More of my philosophy of why i am more positive about our world..

[World-News2100]

Hello..


More of my philosophy of why i am more positive about our world..

I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..

I am more positive about our world since and i am explaining why
by posting my following writing and thoughts, you can read them
in the following web links:

More of my philosophy about capitalism and innovation:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/cf3Wa4z8Xmc

And here:

More of my philosophy about the future of humanity:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/0X024jfzNvM

And here:

More of my philosophy about artificial intelligence and neuroevolution
and common sense and more:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/awfCypJ9iRE

Also read my following thoughts and writing about our Era of
democratization of technology and democratization of information and
democratization of finance so that to be more positive:

More about "democratization" of finance..

This "democratization" of finance is also for Research and Development
(R&D))..

And look at the following "democratization" of finance so that to
understand:

The 4 tools making capital more abundant than it’s ever been

Read more here:

https://singularityhub.com/2018/07/19/the-4-tools-making-capital-more-abundant-than-its-ever-been/


About democratization of digital technology and technology and Research
and Development (R&D) investment

This is also why i said the following:

Look at the following interesting video:

Can South Korea lead global innovation in Fourth Industrial Era?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XUw8gCShEcI


But i think that this minister of education, science and technology
of south Korea looks somewhat archaic since he is not taking correctly
into account the democratization of digital technology and Technology
that permits you to economically grow very rapidly and much cheaply than
using "expensive" Research and Development (R&D) investment, so i think
that he is not correctly adapting to the realities, because the economic
realities have very much changed, since also our era of globalization
has been characterized by the democratization of technology,
democratization of finance, and democratization of information.

Here is more proof of what i am saying:


2. Question: What do you mean by “Democratizing Innovation”?

Eric von Hippel:

The tools for designing high-quality innovations are getting so cheap
and so ubiquitous that individuals can innovate for themselves at a
steadily higher quality and at a steadily decreasing cost. These
sophisticated modern tools are computer-based, and require relatively
little training and practice. As a result, even hobbyist users find they
can use them to design new products and services.

Read more here:

Democratizing Innovation: The Shift of Innovation to Users

https://www.ideaconnection.com/interviews/00010-Democratizing-Innovation-The-Shift-of-Innovation.html

And read my following thoughts of my philosophy so that to understand more:

More of my philosophy about the smart IQ tests and the scalable
algorithms and algorithms..

Bonita Montero a software engineer has just written to me the following
about my new invention below:

> Multiple reader, exlusive writer locks are *never*
> starvation-free. Readers can hold the lock infinitely
> and writers as well,

And i have just answered the following:

>> But i think she is not right, since this holding
>> the lock infinitely is not counted, since you have
>> just to use it correctly and avoid this case, so I
>> think she is making a mistake and she is not
>> understanding what is that a Multiple-Readers-Exclusive-Writer
>> Lock is starvation-free, so what i mean by starvation-free
>> is that in my invention of my algorithm the readers don't
>> starve the writers and the writers don't starve the readers,
>> and the writers don't starve and readers don't starve, it
>> is what we call starvation-free, and i think my invention is
>> scalable and starvation-free and fair.

And Branimir Maksimovic answered me the following:

>>> If used correctly you don't need any lock :P
>>> Locks are for synchronization, which is not
>>> good thing :P

Please read here:

https://groups.google.com/g/comp.programming.threads/c/NOJrZoQ3-qk


But I think my answer is correct and i think i am really smart, and here
is my explanation:

Since my answer is like a smart IQ test, and it is that my answer is
first that you to know how the: "you have just to use it correctly" is
logically in "relation" with the "avoid this case" in my sentence,
so if what i mean in my answer is that the: "you have just to use it
correctly" of my sentence is not the cause of the: "avoid this case"
of my sentence, so you are failing the smart IQ test of my answer,
since you are just thinking the case where: "you have just to use it
correctly" is the cause of the "avoid this case", and the second case
is if we say: "you have to use it correctly", it also mean that you have
to use it in the right environment, so if it is not, so it doesn't just
mean don't use it, but it also mean change the environment that is
causing the Multiple-Readers-Exclusive-Writer Lock to wait indefinitely.
So you are again failing the smart IQ test.

More of my philosophy about the effects of a commercial society based on
the pursuit of self-interest..

I think that we have to understand the work of the philosopher and
economist Adam Smith about economic Liberalism, i think the defect of
his theory or work is that he is for example saying the following:

"Human egoism is the engine of the properity and happiness of nations"

But i think i am a philosopher that is not in accordance with
the philosopher and economist Adam Smith, since you have to understand
that Adam Smith says about his economic Liberalism that self-interest is
most of the time regulated by competition to not lead to corruption,
fraud, price-gouging, and cheating, and self-interest and competition is
the engine of the properity and happiness of nations described the
opposing, but complementary forces of self-interest and competition as
the invisible hand, it means that while producers and consumers are not
acting with the intent of serving the needs of others or society, they
do, since when you work, your goal is to earn money, but in the process
you provide a valuable good or service that benefits others and society,
so it is the basis of the following saying of Adam Smith: "Human egoism
is the engine of the properity and happiness of nations", but i think
that the most important defect of economic Liberalism of Adam Smith is
the following: How to bring the positive or the much more positive
spirit since the way of egoism and competition of economic Liberalism
of Adam Smith brings a negative spirit that causes disorder and violence
? Also i think that a much more positive or positive spirit is better
for economy, this is why my new model that i call coopetition that is a
well balance between cooperation and competition is better, this is why
i am sharing a number of my inventions of scalable algorithms and
algorithms and softwares with the public or people so that to bring the
positive or the much more positive spirit(and you can find all of them
here in my website: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/), and i
think that this positive spirit or much more positive spirit is good for
economy, but you have to play it "smartly", and i give you a proverb of
mine that shows how it is important:

"We can ask of from where comes the attachment of Love between
a mother and her son ? so i think i am smart and i will say
that it comes from the fact that it is like a reward, that the son
is loving or is being the son and the mother is giving a good reward
like giving him more security or giving him food to eat, so as you are
noticing that this rule can be applied to consumerism, since
you can use the same rule with your consumers in a smart
way, for example by giving the impression to your consumers that
you take care of there security by learning them with easy or the like,
and then the consumers will love you much more and will be attracted by
you."

I think i am smart, and notice how i am talking about
how we have not to have a narrow view of what is smartness, and notice
how i am talking about the distributed smartness as rules etc. so i
think i can logically infer from my below thoughts the other way of
solving the greatly complex systems that is not by like "planning" the
whole system from a centralized government, but by emergence of a higher
level intelligence from distributing like the rules or.. into the small
parts of the system that will solve the greatly complex system, it looks
like the evolutionary design and planning, and it looks like the way of
the higher level smartness from an Ant colony, since in an Ant colony
there is no central government, but there is a distributed intelligence
that needs a kind of diversity of genetics of the members of the colony
and it needs like a distributed rules that the members have to follow
that will make emerge a higher level of intelligence. And of course it
looks like evolutionary algorithms in artificial intelligence, since the
advantage of evolutionary algorithms in artificial intelligence is that
they don't plan in advance but they search by like following some
distributed rules, and of course they need some "randomness" so that to
not get stuck in a local optimum, this is why i am talking below about
how to make our civilization that is a complex system much more
resilient by learning how to learn to humans with like a set
of rules like in an Ant colony by saying the following and notice
that the learning how to learn can be an efficient abstraction that
helps a lot:

More of my philosophy about how i am more happy and more..

I think that i am much more happy since i am understanding that being
happy is like a lifestyle that is based on some efficient rules that
permit the emergence of happiness, and i will talk about it more in my
new philosophy, so i think that we even need some important rules so
that to be a much more resilient civilization, since i think that there
is the way of learning people how to become an engineer, but this way of
doing is lacking very much, and there is also the way of learning people
how to learn that also permits to efficiently take advantage of this
sophisticated tool that we call internet, so i think that this way of
learning how to learn to people does make our civilization much more
resilient, since the way of "specialization" of our today civilization
is also a "weakness" that has to be solved much more efficiently by the
way of learning people how to learn on internet etc. and here is my
new proverb that talks about it:

"I think what is happening in the West and other parts of the world,
it is that individuals are becoming too stupid, since it is the way of
specialization that is required, since the individuals are specialized
in there jobs so that to enhance much more the efficiency and
productivity as a society or as group, but this specialization is a
weakness that is making individuals too stupid, but we can become smart
working as a group or as a society using the tools of internet etc."

And here is my thoughts about artificial intelligence and evolutionary
algorithms in artificial intelligence:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/P9OTDTiCZ44

More of my philosophy of why i have just invented a better Reader-Writer
Lock that is scalable and starvation-free and fair and reentrant
(recursive)..

Here is why i have just invented a better Reader-Writer Lock that
is scalable, starvation-free and fair and reentrant (recursive),
and look at my invention below:

Notice that the following PhD researcher says the following:

"Until today, there is no known efficient reader-writer lock with
starvation-freedom guarantees"

Read more here:

http://concurrencyfreaks.blogspot.com/2019/04/onefile-and-tail-latency.html

And read the following paper:

Scalable Read-mostly Synchronization Using Passive Reader-Writer Locks

https://www.usenix.org/system/files/conference/atc14/atc14-paper-liu.pdf

You will notice that it has a first weakness that it is for TSO hardware
memory model and the second weakness is that the writers latency is very
expensive when there is few readers, and it can livelock because of the
writer preference, and it can have starvation.

