Scott Bradbury
Chris Larson
I sure enjoyed getting him to chase his tail. What a blast it was
seeing him respond to posts with his cut and pastes?
Patrick Keenan
news:1116261155....@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> Where is Scott Bradbury/ Doc Tavish? Anyone know.
>
> I sure enjoyed getting him to chase his tail. What a blast it was
> seeing him respond to posts with his cut and pastes?
Hopefully, he's finally caught on that sometimes he was just being
manipulated for other's amusement.
And hopefully, he's found something worthwhile and productive to do.
HTH
-pk
The Chief Instigator
...beyond ensuring that the village of Bellville isn't being deprived.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (pat...@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (soon to be TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Chicago 5, Houston 3 (April 26)
NEXT GAME: Date/opponent/site TBA in August 2005
go-bassn
"Patrick Keenan" <te...@dev.null> wrote in message
news:m9mdnW2R1ta...@rogers.com...
> "Chris Larson" <larsonc...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1116261155....@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> > Where is Scott Bradbury/ Doc Tavish? Anyone know.
> >
> > I sure enjoyed getting him to chase his tail. What a blast it was
> > seeing him respond to posts with his cut and pastes?
>
> Hopefully, he's finally caught on that sometimes he was just being
> manipulated for other's amusement.
Not bloody likely.
>
> And hopefully, he's found something worthwhile and productive to do.
He never seemed suicidal to me.
Steve Talbot
<1116261155....@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> "Chris Larson"
<larsonc...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>Where is Scott Bradbury/ Doc Tavish? Anyone know.
>
He's in other news groups which aren't over-run with trolls such as yourself.
Try to doa google search and see if you can find him. He has taken measures to
prevent trolls from stalking him to greener pastures where he now has an
interested audience.
Ciao
George
are some colleagues around the world in several countries infested by ZHIDS!!
>Ciao
_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 120,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account
The Chief Instigator
>He is still spreading the truth about filthy ZHIDS and their depredations, as
>are some colleagues around the world in several countries infested by ZHIDS!!
That explains why none of the Google links to him are any more recent than a
few months ago...
Roger
(an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
someone claiming to be George wrote
in message <is76915ipeimj04h6...@4ax.com>:
>He is still spreading the truth about filthy ZHIDS and their depredations, as
>are some colleagues around the world in several countries infested by ZHIDS!!
And still running from the $10k zie owes me...
George
are some colleagues around the world in several countries infested by ZHIDS!!
>Ciao
_________________________________________
TR...@cc.info
Talbot) wrote:
Wish I knew where he was, he owes me a bottle of wine.
--
To silence a man is the best honor you can bestow upon him,
it means you recognize his superiority to yourself. - J. Sobran
Roger
(an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
in message <gfs69152psnutrsms...@4ax.com>:
>On Tue, 24 May 2005 04:20:55 GMT, Steve_...@yahoo.com (Steve
>Talbot) wrote:
>>On 16 May 2005 09:32:35 -0700,
>><1116261155....@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> "Chris Larson"
>><larsonc...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>Where is Scott Bradbury/ Doc Tavish? Anyone know.
>>He's in other news groups which aren't over-run with trolls such as yourself.
>>Try to doa google search and see if you can find him. He has taken measures to
>>prevent trolls from stalking him to greener pastures where he now has an
>>interested audience.
>Wish I knew where he was, he owes me a bottle of wine.
And me $10k...
Steve Talbot
Instigator <pat...@io.com> wrote:
>George <fire...@hemisphere.com> writes:
>
>>He is still spreading the truth about filthy ZHIDS and their depredations, as
>>are some colleagues around the world in several countries infested by ZHIDS!!
>
>That explains why none of the Google links to him are any more recent than a
>few months ago...
>
See how you just proved you are stalking Tavish? It drives you nuts not being
able to be a complete jerk by finding him and showing up with the rest of the
same trolls who have no new ideas nor anything to add to the thread other than
ad hominem attacks and destroying the integrity of the thread so the lurkers
lose interest in the original theme.
I forgot to mention Tavish has set the parameters of his Agent news poster
to _X-No-Archive: Yes_ for both his original posting and Agent allows the
No-Archive function to be passed on for all the followups as well.
Sorta drives a stalker kook like you nuts doesn't it seeing how you can't show
up where he is currently enjoying himself and starting with your same rude
boorish behavior.
With that said now try and get a life and move on and stop trying to stalk
Tavish and if you do find Tavish and start up with the usual stuff then he would
have a legit complaint against you that you are stalking and harassing him.
Ciao
P.S. I have seen it posted that your mother is also your aunt.
Message-ID: <3FRX20XO3849...@reece.net.au>
Subject: PATRICK LEE HUMPBOYS MAMMIE IS ALSO HIS AUNT
Is it true? I know about your hillbilly lineage and I know hillbillies have
reputations for inbreeding and incest.
Roger
(an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
in message <4293810c...@news20.forteinc.com>:
>On 24 May 2005 08:27:29 -0500, <szky8a4...@eris.io.com> The Chief
>Instigator <pat...@io.com> wrote:
>>George <fire...@hemisphere.com> writes:
>>>He is still spreading the truth about filthy ZHIDS and their depredations, as
>>>are some colleagues around the world in several countries infested by ZHIDS!!
>>That explains why none of the Google links to him are any more recent than a
>>few months ago...
>See how you just proved you are stalking Tavish?
Ten seconds on Google is stalking?
<snip>
>With that said now try and get a life and move on and stop trying to stalk
>Tavish and if you do find Tavish and start up with the usual stuff then he would
>have a legit complaint against you that you are stalking and harassing him.
Bring it, fat boi: just make sure you have my $10k.
Of course, you never will: you haven't the balls/
Mr Revision
Why?
Steven Mock
8th anniversary of his death.
Steven Mock
Chris Larson
TR...@cc.info wrote:
> On Tue, 24 May 2005 04:20:55 GMT, Steve_...@yahoo.com (Steve
> Talbot) wrote:
>
> >On 16 May 2005 09:32:35 -0700,
> ><1116261155....@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> "Chris Larson"
> ><larsonc...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >>Where is Scott Bradbury/ Doc Tavish? Anyone know.
> >>
> >
> >He's in other news groups which aren't over-run with trolls such as yourself.
> >Try to doa google search and see if you can find him. He has taken measures to
> >prevent trolls from stalking him to greener pastures where he now has an
> >interested audience.
> >
> >Ciao
>
> Wish I knew where he was, he owes me a bottle of wine.
> --
For your tastes- he's only out 3 bucks.
