Proof by LORD Almighty GOD: 6th validation of scientific proof that Jesus is LORD <><
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Jesus is not LORD so that GOD's promise in 1 Corinthians 12:3 that
"...no one can say, 'Jesus is LORD,' except by the Holy Spirit" would
not be realized.
Prediction based on null hypothesis:
Non-christians would be able to publicly say with their mouths "Jesus
is LORD."
Observation:
Non-christians have been invariably unable to publicly say with their
mouths that "Jesus is LORD."
Source:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/a6caff7619f3ff9e?
1st validation...
Dear convicted non-christian neighbor Virgil unwittingly provides a
written confession that he is unable to publicly say with his mouth
that "Jesus is LORD:"
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/c361a4de28fdeffd?
2nd validation...
A sockpuppet unwittingly provides written evidence that satan is
unable to have it publicly say with its mouth that "Jesus is LORD:"
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/4972c3fdbc4ad045?
3rd validation...
Dear convicted non-christian neighbor Don Kirkman unwittingly provides
a written confession that he is unable to publicly say with his mouth
that "Jesus is LORD:"
4th validation...
Another sockpuppet unwittingly provides additional written evidence
that satan is unable to have it publicly say with its mouth that
"Jesus is LORD:"
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/8a3e9087c96c532c?
5th validation...
Yet another sockpuppet is exposed by one of Jesus' disciples as being
unable to publicly say with its mouth that "Jesus is LORD:"
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/91e7a3f1c6508acc?
6th validation...
Dear convicted non-christian neighbor Cary Kittrell unwittingly
provides
a written confession that he is unable to publicly say with his mouth
that "Jesus is LORD:"
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/5b9dec16f3c2bce9?
Conclusions:
Reject the null hypothesis.
Jesus is LORD !!!
Yeshua is Adonai !!!
May dear neighbors, friends, and brethren have a blessedly wonderful
2008th year since the birth of our LORD Jesus Christ as our Messiah,
the Son of Man ...
... by being hungrier:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/f891e617d10bd689?
Hunger is wonderful ! ! !
It's how we know the answer to the question "What does Jesus
want?" (WDJW):
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/f43db72a7c5c1da0?
Yes, hunger is our knowledge of good versus evil that Adam and Eve
paid for with their and our immortal lives:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/52a3db8576495806?
"Blessed are you who hunger NOW...
... for you will be satisfied." -- LORD Jesus Christ (Luke 6:21)
Amen.
Here is a Spirit-guided exegesis of Luke 6:21 given in hopes of
promoting much greater understanding:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/cc2aa8f8a4d41360?
Be hungrier, which is truly healthier:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/991d4e30704307e7?
Marana tha
Prayerfully in the awesome name of our Messiah, LORD Jesus Christ,
Andrew <><
--
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/1a812afc784ae683?
panam...@hotmail.com
wrote:
snip crap
Andrew, your existence is the only proof I need that gods do not
exist. Any compassionate creature with omnipowers would heal you, or
at least end your misery. And any creature that could observe your
madness and not be compassionate to you isn't worthy of the term
"god".
-Panama Floyd, Atlanta.
aa#2015/KoBAAWA!
Virgil
<60dc76f5-42a4-4291...@d77g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>,
"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <lov...@thetruth.com> wrote:
> Null hypothesis:
>
> Jesus is not LORD
> Prediction based on null hypothesis:
>
> Non-christians will not be compelled to say publicly that Jesus is lord.
>
> Observation:
>
> Non-christians have not been forced publicly say with their
> mouths or any other parts of their anatomy that "Jesus is LORD."
>
> Conclusions:
>
> Accept the null hypothesis.
>
> Praise Brahma, Jesus is not LORD !!!
I guess that's the way the cookie crumbles!
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
M_P
> > Null hypothesis:
>
> >Jesusis not LORD
> > Prediction based on null hypothesis:
>
> > Non-christians will not be compelled to say publicly thatJesusis lord.
That "prediction" is equally consistent with the negation of your null
hypothesis. Too bad.
Virgil
<510d78f6-ce9f-4ad8...@k30g2000hse.googlegroups.com>,
"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <lov...@thetruth.com> wrote:
> http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/0648a4a8b4b13aa4?
>
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/0a812afc784ae683?
Sucker!
panam...@hotmail.com
wrote:
snip
http://www.jackanapes.ws/pastorino.html
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/85fbe9596713b5db
~~~~~~~~~~
<><
The fish can breath in the water!
-PF
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>
> > http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/62d844f2cb80b666?
>
> http://www.jackanapes.ws/pastorino.html
Many thanks, much praise, and all the glory to GOD for His compelling
you to unwittingly testify that you remain unable to publicly say with
your mouth that "Jesus is LORD."
Laus Deo ! ! !
<><
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/1a812afc784ae683?
