We Have Met The Enemy...
Sara Salzman
Bradbury was a no-show at the County Courthouse. As expected.
He did say "any date, any time," didn't he?
Well, we were there. He wasn't.
We even called him on the phone. I left a message. He wasn't there.
Must have skedaddled.
The Austin County police and DA, however, were there. And they had some
very interesting things to say.
More interesting were some of the things they wouldn't say. Like:
Policeman: We have a name for Mr. Bradbury, but I can't say it in mixed
company.
Yep. Chickenshit Coward does it again.
Sara
User
Perhaps Mr. Bradbury decided to move to Ireland and become roomies
with the Right Revrend Flormby-Smythe?
You must tell us more about your visit.
Regards,
User
On 22 Jul 2003 23:56:18 GMT, Sara Salzman <cata...@concentric.net>
wrote:
Sara Salzman
Us...@hotmail.com wrote:
> Hi Sara,
>
> Perhaps Mr. Bradbury decided to move to Ireland and become roomies
> with the Right Revrend Flormby-Smythe?
>
> You must tell us more about your visit.
>
> Regards,
> User
It was interesting. {NAME OF TOWN} is a rather small town that has
obviously seen better days. But even the worst of {NAME OF TOWN}pales in
comparison to the shack occupied by our Doc Tavish.
Sara
dudalb
Bradbury is a Chicken shit coward and will probably always be a Chickenshit
Coward.
Gord McFee
Another thing he has in common with big, brave David Michael. Those
guys sure do run when you come to town, Sara. Sort of makes you wonder
if they are nothing but great big chickenshits. Oh yes, that's what you
said above.
:-D
--
Gord McFee
I'll write no line before its time
Sara Salzman
<hKmTa.42358$zwL....@news04.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com>, Gord
McFee <gord....@rogers.com> wrote:
Bradbury sure made a whole lot of big threats about how I ought to show
up and "re-file" a lawsuit I hadn't filed in the first place. I
seriously thought about filing charges against him, but figured he's
such an insignificant little piece of slime who was too frightened to
show his face in town, he's just not worth it.
But the police have a whole new file on him, in addition to the ones he
already has.
Oh, and "Detective Huber"? Bradbury didn't even get his name right: it
was Hubert, and he "doesn't work there anymore."
So much for his threats.
Sara
Patrick Humphrey
>and he is a WUSS.
>Bradbury was a no-show at the County Courthouse. As expected.
It wasn't exactly a surprise.
>He did say "any date, any time," didn't he?
>Well, we were there. He wasn't.
Indeed, and there are three witnesses to your being there.
>We even called him on the phone. I left a message. He wasn't there.
I hope he appreciates our comments. ;-)
>Must have skedaddled.
>The Austin County police and DA, however, were there. And they had some
>very interesting things to say.
>More interesting were some of the things they wouldn't say. Like:
>Policeman: We have a name for Mr. Bradbury, but I can't say it in mixed
>company.
>Yep. Chickenshit Coward does it again.
Dale and I will have to attack some barbecued chicken tonight (Wednesday).
We're honored to have been able to help out in making yesterday a successful
day.
-PLH, no phone bombs on my machine yet, so the Chicken hasn't yet returned
from hiding
David Christian
wrote:
Were you and Pat beastly to Scottikins?
Any bets he hides a week or so before resurfacing with a new series of
nicks and the same old recycled posts?
Sara Salzman
dckomat...@mindspring.com wrote:
> On 22 Jul 2003 23:56:18 GMT, Sara Salzman <cata...@concentric.net>
> wrote:
>
> Were you and Pat beastly to Scottikins?
Not at all. He was hiding from us, and never showed up.
> Any bets he hides a week or so before resurfacing with a new series of
> nicks and the same old recycled posts?
>
Nope. No bets :)
Sara
David Christian
wrote:
>In article <e9lthvs13aa6juh9n...@4ax.com>,
>dckomat...@mindspring.com wrote:
>
>> On 22 Jul 2003 23:56:18 GMT, Sara Salzman <cata...@concentric.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Were you and Pat beastly to Scottikins?
>
>Not at all. He was hiding from us, and never showed up.
See? In his wisdom he know you would be beastly! :)
Why does it not come as any suprise to me to find out the local cops
know all about Scott and have pet names for him?
Charles Don Hall
6E8D44.185...@news.concentric.net:
> and he is a WUSS.
>
> Bradbury was a no-show at the County Courthouse. As expected.
>
> He did say "any date, any time," didn't he?
>
> Well, we were there. He wasn't.
Hmmm, this was posted yesterday, and Bradbury *still* isn't back on
alt.revisionism.
I've been enjoying the peace and quiet, but I guess I'd better call the
paramedics and tell them to run by Bradbury's shack with the "jaws of life"
so they can pry him out from under the bed.
--
======================================
Charles Don Hall, Licensed Philosopher
======================================
Roger
(an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
someone claiming to be Charles Don Hall wrote
in message <Xns93C1B3C1B...@216.254.95.101>:
>> and he is a WUSS.
>>
>> Bradbury was a no-show at the County Courthouse. As expected.
>>
>> He did say "any date, any time," didn't he?
>>
>> Well, we were there. He wasn't.
>Hmmm, this was posted yesterday, and Bradbury *still* isn't back on
>alt.revisionism.
>
>I've been enjoying the peace and quiet, but I guess I'd better call the
>paramedics and tell them to run by Bradbury's shack with the "jaws of life"
>so they can pry him out from under the bed.
Spoilsport :p
steve wolk
"Charles Don Hall" <cdhall_public_remove_this@and_this_pobox.com> wrote in
message news:Xns93C1B3C1B...@216.254.95.101...
> Sara Salzman <cata...@concentric.net> wrote in news:catamont-
> 6E8D44.185...@news.concentric.net:
>
> > and he is a WUSS.
> >
> > Bradbury was a no-show at the County Courthouse. As expected.
> >
> > He did say "any date, any time," didn't he?
> >
> > Well, we were there. He wasn't.
>
> Hmmm, this was posted yesterday, and Bradbury *still* isn't back on
> alt.revisionism.
>
> I've been enjoying the peace and quiet, but I guess I'd better call the
> paramedics and tell them to run by Bradbury's shack with the "jaws of
life"
> so they can pry him out from under the bed.
Perhaps the very thought of being confronted by Sara and Pat brought on the
stroke that has been long overdue. Maybe you should tell the paramedics to
bring along the "jaws of death" too - just in case. Getting all that dead
weight out from under the bed will certainly require some form of mechanical
assistance.
Gord McFee
Sara Salzman <cata...@concentric.net> typed:
> In article <e9lthvs13aa6juh9n...@4ax.com>,
> dckomat...@mindspring.com wrote:
>
>> On 22 Jul 2003 23:56:18 GMT, Sara Salzman <cata...@concentric.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Were you and Pat beastly to Scottikins?
>
> Not at all. He was hiding from us, and never showed up.
He must have learned that one from David Michael.
--
Gord McFee
I'll write no line before its time
Visit the Holocaust History Project
http://www.holocaust-history.org
Gord McFee
Charles Don Hall <cdhall_public_remove_this@and_this_pobox.com> typed:
> Sara Salzman <cata...@concentric.net> wrote in news:catamont-
> 6E8D44.185...@news.concentric.net:
>
>> and he is a WUSS.
>>
>> Bradbury was a no-show at the County Courthouse. As expected.
>>
>> He did say "any date, any time," didn't he?
>>
>> Well, we were there. He wasn't.
>
> Hmmm, this was posted yesterday, and Bradbury *still* isn't back on
> alt.revisionism.
>
> I've been enjoying the peace and quiet, but I guess I'd better call
> the paramedics and tell them to run by Bradbury's shack with the
> "jaws of life" so they can pry him out from under the bed.
ROTFL!
russky
> Sara Salzman <cata...@concentric.net> wrote in news:catamont-
> 6E8D44.185...@news.concentric.net:
>
> > and he is a WUSS.
> >
> > Bradbury was a no-show at the County Courthouse. As expected.
> >
> > He did say "any date, any time," didn't he?
> >
> > Well, we were there. He wasn't.
>
> Hmmm, this was posted yesterday, and Bradbury *still* isn't back on
> alt.revisionism.
Hush!!!There's an old saying in Chicago:If you mention the Devil, he'll pop up.
>
>
steve wolk
"Gord McFee" <gord....@rogers.com> wrote in message
news:KbGTa.55182$zwL....@news04.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com...
> In news:catamont-5A5B94...@news.concentric.net,
> Sara Salzman <cata...@concentric.net> typed:
>
> > In article <e9lthvs13aa6juh9n...@4ax.com>,
> > dckomat...@mindspring.com wrote:
> >
> >> On 22 Jul 2003 23:56:18 GMT, Sara Salzman <cata...@concentric.net>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> Were you and Pat beastly to Scottikins?
> >
> > Not at all. He was hiding from us, and never showed up.
>
> He must have learned that one from David Michael.
ROTFL! Sara 2, lunatic twits 0.
Sara Salzman
<Bar...@Seville.com> wrote:
Aww gee, thanks!! I'm honored.
:)
Sara
Sara Salzman
Salzman <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
Just thought I'd remind everyone of Mr. Bradbury's lunatic ravings
before I left:
---BEGIN QUOTE---
On 11 Jul 2003 18:34:38 GMT, Sara Salzman <cata...@concentric.net>
wrote:
<catamont-A637E1...@spectator.sj.sys.us.xo.net>
"Day, time, place. I'm waiting. Sara"
My answer: Anytime and any day. The place: my local courthouse
(my jurisdiction).
