More of my philosophy about artificial intelligence and neuroevolution and common sense and more..

8 views
Skip to first unread message

World-News2100

unread,
Oct 2, 2021, 8:10:21 PM10/2/21
to
Hello...


More of my philosophy about artificial intelligence and neuroevolution
and common sense and more..

I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..

I have just read the following article about neuroevolution
that is a meta-algorithm in artificial intelligence, an algorithm for
designing algorithms, i invite you to read about it here:

https://www.quantamagazine.org/computers-evolve-a-new-path-toward-human-intelligence-20191106/

So notice that it says the following

"In neuroevolution, you start by assigning random values to the weights
between layers. This randomness means the network won’t be very good at
its job. But from this sorry state, you then create a set of random
mutations — offspring neural networks with slightly different weights —
and evaluate their abilities. You keep the best ones, produce more
offspring, and repeat."

So i think that the problem with neuroevolution above is that the
"evaluate the abilities of the offspring neural networks" lacks common
sense.

So read the following interesting article that says that artificial
intelligence has also brought a kind of common sense to Computers, and
read about it here:

https://arxiv.org/abs/1906.05317

And read about it in the following article:

"Now, Choi and her collaborators have united these approaches. COMET
(short for “commonsense transformers”) extends GOFAI-style symbolic
reasoning with the latest advances in neural language modeling — a kind
of deep learning that aims to imbue computers with a statistical
“understanding” of written language. COMET works by reimagining
common-sense reasoning as a process of generating plausible (if
imperfect) responses to novel input, rather than making airtight
deductions by consulting a vast encyclopedia-like database."

Read more here:

https://www.quantamagazine.org/common-sense-comes-to-computers-20200430/

Also I invite you to look carefully at the following video of a jewish
AI(artificial intelligence) scientist about artificial intelligence(And
read about him here: https://rogantribe.com/who-is-lex-fridman/):

Exponential Progress of AI: Moore's Law, Bitter Lesson, and the Future
of Computation

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Me96OWd44q0

I think that the jewish AI(artificial intelligence) scientist that is
speaking on the video above and that is called Lex Fridman is making a
big mistake, since he focuses too much on improving Deep Learning in
artificial intelligence using exponential improvement of computation of
CPU hardware, but i think that it is a "big" mistake and you can easily
notice it by reading carefully my following thoughts and writing:

More of my philosophy about artificial intelligence and specialized
hardwares and more..

I think that specialized hardwares for deep learning in artificial
intelligence like GPUs and quantum computers are no more needed, since
you can use only a much less powerful CPU with more memory and do it
efficiently, since a PhD researcher called Nir Shavit that is a jewish
from Israel has just invented a very interesting software called neural
magic that does it efficiently, and i invite you to look at the
following very interesting video of Nir Shavit to know more about it:

The Software GPU: Making Inference Scale in the Real World by Nir
Shavit, PhD

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mGj2CJHXXKQ

And there is not only the jewish above called Nir Shavit that has
invented a very interesting thing, but there is also the following
muslim Iranian and Postdoctoral Associate that has also invented a very
interesting thing too for artificial intelligence, and here it is:

Why is MIT's new "liquid" AI a breakthrough innovation?

Read more here:

https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fintelligence-artificielle.developpez.com%2Factu%2F312174%2FPourquoi-la-nouvelle-IA-liquide-de-MIT-est-elle-une-innovation-revolutionnaire-Elle-apprend-continuellement-de-son-experience-du-monde%2F

And here is Ramin Hasani, Postdoctoral Associate (he is an Iranian):

https://www.csail.mit.edu/person/ramin-hasani

And here he is:

http://www.raminhasani.com/

He is the study’s lead author of the following new study:

New ‘Liquid’ AI Learns Continuously From Its Experience of the World

Read more here:

https://singularityhub.com/2021/01/31/new-liquid-ai-learns-as-it-experiences-the-world-in-real-time/


More of my philosophy about can we trust the smartests in how they
measure what is beauty and Love..

There is still a philosophical question of:

Can we trust the smartests among us in how they measure what is beauty
and Love ?

This is a really important question that follows from my explanation
below of is Love and beauty subjective, i think i am smart
and i will answer it as follows:

I think we have discovered many sequences, patterns, or methods that
permit to compose the actual pleasant beauty that we are defining as
beauty, so then it logically follows that we can not say that beauty is
subjective, since also we have not to be pessimistic, since the
smartests among us that define what is beauty and Love will always
enhance there intellectual taste and taste that make us adapt correctly
in defining what is beauty and Love.

More precision of my philosophy of what is beauty and more..

Here is more precision of my definition of what is beauty, read it again:

I think i am smart, and i think i can define beauty with my fluid
intelligence as the following:

Beauty comes from both order and harmony, and i think that beauty is
"order" that is pleasant to the human senses, but this order that is
pleasant of beauty is an arrangement or disposition according to a
particular sequence, pattern, or method, and i think an order that is
pleasant is an arrangement or disposition according to a particular
sequence, pattern, or method that is more perfect or much more perfect
or perfect, so when you have disorder that is unpleasant for the human
senses, so it is not beautiful, so when you look at a circle it is an
order that is pleasant to look at, this is why a circle is beautiful.

More of my philosophy about universal Love and beauty..

I think i am smart, and i think i am a wise type of person,

Now i can ask the following philosophical questions:

Does Love is subjective ?

Does Beauty is subjective ?

Here is my answer:

I think i am smart, and i will say that you have to know how to measure
it, so you have to know how to "prioritize" by weights of importance,
i mean that that so that to know about beauty, there is two ways of
doing it, first there is the inferior way of doing it by looking at
beauty superficially , and it becomes an a not exact appearance and a
not so good measure, and there is the second way that is like scientific
and it is to measure beauty with our smartness, by prioritizing and say
that the smartests and wise persons among us have to measure
beauty and Love and know if we can calling them beauty and Love and if
we can accept them as beauty and Love, so then by measuring it this way
with smartness and wisdom we can then say that Love and beauty don't
become subjective, and as you have just noticed yesterday i said that
Love looks like artificial intelligence, since it needs an action that
merits a reward (as Love), and you can know more about it by reading my
following new proverb:

Here is my new proverb:

"We can ask of from where comes the attachment of Love between
a mother and her son ? so i think i am smart and i will say
that it comes from the fact that it is like a reward, that the son
is loving or is being the son and the mother is giving a good reward
like giving him more security or giving him food to eat, so as you are
noticing that this rule can be applied to consumerism, since
you can use the same rule with your consumers in a smart
way, for example by giving the impression to your consumers that
you take care of there security by learning them with easy or the like,
and then the consumers will love you much more and will be attracted by
you."

So then we can say much more precisely that Love needs an action and
its reward (as Love), but there is individual love that is like a
process of local optimization and there is universal Love that is a
process of global optimization in a society that also can comes with a
"margin" that makes us also be a level of tolerance on this or that
action. And notice with me that it looks like the optimization of
particle swarm optimization (PSO) in artificial intelligence, since the
local optimization of PSO is like the process of individual Love, and
the global optimization of PSO is like the process of the global Love in
a society, and of course particle swarm optimization (PSO) in artificial
intelligence is like Reinforcement Learning in AI(artificial
intelligence), since in PSO in artificial intelligence we have the
actions of the members of the population of PSO that searches for the
optimal value that are found that are then rewarded by making them the
values that optimizes further and further towards the global optimum.

And here is my thoughts about artificial intelligence:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/P9OTDTiCZ44

And speaking about beauty, here is my beautiful poems of Love, read them
all carefully:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/D4qlWWW-o1s

More of my philosophy about scalability and Gödel's incompleteness
theorem and more..

Gödel's incompleteness theorem in mathematics only applies to
sufficiently strong systems. It is not applicable to systems like
Presburger arithmetic and first-order logic.

But FOL(First-order logic) in mathematics is not all-powerful by any
means, and it has
the following disadvantages:

1- It has no concept of time
2- hard to do arithmetic
3- Can't do beliefs --"If he believes this then surely he must believe
that" is often wrong in everyday life; also surprising mathematical
results.
4- Can't have variables with set values: "All functions are boring"
turns out to be a 2nd-order, not 1st-order statement.

So first-order logic is not scalable, so i think we can not avoid the
problem of Gödel's incompleteness theorem in mathematics, but notice
that the Gödel's incompleteness theorem in mathematics says the following:

"For any such consistent formal system, there will always be statements
about natural numbers that are true, but that are unprovable within the
system. The second incompleteness theorem, an extension of the first,
shows that the system cannot demonstrate its own consistency."

So notice carefully that it says that there will always exist in those
systems statements that are "true" that we can not prove, so then
we can not demonstrate the consistency of those systems, but
i think that those systems remain "really" "useful" for us.

More of my philosophy about civilization and specialization of our today
world..

Here is my new proverb:

"I think what is happening in the West and other parts of the world,
it is that individuals are becoming too stupid, since it is the way of
specialization that is required, since the individuals are specialized
in there jobs so that to enhance much more the efficiency and
productivity as a society or as group, but this specialization is a
weakness that is making individuals too stupid, but we can become smart
working as a group or as a society using the tools of internet etc."

I think i am smart and here is my new proverb:

"The most important disadvantage of education today, it is that we are
learning the students, but we are neglecting to efficiently learn to
students how to learn."

This is one of the basis of my philosophy below, and read about it
in my following thoughts:

I think i am smart, and i think you can be more confident with me, since
i think i am not too specialized(Since you have to read my below proverb
about it), since here is what i have done:

1- I have gotten my university level Diploma in Microelectronics and
informatics.
2- I have studied 1 year of applied mathematics at university of
Montreal Canada and i have succeeded it.
3- I have also studied operational research
4- I have also studied network administration and i have worked
as a network administrator
5- I am also an inventor of many scalable algorithms and algorithms
and i have invented some powerful software tools for parallelism.
6- I have studied more web software development with Perl, Javascript
and CGI and FCGI and ODBC using SQL etc. and i have worked in the
past as a web software developer.
7- I have worked as a software developer consultant
etc. etc.

You can read more about my education and my way of doing here:

And here is more proof of the fact that i have invented many scalable
algorithms and algorithms:

https://groups.google.com/g/comp.programming.threads/c/V9Go8fbF10k

I invite you to look at the following beautiful photo Gunnersbury
Writing Desk in a beautiful wood:

https://www.wayfair.ca/furniture/pdp/astoria-grand-gunnersbury-writing-desk-astg6385.html

So i think i am smart, and when i look at the above photo of this
beautiful Gunnersbury Writing Desk made of beautiful wood, it is
like an efficient philosophy for me, since i am seeing the pattern with
my fluid intelligence, since having this Gunnersbury Writing Desk in a
beautiful wood, it is like living near the beautiful of the mother
nature, and it is like an abstraction or it is like an efficient simple
language, since it is like we are bringing the beautiful of mother
nature like a beautiful tree made of beautiful wood into our house, so
it makes our house really beautiful and it makes us more happy, here is
some photos of them:

https://www.thecoolist.com/most-beautiful-trees/

So this kind of philosophy is like using smartly a "lever" to move a
heavy or firmly fixed load, since as you notice that when you have this
beautiful Gunnersbury Writing Desk made of beautiful wood, you are not
bringing all a beautiful forest of beautiful trees made of wood or all a
beautiful tree made of wood of mother into your house, so it permits you
to like easily lift your problems and solve them and be much more happy,
and i think it is the right philosophy, since so that to be much more
happy you have to know how to efficiently find those kind of simple
levers that permits you to be much more happy and use them smartly, and
here is another lever that can be made simple that you can use smartly,
read about it in my following proverb:

"Resourcefulness is one of the most important things, and it is a skill,
and the good news is: this skill can be learned and mastered, and
resourcefulness is attained only when we combine the resourceful mindset
and skills, so we have to filter out some of the most useful resources
that help us, and resourcefulness is also to know who/what to look for
and what to ask, and when ressourcefulness is attained this becomes an
engine that permits you to have hope and to be energetic and to be
positive in doing what you are doing, since resourcefulness also permits
to easy the jobs for you."

So i think when you understand this smart philosophy you will understand
that using an efficient simple language is also very efficient.

More of my philosophy about technology and mother nature..

I think i am a philosopher that is smart, and i think that i am also an
smart artist, and i invite you to look and listen at the following video
of a music of Jean-Michel Jarre:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kSIMVnPA994

So i think i am a smart artist, and i am noticing a smart pattern with
my fluid intelligence in the above music and video of Jean-Michel Jarre,
so the pattern is that the above music of Jean-Michel Jarre is not
complete detachment from the beauty of mother nature, since he is using
a mixture of the beautiful of mother nature(like the wind or the water
as electronic sounds) and the beautiful of electronic music that is
detached from the mother nature, and i think that humans needs and
require the two, the beautifulness of mother nature and the
beautifulness of electronic music or digital photos and such that are
detached from the beautiful of mother nature, so the beautiful of mother
nature is essential for humans, i will give you a quick example so that
to notice it:

I invite you to listen at the following beautiful arab song from Algeria:

Ch'hal aâyit mesbar

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zS6KG2ybOB0&list=RDzS6KG2ybOB0&start_radio=1

And notice how in this beautiful arab music they are using old
music instruments that give beautiful sounds and music that comes from
the beautiful of mother nature or that are much nearer from the mother
nature than electronic music sounds, so then i think that this arab
music and song is like the beautiful of mother nature. And as
i have just said that the beautiful of mother nature is essential for
humans, so i think that there is a difference between my following poems
of Love and mathematics, since mathematics is like far away from the
beautiful of mother nature, it is like robots, but my poems of Love are
like the beautiful of mother nature, here they are, read them all carefully:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/D4qlWWW-o1s

And about extremist ideologies like white supremacism, i invite you to
read my following thoughts about them:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/mjE_2AG1TKQ

More of philosophy about Democracy and the Evolutionary Design methodology..

I will make a logical analogy between software projects and Democracy,
first i will say that because of the today big complexity of software
projects, so the "requirements" of those complex software projects are
not clear and a lot could change in them, so this is
why we are using an Evolutionary Design methodology with different tools
such as Unit Testing, Test Driven Development, Design Patterns,
Continuous Integration, Domain Driven Design, but we have to notice
carefully that an important thing in Evolutionary Design methodology is
that when those complex software projects grow, we have first to
normalize there growth by ensuring that the complex software projects
grow "nicely" and "balanced" by using standards, and second we have to
optimize growth of the complex software projects by balancing between
the criteria of the easy to change the complex software projects and the
performance of the complex software projects, and third you have to
maximize the growth of the complex software projects by making the most
out of each optimization, and i think that by logical analogy we can
notice that in Democracy we have also to normalize the growth by not
allowing "extremism" or extremist ideologies that hurt Democracy, and we
have also to optimize Democracy by for example well balancing between
"performance" of the society and in the Democracy and the "reliability"
of helping others like the weakest members of the society among the
people that of course respect the laws, and so that to understand more
my thoughts of my philosophy about Democracy, i invite you to read them
here:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/vlDWhmf-MIM

And about extremist ideologies like white supremacism, i invite you to
read my following thoughts about them:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/mjE_2AG1TKQ

More of my philosophy about entropy and about how morality is universal..

I think i am smart, and i am explaining below why morality is universal,
but as you have just noticed i have just said that so that to say
that morality is universal, it requires from us to know about the
requirements such as why to be a global world etc., so there must be a
level of consciousness, other than that i will make you feel and see
much more that morality is universal since i am seeing it:

So take for example the human imperfections or world imperfections,
i say that it is because we have those imperfections that also we have
morality, and those imperfections causes entropy(A state of disorder and
disorganization), this is why we have to be more and more perfection so
that to maintain order and so that to attain perfection of being much
more perfect or perfect, for example humans are working in there
everyday life so that to also maintain order or so that to become
perfection or much more perfection, and maintaining order is also that
we are perfectioning so that to not to become disorder.

More of my philosophy about why morality is universal..

I think i am a smart philosopher, and i will now explain why
morality is universal:

So take a look at the thing that we call "time", so you can naively look
at our everyday life and say that time is not relative, but
you can like Einstein analyse it and prove that time is relative,
and morality is the same, so when you naively look at it you will
think that morality is relative, since you can notice that for example
there is many countries with many laws and rules, but when you analyse
it you will notice that the goal of morality that we become perfect or
much more perfect pushes us forward towards more and more perfection
since we have to solve our problems such as our many imperfections, it
is also why morality is "progressive", so then the essence of morality
become that morality is progressing towards the goal that is that we
become perfect or much more perfect, so then the other details of
morality are abstracted, so then those acts of humans perfectioning or
perfecting towards a much more perfect world or perfect world and that
are also codified as morality become that morality is universal, since
also we can take this essence of morality as the most important thing.

More of my philosophy about the superhuman of the philosopher Friedrich
Nietzsche..

I think i am smart philosopher, and i will be more precise in my logical
proof of why the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche believed, like the
philosopher Spinoza, that morality is not universal, so notice carefully
how the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche has wanted to construct a new
type of man that is a superhuman in his view and this superhuman in the
philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche is a superhuman that has mastery over
his emotions and it is a superhuman who takes joy in simply existing, so
as you are noticing that the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche is an
inferior philosopher since he wanted to apply the morality of the strong
to the morality of the weak in not wise manner, also you can
notice it more by him saying the following and recognizing that
there is different types of morals, and here is his saying:

"It is the will to power that must be expressed, not the morals of the
slaves or the weak."

That means in french:

"C'est la volonté de puissance qui doit s'exprimer, non
pas la morale des esclaves ou des faibles.",

So the above saying of the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche is a proof
that he recognized that there is different kinds of morals like the
morals of the slaves or the weak and morals of the strong humans or the
strong. Read more my following thoughts about it and about Stoicism and
existentialism and about how i am explaining that the essence of
morality is universal:

More of my philosophy about the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche and more..

I have just looked at the following video about:

NIETZSCHE - L'exaltation de la vie

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WeVVtxlg_oE

I think i am a philosopher that is smart, and i think that the
philosophy of the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche is not good, since
he says that: "C'est la volonté de puissance qui doit s'exprimer, non
pas la morale des esclaves ou des faibles.", that means in english: "It
is the will to power that must be expressed, not the morals of the
slaves or the weak.", and he said that it needs to construct a new man
that we call the superhuman, but I think that i am a philosopher that is
smart and i am understanding the philosophy of the philosopher Friedrich
Nietzsche, and i think that it is an inferior philosophy, because it
seeks to construct the superhumans from humans and this superhuman in
the philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche is a superhuman that has mastery
over his emotions and it is a superhuman who takes joy in simply
existing, so as you are noticing that it is an inferior philosophy,
because how can you be able to take joy in simply existing ? so as you
are noticing it is illogical and it is as illogical as Stoicism(read my
below thoughts about Stoicism) and i think that it is a violent
philosophy as Stoicism, this is why the philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsch
is a failure as Stoicism, and here is what i said about Stoicism:

More of my philosophy about my philosophy and about Stoicism and
Existentialism..

I invite you to read this very interesting article about philosophy:

Why philosophers could be the ones to transform your 2020

https://www.bbc.com/culture/article/20200114-why-philosophers-could-be-the-ones-to-transform-your-2020

And notice that it says the following:

“The Stoics suggest that what’s most important in order to lead a good
life is internal rather than external. It’s about developing the right
character, the right state of mind,”

I think i am a philosopher that is "smart", so i make you notice the
logical bug in the above saying about Stoicism, and it is that
developing the right character and the right state of the mind in
Stoicism needs the cultural side that also comes from the external
reality and hence from the "purpose" and the "meaning of life", and we
can notice that Stoicism is not so smart, because how can we develop
self-control and fortitude as a means of overcoming destructive emotions
and such without the necessary requirements that have to give enough
hope or a meaning of life that gives the necessary self-control and
fortitude? so this is why i think that Stoicism as a philosophy is a
failure, so what's about existentialism of the philosopher Jean-Paul
Sartre ? Jean-Paul Sartre said that: "Existence precedes essence" or in
french: "L'existence précède l'essence", and it is the central claim of
existentialism of the philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre, but i think that
this claim is not so logical, since it is like a debate that asks the
question of: Wich is more important, the genetical side or cultural
side?, and we have to notice that the essence or nature of a human is
"not" enough and it needs for example a meaning of human life and a
purpose etc. so then notice that existentialism of Jean-Paul Sartre, and
like in absurdism of the philosopher Albert Camus, says that human life
is absurd, but here again my new philosophy says that human life is not
absurd, and read it below.

My philosophy about the philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre and more..

I invite you to look at the following video about philosophy:

SARTRE - Le regard des autres

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BJIM41TnDHI

I have just noticed by looking at the above video, that it is lacking,
since first you have to understand the following:

Jean-Paul Sartre said that: "Existence precedes essence" or in french:
"L'existence précède l'essence", and it is the central claim of
existentialism of the philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre.

But i think people are not understanding the philosopher Jean-Paul
Sartre, since the functionality of our essence is also our genetics that
predetermines to a certain level what is our existence, so the essence
that is our genetics is also important, but since the philosopher
Jean-Paul Sartre was a communist, he has wanted to give much more "hope"
by saying: "Existence precedes essence", and i think this also means that
humans are by essence free, and this also means that the human nurture
is much more important than the human nature, but it is not truth, so i
think that Jean-Paul Sartre has made a big error by saying so. And
Jean-Paul Sartre has also accepted the views of the philosopher Albert
Camus about the absurdism of existence, but i am a philosopher and here
again i am not in accordance with it, since i say that human existence
is not absurd, and read my below thoughts to understand my philosophy:

How can you effectively "measure" how to appreciate human life ?

I think the most important thing is to know that we can measure it
relatively or absolutely, so wich one of the absolute or relative
measure is the right way of measuring ? so now you have to know that
i think that the meaning of human life can not be measured like
absolutely like was doing the philosopher Albert Camus since you will
start to say by measuring like absolutely that human life is "absurd",
and this is not good at all, so now you have to understand the very
basis of philosophy, that philosophy has to give you the will to survive
or the will to live, so then you logically notice that we can say that a
human is smart if he is smart relatively to the distribution of
smartness of humans or such, but if you start to measure it like
absolutely by saying that the smart human is not smart when you look at
all or measuring it by all the difficulties and constraints of our world
or of our universe, i think it is not the right way to do in philosophy,
since you have to give the will to people so that they survive and so
that they live, also you have to give a meaning to human life as
i am doing it in my philosophy(read about it below), so now i
can finally say that you are understanding the how to answer the
above philosophical question since you have to measure how
to appreciate human life "relatively" and "not" like absolutely by
looking at how our past humanity was much less advanced than our today
humanity etc. and so the other important thing is to also understand the
basis of my philosophy by reading it below:

I think that my philosophy is more smart, since in my philosophy
i am also explaining that the day permits to understand the night and
human life is like the alternance of the day and night that brings
beauty, since human life is difficulties and suffering that also permit
us to appreciate much more human life or that permits us to appreciate
much more our kind of civilization and i say in my philosophy that it
also gives more intensity to pleasures of life, so my philosophy doesn't
look like the other philosophies, so i invite you to holistically
understand my philosophy by carefully reading it here:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/YZSYxV41-qI

And read my other thoughts of my philosophy here:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/8jzgRGMOEHs


More of my philosophy about the ideas of the philosopher Friedrich
Nietzsche and the philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer and more..

I invite you to read the following article about the philosopher
Friedrich Nietzsche and the philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer:

The Ideas Of Friedrich Nietzsche

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/ideas-friedrich-nietzsche-dr-marcel-pflug-mba

I think i am a smart philosopher, and i am noticing that the
philosophers Friedrich Nietzsche and Arthur Schopenhauer are inferior
philosophers, and i will explain as following:

Notice in the above article the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche has a
problem with morality, and he thought, like the philosopher Spinoza,
that morality is not universal and he also thought that since for
example for the strong human the good becomes the brave, powerful, rich,
and strong, so he thought that the strong human will have the tendency
to discriminate the weak people, so then the philosopher Friedrich
Nietzsche thought that morality was not working, but i think that the
philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche was an inferior philosopher since i
think i am a philosopher that is smart and i am explaining that the
essence of morality is universal and progressive, read my thoughts below
about it to understand, and also i am saying that we have not to be
pessimistic as the philosophers Friedrich Nietzsche and Arthur
Schopenhauer, since i have just spoken about the value of specialization
that gives a self-esteem to the individuals of a society and i am
explaining in my below thoughts of my new philosophy how we have to be
optimistic about human life, and i invite you to read my below thoughts
so that to understand:

More of my philosophy about universal Love and beauty..

I think i am smart, and i think i am a wise type of person,

Now i can ask the following philosophical questions:

Does Love is subjective ?

Does Beauty is subjective ?

Here is my answer:

I think i am smart, and i will say that you have to know how to measure
it, so you have to know how to "prioritize" by weights of importance,
i mean that that so that to know about beauty, there is two ways of
doing it, first there is the inferior way of doing it by looking at
beauty superficially , and it becomes an a not exact appearance and a
not so good measure, and there is the second way that is like scientific
and it is to measure beauty with our smartness, by prioritizing and say
that the smartests and wise persons among us have to measure
beauty and Love and know if we can calling them beauty and Love and if
we can accept them as beauty and Love, so then by measuring it this way
with smartness and wisdom we can then say that Love and beauty don't
become subjective, and as you have just noticed yesterday i said that
Love looks like artificial intelligence, since it needs an action that
merits a reward (as Love), and you can know more about it by reading my
following new proverb:

Here is my new proverb:

"We can ask of from where comes the attachment of Love between
a mother and her son ? so i think i am smart and i will say
that it comes from the fact that it is like a reward, that the son
is loving or is being the son and the mother is giving a good reward
like giving him more security or giving him food to eat, so as you are
noticing that this rule can be applied to consumerism, since
you can use the same rule with your consumers in a smart
way, for example by giving the impression to your consumers that
you take care of there security by learning them with easy or the like,
and then the consumers will love you much more and will be attracted by
you."

So then we can say much more precisely that Love needs an action and
its reward (as Love), but there is individual love that is like a
process of local optimization and there is universal Love that is a
process of global optimization in a society that also can comes with a
"margin" that makes us also be a level of tolerance on this or that
action. And notice with me that it looks like the optimization of
particle swarm optimization (PSO) in artificial intelligence, since the
local optimization of PSO is like the process of individual Love, and
the global optimization of PSO is like the process of the global Love in
a society, and of course particle swarm optimization (PSO) in artificial
intelligence is like Reinforcement Learning in AI(artificial
intelligence), since in PSO in artificial intelligence we have the
actions of the members of the population of PSO that searches for the
optimal value that are found that are then rewarded by making them the
values that optimizes further and further towards the global optimum.

And here is my thoughts about artificial intelligence:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/P9OTDTiCZ44

More of my philosophy about the too much individualism of the West..

I invite you to look at the following known psychologist that
is talking about self-esteem:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9f3qyNNtpQk

So i am smart and i am not in accordance with the psychologist in the
above video since he is saying that self-esteem comes from comparing
your value with the others in a society, but i think it is a too much
individualistic definition, since the value of an individual of a
society comes also from the fact that the society also gives a certain
level of importance to its parts that are the individuals that
constitutes the society and that are specialized in this or that job,
and this "specialization" is also important for the society and it has a
value in a society, so then the individual has a value and importance in
a society that gives him a self-esteem.

More of my philosophy about beauty..

I will ask a philosophical question:

Is a beautiful women beautiful ?

So it depends on if you are a wise man type of person or not..

Since i think that you have not to rush in like a fool and think that
that the women that is beautiful is beautiful, since the wise man
says that it first needs "wisdom" so that to also appreciate beauty or
so that to appreciate pleasures of human life, so i think that the wise
man type of person is like the way, so read my following thoughts
so that to understand much more clearly:

Here is my other just new proverb:

"I think i am a wise type of person and i say that happiness comes from
an efficient way of thinking or from imagination, and not from reality
and not from pleasures of reality or pleasures of life, since reality
when you look at it from the more and more details, it comes with too
much imperfections, so the efficient way of thinking or of imagination
has to not be "complete" detachment like in Taoism or Buddhism , since i
think by being complete detachment like in Taoism or buddhism you will
make the engine that pushes you forward towards more and more perfection
much more weak, so then you have to be like the right dose of detachment
that makes you like well balanced so that it makes you appreciate our
world much more, and so that it makes you appreciate much more pleasures
of life or so that it makes you appreciate much more life, so then it
makes you much more happy. And of course it is inherent to my proverb
that when you realize that reality, when you look at it from the more
and more details, comes with too much imperfections and that you can not
change for the better quickly, you become much more wise with much more
patience etc. And i will explain more my new philosophy in my next book
that will also extend with much more new creative ideas."

More of my philosophy of what is Love..

I think Love looks like artificial intelligence, since it needs an
action that merits a reward, but i think that you have also to know how
to play it smartly and "wisely", but we have not to be pessimistic since
i think that the best way to attain Love is by being more and more
wisdom so that to become much more wise or wise, since i am really
convinced that by being much more wise or wise you will start to
appreciate much more human life in a smart way and be much more happy as
i am doing it, and you will start to know how to be a wise type of Love
as i am doing it, since i think i am a wise type of person. And so that
to know more how i am wise, you can also look at my following poems of
Love that looks like my personality since i am also a gentleman type of
person:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/ITE99pf3KHA

And since i am saying above that Love looks like the action and its
reward in artificial intelligence, you can read more my following
thoughts about artificial intelligence so that to understand more:

And here is my thoughts about artificial intelligence:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/P9OTDTiCZ44

Here is my new proverb:

"We can ask of from where comes the attachment of Love between
a mother and her son ? so i think i am smart and i will say
that it comes from the fact that it is like a reward, that the son
is loving or is being the son and the mother is giving a good reward
like giving him more security or giving him food to eat, so as you are
noticing that this rule can be applied to consumerism, since
you can use the same rule with your consumers in a smart
way, for example by giving the impression to your consumers that
you take care of there security by learning them with easy or the like,
and then the consumers will love you much more and will be attracted by
you."

You can read all my other proverbs below:

More of my philosophy about money and about the meaning and the purpose
of human life..

I think i am smart and i say that Money is not a good and powerful
engine, since you can be stupid and think that it is a powerful engine,
but when you are a smart philosopher like me you will realize that
thinking that Money is a powerful engine is like the big mistake that
is making the Taoist Philosophy of Lieh Tzu by thinking that the action
itself is sufficient as an engine, and read my thoughts below about it,
since the question is how to make humans more "strong" and "energetic"
and "positive" so that they be pushed forward towards more and more
perfection. So this is why i am talking in my new philosophy about those
kind of powerful "engines".

More of my philosophy about the meaning and the purpose of human life..

I think i am smart, and as you have just noticed i am not speaking
in my new philosophy about the belonging to a society or to group with a
good purpose, since you can think that the pillars of the meaning of
human life are the belonging to a society or group with a good purpose
and with a kind of transcendence and such, but i think i am a
philosopher and i say it is not the right way, since i think what is the
best and right way is to talk about what are the good and powerful
"engines" that make you have this good meaning and purpose of human
life, this is why you have to read my below thoughts of my philosophy so
that to notice my kind of new philosophy and i am extending much more my
new philosophy with other much more creative ideas:

More of my philosophy about the Taoist Philosophy of Lieh Tzu..

I invite you to look at the following video about the Taoist Philosophy
of Lieh Tzu:

Let It Go, Ride the Wind | The Taoist Philosophy of Lieh Tzu

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vA7Q8zb1hVU

I think i am smart, and i am noticing in the above video
that the Taoist Philosophy of Lieh Tzu has a problem,
since notice that it says the following:

"Lieh Tsu shows us that only when we transcend the duality of life -
things like gain and loss, attraction and repulsion, wonderful and
awful, we can become truly indifferent, and start acting for no other
reason than the action itself."

So the problem with this, it is one of the engine, since
we have to have a powerful engine that pushes us forward towards
more and more perfection, and since the Philosopher Lieh Tzu says
that we have to transcend the duality and become truly indifferent, and
start acting for no other reason than the action itself, but how
can you be pushed forward towards more and more perfection by
just the action in itself, so then the engine becomes much more weak,
so the Taoist Philosophy of Lieh Tzu is problematic. But
my new philosophy below is different, since as you notice in my
below proverb that it is not a "complete" detachment and it comes
like with the right dose of detachment, since you have to understand
more my proverb below, and it is that pleasures of consumerism are not
sufficient so that to become happy or much more happy, since it needs
from you to change your state of the mind or your kind of thinking so
that to attain happiness, and it is why is explaining my new proverb
below, so read all my thoughts below so that to understand:

More of my philosophy about how to be harmony and how to be happy and more..

I think i am smart, and i say that the philosopher Baruch Spinoza
said that the being strong makes you happy and the being weak makes you
sad, but so that to be smart, we have to be pragmatic and
learn the others the how to be strong, and we have to learn them
the how to be harmony in a society and how to be harmony with
themselves, so as you are noticing that i am in accordance with
the philosopher Baruch Spinoza on the fact that the being strong makes
you happy and the being weak makes you sad, and here is my
new proverb that talks about it more clearly:

Here is my other new proverb in english and french:

Voici mon nouveau proverbe en français et en anglais:

"La stabilité s'obtient avec la force de la perfection,
car quand vous devenez plus parfait vous augmentez
vos forces et donc vous résistez mieux aux instabilités,
et je pense que ceci est comme une loi de la moralité"

"Stability is obtained with the force of perfection,
because when you become more perfect you increase
your strenghts , then you better resist instabilities,
and I think this is like a law of Morality"

Now as you are noticing i am speaking in my below thoughts
about how to make humans more strong and how to make them
be in harmony by talking about resourcefulness and by
showing them how to be in harmony and how to be happy,
so i invite you to read my below thoughts so that
to understand, other than that i have just looked at the
following video that talks about the philosopher Baruch Spinoza:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K8DECD8kK94

So I think i am a philosopher that is smart, and i am not in accordance
with the philosopher Baruch Spinoza that was a Dutch philosopher of
Portuguese Sephardi origin that said that morality is not universal,
since i think that i am a smart philosopher that has logically proved
that morality is both universal and progressive, so i invite you to read
here in my following thoughts of my philosophy so that to notice it:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/vlDWhmf-MIM

More of my philosophy about Resourcefulness and more..

Here is my new proverb about Resourcefulness that permits
you to understand it:

"Resourcefulness is one of the most important things, and it is a skill,
and the good news is: this skill can be learned and mastered, and
resourcefulness is attained only when we combine the resourceful mindset
and skills, so we have to filter out some of the most useful resources
that help us, and resourcefulness is also to know who/what to look for
and what to ask, and when ressourcefulness is attained this becomes an
engine that permits you to have hope and to be energetic and to be
positive in doing what you are doing, since resourcefulness also permits
to easy the jobs for you."

More of my philosophy about self-affirmations and Mood freezing and more..

As you are noticing i am saying that i am smart or i am a wise type of
person, and i think it is part of the value of self-affirmations, and it
is not that this self-affirmations boost my inner strength and make me
likely to succeed, but it is just that i am much more "confident" about
me and i also think that i am smart, and read my below thoughts so that
to understand more about my personality, also as you are noticing
in my below first proverb that i am using a technic that looks like Mood
freezing in psychology, since the most important aspect of Mood freezing
in psychology it is that it recognizes the true power of the mind, and
it is this true power of the mind that interests me, this is why i am
using my below technic in my first proverb, since i want to make the
others convinced that expressing anger or/and frustration and such in
the given context would not make them feel better, so as you have just
noticed i am wanting to make the others much better persons by improving
their moods etc., so i invite you to read carefully all my thoughts
below so that to understand:

More of my philosophy about my new philosophy about detachment and more..

In Buddhism the detached mindset is one that realizes the importance of
living with the natural flow of things and respecting the impermanence
of all life, but in my new philosophy you can realize a kind of
detachment by understanding my following new proverb:

"I am discovering a pattern with my fluid intelligence and it is that
when you look from a higher level layer to humans, like when you look at
a beautiful movie or a beautiful song, you can like think that it is a
beautiful movie or a beautiful song, but when you get into the more and
more details of being humans you start to see more and more
imperfections of humans, so we have not to think that the beautiful
movie or the beautiful song and such is what will make us more happy,
since the wise type of person like me will say that humans are
problematic or are the main problem, and the wise man will say that it
is so important to learn to humans how to be much more wise, by for
example using wisely the tools such as beauty or money etc. so we have
to become much more wise or wise, and you can also become much more
happy by understanding that life and human life come with too many
imperfections that you can not change for the better "quickly" and you
have then to become "patience" since life and humans come with too many
imperfections so you have to know how to let go and not to become angry
or/and frustrated and such, so by this way of thinking differently and
becoming this kind of patience you will become much more happy, and i
think that being this kind of patience brings harmony, since also when
you become much more wise or wise you will know that this kind of
patience makes us care much more since we become lovable we humans by
being this kind of patience and it also makes us reduce much more our
imperfections and this makes us much more happy."

I think i am smart and i am a wise type of person, and as i have told
you that i am writing a book about my new philosophy, and this book
of mine will also efficiently learn you how to be happy or much more
happy and of course you have seen me posting about my new philosophy,
but i have posted just a part of my new philosophy, but i have extended
my new philosophy with much more of new of my creative ideas, and of
course i will sell my new book about my new philosophy, other than that
i will write a book about how to be successful, and i will write a book
about parallel programming and synchronization algorithms that will talk
much more about my inventions of scalable algorithms and synchronization
algorithms, and of course i will sell all my books, and i am really
confident that i will be successful, other than that i have also told
you that i have invented many powerful software tools and softwares
that i will sell. So stay tuned !

And of course i will invest more for my retirement etc. as follows, read
my following thoughts so that to understand my way of doing about it:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/h4FblBWnNHk

You can read more about my education and my way of doing here:

And here is more proof of the fact that i have invented many scalable
algorithms and algorithms:

https://groups.google.com/g/comp.programming.threads/c/V9Go8fbF10k

More of my philosophy about my new proverbs..

I have just forgotten to say that here is my other new proverbs that i
have just invented quickly, you can read them carefully here:

https://groups.google.com/g/comp.programming.threads/c/U3Tlh2yhaLk

And you can read all my other proverbs that i have just invented quickly
here:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/ZyUvFt_nix8

More of my philosophy about those immature south africans..

I invite you to look at the following interesting video of south
africans about apartheid:
'
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zam4HGAssqY

I think that i am a wise type of person and i don't agree
with the south africans in the above video, since the main problem
is the following, read my following proverb:

Here is my other new proverb:

There is some french that say: "On doit manier bien le verbe", "That we
have to speak or write a sophisticated language" , but they do not say
that speaking or writing a sophisticated language can become a deadly or
dangerous weapon, so i answer them in french: "Il faut aussi enseigner
le savoir vivre ensemble en enseignant aussi une philosophie efficace de
vie", that means in english: "That we have to efficiently educate people
by also learning them a good and efficient philosophy so that they know
how to live in harmony", so as you are noticing that it needs a good
philosophy so that to avoid the mess of Israel.

So if you are smart you will understand the wisdom of my above proverb,
it is that speaking or writing a sophisticated language can become a
deadly or dangerous weapon, and being beautiful can become a dangerous
weapon too, and being happy can become a dangerous weapon, this is why
in south africa there is also racism and discrimination between black
people, so when you are smart you will understand that my above proverb
is a smart and wise proverb.

More of my philosophy about compassion..

I will try to make you feel an important thing by showing you my
following proverb:

And Here is my other new proverb:

"When you like a beautiful song, you will have the strong tendency
to want to hear it or to buy it, but when you are maturity of
responsability, it can become that you have to like the responsability
of hearing or buying the song and not the beauty of the song, so when
you are intellectual maturity you will start to think about responsability."

You have to know from my above proverb that it is pragmatic, so i think
that when you are pragmatic you will notice that the strong tendency
of humans is that they want to be happy and they want the beautiful
and they want more and more money, so they have like a strong tendency
to maximize this way, this is what is also making them discriminate
black people and even south americans etc. and this is what
is making them discriminate each other as a nation, so there is
also the philosophical question of how to make them much more wise,
this is why you were noticing that i was talking about my new philosophy
and about philosophy.

I think i am a wise type of person, and here is my new proverb about the
wise man:

"A wise man is not only more smart, but he has also other
genetical characteristics, and it is that he can intellectually
tune it better than average people and this "tune it better" is like
a more intellectual well balancing and he also can intellectually be
more precise than average people, and i think that this genetical
intellectual more precision or genetical more well intellectual tuning
of a wise man are not correctly measured by IQ tests."

So you can read all my proverbs that i have just invented quickly here:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/ZyUvFt_nix8

You can read my following thoughts about my new philosophy so that
to understand more:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/YZSYxV41-qI

And you can read more about my philosophy in my following thoughts:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/vlDWhmf-MIM

And read my following thoughts of my philosophy about what is smartness:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/Wzf6AOl41xs

And you can take a look at my photo that i have just put
here in my website(I am 53 years old):

https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/jackson-network-problem

And here is my thoughts about artificial intelligence:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/P9OTDTiCZ44


Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.

World-News2100

unread,
Oct 5, 2021, 2:03:50 PM10/5/21
to

World-News2100

unread,
Oct 11, 2021, 12:36:37 PM10/11/21
to
I think i am smart, and notice how i am talking about
how we have not to have a narrow view of what is smartness, and notice
how i am talking about the distributed smartness as rules etc. so i
think i can logically infer from my below thoughts the other way of
solving the greatly complex systems that is not by like "planning" the
whole system from a centralized government, but by emergence of a higher
level intelligence from distributing like the rules or.. into the small
parts of the system that will solve the greatly complex system, it looks
like the evolutionary design and planning, and it looks like the way of
the higher level smartness from an Ant colony, since in an Ant colony
there is no central government, but there is a distributed intelligence
that needs a kind of diversity of genetics of the members of the colony
and it needs like a distributed rules that the members have to follow
that will make emerge a higher level of intelligence. And of course it
looks like evolutionary algorithms in artificial intelligence, since the
advantage of evolutionary algorithms in artificial intelligence is that
they don't plan in advance but they search by like following some
distributed rules, and of course they need some "randomness" so that to
not get stuck in a local optimum, this is why i am talking below about
how to make our civilization that is a complex system much more
resilient by learning how to learn to humans with like a set
of rules like in an Ant colony by saying the following and notice
that the learning how to learn can be an efficient abstraction that
helps a lot:

More of my philosophy about how i am more happy and more..

I think that i am much more happy since i am understanding that being
happy is like a lifestyle that is based on some efficient rules that
permit the emergence of happiness, and i will talk about it more in my
new philosophy, so i think that we even need some important rules so
that to be a much more resilient civilization, since i think that there
is the way of learning people how to become an engineer, but this way of
doing is lacking very much, and there is also the way of learning people
how to learn that also permits to efficiently take advantage of this
sophisticated tool that we call internet, so i think that this way of
learning how to learn to people does make our civilization much more
resilient, since the way of "specialization" of our today civilization
is also a "weakness" that has to be solved much more efficiently by the
way of learning people how to learn on internet etc. and here is my
new proverb that talks about it:

"I think what is happening in the West and other parts of the world,
it is that individuals are becoming too stupid, since it is the way of
specialization that is required, since the individuals are specialized
in there jobs so that to enhance much more the efficiency and
productivity as a society or as group, but this specialization is a
weakness that is making individuals too stupid, but we can become smart
working as a group or as a society using the tools of internet etc."

And here is my thoughts about artificial intelligence and evolutionary
algorithms in artificial intelligence:
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages