> In article <962833$4qo$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>, RevWhite
> <p...@imneverwrong.com> wrote:
>
> > Psycho Sara wrote:
> >
> >I notice you still refuse to name the State Trooper who you gave
> > your "information" to. That's because you made it all up, didn't
> > you?
> >Just like you made up Judge Reibman's "ruling."
>
> a) And Psycho Sara is being told for the second time that if Yale
> F.ag Edeiken ask me in this forum, he gets his answer. The fact the
> chickenshit is still afraid to confront me is noted as I chased
> him off this newsgroup back in October. He doesn't have the balls to
ask
> me personally. The fact that Psycho Sara has to speak for Convicted
> Edeiken is noted.
>
> b) And the fact is, you lied about the Judge not buying Daylin's
> arguments. He accepted them at full value and is seriously
> considering them. In fact, he kept asking Edeiken why he is persuing
a
> judgment in his court at all. I expect the judge to throw out the
judgment
> and I think even Edeiken knows he can't win a cent in Pennsylvania.
>
You were asked to provide the "judgement" you claim was made. You
have remained silent on this, as you are on all facts.
If there was a judgement, post it.
Otherwise, you're just adding to the lies you spew so easily, Father
of Lies.
Produce a single shred of evidence on ANYTHING. You have no
evidence of a DUI arrest of Yale Edeiken. You have no evidence that a
judgement was made.
And you certainly lied through your teeth when you claimed to have
given information to the PA State Police. You can't even produce the
name of the Barracks where this imaginary visit took place!
Sara
--
"It's always nice to see a prejudice overruled by a deeper prejudice."
John Sayles, _Lone Star_
BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH
---
This message did not originate from the Sender address above.
It was posted with the use of anonymizing software at
http://anon.xg.nu
---
> Wash your hair and bathe.
> CPS has received more
> complaints about child
> abuse.
>
> BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH
>
>
1. There's no such thing as "CPS"
2. No agency in the Denver area has received a single complaint.
3. You're a liar.
On 10 Mar 2001 04:26:13 GMT, Sara <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>In article <57eb28d439694934...@anon.xg.nu>, "Public
><Anonymous_Account>" <rema...@anon.xg.nu> wrote:
>
>> Wash your hair and bathe.
>> CPS has received more
>> complaints about child
>> abuse.
>>
>> BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH
Sara Salzman now hangs herself:
>1. There's no such thing as "CPS"
Not according to YOUR previous sworn testimony and not according
to Yale's submission! Are you admitting to making false statements?
>2. No agency in the Denver area has received a single complaint.
Not according to YOUR previous sworn testimony and not according
to Yale's submission! Are you admitting to making false statements?
>3. You're a liar.
I don't know who posted the material to which you now accuse the poster as
being a liar BUT for a FACT you are a perjurer and you have been
officially caught in reversing testimony submitted to a court of law!
>Sara
Thanks for showing again (and this will be filed with the appropriate
agency regarding perjured testimony) that you are a perjurer and that
Yale F. Edeiken does submit false testimony. Care to deny that this was
one of the FALSE complaints Sara and compare it to your stunning
revelations above!
Shofar FTP Archive File
people/b/bradbury.scott/Edeiken-v-Bradbury-A1.01
"Ms. (Sara) Salzman became one of the victims of the Defendant's criminal
harassment after becoming a contributor to an Internet site dealing with
the history of the Holocaust... The campaign conducted by Defendant
Bradbury and his accomplices has gone so far as the filing of fraudulent
charges of child abuse with the child protective agency in the area in
which Ms. Salzman resides (Affidavit of Sara Salzman, attached hereto as
Exhibit A)."
In the future YOU will be compelled to show documented proof of all
accusations such as:
[...]
6) "filing of fraudulent charges of child abuse with the child protective
agency in the area in which Ms. Salzman resides"
Your testimony submitted in the documents which you and your fellow filth
display as fact or "ALL FACTS IN THE COMPLAINT AND ADMISSIONS ARE DEEMED
ADMITTED." is coming back to haunt you. I am going to make damned good and
sure that you and Edeiken pay for all the false statements (perjury if you
wish) that you two made against me in Yale's "malicious prosecution"
against me.
REMEMBER-- I WILL NOT DROP ONE SINGLE CHARGE.
You had better start facing reality real quick Sara because I will not let
up in having JUSTICE meted out to those who have abused the legal system
to try to make my "life a living hell."
I have already filed complaints with the DA's office in Allentown
concerning the criminal activity against me and I will aggressively pursue
it too!
BTW if I were you I would stop worrying about Blakely and would start
worrying about the criminal penalties for being involved in a conspiracy
of malicious prosecution and bearing false witness!
Remember these Torah verses?
Deuteronomy 19:15-21 : New International Version (NIV)
15 One witness is not enough to convict a man accused of any crime or
offense he may have committed. A matter must be established by the
testimony of two or three witnesses.
16 If a malicious witness takes the stand to accuse a man of a crime,
17 the two men involved in the dispute must stand in the presence of the
LORD before the priests and the judges who are in office at the time.
18 The judges must make a thorough investigation, and if the witness
proves to be a liar, giving false testimony against his brother,
19 then do to him as he intended to do to his brother. You must purge the
evil from among you.
20 The rest of the people will hear of this and be afraid, and never again
will such an evil thing be done among you.
21 Show no pity: life for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for
hand, foot for foot.
KEEP THE ABOVE IN MIND!
I am going to do to you and Yale just what you two intended to do to me.
YOU CAN COUNT ON IT PERJURER!
BTW Thanks for the excellent proof that you've lied!
--digsig
Authentic Doc Tavish
Chyeer+xvAMg6mRtq2niuMN+bMnEkGsy0ShVPm2xATn
9ht6KTJwF3BwCXJdWrqn3eSt8VJlNulpXYNe+nzM
4qgm22pMOOW8/iM4uaXUyjegC+/xv7gLjM7vBLJA1
> --
> From: Sara <cata...@concentric.net>
> Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
> Subject: Re: Day 28 - Blakely Lies and Runs Away. Nothing New.
> Date: 10 Mar 2001 04:26:13 GMT
> Organization: Concentric Internet Services
> Message-ID: <catamont-E00097...@news.concentric.net>
> References: <57eb28d439694934...@anon.xg.nu>
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 207.155.173.55
> User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.0 (PPC)
>
> On 10 Mar 2001 04:26:13 GMT, Sara <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>
> >In article <57eb28d439694934...@anon.xg.nu>, "Public
> ><Anonymous_Account>" <rema...@anon.xg.nu> wrote:
> >
> >> Wash your hair and bathe.
> >> CPS has received more
> >> complaints about child
> >> abuse.
> >>
> >> BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH
>
> Sara Salzman now hangs herself:
>
> >1. There's no such thing as "CPS"
>
> Not according to YOUR previous sworn testimony and not according
> to Yale's submission! Are you admitting to making false statements?
>
Once again, Mr. "I can't tell a .com from a .net" screws up again.
> >2. No agency in the Denver area has received a single complaint.
>
> Not according to YOUR previous sworn testimony and not according
> to Yale's submission! Are you admitting to making false statements?
Once again, Mr. "I can't tell a .com from a .net" screws up again.
>
> >3. You're a liar.
>
> I don't know who posted the material to which you now accuse the poster as
> being a liar BUT for a FACT you are a perjurer and you have been
> officially caught in reversing testimony submitted to a court of law!
>
> >Sara
>
> Thanks for showing again (and this will be filed with the appropriate
> agency regarding perjured testimony) that you are a perjurer and that
> Yale F. Edeiken does submit false testimony. Care to deny that this was
> one of the FALSE complaints Sara and compare it to your stunning
> revelations above!
Once again, Mr. "I can't tell a .com from a .net" screws up again.
[blather snipped]
> BTW Thanks for the excellent proof that you've lied!
>
Once again, Mr. "I can't tell a .com from a .net" screws up again.
--
"I'm here to comfort the afflicted, and afflict the comfortable"
- E. K. Hornbeck, "Inherit The Wind"
Scottie, just because you have already lost one case doesn't mean you
can't lose another, so you would be well advised to stop libeling
people.
David Maddisom
Rev White's evidence that you seek is just as real as his 2nd Lieutenant
commission and his ordination as a Christian clergyman.
I expect him to eventually tell us that he has had a personal audience
with Queen Elizabeth
and that he is actually Napoleon Bonaparte.
--
"
Joe Bruno
Respect is a two- way street
http://www.trachtman.org/MIDI/Joplin/magnetic.mid
Joe:
You forgot the part where Donnie tells us that he is enguaged to Julia Roberts,
Cindy Crawford, and Carmen Electra, and as a result, he converted to Mormonism.
Steve
I also proved that I had the URL correct at the outset in my original
posting to USENET with the Subject: "Looks Like Yale "Tubby" Edeiken Isn't
Making it as an Attorney!" on Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 05:44:23 GMT as shown
below for all to see!!! Care to deny the FACT I did have the correct URL
in my post which started the thread? Everyone is watching! Care to try to
prove I posted the link as COM instead of NET before the post I just
pointed to in the previous statements? See how easy it is to prove you to
be a liar?
It was your side who changed the URL in the thread as proven below!! Now
once again I show how your side lies and deceives!
LOOK!
From: Doc Tavish (NOSPAMdo...@my-deja.com)
Subject: Can't Nizkor Director Ken McVay Be Honest Just Once? aka Re:
Daylin Leach says..
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Date: 2001-02-08 18:37:26 PST
[...]
From: Doc Tavish <NOSPAMdo...@my-deja.com>
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Childish Antics of My Adversaries Only Brings Shame Upon Them aka
Re: ZOGCANWEST UPDATE: URGENT - MOST SECRET..
Message-ID: <1c128tcd4jgi860ue...@4ax.com>
References: <95klae$2m7d$1...@news.tht.net>
<catamont-1F80D7...@news.concentric.net>
<25bu7t8f70fv0s94t...@4ax.com>
<3A7FA5E6...@pop.mindspring.com> <95o746$cqj$1...@news.tht.net>
<3a7fa...@news5.newsfeeds.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2001 09:04:29 GMT
On Tue, 6 Feb 2001 07:09:24 -0000, "david_michael"
<david_...@onetel.net.uk> wrote:
>Mr McVay, he who advocates arguing against revisionism rather than
>oppressing it (but who then employs a campaign of smears and intimidation
>against revisionists), has now killfiled pretty much all the revisionists in
>alt.revisionism and has joined the campaign to wreck alt.revisionism by
>posting large numbers of inane messages thereby drowning out those who wish
>to discuss revisionism.
>
>Such are the tactics of the anti-revisionists.
>
>David
Even stranger I posted the correct link to begin with and I have proven it
yet they continue the same campaign. Now that is pathetic. I think one of
them changed my original link from my original, as documented at DejaCom,
in the thread with the sole purpose of creating this current diversion.
Here is evidence my original CORRECT link was changed in the thread and
making the appearance I posted the wrong link as witnessed: "Our thanks to
Agent Salzman for her brilliant manipulation of Subject Tubbiness." I left
all of McVay's assinine attempts to belittle me intact below. Strange he
used the term "manipulation" because that is exactly what happened to the
link from my original post! Shows the depths these serpents will go to in
order to discredit me! The DejaCom Archive and URL below prove beyond any
doubt that I posted the correct link! No IFS, ANDS, or BUTS!
The facts are:
1) I originally posted the correct link.
2) My report to the FTC had in it the correct link.
3) My report to the local BBB had the correct link.
4) My report to the local consumer action group had the correct link. I
don't know why these clowns are behaving in the manner they do!
Here are my undeniable proofs:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=http://www.shaklee.net/edeiken&hl=&rnum=9&seld=932716277&ic=1
From: Doc Tavish <NOSPAMdo...@my-deja.com>
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Looks Like Yale "Tubby" Edeiken Isn't Making it as an Attorney!