Roger
(an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
in message <fh479197fg7jfktsf...@4ax.com>:
>On Tue, 24 May 2005 19:20:50 GMT, Roger <roger@.> wrote:
>>In one age, called the Second Age by some,
>> (an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
>> someone claiming to be TR...@cc.info wrote
>> in message <gfs69152psnutrsms...@4ax.com>:
>>>On Tue, 24 May 2005 04:20:55 GMT, Steve_...@yahoo.com (Steve
>>>Talbot) wrote:
>>>>On 16 May 2005 09:32:35 -0700,
>>>><1116261155....@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> "Chris Larson"
>>>><larsonc...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>Where is Scott Bradbury/ Doc Tavish? Anyone know.
>>>>He's in other news groups which aren't over-run with trolls such as yourself.
>>>>Try to doa google search and see if you can find him. He has taken measures to
>>>>prevent trolls from stalking him to greener pastures where he now has an
>>>>interested audience.
>>>Wish I knew where he was, he owes me a bottle of wine.
>>And me $10k...
>Why?
The morbidly obese Shame of Belleville made a public offer to pay
anyone who could prove zir morbid obesity $10k. I am prepared to do
so, but require that the money be escrowed with proper instructions
for disbursal since I do not believe the fat boil *has* the money,
making zir offer fraudulent.
And it amuses me to point out that dishonesty and zir obesity anytime
zie disturbs any of the groups I read.
The Chief Instigator
>On 24 May 2005 08:27:29 -0500, <szky8a4...@eris.io.com> The Chief
>Instigator <pat...@io.com> wrote:
>>George <fire...@hemisphere.com> writes:
>>>He is still spreading the truth about filthy ZHIDS and their depredations,
>>>as are some colleagues around the world in several countries infested by
>>>ZHIDS!!
>>That explains why none of the Google links to him are any more recent than a
>>few months ago...
>See how you just proved you are stalking Tavish? It drives you nuts not being
>able to be a complete jerk by finding him and showing up with the rest of the
>same trolls who have no new ideas nor anything to add to the thread other than
>ad hominem attacks and destroying the integrity of the thread so the lurkers
>lose interest in the original theme.
Too bad not all the readers are as stupid as you are, Blubberbury...they'll
decide that he's pretty much as insane as he acts online. His county's DA is
well aware of his problems. Why don't you report me?
>I forgot to mention Tavish has set the parameters of his Agent news poster
>to _X-No-Archive: Yes_ for both his original posting and Agent allows the
>No-Archive function to be passed on for all the followups as well.
What bravery!
>Sorta drives a stalker kook like you nuts doesn't it seeing how you can't show
>up where he is currently enjoying himself and starting with your same rude
>boorish behavior.
Thanks for proving, once again, that you can't even figure out how to filter
me out. (Either that, or you like to whine whenever I post.)
>With that said now try and get a life and move on and stop trying to stalk
>Tavish and if you do find Tavish and start up with the usual stuff then he
>would have a legit complaint against you that you are stalking and harassing
>him.
Really? You still haven't learned that you're not exempt from criticism?
That's about what I'd expect from you, since you dropped out of school in
sixth grade.
>P.S. I have seen it posted that your mother is also your aunt.
>Message-ID: <3FRX20XO3849...@reece.net.au>
>Subject: PATRICK LEE HUMPBOYS MAMMIE IS ALSO HIS AUNT
>Is it true? I know about your hillbilly lineage and I know hillbillies have
>reputations for inbreeding and incest.
What you actually know is infinitesimal compared to what you think you know,
Scotty. QED.
The Chief Instigator
>In one age, called the Second Age by some,
> (an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
> someone claiming to be Steve Talbot wrote
> in message <4293810c...@news20.forteinc.com>:
>>On 24 May 2005 08:27:29 -0500, <szky8a4...@eris.io.com> The Chief
>>Instigator <pat...@io.com> wrote:
>>>George <fire...@hemisphere.com> writes:
>>>>He is still spreading the truth about filthy ZHIDS and their depredations,
>>>>as are some colleagues around the world in several countries infested by
>>>>ZHIDS!!
>>>That explains why none of the Google links to him are any more recent than a
>>>few months ago...
>>See how you just proved you are stalking Tavish?
>Ten seconds on Google is stalking?
Amazing how they're so sure that they refuse to make any official complaints.
> <snip>
>>With that said now try and get a life and move on and stop trying to stalk
>>Tavish and if you do find Tavish and start up with the usual stuff then he
>>would have a legit complaint against you that you are stalking and harassing
>>him.
>Bring it, fat boi: just make sure you have my $10k.
>Of course, you never will: you haven't the balls/
Dale's spotted a perfect shirt for him, though it'd have to be in something
like 8XL: "Tough Guys Wear Pink"...
Mr Revision
Perhaps you can point out the exact proviso for payment.
BYW, do you want Pollard released?
--
Debaters should avoid ad hominem
arguments that question their opponents' motives.
Mr Revision
<larsonc...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>TR...@cc.info wrote:
>> On Tue, 24 May 2005 04:20:55 GMT, Steve_...@yahoo.com (Steve
>> Talbot) wrote:
>>
>> >On 16 May 2005 09:32:35 -0700,
>> ><1116261155....@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> "Chris Larson"
>> ><larsonc...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >>Where is Scott Bradbury/ Doc Tavish? Anyone know.
>> >>
>> >
>> >He's in other news groups which aren't over-run with trolls such as yourself.
>> >Try to doa google search and see if you can find him. He has taken measures to
>> >prevent trolls from stalking him to greener pastures where he now has an
>> >interested audience.
>> >
>> >Ciao
>>
>> Wish I knew where he was, he owes me a bottle of wine.
>> --
>
>For your tastes- he's only out 3 bucks.
The quality of the fluid doesn't matter, it's the meaning that will
keep it on my top shelf.
Roger
(an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
someone claiming to be Mr Revision wrote
>>The morbidly obese Shame of Belleville made a public offer to pay
>>anyone who could prove zir morbid obesity $10k. I am prepared to do
>>so, but require that the money be escrowed with proper instructions
>>for disbursal since I do not believe the fat boil *has* the money,
>>making zir offer fraudulent.
>>
>>And it amuses me to point out that dishonesty and zir obesity anytime
>>zie disturbs any of the groups I read.
>Perhaps you can point out the exact proviso for payment.
It is exactly this detail which the morbidly obese Shame of Belleville
keeps running from.
>BYW, do you want Pollard released?
BTW -- why does it matter?
Susan Cohen
"Roger" <roger@.> wrote in message
news:6n1791p5hsa8bq3jn...@4ax.com...
