More of my philosophy about is there any universal morality and more..

83 views
Skip to first unread message

World90

unread,
Jul 23, 2021, 10:35:52 PM7/23/21
to
Hello....


More of my philosophy about is there any universal morality and more..

I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..

I have just looked at the following video that talks about the
philosopher Spinoza:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K8DECD8kK94

I think i am a philosopher that is smart, and i am not in accordance
with the philosopher Baruch Spinoza that was a Dutch philosopher of
Portuguese Sephardi origin that said that morality is not universal,
since i think that i am a smart philosopher that has logically proved
that morality is both universal and progressive, so i invite you to read
here in my following thoughts of my philosophy so that to notice it:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/YZSYxV41-qI

And now i will talk about democracy since it is related to morality:

Being a good democratic player in Democracy is like playing smartly
at a game of chess, it is smartness in action, it is a smart
proactivity, Democracy is a beautiful smart game and it is an very
interesting game, but you have to know the rules of the game of
Democracy, that democracy is not exactness of morality, but
it needs to be exactness of morality, so it needs proactivity and
it needs an well educated society and it needs competitive elections and
free press and it needs to forbid extremism like neo-nazism or communism
or the political far-right or white supremacism and such extremist
behaviors.

More political philosophy about Democracy and Morality..

And now i will start by asking a philosophical question:

Is Democracy morality ?

I will say that Morality is about exactness and how to be the exact
perfection, note that the English dictionary defines "perfection" as:
"the act or process of perfecting", read here to notice it:

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/perfection

And Democracy is a mechanism that permits to avoid corruption of
morality and corruption of morality is also lack of efficiency and it is
extremism that hurts Democracy, and Democracy doesn't mean that people
have to govern, because it is absurdity, but Democracy is the "tool" of
Morality, since morality wants to be the exact perfection , this is why
it needs Democracy, and Morality or society have to be "progressive",
read my following writing of my political philosophy about morality to
know that they have to be progressive:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/7UmkfURwoU4

And we can say the following:

The classical notion of decentralization does not necessarily imply
democracy, and an organization may be decentralized without being based
on democratic principles.

But i ask a smart question of:

Can we say that an organization based on democratic principles may be
centralized ?

Here is my answer:

But we can notice that even though decentralization doesn't necessarily
imply Democracy, Democracy is a "kind" of decentralization, and this
kind of decentralization brings efficiency because we can notice that
Democracy needs requirements such as competitive elections and free
press, and i think that Democracy is more efficient than Dictatorship at
fighting corruption(and corruption can mean lack of efficiency), read my
following thoughts about Democracy and more to understand:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/Nudyb_4QCRU


More political philosophy about Democracy and parliamentary Democracy..


Wich is better, Democracy or parliamentary Democracy ?


When you are smart you will notice that parliamentary Democracy is
better since Democracy means that the people "govern", but this way of
doing brings desorder, since people doesn't mean that it is Elites that
govern, so this is why i think that it is inherent to parliamentary
democracy that it is the Elites that govern and guide people, since also
we can logically prove it by saying the following:

From where people get a correct judgment in Democracy ?

So you are noticing that to be able to be good judgment in Democracy,
you have to be correct "Elitism" that guides people, and you have to be
Meritocracy to be able to be the necessary quality or perfection, but
then you are noticing that to be able to be Meritocracy there must be a
reward for the merit, by for example rewarding by giving more money.

But since i am smart i will ask another important philosophical
question, and it is the following:

Does parliamentary democracy has requirements, and wich requirements it has:

From my above logical proof we can say that the first requirement of
parliamentary democracy is: it is the Elites that must govern and guide
people, and from the first requirement we can logically infer that the
Elites must be competent, so we can logically infer the since they have
to be competent so then we can say the the second requirement of
parliamentary democracy that it must be meritocratic, and the third
requirement of parliamentary democracy is also an important requirement
and it is that we have to have a constitution that says that
parliamentary democracy has to have law enforcement agencies like the
USA FBI and military as necessary basic requirements for a country, and
a country can become a more global world like European union or such.

More political philosophy about the mechanisms of Democracy..

I think that we have to be smart, since i have just written the
following about China and Russia of year 2010 and 2012:


----


More about China and Russia and other such countries education system..

I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have invented many
scalable algorithms, read the following:


“Corruption is pervasive in every part of Chinese society, and education
is no exception,” Mr. Li said.

A Chinese Education, for a Price

Read more here:


https://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/22/world/asia/in-china-schools-a-culture-of-bribery-spreads.html


I think we can not be confident with the Chinese education system, and i
don't think it is meritocratic !

It is the same problem in Russia, read the following to notice it:

Mark Levin, a professor at the Higher School of Economics in Moscow who
has studied the issue, said corruption in universities took place not
only during the entrance examinations but also those at the end of
semesters. Levin said some students preferred to pay money to pass
examinations and obtain a diploma.

RUSSIA: Rising corruption threatens universities

Read more here:

https://www.universityworldnews.com/post.php?story=20100514205552600#:~:text=According%20to%20necessarily%20rough%20estimates,in%202009%20totalled%20%241%20billion.&text=But%2C%20despite%20the%20country's%20increased,much%20the%20salaries%20actually%20are.

----


And also i have just posted about the today China after the
anti-corruption compaign in China, read the following:


---


I invite you to read the following interesting article:

China’s Anti-Corruption Campaign and the Challenges of Political Meritocracy

https://americanaffairsjournal.org/2020/05/chinas-anti-corruption-campaign-and-the-challenges-of-political-meritocracy/


---


So as you are noticing from my above writing that corruption can corrupt
the education system and when education system is corrupt then the
Meritocratic system is corrupt and this is dangerous. So even after the
anti-corruption compaign in China , i think that Dictatorship of China
is not so efficient at fighting corruption, because Democracy is much
better at fighting corruption by competitive elections and free press,
read my following thoughts to understand more:

From where people get a correct judgment in Democracy ?

So you are noticing that to be able to be good judgment in Democracy,
you have to be correct "Elitism" that guides people, and you have to be
Meritocracy to be able to be the necessary quality or perfection, but
then you are noticing that to be able to be Meritocracy there must be a
reward for the merit, by for example rewarding by giving more money.

Now why to be Democracy ?

I think that we have to be more smart and notice that Democracy is also
smart, the big benefits of democracy that it is also like a morality
that is a diversity that prioritize by giving weights to some important
things and processes to be able to succeed, for example
if i ask a question of how to be less corruption ? i think that
Democracy is an enhanced system that fights corruption more efficiently
than dictatorship, i think this is understandable because to be able to
"escape" a local maximum towards a global maximum(like in artificial
intelligence) on efficiency of fighting corruption (and corruption also
means lack of efficiency), we have to be able to vote for another
political party that is more apt and more efficient at fighting
corruption, this is why i think that democracy is better at fighting
corruption, also i think that in democracy the governance must be a
"competent" governance this is how we will enhance democracy to be the best.