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 05:44:23 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 199.174.7.66
Just in to Tavish Dispatch:
http://www.shaklee.net/edeiken
Tubby, you gave out your phone number! Isn't this why you sued me because
I allegedly did so? My Tubby but you are a very FUNNY person!
Is that you wife in the picture Tubby?
Lurkers see: <http://www.shaklee.net/edeiken/aboutme>
Can't be because it looks like she's wearing a cross and we know what you
Jews do when you see crosses. Just like Count Dracula (a fellow blood
sucker your kind is likened to) you should recoil in horror BUT then again
you probably love those blond haired shiksas! Most Jews do prefer Aryan
beauties over the pigs (like Sara)....
<END>
My report to FTC:
FTC's homepage is www.ftc.gov
Their file a complaint online link is:
https://rn.ftc.gov/dod/wsolcq$.startup?Z_ORG_CODE=PU01
Here is what you will see as a response if you use the above
online complaint:
https://rn.ftc.gov/dod/wsolcq$solcq.actioninsert
Success!
Complaint Accepted. Thank you for your input.
First Name: Scott
Last Name: Bradbury
Year Of Birth: (YYYY)
E-Mail Address: xxx...@flash.net
Subject of Your Complaint: Health
Name of Company You Are Complaining About: Edeiken Associates
Street Address: xxxxxxx
City: xxxxxx
State or Canadian Province: Pennsylvania
Country: UNITED STATES
Zip Code or Postal Code: ?
Company Web Site: http://www.shaklee.net/edeiken/aboutme
Company E-Mail Address: ya...@enter.net
Phone Number: xxxxxxxxxxx Ext.
How Did the Company Initially Contact You?: Internet Web Site
Explain Your Problem: http://www.shaklee.net/edeiken/aboutme
The link above makes some pretty tall claims concerning the products
ability in dealing with MS and also I am certain the picture shown is NOT
the person who made the web page and claims to have MS. I have read what
MS has at their web site on alternative cures etc. and this appears to be
offering desperate people in dire straits a "miracle cure." Everything
I've read about MS shows it to be insidious and not reversible.
<Note I "X" out some of the info above to maintain privacy.>
My report to an Allentown consumer watchdog group:
X-Sender: xx...@pop.flash.net
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.3 (32)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 17:12:52 -0600
To: sbi...@quackwatch.com
From: Scott Bradbury <xxx...@flash.net>
Subject: Apparent Consumer Fraud in Allentown, Pennsylvania
To whom it may concern,
The following is a web page advertised a "miracle cure" as I will
call it. I have strong suspicions Wendy Edeiken is not who she claims to
be. This "company" is in Allentown, Pennsylvania and the address is:
Yale F. Edeiken
<Address deleted for this post>
If Wendy Edeiken is not afflicted with MS would not the following be
definite consumer fraud and this is a web based business too!
http://www.shaklee.net/edeiken/aboutme
Edeiken Associates
Wendy & Yale Edeiken
You can change your life because I did!
Let me tell you how I got involved with Shaklee.
In 1984 I was debilitated with multiple sclerosis. I had little hope for
the future and when friends from college told me about Shaklee, I was
desperate enough to listen even though my doctor said that it would be a
waste of money.
With the help of a pharmacist in Shaklee, I began a well-balanced program
of Shaklee supplements, exercise, positive visualization and healthy
eating.
I was amazed at the change! I had energy and the desire to take control of
my prognosis. Now, sixteen years later, I have a thriving Shaklee
business, I am teaching four days a week, and I look forward to every new
day! <BLAH BLAH -- Rest deleted for this post>
<END>
The point being-- I had the correct link from day one and what the clowns
are trying to pull off below looks like another diversion. Also regardless
of how my ignoramus adversaries act the reports were filed with the
~~End of Google Archive~~
Look like I've exposed more of your lies Sara!
>> >2. No agency in the Denver area has received a single complaint.
>> Not according to YOUR previous sworn testimony and not according
>> to Yale's submission! Are you admitting to making false statements?
>Once again, Mr. "I can't tell a .com from a .net" screws up again.
See the post "Subject: Can't Nizkor Director Ken McVay Be Honest Just
Once?" above to prove that I had the URL correct all the time and it was
your band of liars who changed it and all in order to smear me. Don't you
have any pride at all? Do you like being proven constantly to be a
dishonest malicious bitch? I don't mind exposing you or any of your other
liar friends!
>> >3. You're a liar.
>> I don't know who posted the material to which you now accuse the poster as
>> being a liar BUT for a FACT you are a perjurer and you have been
>> officially caught in reversing testimony submitted to a court of law!
>> >Sara
>> Thanks for showing again (and this will be filed with the appropriate
>> agency regarding perjured testimony) that you are a perjurer and that
>> Yale F. Edeiken does submit false testimony. Care to deny that this was
>> one of the FALSE complaints Sara and compare it to your stunning
>> revelations above!
>Once again, Mr. "I can't tell a .com from a .net" screws up again.
See the post "Subject: Can't Nizkor Director Ken McVay Be Honest Just
Once?" above to prove that I had the URL correct all the time and it was
your band of liars who changed it and all in order to smear me. Don't you
have any pride at all? Do you like being proven constantly to be a
dishonest malicious bitch? I don't mind exposing you or any of your other
liar friends!
>[blather snipped]
Restored:
<START>
From: Sara <cata...@concentric.net>
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: Day 28 - Blakely Lies and Runs Away. Nothing New.
Date: 10 Mar 2001 04:26:13 GMT
Organization: Concentric Internet Services
Message-ID: <catamont-E00097...@news.concentric.net>
References: <57eb28d439694934...@anon.xg.nu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 207.155.173.55
User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.0 (PPC)
On 10 Mar 2001 04:26:13 GMT, Sara <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>In article <57eb28d439694934...@anon.xg.nu>, "Public
><Anonymous_Account>" <rema...@anon.xg.nu> wrote:
>
>> Wash your hair and bathe.
>> CPS has received more
>> complaints about child
>> abuse.
>>
>> BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH
Sara Salzman now hangs herself:
>1. There's no such thing as "CPS"
Not according to YOUR previous sworn testimony and not according
to Yale's submission! Are you admitting to making false statements?
>2. No agency in the Denver area has received a single complaint.
Not according to YOUR previous sworn testimony and not according
to Yale's submission! Are you admitting to making false statements?
>3. You're a liar.
I don't know who posted the material to which you now accuse the poster as
being a liar BUT for a FACT you are a perjurer and you have been
officially caught in reversing testimony submitted to a court of law!
>Sara
Thanks for showing again (and this will be filed with the appropriate
agency regarding perjured testimony) that you are a perjurer and that
Yale F. Edeiken does submit false testimony. Care to deny that this was
one of the FALSE complaints Sara and compare it to your stunning
revelations above!
Shofar FTP Archive File
people/b/bradbury.scott/Edeiken-v-Bradbury-A1.01
[...]
Remember these Torah verses?
BTW Thanks for the excellent proof that you've lied!
<STOP>
You perjured and you're now caught!
>> BTW Thanks for the excellent proof that you've lied!
>Once again, Mr. "I can't tell a .com from a .net" screws up again.
See the post "Subject: Can't Nizkor Director Ken McVay Be Honest Just
Once?" above to prove that I had the URL correct all the time and it was
your band of liars who changed it and all in order to smear me. Don't you
have any pride at all? Do you like being proven constantly to be a
dishonest malicious bitch? I don't mind exposing you or any of your other
liar friends!
YOU'RE BOTH A PERJURER AND A PATHOLOGICAL LIAR SARA! MY DOCUMENTATION
ABOVE PROVES IT BEYOND ANY DOUBT!
Doc Tavish
--digsig
Authentic Doc Tavish
Chyeer+xvAMg6mRtq2niuMN+bMnEkGsy0ShVPm2xATn
FU5Ux+UbqpqiWpqzgMWVIRlthereEOwQ51TZYxqU
4mnFHe9Hxl4aeMxeI9/CPAb4D+0uj98TfX8CGvseD
[more hysteria from the idiot who doesn't know the difference between a
"C" and a "D" snipped]
Thanks for once again showing us just how delusional you are, Mr.
Bradbury. Keep it up. It makes delightful reading!!
Sara
--YFE
There goes RevWhite acting like a horse's ass again.
Steve
On 12 Mar 2001 17:30:24 GMT, Sara <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>In article <86vpatc85cta37b2m...@4ax.com>,
>DELETE2MAI...@my-deja.com wrote:
>
>[more hysteria from the idiot who doesn't know the difference between a
>"C" and a "D" snipped]
>
>Thanks for once again showing us just how delusional you are, Mr.
>Bradbury. Keep it up. It makes delightful reading!!
>
>Sara
Thanks once again for providing evidence that you may need a psych eval at
the hearing coming up concerning your perjured testimony. Projecting your
neuroses on me will not in any way divert from the fact you have been
caught in numerous lies and perjury. I will attach what you deleted so all
may see how you avoid reality. Lurkers compare the message ID of my
original post which I restore below to the references in Sara's headers I
included above.
<START>
Path: newssvr16.news.prodigy.com!newsmst02.news.prodigy.com!newsmst01!
newscon06.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.com!nntp.flash.net!
news.maxwell.syr.edu!news.mindspring.net!not-for-mail
From: "McTavish Informational Services (Non-Profit) "
<DELETE2MAI...@my-deja.com>
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism,misc.legal,alt.lawyers
Subject: More of Sara Salzman's Lies Exposed for ALL to See and This Liar
Was a Witness Against Me in Court!!! aka Re: Sara Salzman PROVES She
Perjured and Now Changes Her Story aka Re: Day 28 - Blakely Lies and Runs
Away. Nothing New.
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 11:06:37 -0600
Organization: Ken McVay's WWW.NIZKOR.ORG Smears Private Citizens
Lines: 417
Message-ID: <86vpatc85cta37b2m...@4ax.com>
References: <57eb28d439694934...@anon.xg.nu>
<catamont-E00097...@news.concentric.net>
<05ekatgb7gpe0ni69...@4ax.com>
<catamont-15611B...@news.concentric.net>
Reply-To: DELETE2MAI...@my-deja.com
LOOK!
[...]
http://www.shaklee.net/edeiken
<END>
My report to FTC:
<END>
~~End of Google Archive~~
>> >Sara
>[blather snipped]
Restored:
<START>
>Sara
[...]
Remember these Torah verses?
<STOP>
Doc Tavish
<STOP>
Sara you can't face facts and you can't face reality. You offered perjured
testimony to a court of law and you're in a tizzy because you know I will
make you answer for it. I also exposed your other lies above as well.
Lying seems to be second nature with you!
BTW I am dying to see what the criminal penalties are for perjury.
Also BTW- what is YOUR house worth on the open market?
Doc Tavish
I predict that Scott Bradbury will take this as encouragement
to do exactly the opposite of what you've told him not to do!
Derek - Stupid is as Bradbury does!
--
Derek Bell db...@maths.tcd.ie |"Usenet is a strange place."
WWW: http://www.maths.tcd.ie/~dbell/index.html| - Dennis M Ritchie,
PGP: http://www.maths.tcd.ie/~dbell/key.asc | 29 July 1999.
|
He told me his list of wives was different:
Lizzie Borden
Amelia Earhardt
Eleanor Roosevelt
Anne Boleyn
Imelda Marcos
>On 12 Mar 2001 17:30:24 GMT, Sara <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>>In article <86vpatc85cta37b2m...@4ax.com>,
>>DELETE2MAI...@my-deja.com wrote:
>>[more hysteria from the idiot who doesn't know the difference between a
>>"C" and a "D" snipped]
>>Thanks for once again showing us just how delusional you are, Mr.
>>Bradbury. Keep it up. It makes delightful reading!!
