest diameter.
> Indeed, believers prefer to blatantly LIE about this statement.
>
> This is all you need to know... if you're trying to decide whether a
> lone assassin or a conspiracy took the life of JFK.
> Nothing else is needed.
You have nothing. If you did you would be offering it.
Ben Holmes
Jun 17, 2019, 9:12:20 AM6/17/19
to
On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 16:41:53 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
arguments?
>> Next time "Chickenshit" whines that there's
>> no alien life, I'll hit him with this:
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oR1-UFrcZ0k
>>
>>
>>>> Indeed, believers prefer to blatantly LIE about this statement.
>>>>
>>>> This is all you need to know... if you're trying to decide whether a
>>>> lone assassin or a conspiracy took the life of JFK.
>>>>
>>>> Nothing else is needed.
>>>
>>> You have nothing.
>>
>> Au contraire, I made a prediction - and you're the first to prove the
>> accuracy of my prediction.
Anyone notice that "Chickenshit" just got spanked again?
>> "Chickenshit" absolutely REFUSED to publicly acknowledge the accuracy
>> of the Autopsy Report - the very foundation he uses to argue for a
>> lone assassin from the rear.
>
> The autopsy found Kennedy was shot twice from behind, stupid.
And "Chickenshit" again shifts the goalposts, refusing to admit that
he actually believes the Autopsy Report.
The cowardice of these liars is almost beyond belief!
Notice I began this thread with the statement: "There isn't a *SINGLE*
believer who will publicly state that this is correct"...
And so far, not a single believer has.
"Chickenshit" is making my point for me!
>> And that tells the tale.
And still does.
wrote:
>On Monday, June 10, 2019 at 7:21:41 PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
>> On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 16:00:06 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>On Monday, June 10, 2019 at 6:48:16 PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
>>>> There isn't a *SINGLE* believer who will publicly state that this is
>>>> correct:
>>>>
>>>> 1. There is a large irregular defect of the scalp and skull on the
>>>> right involving chiefly the parietal bone but extending somewhat into
>>>> the temporal and occipital regions. In this region there is an actual
>>>> absence of scalp and bone producing a defect which measures
>>>> approximately 13 cm. in greatest diameter.
>>>
>>> https://youtu.be/n1f2TR19fDk
>>
>> Anyone notice that "Chickenshit" is using film to contradict the
>> official Autopsy Report?
>
> How so?
Anyone notice that "Chickenshit" won't even stand by his own
>On Monday, June 10, 2019 at 7:21:41 PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
>> On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 16:00:06 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>On Monday, June 10, 2019 at 6:48:16 PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
>>>> There isn't a *SINGLE* believer who will publicly state that this is
>>>> correct:
>>>>
>>>> 1. There is a large irregular defect of the scalp and skull on the
>>>> right involving chiefly the parietal bone but extending somewhat into
>>>> the temporal and occipital regions. In this region there is an actual
>>>> absence of scalp and bone producing a defect which measures
>>>> approximately 13 cm. in greatest diameter.
>>>
>>> https://youtu.be/n1f2TR19fDk
>>
>> Anyone notice that "Chickenshit" is using film to contradict the
>> official Autopsy Report?
>
> How so?
arguments?
>> Next time "Chickenshit" whines that there's
>> no alien life, I'll hit him with this:
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oR1-UFrcZ0k
>>
>>
>>>> Indeed, believers prefer to blatantly LIE about this statement.
>>>>
>>>> This is all you need to know... if you're trying to decide whether a
>>>> lone assassin or a conspiracy took the life of JFK.
>>>>
>>>> Nothing else is needed.
>>>
>>> You have nothing.
>>
>> Au contraire, I made a prediction - and you're the first to prove the
>> accuracy of my prediction.
>> "Chickenshit" absolutely REFUSED to publicly acknowledge the accuracy
>> of the Autopsy Report - the very foundation he uses to argue for a
>> lone assassin from the rear.
>
> The autopsy found Kennedy was shot twice from behind, stupid.
he actually believes the Autopsy Report.
The cowardice of these liars is almost beyond belief!
Notice I began this thread with the statement: "There isn't a *SINGLE*
believer who will publicly state that this is correct"...
And so far, not a single believer has.
"Chickenshit" is making my point for me!
>> And that tells the tale.
Ben Holmes
Jun 17, 2019, 9:12:20 AM6/17/19
to
On Tue, 11 Jun 2019 11:59:45 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
>On Tuesday, June 11, 2019 at 10:51:51 AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
>> On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 17:48:58 -0700 (PDT), borisba...@gmail.com
>> wrote:
>>
>>>On Monday, June 10, 2019 at 8:45:16 PM UTC-4, Bud wrote:
>>>> On Monday, June 10, 2019 at 8:35:49 PM UTC-4, borisba...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Why do you say the wound seen
>>>>>
>>>>> Confusing me with the 25 medical expert witnesses again?
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> can`t be "a large irregular defect of the scalp and skull on the right involving chiefly the parietal bone but extending somewhat into the temporal and occipital regions."?
>>>>>
>>>>> Consult a diagram and compare it with the BOH photo if you're too dumb to answer this one yourself.
>>>>>
>>>>> And...where's Boswell's hand in the Z-film?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for the reminder that you only play silly games. Back to "ignore" with you.
>>>
>>><snicker> The retard pretends to ignore me rather than address the points I made, lurkers.
>>
>> Amusingly, "Chickenshit" has not once asserted that the Autopsy Report
>> is correct.
>
> What reason have you given to believe otherwise?
And *STILL* "Chickenshit" refuses to state that the Autopsy Report is
correct!
>> As I stated originally:
>>
>> There isn't a *SINGLE* believer who will publicly state that this is
>> correct:
>>
>> 1. There is a large irregular defect of the scalp and skull on the
>> right involving chiefly the parietal bone but extending somewhat into
>> the temporal and occipital regions. In this region there is an actual
>> absence of scalp and bone producing a defect which measures
>> approximately 13 cm. in greatest diameter.
>
> https://youtu.be/n1f2TR19fDk
"Chickenshit" repeats his false claim.
>> Indeed, believers prefer to blatantly LIE about this statement.
>>
>> This is all you need to know... if you're trying to decide whether a
>> lone assassin or a conspiracy took the life of JFK.
>
> All the audience needs to know is that after weeks and weeks these
> guys have yet to make a conspiracy related argument about these
> wounds. They have nothing to offer but hot air with no substance.
You're *PROVABLY* lying again... see below.
>> Nothing else is needed.
>
> You have nothing. If you did you would be offering it.