More of my philosophy of how to become happy in my philosophy..

I think i am a philosopher that is smart, and i have to make you
understand holistically my new philosophy, so in my new philosophy you
have to be "hope" and how to be this hope ? the answer is
in my philosophy that says that you have to first to know how to
be this kind of alternance of the day and night in your human life that
i am talking about in my philosophy, and this is the first step, but
hope comes from the fact that after some time by being this kind of
alternance of the day and night, you can become peace that
permits you to be much more happy by understanding my following proverb:

Here is my new proverb in english and french:

"In my philosophy our past and our future prevent us from living
peacefully our present, so the best way is to be much more peace by
being Stability that is obtained with the force of perfection, because
when you become more perfect you increase your strenghts , then you
resist better instabilities, and I think this is like a law of Morality"

"Dans ma philosophie notre passé et notre futur nous empêchent de vivre
paisiblement notre présent, donc le meilleur moyen est d'être beaucoup
plus de paix en étant la stabilité qui s'obtient avec la force de la
perfection, car quand tu deviens plus parfait tu augmentes tes forces,
alors tu résistes mieux aux instabilités, et je pense que c'est comme
une loi de la morale"

And you have to understand the rest of my new philosophy by reading
my following thoughts:

How can you effectively "measure" how to appreciate human life ?

I think the most important thing is to know that we can measure it
relatively or absolutely, so wich one of the absolute or relative
measure is the right way of measuring ? so now you have to know that
i think that the meaning of human life can not be measured like
absolutely like was doing the philosopher Albert Camus since you will
start to say by measuring like absolutely that human life is "absurd",
and this is not good at all, so now you have to understand the very
basis of philosophy, that philosophy has to give you the will to survive
or the will to live, so then you logically notice that we can say that a
human is smart if he is smart relatively to the distribution of
smartness of humans or such, but if you start to measure it like
absolutely by saying that the smart human is not smart when you look at
all or measuring it by all the difficulties and constraints of our world
or of our universe, i think it is not the right way to do in philosophy,
since you have to give the will to people so that they survive and so
that they live, also you have to give a meaning to human life as
i am doing it in my philosophy(read about it below), so now i
can finally say that you are understanding the how to answer the
above philosophical question since you have to measure how
to appreciate human life "relatively" and "not" like absolutely by
looking at how our past humanity was much less advanced than our today
humanity etc. and so the other important thing is to also understand the
basis of my philosophy by reading it below:

I think that my philosophy is more smart, since in my philosophy
i am also explaining that the day permits to understand the night and
human life is like the alternance of the day and night that brings
beauty, since human life is difficulties and suffering that also permit
us to appreciate much more human life or that permits us to appreciate
much more our kind of civilization and i say in my philosophy that it
also gives more intensity to pleasures of life, so my philosophy doesn't
look like the other philosophies, so i invite you to holistically
understand my philosophy by carefully reading it here:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/YZSYxV41-qI

And read my other thoughts of my philosophy here:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/8jzgRGMOEHs

I invite you to look at the following interesting video of the good
Entrepreneurial Spirit of USA:

Small Business Revolution Documentary | The Entrepreneurial Spirit of
America

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kik50Ash6Ts

I am finding the good Entrepreneurial Spirit of USA really amazing,
and i think that it is what makes USA great, and i am very confident
that USA can adapt quickly since USA is a great country, but i can ask a
philosophical question of from where comes the american dream ? i think
that the american dream comes from the fact that you have to know how to
"specialize" in your strong aptitude or aptitudes so that to be
successful, since you can notice that the division of Labor and
specialization have enhanced much more efficiency and have enhanced
much more productivity, also read my following thoughts so that to
understand:

More of my philosophy about what is the american dream..

I will ask a philosophical question of:

Does the american dream exists? and if it exists what is it ?

I think the american dream is the fact that becoming rich doesn't come
only from being smart, since becoming rich can come from "creativity",
and I have just talked before about the importance of the following
statement in business:

"The focus should be on the product, since if the product is good
the profits will follow"

But notice that it is saying that if the product is good then the
profits will follow, so as you are noticing we have to define what
is a good product or service ? and does a good product or service only
comes from science or from engineering or from being smart? not at all
!, since the product and service can become good by the process of
creativity, and then we have to define creativity, and creativity needs
globalization, since creativity and innovation come from ideas
circulating and combining across nations and industries, and i invite
you to read about what is creativity in the following interesting web
page from Yale university:

What Is Creativity?

https://insights.som.yale.edu/insights/what-is-creativity

And is the american dream the working hard ? i don't think so,
since i think that working efficiently is the the good way,
since read my following writing so that to notice it:

I invite you to look at the following interesting video to understand
that working efficiently can make you work much less hours,
for example Germany works really efficiently and it works much
less hours than Mexico or USA, so i invite you to look
at the following interesting video so that to understand
that working efficiently is a great thing:

Why is working harder making us poorer?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hD784CHYhGM


Here is my new proverb in english and french:

"In my philosophy our past and our future prevent us from living
peacefully our present, so the best way is to be much more peace by
being Stability that is obtained with the force of perfection, because
when you become more perfect you increase your strenghts , then you
resist better instabilities, and I think this is like a law of Morality"

"Dans ma philosophie notre passé et notre futur nous empêchent de vivre
paisiblement notre présent, donc le meilleur moyen est d'être beaucoup
plus de paix en étant la stabilité qui s'obtient avec la force de la
perfection, car quand tu deviens plus parfait tu augmentes tes forces,
alors tu résistes mieux aux instabilités, et je pense que c'est comme
une loi de la morale"

More of my philosophy about division of Labor and specialization and
about my personality..

Now you have seen me talking to you about how to also become successful,
read my thoughts about it below, and now i have to talk to you not about
my weaknesses if i have any, but about my strong aptitudes, so as you
are noticing i am not saying that i have only one strong aptitude, since
i think i have many strong aptitudes, here they are:

1- I can rapidly think and write an efficient book about my philosophy
and i think it will be successful, and i think i will sell it.

2- I can think fast and write fast beautiful poetry of Love etc.


3- I have invented many interesting proverbs and i am still inventing
other proverbs.

4- I am an inventor who has invented many scalable algorithms and
algorithms and i am still inventing scalable algorithms and
algorithms, and i think i will integrate some of them with some of my
softwares that i will sell.

5- I have invented powerful software tools for parallellism
etc. that i will sell

6- I will write two powerful books, one about my scalable algorithms and
algorithms and about parallelism and i will sell them.


You can read more about my education and my way of doing here:

Here is more proof of the fact that i have invented many scalable
algorithms and algorithms:

https://groups.google.com/g/comp.programming.threads/c/V9Go8fbF10k

More of my philosophy about poetry and art and philosophy and more..

