Sara Salzman Lies about her Being a Crackpot As Well as Other Lies V2.0 U_0121
Eddie Haskell
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/2a225eaec8b8fc70?fwc=1
(Archived locally as: SDScrackpotLie)
<catamont-475031...@news.giganews.com> Sara Salzman
<cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>In article <5flfp1toc4onogh32...@4ax.com>,
> Wally Cleaver <Wally_...@mayfield.net> wrote:
[...]
I had pointed out:
>> because you're a laugh a minute and you make your opponents look good and as my
>> former attorney told you: "I can see Scott's point about you when you threaten me
>> (i.e., the disciplinary committee). You have no idea what you are talking about.
>> File whatever you want. However, I will not join your daily hate E-mail list.
>> This shows what happens when you try to be courteous to crackpots."
^^^^^^^^^
Now Sara Salzman gets caught in still another lie with:
>He was talking about YOU, Idiot.
He was talking about you- you pathetic lying "crackpot" and here are your own
words proving that you are a "big fat liar" (which is what Al Franken called
Rush Limbaugh):
http://www.nizkor.org/hweb/people/s/salzman-sara/please-post.html
(Archived locally as: please-post)
"Until these issues are taken seriously..."
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[Email header trimmed]
Message-Id: <v02130500b69de4c84e18@[207.155.173.15]>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 08:53:30 -0700
To: kmc...@veritas.nizkor.org (Kenneth McVay OBC)
From: cata...@concentric.net (Sara Salzman)
Subject: PLEASE POST THIS ON NIZKOR
[...]
Obviously, Mr. Leach was not taking the issue seriously. I tried to explain it
further by reciting the litany of abuse I have received from his client:
Mr. Leach:
You are mistaken. Based on comments like those from Mr. Bradbury, my
children have been harassed. Child Support Services has been contacted with
claims that I am an abusive parent.
[...]
This is the final time I will speak to you on this subject. I can see
Scott's point about you when you threaten me (i.e., the disciplinary
committee). You have no idea what you are talking about. File whatever you
want. However, I will not join your daily hate E-mail list. This shows what
happens when you try to be courteous to crackpots.
I have heard with my own ears the threats Scott has received... I will not be
responding to you anymore...
Daylin
<END>
Now you add your snide comments with these words:
"So let's sum it up. I described the harassment my family and I have suffered,
and Mr. Leach responded that it's "all a big joke," and that I am a "crackpot."
Until these issues are taken seriously, those of us who believe in free speech
but not hate speech, will be subjected to unchecked attacks on our characters,
our homes and families, our places of business, our neighbors, our livelihoods,
and our safety."
Sara Salzman
<END of Nizkook Web Page>
Now who did my former attorney call a crackpot? Answer: YOU!! BTW the above is
proof that you are an evil agent of smear you stupid pig. I made no threats
against you and you overly exaggerated what others did to you. You claimed in
the above: "Based on comments like those from Mr. Bradbury, my children have
been harassed. Child Support Services has been contacted with claims that I am
an abusive parent." YET you have made USENET posts which greatly contradict your
false claim against me with such gems as these:
On 14 Jan 2002 17:44:26 GMT,
<catamont-682C9B...@news.concentric.net>
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/2e7a3edd365d0686
(Archived locally as SaraAffidavitPerjury_1)
Sara <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>In article <200201141640...@nym.alias.net>, lcs Mixmaster
>Remailer <m...@anon.lcs.mit.edu> wrote:
>> Looks like it's time to get the good Doc Tavish in here, so that he can
>> expose your sick fisting S&M fetish...
[...]
>> P.S.
>>
>> Sara, how many times have you been investigated for child abuse?
:
>My _family_ was investigated once when some sick fuck like you thought
>it would be cute to file an anonymous complaint
^^^^^^^^^
<<Tavish comment: Sara says the complaint was anonymous YET in her sworn
statement she claimed it was me!!! Does everyone see what a liar she is!?>>
That is not what you swore to in a civil court you filthy perjurer. You are on
record as saying: "The campaign conducted by Defendant Bradbury and his
accomplices has gone so far as the filing of fraudulent charges of child abuse
with the child protective agency in the area in which Ms. Salzman resides.." BUT
on the other hand you have stated in public forum: "There's no such thing as
"CPS" ... No agency in the Denver area has received a single complaint."