Certainly... here it is:
My Scenario - Part 1
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/y0hdkKgWvtI/3uukYgXeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 2
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/jSfe1BrGfJc/SOXAOQbeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 2a
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/kGfZPR4C-Lw/AlnRq1HeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 3
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/IShoUFao5OU/VuYGWFTeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 3a
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/JFuasrnWRqA/l1vih03eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 4
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/LRMeWBFE1ug/bfjGTAbeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 5
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/S1ddVKc3Jj4/IESJbFPeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 6
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/b5ODl3yA4uk/g77N-UreAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 7
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/rwmZjz92YC8/P-9Mn07eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 8
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c6e29olW6XA/Os29-FveAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 9
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/ixNqGISHbrU/gd06wVHeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 10
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/3Di6kuseb2Q/aHbAQmLeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 11
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/sYEyPH0A_eI/IH-UZgbeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 11a
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/aGduj6uaGUk/3eDp513eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 11b
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/8rAmKZBOCiY/yCELq27eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 12
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/OnrH5R6ryHE/stjdfgbeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 12a
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/J0A8N12PPHU/CcxpiU7eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 13
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/8hD-q0gTa_c/Co3ZJE7eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 14
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/lsaXwhPRbEg/hZ7ZmEveAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 15
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/UA86YdJXEgY/JhG8o0reAAAJ
My Scenario - The Conclusion
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/UWfco_sGxYw/yApSPFXeAAAJ
Your refusal to address it, or even admit it's existence, shows that
you know you lost.
wrote:
>On Tuesday, June 11, 2019 at 10:51:51 AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
>> On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 17:48:58 -0700 (PDT), borisba...@gmail.com
>> wrote:
>>
>>>On Monday, June 10, 2019 at 8:45:16 PM UTC-4, Bud wrote:
>>>> On Monday, June 10, 2019 at 8:35:49 PM UTC-4, borisba...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Why do you say the wound seen
>>>>>
>>>>> Confusing me with the 25 medical expert witnesses again?
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> can`t be "a large irregular defect of the scalp and skull on the right involving chiefly the parietal bone but extending somewhat into the temporal and occipital regions."?
>>>>>
>>>>> Consult a diagram and compare it with the BOH photo if you're too dumb to answer this one yourself.
>>>>>
>>>>> And...where's Boswell's hand in the Z-film?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for the reminder that you only play silly games. Back to "ignore" with you.
>>>
>>><snicker> The retard pretends to ignore me rather than address the points I made, lurkers.
>>
>> Amusingly, "Chickenshit" has not once asserted that the Autopsy Report
>> is correct.
>
> What reason have you given to believe otherwise?
correct!
>> As I stated originally:
>>
>> There isn't a *SINGLE* believer who will publicly state that this is
>> correct:
>>
>> 1. There is a large irregular defect of the scalp and skull on the
>> right involving chiefly the parietal bone but extending somewhat into
>> the temporal and occipital regions. In this region there is an actual
>> absence of scalp and bone producing a defect which measures
>> approximately 13 cm. in greatest diameter.
>
> https://youtu.be/n1f2TR19fDk
>> Indeed, believers prefer to blatantly LIE about this statement.
>>
>> This is all you need to know... if you're trying to decide whether a
>> lone assassin or a conspiracy took the life of JFK.
>
> All the audience needs to know is that after weeks and weeks these
> guys have yet to make a conspiracy related argument about these
> wounds. They have nothing to offer but hot air with no substance.
>> Nothing else is needed.
>
> You have nothing. If you did you would be offering it.
My Scenario - Part 1
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/y0hdkKgWvtI/3uukYgXeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 2
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/jSfe1BrGfJc/SOXAOQbeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 2a
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/kGfZPR4C-Lw/AlnRq1HeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 3
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/IShoUFao5OU/VuYGWFTeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 3a
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/JFuasrnWRqA/l1vih03eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 4
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/LRMeWBFE1ug/bfjGTAbeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 5
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/S1ddVKc3Jj4/IESJbFPeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 6
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/b5ODl3yA4uk/g77N-UreAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 7
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/rwmZjz92YC8/P-9Mn07eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 8
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c6e29olW6XA/Os29-FveAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 9
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/ixNqGISHbrU/gd06wVHeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 10
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/3Di6kuseb2Q/aHbAQmLeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 11
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/sYEyPH0A_eI/IH-UZgbeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 11a
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/aGduj6uaGUk/3eDp513eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 11b
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/8rAmKZBOCiY/yCELq27eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 12
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/OnrH5R6ryHE/stjdfgbeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 12a
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/J0A8N12PPHU/CcxpiU7eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 13
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/8hD-q0gTa_c/Co3ZJE7eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 14
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/lsaXwhPRbEg/hZ7ZmEveAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 15
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/UA86YdJXEgY/JhG8o0reAAAJ
My Scenario - The Conclusion
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/UWfco_sGxYw/yApSPFXeAAAJ
Your refusal to address it, or even admit it's existence, shows that
you know you lost.
Bud
Jun 17, 2019, 8:08:03 PM6/17/19
to
On Monday, June 17, 2019 at 9:12:20 AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 16:41:53 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
> wrote:
>
> >On Monday, June 10, 2019 at 7:21:41 PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
> >> On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 16:00:06 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>>On Monday, June 10, 2019 at 6:48:16 PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
> >>>> There isn't a *SINGLE* believer who will publicly state that this is
> >>>> correct:
> >>>>
> >>>> 1. There is a large irregular defect of the scalp and skull on the
> >>>> right involving chiefly the parietal bone but extending somewhat into
> >>>> the temporal and occipital regions. In this region there is an actual
> >>>> absence of scalp and bone producing a defect which measures
> >>>> approximately 13 cm. in greatest diameter.
> >>>
> >>> https://youtu.be/n1f2TR19fDk
> >>
> >> Anyone notice that "Chickenshit" is using film to contradict the
> >> official Autopsy Report?
> >
> > How so?
>
>
> Anyone notice that "Chickenshit" won't even stand by his own
> arguments?
What argument?
> On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 16:41:53 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
> wrote:
>
> >On Monday, June 10, 2019 at 7:21:41 PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
> >> On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 16:00:06 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>>On Monday, June 10, 2019 at 6:48:16 PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
> >>>> There isn't a *SINGLE* believer who will publicly state that this is
> >>>> correct:
> >>>>
> >>>> 1. There is a large irregular defect of the scalp and skull on the
> >>>> right involving chiefly the parietal bone but extending somewhat into
> >>>> the temporal and occipital regions. In this region there is an actual
> >>>> absence of scalp and bone producing a defect which measures
> >>>> approximately 13 cm. in greatest diameter.
> >>>
> >>> https://youtu.be/n1f2TR19fDk
> >>
> >> Anyone notice that "Chickenshit" is using film to contradict the
> >> official Autopsy Report?