You and Yale F. Edeiken re-file the same exact perjurious lawsuit
against me with those same perjurious accusations and YOUR same
perjurious affidavit. I would like for YOU to explain to a jury of my
peers why YOU and Yale "bore false witness" against me and why you two
are not responsible for all of the criminal harassment I have had done
to me. I want YOU and Yale to deny causing the harassment I have been
subjected to because of my address being distributed and the info being
used criminally. I want Yale to state his motive for subpoenaing my
medical record and then lying about what it stated. I will show copies
to the jury and have Yale explain how he deduced it stated "morbid
obesity" and that I weighed well over 300 pounds when there are no
height nor weight fields on it and the diagnosis was: "sleep apnea,
narcolepsy, vertigo." I want YOU to explain why the telephone number YOU
distributed was different than the one the subpoena stated and how YOU
knew it seeing how it was unlisted number. I want YOU and Yale to prove
what I ever actually did to either of you that I deserve all of the ill
treatment I have been subjected to because of legal system abuse. I want
YOU and Yale to explain why I am accountable for what a person in
another state and another country allegedly did so that I get harassed
as a proxy of your vindictiveness. I want YOU to explain why I, nor
David Michael, or our attorneys were never served with the complaints
against us YET after the lawsuit was dismissed in my favor then the
"complaints" were posted and distributed giving out my address and new
telephone number. I want YOU to tell a jury of my peers what the purpose
was for YOU to do that to me. IF YOU TWO GOD DAMNED VILE EVIL SHITS
DON'T RE-FILE THEN LET IT BE KNOWN FOREVER THAT YOU TWO ARE COWARDS
AND THAT LAWSUIT HAD NO REAL VALIDITY IN THE FIRST PLACE!! IF YOU DON'T
DO ALL OF THIS THEN IT IS YOU AND YALE WHO ARE THE COWARDS!! MAKE YOUR
SAME ACCUSATIONS TO MY FACE IN FRONT OF A JURY OF MY PEERS AT MY
COURTHOUSE IN MY JURISDICTION!! ARE YOU UP TO IT YOU PERJURIOUS
COWARD!?
---END QUOTE---
Of course, none of this matters, since the Insane Chickenshit left town
and wasn't there to face me. Cowards? I think Mr. Bradbury has given us
a clear definition of what a coward is.
Oh, and by the way, Mr. BRADBURY'S DA said my affidavit was not
"perjury." So did the local police.
Sorry again, Chickenshit.
Sara
Patrick Humphrey
[much that is good about our visit to Bellville yesterday]
>was for YOU to do that to me. IF YOU TWO GOD DAMNED VILE EVIL SHITS
>DON'T RE-FILE THEN LET IT BE KNOWN FOREVER THAT YOU TWO ARE COWARDS
>AND THAT LAWSUIT HAD NO REAL VALIDITY IN THE FIRST PLACE!! IF YOU DON'T
>DO ALL OF THIS THEN IT IS YOU AND YALE WHO ARE THE COWARDS!! MAKE YOUR
>SAME ACCUSATIONS TO MY FACE IN FRONT OF A JURY OF MY PEERS AT MY
>COURTHOUSE IN MY JURISDICTION!! ARE YOU UP TO IT YOU PERJURIOUS
>COWARD!?
>
>---END QUOTE---
>Of course, none of this matters, since the Insane Chickenshit left town
>and wasn't there to face me. Cowards? I think Mr. Bradbury has given us
>a clear definition of what a coward is.
...and a graphic illustration as well, by his absence.
>Oh, and by the way, Mr. BRADBURY'S DA said my affidavit was not
>"perjury." So did the local police.
>Sorry again, Chickenshit.
You know, I think what frightened him out of his wits (not that that would
take a very long trip to begin with) was the possibility that he'd show up and
a certain spouse of mine would be SMALLER than him...
-PLH, who'll be back next April, if not sooner (and will be back to San
Antonio much sooner)
steve wolk
"Sara Salzman" <cata...@concentric.net> wrote in message
news:catamont-3A9741...@news.concentric.net...
Fatbury a no-show. Totally predictable. Just like his English loonybird of
a feather, David Michael. Craven cowards, both of them.
russky
Fatboy has other priorities.He's still beseiging the local Dairy Queen.
russky
russky
Dr. Anthony J. Lomenzo
Joe---just so you know...your identical posts are repeating themselves
three or four times when you send the [what I assume is] single post.
You might want to check your browser or news mailer for a possible glitch.
Doc Tony
russky
Scott was known to the minstrels in medieval England. They wrote this about him:
Scott of Belleville is a curious knave
While cursing Jews, he's known to be brave
He faltereth not in the abuse he hurls
Yet 'tis proven that he feareth girls
russky
Patrick Humphrey
>Sara Salzman <cata...@concentric.net> wrote in message news:<catamont-6E8D44...@news.concentric.net>...
>> and he is a WUSS.
>> Bradbury was a no-show at the County Courthouse. As expected.
>> He did say "any date, any time," didn't he?
>> Well, we were there. He wasn't.
>> We even called him on the phone. I left a message. He wasn't there.
>> Must have skedaddled.
>> The Austin County police and DA, however, were there. And they had some
>> very interesting things to say.
>> More interesting were some of the things they wouldn't say. Like:
>> Policeman: We have a name for Mr. Bradbury, but I can't say it in mixed
>> company.
>> Yep. Chickenshit Coward does it again.
>Fatboy has other priorities.He's still beseiging the local Dairy Queen.
Not on Tuesday, he wasn't. He was gone. Vamoosed. (We ate lunch within
spitting distance of the DQ, and one of us would have noticed. ;-)
-PLH, it was a good day, regardless
russky
The problem is with AOL.
Gerhardt Bruno Tavischen
<cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>and he is a WUSS.
>
>Bradbury was a no-show at the County Courthouse. As expected.
You never selected a date or time to re-file the kook lawsuit and I have a life
and other things I have to do.
>He did say "any date, any time," didn't he?
You left out the rest too!
>Well, we were there. He wasn't.
I have more important things to do rather than sit at home waiting for a
"Crackpot" to show up.
>We even called him on the phone. I left a message. He wasn't there.
We was you and someone with you and NOT my DA or police! BTW thanks for the
admission too!
>Must have skedaddled.
I told the assistant DA where I was going to be! He knew I had personal business
over which I had no control and that is all you need to know!! I hardly consider
me skedaddling but thanks for availing yourself of the legal establishment and
leaving a phone message which was snooty to boot! Thanks also for identifying
yourself as well!
BTW don't forget your latest communique had you only visiting people in the
Northernmost region of my home state and no indication you were coming here:
<START>
> Why should I be afraid that you're stalking me!? If you show up in my
> jurisdiction you will have to provide proofs of all those accusations you
> made against me!
Stalking YOU?!?!?!?! Puh-leaze! I have much better things to do. I have
places to go, people to see... an appointment with a Texas Ranger... old
friends to visit.
Now, posting someone's home address more than 150 times in the last 4
months... THAT'S stalking.
<<Tavish comment July 26, 2003: Paying close attention to what other people do
and "visiting" them is stalking behavior BUT replying to people who won't stop
posting where I live when they have been told repeatedly to stop and me ONLT
replying with the source is no stalking! YOU and Yale have stalked me when Yale
abused the legal system to get my address (which he also tried to do to David
Michael which I will make sure the DA's office knows!!). You have no legal nor
moral high ground! BTW how will you and Yale explain how Yale knew what make,
model, and color of vehicle I drive? I have e-mail, where Yale mentioned what I
drive and the color. How would he know that when he lives 1500 miles away?
Patrick L. Humphrey-- that's how!>>
Sara
And BZZZT!... I'm not in Dallas.
Sara
Post a follow-up to this message
<STOP>
I don't see any mention of "visiting" me! BTW you're whining: "Now, posting
someone's home address more than 150 times in the last 4 months... THAT'S
stalking."-- how is it stalking when it is done ONLY in reply to your pals
posting where I live which they would not have been able to do if it weren't for
YOU and Yale!? Care to explain that for all of us? Care to deny that YOU and
Yale were the two people who made my confidential info public?
BTW you bitch about your address being posted over 150 times but what about mine
being posted over 7,000 times as part of forged child porn ads, fake registered
pedophile lists, death threats etc.!? Care to comment about YOUR responsibility
for all that has been done to me? You can be damned sure I am going to keep my
appointment with the Assistant DA next week like we agreed upon and I will play
your phone message to him too.
I also was not going to stay around waiting for your fat ass! I did state:
BUT I have a life and I have other things to do!
>The Austin County police
There is no such thing as Austin County police!
>and DA, however, were there. And they had some very interesting things to say.
You're lying as usual!
>More interesting were some of the things they wouldn't say. Like:
>
>Policeman: We have a name for Mr. Bradbury, but I can't say it in mixed
>company.
Care to name him? Evidently he was not one who has had to waste his time and
city resources responding to false police reports or having to accompany federal
agents to pay me visits which the DA also knows about!
>Yep. Chickenshit Coward does it again.
How's that PIG? You keep forgetting what my agreement detailed! You only quote:
My answer: Anytime and any day. The place: my local courthouse
(my jurisdiction).
BUT you choose to ignore the rest which is quoted above in its entirety!
Smear is all you have isn't it pig?
>Sara
______________________________________________________________________
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Still Only $9.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com
<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <><><><><><><><>
steve wolk
"Gerhardt Bruno Tavischen" <GerhardtBru...@TAVISCHEN-GMBH.NET> wrote
in message news:v4k6iv8fs5d4a18ea...@4ax.com...
I hear that you live in quite a mansion, Fatbury, with modern art adorning
your broken window. Too bad you didn't have the guts to play host to your
visitors.
Gerhardt Bruno Tavischen
<catamont-7134E1...@news.concentric.net> Sara Salzman
<cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>In article <lomrhvcbs0ej5bl0h...@4ax.com>,
>Us...@hotmail.com wrote:
>
>> Hi Sara,
>>
>> Perhaps Mr. Bradbury decided to move to Ireland and become roomies
>> with the Right Revrend Flormby-Smythe?
>>
>> You must tell us more about your visit.
>>
>> Regards,
>> User
:.
>It was interesting. {NAME OF TOWN} is a rather small town that has
>obviously seen better days. But even the worst of {NAME OF TOWN} pales in
>comparison to the shack occupied by our Doc Tavish.
Look like all you can do is attack me personally such as my residence! Look at
the above which will make a good impression with my local authorities and this:
From: Sara Salzman <cata...@concentric.net>
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: DOGPATCH BOY, GOT ANY?
Date: 12 Jul 2003 02:36:15 GMT
Message-ID: <catamont-F26FCF...@spectator.sj.sys.us.xo.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 207.155.170.210
User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.1 (PPC)
In article <7srugv8t17tn8ro4r...@4ax.com>,
Jew Hating T. Cornpone <wally_cleaver@mayfield01net> wrote:
> On 12 Jul 2003 01:19:37 GMT,
> <catamont-ECBC7B...@spectator.sj.sys.us.xo.net> Sara Salzman
> <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>
> >Chickenshit refusal to face my challenge noted.
>
> Sorry but I am choosey about the people I visit or associate with. I could
> care less about meeting the wh*re who was an accomplice in setting me up for
> almost four years long campaign of being harassed.