Cary Kittrell
> convicted neighbor Floyd (panamfl...@hotmail.com) wrote:
> > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> >
> > > http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/62d844f2cb80b666?
> >
> > http://www.jackanapes.ws/pastorino.html
>
> Many thanks, much praise, and all the glory to GOD for His compelling
> you to unwittingly testify that you remain unable to publicly say with
> your mouth that "Jesus is LORD."
And kudos to you for unwittingly reminding us that "publicly"
is another Chungian "improvement" to Scripture.
-- cary
Virgil
<d2de4289-95e2-479b...@b1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>,
"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <lov...@thetruth.com> wrote:
> convicted neighbor Andrew boldly wrote:
> >
> > > http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/72d844f2cb80b666?
> >
> > http://www.jackanapes.ws/astorino.html
>
> Many thanks, much praise, and all the glory to Brahma for His compelling
> you to unwittingly testify that Andrew remains unable to publicly say with
> his mouth that "Jesus is LORD."
>
> Laus Brahma ! ! !
>
><><
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/xa812afc784ae683?
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote::
> > convicted neighbor Floyd (panamfl...@hotmail.com) wrote:
> > > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > >
> > > > http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/62d844f2cb80b666?
> > >
> > > http://www.jackanapes.ws/pastorino.html
> >
> > Many thanks, much praise, and all the glory to GOD for His compelling
> > you to unwittingly testify that you remain unable to publicly say with
> > your mouth that "Jesus is LORD."
>
> And kudos to you for unwittingly reminding us that "publicly"
> is another Chungian "improvement" to Scripture.
Not for the discerning who understand the very public context of 1
Corinthians being a letter addressed to all the Christians (either Jew
or gentile) in Corinth and beyond...
"Paul, called to be an apostle of Christ Jesus by the will of GOD, and
our brother Sosthenes,
To the church of GOD in Corinth, to those sanctified in Christ Jesus
and called to be holy, together with all those everywhere who call on
the name of our LORD Jesus Christ—their LORD and ours:" -- apostle
Paul at the beginning of his letter to all Christians "everywhere" (1
Corinthians 1:1-2)
Many thanks, much praise, and all the glory to GOD for His compelling
you to also unwittingly testify that you also remain unable to
publicly say with your mouth that "Jesus is LORD."
Bottom line concerning your having less free will:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/a88f3caf4697e3e7?
<><
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/1a812afc784ae683?
Cary Kittrell
> convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:
> > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote::
> > > convicted neighbor Floyd (panamfl...@hotmail.com) wrote:
> > > > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > > >
> 666?
> > > >
> > > > http://www.jackanapes.ws/pastorino.html
> > >
> > > Many thanks, much praise, and all the glory to GOD for His compelling
> > > you to unwittingly testify that you remain unable to publicly say with
> > > your mouth that "Jesus is LORD."
> >
> > And kudos to you for unwittingly reminding us that "publicly"
> > is another Chungian "improvement" to Scripture.
>
> Not for the discerning who understand the very public context of 1
> Corinthians being a letter addressed to all the Christians (either Jew
> or gentile) in Corinth and beyond...
>
> "Paul, called to be an apostle of Christ Jesus by the will of GOD, and
> our brother Sosthenes,
>
> To the church of GOD in Corinth, to those sanctified in Christ Jesus
> and called to be holy, together with all those everywhere who call on
> Paul at the beginning of his letter to all Christians "everywhere" (1
> Corinthians 1:1-2)
Thanks yet once again for adding further evidence to my point that
"publicly" is nothing other than a non-scriptural overlay
by Chung.
Or should I be directing that praise directly to GOD for
compelling you to confess your attempt to usurp His Word?
-- cary
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:
> > > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote::
> > > > convicted neighbor Floyd (panamfl...@hotmail.com) wrote:
> > > > > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/62d844f2cb80b=
> > 666?
> > > > >
> > > > > http://www.jackanapes.ws/pastorino.html
> > > >
> > > > Many thanks, much praise, and all the glory to GOD for His compelling
> > > > you to unwittingly testify that you remain unable to publicly say with
> > > > your mouth that "Jesus is LORD."
> > >
> > > And kudos to you for unwittingly reminding us that "publicly"
> > > is another Chungian "improvement" to Scripture.
> >
> > Not for the discerning who understand the very public context of 1
> > Corinthians being a letter addressed to all the Christians (either Jew
> > or gentile) in Corinth and beyond...
> >
> > "Paul, called to be an apostle of Christ Jesus by the will of GOD, and
> > our brother Sosthenes,
> >
> > To the church of GOD in Corinth, to those sanctified in Christ Jesus
> > and called to be holy, together with all those everywhere who call on
> > Paul at the beginning of his letter to all Christians "everywhere" (1
> > Corinthians 1:1-2)
>
> Thanks yet once again for adding further evidence to my point that
> "publicly" is nothing other than a non-scriptural overlay
> by Chung.