>Thanks once again for providing evidence that you may need a psych eval at
>the hearing coming up concerning your perjured testimony. Projecting your
>neuroses on me will not in any way divert from the fact you have been
>caught in numerous lies and perjury. I will attach what you deleted so all
>may see how you avoid reality. Lurkers compare the message ID of my
>original post which I restore below to the references in Sara's headers I
>included above.
[Scottie's obsessive delusion gets chopped again]
Thanks again for providing further proof that you really are a certifiable
lunatic, Scottie. Her testimony was admitted as fact in the court that's
going to hand you your fat head on a platter -- because you refused to show
up and testify for yourself. If it's been admitted as fact, it can't be
perjury -- which means you'd better start thinking about what dump you're
going to be living in after the court takes everything but your fat carcass
from you.
Judgement Day is on the way, and you can't stop it any more than you can
be cured of your mental problems.
--PLH, --30--
Of course the most humorous part is Mr. Bradbury's hysterical "I WILL
NOT DROP ONE CHARGE!!" statements. One has to, of course, FILE charges
before one can consider dropping them (or not). And to date, Mr.
Bradbury has filed exactly... nothing.
...and his efforts to avoid my observations amount to precisely as much --
his killfiling of me is negated by his obsessive replies to you. No one
will ever justifiably accuse R. Scott Bradbury of being sane OR smart.
--PLH, watching Scottie's slow suicide continue
[...]
>
>Of course the most humorous part is Mr. Bradbury's hysterical "I WILL
>NOT DROP ONE CHARGE!!" statements. One has to, of course, FILE charges
>before one can consider dropping them (or not). And to date, Mr.
>Bradbury has filed exactly... nothing.
Oh, but Sara ... possibly he *has* filed the charges - and locked
them in the ... uh ... cockpit of his Cessna.
hro
=====================
Hilary Ostrov
E-mail: hos...@telus.net
WWW: http://www3.telus.net/myssiwyg/
The Nizkor Project http://www.nizkor.org/
[...]
>Of course the most humorous part is Mr. Bradbury's hysterical "I WILL
>NOT DROP ONE CHARGE!!" statements. One has to, of course, FILE charges
>before one can consider dropping them (or not).
Not necessarily so pig! I could be referring to future action as well!
>And to date, Mr. Bradbury has filed exactly... nothing.
What makes you so sure pig?
You perjured and that is FACT!
http://members.aol.com/StatutesP3/18PA4902.html
Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes
CRIMES AND OFFENSES (TITLE 18)
PART II. DEFINITION OF SPECIFIC OFFENSES.
CHAPTER 49. FALSIFICATION AND INTIMIDATION
SUBCHAPTER A - PERJURY AND FALSIFICATION IN OFFICIAL MATTERS
§ 4902. Perjury.
(a) Offense defined.--A person is guilty of perjury, a felony of the third
degree, if in any official proceeding he makes a false statement under
oath or equivalent affirmation, or swears or affirms the truth of a
statement previously made, when the statement is material and he does not
believe it to be true.
(b) Materiality.--Falsification is material, regardless of the
admissibility of the statement under rules of evidence, if it could have
affected the course or outcome of the proceeding. It is no defense that
the declarant mistakenly believed the falsification to be immaterial.
Whether a falsification is material in a given factual situation is a
question of law.
(c) Irregularities no defense.--It is not a defense to prosecution under
this section that the oath or affirmation was administered or taken in an
irregular manner or that the declarant was not competent to make the
statement. A document purporting to be made upon oath or affirmation at
any time when the actor presents it as being so verified shall be deemed
to have been duly sworn or affirmed.
(d) Retraction.--No person shall be guilty of an offense under this
section if he retracted the falsification in the course of the proceeding
in which it was made before it became manifest that the falsification was
or would be exposed and before the falsification substantially affected
the proceeding.
(e) Inconsistent statements.--Where the defendant made inconsistent
statements under oath or equivalent affirmation, both having been made
within the period of the statute of limitations, the prosecution may
proceed by setting forth the inconsistent statements in a single count
alleging in the alternative that one or the other was false and not
believed by the defendant. In such case it shall not be necessary for the
prosecution to prove which statement was false but only that one or the
other was false and not believed by the defendant to be true.
(f) Corroboration.--In any prosecution under this section, except under
subsection (e) of this section, falsity of a statement may not be
established by the uncorroborated testimony of a single witness.
<end>
Here is an example of perjury:
>Sara
[...]
<END>
Funny thing isn't it that Sara Salzman submits an affidavit to a court of
law which states as documented above among other things: "The campaign
conducted by Defendant Bradbury and his accomplices has gone so far as the
filing of fraudulent charges of child abuse with the child protective
agency in the area in which Ms. Salzman resides (Affidavit of Sara
Salzman, attached hereto as Exhibit A)" yet now Sara Salzman makes public
statements (which have been archived as evidence): "There's no such thing
as "CPS." ...No agency in the Denver area has received a single
complaint."
I really love it that Sara now says in Public Forum: "No agency in the
Denver area has received a single complaint." yet she files a sworn
affidavit to a civil court falsely accusing me: "Defendant Bradbury..
has gone so far as the filing of fraudulent charges of child abuse with
the child protective agency in the area in which Ms. Salzman resides.."
TRY TO GET YOUR STORY STRAIGHT PERJURER!
BTW What is your house worth on the open market?
Your Adversary
>Sara
>On 13 Mar 2001 03:39:12 GMT, in
><catamont-8132DB...@news.concentric.net>, Sara
><cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>
>[...]
>>Of course the most humorous part is Mr. Bradbury's hysterical "I WILL
>>NOT DROP ONE CHARGE!!" statements. One has to, of course, FILE charges
>>before one can consider dropping them (or not). And to date, Mr.
>>Bradbury has filed exactly... nothing.
>Oh, but Sara ... possibly he *has* filed the charges - and locked
>them in the ... uh ... cockpit of his Cessna.
Still giving your dildo a good work out witch? What are you going to say
when Sara and Yale have to answer for all the criminal acts they've done
against me? Perjury and using subpoenaed info to make death threats is
very serious!
BTW it was never proven whether or not I own a Cessna. Sara merely said I
don't have one in MY NAME. There are partnerships etc. you know. Sara also
proved that she stalks and invades my privacy in lieu of also offering
much perjured testimony.
Needless to say your heckling won't be long lasting!
Remember- He Who Laughs Last- Laughs Best (Never forget this!)
Doc Tavish
BTW for the archives here is both Yale and Sara engaging in criminal
felonious activity:
START (Short Version)>
Archive/File: people/b/bradbury.scott/Edeiken-v-Bradbury.C1
Last-Modified: 2001/02/14
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LEHIGH COUNTY
CIVIL DIVISION -- LAW
YALE F. EDEIKEN :
:
Plaintiff :
:
vs. : No. 99-C- 2786
:
SCOTT BRADBURY a/k/a "DOC TAVISH"
COMPLAINT
1 Plaintiff Yale F. Edeiken (hereinafter "Plaintiff") is a an
adult citizen and resident of Lehigh County, Pennsylvania.
[...]
51. On December 18, 1999, Defendant published the following
threat to Plaintiff:
Subject: Re: WHERE OR WHERE IS TAVISH - I'm standing behind you with my
Desert Eagle .50AE locked and loaded.. . . . . . . I'm standing behind you
with my Desert Eagle .50AE locked and loaded slowly squeezing the trigger
for an excellent one shot- one kill! :-) Sleep on that a whil
"nazihunter." Doc Tavish Knowing Time is on His Side"
[...]
Respectfully submitted,
________________________
Yale F. Edeiken
c/o Trainor Law Offices
1720 Fairmont Street
Allentown PA 18104
<end>
The above is verbatim from the complaint from a frivolous lawsuit filed
against me by an attorney who has engaged in criminal acts against me as I
will prove.
FACT: Notice in the complaint that the plaintiff is identified as
Yale F. Edeiken who then identifies himself as "nazihunter" as follows:
<start> (From the above complaint)
51. On December 18, 1999, Defendant published the following
threat to Plaintiff:
Subject: Re: WHERE OR WHERE IS TAVISH - I'm standing behind you with my
Desert Eagle .50AE locked and loaded.. . . . . . . I'm standing behind you
with my Desert Eagle .50AE locked and loaded slowly squeezing the trigger
for an excellent one shot- one kill! :-) Sleep on that a whil
"nazihunter." Doc Tavish Knowing Time is on His Side"
<stop>
In the above complaint the Plaintiff, Yale F. Edeiken, identified himself
as being the recipient of the above "threat." I merely replied to an
anonymous psychopath who just a day earlier posted my address and
telephone number under the pseudonym of "nazihunter" with the invitation
that I be visited with baseball bats!
Here is the post in full context. (Please note that all posts are on file
with law enforcement and with my attorney and they are exact copies with
my address and telephone number intact. In these public postings I delete
what Yale F. Edeiken posted.)
Subject: Re: WHERE OR WHERE IS TAVISH - I'm standing behind you with my
Desert Eagle .50AE locked and loaded..
Date: 12/18/1999
Author: Tavish <doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com>
On 15-Dec-1999, "nazihunter" <anon...@cotse.com> wrote:
> It seems that ever since Tavish's address was published, he
> seems to have disappeared.
> Has he fled?
> Or, better yet, has someone paid him a visit?
I'm standing behind you with my Desert Eagle .50AE locked and loaded
slowly squeezing the trigger for an excellent one shot- one kill! :-)
Sleep on that a while "nazihunter."
Doc Tavish Knowing Time is on His Side
<END>
Compare the text and note that Yale F. Edeiken has in FACT identified
himself as being "nazihunter." Here is the post which Yale F. Edeiken as
"nazihunter" was gloating about above in his vain attempt to intimidate me
into silence through a criminal death threat:
<START Google Archival Excerpt>
From: "nazihunter"
Subject: WHY NOT GIVE THE NAZI SHITHEAD TAVISH A CALL
Date: 14 Dec 1999 00:00:00 GMT
Message-ID: <1999121500...@cotse.com
X-Abuse-to: ab...@cotse.com
Organization: cotse
X-Abuse-goto: http://packetderm.cotse.com/cgi-bin/blockit.cgi
X-Comments: Anonymous mail2news gate web interface -
www.cotse.com/anonnews.htm.
X-Mail-To-News-Contact: ab...@zedz.net
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Anonymously posted.
The following is the address for Doc Tavish
Scott Bradbury
<address and telephone number deleted>
Why not call him and tell him what a nazi prick he is.
Better yet, why not visit him.......with a baseball bat.
~~End of Post~~
See the death threat? See that it was from the same pseudonym the
Plaintiff, Yale F. Edeiken, identified himself as being? Take note of the
time and date of the archive! The critical points are:
Date: 14 Dec 1999 00:00:00 GMT
Organization: cotse
[...]
All of the above criminal harassment happened because a mentally disturbed
attorney obtained my unlisted address and unlisted telephone number by use
of a subpoena as shown here:
"Flash Net Communications, File number 99-C-2786 with a heading:
Yale F. Edeiken Vs Scott Bradbury aka sonn...@flash.net demanding:
"(1) Application for services and all other written materials including
e-mails, complaints or memoranda of internal investigation of
sonn...@flash.net.. This subpoena was issued at the request of the
following person: Yale F. Edeiken, Allentown, PA 18104 Supreme Court ID#
40290.. November 30,1999 Return address: Yale F. Edeiken, 918 North Bayard
Street; Allentown, PA 18104." (Subpoena on file with my attorney, Flash
Net, and law enforcement) [For the record the subpoena does NOT appear on
the docket- rather my confidential info went directly to one of
Yale F. Edeiken's "drops."]
Yale F. Edeiken had a subpoena issued on November 30,1999 and sent it from
Allentown, Pennsylvania to Flash Net in Dallas, Texas. The travel time and
turnaround would be reasonable to assume that Yale F. Edeiken received
my confidential info on about December 14, 1999! I ask what are the odds
that another person other than Yale F. Edeiken would be using the COTSE
anonymizer in a small time frame on the night of December 14, 1999 to
violate my right to privacy!? Yale F. Edeiken did in FACT identify himself
as the plaintiff and that the plaintiff was threatened (personally) when I
replied to "nazihunter" <anon...@cotse.com>.