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 09:12:26 -0600
To: Sara Salzman <cata...@concentric.net>
From: Scott Bradbury <doc_tav...@ix.netcom.com>
Subject: Re: I am Leaving ALT.REVISIONISM For Good! The Thugs Are
Threatening...
I may have a bad reputation but I don't believe in harassing people.
You're also a chickenshit coward who likes to call people names from the
safety if his rat-infested apartment (thanks to DON ELLIS for posting
photographs of his home). When it comes to being a man and facing your
opponent, you're a chickenshit coward who is afraid of a woman.
Big man.
--
First in war, first in peace, first to holler "I QUIT!"
Jubilation T. Cornpone, Scott Bradbury's obvious mentor.
<END>
Tavish
Gerhardt Bruno Tavischen
<catamont-D8403A...@news.concentric.net> Sara Salzman
<cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
> I seriously thought about filing charges against him,
For doing what? Returning in kind what your accomplices do to me!? Let them
start posting where I live again and see what happens!!
Gerhardt Bruno Tavischen
<catamont-D8403A...@news.concentric.net> Sara Salzman
<cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>But the police have a whole new file on him, in addition to the ones he
>already has.
And what would that be? That I have been harassed by a crackpot and her pimp and
their dirty playmates?
>Oh, and "Detective Huber"? Bradbury didn't even get his name right:
I also corrected myself later!
"Detective Hubert certainly wants to know who's heckled him too!"
-Subject: Poor Larry - How Much is Your House Worth on the Open Market?
-Message-ID: <gruact4trmga7esmr...@4ax.com>
-Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2001 07:28:20 GMT
>LOL DETECTIVE HUBER ALREADY SAID YOU OWN NO FIREARMS BRADSHIT
Detective Hubert retired over a year ago with a medical disability.
-Message-ID: <kb6shu8on7luecf8g...@4ax.com>
-Date: 29 Jun 2002 21:35:50 +0100
The "T" is silent and Hubert retired with a medical disability-- bad back BUT he
was the one in charge of the file.
>it was Hubert, and he "doesn't work there anymore."
I think you probably made my case for me. They will compare your psychotic rants
with the facts and they will see you what you are-- a liar with a vendetta!
Shit like you, Yale and the rest of your vermin can only resort to smear,
defamation, deriding people for the homes they live in, lying out you asses and
al;l other things shit like you are known to do and I only pray that the world
in general starts seeing you devils for the evil shits you truly are!
Tavish
From: Sara "The Fist" Salzman
Newsgroups: alt.sex.bondage
Subject: Re: What is power? (was Re: Power Imbalance v. Power Exchange)
In article <3gv6bm$4...@crl9.crl.com>, ver...@crl.com (Janet W. Hardy) wrote:
> Quick straw poll here: How many people have ever felt totally,
> completely safe during any S/M scene -- safeword or no, light or heavy,
> D/S or sensation-only?
Verdant:
I hate to muddle the semantics further, but... safe? You mean safe that my
Master won't break my leg or suffocate me to the point of death in a scene?
100%. Period. I know my Master would never cause tha kind of damage.
Safe, as in not getting hurt, or not getting hurt MORE thn I'd LIKE to accept?
Certianly not 100%. Mastercat is always pushing limits, and pushing me to
the edge or slightly farther.
But safe in terms of not getting killed or left in bondage to die alone?
Absolutely 100%. And not only with my own Master, but I feel equally safe
with those other Dom(mes) he has had me play with. Perrrfect <END>
Sara "The Fist" Salzman on Safe Torture
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=s70dcvgs3eucqd31n81gqo5e21uj7vvg67%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: Sara "The Fist" Salzman - A Compilation of Her Better Known Literary
Works and Opinions
Date: Sat, 17 May 2003 13:35:49 -0500
Message-ID: <s70dcvgs3eucqd31n...@4ax.com>
Gerhardt Bruno Tavischen
<catamont-3A9741...@news.concentric.net> Sara Salzman
<cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
I told the Assistant DA I would be involved in personal business which I had no
control over and you had not stated as to what date YOU and Yale would want to
re-file!
>Oh, and by the way, Mr. BRADBURY'S DA said my affidavit was not
>"perjury." So did the local police.
We'll see! How would they know if it was perjurious or not? Did you substantiate
your accusations? NO!! Once again- you are caught lying!
BTW the local police wouldn't make any judgment on your affidavit being
perjurious or not. Care to name some names for all of us you crackpot?
Tavish
>Sorry again, Chickenshit.
>
>Sara
russky
Sir Joe of Bruno sayeth:
russky
> On 23 Jul 2003 04:14:41 GMT,
> <catamont-D8403A...@news.concentric.net> Sara Salzman
> <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>
> > I seriously thought about filing charges against him,
>
> For doing what? Returning in kind what your accomplices do to me!? Let them
> start posting where I live again and see what happens!!
>
> Tavish
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
>
We know what will happen. We've seen it before.If anyone so much as
mentions the state you live in, you'll retaliate by posting Sara'a
address and pnone number. You must think Sara has extremely broad
shoulders, since you saddle her with responsibility for everything
that anyone else does that displeases you.
Did you blame her for the Kennedy assassination?How about The
Johnstown flood, the San Francisco Earthquake of 1906 and the Chicago
fire?
Gerhardt Bruno Tavischen
rus...@indystart.com (russky) wrote:
>Scott of Xxxxxxxxxx is a curious knave
Seeing how people like to post where I live then I will post where
the people live who made such info public in the first place!
Sara Salzman
http://www.westword.com/issues/11209/4/image.gif
4015 S Killarney Way
Aurora, Colorado 80013
I am being harassed by having my confidential information being posted along
with death threats, forged child porn ads being posted which give out my address
etc., having phoney sex offender lists posted which give out my address, having
magazine and catalog subscriptions forged in my identity etc. FOR A FACT it was
Yale F. Edeiken and Yale F. Edeiken alone who subpoenaed my confidential info
from my ISP and made the subpoenaed info public-- now let him receive justice
under the Law of Moses:
Just as has been done to me and is still being done to me and solely because
of Yale F. Edeiken exclusively I will apply the LAW he claims to observe to him:
Leviticus 24:19-20 :: New International Version (NIV)
19 If anyone injures his neighbor, whatever he has done must be done to him:
20 fracture for fracture, eye for eye, tooth for tooth. As he has injured the
other, so he is to be injured.
Yale F. Edeiken
465 W Linden St
Allentown
PA 18102-3453
Tel 610 435-9820
Source: Public Knowledge:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=39A60D74.40A0B998%40israelmail.com.xx&rnum=2
Message-ID: <39A60D74...@israelmail.com.xx>
If Yale does not like getting back in kind what he has dished out in kind
under the Law of Moses then he should either:
1) Re-file his nut case lawsuit in the proper jurisdiction and get charged with
numerous criminal counts of perjury and legal system abuse
OR
2) Encourage his THUG allies to stop harassing me and invading my privacy!
The choice is his!
Gerhardt Bruno Tavischen
rus...@indystart.com (russky) wrote:
>We know what will happen. We've seen it before.If anyone so much as
>mentions the state you live in,
Where I live is no one's god damned business! Shit like you only post where I
live in order to try to intimidate me into silence! I am tired of the god damned
harassment and I will fight back. If the bitch doesn't like it then she needs to
learn to accept the responsibility for her part in denying me my right to
privacy! Every time my right to privacy gets stepped on the I will retaliate!
GET THAT INTO YOUR HARD HEAD YOU FUCKING BASTARD!!!
>you'll retaliate by posting Sara'a address and pnone number.
Turn about is fair play when dealing with filth who doesn't play fair to begin
with!
Post where I live as you have done and see what happens! If my privacy rights
keep getting violated then I will do to those who have caused such to be done to
me! BTW see how long you have your GOOGLE account if you start posting where I
live again you bastard!
--The hypocrisy of the Nizkor Bunch - Posting Where People Live:
http://www.westword.com/issues/2000-08-10/feature3.html/1/index.html
"The messages have escalated over the last few months to the point where [Sara]
Salzman's address... along with death threats.. have been posted... The family's
three birds squawk loudly and often, and their two dogs race around, but the
noise is so much a part of the background buzz that Salzman and her husband
hardly notice. They light one cigarette after another and continue talking about
the dark cloud that has been hanging over this home for the past six months..."
<END> **** <<I now ask: Why is it bad for people to post where Sara lives YET it
is okay for Sara and her pals to post where I live? Why am I bad if I do to
others as they have done to me? I am seeing the wisdom of "EYE FOR AN EYE AND
TOOTH FOR A TOOTH." They start it and when they receive like in kind then they
wail and they whine! Respect for people's rights of privacy as well as many
other items of civility is a two way street. Tavish>>
Gerhardt Bruno Tavischen
Gerhardt Bruno Tavischen <GerhardtBru...@TAVISCHEN-GMBH.NET> wrote:
>On 23 Jul 2003 02:04:06 GMT,
><catamont-7134E1...@news.concentric.net> Sara Salzman
><cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>
>>In article <lomrhvcbs0ej5bl0h...@4ax.com>,
>>Us...@hotmail.com wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Sara,
>>>
>>> Perhaps Mr. Bradbury decided to move to Ireland and become roomies
>>> with the Right Revrend Flormby-Smythe?
>>>
>>> You must tell us more about your visit.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> User
:.
>>It was interesting. {NAME OF TOWN} is a rather small town that has
>>obviously seen better days. But even the worst of {NAME OF TOWN} pales in
>>comparison to the shack occupied by our Doc Tavish.
:.
>Looks like all you can do is attack me personally such as my residence! Look at
>the above which will make a good impression with my local authorities and this:
>
>From: Sara Salzman <cata...@concentric.net>
>Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.revisionism
>Subject: Re: DOGPATCH BOY, GOT ANY?
>Date: 12 Jul 2003 02:36:15 GMT
>Message-ID: <catamont-F26FCF...@spectator.sj.sys.us.xo.net>
>NNTP-Posting-Host: 207.155.170.210
>User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.1 (PPC)
>
>In article <7srugv8t17tn8ro4r...@4ax.com>,
>Jew Hating T. Cornpone <wally_cleaver@mayfield01net> wrote:
>
>> On 12 Jul 2003 01:19:37 GMT,
>> <catamont-ECBC7B...@spectator.sj.sys.us.xo.net> Sara Salzman
>> <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>>
>> >Chickenshit refusal to face my challenge noted.
:.