And here is the other best scalable reader-writer lock invention of
Facebook:

SharedMutex is a reader-writer lock. It is small, very fast, scalable
on multi-core

Read here:

https://github.com/facebook/folly/blob/master/folly/SharedMutex.h

But you will notice that the weakness of this scalable reader-writer
lock is that the priority can only be configured as the following:

SharedMutexReadPriority gives priority to readers,
SharedMutexWritePriority gives priority to writers.

So the weakness of this scalable reader-writer lock is that
you can have starvation with it and you can have a livelock.

Bonita Montero a software engineer has just written to me the following
about my new invention below:

> Multiple reader, exlusive writer locks are *never* starvation-free.
> Readers can hold the lock infinitely and writers as well,

But i think she is not right, since this holding the lock infinitely is
not counted, since you have just to use it correctly and avoid this
case, so I think she is making a mistake and she is not understanding
what is that a Multiple-Readers-Exclusive-Writer Lock is
starvation-free, so what i mean by starvation-free is that in my
invention of my algorithm the readers don't starve the writers and the
writers don't starve the readers, and the writers don't starve and
readers don't starve, it is what we call starvation-free, and i think my
invention is scalable and starvation-free and fair.

And as you have just noticed i am also making public a number of my
scalable algorithms and algorithms and softwares as also open source
softwares and since i have just said in my new philosophy the following
about my new model that is called coopetition that is a well balancing
between cooperation and competition, since i think that economic
Liberalism or capitalism needs both competition and cooperation, since
we even need economic actors that share ideas across nations and
industries(and this needs globalization) that make us much more
creative, and i invite you to read the following important article so
that to notice it:

EU study on the impact of open source published

https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/collection/open-source-observatory-osor/news/report-open-source-driver-eus-digital-innovation

And read my following thoughts about Adam Smith and more so that to
notice it:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/ftf3lx5Rzxo

And read also here:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/YSaGSfcYmtc

Here is my new invention of a fast, and scalable and starvation-free and
fair and lightweight Multiple-Readers-Exclusive-Writer Lock called
LW_RWLockX, and now i have included two units that are called MREWEx and
LighweightMREWEx that include TMultiReadExclusiveWriteSynchronizer and
TLightweightMREW classes that are scalable and starvation-free and fair
since they are using my Scalable LW_RWLockX that is starvation-free and
fair, also BeginRead() and BeginWrite() of LightweightMREWEx and MREWEx
are reentrant (recursive), so in other words, if a thread already called
BeginWrite(), it can call BeginWrite() again and it will succeed and it
will not deadlock, and the same applies to BeginRead(), please take a
look at them inside the source code of my units.

You can download it from my website here:

https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/new-variants-of-scalable-rwlocks

Here is also my way of how i am becoming rich:

First i want to say that i have passed four IQ tests and some of them
are certified and i have scored high, so i am highly smart, second,
my methodology is also that i am reading many PhD papers of researchers
and i am seeking the weaknesses of them, and i have found many
weaknesses on those PhD papers and from those weaknesses i have invented
many software scalable algorithms and algorithms and i have invented
some powerful software tools for parallelism etc., so i give you an
example of one of my invention that is: A Scalable reference counting
with efficient support for weak references, so that you understand that
i am truthful, here it is:

https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-reference-counting-with-efficient-support-for-weak-references

But the truth is that i have invented many scalable algorithms such
as this one, and i have made public some of them. And here is another
example of how i am inventive and creative in operational research too,
i have just read the following book (and of other books like it) of a
PhD researcher about operational research and capacity planning, here
they are:

Performance by Design: Computer Capacity Planning by Example

https://www.amazon.ca/Performance-Design-Computer-Capacity-Planning/dp/0130906735

So i have just found that there methodologies of those PhD researchers
for the E-Business service don't work, because they are doing
calculations for a given arrival rate that is statistically and
empirically measured from the behavior of customers, but i think that it
is not correct, so i am being inventive and i have come with my new
methodology that fixes the arrival rate from the data by using an
hyperexponential service distribution(and it is mathematical) since it
is also good for Denial-of-Service (DoS) attacks and i will write a
powerful book about it that will teach my new methodology and i will
also explain the mathematics behind it and i will sell it, and my new
methodology will work for cloud computing and for computer servers.

You can read more about my education and my way of doing here:

And here is more proof of the fact that i have invented many scalable
algorithms and algorithms:

https://groups.google.com/g/comp.programming.threads/c/V9Go8fbF10k

I have just talked about the way to success, and read the following
about the best big brains from around the world in USA so that to
understand more about the way of success:

Let's look for example at USA, so read the following from Jonathan Wai
that is a Ph.D., it says:

"Heiner Rindermann and James Thompson uncovered that the “smart
fraction” of a country is quite influential in impacting the performance
of that country, for example, its GDP."

And it also says the following:

"“According to recent population estimates, there are about eight
Chinese and Indians for every American in the top 1 percent in brains.”
But consider that the U.S. benefits from the smart fractions of every
other country in the world because it continues to serve as a magnet for
brainpower, something that is not even factored into these rankings.

What these rankings clearly show is America is likely still in the lead
in terms of brainpower. And this is despite the fact federal funding for
educating our smart fraction is currently zero. Everyone seems worried
Americans are falling behind, but this is because everyone is focusing
on average and below average people. Maybe it’s time we started taking a
closer look at the smartest people of our own country."

Read more here:

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/finding-the-next-einstein/201312/whats-the-smartest-country-in-the-world

So as you are noticing it's immigrants(and there are about eight Chinese
and Indians for every American in the top 1 percent in brains) that are
making USA a rich country.

And read also the following to understand more:

Why Silicon Valley Wouldn’t Work Without Immigrants

There are many theories for why immigrants find so much success in tech.
Many American-born tech workers point out that there is no shortage of
American-born employees to fill the roles at many tech companies.
Researchers have found that more than enough students graduate from
American colleges to fill available tech jobs. Critics of the industry’s
friendliness toward immigrants say it comes down to money — that
technology companies take advantage of visa programs, like the H-1B
system, to get foreign workers at lower prices than they would pay
American-born ones.

But if that criticism rings true in some parts of the tech industry, it
misses the picture among Silicon Valley’s top companies. One common
misperception of Silicon Valley is that it operates like a factory; in
that view, tech companies can hire just about anyone from anywhere in
the world to fill a particular role.

But today’s most ambitious tech companies are not like factories.
They’re more like athletic teams. They’re looking for the LeBrons and
Bradys — the best people in the world to come up with some brand-new,
never-before-seen widget, to completely reimagine what widgets should do
in the first place.

“It’s not about adding tens or hundreds of thousands of people into
manufacturing plants,” said Aaron Levie, the co-founder and chief
executive of the cloud-storage company Box. “It’s about the couple ideas
that are going to be invented that are going to change everything.”

Why do tech honchos believe that immigrants are better at coming up with
those inventions? It’s partly a numbers thing. As the tech venture
capitalist Paul Graham has pointed out, the United States has only 5
percent of the world’s population; it stands to reason that most of the
world’s best new ideas will be thought up by people who weren’t born here.

If you look at some of the most consequential ideas in tech, you find an
unusual number that were developed by immigrants. For instance, Google’s
entire advertising business — that is, the basis for the vast majority
of its revenues and profits, the engine that allows it to hire thousands
of people in the United States — was created by three immigrants: Salar
Kamangar and Omid Kordestani, who came to the United States from Iran,
and Eric Veach, from Canada.

But it’s not just a numbers thing. Another reason immigrants do so well
in tech is that people from outside bring new perspectives that lead to
new ideas.

Read more here:

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/08/technology/personaltech/why-silicon-valley-wouldnt-work-without-immigrants.html


More of my philosophy about the financial market and more..

I think that the stock market crashes can be due to economic or natural
disasters, speculation, or investor panic, but i also think that
it is the "control" over the factors of speculation and investment panic
that is the most important that permits to prevent a stock market crash,
so first we have to know that an investor is concerned with the
fundamental value of his investment, whereas a speculator is only
concerned with market price movement, and here is my thoughts about how
to avoid stock market crash:

More philosophy about the future of financial stability and cyber risk..

I have just read rapidly the following very interesting article,
i invite you to read it carefully:

The future of financial stability and cyber risk

https://www.brookings.edu/research/the-future-of-financial-stability-and-cyber-risk/

I think that we have to be positive about the future of financial
stability and cyber risk, since notice that the financial stability
depends on three things:

1- Leverage
2- Maturity and Risk Transformation
3- Procyclicality of the price of risk

Read the above article to notice it, but i think that for the first two,
i mean Leverage and Maturity and Risk Transformation, the financial
institutions have not to put all the eggs in the same basket, so
they need to diversify the risk correctly by diversifying portfolios
etc., and for the third that is the Procyclicality of the price of risk,
i think that it is less risky since it depends on the "asset" prices
that are diversified to a certain level, and for the cyber risk i am
positive since i think we are getting much more sophisticated in cyber
security. So i remain positive.