> In one age, called the Second Age by some,
> (an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
> someone claiming to be Steve Talbot wrote
> in message <4293810c...@news20.forteinc.com>:
>
>>On 24 May 2005 08:27:29 -0500, <szky8a4...@eris.io.com> The Chief
>>Instigator <pat...@io.com> wrote:
>
>>>George <fire...@hemisphere.com> writes:
>
>>>>He is still spreading the truth about filthy ZHIDS and their
>>>>depredations, as
>>>>are some colleagues around the world in several countries infested by
>>>>ZHIDS!!
>
>>>That explains why none of the Google links to him are any more recent
>>>than a
>>>few months ago...
>
>>See how you just proved you are stalking Tavish?
>
> Ten seconds on Google is stalking?
Funny how stalkers (or, at best, wanna-be stalkers) are the first to whine
when they think their tactics are being used on them.
Susan
Ben Cramer
"Susan Cohen" <flav...@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:bIWke.1715$3u3.1689@trnddc07...
>
> Funny how stalkers (or, at best, wanna-be stalkers) are the first to whine
> when they think their tactics are being used on them.
Suzie is the expert at "wannabe", after all, she is a wannabe joo, the
despicable cunt.
Mr Revision
>>BYW, do you want Pollard released?
>
>BTW -- why does it matter?
Curious minds want to know.
Chris Larson
A Freddy Luechter birthday perhaps?
Roger
(an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
someone claiming to be Mr Revision wrote
>On Wed, 25 May 2005 06:12:01 GMT, Roger <roger@.> wrote:
>>>BYW, do you want Pollard released?
>>BTW -- why does it matter?
>Curious minds want to know.
Of course, that the answer has been posted and responded to, and then
the question asked again rather puts the lie to this, don't you think?
You mentioned that it was relevant because I was talking about the
plea bargain (the discussion of which, one notes, the idiot child has
once again run from.)
In what way? How does my opinion on his release change in the
smallest detail the facts about that bargain?
Mr Revision
I know you position on the plea bargain, but I don't know you position
on his release. That's why I ask.
Why are you trying to be an artfull dodger, Roger?
Please answer the question. Do you want Pollard released?
NOTE to lurkers. Are you wondering why Roger refuses to answer this
very simple question?
--
"Let the gas chambers remain closed to prying eyes, and to imagination."
E. Wiesel, All Rivers Run to the Sea, Memoirs (New York: Random House/ Knopf, 1995), p. 74.
Sara Salzman
Mr Revision <revisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 26 May 2005 05:20:50 GMT, Roger <roger@.> wrote:
>
> >In one age, called the Second Age by some,
> > (an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
> > someone claiming to be Mr Revision wrote
> > in message <f2n891hf4qmb16kok...@4ax.com>:
> >
> >>On Wed, 25 May 2005 06:12:01 GMT, Roger <roger@.> wrote:
> >
> >>>>BYW, do you want Pollard released?
> >
> >>>BTW -- why does it matter?
> >
> >>Curious minds want to know.
> >
> >Of course, that the answer has been posted and responded to, and then
> >the question asked again rather puts the lie to this, don't you think?
> >
> >You mentioned that it was relevant because I was talking about the
> >plea bargain (the discussion of which, one notes, the idiot child has
> >once again run from.)
> >
> >In what way? How does my opinion on his release change in the
> >smallest detail the facts about that bargain?
>
> I know you position on the plea bargain, but I don't know you position
> on his release. That's why I ask.
> Why are you trying to be an artfull dodger, Roger?
>
> Please answer the question. Do you want Pollard released?
>
> NOTE to lurkers. Are you wondering why Roger refuses to answer this
> very simple question?
Maybe because it has nothing to do with the topic of this newsgroup?
Maybe because he doesn't think it's any of your business?
Maybe because it's irrelevant?
Maybe because he already answered it?
Maybe because you're an annoying little git?
Hope that helps,
Sara
Followups set to alt.revisionism
--
"... All the Dachaus must remain standing. The Dachaus, the Belsens,
the Buchenwalds, the Auschwitzes - all of them. ... they are a monument
to a moment in time when some men decided to turn the Earth into a
graveyard. Into it they shoveled all their reason, their logic, their
knowledge, but worst of all, their conscience. And the moment we forget
this, the moment we cease to be haunted by its remembrance, then we become
the gravediggers. Something to dwell on and remember, not only in the
Twilight Zone but wherever men walk God's Earth."
Gord McFee
> On Thu, 26 May 2005 05:20:50 GMT, Roger <roger@.> wrote:
>
> >In one age, called the Second Age by some,
> > (an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
> > someone claiming to be Mr Revision wrote
> > in message <f2n891hf4qmb16kok...@4ax.com>:
> >
> >>On Wed, 25 May 2005 06:12:01 GMT, Roger <roger@.> wrote:
> >
> >>>>BYW, do you want Pollard released?
> >
> >>>BTW -- why does it matter?
> >
> >>Curious minds want to know.
> >
> >Of course, that the answer has been posted and responded to, and then
> >the question asked again rather puts the lie to this, don't you think?
> >
> >You mentioned that it was relevant because I was talking about the
> >plea bargain (the discussion of which, one notes, the idiot child has
> >once again run from.)
> >
> >In what way? How does my opinion on his release change in the
> >smallest detail the facts about that bargain?
>
> I know you position on the plea bargain, but I don't know you position
> on his release. That's why I ask.
> Why are you trying to be an artfull dodger, Roger?
>
> Please answer the question. Do you want Pollard released?
>
> NOTE to lurkers. Are you wondering why Roger refuses to answer this
> very simple question?
No, we are aware that he has seen through your transparent troll.
--
Gord McFee
I'll write no line before its time
Visit the Holocaust History Project
http://www.holocaust-history.org
Roger
(an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
someone claiming to be Mr Revision wrote
>On Thu, 26 May 2005 05:20:50 GMT, Roger <roger@.> wrote:
>>>>>BYW, do you want Pollard released?
>>>>BTW -- why does it matter?
>>>Curious minds want to know.
>>
>>Of course, that the answer has been posted and responded to, and then
>>the question asked again rather puts the lie to this, don't you think?
chrissy goes splat again.
>>You mentioned that it was relevant because I was talking about the
>>plea bargain (the discussion of which, one notes, the idiot child has
>>once again run from.)
>>
>>In what way? How does my opinion on his release change in the
>>smallest detail the facts about that bargain?
>I know you position on the plea bargain, but I don't know you position
>on his release. That's why I ask.
And you claimed it was relevant to the discussion of the plea bargain.
I'm wondering what relevance you see.
>Why are you trying to be an artfull dodger, Roger?
No dodging: the question has been answered and you know this because
you responded to it.
>Please answer the question. Do you want Pollard released?
Please answer the question: why is it relevant?
>NOTE to lurkers. Are you wondering why Roger refuses to answer this
>very simple question?
Note to lurkers: you probably have more than one neuron, so can
search Google for the answer already given which chrissy responded to.
Are you wondering what relevance the question has?
Mr Revision
Thank you, Roger. You came through as predicted.
Roger
(an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
someone claiming to be Mr Revision wrote
>On Fri, 27 May 2005 00:28:39 GMT, Roger <roger@.> wrote:
>>>>>>>BYW, do you want Pollard released?
>>>>>>BTW -- why does it matter?
>>>>>Curious minds want to know.
>>>>
>>>>Of course, that the answer has been posted and responded to, and then
>>>>the question asked again rather puts the lie to this, don't you think?
>>chrissy goes splat again.
>>>>You mentioned that it was relevant because I was talking about the
>>>>plea bargain (the discussion of which, one notes, the idiot child has
>>>>once again run from.)
>>>>
>>>>In what way? How does my opinion on his release change in the
>>>>smallest detail the facts about that bargain?
>>>I know you position on the plea bargain, but I don't know you position
>>>on his release. That's why I ask.
>>And you claimed it was relevant to the discussion of the plea bargain.
>>
>>I'm wondering what relevance you see.
Even "chrissy" cannot say...
>>>Why are you trying to be an artfull dodger, Roger?
>>
>>No dodging: the question has been answered and you know this because
>>you responded to it.
Well, *you're* dodging, but ...
>>>Please answer the question. Do you want Pollard released?
>>Please answer the question: why is it relevant?
>>>NOTE to lurkers. Are you wondering why Roger refuses to answer this
>>>very simple question?
>>Note to lurkers: you probably have more than one neuron, so can
>>search Google for the answer already given which chrissy responded to.
>>
>>Are you wondering what relevance the question has?
>Thank you, Roger. You came through as predicted.
As did you...
Ben Cramer
"Gord McFee" <gord....@rogers.com> wrote in message
news:9noc91hv8nqths478...@4ax.com...
How extremely perspicacious of you mcfoo.
Ken McVaySOBC
are some colleagues around the world in several countries infested by ZHIDS!!
On Tue, 24 May 2005 04:20:55 GMT, Steve_...@yahoo.com (Steve Talbot) wrote:
>On 16 May 2005 09:32:35 -0700,
><1116261155....@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> "Chris Larson"
><larsonc...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>Where is Scott Bradbury/ Doc Tavish? Anyone know.
>He's in other news groups which aren't over-run with trolls such as yourself.
>Try to do a google search and see if you can find him. He has taken measures to
>prevent trolls from stalking him to greener pastures where he now has an
>interested audience.
>Ciao
_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 120,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account
Kenneth McVay OBC
Ken McVaySOBC <JoeB...@xmail.net> wrote:
Still afraid to use your real name, Grosvenor?
Can't say I blame you; perhaps you should change it again,
perhaps to "Pferdendroppings" or "Schweinscheiße."
http://www.vex.net/~nizkor/hweb/people/g/grosvenor-william
http://groups.google.ca/groups?q=grosvenor+faq
KILLFILE these Grosvenor sockpuppets:
-------------------------------------
heinrichh...@xmail.net
thra...@reece.net.au
bo...@movil.com
bo...@sonic.net
Dart...@nowhere.else
Desi...@zeouane.fr
Dezi...@zeouane.net
ErnstSt...@veritas.net
Ernst Zundholz
ErnstZu...@veritas.net
ErnstZ...@wahrheit.net
Falv...@verizon.net
Flav...@verizon.net
fe...@guess.where
fire...@hemisphere.com
freecycle@pepsiphreak
GeorgeF...@vex.net
Flav...@verizon.net
Flav...@lesbos.net
GeorgesF...@nowhere.else
Georges Feuerstein
HansM...@vex.netz
heinrichh...@xmail.net
her...@nowhere.com
JoeB...@xmail.net
JoeRos...@vex.net
kdam...@webspeed.dk
kenm...@xmail.net
KevinAlf...@nowhere.humanoid
GayM...@vex.netz
kmcva...@xmail.net
Kenny...@vex.net
PanPiotrGlownia@*
PLe...@verite.jaccuse.fr
Ri...@riain.us
RiainBa...@nowhere.humanoid
Riain Bart...@nowhere.humanoid
RiainYB...@nitzkor.NAMBLA.net
Sami...@veritas.net
Steven...@nowhere.else
SusanShi...@vex.net
ViktorA...@veritas.net
VladZhi...@verite.jaccuse.fr
--
"...the antisemite is immune to refutation from either facts or logic.
An antisemite has chosen to live in hatred, without regard to either
facts or logic." (Matas, David. Bloody Speech, p. 37)
The Nizkor Project: http://www.nizkor.org
James Fenimoore
>
>He is still spreading the truth about filthy ZHIDS and their depredations, as
>are some colleagues around the world in several countries infested by ZHIDS!!
>
And I do know where he is.
James Fenimoore
>
The last I had heard is that you finally succumbed to AIDS.
Sara Salzman
fenim...@hotmail.com (James Fenimoore) wrote:
> In article <iei0b1t39vsj3s4jo...@4ax.com>, JoeB...@xmail.net
> says...
> >
> >He is still spreading the truth about filthy ZHIDS and their depredations,
> >as
> >are some colleagues around the world in several countries infested by
> >ZHIDS!!
> >
>
> And I do know where he is.
We all do. He's in his little town in Texas, around the corner from the
bakery and the Dairy Queen. And he still hasn't fixed that broken window.
Sara
Oh, and the local cops STILL call him names I can't repeat here.
>
> >On Tue, 24 May 2005 04:20:55 GMT, Steve_...@yahoo.com (Steve Talbot)
> >wrote:
> >>On 16 May 2005 09:32:35 -0700,
> >><1116261155....@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> "Chris Larson"
> >><larsonc...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >>>Where is Scott Bradbury/ Doc Tavish? Anyone know.
> >
> >>He's in other news groups which aren't over-run with trolls such as
> >>yourself.
> >>Try to do a google search and see if you can find him. He has taken
> >>measures
> >>to prevent trolls from stalking him to greener pastures where he now has an
> >>interested audience.
> >
> >>Ciao
> >
> >_________________________________________
> >Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
> >More than 120,000 groups
> >Unlimited download
> >http://www.usenetzone.com to open account
--
"Is that the same Hans Frank who modified his little daughter's diary?
-- The brilliance and insight of denier "Ben Cramer"
Sara Salzman
fenim...@hotmail.com (James Fenimoore) wrote:
> In article <11b0jiu...@corp.supernews.com>, kmc...@shell.vex.net says...