>> Sorry but I am choosey about the people I visit or associate with. I could
>> care less about meeting the wh*re who was an accomplice in setting me up for
>> almost four years long campaign of being harassed.
:.
>Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 09:12:26 -0600
>To: Sara Salzman <cata...@concentric.net>
>From: Scott Bradbury <doc_tav...@ix.netcom.com>
>Subject: Re: I am Leaving ALT.REVISIONISM For Good! The Thugs Are
>Threatening...
>
>I may have a bad reputation but I don't believe in harassing people.
>
>You're also a chickenshit coward who likes to call people names
Look who calls people names! YOU and yours! I am content with posting such gems
as what these archives entail (and I mention not a single one of you in them yet
you and yours call me names every time I post such material!):
How First Century Christianity Was Treated by Jews:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=711ucv8tmute29h3gdcgds6ajmd7eekovr%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: The Most Heinous Murder Plot Ever Devised (For Your Archives &
Research) V2 R_0524
Message-ID: <711ucv8tmute29h3g...@4ax.com>
Date: 24 May 2003 05:30:10 GMT
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=k11ucvc1j4hl6s7av6qpr9882esa96oaav%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: Babylon the Great - Religious Persecution, Torture, Harassment R_0524
Message-ID: <k11ucvc1j4hl6s7av...@4ax.com>
Date: 24 May 2003 05:30:17 GMT
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=i31ucv4nvr6ehh6r2jgq8d7orrpfhm3j09%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: The Apostle Paul on Judaized Jews R_0524
Message-ID: <i31ucv4nvr6ehh6r2...@4ax.com>
Date: 24 May 2003 05:30:25 GMT
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=vd01cvsh9ta3ep7b3crfru9ce2rb0snnls%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: Children of the Devil and Anti-Christ[s] Positively Identified Using
Scripture-- Check The Proofs For Yourselves! V2.0
Message-ID: <vd01cvsh9ta3ep7b3...@4ax.com>
Date: 13 May 2003 05:29:00 GMT
The first "Holocaust" was not Gentiles (Nazis) Against Jews BUT was Jews
(Communists) Against Christian Kulaks!!!
How Later Christianity was treated by Jews:
Jewish Led Bolsheviks Scalped & Crucified Christians by Philippa Fletcher
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=34c17d0f.1410012285%40news.smart1.net&rnum=7
Subject: Bolsheviks Scalped and Crucified Christians -
Date: 1998/01/18
Message-ID: <34c17d0f....@news.smart1.net>
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=cqrhav0th39prr3bf5am4dnkcn89j52p8b%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: Post-Soviet Religion (What Communists did to Christians) R_0425
Date: 25 Apr 2003 08:14:41 GMT
Message-ID: <cqrhav0th39prr3bf...@4ax.com>
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=ek19cv4ei9cf2nrvull7df5rgn2rhai54c%404ax.com&rnum=2
Subject: Soviets (Communists) Were Jews as Proven by BOOLEAN Operands (Classic
Repost from 3-31-2000) Abridged Version R_0516
Message-ID: <ek19cv4ei9cf2nrvu...@4ax.com>
Date: 16 May 2003 06:36:09 GMT
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=uscefvgfqpvt2cs8l...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
Subject: Forefathers of the Soviet State (Short Compilation) R_0623
Message-ID: <uscefvgfqpvt2cs8l...@4ax.com>
Date: 23 Jun 2003 16:58:25 GMT
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=kllghv4i1i04qsl4hc4uva984ad499imdg%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: Non-Jews: What is Taught About Them & How They are Viewed by 21st
Century Pharisees V2.1 Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2003 15:23:59 -0500
Message-ID: <kllghv4i1i04qsl4h...@4ax.com>
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=k13kevcj90g42mifth1ghve92udggtqqbb%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: Jews Spitting on Jesus During Aleinu (In Their Own Words Series)
Message-ID: <k13kevcj90g42mift...@4ax.com>
Date: 13 Jun 2003 17:34:27 GMT
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=jgdocvkn0taifppvap9be3g2dm60853s25%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: Jews and Their Intolerance Toward Christian Symbols-- Crosses
Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 21:31:56 -0500
Message-ID: <jgdocvkn0taifppva...@4ax.com>
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=1f8acvstaavq2cpk5s82i72ld7b7p5rkon%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: Lubavitcher Given Congressional Gold Medal aka Congressional Jewish
Lobbyists -- Whose Interests Do They Serve?
Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 12:41:46 -0500
Message-ID: <1f8acvstaavq2cpk5...@4ax.com>
>from the safety if his rat-infested apartment
You go from making personal attacks against me to now making insults about where
I live YET you don't seem to care that your accomplice, Patrick L. Humphrey,
lives in an apartment! Why is it people like you always resort to denigrating
people for where they live or what they do for a living?
>(thanks to DON ELLIS for posting photographs of his home).
I just found those web pages (I saved) which had pictures of where I live etc.
as well as my address and much defamation made against me! Glad to see you give
thanks to a person you enabled to do such to me seeing how he never knew where I
lived until YOU and Yale made it known! That is a conspiracy if ever there was
one! BTW I still bet money that your accomplice Patrick took those pictures!
>When it comes to being a man and facing your opponent, you're a chickenshit
>coward who is afraid of a woman.
>
>Big man.
You are a crackpot and you are deluded if you think I am afraid of a slob like
you! Get your pimp to re-file his lawsuit against me and we will see who is
afraid!
BTW try and get the meaning of this:
USC Code Chapter 18 Sec. 241. Conspiracy against rights
"If two or more persons conspire to intimidate, oppress, threaten, or
intimidate any citizen in the free exercise of any right or privilege
secured by him by the Constitution of the United States, or because
of his having exercised the same; or
If two or more persons go on the highway, or on the premises of
another, with the intent to prevent or hinder his free exercise or
enjoyment of any right or privilege so secured --
They shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned for more
that ten years, or both; and if death results, they shall be subject to
imprisonment for any terms of years, or life."
What do you call the posting of where I live and then making such statements as:
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=abf0ff5d.03051...@posting.google.com&lr=&hl=en
From: tar...@indystart.com (knight57)
Subject: More Hypocrisy and lies by the Fatboy
Date: 15 May 2003 20:03:31 -0700
Message-ID: <abf0ff5d.03051...@posting.google.com>
>I am very pissed off and especially so when god damned
> hypocrites keep posting where I live!!!
WHO CARES? I HOPE THEY BURN YOUR HOUSE DOWN WITH YOU IN IT.
~~End of GOOGLE Archival Excerpt~~
Care to deny Arthur J. Tandy and you are allies? Care to deny Arthur J. Tandy
can continually post where I live on account of YOU and Yale?
I AM GETTING GOD DAMNED TIRED OF BEING HARASSED AND DEFAMED BY A BUNCH OF FILTH
AND SHIT!!
Tavish
~~Yale "Tubby" Edeiken is a Perjurer who Commits Numerous Felonious Acts~~
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=k68ogv0p2mbe3p7eq...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
Subject: Speaking of Felonies-- Attention John Morris and Patrick Keenan...
Reply-To: YITavis...@NO-REPLYdesired.NET
Message-ID: <k68ogv0p2mbe3p7eq...@4ax.com>
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=n28ogvk46pia9hhff...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
Subject: Supplement: Speaking of Felonies-- Attention John Morris and Patrick
Keenan... Message-ID: <n28ogvk46pia9hhff...@4ax.com>
Date: 9 Jul 2003 13:58:49 GMT
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=dngmgvso0jgubb47s1f3n5ec1pcqb7jv22%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: Re: Speaking of Felonies-- Attention John Morris and Patrick Keenan...
Message-ID: <dngmgvso0jgubb47s...@4ax.com>
Date: 8 Jul 2003 22:39:09 GMT
The above defines perjury which Yale committed against me and the following
archive gives many examples out of a lot more instances:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=&selm=3bmv4vc9u4kh2qs4v84aek0qsbfhb5eul8%404ax.com
Subject: Test this, David Michael aka Ken McVay's "Edeiken-v-Bradbury.C1" Is
Filled With Lies and Perjury...
Message-ID: <3bmv4vc9u4kh2qs4v...@4ax.com>
More unethical and disgraceful conduct by "Attorney" Edeiken:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=abnlevo9pmlk9aq5e9ugpgqm6t9rspfvrq%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: Legal System Abuse to Get Confidential Info by Jews in Order to Harass
and Intimidate Their Opposition Documented in Full
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2003 03:31:46 -0500
Message-ID: <abnlevo9pmlk9aq5e...@4ax.com>
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=rhi7cvsotqaj3t6btide56jdi44odj5oip%404ax.com&rnum=3&filter=0
Subject: Edeikook Follies #6 Yale F. Edeiken Goes on a Rampage at His County
Courthouse Message-ID: <rhi7cvsotqaj3t6bt...@4ax.com>
Date: 15 May 2003 17:11:06 GMT
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=f78ogvk6b78m28v34...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
Subject: My Former Attorney Confirmed Yale F. "Tubby" Edeiken is a Very Obese
Waddler V2.1 Message-ID: <f78ogvk6b78m28v34...@4ax.com>
Date: 9 Jul 2003 13:58:44 GMT
<<Special Note: It was because of Yale "Tubby" Edeiken that I am continually
insulted with such names as Fatboy, Fat Freak, Blimpie etc. Because he is a
major fat-slob lard ass and because he knew my former attorney gave me the real
goods on what Yale is like as a person- Tubby decided to project his "morbid
obesity" on to me.>>
Gerhardt Bruno Tavischen
rus...@indystart.com (russky) wrote:
>Scott of Xxxxxxxxxxx
Gerhardt Bruno Tavischen
rus...@indystart.com (russky) wrote:
>Scott of Xxxxxxxx is a curious knave
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=kgqc8vc1uc11l0tqme9efdkaplu3an2qm1%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: Three questions Nizkor's Ken McVay Avoids Like the Plague-- Watch Him
Run to the Hills!!
Message-ID: <kgqc8vc1uc11l0tqm...@4ax.com>
Date: 30 Mar 2003 03:49:44 GMT
Sara Salzman
GerhardtBru...@TAVISCHEN-GMBH.NET wrote:
Your local DA says this is a no-no, Scotty. He says "An eye for an eye"
is NOT a legitimate legal defense.
Sorry.
Sara
PS - Oh.. this will all be forwarded to him, Coward.
Sara Salzman
GerhardtBru...@TAVISCHEN-GMBH.NET wrote:
The DA said it. The police just laughed at you.