I ask how much more criminal can an attorney be compared to an evil
corrupt bastard who abuses the legal system for his own vendettas against
others?
-----
Now I would like for all concerned to answer these questions:
1) Who is identified as the plaintiff in 1999-C-2786?
2) Who identified himself as the recipient of: "I'm standing behind you
with my Desert Eagle .50AE locked and loaded.. . . . . . . I'm standing
behind you with my Desert Eagle .50AE locked and loaded slowly squeezing
the trigger for an excellent one shot- one kill! :-) Sleep on that a whil
"nazihunter." Doc Tavish Knowing Time is on His Side" which he said in his
own words: "On December 18, 1999, Defendant published the following threat
to Plaintiff"?
3) Given that the answer to question number ONE is also the answer to
question number TWO I ask: Who identified himself as "nazihunter"- the
recipient of my reply to an anonymous post?
All three questions have the same answer! I posed the same questions to my
local District Attorney and he got the answers correct given the
information provided to the DA in Allentown!
Now I ask what are the odds that another entirely different person would
also acquire my unlisted telephone number and address and be posting it on
the night of the December 14, 1999 to be archived by DejaCom within a very
narrow time frame?
<STOP>
Sara Salzman engaging in perjured testimony:
>Sara
[...]
<END>
Funny thing isn't it that Sara Salzman submits an affidavit to a court of
law which states as documented above among other things: "The campaign
conducted by Defendant Bradbury and his accomplices has gone so far as the
filing of fraudulent charges of child abuse with the child protective
agency in the area in which Ms. Salzman resides (Affidavit of Sara
Salzman, attached hereto as Exhibit A)" yet now Sara Salzman makes public
statements (which have been archived as evidence): "There's no such thing
as "CPS." ...No agency in the Denver area has received a single
complaint."
I really love it that Sara now says in Public Forum: "No agency in the
Denver area has received a single complaint." yet she files a sworn
affidavit to a civil court falsely accusing me: "Defendant Bradbury..
has gone so far as the filing of fraudulent charges of child abuse with
the child protective agency in the area in which Ms. Salzman resides.."
<end>
I love the way you Nizkor Kooks dodge and divert from serious felonies in
order to try to save face! It only brings much reproach upon you!
You vermin are proven again and again to be liars!
BTW here is another one of Sara Salzman's lies exposed:
Sara stated: _There's no such thing as "CPS"_
in reply to an anonymous poster who said: "Wash your hair and bathe.
CPS has received more complaints about child abuse."
I just did a www.google.com search using keywords:
"Children's Protective Services Denver" and these
are the partial results:
Searched the web for Children's Protective Services Denver.
Results 1 - 10 of about 6,040. Search took 0.37 seconds.
PARENTS VICTIMIZED BY CHILDREN'S PROTECTIVE SERVICES
... Children's Operation Bureau; Attn ... investigations of Child
Protective Services are being ... Health and Human Services. This BBS can
... E. Kenyon Ave., Denver, CO, 80237 ...
www.childprotectionreform.org/defense/yourself/vocal_advice.htm
Supervising Child Protective Services Caseworkers - Selected ...
... Case Recording in Children's Protective Services." Social ... and
Child Protective Services. Lanham, MD: AEI ... Casework Effectiveness.
Denver, CO: American ...
www.calib.com/nccanch/pubs/usermanuals/supercps/biblio.htm
Child Protective Services - Notes
... Department of Family and Children's Services Certification Training
Program ... Skills in Child Protective Services (Denver, CO: American
Humane ...
www.calib.com/nccanch/pubs/usermanuals/cpswork/notes.htm
Commerce Kidz Com - Protective Services Page
... to the childrens protective services section of ... the Vanished
Children's Alliance, developed ... Criminal Justice Services. We guarantee
... Click for Denver, Colorado ...
www.commerce.kidz.com/Protective_Services/
A Successful Public/Private Partnership in Children s ...
... Developmental. Caregiver Interview; Denver II. Not Applicable.
Emotional ... Economic Impact to Child Protective Services. Utilization of
the CIVITAS ...
www.bcm.tmc.edu/cta/cccc_partners.htm
VICTIMS OF CHILD ABUSE
... Child fell thru the 'Children's Protective Services' cracks". This
"crack ... and Ramon Espinoza - Denver - Separated by Child ... Benefit of
Family Services. ...
www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/Lobby/8460/cpspage.htm
Parents victimized by children's protective services
... investigations of Child Protective Services are being ... E. Kenyon
Ave., Denver, CO, 80237. They ... on the injustice of Children's Services
departments." See ...
www.glasstemple.com/essays/eabuse.htm
[PDF] www.futureofchildren.org/pcn/10_pcn.pdf
... through legislative reform. Denver, CO: National Conference of ...
eds. Decision making in children's protective services
<end>
I guess Hilary will say GOOGLE.COM lied instead of sara. GOOGLE.COM shows
Children's Protective Services (CPS) as existing in Denver yet Sow Salzman
stated: _There's no such thing as "CPS"_
Who do you all believe? GOOGLE or a perjurious pathological liar named
Sara Salzman?
Why can't Sara and her fellow pigs accept truth, tell the truth,
and not be such hard headed liars? Is truth an enemy to their psyches?
Must be because truth is alien to their minds!
>hro
>=====================
>Hilary Ostrov
>E-mail: hos...@telus.net
>WWW: http://www3.telus.net/myssiwyg/
>The Nizkor Project http://www.nizkor.org/
Why is it every time I see Nizkor I associate it with lies and smear?
Doc Tavish
--digsig
Authentic Doc Tavish
Chyeer+xvAMg6mRtq2niuMN+bMnEkGsy0ShVPm2xATn
kMLDzPQco6lZ6+TORkKpFKITt7ULfg/KGDJP9c76
41duCppl0OVpPk0BopiqIIqeyFcYc1kYuHdiJ16gH
>On 13 Mar 2001 03:39:12 GMT, Sara <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>[...]
>>Of course the most humorous part is Mr. Bradbury's hysterical "I WILL
>>NOT DROP ONE CHARGE!!" statements. One has to, of course, FILE charges
>>before one can consider dropping them (or not).
>Not necessarily so pig! I could be referring to future action as well!
You could be...but your documented history shows a different story. You
see, Sara just might know how to check on such things as suits that have
been filed.
>>And to date, Mr. Bradbury has filed exactly... nothing.
>What makes you so sure pig?
>You perjured and that is FACT!
Only in that terminally damaged mind of yours, Scottie. You didn't take
your case to a real court, and that's why you're going to get your fat ass
handed to you on a platter.
Keep up the good work, Scottie -- you'll be moved to Rusk in no time!
--PLH, and Bellville will be a better place for it
Proving yet again that the law is yet another topic Bradbury is
profoundly ignorant of!!
Derek
I don't live in the "Denver" area, Moron. And since there is no such
thing as "CPS" in my area, no charges could have been filed with CPS.
But please, keep threatening me. It will certainly impress the Judge.
True. And they were hand-delivered to his lawyer by Bruno?
>> >Sara
>> >Sara
The incorporated area you live in is in the Denver area according to Rand
McNally's Road Atlas- Aurora is within Denver's city limits! I'd imagine
Aurora is a non-incorporated township BUT for a fact it is surrounded by
Denver! Are you now going to imply Rand McNally is false too!? Aurora is
in Denver and just as those Jewish New Year's cards you FWD from Tubby
came from a Denver post office. My my my but you do lie!
>And since there is no such thing as "CPS" in my area, no charges could
>have been filed with CPS.
There is a "CPS" in your area pig and I proved it in another post.
Denver surrounds Aurora so that makes it your area! Care to continually
deny:
Sara stated: _There's no such thing as "CPS"_
in reply to an anonymous poster who said: "Wash your hair and bathe.
CPS has received more complaints about child abuse."
I just did a www.google.com search using keywords:
More links from www.google.com
http://www.bcm.tmc.edu/cta/NewZealand_abstract.htm
"Thousands of children in the United States are referred to Children's
Protective Services (CPS) for allegations of abuse and neglect each year.
These children are often at greater risk for physical, emotional,
behavioral, cognitive, developmental, and social problems. Despite this,
systematic evaluation of the needs of children in custody is rarely
proactive. Frequently, children in custody receive psychological
evaluations only after disruptive behaviors surface in school or at home.
Children who are not yet school age or overtly exhibiting psychopathology
may not even be evaluated... In addition to these findings, the utility of
different standard measures in a Children’s Protective Services evaluation
will also be reviewed. KEYWORDS: Child Maltreatment; Denver Developmental
Screening Test; Children’s Protective Services"
http://childlaw.law.sc.edu/manuals/user/cpswork/notes.htm
CPS Guide for Caseworkers
27. Adapted from V. DeFrancis, Special Skills in Child Protective Services
(Denver, CO: American Humane Association, n.d.), 1.
www.silent-no-more.org/childabuse.html
(C. Henry Kempe Center. Denver). ... Seek Help. Call Children's
protective Services and your family doctor ...
Need I say more? (Sara is a liar!)
>But please, keep threatening me. It will certainly impress the Judge.
Who has threatened you pig? When is pointing out your numerous lies and
perjuries making threats!? You will make an impression on the judge when
you are compelled to prove all you claimed in your affidavit!
BTW regarding the subject title you kooks made: "Re: Frothing at the Mouth
Won't Make Your Judgement Loss Disappear, Scottie!"
What judgment losses? Care to name an amount liars!?
>Sara
Doc Tavish
No doubt Bruno also delivered the federal charges to Brunos'
brother, the federal prosecutor that Tavish says he's getting.
Here was his cowardly warning and this repost is counter to his deeds:
From: S...@shaklee.net (Shaklee)
Subject: ANNOUNCING MASS CANCELLATION OF SCOTTIE IS UNDERWAY
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2001 13:08:06 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: net NOT com
Message-ID: <98l63m$1ea$2...@news.tht.net>
X-Complaints-To: scr...@hub.org
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.99.9 (Released Version) (x86 32bit)
COURTESY OF NAZIHUNTER
<end>
The person above is a coward who hides behind anonymity and has never
showed the intelligence or courage to refute ONE single post I've made!
--
From: Sara <cata...@concentric.net>
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism,misc.legal,alt.lawyers
Subject: Re: Sara Salzman PROVES She Perjured and Now Changes Her Story
aka Re: Day 28 - Blakely Lies and Runs Away. Nothing New.
Date: 10 Mar 2001 15:20:38 GMT
Organization: Concentric Internet Services
Message-ID: <catamont-15611B...@news.concentric.net>
References: <57eb28d439694934...@anon.xg.nu>
<catamont-E00097...@news.concentric.net>
<05ekatgb7gpe0ni69...@4ax.com>
I also proved that I had the URL correct at the outset in my original
LOOK!
[...]
http://www.shaklee.net/edeiken
<END>
My report to FTC:
<END>
~~End of Google Archive~~
>> >2. No agency in the Denver area has received a single complaint.
>> Not according to YOUR previous sworn testimony and not according
>> to Yale's submission! Are you admitting to making false statements?
>Once again, Mr. "I can't tell a .com from a .net" screws up again.
See the post "Subject: Can't Nizkor Director Ken McVay Be Honest Just
Once?" above to prove that I had the URL correct all the time and it was
your band of liars who changed it and all in order to smear me. Don't you
have any pride at all? Do you like being proven constantly to be a
dishonest malicious bitch? I don't mind exposing you or any of your other
liar friends!
>> >3. You're a liar.
>> I don't know who posted the material to which you now accuse the poster as
>> being a liar BUT for a FACT you are a perjurer and you have been
>> officially caught in reversing testimony submitted to a court of law!