> >
> > How so?
>
>
> Anyone notice that "Chickenshit" won't even stand by his own
> arguments?
>
> >> Next time "Chickenshit" whines that there's
> >> no alien life, I'll hit him with this:
> >>
> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oR1-UFrcZ0k
> >>
> >>
> >>>> Indeed, believers prefer to blatantly LIE about this statement.
> >>>>
> >>>> This is all you need to know... if you're trying to decide whether a
> >>>> lone assassin or a conspiracy took the life of JFK.
> >>>>
> >>>> Nothing else is needed.
> >>>
> >>> You have nothing.
> >>
> >> Au contraire, I made a prediction - and you're the first to prove the
> >> accuracy of my prediction.
>
>
> Anyone notice that "Chickenshit" just got spanked again?
>
> >> "Chickenshit" absolutely REFUSED to publicly acknowledge the accuracy
> >> of the Autopsy Report - the very foundation he uses to argue for a
> >> lone assassin from the rear.
> >
> > The autopsy found Kennedy was shot twice from behind, stupid.
>
>
> And "Chickenshit" again shifts the goalposts,
The autopsy supports a shooter from the rear, stupid.
> >> "Chickenshit" absolutely REFUSED to publicly acknowledge the accuracy
> >> of the Autopsy Report - the very foundation he uses to argue for a
> >> lone assassin from the rear.
> >
> > The autopsy found Kennedy was shot twice from behind, stupid.
>
>
> And "Chickenshit" again shifts the goalposts,
>refusing to admit that
> he actually believes the Autopsy Report.
>
> The cowardice of these liars is almost beyond belief!
>
>
> Notice I began this thread with the statement: "There isn't a *SINGLE*
> believer who will publicly state that this is correct"...
>
> And so far, not a single believer has.
>
> "Chickenshit" is making my point for me!
You have nothing.
Bud
Jun 17, 2019, 8:11:54 PM6/17/19
to
On Monday, June 17, 2019 at 9:12:20 AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Jun 2019 11:59:45 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
> wrote:
>
> >On Tuesday, June 11, 2019 at 10:51:51 AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
> >> On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 17:48:58 -0700 (PDT), borisba...@gmail.com
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>>On Monday, June 10, 2019 at 8:45:16 PM UTC-4, Bud wrote:
> >>>> On Monday, June 10, 2019 at 8:35:49 PM UTC-4, borisba...@gmail.com wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Why do you say the wound seen
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Confusing me with the 25 medical expert witnesses again?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> can`t be "a large irregular defect of the scalp and skull on the right involving chiefly the parietal bone but extending somewhat into the temporal and occipital regions."?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Consult a diagram and compare it with the BOH photo if you're too dumb to answer this one yourself.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> And...where's Boswell's hand in the Z-film?
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks for the reminder that you only play silly games. Back to "ignore" with you.
> >>>
> >>><snicker> The retard pretends to ignore me rather than address the points I made, lurkers.
> >>
> >> Amusingly, "Chickenshit" has not once asserted that the Autopsy Report
> >> is correct.
> >
> > What reason have you given to believe otherwise?
>
>
> And *STILL* "Chickenshit" refuses to state that the Autopsy Report is
> correct!
Until you can make an argument otherwise there is nothing I need to do.
> On Tue, 11 Jun 2019 11:59:45 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
> wrote:
>
> >On Tuesday, June 11, 2019 at 10:51:51 AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
> >> On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 17:48:58 -0700 (PDT), borisba...@gmail.com
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>>On Monday, June 10, 2019 at 8:45:16 PM UTC-4, Bud wrote:
> >>>> On Monday, June 10, 2019 at 8:35:49 PM UTC-4, borisba...@gmail.com wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Why do you say the wound seen
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Confusing me with the 25 medical expert witnesses again?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> can`t be "a large irregular defect of the scalp and skull on the right involving chiefly the parietal bone but extending somewhat into the temporal and occipital regions."?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Consult a diagram and compare it with the BOH photo if you're too dumb to answer this one yourself.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> And...where's Boswell's hand in the Z-film?
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks for the reminder that you only play silly games. Back to "ignore" with you.
> >>>
> >>><snicker> The retard pretends to ignore me rather than address the points I made, lurkers.
> >>
> >> Amusingly, "Chickenshit" has not once asserted that the Autopsy Report
> >> is correct.
> >
> > What reason have you given to believe otherwise?
>
>
> And *STILL* "Chickenshit" refuses to state that the Autopsy Report is
> correct!
>
> >> As I stated originally:
> >>
> >> There isn't a *SINGLE* believer who will publicly state that this is
> >> correct:
> >>
> >> 1. There is a large irregular defect of the scalp and skull on the
> >> right involving chiefly the parietal bone but extending somewhat into
> >> the temporal and occipital regions. In this region there is an actual
> >> absence of scalp and bone producing a defect which measures
> >> approximately 13 cm. in greatest diameter.
> >
> > https://youtu.be/n1f2TR19fDk
>
>
> "Chickenshit" repeats his false claim.
> >> Indeed, believers prefer to blatantly LIE about this statement.
> >>
> >> This is all you need to know... if you're trying to decide whether a
> >> lone assassin or a conspiracy took the life of JFK.
> >
> > All the audience needs to know is that after weeks and weeks these
> > guys have yet to make a conspiracy related argument about these
> > wounds. They have nothing to offer but hot air with no substance.
>
>
> You're *PROVABLY* lying again... see below.
>
>
> >> Nothing else is needed.
> >
> > You have nothing. If you did you would be offering it.
>
> Certainly... here it is:
borisba...@gmail.com
Jun 17, 2019, 8:20:38 PM6/17/19
to
Anyone notice bub is running from all the points I made, lurkers?
Ben Holmes
Jun 25, 2019, 10:24:17 AM6/25/19
to
On Mon, 17 Jun 2019 17:11:53 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
cite the Autopsy Report for your belief of what happened to JFK on
11/22/63 - BUT YOU DON'T BELIEVE THE VERY AUTOPSY REPORT YOU CITE.
This proves you guilty of selective and dishonest usage of the
evidence to bolster your faith in the WCR.
Of course, you'll run from this argument, just as you do all others.
>>>> As I stated originally:
>>>>
>>>> There isn't a *SINGLE* believer who will publicly state that this is
>>>> correct:
>>>>
>>>> 1. There is a large irregular defect of the scalp and skull on the
>>>> right involving chiefly the parietal bone but extending somewhat into
>>>> the temporal and occipital regions. In this region there is an actual
>>>> absence of scalp and bone producing a defect which measures
>>>> approximately 13 cm. in greatest diameter.
>>>
>>> https://youtu.be/n1f2TR19fDk
>>
>> "Chickenshit" repeats his false claim.