Your inability to address the author of this post directly in your
written response is a tell that betrays how this discussion terribly
troubles your brain as you struggle valiantly to rationalize why you
are unable to publicly say with your mouth that "Jesus is LORD."
Cary Kittrell
I just did.
Did you miss it?
-- cary
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:
> > > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > > > convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:
> > > > > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote::
> > > > > > convicted neighbor Floyd (panamfl...@hotmail.com) wrote:
> > > > > > > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > http://www.jackanapes.ws/pastorino.html
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Many thanks, much praise, and all the glory to GOD for His compelling
> > > > > > you to unwittingly testify that you remain unable to publicly say with
> > > > > > your mouth that "Jesus is LORD."
> > > > >
> > > > > And kudos to you for unwittingly reminding us that "publicly"
> > > > > is another Chungian "improvement" to Scripture.
> > > >
> > > > Not for the discerning who understand the very public context of 1
> > > > Corinthians being a letter addressed to all the Christians (either Jew
> > > > or gentile) in Corinth and beyond...
> > > >
> > > > "Paul, called to be an apostle of Christ Jesus by the will of GOD, and
> > > > our brother Sosthenes,
> > > >
> > > > To the church of GOD in Corinth, to those sanctified in Christ Jesus
> > > > and called to be holy, together with all those everywhere who call on
> > > > the name of our LORD Jesus Christ, their LORD and ours:" -- apostle
> > > > Paul at the beginning of his letter to all Christians "everywhere" (1
> > > > Corinthians 1:1-2)
> > >
> > > Thanks yet once again for adding further evidence to my point that
> > > "publicly" is nothing other than a non-scriptural overlay
> > > by Chung.
>
> > Your inability to address the author of this post directly in your
> > written response is a tell that betrays how this discussion terribly
> > troubles your brain as you struggle valiantly to rationalize why you
> > are unable to publicly say with your mouth that "Jesus is LORD."
>
> I just did.
Tells transiently disappear only to return for those who have less
free will like you:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/a88f3caf4697e3e7?
<><
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/1a812afc784ae683?
panam...@hotmail.com
scrawled in crayon on the walls of his padded cell:
>
> > >http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/62d844f2cb80b666?
>
> >http://www.jackanapes.ws/pastorino.html
>
> Many thanks, much praise, and all the glory to GOD for His compelling
> you to unwittingly testify that you remain unable to publicly say with
> your mouth that "Jesus is LORD."
That's because I don't like to lie.
Although I see in your reply another reason to condemn your mythology.
You *want* to see me burn, don'tcha. Yeah....it's not enough for you
that your gods will reward you. You won't be happy until that
vindictive bastard gets your revenge *for* you, you lazy ass.
This is the appeal of the Christian myth. Daddy will beat up the kids
making fun of you.
-Panama Floyd, Atlanta.
aa#2015/Member, Knights of BAAWA!
panam...@hotmail.com
Then let's get some more Free Will!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MYzGMxGq9rM
<thumbs up>
Don Kirkman
article
<d7bff6e9-7d8a-415f...@73g2000hsx.googlegroups.com>:
>convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:
>> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote::
>> > convicted neighbor Floyd (panamfl...@hotmail.com) wrote:
>> > > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/62d844f2cb80b666?
>> > >
>> > > http://www.jackanapes.ws/pastorino.html
>> >
>> > Many thanks, much praise, and all the glory to GOD for His compelling
>> > you to unwittingly testify that you remain unable to publicly say with
>> > your mouth that "Jesus is LORD."
>>
>> And kudos to you for unwittingly reminding us that "publicly"
>> is another Chungian "improvement" to Scripture.
>Not for the discerning who understand the very public context of 1
>Corinthians being a letter addressed to all the Christians (either Jew
>or gentile) in Corinth and beyond...
". . . and beyond" is another historical improvement of the record.
Paul wrote to individual churches; if he had a message for a different
church he traveled to it or wrote a letter directly to it. Here, your
"improvement" doesn't even have a scintilla of support in the Bible.
>"Paul, called to be an apostle of Christ Jesus by the will of GOD, and
>our brother Sosthenes,
>To the church of GOD in Corinth, to those sanctified in Christ Jesus
>and called to be holy, together with all those everywhere who call on
>the name of our LORD Jesus Christ?their LORD and ours:" -- apostle
>Paul at the beginning of his letter to all Christians "everywhere" (1
>Corinthians 1:1-2)
You really, really, really should have taken my many suggestions and
learned something about the Bible *before* you began "informing" the
multitudes.* Paul isn't saying he's writing to Corinth and all the
other Christians everywhere, he's saying the Christians of Corinth are
called to be saints, as are all Christians everywhere.