> >
>
> The last I had heard is that you finally succumbed to AIDS.
Which is about as accurate as your claim that I am posting the "Thrasher
Remailer" posts.
Sara
Susan Cohen
Susan
ריעין ברתון/Riain Barton
"James Fenimoore" <fenim...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1119272228.c7266d3d82f43a445ba9e21264efbddf@teranews...
: In article <11b0jiu...@corp.supernews.com>, kmc...@shell.vex.net
:
The Chief Instigator
:In article <11b0jiu...@corp.supernews.com>, kmc...@shell.vex.net says...
:The last I had heard is that you finally succumbed to AIDS.
...and you're stupid enough to keep claiming it, despite all evidence to the
contrary.
The Chief Instigator
:In article <iei0b1t39vsj3s4jo...@4ax.com>, JoeB...@xmail.net says...
:>He is still spreading the truth about filthy ZHIDS and their depredations, as
:>are some colleagues around the world in several countries infested by ZHIDS!!
:And I do know where he is.
So do I - he's still in Bellville, except for the occasional visit for a
checkup here in Houston, and he's every inch the coward you are.
Ben Cramer
"The Chief Instigator" <pat...@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkbr60...@eris.io.com...
> fenim...@hotmail.com (James Fenimoore) writes:
>
> :In article <11b0jiu...@corp.supernews.com>, kmc...@shell.vex.net
> says...
>
> :The last I had heard is that you finally succumbed to AIDS.
>
> ...and you're stupid enough to keep claiming it, despite all evidence to
> the
> contrary.
And we're meant to accept evidence from you?
>
> --
> Patrick "The Chief Boy Botherer" Humphrey (pat...@io.com) Houston,
George
are some colleagues around the world in several countries infested by ZHIDS!!
On Tue, 24 May 2005 04:20:55 GMT, Steve_...@yahoo.com (Steve Talbot) wrote:
Roger
(an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
in message <OW8Fe.5734$U%6.3...@fe05.lga>:
>Bradbury is too cool!
Says the pathetic dishonest hypocritical little child who wished zie
could be blubberbury when zie puts on about 200 more pounds...
Sara Salzman
wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> George wrote:
>
> > He is still spreading the truth about filthy ZHIDS and their depredations,
> > as are some colleagues around the world in several countries infested by
> > ZHIDS!!
> >
>
> Bradbury is too cool!
And I'm sure it warms his heart to know that he has an illiterate,
thick-headed baby-child as a fan.
Sara
--
The Jews may think all people are stupid when I reality the are watch ever
move you people make.
-- Kurt Knoll.
Sara Salzman
wrote:
> Sara Salzman wrote:
>
> > In article <OW8Fe.5734$U%6.3...@fe05.lga>, Tommy <nos...@nosapam.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> >> Hash: SHA1
> >>
> >> George wrote:
> >>
> >> > He is still spreading the truth about filthy ZHIDS and their
> >> > depredations, as are some colleagues around the world in several
> >> > countries infested by ZHIDS!!
> >> >
> >>
> >> Bradbury is too cool!
> >
> > And I'm sure it warms his heart to know that he has an illiterate,
> > thick-headed baby-child as a fan.
> >
> > Sara
> >
>
> You must be a fan also, afterall - you drove all the way to Houston to make
> a complete fool out of yourself. The D.A. in his town said you were a
> nutjob.
Really?
Since I spoke to the DA and you didn't, why should anyone believe you?
Roger
(an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
someone claiming to be Tommy wrote
>Sara Salzman wrote:
>> In article <OW8Fe.5734$U%6.3...@fe05.lga>, Tommy <nos...@nosapam.com>
>> wrote:
>>> George wrote:
>>> > He is still spreading the truth about filthy ZHIDS and their
>>> > depredations, as are some colleagues around the world in several
>>> > countries infested by ZHIDS!!
>>> Bradbury is too cool!
>> And I'm sure it warms his heart to know that he has an illiterate,
>> thick-headed baby-child as a fan.
>You must be a fan also, afterall - you drove all the way to Houston to make
>a complete fool out of yourself. The D.A. in his town said you were a
>nutjob.
No, that's not what was said -- but then we already knew that the
truth has no meaning for you...
Mickey
> Sara Salzman wrote:
>
> > In article <Bm9Fe.5736$U%6.1...@fe05.lga>, Tommy <nos...@nosapam.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Sara Salzman wrote:
> >>
> >> > In article <OW8Fe.5734$U%6.3...@fe05.lga>, Tommy <nos...@nosapam.com>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> >> >> Hash: SHA1
> >> >>
> >> >> George wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> > He is still spreading the truth about filthy ZHIDS and their
> >> >> > depredations, as are some colleagues around the world in several
> >> >> > countries infested by ZHIDS!!
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> Bradbury is too cool!
> >> >
> >> > And I'm sure it warms his heart to know that he has an illiterate,
> >> > thick-headed baby-child as a fan.
> >> >
> >> > Sara
> >> >
> >>
> >> You must be a fan also, afterall - you drove all the way to Houston to
> >> make a complete fool out of yourself. The D.A. in his town said you
were
> >> a nutjob.
> >
> > Really?
> >
> > Since I spoke to the DA and you didn't, why should anyone believe you?
> >
>
> Only an idiot would drive from Colorado to Houston over a Usenet flamewar.
> If I were to go to Colorado and tell your DA that you flamed me in a
Usenet
> discussion group, he would call me a nutjob.
Oh well then... if a liar told another liar something, then it MUST be
true....
Life's tough when your family tree has no branches, eh pinhead?
Sara Salzman
> Sara Salzman wrote:
>
> > In article <Bm9Fe.5736$U%6.1...@fe05.lga>, Tommy <nos...@nosapam.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Sara Salzman wrote:
> >>
> >> > In article <OW8Fe.5734$U%6.3...@fe05.lga>, Tommy <nos...@nosapam.com>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> >> >> Hash: SHA1
> >> >>
> >> >> George wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> > He is still spreading the truth about filthy ZHIDS and their
> >> >> > depredations, as are some colleagues around the world in several
> >> >> > countries infested by ZHIDS!!
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> Bradbury is too cool!
> >> >
> >> > And I'm sure it warms his heart to know that he has an illiterate,
> >> > thick-headed baby-child as a fan.
> >> >
> >> > Sara
> >> >
> >>
> >> You must be a fan also, afterall - you drove all the way to Houston to
> >> make a complete fool out of yourself. The D.A. in his town said you were
> >> a nutjob.
> >
> > Really?
> >
> > Since I spoke to the DA and you didn't, why should anyone believe you?
> >
>
> The DA told Scott you were a nutjob.
The DA denied that. Are you saying that the DA is a liar?
> Only an idiot would drive from Colorado to Houston over a Usenet flamewar.
That may be. I didn't drive from Colorado to Houston over a Usenet flame
war. In fact, I never drove to Houston. I've never been to Houston. It's
not any of your business, but I was visiting friends in Texas, and made
a side-trip to a little town near Houston.
> If I were to go to Colorado and tell your DA that you flamed me in a Usenet
> discussion group, he would call me a nutjob.
That's because you ARE a nut job. I had an APPOINTMENT with the DA, and
an APPOINTMENT with the Sheriff. It had nothing to do with a flame war,
little baby. It had to do with attempted harassment of my father,
harassment of my children, and Mr Bradbury's complicity.
So once again, you're wrong on everything.
Patrick Keenan
> Mickey wrote:
>
>
>> Oh well then... if a liar told another liar something, then it MUST be
>> true....
>>
>> Life's tough when your family tree has no branches, eh pinhead?
>
Still having trouble understanding that killfiles don't follow you from
machine to machine, eh Tommy?
-pk
Roger
(an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
someone claiming to be Tommy wrote
>The DA told Scott you were a nutjob.
No, blubberbury was lying when zie told you that.
>Only an idiot would drive from Colorado to Houston over a Usenet flamewar.
And since that's not what happened, your point is ... ?
>If I were to go to Colorado and tell your DA that you flamed me in a Usenet
>discussion group, he would call me a nutjob.
Of course, that's not what the conversation was about, so why don't
you go back to telling lies about the Moon landings?
Mickey
> Mickey wrote:
>
>
> > Oh well then... if a liar told another liar something, then it MUST be
> > true....
> >
> > Life's tough when your family tree has no branches, eh pinhead?
>
Nope, but you work hard at getting around it. I took the opportunity of
reminding everyone what a lying little puke you are before killing THIS
iteration of your rancid self.
Mickey
news:ygbFe.1574$q23.3...@news20.bellglobal.com...
Nor do they work when the intended victim changes his/her/its posting name
to avoid them, like Tommy does.
Reporting
> Sara Salzman wrote:
>
> > In article <OW8Fe.5734$U%6.3...@fe05.lga>, Tommy <nos...@nosapam.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> >> Hash: SHA1
> >>
> >> George wrote:
> >>
> >> > He is still spreading the truth about filthy ZHIDS and their
> >> > depredations, as are some colleagues around the world in several
> >> > countries infested by ZHIDS!!
> >> >
> >>
> >> Bradbury is too cool!
> >
> > And I'm sure it warms his heart to know that he has an illiterate,
> > thick-headed baby-child as a fan.
> >
> > Sara
> >
>
make
> a complete fool out of yourself. The D.A. in his town said you were a
> nutjob.
A District Attorney cannot call someone a "nutjob" nor can he call anyone
derogatory names, especially if it is a person attempting to report a
possible crime.
If a District Attorney did call her that derogatory name, then she should
file a federal lawsuit against him, and his employer.
Additionally, calling a person derogatory names while he or she is
attempting to report a possible crime is a federal offense. It's called
intimidation of party/witness, with strict penalties that include jail time.
Any District Attorney who does this should be fired from his job
immediately. America does not allow law enforcement offiicials to call
derogatory names at law abiding citizens.
Reporting
> Sara Salzman wrote:
>
> > In article <Bm9Fe.5736$U%6.1...@fe05.lga>, Tommy <nos...@nosapam.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Sara Salzman wrote:
> >>
> >> > In article <OW8Fe.5734$U%6.3...@fe05.lga>, Tommy <nos...@nosapam.com>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> >> >> Hash: SHA1
> >> >>
> >> >> George wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> > He is still spreading the truth about filthy ZHIDS and their
> >> >> > depredations, as are some colleagues around the world in several
> >> >> > countries infested by ZHIDS!!
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> Bradbury is too cool!
> >> >
> >> > And I'm sure it warms his heart to know that he has an illiterate,
> >> > thick-headed baby-child as a fan.
> >> >
> >> > Sara
> >> >
> >>
> >> You must be a fan also, afterall - you drove all the way to Houston to
> >> make a complete fool out of yourself. The D.A. in his town said you
were
> >> a nutjob.
> >
> > Really?
> >
> > Since I spoke to the DA and you didn't, why should anyone believe you?
> >
>
This citizen can drive anywhere she likes in America, and she can be tired
or exhausted when she arrives. That is fine, the Constitution allows that.
It is totally irrelevent under the law.
If the District Attorney did make that statement, he should be fired
immediately. I don't care who he said it about. A District Attorney in
America does not talk that way about any citizen attempting to report a
possible crime.
USNSM
> The DA told Scott you were a nutjob.
> Only an idiot would drive from Colorado to Houston over a Usenet flamewar.
> discussion group, he would call me a nutjob.
Considering no charges were filed, I would tend to believe that is the
correct version of the story.
USNSM
No, we are calling you a liar.
>
> That's because you ARE a nut job. I had an APPOINTMENT with the DA, and
> an APPOINTMENT with the Sheriff.
And they agreed with Bradbury and filed no charges against him. Didn't
you also drag your mentally disabled son into this mess also?
USNSM
>
>
> A District Attorney cannot call someone a "nutjob" nor can he call anyone
> derogatory names, especially if it is a person attempting to report a
> possible crime.
Sure he can. Private conservation. Happens all the time. They probably
know each other by first name. I figure in Tavish's small town, everyone
knows everyone. They probably had a huge laugh about it at the local
tavern.
The result was no charges against him were ever filed so I tend to
believe the story were the DA called Salzman a nutjob. Not the first
time a public official has called Salzman a "nutjob"
Steve Wolk
"Reporting" <r...@no.spam.net> wrote in message
news:_gdFe.9047$in2.2035@trndny05...
Either you are taking too many drugs or you are not taking enough. Seek
professional help.
USNSM
>
> If the District Attorney did make that statement, he should be fired
> immediately. I don't care who he said it about. A District Attorney in
> America does not talk that way about any citizen attempting to report a
> possible crime.
They do it all the time in private conservations. Especially in small
towns where everybody knows everybody else by first name. I suspect the
DA was giving Salzman and her son professiona courtesy, but then laughed
his ass off once they left.
Steve Wolk
"Roger" <roger@.> wrote in message
news:7lbae1t9jk5lle6k8...@4ax.com...
USNSM
types can't keep the attention span to read it.
Steve Wolk
"Sara Salzman" <cata...@concentric.net> wrote in message
news:catamont-132E15...@news.giganews.com...