Sara
Sara Salzman
YOU said "any date, any time, my courthouse."
We were there. You were out of town.
Case, as they say, CLOSED.
Sara
Sara Salzman
Jew-Hating T. Coward @TAVISCHEN-GMBH.NET wrote:
...bravely ran away.
Sara
Sara Salzman
Sara Salzman
GerhardtBru...@TAVISCHEN-GMBH.NET wrote:
> On 23 Jul 2003 02:04:06 GMT,
> <catamont-7134E1...@news.concentric.net> Sara Salzman
> <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>
> >In article <lomrhvcbs0ej5bl0h...@4ax.com>,
> >Us...@hotmail.com wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Sara,
> >>
> >> Perhaps Mr. Bradbury decided to move to Ireland and become roomies
> >> with the Right Revrend Flormby-Smythe?
> >>
> >> You must tell us more about your visit.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> User
> :.
> >It was interesting. {NAME OF TOWN} is a rather small town that has
> >obviously seen better days. But even the worst of {NAME OF TOWN} pales
> >in
> >comparison to the shack occupied by our Doc Tavish.
>
> Look like all you can do is attack me personally such as my residence!
> Look at
> the above which will make a good impression with my local authorities and
> this:
>
I already made a good impression with your local authorities.
You, on the other hand, are the laughing stock of Bellville.
Sara
Sara Salzman
GerhardtBru...@TAVISCHEN-GMBH.NET wrote:
> On 22 Jul 2003 23:56:18 GMT,
> <catamont-6E8D44...@news.concentric.net> Sara Salzman
> <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>
> >and he is a WUSS.
> >
> >Bradbury was a no-show at the County Courthouse. As expected.
>
> You never selected a date or time to re-file the kook lawsuit and I have
> a life
> and other things I have to do.
>
> >He did say "any date, any time," didn't he?
>
> You left out the rest too!
>
> >Well, we were there. He wasn't.
>
> I have more important things to do rather than sit at home waiting for a
> "Crackpot" to show up.
>
> >We even called him on the phone. I left a message. He wasn't there.
>
> We was you and someone with you and NOT my DA or police! BTW thanks for
> the
> admission too!
"We was you"?!? You're babbling again, Scotty.
>
> >Must have skedaddled.
>
> I told the assistant DA where I was going to be! He knew I had personal
> business
> over which I had no control and that is all you need to know!! I hardly
> consider
> me skedaddling but thanks for availing yourself of the legal
> establishment and
> leaving a phone message which was snooty to boot! Thanks also for
> identifying
> yourself as well!
>
Of course! I have nothing to fear from a coward like you.
You're an idiot and a LIAR. Patrick Humphrey said nothing at all to Yale
about you or your car.
> Sara
>
> And BZZZT!... I'm not in Dallas.
>
> Sara
> Post a follow-up to this message
>
I never said that, Idiot.
> <STOP>
>
Yes, please do!
Where does it say "northermost region" anywhere, Asshole?
> I don't see any mention of "visiting" me!
I didn't have to. YOU invited me "any date, any time."
> BTW you're whining: "Now,
> posting
> someone's home address more than 150 times in the last 4 months... THAT'S
> stalking."-- how is it stalking when it is done ONLY in reply to your
> pals
> posting where I live which they would not have been able to do if it
> weren't for
> YOU and Yale!? Care to explain that for all of us? Care to deny that YOU
> and
> Yale were the two people who made my confidential info public?
Yes, I deny it completely. I had absolutely nothing to do with posting
your address. And I have been saying so since the very beginning.
>
> BTW you bitch about your address being posted over 150 times but what
> about mine
> being posted over 7,000 times as part of forged child porn ads, fake
> registered
> pedophile lists, death threats etc.!? Care to comment about YOUR
> responsibility
> for all that has been done to me? You can be damned sure I am going to
> keep my
> appointment with the Assistant DA next week like we agreed upon and I
> will play
> your phone message to him too.
Please do! And why bother with an ASSISTANT? I spoke directly to Mr.
Koehn -- for over an hour, in fact.
Sorry. I saw the Bellville Police and the Austin County Sheriff's
Office. I didn't mean to confuse them.
>
> >and DA, however, were there. And they had some very interesting things
> >to say.
>
> You're lying as usual!
>
Not at all. Go ask Mr. Koehn if I spoke with him.
> >More interesting were some of the things they wouldn't say. Like:
> >
> >Policeman: We have a name for Mr. Bradbury, but I can't say it in mixed
> >company.
>
> Care to name him? Evidently he was not one who has had to waste his time
> and
> city resources responding to false police reports or having to accompany
> federal
> agents to pay me visits which the DA also knows about!
No, but he sure knew about it. And he sure wasn't "Huber."
>
> >Yep. Chickenshit Coward does it again.
>
> How's that PIG? You keep forgetting what my agreement detailed!
What AGREEMENT, Moron? An AGREEMENT is something two people AGREE upon.
> You only
> quote:
> My answer: Anytime and any day. The place: my local courthouse
> (my jurisdiction).
>
That's what you said. The rest is moronic drivel, since I cannot
"re-file" a lawsuit that I never filed in the first place. Only Yale can
"refile" his own lawsuit.
> BUT you choose to ignore the rest which is quoted above in its entirety!
>
> Smear is all you have isn't it pig?
>
Oh, no. I have much more.
Sara
Gerhardt Bruno Tavischen
<catamont-CAA8CD...@news.concentric.net> Sara Salzman
<cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>You, on the other hand, are the laughing stock of Xxxxxxxx
Gerhardt Bruno Tavischen
<catamont-7E1E84...@news.concentric.net> Sara Salzman
<cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>YOU said "any date, any time, my courthouse."
>
>We were there. You were out of town.
Do you really expect me to stay at home waiting for a slob like you to show up
at your convenience!? I have a life and I have things that have to be done and I
am grateful that you "availed" yourself to the legal community in my
jurisdiction!
>Case, as they say, CLOSED.
Not by a long shot you filthy pig! I am presenting the DA's Office all the
material they requested this coming week!
>Sara
Tavish
Richard Phillips
===============================================
Phillips
Places to go, things to see, people to do.
===============================================
Gerhardt Bruno Tavischen
<catamont-771B7B...@news.concentric.net> Sara Salzman
<cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
As long as your pals keep posting where I live I will repsond in kind!
Tavish
Gerhardt Bruno Tavischen
<catamont-C8C825...@news.concentric.net> Sara Salzman
<cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>In article <v4k6iv8fs5d4a18ea...@4ax.com>,
>GerhardtBru...@TAVISCHEN-GMBH.NET wrote:
>
>> On 22 Jul 2003 23:56:18 GMT,
>> <catamont-6E8D44...@news.concentric.net> Sara Salzman
>> <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>>
>> >and he is a WUSS.
>> >
>> >Bradbury was a no-show at the County Courthouse. As expected.
>>
>> You never selected a date or time to re-file the kook lawsuit and I have
>> a life
>> and other things I have to do.
>>
>> >He did say "any date, any time," didn't he?
>>
>> You left out the rest too!
>>
>> >Well, we were there. He wasn't.
>>
>> I have more important things to do rather than sit at home waiting for a
>> "Crackpot" to show up.
>>
>> >We even called him on the phone. I left a message. He wasn't there.
:.
>> We was you and someone with you and NOT my DA or police! BTW thanks for
>> the admission too!
:.
>"We was you"?!? You're babbling again, Scotty.
You are the one who made reference to "we" instead of "I".
>> >Must have skedaddled.
:.
>> I told the assistant DA where I was going to be! He knew I had personal
>> business over which I had no control and that is all you need to know!! I hardly
>> consider me skedaddling but thanks for availing yourself of the legal
>> establishment and leaving a phone message which was snooty to boot! Thanks also for
>> identifying yourself as well!
:.
>Of course! I have nothing to fear from a coward like you.
The true cowards are the vile filth who abuse the legal system to get someone's
confidential info and then post it all over the place like you and Yale did!
>> BTW don't forget your latest communique had you only visiting people in
>> the Northernmost region of my home state and no indication you were coming
>> here:
>>
>> <START>
>>
>> > Why should I be afraid that you're stalking me!? If you show up in my
>> > jurisdiction you will have to provide proofs of all those accusations
>> > you made against me!
:.
>> Stalking YOU?!?!?!?! Puh-leaze! I have much better things to do. I have
>> places to go, people to see... an appointment with a Texas Ranger... old
>> friends to visit.
>>
>> Now, posting someone's home address more than 150 times in the last 4
>> months... THAT'S stalking.
>>
>> <<Tavish comment July 26, 2003: Paying close attention to what other
>> people do and "visiting" them is stalking behavior BUT replying to people who won't
>> stop posting where I live when they have been told repeatedly to stop and me
>> ONLT replying with the source is no stalking! YOU and Yale have stalked me
>> when Yale abused the legal system to get my address (which he also tried to do to
>> David Michael which I will make sure the DA's office knows!!). You have no
>> legal nor moral high ground! BTW how will you and Yale explain how Yale knew what
>> make, model, and color of vehicle I drive? I have e-mail, where Yale mentioned
>> what I drive and the color. How would he know that when he lives 1500 miles
>> away? Patrick L. Humphrey-- that's how!>>
:.
>You're an idiot and a LIAR. Patrick Humphrey said nothing at all to Yale
>about you or your car.
How do you know?
>> Sara
>>
>> And BZZZT!... I'm not in Dallas.
>>
>> Sara
>> Post a follow-up to this message
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ This line was from the GOOGLR archive
>I never said that, Idiot.
Yes you did and here is the archive:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=catamont-A7107F.20074118072003%40news.concentric.net&rnum=1
Message-ID: <catamont-A7107F...@news.concentric.net>
>> <STOP>
:.
>Yes, please do!
:.
>Where does it say "northermost region" anywhere, Asshole?
My choice of words.
>> I don't see any mention of "visiting" me!
:.
>I didn't have to. YOU invited me "any date, any time."
I am not going to sit at home waiting for you-- I have a life and other things I
have to do!
>> BTW you're whining: "Now, posting someone's home address more than 150 times in the
>> last 4 months... THAT'S stalking."-- how is it stalking when it is done ONLY in reply to your
>> pals posting where I live which they would not have been able to do if it
>> weren't for YOU and Yale!? Care to explain that for all of us? Care to deny that YOU
>> and Yale were the two people who made my confidential info public?
:.
>Yes, I deny it completely. I had absolutely nothing to do with posting
>your address. And I have been saying so since the very beginning.