And my above thoughts are related to how i will invest more for my
retirement etc. as follows, read my following thoughts so that to
understand my way of doing about it:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/h4FblBWnNHk

More of my philosophy about my new proverb and more..

I think i am smart and i think i am a wise type of person,
and as you have just noticed i have just invented quickly
a new proverb and here it is and read my explanation below:

---

Here is my new proverb:

"When you walk towards a goal in life it's like you walk down a forest
path towards a goal, but when you walk this forest path you can look at
flowers and pretty trees and be happier or you can also learn more and
have more experience which is useful while walking in the forest, then
life is like this, you can go through it towards goals, but going
through it you can also have pleasures that make you happier and you can
learn more and have more experience and that is useful to you, and i
think this conception of life makes you more positive."

And here is the translation in french of my new proverb:

"Quand tu marches vers un objectif dans la vie, c'est comme tu marches
dans un chemin de forêt vers un objectif, mais quand tu marches dans ce
chemin de forêt tu peux regarder des fleurs et de jolis arbres et être
plus joyeux ou tu peux aussi en apprendre plus et avoir plus
d'expérience qui est utile en marchant dans la forêt, alors la vie
ressemble à cela, tu peux la traverser vers des objectifs, mais en la
traversant tu peux avoir aussi des plaisirs qui te rendent plus heureux
et tu peux apprendre plus et avoir plus d'experience et cela t'est
utile, et je pense que cette conception de la vie te rend plus positif."

And you can read my other proverbs that i have just invented quickly here:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/ZyUvFt_nix8

---

So you have to understand that my proverb above is like
trying to well balance between, in one side, our strong human desire for
success and the fear or the disliking of failure to attain the goal,
and, in the other side, i am showing in my new proverb the good sides or
advantages or the pros of walking our lives towards the goal or goals
even if failure or failures happen(s), and i think this conception of
life of my proverb permits to be more positive, also you have to align
the usefulness of the utility with the global mission of the country or
global world, and read my following thoughts about how i am redefining
Utilitarianism so that to make you understand the how:

More of my philosophy about why the definition of Utilitarianism is like
an IQ test..

Notice that i think i am smart, since when i just looked rapidly at the
definition below of Utilitarianism, i have rapidly discovered a pattern
with my fluid intelligence and it is that even if the definition
of Utilitarianism is: That Utilitarianism prescribes actions that
maximise happiness and well-being for all affected individuals,
i can easily see a pattern with my fluid intelligence since i am
smart, since the pattern is that Utilitarianism maximises happiness and
well-being by well balancing taking into account not
only the present but also the future, i mean that responability
is inherent to the definition since the well balancing forces us
to be responsability in the present or today so that to maximize
correctly happiness and well being tomorrow or in the future.

I can give you another IQ test that i have rapidly invented and
here it is:

So i will give my example of pattern recognition with my fluid
intelligence that permits to understand, here it is:

So if you want to go fast from my country Morocco to another country
called USA , how will you do it ? or what will you do ?

It is like my IQ test..

So if you answer that you need for example to use a fast airplane to go
fast from Morocco to USA, your answer is a stupid answer, so you need
the smart answer, so i will answer that the fast airplane too has to be
"reliable" and your "health" has too to permit it and the "weather" has
too to permit it, so now you are clearly noticing that you need to take
into account many "factors" so that to go fast from Morocco to USA, so
you are clearly noticing that being smart needs also a good plan.

More precision of my philosophy about Utilitarianism..

I invite you to read the following definition of what is Utilitarianism:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utilitarianism

So as you are noticing, it says that Utilitarianism prescribes actions
that maximise happiness and well-being for all affected individuals,
but i think that Utilitarianism is not idiotic since it maximises
happiness and well-being by well balancing taking into account not
only the present but also the future.

And read more about the Japanese Ikigai in the following article:

The More People With Purpose, the Better the World Will Be

https://singularityhub.com/2018/06/15/the-more-people-with-purpose-the-better-the-world-will-be/

I think that Japanese Ikigai gets the "passion" from the "mission",
since the mission is the set of interests and of course you have to get
the interest that is interesting for you from the mission,
so then this interest becomes your passion that plays the role
of an engine, and the interest can become the interest of making much
more money so that to become rich, but this interest has to be aligned
with the right global mission, since you can have local missions or a
global mission.

More of my philosophy about the true power of the idea and more..

I think i am smart and i think i am a wise type of person,
and now i will speak about an important subject,
so i will ask the following philosophical question:

What is the true power of the idea ?

This is a so important philosophical subject, since
i think i am smart and i will make you feel more the true
power of the idea by first talking about the technic in psychology that
we call "Mood freezing", since i think that the most important aspect of
Mood freezing is that it recognizes the true power of the mind, and you
can read about it here:

https://www.alleydog.com/glossary/definition.php?term=Mood+Freezing

So as you are noticing that it says that when the respondents were
convinced that expressing aggression would not make them feel better,
they actually accepted their current situation which eventually improved
their moods, so this proves that the power of the idea is great, this is
why i am of the ones that believes that we can enhance much better
humans and construct a new type of man by using some intellectual
mechanisms, and i am talking about some of them below and here is my
poem about the true power of the idea, read it again:

"Give me this beautiful and so smart idea
Since it is how they have built south Korea
Give me this beautiful and so smart idea
Since it is how we unite the people such as of Crimea
Give me this beautiful and so smart idea
Since it is not just a pizza from the pizzeria
Give me this beautiful and so smart idea
Since it is not the simple prayer of Ave Maria
Give me this beautiful and so smart idea
Since it is not the stupid war between the sunnite and shiah
Give me this beautiful and so smart idea
Since it is how we make north Korea look like a beautiful America
So give me more of those beautiful and so smart ideas !"

Other than that as you have noticed, by talking below about my other new
poem below called: "I hear this so beautiful music", i have just
said that the virtuous citizen is constructed by efficiently educating
with both theory and experience and i am not speaking about the laws of
a country or global world, since you have to understand that i am
speaking about the abstract "model" that gives the virtuous citizen,
since we can say that, at the very basis, efficiently educating the
citizens with both theory and experience does also cause that the a
society is formed using laws etc. so i think that my abstract model is
correct.

More of my philosophy about what is dignity and more..

As you are noticing i have just written a poem, and
here it is:

"I hear this so beautiful music
And it is like the so beautifully exotic
And it is like the being the monotheistic
Since is not the so beautiful royalistic or majestic ?
Since is not the so beautiful like the idealistic ?
And is not the so beautiful bringing the moralistic ?
And is not the so beautiful bringing the xenophobic ?
So is the so beautiful of the too materialistic ?
And what about the so beautifully romantic ?
And i think all of them needs the good strategic
So then you have to avoid to be the too simplistic !
Since you are even hearing this so beautiful music !"

So as you are noticing that i am saying in my poem that
we have not to be too simplistic by looking at the so beautiful
and we have then to be the good strategic, so then i think that
the good strategy is not to try to quickly construct a new kind of
man that is much more wise or wise, but the good strategy
is to construct a new type of man that is the "virtuous citizen",
since here is my philosophy about it:

If i ask a philosophical question of:

From where comes dignity ?

As you have just noticed i have just spoken about the dignity
of speaking the standard english language that is easy and efficient,
but a very important question is to know from where comes dignity,
so i think that i am a smart philosopher and i will say that dignity
comes from knowing how to be a "virtuous" citizen,
but how to be a virtuous citizen? so first you have to notice
one of the basics of my philosophy is that when you look at an
abstraction of a concept we can ask a philosophical question of can you
understand the general concept without understanding the particularities
that constitutes the general concept ? i mean can you understand
the concept of a Dog without understanding many particularities of a Dog
like the Husky Dog and many others ? so we can further ask what is the
particularities from where comes the general concept of a Dog ? so i
think that it is inherent to the particularities from where comes the
the general concept of a Dog that we have to have the "experience" that
permits to understand the particularities of a Dog so that to understand
the general concept of a Dog, so as you are noticing that it means that
theory alone is not sufficient, so in my philosophy the right level of
experience is also important so that to understand the theory or so that
to understand a concept, so then the virtuous citizen has to be
efficiently educated with both theory and experience, and efficiently
educated means also that so that to be a virtuous citizen you have to be
educated with an efficient philosophy, this is why you are noticing that
i am posting my new philosophy and i am posting my new poems of Love and
i am posting my new proverbs etc. so that to make the virtuous citizens.

And read below in my philosophy since i am saying that
we can construct this new type of man that is the "virtuous citizen"
by using some mechanisms such as the mechanism that i am talking
about below such as the following:

More of my philosophy about the good professionalism and the good business..

I think i am a smart guy, and i think i am a wise type of person,
and i say that there is the methodology of enhancing much more humans by
making them much more wise or wise, but i think that this takes
much more time, so i think that the best way and the quick way is to use
some "mechanisms" to make humans much better, like the mechanism that i
am using below by talking about how to be the good business or how to be
the good professionalism, so we have to make people understand the way
of being the good business and the good professionalism.

More of my philosophy about the good business..