Steve Wolk
Steve Wolk
Steve Wolk
> Mickey wrote:
>
>
> > Oh well then... if a liar told another liar something, then it MUST be
> > true....
> >
> > Life's tough when your family tree has no branches, eh pinhead?
>
Steve Wolk
"Patrick Keenan" <te...@dev.null> wrote in message
news:ygbFe.1574$q23.3...@news20.bellglobal.com...
Reporting
Doesn't matter. If the DA said that, it's an extremely serious violation of
the Constitution.
Will Bradbury sign an affidavit swearing that the District Attorney did make
that statement about Sara?
See, I don't care who he said it about. It's still illegal. If the District
Attorney said it about Bradbury, I would back him up too. A District
Attorney can't say that about anyone.
If the District Attorney made those statements, Sara should file a federal
lawsuit for $1,000,000.00 on the government.
Will Bradbury sign an affidavit attesting that the District Attorney did in
fact make those statements about Sara?
Reporting
> Reporting wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > A District Attorney cannot call someone a "nutjob" nor can he call
anyone
> > derogatory names, especially if it is a person attempting to report a
> > possible crime.
>
> Sure he can. Private conservation. Happens all the time.
Not from a District Attorney's mouth it is not allowed. Not in the United
States of America.
The Constitution forbids this kind of intimidation.
Reporting
> Reporting wrote:
>
> >
> > If the District Attorney did make that statement, he should be fired
> > immediately. I don't care who he said it about. A District Attorney in
> > America does not talk that way about any citizen attempting to report a
> > possible crime.
>
> They do it all the time in private conservations. Especially in small
> towns where everybody knows everybody else by first name.
It doesn't matter whose name someone knows how to say, or doesn't. The
Constitution doesn't care.
Just like with the Civil rights violation of Kortni Rae
Grimm by the Provo, Utah, police SWAT team in August of 2002. I don't care
who the girl is, or what she looks like. I don't care what her political
beliefs are, and neither does the Constitution. Under US law she is
guaranteed all the rights of the Constitution.
The poorly trained Provo police gunned her down in a motel room. Now the
government has to pay, and I say pay her family $10 million.
The Constitution doesn't care what someone's beliefs are, or who someone is
friends with. The Constitution says all people are equal under the law,
without exception.
It doesn't matter what someone's political beliefs are.
Reporting
> Reporting wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > A District Attorney cannot call someone a "nutjob" nor can he call
anyone
> > derogatory names, especially if it is a person attempting to report a
> > possible crime.
>
> Sure he can. Private conservation.
A District Attorney is considered "acting under color of law" when he
speaks.
Roger
(an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
in message <5qdFe.145$Ie...@bignews1.bellsouth.net>:
Nor were charges contemplated, except by blubberbury, who turned out
being too chickensh*t to follow through on zir threats.
Roger
(an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
someone claiming to be USNSM wrote
>Tavish gives so much facts and information, these low attention OCD
>types can't keep the attention span to read it.
and gives and gives and gives, and changes zir nym so you can't avoid
it.
But when push came to shove, zie hid under zir bed when Sara stopped
by as zie had challenged her to do.
Susan Cohen
> Tavish gives so much facts and information, these low attention OCD types
> can't keep the attention span to read it.
Oh, I see - it's a Scotty puppet.
Susan
Reporting
Forget the nonsense. Let's hear some facts about what may be an extremely
serious violation of the Constitution by the District Attorney's office.
What district this this occur? Where was it, and what was the District
Attorney's name?
A District Attorney is a public official acting "under color of law". He is
not some kid on a newsgroup clowning around.
Roger
(an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
in message <5HeFe.9426$in2.9196@trndny05>:
>"Roger" <roger@.> wrote in message
>news:3ctae1hsimkpreo01...@4ax.com...
>> >> The DA told Scott you were a nutjob.
>> >> Only an idiot would drive from Colorado to Houston over a Usenet
>> >> flamewar.
>> >> If I were to go to Colorado and tell your DA that you flamed me in a
>> >> Usenet discussion group, he would call me a nutjob.
>> >Considering no charges were filed, I would tend to believe that is the
>> >correct version of the story.
>> Nor were charges contemplated, except by blubberbury, who turned out
>> being too chickensh*t to follow through on zir threats.
>Forget the nonsense. Let's hear some facts about what may be an extremely
>serious violation of the Constitution by the District Attorney's office.
You mean the nonsense that he said any such thing, since your only
"proof" is the word of a liar reporting what another liar said?
Sara Salzman
USNSM <us...@jointhe.usnsm.org> wrote:
No one ASKED for charges to be filed.
Sara Salzman
USNSM <us...@jointhe.usnsm.org> wrote:
Same thing.
> >
> > That's because you ARE a nut job. I had an APPOINTMENT with the DA, and
> > an APPOINTMENT with the Sheriff.
>
> And they agreed with Bradbury and filed no charges against him. Didn't
> you also drag your mentally disabled son into this mess also?
I didn't ASK them to file charges, Moron. I simply wanted them to know
what their local loony was up to.
You mean my son who scored in the 97th percentile in the SATs?
Sara Salzman
"Reporting" <r...@no.spam.net> wrote:
> "USNSM" <us...@jointhe.usnsm.org> wrote in message
> news:5qdFe.145$Ie...@bignews1.bellsouth.net...
> > >
> > > The DA told Scott you were a nutjob.
> > > Only an idiot would drive from Colorado to Houston over a Usenet
> flamewar.
> > > If I were to go to Colorado and tell your DA that you flamed me in a
> Usenet
> > > discussion group, he would call me a nutjob.
> >
> > Considering no charges were filed, I would tend to believe that is the
> > correct version of the story.
>
> Doesn't matter. If the DA said that, it's an extremely serious violation of
> the Constitution.
It sure would be. That's why the DA didn't say it.
>
> Will Bradbury sign an affidavit swearing that the District Attorney did make
> that statement about Sara?
Of course he won't/ He'll only bluster and lie -- like he always does.
>
> See, I don't care who he said it about. It's still illegal. If the District
> Attorney said it about Bradbury, I would back him up too. A District
> Attorney can't say that about anyone.
>
The District Attorney was very careful not to say anything defamatory
about Mr. Bradbury. And the police folks we spoke to said they _did_
have a special name for him, but they wouldn't repeat it in mixed
company.
> If the District Attorney made those statements, Sara should file a federal
> lawsuit for $1,000,000.00 on the government.
>
> Will Bradbury sign an affidavit attesting that the District Attorney did in
> fact make those statements about Sara?
I'd like to know that too.
Sara Salzman
USNSM <us...@jointhe.usnsm.org> wrote:
You can suspect whatever you wish. You'd still be wrong.
Reporting
Well Sara, the police cannot have any special name for him, or for anyone.