>
> How is it a false claim?
How is it not?
>>>> Indeed, believers prefer to blatantly LIE about this statement.
>>>>
>>>> This is all you need to know... if you're trying to decide whether a
>>>> lone assassin or a conspiracy took the life of JFK.
>>>
>>> All the audience needs to know is that after weeks and weeks these
>>> guys have yet to make a conspiracy related argument about these
>>> wounds. They have nothing to offer but hot air with no substance.
>>
>>
>> You're *PROVABLY* lying again... see below.
>>
>>
>>>> Nothing else is needed.
>>>
>>> You have nothing. If you did you would be offering it.
>>
>> Certainly... here it is:
>
> Are you trying to show you can`t make a case again?
Your repeated refusals to respond to these posts prove that you're not
only lying again, but it also shows your cowardice.
Empty claim, DUMBASS! As you yourself stated: "...if he is unwilling
to support a claim it is an empty claim, lurkers. No one has to
contest an unsupported claim, it is nothing by its very nature."
wrote:
>On Monday, June 17, 2019 at 9:12:20 AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
>> On Tue, 11 Jun 2019 11:59:45 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>On Tuesday, June 11, 2019 at 10:51:51 AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 17:48:58 -0700 (PDT), borisba...@gmail.com
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Monday, June 10, 2019 at 8:45:16 PM UTC-4, Bud wrote:
>>>>>> On Monday, June 10, 2019 at 8:35:49 PM UTC-4, borisba...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Why do you say the wound seen
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Confusing me with the 25 medical expert witnesses again?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> can`t be "a large irregular defect of the scalp and skull on the right involving chiefly the parietal bone but extending somewhat into the temporal and occipital regions."?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Consult a diagram and compare it with the BOH photo if you're too dumb to answer this one yourself.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And...where's Boswell's hand in the Z-film?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks for the reminder that you only play silly games. Back to "ignore" with you.
>>>>>
>>>>><snicker> The retard pretends to ignore me rather than address the points I made, lurkers.
>>>>
>>>> Amusingly, "Chickenshit" has not once asserted that the Autopsy Report
>>>> is correct.
>>>
>>> What reason have you given to believe otherwise?
>>
>>
>> And *STILL* "Chickenshit" refuses to state that the Autopsy Report is
>> correct!
>
> Until you can make an argument otherwise there is nothing I need to do.
Okay - here's the argument: all believers, including you, consistently
>On Monday, June 17, 2019 at 9:12:20 AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
>> On Tue, 11 Jun 2019 11:59:45 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>On Tuesday, June 11, 2019 at 10:51:51 AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 17:48:58 -0700 (PDT), borisba...@gmail.com
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Monday, June 10, 2019 at 8:45:16 PM UTC-4, Bud wrote:
>>>>>> On Monday, June 10, 2019 at 8:35:49 PM UTC-4, borisba...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Why do you say the wound seen
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Confusing me with the 25 medical expert witnesses again?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> can`t be "a large irregular defect of the scalp and skull on the right involving chiefly the parietal bone but extending somewhat into the temporal and occipital regions."?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Consult a diagram and compare it with the BOH photo if you're too dumb to answer this one yourself.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And...where's Boswell's hand in the Z-film?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks for the reminder that you only play silly games. Back to "ignore" with you.
>>>>>
>>>>><snicker> The retard pretends to ignore me rather than address the points I made, lurkers.
>>>>
>>>> Amusingly, "Chickenshit" has not once asserted that the Autopsy Report
>>>> is correct.
>>>
>>> What reason have you given to believe otherwise?
>>
>>
>> And *STILL* "Chickenshit" refuses to state that the Autopsy Report is
>> correct!
>
> Until you can make an argument otherwise there is nothing I need to do.
cite the Autopsy Report for your belief of what happened to JFK on
11/22/63 - BUT YOU DON'T BELIEVE THE VERY AUTOPSY REPORT YOU CITE.
This proves you guilty of selective and dishonest usage of the
evidence to bolster your faith in the WCR.
Of course, you'll run from this argument, just as you do all others.
>>>> As I stated originally:
>>>>
>>>> There isn't a *SINGLE* believer who will publicly state that this is
>>>> correct:
>>>>
>>>> 1. There is a large irregular defect of the scalp and skull on the
>>>> right involving chiefly the parietal bone but extending somewhat into
>>>> the temporal and occipital regions. In this region there is an actual
>>>> absence of scalp and bone producing a defect which measures
>>>> approximately 13 cm. in greatest diameter.
>>>
>>> https://youtu.be/n1f2TR19fDk
>>
>> "Chickenshit" repeats his false claim.
>
> How is it a false claim?
>>>> Indeed, believers prefer to blatantly LIE about this statement.
>>>>
>>>> This is all you need to know... if you're trying to decide whether a
>>>> lone assassin or a conspiracy took the life of JFK.
>>>
>>> All the audience needs to know is that after weeks and weeks these
>>> guys have yet to make a conspiracy related argument about these
>>> wounds. They have nothing to offer but hot air with no substance.
>>
>>
>> You're *PROVABLY* lying again... see below.
>>
>>
>>>> Nothing else is needed.
>>>
>>> You have nothing. If you did you would be offering it.
>>
>> Certainly... here it is:
>
> Are you trying to show you can`t make a case again?
only lying again, but it also shows your cowardice.
to support a claim it is an empty claim, lurkers. No one has to
contest an unsupported claim, it is nothing by its very nature."
Ben Holmes
Jun 25, 2019, 10:24:18 AM6/25/19
to
On Mon, 17 Jun 2019 17:08:02 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
>>>> Next time "Chickenshit" whines that there's
>>>> no alien life, I'll hit him with this:
>>>>
>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oR1-UFrcZ0k
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>> Indeed, believers prefer to blatantly LIE about this statement.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This is all you need to know... if you're trying to decide whether a
>>>>>> lone assassin or a conspiracy took the life of JFK.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nothing else is needed.
>>>>>
>>>>> You have nothing.
>>>>
>>>> Au contraire, I made a prediction - and you're the first to prove the
>>>> accuracy of my prediction.
>>
>> Anyone notice that "Chickenshit" just got spanked again?
>
> I thought you were supporting what I said.
"Chickenshit" likes to play games with the deaths of these men.
>>>> "Chickenshit" absolutely REFUSED to publicly acknowledge the accuracy
>>>> of the Autopsy Report - the very foundation he uses to argue for a
>>>> lone assassin from the rear.
>>>
>>> The autopsy found Kennedy was shot twice from behind, stupid.
>>
>> And "Chickenshit" again shifts the goalposts,
>
> The autopsy supports a shooter from the rear, stupid.