<catamont-BA1794...@news.concentric.net>
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/157dca3f76af2895
(Archived locally as SaraAffidavitPerjury_2)
---------New additions for July 27, 2005--------------
More extracts from the above cited link:
<start/quote>
> Sara Salzman now hangs herself:
>
> >1. There's no such thing as "CPS"
>
> Not according to YOUR previous sworn testimony and not according
> to Yale's submission! Are you admitting to making false statements?
>
> >2. No agency in the Denver area has received a single complaint.
>
> Not according to YOUR previous sworn testimony and not according
> to Yale's submission! Are you admitting to making false statements?
[...]
> BTW there is a CPS in Sara's area- so here is another one of her lies
> exposed:
> http://www.denvergov.org/dephome.asp?depid=244
> Family and Children's Division
> About Us
> Adolescent - Youth Services
> Adoption Services
> Child Care Service
> Child Protection Services
>
> <http://www.denvergov.org/content/template160.asp>
>
> [...]
>
> What is that last line Sara? I thought you said: "And since
> there is no such thing as "CPS" in my area, no charges could
> have been filed with CPS."
> Click the CPS link <http://www.denvergov.org/content/template160.asp>
> and this is what you get:
> <START>
> Family and Children's Division
> CHILD PROTECTION SERVICES
> For those families where maltreatment has been found to exist with
> children under the age of 12, and the risk of additional maltreatment
> requires further protective measures, this second major sub-division of
> the Family and Children's Division is utilized.
<end/quote>
More additional proofs that Sara lied to a civil court:
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.legal/msg/bf00819e583d4a38
(Archived locally as SaraAffidavitPerjury_3)
"I don't live in the "Denver" area, Moron. And since there is no such
thing as "CPS" in my area, no charges could have been filed with
CPS." Sara <<Tavish comment: But you do live in the Denver area and your
"township" is nearly engulfed by Denver!!!>>
-----------------------------------------------------
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/7a8c3c08d6cde513
(Archived locally as SaraAffidavitPerjury_4)
In article <57eb28d4396949341e328f764971d...@anon.xg.nu>, "Public
<Anonymous_Account>" <remai...@anon.xg.nu> wrote:
> Wash your hair and bathe.
> CPS has received more
> complaints about child
> abuse.
> BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH
1. There's no such thing as "CPS"
2. No agency in the Denver area has received a single complaint.
3. You're a liar.
Sara
<END>
Again from Sara's sworn statement to a civil court of law:
<start/quote>
[Archive/File: people/b/bradbury.scott/Edeiken-v-Bradbury-A2.01
[Last-Modified: 2001/02/07]
AFFIDAVIT
I, Sara Salzman, being duly sworn, state as follows:
8. That in addition to such public statements about Deponent,
Defendant Bradbury and/or his accomplices have filed false accusations with
child protection authorities in Deponent's community and have encouraged
others to do the same.
FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NOT.
<end/quote>
Sara swore in an affidavit "Defendant Bradbury and/or his accomplices have filed
false accusations with child protection authorities in Deponent's community" YET
she also has claimed since the affidavit (as proven in excerpts given in this
post): "And since there is no such thing as "CPS" in my area, no charges could
have been filed with CPS." AND "No agency in the Denver area has received a
single complaint."
Xref:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/ddf877bf49b153c2?fwc=1
Subject: Sara Salzman's Affidavit Perjury. One Example of Criminality Revealed.
Message-ID: <o3vfe1tnijjcpqq44...@4ax.com>
Date: 27 Jul 2005 22:18:07 GMT
Sara Salzman's poor damage control and diversion countered with:
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/6ffc6ccf93e09d37?fwc=1
Subject: Re: Sara Salzman's Affidavit Perjury. One Example of Criminality
Revealed.
Message-ID: <9qphe1ttfrdjeu9hs...@4ax.com>
References: <o3vfe1tnijjcpqq44...@4ax.com>
<catamont-18678C...@news.giganews.com>
Date: 28 Jul 2005 14:18:58 GMT
Back to Sara lying about who my former attorney called a crackpot. She claims
above that I was the one he called a crackpot BUT the pig's own lying squeals
prove again what a pathetic liar she is and once again in the swine's own words:
Key phrase= "Mr. Leach then called me a "crackpot." from Sara's defamatory spew
to a news paper YET the pig claims she doesn't seek media attention which is
another big fat lie:
~~Sara Salzman Caught Lying About Using The Media For Her Own Agenda~~
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/86055f63edf2cd18?fwc=1
(Archived locally as: TAV_1 and TAV_2) <See extra links below.>
Subject: Re: Why does Sara Salzman run from her challenge of wanting proof
after it has been provided? Why won't she own up to her lies?
