Unmerciful "praying" on 03/07/12 ...

Dr. Brian Gene Kelley, PhD

unread,

Mar 7, 2012, 3:00:11 AM3/7/12

to

On Feb 27, 7:28 am, •*´¯`*•.¸ஐ*•.¥.•*ஐ¸.•*´¯`*• <bus...@cbgb.net>
wrote:
> Sick twisted evil Andy Chung wrote:
>
> > May ever so severely curse you and all around you
>
> > This prayer is being answered
>
> >http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/a9494e037c47b328?
>
> > My health insurance has expired. They figure I'd have 6 months at
> > best with continued treatments. 2 months at best without. I'm down to 120
> > lbs. My family is suffering all kinds of health problems as well. We
> > may be homeless soon. But I'll keep plugging away till the end."
>
> This is what poisonous creeps like fake Christian Andy Chung "pray"
> for?
> What a miserable reprobate sicko Andy Chung is.

Yep.
--

Brian Gene Kelley, PhD

"Myth: You Can't Be Overweight and Healthy"
http://www.obesitymyths.com/myth4.1.htm

"Study: Overweight People Live Longer"
http://www.webmd.com/diet/news/20090625/study-overweight-people-live-longer

"Starvation and Hunger, Humankind's Constant Companions"
http://gherkinstomatoes.com/2009/11/10/14837/

"Stop Hunger Now"
http://www.stophungernow.org/site/PageServer

Paul is not talking about just saying the words "Jesus is Lord".
Anyone can say that. Even demons can say it through people whom they
have possessed
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LL7AhTdZHas

**again**

Anyone can say insincerely say "Jesus is Lord".
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BpH28urOlqE

***and***

Beware of the loner (Someone who is alone in their interpretation of
the Bible)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UfcEWZceWhI

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,

Mar 8, 2012, 1:24:54 AM3/8/12

to

... and encouraging born-again (John 3:3 & 5) friends like Rod Eastman
( http://WDJW.net ) to also pray for Robert simply because we really
love him as our LORD loves and commands (John 15:12-3) us with all
glory to GOD the Father.

Robert Miles wrote:
> MU wrote:
> > Robert Miles wrote:
> >> MU wrote:
> >>> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> >>>> MU wrote:
> >>>>> Robert Miles wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Let's see Chung adopt a diet of 2 pounds of candy a day to test his 2
> >>>>>> pound diet plan
> >>>>>
> >>>>>LOL LOL LOL
> >>>>
> >>>> It is actually sad to see that Robert falsely believes that he has
> >>>> type-2 diabetes because of his eating too much candy in the past. We
> >>>> know this belief to be false because candy would be banned if it truly
> >>>> were the cause of type-2 diabetes just as thalidomide is banned
> >>>> because it truly causes birth defects.
> >>>
> >>> Well, Robbie isn't the smartest bird in the flock now is he?
> >>>
> >>>> The fact remains that Robert has type-2 diabetes because of eating
> >>>> more than 2 pounds of regular food every day and that if he had been
> >>>> using the 2PD-OMER Approach since graduating from high school he
> >>>> wouldn't have type-2 diabetes today. Moreover, it is likely that if
> >>>> he were to start using the 2PD-OMER Approach today, he would no longer
> >>>> be on diabetic medications in just a few months:
> >>>
> >>> I think he wants to eat 2 pounds of candy everyday. I'm sure he can do
> >>> that. Yeah, I'm really really sure he can.
> >>
> >> Looks like you've decided to compete with Chung to see which of you can
> >> make the most incorrect conclusions from inadequate evidence.
> >
> > Since when is seeing the 2lb eating approach work on myself, Chung and
> > dozens of others "inadequate evidence"?
>
> Chung and dozens of sockpuppets?

Source:

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/713988a3a64cfd6e?

Your lie-riddled question simply confirms this physician's assessment
of why you have type-2 diabetes.

And, so this bona-fide physician ( http://WDJW.net/HeartDoc ) freely
chooses to continue to pray for you as outlined per the amazing
Facebook spectacle at http://WDJW.net/Salvation earlier:

May GOD give you, Robert, a new heart and a new spirit (Ezekiel
11:19-20 and 36:26) so that you would be born again of water and
Spirit (John 3:3 and 3:5) so that you would come to trust the truth,
Who is Jesus Christ of Nazareth:

http://T3WiJ.com

Amen.

Be hungrier, which really is wonderfully healthier especially for
diabetics and other heart disease patients:

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/9642aafa0aad16eb?

...because we mindfully choose to openly care with our heart,

Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
EmoryIMVC.org Cardiologist
and Author of the 2PD-OMER Approach:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/9ad0c19df5ffc2f7?