I think i am a philosopher that is smart and you will know more
about me since i am writing an efficient book of my philosophy
that i think i will sell, and i have just added much more creative ideas
to my philosophy, so i think it will be successful, but i will talk much
more about some of my ideas, here they are:

I think that humans come with weaknesses, but humans that have
weaknesses also can have strong aptitude or aptitudes, so then
if a human comes with weaknesses and a strong aptitude or aptitudes ,
he has to become like strong by being specialized in his strong aptitude
or aptitudes so that to be successful and he has to minimize at best
his defects that comes from his weaknesses, so it looks like the
division of Labor and specialization that enhance productivity etc.

I will give you a quick example, and here it is:

So i invite you to listen to the following beautiful song:

Mira Como Baila

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UEjT2XzcD1U

So if you are smart you will notice that the above beautiful song
is doing the same, since it is being like specialized and by minimizing
at best the defects from the weaknesses, since notice that the music
is like perfect, but notice that there is just few words in the song so
that to make it perfect by minimizing the defects from the weaknesses
that comes from the words of the song. And if you look carefully
at my poems of Love you will notice that i am doing the same.

And read my following thoughts so that to know more about the division
of Labor and about specialization and about productivity:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/AECrpm1IDTA


More of my philosophy about the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche and more..

I have just looked at the following video about:

NIETZSCHE - L'exaltation de la vie

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WeVVtxlg_oE

I think i am a philosopher that is smart, and i think that the
philosophy of the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche is not good, since
he says that: "C'est la volonté de puissance qui doit s'exprimer, non
pas la morale des esclaves ou des faibles.", that means in english: "It
is the will to power that must be expressed, not the morals of the
slaves or the weak.", and he said that it needs to construct a new man
that we call the superhuman, but I think that i am a philosopher that is
smart and i am understanding the philosophy of the philosopher Friedrich
Nietzsche, and i think that it is an inferior philosophy, because it
seeks to construct the superhumans from humans and this superhuman in
the philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche is a superhuman that has mastery
over his emotions and it is a superhuman who takes joy in simply
existing, so as you are noticing that it is an inferior philosophy,
because how can you be able to take joy in simply existing ? so as you
are noticing it is illogical and it is as illogical as Stoicism(read my
below thoughts about Stoicism) and i think that it is a violent
philosophy as Stoicism, this is why the philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsch
is a failure as Stoicism, and here is what i said about Stoicism:

More of my philosophy about my philosophy and about Stoicism and
Existentialism..

I invite you to read this very interesting article about philosophy:

Why philosophers could be the ones to transform your 2020

https://www.bbc.com/culture/article/20200114-why-philosophers-could-be-the-ones-to-transform-your-2020

And notice that it says the following:

“The Stoics suggest that what’s most important in order to lead a good
life is internal rather than external. It’s about developing the right
character, the right state of mind,”

I think i am a philosopher that is "smart", so i make you notice the
logical bug in the above saying about Stoicism, and it is that
developing the right character and the right state of the mind in
Stoicism needs the cultural side that also comes from the external
reality and hence from the "purpose" and the "meaning of life", and we
can notice that Stoicism is not so smart, because how can we develop
self-control and fortitude as a means of overcoming destructive emotions
and such without the necessary requirements that have to give enough
hope or a meaning of life that gives the necessary self-control and
fortitude? so this is why i think that Stoicism as a philosophy is a
failure, so what's about existentialism of the philosopher Jean-Paul
Sartre ? Jean-Paul Sartre said that: "Existence precedes essence" or in
french: "L'existence précède l'essence", and it is the central claim of
existentialism of the philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre, but i think that
this claim is not so logical, since it is like a debate that asks the
question of: Wich is more important, the genetical side or cultural
side?, and we have to notice that the essence or nature of a human is
"not" enough and it needs for example a meaning of human life and a
purpose etc. so then notice that existentialism of Jean-Paul Sartre, and
like in absurdism of the philosopher Albert Camus, says that human life
is absurd, but here again my new philosophy says that human life is not
absurd, and read it below.

My philosophy about the philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre and more..

I invite you to look at the following video about philosophy:

SARTRE - Le regard des autres

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BJIM41TnDHI

I have just noticed by looking at the above video, that it is lacking,
since first you have to understand the following:

Jean-Paul Sartre said that: "Existence precedes essence" or in french:
"L'existence précède l'essence", and it is the central claim of
existentialism of the philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre.

But i think people are not understanding the philosopher Jean-Paul
Sartre, since the functionality of our essence is also our genetics that
predetermines to a certain level what is our existence, so the essence
that is our genetics is also important, but since the philosopher
Jean-Paul Sartre was a communist, he has wanted to give much more "hope"
by saying: "Existence precedes essence", and i think this also means that
humans are by essence free, and this also means that the human nurture
is much more important than the human nature, but it is not truth, so i
think that Jean-Paul Sartre has made a big error by saying so. And
Jean-Paul Sartre has also accepted the views of the philosopher Albert
Camus about the absurdism of existence, but i am a philosopher and here
again i am not in accordand with it, since i say that human existence is
not absurd, and read my below thoughts to understand my philosophy:

How can you effectively "measure" how to appreciate human life ?

I think the most important thing is to know that we can measure it
relatively or absolutely, so wich one of the absolute or relative
measure is the right way of measuring ? so now you have to know that
i think that the meaning of human life can not be measured like
absolutely like was doing the philosopher Albert Camus since you will
start to say by measuring like absolutely that human life is "absurd",
and this is not good at all, so now you have to understand the very
basis of philosophy, that philosophy has to give you the will to survive
or the will to live, so then you logically notice that we can say that a
human is smart if he is smart relatively to the distribution of
smartness of humans or such, but if you start to measure it like
absolutely by saying that the smart human is not smart when you look at
all or measuring it by all the difficulties and constraints of our world
or of our universe, i think it is not the right way to do in philosophy,
since you have to give the will to people so that they survive and so
that they live, also you have to give a meaning to human life as
i am doing it in my philosophy(read about it below), so now i
can finally say that you are understanding the how to answer the
above philosophical question since you have to measure how
to appreciate human life "relatively" and "not" like absolutely by
looking at how our past humanity was much less advanced than our today
humanity etc. and so the other important thing is to also understand the
basis of my philosophy by reading it below:

I think that my philosophy is more smart, since in my philosophy
i am also explaining that the day permits to understand the night and
human life is like the alternance of the day and night that brings
beauty, since human life is difficulties and suffering that also permit
us to appreciate much more human life or that permits us to appreciate
much more our kind of civilization and i say in my philosophy that it
also gives more intensity to pleasures of life, so my philosophy doesn't
look like the other philosophies, so i invite you to holistically
understand my philosophy by carefully reading it here:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/YZSYxV41-qI

And read my other thoughts of my philosophy here:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/8jzgRGMOEHs

More of my philosophy about sex and about civilization..