Message-ID: <5qcpb1t3fg49vpv5q...@4ax.com>
Now for the swine to start her smear against two people:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/7cd3012c198a78f8?fwc=1
(Archived locally as: SDSsmearsLeach)
From: Sara <cata...@concentric.net>
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: Now why would Sara ...
Date: 07 Mar 2002 03:58:20 GMT
Message-ID: <catamont-F05F99...@news.concentric.net>
References: <636415e9.02030...@posting.google.com>
In article <636415e9.02030...@posting.google.com>,
ewanlo...@my-deja.com (Dr. Ewan Jackson) wrote:
> Sara <cata...@concentric.net> wrote in message
> news:<catamont-D64337...@news.concentric.net>...
> > In article <636415e9.02030...@posting.google.com>,
> > ewanlo...@my-deja.com (Dr. Ewan Jackson) wrote:
> >
> > > ... be writing letters to the editior of the Main
> > > Line Times?
> > >
> > > You tell 'em Sara.
> > >
> > > EJ
:.
> > Ohh, now you have a problem with people who ... *gasp* ... write
> > letters to newspapers?!?
> >
> > Sara
:.
> You wrote a letter to New Line Times as part of your
> harassment campaign against Daylin Leach.
That's a lie. I wrote a letter stating THE FACTS of my exchanges, both
verbal and via e-mail, to Daylin Leach. Are you implying that there is
something wrong in stating facts in order to enlighten potential voters?
<<Tavish comment: FACTS? That whole lawsuit was filled with perjury and your
affidavit is filled with outright lies!>>
> Do I have your permission to post a transcription of the letter?
>
>
> EJ
I'll save you the trouble:
It is with great concern that I read of Daylin Leach's announcement of
his intention to run for State Representative.
I am a 45-year old mother of two children who has been involved for many
years in the fight against Holocaust Denial and anti-Semitism. My work
in this area has made me the target of a number of neo-Nazis and
anti-Semites, especially on the Internet. After a colleague of mine from
your area suffered intense harassment and filed suit against a virulent
racist from Texas, I was asked to submit an affidavit documenting the
threats and harassment made against me.
This anti-Semitic racist was represented by Daylin Leach. His client had
threatened to "skin me alive and make a holster" for his gun.
<<Tavish comment: You have yet to substantiate that perjury. Care to post the
proof? You haven't yet! I wonder why!?>>
This racist and his friends had harassed me for more than 2 years, They
threatened my family.
<<Tavish comment: You have yet to substantiate that perjury. Care to post the
proof? You haven't yet! I wonder why!? How did I personally threaten your
family?>>
They forged e-mail in my name.
<<Tavish comment: You have yet to substantiate that perjury. Care to post the
proof? Show e-mail I forged in you name.>>
They forged a death threat to the President in my name.
<<Tavish comment: You have yet to substantiate that perjury. Care to post the
proof? Care to prove I had anything to do with it?>>
They encouraged other racists living in my area to harass me and my family.
<<Tavish comment: You have yet to substantiate that perjury. Care to post the
proof? Care to prove I did such BUT I can prove you and Yale have encouraged
kooks to harass me.>>
And once this racist knew I was planning to testify against him, the harassment
escalated.
<<Tavish comment: You have yet to substantiate that perjury. All I told you was
is that you had better tell the truth-- which you did not do!>>
At this point, I contacted Mr. Leach to ask that his client leave me
alone. Mr. Leach laughed at my situation. He told me it was all a "big
joke." I informed him that being investigated by the Secret Service for
threatening the President was not a joke. I told him that my children
living in fear was not a joke. I told him that the publishing on the
Internet of my neighbors' addresses with encouragement to harass me
through them was not a joke. Mr. Leach then called me a "crackpot."
I live in Denver, Colorado,
<<Tavish comment: You don't live in Denver, Colorado! Shall I post the real town
as your pals keep doing to me?>>
where disc jockey Alan Berg was murdered by racists, where an Ethiopian man was
murdered at a bus stop by racists.