* And parsing the Bible with traditional English syntax would cover a
multitude of sins which you commit by "improving" what is plainly
written.
--
Don Kirkman
don...@charter.net
E.P. Uum
<d7bff6e9-7d8a-415f...@73g2000hsx.googlegroups.com>,
"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <lov...@thetruth.com> wrote:
By convicted pederast Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
ABC
<cd6c0461-7d48-4892...@x41g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>,
"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <lov...@thetruth.com> wrote:
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD toots his own horn.
Most of us are not flexible enough to do it.
E.P. Uum
<78496a12-2cc7-48e2...@26g2000hsk.googlegroups.com>,
"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <lov...@thetruth.com> wrote:
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/a888f3caf4697e3e7?
>
<><
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/1a6969afc784ae683?
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:
> >> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote::
> >> > convicted neighbor Floyd (panamfl...@hotmail.com) wrote:
> >> > > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > > http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/62d844f2cb80b666?
> >> > >
> >> > > http://www.jackanapes.ws/pastorino.html
> >> >
> >> > Many thanks, much praise, and all the glory to GOD for His compelling
> >> > you to unwittingly testify that you remain unable to publicly say with
> >> > your mouth that "Jesus is LORD."
> >>
> >> And kudos to you for unwittingly reminding us that "publicly"
> >> is another Chungian "improvement" to Scripture.
>
> > Not for the discerning who understand the very public context of 1
> > Corinthians being a letter addressed to all the Christians (either Jew
> > or gentile) in Corinth and beyond...
>
> ". . . and beyond" is another historical improvement of the record.
Not for the discerning, who understand the work of the Holy Spirit.
Many thanks, much praise, and all the glory to GOD for His compelling
you to unwittingly testify that you also remain unable to publicly say
with your mouth that "Jesus is LORD."
Bottom line concerning your having less free will:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/6c3ca11187d0eb9e?
<><
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/1a812afc784ae683?
Mark K. Bilbo
> convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:
>> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote::
>>> convicted neighbor Floyd (panamfl...@hotmail.com) wrote:
>>>> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/62d844f2cb80b666?
>>>> http://www.jackanapes.ws/pastorino.html
>>> Many thanks, much praise, and all the glory to GOD for His compelling
>>> you to unwittingly testify that you remain unable to publicly say with
>>> your mouth that "Jesus is LORD."
>> And kudos to you for unwittingly reminding us that "publicly"
>> is another Chungian "improvement" to Scripture.
>
> Not for the discerning
Translation: "I'm rewriting the Bible"
--
Mark K. Bilbo a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
------------------------------------------------------------
"You know, I'd get it if people were just looking for a
way to fill the holes. But they want the holes. They wanna
live in the holes. And they go nuts when someone else
pours dirt in their holes.
"Climb out of your holes people!"
- Dr. House, on faith
Mark K. Bilbo
In his ever increasing distance from reality, I'm sure he's missed a lot
of things...
Mark K. Bilbo
> convicted neighbor Don Kirkman wrote:
>> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>>> convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:
>>>> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote::
>>>>> convicted neighbor Floyd (panamfl...@hotmail.com) wrote:
>>>>>> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/62d844f2cb80b666?
>>>>>> http://www.jackanapes.ws/pastorino.html
>>>>> Many thanks, much praise, and all the glory to GOD for His compelling
>>>>> you to unwittingly testify that you remain unable to publicly say with
>>>>> your mouth that "Jesus is LORD."
>>>> And kudos to you for unwittingly reminding us that "publicly"
>>>> is another Chungian "improvement" to Scripture.
>>> Not for the discerning who understand the very public context of 1
>>> Corinthians being a letter addressed to all the Christians (either Jew
>>> or gentile) in Corinth and beyond...
>> ". . . and beyond" is another historical improvement of the record.
>
> Not for the discerning, who understand the work of the Holy Spirit.
Translation: "I'm rewriting the Bible"
Cary Kittrell
> convicted neighbor Don Kirkman wrote:
> > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > > convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:
> > >> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote::
> > >> > convicted neighbor Floyd (panamfl...@hotmail.com) wrote:
> > >> > > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > > http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/62d844f2cb80b666?
> > >> > >
> > >> > > http://www.jackanapes.ws/pastorino.html
> > >> >
> > >> > Many thanks, much praise, and all the glory to GOD for His compelling
> > >> > you to unwittingly testify that you remain unable to publicly say with
> > >> > your mouth that "Jesus is LORD."
> > >>
> > >> And kudos to you for unwittingly reminding us that "publicly"
> > >> is another Chungian "improvement" to Scripture.
> >
> > > Not for the discerning who understand the very public context of 1
> > > Corinthians being a letter addressed to all the Christians (either Jew
> > > or gentile) in Corinth and beyond...