I think i am smart, and when i look at sex, it is like layers of
sophistication from the low unsophisticated layer that is sex that comes
from our animal instincts to the much higher layer of sophistication
that transcend our animal instincts, sex is for me like an inferior
state of being alcoholic, since sex is for me a really inferior thing,
this is why i am working harder so that to transcend
towards a much higher level of sophistication, and this is
why you are seeing me talking about universal Love as i am talking, and
this is why i am talking about my philosophy and about my strengths,
so you have to read my below thoughts carefully so that to
understand my way of thinking and doing:

More of my philosophy about Gays and Lesbians and bisexuals..

I invite you to look at the following video about gays and lesbians in
France:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZgOcE27EXN0

I have just quickly noticed how gays and lesbians and bisexuals of the
above video speak about there weaknesses, so i think that gays and
lesbians and bisexuals have the tendencies to speak about there
weaknesses as such, and it is not my way of doing, and as i can say in
french: "Si j'ai un bouton moche sur mon corps qui ne part pas,
devrais-je parler aux autres de ce bouton moche ? alors tu comprends
bien que ce n'est pas la bonne méthode de faire, car c'est mal vu de
parler ainsi de ses faiblesses aux autres, alors comme tu comprends bien
il faut du savoir-vivre ensemble, car les relations humaines ont besoin
de règles à suivre."

Here is the translation in english:

"If I have an ugly pimple on my body that won't go away, should I tell
others about that ugly pimple? So you understand that this is not the
right way to do, because it is frowned upon to talk about your
weaknesses to others in this way, so as you understand well, you have to
know that human relationships need rules to follow so that to be able
for us to be organized correctly into a society."

This is why you are noticing that i am talking as i am talking by also
showing my strenghts to others, so i invite you to read my following
thoughts so that to understand my kind of personality:

More of my philosophy about what is the american dream..

I will ask a philosophical question of:

Does the american dream exists? and if it exists what is it ?

I think the american dream is the fact that becoming rich doesn't come
only from being smart, since becoming rich can come from "creativity",
and I have just talked before about the importance of the following
statement in business:

"The focus should be on the product, since if the product is good
the profits will follow"

But notice that it is saying that if the product is good then the
profits will follow, so as you are noticing we have to define what
is a good product or service ? and does a good product or service only
comes from science or from engineering or from being smart? not at all
!, since the product and service can become good by the process of
creativity, and then we have to define creativity, and creativity needs
globalization, since creativity and innovation come from ideas
circulating and combining across nations and industries, and i invite
you to read about what is creativity in the following interesting web
page from Yale university:

What Is Creativity?

https://insights.som.yale.edu/insights/what-is-creativity

And is the american dream the working hard ? i don't think so,
since i think that working efficiently is the the good way,
since read my following writing so that to notice it:

I invite you to look at the following interesting video to understand
that working efficiently can make you work much less hours,
for example Germany works really efficiently and it works much
less hours than Mexico or USA, so i invite you to look
at the following interesting video so that to understand
that working efficiently is a great thing:

Why is working harder making us poorer?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hD784CHYhGM

More of philosophy about one of my proverbs about intellectual openness
and more..

I think i have just invented fast a proverb and i think it is really
important, and here it is:

"Human vitality comes from intellectual openness and intellectual
openness also comes from divergent thinking and you have to well balance
divergent thinking with convergent thinking so that to converge towards
the global optimum of efficiency and not get stuck on a local optimum of
efficiency, and this kind of well balancing makes the good creativity."

And i will explain more my proverb so that you understand it:

I think that divergent thinking is thought process or method used to
generate creative ideas by exploring many possible solutions, but notice
that we even need openness in a form of economic actors that share ideas
across nations and industries (and this needs globalization) that make
us much more creative and that's good for economy, since you can easily
notice that globalization also brings a kind of optimality to divergent
thinking, and also you have to know how to balance divergent thinking
with convergent thinking, since if divergent thinking is much greater
than convergent thinking it can become costly in terms of time, and if
the convergent thinking is much greater than divergent thinking you can
get stuck on local optimum of efficiency and not converge to a global
optimum of efficiency, and it is related to my following thoughts about
the philosopher and economist Adam Smith, so i invite you to read them:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/ftf3lx5Rzxo

More of my philosophy about is Human smartness just a particular
survival strategy..

I think i am a smart philosopher and i will explain more,
notice in my below writing that the Senior Consultant (and former
Editor-in-Chief and Publishing Director) of New Scientist and Author of
After the Ice said the following:

"Human "smartness" is just a particular survival strategy"

I think it is stupid, because when you become rich using your smartness
you transcend "survival" and you cease to use smartness as only
a survival strategy and you can start to use your smartness to become
more and more rich or/and to living a much better human life etc. or
when you have a high salary you are not thinking much of the time about
survival since survival is only to remain alive, but you are living and
being in a much better human condition, so this proves that Human
smartness is not just a particular survival strategy.

More of my philosophy about beauty and about human smartness..

I think i am a philosopher that is smart, and as you have just noticed
i have just explained more the basis of my philosophy(read it below)
and now i will ask two philosophical questions and they are the following:

Are humans smarter than other animals?

And does universal beauty exists ?

So i will answer the first philosophical question by saying the following:

So i will start it by inviting you to read carefully the following
webpage from a Senior Consultant (and former Editor-in-Chief and
Publishing Director) of New Scientist and Author of After the Ice:

Why are humans smarter than other animals?

https://www.edge.org/response-detail/12021

So as you are noticing he is saying the following:


--
"The idea of human superiority should have died when Darwin came on the
scene.
Unfortunately, the full implications of what he said have been difficult
to take in: there is no Great Chain of Being, no higher and no lower.
All creatures have adapted effectively to their own environments in
their own way. Human "smartness" is just a particular survival strategy
among many others, not the top of a long ladder. It took a surprisingly
long time for scientists to grasp this. For decades, comparative
psychologists tried to work out the learning abilities of different
species so that they could be arranged on a single scale. Animal
equivalents of intelligence tests were used and people seriously asked
whether fish were smarter than birds. It took the new science of
ethology, created by Nobel-prize winners Konrad Lorenz, Niko Tinbergen
and Karl von Frisch, to show that each species had the abilities it
needed for its own lifestyle and they could not be not arranged on a
universal scale. Human smartness is no smarter than anyone else's
smartness. The question should have died for good."
--


So i think i am smart and say that the above webpage is not so smart,
because the logical reasoning defect is that he is first saying the
following:


"Human "smartness" is just a particular survival strategy"


This is the first logical defect, since he is like using boolean logic
by saying that human smartness is only a particular survival strategy,
and this is not correct logical reasoning, because we have like to be
fuzzy logic and say that not all humans are using smartness for only
survival, since we are not like animals, since we have not to think it
only societally, but we can also say there is a great proportion of
humans that have transcended there "survival" condition with there
smartness to be a much better human condition than only survival. So now
we can say with human smartness (and measure it with human smartness)
that the humans that have transcended there "survival" condition with
there smartness to be a much better human condition have a much superior
smartness than animals, since we can measure it with human smartness,
and here is the definition of surviving in the dictionary:

https://www.dictionary.com/browse/survive

So as you are noticing that survival is only to remain alive, so i am
logical in my thoughts above.

