DXP, his elder son Deng Pufeng, and Mao's Cultural Revolution
report2009
students accuse teachers, children accuse parents, citizens accuse
officials etc which had ruined social infrastructure and judicial
system and put China in chaos? During that time, many Chinese were
thrown into jail and tortured to death, some even committed suicide
for unfounded accusation and unbearable torture? Didn't Red Guards
torture DXP’s elder son Deng Pufang just because of his father, later
Deng Pufeng became a cripple because of that? So “Yes we can kill
Chinese people as we wish” had become legitimate for Mao’s Red Guards
during the Cultural Revolution.
Disagree? Or you don't want me to talk about it because it hurts image
of CCP and China? Or as Chinese we can only talk about faults of
western democracy?
=====
During the Cultural Revolution, Deng Xiaoping and his family were
targeted by Mao Zedong. Xiaoping was branded as a capitalist roader.
[1] In one session he was forced to kneel to the ground with his arm
stretched out behind him and over his head. His family watched as the
guards forced him to confess to capitalist ways of thinking.[3]
Mao's Red Guards then imprisoned Deng Pufang. He was tortured and
thrown out of the window of a three-story building at Beijing
University in 1968, though some sources claimed he may have fallen or
jumped out of the window himself.[3][2][1][4] He was rushed to the
hospital but was denied admission, because he was the son of a
capitalist. By the time he reached another clinic, he was paralyzed.
[3]
His back was broken, and he has since been confined to a wheelchair,
becoming a paraplegic.[2][1]
On Jan 4, 4:59 pm, ltlee1 <ltl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Jan 4, 4:27 pm, "abianc...@my-deja.com" <abianc...@my-deja.com>
> wrote:
>
> > China is my cultural motherland, ROC not PRC is my political
> > motherland. I am for status-quo for now, I also support KMT’s mainland
> > policy in general.
>
> > Like I said, I will continue to criticize Mao, you are entitled to
> > refute me.
>
> I had given you my view. But you changed "Yes we can" to "Yes we can
> kill million of Chinese people." You are ascribing an evil intention
> to Mao to
> make him look evil.
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jan 4, 4:17 pm, ltlee1 <ltl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Jan 4, 3:37 pm, "abianc...@my-deja.com" <abianc...@my-deja.com>
> > > wrote:
>
> > > > I guess I came from Taiwan, a free society so I am different from you.
> > > > I even once explained to Rusty how KMT troops massacred Taiwanese
> > > > during 228 uprising in 1947. I will not feel offended if anyone
> > > > criticizes CKS or CCK if s/he speaks the truth.
>
> > > I was not offended by someone criticizing Mao. People like Terpster
> > > could say whatever he wants about China or Mao. It has no consequence.
> > > But when mainlanders and Taiwan people cannot reach an understanding,
> > > tragic is unavoidable. If everytime the PRC proposes something which
> > > the mainlanders see as a good faith effort although it requires some
> > > suspension of disbelief but the Taiwan people insist such proposal
> > > reflects the PRC's leader's desire to kill million of Chinese people
> > > and react accordingly, how can there be peace across the Strait? War,
> > > frequently, is the result of misunderstanding.
>
> > > > BTW, I believe I have [almost] never criticized DXP, if there is a
> > > > “Great Man” in PRC history, it should be DXP not Mao. Picture this, if
> > > > DXP had ruled China since 1949... To me, Mao is one of the worst in
> > > > human history, Mao, Pol Pot, Hitler, Stalin four worst in 20th
> > > > century.
>
> > > As I had explained, most Chinese people do not share your view about
> > > Mao.
> > > They admire Mao because he dared to kill millions of Chinese people.
> > > If that
> > > is your view, such view will be self-filfulling.
>
> > > > Oh, I will continue to criticize Mao but you are entitled to refute
> > > > me.
>
> > > > On Jan 4, 2:56 pm, ltlee1 <ltl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > Judging from your characterization of Mao, apparently you cannot read
> > > > > the mainlanders correctly. If most mainlanders see Mao as you do, Mao
> > > > > would not be as popular in China now. Since you cannot read the
> > > > > Chinese
> > > > > people who share your ethnicity and your culture. How well can you
> > > > > read
> > > > > America and Japan? How much can you depend on them in the absence
> > > > > of any formal treaty?