I think i am smart, and i am "quickly" understanding that hate
and negativity are not good for business and they are not good for
adaptation, so you have to know how to play it "smartly", and here
is my new proverb that will allow you to understand how you have
to behave so that to be the good business:

Here is my new proverb:

"We can ask of from where comes the attachment of Love between
a mother and her son ? so i think i am smart and i will say
that it comes from the fact that it is like a reward, that the son
is loving or is being the son and the mother is giving a good reward
like giving him more security or giving him food to eat, so as you are
noticing that this rule can be applied to consumerism, since
you can use the same rule with your consumers in a smart
way, for example by giving the impression to your consumers that
you take care of there security by learning them with easy or the like,
and then the consumers will love you much more and will be attracted by
you."

Here is my new poem called "I hear this so beautiful music"

Here is my just new poem:


I hear this so beautiful music

And it is like the so beautifully exotic

And it is like the being the monotheistic

Since is not the so beautiful royalistic or majestic ?

Since is not the so beautiful like the idealistic ?

And is not the so beautiful bringing the moralistic ?

And is not the so beautiful bringing the xenophobic ?

So is the so beautiful of the too materialistic ?

And what about the so beautifully romantic ?

And i think all of them needs the good strategic

So then you have to avoid to be the too simplistic !

Since you are even hearing this so beautiful music !

--

More of my philosophy about abnormal and violent people and more..

I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..

I think from the normal distribution we have around 16.1% of genetically
violent people in the population, but not all of them are too violent
people, so then we have not to be pessimistic, since i think that those
genetically too violent people are the most problematic among
genetically abnormal people.

More of my philosophy about how i am more happy and more..

I think that i am much more happy since i am understanding that being
happy is like a lifestyle that is based on some efficient rules that
permit the emergence of happiness, and i will talk about it more in my
new philosophy, so i think that we even need some important rules so
that to be a much more resilient civilization, since i think that there
is the way of learning people how to become an engineer, but this way of
doing is lacking very much, and there is also the way of learning people
how to learn that also permits to efficiently take advantage of this
sophisticated tool that we call internet, so i think that this way of
learning how to learn to people does make our civilization much more
resilient, since the way of "specialization" of our today civilization
is also a "weakness" that has to be solved much more efficiently by the
way of learning people how to learn on internet etc. and here is my
new proverb that talks about it:

"I think what is happening in the West and other parts of the world,
it is that individuals are becoming too stupid, since it is the way of
specialization that is required, since the individuals are specialized
in there jobs so that to enhance much more the efficiency and
productivity as a society or as group, but this specialization is a
weakness that is making individuals too stupid, but we can become smart
working as a group or as a society using the tools of internet etc."

More of my philosophy about the good professionalism and the good business..

I think i am a smart guy, and i think i am a wise type of person,
and i say that there is the methodology of enhancing much more humans by
making them much more wise or wise, but i think that this takes
much more time, so i think that the best way and the quick way is to use
some "mechanisms" to make humans much better, like the mechanism that i
am using below by talking about how to be the good business or how to be
the good professionalism, so we have to make people understand the way
of being the good business and the good professionalism.

More of my philosophy about the good business..

I think i am smart, and i am "quickly" understanding that hate
and negativity are not good for business and they are not good for
adaptation, so you have to know how to play it "smartly", and here
is my new proverb that will allow you to understand how you have
to behave so that to be the good business:

Here is my new proverb:

"We can ask of from where comes the attachment of Love between
a mother and her son ? so i think i am smart and i will say
that it comes from the fact that it is like a reward, that the son
is loving or is being the son and the mother is giving a good reward
like giving him more security or giving him food to eat, so as you are
noticing that this rule can be applied to consumerism, since
you can use the same rule with your consumers in a smart
way, for example by giving the impression to your consumers that
you take care of there security by learning them with easy or the like,
and then the consumers will love you much more and will be attracted by
you."

More of my philosophy about the gentle man and more..

I am using the word "gentle" in my below thoughts and writing,
and here is the definition of gentle man:

"In absolute terms a gentle man or a gentleman is a man who acts with
grace, a man of serene carriage, and of quiet noble spirit."

More of my philosophy about my model of how to be successful..

I think i am smart, and notice my model below of how to be successful,
so as you are noticing i am not saying in my model below that you have
to be smart, but the definition of forethought is: "thinking or planning
out in advance", so the good forethought is good thinking or good
planning out in advance, so it means that you have to be smart,
and being smart is also being the creative that makes the tools that
make you smart, since when you become rich by being creative you attract
talents that are smart people and then you become smart, and notice that
in my below model that being the average willpower and the average
perseverance and being the desire to excel make you well educated, so i
think that my below model of how to be successful is a smart abstraction
of how to be successful. Read again carefully my model of how to be
successful so that you understand:

More precision about more of my philosophy about what are my kind of
people..

I think i am smart, so my kind of people are humans that have a good
character like having the desire to excel and being the right prudence
and being the good forethought and being gentle and having an average
willpower and an average perseverance, and i think that from those kind
of characteristics we can easily evolve and become quickly much better
humans, it is also my kind of women.

More of my philosophy on how to be successful..

So that to be successful as an individual we can say that we have to
have the following:

The right prudence(caution or circumspection as to danger or risk) and
good forethought, willpower, perseverance, and the desire to excel.

But i think that you can be successful as an individual by being
prudent(caution or circumspection as to danger or risk) and by being a
good forethought and by having the desire to excel and by having an
average willpower and an average perseverance.

And i think that my following proverbs will help you to understand it more:

Here is my just new proverb and here is my other new proverbs:

"Consumers are demanding high quality at low prices, so this is
why you have to master the tools of adaptation, such as having
a good education with a good education system, since getting
rich quickly is not the wise thing to do, since mastering the
tools of adaptation like having a good education will allow
you to get rich and will allow you to keep you rich, so in this
proverb of mine the kind of "adaptation" sets the kind of tools that you
need, so if you need to adapt in internet, so it depends on your kind of
adaptation of your kind of job that for example will set the size of
knowledge about internet that you need so that to adapt efficiently in
your kind of job, so you are understanding the idea, so this proverb of
mine is efficient since it is adaptative to the contexts or situations,
so then you have to be of this right perfection and you have to think
Economies of scale since they also resulted in the most affordable price
of any product for the consumer without the manufacturer having to
sacrifice profits, and you have to be fast exponential growth by also
using digitalization and you have to be exponential thinking."

And you can read my new following Proverbs that i have just invented
quickly:

I have just invented the following two proverbs that also talks about
the exponential impact of digital transformation on your business, so i
invite you to read the following interesting article about it:

https://www.leaguedigital.com/articles/the-exponential-impact-of-digital-transformation-on-your-business/

And read my following proverbs about it:

Here is my new proverb:

"Being strong can become being weak by containing a small weak part that
makes you weak, and being weak can become being strong by containing a
small strong part of great weight of importance that makes you strong"

Here is my other new proverb:

"When you want to construct a much better version of yourself so
that to become successful, there is the first way of the hard working
way, but the hard working way is not the efficient and smart way, this
is why you can construct a much better version of yourself
by being some creative thinking and by being exponential thinking and by
using the exponential progress and growth brought by digitalization to
sell on internet your product or service from this some creative
thinking so that to be successful, so as you notice that this shows that
we have to be positive about our world, and this shows that my following
proverb is truth that actually says the following: The being weak can
become being strong by containing a small strong part of great weight of
importance that makes you strong, since the some creative thinking is a
small part of great weight of importance that makes you strong, since it
is not only capital and talents that make you successful, but it is also
some creative ideas that makes the great Capital that makes you
successful and the great capital that attracts talents that makes you
much more successful than successful."

More philosophy about what does it mean to be mature and more..

I invite you to read the following interesting article
about what does it mean to be mature:

What does it mean to be mature?

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/blogs/O-zone/what-does-it-mean-to-be-mature/

More of my philosophy about can we trust the smartests in how they
measure what is beauty and Love..

There is still a philosophical question of:

Can we trust the smartests among us in how they measure what is beauty
and Love ?

This is a really important question that follows from my explanation
below of is Love and beauty subjective, i think i am smart
and i will answer it as follows:

I think we have discovered many sequences, patterns, or methods that
permit to compose the actual pleasant beauty that we are defining as
beauty, so then it logically follows that we can not say that beauty is
subjective, since also we have not to be pessimistic, since the
smartests among us that define what is beauty and Love will always
enhance there intellectual taste and taste that make us adapt correctly
in defining what is beauty and Love.

More precision of my philosophy of what is beauty and more..

Here is more precision of my definition of what is beauty, read it again:

I think i am smart, and i think i can define beauty with my fluid
intelligence as the following:

Beauty comes from both order and harmony, and i think that beauty is
"order" that is pleasant to the human senses, but this order that is
pleasant of beauty is an arrangement or disposition according to a
particular sequence, pattern, or method, and i think an order that is
pleasant is an arrangement or disposition according to a particular
sequence, pattern, or method that is more perfect or much more perfect
or perfect, so when you have disorder that is unpleasant for the human
senses, so it is not beautiful, so when you look at a circle it is an
order that is pleasant to look at, this is why a circle is beautiful.

More of my philosophy about universal Love and beauty..