> >
> > ". . . and beyond" is another historical improvement of the record.
>
> Not for the discerning, who understand the work of the Holy Spirit.
Would that be the same "discerning" who have no need "for an objective
consideration of the facts"? THOSE "discerning"?
-- cary
Cary Kittrell
>
> Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
> > convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:
> >> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote::
> >>> convicted neighbor Floyd (panamfl...@hotmail.com) wrote:
> >>>> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/62d844f2cb80b666?
> >>>> http://www.jackanapes.ws/pastorino.html
> >>> Many thanks, much praise, and all the glory to GOD for His compelling
> >>> you to unwittingly testify that you remain unable to publicly say with
> >>> your mouth that "Jesus is LORD."
> >> And kudos to you for unwittingly reminding us that "publicly"
> >> is another Chungian "improvement" to Scripture.
> >
> > Not for the discerning
>
> Translation: "I'm rewriting the Bible"
"Again."
-- cary
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > convicted neighbor Don Kirkman wrote:
> > > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > > > convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:
> > > >> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote::
> > > >> > convicted neighbor Floyd (panamfl...@hotmail.com) wrote:
> > > >> > > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/62d844f2cb80b666?
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > http://www.jackanapes.ws/pastorino.html
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Many thanks, much praise, and all the glory to GOD for His compelling
> > > >> > you to unwittingly testify that you remain unable to publicly say with
> > > >> > your mouth that "Jesus is LORD."
> > > >>
> > > >> And kudos to you for unwittingly reminding us that "publicly"
> > > >> is another Chungian "improvement" to Scripture.
> > >
> > > > Not for the discerning who understand the very public context of 1
> > > > Corinthians being a letter addressed to all the Christians (either Jew
> > > > or gentile) in Corinth and beyond...
> > >
> > > ". . . and beyond" is another historical improvement of the record.
> >
> > Not for the discerning, who understand the work of the Holy Spirit.
>
> Would that be the same "discerning" who have no need "for an objective
> consideration of the facts"? THOSE "discerning"?
No. The discerning are simply those who have understanding.
Those without understanding, like you and Don, will remain spiritually
blind in your "objective consideration of the facts" just as the
visually blind will remain visually blind no matter how much groping
around they do.
Bottom line concerning you and dear Don Kirkman:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/b09fe2cd7fceefc8?
<><
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/1a812afc784ae683?
Cary Kittrell
Bottom line concerning your self-contradiction:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.christnet.christianlife/msg/c8e74c9ce6e620c7
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/b09fe2cd7fceefc8?
>
> <><
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/1a812afc784ae683?
Virgil
realized that The Lord doesn't work that way, so I stole one and asked
him
to forgive me.
I've often wanted to drown my troubles, but I can't get my wife to go
swimming.
I went to a restaurant that serves 'breakfast at any time'.
So I ordered French Toast during the Renaissance.
Well I was bullied at school, called all kinds of different names.
But one day I turned to my bullies and said -'Sticks and stones may
break my bones but names will never hurt me', and it worked!
From there on it was sticks and stones all the way.
My Dad used to say 'always fight fire with fire',
which is probably why he got thrown out of the fire brigade.
I saw six men kicking and punching the mother-in-law.
My neighbor said
'Are you going to help?'
I said 'No, Six should be enough.'
I think animal testing is a terrible idea; they get all nervous and
give the wrong answers.
If a person owns a piece of land do they own it all the way down to the
core of the earth?
Why is it called Alcoholics Anonymous when the first thing you do is
stand up and say, 'My name is Bob, and I am an alcoholic'?
Why does mineral water that 'has trickled through mountains for
centuries' have a 'use by' date?
Is French kissing in France just called kissing?
What do people in China call their good plates?
--------------------------------------------------------
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Eye halve a spelling check her
It came with my pea sea
It plainly marques four my revue
Miss steaks eye kin knot sea.
Eye strike a key and type a word
And weight four it two say
Weather eye am wrong oar write
It shows me strait a weigh.
As soon as a mist ache is maid
It nose bee fore two long
And eye can put the error rite
Its rare lea ever wrong.
Eye have run this poem threw it
I am shore your pleased two no
Its letter perfect awl the weigh
My chequer tolled me sew.
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
to help encourage and better equip pastors vicars & the like for their
ministry.
Among the speakers were many well known and dynamic speakers. One such
boldly approached the pulpit and, gathering the entire crowd's
attention, said, "The best years of my life were spent in the arms of a
woman that wasn't my wife!" The crowd was shocked! He followed up by
saying, "And that woman was my mother!" - The crowd burst into laughter
and he delivered the rest of his talk, which went over quite well.
The next week, the local vicar decided he'd give this humour thing a
try, and use that joke in his sermon. As he surely approached the pulpit
that sunny Sunday, he tried to rehearse the joke in his head. It
suddenly seemed a bit foggy to him.
