=====================================================
BATTLING ANTI-BUGLIOSI BULLSHIT:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/b2326782552cef9c
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/334c3599e4f7bceb
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/51070d52fc62629b
THAT "OSWALD IN DOORWAY" BUSINESS AGAIN?:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.assassination.jfk/msg/c1de2e3ce73873c2
RABID CONSPIRACISTS -- A CURIOUS LOT:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/27968846a091de62
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/243408b33bd0b5df
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/f63a695aee480351
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/b3d972acbae844e3
HOOVER, DARBY, AND LATENT PRINTS:
http://www.amazon.com/Message-Patricia-Lambert-apology-Bugliosi/forum/Fx2TVHW5I0UEY9A/TxR9QNQTFC20JF/2/ref=cm_cd_et_md_pl/?%5Fencoding=UTF8&cdMsgNo=36&cdAnchor=0393045250&cdSort=oldest&cdMsgID=MxHLYDWKI8KN2E#MxHLYDWKI8KN2E
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/959348ffc39ae22e
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/3f959277ca07aecd
TIMELINES AND SODA MACHINES:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/9b0439b80997d6f9
LANE, WECHT, AND BUGLIOSI:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/329b391dc93abd62
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/2f0c7b0ddb1cab77
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/4428bfcff84cd0c5
TIPPIT:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/2c1f37591d667872
JACK RUBY AND KAREN CARLIN:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/8455f7c9078a2f4e
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/bbbfe8e225d4fd8d
=====================================================
=====================================================
VINCENT T. BUGLIOSI, HIS BOOK, AND ASSORTED RELATED MISCELLANY:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.assassination.jfk/msg/f7a37786fdfdc665
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/41f4d4110b16a4ad
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/7a14370ddd1b92c5
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/d1ddf0d7a0e0aa25
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/e3d46ffb69732c37
INTERVIEW WITH VINCE BUGLIOSI:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/2cdfdf0b58b5df8b
BUGLIOSI, POSNER, AND OSWALD'S RIFLE:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/822aca41bf953723
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/666e579e2de8096a
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/2a521c7297aaf36c
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/fe7365d8ba5ae464
JEAN HILL:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/633723d097747c78
OLIVER STONE'S MANGLING OF HISTORY:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/0a931249aa0eddff
NEW 11/22/63 HOME MOVIE SHOWING JFK IN DALLAS (THE "YEARGAN FILM"):
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/ed3d045f56adaecc
JFK'S CRANIUM:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/baf36167d8a1c948
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.assassination.jfk/msg/c441afbbaae69dda
THE FORWARD "HEAD SNAP":
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.assassination.jfk/msg/274d962d2c2b0b15
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/431f9d7fc0d138ed
JIM GARRISON'S NUTTINESS (CIRCA 1967):
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/d5386a8c3745a27d
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/2cc8d7654dccbcdb
THE SILLIEST DECISION EVER!:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.assassination.jfk/msg/c937b1d25164ae5b
=====================================================
No, we're not talking about exactly "7.1" seconds. That's merely your
(pro-CT) interpretation, evidently, of the Warren Report's "in excess
of 7 seconds" verbiage on page 117 of the WCR. .....
http://history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wr/html/WCReport_0071a.htm
But, "in excess of 7 seconds" incorporates a lot more possibilities
than just "7.1 seconds". Where did you get that precise figure from
anyway?
The best evidence, IMO, is that Oswald had 8.36 seconds (Z160 through
Z313) to do his deed. Plenty of time...for even a marginal
sharpshooter.
And I see that the above-quoted CTer is still clinging to the silly
notion that Oswald was a "poor shot".
Incredibly, "Sharpshooter" in the Marine Corps translates to many
CTers to Lee Harvey Oswald being "a poor shot". Crazy, man. And silly
too.
~~~~~~~~~
VINCE BUGLIOSI (at the 1986 TV Docu-Trial) -- "Mr. Delgado, I believe
you testified before the Warren Commission, that on the rifle range
Oswald was kind of a joke, a pretty big joke."
NELSON DELGADO (served with Oswald in Marine Corps) -- "Yes, he was."
MR. BUGLIOSI -- "You're aware that at the time Oswald was doing poorly
on the range, he was about to be released from the Marines, is that
correct?"
MR. DELGADO -- "Yes, he was."
MR. BUGLIOSI -- "Are you aware that in 1956, when Oswald first joined
the Marines, and was going through Basic Training, he fired a 212 on
the rifle range with an M-1 rifle, which made him a 'sharpshooter' at
that time -- are you aware of that?"
MR. DELGADO -- "Yes."
MR. BUGLIOSI -- "Given the fact that Oswald was about to get out of
the Marines when he was in your unit, and the fact that he showed no
interest in firing on the range -- you don't attribute his poor
showing on the range to his being a poor shot?"
MR. DELGADO -- "No."
MR. BUGLIOSI -- "He could have done better, you felt, if he tried?"
MR. DELGADO -- "Certainly."