I think i am smart, and i think i am a wise type of person,

Now i can ask the following philosophical questions:

Does Love is subjective ?

Does Beauty is subjective ?

Here is my answer:

I think i am smart, and i will say that you have to know how to measure
it, so you have to know how to "prioritize" by weights of importance,
i mean that that so that to know about beauty, there is two ways of
doing it, first there is the inferior way of doing it by looking at
beauty superficially , and it becomes an a not exact appearance and a
not so good measure, and there is the second way that is like scientific
and it is to measure beauty with our smartness, by prioritizing and say
that the smartests and wise persons among us have to measure
beauty and Love and know if we can calling them beauty and Love and if
we can accept them as beauty and Love, so then by measuring it this way
with smartness and wisdom we can then say that Love and beauty don't
become subjective, and as you have just noticed yesterday i said that
Love looks like artificial intelligence, since it needs an action that
merits a reward (as Love), and you can know more about it by reading my
following new proverb:

Here is my new proverb:

"We can ask of from where comes the attachment of Love between
a mother and her son ? so i think i am smart and i will say
that it comes from the fact that it is like a reward, that the son
is loving or is being the son and the mother is giving a good reward
like giving him more security or giving him food to eat, so as you are
noticing that this rule can be applied to consumerism, since
you can use the same rule with your consumers in a smart
way, for example by giving the impression to your consumers that
you take care of there security by learning them with easy or the like,
and then the consumers will love you much more and will be attracted by
you."

So then we can say much more precisely that Love needs an action and
its reward (as Love), but there is individual love that is like a
process of local optimization and there is universal Love that is a
process of global optimization in a society that also can comes with a
"margin" that makes us also be a level of tolerance on this or that
action. And notice with me that it looks like the optimization of
particle swarm optimization (PSO) in artificial intelligence, since the
local optimization of PSO is like the process of individual Love, and
the global optimization of PSO is like the process of the global Love in
a society, and of course particle swarm optimization (PSO) in artificial
intelligence is like Reinforcement Learning in AI(artificial
intelligence), since in PSO in artificial intelligence we have the
actions of the members of the population of PSO that searches for the
optimal value that are found that are then rewarded by making them the
values that optimizes further and further towards the global optimum.

And here is my thoughts about artificial intelligence:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/P9OTDTiCZ44

And speaking about beauty, here is my beautiful poems of Love, read them
all carefully:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/D4qlWWW-o1s

More of my philosophy about scalability and Gödel's incompleteness
theorem and more..

Gödel's incompleteness theorem in mathematics only applies to
sufficiently strong systems. It is not applicable to systems like
Presburger arithmetic and first-order logic.

But FOL(First-order logic) in mathematics is not all-powerful by any
means, and it has
the following disadvantages:

1- It has no concept of time
2- hard to do arithmetic
3- Can't do beliefs --"If he believes this then surely he must believe
that" is often wrong in everyday life; also surprising mathematical
results.
4- Can't have variables with set values: "All functions are boring"
turns out to be a 2nd-order, not 1st-order statement.

So first-order logic is not scalable, so i think we can not avoid the
problem of Gödel's incompleteness theorem in mathematics, but notice
that the Gödel's incompleteness theorem in mathematics says the following:

"For any such consistent formal system, there will always be statements
about natural numbers that are true, but that are unprovable within the
system. The second incompleteness theorem, an extension of the first,
shows that the system cannot demonstrate its own consistency."

So notice carefully that it says that there will always exist in those
systems statements that are "true" that we can not prove, so then
we can not demonstrate the consistency of those systems, but
i think that those systems remain "really" "useful" for us.

More of my philosophy about civilization and specialization of our today
world..

Here is my new proverb:

"I think what is happening in the West and other parts of the world,
it is that individuals are becoming too stupid, since it is the way of
specialization that is required, since the individuals are specialized
in there jobs so that to enhance much more the efficiency and
productivity as a society or as group, but this specialization is a
weakness that is making individuals too stupid, but we can become smart
working as a group or as a society using the tools of internet etc."

I think i am smart and here is my new proverb:

"The most important disadvantage of education today, it is that we are
learning the students, but we are neglecting to efficiently learn to
students how to learn."

This is one of the basis of my philosophy below, and read about it
in my following thoughts:

I think i am smart, and i think you can be more confident with me, since
i think i am not too specialized(Since you have to read my below proverb
about it), since here is what i have done:

1- I have gotten my university level Diploma in Microelectronics and
informatics.
2- I have studied 1 year of applied mathematics at university of
Montreal Canada and i have succeeded it.
3- I have also studied operational research
4- I have also studied network administration and i have worked
as a network administrator
5- I am also an inventor of many scalable algorithms and algorithms
and i have invented some powerful software tools for parallelism.
6- I have studied more web software development with Perl, Javascript
and CGI and FCGI and ODBC using SQL etc. and i have worked in the
past as a web software developer.
7- I have worked as a software developer consultant
etc. etc.

You can read more about my education and my way of doing here:

And here is more proof of the fact that i have invented many scalable
algorithms and algorithms:

https://groups.google.com/g/comp.programming.threads/c/V9Go8fbF10k

I invite you to look at the following beautiful photo Gunnersbury
Writing Desk in a beautiful wood:

https://www.wayfair.ca/furniture/pdp/astoria-grand-gunnersbury-writing-desk-astg6385.html

So i think i am smart, and when i look at the above photo of this
beautiful Gunnersbury Writing Desk made of beautiful wood, it is
like an efficient philosophy for me, since i am seeing the pattern with
my fluid intelligence, since having this Gunnersbury Writing Desk in a
beautiful wood, it is like living near the beautiful of the mother
nature, and it is like an abstraction or it is like an efficient simple
language, since it is like we are bringing the beautiful of mother
nature like a beautiful tree made of beautiful wood into our house, so
it makes our house really beautiful and it makes us more happy, here is
some photos of them:

https://www.thecoolist.com/most-beautiful-trees/

So this kind of philosophy is like using smartly a "lever" to move a
heavy or firmly fixed load, since as you notice that when you have this
beautiful Gunnersbury Writing Desk made of beautiful wood, you are not
bringing all a beautiful forest of beautiful trees made of wood or all a
beautiful tree made of wood of mother into your house, so it permits you
to like easily lift your problems and solve them and be much more happy,
and i think it is the right philosophy, since so that to be much more
happy you have to know how to efficiently find those kind of simple
levers that permits you to be much more happy and use them smartly, and
here is another lever that can be made simple that you can use smartly,
read about it in my following proverb:

"Resourcefulness is one of the most important things, and it is a skill,
and the good news is: this skill can be learned and mastered, and
resourcefulness is attained only when we combine the resourceful mindset
and skills, so we have to filter out some of the most useful resources
that help us, and resourcefulness is also to know who/what to look for
and what to ask, and when ressourcefulness is attained this becomes an
engine that permits you to have hope and to be energetic and to be
positive in doing what you are doing, since resourcefulness also permits
to easy the jobs for you."

So i think when you understand this smart philosophy you will understand
that using an efficient simple language is also very efficient.

More of my philosophy about technology and mother nature..

I think i am a philosopher that is smart, and i think that i am also an
smart artist, and i invite you to look and listen at the following video
of a music of Jean-Michel Jarre:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kSIMVnPA994

So i think i am a smart artist, and i am noticing a smart pattern with
my fluid intelligence in the above music and video of Jean-Michel Jarre,
so the pattern is that the above music of Jean-Michel Jarre is not
complete detachment from the beauty of mother nature, since he is using
a mixture of the beautiful of mother nature(like the wind or the water
as electronic sounds) and the beautiful of electronic music that is
detached from the mother nature, and i think that humans needs and
require the two, the beautifulness of mother nature and the
beautifulness of electronic music or digital photos and such that are
detached from the beautiful of mother nature, so the beautiful of mother
nature is essential for humans, i will give you a quick example so that
to notice it:

I invite you to listen at the following beautiful arab song from Algeria:

Ch'hal aâyit mesbar

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zS6KG2ybOB0&list=RDzS6KG2ybOB0&start_radio=1

And notice how in this beautiful arab music they are using old
music instruments that give beautiful sounds and music that comes from
the beautiful of mother nature or that are much nearer from the mother
nature than electronic music sounds, so then i think that this arab
music and song is like the beautiful of mother nature. And as
i have just said that the beautiful of mother nature is essential for
humans, so i think that there is a difference between my following poems
of Love and mathematics, since mathematics is like far away from the
beautiful of mother nature, it is like robots, but my poems of Love are
like the beautiful of mother nature, here they are, read them all carefully:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/D4qlWWW-o1s

And about extremist ideologies like white supremacism, i invite you to
read my following thoughts about them:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/mjE_2AG1TKQ

More of philosophy about Democracy and the Evolutionary Design methodology..