Getting to the microphone he said loudly, "The greatest years of my life
were spent in the arms of another woman that was not my wife!" The
congregation inhaled half the air in the church. After standing there
for almost 10 seconds in the stunned silence, trying to recall the
second half of the joke, the vicar finally blurted out, "...and I can't
remember who she was!"
BrG...@gmail.com
>
> Non-christians would be able to publicly say with their mouths "Jesus
> is LORD."
That's what they call "Lip Service", right?
XaurreauX
> you to unwittingly testify that you remain unable to publicly say with
> your mouth that "Jesus is LORD."
I don't get it. What kind of sacro-rubbish IS this?
Don Kirkman
article
>convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:
>> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>> > convicted neighbor Don Kirkman wrote:
>> > > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>> > > > convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:
>> > > >> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote::
>> > > >> > convicted neighbor Floyd (panamfl...@hotmail.com) wrote:
>> > > >> > > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>> > > >> > > > http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/62d844f2cb80b666?
>> > > >> > > http://www.jackanapes.ws/pastorino.html
>> > > >> > Many thanks, much praise, and all the glory to GOD for His compelling
>> > > >> > you to unwittingly testify that you remain unable to publicly say with
>> > > >> > your mouth that "Jesus is LORD."
>> > > >> And kudos to you for unwittingly reminding us that "publicly"
>> > > >> is another Chungian "improvement" to Scripture.
>> > > > Not for the discerning who understand the very public context of 1
>> > > > Corinthians being a letter addressed to all the Christians (either Jew
>> > > > or gentile) in Corinth and beyond...
You have been told that it was not a public context nor was it
addressed to anyone except the Church in Corinth. Don't start trying
to "improve" the syntax of the English language.
>> > > ". . . and beyond" is another historical improvement of the record.
>> > Not for the discerning, who understand the work of the Holy Spirit.
And since your style of "discerning" doesn't exist in the real world
your whole statement is moot.
>> Would that be the same "discerning" who have no need "for an objective
>> consideration of the facts"? THOSE "discerning"?
>No. The discerning are simply those who have understanding.
What do they understand if not the objective facts?
>Those without understanding, like you and Don, will remain spiritually
>blind in your "objective consideration of the facts" just as the
>visually blind will remain visually blind no matter how much groping
>around they do.
>Bottom line concerning you and dear Don Kirkman:
You refuse to accept correction about the facts of the Bible record,
preferring your "understanding" of unsubstantiated (and often
contradicted) assertions which have no evidence supporting them.
First, you abandoned the Bible as a source of knowledge, substituting
your own religious inventions and building your faith on them. And
compounding the problem you swore off science as a source of
knowledge and truth, leaving you with no basis but the voices in your
head for your "discernment" and "understanding."
--
Don Kirkman
don...@charter.net
Cary Kittrell
>
> It seems to me I heard somewhere that Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote in
> article
> <a1a65a89-6583-4b70...@c65g2000hsa.googlegroups.com>:
>
> >convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:
> >> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> >> > convicted neighbor Don Kirkman wrote:
> >> > > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> >> > > > convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:
> >> > > >> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote::
> >> > > >> > convicted neighbor Floyd (panamfl...@hotmail.com) wrote:
> >> > > >> > > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>
> >> > > >> > > > http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/62d844f2cb80b666?
>
> >> > > >> > > http://www.jackanapes.ws/pastorino.html
>
> >> > > >> > Many thanks, much praise, and all the glory to GOD for His compelling
> >> > > >> > you to unwittingly testify that you remain unable to publicly say with
> >> > > >> > your mouth that "Jesus is LORD."
>
> >> > > >> And kudos to you for unwittingly reminding us that "publicly"
> >> > > >> is another Chungian "improvement" to Scripture.
>
> >> > > > Not for the discerning who understand the very public context of 1
> >> > > > Corinthians being a letter addressed to all the Christians (either Jew
> >> > > > or gentile) in Corinth and beyond...
>
> You have been told that it was not a public context nor was it
> addressed to anyone except the Church in Corinth. Don't start trying
> to "improve" the syntax of the English language.
But it's all he's got. He tried floating a silly idea, had it
shot out from under him...and being Andrew, would rather eat
an eft, tail, claws, and all of him, rather than to admit it.
-- cary, who thanks Edward Arlington Robinson for the image.
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> >
>
> You have been told that it was not a public context nor was it
> addressed to anyone except the Church in Corinth.
The Church in Corinth was not a person but rather an assembly of
Christian gentiles residing in Corinth.
In the Holy Spirit, Paul knew that the letter he was writing would be
made public and be distributed widely to all Christian gentiles
because GOD had called him to be an apostle to the gentiles and so he
was inspired to write accordingly.