Dr. Brian Gene Kelley, PhD

unread,

Mar 8, 2012, 2:12:25 AM3/8/12

to

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,

Mar 9, 2012, 6:44:17 AM3/9/12

to

Dr. Brian Gene Kelley, PhD

unread,

Mar 9, 2012, 8:14:00 AM3/9/12

to

> Non-christians simply cannot publicly say "Jesus is LORD"

Bizzzt wrong:

A non-christian saying "Jesus is Lord" in pure blasphemous mockery:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PeN7oF78Xkg

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MWnl6ucHnSE

> false Bible teachers

Bizzzt wrong - They were correct

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LL7AhTdZHas

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BpH28urOlqE

Only Satan would try to lull people into a false assurance of
Salvation in Jesus Christ, by claiming it's summed up in someone's
ability to parrot the second half of a Bible verse.

> Only those who work for satan would claim they know what satan would
> do.

Bizzzt wrong

"So that no advantage would be taken of us by Satan, for we are not
ignorant of his schemes" (2 Corinthians 2:11)

> someone whose name has been blotted(Deu29:20) from His Book(Deu32:33)
> of Life.

Bizzzt wrong:

Mosaic Covenant - Covenant in Moab: Only applicable to Israel under
the Old Covenant.

> from His Book(Deu32:33)

Bizzzt wrong:

"Their wine is the poison of serpents,
And the cruel venom of cobras" (Deu32:33)

Nether the verse nor the entire chapter (The Song of Moses) is
applicable.

<Crackpot shifts gears>

> someone whose name has been blotted(Rev3:5)

Bizzzt wrong:

"He who overcomes shall be clothed in white garments, and I will not
blot out his name from the Book of Life; but I will confess his name
before My Father and before His angels" (Rev3:5)

Rev 3:5 is obviously an assurance of Salvation, not a threat.

> Eternal condemnation of
> someone whose name has been blotted

Let's see the impostor provide a concise
straightforward explanation of precisely why this person's name
supposedly was blotted from God's Book of Life?

> The reason is simply lying to someone in the Holy Spirit is lying to
> the Holy Spirit:

Bizzzt wrong:

None of the misused Bible verses supplied by the crackpot; Deu29:20,
32:33; Rev 3:5, 20:15 substantiate this claim :-)

> This does mean that lying to the Holy Spirit is equivalent to
> blaspheming against the Holy Spirit.

Bizzzt wrong:

Blaspheming the Holy Spirit The Unpardonable Sin (Matthew 12:21,32)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6yWk0PtrhdQ

Bottom line concerning the impostor:

"While evildoers and impostors will go from bad to worse, deceiving
and being deceived" (2 Timothy 3:13).

"A whole system of false doctrine blended with a lot of truth"
- Dr.Gene Getz
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UfcEWZceWhI

"To avoid being influenced by false doctrine is, number one:
Be on guard against a loner [like Andrew B. Chung] when it comes to
Biblical interpretation.

People [like Andrew] who say that they have the truth and they're
alone in it and
they're creating new ideas. A lone individual who claims to have some
kind of revelation [like Andrew does] which is actually false doctrine
blended with
truth. We have to be careful of these individuals who claim to have
the Holy Spirit, but they are out of harmony with historic true
doctrine [as has always been the case with Andrew B. Chung]

Second, become a good [skilled, ardent, dedicated]
student of Scripture... with other Bible
studying Christians. Not alone only [as Andrew B. Chung is alone] It's
not wrong to study the Scriptures alone, but studying with other Bible
studying Christians,
interacting with other Bible studying Christians, mentors, on full
time regular basis, in order to avoid some kind of strange
interpretation of Scripture" - Dr. Gene Getz
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UfcEWZceWhI

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,

Mar 10, 2012, 2:20:36 AM3/10/12

to

Dr. Brian Gene Kelley, PhD

unread,

Mar 10, 2012, 3:20:18 AM3/10/12

to

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,

Mar 11, 2012, 5:01:39 AM3/11/12

to

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,

Mar 12, 2012, 2:03:44 AM3/12/12

to

Andrew B. Chung

unread,

Mar 13, 2012, 4:47:45 AM3/13/12

to

Andrew B. Chung is an attention whore; do not enable.

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,

Mar 14, 2012, 2:32:51 AM3/14/12

to

Andrew B. Chung

unread,

Mar 14, 2012, 2:48:02 AM3/14/12

to

Andrew B. Chung; attention whore.