I will make a logical analogy between software projects and Democracy,
first i will say that because of the today big complexity of software
projects, so the "requirements" of those complex software projects are
not clear and a lot could change in them, so this is
why we are using an Evolutionary Design methodology with different tools
such as Unit Testing, Test Driven Development, Design Patterns,
Continuous Integration, Domain Driven Design, but we have to notice
carefully that an important thing in Evolutionary Design methodology is
that when those complex software projects grow, we have first to
normalize there growth by ensuring that the complex software projects
grow "nicely" and "balanced" by using standards, and second we have to
optimize growth of the complex software projects by balancing between
the criteria of the easy to change the complex software projects and the
performance of the complex software projects, and third you have to
maximize the growth of the complex software projects by making the most
out of each optimization, and i think that by logical analogy we can
notice that in Democracy we have also to normalize the growth by not
allowing "extremism" or extremist ideologies that hurt Democracy, and we
have also to optimize Democracy by for example well balancing between
"performance" of the society and in the Democracy and the "reliability"
of helping others like the weakest members of the society among the
people that of course respect the laws, and so that to understand more
my thoughts of my philosophy about Democracy, i invite you to read them
here:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/vlDWhmf-MIM

And about extremist ideologies like white supremacism, i invite you to
read my following thoughts about them:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/mjE_2AG1TKQ

More of my philosophy about entropy and about how morality is universal..

I think i am smart, and i am explaining below why morality is universal,
but as you have just noticed i have just said that so that to say
that morality is universal, it requires from us to know about the
requirements such as why to be a global world etc., so there must be a
level of consciousness, other than that i will make you feel and see
much more that morality is universal since i am seeing it:

So take for example the human imperfections or world imperfections,
i say that it is because we have those imperfections that also we have
morality, and those imperfections causes entropy(A state of disorder and
disorganization), this is why we have to be more and more perfection so
that to maintain order and so that to attain perfection of being much
more perfect or perfect, for example humans are working in there
everyday life so that to also maintain order or so that to become
perfection or much more perfection, and maintaining order is also that
we are perfectioning so that to not to become disorder.

More of my philosophy about why morality is universal..

I think i am a smart philosopher, and i will now explain why
morality is universal:

So take a look at the thing that we call "time", so you can naively look
at our everyday life and say that time is not relative, but
you can like Einstein analyse it and prove that time is relative,
and morality is the same, so when you naively look at it you will
think that morality is relative, since you can notice that for example
there is many countries with many laws and rules, but when you analyse
it you will notice that the goal of morality that we become perfect or
much more perfect pushes us forward towards more and more perfection
since we have to solve our problems such as our many imperfections, it
is also why morality is "progressive", so then the essence of morality
become that morality is progressing towards the goal that is that we
become perfect or much more perfect, so then the other details of
morality are abstracted, so then those acts of humans perfectioning or
perfecting towards a much more perfect world or perfect world and that
are also codified as morality become that morality is universal, since
also we can take this essence of morality as the most important thing.

More of my philosophy about the superhuman of the philosopher Friedrich
Nietzsche..

I think i am smart philosopher, and i will be more precise in my logical
proof of why the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche believed, like the
philosopher Spinoza, that morality is not universal, so notice carefully
how the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche has wanted to construct a new
type of man that is a superhuman in his view and this superhuman in the
philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche is a superhuman that has mastery over
his emotions and it is a superhuman who takes joy in simply existing, so
as you are noticing that the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche is an
inferior philosopher since he wanted to apply the morality of the strong
to the morality of the weak in not wise manner, also you can
notice it more by him saying the following and recognizing that
there is different types of morals, and here is his saying:

"It is the will to power that must be expressed, not the morals of the
slaves or the weak."

That means in french:

"C'est la volonté de puissance qui doit s'exprimer, non
pas la morale des esclaves ou des faibles.",

So the above saying of the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche is a proof
that he recognized that there is different kinds of morals like the
morals of the slaves or the weak and morals of the strong humans or the
strong. Read more my following thoughts about it and about Stoicism and
existentialism and about how i am explaining that the essence of
morality is universal:

More of my philosophy about the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche and more..

I have just looked at the following video about:

NIETZSCHE - L'exaltation de la vie

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WeVVtxlg_oE

I think i am a philosopher that is smart, and i think that the
philosophy of the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche is not good, since
he says that: "C'est la volonté de puissance qui doit s'exprimer, non
pas la morale des esclaves ou des faibles.", that means in english: "It
is the will to power that must be expressed, not the morals of the
slaves or the weak.", and he said that it needs to construct a new man
that we call the superhuman, but I think that i am a philosopher that is
smart and i am understanding the philosophy of the philosopher Friedrich
Nietzsche, and i think that it is an inferior philosophy, because it
seeks to construct the superhumans from humans and this superhuman in
the philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche is a superhuman that has mastery
over his emotions and it is a superhuman who takes joy in simply
existing, so as you are noticing that it is an inferior philosophy,
because how can you be able to take joy in simply existing ? so as you
are noticing it is illogical and it is as illogical as Stoicism(read my
below thoughts about Stoicism) and i think that it is a violent
philosophy as Stoicism, this is why the philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsch
is a failure as Stoicism, and here is what i said about Stoicism:

More of my philosophy about my philosophy and about Stoicism and
Existentialism..

I invite you to read this very interesting article about philosophy:

Why philosophers could be the ones to transform your 2020

https://www.bbc.com/culture/article/20200114-why-philosophers-could-be-the-ones-to-transform-your-2020

And notice that it says the following:

“The Stoics suggest that what’s most important in order to lead a good
life is internal rather than external. It’s about developing the right
character, the right state of mind,”

I think i am a philosopher that is "smart", so i make you notice the
logical bug in the above saying about Stoicism, and it is that
developing the right character and the right state of the mind in
Stoicism needs the cultural side that also comes from the external
reality and hence from the "purpose" and the "meaning of life", and we
can notice that Stoicism is not so smart, because how can we develop
self-control and fortitude as a means of overcoming destructive emotions
and such without the necessary requirements that have to give enough
hope or a meaning of life that gives the necessary self-control and
fortitude? so this is why i think that Stoicism as a philosophy is a
failure, so what's about existentialism of the philosopher Jean-Paul
Sartre ? Jean-Paul Sartre said that: "Existence precedes essence" or in
french: "L'existence précède l'essence", and it is the central claim of
existentialism of the philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre, but i think that
this claim is not so logical, since it is like a debate that asks the
question of: Wich is more important, the genetical side or cultural
side?, and we have to notice that the essence or nature of a human is
"not" enough and it needs for example a meaning of human life and a
purpose etc. so then notice that existentialism of Jean-Paul Sartre, and
like in absurdism of the philosopher Albert Camus, says that human life
is absurd, but here again my new philosophy says that human life is not
absurd, and read it below.

My philosophy about the philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre and more..

I invite you to look at the following video about philosophy:

SARTRE - Le regard des autres

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BJIM41TnDHI

I have just noticed by looking at the above video, that it is lacking,
since first you have to understand the following:

Jean-Paul Sartre said that: "Existence precedes essence" or in french:
"L'existence précède l'essence", and it is the central claim of
existentialism of the philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre.

But i think people are not understanding the philosopher Jean-Paul
Sartre, since the functionality of our essence is also our genetics that
predetermines to a certain level what is our existence, so the essence
that is our genetics is also important, but since the philosopher
Jean-Paul Sartre was a communist, he has wanted to give much more "hope"
by saying: "Existence precedes essence", and i think this also means that
humans are by essence free, and this also means that the human nurture
is much more important than the human nature, but it is not truth, so i
think that Jean-Paul Sartre has made a big error by saying so. And
Jean-Paul Sartre has also accepted the views of the philosopher Albert
Camus about the absurdism of existence, but i am a philosopher and here
again i am not in accordance with it, since i say that human existence
is not absurd, and read my below thoughts to understand my philosophy:

How can you effectively "measure" how to appreciate human life ?

I think the most important thing is to know that we can measure it
relatively or absolutely, so wich one of the absolute or relative
measure is the right way of measuring ? so now you have to know that
i think that the meaning of human life can not be measured like
absolutely like was doing the philosopher Albert Camus since you will
start to say by measuring like absolutely that human life is "absurd",
and this is not good at all, so now you have to understand the very
basis of philosophy, that philosophy has to give you the will to survive
or the will to live, so then you logically notice that we can say that a
human is smart if he is smart relatively to the distribution of
smartness of humans or such, but if you start to measure it like
absolutely by saying that the smart human is not smart when you look at
all or measuring it by all the difficulties and constraints of our world
or of our universe, i think it is not the right way to do in philosophy,
since you have to give the will to people so that they survive and so
that they live, also you have to give a meaning to human life as
i am doing it in my philosophy(read about it below), so now i
can finally say that you are understanding the how to answer the
above philosophical question since you have to measure how
to appreciate human life "relatively" and "not" like absolutely by
looking at how our past humanity was much less advanced than our today
humanity etc. and so the other important thing is to also understand the
basis of my philosophy by reading it below:

I think that my philosophy is more smart, since in my philosophy
i am also explaining that the day permits to understand the night and
human life is like the alternance of the day and night that brings
beauty, since human life is difficulties and suffering that also permit
us to appreciate much more human life or that permits us to appreciate
much more our kind of civilization and i say in my philosophy that it
also gives more intensity to pleasures of life, so my philosophy doesn't
look like the other philosophies, so i invite you to holistically
understand my philosophy by carefully reading it here:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/YZSYxV41-qI

And read my other thoughts of my philosophy here:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/8jzgRGMOEHs


More of my philosophy about the ideas of the philosopher Friedrich
Nietzsche and the philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer and more..