>> >Sara
>> Thanks for showing again (and this will be filed with the appropriate
>> agency regarding perjured testimony) that you are a perjurer and that
>> Yale F. Edeiken does submit false testimony. Care to deny that this was
>> one of the FALSE complaints Sara and compare it to your stunning
>> revelations above!
>Once again, Mr. "I can't tell a .com from a .net" screws up again.
See the post "Subject: Can't Nizkor Director Ken McVay Be Honest Just
Once?" above to prove that I had the URL correct all the time and it was
your band of liars who changed it and all in order to smear me. Don't you
have any pride at all? Do you like being proven constantly to be a
dishonest malicious bitch? I don't mind exposing you or any of your other
liar friends!
>[blather snipped]
Restored:
<START>
From: Sara <cata...@concentric.net>
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: Day 28 - Blakely Lies and Runs Away. Nothing New.
Date: 10 Mar 2001 04:26:13 GMT
Organization: Concentric Internet Services
Message-ID: <catamont-E00097...@news.concentric.net>
References: <57eb28d439694934...@anon.xg.nu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 207.155.173.55
User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.0 (PPC)
On 10 Mar 2001 04:26:13 GMT, Sara <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>In article <57eb28d439694934...@anon.xg.nu>, "Public
><Anonymous_Account>" <rema...@anon.xg.nu> wrote:
>
>> Wash your hair and bathe.
>> CPS has received more
>> complaints about child
>> abuse.
>>
>> BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH
Sara Salzman now hangs herself:
>1. There's no such thing as "CPS"
Not according to YOUR previous sworn testimony and not according
to Yale's submission! Are you admitting to making false statements?
>2. No agency in the Denver area has received a single complaint.
Not according to YOUR previous sworn testimony and not according
to Yale's submission! Are you admitting to making false statements?
>3. You're a liar.
I don't know who posted the material to which you now accuse the poster as
being a liar BUT for a FACT you are a perjurer and you have been
officially caught in reversing testimony submitted to a court of law!
>Sara
Thanks for showing again (and this will be filed with the appropriate
agency regarding perjured testimony) that you are a perjurer and that
Yale F. Edeiken does submit false testimony. Care to deny that this was
one of the FALSE complaints Sara and compare it to your stunning
revelations above!
Shofar FTP Archive File
people/b/bradbury.scott/Edeiken-v-Bradbury-A1.01
[...]
Remember these Torah verses?
BTW Thanks for the excellent proof that you've lied!
<STOP>
You perjured and you're now caught!
>> BTW Thanks for the excellent proof that you've lied!
>Once again, Mr. "I can't tell a .com from a .net" screws up again.
See the post "Subject: Can't Nizkor Director Ken McVay Be Honest Just
Once?" above to prove that I had the URL correct all the time and it was
your band of liars who changed it and all in order to smear me. Don't you
have any pride at all? Do you like being proven constantly to be a
dishonest malicious bitch? I don't mind exposing you or any of your other
liar friends!
YOU'RE BOTH A PERJURER AND A PATHOLOGICAL LIAR SARA! MY DOCUMENTATION
ABOVE PROVES IT BEYOND ANY DOUBT!
Doc Tavish
--digsig
Authentic Doc Tavish
Chyeer+xvAMg6mRtq2niuMN+bMnEkGsy0ShVPm2xATn
FU5Ux+UbqpqiWpqzgMWVIRlthereEOwQ51TZYxqU
4mnFHe9Hxl4aeMxeI9/CPAb4D+0uj98TfX8CGvseD
Here was his cowardly warning and this repost is counter to his deeds:
From: S...@shaklee.net (Shaklee)
Subject: ANNOUNCING MASS CANCELLATION OF SCOTTIE IS UNDERWAY
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2001 13:08:06 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: net NOT com
Message-ID: <98l63m$1ea$2...@news.tht.net>
X-Complaints-To: scr...@hub.org
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.99.9 (Released Version) (x86 32bit)
COURTESY OF NAZIHUNTER
<end>
The person above is a coward who hides behind anonymity and has never
showed the intelligence or courage to refute ONE single post I've made!
On 13 Mar 2001 03:39:12 GMT, Sara <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
[...]
>Of course the most humorous part is Mr. Bradbury's hysterical "I WILL
>NOT DROP ONE CHARGE!!" statements. One has to, of course, FILE charges
>before one can consider dropping them (or not).
Not necessarily so pig! I could be referring to future action as well!
>And to date, Mr. Bradbury has filed exactly... nothing.
What makes you so sure pig?
http://members.aol.com/StatutesP3/18PA4902.html
<end>
>Sara
[...]
<END>
Funny thing isn't it that Sara Salzman submits an affidavit to a court of
law which states as documented above among other things: "The campaign
conducted by Defendant Bradbury and his accomplices has gone so far as the
filing of fraudulent charges of child abuse with the child protective
agency in the area in which Ms. Salzman resides (Affidavit of Sara
Salzman, attached hereto as Exhibit A)" yet now Sara Salzman makes public
statements (which have been archived as evidence): "There's no such thing
as "CPS." ...No agency in the Denver area has received a single
complaint."
I really love it that Sara now says in Public Forum: "No agency in the
Denver area has received a single complaint." yet she files a sworn
affidavit to a civil court falsely accusing me: "Defendant Bradbury..
has gone so far as the filing of fraudulent charges of child abuse with
the child protective agency in the area in which Ms. Salzman resides.."
TRY TO GET YOUR STORY STRAIGHT PERJURER!
BTW What is your house worth on the open market?
Your Adversary
>Sara
Here was his cowardly warning and this repost is counter to his deeds:
From: S...@shaklee.net (Shaklee)
Subject: ANNOUNCING MASS CANCELLATION OF SCOTTIE IS UNDERWAY
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2001 13:08:06 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: net NOT com
Message-ID: <98l63m$1ea$2...@news.tht.net>
X-Complaints-To: scr...@hub.org
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.99.9 (Released Version) (x86 32bit)
COURTESY OF NAZIHUNTER
<end>
The person above is a coward who hides behind anonymity and has never
showed the intelligence or courage to refute ONE single post I've made!
From: Sara <cata...@concentric.net>
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism,misc.legal,alt.lawyers
Subject: Scott Bradbury Froths at the Mouth; Proves Nothing
Date: 12 Mar 2001 17:30:24 GMT
Organization: Concentric Internet Services
Message-ID: <catamont-4578BA...@news.concentric.net>
References: <57eb28d439694934...@anon.xg.nu>
<catamont-E00097...@news.concentric.net>
<05ekatgb7gpe0ni69...@4ax.com>
<catamont-15611B...@news.concentric.net>
<86vpatc85cta37b2m...@4ax.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 207.155.172.87
On 12 Mar 2001 17:30:24 GMT, Sara <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>In article <86vpatc85cta37b2m...@4ax.com>,
>DELETE2MAI...@my-deja.com wrote:
>
>[more hysteria from the idiot who doesn't know the difference between a
>"C" and a "D" snipped]
>
>Thanks for once again showing us just how delusional you are, Mr.
>Bradbury. Keep it up. It makes delightful reading!!
>
>Sara
Thanks once again for providing evidence that you may need a psych eval at
the hearing coming up concerning your perjured testimony. Projecting your
neuroses on me will not in any way divert from the fact you have been
caught in numerous lies and perjury. I will attach what you deleted so all
may see how you avoid reality. Lurkers compare the message ID of my
original post which I restore below to the references in Sara's headers I
included above.
<START>
Path: newssvr16.news.prodigy.com!newsmst02.news.prodigy.com!newsmst01!
newscon06.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.com!nntp.flash.net!
news.maxwell.syr.edu!news.mindspring.net!not-for-mail
From: "McTavish Informational Services (Non-Profit) "
<DELETE2MAI...@my-deja.com>
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism,misc.legal,alt.lawyers
Subject: More of Sara Salzman's Lies Exposed for ALL to See and This Liar
Was a Witness Against Me in Court!!! aka Re: Sara Salzman PROVES She
Perjured and Now Changes Her Story aka Re: Day 28 - Blakely Lies and Runs
Away. Nothing New.
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 11:06:37 -0600
Organization: Ken McVay's WWW.NIZKOR.ORG Smears Private Citizens
Lines: 417
Message-ID: <86vpatc85cta37b2m...@4ax.com>
References: <57eb28d439694934...@anon.xg.nu>
<catamont-E00097...@news.concentric.net>
<05ekatgb7gpe0ni69...@4ax.com>
<catamont-15611B...@news.concentric.net>
Reply-To: DELETE2MAI...@my-deja.com
From: Sara <cata...@concentric.net>
LOOK!
[...]
http://www.shaklee.net/edeiken
<END>
My report to FTC:
<END>
~~End of Google Archive~~
>> >Sara
>[blather snipped]
Restored:
<START>
>Sara
[...]
Remember these Torah verses?
<STOP>
Doc Tavish
<STOP>
Sara you can't face facts and you can't face reality. You offered perjured
testimony to a court of law and you're in a tizzy because you know I will
make you answer for it. I also exposed your other lies above as well.
Lying seems to be second nature with you!
BTW I am dying to see what the criminal penalties are for perjury.
Also BTW- what is YOUR house worth on the open market?
Doc Tavish
Here was his cowardly warning and this repost is counter to his deeds:
From: S...@shaklee.net (Shaklee)
Subject: ANNOUNCING MASS CANCELLATION OF SCOTTIE IS UNDERWAY
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2001 13:08:06 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: net NOT com
Message-ID: <98l63m$1ea$2...@news.tht.net>
X-Complaints-To: scr...@hub.org
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.99.9 (Released Version) (x86 32bit)
COURTESY OF NAZIHUNTER
<end>
The person above is a coward who hides behind anonymity and has never
showed the intelligence or courage to refute ONE single post I've made!
--
On Tue, 13 Mar 2001 04:24:43 GMT, Hilary Ostrov <hos...@telus.net> wrote:
>On 13 Mar 2001 03:39:12 GMT, in
><catamont-8132DB...@news.concentric.net>, Sara
><cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>
>[...]
>>Of course the most humorous part is Mr. Bradbury's hysterical "I WILL
>>NOT DROP ONE CHARGE!!" statements. One has to, of course, FILE charges
>>before one can consider dropping them (or not). And to date, Mr.
>>Bradbury has filed exactly... nothing.
>Oh, but Sara ... possibly he *has* filed the charges - and locked
>them in the ... uh ... cockpit of his Cessna.
Still giving your dildo a good work out witch? What are you going to say
Doc Tavish
START (Short Version)>
Archive/File: people/b/bradbury.scott/Edeiken-v-Bradbury.C1
Last-Modified: 2001/02/14
CIVIL DIVISION -- LAW
COMPLAINT
[...]
[...]
<end>
<stop>
<END>
<START Google Archival Excerpt>
Anonymously posted.
~~End of Post~~
[...]
-----
<STOP>
On 10 Mar 2001 04:26:13 GMT, Sara <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>Sara
[...]
<END>
Funny thing isn't it that Sara Salzman submits an affidavit to a court of
law which states as documented above among other things: "The campaign
conducted by Defendant Bradbury and his accomplices has gone so far as the
filing of fraudulent charges of child abuse with the child protective
agency in the area in which Ms. Salzman resides (Affidavit of Sara
Salzman, attached hereto as Exhibit A)" yet now Sara Salzman makes public
statements (which have been archived as evidence): "There's no such thing
as "CPS." ...No agency in the Denver area has received a single
complaint."
I really love it that Sara now says in Public Forum: "No agency in the
Denver area has received a single complaint." yet she files a sworn
affidavit to a civil court falsely accusing me: "Defendant Bradbury..
has gone so far as the filing of fraudulent charges of child abuse with
the child protective agency in the area in which Ms. Salzman resides.."