You provably don't believe the Autopsy Report. So why do you keep
citing it?
>>refusing to admit that
>> he actually believes the Autopsy Report.
>>
>> The cowardice of these liars is almost beyond belief!
>>
>>
>> Notice I began this thread with the statement: "There isn't a *SINGLE*
>> believer who will publicly state that this is correct"...
>>
>> And so far, not a single believer has.
>>
>> "Chickenshit" is making my point for me!
>
> You made mine for me.
>
> You have nothing.
It would be a moron lurker indeed who didn't fail to notice that you
refuse to publicly state that you believe the Autopsy Report.
wrote:
>On Monday, June 17, 2019 at 9:12:20 AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
>> On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 16:41:53 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>On Monday, June 10, 2019 at 7:21:41 PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 16:00:06 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Monday, June 10, 2019 at 6:48:16 PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
>>>>>> There isn't a *SINGLE* believer who will publicly state that this is
>>>>>> correct:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1. There is a large irregular defect of the scalp and skull on the
>>>>>> right involving chiefly the parietal bone but extending somewhat into
>>>>>> the temporal and occipital regions. In this region there is an actual
>>>>>> absence of scalp and bone producing a defect which measures
>>>>>> approximately 13 cm. in greatest diameter.
>>>>>
>>>>> https://youtu.be/n1f2TR19fDk
>>>>
>>>> Anyone notice that "Chickenshit" is using film to contradict the
>>>> official Autopsy Report?
>>>
>>> How so?
>>
>> Anyone notice that "Chickenshit" won't even stand by his own
>> arguments?
>
> What argument?
Anyone notice "Chickenshit's" cowardice?
>On Monday, June 17, 2019 at 9:12:20 AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
>> On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 16:41:53 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>On Monday, June 10, 2019 at 7:21:41 PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 16:00:06 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Monday, June 10, 2019 at 6:48:16 PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
>>>>>> There isn't a *SINGLE* believer who will publicly state that this is
>>>>>> correct:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1. There is a large irregular defect of the scalp and skull on the
>>>>>> right involving chiefly the parietal bone but extending somewhat into
>>>>>> the temporal and occipital regions. In this region there is an actual
>>>>>> absence of scalp and bone producing a defect which measures
>>>>>> approximately 13 cm. in greatest diameter.
>>>>>
>>>>> https://youtu.be/n1f2TR19fDk
>>>>
>>>> Anyone notice that "Chickenshit" is using film to contradict the
>>>> official Autopsy Report?
>>>
>>> How so?
>>
>> Anyone notice that "Chickenshit" won't even stand by his own
>> arguments?
>
> What argument?
>>>> Next time "Chickenshit" whines that there's
>>>> no alien life, I'll hit him with this:
>>>>
>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oR1-UFrcZ0k
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>> Indeed, believers prefer to blatantly LIE about this statement.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This is all you need to know... if you're trying to decide whether a
>>>>>> lone assassin or a conspiracy took the life of JFK.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nothing else is needed.
>>>>>
>>>>> You have nothing.
>>>>
>>>> Au contraire, I made a prediction - and you're the first to prove the
>>>> accuracy of my prediction.
>>
>> Anyone notice that "Chickenshit" just got spanked again?
>
> I thought you were supporting what I said.
>>>> "Chickenshit" absolutely REFUSED to publicly acknowledge the accuracy
>>>> of the Autopsy Report - the very foundation he uses to argue for a
>>>> lone assassin from the rear.
>>>
>>> The autopsy found Kennedy was shot twice from behind, stupid.
>>
>> And "Chickenshit" again shifts the goalposts,
>
> The autopsy supports a shooter from the rear, stupid.
citing it?
>>refusing to admit that
>> he actually believes the Autopsy Report.
>>
>> The cowardice of these liars is almost beyond belief!
>>
>>
>> Notice I began this thread with the statement: "There isn't a *SINGLE*
>> believer who will publicly state that this is correct"...
>>
>> And so far, not a single believer has.
>>
>> "Chickenshit" is making my point for me!
>
> You made mine for me.
>
> You have nothing.
refuse to publicly state that you believe the Autopsy Report.
Bud
Jun 25, 2019, 6:10:28 PM6/25/19
to
>
> >>>> Next time "Chickenshit" whines that there's
> >>>> no alien life, I'll hit him with this:
> >>>>
> >>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oR1-UFrcZ0k
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>> Indeed, believers prefer to blatantly LIE about this statement.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> This is all you need to know... if you're trying to decide whether a
> >>>>>> lone assassin or a conspiracy took the life of JFK.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Nothing else is needed.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> You have nothing.
> >>>>
> >>>> Au contraire, I made a prediction - and you're the first to prove the
> >>>> accuracy of my prediction.
> >>
> >> Anyone notice that "Chickenshit" just got spanked again?
> >
> > I thought you were supporting what I said.
>
>
> "Chickenshit" likes to play games with the deaths of these men.
> >>>> "Chickenshit" absolutely REFUSED to publicly acknowledge the accuracy
> >>>> of the Autopsy Report - the very foundation he uses to argue for a
> >>>> lone assassin from the rear.
> >>>
> >>> The autopsy found Kennedy was shot twice from behind, stupid.
> >>
> >> And "Chickenshit" again shifts the goalposts,
> >
> > The autopsy supports a shooter from the rear, stupid.
>
>
> You provably don't believe the Autopsy Report. So why do you keep
> citing it?
> >>refusing to admit that
> >> he actually believes the Autopsy Report.
> >>
> >> The cowardice of these liars is almost beyond belief!
> >>
> >>
> >> Notice I began this thread with the statement: "There isn't a *SINGLE*
> >> believer who will publicly state that this is correct"...
> >>
> >> And so far, not a single believer has.
> >>
> >> "Chickenshit" is making my point for me!
> >
> > You made mine for me.
> >
> > You have nothing.
>
>
> It would be a moron lurker indeed who didn't fail to notice that you
> refuse to publicly state that you believe the Autopsy Report.
Ben Holmes
Jul 9, 2019, 11:33:52 AM7/9/19
to
On Tue, 25 Jun 2019 15:10:27 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
Anyone notice that "Chickenshit" is running from his own assertion?
>>>>>> Next time "Chickenshit" whines that there's
>>>>>> no alien life, I'll hit him with this:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oR1-UFrcZ0k
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Indeed, believers prefer to blatantly LIE about this statement.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This is all you need to know... if you're trying to decide whether a
>>>>>>>> lone assassin or a conspiracy took the life of JFK.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Nothing else is needed.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You have nothing.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Au contraire, I made a prediction - and you're the first to prove the
>>>>>> accuracy of my prediction.