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,

Mar 15, 2012, 2:12:15 AM3/15/12

to

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,

Mar 16, 2012, 3:36:57 AM3/16/12

to

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,

Mar 17, 2012, 1:02:40 AM3/17/12

to

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,

Mar 18, 2012, 12:53:52 AM3/18/12

to

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,

Mar 19, 2012, 1:21:24 AM3/19/12

to

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,

Mar 21, 2012, 4:29:34 AM3/21/12

to

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,

Mar 22, 2012, 4:32:09 AM3/22/12

to

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,

Mar 23, 2012, 10:14:33 PM3/23/12

to

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,

Mar 25, 2012, 5:57:09 AM3/25/12

to

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,

Mar 27, 2012, 6:13:17 AM3/27/12

to

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,

Mar 29, 2012, 6:07:38 AM3/29/12

to

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,

Mar 30, 2012, 9:22:50 PM3/30/12

to

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,

Apr 4, 2012, 3:08:36 AM4/4/12

to

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,

Apr 5, 2012, 7:31:11 AM4/5/12

to

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,

Apr 6, 2012, 7:35:56 PM4/6/12

to

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,

Apr 7, 2012, 6:55:24 PM4/7/12

to

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,

Apr 8, 2012, 11:22:22 PM4/8/12

to

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,

Apr 11, 2012, 8:58:34 PM4/11/12

to

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,

Apr 12, 2012, 10:33:50 PM4/12/12

to

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,

Apr 13, 2012, 11:08:01 PM4/13/12

to

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,

Apr 17, 2012, 10:26:03 PM4/17/12

to

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,

Apr 19, 2012, 10:50:09 PM4/19/12

to

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,

Apr 20, 2012, 11:34:15 PM4/20/12

to

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,

Apr 23, 2012, 2:12:46 AM4/23/12

to

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,

Apr 24, 2012, 10:17:12 PM4/24/12

to

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,

Apr 26, 2012, 9:20:41 PM4/26/12

to

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,

Apr 27, 2012, 6:41:34 PM4/27/12

to

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,

Apr 28, 2012, 9:51:00 PM4/28/12

to

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,

Apr 29, 2012, 11:03:41 PM4/29/12

to

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,

May 1, 2012, 10:26:04 PM5/1/12

to

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,

May 3, 2012, 4:25:35 AM5/3/12

to

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,

May 4, 2012, 6:13:07 AM5/4/12

to

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,

May 5, 2012, 3:25:43 AM5/5/12

to

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,

May 6, 2012, 2:58:27 AM5/6/12

to

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,

May 7, 2012, 6:44:35 PM5/7/12

to

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,

May 8, 2012, 10:01:36 PM5/8/12

to

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,

May 9, 2012, 9:26:42 PM5/9/12

to

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,

May 11, 2012, 4:34:53 AM5/11/12

to

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,

May 12, 2012, 3:33:11 AM5/12/12

to

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,

May 13, 2012, 7:58:05 PM5/13/12

to

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,

May 17, 2012, 7:19:48 AM5/17/12

to

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,

May 19, 2012, 10:02:37 PM5/19/12

to

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,

May 24, 2012, 8:36:42 PM5/24/12

to

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,

May 30, 2012, 7:55:15 PM5/30/12

to

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,

Jun 6, 2012, 6:12:38 AM6/6/12

to

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,

Jun 11, 2012, 11:30:07 PM6/11/12

to

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,

Jun 17, 2012, 8:30:04 PM6/17/12

to

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,

Jun 24, 2012, 4:44:13 AM6/24/12

to

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,

Jun 29, 2012, 7:43:12 PM6/29/12

to

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,

Jul 5, 2012, 6:58:26 PM7/5/12

to

Don't be an Ayoob:

https://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/91c1431a6b413912?

Be hungrier, which really is wonderfully healthier especially for
diabetics and other heart disease patients:

https://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/0e719da5c2d970ca?

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,

Jul 13, 2012, 7:42:20 PM7/13/12

to

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,

Jul 22, 2012, 10:22:18 PM7/22/12

to

... and encouraging born-again (John 3:3 & 5) friends like Rod Eastman
( http://WDJW.net ) to also pray for Robert simply because we really
love him as our LORD loves and commands (John 15:12-3) us with all
glory to GOD the Father.

Robert Miles wrote:
>

> Being 'Born-Again' Linked to More Brain Atrophy: Study
> http://www.philly.com/philly/health/132456883.html

From your source:

"According to the study, people who said they were a "born-again"
Protestant or Catholic, or conversely, those who had no religious
affiliation, had more hippocampal shrinkage (or 'atrophy') compared to
people who identified themselves as Protestants, but not born-again"

This study does exclude those of us who are the LORD's http://WDJW.net/Redeemed
who simply **prove** we are born again (John 3:3 & 5) by saying "Jesus
is LORD" with our mouth (Romans 10:9) unto salvation (Romans 10:10)
from all things including brain atrophy :-)

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,

Jul 31, 2012, 10:26:18 PM7/31/12

to

... and encouraging born-again (John 3:3 & 5) friends like Rod Eastman
( http://WDJW.net ) to also pray for Robert simply because we really
love him as our LORD loves and commands (John 15:12-3) us with all
glory to GOD the Father.