Many thanks, much praise, and all the glory to GOD for His compelling
you to unwittingly reveal that your inability to publicly say that
"Jesus is LORD" is troubling you greatly.
Laus Deo ! ! !
<><
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/1a812afc784ae683?
SkyEyes
Chung is mentally ill. Don't pay any attention to him. A few
regulars on here like to bat him around like a cat toy, but it just
encourages him to spam newsgroups more.
Brenda Nelson, A.A.#34
BAAWA Knight
EAC Professor of Feline Thermometrics and Cat-Herding
skyeyes nine at cox dot net
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
about the birds and the bees.
"I don't want to know!" the child says, bursting
into tears. "Promise me you won't tell me!"
Confused, the father asks what's wrong?
"Oh, dad," the boy sobs. "When I was six, I got
the 'There's no Santa speech.'
At seven, I got the 'There's no Easter Bunny' speech.
When I was eight, you hit me with the 'There's no
Tooth Fairy' speech.
If you're going to tell me that grown ups don't
really get laid, I'll have nothing left to live for."
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Whitburn, Tyne and Wear:
Your article on MRI (This Week, 3 April, p 7) reminded me of a story,
probably untrue, related by a doctor friend.
MRI used to be known in hospitals as nuclear magnetic resonance, or
NMR.
Unfortunately, patients who arrived at the hospital asking for "an NMR"
often received a treatment that they were not expecting.
Hence the change to MRI.
Mark K. Bilbo
> convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:
>> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>>> convicted neighbor Don Kirkman wrote:
>>>> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>>>>> convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:
>>>>>> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote::
>>>>>>> convicted neighbor Floyd (panamfl...@hotmail.com) wrote:
>>>>>>>> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/62d844f2cb80b666?
>>>>>>>> http://www.jackanapes.ws/pastorino.html
>>>>>>> Many thanks, much praise, and all the glory to GOD for His compelling
>>>>>>> you to unwittingly testify that you remain unable to publicly say with
>>>>>>> your mouth that "Jesus is LORD."
>>>>>> And kudos to you for unwittingly reminding us that "publicly"
>>>>>> is another Chungian "improvement" to Scripture.
>>>>> Not for the discerning who understand the very public context of 1
>>>>> Corinthians being a letter addressed to all the Christians (either Jew
>>>>> or gentile) in Corinth and beyond...
>>>> ". . . and beyond" is another historical improvement of the record.
>>> Not for the discerning, who understand the work of the Holy Spirit.
>> Would that be the same "discerning" who have no need "for an objective
>> consideration of the facts"? THOSE "discerning"?
>
> No. The discerning are simply those who have understanding.
Boy that rules you out right quick...
Mark K. Bilbo
> In article <2ukcq5-...@blaze.blaze.net> "Mark K. Bilbo" <gm...@com.mkbilbo> writes:
>> Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
>>> convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:
>>>> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote::
>>>>> convicted neighbor Floyd (panamfl...@hotmail.com) wrote:
>>>>>> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/62d844f2cb80b666?
>>>>>> http://www.jackanapes.ws/pastorino.html
>>>>> Many thanks, much praise, and all the glory to GOD for His compelling
>>>>> you to unwittingly testify that you remain unable to publicly say with
>>>>> your mouth that "Jesus is LORD."
>>>> And kudos to you for unwittingly reminding us that "publicly"
>>>> is another Chungian "improvement" to Scripture.
>>> Not for the discerning
>> Translation: "I'm rewriting the Bible"
>
> "Again."
"The Holy Spurt made me do it!"
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Virgil
>
> GOD is keeping all non-christians including you from saying "Jesus is
> LORD."
There is no god who can prevent anybody from saying it,
I have said it myself several times to test Chung's claim.
Thus I have found his claim trivially false.
On the other hand, it does not need any god to keep me from meaning it.
Don Kirkman
article
>convicted neighbor Don Kirkman wrote:
>> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>> > http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/324585da9d9abd20?
>> You have been told that it was not a public context nor was it
>> addressed to anyone except the Church in Corinth.
>The Church in Corinth was not a person but rather an assembly of
>Christian gentiles residing in Corinth.
You're confused again (still?). Of course I know the Church in
Corinth was not a person. And the members were not necessarily
Gentiles, since Paul went to Jewish communities as well. Note the
number of Jewish (Hebrew/Aramaic) names in his writings, starting with
Stephen.
But note that I never suggested a church is a person; I said Paul did
not address anyone except the church (the community) in Corinth.
BTW, bet you didn't know that's where the word "currant" came from.
But then there are a lot of things you don't know, discernment or not.
>In the Holy Spirit, Paul knew that the letter he was writing would be
>made public and be distributed widely to all Christian gentiles
>because GOD had called him to be an apostle to the gentiles and so he
>was inspired to write accordingly.