I invite you to read the following article about the philosopher
Friedrich Nietzsche and the philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer:

The Ideas Of Friedrich Nietzsche

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/ideas-friedrich-nietzsche-dr-marcel-pflug-mba

I think i am a smart philosopher, and i am noticing that the
philosophers Friedrich Nietzsche and Arthur Schopenhauer are inferior
philosophers, and i will explain as following:

Notice in the above article the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche has a
problem with morality, and he thought, like the philosopher Spinoza,
that morality is not universal and he also thought that since for
example for the strong human the good becomes the brave, powerful, rich,
and strong, so he thought that the strong human will have the tendency
to discriminate the weak people, so then the philosopher Friedrich
Nietzsche thought that morality was not working, but i think that the
philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche was an inferior philosopher since i
think i am a philosopher that is smart and i am explaining that the
essence of morality is universal and progressive, read my thoughts below
about it to understand, and also i am saying that we have not to be
pessimistic as the philosophers Friedrich Nietzsche and Arthur
Schopenhauer, since i have just spoken about the value of specialization
that gives a self-esteem to the individuals of a society and i am
explaining in my below thoughts of my new philosophy how we have to be
optimistic about human life, and i invite you to read my below thoughts
so that to understand:

More of my philosophy about universal Love and beauty..

I think i am smart, and i think i am a wise type of person,

Now i can ask the following philosophical questions:

Does Love is subjective ?

Does Beauty is subjective ?

Here is my answer:

I think i am smart, and i will say that you have to know how to measure
it, so you have to know how to "prioritize" by weights of importance,
i mean that that so that to know about beauty, there is two ways of
doing it, first there is the inferior way of doing it by looking at
beauty superficially , and it becomes an a not exact appearance and a
not so good measure, and there is the second way that is like scientific
and it is to measure beauty with our smartness, by prioritizing and say
that the smartests and wise persons among us have to measure
beauty and Love and know if we can calling them beauty and Love and if
we can accept them as beauty and Love, so then by measuring it this way
with smartness and wisdom we can then say that Love and beauty don't
become subjective, and as you have just noticed yesterday i said that
Love looks like artificial intelligence, since it needs an action that
merits a reward (as Love), and you can know more about it by reading my
following new proverb:

Here is my new proverb:

"We can ask of from where comes the attachment of Love between
a mother and her son ? so i think i am smart and i will say
that it comes from the fact that it is like a reward, that the son
is loving or is being the son and the mother is giving a good reward
like giving him more security or giving him food to eat, so as you are
noticing that this rule can be applied to consumerism, since
you can use the same rule with your consumers in a smart
way, for example by giving the impression to your consumers that
you take care of there security by learning them with easy or the like,
and then the consumers will love you much more and will be attracted by
you."

So then we can say much more precisely that Love needs an action and
its reward (as Love), but there is individual love that is like a
process of local optimization and there is universal Love that is a
process of global optimization in a society that also can comes with a
"margin" that makes us also be a level of tolerance on this or that
action. And notice with me that it looks like the optimization of
particle swarm optimization (PSO) in artificial intelligence, since the
local optimization of PSO is like the process of individual Love, and
the global optimization of PSO is like the process of the global Love in
a society, and of course particle swarm optimization (PSO) in artificial
intelligence is like Reinforcement Learning in AI(artificial
intelligence), since in PSO in artificial intelligence we have the
actions of the members of the population of PSO that searches for the
optimal value that are found that are then rewarded by making them the
values that optimizes further and further towards the global optimum.

And here is my thoughts about artificial intelligence:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/P9OTDTiCZ44

More of my philosophy about the too much individualism of the West..

I invite you to look at the following known psychologist that
is talking about self-esteem:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9f3qyNNtpQk

So i am smart and i am not in accordance with the psychologist in the
above video since he is saying that self-esteem comes from comparing
your value with the others in a society, but i think it is a too much
individualistic definition, since the value of an individual of a
society comes also from the fact that the society also gives a certain
level of importance to its parts that are the individuals that
constitutes the society and that are specialized in this or that job,
and this "specialization" is also important for the society and it has a
value in a society, so then the individual has a value and importance in
a society that gives him a self-esteem.

More of my philosophy about beauty..

I will ask a philosophical question:

Is a beautiful women beautiful ?

So it depends on if you are a wise man type of person or not..

Since i think that you have not to rush in like a fool and think that
that the women that is beautiful is beautiful, since the wise man
says that it first needs "wisdom" so that to also appreciate beauty or
so that to appreciate pleasures of human life, so i think that the wise
man type of person is like the way, so read my following thoughts
so that to understand much more clearly:

Here is my other just new proverb:

"I think i am a wise type of person and i say that happiness comes from
an efficient way of thinking or from imagination, and not from reality
and not from pleasures of reality or pleasures of life, since reality
when you look at it from the more and more details, it comes with too
much imperfections, so the efficient way of thinking or of imagination
has to not be "complete" detachment like in Taoism or Buddhism , since i
think by being complete detachment like in Taoism or buddhism you will
make the engine that pushes you forward towards more and more perfection
much more weak, so then you have to be like the right dose of detachment
that makes you like well balanced so that it makes you appreciate our
world much more, and so that it makes you appreciate much more pleasures
of life or so that it makes you appreciate much more life, so then it
makes you much more happy. And of course it is inherent to my proverb
that when you realize that reality, when you look at it from the more
and more details, comes with too much imperfections and that you can not
change for the better quickly, you become much more wise with much more
patience etc. And i will explain more my new philosophy in my next book
that will also extend with much more new creative ideas."

More of my philosophy of what is Love..

I think Love looks like artificial intelligence, since it needs an
action that merits a reward, but i think that you have also to know how
to play it smartly and "wisely", but we have not to be pessimistic since
i think that the best way to attain Love is by being more and more
wisdom so that to become much more wise or wise, since i am really
convinced that by being much more wise or wise you will start to
appreciate much more human life in a smart way and be much more happy as
i am doing it, and you will start to know how to be a wise type of Love
as i am doing it, since i think i am a wise type of person. And so that
to know more how i am wise, you can also look at my following poems of
Love that looks like my personality since i am also a gentleman type of
person:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/ITE99pf3KHA

And since i am saying above that Love looks like the action and its
reward in artificial intelligence, you can read more my following
thoughts about artificial intelligence so that to understand more:

And here is my thoughts about artificial intelligence:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/P9OTDTiCZ44

Here is my new proverb:

"We can ask of from where comes the attachment of Love between
a mother and her son ? so i think i am smart and i will say
that it comes from the fact that it is like a reward, that the son
is loving or is being the son and the mother is giving a good reward
like giving him more security or giving him food to eat, so as you are
noticing that this rule can be applied to consumerism, since
you can use the same rule with your consumers in a smart
way, for example by giving the impression to your consumers that
you take care of there security by learning them with easy or the like,
and then the consumers will love you much more and will be attracted by
you."

You can read all my other proverbs below:

More of my philosophy about money and about the meaning and the purpose
of human life..

I think i am smart and i say that Money is not a good and powerful
engine, since you can be stupid and think that it is a powerful engine,
but when you are a smart philosopher like me you will realize that
thinking that Money is a powerful engine is like the big mistake that
is making the Taoist Philosophy of Lieh Tzu by thinking that the action
itself is sufficient as an engine, and read my thoughts below about it,
since the question is how to make humans more "strong" and "energetic"
and "positive" so that they be pushed forward towards more and more
perfection. So this is why i am talking in my new philosophy about those
kind of powerful "engines".

More of my philosophy about the meaning and the purpose of human life..

I think i am smart, and as you have just noticed i am not speaking
in my new philosophy about the belonging to a society or to group with a
good purpose, since you can think that the pillars of the meaning of
human life are the belonging to a society or group with a good purpose
and with a kind of transcendence and such, but i think i am a
philosopher and i say it is not the right way, since i think what is the
best and right way is to talk about what are the good and powerful
"engines" that make you have this good meaning and purpose of human
life, this is why you have to read my below thoughts of my philosophy so
that to notice my kind of new philosophy and i am extending much more my
new philosophy with other much more creative ideas:

More of my philosophy about the Taoist Philosophy of Lieh Tzu..

I invite you to look at the following video about the Taoist Philosophy
of Lieh Tzu:

Let It Go, Ride the Wind | The Taoist Philosophy of Lieh Tzu

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vA7Q8zb1hVU

I think i am smart, and i am noticing in the above video
that the Taoist Philosophy of Lieh Tzu has a problem,
since notice that it says the following:

"Lieh Tsu shows us that only when we transcend the duality of life -
things like gain and loss, attraction and repulsion, wonderful and
awful, we can become truly indifferent, and start acting for no other
reason than the action itself."