<end>
I love the way you Nizkor Kooks dodge and divert from serious felonies in
order to try to save face! It only brings much reproach upon you!
You vermin are proven again and again to be liars!
BTW here is another one of Sara Salzman's lies exposed:
Sara stated: _There's no such thing as "CPS"_
in reply to an anonymous poster who said: "Wash your hair and bathe.
CPS has received more complaints about child abuse."
I just did a www.google.com search using keywords:
<end>
I guess Hilary will say GOOGLE.COM lied instead of sara. GOOGLE.COM shows
Children's Protective Services (CPS) as existing in Denver yet Sow Salzman
stated: _There's no such thing as "CPS"_
Who do you all believe? GOOGLE or a perjurious pathological liar named
Sara Salzman?
Why can't Sara and her fellow pigs accept truth, tell the truth,
and not be such hard headed liars? Is truth an enemy to their psyches?
Must be because truth is alien to their minds!
>hro
>=====================
>Hilary Ostrov
>E-mail: hos...@telus.net
>WWW: http://www3.telus.net/myssiwyg/
>The Nizkor Project http://www.nizkor.org/
Why is it every time I see Nizkor I associate it with lies and smear?
Doc Tavish
--digsig
Authentic Doc Tavish
Chyeer+xvAMg6mRtq2niuMN+bMnEkGsy0ShVPm2xATn
kMLDzPQco6lZ6+TORkKpFKITt7ULfg/KGDJP9c76
41duCppl0OVpPk0BopiqIIqeyFcYc1kYuHdiJ16gH
Here was his cowardly warning and this repost is counter to his deeds:
From: S...@shaklee.net (Shaklee)
Subject: ANNOUNCING MASS CANCELLATION OF SCOTTIE IS UNDERWAY
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2001 13:08:06 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: net NOT com
Message-ID: <98l63m$1ea$2...@news.tht.net>
X-Complaints-To: scr...@hub.org
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.99.9 (Released Version) (x86 32bit)
COURTESY OF NAZIHUNTER
<end>
The person above is a coward who hides behind anonymity and has never
showed the intelligence or courage to refute ONE single post I've made!
>> >Sara
>> >Sara
The incorporated area you live in is in the Denver area according to Rand
McNally's Road Atlas- Aurora is within Denver's city limits! I'd imagine
Aurora is a non-incorporated township BUT for a fact it is surrounded by
Denver! Are you now going to imply Rand McNally is false too!? Aurora is
in Denver and just as those Jewish New Year's cards you FWD from Tubby
came from a Denver post office. My my my but you do lie!
>And since there is no such thing as "CPS" in my area, no charges could
>have been filed with CPS.
There is a "CPS" in your area pig and I proved it in another post.
Denver surrounds Aurora so that makes it your area! Care to continually
deny:
Sara stated: _There's no such thing as "CPS"_
in reply to an anonymous poster who said: "Wash your hair and bathe.
CPS has received more complaints about child abuse."
I just did a www.google.com search using keywords:
More links from www.google.com
http://www.bcm.tmc.edu/cta/NewZealand_abstract.htm
"Thousands of children in the United States are referred to Children's
Protective Services (CPS) for allegations of abuse and neglect each year.
These children are often at greater risk for physical, emotional,
behavioral, cognitive, developmental, and social problems. Despite this,
systematic evaluation of the needs of children in custody is rarely
proactive. Frequently, children in custody receive psychological
evaluations only after disruptive behaviors surface in school or at home.
Children who are not yet school age or overtly exhibiting psychopathology
may not even be evaluated... In addition to these findings, the utility of
different standard measures in a Children’s Protective Services evaluation
will also be reviewed. KEYWORDS: Child Maltreatment; Denver Developmental
Screening Test; Children’s Protective Services"
http://childlaw.law.sc.edu/manuals/user/cpswork/notes.htm
CPS Guide for Caseworkers
27. Adapted from V. DeFrancis, Special Skills in Child Protective Services
(Denver, CO: American Humane Association, n.d.), 1.
www.silent-no-more.org/childabuse.html
(C. Henry Kempe Center. Denver). ... Seek Help. Call Children's
protective Services and your family doctor ...
Need I say more? (Sara is a liar!)
>But please, keep threatening me. It will certainly impress the Judge.
Who has threatened you pig? When is pointing out your numerous lies and
Here was his cowardly warning and this repost is counter to his deeds:
From: S...@shaklee.net (Shaklee)
Subject: ANNOUNCING MASS CANCELLATION OF SCOTTIE IS UNDERWAY
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2001 13:08:06 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: net NOT com
Message-ID: <98l63m$1ea$2...@news.tht.net>
X-Complaints-To: scr...@hub.org
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.99.9 (Released Version) (x86 32bit)
COURTESY OF NAZIHUNTER
<end>
The person above is a coward who hides behind anonymity and has never
showed the intelligence or courage to refute ONE single post I've made!
--
>Sara
[...]
REMEMBER-- I WILL NOT DROP ONE SINGLE CHARGE.
Remember these Torah verses?
--digsig
Authentic Doc Tavish
Chyeer+xvAMg6mRtq2niuMN+bMnEkGsy0ShVPm2xATn
9ht6KTJwF3BwCXJdWrqn3eSt8VJlNulpXYNe+nzM
4qgm22pMOOW8/iM4uaXUyjegC+/xv7gLjM7vBLJA1
>On 13 Mar 2001 15:56:19 GMT, Sara <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
[...]
>>But please, keep threatening me. It will certainly impress the Judge.
>Who has threatened you pig? When is pointing out your numerous lies and
>perjuries making threats!? You will make an impression on the judge when
>you are compelled to prove all you claimed in your affidavit!
You're already making an impression on the judge, Scottie -- because Sara's
testimony, among that of others, was admitted as fact by the judge when you
couldn't be bothered to show up in court, as you were requested to do.
>BTW regarding the subject title you kooks made: "Re: Frothing at the Mouth
>Won't Make Your Judgement Loss Disappear, Scottie!"
Uh, Scottie -- that was MY creation, not Sara's. You got a problem with
that? Take it to someone who cares. (It's been restored.)
>What judgment losses? Care to name an amount liars!?
Well, Scottie, YOU should know -- you ARE in communication with your alleged
attorney, aren't you? You were the one ranting about the proposed
settlement, which indicates you *do* know what it entails...which is why
you've started squealing like the pig you are. Guess what? All you're
doing is driving the eventual damages award ever higher -- which means you'd
better start scouting the outlying roads around Bellville for prime bridges
to live under, because you're going to be needing one, soon enough.
It's coming time to pay the piper for your deeds, Scottie -- and you're
going to be caught far, far short of the bill you owe.
--PLH, and I'm planning the celebration
WE NEED TO SMASH THOSE WHO TRY TO SUPPRES ARE FREE SPEECH
THERE MOSTLY LIBERALES ANYWAY. SO THEY ARE COWUDLY AND RACE-TRADERS.
=================================================
-- FEAR ME I AM THOR 14/88
You want free speach..
There are those who don't like what you say and so use THEIR first amendment
right to speak against what you say.
And now you want to smash them.
Let us for one second, replace the word 'smash' with the words 'put in
jail,' 'incarcerate,' 'arrest' or 'invalidate.' Which is what I'll assume
you accuse the 'weakened government' of doing.
Wouldn't you be a hipocrate in this sense?
You would like to 'smash' those who disagree with you? In this case, you're
no better.
--
"You can attract more flies with honey than with vinegar...
But if you pull their wings off, they'll eat anything"
T-D-R
THOR88 <TH...@HAMMER.ORG> wrote in message
news:4BOr6.381$nt6.4742@NewsReader...
Do they have Care in the Community in the US?
--
"You can attract more flies with honey than with vinegar...
But if you pull their wings off, they'll eat anything"
T-D-R
DaveVH <big_bug...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:_cQr6.59$KL5.1590@NewsReader...
>PLEASE get this personal attack bullshit out of alt.lawyers. Take to email as
>it's obvious very few people if any actually care.
Is this an indicator that you approve of perjury or the criminal misuse of
a subpoena? Certainly looks that way! Do you approve of the following?
PERJURY
>Sara
[...]
The above is only a partial "list" of Sara's false and undocumented
charges. Here is what Yale F. Edeiken is having circulated all over the
Internet as FACT:
Shofar FTP Archive File
people/b/bradbury.scott/Edeiken-v-Bradbury-A1.01
"Ms. (Sara) Salzman became one of the victims of the Defendant's criminal
harassment after becoming a contributor to an Internet site dealing with
the history of the Holocaust. As a result, Defendant began stalking her
on the Internet, defaming her as a "dog fucker" and child-abuser and
threatening her with violence. His attacks intensified.
In recent weeks Defendant Bradbury and his accomplices (Complaint,
Paragraphs 17-19) Ms. Salzman and her family have been threatened with
retribution if she testifies in this matter. This harassment has
included threats against her, her children, and her father, The campaign
conducted by Defendant Bradbury and his accomplices has gone so far as
the filing of fraudulent charges of child abuse with the child
protective agency in the area in which Ms. Salzman resides (Affidavit of
Sara Salzman, attached hereto as Exhibit A)."
I now reply with:
In the future YOU will be compelled to show documented proof of all
accusations such as:
1) defaming her as a "dog fucker"
2) defaming her as a child-abuser
3) threatening her with violence
4) threats against her children
5) threats against her father
6) filing of fraudulent charges of child abuse with
the child protective agency
If you can't substantiate the above then what you engaged in was PERJURY!!
-----
Sara testifies that: "Defendant Bradbury.. has gone so far as the filing
of fraudulent charges of child abuse with the child protective agency in
the area in which Ms. Salzman resides (Affidavit of Sara Salzman, attached
hereto as Exhibit A)." YET she runs her mouth off in public forum shortly
after offering "sworn testimony" against me: "There's no such thing as
"CPS"... No agency in the Denver area has received a single complaint."
See the perjury and the lies.
There is a CPS in her area and despite what she claims about where she
lives Aurora is surrounded by Denver as the map shows. For the record I
did NOT as the affidavit claims: "fil[ed] of fraudulent charges of child
abuse with the child protective agency in the area in which Ms. Salzman
resides" to which Sara now says: "No agency in the Denver area has
received a single complaint."
Here is proof positive that Sara Salzman is a malicious perjurious witness
who's second nature is lying:
Sara lies:
"I don't live in the "Denver" area, Moron. And since there is no such
thing as "CPS" in my area, no charges could have been filed with CPS."
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=Moron=rnum=3&seld=914640418&ic=1
What does the map from Yahoo prove? It proves that I was correct in the
statements which follow the map link.
Try zoom levels 5 and 6 and see for yourself that the county seat Denver
surrounds Aurora where Sara resides! Aurora is completely surrounded which
proves Sara lives in the Denver area!
As for Sara saying both: "there is no such thing as "CPS" in my area, no
charges could have been filed with CPS" and "No agency in the Denver area
has received a single complaint" proves that she perjured herself with the
affidavit she presented to Yale to be submitted which stated: "Defendant
Bradbury... has gone so far as the filing of fraudulent charges of child
abuse with the child protective agency in the area in which Ms. Salzman
resides (Affidavit of Sara Salzman, attached hereto as Exhibit A)."
IS THE ABOVE NOT PERJURY?
BTW there is a CPS in Sara's area- so here is another one of her lies
exposed:
http://www.denvergov.org/dephome.asp?depid=244
Family and Children's Division
About Us
Adolescent - Youth Services
Adoption Services
Child Care Service
Child Protection Services
<http://www.denvergov.org/content/template160.asp>
[...]
What is that last line Sara? I thought you said: "And since
there is no such thing as "CPS" in my area, no charges could
have been filed with CPS."
The "township" (Aurora) is completely surrounded by Denver which the Yahoo
map proves beyond any doubt and now I show that there does exist a CPS in
Denver! What have you to say now liar!?