The second logical defect of the above webpage is the following:

Notice that the above webpage that he is saying the following:

"Strangley enough, even evolutionary biologists still get caught up with
the notion that humans stand at the apex of existence. There are
endless books from evolutionary biologists speculating on the reasons
why humans evolved such wonderful big brains, but a complete absence of
those which ask if a big brains is a really useful organ to have. The
evidence is far from persuasive. If you look at a wide range of
organisms, those with bigger brains are generally no more successful
than those with smaller brains — hey go extinct just as fast."

So i think that the above webpage is not right.

So notice again that he is saying that the brain must be successful in
survival, and this is not correct reasoning, since as i said above
smartness is not only about survival, since we have to measure it with
our smartness and notice that from also my above thoughts that we can be
humans that are much more smart than animals even if we go extinct.

So the important thing to notice in my above logical reasoning , is that
you have to measure smartness with smartness, it is the same as my
following logical proof about: Is beauty universal ? , here it is , read
it carefully:

I will make you understand with smartness what about the following webpage:

Look at the following webpage from BBC:

The myth of universal beauty

https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20150622-the-myth-of-universal-beauty

So notice in the above webpage that it is saying the following about beauty:

"Where starvation is a risk, heavier weight is more attractive"

So you have to understand that the above webpage from BBC is not smart,
i will make you understand with smartness that beauty is universal, so
if we take the following sentence of the above webpage:

"Where starvation is a risk, heavier weight is more attractive"

So you have to put it in the context of the above webpage, and
understand that the way of thinking of the webpage from BBC is not
smart, because it is saying that since in the above sentence starvation
is a risk , so heavier weight can be more attractive, but this can be
heavier weight that is not beautiful for the eyes, so it makes a
conclusion that universal beauty is not universal, but this is not smart
because we have not to measure beautifulness with only our eyes and
say that heavier weight that is not beautiful for the eyes is not
beautiful, because we have to measure it with smartness and say that
smartness says that in the above sentence that heavier weight that is
not beautiful for the eyes is beautiful for smartness because
starvation is a risk, so then with smartness we can say that beauty is
universal. So we have to know that that the system of reference of
measure is very important, by logical analogy we can say that measuring
beautifulness with the eyes is like measuring individual smartness with
only genetics, but measuring beautifulness with both the eyes and
smartness is like measuring individual smartness with both the
genetical and the cultural.

More of my philosophy about the problems of our humanity..

I think the Climate crisis that is a term describing global warming and
climate change will be solved by using science and technology and i have
posted about the new technologies that will be used to solve it, and i
think we can fix capitalism using some reforms and it is not so
difficult, but there is some problems that remain and they are the
following:

As you have noticed(read below), the global average ecological footprint
is 2.84 gha per person while the average biocapacity is 1.68 gha per
person; it takes 1.69 Earth to cover the consumption of humanity; and
this global average ecological footprint brings problems, so this global
average ecological footprint is growing more and more,
so economic growth can be separated from unsustainable resource
consumption and harmful pollution. It is what our humanity has to do by
also using science and technology.

Some benchmarks for the year 2014:

The global average ecological footprint is 2.84 gha per person while the
average biocapacity is 1.68 gha per person; it takes 1.69 Earth to cover
the consumption of humanity; and this global average ecological
footprint brings problems.

A French person needs 4.7 gha to maintain his standard of living. If all
humans consumed as much as a Frenchman, we would need 2.79 planets;

An American needs 8.37 gha for his consumption. If all humans consumed
like an American, we would need 4.97 planets;

A Brazilian has an ecological footprint of 3.08 hag (1.83 planet);

A Chinese has a footprint of 3.71 hag (2.21 planets);

An Indian has a footprint of 1.12 hag (0.67 planet).

a Haitian has a footprint of 0.67 hag (0.4 planet).


And the other problem that remains is the following:

Look at the following video to understand it:

Global Junk Food: How the Western Food Industry is Making Poor Countries Fat

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uEJwbGBrXfk


Yet more of my philosophy about capitalism..


I just written the following:

---

More philosophy about why raising taxes destroys the economy and more..


I invite you to look at the following interesting video:

Why raising taxes destroys the economy

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GChpnX44_Ns

So i think you are understanding more that raising taxes destroys
economy, so there remains an important thing and it is that we have to
fix capitalism in a smart way by more-effective regulation and not by
raising taxes, since there remain the following problem, read about it here:

One last chance to fix capitalism

https://hbr.org/2020/03/one-last-chance-to-fix-capitalism

---


So i invite you to look at the following video about capitalism:

How to Improve Capitalism

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YOaJe68C-bU

So as you notice in the above video that you can also fix capitalism by
giving voting rights and tax advantages to long-term shareholders and
not by raising taxes, and you need to have sovereign wealth funds and
national pension funds representative of the long term collective
interests etc, so i invite you to look the above video of "How to
improve capitalism" so that to understand more.

More of my philosophy about relative and absolute measuring..

I think i am a philosopher that is smart, so i will ask
a philosophical question of:

How can you effectively "measure" how to appreciate human life ?

I think the most important thing is to know that we can measure it
relatively or absolutely, so wich one of the absolute or relative
measure is the right way of measuring ? so now you have to know that
i think that the meaning of human life can not be measured like
absolutely like was doing the philosopher Albert Camus since you will
start to say by measuring like absolutely that human life is "absurd",
and this is not good at all, so now you have to understand the very
basis of philosophy, that philosophy has to give you the will to survive
or the will to live, so then you logically notice that we can say that a
human is smart if he is smart relatively to the distribution of
smartness of humans or such, but if you start to measure it like
absolutely by saying that the smart human is not smart when you look at
all or measuring it by all the difficulties and constraints of our world
or of our universe, i think it is not the right way to do in philosophy,
since you have to give the will to people so that they survive and so
that they live, also you have to give a meaning to human life as
i am doing it in my philosophy(read about it below), so now i
can finally say that you are understanding the how to answer the
above philosophical question since you have to measure how
to appreciate human life "relatively" and "not" like absolutely by
looking at how our past humanity was much less advanced than our today
humanity etc. and so the other important thing is to also understand the
basis of my philosophy by reading it below:

More of my philosophy about my philosophy..