The Constitution disallows policemen from namecalling against citizens.
I know a guy who reported to a federal investigator about a local policeman
who made up false, highly derogatory stories claiming law abiding citizens
were engaging in serious crimes, when in fact they were not, and they were
never even charged with any crimes.
The FBI agent replied "What do you care what people say?".
A short time after that, the World Trade towers got knocked down and Anthrax
was being mailed out to Washington DC. This resulted in the government
looking into "a corrupt local policeman who makes up fake stories about
serious crimes".
Since the World Trade Towers were knocked down, FBI agents no longer say
""What do you care what people say?" when a citizen reports a "a corrupt
local policeman who makes up fake stories about serious crimes".
Roger
(an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
someone claiming to be Reporting wrote
>"Sara Salzman" <cata...@concentric.net> wrote in message
>news:catamont-435AB9...@news.giganews.com...
>> The District Attorney was very careful not to say anything defamatory
>> about Mr. Bradbury. And the police folks we spoke to said they _did_
>> have a special name for him, but they wouldn't repeat it in mixed
>> company.
>Well Sara, the police cannot have any special name for him, or for anyone.
>The Constitution disallows policemen from namecalling against citizens.
really? In which article?
>I know a guy who reported to a federal investigator about a local policeman
>who made up false, highly derogatory stories claiming law abiding citizens
>were engaging in serious crimes, when in fact they were not, and they were
>never even charged with any crimes.
>
>The FBI agent replied "What do you care what people say?".
>
>A short time after that, the World Trade towers got knocked down and Anthrax
>was being mailed out to Washington DC. This resulted in the government
>looking into "a corrupt local policeman who makes up fake stories about
>serious crimes".
>
>Since the World Trade Towers were knocked down, FBI agents no longer say
>""What do you care what people say?" when a citizen reports a "a corrupt
>local policeman who makes up fake stories about serious crimes".
Of course, calling someone names is not eh same as claiming someone is
engaged in a crime.
Do you even *read* what you post?
ריעין ברתון/Riain Barton
"Tommy" <nos...@nosapam.com> wrote in message
news:Bm9Fe.5736$U%6.1...@fe05.lga...
ריעין ברתון/Riain Barton
"Tommy" <nos...@nosapam.com> wrote in message
news:g1aFe.8$si...@fe05.lga...
: Sara Salzman wrote:
:
: > In article <Bm9Fe.5736$U%6.1...@fe05.lga>, Tommy
<nos...@nosapam.com>
: > wrote:
: >
: >> Sara Salzman wrote:
: >>
: >> > In article <OW8Fe.5734$U%6.3...@fe05.lga>, Tommy
<nos...@nosapam.com>
: >> > wrote:
: >> >
: >> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
: >> >> Hash: SHA1
: >> >>
: >> >> George wrote:
: >> >>
: >> >> > He is still spreading the truth about filthy ZHIDS and their
: >> >> > depredations, as are some colleagues around the world in
several
: >> >> > countries infested by ZHIDS!!
: >> >> >
: >> >>
: >> >> Bradbury is too cool!
: >> >
: >> > And I'm sure it warms his heart to know that he has an
illiterate,
: >> > thick-headed baby-child as a fan.
: >> >
: >> > Sara
: >> >
: >>
: >> You must be a fan also, afterall - you drove all the way to Houston
to
: >> make a complete fool out of yourself. The D.A. in his town said you
were
: >> a nutjob.
: >
: > Really?
: >
: > Since I spoke to the DA and you didn't, why should anyone believe
you?
: >
:
: The DA told Scott you were a nutjob.
ריעין ברתון/Riain Barton
when your message is included in a post by someone who is not in that
killfile, people who killfiled you can read what rubbish you write!!!
Gawd, you are one thick NAZI cunt!
"Tommy" <nos...@nosapam.com> wrote in message
ריעין ברתון/Riain Barton
or is it the other way around?
Either way he is wrong and stupid!
"Sara Salzman" <cata...@concentric.net> wrote in message
news:catamont-132E15...@news.giganews.com...
:
: So once again, you're wrong on everything.
:
: Sara
Chris Larson
dozen Krispy Kremes and reach into a fresh pie with his hand for a
tasty treat.
ריעין ברתון/Riain Barton
United States NAZIS and other Stupid Mamzers
"USNSM" <us...@jointhe.usnsm.org> wrote in message
news:OrdFe.146$Ie1...@bignews1.bellsouth.net...
ריעין ברתון/Riain Barton
into this!
They both need a bullet shot through the front of their tiny brains.
"Sara Salzman" <cata...@concentric.net> wrote in message
news:catamont-528C17...@news.giganews.com...
: In article <OrdFe.146$Ie1...@bignews1.bellsouth.net>,
ריעין ברתון/Riain Barton
and to the truth!
Are you man enough to stop attacking a woman and her son, and attack me
instead????
Except I want it to be face to face, you fucking NAZI coward.
"USNSM" <us...@jointhe.usnsm.org> wrote in message
news:5qdFe.145$Ie...@bignews1.bellsouth.net...
:>
: > The DA told Scott you were a nutjob.
: > Only an idiot would drive from Colorado to Houston over a Usenet
flamewar.
: > If I were to go to Colorado and tell your DA that you flamed me in a
Usenet
: > discussion group, he would call me a nutjob.
:
: Considering no charges were filed, I would tend to believe that is the
ריעין ברתון/Riain Barton
unless you expect us to try to find hidden in each post...
"Steve Wolk" <Bar...@Seville.com> wrote in message
news:P7CdnSOcm5f...@rcn.net...
:
: "USNSM" <us...@jointhe.usnsm.org> wrote in message
:
:
ריעין ברתון/Riain Barton
"Reporting" <r...@no.spam.net> wrote in message
news:5HeFe.9426$in2.9196@trndny05...
:
: Forget the nonsense. Let's hear some facts about what may be an
:
:
:
Gord McFee
<_tdFe.148$Ie1...@bignews1.bellsouth.net>, USNSM
<us...@jointhe.usnsm.org> wrote:
> Reporting wrote:
>
> > A District Attorney cannot call someone a "nutjob" nor can he call anyone
> > derogatory names, especially if it is a person attempting to report a
> > possible crime.
>
> Sure he can. Private conservation. Happens all the time. They probably
> know each other by first name. I figure in Tavish's small town, everyone
> knows everyone. They probably had a huge laugh about it at the local
> tavern.
The problem is, Chris, that they do know Bradbury, very well, and they
think *he* is a flaming nutjob. And they are right.
--
Gord McFee
I'll write no line before its time
Visit the Holocaust History Project
http://www.holocaust-history.org