The DA will be given proof this coming week and he will see what a liar you are!
I have the archives saved already! You made sure to include my new unlisted
phone number as well and you posted it in early 2001!
>> BTW you bitch about your address being posted over 150 times but what
>> about mine being posted over 7,000 times as part of forged child porn ads, fake
>> registered pedophile lists, death threats etc.!? Care to comment about YOUR
>> responsibility for all that has been done to me? You can be damned sure I am going to
>> keep my appointment with the Assistant DA next week like we agreed upon and I
>> will play your phone message to him too.
:.
>Please do! And why bother with an ASSISTANT? I spoke directly to Mr.
>Koehn -- for over an hour, in fact.
SO WHAT!? He hasn't heard my side of the story either! Remember what the DA did
in Don's jurisdiction did when he found out what a lying crackpot you are!
:.
>> >The Austin County police
:.
>> There is no such thing as Austin County police!
:.
>Sorry. I saw the Xxxxx Police and the Xxxxx County Sheriff's
>Office. I didn't mean to confuse them.
:.
The same two agencies who would have probably charged you with being an
accessory to criminal acts against me if they knew how you have been part of
filing false police reports and fake child porn ads!
>> >and DA, however, were there. And they had some very interesting things
>> >to say.
:.
>> You're lying as usual!
:.
>Not at all. Go ask Mr. Koehn if I spoke with him.
I have no doubt you grunted to the DA-- what I doubt is that he would have spoke
negatively of me to a total stranger making accusations against me without
hearing my side of the story! It would have been most unprofessional and
unethical of him to speak in a way you attribute to him. I will make sure he
knows that you are implying he's unethical.
>> >More interesting were some of the things they wouldn't say. Like:
>> >
>> >Policeman: We have a name for Mr. Bradbury, but I can't say it in mixed
>> >company.
:.
>> Care to name him? Evidently he was not one who has had to waste his time
>> and city resources responding to false police reports or having to accompany
>> federal agents to pay me visits which the DA also knows about!
:.
>No, but he sure knew about it.
Thought so!
>And he sure wasn't "Huber."
Hubert retired a while back with a medical because of a bad back.
BTW I have already corrected you about "Hubert" with:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=ns07ivcpkueqf3ul4k3fakc0eqgdh67epi%404ax.com&rnum=1
Message-ID: <ns07ivcpkueqf3ul4...@4ax.com>
On 23 Jul 2003 04:14:41 GMT,
<catamont-D8403A...@news.concentric.net> Sara Salzman
<cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>But the police have a whole new file on him, in addition to the ones he
>already has.
And what would that be? That I have been harassed by a crackpot and her pimp and
their dirty playmates?
>Oh, and "Detective Huber"? Bradbury didn't even get his name right:
I also corrected myself later!
"Detective Hubert certainly wants to know who's heckled him too!"
-Subject: Poor Larry - How Much is Your House Worth on the Open Market?
-Message-ID: <gruact4trmga7esmr...@4ax.com>
-Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2001 07:28:20 GMT
>LOL DETECTIVE HUBER ALREADY SAID YOU OWN NO FIREARMS BRADSHIT
Detective Hubert retired over a year ago with a medical disability.
-Message-ID: <kb6shu8on7luecf8g...@4ax.com>
-Date: 29 Jun 2002 21:35:50 +0100
The "T" is silent and Hubert retired with a medical disability-- bad back BUT he
was the one in charge of the file.
>it was Hubert, and he "doesn't work there anymore."
<END>
Mark my words-- as long as your accomplices keep posting where I live I will
respond in kind! You have made not one bit of tangible effort to stop Art. Pat
and others from violating my right to privacy and I do have the goods on you
which will prove you took part in violating my right to privacy!
>> >Yep. Chickenshit Coward does it again.
:.
>> How's that PIG? You keep forgetting what my agreement detailed!
:.
>What AGREEMENT, Moron? An AGREEMENT is something two people AGREE upon.
>> You only quote:
>> My answer: Anytime and any day. The place: my local courthouse
>> (my jurisdiction).
:.
>That's what you said. The rest is moronic drivel, since I cannot
>"re-file" a lawsuit that I never filed in the first place. Only Yale can
>"refile" his own lawsuit.
Get you mentor to re-file then!
>> BUT you choose to ignore the rest which is quoted above in its entirety!
>>
>> Smear is all you have isn't it pig?
>>
>
>Oh, no. I have much more.
>
>Sara
Tavish
From: Sara "The Fist" Salzman
Newsgroups: alt.sex.bondage
Subject: Fist Fucking
:
By the way... Elbow Grease IS WATER SOLUABLE.
Says so right on the label.
We've found for MANY things, it is "wetter" and slicker than KY.
Your mileage may, of course, vary.
Perrrfect
--
It never rains under my umbrella
~~End~~
From: Sara "The Fist" Salzman
Newsgroups: alt.sex.bondage
Subject: Re: Fist fucking (1)
In article <3hg9a1$i...@newsbf02.news.aol.com>, lant...@aol.com (L
Antoniou) wrote:
> Perhaps you should read the messages before responding. If you read all
> of mine, you will see that eventually I do suggest the "duck" position -
> all fingers together. What I (and Elf) was responding to was the
> suggestion that one *begin* fisting in that position. Of course, you go
> on to say *exactly that*.
In fact, Laura, I did NOT say you should begin in the "duck" position. I
just stated that it was the eventual position to achieve.
I'm sorry if I did not make that clear in my post. I *did* state that fist
fucking was not something I had done very often, and merely wanted to
impart my own (limited) experience. <END>
Imagine the person in these photos assuming the "duck" position
and "fisting" herself!
http://www.westword.com/issues/11209/2/image.gif
http://www.westword.com/issues/11209/4/image.gif
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=s70dcvgs3eucqd31n81gqo5e21uj7vvg67%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: Sara "The Fist" Salzman - A Compilation of Her Better Known Literary
Works and Opinions
Date: Sat, 17 May 2003 13:35:49 -0500
Message-ID: <s70dcvgs3eucqd31n...@4ax.com>
______________________________________________________________________
Patrick Humphrey
>Sorry.
>
>Sara
You are just *no* fun at all. ;-)
-PLH, What Would Bradbury Do?
Gord McFee
Gerhardt Bruno Tavischen <GerhardtBru...@TAVISCHEN-GMBH.NET> wrote:
> On 27 Jul 2003 22:05:16 GMT,
> <catamont-7E1E84...@news.concentric.net> Sara Salzman
> <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>
>> YOU said "any date, any time, my courthouse."
>>
>> We were there. You were out of town.
>
> Do you really expect me to stay at home waiting for a slob like you
> to show up
> at your convenience!?
No. No one expected you to stay there. Everyone expected you to do exactly
what you did -- head for the hills.
--
Gord McFee
I'll write no line before its time
Visit the Holocaust History Project
http://www.holocaust-history.org
Patrick Humphrey
>On 27 Jul 2003 22:02:27 GMT,
><catamont-771B7B...@news.concentric.net> Sara Salzman
><cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>>In article <jo38ivcbosnqiq8lr...@4ax.com>,
>>GerhardtBru...@TAVISCHEN-GMBH.NET wrote:
>>Your local DA says this is a no-no, Scotty. He says "An eye for an eye"
>>is NOT a legitimate legal defense.
>>Sorry.
>>
>>Sara
>>PS - Oh.. this will all be forwarded to him, Coward.
>As long as your pals keep posting where I live I will repsond in kind!
...which will only confirm that the DA (and the Sheriff's Department) are
right in their opinion of you.
Way to GO, Barbecued Chicken!
-PLH, we had a good time...where the hell were you?
Patrick Humphrey
>On 27 Jul 2003 22:05:16 GMT,
><catamont-7E1E84...@news.concentric.net> Sara Salzman
><cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>>YOU said "any date, any time, my courthouse."
>>We were there. You were out of town.
>Do you really expect me to stay at home waiting for a slob like you to show
>up at your convenience!? I have a life and I have things that have to be done
>and I am grateful that you "availed" yourself to the legal community in my
>jurisdiction!
She didn't do what YOU fantasize about, Scottie. Your standing in the legal
community isn't quite what you think it is.
>>Case, as they say, CLOSED.
>Not by a long shot you filthy pig! I am presenting the DA's Office all the
>material they requested this coming week!
:snicker:
-PLH, looks like Blimpie's as delusional as ever
Gerhardt Bruno Tavischen
>> > > Why should I be afraid that you're stalking me!? If you show up in my
>> > > jurisdiction you will have to provide proofs of all those accusations
>> > > you made against me!
:.
>> > Stalking YOU?!?!?!?! Puh-leaze! I have much better things to do. I have
>> > places to go, people to see...
>===============================================
>Phillips
>
>Places to go, things to see, people to do.
Very clever and Sara does "do" people with her lies and her being an accessory
to criminal harassment. I am glad she availed herself to the legal establishment
in my jurisdiction. Perhaps now something can finally be done about Sara and
company escaping justice for so long and have no doubt-- she was part of the
criminal distribution of subpoenaed information which was NEVER public knowledge
as she claims! That subpoena was NEVER registered with the court and I am going
to present my local DA's Office with a copy of the subpoena and a copy of the
docket printout! Distributing confidential subpoenaed information is a criminal
offense and seeing how I was denied due process in being allowed to quash it
makes me even more angry!
Tavish
Patrick Humphrey
>In article <tds6iv0p44ibt1f8j...@4ax.com>,
>GerhardtBru...@TAVISCHEN-GMBH.NET wrote:
>> On 23 Jul 2003 02:04:06 GMT,
>> <catamont-7134E1...@news.concentric.net> Sara Salzman
>> <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>> >In article <lomrhvcbs0ej5bl0h...@4ax.com>,
>> >Us...@hotmail.com wrote:
>> >> Hi Sara,
>> >> Perhaps Mr. Bradbury decided to move to Ireland and become roomies
>> >> with the Right Revrend Flormby-Smythe?
>> >> You must tell us more about your visit.
>> >>
>> >> Regards,
>> >> User
>> >It was interesting. {NAME OF TOWN} is a rather small town that has
>> >obviously seen better days. But even the worst of {NAME OF TOWN} pales in
>> >comparison to the shack occupied by our Doc Tavish.
>> Look like all you can do is attack me personally such as my residence!
>> Look at the above which will make a good impression with my local
>> authorities and this:
>I already made a good impression with your local authorities.
>You, on the other hand, are the laughing stock of Bellville.