<<Tavish comment: So now you are implying I am a murderer. It was your pimp who
posted where I live and invited people to visit me with baseball bats!>>
Almost daily, my address and phone number were being plastered over the
Internet, distributed to racists and skinheads.
<<Tavish comment: Like the over 6,000 times my address etc. has been posted
because you and Yale in typical Jew vindictiveness gave it to all of your little
friends?>>
And yet Daylin Leach, who wishes to represent the ___ district, thought it was
all a big joke.
<<Tavish comment: NO! He knew what you devils were doing to me!>>
I would strongly advise anyone interested in this election to look
carefully at the record. Is a person who defends hate speech the right
person to represent your district? Is a person who values the rights of
a racist to threaten innocent children over the rights of those children
the right person to represent your district? Is a person who laughs at
the fears of a victim of harassment, who calls the victim names, and who
considers anti-Semitism a "big joke" the right person to represent your
district?
<<Tavish comment: My former attorney was a Jew so how could he be anti-Semitic?
Though he would not use the word he knows what kikes are and how they make life
difficult for decent Jews.>>
My affidavit is available online at nizkor.org. I encourage voters to
read it before making their election choice.
~~End of GOOGLE Archive~~
See how the pig lies and here is a catalog of archives detailing many more lies
the swine has been caught in:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics.nationalism.white/msg/74d17effed6ddec
Subject: Sara Salzman's Recent Lies Documented and Archived. V2.0 T_0807
Message-ID: <9sedf1tc6173cb8ko...@4ax.com>
Date: 8 Aug 2005 02:04:13 GMT
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/514d1e8240b88a7c?fwc=1
Subject: Sara Salzman's "Day, time, place. I'm waiting" and From Whence It Came!
V5.0 (Corrections Made) T_0822
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 09:49:21 -0500
Message-ID: <ukojg1d6n0obssupo...@4ax.com>
MORE LIES EXPOSED IN RELATION TO THE ABOVE:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/1396457beb27db68?fwc=1
Subject: Sara Salzman Caught in Two New Lies!! My BUT How That Daughter of
Belial Can Lie!! aka Re: Scott Bradbury Continues to Demonstrate his Psychosis
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 22:53:01 -0500
Message-ID: <pbcqg1pc8hasr00ur...@4ax.com>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/e5a29037c5e168c8?fwc=1
Subject: Sara Salzman Caught in Third New Lie (Possibly Four Lies) in the past
24 Hours!!! aka Re: Scott Bradbury Continues to Demonstrate his Psychosis
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 10:01:12 -0500
Message-ID: <d0krg15oqh52942qr...@4ax.com>
--------------------------------------------------------
The above archives catalog how Sara tells one lie right after another in order
to cover for her previous lie! Truly hilarious and at the same time pathetic
seeing how the slob is connected to two "Holocaust Research Web Sites." Who in
their right mind would take the word of a demonstrated liar such as Sara "The
Fist" Salzman? Also see:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/ddf877bf49b153c2?fwc=1
Subject: Sara Salzman's Affidavit Perjury. One Example of Criminality Revealed.
Message-ID: <o3vfe1tnijjcpqq44...@4ax.com>
Date: 27 Jul 2005 22:18:07 GMT
Sara Salzman's poor damage control and diversion countered with:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/6ffc6ccf93e09d37?fwc=1
Subject: Re: Sara Salzman's Affidavit Perjury. One Example of Criminality
Revealed.
Message-ID: <9qphe1ttfrdjeu9hs...@4ax.com>
References: <o3vfe1tnijjcpqq44...@4ax.com>
<catamont-18678C...@news.giganews.com>
Date: 28 Jul 2005 14:18:58 GMT
------------------------------
~~Sara Salzman caught lying about my District Attorney~~
1) 25 Jul 2005 "The District Attorney was very careful not to say anything
defamatory about Mr. Bradbury."
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2) 07 Nov 2003 In article <Z8Qqb.10092$Pg1.485...@news20.bellglobal.com>,
"Patrick Keenan" <d...@null.net> wrote:
> "Tommy" <T...@NoMail.com> wrote in message news:3885729.VEmTUV52op@FreeBSD...