I think i am a philosopher that is smart, and i have just looked
at the following video about Hedonism, i invite you to look at it:

Why Hedonism Fails

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yiFJpsbVCpM

But i think that my philosophy is more smart, since in my philosophy
i am also explaining that the day permits to understand the night and
human life is like the alternance of the day and night that brings
beauty, since human life is difficulties and suffering that also permit
us to appreciate much more human life or that permits us to appreciate
much more our kind of civilization and i say in my philosophy that it
also gives more intensity to pleasures of life, so my philosophy doesn't
look like the other philosophies, so i invite you to holistically
understand my philosophy by carefully reading it here:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/YZSYxV41-qI

And read my other thoughts of my philosophy here:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/8jzgRGMOEHs

More of my philosophy about arabs and muslims in western countries..

I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..

I invite you to look at this interesting video about muslim immigrants
in Norway:

Norway's Muslim immigrants attend classes on western attitudes to women

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oKY600o3CXw

I think that the norwegians don't understand correctly what is
arab and muslim countries and don't understand arab and muslim people,
and since i am a white arab , i invite to read my following proverbs and
thoughts so that to understand more arabs and muslims:

More of my philosophy about humans animal instincts..

I think i am smart, and i will say that humans are behaving like
inferior animals since they are also guided by there "tendencies" of
there animal instincts that want to be too much individualistic or
hedonistic or to want beautiful womens or need to make much more sex
with beautiful womens etc. but i think that the right way is that they
have to love and want to be morality and order, so it is by logical
analogy like my following proverb:

"There is an important difference between the appearance of a reality
and the truth of a reality, this is why in science you have not to be
confident with the appearances, since in science you have to understand
the truth, so, to be able to understand the truth you have to know how
to be patience before understanding the truth and not to rush in like a
fool by lack of wisdom "

The appearance of a reality in my proverb above is by logical analogy
like the tendencies brought by animal instincts of humans that make us
not walk in or take the right path, so we have to educate correctly
humans and to make them love and want to be morality and order.

And i think i am a wise type of person and here my other proverb about
the wise man:

"A wise man is by "logical" analogy like the person that knows how to
prepare a good meal from ingredients, since a wise man is the one that
knows how to prepare a well organized society or well organized global
world from the people."

And Here is all my other new proverbs that i have invented fast:

"When you like a beautiful song, you will have the strong tendency
to want to hear it or to buy it, but when you are maturity of
responsability, it can become that you have to like the responsability
of hearing or buying the song and not the beauty of the song, so when
you are intellectual maturity you will start to think about responsability."

Here is my new proverb:

"When you are still organized like human animals you will have the
strong tendency to want to marry with a beautiful women, but when you
are critical thinking you have to ask yourself if all of us have to
marry a beautiful women. So when you are critical thinking you have to
think systemically about order"

Here is my other new proverb:

There is some french that say: "On doit manier bien le verbe", "That we
have to speak or write a sophisticated language" , but they do not say
that speaking or writing a sophisticated language can become a deadly or
dangerous weapon, so i answer them in french: "Il faut aussi enseigner
le savoir vivre ensemble en enseignant aussi une philosophie efficace de
vie", that means in english: "That we have to efficiently educate people
by also learning them a good and efficient philosophy so that they know
how to live in harmony", so as you are noticing that it needs a good
philosophy so that to avoid the mess of Israel.

More philosophy about the problem of western white Europeans..

I have looked at many videos about western white Europeans life style,
i am not speaking about north americans, and i think i have found the
problem of western white Europeans, and here it is, it is what we call
Hedonism, and i invite you to look at the following video so that to
understand:

Why Hedonism fails

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yiFJpsbVCpM

And i think that my philosophy is not Hedonism, but you have
to understand it holistically so that to understand it correctly,
so i invite you to read my thoughts of my philosophy so that
to understand, and here they are:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/YZSYxV41-qI

And read my other thoughts of my philosophy here:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/8jzgRGMOEHs

More of my philosophy about my emancipation..

I am not like the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer movement
and i am not like the feminist movement or such organized groups, i am
alone constructing my emancipation by for example speaking and writing
french and english and arabic , but speaking and writing three languages
is not sufficient for me, so i have also got a Diploma in
microelectronics and informatics, and i have studied operational
research(it uses a lot of mathematics), and i have studied network
administration and i have worked as a network administrator, and i have
also worked as a software programmer consultant for many companies and i
have worked as a software programmer consultant for some hospitals in
USA, but it was not sufficient for me, so i have invented some softwares
such as my PerlZip that looks like PkZip from PkWare and i have sold it
to many companies and individuals around the world, and this was not
sufficient for me, so i have also invented many scalable algorithms and
algorithms and i have invented some very powerful software tools that i
will sell, and i am also writing two books about software programming
that i will sell, so i am alone constructing my "big" business by
inventing scalable algorithm and algorithms and by inventing powerful
software tools and by writing some important books in computer
programming and i will use exponential thinking and exponential growth
of capitalism so that to become powerful and rich.

You can read more about my education and my way of doing here:

Here is more proof of the fact that i have invented many scalable
algorithms and algorithms:

https://groups.google.com/g/comp.programming.threads/c/V9Go8fbF10k

More of my philosophy about money..

I think i am smart, and what do i think about money ?

Here is my thoughts of my philosophy and my other proverb about it:

More philosophy about adaptation..

As you have just noticed i have just written a proverb about adaptation
by saying: "You have to master the tools of adaptation", notice
that we can say: "the tools for adaptation" or "the tool of adaptation",
read in the following dictionary of psychology, and you will notice that
it is saying the "tools of intellectual adaptation", read here to notice it:

https://dictionary.apa.org/tools-of-intellectual-adaptation

So this proves that the saying of my proverb is correct, here is
my just new proverb and notice it:

"You have to master the tools of adaptation, such as having
a good education with a good education system, since getting
rich quickly is not the wise thing to do, since mastering the
tools of adaptation like having a good education will allow
you to get rich and will allow you to keep you rich."

More of my philosophy about Liberty and emancipation..

Now i want to talk about "emancipation", so i think you already know the
emancipation that comes from the feminist ideas, but how do you think i
am doing it ? i am not thinking about sexual emancipation because sex is
an inferior thing for me and read below how i am explaining it , so the
way that i am doing it is that i am seeking emancipation by using
exponential growth of capitalism and exponential thinking, i am not like
the feminist movement, i am not like a group, i am alone constructing my
"big" business by inventing scalable algorithm and algorithms and by
inventing powerful software tools and i will use exponential thinking
and exponential growth of capitalism so that to become powerful and rich.

More of my philosophy about dignity..