...and you have three witnesses to that fact.
-PLH, it was a thoroughly enjoyable day
Gerhardt Bruno Tavischen
"Peeping Tom" Patrick L. Humphrey <pat...@io.com> wrote:
>Gerhardt Bruno Tavischen <GerhardtBru...@TAVISCHEN-GMBH.NET> writes:
>
>>On 27 Jul 2003 22:02:27 GMT,
>><catamont-771B7B...@news.concentric.net> Sara Salzman
>><cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>
>>>In article <jo38ivcbosnqiq8lr...@4ax.com>,
>>>GerhardtBru...@TAVISCHEN-GMBH.NET wrote:
>
>>>Your local DA says this is a no-no, Scotty. He says "An eye for an eye"
>>>is NOT a legitimate legal defense.
>
>>>Sorry.
>>>
>>>Sara
>
>>>PS - Oh.. this will all be forwarded to him, Coward.
:.
>>As long as your pals keep posting where I live I will respond in kind!
:.
>...which will only confirm that the DA (and the Sheriff's Department) are
>right in their opinion of you.
IOW it is okay for you and yours to post where I live BUT when I reply in kind
it is bad!? Thanks for showing what a hypocrite you are! BTW your implying my
local law enforcement would say anything denigrating about me seeing how I have
been harassed by you and your thugs and law enforcement knowing about it is
really a stretch Patjerk!
>Way to GO, Barbecued Chicken!
>
>-PLH, we had a good time...where the hell were you?
Attending to business. What's it to you jerk?
I am sure my small town people would really appreciate a person who says
disparaging things about Jesus (a few examples shown below) and who advocates
killing unborn babies or who sides with proven communists-- all of which you
have done or advocated. You are the evil one!
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=szkbsfng5a6.fsf%40eris.io.com&rnum=2
Sender: pat...@eris.io.com
Newsgroups: alt.abortion
Subject: Re: Jesus Christ or eternal hell fire.
From: pat...@io.com (Patrick L. Humphrey)
Message-ID: <szkbsfn...@eris.io.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 14:14:31 GMT
shi...@yahoo.com (Ruth Muraya) writes:
>please avoid using foul language when addressing issues relating to
>Jesus Christ else you will surely DIE!!!!.
We all have to face that eventually...why don't you let your alleged savior
speak for himself?
--PLH, I found Jesus! He was buried under the dustbunnies back of the couch
<END>
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=szkr9mmcwmu.fsf%40eris.io.com&rnum=1
From: pat...@io.com (Patrick L. Humphrey)
Subject: Re: JESUS IS LORD
Date: 1999/07/05
Message-ID: <szkr9mm...@eris.io.com>
Valerie Gould <sgo...@ionet.net> writes:
>"Patrick L. Humphrey" wrote:
[...]
>I am not one of Oral's mindless drones I am an independent Christian who Loves
>Jesus Christ with all my heart mind soul and strength. That is the greatest
>commandment. Your persecution doesn't bother me just shows that I am doing
>something right. And no I wont take it to a religious newsgroups. If you can
>worship satan here I can worship Jesus! IT is time for the Christians to stand
>up and say WE are not going to take it off of satan anymore! I will continue
>to worship my Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ anyway I please. come to Jesus
>before its too late!
You can worship Tinky Winky, for all I care -- but this is Usenet, and idiots
like you don't have a _right_ to clog this newsgroup with your crap, no matter
what you think your alleged deity tells you...
~~End of GOOGLE Excerpt~~
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=szkemlks6xl.fsf%40dillinger.io.com&rnum=4
From: pat...@io.com (Patrick L. Humphrey)
Subject: Re: Tired of All this Jesus Nonsense
Date: 1999/04/16
Message-ID: <szkemlk...@dillinger.io.com>
"millerbeers" <mille...@email.msn.com> writes:
>Patrick L. Humphrey wrote in message ...
>>"In His Service" <knzpe...@uswest.net> writes:
>>>Fury, PLH & prochoice (aka: proabort; prodeath),
:.
>>Sorry, schmuck. I'm pro-choice. Take your religious crap to a religious
>>newsgroup. Meanwhile, follow your death-cult's own advice and beat the dust
>>off your sandals and leave -- you're not wanted or needed here.
:.
>So what is this newsgroup for then? If you don't want to discuss ideas, are
>you all just hanging out here to discuss different ways to abort unborn
>children?
This newsgroup is alt.abortion. It isn't alt.jesus.is.lord, or any other name
that would signify its purpose as being for religious discussions. There are
plenty of those in the alt. and soc. hierarchies, already, so any preachers
are advised to take their babble to a newsgroup where it's at least got _some_
connection with the newsgroup's purpose. Bothering other newsgroups with
their prattling won't win them any converts, but _will_ likely piss off people
to the point where you get the inevitable flamefest.
>What do you mean by "death-cult"?
Well, what would you call a religion that makes such a big deal of its
supposed founder being nailed up and left to die, and crafts such a convoluted
morality that produces such marvels as suffering being deemed virtuous?
--PLH, think I'll stick to more common-sense notions than those
~~End of GOOGLE Archive~~
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=szken0bxmti.fsf%40bermuda.io.com&rnum=5
From: pat...@io.com (Patrick L. Humphrey)
Subject: Re: Jesus and homosexuals (was Re: Gays v. Boy Scouts of America)
Date: 1998/03/09
Message-ID: <szken0b...@bermuda.io.com>
"Actually, the way I look at it, if this Jesus fellow died for
our sins, why make his death meaningless by not committing a few of 'em? ;-)
--PLH, just helping some of the more devout churchfolks out"
<END>
No wonder why you get along with the likes of anti-Christs such as Edeiken,
Salzman, and Tandy!
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=vd01cvsh9ta3ep7b3crfru9ce2rb0snnls%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: Children of the Devil and Anti-Christ[s] Positively Identified Using
Scripture-- Check The Proofs For Yourselves! V2.0
Message-ID: <vd01cvsh9ta3ep7b3...@4ax.com>
Date: 13 May 2003 05:29:00 GMT
Tavish
---Undeniable proof Patrick "Peeping Tom" Humphrey has a mental disorder:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=4&ic=1&selm=50ht24%24l0g%40anarchy.io.com
Subject: Re: PATRICK "THE STALKER?"
Date: 1996/09/03
Message-ID: <50ht24$l...@anarchy.io.com>
references: <Pine.SOL.3.91.960808...@omni.cc.purdue.edu>
---Sad, but true, but at least it'll be a bit easier than I thought to
encounter "Shawn" when I'm in Austin next month--if I'm out at night, just look
for anyone peeking into windows... Patrick L. Humphrey
Here is what some experts say about Patrick's behavior:
http://www.dailybruin.ucla.edu/db/issues/99/10.28/news.peeping.html
Voyeurism at root of Peeping Tom incidents
CRIME: Cases uncommon on campus; recent arrest one of seven since 1997
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
By Linh Tat Daily Bruin Contributor Although everyone has heard the term
"Peeping Tom" before, most people may still be in the dark when it comes to
understanding the nature of this criminal offense. Many people may label a
person who secretly observes another undressing or in the nude as a Peeping Tom,
but they do not always consider that those who repeatedly commit this offense
may suffer from a psychological disorder.... <END>
http://www.usdoj.gov/osg/briefs/2000/0responses/2000-0919.resp.html
...In November 1997, after reviewing police reports that implicated petitioner
as a suspect in a "Peeping Tom" incident that occurred in the vicinity of the
rape, NCIS reopened its investigation. Pet. App. 23a. Thereafter, the NCIS
office in Hawaii asked NCIS Special Agent John McNutt, assigned to the NCIS
office in Memphis, Tennessee, to interrogate petitioner, who was living in
Memphis, and to ask him to provide NCIS with a sample of his blood. Id. at 24a.
After learning that petitioner was receiving medical treatment at the
Veteran's Administration (VA) Hospital in Memphis, McNutt contacted the VA and
was allowed to review petitioner's medical records. Pet. App. 24a. During that
review, McNutt learned that petitioner was being treated for diabetes and a
mental disorder.... <END>
Did everyone notice "Peeping Tom" and mental disorder were used in the police
report? Notice the source? Did everyone note Patrick wants to PEEP on a male
which would make him a GAY Peeping Tom as well!
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=mmqfev0mn3u3r8gtr...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
Subject: Houstonian Patrick L. Humphrey Defends His Homosexualist Ally and
Attends Gay Pride Parades (His Gay Cruising Fully Documented)
Message-ID: <mmqfev0mn3u3r8gtr...@4ax.com>
Date: 12 Jun 2003 03:16:05 GMT
David Christian
wrote:
>Gerhardt Bruno Tavischen <GerhardtBru...@TAVISCHEN-GMBH.NET> writes:
>
>>On 27 Jul 2003 22:05:16 GMT,
>><catamont-7E1E84...@news.concentric.net> Sara Salzman
>><cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>
>>>YOU said "any date, any time, my courthouse."
>
>>>We were there. You were out of town.
>
>>Do you really expect me to stay at home waiting for a slob like you to show
>>up at your convenience!? I have a life and I have things that have to be done
>>and I am grateful that you "availed" yourself to the legal community in my
>>jurisdiction!
You made the offer, Fatboy, they set the date, This wasnt unexpected,
now was it?
>
>She didn't do what YOU fantasize about, Scottie. Your standing in the legal
>community isn't quite what you think it is.
>
>>>Case, as they say, CLOSED.
>
>>Not by a long shot you filthy pig! I am presenting the DA's Office all the
>>material they requested this coming week!
>
>:snicker:
>
>-PLH, looks like Blimpie's as delusional as ever
Oh he may well waddle over and shove a ream or three, or six, or
twenty of printouts at them. Knowing Scottikins that wouldn't surprise
me. Sounds like the Dogpatch authorities know exactly how seriously to
take the whole matter.
Not at all.
Apologies to all in Dogpatch, which looks like a pleasent town, for
the namechange,
Patrick Humphrey
>On Sun, 27 Jul 2003 15:50:49 -0700, <3F245749...@mbay.net> Richard
>Phillips <rgp...@mbay.net> wrote:
>>> > > Why should I be afraid that you're stalking me!? If you show up in my
>>> > > jurisdiction you will have to provide proofs of all those accusations
>>> > > you made against me!
>>> > Stalking YOU?!?!?!?! Puh-leaze! I have much better things to do. I have
>>> > places to go, people to see...
>>Places to go, things to see, people to do.