Click the CPS link <http://www.denvergov.org/content/template160.asp>
and this is what you get:
<START>
Family and Children's Division
CHILD PROTECTION SERVICES
For those families where maltreatment has been found to exist with
children under the age of 12, and the risk of additional maltreatment
requires further protective measures, this second major sub-division of
the Family and Children's Division is utilized.
The Ongoing Child Protection staff numbers 14 supervisors and 91 full time
caseworkers. Specialization exists in the areas of regular and Intensive
Family Treatment. The primary goals of ongoing child protection activities
are to achieve safety, stability and permanency in a child's home.
Return To Top
<STOP>
Even more info on CPS which you (Sara Salzman) deny exists in the City of
Denver which totally surrounds your area (Aurora):
http://www.denvergov.org/content/244contact.asp
Family and Children's Division
Contact Us
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Oversight of the Family and Children's Division. Doris Puga
Division Director
720.944.2799
doris...@dhs.co.denver.co.us
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Investigation of child maltreatment and intake services. Janice McIntosh
Program Manager
720.944.2808
janice....@dhs.co.denver.co.us
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Child protection services Jude Liguori
Program Manager
720.944.2302
jude.l...@dhs.co.denver.co.us
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
I WANT SARA SALZMAN TO BE BROUGHT UP ON PERJURY CHARGES AND I WANT....
<END>
CRIMINAL MISUSE OF SUBPOENAED INFORMATION BY AN ATTORNEY
START (Short Version)>
Archive/File: people/b/bradbury.scott/Edeiken-v-Bradbury.C1
Last-Modified: 2001/02/14
CIVIL DIVISION -- LAW
COMPLAINT
[...]
[...]
<end>
<stop>
<END>
<START Google Archival Excerpt>
Anonymously posted.
~~End of Post~~
[...]
-----
<STOP>
Well Najena- how would you like to be the recipient of death threats or
perjured testimony all the result of a mentally unbalanced attorney who
has a history of doing such too!?
In <4BOr6.381$nt6.4742@NewsReader> in alt.revisionism, on Wed, 14 Mar
2001 18:17:15 -0000, "THOR88" <TH...@HAMMER.ORG> wrote:
>
> McTavish Informational Services (Non-Profit)
> <DELETE
Okay.
> WE NEED TO SMASH THOSE WHO TRY TO SUPPRES ARE FREE SPEECH
> THERE MOSTLY LIBERALES ANYWAY. SO THEY ARE COWUDLY AND
> RACE-TRADERS.
> =================================================
> -- FEAR ME I AM THOR 14/88
You might not be tho thor if you didn't play with yourthelf tho much.
- --
John Morris <John....@UAlberta.CA>
at University of Alberta <Multi pertransibunt & augebitur scientia>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.2 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>
iQA/AwUBOq/8ZZQgvG272fn9EQJ87gCgmrRXQsED11VsLoNQKZs6g1ip5AMAn1Oq
//mOYWCCBvsqjmB5iK1ta2so
=Mjfq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
IM THOR BECOASE I AM THE SON OF VENGEFUL GODS!!!
YOU ARE A TIPPICAL LIBERAL INTERLECTUAL IN YOUR UNIVESRITY OF ALBERT SITING
IN YOR IVERY TOWER DO YOU KNOE WHAT THEY DID TO INTERLECTUALS IN THE WAR???
THATS RIGHT THEY WERE SMASHED BY THE POEPLE AS DIGENERATES AND UNPRODUCIVE
TO SOCIATY!!!!
YOU MAYNT BE A NIGER BUT YOU TOO WIL FEAL THE AWESOME TEROR OF THE WITE MANS
RIVENGE AS WE HAND DOWN ARE ROTH!!!!!
>Path: newssvr10-int.news.prodigy.com!newscon03.news.prodigy.com!
>newsmst01!newscon04.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.com!howland.erols.net!
>sunqbc.risq.qc.ca!feeder.qis.net!btnet-peer!btnet-peer0!btnet-feed5!
>btnet!NewsPeer!Fusion!NewsReader.POSTED!not-for-mail
You're obviously another UK troll trying to make revisionists etc. look
illiterate. Just another cheap show by our opposition!
>Reply-To: "THOR88" <TH...@HAMMER.ORG>
>From: "THOR88" <TH...@HAMMER.ORG>
There is no HAMMER.ORG for skinheads! Another dead give away that the UK
Trolls are up to their usual games:
HAMMER.ORG resolves to:
http://www.geektools.com/cgi-bin/proxy.cgi
Hammer Residences, Inc (HAMMER10-DOM)
1909 East Wayzata Blvd.
Wayzata, MN 55391
US
Domain Name: HAMMER.ORG
Administrative Contact, Billing Contact:
Hammer, James (JHZ944) ja...@HAMMER.ORG
Hammer Residences, Inc.
1909 East Wayzata Blvd
Wayzata , MN 55391
952-277-2445 (FAX) 952-473-8629
When are you lefties ever going to stop your lies and deceptions?
This only reflects on the Nizkooks and Edeikenites! I am sure James Hammer
would really appreciate his domain being defamed by you Nizkooks too!
>Newsgroups: alt.revisionism,misc.legal,alt.lawyers,alt.music.white-power
>References: <catamont-15611B...@news.concentric.net>
><86vpatc85cta37b2m...@4ax.com>
><catamont-4578BA...@news.concentric.net>
><arcqat8tmcm9umqri...@4ax.com>
><szkd7bm4a...@eris.io.com>
><catamont-8132DB...@news.concentric.net>
><basrat4br0uajv1rd...@4ax.com>
><catamont-43EDE7...@news.concentric.net>
><bm3tatca20smhg2ss...@4ax.com>
><4BOr6.381$nt6.4742@NewsReader>
><qvuvatkp0uiu5sgmu...@4ax.com>
>Subject: Re: Profile of a Pathological Liar and Perjurer- Sara Salzman
>aka Re: Frothing at the Mouth Won't Make Your Judgement Loss Disappear, Scottie!
>X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2014.211
>X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2014.211
>Message-ID: <I2Ur6.975$nt6.8678@NewsReader>
>Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 00:30:25 -0000
>NNTP-Posting-Host: 217.32.153.130
Let us look at what your posting host resolves to:
http://www.geektools.com/cgi-bin/proxy.cgi
inetnum: 217.32.128.0 - 217.32.159.255
netname: BT-WEBPORT
descr: BT-Webport
country: GB
admin-c: BS1474-RIPE
tech-c: BS1474-RIPE
status: ASSIGNED PA
remarks: Please send abuse notification to ab...@bt.net
changed: sup...@bt.net 20000927
source: RIPE
route: 217.32.0.0/12
descr: BT Public Internet Service
origin: AS2856
remarks: Please send abuse notification to ab...@bt.net
remarks: PLEASE DIRECT ALL QUERIES TO sup...@bt.net
mnt-by: BTNET-MNT
changed: Jas....@bt.net 20000921
source: RIPE
role: BTnet Support
address: 154 St Albans Rd
address: Sandridge
address: St Albans
address: Hertfordshire
address: AL4 9NH
address: GB
phone: +44 1189 512313
e-mail: sup...@bt.net
trouble: sup...@bt.net
admin-c: PW3808-RIPE
tech-c: JG561-RIPE
nic-hdl: BS1474-RIPE
remarks: Please send abuse notification to ab...@bt.net
remarks: For all queries contact sup...@bt.net
mnt-by: BTNET-MNT
changed: sup...@bt.net 20000727
source: RIPE
YEP- Just another UK Troll trying to make all people who disagree with
lefties etc. into illiterate people! Won't work and you're now exposed.
>X-Trace: NewsReader 984616232 217.32.153.130 (Thu, 15 Mar 2001 00:30:32 GMT)
>NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 00:30:32 GMT
>Xref: newsmst01 alt.revisionism:916694 misc.legal:312760
>alt.lawyers:25211 alt.music.white-power:22453
>
>
>John Morris <John....@UAlberta.CA> wrote in message
>news:qvuvatkp0uiu5sgmu...@4ax.com...
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> In <4BOr6.381$nt6.4742@NewsReader> in alt.revisionism, on Wed, 14 Mar
>> 2001 18:17:15 -0000, "THOR88" <TH...@HAMMER.ORG> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > McTavish Informational Services (Non-Profit)
>> > <DELETE
>>
>> Okay.
>>
>> > WE NEED TO SMASH THOSE WHO TRY TO SUPPRES ARE FREE SPEECH
>>
>> > THERE MOSTLY LIBERALES ANYWAY. SO THEY ARE COWUDLY AND
>> > RACE-TRADERS.
>>
>> > =================================================
>> > -- FEAR ME I AM THOR 14/88
>> You might not be tho thor if you didn't play with yourthelf tho much.
You come across as an expert John. I noticed that your "speech" shows
you're stressed. Were you whacking off with one hand and typing with the
other?
>> - --
>> John Morris <John....@UAlberta.CA>
>> at University of Alberta <Multi pertransibunt & augebitur scientia>
>IM THOR BECOASE I AM THE SON OF VENGEFUL GODS!!!
>
>YOU ARE A TIPPICAL LIBERAL INTERLECTUAL IN YOUR UNIVESRITY OF ALBERT SITING
>IN YOR IVERY TOWER DO YOU KNOE WHAT THEY DID TO INTERLECTUALS IN THE WAR???
>THATS RIGHT THEY WERE SMASHED BY THE POEPLE AS DIGENERATES AND UNPRODUCIVE
>TO SOCIATY!!!!
>
>YOU MAYNT BE A NIGER BUT YOU TOO WIL FEAL THE AWESOME TEROR OF THE WITE MANS
>RIVENGE AS WE HAND DOWN ARE ROTH!!!!!
Poor attempt to smear revisionists folks. You get an F=.
Doc Tavish
---
"If you stop fabricating lies about me, I will stop disclosing the
truth about you." Adapted from UKRAINE ORGANIZATION'S Terms of Truce
weed lyke ter no a lyttil bit abowt yer fer wor fyles,
weed lyke ter elp yer lern ter elp yersel.
luk aownd yer ahl yer sea ar simpathetic ayes,
stroll arownd teh grownds untyll yer feal at ome.
--
Whaur's yer Wully Shakespeare noo?
Yo DaveVH:
Great
see you in here kicking revisionist butt. :)
Steve
At least she didn't no show to a court case like you did you spineless puss.
Steve
> ---
> "If you stop fabricating lies about me, I will stop disclosing the
> truth about you." Adapted from UKRAINE ORGANIZATION'S Terms of Truce
>
>
Then perhaps you'd like to tell us why your attorney stated -- in
writing -- that you would be willing to apologise?
Sara
--
"I'm here to comfort the afflicted, and afflict the comfortable"
- E. K. Hornbeck, "Inherit The Wind"
Then perhaps you'd like to tell us why your attorney stated -- in
writing -- that you would be wiling to apologise to Mr. Edeiken?
Perhaps because even your attorney knows that _you_ are the one
harassing people? And even now, you're doing it in misc.legal and
alt.lawyers.
You're pathetic, Mr. Bradbury.
Sara
Follow-ups set to alt.revisionism, where we're used to Mr. Bradbury's
ravings.
--
"I'm here to comfort the afflicted, and afflict the comfortable"
- E. K. Hornbeck, "Inherit The Wind"
Your current dialup still shows you being BT from UK
http://www.geektools.com/cgi-bin/proxy.cgi
inetnum: 217.32.120.0 - 217.32.127.255
On Thu, 15 Mar 2001 08:00:36 -0000, "THOR88" <TH...@HAMMER.ORG> wrote:
>McTavish Informational Services (Non-Profit)
><DELETE2MAI...@my-deja.com> wrote in message
>news:qu30btgaiebdkp87q...@4ax.com...
>SHUT UP TROLL!!! HAMMER RESIDENSE IS WERE I LIVE!!!!
So you live in Minnesota but your dialup is in UK? How interesting!