Paul never once mentioned "discernment" or "being in the Holy Spirit,"
let alone relying on that to give him knowledge of coming events.
--
Don Kirkman
don...@charter.net
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> >convicted neighbor Don Kirkman wrote:
> >> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>
> >> > http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/324585da9d9abd20?
>
> >> You have been told that it was not a public context nor was it
> >> addressed to anyone except the Church in Corinth.
>
> >The Church in Corinth was not a person but rather an assembly of
> >Christian gentiles residing in Corinth.
>
> You're confused again (still?). Of course I know the Church in
> Corinth was not a person.
Then you are now acknowledging the public context.
> And the members were not necessarily
> Gentiles, since Paul went to Jewish communities as well. Note the
> number of Jewish (Hebrew/Aramaic) names in his writings, starting with
> Stephen.
Again, you are now acknowledging the public context.
> But note that I never suggested a church is a person; I said Paul did
> not address anyone except the church (the community) in Corinth.
Again, you are equating a community with a single person.
The challenge stands for you and any other non-christian to publicly
declare with your mouth that "Jesus is LORD" and when unable, to
acknowledge that the Holy Spirit did not allow it:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/3473dc0d15d056f7?
<><
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/1a812afc784ae683?
Anon
convicted neighbor
Andrew boldly wrote:
Yum cha restaurants in Chinatown will now have to train workers who push
food carts to pass a "driving licence" under new regulations from Sydney
City Council.
The move comes after a spate of accidents in which novice or careless
trolley-pushers have crashed carts, injuring or making a mess of patrons
and
co-workers.
In one case last year, an elderly customer at a large yum cha restaurant
was
covered in plates of sticky black bean sauce after a trolley waitress
lost
her load while she was text messaging on her mobile phone.
In another incident in 2002, a yum cha trolley waiter lost control of a
cart
laden with steamed dumpling as she was trundling down a steep ramp
between
levels of a Chinatown restaurant. The dumpling cart ended up ploughing
head
on into an unattended trolley at the bottom.
"We've had quite a few complaints about some of these yum cha waiting
staff," said Mr Frank Boles, head of the council's environmental health
and
safety division.
"It's either young, inexperienced students who take these jobs or someone
just off the boat. In either case, they need to be properly trained."
Under plans to be announced later today, waiters and waitresses at the 24
restaurants within the council's recently enlarged boundaries offering a
yum
cha service will be required to attend an approved two-day course.
The workers will be instructed in trolley pushing techniques and learn
about
the occupational health and safety aspects of the work.
After completing the course, they will be required to carry a small "L"
plate on their carts for six months before being granted full licences.
Learners can only push a cart while accompanied by fully licensed waiting
staff.
As a one off, the council will issue full licences to staff nominated by
restaurant management who have a minimum of three years experience.
Mr Wan Xiao, manager of the Hungry Dragon restaurant in Chinatown, which
runs a seven-day-a- week yum cha service, said although the new
regulations
would mean increased labour and training costs, he was confident the new
measures would result in a lowering of his insurance premiums.
"Our public liability premiums have been going through the roof in recent
years," he said. " I welcome this move because it will restore
confidence in
our service and allay the concerns of our customers."
The new measures will come into effect on April 1 next year.
Don Kirkman
article
>convicted neighbor Don Kirkman wrote:
>> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>> >convicted neighbor Don Kirkman wrote:
>> >> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>> >> > http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/324585da9d9abd20?
>> >> You have been told that it was not a public context nor was it
>> >> addressed to anyone except the Church in Corinth.
>> >The Church in Corinth was not a person but rather an assembly of
>> >Christian gentiles residing in Corinth.
>> You're confused again (still?). Of course I know the Church in
>> Corinth was not a person.
>Then you are now acknowledging the public context.
S'pose you show me how that computes here . . .
>> And the members were not necessarily
>> Gentiles, since Paul went to Jewish communities as well. Note the
>> number of Jewish (Hebrew/Aramaic) names in his writings, starting with
>> Stephen.
. . . and here . . .
>Again, you are now acknowledging the public context.
. . . and here . . .
>> But note that I never suggested a church is a person; I said Paul did
>> not address anyone except the church (the community) in Corinth.
>Again, you are equating a community with a single person.
That would require that it be legally incorporated. I don't think the
Church in Corinth had the paperwork drawn up.
>The challenge stands for you and any other non-christian to publicly
>declare with your mouth that "Jesus is LORD" and when unable, to
>acknowledge that the Holy Spirit did not allow it:
Enough of that arrogant assumption that you know my religious
inclinations.
--
Don Kirkman
don...@charter.net
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> >
>
> S'pose you show me how that computes here . . .
>
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/b09fe2cd7fceefc8?
<><
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/5ed925253232ff23?