> > Patrick Keenan wrote:
> > > "Tommy" <T...@NoMail.com> wrote in message
> > > news:8155340.f0uTj6H1vf@FreeBSD...
> > >> > Sara Salzman wrote:
> > >> I forgot to mention: You drove all the way down and talked to the D.A.
> > >> in Bradbury's town and the DA said you were a nut-case!
> > >
> > > You were in the room, were you?
> >
> > No, Were You?
>
> No. The people who *were* in the room say that it didn't happen. Whose
> word do you have that it did? Did *you* hear the term used by the D.A.?
I did! But it was in reference to a local resident, not to me.
Sara
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3) 22 Jul 2003 "...The Austin County police and DA, however, were there. And
they had some very interesting things to say. More interesting were some of the
things they wouldn't say. Like: Policeman: We have a name for Mr. Bradbury, but
I can't say it in mixed company."
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sara states on 25 Jul 2005: "The District Attorney was very careful not to say
anything defamatory about Mr. Bradbury." YET on 07 Nov 2003 She implies my DA
referred to me (a local resident) as a "nut-case!" YET again Sara states on
22 Jul 2003: "The Austin County police and DA, however, were there. And they had
some very interesting things to say. More interesting were some of the things
they wouldn't say." IT IS OBVIOUS SARA SALZMAN IS A RETARDED CRACKPOT WITH
MALICIOUS INTENT!! Notice Sara shows what a liar she is when she stated: "More
interesting were some of the things they wouldn't say. Like: Policeman: We have
a name for Mr. Bradbury, but I can't say it in mixed company." IF THEY WOULDN'T
SAY IT THEN THAT MEANS YOUR QUOTING WHAT "THEY WOULDN'T SAY" IS YOUR OWN
MENTALLY RETARDED IMAGINATIONS!! Care to deny you disgusting pig!?
Xrefs:
1) http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/f273677f0a167b2d
(Archived locally as: SDS_Defamation_2)
From: Sara Salzman <cata...@concentric.net>
Subject: Re: Scott Bradbury-He Is Still Active
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 18:16:47 -0600
Message-ID: <catamont-435AB9...@news.giganews.com>
2) http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/ebdc63494ff3b481
(Archived locally as: SDS_Defamation_3)
From: Sara Salzman <cata...@concentric.net>
Subject: Re: 3rd PING: Tommy... running away again?
Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2003 13:08:43 -0700
Message-ID: <catamont-72C6B6...@news-60.giganews.com>
3) http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/0d711ad4bced9b85
(Archived locally as: SDS_Defamation_4)
From: Sara Salzman <cata...@concentric.net>
Subject: We Have Met The Enemy...
Date: 22 Jul 2003 23:56:18 GMT
Message-ID: <catamont-6E8D44...@news.concentric.net>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 07 Jul 2003 01:31:53 GMT, Sara Salzman <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
"How many times do I have to tell you-- I AM RETARDED!!!"
Message ID: <catamont-548CA8...@spectator.sj.sys.us.xo.net>
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.politics.nationalism.white/msg/9d9e9b42701ff692
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.politics.nationalism.white/msg/9d9e9b42701ff692?dmode=source
Date: 07 Jul 2003 01:31:53 GMT
(Archived locally as: RetardSara and RetardSara2)
~~Sara Salzman's conflicting lies concerning my local law enforcement~~
1) 22 Jul 2003 "Policeman: We have a name for Mr. Bradbury, but I can't say it
in mixed company."
2) 07 Nov 2003 "The deputy sherrif we spoke to also had a name for Mr. Bradbury,
but said he wouldn't repeat it "in mixed company, and in front of children."
3) 25 Jan 2004 "The local Sheriff told us that they have a name for you but
"couldn't repeat it in mixed company."
4) 25 Jul 2005 "[T]he police folks we spoke to said they _did_ have a special
name for him, but they wouldn't repeat it in mixed company."
----------------------------------------------------------------------
1) http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/0d711ad4bced9b85
(Archived locally as: SDS_Defamation_4)
From: Sara Salzman <cata...@concentric.net>
Subject: We Have Met The Enemy...
Date: 22 Jul 2003
2) http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/ebdc63494ff3b481
(Archived locally as: SDS_Defamation_3)
From: Sara Salzman <cata...@concentric.net>
Subject: Re: 3rd PING: Tommy... running away again?
Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2003 13:08:43 -0700
3) http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/2a9b66595b986823
(Archived locally as: SDS_Defamation_1)
From: Sara Salzman <cata...@concentric.net>
Subject: Re: Patrick L Humphrey laughing at R. Scott Bradbury again
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2004 13:18:59 -0700
4) http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/f273677f0a167b2d
(Archived locally as: SDS_Defamation_2)
From: Sara Salzman <cata...@concentric.net>
Subject: Re: Scott Bradbury-He Is Still Active
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 18:16:47 -0600
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
So Sara; who said: "We have a name for Mr. Bradbury, but I can't say it in mixed
company"? A policeman, a Deputy Sheriff, the Sheriff, or "police folks"?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Does it bother you at all that you are forced to tell transparent lies
about your opposition, while they can undermine your efforts merely by
telling the truth about you?" -Jim Alder 01 Jun 2005
Message ID: Xns96687CF5C4150...@216.196.97.142
Tavish
Sara Salzman
Eddie Haskell <Eddie_...@001-mayfield.net> wrote:
[530+ lines of Bradbury's moronic spew deleted]
*yawn*
Go file a report to DA Martin, COWARD.
Sara
--
The Jews may think all people are stupid when I reality the are watch ever
move you people make.
An old German saying is the Jews will give nothing for what you did have
before. The Jews supporting poor black people means there will be absolutely
no return of some of the money this alone speaks for itself.
-- Kurt Knoll.
Eddie Haskell
<catamont-F64087...@news.giganews.com> Sara Salzman
<cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>In article <qok5t1tf5hev7f7m6...@4ax.com>,
> Eddie Haskell <Eddie_...@001-mayfield.net> wrote:
>
>[530+ lines of Bradbury's moronic spew deleted]
Can't refute the fact you were caught lying big time can you- you lying swine?
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/c1ab5163934419f4?fwc=1
Subject: Sara Salzman Lies about her Being a Crackpot As Well as Other Lies
V2.0 U_0121
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 18:35:11 -0600
Message-ID: <qok5t1tf5hev7f7m6...@4ax.com>
>*yawn*
If you would get up off your fat behind and get some exercise you may lose
weight and for sure have more energy instead of being a lethargic lazy sow.
>Go file a report to DA Martin, COWARD.
Statute of limitations you stupid swine.
>Sara
"Fat, high on drugs, and retarded is no way for you to go through life Sara D.
Salzman" and here is what I recommend:
1) Go on a diet and get some exercise which you need desperately. Sitting at
your computer and annoying people is not helping your waste line one bit.
2) Stop doing drugs. They are affecting your mind in a most negative way.
3) Practice the two suggestions above and perhaps your retardation won't be so
severe but one can't expect miracles from years of abuse.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Compelling proofs all of the above are rightful observations:
1) Sara D. Salzman being fat:
http://www.westword.com/issues/2000-08-10/news/feature3_4.gif
2) Sara D. Salzman is a drug user:
"The funniest part of this is that, although I do smoke cigarettes (as
did my ex-husband), HE was the one who abused drugs." - Sara Salzman
Message-ID: <catamont-D20A99...@news.concentric.net>
(Archived locally as: SDSdruggieHome)
Funny that Sara denies doing drugs above BUT she states such as shown below!
"Please let me know what drugs you're taking. They sound wonderful!" - Sara
Salzman Message-ID: <schwartz-180...@cmh-p028.infinet.com>
(Archived locally as: SaraSplainsAll_3 and SaraSplainsAll_4)
3) Sara D. Salzman is retarded:
"How many times do I have to tell you-- I AM RETARDED!!!" - Sara Salzman
Message ID: <catamont-548CA8...@spectator.sj.sys.us.xo.net>
(Archived locally as: RetardSara and RetardSara2)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Is it any wonder Sara D. Salzman mothered two mentally challenged children?
Tavish
Roger
(an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
someone claiming to be Eddie Haskell wrote
in message <g0f6t1tpmp70u7fus...@4ax.com>:
>On Sat, 21 Jan 2006 19:35:27 -0700,
><catamont-F64087...@news.giganews.com> Sara Salzman
><cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>>Go file a report to DA Martin, COWARD.
>Statute of limitations you stupid swine.
There is a Statute of Limitations on gun control laws?
Do tell.
And where's my $10k, lard ass?