BTW you left this out!
>YOU ARE THE ONE BESMERCHING THE GOOD NAME OF THE WITE POWER MOVEMENT!!! WE
>ARE TRYING TO MAKE A BETER FUTURE FOR OUR CHILDRUN AND SECURE THE EXISTANCE
>OF THE WITE RACE BUT LIBERAL TROLLS LIKE YOU KEEP TRYING TO DEVIDE OUR
>STRUGGEL AND WEEKEN US WITH UNDERHAND METHODS!!!
>
>I CAN SEE IT THE WAY YOU TRY AND DIFEND JOHN MORIS WHO IS IN LEEGE WITH
>YOU!!!!
>
>YOU WILL SUFER WHEN WE BEGIN ARE RAIN OF TEROR!!!!
>
>===================================================
>FEAR ME, I AM THOR!!!! 14/88
You're one of the UK Trolls and you're failing admirably. Thanks for
showing all how desperate our opposition is!
Doc Tavish
---
"If you stop fabricating lies about US, I will stop disclosing the
truth about you all." Adapted from UKRAINE ORGANIZATION'S Terms of Truce
--digsig
Authentic Doc Tavish
Chyeer+xvAMg6mRtq2niuMN+bMnEkGsy0ShVPm2xATn
jCP1CJYCiT5Hyu0pJdyccTqvk01UQFfNKIT9KphO
45ZeflU5iYKvZk8QYN/0V11L79kSFXmqBZmTzas/z
SHUT UP TROLL!!! HAMMER RESIDENSE IS WERE I LIVE!!!!
YOU ARE THE ONE BESMERCHING THE GOOD NAME OF THE WITE POWER MOVEMENT!!! WE
SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
NOW I KNOE YORE A NIGER TRYING TO MAKE ME LOOK STUPID!!!!
YOU WIL SUFER!!! I WILL MAKE YOU MY PET NIGER AND KICK YOU ROUND THE
INTANET!!!!!
HAHAHAHAHA!!!!!
==============================================
>McTavish Informational Services (Non-Profit)
><DELETE2MAI...@my-deja.com> wrote in message
>news:bm3tatca20smhg2ss...@4ax.com...
>> REPOSTED DUE TO A PERSON WHO DOES NOT SUPPORT FREE SPEECH NOR CAN REFUTE
>> WHAT I POST.
>WE NEED TO SMASH THOSE WHO TRY TO SUPPRES ARE FREE SPEECH
...to say nothing of the idiot trolls who can't find their CapsLock key.
>THERE MOSTLY LIBERALES ANYWAY. SO THEY ARE COWUDLY AND RACE-TRADERS.
>-- FEAR ME I AM THOR 14/88
Yeah, I'm really afraid of a troll abusing the services of bt.net, 4000
miles away...and if your so thor, why don't you take a rest?
--PLH, thorely amused by this troll
In alt.revisionism McTavish Informational Services (Non-Profit) <DELETE2MAI...@my-deja.com> wrote:
: On Wed, 14 Mar 2001 15:55:30 GMT, naj...@hotmail.dot.com (Najena) wrote:
:>PLEASE get this personal attack bullshit out of alt.lawyers. Take
:>to email as it's obvious very few people if any actually care.
: Is this an indicator that you approve of perjury or the criminal misuse of
: a subpoena? Certainly looks that way! Do you approve of the following?
Get a grip, Bradbury!!
Derek
--
Derek Bell db...@maths.tcd.ie |"Usenet is a strange place."
WWW: http://www.maths.tcd.ie/~dbell/index.html| - Dennis M Ritchie,
PGP: http://www.maths.tcd.ie/~dbell/key.asc | 29 July 1999.
|
Yo Man:
See how little fat white boy Tavish just runs from KCOM? He know that KCOM will kick his little honkie ass.
Leroy
Excellent question, Sara!
: He did not do such and once again you are lying. Why would my attorney
: suggest I apologize when it is on his advice I contact the DA and DJ?
: I have nothing to apologize for perjurer BUT you and Yale do BUT I won't
: accept any!
Bradbury, for you to accuse someone else of lying is so ironic,
that words fail me!
>In article <98q341$1tb5$1...@salmon.maths.tcd.ie>, Derek Bell
><db...@salmon.maths.tcd.ie> wrote:
>
>> Note: newsgroup and followup-to lines reset.
>>
>> In alt.revisionism McTavish Informational Services (Non-Profit)
>> <DELETE2MAI...@my-deja.com> wrote:
>> : On Wed, 14 Mar 2001 15:55:30 GMT, naj...@hotmail.dot.com (Najena)
>> : wrote:
>> :>PLEASE get this personal attack bullshit out of alt.lawyers. Take
>> :>to email as it's obvious very few people if any actually care.
>> : Is this an indicator that you approve of perjury or the criminal misuse
>> : of
>> : a subpoena? Certainly looks that way! Do you approve of the following?
>>
>> Get a grip, Bradbury!!
>>
>> Derek
>And more important, ask your attorney why he stated -- in writing --
>that you would be willing to apologise to Mr. Edeiken?
He did not do such and once again you are lying. Why would my attorney
suggest I apologize when it is on his advice I contact the DA and DJ?
I have nothing to apologize for perjurer BUT you and Yale do BUT I won't
accept any!
Doc Tavish
>Sara
> Note: newsgroup and followup-to lines reset.
>
> In alt.revisionism McTavish Informational Services (Non-Profit)
> <DELETE2MAI...@my-deja.com> wrote:
> : On Wed, 14 Mar 2001 15:55:30 GMT, naj...@hotmail.dot.com (Najena)
> : wrote:
> :>PLEASE get this personal attack bullshit out of alt.lawyers. Take
> :>to email as it's obvious very few people if any actually care.
> : Is this an indicator that you approve of perjury or the criminal misuse
> : of
> : a subpoena? Certainly looks that way! Do you approve of the following?
>
> Get a grip, Bradbury!!
>
> Derek
And more important, ask your attorney why he stated -- in writing --
that you would be willing to apologise to Mr. Edeiken?
Sara
--
"I'm here to comfort the afflicted, and afflict the comfortable"
- E. K. Hornbeck, "Inherit The Wind"
Poor Bradbury, he doesn't understand that soon, very soon, that his
soul will belong to me.......
The Fourth
Horseman
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHHA
He has no sole, he is bedridden.
>On 15 Mar 2001 15:34:14 GMT, Sara <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>>In article <98q341$1tb5$1...@salmon.maths.tcd.ie>, Derek Bell
>><db...@salmon.maths.tcd.ie> wrote:
>>> Note: newsgroup and followup-to lines reset.
>>> In alt.revisionism McTavish Informational Services (Non-Profit)
>>> <DELETE2MAI...@my-deja.com> wrote:
>>> : On Wed, 14 Mar 2001 15:55:30 GMT, naj...@hotmail.dot.com (Najena)
>>> : wrote:
>>> :>PLEASE get this personal attack bullshit out of alt.lawyers. Take
>>> :>to email as it's obvious very few people if any actually care.
>>> : Is this an indicator that you approve of perjury or the criminal misuse
>>> : of
>>> : a subpoena? Certainly looks that way! Do you approve of the following?
>>> Get a grip, Bradbury!!
>>And more important, ask your attorney why he stated -- in writing --
>>that you would be willing to apologise to Mr. Edeiken?
>He did not do such and once again you are lying. Why would my attorney
>suggest I apologize when it is on his advice I contact the DA and DJ?
That's not what *he* told Judge Reibman, Scottie...which means you have a
LOT to be explaining now.
>I have nothing to apologize for perjurer BUT you and Yale do BUT I won't
>accept any!
I'll be sure and visit you in Rusk, then, if you really believe that.
--PLH, that day is getting closer
> In article <szk66ha...@eris.io.com>, pat...@io.com (Patrick L.
> Humphrey) wrote:
>
> > "McTavish Informational Services (Non-Profit) "
> > <DELETE2MAI...@my-deja.com> writes:
> >
> > >On 15 Mar 2001 15:34:14 GMT, Sara <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
> >
> > >>And more important, ask your attorney why he stated -- in writing --
> > >>that you would be willing to apologise to Mr. Edeiken?
> >
> > >He did not do such and once again you are lying. Why would my attorney
> > >suggest I apologize when it is on his advice I contact the DA and DJ?
> >
> > That's not what *he* told Judge Reibman, Scottie...which means you have a
> > LOT to be explaining now.
>
> He (Leach) didn't tell Reibman anything. HE SUBMITTED IT IN WRITING. He
> claimed that Mr.Bradbury would be willing to apologise, and would accept
> an apology from Mr. Edeiken.
>
> Of course, since Mr. Bradbury has publicly stated here that he will
> never accept an apology, I suppose Mr. Leach was... lying?
I don't think so. I would guess that he just couldn't in his wildest dreams
imagine that his client was really as stupid as he is.
I guess its Leach: 0, Darwin: 1
Steven Mock
--
"I may not agree with your bumper sticker;
but I'll defend your right to stick it." - Ed Anger
He (Leach) didn't tell Reibman anything. HE SUBMITTED IT IN WRITING. He
claimed that Mr.Bradbury would be willing to apologise, and would accept
an apology from Mr. Edeiken.
Of course, since Mr. Bradbury has publicly stated here that he will
never accept an apology, I suppose Mr. Leach was... lying?
Sara
--
"It's always nice to see a prejudice overruled by a deeper prejudice."
John Sayles, _Lone Star_
>In article <98q341$1tb5$1...@salmon.maths.tcd.ie>, Derek Bell
><db...@salmon.maths.tcd.ie> wrote:
>> Note: newsgroup and followup-to lines reset.
>> In alt.revisionism McTavish Informational Services (Non-Profit)
>> <DELETE2MAI...@my-deja.com> wrote:
>> : On Wed, 14 Mar 2001 15:55:30 GMT, naj...@hotmail.dot.com (Najena)
>> : wrote:
>> :>PLEASE get this personal attack bullshit out of alt.lawyers. Take
>> :>to email as it's obvious very few people if any actually care.
>> : Is this an indicator that you approve of perjury or the criminal misuse
>> : of
>> : a subpoena? Certainly looks that way! Do you approve of the following?
>> Get a grip, Bradbury!!
>And more important, ask your attorney why he stated -- in writing --
>that you would be willing to apologise to Mr. Edeiken?
Because maybe Leach wants to at least earn *some* honest money? :-)
--PLH, not that Bradbury would have any such thing, of course
>> >>> Get a grip, Bradbury!!
Sorry for the confusion -- I didn't mean to imply Leach told the Judge
verbally.
>Of course, since Mr. Bradbury has publicly stated here that he will
>never accept an apology, I suppose Mr. Leach was... lying?
The more likely case is that Scottie has descended to the point where he's
ignoring the advice of his own attorney, the consequences be damned.
--PLH, watching Bradbury's continued self-immolation
>> >>> Get a grip, Bradbury!!
How do you know what he "told" the judge Patrick? You know nothing!
>He (Leach) didn't tell Reibman anything. HE SUBMITTED IT IN WRITING. He
>claimed that Mr.Bradbury would be willing to apologise, and would accept
>an apology from Mr. Edeiken.
That is NOT true! I have an exact copy of what was submitted in writing
and apologies were not a part of it! Once again you lie! Is lying all you
have Sara? Does it come second nature to you?
>Of course, since Mr. Bradbury has publicly stated here that he will
>never accept an apology, I suppose Mr. Leach was... lying?
Once again you're caught lying and your changing your story shows it.
Re-read what you wrote!
>Sara
Doc Tavish
--digsig
Authentic Doc Tavish
Chyeer+xvAMg6mRtq2niuMN+bMnEkGsy0ShVPm2xATn
ePxjacGtn97MKq5n6jOGv9qwRCaTbq1hsXu2rlSg
4uSUzfOKCNravyo+MOYa7/DA6pq8y3YupixgD08Bf