So the problem with this, it is one of the engine, since
we have to have a powerful engine that pushes us forward towards
more and more perfection, and since the Philosopher Lieh Tzu says
that we have to transcend the duality and become truly indifferent, and
start acting for no other reason than the action itself, but how
can you be pushed forward towards more and more perfection by
just the action in itself, so then the engine becomes much more weak,
so the Taoist Philosophy of Lieh Tzu is problematic. But
my new philosophy below is different, since as you notice in my
below proverb that it is not a "complete" detachment and it comes
like with the right dose of detachment, since you have to understand
more my proverb below, and it is that pleasures of consumerism are not
sufficient so that to become happy or much more happy, since it needs
from you to change your state of the mind or your kind of thinking so
that to attain happiness, and it is why is explaining my new proverb
below, so read all my thoughts below so that to understand:

More of my philosophy about how to be harmony and how to be happy and more..

I think i am smart, and i say that the philosopher Baruch Spinoza
said that the being strong makes you happy and the being weak makes you
sad, but so that to be smart, we have to be pragmatic and
learn the others the how to be strong, and we have to learn them
the how to be harmony in a society and how to be harmony with
themselves, so as you are noticing that i am in accordance with
the philosopher Baruch Spinoza on the fact that the being strong makes
you happy and the being weak makes you sad, and here is my
new proverb that talks about it more clearly:

Here is my other new proverb in english and french:

Voici mon nouveau proverbe en français et en anglais:

"La stabilité s'obtient avec la force de la perfection,
car quand vous devenez plus parfait vous augmentez
vos forces et donc vous résistez mieux aux instabilités,
et je pense que ceci est comme une loi de la moralité"

"Stability is obtained with the force of perfection,
because when you become more perfect you increase
your strenghts , then you better resist instabilities,
and I think this is like a law of Morality"

Now as you are noticing i am speaking in my below thoughts
about how to make humans more strong and how to make them
be in harmony by talking about resourcefulness and by
showing them how to be in harmony and how to be happy,
so i invite you to read my below thoughts so that
to understand, other than that i have just looked at the
following video that talks about the philosopher Baruch Spinoza:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K8DECD8kK94

So I think i am a philosopher that is smart, and i am not in accordance
with the philosopher Baruch Spinoza that was a Dutch philosopher of
Portuguese Sephardi origin that said that morality is not universal,
since i think that i am a smart philosopher that has logically proved
that morality is both universal and progressive, so i invite you to read
here in my following thoughts of my philosophy so that to notice it:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/vlDWhmf-MIM

More of my philosophy about Resourcefulness and more..

Here is my new proverb about Resourcefulness that permits
you to understand it:

"Resourcefulness is one of the most important things, and it is a skill,
and the good news is: this skill can be learned and mastered, and
resourcefulness is attained only when we combine the resourceful mindset
and skills, so we have to filter out some of the most useful resources
that help us, and resourcefulness is also to know who/what to look for
and what to ask, and when ressourcefulness is attained this becomes an
engine that permits you to have hope and to be energetic and to be
positive in doing what you are doing, since resourcefulness also permits
to easy the jobs for you."

More of my philosophy about self-affirmations and Mood freezing and more..

As you are noticing i am saying that i am smart or i am a wise type of
person, and i think it is part of the value of self-affirmations, and it
is not that this self-affirmations boost my inner strength and make me
likely to succeed, but it is just that i am much more "confident" about
me and i also think that i am smart, and read my below thoughts so that
to understand more about my personality, also as you are noticing
in my below first proverb that i am using a technic that looks like Mood
freezing in psychology, since the most important aspect of Mood freezing
in psychology it is that it recognizes the true power of the mind, and
it is this true power of the mind that interests me, this is why i am
using my below technic in my first proverb, since i want to make the
others convinced that expressing anger or/and frustration and such in
the given context would not make them feel better, so as you have just
noticed i am wanting to make the others much better persons by improving
their moods etc., so i invite you to read carefully all my thoughts
below so that to understand:

More of my philosophy about my new philosophy about detachment and more..

In Buddhism the detached mindset is one that realizes the importance of
living with the natural flow of things and respecting the impermanence
of all life, but in my new philosophy you can realize a kind of
detachment by understanding my following new proverb:

"I am discovering a pattern with my fluid intelligence and it is that
when you look from a higher level layer to humans, like when you look at
a beautiful movie or a beautiful song, you can like think that it is a
beautiful movie or a beautiful song, but when you get into the more and
more details of being humans you start to see more and more
imperfections of humans, so we have not to think that the beautiful
movie or the beautiful song and such is what will make us more happy,
since the wise type of person like me will say that humans are
problematic or are the main problem, and the wise man will say that it
is so important to learn to humans how to be much more wise, by for
example using wisely the tools such as beauty or money etc. so we have
to become much more wise or wise, and you can also become much more
happy by understanding that life and human life come with too many
imperfections that you can not change for the better "quickly" and you
have then to become "patience" since life and humans come with too many
imperfections so you have to know how to let go and not to become angry
or/and frustrated and such, so by this way of thinking differently and
becoming this kind of patience you will become much more happy, and i
think that being this kind of patience brings harmony, since also when
you become much more wise or wise you will know that this kind of
patience makes us care much more since we become lovable we humans by
being this kind of patience and it also makes us reduce much more our
imperfections and this makes us much more happy."

I think i am smart and i am a wise type of person, and as i have told
you that i am writing a book about my new philosophy, and this book
of mine will also efficiently learn you how to be happy or much more
happy and of course you have seen me posting about my new philosophy,
but i have posted just a part of my new philosophy, but i have extended
my new philosophy with much more of new of my creative ideas, and of
course i will sell my new book about my new philosophy, other than that
i will write a book about how to be successful, and i will write a book
about parallel programming and synchronization algorithms that will talk
much more about my inventions of scalable algorithms and synchronization
algorithms, and of course i will sell all my books, and i am really
confident that i will be successful, other than that i have also told
you that i have invented many powerful software tools and softwares
that i will sell. So stay tuned !

And of course i will invest more for my retirement etc. as follows, read
my following thoughts so that to understand my way of doing about it:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/h4FblBWnNHk

You can read more about my education and my way of doing here:

And here is more proof of the fact that i have invented many scalable
algorithms and algorithms:

https://groups.google.com/g/comp.programming.threads/c/V9Go8fbF10k

More of my philosophy about my new proverbs..

I have just forgotten to say that here is my other new proverbs that i
have just invented quickly, you can read them carefully here:

https://groups.google.com/g/comp.programming.threads/c/U3Tlh2yhaLk

And you can read all my other proverbs that i have just invented quickly
here:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/ZyUvFt_nix8

More of my philosophy about those immature south africans..

I invite you to look at the following interesting video of south
africans about apartheid:
'
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zam4HGAssqY

I think that i am a wise type of person and i don't agree
with the south africans in the above video, since the main problem
is the following, read my following proverb:

Here is my other new proverb:

There is some french that say: "On doit manier bien le verbe", "That we
have to speak or write a sophisticated language" , but they do not say
that speaking or writing a sophisticated language can become a deadly or
dangerous weapon, so i answer them in french: "Il faut aussi enseigner
le savoir vivre ensemble en enseignant aussi une philosophie efficace de
vie", that means in english: "That we have to efficiently educate people
by also learning them a good and efficient philosophy so that they know
how to live in harmony", so as you are noticing that it needs a good
philosophy so that to avoid the mess of Israel.

So if you are smart you will understand the wisdom of my above proverb,
it is that speaking or writing a sophisticated language can become a
deadly or dangerous weapon, and being beautiful can become a dangerous
weapon too, and being happy can become a dangerous weapon, this is why
in south africa there is also racism and discrimination between black
people, so when you are smart you will understand that my above proverb
is a smart and wise proverb.

More of my philosophy about compassion..

I will try to make you feel an important thing by showing you my
following proverb:

And Here is my other new proverb:

"When you like a beautiful song, you will have the strong tendency
to want to hear it or to buy it, but when you are maturity of
responsability, it can become that you have to like the responsability
of hearing or buying the song and not the beauty of the song, so when
you are intellectual maturity you will start to think about responsability."

You have to know from my above proverb that it is pragmatic, so i think
that when you are pragmatic you will notice that the strong tendency
of humans is that they want to be happy and they want the beautiful
and they want more and more money, so they have like a strong tendency
to maximize this way, this is what is also making them discriminate
black people and even south americans etc. and this is what
is making them discriminate each other as a nation, so there is
also the philosophical question of how to make them much more wise,
this is why you were noticing that i was talking about my new philosophy
and about philosophy.

I think i am a wise type of person, and here is my new proverb about the
wise man:

"A wise man is not only more smart, but he has also other
genetical characteristics, and it is that he can intellectually
tune it better than average people and this "tune it better" is like
a more intellectual well balancing and he also can intellectually be
more precise than average people, and i think that this genetical
intellectual more precision or genetical more well intellectual tuning
of a wise man are not correctly measured by IQ tests."

So you can read all my proverbs that i have just invented quickly here:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/ZyUvFt_nix8

You can read my following thoughts about my new philosophy so that
to understand more:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/YZSYxV41-qI

And you can read more about my philosophy in my following thoughts:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/vlDWhmf-MIM

And read my following thoughts of my philosophy about what is smartness:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/Wzf6AOl41xs

And you can take a look at my photo that i have just put
here in my website(I am 53 years old):

https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/jackson-network-problem

And here is my thoughts about artificial intelligence:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/P9OTDTiCZ44


Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.