Robert Miles wrote:
>
> Being 'Born-Again' Linked to More Brain Atrophy: Study
> http://www.philly.com/philly/health/132456883.html

From your source:

"According to the study, people who said they were a "born-again"
Protestant or Catholic, or conversely, those who had no religious
affiliation, had more hippocampal shrinkage (or 'atrophy') compared to
people who identified themselves as Protestants, but not born-again"

This study does exclude those of us who are the LORD's http://WDJW.net/Redeemed
who simply **prove** we are born again (John 3:3 & 5) by saying "Jesus
is LORD" with our mouth (Romans 10:9) unto salvation (Romans 10:10)
from all things including brain atrophy :-)

Source:
https://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/d8140cee2925da4f?

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,

Aug 9, 2012, 10:03:34 PM8/9/12

to

Virgil

unread,

Aug 10, 2012, 12:56:34 AM8/10/12

to

In article
<e99c7d00-05f7-4758...@n18g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>,
"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <lov...@thetruth.com> wrote:
`

> From your source:
>
> "According to the study, people who said they were a "born-again"

> Protestant or Catholic, those who had religious affiliation,

> had more hippocampal shrinkage (or 'atrophy') compared to

> people who identified themselves as atheists."
--

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,

Aug 20, 2012, 7:44:47 PM8/20/12

to

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,

Sep 1, 2012, 8:46:06 PM9/1/12

to

https://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/9c87c24ea7a7ee20?

Jimmy Alpha GeD

unread,

Sep 1, 2012, 10:14:01 PM9/1/12

to

On 9/1/2012 8:46 PM, sightwalker with a supposed phd said:

> This study does exclude those of us who are the LORD's http://WDJW.net/Redeemed

> who simply **prove** we are born again (John 3:3& 5) by saying "Jesus

> is LORD" with our mouth (Romans 10:9) unto salvation (Romans 10:10)
> from all things including brain atrophy

Charlie, that isn't a proof text of a Christian. Is it any wonder you
don't have a home church and need to make it up as you go!
Jimmy Alpha GeD

B.G. Kelley

unread,

Sep 2, 2012, 12:29:57 AM9/2/12

to

"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" wrote:

> This study does exclude those of us who are the LORD's

> who simply **prove** we are born again (John 3:3 & 5) by saying "Jesus
> is LORD" with our mouth (Romans 10:9) unto salvation

Non-christian: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MWnl6ucHnSE

Video description: "Some fundies are nuts enough to think that saying
"Jesus is Lord" is impossible for non-christians. Do you think the
person who made this a christian?"

Just as the non-christain in the video can say "Jesus is Lord" over
and over again, so can false-christian huckster Andrew B. Chung.

Jimmy Alpha GeD

unread,

Sep 2, 2012, 8:13:28 AM9/2/12

to

On 9/2/2012 12:29 AM, B.G. Kelley wrote:
> "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" wrote:
>
>> This study does exclude those of us who are the LORD's

>> who simply **prove** we are born again (John 3:3& 5) by saying "Jesus

>> is LORD" with our mouth (Romans 10:9) unto salvation
>
> Non-christian: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MWnl6ucHnSE
>
> Video description: "Some fundies are nuts enough to think that saying
> "Jesus is Lord" is impossible for non-christians. Do you think the
> person who made this a christian?"
>
> Just as the non-christain in the video can say "Jesus is Lord" over
> and over again, so can false-christian huckster Andrew B. Chung.

Out of the mouth of my dog I saw cleansing of arse, but other than that
and the butter knife not much is cleaned with mouth. I'll bet the heart
isn't cleaned unto salvation with the mouth, but I'm no heart doctor,
not even a supposed one like charlie.

Jimmy Alpha GeD

B.G. Kelley

unread,

Sep 2, 2012, 2:45:58 PM9/2/12

to

It's never been about reciting a Bible verse, or lifting up one's hand
at an alter call and reciting the "sinner's prayer" in order to get
one's ticket to heaven punched. It's about being a true disciple of
Jesus Christ. One can ask a lot of people, "are you a Christian?" And
they'll reply, "Oh yeah, I was baptized once" or "I said the 'sinners
prayer'". or "I can say Jesus is Lord". But, if you ask people, "are
you a devoted disciple of Jesus Christ, who obeys His commandments?"
The response will too often be, "huh? What?!"

Telling someone they're saved simply because they said something, is a
lie straight from the pit of Hell.

filmflow...@gmail.com

unread,

Sep 3, 2012, 3:45:01 AM9/3/12

to

On Tuesday, March 13, 2012 2:17:45 PM UTC+5:30, B.G. Kelley wrote:
> Andrew B. Chung is an attention whore; do not enable.