>>>>
>>>> Anyone notice that "Chickenshit" just got spanked again?
>>>
>>> I thought you were supporting what I said.
>>
>> "Chickenshit" likes to play games with the deaths of these men.
>
> I said you had nothing. You supported what I said by offering nothing.
And *again* "Chickenshit" runs away!
>>>>>> "Chickenshit" absolutely REFUSED to publicly acknowledge the accuracy
>>>>>> of the Autopsy Report - the very foundation he uses to argue for a
>>>>>> lone assassin from the rear.
>>>>>
>>>>> The autopsy found Kennedy was shot twice from behind, stupid.
>>>>
>>>> And "Chickenshit" again shifts the goalposts,
>>>
>>> The autopsy supports a shooter from the rear, stupid.
>>
>> You provably don't believe the Autopsy Report. So why do you keep
>> citing it?
>
> Of course I believe the autopsy report when ...
There's no "when" involved. You either believe it in it's entirety, or
you *DON'T* believe the experts.
Dunning-Kruger strikes again!
So why do you keep citing something you don't accept?
>>>>refusing to admit that
>>>> he actually believes the Autopsy Report.
>>>>
>>>> The cowardice of these liars is almost beyond belief!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Notice I began this thread with the statement: "There isn't a *SINGLE*
>>>> believer who will publicly state that this is correct"...
>>>>
>>>> And so far, not a single believer has.
>>>>
>>>> "Chickenshit" is making my point for me!
>>>
>>> You made mine for me.
>>>
>>> You have nothing.
>>
>> It would be a moron lurker indeed who didn't fail to notice that you
>> refuse to publicly state that you believe the Autopsy Report.
>
> In what way?
There you go again, evading a simple question.
What AMAZING cowardice!
>>>>>> Next time "Chickenshit" whines that there's
>>>>>> no alien life, I'll hit him with this:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oR1-UFrcZ0k
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Indeed, believers prefer to blatantly LIE about this statement.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This is all you need to know... if you're trying to decide whether a
>>>>>>>> lone assassin or a conspiracy took the life of JFK.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Nothing else is needed.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You have nothing.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Au contraire, I made a prediction - and you're the first to prove the
>>>>>> accuracy of my prediction.
>>>>
>>>> Anyone notice that "Chickenshit" just got spanked again?
>>>
>>> I thought you were supporting what I said.
>>
>> "Chickenshit" likes to play games with the deaths of these men.
>
> I said you had nothing. You supported what I said by offering nothing.
>>>>>> "Chickenshit" absolutely REFUSED to publicly acknowledge the accuracy
>>>>>> of the Autopsy Report - the very foundation he uses to argue for a
>>>>>> lone assassin from the rear.
>>>>>
>>>>> The autopsy found Kennedy was shot twice from behind, stupid.
>>>>
>>>> And "Chickenshit" again shifts the goalposts,
>>>
>>> The autopsy supports a shooter from the rear, stupid.
>>
>> You provably don't believe the Autopsy Report. So why do you keep
>> citing it?
>
There's no "when" involved. You either believe it in it's entirety, or
you *DON'T* believe the experts.
Dunning-Kruger strikes again!
So why do you keep citing something you don't accept?
>>>>refusing to admit that
>>>> he actually believes the Autopsy Report.
>>>>
>>>> The cowardice of these liars is almost beyond belief!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Notice I began this thread with the statement: "There isn't a *SINGLE*
>>>> believer who will publicly state that this is correct"...
>>>>
>>>> And so far, not a single believer has.
>>>>
>>>> "Chickenshit" is making my point for me!
>>>
>>> You made mine for me.
>>>
>>> You have nothing.
>>
>> It would be a moron lurker indeed who didn't fail to notice that you
>> refuse to publicly state that you believe the Autopsy Report.
>
> In what way?
What AMAZING cowardice!
Bud
Jul 25, 2019, 7:04:03 PM7/25/19
to
>
>
> >>>>>> Next time "Chickenshit" whines that there's
> >>>>>> no alien life, I'll hit him with this:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oR1-UFrcZ0k
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Indeed, believers prefer to blatantly LIE about this statement.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> This is all you need to know... if you're trying to decide whether a
> >>>>>>>> lone assassin or a conspiracy took the life of JFK.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Nothing else is needed.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> You have nothing.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Au contraire, I made a prediction - and you're the first to prove the
> >>>>>> accuracy of my prediction.
> >>>>
> >>>> Anyone notice that "Chickenshit" just got spanked again?
> >>>
> >>> I thought you were supporting what I said.
> >>
> >> "Chickenshit" likes to play games with the deaths of these men.
> >
> > I said you had nothing. You supported what I said by offering nothing.
>
>
> And *again* "Chickenshit" runs away!
> >>>>>> "Chickenshit" absolutely REFUSED to publicly acknowledge the accuracy
> >>>>>> of the Autopsy Report - the very foundation he uses to argue for a
> >>>>>> lone assassin from the rear.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The autopsy found Kennedy was shot twice from behind, stupid.
> >>>>
> >>>> And "Chickenshit" again shifts the goalposts,
> >>>
> >>> The autopsy supports a shooter from the rear, stupid.
> >>
> >> You provably don't believe the Autopsy Report. So why do you keep
> >> citing it?
> >
> > Of course I believe the autopsy report when ...
>
>
> There's no "when" involved.
> You either believe it in it's entirety, or
> you *DON'T* believe the experts.
The findings of the autopsy were that Kennedy was shot twice from above and behind. I`ll go with that. Idiots can do whatever idiots want to do.
> Dunning-Kruger strikes again!
>
> So why do you keep citing something you don't accept?
>
> >>>>refusing to admit that
> >>>> he actually believes the Autopsy Report.
> >>>>
> >>>> The cowardice of these liars is almost beyond belief!
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Notice I began this thread with the statement: "There isn't a *SINGLE*
> >>>> believer who will publicly state that this is correct"...
> >>>>
> >>>> And so far, not a single believer has.
> >>>>
> >>>> "Chickenshit" is making my point for me!
> >>>
> >>> You made mine for me.
> >>>
> >>> You have nothing.
> >>
> >> It would be a moron lurker indeed who didn't fail to notice that you
> >> refuse to publicly state that you believe the Autopsy Report.
> >
> > In what way?
>
>
> There you go again, evading a simple question.
Ben Holmes
Jul 31, 2019, 10:45:31 AM7/31/19
to
On Thu, 25 Jul 2019 16:04:02 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
Anyone notice "Chickenshit's" running from his own assertion?