>
> > > > > You could choose to have faith in them. But remember it is only your
> > > > > faith.
>
> > > > > On Jan 4, 11:51 am, report2009 <repost2...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > A quick update on China/Taiwan status to educate clueless ignorant Mao
> > > > > > worshippers like Rusty Old Fool. Haha!
>
> > > > > > Oh, Rusty, you are ignorant, as usual. Taiwan purchased Patriot
> > > > > > missiles etc so that Taiwan can hold for 2 weeks before US troops
> > > > > > arrive in Taiwan from Japan, that’s grand plan between Japan, Taiwan,
> > > > > > USA. You have never heard of this before, right? That’s why China is
> > > > > > furious with any arms sale to Taiwan. Also, Taiwan is making her own
> > > > > > missiles which are capable of attacking Three Gorge Dam if China
> > > > > > invades Taiwan. Even USA could not stop Taiwan making her own
> > > > > > missiles.
>
> > > > > > BTW, within a few years, Taiwan will receive 8 more submarines. Just
> > > > > > FYI… Haha!
>
> > > > > > What an ignorant fool, Rusty! Not all manufacturing done in China.
> > > > > > High techs like the most advanced semiconductor chips are done in
> > > > > > Taiwan to supply Texas Instrument, Intel, etc. The most advanced high
> > > > > > techs are not allowed to export to China so if anything happens to
> > > > > > Taiwan, USA will suffer first. That’s why USA had agreement with Japan
> > > > > > to send their armed force to Taiwan directly from Japan. Rusty Old
> > > > > > Fool, you have never heard of this before, right?
>
> > > > > > During 1996 missile crisis (right before Taiwan’s presidential
> > > > > > election), China launched 3 missiles (empty shell though, haha!) into
> > > > > > Taiwan Strait to warn Taiwan not moving towards independence.
> > > > > > Clinton immediately sent 7th fleet to Taiwan Strait to warn China not
> > > > > > to do anything stupid. Because of missile crisis, China’s most hated
> > > > > > LTH won big in the presidential election. China learned the lesson.
>
> > > > > > Because USA has shown her determination to defend Taiwan so after 1996
> > > > > > missile crisis, China dared not to launch single missile to Taiwan
> > > > > > Strait even former Taiwan president Chen Shui-bian kept threatening
> > > > > > (or teasing) China with Taiwan Independence for his own political
> > > > > > gain. In 2004 presidential election, China forgot the lesson, Premier
> > > > > > Zhu again verbally warned Taiwan on independence but that again helped
> > > > > > Chen won the election. Since then, China has been very quiet like a
> > > > > > mute during any Taiwan elections. Haha! In every election, Chen
> > > > > > manipulated anti-China agendas to help his party DPP to win. China was
> > > > > > furious with CSB but could do little. In the end, CSB’s own corruption
> > > > > > scandals caused his downfall and also downfall of DPP. In 2008, KMT
> > > > > > won landslide in presidential election. Now KMT is in power, China
> > > > > > finally feels relieved and seized this opportunity to offer Taiwan all
> > > > > > sorts of incentives to prevent TI (like a guy chasing a beautiful
> > > > > > girl). One of examples, China promises 1 million Chinese visitors per
> > > > > > year to revitalize Taiwan tourism. Now Taiwan businessmen are busy
> > > > > > counting RMB every day that rich Chinese tourists have spent in
> > > > > > Taiwan. Haha!
>
> > > > > > Oh as for Chinese tourists, they are so impressed and surprised with
> > > > > > our civility, some even wrote in their travel blogs, TAIWAN IS WHAT
> > > > > > FUTURE CHINA SHOULD BE!!! Haha!
>
> > > > > > Taipei, where my family lives, last year even during world financial
> > > > > > crisis, some real estates in Taipei have gone up to 48% in 2009 alone
> > > > > > to expect upcoming ECFA (sort of FTA) agreement between Taiwan and
> > > > > > China. You see, China has learned the lesson, missiles only push
> > > > > > Taiwan further away from China but only economic tie will keep Taiwan
> > > > > > within Greater China circle. Yes, China has learned the lesson. Haha!
>
> > > > > > Like Clinton said “It’s the economy, stupid!”
>
> > > > > > *** End of education for Mao worshipper, Rusty Old Fool, haha! ***
>
> > > > > > Oh, a quick note on Chinese unification:
>
> > > > > > In case you did not know… According to a recent poll in Taiwan, 88% of
> > > > > > Taiwanese chose status-quo, i.e., we do not want Chinese unification.
> > > > > > We have democracy, much higher GDP per capita, civility, self-rule so
> > > > > > who wants to be ruled by less civilized CCP. I don’t! And Taiwan is
> > > > > > not HK!!!
>
> > > > > > That's why our ROC President Ma Ying-joeu said no unification talk
> > > > > > during his term and he does not foresee unification in his lifetime.
>
> > > > > > Make sense?
>
> > > > > > On Jan 4, 11:50 am, rst9 <rst9w...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > Your parrot posts also show your stupidity, uneducated ignorant turkey
> > > > > > > foolish way of life. Your constant reference to Tawang only shows your
> > > > > > > own shallow life.
> > > > > > > Your constant reference to Tawang only shows your own short-comings.
> > > > > > > Your constant reference to Tawang only shows your own self-esteem..
>
> > > > > > > From a parrot evil ugly uneducated ignorant turkey fool abianchen slut
> > > > > > > cunt chattering monkey, the "guy from Tawang, a place out of her
> > > > > > > deranged mind" and someone who refuses to recognize her own ethnic
> > > > > > > background of Filipino ancestry, your constant references to Taiwan
> > > > > > > only shows your own shallow life, your own short-coming, your own self-
> > > > > > > esteem.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Anti-DabianchenVirus
is a Philippino dyke, trolling on SCC and related newsgroup claiming
to be a "guy from Taiwan" for the past 11 (eleven) years!
Proof: http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.china/msg/31e3f301c13dbbbe?hl=en
.
Proof that abianchen/Meichi/report2009 can't read/write Chinese other
than cutting-and-pasting from the internet:
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.china/msg/7576019d05116a21?hl=en
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.china/msg/2820117f3da3ac55?hl=en
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.china/msg/83029bb548080af5?hl=en
Proof that abianchen/Meichi/report2009 is a pathological liar:
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.china/msg/ee41fc07a8921a88?hl=en
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.china/msg/995a71070728ba0c?hl=en
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.china/msg/fdeab5e65d151e9c?hl=en
Proof that abianchen/Meichi/report2009 is not a "guy from Taiwan":
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.china/msg/fc81fe43d9c693e2?hl=en
Proof that abianchen/Meichi/report2009 makes persitent childish and
girlish claims:
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.china/msg/7d3d15d1e66e4876?hl=en
Proof that abianchen/Meichi/report2009 is a loser:
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.china/msg/8af8fda3a280e511?hl=en
Proof that abianchen/Meichi/report2009 is childish and repetitive:
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.china/msg/5646b3ef057db25d?hl=en
Say no more.
> ...
>
> read more »- Hide quoted text -
Rainbow 虹
baldeagle
.>
> During the Cultural Revolution, didn’t Mao and his gang of 4 encourage
> students accuse teachers, children accuse parents, citizens accuse
> officials etc which had ruined social infrastructure and judicial
> system and put China in chaos?
You see the events in China with a pair of Western eyes..
Obviously, you have been brainwashed by western media,
and China-bashing spins.
Let's see the truth with 20/20 eyes, without the coloured
glasses :
Twenty years after KMT had been driven out of the mainland,
the old intellectuals, the elders and interest groups refused to
accept to the new orders in China...as it meant losses of
privileges and their corrupt ways. It is a natural tendency for
them to stick to the old way of life.
However, their old ways obstructed the progress and much
needed advancement by China...prevented the changes needed
to uplift the lives of the masses.
A Revolution was needed to abolish the "Old Customs, Old
Culture, Old Habits, and Old Ideas" (the four Olds). The same
old corrupt ways that led to the fall of emperors in old China.
In 1966, youths and progressive intellectuals were mobilized..to
change people's superstitions by getting rid of temples, churches,
mosques and other ways of blind worship...burning books that
glorify the bad old ways...and re-educating the old people to live
in a progressive society.
As in any revolutions...(example the French revolutions), there
were bloodshed, killings and unhappiness. This is unavoidable,
a necessary price for progress.
The objectives of the cultural revolution were achieved by 1969...
and Mao declared the end of the cultural revolution.
As a result of the cultural revolution, Chinese now accept
easily any changes needed for improvement...without the
usual rioting and social upheaval seen in the West.
The revolution made it possible for TengXiaoPing to change
the economy system to market economy...and to adopt
the new system of governance. ..without any problem.
report2009
it might have been best if Mao had died in 1956.
Chairman Mao , expert fucker of Chinese High School Girl 's cunts in China
why are you spreading your lies about me ?
ltlee1
Mao was a true believer who wanted to accomplish all kind of
good things in a hurry. "Ten thousand years is too long, must
struggle for this morning and evening." Revolution, to him, was
the shortest way to get things done.
report2009
that it might have been best if Mao had died in 1956.
On Jan 5, 9:31 pm, ltlee1 <ltl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Jan 5, 12:14 am, report2009 <repost2...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > During the Cultural Revolution, didn't Mao and his gang of 4 encourage
> > students accuse teachers, children accuse parents, citizens accuse
> > officials etc which had ruined social infrastructure and judicial
> > system and put China in chaos? During that time, many Chinese were
> > thrown into jail and tortured to death, some even committed suicide
> > for unfounded accusation and unbearable torture? Didn't Red Guards
> > torture DXP's elder son Deng Pufang just because of his father, later
> > Deng Pufeng became a cripple because of that? So "Yes we can kill
> > Chinese people as we wish" had become legitimate for Mao's Red Guards
> > during the Cultural Revolution.
>
> > Disagree? Or you don't want me to talk about it because it hurts image
> > of CCP and China? Or as Chinese we can only talk about faults of
> > western democracy?
>
> I think you had another reply which I don't care to reply because you
> were
> assigning Mao an evil intention without any evidence. I will answer
> this one.
>
> First of all, you have not presented anything new. The tragic had been
> well known
> and many cased had been reversed. Of course, the death and the
> suffering were
> could never be rectified. Furthermore, if one is to apply the
> principle of "All under
> heaven have no sin, the sin is on me [the emporer] alone," Mao was
> guilty as
> charged because he was the ultiamte leader with ulitmate
> responsibility. The buck
> stopped with him. Nevertheless, most of the Chinese people do not see
> Mao as the
> monster. Actually, WJS, the so called "China's father of democracy"
> had characterized
> the period as the only time when China had real democracy. For many
> people, the
> period was a period of total and unnrestrained freedom. And freedom is
> messy, then
> and now.
>
> Of coruse, one does not need to to resort to WJS's view to know that
> people could
> have different interpretations over the same event. Even if one had
> concluded that
> the period was bad. It alone does not make Mao the monster you had
> envisioned.
> If for no other reason, bad things frequently happened despite the
> best of intention.
> Example. You seems to like confuciaanism. But do you know that if
> there is one
> suspect responsible for China's falling behind during the last several
> centuries, it
> would be confucianism.
>
> Briefly, China's best and brightest, easily millions of them over
> several centuries,
> were involved in a fruitless debate on how to achieve the confucian
> goal of "Inner
> saint, outer king." That is, once they had successfully cultivate
> their virtues, they
> would be saints and if opportunities arise, kings. The debate, in
> short, was between
> "Knowing is difficult, behaving is easy" and "Knowing is easy,
> behaviing is difficult." The
> debate was similar to the Zen buddhist debate between "gradual
> realization"
> through work and "sudden realization." It also had its counterpart in
> Christianity:
> the debate between "Salvation by work." and "salvation by grace."
>
> Rather than doing useful things, they "whiten their hair to search all
> books" to find
> arguments which would their views. They, China's best and brightest
> had wasted
> a large chunk of their lives making a living from old papers. Under
> this circumstance,
> China had no where to go but down. Results: Many problems critical to
> the people's
> well being were not attended to. More people suffered and killed for
> all kinds of reasons.
> Were that the intention of the confucians who wanted to seek a fool-
> proof way to acheive
> their confucian goal such that everyone could be better person? I
> would say yes. Yet
> their good intention had produced the opposite effect. One could also
> proclaim that "If
> Confucisus was never born, such disaster would be happen." But was
> Confucius a
> monster? Similarly, a lot of evil was committed in the name of Jesus.
> But was Jesus the
> man a monster?
>
> On western democracy. Bush did order the military to invade Iraq, many
> killings could be
> legitimately laid on Bush's head. Nevertheless, I never see Bush as a
> monster. Most
> Americans don't see him that way, I accept and respect their view. My
> only complaint
> is that if western media had decided to called Mao a killer of
> millions, they should also
> apply the name to Bush.
>
> Continue to criticize whoever you want. I would not object that. The
> difference betwen criticizism
> and demonization is about evidence. If you are going to assign an evil
> attention, you need more.
>
>
>
>
>
> > =====
>
> > During the Cultural Revolution, Deng Xiaoping and his family were
> > targeted by Mao Zedong. Xiaoping was branded as a capitalist roader.
> > [1] In one session he was forced to kneel to the ground with his arm
> > stretched out behind him and over his head. His family watched as the
> > guards forced him to confess to capitalist ways of thinking.[3]
>
> > Mao's Red Guards then imprisoned Deng Pufang. He was tortured and
> > thrown out of the window of a three-story building at Beijing
> > University in 1968, though some sources claimed he may have fallen or
> > jumped out of the window himself.[3][2][1][4] He was rushed to the
> > hospital but was denied admission, because he was the son of a
> > capitalist. By the time he reached another clinic, he was paralyzed.
> > [3]
>
> > His back was broken, and he has since been confined to a wheelchair,
> > becoming a paraplegic.[2][1]
>
> > > > > > > > FYI... Haha!
>
> > > > > > > > What an ignorant fool, Rusty! Not all manufacturing done in China.
> > > > > > > > High techs like the most advanced semiconductor chips are done in
> > > > > > > > Taiwan to supply Texas Instrument, Intel, etc. The most advanced high
> > > > > > > > techs are not allowed to export to China so if anything happens to
> > > > > > > > Taiwan, USA will suffer first. That's why USA had agreement with Japan
> > > > > > > > to send their armed force to Taiwan directly from Japan. Rusty Old
> > > > > > > > Fool, you have never heard of this before, right?
>
> > > > > > > > During 1996 missile crisis (right before Taiwan's presidential
> > > > > > > > election), China launched 3 missiles (empty shell though, haha!) into
> > > > > > > > Taiwan Strait
>
baldeagle
.>
> Chen Yun, one of the top Chinese leaders in the 1980's, suggested that
> it might have been best if Mao had died in 1956.
>
The small minds will not see the greatness,
in people who changed their societies for the better.
The flaw lies in their small-mindedness..not with
the great man.
The able leaders who led modern China were:
First generation:
Mao Zedong and Zhou Enlai
(Like LinBiao, Chen Yun was a small man 小人)
Second generation:
Deng Xiaoping and Hu Yaobang,
Third generation:
Jiang Zemin and Zhu Rongji,
Forth generation (present day):
Hu Jintao and Wen Jiabao
abia...@my-deja.com
要點。所 以，我看陳雲同志行。""
http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E9%99%88%E4%BA%91
And "看問題尖銳，能抓到要點" 的 Chen Yun said this about Mao:
"Chen Yun, one of the top Chinese leaders in the 1980's, suggested
that it might have been best if Mao had died in 1956."
ltlee1
> Chen Yun (陳雲), one of the top Chinese leaders in the 1980's, suggested
> that it might have been best if Mao had died in 1956.
Don't know.
What I can tell is that you had accused Mao of evil intention without
any evidence. Most Chinese don't agree with your characterization of
Mao.
Such mis-characterization, intentional or unintentional, if widespread
in
Taiwan, could have deadly consequence for Chinese people.
abia...@my-deja.com
http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E9%99%88%E4%BA%91
And "看問題尖銳，能抓到要點" 的 Chen Yun (陳雲) said this about Mao: "Chen Yun, one
of the top Chinese leaders in the 1980's, suggested that it might have
been best if Mao had died in 1956."
baldeagle
.> Mao was a true believer who wanted to accomplish all kind of
.> good things in a hurry. "Ten thousand years is too long, must
.> struggle for this morning and evening." Revolution, to him, was
.> the shortest way to get things done.
For hundreds of years, Chinese had lived in a
fossilized society..a society where time stood
still...and where people were backward looking
(towards the past glories)...unable and afraid to
modernize. The ugly truth: China lacked behind
countries like GB and USA by hundreds of years.
Mao inherited a sick society..a country on the
verge of disintegration.
He and Zhou were faced with huge internal problems
and external threats.
According to 'I Ching', he had to burn the old building
and uproot its piles ..in order to lay the foundation
for a new building. To start everything from zero
ground upwards. (in the West, it is called drastic
situation demand drastic solution).
It took him almost 25 years (from 1947), with one
revolution following another, to rid China of all its
ills for a chance to start all anew. On the whole he
had succeeded quite well...except in China's economy.
He laid the grounds for TengXiaoPing to build a new
China, with a new economy and a new system of
governance... a China that Chinese can be proud of.
report2009
要點。所以，我看陳雲同志行。""
http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E9%99%88%E4%BA%91
And "看問題尖銳，能抓到要點" 的 Chen Yun (陳雲) said this about Mao: "Chen Yun, one
of the top Chinese leaders in the 1980's, suggested that it might have
been best if Mao had died in 1956."
On Jan 5, 9:29 pm, "Chairman Mao , expert fucker of Chinese High
> > > the new system of governance. ..without any problem.- Hide quoted text -
baldeagle
> "毛澤東曾評價陳雲说："我看他這個人是個好人，他比較公道、能幹，比較穩當，他看問題有眼光。......不要看他平和得很，但他看問題尖銳，能抓到
> 要點。所以，我看陳雲同志行。""
Chen is a small man (小人)
you seem to adore him...you are a small small man
with a brainwashed tiny brain.
abia...@my-deja.com
要點。所以，我看陳雲同志行。""
http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E9%99%88%E4%BA%91
And "看問題尖銳，能抓到要點" 的 Chen Yun (陳雲) said this about Mao: "Chen Yun, one
of the top Chinese leaders in the 1980's, suggested that it might have
been best if Mao had died in 1956."
Anti-DabianchenVirus
it can be compared to your saying that had your mother not opened her
legs to her ugly pimp, you would not have to suffer the terrible
existence you are now enduring as an ugly Philippino dyke!
On Jan 5, 11:27 pm, "abianc...@my-deja.com" <abianc...@my-deja.com>
wrote:
> "毛澤東曾評價陳雲说："我看他這個人是個好人，他比較公道、能幹，比較穩當，他看問題有眼光。......不要看他平和得很，但他看問題尖銳，能抓到
> 要點。所以，我看陳雲同志行。""
>
> http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E9%99%88%E4%BA%91
>
> And "看問題尖銳，能抓到要點" 的 Chen Yun (陳雲) said this about Mao: "Chen Yun, one
> of the top Chinese leaders in the 1980's, suggested that it might have
> been best if Mao had died in 1956."
>
> On Jan 6, 1:19 am, baldeagle <botakea...@yahoo.com.sg> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jan 6, 2:01 pm, report2009 <repost2...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > "毛澤東曾評價陳雲说："我看他這個人是個好人，他比較公道、能幹，比較穩當，他看問題有眼光。......不要看他平和得很，但他看問題尖銳，能抓到
> > > 要點。所以，我看陳雲同志行。""
>
> > Chen is a small man (小人)
> > you seem to adore him...you are a small small man
> > with a brainwashed tiny brain.- Hide quoted text -
baldeagle
report2009
要點。所以，我看陳雲同志行。""
http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E9%99%88%E4%BA%91
And "看問題尖銳，能抓到要點" 的 Chen Yun (陳雲) said this about Mao: "Chen Yun, one
of the top Chinese leaders in the 1980's, suggested that it might have
been best if Mao had died in 1956."
Anti-DabianchenVirus
broken-record mode - which she considers as "taunting fun", but only
displays her lack of education and intelligence.
report2009
要點。所以，我看陳雲同志行。""
http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E9%99%88%E4%BA%91
And "看問題尖銳，能抓到要點" 的 Chen Yun (陳雲) said this about Mao: "Chen Yun, one
of the top Chinese leaders in the 1980's, suggested that it might have
been best if Mao had died in 1956."
On Jan 6, 1:44 am, Anti-DabianchenVirus <wuso...@rocketmail.com>
wrote:
Anti-DabianchenVirus
it can be compared to your saying that had your mother not opened her
legs to her ugly pimp, you would not have to suffer the terrible
existence you are now enduring as an ugly Philippino dyke!