>Very clever and Sara does "do" people with her lies and her being an
>accessory to criminal harassment. I am glad she availed herself to the legal
>establishment in my jurisdiction. Perhaps now something can finally be done
>about Sara and company escaping justice for so long and have no doubt-- she
>was part of the criminal distribution of subpoenaed information which was
>NEVER public knowledge as she claims! That subpoena was NEVER registered with
>the court and I am going to present my local DA's Office with a copy of the
>subpoena and a copy of the docket printout! Distributing confidential
>subpoenaed information is a criminal offense and seeing how I was denied due
>process in being allowed to quash it makes me even more angry!
You denied yourself the due process, Perry Mason -- by routinely sending back
mail from the court unopened. Meanwhile, you had every opportunity in the
world to actually show up and plead your own case -- Sara all but told you
when she was going to be there, but true to your lack of spine, you ran like
the coward you are, and invented some pitiful story to cover your cowardice.
Funny how that "committment" never was important enough for you to mention
until *after* the fact, eh?
-PLH, game's over, Bradbury's one massive barbecued chicken
Gerhardt Bruno Tavischen
<pat...@io.com> wrote:
>Distributing confidential subpoenaed information is a criminal offense and seeing how I was denied due
>>process in being allowed to quash it makes me even more angry!
:.
>You denied yourself the due process, Perry Mason -- by routinely sending back
>mail from the court unopened.
That subpoena was issued BEFORE I was ever served with the lawsuit you stupid
stalker mother fucker and long before I sent back your fellow shit's ravings
unopened! Now go fuck your fat pig and stop stalking me!
Sara Salzman
Jew Hating T Cow...@TAVISCHEN-GMBH.NET wrote:
[crap deleted]
>
> The same two agencies who would have probably charged you with being an
> accessory to criminal acts against me if they knew how you have been part
> of
> filing false police reports and fake child porn ads!
>
That is an absolute and actionable lie, Mr. Bradbury. And I will be sure
that the DA knows you have made this statement in a public forum.
Sara
Sara Salzman
With our ammunition gone and faced with utter defeat,
Who was it that burned the crops and left us nothing to eat?
Why it was Jubilation T. Cornpone; Old "September Morn - pone."
Jubilation T. Cornpone, the pants blown off his seat!
Sara Salzman
GerhardtBru...@TAVISCHEN-GMBH.NET wrote:
> On 27 Jul 2003 22:02:27 GMT,
> <catamont-771B7B...@news.concentric.net> Sara Salzman
> <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>
> >In article <jo38ivcbosnqiq8lr...@4ax.com>,
> >GerhardtBru...@TAVISCHEN-GMBH.NET wrote:
> >
> >
> >Your local DA says this is a no-no, Scotty. He says "An eye for an eye"
> >is NOT a legitimate legal defense.
> >
> >Sorry.
> >
> >Sara
> >
> >PS - Oh.. this will all be forwarded to him, Coward.
>
> As long as your pals keep posting where I live I will repsond in kind!
>
> Tavish
>
You can "repsond" all you like, but MY address has nothing to do with it.
Sara
Patrick Humphrey
>On 27 Jul 2003 19:10:11 -0500, <szkfzkr...@fnord.io.com> Self confessed
>"Peeping Tom" Patrick L. Humphrey <pat...@io.com> wrote:
Only to professional cranks like yourself, Scottie. If you're so sure, call
the cops...oops! They already know about your problems. Never mind.
>>Gerhardt Bruno Tavischen <GerhardtBru...@TAVISCHEN-GMBH.NET> writes:
>>>On 27 Jul 2003 22:02:27 GMT,
>>><catamont-771B7B...@news.concentric.net> Sara Salzman
>>><cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>>>>In article <jo38ivcbosnqiq8lr...@4ax.com>,
>>>>GerhardtBru...@TAVISCHEN-GMBH.NET wrote:
>>>>Your local DA says this is a no-no, Scotty. He says "An eye for an eye"
>>>>is NOT a legitimate legal defense.
>>>>Sorry.
>>>>
>>>>Sara
>>>>PS - Oh.. this will all be forwarded to him, Coward.
>>>As long as your pals keep posting where I live I will respond in kind!
>>...which will only confirm that the DA (and the Sheriff's Department) are
>>right in their opinion of you.
>IOW it is okay for you and yours to post where I live BUT when I reply in
>kind it is bad!? Thanks for showing what a hypocrite you are! BTW your
>implying my local law enforcement would say anything denigrating about me
>seeing how I have been harassed by you and your thugs and law enforcement
>knowing about it is really a stretch Patjerk!
You've been harassed by the mere mentioning of your town's name? *laugh*
That's YOUR problem. You're not doing a thing to me by trying to get back at
me by posting my address, when anyone with enough brains to use a browser can
get it. No, you'd rather try and intimidate an easier target, and you thought
you could scare Sara away. As usual, you were as wrong as you can be, she
showed up, and you ran like the coward you are. End of story.
>>Way to GO, Barbecued Chicken!
>>-PLH, we had a good time...where the hell were you?
>Attending to business. What's it to you jerk?
Sure you were, Scottie -- it's just a coincidence you never mentioned that
BEFORE last week, right?
>I am sure my small town people would really appreciate a person who says
>disparaging things about Jesus (a few examples shown below) and who advocates
>killing unborn babies or who sides with proven communists-- all of which you
>have done or advocated. You are the evil one!
So call the cops if you're so sure, Scottie. Too bad for you I've never
killed a baby or even advocated it -- I'm a parent and grandparent, remember?
I'm not the one with a stack of records in your county's courthouse.
[the rest of Bradbury's compulsive re-posting deleted, as always]
-PLH, Bradbury goes apeshit, no film at 10 (it's another Sunday night for him)
Patrick Humphrey
>On 27 Jul 2003 19:16:55 -0500, Patrick Humphrey <pat...@io.com>
>wrote:
>>Gerhardt Bruno Tavischen <GerhardtBru...@TAVISCHEN-GMBH.NET> writes:
>>>On 27 Jul 2003 22:05:16 GMT,
>>><catamont-7E1E84...@news.concentric.net> Sara Salzman
>>><cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>>>>YOU said "any date, any time, my courthouse."
>>>>We were there. You were out of town.
>>>Do you really expect me to stay at home waiting for a slob like you to show
>>>up at your convenience!? I have a life and I have things that have to be
>>>done and I am grateful that you "availed" yourself to the legal community
>>>in my jurisdiction!
>You made the offer, Fatboy, they set the date, This wasnt unexpected,
>now was it?
Of course not -- Scottie just ran away and then made up his "commitment" story
when he got back and found out what happened. Anything to save face for him.
>>She didn't do what YOU fantasize about, Scottie. Your standing in the legal
>>community isn't quite what you think it is.
>>>>Case, as they say, CLOSED.
>>>Not by a long shot you filthy pig! I am presenting the DA's Office all the
>>>material they requested this coming week!
>>:snicker:
>>
>>-PLH, looks like Blimpie's as delusional as ever
>Oh he may well waddle over and shove a ream or three, or six, or
>twenty of printouts at them. Knowing Scottikins that wouldn't surprise
>me. Sounds like the Dogpatch authorities know exactly how seriously to
>take the whole matter.
>Not at all.
Precisely. They're capable of learning from experience, something Bradbury
has yet to show any concrete evidence of having accomplished.
>Apologies to all in Dogpatch, which looks like a pleasent town, for
>the namechange,
Yep -- it's got some respectable folks in it, and with it being seven times or
so more populous than the coal camp I'm a native of, it only stands to reason
that there'd be one or two duds among the townspeople.
-PLH, but it's a good place to stop in the midst of a long trip
Patrick Humphrey
>On 27 Jul 2003 19:54:59 -0500, <szky8yj...@fnord.io.com> Patrick Humphrey
><pat...@io.com> wrote:
>>>Distributing confidential subpoenaed information is a criminal offense and
>>>seeing how I was denied due process in being allowed to quash it makes me
>>>even more angry!
>>You denied yourself the due process, Perry Mason -- by routinely sending back
>>mail from the court unopened.
>That subpoena was issued BEFORE I was ever served with the lawsuit you stupid
>stalker mother fucker and long before I sent back your fellow shit's ravings
>unopened! Now go fuck your fat pig and stop stalking me!
Keep talking yourself into the ditch, Scottie. You can't even remember the
sequence of events, but you can convince a district attorney that you know
what you're ranting about? Sorry, that doesn't compute.
-PLH, thanks for giving me more evidence
russky
> In article <jo38ivcbosnqiq8lr...@4ax.com>,
> GerhardtBru...@TAVISCHEN-GMBH.NET wrote:
>
>
> Your local DA says this is a no-no, Scotty. He says "An eye for an eye"
> is NOT a legitimate legal defense.
>
> Sorry.
>
> Sara
>
> PS - Oh.. this will all be forwarded to him, Coward.
It also puts the lie to Fatboy's claims to being a Christian;
Bible, King James Version
The Apostle Paul is speaking here:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rom.12
[19] Dearly beloved, avenge not yourselves, but rather give place unto
wrath: for it is written, Vengeance is mine; I will repay, saith the
Lord.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pat Winstanley
GerhardtBru...@TAVISCHEN-GMBH.NET says...
>
> I am sure my small town people would really appreciate a person who says
> disparaging things about Jesus (a few examples shown below) and who advocates
> killing unborn babies or who sides with proven communists-- all of which you
> have done or advocated. You are the evil one!
>
> http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=szkbsfng5a6.fsf%40eris.io.com&rnum=2
> Sender: pat...@eris.io.com
> Newsgroups: alt.abortion
> Subject: Re: Jesus Christ or eternal hell fire.
> From: pat...@io.com (Patrick L. Humphrey)
> Message-ID: <szkbsfn...@eris.io.com>
> Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 14:14:31 GMT
>
> shi...@yahoo.com (Ruth Muraya) writes:
>
> >please avoid using foul language when addressing issues relating to
> >Jesus Christ else you will surely DIE!!!!.
>
> We all have to face that eventually...why don't you let your alleged savior
> speak for himself?
>
>
>
etc, etc
What was 'foul' about the language Patrick posted when he was referring
to your particular religious icon?
Meanwhile, why are you issuing death threats to people posting here in
talk.abortion?
vonroach
wrote:
>What was 'foul' about the language PatrickHumphrey
Thanks for continuing the boring Humphrey dialog, you have again rescued this
area from becoming interesting.......yawn.....ZZzzzzz.....