>>>>>>>> Next time "Chickenshit" whines that there's
>>>>>>>> no alien life, I'll hit him with this:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oR1-UFrcZ0k
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Indeed, believers prefer to blatantly LIE about this statement.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> This is all you need to know... if you're trying to decide whether a
>>>>>>>>>> lone assassin or a conspiracy took the life of JFK.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Nothing else is needed.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You have nothing.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Au contraire, I made a prediction - and you're the first to prove the
>>>>>>>> accuracy of my prediction.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Anyone notice that "Chickenshit" just got spanked again?
>>>>>
>>>>> I thought you were supporting what I said.
>>>>
>>>> "Chickenshit" likes to play games with the deaths of these men.
>>>
>>> I said you had nothing. You supported what I said by offering nothing.
>>
>> And *again* "Chickenshit" runs away!
>
> From nothing?
And *AGAIN* "Chickenshit" runs away!
>>>>>>>> "Chickenshit" absolutely REFUSED to publicly acknowledge the accuracy
>>>>>>>> of the Autopsy Report - the very foundation he uses to argue for a
>>>>>>>> lone assassin from the rear.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The autopsy found Kennedy was shot twice from behind, stupid.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And "Chickenshit" again shifts the goalposts,
>>>>>
>>>>> The autopsy supports a shooter from the rear, stupid.
>>>>
>>>> You provably don't believe the Autopsy Report. So why do you keep
>>>> citing it?
>>>
>>> Of course I believe the autopsy report when ...
>>
>> There's no "when" involved.
>
> There was, but the point I made terrified you so much you had to remove it.
"Chickenshit" runs again!
>> You either believe it in it's entirety, or
>> you *DON'T* believe the experts.
>
> What a stupid thing to say. I need to be an astronomer to believe
> the Earth revolves around the Sun?
Non sequitur... Now you're not even making coherent arguments.
You lose!
> The findings of the autopsy were that Kennedy was shot twice from
> above and behind. I`ll go with that. Idiots can do whatever idiots
> want to do.
When you base your beliefs on the "findings" which were based on lies,
then you merely illustrate the fact that you're dishonest.
The Warren Commission lied repeatedly - and you can't refute that
fact.
>> Dunning-Kruger strikes again!
>>
>> So why do you keep citing something you don't accept?
>
> I accept the findings of the autopsy.
You *REFUSE* to accept what they saw and described.
Dunning-Kruger strikes again!
>>>>>>refusing to admit that
>>>>>> he actually believes the Autopsy Report.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The cowardice of these liars is almost beyond belief!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Notice I began this thread with the statement: "There isn't a *SINGLE*
>>>>>> believer who will publicly state that this is correct"...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And so far, not a single believer has.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Chickenshit" is making my point for me!
>>>>>
>>>>> You made mine for me.
>>>>>
>>>>> You have nothing.
>>>>
>>>> It would be a moron lurker indeed who didn't fail to notice that you
>>>> refuse to publicly state that you believe the Autopsy Report.
>>>
>>> In what way?
>>
>> There you go again, evading a simple question.
>
> Define the concept.
The concept of honesty? You really want me to define that to a
dishonest coward?
Can't do it.
But it would be a moron lurker indeed who didn't fail to notice that
you AGAIN refuse to publicly state that you believe the Autopsy
Report.
You prove my point.
>>>>>>>> Next time "Chickenshit" whines that there's
>>>>>>>> no alien life, I'll hit him with this:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oR1-UFrcZ0k
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Indeed, believers prefer to blatantly LIE about this statement.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> This is all you need to know... if you're trying to decide whether a
>>>>>>>>>> lone assassin or a conspiracy took the life of JFK.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Nothing else is needed.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You have nothing.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Au contraire, I made a prediction - and you're the first to prove the
>>>>>>>> accuracy of my prediction.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Anyone notice that "Chickenshit" just got spanked again?
>>>>>
>>>>> I thought you were supporting what I said.
>>>>
>>>> "Chickenshit" likes to play games with the deaths of these men.
>>>
>>> I said you had nothing. You supported what I said by offering nothing.
>>
>> And *again* "Chickenshit" runs away!
>
> From nothing?
>>>>>>>> "Chickenshit" absolutely REFUSED to publicly acknowledge the accuracy
>>>>>>>> of the Autopsy Report - the very foundation he uses to argue for a
>>>>>>>> lone assassin from the rear.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The autopsy found Kennedy was shot twice from behind, stupid.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And "Chickenshit" again shifts the goalposts,
>>>>>
>>>>> The autopsy supports a shooter from the rear, stupid.
>>>>
>>>> You provably don't believe the Autopsy Report. So why do you keep
>>>> citing it?
>>>
>>> Of course I believe the autopsy report when ...
>>
>> There's no "when" involved.
>
> There was, but the point I made terrified you so much you had to remove it.
>> You either believe it in it's entirety, or
>> you *DON'T* believe the experts.
>
> What a stupid thing to say. I need to be an astronomer to believe
> the Earth revolves around the Sun?
You lose!
> The findings of the autopsy were that Kennedy was shot twice from
> above and behind. I`ll go with that. Idiots can do whatever idiots
> want to do.
then you merely illustrate the fact that you're dishonest.
The Warren Commission lied repeatedly - and you can't refute that
fact.
>> Dunning-Kruger strikes again!
>>
>> So why do you keep citing something you don't accept?
>
> I accept the findings of the autopsy.
Dunning-Kruger strikes again!
>>>>>>refusing to admit that
>>>>>> he actually believes the Autopsy Report.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The cowardice of these liars is almost beyond belief!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Notice I began this thread with the statement: "There isn't a *SINGLE*
>>>>>> believer who will publicly state that this is correct"...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And so far, not a single believer has.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Chickenshit" is making my point for me!
>>>>>
>>>>> You made mine for me.
>>>>>
>>>>> You have nothing.
>>>>
>>>> It would be a moron lurker indeed who didn't fail to notice that you
>>>> refuse to publicly state that you believe the Autopsy Report.
>>>
>>> In what way?
>>
>> There you go again, evading a simple question.
>
> Define the concept.
dishonest coward?
Can't do it.
But it would be a moron lurker indeed who didn't fail to notice that
you AGAIN refuse to publicly state that you believe the Autopsy
Report.
You prove my point.
Bud
Aug 4, 2019, 9:58:22 AM8/4/19
to
> >>>>>>>> Next time "Chickenshit" whines that there's
> >>>>>>>> no alien life, I'll hit him with this:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oR1-UFrcZ0k
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Indeed, believers prefer to blatantly LIE about this statement.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> This is all you need to know... if you're trying to decide whether a
> >>>>>>>>>> lone assassin or a conspiracy took the life of JFK.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Nothing else is needed.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> You have nothing.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Au contraire, I made a prediction - and you're the first to prove the
> >>>>>>>> accuracy of my prediction.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Anyone notice that "Chickenshit" just got spanked again?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I thought you were supporting what I said.
> >>>>
> >>>> "Chickenshit" likes to play games with the deaths of these men.
> >>>
> >>> I said you had nothing. You supported what I said by offering nothing.
> >>
> >> And *again* "Chickenshit" runs away!
> >
> > From nothing?
>
>
> And *AGAIN* "Chickenshit" runs away!
> >>>>>>>> "Chickenshit" absolutely REFUSED to publicly acknowledge the accuracy
> >>>>>>>> of the Autopsy Report - the very foundation he uses to argue for a
> >>>>>>>> lone assassin from the rear.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> The autopsy found Kennedy was shot twice from behind, stupid.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> And "Chickenshit" again shifts the goalposts,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The autopsy supports a shooter from the rear, stupid.
> >>>>
> >>>> You provably don't believe the Autopsy Report. So why do you keep
> >>>> citing it?
> >>>
> >>> Of course I believe the autopsy report when ...
> >>
> >> There's no "when" involved.
> >
> > There was, but the point I made terrified you so much you had to remove it.
>
>
> "Chickenshit" runs again!
> >> You either believe it in it's entirety, or
> >> you *DON'T* believe the experts.
> >
> > What a stupid thing to say. I need to be an astronomer to believe
> > the Earth revolves around the Sun?
>
>
> Non sequitur... Now you're not even making coherent arguments.
> You lose!
>
>
> > The findings of the autopsy were that Kennedy was shot twice from
> > above and behind. I`ll go with that. Idiots can do whatever idiots
> > want to do.
>
>
> When you base your beliefs on the "findings" which were based on lies,
> then you merely illustrate the fact that you're dishonest.
>
> The Warren Commission lied repeatedly - and you can't refute that
> fact.
>
>
>
> >> Dunning-Kruger strikes again!
> >>
> >> So why do you keep citing something you don't accept?
> >
> > I accept the findings of the autopsy.
>
>
> You *REFUSE* to accept what they saw and described.
> Dunning-Kruger strikes again!
How many autopsies have you performed?
>
> >>>>>>refusing to admit that
> >>>>>> he actually believes the Autopsy Report.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The cowardice of these liars is almost beyond belief!
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Notice I began this thread with the statement: "There isn't a *SINGLE*
> >>>>>> believer who will publicly state that this is correct"...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> And so far, not a single believer has.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> "Chickenshit" is making my point for me!
> >>>>>
> >>>>> You made mine for me.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> You have nothing.
> >>>>
> >>>> It would be a moron lurker indeed who didn't fail to notice that you
> >>>> refuse to publicly state that you believe the Autopsy Report.
> >>>
> >>> In what way?
> >>
> >> There you go again, evading a simple question.
> >
> > Define the concept.
>
>
> The concept of honesty?
> You really want me to define that to a
> dishonest coward?
Clearly, "believe the Autopsy Report" was the concept I asked you to define.
> Can't do it.
>
> But it would be a moron lurker indeed who didn't fail to notice that
> you AGAIN refuse to publicly state that you believe the Autopsy
> Report.
Ben Holmes
Aug 20, 2019, 11:38:53 AM8/20/19
to
On Sun, 4 Aug 2019 06:58:21 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
Nope.
There isn't a *SINGLE* believer who will publicly state that this is
correct:
1. There is a large irregular defect of the scalp and skull on the
right involving chiefly the parietal bone but extending somewhat into
the temporal and occipital regions. In this region there is an actual
absence of scalp and bone producing a defect which measures
approximately 13 cm. in greatest diameter.
Amusingly - still absolutely true.
There isn't a *SINGLE* believer who will publicly state that this is
correct:
1. There is a large irregular defect of the scalp and skull on the
right involving chiefly the parietal bone but extending somewhat into
the temporal and occipital regions. In this region there is an actual
absence of scalp and bone producing a defect which measures
approximately 13 cm. in greatest diameter.
Bud
Aug 30, 2019, 6:48:08 PM8/30/19
to
> There isn't a *SINGLE* believer who will publicly state that this is
> correct:
>
> 1. There is a large irregular defect of the scalp and skull on the
> right involving chiefly the parietal bone but extending somewhat into
> the temporal and occipital regions. In this region there is an actual
> absence of scalp and bone producing a defect which measures
> approximately 13 cm. in greatest diameter.
Ben Holmes
Sep 19, 2019, 9:31:30 PM9/19/19
to
On Fri, 30 Aug 2019 15:48:07 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
Nope.
>> There isn't a *SINGLE* believer who will publicly state that this is
>> correct:
>>
>> 1. There is a large irregular defect of the scalp and skull on the
>> right involving chiefly the parietal bone but extending somewhat into
>> the temporal and occipital regions. In this region there is an actual
>> absence of scalp and bone producing a defect which measures
>> approximately 13 cm. in greatest diameter.
>
> This looks like a correct rendering of what appears in the autopsy
> report. What about it?
Once again, you support the point I made. There isn't a *SINGLE*
believer who will publicly state that the quote I provided above is
correct.
"Chickenshit" refuses to do so... thus adding support to my statement.
>> Amusingly - still absolutely true.
And even given the opportunity to prove me wrong, "Chickenshit" is
unable to do so.
>> There isn't a *SINGLE* believer who will publicly state that this is
>> correct:
>>
>> 1. There is a large irregular defect of the scalp and skull on the
>> right involving chiefly the parietal bone but extending somewhat into
>> the temporal and occipital regions. In this region there is an actual
>> absence of scalp and bone producing a defect which measures
>> approximately 13 cm. in greatest diameter.
>
> This looks like a correct rendering of what appears in the autopsy
> report. What about it?
believer who will publicly state that the quote I provided above is
correct.
"Chickenshit" refuses to do so... thus adding support to my statement.
>> Amusingly - still absolutely true.
unable to do so.
Bud
Sep 20, 2019, 4:27:41 PM9/20/19
to
> >> There isn't a *SINGLE* believer who will publicly state that this is
> >> correct:
> >>
> >> 1. There is a large irregular defect of the scalp and skull on the
> >> right involving chiefly the parietal bone but extending somewhat into
> >> the temporal and occipital regions. In this region there is an actual
> >> absence of scalp and bone producing a defect which measures
> >> approximately 13 cm. in greatest diameter.
> >
> > This looks like a correct rendering of what appears in the autopsy
> > report. What about it?
>
>
> Once again, you support the point I made. There isn't a *SINGLE*
> believer who will publicly state that the quote I provided above is
> correct.
Ben Holmes
Oct 23, 2019, 11:52:19 AM10/23/19
to
On Fri, 20 Sep 2019 13:27:40 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
Don't need to - your cite is still located in the above post.
0 new messages