I want you to understand more my way of doing, i am for example
writing and posting my poems of Love and my thoughts of my philosophy in
front of you since i am constructing "confidence" and "order", and this
confidence and order for me is like the basis of universal Love,
since when you take a look at someone and you are confident with his
actions and he is also the right order, then this can easily become
Love, so i am of the ones that are convinced that we have to be this
kind of dignity that brings the universal Love, also i am working on
other of my software projects, for example i am actually writing two
important books about software programming and about my scalable
algorithms and algorithms that i will sell, also i will sell some of my
powerful software tools that i have invented and i think all this will
permit me to become rich, and as soon as i will become rich i will also
help the poor and needy people with my money, since being charity with
the poor and needy people is an important thing for me.

More precision and more philosophy about capitalism..

I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..

I think i am understanding more, since i think that capitalism
is not savagery, since i think it only needs some reforms, so when
you look at capitalism, it permits also the exponential progress
of our humanity that is powerful, so i think that we have not
to be pessimistic about capitalism, since i think that we don't need
a violent revolution but we need the following reforms:

I invite you to read the following interesting article:

One last chance to fix capitalism

https://hbr.org/2020/03/one-last-chance-to-fix-capitalism

So as you notice that the above interesting article says that so that to
fix capitalism it needs more-effective regulation, progressive taxation,
wealth taxes, or other measures.

More of my philosophy about our today world..

I am a techno-optimist and i think by looking at the exponential
progress of our humanity i think that we have to be optimistic about it,
also you have to read my following thoughts:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/2ws8UPouQbE

So as you notice my above previous thoughts in the above web link are
in accordance with the following new interesting article, and i invite
you to read it carefully:

Life in 2050: A Glimpse at Medicine in the Future

https://interestingengineering.com/life-in-2050-a-glimpse-at-medicine-in-the-future

And there is still an important thing to say and it is that
of the intellectual taste that we have to enhance much more so that
to push the quality of products and services upward and i think it is a
process that is so important, and you have to read about it here in my
thoughts of my philosophy about Adam Smith economist and philosopher:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/ftf3lx5Rzxo

More of my philosophy about the way of how i am solving the problem of
egoism and materialism..

I think i am a smart philosopher, you have to understand more
how i am solving the problem of egoism and materialism, so
i am showing you(read below) that egoism comes from normal
desire of being rich, since when you are not rich you are
not positive and not happy, so this causes that you are "egoistic" with
others, so then the problem becomes: How to make the not rich being
happy without being rich so that to not be egoistic with others?, and
this is what is explaining my philosophy, read it below:

More philosophy about the way of solving the problem of egoism and
materialism..

Here is more proof of the fact that i have invented many scalable
algorithms and algorithms:

https://groups.google.com/g/comp.programming.threads/c/V9Go8fbF10k

I have just written the following:

---

More philosophy about the human desire and human egoism..

I think i am a philosopher that is smart, and i think that
the problem comes not only from egoism but from the human "desire",
but here again we have to logically "distinguish", since we can
ask a philosophical question of what is the normal desire ?
so you can for example say that the constraints of human life
require from us to be rich so that to be happy, so the normal desire
becomes the desire of being rich, so this kind of normal desire makes us
egoist, so as you are noticing this becomes a psychologically normal
behavior, so then as you are noticing that we have to be smart and think
more, so how can we solve the problem ? i think that i am a smart
philosopher and i have solved the problem by bringing my thoughts of my
philosophy, and you can read how i have solved the problem here in my
thoughts of my philosophy, read it carefully here:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/YZSYxV41-qI

And i have talked above about human desire and about egoism, and to
understand more about human egoism, i invite you to read my thoughts of
my philosophy about Adam Smith economist and philosopher:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/ftf3lx5Rzxo

and here:

https://groups.google.com/g/comp.programming.threads/c/OjDTCDiawJw

Also read my other thoughts of my philosophy here:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/nBO-dfRVMII

----


I think i am a philosopher that is smart, so i am explaining above that
egoism comes from the psychologically normal desire of wanting to be
rich, but you have to understand that the way of indian meditation is to
require to stop seeking pleasure of the senses to also try
to solve the problem of egoism that comes from the "desire", but
i don't think it is the right way to do, so the way of my new philosophy
is to seek much more a kind of pleasure of the senses and here it is:

Am i a philosopher that is a materialistic ?

No, i am not materialistic , i am a philosopher that is seeking like a
"balance" between being materialistic and not being materialistic , and
i am pragmatic, i will give you an example so that you understand my
philosophy:

I think that looking at the videos of youtube is like being not
materialistic, since a video on youtube is like the immaterial, so then
you can enjoy those pleasures of life on internet by looking at the
videos of youtube or by reading facebook etc. by being not
materialistic, so then i am a philosopher that is convinced that we can
be happy even if we are not "rich", since with the sophistication of
internet and such tools, i say that we can be happy without being rich
by accessing internet and enjoying pleasures of life of internet and
such tools with a very low price, and what i predict that in about 10
years from now, and with the exponential progress of our humanity, we
will be happy and much more happy without being rich since this
exponential progress will provide us with much more powerful tools that
enhance much more the quality of our lives.

The Consoomer: Consumerism is Nihilism

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8zZJ1BFQ1hw

I think the person that is talking in the above video is low IQ, i have
a high IQ and i answer the following:

Capitalism is a "tool" and you have to know how to use this tool and
capitalism is an "engine" that permits to create pleasures of life that
we enjoy (as services or products) so that to be happy(and this being
happy is the meaning of human life in my philosophy below), but notice
that this permits also the not rich to be happy because Mass production
in capitalism resulted in lower prices of consumer goods. Eventually,
economies of scale resulted in the most affordable price of any product
for the consumer without the manufacturer having to sacrifice profits,
and also look at how we are taking advantage of youtube videos or the
like in internet with a low price, and this low prices in capitalism
allows the not rich to be happy, and this at the same time avoids
totalitarianism such as communism and neo-nazism and nazism(because they
are "Fascism" of socialism that is against capitalism), read my below
philosophy to understand more, and notice that dictatorship of communism
of China is not communism, because it is using capitalism as an engine
that permits the people to be happy, so communism of China is not like
communism

More philosophy about R&D and economic growth and more..

I invite you to read the following interesting article that says
that in the last 50 years, R&D has not increased much economic growth,
but we have not to think just economic growth since we have to think the
standard of living, so then we have to understand that the standard of
living generally refers to wealth, comfort, material goods, and
necessities of certain classes in certain areas. So i think that R&D has
increased much the standard of living, so it is good for happiness.

How important is R&D for economic growth?

Read more here:

https://www.rdworldonline.com/how-important-is-rd-for-economic-growth/

More philosophy about why Globalization has become so important and more..

Why has Globalization become so important?

Read more here:

https://smallbusiness.chron.com/globalization-become-important-77671.html

And read the following study to know more about globalization:

The Economic Benefits of Globalization for Business and Consumers

http://ecipe.org/publications/the-economic-benefits-of-globalization-for-business-and-consumers/

More philosophy about venture capital in Silicon Valley and about the
future of financial stability and cyber risk and more..