HyderabadHospitals.com covers all types of Hospitals information in Hyderabad and Secunderabad, which includes Healthcare, Hyderabad Doctors, Medical Events, healthcare jobs etc

Hyderabad is attracting for tourisam, medical and IT. Now a days the Hospitals in Hyderabad is attracting for the travelers looking for medical treatment. Everyday thousands of people coming from the Pakisthan, Srilanka, Mianmar,US and Europe.

filmflow...@gmail.com

unread,

Sep 3, 2012, 3:45:52 AM9/3/12

to

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,

Sep 16, 2012, 8:07:51 PM9/16/12

to

Virgil

unread,

Sep 17, 2012, 2:02:39 AM9/17/12

to

In article
<1b82e3af-4fb4-418c...@h5g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>,

"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <lov...@thetruth.com> wrote:

Theist liars keep claiming that atheists claim that no gods exist, but
that is false.

What atheists actually say is merely that they lack faith that any gods
exist.

And as atheism makes no claims about whether any gods actually do or do
not exist, it has no need of proof.

On the other hand, those theists who claim that their gods do exist
are each claiming something that presupposes objective
physical evidence, but for which they can provide absolutely none of
that needed objective physical evidence.

To reprise: Lack of belief in the existence of something, as in atheism,
is only problematic when there is a plentiful supply of objective
physical evidence that that thing actually exists. Which is NOT the case
with anything that atheists fail to believe in.

Presence of belief in the existence of something, as in theism, �is only
problematic when there is a total lack of objective physical evidence
that that thing actually exists. Which IS the case with most of what
theists claim to believe in.
--

Dr. Brian Gene Kelley, PhD

unread,

Sep 17, 2012, 2:44:41 AM9/17/12

to

On Sep 16, 11:02 pm, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
> In article
> <1b82e3af-4fb4-418c-a607-63f42f68b...@h5g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>,

There seems to be a lot more to atheism than just not believing. It
seems more like an organization with an agenda. The more I learn about
it, the more it reminds me of religion, ironically enough. Kind of
"what they believe is wrong, what we believe in is correct". Atheists
I listen to; Bill Maher, Penn Jillette, Ricky Ricky Gervais and
Richard Dawkins, to name a few seem interested in Atheism becoming the
dominant believe system and all other belief systems being eliminated.
They use all kinds of propaganda tactics; "people who believe in God
are stupid rednecks, atheists are sophisticate intellectuals".
Atheists seem to proselytize atheism the same was as religion is
proselytized.

There's atheist gatherings, stage shows, conventions, books, TV
programs, podcasts and movies, all devoted to what's supposed to be
"simply not believing". All of this has of course turned into a
multimillion (if not billion by now) industries.
The people I listed above and many others are making zillions of
dollars off atheism. Where's the following of people who don't believe
in Bigfoot? Is there a name for that? Like Abigfootistsim?

I think this highly respected scientist, Neil deGrasse Tyson, best
sums up the fallacy I myself see in atheism:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CzSMC5rWvos

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,

Sep 28, 2012, 7:42:17 PM9/28/12

to

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,

Oct 13, 2012, 8:10:47 PM10/13/12

to

http://www.11alive.com/news/article/251415/3/Doctor-Touts-Hunger (Luke
6:21a) with all glory to GOD, Who causes us to hunger (Deuteronomy
8:3) when He blesses us right now (Luke 6:21a) thereby removing the
http://WDJW.net/VAT

Uergil

unread,

Oct 14, 2012, 4:59:20 AM10/14/12

to

In article
<2a3949a1-f0e0-41e4...@p14g2000yqk.googlegroups.com>,

"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <lov...@thetruth.com> wrote:

> Don't be an Ayoob:

Don't be an Chung.

Keith Ayoob wants kids going to classes to have breakfasts first.
Chung want kids to go to classes without having any breakfasts.

Teachers everywhere know that Chung is wrong and Keith is right.

Unbreakfasted kids do not learn well and are often disruptive in classes
compared to breakfasted kids.

One wonders why Chung is so determined to support such a detrimental
educational practice as sandding kids to classes without allowing them
breakfasts.
--
"Ignorance is preferable to error, and he is less
remote from the- truth who believes nothing than
he who believes what is wrong.
Thomas Jefferson

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,

Oct 27, 2012, 7:56:21 PM10/27/12

to

Uergil

unread,

Oct 27, 2012, 9:08:47 PM10/27/12

to

In article
<0cddac75-2d91-4636...@q16g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>,

"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <lov...@thetruth.com> wrote:

> > Being 'Born-Again' Linked to More Brain Atrophy: Study
> > http://www.philly.com/philly/health/132456883.html
>
> From your source:
>
> "According to the study, people who said they were a "born-again"
> Protestant or Catholic, or conversely, those who had no religious
> affiliation, had more hippocampal shrinkage (or 'atrophy') compared to
> people who identified themselves as Protestants, but not born-again"

Yup!

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,

Nov 8, 2012, 8:30:41 PM11/8/12

to

The Irishman

unread,

Nov 8, 2012, 10:09:55 PM11/8/12

to

"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" wrote to Dr. Brian Gene Kelley, PhD:

> May GOD ever so severely curse you and all around
> you to the Nth generation
> This prayer is being answered:

> http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/a9494e037c47b328?

From the same thread:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/2130bd18842c13e3
A hoax perpetrated by a clone, more than 6 months ago :-)

> http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/0168fcef73d5713e?

From the same thread:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/01f8276f28a36d55
An obvious Fool's Day joke saying Brian Gene Kelley died, posted on
April 1st :-)

> http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/b5414d2cf7aa83c5?

Containing:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X7Y3nbNFir8
A video showing a healthy BMI of 21 (160 lbs) and looking younger than
his being 55 at the time :-)

Proof that Andrew's prayers of this nature go unanswered :-)

Dr. Brian Gene Kelley, PhD is alive and very well :-)

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med/msg/5f88a360d1c8766f

Hunger is starvation

unread,

Nov 15, 2012, 5:15:36 AM11/15/12

to

"Uirgil" <uir...@uirgil.ur> wrote in message
news:uirgil-E90360....@BIGNEWS.USENETMONSTER.COM...
> In article
> <f0f15c89-9250-4e8b...@y8g2000yqy.googlegroups.com>,

> "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <lov...@thetruth.com> wrote:
>

>> Don't be an Ayoob:
>
>>
>> https://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/9c87c24ea7a7ee20?
>>
>> Be hungrier, which really is wonderfully healthier especially for
>> diabetics and other heart disease patients:
>

> But not for school children when going to classes.
>
> So BE an Ayoob, and like him, support giving all children an adequate
> breakfast before school.
>
> "But Keith Ayoob, director of the Rose R. Kennedy Center Nutrition
> Clinic at Albert Einstein College of Medicine in New York City, said the
> programs arenąt the problem.
> łThere is a mountain of research that shows school breakfasts, and
> particularly breakfast in the classroom, have a positive outcomes,˛ he
> said, describing a drop in truancy, behavior problems and visits to the
> school nurse as well as an improvement in grades. łSchool breakfasts are
> not making kids overweight. If theyąre eating two breakfasts, parents
> need to know that and adjust accordingly at home.˛
> Speaking to the New York Academy of Medicine Thursday, Ayoob defended
> breakfast programs and stressed the importance of parents keeping track
> of what their kids are eating.
> łWe donąt want some kids going hungry just because some kids are
> overeating,˛ he said. łA child getting two breakfasts is a much easier
> fix.˛
> http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/health/2012/04/20/school-breakfast-programs-p
> anned-for-feeding-kids-twice/
>
>
> And, apparently, ABChung would rather have kids hungry all the time and
> out of control in classes than breakfasted and good students.

Hunger is starvation

unread,

Nov 15, 2012, 7:58:54 AM11/15/12

to

Dr. John F. MacArthur, a Holy Spirit filled Bible teacher, who is
considered by mainstream Christianity
as one of the best theologians of all time, explains why someone's
name *will never* be
blotted from the Book of Life (Rev 3:5), as Dr. Brian G. Kelley has
categorically stated all along:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h77BDAgzEAs

"Andrew B. Chung, MD PhD" wrote:
> someone whose name's been blotted (Deu29:20) from GOD's Book (Deu
> 32:33) wrote:
>
> someone whose name has been blotted(Rev3:5) from His Book(Rev20:15)
> wrote:
>
> one whose name's been blotted(Mt25:41&Ps69:28) from His Book(Rev20:15)
> wrote:

For someone who claims Holy Spirit discernment, Andrew Chung sure
changes gears a lot.
And his changing gears is based on the input of people, not the Holy
Spirit, as documented below:

On Nov 13, 2:30 am est, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <disci...@T3WiJ.com>
wrote:
> one

Once again, the physician who claims to have an active clinic, is up
at 2:30 am spamming on Usenet :-)

> whose name's been blotted (Mt25:41

“Then He will also say to those on the left hand, ‘Depart from Me, you
cursed, into the everlasting fire prepared for the devil and his
angels"

Once again, these names were never written in the Book of Life (Rev
3:5) to begin with as is the case with Mt 25:41 and corresponding
verse, Rev 20:15

Now why did Chung switch from Rev 3:5...

> someone whose name has been blotted (Rev3:5)
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/e5b7684e99305945

...To Mt. 25:41? Because Rev 3:5 didn't qualify for what he's trying
to claim. And neither does Mt. 25:41 qualify for what he's trying to
claim. Thus proving Chung's lack of Holy Spirit discernment.

> someone whose name has been blotted (Rev3:5)

"I will not blot out his name from the Book of Life" Rev 3:5

What has failed to discern, is that God is obviously promising that
he will *not* blot out a name from the Book of Life once it's written
there :-)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h77BDAgzEAs

> &Ps69:28

That one also had to be given to Chung by someone else who didn't get
it right; still no Holy Spirit discernment from Chung.

PS 69:28a is Book 1: Let them be blotted out of the book of the living
PS 69:28b is, Book 2: and not be written with the righteous [in the
Lamb's Book of Life].

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/be7cf18d9ecd8911

> from His Book(Rev20:15)

"And anyone not found written in the Book of Life was cast into the
lake of fire." Rev 20:15

Obviously those names were never written in the Book of Life to begin
with.

Chung’s previous lack of Holy Spirit discernment failed attempt at
this was:

> someone whose name has been blotted(Deu29:20) from His Book(Deu32:33)
> of Life.

Mosaic Covenant - Covenant in Moab: Only applicable to Israel under
the Old Covenant.

> from His Book(Deu32:33)

"Their wine is the poison of serpents,
And the cruel venom of cobras."
Nether the verse nor the entire chapter (The Song of Moses) is
applicable.

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.messianic.yeshua/msg/ba274bde5f71cbcb

Why does Andrew B. Chung persist staying on this course of folly? The
same reason why he’s stayed on every course of folly he’s been on.
Because of his apparent lack of discernment and his pride.

Which is the same reason why he got fired:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.usenet.kooks/msg/c76e3e39ae96abb4

Which is the same reason why he was evicted from a church:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.usenet.kooks/msg/696af5851a414ee3

Which is the same reason why he was arrested:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/43c54ad99711bfc3

Hunger is starvation

unread,

Nov 15, 2012, 8:09:24 AM11/15/12

to

"mercy" wrote:

> A paranoid schizophrenic
>
> For the last decade this disorder has advanced by degree in Dr. Chung.
>
> Shouldn't we now stop poking sticks at a sick man?
>
> It is like stealing the cane from a blind person for sport.
>
> What is there to gain by it?
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/873d27d604e21793

In the words of his best buddy:

> > It's outside of your realm of serious thought that a a group based
> > on cardiology might not be the best place to libel, troll and pass
> > bad, unprofessional and unsolicited advice.
>
> > I for one don't feel a bit bad for him either. He's a career whiner,
> > a Usenet abuser, an exposed forger, and a pathological liar. Wrap that
> > with his "Oh gosh, it's not my fault, I've got a screw loose" mantra,
> > gee, what a perfect guy for a cardiology newsgroup.
>
> > Either one alone is reason enough to use him for target practice. Put
> > the any of the two together and it's almost morally wrong to not beat
> > him with a brick every chance you get.
>
> > MU
--
A Google search of "Andrew Chung and Markea Berry" produced the
following:

"DR ANDREW CHUNG AND EBONY BERRY ACCUSED OF STARVING DAUGHTER"
http://lapanchinadimariella.forumfree.it/?t=62125479

"Ebony Berry, Mom who starved teen daughter Markea to death, linked to
'hunger' cure Doc (Video)"
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/ebony-berry-mom-starved-teen-daughter-markea-death-linked-hunger-cure-doc-video-article-1.1103172

"Update: Dr. Andrew Chung admits he spoke with starved teen's ..."
http://www.atoast2wealth.com/2012/06/27/update-dr-andrew-chung-admits-he-spoke-with-starved-teens-mom-ebony-berry/

"Update: Dr. Andrew Chung admits he spoke with starved teen's mom ..."
http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/TJE0OPIR81HG0GU23

"Being Hungry is Wonderful": Mother Who Allegedly Starved Daughter as
Part of a “Hunger Cult”
http://www.yourblackworld.net/2012/06/black-news/woman-starves-her-daughter-to-death-as-part-of-a-cult/#

"Dr Andrew Chung advocates 'wonderfully hungry' and is friends with
Ebony Berry, accused of starving daughter"
http://entertainment.topnewstoday.org/music/article/2644930/

"The doctor behind the ‘hunger cult’ that obsessed a mother who
‘starved her 16-year-old daughter to death"
http://investmentwatchblog.com/the-doctor-behind-the-hunger-cult-that-obsessed-a-mother-who-starved-her-16-year-old-daughter-to-death/#.T_HazM0pCh0

--
Hunger is starvation.

"Starvation: The term hunger refers to the symptoms and effects of
starvation. According to the World Health Organization, hunger is the
single gravest threat to the world"

"Starve | Define Starve at Dictionary.com
to cause to starve; kill, weaken, or reduce by lack of food by
hunger":
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/starve

"The world hunger problem: Facts, figures and statistics":
http://library.thinkquest.org/C002291/high/present/stats.htm

"Global Hunger - Bread for the World: Have Faith. End Hunger":
http://www.bread.org/hunger/global/

"Hunger and Children in America: A Slow and Steady Starvation":
http://abcnews.go.com/Health/US/hunger-children-america-slow-steady-starvation/story?id=14328390#.UDuKMfVvF48

"Hunger Starvation":
http://www.geni.org/globalenergy/issues/global/qualityoflife/hunger/index.shtml

"Stop Hunger Now":
http://www.stophungernow.org/site/PageServer

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,

Nov 25, 2012, 7:24:28 PM11/25/12

to

Virgil

unread,

Nov 25, 2012, 9:26:59 PM11/25/12

to

In article
<c315ec92-cf6c-4513...@g6g2000vbk.googlegroups.com>,

"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <lov...@thetruth.com> wrote:

> From your source:
>
> "According to the study, people who said they were a "born-again"
> Protestant or Catholic, or conversely, those who had no religious
> affiliation, had more hippocampal shrinkage (or 'atrophy') compared to
> people who identified themselves as Protestants, but not born-again"

Actually, ones positive mental capacity has been shown scientifically to
be negatively correlated to ones depth of religious belief.

Which goes a long way towards explaining Chung!
--

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,

Dec 7, 2012, 8:19:05 PM12/7/12

to

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,

Dec 21, 2012, 2:56:43 AM12/21/12

to

Virgil

unread,

Dec 21, 2012, 3:56:42 AM12/21/12

to

In article
<3df0e1c9-fc38-47aa...@w8g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>,

"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <disc...@T3WiJ.com> wrote:

> Don't be an Ayoob:

>
> https://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/9c87c24ea7a7ee20?
>
> Be hungrier, which really is wonderfully healthier especially for
> diabetics and other heart disease patients:

But not for school children when going to classes.

Hungry children in classes don't learn, nor allow others in those
classes to do so.

So BE an Ayoob, and like him, support giving all children an adequate
breakfast before school.

"But Keith Ayoob, director of the Rose R. Kennedy Center Nutrition
Clinic at Albert Einstein College of Medicine in New York City, said the

programs aren¹t the problem.
³There is a mountain of research that shows school breakfasts, and

particularly breakfast in the classroom, have a positive outcomes,² he
said, describing a drop in truancy, behavior problems and visits to the

school nurse as well as an improvement in grades. ³School breakfasts are
not making kids overweight. If they¹re eating two breakfasts, parents

need to know that and adjust accordingly at home.²
Speaking to the New York Academy of Medicine Thursday, Ayoob defended
breakfast programs and stressed the importance of parents keeping track
of what their kids are eating.

³We don¹t want some kids going hungry just because some kids are
overeating,² he said. ³A child getting two breakfasts is a much easier

fix.²
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/health/2012/04/20/school-breakfast-programs-p
anned-for-feeding-kids-twice/

And, apparently, ABChung would rather have kids hungry all the time and
out of control in classes than breakfasted and good students.

--

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,

Jan 4, 2013, 6:52:38 PM1/4/13

to

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,

Jan 21, 2013, 7:51:39 PM1/21/13

to

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,

Feb 11, 2013, 8:31:49 PM2/11/13

to

EmoryIMVC.org Cardiologist (GA Lic#04037)

Ken

unread,

Feb 11, 2013, 9:14:16 PM2/11/13

to

http://www.abim.org/services/physver.aspx

Dr. Andrew Ben-hua Chung
Certification Area
Certification Status
Certification History

Internal Medicine
Not Certified
Certified 08/20/1997, Certificate valid through 12/31/2007
Cardiovascular Disease
Not Certified
Certified 11/06/2002, Certificate valid through 12/31/2012

Quacks and witch doctors don't seem to need them

Ken

unread,

Feb 12, 2013, 10:37:09 AM2/12/13

to

What's the matter, ya Quack?
Can't afford to pay the application fees?

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,

Feb 13, 2013, 3:10:14 AM2/13/13

to

... and encouraging born-again (John 3:3 & 5) friends like Rod Eastman

( http://WDJW.net ) to also pray for Ken simply because we really love
him as our LORD loves and commands (John 15:12-3) with all glory to
GOD the Father:

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/42797e450fd691c1?

Don't be an Ayoob:

https://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/9c87c24ea7a7ee20?

Be hungrier, which really is wonderfully healthier especially for
diabetics and other heart disease patients:

http://www.11alive.com/news/article/251415/3/Doctor-Touts-Hunger (Luke
6:21a) with all glory to GOD, Who causes us to hunger (Deuteronomy
8:3) when He blesses us right now (Luke 6:21a) thereby removing the
http://WDJW.net/VAT

... because we mindfully choose to openly care with our heart,

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,

Feb 14, 2013, 2:56:35 AM2/14/13

to