I invite you to look at the following video, and i am not in accordance
with the english man that is speaking on the following video, because he
is too pessimistic by saying that the culture of venture capital in
Silicon Valley in USA has seen a dramatic shift, and it is that
investors care much less about investing in companies with the potential
to create a massive value and they care much more about investing in
companies that can scale quickly so that they can sell after that and
get more profit, so i think that it is not realistic to say so and it is
too pessimistic to say so, since i think that it is not at all so
problematic and i think that it just needs a more "smarter" culture of
investing and i think that USA is in a good economic shape, look at the
following video to notice how it is pessimistic:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ydeuxF0AkR8

And i invite you to read the following interesting article
about venture capital so that to understand:

http://parisinnovationreview.com/articles-en/silicon-valley-a-cluster-of-venture-capitalists

More political philosophy about Ray Dalio and about happiness..

Read about Ray Dalio here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ray_Dalio

And look at the following video of him:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tw0wtyzW6nA

I think that Ray Dalio is not thinking correctly, since he speaks like
an economist and he is not a philosopher, and this way of doing is
lacking intelligence, so i will explain with my smartness:

Read the following about what is the Standard of living:

"Standard of living generally refers to wealth, comfort, material goods,
and necessities of certain classes in certain areas—or more objective
characteristics—whereas quality of life is more subjective and
intangible, such as personal liberty or environmental quality."

So i think that Ray Dalio is making a "mistake" since the world has very
much changed and i think i am a philosopher and Ray Dalio is not
understanding correctly my philosophy: So in my philosophy i am talking
about how to be happiness and joy even if we are not the standard of
living of being highly wealthy etc. i mean even if we are also having a
problem with unequal distribution of income and opportunities because of
globalization, i think we can still be happy and i am giving the way in
my following philosophy, so read my below thoughts of my philosophy so
that to understand:

More philosophy about the future of financial stability and cyber risk..

I have just read rapidly the following very interesting article,
i invite you to read it carefully:

The future of financial stability and cyber risk

https://www.brookings.edu/research/the-future-of-financial-stability-and-cyber-risk/

I think that we have to be positive about the future of financial
stability and cyber risk, since notice that the financial stability
depends on three things:

1- Leverage
2- Maturity and Risk Transformation
3- Procyclicality of the price of risk

Read the above article to notice it, but i think that for the first two,
i mean Leverage and Maturity and Risk Transformation, the financial
institutions have not to put all the eggs in the same basket, so
they need to diversify the risk correctly, and for the third that is the
Procyclicality of the price of risk, i think that it is less risky
since it depends on the "asset" prices that are diversified to a certain
level, and for the cyber risk i am positive since i think we are getting
much more sophisticated in cyber security. So i am positive.

More philosophy about Globalization..

I think that globalization is a good thing, but you have to be smart
and know how to take advantage of it, so i invite you to read
the following about the positive effects of Globalization on developing
countries such as:

1- Globalization has permitted developed nations to invest in less
developed nations which has lead to creation of jobs for poor people.

2- The health and education system in developing countries has benefited
in a positive way due to the contribution of globalization.

And about Globalization and the unequal distribution of income
read my below thoughts of my philosophy about human existence where i am
also speaking about it.

So i invite you to read the following article to notice it:

The effects of Globalization on developing countries

Read more here:

https://medium.com/@BonillaXM/the-effects-of-globalization-on-developing-countries-1e465257c400

And you have to know how to take advantage of exponential growth of
capitalism, so i invite you to read the following article
that speaks about it:

Capitalism switches from linear to exponential growth

http://parisinnovationreview.com/articles-en/capitalism-switches-from-linear-to-exponential-growth

And i invite you to read my thoughts of my philosophy here:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/YZSYxV41-qI

Also i invite you to read more of my thoughts of my philosophy here:

https://groups.google.com/g/comp.programming.threads/c/OjDTCDiawJw

Also i invite you to read more of my thoughts of my philosophy here:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/ftf3lx5Rzxo

Also i invite you to read more of my thoughts of my philosophy here:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/WeH9Oh7S-lc

Also you can read more about my thoughts of my philosophy about human
smartness in the following web link:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/Wzf6AOl41xs

More philosophy about the human existence..

I also invite you to read my following philosophy in my following
beautiful webpage about human existence where i am also speaking
about Globalization and the unequal distribution of income:

https://scalable68.godaddysites.com/f/my-philosophy-about-human-existence

More precision about here is my just new proverb and my other proverbs..

Here is more proof of the fact that i have invented many scalable
algorithms and algorithms:

https://groups.google.com/g/comp.programming.threads/c/V9Go8fbF10k

I think i am really smart, so i have just invented fast another proverb
and here it is:

"Human vitality comes from intellectual openness and intellectual
openness also comes from divergent thinking and you have to well balance
divergent thinking with convergent thinking so that to converge towards
the global optimum of efficiency and not get stuck on a local optimum of
efficiency, and this kind of well balancing makes the good creativity."

And Here is all my other new proverbs that i have invented fast:

"When you like a beautiful song, you will have the strong tendency
to want to hear it or to buy it, but when you are maturity of
responsability, it can become that you have to like the responsability
of hearing or buying the song and not the beauty of the song, so when
you are intellectual maturity you will start to think about responsability."

Here is my new proverb:

"When you are still organized like human animals you will have the
strong tendency to want to marry with a beautiful women, but when you
are critical thinking you have to ask yourself if all of us have to
marry a beautiful women. So when you are critical thinking you have to
think systemically about order"

Here is my other new proverb:

There is some french that say: "On doit manier bien le verbe", "That we
have to speak or write a sophisticated language" , but they do not say
that speaking or writing a sophisticated language can become a deadly or
dangerous weapon, so i answer them in french: "Il faut aussi enseigner
le savoir vivre ensemble en enseignant aussi une philosophie efficace de
vie", that means in english: "That we have to efficiently educate people
by also learning them a good and efficient philosophy so that they know
how to live in harmony", so as you are noticing that it needs a good
philosophy so that to avoid the mess of Israel.

And here is my new proverbs:

"The intelligent favors healthy eating over tasty eating, and by analogy
we can also say that the intelligent also favors the effective speaker
over the sweet talker"

"L'intelligent privilégie le manger santé au manger qui a du goût, et
par analogie on peut aussi dire que l'intelligent aussi privilégie le
parleur efficace au beau parleur."

Here is my just new proverb:

"Even silence makes us advance, since a human life full of silence is
not the right diversity as a balance that makes the good reliance"

Here is my other just new proverb in english and french:

"Learn to lift your head with dignity because even the sea has
threatening waves."

"Apprends à élever la tête avec dignité car même la mer a des vagues qui
menacent."

And here is my other new proverbs, read them carefully:

https://groups.google.com/g/comp.programming.threads/c/w7wgcbkEEIQ

And read my other new proverbs here:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/FPdu0B9_Vlc



Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages