Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Shouldn’t the voters be selecting our President?
143 views
Skip to first unread message
NoEinstein
Sep 27, 2012, 9:00:42 PM9/27/12
to
Early in the present long campaign, there were a dozen or so variously-
appealing candidates wishing to become our President. Beginning well
before the IOWA caucuses, the media was polling the voters and
handicapping the various candidates’ chances of getting the nomination
of… “their party”. Statements such as: “Ron Paul doesn’t have a
chance,” said by Charles Krauthammer, as well as by other supposed
conservatives, gave the impression that the media is all-knowing.
Whether the voters are aware of the influence or not, they desire to
back the candidate who will “be beholden” to them for voting for that
nominee on election day. If “the consensus” is that Ron Paul can’t
win, there is a high percentage of voters who will then back their
second or third choice, rather than “wasting” their vote on Paul. Why
is “the media” allowed to have such overwhelming influence over whom
we can choose to be our President? Since the Constitution stipulates
that the voters should be determining who becomes President, why
hasn’t anyone before me cried FOUL?
The numerical results of the early primaries are presented in the
media. Those candidates not in the top one or two, are,
statistically, tagged as fighting a losing race, and most of them will
soon drop out, because there isn’t enough money to continue
campaigning. Effectively, the media; the early voters; and the bank
accounts are ruling out 80% plus of the candidates before even 15% of
the members of that party have had a say-so. And THAT is clearly
unconstitutional from at least three different perspectives! First,
political parties are NOT sanctioned by the Constitution to be
determining anything done in the USA! Second, even if political
parties were sanctioned, having spaced-out primaries giving the most
influence to those living in the early primary states would be the
anti-thesis of a Representative Republic—like the USA was supposed to
be, but since day one, has not been. And third, allowing ANY campaign
to be limited by ones bank account allows money, rather than personal
experience and character to determine who stays in the race. The
Founding Fathers would not be happy about that!
Well before I contemplated writing us a New Constitution of the United
States of America, I was aware that tremendous pressure was being put
on candidates to publicly state that they will favor this or that
group in order to become the nominee. Most of the bad things that are
happening in the world is because of group-against-group fights.
Following elections, there will be huge celebrations when the nominee
of a particular party wins office. But on that very day, the next
campaign plans of the losing party are being formulated. In the USA,
we are split-down-the-aisle along unconstitutional party lines, and
the power keeps seesawing to allow the opposing party to again be on
top, at least for a while.
What I’ve put in a nutshell is the regrettable norm of politics. No
New Constitution having the objective of being FAIR to all law-abiding
citizens can allow the status quo norms to continue! Since political
parties are the anti-thesis of a Representative Republic, how, then,
will we decide whom is to be our President? By reading the following,
most should realize that, finally, it will be the voters, NOT any
biased group pressures, determining whom the President will be.
From Article I, Section 4: “Representatives shall not intentionally
communicate with any news medium whose coverage area is predominately
outside of their home district. Nor shall they, or any government
official, cultivate a media personae, or make petty public speeches,
introductions or comments lauding any person, living or dead, nor any
civil or private projects or those responsible. Comments to media by
representatives or government employees shall be germane to pending
legislation, or to the exercise of their jobs. The media shall not
solicit public officials’ opinions over those of the People. The
American Flag shall be red, white, and readily discernable blue. Only
when the President or Secretary of State are addressing the nation or
appearing before or receiving foreign dignitaries shall the American
Flag, bunting, or flag-color drapes be used as a backdrop. No other
public official nor candidate shall use such. Flags shall not be
displayed in or outside of government buildings other than: public
schools, post offices, military bases, memorials, the White House, the
Pentagon, and outside of the Capital or other government seats. Use
this public oath: “I Pledge Allegiance to the Flag of the United
States of America and to the Democracy-on-demand Republic for which it
stands. We’re One Nation of individuals who champion fair play,
maximum civil liberties, the Right of Self-determination, and having
an efficient, unobtrusive and deferential government.” Governments
aren’t graders of performance, style, art, design, history, nor social
significance, and shall make no law, proclamation, stamp or other
acclaim recognizing any persons, organizations or events in history.
Public officials shall make judgments within their expertise or shall
poll unbiased experts, or the Citizens, and defer to the opinions of
such.
And… from Article I, Section 9: “It is unlawful for representatives
to intentionally reveal affiliation with any political party or
political activist group, whatsoever, and unlawful for representatives
to assemble in such groups, or in pro or con factions, for the purpose
of gaining persuasion over any vote.” And… also from Section 9:
“Representatives shall not be polled concerning issues up for a vote,
nor shall Citizens be polled prior to any election on their support
for any candidate, amendment, or referendum item. It shall be a
felony to take, or to disseminate, the results of any such poll. But
representatives shall poll those law-abiding Citizens within their
districts who are most affected by any bill, and defer to the results
in voting. No release of projected election or referenda results
shall be made until all polls have been closed one hour.
“Article II:
Section 1: Executive power shall be vested in a President of the
United States of America. Candidates for President shall be Citizens
born in the USA who are at least 35 years of age. With the exception
of the incumbent President and/or VP—if eligible and seeking re
election—other candidates shall, within ninety days of the date of
filing as a candidate for President, have obtained the endorsement of
a minimum of 25,000 confirmed registered voters knowledgeable of such
candidate’s qualifications. The 3rd Tuesday in July, voters of all
the states and territories shall reduce the field of presidential
candidates to 8, with the incumbent Pres. & VP to be included in such
number, if applicable. The 3rd Tuesday in October, voters shall
reduce the field to four, with the incumbent Pres. and VP not
automatically included. The 1st Tuesday in November, each voter
selects their 1st & 2nd choices—points 4 and 3 respectively. The
President and Vice President Elect receive the highest and the 2nd
highest total points.”
And… from Section 4: “It shall be a felony for any government
official, celebrity or media idol—past or present—to publicly endorse
or campaign on behalf of any candidate for public office or job.
Candidates for public office shall be disqualified for: soliciting the
votes of any ideologically-biased group or obtaining the endorsement
of such a group, as by addressing a gathering that is composed only of
the biased members of such; soliciting new voter registrants; and
aiding or organizing the transportation of voters to the polls. The
winners in national elections shall be determined only by the popular
vote totals, irrespective of State borders. Therefore, any candidate
for such offices shall be disqualified for making campaign appearances
to target the voters of any state, county or city. Voters shall make
their decisions based on non-media-sponsored televised debates and on
fair and unscripted candidate interviews—televised nationally—and held
no sooner than four months before the specific election.”
And… from Amendment 1: “Freedom of the press or other medium mandates
that there be reasonable truthfulness in reporting. Wanton distortion
of the truth, or deliberate omission of the truth—except in cases of
obvious fiction or satire—is prohibited. Stating or implying that a
particular news medium has a collective voice (we) or position on any
issue is prohibited, as for example via: anonymous editorials;
regularly occurring accompanying comments; commentary programs
financed by, or ideologically screened by, the same news medium;
editorials named as being authored by management; editorial comments
by others that are in any way ideologically censored, omitted or
screened; or by comments occurring at specific times or designated
locations that most would come to associate with the management of
such medium, even if such are innocuous. No medium shall be a forum
for promoting the ideology of its management or owners, nor shall they
employ anyone who uses such job to hawk their personal political
preferences—at risk of loss of license or closure of the business.
Flagrantly editing news to promote the ideology of management is a
felony. No medium shall analyze, assess, summarize, or make
subjective judgments about any pending election or referendum, nor
badger a candidate or office-holder with acrid questions, nor violate
the latter’s right to privacy by intentionally revealing non criminal
interpersonal dealings. Any person(s) who does the latter is
committing a felony. However, factual, thorough coverage of the
candidates or referenda issues—on an as occurs basis—is allowed,
provided there are no comments nor actions, as above, and provided the
same unbiased coverage is given to all of the candidates or to all of
the referenda issues. No medium’s programs or formats, nor the status
of any of its associated employees shall unduly influence any election
or governmental process, or the business shall be closed. It shall be
a 10 year felony to repress truthful news reporting in any medium by
threatening legal action. No medium can be sued for libel for
presenting material authored by others, but if a person is harmed by
the medium’s content, they shall be allowed to reply—without editing—
in that medium. Each medium shall respond to breaking news without
considering the response of any other medium. Injuries due to
improper news coverage or non coverage shall not be excused by the
media response. A medium reporting on government shall do so
thoroughly, objectively, and with detachment—being neither laudatory
nor critical by form, and not repressing thoughtful dissent nor its
coverage. Every medium shall favor the truth over supposition,
without parity nor bias. False or deceptive commercial advertising is
prohibited. Deliberate use by any candidate, their staffs or election
committees, of false or deceptive campaign speeches, slogans,
advertisements, humor, or innuendo is a felony. No organization, nor
part of the media, nor any special interest group(s) shall in any way
endorse a slate of candidates for public office; flagrant violation is
a felony. No medium shall display active public records without the
free consent of the apt parties.”
And… Amendment 36: “All campaign contributions to candidates for
public office shall be made anonymously through a Federal Campaign
Contribution Clearing House, and such shall limit individual
contributions per election, per candidate, to $1,000.00, and limit
corporate contributions to $10,000 per election, per candidate
(adjustable for inflation). With the exception of contributions from
one’s family or business associates, accepting contributions from any
other known source shall disqualify a candidate for office.”
Dear Readers: The majority of the above relates to what methods and
influences are constitutional regarding how the People get to elect
their public officials. The media will never again have any influence
on how we elect our public officials and next to no influence on what
transpires in government. And THAT is the only way a Democracy-on-
demand Republic can function! Respectfully Submitted, — John A.
Armistead — Author and Patriot, AKA — NoEinstein —
appealing candidates wishing to become our President. Beginning well
before the IOWA caucuses, the media was polling the voters and
handicapping the various candidates’ chances of getting the nomination
of… “their party”. Statements such as: “Ron Paul doesn’t have a
chance,” said by Charles Krauthammer, as well as by other supposed
conservatives, gave the impression that the media is all-knowing.
Whether the voters are aware of the influence or not, they desire to
back the candidate who will “be beholden” to them for voting for that
nominee on election day. If “the consensus” is that Ron Paul can’t
win, there is a high percentage of voters who will then back their
second or third choice, rather than “wasting” their vote on Paul. Why
is “the media” allowed to have such overwhelming influence over whom
we can choose to be our President? Since the Constitution stipulates
that the voters should be determining who becomes President, why
hasn’t anyone before me cried FOUL?
The numerical results of the early primaries are presented in the
media. Those candidates not in the top one or two, are,
statistically, tagged as fighting a losing race, and most of them will
soon drop out, because there isn’t enough money to continue
campaigning. Effectively, the media; the early voters; and the bank
accounts are ruling out 80% plus of the candidates before even 15% of
the members of that party have had a say-so. And THAT is clearly
unconstitutional from at least three different perspectives! First,
political parties are NOT sanctioned by the Constitution to be
determining anything done in the USA! Second, even if political
parties were sanctioned, having spaced-out primaries giving the most
influence to those living in the early primary states would be the
anti-thesis of a Representative Republic—like the USA was supposed to
be, but since day one, has not been. And third, allowing ANY campaign
to be limited by ones bank account allows money, rather than personal
experience and character to determine who stays in the race. The
Founding Fathers would not be happy about that!
Well before I contemplated writing us a New Constitution of the United
States of America, I was aware that tremendous pressure was being put
on candidates to publicly state that they will favor this or that
group in order to become the nominee. Most of the bad things that are
happening in the world is because of group-against-group fights.
Following elections, there will be huge celebrations when the nominee
of a particular party wins office. But on that very day, the next
campaign plans of the losing party are being formulated. In the USA,
we are split-down-the-aisle along unconstitutional party lines, and
the power keeps seesawing to allow the opposing party to again be on
top, at least for a while.
What I’ve put in a nutshell is the regrettable norm of politics. No
New Constitution having the objective of being FAIR to all law-abiding
citizens can allow the status quo norms to continue! Since political
parties are the anti-thesis of a Representative Republic, how, then,
will we decide whom is to be our President? By reading the following,
most should realize that, finally, it will be the voters, NOT any
biased group pressures, determining whom the President will be.
From Article I, Section 4: “Representatives shall not intentionally
communicate with any news medium whose coverage area is predominately
outside of their home district. Nor shall they, or any government
official, cultivate a media personae, or make petty public speeches,
introductions or comments lauding any person, living or dead, nor any
civil or private projects or those responsible. Comments to media by
representatives or government employees shall be germane to pending
legislation, or to the exercise of their jobs. The media shall not
solicit public officials’ opinions over those of the People. The
American Flag shall be red, white, and readily discernable blue. Only
when the President or Secretary of State are addressing the nation or
appearing before or receiving foreign dignitaries shall the American
Flag, bunting, or flag-color drapes be used as a backdrop. No other
public official nor candidate shall use such. Flags shall not be
displayed in or outside of government buildings other than: public
schools, post offices, military bases, memorials, the White House, the
Pentagon, and outside of the Capital or other government seats. Use
this public oath: “I Pledge Allegiance to the Flag of the United
States of America and to the Democracy-on-demand Republic for which it
stands. We’re One Nation of individuals who champion fair play,
maximum civil liberties, the Right of Self-determination, and having
an efficient, unobtrusive and deferential government.” Governments
aren’t graders of performance, style, art, design, history, nor social
significance, and shall make no law, proclamation, stamp or other
acclaim recognizing any persons, organizations or events in history.
Public officials shall make judgments within their expertise or shall
poll unbiased experts, or the Citizens, and defer to the opinions of
such.
And… from Article I, Section 9: “It is unlawful for representatives
to intentionally reveal affiliation with any political party or
political activist group, whatsoever, and unlawful for representatives
to assemble in such groups, or in pro or con factions, for the purpose
of gaining persuasion over any vote.” And… also from Section 9:
“Representatives shall not be polled concerning issues up for a vote,
nor shall Citizens be polled prior to any election on their support
for any candidate, amendment, or referendum item. It shall be a
felony to take, or to disseminate, the results of any such poll. But
representatives shall poll those law-abiding Citizens within their
districts who are most affected by any bill, and defer to the results
in voting. No release of projected election or referenda results
shall be made until all polls have been closed one hour.
“Article II:
Section 1: Executive power shall be vested in a President of the
United States of America. Candidates for President shall be Citizens
born in the USA who are at least 35 years of age. With the exception
of the incumbent President and/or VP—if eligible and seeking re
election—other candidates shall, within ninety days of the date of
filing as a candidate for President, have obtained the endorsement of
a minimum of 25,000 confirmed registered voters knowledgeable of such
candidate’s qualifications. The 3rd Tuesday in July, voters of all
the states and territories shall reduce the field of presidential
candidates to 8, with the incumbent Pres. & VP to be included in such
number, if applicable. The 3rd Tuesday in October, voters shall
reduce the field to four, with the incumbent Pres. and VP not
automatically included. The 1st Tuesday in November, each voter
selects their 1st & 2nd choices—points 4 and 3 respectively. The
President and Vice President Elect receive the highest and the 2nd
highest total points.”
And… from Section 4: “It shall be a felony for any government
official, celebrity or media idol—past or present—to publicly endorse
or campaign on behalf of any candidate for public office or job.
Candidates for public office shall be disqualified for: soliciting the
votes of any ideologically-biased group or obtaining the endorsement
of such a group, as by addressing a gathering that is composed only of
the biased members of such; soliciting new voter registrants; and
aiding or organizing the transportation of voters to the polls. The
winners in national elections shall be determined only by the popular
vote totals, irrespective of State borders. Therefore, any candidate
for such offices shall be disqualified for making campaign appearances
to target the voters of any state, county or city. Voters shall make
their decisions based on non-media-sponsored televised debates and on
fair and unscripted candidate interviews—televised nationally—and held
no sooner than four months before the specific election.”
And… from Amendment 1: “Freedom of the press or other medium mandates
that there be reasonable truthfulness in reporting. Wanton distortion
of the truth, or deliberate omission of the truth—except in cases of
obvious fiction or satire—is prohibited. Stating or implying that a
particular news medium has a collective voice (we) or position on any
issue is prohibited, as for example via: anonymous editorials;
regularly occurring accompanying comments; commentary programs
financed by, or ideologically screened by, the same news medium;
editorials named as being authored by management; editorial comments
by others that are in any way ideologically censored, omitted or
screened; or by comments occurring at specific times or designated
locations that most would come to associate with the management of
such medium, even if such are innocuous. No medium shall be a forum
for promoting the ideology of its management or owners, nor shall they
employ anyone who uses such job to hawk their personal political
preferences—at risk of loss of license or closure of the business.
Flagrantly editing news to promote the ideology of management is a
felony. No medium shall analyze, assess, summarize, or make
subjective judgments about any pending election or referendum, nor
badger a candidate or office-holder with acrid questions, nor violate
the latter’s right to privacy by intentionally revealing non criminal
interpersonal dealings. Any person(s) who does the latter is
committing a felony. However, factual, thorough coverage of the
candidates or referenda issues—on an as occurs basis—is allowed,
provided there are no comments nor actions, as above, and provided the
same unbiased coverage is given to all of the candidates or to all of
the referenda issues. No medium’s programs or formats, nor the status
of any of its associated employees shall unduly influence any election
or governmental process, or the business shall be closed. It shall be
a 10 year felony to repress truthful news reporting in any medium by
threatening legal action. No medium can be sued for libel for
presenting material authored by others, but if a person is harmed by
the medium’s content, they shall be allowed to reply—without editing—
in that medium. Each medium shall respond to breaking news without
considering the response of any other medium. Injuries due to
improper news coverage or non coverage shall not be excused by the
media response. A medium reporting on government shall do so
thoroughly, objectively, and with detachment—being neither laudatory
nor critical by form, and not repressing thoughtful dissent nor its
coverage. Every medium shall favor the truth over supposition,
without parity nor bias. False or deceptive commercial advertising is
prohibited. Deliberate use by any candidate, their staffs or election
committees, of false or deceptive campaign speeches, slogans,
advertisements, humor, or innuendo is a felony. No organization, nor
part of the media, nor any special interest group(s) shall in any way
endorse a slate of candidates for public office; flagrant violation is
a felony. No medium shall display active public records without the
free consent of the apt parties.”
And… Amendment 36: “All campaign contributions to candidates for
public office shall be made anonymously through a Federal Campaign
Contribution Clearing House, and such shall limit individual
contributions per election, per candidate, to $1,000.00, and limit
corporate contributions to $10,000 per election, per candidate
(adjustable for inflation). With the exception of contributions from
one’s family or business associates, accepting contributions from any
other known source shall disqualify a candidate for office.”
Dear Readers: The majority of the above relates to what methods and
influences are constitutional regarding how the People get to elect
their public officials. The media will never again have any influence
on how we elect our public officials and next to no influence on what
transpires in government. And THAT is the only way a Democracy-on-
demand Republic can function! Respectfully Submitted, — John A.
Armistead — Author and Patriot, AKA — NoEinstein —
NoEinstein
Sep 30, 2012, 6:47:57 PM9/30/12
to
would be the gregarious guy who is talking to one or more strangers
near me. My voice travels and has strong, emotional inflection, so
others within 100 feet or so will be turning to look at me, simply
because of the sound of my voice, and likely because of the smile or
positive energy I show. Here, when I make a New Post, I write in the
same narrative style. Those of you who love one-sentence sound bites
like Twitter favors, will probably continue to keep your
communications shallow. I'm explaining this, because the New
Constitution that I have penned and polished is more important to the
future survival of the USA than all of the YouTube, FaceBook and
Twitter posts in an entire year, combined! I know many of you have at
least skimmed this post, because such has caused a small jump in the
number of readers per week that Google tallies. Any of you,
especially any readers from the screwed-up existing media who are
brave enough to leave a one paragraph reply, are invited to do so. I
won't bite-the-head-off of anyone who has anything constructive to
say. Your collective willingness to speak up could be crucial to
finally fixing the thousand plus things wrong with how the USA has
evolved. I suspect you will feel better if you think first and make a
good comment. I can't accomplish my ends without the support of the
majority of Americans. So, speak up, America! — John A. Armistead —
Author and Patriot; AKA — NoEinstein — on sci.physics.
Tom Potter
Sep 30, 2012, 7:53:58 PM9/30/12
to
"NoEinstein" <noein...@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
>news:8e3299c9-eea5-44e8...@o8g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...
>On Sep 27, 9:00 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>> Early in the present long campaign, there were a dozen or so variously-
>> appealing candidates wishing to become our President. Beginning well
>> before the IOWA caucuses, the media was polling the voters and
>> handicapping the various candidates' chances of getting the nomination
>> of. "their party". Statements such as: "Ron Paul doesn't have a
>> Early in the present long campaign, there were a dozen or so variously-
>> appealing candidates wishing to become our President. Beginning well
>> before the IOWA caucuses, the media was polling the voters and
>> handicapping the various candidates' chances of getting the nomination
>> chance," said by Charles Krauthammer, as well as by other supposed
>> conservatives, gave the impression that the media is all-knowing.
>> Whether the voters are aware of the influence or not, they desire to
>> back the candidate who will "be beholden" to them for voting for that
>> nominee on election day. If "the consensus" is that Ron Paul can't
>> win, there is a high percentage of voters who will then back their
>> second or third choice, rather than "wasting" their vote on Paul. Why
>> is "the media" allowed to have such overwhelming influence over whom
>> we can choose to be our President? Since the Constitution stipulates
>> that the voters should be determining who becomes President, why
>> hasn't anyone before me cried FOUL?
>>
>> The numerical results of the early primaries are presented in the
>> media. Those candidates not in the top one or two, are,
>> statistically, tagged as fighting a losing race, and most of them will
>> soon drop out, because there isn't enough money to continue
>> campaigning. Effectively, the media; the early voters; and the bank
>> accounts are ruling out 80% plus of the candidates before even 15% of
>> the members of that party have had a say-so. And THAT is clearly
>> unconstitutional from at least three different perspectives! First,
>> political parties are NOT sanctioned by the Constitution to be
>> determining anything done in the USA! Second, even if political
>> parties were sanctioned, having spaced-out primaries giving the most
>> influence to those living in the early primary states would be the
>> anti-thesis of a Representative Republic-like the USA was supposed to
>> conservatives, gave the impression that the media is all-knowing.
>> Whether the voters are aware of the influence or not, they desire to
>> back the candidate who will "be beholden" to them for voting for that
>> nominee on election day. If "the consensus" is that Ron Paul can't
>> win, there is a high percentage of voters who will then back their
>> second or third choice, rather than "wasting" their vote on Paul. Why
>> is "the media" allowed to have such overwhelming influence over whom
>> we can choose to be our President? Since the Constitution stipulates
>> that the voters should be determining who becomes President, why
>> hasn't anyone before me cried FOUL?
>>
>> The numerical results of the early primaries are presented in the
>> media. Those candidates not in the top one or two, are,
>> statistically, tagged as fighting a losing race, and most of them will
>> soon drop out, because there isn't enough money to continue
>> campaigning. Effectively, the media; the early voters; and the bank
>> accounts are ruling out 80% plus of the candidates before even 15% of
>> the members of that party have had a say-so. And THAT is clearly
>> unconstitutional from at least three different perspectives! First,
>> political parties are NOT sanctioned by the Constitution to be
>> determining anything done in the USA! Second, even if political
>> parties were sanctioned, having spaced-out primaries giving the most
>> influence to those living in the early primary states would be the
>> to intentionally reveal affiliation with any political party or
>> political activist group, whatsoever, and unlawful for representatives
>> to assemble in such groups, or in pro or con factions, for the purpose
>> of gaining persuasion over any vote." And. also from Section 9:
>> political activist group, whatsoever, and unlawful for representatives
>> to assemble in such groups, or in pro or con factions, for the purpose
>> "Representatives shall not be polled concerning issues up for a vote,
>> nor shall Citizens be polled prior to any election on their support
>> for any candidate, amendment, or referendum item. It shall be a
>> felony to take, or to disseminate, the results of any such poll. But
>> representatives shall poll those law-abiding Citizens within their
>> districts who are most affected by any bill, and defer to the results
>> in voting. No release of projected election or referenda results
>> shall be made until all polls have been closed one hour.
>>
>> "Article II:
>>
>> Section 1: Executive power shall be vested in a President of the
>> United States of America. Candidates for President shall be Citizens
>> born in the USA who are at least 35 years of age. With the exception
>> of the incumbent President and/or VP-if eligible and seeking re
>> nor shall Citizens be polled prior to any election on their support
>> for any candidate, amendment, or referendum item. It shall be a
>> felony to take, or to disseminate, the results of any such poll. But
>> representatives shall poll those law-abiding Citizens within their
>> districts who are most affected by any bill, and defer to the results
>> in voting. No release of projected election or referenda results
>> shall be made until all polls have been closed one hour.
>>
>> "Article II:
>>
>> Section 1: Executive power shall be vested in a President of the
>> United States of America. Candidates for President shall be Citizens
>> born in the USA who are at least 35 years of age. With the exception
>> election-other candidates shall, within ninety days of the date of
>> filing as a candidate for President, have obtained the endorsement of
>> a minimum of 25,000 confirmed registered voters knowledgeable of such
>> candidate's qualifications. The 3rd Tuesday in July, voters of all
>> the states and territories shall reduce the field of presidential
>> candidates to 8, with the incumbent Pres. & VP to be included in such
>> number, if applicable. The 3rd Tuesday in October, voters shall
>> reduce the field to four, with the incumbent Pres. and VP not
>> automatically included. The 1st Tuesday in November, each voter
>> selects their 1st & 2nd choices-points 4 and 3 respectively. The
>> a minimum of 25,000 confirmed registered voters knowledgeable of such
>> candidate's qualifications. The 3rd Tuesday in July, voters of all
>> the states and territories shall reduce the field of presidential
>> candidates to 8, with the incumbent Pres. & VP to be included in such
>> number, if applicable. The 3rd Tuesday in October, voters shall
>> reduce the field to four, with the incumbent Pres. and VP not
>> automatically included. The 1st Tuesday in November, each voter
>> President and Vice President Elect receive the highest and the 2nd
>> highest total points."
>>
>> And. from Section 4: "It shall be a felony for any government
>> highest total points."
>>
>> official, celebrity or media idol-past or present-to publicly endorse
>> or campaign on behalf of any candidate for public office or job.
>> Candidates for public office shall be disqualified for: soliciting the
>> votes of any ideologically-biased group or obtaining the endorsement
>> of such a group, as by addressing a gathering that is composed only of
>> the biased members of such; soliciting new voter registrants; and
>> aiding or organizing the transportation of voters to the polls. The
>> winners in national elections shall be determined only by the popular
>> vote totals, irrespective of State borders. Therefore, any candidate
>> for such offices shall be disqualified for making campaign appearances
>> to target the voters of any state, county or city. Voters shall make
>> their decisions based on non-media-sponsored televised debates and on
>> fair and unscripted candidate interviews-televised nationally-and held
>> Candidates for public office shall be disqualified for: soliciting the
>> votes of any ideologically-biased group or obtaining the endorsement
>> of such a group, as by addressing a gathering that is composed only of
>> the biased members of such; soliciting new voter registrants; and
>> aiding or organizing the transportation of voters to the polls. The
>> winners in national elections shall be determined only by the popular
>> vote totals, irrespective of State borders. Therefore, any candidate
>> for such offices shall be disqualified for making campaign appearances
>> to target the voters of any state, county or city. Voters shall make
>> their decisions based on non-media-sponsored televised debates and on
>> no sooner than four months before the specific election."
>>
>> And. from Amendment 1: "Freedom of the press or other medium mandates
>>
>> that there be reasonable truthfulness in reporting. Wanton distortion
>> of the truth, or deliberate omission of the truth-except in cases of
>> obvious fiction or satire-is prohibited. Stating or implying that a
>> particular news medium has a collective voice (we) or position on any
>> issue is prohibited, as for example via: anonymous editorials;
>> regularly occurring accompanying comments; commentary programs
>> financed by, or ideologically screened by, the same news medium;
>> editorials named as being authored by management; editorial comments
>> by others that are in any way ideologically censored, omitted or
>> screened; or by comments occurring at specific times or designated
>> locations that most would come to associate with the management of
>> such medium, even if such are innocuous. No medium shall be a forum
>> for promoting the ideology of its management or owners, nor shall they
>> employ anyone who uses such job to hawk their personal political
>> preferences-at risk of loss of license or closure of the business.
>> issue is prohibited, as for example via: anonymous editorials;
>> regularly occurring accompanying comments; commentary programs
>> financed by, or ideologically screened by, the same news medium;
>> editorials named as being authored by management; editorial comments
>> by others that are in any way ideologically censored, omitted or
>> screened; or by comments occurring at specific times or designated
>> locations that most would come to associate with the management of
>> such medium, even if such are innocuous. No medium shall be a forum
>> for promoting the ideology of its management or owners, nor shall they
>> employ anyone who uses such job to hawk their personal political
>> Flagrantly editing news to promote the ideology of management is a
>> felony. No medium shall analyze, assess, summarize, or make
>> subjective judgments about any pending election or referendum, nor
>> badger a candidate or office-holder with acrid questions, nor violate
>> the latter's right to privacy by intentionally revealing non criminal
>> interpersonal dealings. Any person(s) who does the latter is
>> committing a felony. However, factual, thorough coverage of the
>> candidates or referenda issues-on an as occurs basis-is allowed,
>> felony. No medium shall analyze, assess, summarize, or make
>> subjective judgments about any pending election or referendum, nor
>> badger a candidate or office-holder with acrid questions, nor violate
>> the latter's right to privacy by intentionally revealing non criminal
>> interpersonal dealings. Any person(s) who does the latter is
>> committing a felony. However, factual, thorough coverage of the
>> provided there are no comments nor actions, as above, and provided the
>> same unbiased coverage is given to all of the candidates or to all of
>> the referenda issues. No medium's programs or formats, nor the status
>> of any of its associated employees shall unduly influence any election
>> or governmental process, or the business shall be closed. It shall be
>> a 10 year felony to repress truthful news reporting in any medium by
>> threatening legal action. No medium can be sued for libel for
>> presenting material authored by others, but if a person is harmed by
>> the medium's content, they shall be allowed to reply-without editing-
>> same unbiased coverage is given to all of the candidates or to all of
>> the referenda issues. No medium's programs or formats, nor the status
>> of any of its associated employees shall unduly influence any election
>> or governmental process, or the business shall be closed. It shall be
>> a 10 year felony to repress truthful news reporting in any medium by
>> threatening legal action. No medium can be sued for libel for
>> presenting material authored by others, but if a person is harmed by
>> in that medium. Each medium shall respond to breaking news without
>> considering the response of any other medium. Injuries due to
>> improper news coverage or non coverage shall not be excused by the
>> media response. A medium reporting on government shall do so
>> thoroughly, objectively, and with detachment-being neither laudatory
>> considering the response of any other medium. Injuries due to
>> improper news coverage or non coverage shall not be excused by the
>> media response. A medium reporting on government shall do so
>> nor critical by form, and not repressing thoughtful dissent nor its
>> coverage. Every medium shall favor the truth over supposition,
>> without parity nor bias. False or deceptive commercial advertising is
>> prohibited. Deliberate use by any candidate, their staffs or election
>> committees, of false or deceptive campaign speeches, slogans,
>> advertisements, humor, or innuendo is a felony. No organization, nor
>> part of the media, nor any special interest group(s) shall in any way
>> endorse a slate of candidates for public office; flagrant violation is
>> a felony. No medium shall display active public records without the
>> free consent of the apt parties."
>>
>> And. Amendment 36: "All campaign contributions to candidates for
>> coverage. Every medium shall favor the truth over supposition,
>> without parity nor bias. False or deceptive commercial advertising is
>> prohibited. Deliberate use by any candidate, their staffs or election
>> committees, of false or deceptive campaign speeches, slogans,
>> advertisements, humor, or innuendo is a felony. No organization, nor
>> part of the media, nor any special interest group(s) shall in any way
>> endorse a slate of candidates for public office; flagrant violation is
>> a felony. No medium shall display active public records without the
>> free consent of the apt parties."
>>
>> public office shall be made anonymously through a Federal Campaign
>> Contribution Clearing House, and such shall limit individual
>> contributions per election, per candidate, to $1,000.00, and limit
>> corporate contributions to $10,000 per election, per candidate
>> (adjustable for inflation). With the exception of contributions from
>> one's family or business associates, accepting contributions from any
>> other known source shall disqualify a candidate for office."
>>
>> Dear Readers: The majority of the above relates to what methods and
>> influences are constitutional regarding how the People get to elect
>> their public officials. The media will never again have any influence
>> on how we elect our public officials and next to no influence on what
>> transpires in government. And THAT is the only way a Democracy-on-
>> demand Republic can function! Respectfully Submitted, - John A.
>> Contribution Clearing House, and such shall limit individual
>> contributions per election, per candidate, to $1,000.00, and limit
>> corporate contributions to $10,000 per election, per candidate
>> (adjustable for inflation). With the exception of contributions from
>> one's family or business associates, accepting contributions from any
>> other known source shall disqualify a candidate for office."
>>
>> Dear Readers: The majority of the above relates to what methods and
>> influences are constitutional regarding how the People get to elect
>> their public officials. The media will never again have any influence
>> on how we elect our public officials and next to no influence on what
>> transpires in government. And THAT is the only way a Democracy-on-
>> Armistead - Author and Patriot, AKA - NoEinstein -
>
>Dear Readers: If most of you saw me in the checkout line at WalMart, I
>would be the gregarious guy who is talking to one or more strangers
>near me. My voice travels and has strong, emotional inflection, so
>others within 100 feet or so will be turning to look at me, simply
>because of the sound of my voice, and likely because of the smile or
>positive energy I show. Here, when I make a New Post, I write in the
>same narrative style. Those of you who love one-sentence sound bites
>like Twitter favors, will probably continue to keep your
>communications shallow. I'm explaining this, because the New
>Constitution that I have penned and polished is more important to the
>future survival of the USA than all of the YouTube, FaceBook and
>Twitter posts in an entire year, combined! I know many of you have at
>least skimmed this post, because such has caused a small jump in the
>number of readers per week that Google tallies. Any of you,
>especially any readers from the screwed-up existing media who are
>brave enough to leave a one paragraph reply, are invited to do so. I
>won't bite-the-head-off of anyone who has anything constructive to
>say. Your collective willingness to speak up could be crucial to
>finally fixing the thousand plus things wrong with how the USA has
>evolved. I suspect you will feel better if you think first and make a
>good comment. I can't accomplish my ends without the support of the
>majority of Americans. So, speak up, America! - John A. Armistead -
>Dear Readers: If most of you saw me in the checkout line at WalMart, I
>would be the gregarious guy who is talking to one or more strangers
>near me. My voice travels and has strong, emotional inflection, so
>others within 100 feet or so will be turning to look at me, simply
>because of the sound of my voice, and likely because of the smile or
>positive energy I show. Here, when I make a New Post, I write in the
>same narrative style. Those of you who love one-sentence sound bites
>like Twitter favors, will probably continue to keep your
>communications shallow. I'm explaining this, because the New
>Constitution that I have penned and polished is more important to the
>future survival of the USA than all of the YouTube, FaceBook and
>Twitter posts in an entire year, combined! I know many of you have at
>least skimmed this post, because such has caused a small jump in the
>number of readers per week that Google tallies. Any of you,
>especially any readers from the screwed-up existing media who are
>brave enough to leave a one paragraph reply, are invited to do so. I
>won't bite-the-head-off of anyone who has anything constructive to
>say. Your collective willingness to speak up could be crucial to
>finally fixing the thousand plus things wrong with how the USA has
>evolved. I suspect you will feel better if you think first and make a
>good comment. I can't accomplish my ends without the support of the
>Author and Patriot; AKA - NoEinstein - on sci.physics.
As shown by ancient Greek and Roman writers such as Polybius,
and by the American Founding Fathers in the Federalist Papers,
the most stable forms of government
have featured a strong executive,
provided stability for the elite to implement long term and costly projects,
and functioned to serve the masses.
The best way to do this would be to randomly
select a "House of Representatives"
from a pool of ANYONE who wanted the job,
and to sell the seats in the "Elite Senate" to the highest bidders,
NO MATTER who they are or where they live,
as the elite are multinational in truth.
The department heads (Defense, State, housing, transportation, etc.)
would be screened by the Senate, and accepted by the Representatives,
and the department heads would select someone to be the "Buck Stopper".
The Senate would have the power to shift a certain percentages of the
resources and responsibilities around in the executive,
for SHORT periods of time during emergencies,
after which the shift had to be approved by the Representatives.
The Senators, which would be composed of the most successful business
people, understand what it takes to be a good executive,
whereas the masses do not,
and as can seen by many presidential appointments, most presidents do not.
The Representatives would have power to select Judges,
and to initiate budgets,
which would have to be approved by the Senate.
And in order to prevent Judges from being biased
to the left ( Catering to the masses. )
or the right ( Catering to the elite. )
any Federal Judge could be removed
by two thirds of either the Senators or the Representatives.
A system like this would make for a true democracy,
would eliminate the hostility and division that results from the two party
system, and it would prevent media, search engines, foreign nations,
religions, unions, etc. from co-opting the government by various tactics.
The system would also protect the elite and give them the confidence to make
the large, long term investments that are needed to build a viable society.
As the power of the executive would be divided, it would be impossible for
any one man to grab all of the power, and it would eliminate the situations
where fools, wanabe tyrants, immoral people, and loose cannons have their
hands on the nuclear button, and most of the power.
The responsibilities between the Senate and the Representatives would be
pretty much along the same lines as it is in the American Congress. The
Senate would be more responsible for treaties, and the Representatives would
be most responsible for budgets, crime and punishment.
Observe that selecting Representatives randomly
would insure that the masses are truly represented,
and that selling Senate seats to the highest bidder
would insure that the elite are truly represented.
As it is today the masses are brainwashed
by the Mass Media and search engines like Google
to accept a small set of leaders
and politicians in the "acceptable" group
are bought and controlled by Internationalists
motivated by power and riches, rather than
the greatest good for the greatest number.
--
Tom Potter
http://tom-potter.tel
https://tdp1001.jux.com/
NoEinstein
Oct 3, 2012, 10:59:02 AM10/3/12
to
Hello Tom! Have the Jews gotten to China, yet? You can be credited
with having some real original ideas about how government should
work. I’ll inject several, I hope informative, insights where apt. —
NoEinstein — AKA John A. Armistead, Author and Patriot
that such person’s ideals and proposals for America matter very much.
An executive needs to manage people and to orchestrate running the
land based on the Laws that are in place. 'The Donald' has more, true
executive experience and native ability than all of the other (had
been) candidates combined. And his views on how to deal with China,
and with OPEC, certainly would be legal.
The best, and most efficient form of government would be a benevolent
dictatorship. Of course, it would help if that dictator was as wise
as Solomon, and as tight with the tax money as possible. Being
benevolent, in my ideal, is making decisions that will foster having
the optimum interactions of all portions of society and of
businesses. It is not about giving free lunches to anyone. Most
people don’t mind working for a living so long as they know others
aren’t getting monetary favors. And once things are as fair as
possible, most won’t mind being charitable to neighbors in true need.
There is a reluctance to be charitable if “government” is perceived as
looking out for everyone. Once that latter cancerous ’bubble’ is
busted, things can start improving, quickly.
> provided stability for the elite to implement long term and costly projects,
> and functioned to serve the masses.
>
> The best way to do this would be to randomly
> select a "House of Representatives"
> from a pool of ANYONE who wanted the job,
If the people are selected, randomly, then the ones pulled out of the
“selective service” hat wouldn’t be “representatives” at all. What
you say ‘might’ work, but only if the randomly chosen ones poll the
voters in their districts to be sure the House votes being made are
acceptable to the voters.
>
> and to sell the seats in the "Elite Senate" to the highest bidders,
> NO MATTER who they are or where they live,
> as the elite are multinational in truth.
Those egomaniac JERKS who run for Senate seats are, effectively,
buying their way into office—either by the high cost (millions) of
their campaigns, or by the implied bribes of “free lunches” if such
and such candidate wins. Oligarchies are the anti-thesis of a
Representative Republic. Don’t try to “save” such a self-serving
governing body that bribed its way into being in the first place!
>
> The department heads (Defense, State, housing, transportation, etc.)
> would be screened by the Senate, and accepted by the Representatives,
>
Oh. So, you think the Senate should have the power to select, and the
House can only say yea or nay.
> and the department heads would select someone to be the "Buck Stopper".
>
> The Senate would have the power to shift a certain percentages of the
> resources and responsibilities around in the executive,
> for SHORT periods of time during emergencies,
> after which the shift had to be approved by the Representatives.
The president can declare war, but only for a short while until things
must be approved by the Congress.
>
> The Senators, which would be composed of the most successful business
> people,
The US Senate is composed, primarily, of CAREER politicians, most of
whom had a decade or so of experience being God damned lawyers. Is it
any wonder that things in this country are so adversarial?
Collectively, there is very little true business management experience
in the Senate nor in the House. My “NC” removes the EGO component
from those willing to run for public office. Finally, smart executive
types, not expected to be in the public eye all of the time, will
start running for public office! Our governments’ failings are
largely personnel issues. Once we take away the career politicians
with term limits and etc., and deny allowing national media
interaction with Congress, our governmental processes can start being
pragmatic.
> understand what it takes to be a good executive,
> whereas the masses do not,
> and as can seen by many presidential appointments, most presidents do not.
>
> The Representatives would have power to select Judges,
> and to initiate budgets,
> which would have to be approved by the Senate.
Tom, before you start giving powers to branches of government,
shouldn’t we be sure that there are no built-in biases in the
branches? The unconstitutional democrats control the Senate, and
nothing (like a budget) is getting done. Don’t you realize that the
House and Senate are always at odds? Only the HOUSE is needed to have
representative government. The Senate is just a HUGE embarrassment
that I have rightly eliminated in my “NC”.
>
> And in order to prevent Judges from being biased
> to the left ( Catering to the masses. )
> or the right ( Catering to the elite. )
>
> any Federal Judge could be removed
> by two thirds of either the Senators or the Representatives.
Here is what my “NC” says:
Article III:
Section 1: The lesser Judicial Branch consists of a High Court and
such inferior courts as the House establishes. Its major duty is to
interpret laws. It has no power to command enforcement of any of its
rulings unless so mandated in prior, formally stipulated and apt
laws. Judges and justices are technicians of the law and of this New
Constitution. They shall perform their duties as individuals, never
as part of any perceived culture of the lesser Judicial Branch, nor
from any consultation whatsoever with past or present members of
such. Additionally, they shall not have held state or federal
executive or legislative office. The President shall nominate new
justices who are between the ages of 50 and 60 years old, and may on
good behavior, serve a single term of up to 10 years. The President,
or his agents, shall not work to win the confirmation of any
nominee. Judges and justices shall be selected for their intellect,
high moral character, compassion, knowledge of the law, likable
nature, and for their proficiency and expediency in office. Such
shall not be aloft nor considered infallible in all their judgments,
yet shall be respected if they right injustices quickly. They shall
make decisions based on apt laws and this New Constitution—never on
their personal ideologies. *** Every two years an unbiased review
panel shall apprise the Citizens of the job performance grade, as
herein, of seated judges and justices. With the assent of 60% of the
voters nationwide, the latter can be unseated. Judges and justices
aren’t royalty, nor do they have an implied moral judgment inherently
superior to public macro-consensus. They shall not be chambered
lavishly, sit in throne-like chairs, wear robes on the job, nor dress
in a style that differentiates them from the People. They shall not
socialize with, nor privately be in conference with, members of the
Executive or Legislative branches of government; nor shall they attend
State of the Union Addresses or similar events. The Public shall not
stand for entering or exiting judges or justices who shall be
addressed only as: judge or justice. Judges and justices not
respecting such provisions, or who exhibit excessive arrogance or
pomposity on the job shall be removed. Sessions of all trials shall
begin with the judge(s) or justice(s) saying: “The justice system is
on trial.” All assent five-to-four High Court decisions are for one
year only, or shall be invalid; and the same nine justices shall not—
on their own—reconsider such issue. Courtrooms shall be devoid of
gavels, seals, flags and oppressive art, and no design feature nor
process shall imply that judges or justices represent government or
respond patly or collectively. It is TREASON for a judge or justice
to rule with disfavor on the supremacy of a fair democracy.
>
> A system like this would make for a true democracy,
> would eliminate the hostility and division that results from the two party
> system, and it would prevent media, search engines, foreign nations,
> religions, unions, etc. from co-opting the government by various tactics.
Tom, how do any of the excerpts that I’ve given on my “NC” fail to
have adequate controls and protections?
>
> The system would also protect the elite and give them the confidence to make
> the large, long term investments that are needed to build a viable society.
> As the power of the executive would be divided, it would be impossible for
> any one man to grab all of the power, and it would eliminate the situations
> where fools, wanabe tyrants, immoral people, and loose cannons have their
> hands on the nuclear button, and most of the power.
>
> The responsibilities between the Senate and the Representatives would be
> pretty much along the same lines as it is in the American Congress. The
> Senate would be more responsible for treaties, and the Representatives would
> be most responsible for budgets, crime and punishment.
How will “division of authority” make government run efficiently? And
how will the people know that it is they, not Congress, who control
what happens in this country?
>
> Observe that selecting Representatives randomly
> would insure that the masses are truly represented,
> and that selling Senate seats to the highest bidder
> would insure that the elite are truly represented.
That is bull! What we have, now, is God damned senate candidates
promising “free lunches” and defrauding those who want “free lunches”
out of their hard-earned money in order to keep returning those same
corrupt career politicians to office. Where do you suppose that
squatting Kenyan ’president’ of ours, Barack Obama, is getting the
billions of dollars being wasted on his corrupt campaign? From the
say-they-are-poor Democrats, that’s who! Hang Obama for TREASON!
There isn’t a Christian bone in his body. He is the anti-Christ, bent
on controlling, and destroying, the entire world!
>
> As it is today the masses are brainwashed
> by the Mass Media and search engines like Google
> to accept a small set of leaders
My “NC” most effectively neuters the entire media! No one needs to
worry about the media ever gaining effective control of government
again!!!!!
> and politicians in the "acceptable" group
> are bought and controlled by Internationalists
> motivated by power and riches, rather than
> the greatest good for the greatest number.
Having “the greatest good for the greatest number” is the entire
motivation for my having written my New Constitution! With regards,
— NoEinstein — AKA John A. Armistead, Author and Patriot.
> Tom Potterhttp://tom-potter.telhttps://tdp1001.jux.com/
with having some real original ideas about how government should
work. I’ll inject several, I hope informative, insights where apt. —
NoEinstein — AKA John A. Armistead, Author and Patriot
>
> As shown by ancient Greek and Roman writers such as Polybius,
> and by the American Founding Fathers in the Federalist Papers,
> the most stable forms of government
> have featured a strong executive,
A huge mistake being made regarding the “executive” (or President) is
> As shown by ancient Greek and Roman writers such as Polybius,
> and by the American Founding Fathers in the Federalist Papers,
> the most stable forms of government
> have featured a strong executive,
that such person’s ideals and proposals for America matter very much.
An executive needs to manage people and to orchestrate running the
land based on the Laws that are in place. 'The Donald' has more, true
executive experience and native ability than all of the other (had
been) candidates combined. And his views on how to deal with China,
and with OPEC, certainly would be legal.
The best, and most efficient form of government would be a benevolent
dictatorship. Of course, it would help if that dictator was as wise
as Solomon, and as tight with the tax money as possible. Being
benevolent, in my ideal, is making decisions that will foster having
the optimum interactions of all portions of society and of
businesses. It is not about giving free lunches to anyone. Most
people don’t mind working for a living so long as they know others
aren’t getting monetary favors. And once things are as fair as
possible, most won’t mind being charitable to neighbors in true need.
There is a reluctance to be charitable if “government” is perceived as
looking out for everyone. Once that latter cancerous ’bubble’ is
busted, things can start improving, quickly.
> provided stability for the elite to implement long term and costly projects,
> and functioned to serve the masses.
>
> The best way to do this would be to randomly
> select a "House of Representatives"
> from a pool of ANYONE who wanted the job,
“selective service” hat wouldn’t be “representatives” at all. What
you say ‘might’ work, but only if the randomly chosen ones poll the
voters in their districts to be sure the House votes being made are
acceptable to the voters.
>
> and to sell the seats in the "Elite Senate" to the highest bidders,
> NO MATTER who they are or where they live,
> as the elite are multinational in truth.
buying their way into office—either by the high cost (millions) of
their campaigns, or by the implied bribes of “free lunches” if such
and such candidate wins. Oligarchies are the anti-thesis of a
Representative Republic. Don’t try to “save” such a self-serving
governing body that bribed its way into being in the first place!
>
> The department heads (Defense, State, housing, transportation, etc.)
> would be screened by the Senate, and accepted by the Representatives,
>
House can only say yea or nay.
> and the department heads would select someone to be the "Buck Stopper".
>
> The Senate would have the power to shift a certain percentages of the
> resources and responsibilities around in the executive,
> for SHORT periods of time during emergencies,
> after which the shift had to be approved by the Representatives.
must be approved by the Congress.
>
> The Senators, which would be composed of the most successful business
> people,
whom had a decade or so of experience being God damned lawyers. Is it
any wonder that things in this country are so adversarial?
Collectively, there is very little true business management experience
in the Senate nor in the House. My “NC” removes the EGO component
from those willing to run for public office. Finally, smart executive
types, not expected to be in the public eye all of the time, will
start running for public office! Our governments’ failings are
largely personnel issues. Once we take away the career politicians
with term limits and etc., and deny allowing national media
interaction with Congress, our governmental processes can start being
pragmatic.
> understand what it takes to be a good executive,
> whereas the masses do not,
> and as can seen by many presidential appointments, most presidents do not.
>
> The Representatives would have power to select Judges,
> and to initiate budgets,
> which would have to be approved by the Senate.
shouldn’t we be sure that there are no built-in biases in the
branches? The unconstitutional democrats control the Senate, and
nothing (like a budget) is getting done. Don’t you realize that the
House and Senate are always at odds? Only the HOUSE is needed to have
representative government. The Senate is just a HUGE embarrassment
that I have rightly eliminated in my “NC”.
>
> And in order to prevent Judges from being biased
> to the left ( Catering to the masses. )
> or the right ( Catering to the elite. )
>
> any Federal Judge could be removed
> by two thirds of either the Senators or the Representatives.
Article III:
Section 1: The lesser Judicial Branch consists of a High Court and
such inferior courts as the House establishes. Its major duty is to
interpret laws. It has no power to command enforcement of any of its
rulings unless so mandated in prior, formally stipulated and apt
laws. Judges and justices are technicians of the law and of this New
Constitution. They shall perform their duties as individuals, never
as part of any perceived culture of the lesser Judicial Branch, nor
from any consultation whatsoever with past or present members of
such. Additionally, they shall not have held state or federal
executive or legislative office. The President shall nominate new
justices who are between the ages of 50 and 60 years old, and may on
good behavior, serve a single term of up to 10 years. The President,
or his agents, shall not work to win the confirmation of any
nominee. Judges and justices shall be selected for their intellect,
high moral character, compassion, knowledge of the law, likable
nature, and for their proficiency and expediency in office. Such
shall not be aloft nor considered infallible in all their judgments,
yet shall be respected if they right injustices quickly. They shall
make decisions based on apt laws and this New Constitution—never on
their personal ideologies. *** Every two years an unbiased review
panel shall apprise the Citizens of the job performance grade, as
herein, of seated judges and justices. With the assent of 60% of the
voters nationwide, the latter can be unseated. Judges and justices
aren’t royalty, nor do they have an implied moral judgment inherently
superior to public macro-consensus. They shall not be chambered
lavishly, sit in throne-like chairs, wear robes on the job, nor dress
in a style that differentiates them from the People. They shall not
socialize with, nor privately be in conference with, members of the
Executive or Legislative branches of government; nor shall they attend
State of the Union Addresses or similar events. The Public shall not
stand for entering or exiting judges or justices who shall be
addressed only as: judge or justice. Judges and justices not
respecting such provisions, or who exhibit excessive arrogance or
pomposity on the job shall be removed. Sessions of all trials shall
begin with the judge(s) or justice(s) saying: “The justice system is
on trial.” All assent five-to-four High Court decisions are for one
year only, or shall be invalid; and the same nine justices shall not—
on their own—reconsider such issue. Courtrooms shall be devoid of
gavels, seals, flags and oppressive art, and no design feature nor
process shall imply that judges or justices represent government or
respond patly or collectively. It is TREASON for a judge or justice
to rule with disfavor on the supremacy of a fair democracy.
>
> A system like this would make for a true democracy,
> would eliminate the hostility and division that results from the two party
> system, and it would prevent media, search engines, foreign nations,
> religions, unions, etc. from co-opting the government by various tactics.
have adequate controls and protections?
>
> The system would also protect the elite and give them the confidence to make
> the large, long term investments that are needed to build a viable society.
> As the power of the executive would be divided, it would be impossible for
> any one man to grab all of the power, and it would eliminate the situations
> where fools, wanabe tyrants, immoral people, and loose cannons have their
> hands on the nuclear button, and most of the power.
>
> The responsibilities between the Senate and the Representatives would be
> pretty much along the same lines as it is in the American Congress. The
> Senate would be more responsible for treaties, and the Representatives would
> be most responsible for budgets, crime and punishment.
how will the people know that it is they, not Congress, who control
what happens in this country?
>
> Observe that selecting Representatives randomly
> would insure that the masses are truly represented,
> and that selling Senate seats to the highest bidder
> would insure that the elite are truly represented.
promising “free lunches” and defrauding those who want “free lunches”
out of their hard-earned money in order to keep returning those same
corrupt career politicians to office. Where do you suppose that
squatting Kenyan ’president’ of ours, Barack Obama, is getting the
billions of dollars being wasted on his corrupt campaign? From the
say-they-are-poor Democrats, that’s who! Hang Obama for TREASON!
There isn’t a Christian bone in his body. He is the anti-Christ, bent
on controlling, and destroying, the entire world!
>
> As it is today the masses are brainwashed
> by the Mass Media and search engines like Google
> to accept a small set of leaders
worry about the media ever gaining effective control of government
again!!!!!
> and politicians in the "acceptable" group
> are bought and controlled by Internationalists
> motivated by power and riches, rather than
> the greatest good for the greatest number.
motivation for my having written my New Constitution! With regards,
— NoEinstein — AKA John A. Armistead, Author and Patriot.
> Tom Potterhttp://tom-potter.telhttps://tdp1001.jux.com/
NoEinstein
Oct 10, 2012, 7:02:38 AM10/10/12
to
you make on any of my posts or "talking station" (post of another) of
the moment. HahaHanson and Tom Potter have done that quite well.
Won't others give replying a try, too? Google doesn't always update
the threads so that people can find where I have been replying. I
recommend that you SERIOUS readers copy the http address bar of
threads of mine you wish to follow. At any given time, there won't be
more than four or five, and even less if the readers will actually
start interacting. I need your active involvement, and the world
needs you, too. Be SERIOUS and start replying!!!!! — John A.
NoEinstein
Oct 10, 2012, 7:05:58 AM10/10/12
to
>
> read more »- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
NoEinstein
Oct 17, 2012, 9:55:05 PM10/17/12
to
On Oct 10, 7:05 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
Dear Readers: Google isn't yet showing the present post in my
profile. The following link is to some of my meatier, essay-like
replies on can-be-finicky Political Forum news group. Please copy and
past what I say on other sites and blogs so my save-the-USA messages
can get out. Thanks! John A. Armistead, Author and Patriot
https://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/4a4f50f4ad095c78/6f58eab6bf751173?hl=en#6f58eab6bf751173
>
Dear Readers: Google isn't yet showing the present post in my
profile. The following link is to some of my meatier, essay-like
replies on can-be-finicky Political Forum news group. Please copy and
past what I say on other sites and blogs so my save-the-USA messages
can get out. Thanks! John A. Armistead, Author and Patriot
https://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/4a4f50f4ad095c78/6f58eab6bf751173?hl=en#6f58eab6bf751173
NoEinstein
Oct 22, 2012, 12:50:41 PM10/22/12
to
On Oct 17, 9:55 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
Dear Readers: The height of Glenn Beck’s patriotic fervor on Fox
News, three years ago, was when he showed up wearing combat boots. At
the end of that particular show, he boldly told his viewing audience
that he would not take off those combat boots until our out-of-control
government is reined-in. That was about the time that the ‘Tea Party’
was stressing having government be fiscally responsible as well as
answerable to the Will of the People. I was disappointed that Beck,
to my knowledge, only wore combat boots that one day. He mentioned on
a subsequent show that he had been getting death threats. He also
mentioned that the Obama administration had given out a directive
allowing ‘terrorists’ to be shot, with impunity, for threatening this
country in any way. In a very short time, the “steam” was taken out
of Beck’s TV show. The show’s decline coincided with his shift of
topic away from… “revolt!” and toward American history and the
righteousness of our fore bearers. That must have struck a responsive
chord with the religious right, because over 700,000 people showed up
for his Washington rally, last year, including a flight of curious
Canada geese.
At the rally, Beck said that there might be a young “George
Washington” in the crowd who will one day straighten out our many
governmental woes. For the ‘latter’, post-revolt Beck, the solutions
to what ails this country are things in the future, not things in the
present. Perhaps to prove that his intentions are peaceful, he
shifted emphasis from “now” to future, and from “us” to God, as though
there are no solutions to be found without help from the Devine.
Judging by the attendance, or non attendance, at his next gathering,
the steam seemed to have gone out of the latter rallying-cry, too.
I was and am offended by those who see saving the USA as some slow,
work-within-the-system process. This anecdote, with a message, is
apt: The low-lying areas of a town were flooding. When it became
obvious that a man’s home was in the path, he climbed up on the roof
of the porch. A neighbor, with a row boat, offered to transport him
to safe ground, but he said, “I’m fine; the Lord will take care of
me.” The water kept rising, so the man climbed up onto the higher,
main roof. A police power boat came by. Again, the man said, “I’m
fine; the Lord will take care of me.” Not long after that the man was
forced to climb up onto his chimney in order to be above water. A
Coast Guard helicopter dangled a life ring on a rope, but the man
waved it away, saying, “I’m fine, the Lord will look after me.” Half
an hour later, this same, now angry, man was at the Pearly Gate. He
told Saint Peter: “I put my FAITH in the Lord and he let me down!” To
which Saint Peter replied: “No He didn’t! Who do you think sent those
two boats and that helicopter?”
It doesn’t require a young “George Washington” politician… to save the
USA, it only requires me, John A. Armistead. I’m a wise, patriotic
and super-intelligent man. I’ve worked for 16 plus years, OUTSIDE of
the corrupt political processes, to quite easily SAVE the USA in just
a single day. My work is substantially completed; it is our ‘New
Constitution of the United States of America‘! The premise of such is
this: There are simple and optimum ways of doing things that can
benefit the vast majority of Americans, without the constant group-
against-group fighting that many, like the media, consider to be
sport, but I consider to be the surest routes to our doom as a nation.
As the present race for President is drawing to a close, it will be
obvious that most Americans are pinning their hopes on the “next”
executive and on the “next” Congress. But like “tomorrow”, the “next”
never really comes. History shows that government seldom satisfies
more than about 50% of the people. Those who wind up on the losing
side will resolve, one day after the election, to keep fighting for
the ideals of the particular group(s) that they champion. My
socioeconomic book, ‘The Shortest Distance; Harmony Through
Prosperity’ explains how a flourishing capitalist, free-enterprise
system is the ONLY ONE capable of benefiting the vast majority of
Americans, and with little or no input being required from
government(s)!
This one, short requirement (***) in my “NC”, defines our country’s
governmental ideal:
“Article VI:
Section 1: Laws in effect when this New Constitution is ratified
shall remain in effect while such are systematically reviewed, debated
and revoted in the House. Whether for the revoting of existing laws
and regulations or for new bills, early and conspicuous public notice
in the media shall invite Public input. Bills passing without broad
and substantiated Public input, especially by those law-abiding
Citizens most affected by the legislation, shall not become laws. The
House shall make new laws and define procedures for implementing this
New Constitution. Federal functions to be shifted to local or state
governments shall be phased out gradually to be considerate of those
to be displaced or relocated. Under this New Constitution the future
state taxes on Citizens or businesses, typically, shall not exceed
their former total of state and federal taxes. No public records
shall be kept, beyond two years, on individual or business taxes
paid. ***At any level of services provided, streamlining government
and minimizing bureaucracy via wise laws shall always be primary
goals.”
In my book, mentioned two paragraphs above, I suggest that taxation at
about 10% of the GNP would be ideal. My “NC” stipulates: “Except as
allowed elsewhere in this constitution, there shall be no taxes, fees,
licenses or other payments that are prorated based on income or
personal property; nor taxes on the free transfer of estates to
rightful heirs and/or assigns.”
On day one following the ratification of my “NC” the IRS will be in
phase-out mode. The sole means the federal government shall have for
raising revenue is as follows:
“The federal government’s only revenue tax shall be a single item tax
of the individual states and territories, in total, not to exceed 15%
of the previous year’s gross national product. The tax rate shall be
uniform for states in proportion to the total population of each
state, but may be adjusted downward for territories, only, if such
receive greatly reduced services. The House authors bills of
revenue, but no increase in federal taxes on the states shall be made
without 55% of the voters so approving on election day, and no
increase beyond 15% of the previous year’s gross national product
shall be allowed without an amendment to this constitution ratified in
a referendum by 75% of the People voting. Accounting methods for
determining gross national product shall be consistent and untampered
with for any purpose of tax increase. ‘Government shall function
within its means, without an inflationary over-printing of currency.
The stated rate of return on government guaranteed bonds, and/or tax
exempt bonds, shall always be—at the time of purchase—15% lower than
similar non guaranteed, or non tax exempt bonds in the private
sector.* Publicly traded stocks shall be valued, at time of purchase
or sale, at the average worth in the prior six months.*’ The House
shall author bills of appropriation within budget; in addition, the
President shall have Line Item Veto power on all such bills, except if
overruled by a 60% vote of the House. ‘12 years from the adoption of
this New Constitution, and following a successful two year test in two
or more states, taxation in the USA shall be changed to sales tax and
fuel tax, only—at a max. conglomerate rate per annum of **35% of the
GNP—home food and medicines excluded. In addition, cities and
counties may charge the employers therein a nominal head tax on their
full time adult employees.*’
Note: The **35% of GNP, mentioned above, is in there solely to pay
for the truly needy as well as for the survival needs of those over 55
until such time as our expected burgeoning economy can allow the rest
of the populace to obtain needed security in non-government-affiliated
ways. Once the latter happens, probably in about three decades, the
BURDEN of governments will start approaching the 15% ideal, down from
35%! And each year, as that is happening, the amount of goods being
produced by industry, no longer encumbered by government taxation and
over-regulation, will increase the purchasing power of every American
by at least 30%! Please re read the last sentence!
At this very moment my New Constitution, in spirit, has the tacit
support of 100% of conservatives, and at least 50% of the loyalist
left. It might be hard for the left to fathom, but it is, primarily,
tradition and pressures to have year-in-and-year-out group solidarity
that accounts for most of the split-down-the-aisles differences among
the American people. The left continues to vote the straight liberal
ticket, because of their concerns for known, down-and-out family
members or acquaintances whom no liberal wants to see go without.
Since our out-of-control federal government keeps promising to be all-
things-for-all-people, liberals and progressives in government keep
thinking of ways to “give” without there being the money for doing
so. “Giving” without there being the money to “give” is presently
dooming the USA.
I believe that at the earned family budget level, most of us are
conservatives! With regularity, 85% of those polled say they are
dissatisfied with the present course of government. That means that a
New Constitution is just what we need! How many of you would prefer
living with less government intrusion in your lives? All that is
required is for each of us to accept that the disparate groups we have
long supported for giving us ‘power‘, aren’t helping our nation to do
the right things. “Groups DIVIDE the country; they almost never
unite the country.” Groups tend to do what the group leaders say.
Where is YOUR voice in all of this, and where is your freedom, and the
deserved freedoms of all Americans? Talk about what I have
unselfishly done for all of you, left and right. Talk about “Paying
it Forward”!
Respectfully submitted,
John A. Armistead
Author and Patriot
AKA NoEinstein on Google’s sci.physics news group
>
> On Oct 10, 7:05 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> Dear Readers: Google isn't yet showing the present post in my
> profile. The following link is to some of my meatier, essay-like
> replies on can-be-finicky Political Forum news group. Please copy and
> past what I say on other sites and blogs so my save-the-USA messages
> can get out. Thanks! John A. Armistead, Author and Patriot
>
> https://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/4...
>
Dear Readers: The height of Glenn Beck’s patriotic fervor on Fox
News, three years ago, was when he showed up wearing combat boots. At
the end of that particular show, he boldly told his viewing audience
that he would not take off those combat boots until our out-of-control
government is reined-in. That was about the time that the ‘Tea Party’
was stressing having government be fiscally responsible as well as
answerable to the Will of the People. I was disappointed that Beck,
to my knowledge, only wore combat boots that one day. He mentioned on
a subsequent show that he had been getting death threats. He also
mentioned that the Obama administration had given out a directive
allowing ‘terrorists’ to be shot, with impunity, for threatening this
country in any way. In a very short time, the “steam” was taken out
of Beck’s TV show. The show’s decline coincided with his shift of
topic away from… “revolt!” and toward American history and the
righteousness of our fore bearers. That must have struck a responsive
chord with the religious right, because over 700,000 people showed up
for his Washington rally, last year, including a flight of curious
Canada geese.
At the rally, Beck said that there might be a young “George
Washington” in the crowd who will one day straighten out our many
governmental woes. For the ‘latter’, post-revolt Beck, the solutions
to what ails this country are things in the future, not things in the
present. Perhaps to prove that his intentions are peaceful, he
shifted emphasis from “now” to future, and from “us” to God, as though
there are no solutions to be found without help from the Devine.
Judging by the attendance, or non attendance, at his next gathering,
the steam seemed to have gone out of the latter rallying-cry, too.
I was and am offended by those who see saving the USA as some slow,
work-within-the-system process. This anecdote, with a message, is
apt: The low-lying areas of a town were flooding. When it became
obvious that a man’s home was in the path, he climbed up on the roof
of the porch. A neighbor, with a row boat, offered to transport him
to safe ground, but he said, “I’m fine; the Lord will take care of
me.” The water kept rising, so the man climbed up onto the higher,
main roof. A police power boat came by. Again, the man said, “I’m
fine; the Lord will take care of me.” Not long after that the man was
forced to climb up onto his chimney in order to be above water. A
Coast Guard helicopter dangled a life ring on a rope, but the man
waved it away, saying, “I’m fine, the Lord will look after me.” Half
an hour later, this same, now angry, man was at the Pearly Gate. He
told Saint Peter: “I put my FAITH in the Lord and he let me down!” To
which Saint Peter replied: “No He didn’t! Who do you think sent those
two boats and that helicopter?”
It doesn’t require a young “George Washington” politician… to save the
USA, it only requires me, John A. Armistead. I’m a wise, patriotic
and super-intelligent man. I’ve worked for 16 plus years, OUTSIDE of
the corrupt political processes, to quite easily SAVE the USA in just
a single day. My work is substantially completed; it is our ‘New
Constitution of the United States of America‘! The premise of such is
this: There are simple and optimum ways of doing things that can
benefit the vast majority of Americans, without the constant group-
against-group fighting that many, like the media, consider to be
sport, but I consider to be the surest routes to our doom as a nation.
As the present race for President is drawing to a close, it will be
obvious that most Americans are pinning their hopes on the “next”
executive and on the “next” Congress. But like “tomorrow”, the “next”
never really comes. History shows that government seldom satisfies
more than about 50% of the people. Those who wind up on the losing
side will resolve, one day after the election, to keep fighting for
the ideals of the particular group(s) that they champion. My
socioeconomic book, ‘The Shortest Distance; Harmony Through
Prosperity’ explains how a flourishing capitalist, free-enterprise
system is the ONLY ONE capable of benefiting the vast majority of
Americans, and with little or no input being required from
government(s)!
This one, short requirement (***) in my “NC”, defines our country’s
governmental ideal:
“Article VI:
Section 1: Laws in effect when this New Constitution is ratified
shall remain in effect while such are systematically reviewed, debated
and revoted in the House. Whether for the revoting of existing laws
and regulations or for new bills, early and conspicuous public notice
in the media shall invite Public input. Bills passing without broad
and substantiated Public input, especially by those law-abiding
Citizens most affected by the legislation, shall not become laws. The
House shall make new laws and define procedures for implementing this
New Constitution. Federal functions to be shifted to local or state
governments shall be phased out gradually to be considerate of those
to be displaced or relocated. Under this New Constitution the future
state taxes on Citizens or businesses, typically, shall not exceed
their former total of state and federal taxes. No public records
shall be kept, beyond two years, on individual or business taxes
paid. ***At any level of services provided, streamlining government
and minimizing bureaucracy via wise laws shall always be primary
goals.”
In my book, mentioned two paragraphs above, I suggest that taxation at
about 10% of the GNP would be ideal. My “NC” stipulates: “Except as
allowed elsewhere in this constitution, there shall be no taxes, fees,
licenses or other payments that are prorated based on income or
personal property; nor taxes on the free transfer of estates to
rightful heirs and/or assigns.”
On day one following the ratification of my “NC” the IRS will be in
phase-out mode. The sole means the federal government shall have for
raising revenue is as follows:
“The federal government’s only revenue tax shall be a single item tax
of the individual states and territories, in total, not to exceed 15%
of the previous year’s gross national product. The tax rate shall be
uniform for states in proportion to the total population of each
state, but may be adjusted downward for territories, only, if such
receive greatly reduced services. The House authors bills of
revenue, but no increase in federal taxes on the states shall be made
without 55% of the voters so approving on election day, and no
increase beyond 15% of the previous year’s gross national product
shall be allowed without an amendment to this constitution ratified in
a referendum by 75% of the People voting. Accounting methods for
determining gross national product shall be consistent and untampered
with for any purpose of tax increase. ‘Government shall function
within its means, without an inflationary over-printing of currency.
The stated rate of return on government guaranteed bonds, and/or tax
exempt bonds, shall always be—at the time of purchase—15% lower than
similar non guaranteed, or non tax exempt bonds in the private
sector.* Publicly traded stocks shall be valued, at time of purchase
or sale, at the average worth in the prior six months.*’ The House
shall author bills of appropriation within budget; in addition, the
President shall have Line Item Veto power on all such bills, except if
overruled by a 60% vote of the House. ‘12 years from the adoption of
this New Constitution, and following a successful two year test in two
or more states, taxation in the USA shall be changed to sales tax and
fuel tax, only—at a max. conglomerate rate per annum of **35% of the
GNP—home food and medicines excluded. In addition, cities and
counties may charge the employers therein a nominal head tax on their
full time adult employees.*’
Note: The **35% of GNP, mentioned above, is in there solely to pay
for the truly needy as well as for the survival needs of those over 55
until such time as our expected burgeoning economy can allow the rest
of the populace to obtain needed security in non-government-affiliated
ways. Once the latter happens, probably in about three decades, the
BURDEN of governments will start approaching the 15% ideal, down from
35%! And each year, as that is happening, the amount of goods being
produced by industry, no longer encumbered by government taxation and
over-regulation, will increase the purchasing power of every American
by at least 30%! Please re read the last sentence!
At this very moment my New Constitution, in spirit, has the tacit
support of 100% of conservatives, and at least 50% of the loyalist
left. It might be hard for the left to fathom, but it is, primarily,
tradition and pressures to have year-in-and-year-out group solidarity
that accounts for most of the split-down-the-aisles differences among
the American people. The left continues to vote the straight liberal
ticket, because of their concerns for known, down-and-out family
members or acquaintances whom no liberal wants to see go without.
Since our out-of-control federal government keeps promising to be all-
things-for-all-people, liberals and progressives in government keep
thinking of ways to “give” without there being the money for doing
so. “Giving” without there being the money to “give” is presently
dooming the USA.
I believe that at the earned family budget level, most of us are
conservatives! With regularity, 85% of those polled say they are
dissatisfied with the present course of government. That means that a
New Constitution is just what we need! How many of you would prefer
living with less government intrusion in your lives? All that is
required is for each of us to accept that the disparate groups we have
long supported for giving us ‘power‘, aren’t helping our nation to do
the right things. “Groups DIVIDE the country; they almost never
unite the country.” Groups tend to do what the group leaders say.
Where is YOUR voice in all of this, and where is your freedom, and the
deserved freedoms of all Americans? Talk about what I have
unselfishly done for all of you, left and right. Talk about “Paying
it Forward”!
Respectfully submitted,
John A. Armistead
Author and Patriot
>
> On Oct 10, 7:05 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> Dear Readers: Google isn't yet showing the present post in my
> profile. The following link is to some of my meatier, essay-like
> replies on can-be-finicky Political Forum news group. Please copy and
> past what I say on other sites and blogs so my save-the-USA messages
> can get out. Thanks! John A. Armistead, Author and Patriot
>
NoEinstein
Oct 26, 2012, 6:14:00 PM10/26/12
to
On Oct 22, 12:50 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
Time was when the killing of an American citizen by any foreign
government, or by foreign government affiliates, and especially the
killing of an American public official, would cause immediate military
retaliation. There are records of emails that were sent to the White
House, and to other seats of departments of our government, that prove
that the White House was informed within one hour that an attack on
the US Embassy compound in Benghazi, Libya was under way. But the
White House did not order the immediate sending-in of troops, that
were as close as a mile away, to save, perhaps three of those who
would be killed within the next seven to eight hours.
Yesterday—apparently at the bequest of the Obama Administration—former
General Colen Powel went before the media to explain that it ‘took
time’ to realize what was going on in Libya and ‘took time’ to order
the launching of two drones to confirm what was happening. Powel then
gave this most criminally-shallow rationale: “We don’t send troops
into harm’s way without justification.”
First, by logic—which Colen Powel is apparently incapable of using—the
sending of troops to the embassy compound, when there wasn’t an attack
going on there, could not possibly place anyone in danger. Second,
Powel knew that troops would be going into “harm’s way”. So, the
White House, in a likely ‘Freudian slip’, indicates that they knew
there was fighting going on in Benghazi and knew that an American
diplomat and soldiers were in mortal danger—but they did nothing.
Here is how the White House could have, within one minute’s time,
determined the truth about what was “likely” happening at that embassy
compound, and without wasting hours ordering the launching of unarmed
drones. *** They could have phoned the people in that place and
asked: “Is the Embassy under attack?” A reply like: “Yes! Please
send military help, immediately!” should have caused helicopter gun
ships to be launched, and troop reinforcements to be dispatched.
To add insult to his own treasonous aiding-and-abetting of the ENEMY,
Barack Hussein Obama, Colen Powel went on the say, as he did in 2008,
that he continues to endorse Obama for President. Whether you like
him or not (I don‘t.), Charles Krauthammer supposed that there aren’t
ten people who will be swayed to vote for Obama because of Powel’s
endorsement. It’s amazing to me how someone with the “caged smarts”
of Charles Krauthammer doesn’t have the moral backbone to call Obama,
the Kenyan squatter-in-the-White House, a TRAITOR to the USA who
should be HANGED for treason. Isn’t it logical to use capital
punishment on THE most damaging “human” ever to set foot on American
soil? Isn’t “robbing” 4,000 plus dollars from every family in
America, and promoting a form of government that is dooming this
country, treason? The liberal publishers of Krauthammer’s
syndicated news commentary columns don’t think so. As a result, low-
morals Krauthammer JUMPS whenever his liberal bosses tell him how
high. Sad but true; sad but true.
The likely reason that Obama ’sacrificed’ those Americans in Benghazi
is this: One of the top “accomplishments” of his term—while he has
been squatting as President—was the killing of Osama Ben Laden. By
that deed, Obama and Biden have implied that the USA is safer from
terrorism. Obama has also been downsizing the military. He probably
realized that if he ordered military action that was too little too
late, his arguments for reducing our military would be shot all to
hell. There was a real possibility that if a huge and angry outcry
went up from the White House against Muslim extremists, that there
would be an immediate, greater risk of a deadly attack, here in the
USA. In either case, the demand on Obama’s time would reduce the
amount of campaigning he can do, and reduce his chances of continuing
to destroy our country via socialism and communism, in a… second term.
Most politicians are chameleons. Today, “Laughing” Joe Biden did a
credible job of eulogizing former Senator George McGovern—for whom I
had voted for president. Like millions of Americans, I was against
the Vietnam ’war’. My rationale is that no American should be asked
to “go-into-harm’s-way” for any reason not supported by the vast
majority of Americans. When the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor, the
vast majority of Americans were in favor of fighting. But there
wasn’t even a simple majority of Americans agreeing that our young men
risk all in Vietnam.
I had forgotten that McGovern was responsible for “food stamps”. As I
would gradually figure out, “charity” should be dispensed by private
citizens, close to home, and seldom if ever should be dispensed by
government programs. If McGovern were alive, today, I wouldn’t vote
for him. But if Biden was as consistently nice in “tone” as he was,
today, at McGovern’s funeral, there would probably be more people
willing to vote Obama-Biden. Of course, both of those men are
criminals of the highest order. Both should be arrested,
immediately! Two billion dollars is a shameful amount of money to
waste on any campaign for President. My New Constitution will END
state by state campaigning once and for all! From Article II, Section
4:
“… Candidates for public office shall be disqualified for: soliciting
televised nationally—and held no sooner than four months before the
specific election.”
Best wishes to all Americans who are good at heart.
Respectfully submitted,
John A. Armistead, Author and Patriot
> New ...
>
> read more »
>
Time was when the killing of an American citizen by any foreign
government, or by foreign government affiliates, and especially the
killing of an American public official, would cause immediate military
retaliation. There are records of emails that were sent to the White
House, and to other seats of departments of our government, that prove
that the White House was informed within one hour that an attack on
the US Embassy compound in Benghazi, Libya was under way. But the
White House did not order the immediate sending-in of troops, that
were as close as a mile away, to save, perhaps three of those who
would be killed within the next seven to eight hours.
Yesterday—apparently at the bequest of the Obama Administration—former
General Colen Powel went before the media to explain that it ‘took
time’ to realize what was going on in Libya and ‘took time’ to order
the launching of two drones to confirm what was happening. Powel then
gave this most criminally-shallow rationale: “We don’t send troops
into harm’s way without justification.”
First, by logic—which Colen Powel is apparently incapable of using—the
sending of troops to the embassy compound, when there wasn’t an attack
going on there, could not possibly place anyone in danger. Second,
Powel knew that troops would be going into “harm’s way”. So, the
White House, in a likely ‘Freudian slip’, indicates that they knew
there was fighting going on in Benghazi and knew that an American
diplomat and soldiers were in mortal danger—but they did nothing.
Here is how the White House could have, within one minute’s time,
determined the truth about what was “likely” happening at that embassy
compound, and without wasting hours ordering the launching of unarmed
drones. *** They could have phoned the people in that place and
asked: “Is the Embassy under attack?” A reply like: “Yes! Please
send military help, immediately!” should have caused helicopter gun
ships to be launched, and troop reinforcements to be dispatched.
To add insult to his own treasonous aiding-and-abetting of the ENEMY,
Barack Hussein Obama, Colen Powel went on the say, as he did in 2008,
that he continues to endorse Obama for President. Whether you like
him or not (I don‘t.), Charles Krauthammer supposed that there aren’t
ten people who will be swayed to vote for Obama because of Powel’s
endorsement. It’s amazing to me how someone with the “caged smarts”
of Charles Krauthammer doesn’t have the moral backbone to call Obama,
the Kenyan squatter-in-the-White House, a TRAITOR to the USA who
should be HANGED for treason. Isn’t it logical to use capital
punishment on THE most damaging “human” ever to set foot on American
soil? Isn’t “robbing” 4,000 plus dollars from every family in
America, and promoting a form of government that is dooming this
country, treason? The liberal publishers of Krauthammer’s
syndicated news commentary columns don’t think so. As a result, low-
morals Krauthammer JUMPS whenever his liberal bosses tell him how
high. Sad but true; sad but true.
The likely reason that Obama ’sacrificed’ those Americans in Benghazi
is this: One of the top “accomplishments” of his term—while he has
been squatting as President—was the killing of Osama Ben Laden. By
that deed, Obama and Biden have implied that the USA is safer from
terrorism. Obama has also been downsizing the military. He probably
realized that if he ordered military action that was too little too
late, his arguments for reducing our military would be shot all to
hell. There was a real possibility that if a huge and angry outcry
went up from the White House against Muslim extremists, that there
would be an immediate, greater risk of a deadly attack, here in the
USA. In either case, the demand on Obama’s time would reduce the
amount of campaigning he can do, and reduce his chances of continuing
to destroy our country via socialism and communism, in a… second term.
Most politicians are chameleons. Today, “Laughing” Joe Biden did a
credible job of eulogizing former Senator George McGovern—for whom I
had voted for president. Like millions of Americans, I was against
the Vietnam ’war’. My rationale is that no American should be asked
to “go-into-harm’s-way” for any reason not supported by the vast
majority of Americans. When the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor, the
vast majority of Americans were in favor of fighting. But there
wasn’t even a simple majority of Americans agreeing that our young men
risk all in Vietnam.
I had forgotten that McGovern was responsible for “food stamps”. As I
would gradually figure out, “charity” should be dispensed by private
citizens, close to home, and seldom if ever should be dispensed by
government programs. If McGovern were alive, today, I wouldn’t vote
for him. But if Biden was as consistently nice in “tone” as he was,
today, at McGovern’s funeral, there would probably be more people
willing to vote Obama-Biden. Of course, both of those men are
criminals of the highest order. Both should be arrested,
immediately! Two billion dollars is a shameful amount of money to
waste on any campaign for President. My New Constitution will END
state by state campaigning once and for all! From Article II, Section
4:
“… Candidates for public office shall be disqualified for: soliciting
the votes of any ideologically-biased group or obtaining the
endorsement of such a group, as by addressing a gathering that is
composed only of the biased members of such; soliciting new voter
registrants; and aiding or organizing the transportation of voters to
the polls. The winners in national elections shall be determined only
by the popular vote totals, irrespective of State borders. Therefore,
any candidate for such offices shall be disqualified for making
campaign appearances to target the voters of any state, county or
city. Voters shall make their decisions based on non-media-sponsored
televised debates and on fair and unscripted candidate interviews—
endorsement of such a group, as by addressing a gathering that is
composed only of the biased members of such; soliciting new voter
registrants; and aiding or organizing the transportation of voters to
the polls. The winners in national elections shall be determined only
by the popular vote totals, irrespective of State borders. Therefore,
any candidate for such offices shall be disqualified for making
campaign appearances to target the voters of any state, county or
city. Voters shall make their decisions based on non-media-sponsored
televised nationally—and held no sooner than four months before the
specific election.”
Best wishes to all Americans who are good at heart.
Respectfully submitted,
John A. Armistead, Author and Patriot
AKA NoEinstein on Google’s sci.physics
>
>
>
> read more »
NoEinstein
Oct 29, 2012, 9:11:10 PM10/29/12
to
On Oct 26, 6:14 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
Folks: I know, by logic, and sometimes by 'vibes', that those in the
media are reading this and similar posts regarding my "New
Constitution" or "NC". A big reason I get so few comments is because
most in the media would get fired for acknowledging, in any way, what
I have done for the American people. People making huge salaries
working for years before the cameras, must realize, in their gut, that
filtering "the news" through the almost always biased media runs
counter to all principles of democracy. When the Founding Fathers
guaranteed "freedom of the press" what they were wishing to do was to
make sure the people "out there" could get to find out what important
things are happening that would likely affect how the People will vote
on election day.
The Founding Fathers were NOT assenting to allowing "the press" to use
their power to cause the voters to vote like the press wants, rather
than like the REAL news will cause the people to vote! It is the anti-
thesis of a fair Representative Republic to have the unsanctioned
press deciding how the voters should vote, and then slanting the news,
or "filtering out" the news, so that the gullible citizens will do
like the press wishes. Is the USA government of the People, by the
People, and for the People? Or is it government of the press, by the
press and for the press? Only by castrating and neutering the press,
will the USA ever have a chance to be, for the first time in our
history, a democracy on demand republic! The democracy part will come
into play to allow the popular vote of the people to decide
controversial issues like abortion. I can assure thinking women,
everywhere, that the right to early term abortions shall never be
taken away by court decision, nor by the vote of the House. (There
will never again be an oligarchy Senate!)
Any 'group' that doesn't want the citizens to decide controversial
issues simply doesn't want government to be fair. Realize that under
my "NC" the Supreme Court will never again decide any truly
controversial issues. Hear THAT, those in black robes? Ha, ha, HA!
— John A. Armistead —
>
Folks: I know, by logic, and sometimes by 'vibes', that those in the
media are reading this and similar posts regarding my "New
Constitution" or "NC". A big reason I get so few comments is because
most in the media would get fired for acknowledging, in any way, what
I have done for the American people. People making huge salaries
working for years before the cameras, must realize, in their gut, that
filtering "the news" through the almost always biased media runs
counter to all principles of democracy. When the Founding Fathers
guaranteed "freedom of the press" what they were wishing to do was to
make sure the people "out there" could get to find out what important
things are happening that would likely affect how the People will vote
on election day.
The Founding Fathers were NOT assenting to allowing "the press" to use
their power to cause the voters to vote like the press wants, rather
than like the REAL news will cause the people to vote! It is the anti-
thesis of a fair Representative Republic to have the unsanctioned
press deciding how the voters should vote, and then slanting the news,
or "filtering out" the news, so that the gullible citizens will do
like the press wishes. Is the USA government of the People, by the
People, and for the People? Or is it government of the press, by the
press and for the press? Only by castrating and neutering the press,
will the USA ever have a chance to be, for the first time in our
history, a democracy on demand republic! The democracy part will come
into play to allow the popular vote of the people to decide
controversial issues like abortion. I can assure thinking women,
everywhere, that the right to early term abortions shall never be
taken away by court decision, nor by the vote of the House. (There
will never again be an oligarchy Senate!)
Any 'group' that doesn't want the citizens to decide controversial
issues simply doesn't want government to be fair. Realize that under
my "NC" the Supreme Court will never again decide any truly
controversial issues. Hear THAT, those in black robes? Ha, ha, HA!
— John A. Armistead —
NoEinstein
Nov 3, 2012, 6:00:53 PM11/3/12
to
On Oct 29, 9:11 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
Folks: As the presidential election nears, the two (yes,
unconstitutional) parties are pinning their hopes on having group
solidarity, and high group turnout. If, and probably when, Romney-
Ryan win, very little of the actual cancer that is socialism and
communism will have been cut out. Effectively, it will be business as
usual in Washington with this country still split close to 47% to 47%
‘down-the-aisle’. Haven’t we all “been-there-done-that-bought-the-tee-
shirt?” Is the USA any better off with the G. D. media rejoicing how
effectively they have made the sickening game of politics into a
national, non-stop, year-in-year-out sport? Is the USA any better off
because of the thousands of voter-usurping polls that have been taken
that have only served to seduce viewers into watching the
advertisements on “news” finger-down-the-throat networks? Is the
dissatisfaction of up to 85% of the citizens over the direction the
USA is headed suddenly going away just because of a (likely) change in
the “leadership” in the White House? Absolutely not!
Those who want to GET from government, “without giving”, will be even
more determined to lie, cheat and steal their way back into power in
the next two or four years. It is a virtual certainty that few, if
any, non-ego-maniacs will venture into the political arena. And only
those with large private fortunes, who are so unsavory to many, will
command the backing necessary to repeat the can-only-be-called-lunacy,
state-by-state campaigns that should have gone out of style with the
invention of the printing press. In short, the USA has WASTED the
time and part-of-the-“fortunes” of many on the “traditional” political
processes that have FAILED the people for well over a century.
Considering the fact that the US Senate is an UNCONSTITUTIONAL
oligarchy in a should be, but never has been, Representative Republic,
probably 90% of the supposed laws that have been passed since this
country was founded won’t pass the test of being “agreeable” to the
majority of Americans, then OR now.
Barack Obama, a non-American, was prohibited, by our Constitution from
running for, and somehow managing to “win” the White House. Over four
years ago, I was already tagging that traitor the Manchurian
Candidate. Comedian Victoria Jackson sang: “Though I sound like a
mouse, we have a communist living in the White House!” I find it
absolutely amazing how many supposed “good” public officials, out of
“respect” for the “Office of the President” have allowed the most
damaging to the USA individual in our entire history, Barack Hussein
Obama, to decimate our Flag by having him stand in front of it as
though “America” is what that anti-Christ somehow represents! Here is
what my “NC” says about that:
“The American Flag shall be red, white, and readily discernable blue.
Only when the President or Secretary of State are *addressing the
“Courtrooms shall be devoid of gavels, seals, flags and oppressive
And… “It shall be a felony for any person—in the media or in any
public gathering—to deliberately foment racial or group-against-group
division by claiming there is bias. This New Constitution was
expressly written to stop unfair biases from harming any citizen or
group. So, any anti-group rhetoric is seeking power over others NOT
granted by the New Constitution. It shall be treason for any public
office holder or candidate for public office to deliberately and
consistently use anti-group rhetoric.”
And… “It shall be a felony for any government official, celebrity or
media idol—past or present—to publicly endorse or campaign on behalf
of any candidate for public office or job. Candidates for public
Folks, by the above standards, Barack Obama should have been arrested
on “day 1” when he and his coconspirator, Chief Justice John Roberts,
botched the oath of office requiring that the President DEFEND the
Constitution, when his recorded speeches clearly show that Obama
didn’t agree with the Constitution LIMITING what government can do,
and for not being redistributive enough. Note: The latter
“redistribution” was clearly socialism—socialism that was, and is, the
anti-thesis of a Representative Republic!
Because I am technology savvy, I, and thousands of others like me,
have been flagrantly disrespected by the US Secret Service (All law-
abiding citizens must be respected!), when I and the rest realized
that the electronically-transmitted, purported birth certificate of
Barack Obama was a LAYERED PDF file that showed the background
erasures with the “birth data” typed in on the erased places, I knew
such was proof that Barack Obama is a TRAITOR to the USA! Fifty
years ago when Obama was born, there was no such thing as PDF files!
And there was no KENYA, as a national name, where Obama’s father was
an apparent Citizen. And add to that the fact that there is no
evidence that Obama’s mother was ever listed as having given birth in
any hospital in Hawaii.
Since our present Constitution defines “giving aid and comfort to the
enemy” as treason, and since the US Secret Service shirked its sworn
duty, as THE top document fraud agency in the USA, by protecting our
FRAUDULENT president, then those responsible, as for Obama himself,
are guilty of capital treason. The latter is under our present
Constitution. My “NC” makes things even clearer:
“All local, state and federal officer holders and employees—upon
taking office or assuming employment—shall take the following oath:
“I, (Name), promise to serve and be deferential to the People, and to
be unbiased toward any group with a pro democracy, pro fairness
ideology. I swear to honor and uphold the full civil rights of the
citizens, as guaranteed by the New Constitution, and I shall expect my
coworkers and superiors to do the same. I understand that my
employment in or by government is conditional upon my adherence to
this oath.” No employee nor office holder shall be sanctioned for
making complaints against another office holder, employee or
superior. No government employee nor office holder shall be coerced
into wrongdoing, immoral action or non action, or illegality by a real
or implied threat of the loss of one’s job, promotion or benefits, nor
by any bribe or promise of promotion or benefits. Making such a
threat, bribe or promise is a felony carrying a minimum ten year
prison sentence—and if part of a pattern—making such threats, bribes
or promises is treason. Acquiescing to such is a felony. Government
officials, agents or employees who become aware of corruption in
government or in any of its departments shall notify the Executive
Branch and the courts; willful failure to do so is a felony. With
impunity, a government officer(s) or employee(s) shall enforce no law
nor perform any order or directive which violates their personal moral
conscience or their oath.”
Clint Eastwood and I agree that those who fail to perform their jobs
should be fired. 75% of the problems with our government(s) are
PERSONNEL problems. My “NC” will correct the bad personnel problems
once and for all! And it will guarantee the equality of opportunity
and freedom from unjustified discrimination fought for so hard by our
citizens. Please ponder these things during the cheers or the tears
following Tuesday’s most important election. And know this: My “NC”
will successfully excise the socialist-communist cancer in our
governments, and it will do so while fostering the capitalist
PROSPERITY that will benefit the vast majority of Americans, not just
those on the extreme left or right. Remember this: “United we stand;
divided we fall.”
>
Folks: As the presidential election nears, the two (yes,
unconstitutional) parties are pinning their hopes on having group
solidarity, and high group turnout. If, and probably when, Romney-
Ryan win, very little of the actual cancer that is socialism and
communism will have been cut out. Effectively, it will be business as
usual in Washington with this country still split close to 47% to 47%
‘down-the-aisle’. Haven’t we all “been-there-done-that-bought-the-tee-
shirt?” Is the USA any better off with the G. D. media rejoicing how
effectively they have made the sickening game of politics into a
national, non-stop, year-in-year-out sport? Is the USA any better off
because of the thousands of voter-usurping polls that have been taken
that have only served to seduce viewers into watching the
advertisements on “news” finger-down-the-throat networks? Is the
dissatisfaction of up to 85% of the citizens over the direction the
USA is headed suddenly going away just because of a (likely) change in
the “leadership” in the White House? Absolutely not!
Those who want to GET from government, “without giving”, will be even
more determined to lie, cheat and steal their way back into power in
the next two or four years. It is a virtual certainty that few, if
any, non-ego-maniacs will venture into the political arena. And only
those with large private fortunes, who are so unsavory to many, will
command the backing necessary to repeat the can-only-be-called-lunacy,
state-by-state campaigns that should have gone out of style with the
invention of the printing press. In short, the USA has WASTED the
time and part-of-the-“fortunes” of many on the “traditional” political
processes that have FAILED the people for well over a century.
Considering the fact that the US Senate is an UNCONSTITUTIONAL
oligarchy in a should be, but never has been, Representative Republic,
probably 90% of the supposed laws that have been passed since this
country was founded won’t pass the test of being “agreeable” to the
majority of Americans, then OR now.
Barack Obama, a non-American, was prohibited, by our Constitution from
running for, and somehow managing to “win” the White House. Over four
years ago, I was already tagging that traitor the Manchurian
Candidate. Comedian Victoria Jackson sang: “Though I sound like a
mouse, we have a communist living in the White House!” I find it
absolutely amazing how many supposed “good” public officials, out of
“respect” for the “Office of the President” have allowed the most
damaging to the USA individual in our entire history, Barack Hussein
Obama, to decimate our Flag by having him stand in front of it as
though “America” is what that anti-Christ somehow represents! Here is
what my “NC” says about that:
“The American Flag shall be red, white, and readily discernable blue.
Only when the President or Secretary of State are *addressing the
nation or appearing before or receiving foreign dignitaries
(*campaigning doesn’t qualify!) shall the American Flag, bunting, or
flag-color drapes be used as a backdrop. No other public official nor
candidate shall use such. Flags shall not be displayed in or outside
of government buildings other than: public schools, post offices,
military bases, memorials, the White House, the Pentagon, and outside
of the Capital or other government seats. Use this public oath: “I
Pledge Allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America and to
the Democracy-on-demand Republic for which it stands. We’re One
Nation of individuals who champion fair play, maximum civil liberties,
the Right of Self-determination, and having an efficient, unobtrusive
and deferential government.”
candidate shall use such. Flags shall not be displayed in or outside
of government buildings other than: public schools, post offices,
military bases, memorials, the White House, the Pentagon, and outside
of the Capital or other government seats. Use this public oath: “I
Pledge Allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America and to
the Democracy-on-demand Republic for which it stands. We’re One
Nation of individuals who champion fair play, maximum civil liberties,
the Right of Self-determination, and having an efficient, unobtrusive
“Courtrooms shall be devoid of gavels, seals, flags and oppressive
art, and no design feature nor process shall imply that judges or
justices represent government or respond patly or collectively. It is
TREASON for a judge or justice to rule with disfavor on the supremacy
of a fair democracy.”
justices represent government or respond patly or collectively. It is
TREASON for a judge or justice to rule with disfavor on the supremacy
And… “It shall be a felony for any person—in the media or in any
public gathering—to deliberately foment racial or group-against-group
division by claiming there is bias. This New Constitution was
expressly written to stop unfair biases from harming any citizen or
group. So, any anti-group rhetoric is seeking power over others NOT
granted by the New Constitution. It shall be treason for any public
office holder or candidate for public office to deliberately and
consistently use anti-group rhetoric.”
And… “It shall be a felony for any government official, celebrity or
media idol—past or present—to publicly endorse or campaign on behalf
of any candidate for public office or job. Candidates for public
office shall be disqualified for: soliciting the votes of any
ideologically-biased group or working to obtain the endorsement of
such a group, as by addressing a gathering that is composed only of
the biased members of such; soliciting new voter registrants; and
aiding or organizing the transportation of voters to the polls. The
winners in national elections shall be determined only by the popular
vote totals, irrespective of State borders. Therefore, any candidate
for such offices shall be disqualified for making campaign appearances
to target the voters of any state, county or city. Voters shall make
their decisions based on non-media-sponsored televised debates and on
fair and unscripted candidate interviews—televised nationally—and held
no sooner than four months before the specific election.”
Lastly… “Deliberate use by any candidate, their staffs or election
the biased members of such; soliciting new voter registrants; and
aiding or organizing the transportation of voters to the polls. The
winners in national elections shall be determined only by the popular
vote totals, irrespective of State borders. Therefore, any candidate
for such offices shall be disqualified for making campaign appearances
to target the voters of any state, county or city. Voters shall make
their decisions based on non-media-sponsored televised debates and on
fair and unscripted candidate interviews—televised nationally—and held
no sooner than four months before the specific election.”
committees, of false or deceptive campaign speeches, slogans,
advertisements, humor, or innuendo is a felony. No organization, nor
part of the media, nor any special interest group(s) shall in any way
endorse a slate of candidates for public office; flagrant violation is
a felony.”
advertisements, humor, or innuendo is a felony. No organization, nor
part of the media, nor any special interest group(s) shall in any way
endorse a slate of candidates for public office; flagrant violation is
Folks, by the above standards, Barack Obama should have been arrested
on “day 1” when he and his coconspirator, Chief Justice John Roberts,
botched the oath of office requiring that the President DEFEND the
Constitution, when his recorded speeches clearly show that Obama
didn’t agree with the Constitution LIMITING what government can do,
and for not being redistributive enough. Note: The latter
“redistribution” was clearly socialism—socialism that was, and is, the
anti-thesis of a Representative Republic!
Because I am technology savvy, I, and thousands of others like me,
have been flagrantly disrespected by the US Secret Service (All law-
abiding citizens must be respected!), when I and the rest realized
that the electronically-transmitted, purported birth certificate of
Barack Obama was a LAYERED PDF file that showed the background
erasures with the “birth data” typed in on the erased places, I knew
such was proof that Barack Obama is a TRAITOR to the USA! Fifty
years ago when Obama was born, there was no such thing as PDF files!
And there was no KENYA, as a national name, where Obama’s father was
an apparent Citizen. And add to that the fact that there is no
evidence that Obama’s mother was ever listed as having given birth in
any hospital in Hawaii.
Since our present Constitution defines “giving aid and comfort to the
enemy” as treason, and since the US Secret Service shirked its sworn
duty, as THE top document fraud agency in the USA, by protecting our
FRAUDULENT president, then those responsible, as for Obama himself,
are guilty of capital treason. The latter is under our present
Constitution. My “NC” makes things even clearer:
“All local, state and federal officer holders and employees—upon
taking office or assuming employment—shall take the following oath:
“I, (Name), promise to serve and be deferential to the People, and to
be unbiased toward any group with a pro democracy, pro fairness
ideology. I swear to honor and uphold the full civil rights of the
citizens, as guaranteed by the New Constitution, and I shall expect my
coworkers and superiors to do the same. I understand that my
employment in or by government is conditional upon my adherence to
this oath.” No employee nor office holder shall be sanctioned for
making complaints against another office holder, employee or
superior. No government employee nor office holder shall be coerced
into wrongdoing, immoral action or non action, or illegality by a real
or implied threat of the loss of one’s job, promotion or benefits, nor
by any bribe or promise of promotion or benefits. Making such a
threat, bribe or promise is a felony carrying a minimum ten year
prison sentence—and if part of a pattern—making such threats, bribes
or promises is treason. Acquiescing to such is a felony. Government
officials, agents or employees who become aware of corruption in
government or in any of its departments shall notify the Executive
Branch and the courts; willful failure to do so is a felony. With
impunity, a government officer(s) or employee(s) shall enforce no law
nor perform any order or directive which violates their personal moral
conscience or their oath.”
Clint Eastwood and I agree that those who fail to perform their jobs
should be fired. 75% of the problems with our government(s) are
PERSONNEL problems. My “NC” will correct the bad personnel problems
once and for all! And it will guarantee the equality of opportunity
and freedom from unjustified discrimination fought for so hard by our
citizens. Please ponder these things during the cheers or the tears
following Tuesday’s most important election. And know this: My “NC”
will successfully excise the socialist-communist cancer in our
governments, and it will do so while fostering the capitalist
PROSPERITY that will benefit the vast majority of Americans, not just
those on the extreme left or right. Remember this: “United we stand;
divided we fall.”
NoEinstein
Nov 8, 2012, 5:15:50 PM11/8/12
to
On Nov 3, 5:00 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
Our broken government and the 2012 illegitimate election.
About two months ago, I saw on ‘Political Forum’ news group a link to
an article that was obviously written by a disillusioned
conservative. The author expressed the surprising wish that Obama
‘win’ the election. His rationale was that only by having a Democrat
president in power when the USA goes into economic collapse, will
there be any hope of squelching the socialist tide that has become so
dominant in this country.
Four years ago, after Obama—who is not even a legal American citizen—
“won” the election over McCain, 53 to 47, many of the obviously-not-
racist-conservatives were considerate enough of Obama to side with
Democrats and to indicate, in subsequent polls, more than 75%
‘hopefulness’ for Obama’s term. It would be learned within the first
year, that Obama’s idea of “working with Republicans” was for
Republicans to roll-over-and-play-dead, and to go along with anything
our socialist, and thus also illegitimate president dictated. That
same period of ’hopefulness’ caused many Republicans in Congress to
have a wait-and-see attitude. They were expecting to negotiate
meaningful compromises that were never sought.
The Obama Care debacle resulted in a ‘law’ that was so obviously not
wanted by the majority of Americans, that moderate Democrats—who would
be up for re election within months—realized that they, personally,
would be committing political suicide to continue to side with our,
obviously, dictatorial ’president’ on anything. The 2010 election saw
the tide turn to empower conservatives in the House to squelch any
further “congressional” routes to Obama’s socialism. As a result,
Obama stretched, to UNCONSTITUTIONAL levels, the power of the
president to bypass the authority of congress by issuing presidential
orders. He placed 'czars’ in control of many departments of government
—with the objective of stomping-out any state or other authority that
was in conflict with Obama not having total control of what happens in
this country. The latter, largely subliminal, power struggle never
became a big public campaign issue, though Romney mentioned
eliminating czars “on day one”.
Unfortunately for Obama, he is now facing a much wiser, still
Republican-controlled House that will not give him another year-long
grace period to ‘ascertain’ his character. Everyone knows Obama’s
character, or more particularly, his lack of character, by now.
The post election assessment of the political situation would probably
be ‘on-the-fence’ constitutional, because nothing anyone in the media
says, right now, will have much effect on the outcome of any election
or referenda. It was interesting to me to hear David Axelrod say that
Obama ‘won’ because of… the Democrats’ “ground game”. It was
explained that volunteers went door-to-door drumming-up support for
Obama. And the “get-out-the-vote”, in many cases, included rides to
the polls.
In South Carolina the sale of alcoholic beverages, in any form, is
prohibited on election days. In past times it had been common for
candidates to offer free liquor to anyone who would vote such-and-such
way. Clearly, doing that would be offering BRIBES for votes. In most
cases, offering bribes for doing things counter to the laws or counter
to the Constitution is, itself, a crime. Does anyone not realize how
serious bribing voters is?
The voting results show that over 70% of Hispanics voted for Obama.
During the last four years, Obama has made a conspicuous effort to
prohibit states, such as Arizona, from enforcing laws requiring proof
of citizenship for those stopped for other infractions that would
cause a prudent person to question the citizenship of the person
stopped. Obama doesn’t want the illegals who are presently working in
this country to have to show ID in order to continue employment, or to
be able to vote. Huge numbers of illegals come to the USA each year
for the expressed purpose of having a child born here, so that our…
’welfare state’ will pay for that child’s every need. At no point in
that process are the voters being allowed to say whether anything
about such goings-on is fair. Of course it is never fair to require
hard-working and taxpaying Americans to pay for free-loaders crossing
our borders illegally. Yet, the following is what is happening:
The Democrats “ground game” had biased individuals who were
sympathetic to Hispanic causes going door-to-door in Hispanic
communities to explain that a “vote for Obama” would be tantamount to
an assurance that government will be soft on immigration issues
relating to Mexico. A 70% vote for Obama, in an otherwise 52-48 race,
is an indication of the power of ILLEGAL BRIBES to influence the
outcome of a national election.
The 14th Amendment to our Constitution requires the equal protection
of the law. But where is equal protection, if our polling places are
being stacked with those from biased groups who will vote such and
such way, when the people who must PAY FOR the resulting unfairness
never get a chance to vote to the contrary? Since hardworking
conservatives are being asked to pay for those whose main “talent” is
to vote for the Democrats’ free lunches, then there is a clear
violation of the 14th amendment that DISQUALIFIES, or at least calls
into question, 100% of the Hispanic votes. Beyond what the present
Constitution says, here is what my New Constitution says:
“It shall be unlawful for any racial minority group already legally
residing in the USA to vote, or to pressure or coerce others to vote,
for the purpose of disallowing the full and complete control of
similar races, who reside outside the USA, relative to the latter
gaining entry—as by illegally crossing the borders of the USA.”
In lieu of the, perhaps, power of Voodoo dolls, Chief Justice John G.
Roberts will, again, be asked to swear-in Barack Hussein Obama in
2013. It is quite obvious that every day for the last four plus years
that Obama has willingly VIOLATED our existing Constitution, and
especially the SPIRIT and language of that document that requires that
the USA be a Representative Republic. Such a form of government shall
never allow taxation without the consent of the governed—especially
those law-abiding citizens who would be the ones taxed. Our
Constitution, as Obama decries, limit’s the powers of the federal
government, while attempting to make as much about government be as
fair as possible. Obama, on the other hand, wants to expand the
power of government and especially the ability of government to take
property or assets without recourse by the property holder. Doing the
latter is socialism, and socialism is the anti-thesis of our well-
motivated, but mostly toothless, present Constitution.
*** If the highest Justice in the Land, for the second time, accepts
the INSINCERE oath of office of one, who is, clearly, THE most
economically and socially hurtful FOREIGNER or native to ever set foot
on American soil, then Justice Roberts is, himself, in supreme
violation of the fiduciary responsibilities placed on him by our
present Constitution. The latter requires that Obama PROVE, to US
Secret Service standards, that his (PDF) birth certificate is
legitimate; and prove that he isn’t motivated to change our form of
government, in any way, from the one conceived by our Founding
Fathers. Unless Roberts disqualifies Obama from ever holding office
and orders the expeditious arrest of that treasonous bastard, I, as a
law-abiding and America-loving citizen, declare that Justice John G.
Roberts is a public OUTLAW guilty of capital crimes worthy of his
being otherwise hanged-by-the-neck until dead for treason. The
survival of the USA is more important than the criminal machinations
of anyone within our borders—high public office holders not
withstanding.
Respectfully submitted,
John A. Armistead
Author and Patriot
>
> governments, and it will ...
>
> read more »
>
Our broken government and the 2012 illegitimate election.
About two months ago, I saw on ‘Political Forum’ news group a link to
an article that was obviously written by a disillusioned
conservative. The author expressed the surprising wish that Obama
‘win’ the election. His rationale was that only by having a Democrat
president in power when the USA goes into economic collapse, will
there be any hope of squelching the socialist tide that has become so
dominant in this country.
Four years ago, after Obama—who is not even a legal American citizen—
“won” the election over McCain, 53 to 47, many of the obviously-not-
racist-conservatives were considerate enough of Obama to side with
Democrats and to indicate, in subsequent polls, more than 75%
‘hopefulness’ for Obama’s term. It would be learned within the first
year, that Obama’s idea of “working with Republicans” was for
Republicans to roll-over-and-play-dead, and to go along with anything
our socialist, and thus also illegitimate president dictated. That
same period of ’hopefulness’ caused many Republicans in Congress to
have a wait-and-see attitude. They were expecting to negotiate
meaningful compromises that were never sought.
The Obama Care debacle resulted in a ‘law’ that was so obviously not
wanted by the majority of Americans, that moderate Democrats—who would
be up for re election within months—realized that they, personally,
would be committing political suicide to continue to side with our,
obviously, dictatorial ’president’ on anything. The 2010 election saw
the tide turn to empower conservatives in the House to squelch any
further “congressional” routes to Obama’s socialism. As a result,
Obama stretched, to UNCONSTITUTIONAL levels, the power of the
president to bypass the authority of congress by issuing presidential
orders. He placed 'czars’ in control of many departments of government
—with the objective of stomping-out any state or other authority that
was in conflict with Obama not having total control of what happens in
this country. The latter, largely subliminal, power struggle never
became a big public campaign issue, though Romney mentioned
eliminating czars “on day one”.
Unfortunately for Obama, he is now facing a much wiser, still
Republican-controlled House that will not give him another year-long
grace period to ‘ascertain’ his character. Everyone knows Obama’s
character, or more particularly, his lack of character, by now.
The post election assessment of the political situation would probably
be ‘on-the-fence’ constitutional, because nothing anyone in the media
says, right now, will have much effect on the outcome of any election
or referenda. It was interesting to me to hear David Axelrod say that
Obama ‘won’ because of… the Democrats’ “ground game”. It was
explained that volunteers went door-to-door drumming-up support for
Obama. And the “get-out-the-vote”, in many cases, included rides to
the polls.
In South Carolina the sale of alcoholic beverages, in any form, is
prohibited on election days. In past times it had been common for
candidates to offer free liquor to anyone who would vote such-and-such
way. Clearly, doing that would be offering BRIBES for votes. In most
cases, offering bribes for doing things counter to the laws or counter
to the Constitution is, itself, a crime. Does anyone not realize how
serious bribing voters is?
The voting results show that over 70% of Hispanics voted for Obama.
During the last four years, Obama has made a conspicuous effort to
prohibit states, such as Arizona, from enforcing laws requiring proof
of citizenship for those stopped for other infractions that would
cause a prudent person to question the citizenship of the person
stopped. Obama doesn’t want the illegals who are presently working in
this country to have to show ID in order to continue employment, or to
be able to vote. Huge numbers of illegals come to the USA each year
for the expressed purpose of having a child born here, so that our…
’welfare state’ will pay for that child’s every need. At no point in
that process are the voters being allowed to say whether anything
about such goings-on is fair. Of course it is never fair to require
hard-working and taxpaying Americans to pay for free-loaders crossing
our borders illegally. Yet, the following is what is happening:
The Democrats “ground game” had biased individuals who were
sympathetic to Hispanic causes going door-to-door in Hispanic
communities to explain that a “vote for Obama” would be tantamount to
an assurance that government will be soft on immigration issues
relating to Mexico. A 70% vote for Obama, in an otherwise 52-48 race,
is an indication of the power of ILLEGAL BRIBES to influence the
outcome of a national election.
The 14th Amendment to our Constitution requires the equal protection
of the law. But where is equal protection, if our polling places are
being stacked with those from biased groups who will vote such and
such way, when the people who must PAY FOR the resulting unfairness
never get a chance to vote to the contrary? Since hardworking
conservatives are being asked to pay for those whose main “talent” is
to vote for the Democrats’ free lunches, then there is a clear
violation of the 14th amendment that DISQUALIFIES, or at least calls
into question, 100% of the Hispanic votes. Beyond what the present
Constitution says, here is what my New Constitution says:
“It shall be unlawful for any racial minority group already legally
residing in the USA to vote, or to pressure or coerce others to vote,
for the purpose of disallowing the full and complete control of
similar races, who reside outside the USA, relative to the latter
gaining entry—as by illegally crossing the borders of the USA.”
In lieu of the, perhaps, power of Voodoo dolls, Chief Justice John G.
Roberts will, again, be asked to swear-in Barack Hussein Obama in
2013. It is quite obvious that every day for the last four plus years
that Obama has willingly VIOLATED our existing Constitution, and
especially the SPIRIT and language of that document that requires that
the USA be a Representative Republic. Such a form of government shall
never allow taxation without the consent of the governed—especially
those law-abiding citizens who would be the ones taxed. Our
Constitution, as Obama decries, limit’s the powers of the federal
government, while attempting to make as much about government be as
fair as possible. Obama, on the other hand, wants to expand the
power of government and especially the ability of government to take
property or assets without recourse by the property holder. Doing the
latter is socialism, and socialism is the anti-thesis of our well-
motivated, but mostly toothless, present Constitution.
*** If the highest Justice in the Land, for the second time, accepts
the INSINCERE oath of office of one, who is, clearly, THE most
economically and socially hurtful FOREIGNER or native to ever set foot
on American soil, then Justice Roberts is, himself, in supreme
violation of the fiduciary responsibilities placed on him by our
present Constitution. The latter requires that Obama PROVE, to US
Secret Service standards, that his (PDF) birth certificate is
legitimate; and prove that he isn’t motivated to change our form of
government, in any way, from the one conceived by our Founding
Fathers. Unless Roberts disqualifies Obama from ever holding office
and orders the expeditious arrest of that treasonous bastard, I, as a
law-abiding and America-loving citizen, declare that Justice John G.
Roberts is a public OUTLAW guilty of capital crimes worthy of his
being otherwise hanged-by-the-neck until dead for treason. The
survival of the USA is more important than the criminal machinations
of anyone within our borders—high public office holders not
withstanding.
Respectfully submitted,
John A. Armistead
Author and Patriot
>
>
> read more »
NoEinstein
Nov 9, 2012, 8:18:17 PM11/9/12
to
On Nov 8, 5:15 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
Some of you folks may be interested in reading more regarding my years-
long odyssey to save the USA from corruption and socialism. My meaty
little book, 'The Shortest Distance; Harmony Through Prosperity', has
a chapter on spheres of influence that explains why it is counter
productive to band together in groups and to fight for one's personal
ideals at the expense of respecting the differing, but still
legitimate ideals of others. Such semi-autobiographical book is
available at http://www.virtualbookworm.com/bookstore/ or at Amazon.
About 90% of my 'New Constitution of the United States of America' has
been posted, deliberately in segments, so that there will be little
chance such heart-felt work will be 'blanket' slighted by the less
inspired. I have posted for two or three years on Political Forum
news group, only to realize that the Tico 'owner' of that site is a
political sadist, with inclination to "moderate" any idea he didn't
like. Freedom of Speech, especially on the Internet, is one of our
"last" great freedoms. Obama and liberals want to see that taken
away.
The links at the end are essays on political subjects that I've
written over the last five or six years. More recently, I've not been
making as many ''+new posts', but rather I have been putting essay-
like replies within posts that will remain active for a long time.
Any of you willing to go back into each of the more recent threads
will find some emotional, but always truthful assessments of our
broken government and how I am most qualified to FIX it.
Surprisingly, the majority of the problems with government are
personnel ones. In my "NC" I empower any law-abiding citizen who is
conversant on the New Constitution as a whole to FIRE (The Donald
would be amazed!) any employee of government or any public official
who violates that person's well-spelled-out civil liberties. Clint
Eastwood would be so proud!
"All local, state and federal officer holders and employees—upon
taking office or assuming employment—shall take the following oath:
“I, (Name), promise to serve and be deferential to the People, and to
be unbiased toward any group with a pro democracy, pro fairness
ideology. I swear to honor and uphold the full civil rights of the
citizens, as guaranteed by the New Constitution, and I shall expect my
coworkers and superiors to do the same. I understand that my
employment in or by government is conditional upon my adherence to
this oath.”
“The Will of the People is the foundation of government. So,
Citizens’ votes shall have parity without compromise. Principles of
fair play and democracy shall have supremacy in the USA. Any public
office holder who disavows or manifests disagreement with the latter
shall be guilty of treason. Those found guilty can be punished up to
and including the death penalty. Any government employee, media
figure or private person(s) who uses the authority or influence of
their job, or their celebrity, to argue against democracy and fair
play shall be guilty of a felony. Note: Fair play shall be defined as
any individual or group action that achieves positive results without
bias or partiality of the weak toward the strong nor of the strong
toward the weak and which doesn’t selfishly or maliciously exploit any
individual, group or class. None of the latter shall be allowed to
claim the personal property of others, or to limit the rights of others
—whether by government edict or private business rules—without first
obtaining the free consent of the property holder, or of the person or
group whose property is being taken or whose rights are being
limited. In no case shall fair play be defined as an entitlement of
an individual, group or class to have equality of lifestyle, material
possessions or any assisted living equivalent thereof paid for by
others. In the USA the ideal shall be to have reasonable equality of
opportunity for self determination of one’s own lifestyle and level of
personal achievement within our Free Enterprise System without
requiring government oversight.”
"Conclusion: This New Constitution, together with any and all
subsequent amendments, shall set the tone for all other laws that are
made or that shall be allowed to remain in force. The
constitutionality of laws may be brought into question by any law-
abiding, prudent Citizen conversant on the whole New Constitution.
When a law’s constitutionality is justifiably questioned,
determination of constitutionality shall be made by a qualified judge
or justice—thoughtfully and without bias—within six weeks. Any such
ruling by a judge or justice can be appealed to an upper court or to
the entire High Court on a first-come-first-serve basis.
This New Constitution empowers every Citizen with broad civil
rights that they may invoke at will without the necessity of the prior
involvement of counsel or of a judicial authority. Those in or
working for governments shall be subordinate to any Citizen demanding
civil rights. The rightfulness of any such demand may be brought into
question only by just and comprehensive proof—delivered at a later
date in writing—with the apt named official(s) being in full jeopardy
of such punishments as are herein defined, if they are in error."
I've been getting "vibes" from some 'name' people in the media
regarding my recent "stand-tall-and-carry-a-big-stick" reply. I've
also gotten 'smiling' vibes from Romney, who, rightfully, should
become our next LEGAL President! I will gladly explain my rationale
regarding any portion of my "NC", if a person with love in their heart
for the USA will simply ask. Remember what I often say: "Pay It
Forward!"! — John A. Armistead — Author and Patriot
Handwriting Analysis of Clinton, Obama, McCain and Einstein (is
Copyrighted.)
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/eed2bb0cf762e015/6173e270dee543b3?hl=en#6173e270dee543b3
Happy Days… !
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/9903367481ce7970/ae4338645fbefbf5?hl=en&lnk=st&q=Happy+Days...!#ae4338645fbefbf5
Happy Days... 2
http://groups.google.com/group/views/browse_thread/thread/d63f04a059491122/579a48e380c75116?hl=en#579a48e380c75116
Campaigning is a Science, too.
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/a83e59ee6ca4d1f5/b29f39ee45684d85?hl=en&lnk=st&q=#b29f39ee45684d85
OBAMA’S NOMINATION OF SOTOMAYOR BETRAYS DEMOCRACY
http://groups.google.com/group/views/browse_thread/thread/998870d93fd1a994?hl=en
USA IS BOTH SOOTHED AND BETRAYED BY RHETORIC
http://groups.google.com/group/views/browse_thread/thread/576e701e1d916343?hl=en
A Democracy Doesn’t Favor Media Figures and Celebrities
http://groups.google.com/group/views/browse_thread/thread/e6230d6402064fbd?hl=en
Changing the USA from a Police State
http://groups.google.com/group/views/browse_thread/thread/4b4b7fbd47ddbee6?hl=en
A Line Is Drawn in the Sand for the USA
http://groups.google.com/group/views/browse_thread/thread/11704cf2bc723291?hl=en
A TIME FOR TRUTH AND A TIME FOR LIES
http://groups.google.com/group/views/browse_thread/thread/d93ce51a4db71bcc?hl=en
Government ‘As You Like It’
http://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/ae6e586e2406bf76/0a27c2c9e0ab3902?hl=en#0a27c2c9e0ab3902
THE FOUNDING FATHERS WOULD NOT RECOGNIZE OUR GOVERNMENT, TODAY.
http://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/f3571de031791f1e/1ad0ffb427f2d671?hl=en#1ad0ffb427f2d671
PLAYING THE GAME TO BRING DOWN AMERICA
http://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/351908b1ce584e2b/de2b3c61d914bed1?hl=en#de2b3c61d914bed1
There’s Only One Way for the Tea Party Movement to WIN.
http://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/8ecb9014d9b7d3df/cbf5ac1d0ea558bd?hl=en#cbf5ac1d0ea558bd
Start the Revolution! Government is out-of-touch with the People!
http://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/c6047e7611e3f2db/4ed5ce8feba4bb37?hl=en#4ed5ce8feba4bb37
Wringing-the-Neck of Empty Ritual.
http://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/5ad27d8545a23076/3a6e4c81efd1074d?hl=en#3a6e4c81efd1074d
The USA is lost in the "Corn" of politics.
http://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/62032166072f9168/c1b14fcc9ddfd1ad?hl=en&lnk=gst&q=The+USA+is+lost+in+the+%E2%80%98Corn%E2%80%99+of+politics.#c1b14fcc9ddfd1ad
Democrats won’t be laughing for long.
http://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/78e57e299f62d5a8/93228d8aefd31c7c?hl=en&q=Democrats+won%27t+be+laughing+for+long.#93228d8aefd31c7c
Can Donald Trump fix the thin ice the USA is skating on?
http://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/4fe6e7e22bb629da/4787411ab88d014d?hl=en&q=Can+Donald+Trump+fix+the+thin+ice+the+USA+is+skating+on%3F#478
Building Obama’s Gallows
http://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/caef7db016310d60/5300df2a461e1aeb?hl=en%20\%205300df2a461e1aeb
Empty ritual is stymieing America’s hopes.
http://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/eaa28e46972c5466/44c5fa90d7a12b07?hl=en#44c5fa90d7a12b07
Save America by kicking all political rituals in the ass!
http://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/bf5b24a93a67bfe6/4711d3b984e5a4ff?hl=en#4711d3b984e5a4ff
Brainwashed by religious rituals
http://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/ebfad09eae27c37a/a8f5c9c30280cd30?hl=en#a8f5c9c30280cd30
Understanding Political ‘Science’
https://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/24264dc67b645e2f/d8aa3884a8477885?hl=en#d8aa3884a8477885
>
Some of you folks may be interested in reading more regarding my years-
long odyssey to save the USA from corruption and socialism. My meaty
little book, 'The Shortest Distance; Harmony Through Prosperity', has
a chapter on spheres of influence that explains why it is counter
productive to band together in groups and to fight for one's personal
ideals at the expense of respecting the differing, but still
legitimate ideals of others. Such semi-autobiographical book is
available at http://www.virtualbookworm.com/bookstore/ or at Amazon.
About 90% of my 'New Constitution of the United States of America' has
been posted, deliberately in segments, so that there will be little
chance such heart-felt work will be 'blanket' slighted by the less
inspired. I have posted for two or three years on Political Forum
news group, only to realize that the Tico 'owner' of that site is a
political sadist, with inclination to "moderate" any idea he didn't
like. Freedom of Speech, especially on the Internet, is one of our
"last" great freedoms. Obama and liberals want to see that taken
away.
The links at the end are essays on political subjects that I've
written over the last five or six years. More recently, I've not been
making as many ''+new posts', but rather I have been putting essay-
like replies within posts that will remain active for a long time.
Any of you willing to go back into each of the more recent threads
will find some emotional, but always truthful assessments of our
broken government and how I am most qualified to FIX it.
Surprisingly, the majority of the problems with government are
personnel ones. In my "NC" I empower any law-abiding citizen who is
conversant on the New Constitution as a whole to FIRE (The Donald
would be amazed!) any employee of government or any public official
who violates that person's well-spelled-out civil liberties. Clint
Eastwood would be so proud!
"All local, state and federal officer holders and employees—upon
taking office or assuming employment—shall take the following oath:
“I, (Name), promise to serve and be deferential to the People, and to
be unbiased toward any group with a pro democracy, pro fairness
ideology. I swear to honor and uphold the full civil rights of the
citizens, as guaranteed by the New Constitution, and I shall expect my
coworkers and superiors to do the same. I understand that my
employment in or by government is conditional upon my adherence to
this oath.”
Citizens’ votes shall have parity without compromise. Principles of
fair play and democracy shall have supremacy in the USA. Any public
office holder who disavows or manifests disagreement with the latter
shall be guilty of treason. Those found guilty can be punished up to
and including the death penalty. Any government employee, media
figure or private person(s) who uses the authority or influence of
their job, or their celebrity, to argue against democracy and fair
play shall be guilty of a felony. Note: Fair play shall be defined as
any individual or group action that achieves positive results without
bias or partiality of the weak toward the strong nor of the strong
toward the weak and which doesn’t selfishly or maliciously exploit any
individual, group or class. None of the latter shall be allowed to
claim the personal property of others, or to limit the rights of others
—whether by government edict or private business rules—without first
obtaining the free consent of the property holder, or of the person or
group whose property is being taken or whose rights are being
limited. In no case shall fair play be defined as an entitlement of
an individual, group or class to have equality of lifestyle, material
possessions or any assisted living equivalent thereof paid for by
others. In the USA the ideal shall be to have reasonable equality of
opportunity for self determination of one’s own lifestyle and level of
personal achievement within our Free Enterprise System without
requiring government oversight.”
"Conclusion: This New Constitution, together with any and all
subsequent amendments, shall set the tone for all other laws that are
made or that shall be allowed to remain in force. The
constitutionality of laws may be brought into question by any law-
abiding, prudent Citizen conversant on the whole New Constitution.
When a law’s constitutionality is justifiably questioned,
determination of constitutionality shall be made by a qualified judge
or justice—thoughtfully and without bias—within six weeks. Any such
ruling by a judge or justice can be appealed to an upper court or to
the entire High Court on a first-come-first-serve basis.
This New Constitution empowers every Citizen with broad civil
rights that they may invoke at will without the necessity of the prior
involvement of counsel or of a judicial authority. Those in or
working for governments shall be subordinate to any Citizen demanding
civil rights. The rightfulness of any such demand may be brought into
question only by just and comprehensive proof—delivered at a later
date in writing—with the apt named official(s) being in full jeopardy
of such punishments as are herein defined, if they are in error."
I've been getting "vibes" from some 'name' people in the media
regarding my recent "stand-tall-and-carry-a-big-stick" reply. I've
also gotten 'smiling' vibes from Romney, who, rightfully, should
become our next LEGAL President! I will gladly explain my rationale
regarding any portion of my "NC", if a person with love in their heart
for the USA will simply ask. Remember what I often say: "Pay It
Forward!"! — John A. Armistead — Author and Patriot
Handwriting Analysis of Clinton, Obama, McCain and Einstein (is
Copyrighted.)
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/eed2bb0cf762e015/6173e270dee543b3?hl=en#6173e270dee543b3
Happy Days… !
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/9903367481ce7970/ae4338645fbefbf5?hl=en&lnk=st&q=Happy+Days...!#ae4338645fbefbf5
Happy Days... 2
http://groups.google.com/group/views/browse_thread/thread/d63f04a059491122/579a48e380c75116?hl=en#579a48e380c75116
Campaigning is a Science, too.
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/a83e59ee6ca4d1f5/b29f39ee45684d85?hl=en&lnk=st&q=#b29f39ee45684d85
OBAMA’S NOMINATION OF SOTOMAYOR BETRAYS DEMOCRACY
http://groups.google.com/group/views/browse_thread/thread/998870d93fd1a994?hl=en
USA IS BOTH SOOTHED AND BETRAYED BY RHETORIC
http://groups.google.com/group/views/browse_thread/thread/576e701e1d916343?hl=en
A Democracy Doesn’t Favor Media Figures and Celebrities
http://groups.google.com/group/views/browse_thread/thread/e6230d6402064fbd?hl=en
Changing the USA from a Police State
http://groups.google.com/group/views/browse_thread/thread/4b4b7fbd47ddbee6?hl=en
A Line Is Drawn in the Sand for the USA
http://groups.google.com/group/views/browse_thread/thread/11704cf2bc723291?hl=en
A TIME FOR TRUTH AND A TIME FOR LIES
http://groups.google.com/group/views/browse_thread/thread/d93ce51a4db71bcc?hl=en
Government ‘As You Like It’
http://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/ae6e586e2406bf76/0a27c2c9e0ab3902?hl=en#0a27c2c9e0ab3902
THE FOUNDING FATHERS WOULD NOT RECOGNIZE OUR GOVERNMENT, TODAY.
http://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/f3571de031791f1e/1ad0ffb427f2d671?hl=en#1ad0ffb427f2d671
PLAYING THE GAME TO BRING DOWN AMERICA
http://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/351908b1ce584e2b/de2b3c61d914bed1?hl=en#de2b3c61d914bed1
There’s Only One Way for the Tea Party Movement to WIN.
http://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/8ecb9014d9b7d3df/cbf5ac1d0ea558bd?hl=en#cbf5ac1d0ea558bd
Start the Revolution! Government is out-of-touch with the People!
http://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/c6047e7611e3f2db/4ed5ce8feba4bb37?hl=en#4ed5ce8feba4bb37
Wringing-the-Neck of Empty Ritual.
http://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/5ad27d8545a23076/3a6e4c81efd1074d?hl=en#3a6e4c81efd1074d
The USA is lost in the "Corn" of politics.
http://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/62032166072f9168/c1b14fcc9ddfd1ad?hl=en&lnk=gst&q=The+USA+is+lost+in+the+%E2%80%98Corn%E2%80%99+of+politics.#c1b14fcc9ddfd1ad
Democrats won’t be laughing for long.
http://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/78e57e299f62d5a8/93228d8aefd31c7c?hl=en&q=Democrats+won%27t+be+laughing+for+long.#93228d8aefd31c7c
Can Donald Trump fix the thin ice the USA is skating on?
http://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/4fe6e7e22bb629da/4787411ab88d014d?hl=en&q=Can+Donald+Trump+fix+the+thin+ice+the+USA+is+skating+on%3F#478
Building Obama’s Gallows
http://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/caef7db016310d60/5300df2a461e1aeb?hl=en%20\%205300df2a461e1aeb
Empty ritual is stymieing America’s hopes.
http://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/eaa28e46972c5466/44c5fa90d7a12b07?hl=en#44c5fa90d7a12b07
Save America by kicking all political rituals in the ass!
http://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/bf5b24a93a67bfe6/4711d3b984e5a4ff?hl=en#4711d3b984e5a4ff
Brainwashed by religious rituals
http://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/ebfad09eae27c37a/a8f5c9c30280cd30?hl=en#a8f5c9c30280cd30
Understanding Political ‘Science’
https://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/24264dc67b645e2f/d8aa3884a8477885?hl=en#d8aa3884a8477885
NoEinstein
Nov 11, 2012, 4:53:59 PM11/11/12
to
On Nov 9, 8:18 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
Folks: I'm almost certain that members of the media; ham-strung
politicians; and science teachers, both at the high school and college
levels, constitute the vast majority of my readers. If 47% of you
media people are disillusioned by the illegal and UNCONSTITUTIONAL
Obama "victory", why don't a few of you mention on the air what I keep
explaining about our broken government, and especially about the
outmoded-since-the-horse-and-buggy era manner in which we "elect" our
president.
Take away the twenty percent of Obama’s votes that were obtained by
out-and-out BRIBES using the money of others, or by out-and-out lies
(fraud) that were used to attack Romney in the early going, and it can
only be ROMNEY who is qualified to be our next president! Instead of
his just "smiling" as if to say: "Look how good a looser I am.",
Romney should go on the ATTACK and say—before the media—that Obama is
a fraud president who has BRIBED the people to give him the margin of
victory. If the Republicans in the House will make up their minds to
abstain from voting for anything that Obama proposes, he is already
dead meat to deliver anything to any of those expecting to "get" from
him. The survival of the USA is about getting off of our tushes and
demanding that justice be done! Since day one, Obama has been guilty
of TREASON. Once that bastard, and some of his hey-boys, have been
hanged, the USA will finally be on a true course. Long live the USA!
— John A. Armistead — Author and Patriot
>
> On Nov 8, 5:15 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> Some of you folks may be interested in reading more regarding my years-
> long odyssey to save the USA from corruption and socialism. My meaty
> little book, 'The Shortest Distance; Harmony Through Prosperity', has
> a chapter on spheres of influence that explains why it is counter
> productive to band together in groups and to fight for one's personal
> ideals at the expense of respecting the differing, but still
> legitimate ideals of others. Such semi-autobiographical book is
> available athttp://www.virtualbookworm.com/bookstore/or at Amazon.
> Copyrighted.)http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/eed2b...
> Happy Days… !http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/99033...
> Happy Days... 2http://groups.google.com/group/views/browse_thread/thread/d63f04a0594...
> Campaigning is a Science, too.http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/a83e5...
> OBAMA’S NOMINATION OF SOTOMAYOR BETRAYS DEMOCRACYhttp://groups.google.com/group/views/browse_thread/thread/998870d93fd...
> USA IS BOTH SOOTHED AND BETRAYED BY RHETORIChttp://groups.google.com/group/views/browse_thread/thread/576e701e1d9...
> A Democracy Doesn’t Favor Media Figures and Celebritieshttp://groups.google.com/group/views/browse_thread/thread/e6230d64020...
> Changing the USA from a Police Statehttp://groups.google.com/group/views/browse_thread/thread/4b4b7fbd47d...
> A Line Is Drawn in the Sand for the USAhttp://groups.google.com/group/views/browse_thread/thread/11704cf2bc7...
> A TIME FOR TRUTH AND A TIME FOR LIEShttp://groups.google.com/group/views/browse_thread/thread/d93ce51a4db...
> Government ‘As You Like It’http://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/ae...
> THE FOUNDING FATHERS WOULD NOT RECOGNIZE OUR GOVERNMENT, TODAY.http://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/f3...
> PLAYING THE GAME TO BRING DOWN AMERICAhttp://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/35...
> There’s Only One Way for the Tea Party Movement to WIN.http://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/8e...
> Start the Revolution! Government is out-of-touch with the People!http://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/c6...
> Wringing-the-Neck of Empty Ritual.http://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/5a...
> The USA is lost in the "Corn" of politics.http://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/62...
> Democrats won’t be laughing for long.http://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/78...
> Can Donald Trump fix the thin ice the USA is skating on?http://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/4f...
> Building Obama’s Gallowshttp://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/ca...%205300df2a461e1aeb
> Empty ritual is stymieing America’s hopes.http://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/ea...
> Save America by kicking all political rituals in the ass!http://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/bf...
> Brainwashed by religious ritualshttp://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/eb...
> Understanding Political ‘Science’https://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/2426...
>
Folks: I'm almost certain that members of the media; ham-strung
politicians; and science teachers, both at the high school and college
levels, constitute the vast majority of my readers. If 47% of you
media people are disillusioned by the illegal and UNCONSTITUTIONAL
Obama "victory", why don't a few of you mention on the air what I keep
explaining about our broken government, and especially about the
outmoded-since-the-horse-and-buggy era manner in which we "elect" our
president.
Take away the twenty percent of Obama’s votes that were obtained by
out-and-out BRIBES using the money of others, or by out-and-out lies
(fraud) that were used to attack Romney in the early going, and it can
only be ROMNEY who is qualified to be our next president! Instead of
his just "smiling" as if to say: "Look how good a looser I am.",
Romney should go on the ATTACK and say—before the media—that Obama is
a fraud president who has BRIBED the people to give him the margin of
victory. If the Republicans in the House will make up their minds to
abstain from voting for anything that Obama proposes, he is already
dead meat to deliver anything to any of those expecting to "get" from
him. The survival of the USA is about getting off of our tushes and
demanding that justice be done! Since day one, Obama has been guilty
of TREASON. Once that bastard, and some of his hey-boys, have been
hanged, the USA will finally be on a true course. Long live the USA!
— John A. Armistead — Author and Patriot
>
> On Nov 8, 5:15 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> Some of you folks may be interested in reading more regarding my years-
> long odyssey to save the USA from corruption and socialism. My meaty
> little book, 'The Shortest Distance; Harmony Through Prosperity', has
> a chapter on spheres of influence that explains why it is counter
> productive to band together in groups and to fight for one's personal
> ideals at the expense of respecting the differing, but still
> legitimate ideals of others. Such semi-autobiographical book is
> Happy Days… !http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/99033...
> Happy Days... 2http://groups.google.com/group/views/browse_thread/thread/d63f04a0594...
> Campaigning is a Science, too.http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/a83e5...
> OBAMA’S NOMINATION OF SOTOMAYOR BETRAYS DEMOCRACYhttp://groups.google.com/group/views/browse_thread/thread/998870d93fd...
> USA IS BOTH SOOTHED AND BETRAYED BY RHETORIChttp://groups.google.com/group/views/browse_thread/thread/576e701e1d9...
> A Democracy Doesn’t Favor Media Figures and Celebritieshttp://groups.google.com/group/views/browse_thread/thread/e6230d64020...
> Changing the USA from a Police Statehttp://groups.google.com/group/views/browse_thread/thread/4b4b7fbd47d...
> A Line Is Drawn in the Sand for the USAhttp://groups.google.com/group/views/browse_thread/thread/11704cf2bc7...
> A TIME FOR TRUTH AND A TIME FOR LIEShttp://groups.google.com/group/views/browse_thread/thread/d93ce51a4db...
> Government ‘As You Like It’http://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/ae...
> THE FOUNDING FATHERS WOULD NOT RECOGNIZE OUR GOVERNMENT, TODAY.http://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/f3...
> PLAYING THE GAME TO BRING DOWN AMERICAhttp://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/35...
> There’s Only One Way for the Tea Party Movement to WIN.http://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/8e...
> Start the Revolution! Government is out-of-touch with the People!http://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/c6...
> Wringing-the-Neck of Empty Ritual.http://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/5a...
> The USA is lost in the "Corn" of politics.http://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/62...
> Democrats won’t be laughing for long.http://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/78...
> Can Donald Trump fix the thin ice the USA is skating on?http://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/4f...
> Building Obama’s Gallowshttp://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/ca...%205300df2a461e1aeb
> Empty ritual is stymieing America’s hopes.http://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/ea...
> Save America by kicking all political rituals in the ass!http://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/bf...
> Brainwashed by religious ritualshttp://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/eb...
> Understanding Political ‘Science’https://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/2426...
Sid9
Nov 11, 2012, 5:43:28 PM11/11/12
to
Sore loser!
news:3af6df40-52db-4992...@c20g2000vbz.googlegroups.com...
news:3af6df40-52db-4992...@c20g2000vbz.googlegroups.com...
NoEinstein
Nov 13, 2012, 2:39:02 PM11/13/12
to
On Nov 11, 5:43 pm, "Sid9" <sid9@ bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
Dear Sid9: Your maximum "Tweet" mentality (140 characters to
overload) may enjoy reveling in a victory "won" by fraud, bribery, and
a complete and total disregard for the letter and the SPIRIT of the
Constitution—as conceived by our Founding Fathers. "Four more years!"
will become "Many more TEARS..." for any of you socialists expecting
to 'get' by the dictates of a fraudulent 'president'. The Office of
President shall never be that of a DICTATOR who gets to do a thing not
authorized by the Constitution! The ideology of the President is
allowed, by the Constitution, to have an effect only to the extent
that he (or she) can convince Congress to enact CONSTITUTIONAL
legislation. [Note: No ’law’—such as ‘Obama Care’—can meet the SPIRIT
of the Constitution’s requirement that the enacted laws be AGREEABLE
to the majority of the PEOPLE, simply because 51% of the corrupt
politicians voted that way. And no FRAUDULENT president can
“validate” such a non-law by signing it.] The Constitution never
intended to allow presidential directives, with respect to the
operations of departments of government, or of the 'rules and
regulations' affecting businesses, to bypass the authority intended
ONLY for Congress or for the PEOPLE. And the CONSTITUTION never
intended to allow those nominated to the US Supreme Court to be so
beholden to the President who nominated them, that such airheads will
vote to overturn or invalidate any law which the UNCONSTITUTIONAL
seated president dislikes.
The Constitution has been undermined—since the beginning of the last
century—with the MISTAKEN notion that anything that can get 51% of the
votes is OK, or is "constitutional" (ha!). It was never
constitutional (by the SPIRIT of the Constitution) to have the
oligarchy US Senate be allowed to have any say-so, whatsoever, in what
laws can get passed. Such UNCONSTITUTIONAL inclusion of the US Senate
was the result of the BRIBE of small states who said that they would
not sign the document unless the small-population areas had the same
POWER as the larger population areas. The latter is clearly a
VIOLATION of the SPIRIT of the Constitution that the USA be as close
to a democracy (exclusive of SOCIALISM) as possible. A Representative
Republic, which it was supposed the USA would be, has never been
realized for a single DAY that the USA has existed! The USA, by the
'powers' invested, is primarily an oligarchy, because the G. D. US
Senate has the majority power, per member of Congress. From day one,
my ten-fold strengthened NEW Constitution FIRES every single member of
the US Senate and CLOSES that branch of government, permanently.
Similarly, it will close down every state senate anywhere in the USA.
No state can decide to be run by elected officials (representatives)
not prorated based on the populations of the districts served.
Sid9, if you have ANY arguments in any regard that can counter even
one sentence of my New Constitution, I'm sure the readers will find it
most humorous how little you have going for you as "an intellectual".
Otherwise, thank you for taking the time to reply. Now, I KNOW that
I’m getting-under-the-skin of socialists. So, your period of
'rejoicing' over Obama will soon be coming to an abrupt termination,
when Obama drops to the end of his most-just hangman’s noose. — John
A. Armistead — Author and Patriot [For more details, read my book,
'The Shortest Distance; Harmony Through Prosperity'.]
>
> Sore loser!
> "NoEinstein" <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
> >> available athttp://www.virtualbookworm.com/bookstore/orat Amazon.
> >> Government As You Like Ithttp://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/ae...
>
Dear Sid9: Your maximum "Tweet" mentality (140 characters to
overload) may enjoy reveling in a victory "won" by fraud, bribery, and
a complete and total disregard for the letter and the SPIRIT of the
Constitution—as conceived by our Founding Fathers. "Four more years!"
will become "Many more TEARS..." for any of you socialists expecting
to 'get' by the dictates of a fraudulent 'president'. The Office of
President shall never be that of a DICTATOR who gets to do a thing not
authorized by the Constitution! The ideology of the President is
allowed, by the Constitution, to have an effect only to the extent
that he (or she) can convince Congress to enact CONSTITUTIONAL
legislation. [Note: No ’law’—such as ‘Obama Care’—can meet the SPIRIT
of the Constitution’s requirement that the enacted laws be AGREEABLE
to the majority of the PEOPLE, simply because 51% of the corrupt
politicians voted that way. And no FRAUDULENT president can
“validate” such a non-law by signing it.] The Constitution never
intended to allow presidential directives, with respect to the
operations of departments of government, or of the 'rules and
regulations' affecting businesses, to bypass the authority intended
ONLY for Congress or for the PEOPLE. And the CONSTITUTION never
intended to allow those nominated to the US Supreme Court to be so
beholden to the President who nominated them, that such airheads will
vote to overturn or invalidate any law which the UNCONSTITUTIONAL
seated president dislikes.
The Constitution has been undermined—since the beginning of the last
century—with the MISTAKEN notion that anything that can get 51% of the
votes is OK, or is "constitutional" (ha!). It was never
constitutional (by the SPIRIT of the Constitution) to have the
oligarchy US Senate be allowed to have any say-so, whatsoever, in what
laws can get passed. Such UNCONSTITUTIONAL inclusion of the US Senate
was the result of the BRIBE of small states who said that they would
not sign the document unless the small-population areas had the same
POWER as the larger population areas. The latter is clearly a
VIOLATION of the SPIRIT of the Constitution that the USA be as close
to a democracy (exclusive of SOCIALISM) as possible. A Representative
Republic, which it was supposed the USA would be, has never been
realized for a single DAY that the USA has existed! The USA, by the
'powers' invested, is primarily an oligarchy, because the G. D. US
Senate has the majority power, per member of Congress. From day one,
my ten-fold strengthened NEW Constitution FIRES every single member of
the US Senate and CLOSES that branch of government, permanently.
Similarly, it will close down every state senate anywhere in the USA.
No state can decide to be run by elected officials (representatives)
not prorated based on the populations of the districts served.
Sid9, if you have ANY arguments in any regard that can counter even
one sentence of my New Constitution, I'm sure the readers will find it
most humorous how little you have going for you as "an intellectual".
Otherwise, thank you for taking the time to reply. Now, I KNOW that
I’m getting-under-the-skin of socialists. So, your period of
'rejoicing' over Obama will soon be coming to an abrupt termination,
when Obama drops to the end of his most-just hangman’s noose. — John
A. Armistead — Author and Patriot [For more details, read my book,
'The Shortest Distance; Harmony Through Prosperity'.]
>
> Sore loser!
> "NoEinstein" <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
> >> THE FOUNDING FATHERS WOULD NOT RECOGNIZE OUR GOVERNMENT,
> >> TODAY.http://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/f3...
> >> PLAYING THE GAME TO BRING DOWN
> >> AMERICAhttp://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/35...
> >> There s Only One Way for the Tea Party Movement to
> >> WIN.http://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/8e...
> >> Start the Revolution! Government is out-of-touch with the
> >> People!http://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/c6...
> >> Wringing-the-Neck of Empty
> >> Ritual.http://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/5a...
> >> The USA is lost in the "Corn" of
> >> politics.http://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/62...
> >> Democrats won t be laughing for
> >> long.http://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/78...
> >> Can Donald Trump fix the thin ice the USA is skating
> >> on?http://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/4f...
> >> Building Obama s
> >> Gallowshttp://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/ca...
> >> TODAY.http://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/f3...
> >> PLAYING THE GAME TO BRING DOWN
> >> AMERICAhttp://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/35...
> >> There s Only One Way for the Tea Party Movement to
> >> WIN.http://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/8e...
> >> Start the Revolution! Government is out-of-touch with the
> >> People!http://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/c6...
> >> Wringing-the-Neck of Empty
> >> Ritual.http://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/5a...
> >> The USA is lost in the "Corn" of
> >> politics.http://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/62...
> >> Democrats won t be laughing for
> >> long.http://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/78...
> >> Can Donald Trump fix the thin ice the USA is skating
> >> on?http://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/4f...
> >> Building Obama s
> >> Gallowshttp://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/ca...
> >> Empty ritual is stymieing America s
> >> hopes.http://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/ea...
> >> Save America by kicking all political rituals in the
> >> ass!http://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/bf...
> >> Brainwashed by religious
> >> ritualshttp://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/eb...
> >> Understanding Political Sciencehttps://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/2426...
> >> hopes.http://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/ea...
> >> Save America by kicking all political rituals in the
> >> ass!http://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/bf...
> >> Brainwashed by religious
> >> ritualshttp://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/eb...
Sid9
Nov 13, 2012, 3:06:58 PM11/13/12
to
news:416c42f7-afa7-4a74...@f17g2000vbz.googlegroups.com...
.
.
.
Quickly seek a doctor who will prescribe tranquilizers.
You may no know how close you are to be admitted to as mental institution
.
.
Quickly seek a doctor who will prescribe tranquilizers.
You may no know how close you are to be admitted to as mental institution
NoEinstein
Nov 15, 2012, 8:06:21 PM11/15/12
to
On Nov 13, 3:07 pm, "Sid9" <sid9@ bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
Dear Sid9: The people who voted for Obama are the naive mentalities
who suppose that money grows from the US Mint, not from the goods and
services sold by those who actually work for a living. Obama has
BRIBED his supporters with such things as promises of free college
educations for every "poor" person. He has BRIBED Hispanics with the
promise of favoritism counter to the majority will of the people, and
counter to the best interests of the USA. Obama stated in that
'rigged' press conference how wonderful it is that Hispanics are
starting to become involved in elections. But, of course, he was
rejoicing that all of them are being conditioned to vote for
socialism. Obama, the anti-Christ, sees himself running, a borderless
socialist world. He is the Liar-in-Chief, who stated that he will
find out what happened "in Libya" and will inform the relatives of
those four men who died, needlessly. But he stated in the same breath
that he won't tell that same group of reporters (as in a press
conference.)
So far, my observation of you as someone (a socialist) with a maximum
of 140 printed characters (and spaces) to over-load, fits you
exactly. If you dislike what I'm saying enough to fault me, then you
hate half of the USA, just like OBAMA. It is a near certainty that
you have never strived for anything approaching an ideal. Until you
do, don't bother me with your petty mouse-squeaks. — John A.
Armistead — Author and Patriot.
A note to Dick Morris: "Loosing" in an illegitimate election, such as
on November 6, doesn't change a thing if those of us who are still
honest will stick together, and will hopefully speak out. What is
constitutional isn't determined by bribing large numbers of voters so
things will be this way or that. What is constitutional is determined
by understanding the SPIRIT of the Constitution, which mainly is:
"That democracy and fair play shall have supremacy in the USA."
Socialism can't exist, anywhere, if that one simple sentence is
respected! That’s because it is never fair to STEAL from those who
work, by supposing the votes of the lazy and the shallow are on a
par. Crimes perpetrated by government are still crimes. My New
Constitution will benefit both the left and the right. But the way to
our salvation is liberated capitalism, not governments pushing us over
that one last fiscal cliff. Once the economic stability is restored
(by reducing government to the minimum size practical) there should be
very few people living below the poverty line, and very few people who
think government is the answer to every want. "ATLAS Shrugged". I’ve
spent the last sixteen years of my life trying to make sure that the
USA doesn't! — J. A. A. —
>
Dear Sid9: The people who voted for Obama are the naive mentalities
who suppose that money grows from the US Mint, not from the goods and
services sold by those who actually work for a living. Obama has
BRIBED his supporters with such things as promises of free college
educations for every "poor" person. He has BRIBED Hispanics with the
promise of favoritism counter to the majority will of the people, and
counter to the best interests of the USA. Obama stated in that
'rigged' press conference how wonderful it is that Hispanics are
starting to become involved in elections. But, of course, he was
rejoicing that all of them are being conditioned to vote for
socialism. Obama, the anti-Christ, sees himself running, a borderless
socialist world. He is the Liar-in-Chief, who stated that he will
find out what happened "in Libya" and will inform the relatives of
those four men who died, needlessly. But he stated in the same breath
that he won't tell that same group of reporters (as in a press
conference.)
So far, my observation of you as someone (a socialist) with a maximum
of 140 printed characters (and spaces) to over-load, fits you
exactly. If you dislike what I'm saying enough to fault me, then you
hate half of the USA, just like OBAMA. It is a near certainty that
you have never strived for anything approaching an ideal. Until you
do, don't bother me with your petty mouse-squeaks. — John A.
Armistead — Author and Patriot.
A note to Dick Morris: "Loosing" in an illegitimate election, such as
on November 6, doesn't change a thing if those of us who are still
honest will stick together, and will hopefully speak out. What is
constitutional isn't determined by bribing large numbers of voters so
things will be this way or that. What is constitutional is determined
by understanding the SPIRIT of the Constitution, which mainly is:
"That democracy and fair play shall have supremacy in the USA."
Socialism can't exist, anywhere, if that one simple sentence is
respected! That’s because it is never fair to STEAL from those who
work, by supposing the votes of the lazy and the shallow are on a
par. Crimes perpetrated by government are still crimes. My New
Constitution will benefit both the left and the right. But the way to
our salvation is liberated capitalism, not governments pushing us over
that one last fiscal cliff. Once the economic stability is restored
(by reducing government to the minimum size practical) there should be
very few people living below the poverty line, and very few people who
think government is the answer to every want. "ATLAS Shrugged". I’ve
spent the last sixteen years of my life trying to make sure that the
USA doesn't! — J. A. A. —
Sid9
Nov 15, 2012, 8:16:55 PM11/15/12
to
news:b6a26c9a-9027-4db0...@v9g2000yql.googlegroups.com...
As long as people like you are significant in the Republican Party they will
not win national elections.
Keep up the good work, your are Democrat's helpers
not win national elections.
Keep up the good work, your are Democrat's helpers
Patrick Powers
Nov 16, 2012, 9:19:07 AM11/16/12
to
NoEinstein
Nov 16, 2012, 10:07:05 PM11/16/12
to
On Nov 15, 8:06 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
Dear Readers in Revolt: For over two years, the conservatives in the
media—such as Shawn Hannity and Glenn Beck—have been calling the 2012
presidential election the most crucial one in our entire history. The
“war” isn’t yet bloody. Nonetheless, it is being fought between these
two clearly-delineated factions: Those who think that stealing is OK
if “sanctioned” by the majority vote and “authorized” by an otherwise
unresponsive-to-the-People government; and those who think that
candidates running for office shouldn’t be allowed to BRIBE voters
with monetary promises or with any other favoritism not supported by
“law”. In the case of the president, a simple proof of the latter
would be to ask HOW such money or favoritism would be doled-out except
by his exercising DICTATORIAL powers NOT granted to the Executive
Office by the Constitution, nor supported by the will of those voters
who weren’t… BOUGHT. To wit: Telling young people… “Vote for Obama,
and he will get you a free college education.” amounts to bribery
approaching $100,000 per young person!
Several years ago, Obama care got “passed” without the support of the
people. States began challenging the enforceability of that “law”
based on the 10th Amendment. That was because Obama Care was
requiring people to buy health insurance, or it would force them to
pay a heavy “fine”. The CORRUPT Supreme Court rejected the states
arguments by calling the “fine” a tax. I was incensed that it is
wrongly presumed that every controversial issue in the country
requires a lawsuit that must be argued, hat-in-hand, before the
CORRUPT high court. My rationale is summarized in the following
excerpt from my New Constitution:
“Article III:
Section 1: The lesser Judicial Branch consists of a High Court and
such inferior courts as the House establishes. Its major duty is to
interpret laws. It has no power to command enforcement of any of its
rulings unless so mandated in prior, formally stipulated and apt
laws. Judges and justices are technicians of the law and of this New
Constitution, ***and have no implied exclusivity of qualification to
decide what is or is not legal or constitutional.*** They shall
governors, that they should simply order the arrest of Obama the
moment his “campaign” plane landed in their state. Gov. Bobby Jindal
was someone who seemed motivated to revolt against our run-away
government. But Hurricane Katrina soon had Jindal almost embracing
Obama, not unlike Gov. Chris Christie had betrayed Republicans by
hugging Obama. Christie also had seemed to ’betray’ Republicans when
he was so “soft” on Obama in his keynote speech at the RNC.
Today, Gov. Bobby Jindal disappointed me, again. He said (I
paraphrase): “We Republicans must reinvent ourselves if we are to
expect victory in future elections. We can’t be faulting Democrats as
though they have been bought (bribed).” I am probably the most vocal
person regarding Obama’s bribes. He bribed Hillary Clinton to
“endorse” him, with a promise of her being VP or… Sec. of State. Bill
Clinton was so angry that Biden got the VP slot, that Bill almost
couldn’t bring himself to address the DNC. As soon as David Axelrod
pointed out how Obama’s “ground game” was the margin of victory, I
realized that at least 16 to 20 percent of the “new” voters (that Dick
Morris had ‘missed’ by his high logic that the enthusiasm of Democrats
is down) must have resulted from the “promises” that those door-to-
door Obama surrogates had made. People will vote for someone if a
sympathetic-sounding person comes into their homes and tells them they
will get ‘free stuff’, not to mention driving them to the polls on
election day.
Four years ago a Black woman in a throng was rejoicing over the Obama
victory. A reporter asked her why she was rejoicing. She said:
“Because of the money!” “Whose money are you talking about?” After a
pause, she said, “Obama’s money!” If one took Obama’s entire personal
worth and divided “Obama’s money” up between those who voted for him,
they would get just a few cents, each. What Obama has done for over
six years is to BRIBE the voters with the money he expects to STEAL
from the conservatives, and without allowing them a chance to vote
no. Only those promising ‘gifts’ (like booze) can have that
advantage. The Republicans’ only promise was JOBS. Obama kept LYING
that Romney’s plan had been tried before, and it didn’t work. My “NC”
says:
“Deliberate use by any candidate, their staffs or election committees,
of false or deceptive campaign speeches, slogans, advertisements,
humor, or innuendo is a felony. No organization, nor part of the
media, nor any special interest group(s) shall in any way endorse a
slate of candidates for public office; flagrant violation is a
felony.”
There has not been a day that has gone by, in the last six years, that
Obama hasn’t been lying himself into office. Rush Limbaugh pointed
out something very observant. He said (I paraphrase): “General David
Petraeus admitted that he knew, immediately, that the Benghazi raid
was due to Muslim terrorists. So, it is most evident that the reports
that such violence was the spontaneous offense of Muslims to a USA
video mocking Muhammad has to have been deliberated contrived (lied
about).”
On the radio, also, today, one call-in person said—as have I, in these
essays—that “Obama is wishing to be seen as ’pro-Muslim’.” So, for
selfish gain… “as a world leader”, Obama was willing to sacrifice four
Americans rather than to hurt his ’image’ with the HUGE Muslim… voting
block. Only the anti-Christ, would care what Muslims think of him!
In just a few more weeks, Chief Justice John G. Roberts will come out
“proudly” to give the Oath of Office to Obama. Oaths are statements
being sworn to be true. But how can a pathological liar, such as
Obama, have anything that he says be accepted as a sworn oath? Has
Obama protected the Constitution for the last four years, like he
swore (with his HEART crossed) to do? Or has he worked—with SICK
fervor—to disregard the Constitution as conceived by our Founding
Fathers in favor of his dictating that the USA become his socialist
play-toy.
I sense that there is a rising revolt of those had-been nice
taxpayers. There could well be (short-term) $2.75 solutions to our
present problems. I have not heard of a single person, other than
myself, who proposes the substituting of a much more thorough and ten
times more exacting New Constitution for the former. Know this,
people: My “NC” uses the existing as the model, and saves the vast
majority of those things championed by most patriots. Would you be
more likely to trust the moral judgment of perhaps THE most
intelligent person on Earth—me? Or do you trust the judgment of the
Bobby Jindals out there who suppose that elections in the future will
somehow correct what all of the elections in the past have not stopped—
SOCIALISM.
With haste, Chief Justice John G. Roberts shall instruct the US Secret
Service to examine, once-and-for-all, Obama’s birth records, or non
birth records, and give a formal report to the American People.
Obama, by his personal selfish motive of wishing to appear friendly to
Muslims, has caused four Americans to be killed. THAT is murder. No
LYING, MURDERING, BASTARD shall ever be the legitimate President of
the USA! By my decree, as perhaps THE most patriotic American, Barack
Obama has long-since been an outlaw. And no one employed by
government shall ever give him aid and comfort.
Call Fort Knox, Obama. Tell them that you are the Commander in Chief
and have them take you into their vault to ROT amongst the gold. Or,
do like the Fred Astaire that you often seem to emulate, and JOG down
those few steps of the presidential helicopter, that is hovering three
hundred feet over the reflection pond on the Washington Mall, then
drop the twelve feet or so to the END of your tight hangman’s noose.
With luck, your demise will be quick and bloodless, as millions of the
now saved Americans get to breathe sighs of relief. Good riddance,
Barack Hussein Obama!
For his not-small contribution to the horrific mess that Obama has
gotten us all in, John G. Roberts should immediately RESIGN in
disgrace over how LIGHTLY he took his sworn duty as Chief Justice. In
the same honor that was Major George Armistead, who saved the USA from
the British at Fort McHenry in the War of 1812, I say: Long live the
USA!
Respectfully submitted,
John A. Armistead
Author and Patriot
>
> Constitution will benefit both the left and the right. But the way tooursalvation is liberated capitalism, not governments pushing us over
> > >> > explaining aboutourbroken government, and especially about the
>
Dear Readers in Revolt: For over two years, the conservatives in the
media—such as Shawn Hannity and Glenn Beck—have been calling the 2012
presidential election the most crucial one in our entire history. The
“war” isn’t yet bloody. Nonetheless, it is being fought between these
two clearly-delineated factions: Those who think that stealing is OK
if “sanctioned” by the majority vote and “authorized” by an otherwise
unresponsive-to-the-People government; and those who think that
candidates running for office shouldn’t be allowed to BRIBE voters
with monetary promises or with any other favoritism not supported by
“law”. In the case of the president, a simple proof of the latter
would be to ask HOW such money or favoritism would be doled-out except
by his exercising DICTATORIAL powers NOT granted to the Executive
Office by the Constitution, nor supported by the will of those voters
who weren’t… BOUGHT. To wit: Telling young people… “Vote for Obama,
and he will get you a free college education.” amounts to bribery
approaching $100,000 per young person!
Several years ago, Obama care got “passed” without the support of the
people. States began challenging the enforceability of that “law”
based on the 10th Amendment. That was because Obama Care was
requiring people to buy health insurance, or it would force them to
pay a heavy “fine”. The CORRUPT Supreme Court rejected the states
arguments by calling the “fine” a tax. I was incensed that it is
wrongly presumed that every controversial issue in the country
requires a lawsuit that must be argued, hat-in-hand, before the
CORRUPT high court. My rationale is summarized in the following
excerpt from my New Constitution:
“Article III:
Section 1: The lesser Judicial Branch consists of a High Court and
such inferior courts as the House establishes. Its major duty is to
interpret laws. It has no power to command enforcement of any of its
rulings unless so mandated in prior, formally stipulated and apt
laws. Judges and justices are technicians of the law and of this New
decide what is or is not legal or constitutional.*** They shall
perform their duties as individuals, never as part of any perceived
culture of the lesser Judicial Branch, nor from any consultation
whatsoever with past or present members of such. Additionally, they
shall not have held state or federal executive or legislative office.
The President shall nominate new justices who are between the ages of
50 and 60 years old, and may on good behavior, serve a single term of
up to 10 years. The President, or his agents, shall not work to win
the confirmation of any nominee. Judges and justices shall be
selected for their intellect, high moral character, compassion,
knowledge of the law, likable nature, and for their proficiency and
expediency in office. Such shall not be aloft nor considered
infallible in all their judgments, yet shall be respected if they
right injustices quickly. They shall make decisions based on apt laws
and this New Constitution—never on their personal ideologies. Every
culture of the lesser Judicial Branch, nor from any consultation
whatsoever with past or present members of such. Additionally, they
shall not have held state or federal executive or legislative office.
The President shall nominate new justices who are between the ages of
50 and 60 years old, and may on good behavior, serve a single term of
up to 10 years. The President, or his agents, shall not work to win
the confirmation of any nominee. Judges and justices shall be
selected for their intellect, high moral character, compassion,
knowledge of the law, likable nature, and for their proficiency and
expediency in office. Such shall not be aloft nor considered
infallible in all their judgments, yet shall be respected if they
right injustices quickly. They shall make decisions based on apt laws
two years an unbiased review panel shall apprise the Citizens of the
job performance grade, as herein, of seated judges and justices. With
the assent of 60% of the voters nationwide, the latter can be
unseated. ***Judges and justices aren’t royalty, nor do they have an
job performance grade, as herein, of seated judges and justices. With
the assent of 60% of the voters nationwide, the latter can be
implied moral judgment inherently superior to public macro-
consensus.*** They shall not be chambered lavishly, sit in throne-
like chairs, wear robes on the job, nor dress in a style that
differentiates them from the People. They shall not socialize with,
nor privately be in conference with, members of the Executive or
Legislative branches of government; nor shall they attend State of the
Union Addresses or similar events. The Public shall not stand for
entering or exiting judges or justices who shall be addressed only as:
judge or justice. Judges and justices not respecting such provisions,
or who exhibit excessive arrogance or pomposity on the job shall be
removed. Sessions of all trials shall begin with the judge(s) or
justice(s) saying: “The justice system is on trial.” All assent five-
to-four High Court decisions are for one year only, or shall be
invalid; and the same nine justices shall not—on their own—reconsider
such issue. Courtrooms shall be devoid of gavels, seals, flags and
differentiates them from the People. They shall not socialize with,
nor privately be in conference with, members of the Executive or
Legislative branches of government; nor shall they attend State of the
Union Addresses or similar events. The Public shall not stand for
entering or exiting judges or justices who shall be addressed only as:
judge or justice. Judges and justices not respecting such provisions,
or who exhibit excessive arrogance or pomposity on the job shall be
removed. Sessions of all trials shall begin with the judge(s) or
justice(s) saying: “The justice system is on trial.” All assent five-
to-four High Court decisions are for one year only, or shall be
invalid; and the same nine justices shall not—on their own—reconsider
oppressive art, and no design feature nor process shall imply that
judges or justices represent government or respond patly or
collectively. It is TREASON for a judge or justice to rule with
disfavor on the supremacy of a fair democracy.”
In numbers of essays like this, I proposed to all of the disgruntled
judges or justices represent government or respond patly or
collectively. It is TREASON for a judge or justice to rule with
disfavor on the supremacy of a fair democracy.”
governors, that they should simply order the arrest of Obama the
moment his “campaign” plane landed in their state. Gov. Bobby Jindal
was someone who seemed motivated to revolt against our run-away
government. But Hurricane Katrina soon had Jindal almost embracing
Obama, not unlike Gov. Chris Christie had betrayed Republicans by
hugging Obama. Christie also had seemed to ’betray’ Republicans when
he was so “soft” on Obama in his keynote speech at the RNC.
Today, Gov. Bobby Jindal disappointed me, again. He said (I
paraphrase): “We Republicans must reinvent ourselves if we are to
expect victory in future elections. We can’t be faulting Democrats as
though they have been bought (bribed).” I am probably the most vocal
person regarding Obama’s bribes. He bribed Hillary Clinton to
“endorse” him, with a promise of her being VP or… Sec. of State. Bill
Clinton was so angry that Biden got the VP slot, that Bill almost
couldn’t bring himself to address the DNC. As soon as David Axelrod
pointed out how Obama’s “ground game” was the margin of victory, I
realized that at least 16 to 20 percent of the “new” voters (that Dick
Morris had ‘missed’ by his high logic that the enthusiasm of Democrats
is down) must have resulted from the “promises” that those door-to-
door Obama surrogates had made. People will vote for someone if a
sympathetic-sounding person comes into their homes and tells them they
will get ‘free stuff’, not to mention driving them to the polls on
election day.
Four years ago a Black woman in a throng was rejoicing over the Obama
victory. A reporter asked her why she was rejoicing. She said:
“Because of the money!” “Whose money are you talking about?” After a
pause, she said, “Obama’s money!” If one took Obama’s entire personal
worth and divided “Obama’s money” up between those who voted for him,
they would get just a few cents, each. What Obama has done for over
six years is to BRIBE the voters with the money he expects to STEAL
from the conservatives, and without allowing them a chance to vote
no. Only those promising ‘gifts’ (like booze) can have that
advantage. The Republicans’ only promise was JOBS. Obama kept LYING
that Romney’s plan had been tried before, and it didn’t work. My “NC”
says:
“Deliberate use by any candidate, their staffs or election committees,
of false or deceptive campaign speeches, slogans, advertisements,
humor, or innuendo is a felony. No organization, nor part of the
media, nor any special interest group(s) shall in any way endorse a
slate of candidates for public office; flagrant violation is a
felony.”
Obama hasn’t been lying himself into office. Rush Limbaugh pointed
out something very observant. He said (I paraphrase): “General David
Petraeus admitted that he knew, immediately, that the Benghazi raid
was due to Muslim terrorists. So, it is most evident that the reports
that such violence was the spontaneous offense of Muslims to a USA
video mocking Muhammad has to have been deliberated contrived (lied
about).”
On the radio, also, today, one call-in person said—as have I, in these
essays—that “Obama is wishing to be seen as ’pro-Muslim’.” So, for
selfish gain… “as a world leader”, Obama was willing to sacrifice four
Americans rather than to hurt his ’image’ with the HUGE Muslim… voting
block. Only the anti-Christ, would care what Muslims think of him!
In just a few more weeks, Chief Justice John G. Roberts will come out
“proudly” to give the Oath of Office to Obama. Oaths are statements
being sworn to be true. But how can a pathological liar, such as
Obama, have anything that he says be accepted as a sworn oath? Has
Obama protected the Constitution for the last four years, like he
swore (with his HEART crossed) to do? Or has he worked—with SICK
fervor—to disregard the Constitution as conceived by our Founding
Fathers in favor of his dictating that the USA become his socialist
play-toy.
I sense that there is a rising revolt of those had-been nice
taxpayers. There could well be (short-term) $2.75 solutions to our
present problems. I have not heard of a single person, other than
myself, who proposes the substituting of a much more thorough and ten
times more exacting New Constitution for the former. Know this,
people: My “NC” uses the existing as the model, and saves the vast
majority of those things championed by most patriots. Would you be
more likely to trust the moral judgment of perhaps THE most
intelligent person on Earth—me? Or do you trust the judgment of the
Bobby Jindals out there who suppose that elections in the future will
somehow correct what all of the elections in the past have not stopped—
SOCIALISM.
With haste, Chief Justice John G. Roberts shall instruct the US Secret
Service to examine, once-and-for-all, Obama’s birth records, or non
birth records, and give a formal report to the American People.
Obama, by his personal selfish motive of wishing to appear friendly to
Muslims, has caused four Americans to be killed. THAT is murder. No
LYING, MURDERING, BASTARD shall ever be the legitimate President of
the USA! By my decree, as perhaps THE most patriotic American, Barack
Obama has long-since been an outlaw. And no one employed by
government shall ever give him aid and comfort.
Call Fort Knox, Obama. Tell them that you are the Commander in Chief
and have them take you into their vault to ROT amongst the gold. Or,
do like the Fred Astaire that you often seem to emulate, and JOG down
those few steps of the presidential helicopter, that is hovering three
hundred feet over the reflection pond on the Washington Mall, then
drop the twelve feet or so to the END of your tight hangman’s noose.
With luck, your demise will be quick and bloodless, as millions of the
now saved Americans get to breathe sighs of relief. Good riddance,
Barack Hussein Obama!
For his not-small contribution to the horrific mess that Obama has
gotten us all in, John G. Roberts should immediately RESIGN in
disgrace over how LIGHTLY he took his sworn duty as Chief Justice. In
the same honor that was Major George Armistead, who saved the USA from
the British at Fort McHenry in the War of 1812, I say: Long live the
USA!
Respectfully submitted,
John A. Armistead
Author and Patriot
>
> that one last fiscal cliff. Once the economic stability is restored
> (by reducing government to the minimum size practical) there should be
> very few people living below the poverty line, and very few people who
> think government is the answer to every want. "ATLAS Shrugged". I’ve
> spent the last sixteen years of my life trying to make sure that the
> USA doesn't! — J. A. A. —
>
>
>
>
>
> > "NoEinstein" <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
>
> >news:416c42f7-afa7-4a74...@f17g2000vbz.googlegroups.com...> On Nov 11, 5:43 pm, "Sid9" <sid9@ bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > > Dear Sid9: Your maximum "Tweet" mentality (140 characters to
> > > overload) may enjoy reveling in a victory "won" by fraud, bribery, and
> > > a complete and total disregard for the letter and the SPIRIT of the
> > > Constitution as conceived byourFounding Fathers. "Four more years!"
> (by reducing government to the minimum size practical) there should be
> very few people living below the poverty line, and very few people who
> think government is the answer to every want. "ATLAS Shrugged". I’ve
> spent the last sixteen years of my life trying to make sure that the
> USA doesn't! — J. A. A. —
>
>
>
>
>
> > "NoEinstein" <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
>
> >news:416c42f7-afa7-4a74...@f17g2000vbz.googlegroups.com...> On Nov 11, 5:43 pm, "Sid9" <sid9@ bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > > Dear Sid9: Your maximum "Tweet" mentality (140 characters to
> > > overload) may enjoy reveling in a victory "won" by fraud, bribery, and
> > > a complete and total disregard for the letter and the SPIRIT of the
> > > will become "Many more TEARS..." for any of you socialists expecting
> > > to 'get' by the dictates of a fraudulent 'president'. The Office of
> > >Presidentshall never be that of a DICTATOR who gets to do a thing not
> > > to 'get' by the dictates of a fraudulent 'president'. The Office of
> > > authorized by the Constitution! The ideology of thePresidentis
> > > allowed, by the Constitution, to have an effect only to the extent
> > > that he (or she) can convince Congress to enact CONSTITUTIONAL
> > > legislation. [Note: No law such as Obama Care can meet the SPIRIT
> > > of the Constitution s requirement that the enacted laws be AGREEABLE
> > > to the majority of the PEOPLE, simply because 51% of the corrupt
> > > politicians voted that way. And no FRAUDULENTpresidentcan
> > > validate such a non-law by signing it.] The Constitution never
> > > intended to allow presidential directives, with respect to the
> > > operations of departments of government, or of the 'rules and
> > > regulations' affecting businesses, to bypass the authority intended
> > > ONLY for Congress or for the PEOPLE. And the CONSTITUTION never
> > > intended to allow those nominated to the US Supreme Court to be so
> > > beholden to thePresidentwho nominated them, that such airheads will
> > > allowed, by the Constitution, to have an effect only to the extent
> > > that he (or she) can convince Congress to enact CONSTITUTIONAL
> > > legislation. [Note: No law such as Obama Care can meet the SPIRIT
> > > of the Constitution s requirement that the enacted laws be AGREEABLE
> > > to the majority of the PEOPLE, simply because 51% of the corrupt
> > > politicians voted that way. And no FRAUDULENTpresidentcan
> > > validate such a non-law by signing it.] The Constitution never
> > > intended to allow presidential directives, with respect to the
> > > operations of departments of government, or of the 'rules and
> > > regulations' affecting businesses, to bypass the authority intended
> > > ONLY for Congress or for the PEOPLE. And the CONSTITUTION never
> > > intended to allow those nominated to the US Supreme Court to be so
> > >> > outmoded-since-the-horse-and-buggy era manner in which we "elect"our
> > >> >president.
>
> > >> > Take away the twenty percent of Obama s votes that were obtained by
> > >> > out-and-out BRIBES using the money of others, or by out-and-out lies
> > >> > (fraud) that were used to attack Romney in the early going, and it can
> > >> > only be ROMNEY who is qualified to beournextpresident! Instead of
> > >> >president.
>
> > >> > Take away the twenty percent of Obama s votes that were obtained by
> > >> > out-and-out BRIBES using the money of others, or by out-and-out lies
> > >> > (fraud) that were used to attack Romney in the early going, and it can
> > >> > his just "smiling" as if to say: "Look how good a looser I am.",
> > >> > Romney should go on the ATTACK and say before the media that Obama is
> > >> > a fraudpresidentwho has BRIBED the people to give him the margin of
> > >> > Romney should go on the ATTACK and say before the media that Obama is
> > >> > victory. If the Republicans in the House will make up their minds to
> > >> > abstain from voting for anything that Obama proposes, he is already
> > >> > dead meat to deliver anything to any of those expecting to "get" from
> > >> > him. The survival of the USA is about getting off ofourtushes and
> > >> > abstain from voting for anything that Obama proposes, he is already
> > >> > dead meat to deliver anything to any of those expecting to "get" from
> > >> > demanding that justice be done! Since day one, Obama has been guilty
> > >> > of TREASON. Once that bastard, and some of his hey-boys, have been
> > >> > hanged, the USA will finally be on a true course. Long live the USA!
> > >> > John A. Armistead Author and Patriot
>
> > >> >> On Nov 8, 5:15 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > >> >> Some of you folks may be interested in reading more regarding my
> > >> >> years-
> > >> >> long odyssey to save the USA from corruption and socialism. My meaty
> > >> >> little book, 'The Shortest Distance; Harmony Through Prosperity', has
> > >> >> a chapter on spheres of influence that explains why it is counter
> > >> >> productive to band together in groups and to fight for one's personal
> > >> >> ideals at the expense of respecting the differing, but still
> > >> >> legitimate ideals of others. Such semi-autobiographical book is
> > >> >> available athttp://www.virtualbookworm.com/bookstore/oratAmazon.
>
> > >> >> About 90% of my 'New Constitution of the United States of America' has
> > >> >> been posted, deliberately in segments, so that there will be little
> > >> >> chance such heart-felt work will be 'blanket' slighted by the less
> > >> >> inspired. I have posted for two or three years on Political Forum
> > >> >> news group, only to realize that the Tico 'owner' of that site is a
> > >> >> political sadist, with inclination to "moderate" any idea he didn't
> > >> >> like. Freedom of Speech, especially on the Internet, is one ofour
> > >> >> "last" great freedoms. Obama and liberals want to
>
> > >> > of TREASON. Once that bastard, and some of his hey-boys, have been
> > >> > hanged, the USA will finally be on a true course. Long live the USA!
> > >> > John A. Armistead Author and Patriot
>
> > >> >> On Nov 8, 5:15 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > >> >> Some of you folks may be interested in reading more regarding my
> > >> >> years-
> > >> >> long odyssey to save the USA from corruption and socialism. My meaty
> > >> >> little book, 'The Shortest Distance; Harmony Through Prosperity', has
> > >> >> a chapter on spheres of influence that explains why it is counter
> > >> >> productive to band together in groups and to fight for one's personal
> > >> >> ideals at the expense of respecting the differing, but still
> > >> >> legitimate ideals of others. Such semi-autobiographical book is
> > >> >> available athttp://www.virtualbookworm.com/bookstore/oratAmazon.
>
> > >> >> About 90% of my 'New Constitution of the United States of America' has
> > >> >> been posted, deliberately in segments, so that there will be little
> > >> >> chance such heart-felt work will be 'blanket' slighted by the less
> > >> >> inspired. I have posted for two or three years on Political Forum
> > >> >> news group, only to realize that the Tico 'owner' of that site is a
> > >> >> political sadist, with inclination to "moderate" any idea he didn't
> > >> >> like. Freedom of Speech, especially on the Internet, is one ofour
> > >> >> "last" great freedoms. Obama and liberals want to
>
NoEinstein
Nov 18, 2012, 4:33:11 PM11/18/12
to
On Nov 16, 10:07 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
The “spin” of corruption.
Being a very busy person, I almost had to force myself to watch ‘Face
the Nation’ and ‘This Week’, today. Experience has shown that both
of those shows are platforms intended to allow Democratic Party
insiders to brainwash the viewers regarding the ‘news‘ of the day.
Typically, each of those shows will have an “almost” conservative like
George Will on their expert panel list in order to make their 75% left-
leaning guests seem to be… ’fair’.
Ubiquitous Senator John McCain was on Bob Schieffer’s show. McCain
repeated his usual questions: “What did ’president’ Obama know (about
Benghazi)” ? And… “When did he know it?” McCain seemed ’pained’ to
add that the “reason” we need such information is “for the benefit of
the families of those who were killed“; and to work, with Congress, to
“make sure such things don’t happen again.” Throughout all of this,
Bob Schieffer had on his quite-often revealing, frozen-in-place, “used
car salesman” smile. Though biased for the left, Schieffer is smart
enough to know that the implications for Obama are much more DIRE than
his simply being an instrument for understanding why the White House
goofed up. McCain knows that, too. But because McCain needs forums
for getting-out his messages, he always includes the required liberal
“CURL” somewhere within his remarks so that it will be likely he will
be invited back on those corrupt, and under my “NC”, UNCONSTITUTIONAL
shows, again.
On ‘This Week', a video of Governor Bobby Jindal was shown as he
stated that Republicans shouldn’t be saying that “Democrats were
’bought’ (in the election).” I was pleased to see that Mitt Romney
has, apparently, agreed with me that it was the “gifts” of the
Democrats (Obama) that had resulted in his (appearance of, but not
LEGAL) victory in the election. For the liberal producers of that
show, leaving Romney’s photo on the screen for so long, with the word
“gifts” in the caption, was their way of setting-up USA-traitor-guest
Donna Brazile to say (I paraphrase): “People are asking me: ’Where are
my gifts?” Exactly!!! Obama made only PROMISES OF GIFTS in order to
get the corrupt votes he needed for his ILLEGAL victory. A promise
is every bit as much a BRIBE as is the delivery on those
UNCONSTITUTIONAL promises! Take this example:
I lived in Charlotte for two decades. Just across the border in SC
was where TV evangelist Jim Bakker had his “PTL Club” headquarters.
The grand plans included having a retirement/vacation village that was
being constructed from both the contributions of viewers, and by the
selling of “time shares”. The “need for money”—in order to support
the Bakker family’s high-end life style—caused them to OVERSELL the
time shares in the already-built condos by several hundred percent.
Effectively, they were obtaining money by ’promising’ a vacation place
that couldn’t possibly be there for up to 2/3rd of people who were
paying money (or VOTING!) based on un unfulfillable PROMISES. Jim
Bakker was sentenced to YEARS in prison for FRAUD. Barack OBAMA
should be HANGED for TREASON for using much more far-reaching and
hurtful FRAUD to get “elected” ‘president’ for the tacit purpose of
DESTROYING the wished-to-be fair, Representative Republic as
envisioned by our Founding Fathers—that is the very essence of our
present Constitution—even though such form of government has not been
realized for a single day since the Constitution was ratified!
On today’s “This Week” show, pseudo conservative, George Will, got
‘Brownie points’ with the liberals who pay his salaries, by jumping-up-
and-down on Romney by proclaiming that “Romney isn’t the leader of the
Republican movement“. Know this, George Will (We go way, back, don’t
we.): Romney-Ryan received well OVER 51% of the unbribed, and thus
LEGAL, votes that were cast!!! *** Therefore, Mitt Romney is the ONLY
person entitled, by the Constitution, to be sworn in as President
(Note the capital ‘P’ that is absent when referencing Obama.)!!!!!
When I transcribed the original Constitution into my computer, in 1996—
key stroke by key stroke—I realized how much deadwood there was, and
how many “holes” there were in that essentially TOOTHLESS document.
My “NC” removes the deadwood; clarifies things without ambiguity (such
as what the 2nd Amendment means); and puts in so many ’teeth’, that no
person in their right mind would even think of trying to subvert my
document—the way the present Constitution has so easily been 99%
subverted! I do that by CRIMINALIZING any acts by government
officials that aren’t deferential to the Citizen(s) and my “NC”. In
short, there will never again be another PERSONNEL problem in
government (without firing, jailing or hanging as solutions) and on
which can be blamed close to 100% of the screw-ups by government that
are responsible for the horrific economic and social mess the USA
finds itself in.
It is obvious that very few American’s have ever read and understood
the Constitution. What most do—including a high percentage of
politicians and those in the media—is to recall what “the processes”
are, and assume that because those have been the status quo for so
long, that such must be what the Founding Fathers intended (finger-
down-the-throat gagging). I would bet that not one American in a
hundred realizes that no oath or declaration is legal unless the
person making such is honest and sincere. If a person, such as Obama
LIES (commits FRAUD) in order to get into a position to take an oath—
with which he does not even agree—then Obama becomes criminally liable
for 100% of the damages that result from his blatant FRAUD! The
financial losses to all Americans simply due to the devaluing of the
purchasing power of our money go into the tens of trillions of
dollars. Can Obama repay that with just the few millions of dollars
he has made from the sell of his books?
The STUPIDITY regarding what determines constitutionality extends to
should-be-smart people such as Fox’s John Stossel. Yesterday, he was
discussing—with should-be-smart Judge Andrew Napolitano—what effect
“four more years” (should be ‘days’) of Obama will have on the Supreme
Court. Napolitano said—with his sometimes used-car-salesman, fixed
smile—that because of the advancing ages of at least four of the
present nine justices, if Obama nominates any more justices like Elena
Kagan and Sonia M. Sotomayo, the “2nd Amendment” could get
overturned. Lest any of you have similar fears regarding my document,
here is what my “NC” says:
“2nd Amendment: Law-abiding, peaceable Citizens shall have the right
to keep and bear arms for sport or protection. Such may use
appropriate action—by degrees—to counter unlawful, forced or
threatening intrusion onto or into their private property, including:
verbal warning; the threat of; and then the use of, deadly force, if
necessary.”
“Section 7: ***Judges and justices shall not selectively interpret,
limit, or exclude existing laws so as to effectively make new laws.
No judge or justice shall be appointed based on their ideology, nor
shall ideology be considered in confirmation processes. As to the
nominating or appointing of judges or justices: No candidate for
public office, member of the Executive Branch nor the House, shall
state nor imply that a nominee will hold, or does hold, a particular
ideology, because by so stating or implying, such candidate shall be
disqualified, the apt one’s governmental job shall be lost, and the
apt nominee disqualified. Criminal cases shall be processed as a
named, titleless person v. a named person(s). The defense can choose
to sit on either side of the court. Judges and justices shall not
anthropomorphize “the Court”, nor seek out “historical” court
positions on which to base decisions; rather, decisions shall be
theirs alone.”
It is URGENT that freedom-loving Americans, everywhere, NOT be seduced
by the repetition of failed RITUAL governmental processes into
supposing that anything, at all, that is being done by government even
approaches being Constitutional! I can’t be sure, but the USA could
well be on the verge of another civil war if socialism isn’t stopped,
and stopped NOW! Our “elected” traitor to the USA, Barack Obama is
claiming that his “mandate” is to serve the middle class, when the
Constitution requires that he serve the ENTIRE country! Obama wants
only ONE class of people. His socialist-communist ideal is to force
the self-made, successful people DOWN into the middle class, and to
raise everyone now in poverty UP to the middle Class. I have
mathematical news for Obama, if 100% of the USA has the identical
mediocrity, then there IS no middle class at all—there is only
DOOM!!!!!
Those of you, like me, who don’t like having angry Americans even
considering the $2.75 short-term solutions to the horrific problems
that face America, should start talking about my New Constitution!
Such, through LIBERATED CAPITALISM, can save even the most down-and-
out citizens, and without any further increase in the un Holy size of
government. I HAVE the document that can SAVE the USA, including
those on the left and on the right! But some of the media must start
TALKING about it! Otherwise, there could be very little left to talk
about unless… you timid, timid souls start speaking up ON THE AIR and
ON CAMERA! Hear that Sean Hannity, Glenn Beck and etc. ???
Incredibly, Donna Brazile ended her Romney “gifts” remark, as in the
above, by saying that the “gifts” will come through having an improved
economy. Isn’t that EXACTLY what Romney-Ryan were saying every day
of their campaign??? Long live the USA!
Respectfully submitted,
John A. Armistead
Author and Patriot
>
> ThePresidentshall nominate new justices who are between the ages of
> realized that at least 16 to 20 percent of the “new”voters(that Dick
> Service to examine, ...
>
> read more »
>
The “spin” of corruption.
Being a very busy person, I almost had to force myself to watch ‘Face
the Nation’ and ‘This Week’, today. Experience has shown that both
of those shows are platforms intended to allow Democratic Party
insiders to brainwash the viewers regarding the ‘news‘ of the day.
Typically, each of those shows will have an “almost” conservative like
George Will on their expert panel list in order to make their 75% left-
leaning guests seem to be… ’fair’.
Ubiquitous Senator John McCain was on Bob Schieffer’s show. McCain
repeated his usual questions: “What did ’president’ Obama know (about
Benghazi)” ? And… “When did he know it?” McCain seemed ’pained’ to
add that the “reason” we need such information is “for the benefit of
the families of those who were killed“; and to work, with Congress, to
“make sure such things don’t happen again.” Throughout all of this,
Bob Schieffer had on his quite-often revealing, frozen-in-place, “used
car salesman” smile. Though biased for the left, Schieffer is smart
enough to know that the implications for Obama are much more DIRE than
his simply being an instrument for understanding why the White House
goofed up. McCain knows that, too. But because McCain needs forums
for getting-out his messages, he always includes the required liberal
“CURL” somewhere within his remarks so that it will be likely he will
be invited back on those corrupt, and under my “NC”, UNCONSTITUTIONAL
shows, again.
On ‘This Week', a video of Governor Bobby Jindal was shown as he
stated that Republicans shouldn’t be saying that “Democrats were
’bought’ (in the election).” I was pleased to see that Mitt Romney
has, apparently, agreed with me that it was the “gifts” of the
Democrats (Obama) that had resulted in his (appearance of, but not
LEGAL) victory in the election. For the liberal producers of that
show, leaving Romney’s photo on the screen for so long, with the word
“gifts” in the caption, was their way of setting-up USA-traitor-guest
Donna Brazile to say (I paraphrase): “People are asking me: ’Where are
my gifts?” Exactly!!! Obama made only PROMISES OF GIFTS in order to
get the corrupt votes he needed for his ILLEGAL victory. A promise
is every bit as much a BRIBE as is the delivery on those
UNCONSTITUTIONAL promises! Take this example:
I lived in Charlotte for two decades. Just across the border in SC
was where TV evangelist Jim Bakker had his “PTL Club” headquarters.
The grand plans included having a retirement/vacation village that was
being constructed from both the contributions of viewers, and by the
selling of “time shares”. The “need for money”—in order to support
the Bakker family’s high-end life style—caused them to OVERSELL the
time shares in the already-built condos by several hundred percent.
Effectively, they were obtaining money by ’promising’ a vacation place
that couldn’t possibly be there for up to 2/3rd of people who were
paying money (or VOTING!) based on un unfulfillable PROMISES. Jim
Bakker was sentenced to YEARS in prison for FRAUD. Barack OBAMA
should be HANGED for TREASON for using much more far-reaching and
hurtful FRAUD to get “elected” ‘president’ for the tacit purpose of
DESTROYING the wished-to-be fair, Representative Republic as
envisioned by our Founding Fathers—that is the very essence of our
present Constitution—even though such form of government has not been
realized for a single day since the Constitution was ratified!
On today’s “This Week” show, pseudo conservative, George Will, got
‘Brownie points’ with the liberals who pay his salaries, by jumping-up-
and-down on Romney by proclaiming that “Romney isn’t the leader of the
Republican movement“. Know this, George Will (We go way, back, don’t
we.): Romney-Ryan received well OVER 51% of the unbribed, and thus
LEGAL, votes that were cast!!! *** Therefore, Mitt Romney is the ONLY
person entitled, by the Constitution, to be sworn in as President
(Note the capital ‘P’ that is absent when referencing Obama.)!!!!!
When I transcribed the original Constitution into my computer, in 1996—
key stroke by key stroke—I realized how much deadwood there was, and
how many “holes” there were in that essentially TOOTHLESS document.
My “NC” removes the deadwood; clarifies things without ambiguity (such
as what the 2nd Amendment means); and puts in so many ’teeth’, that no
person in their right mind would even think of trying to subvert my
document—the way the present Constitution has so easily been 99%
subverted! I do that by CRIMINALIZING any acts by government
officials that aren’t deferential to the Citizen(s) and my “NC”. In
short, there will never again be another PERSONNEL problem in
government (without firing, jailing or hanging as solutions) and on
which can be blamed close to 100% of the screw-ups by government that
are responsible for the horrific economic and social mess the USA
finds itself in.
It is obvious that very few American’s have ever read and understood
the Constitution. What most do—including a high percentage of
politicians and those in the media—is to recall what “the processes”
are, and assume that because those have been the status quo for so
long, that such must be what the Founding Fathers intended (finger-
down-the-throat gagging). I would bet that not one American in a
hundred realizes that no oath or declaration is legal unless the
person making such is honest and sincere. If a person, such as Obama
LIES (commits FRAUD) in order to get into a position to take an oath—
with which he does not even agree—then Obama becomes criminally liable
for 100% of the damages that result from his blatant FRAUD! The
financial losses to all Americans simply due to the devaluing of the
purchasing power of our money go into the tens of trillions of
dollars. Can Obama repay that with just the few millions of dollars
he has made from the sell of his books?
The STUPIDITY regarding what determines constitutionality extends to
should-be-smart people such as Fox’s John Stossel. Yesterday, he was
discussing—with should-be-smart Judge Andrew Napolitano—what effect
“four more years” (should be ‘days’) of Obama will have on the Supreme
Court. Napolitano said—with his sometimes used-car-salesman, fixed
smile—that because of the advancing ages of at least four of the
present nine justices, if Obama nominates any more justices like Elena
Kagan and Sonia M. Sotomayo, the “2nd Amendment” could get
overturned. Lest any of you have similar fears regarding my document,
here is what my “NC” says:
“2nd Amendment: Law-abiding, peaceable Citizens shall have the right
to keep and bear arms for sport or protection. Such may use
appropriate action—by degrees—to counter unlawful, forced or
threatening intrusion onto or into their private property, including:
verbal warning; the threat of; and then the use of, deadly force, if
necessary.”
“Section 7: ***Judges and justices shall not selectively interpret,
limit, or exclude existing laws so as to effectively make new laws.
No judge or justice shall be appointed based on their ideology, nor
shall ideology be considered in confirmation processes. As to the
nominating or appointing of judges or justices: No candidate for
public office, member of the Executive Branch nor the House, shall
state nor imply that a nominee will hold, or does hold, a particular
ideology, because by so stating or implying, such candidate shall be
disqualified, the apt one’s governmental job shall be lost, and the
apt nominee disqualified. Criminal cases shall be processed as a
named, titleless person v. a named person(s). The defense can choose
to sit on either side of the court. Judges and justices shall not
anthropomorphize “the Court”, nor seek out “historical” court
positions on which to base decisions; rather, decisions shall be
theirs alone.”
It is URGENT that freedom-loving Americans, everywhere, NOT be seduced
by the repetition of failed RITUAL governmental processes into
supposing that anything, at all, that is being done by government even
approaches being Constitutional! I can’t be sure, but the USA could
well be on the verge of another civil war if socialism isn’t stopped,
and stopped NOW! Our “elected” traitor to the USA, Barack Obama is
claiming that his “mandate” is to serve the middle class, when the
Constitution requires that he serve the ENTIRE country! Obama wants
only ONE class of people. His socialist-communist ideal is to force
the self-made, successful people DOWN into the middle class, and to
raise everyone now in poverty UP to the middle Class. I have
mathematical news for Obama, if 100% of the USA has the identical
mediocrity, then there IS no middle class at all—there is only
DOOM!!!!!
Those of you, like me, who don’t like having angry Americans even
considering the $2.75 short-term solutions to the horrific problems
that face America, should start talking about my New Constitution!
Such, through LIBERATED CAPITALISM, can save even the most down-and-
out citizens, and without any further increase in the un Holy size of
government. I HAVE the document that can SAVE the USA, including
those on the left and on the right! But some of the media must start
TALKING about it! Otherwise, there could be very little left to talk
about unless… you timid, timid souls start speaking up ON THE AIR and
ON CAMERA! Hear that Sean Hannity, Glenn Beck and etc. ???
Incredibly, Donna Brazile ended her Romney “gifts” remark, as in the
above, by saying that the “gifts” will come through having an improved
economy. Isn’t that EXACTLY what Romney-Ryan were saying every day
of their campaign??? Long live the USA!
Respectfully submitted,
John A. Armistead
Author and Patriot
>
> On Nov 15, 8:06 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> Dear Readers in Revolt: For over two years, the conservatives in the
> media—such as Shawn Hannity and Glenn Beck—have been calling the 2012
> presidential election the most crucial one inourentire history. The
>
> Dear Readers in Revolt: For over two years, the conservatives in the
> media—such as Shawn Hannity and Glenn Beck—have been calling the 2012
> “war” isn’t yet bloody. Nonetheless, it is being fought between these
> two clearly-delineated factions: Those who think that stealing is OK
> if “sanctioned” by the majority vote and “authorized” by an otherwise
> unresponsive-to-the-People government; and those who think that
> candidates running for officeshouldn’tbe allowed to BRIBEvoters
> with monetary promises or with any other favoritism not supported by
> “law”. In the case of thepresident, a simple proof of the latter
> two clearly-delineated factions: Those who think that stealing is OK
> if “sanctioned” by the majority vote and “authorized” by an otherwise
> unresponsive-to-the-People government; and those who think that
> candidates running for officeshouldn’tbe allowed to BRIBEvoters
> with monetary promises or with any other favoritism not supported by
> 50 and 60 years old, and may on good behavior, serve a single term of
> up to 10 years. ThePresident, or his agents, shall not work to win
> the confirmation of any nominee. Judges and justices shall be
> selected for their intellect, high moral character, compassion,
> knowledge of the law, likable nature, and for their proficiency and
> expediency in office. Such shall not be aloft nor considered
> infallible in all their judgments, yet shall be respected if they
> right injustices quickly. They shall make decisions based on apt laws
> and this New Constitution—never on their personal ideologies. Every
> two years an unbiased review panel shall apprise the Citizens of the
> job performance grade, as herein, of seated judges and justices. With
> the assent of 60% of thevotersnationwide, the latter can be
> selected for their intellect, high moral character, compassion,
> knowledge of the law, likable nature, and for their proficiency and
> expediency in office. Such shall not be aloft nor considered
> infallible in all their judgments, yet shall be respected if they
> right injustices quickly. They shall make decisions based on apt laws
> and this New Constitution—never on their personal ideologies. Every
> two years an unbiased review panel shall apprise the Citizens of the
> job performance grade, as herein, of seated judges and justices. With
> Morris had ‘missed’ by his high logic that the enthusiasm of Democrats
> is down) must have resulted from the “promises” that those door-to-
> door Obama surrogates had made. People will vote for someone if a
> sympathetic-sounding person comes into their homes and tells them they
> will get ‘free stuff’, not to mention driving them to the polls on
> election day.
>
> Four years ago a Black woman in a throng was rejoicing over the Obama
> victory. A reporter asked her why she was rejoicing. She said:
> “Because of the money!” “Whose money are you talking about?” After a
> pause, she said, “Obama’s money!” If one took Obama’s entire personal
> worth and divided “Obama’s money” up between those who voted for him,
> they would get just a few cents, each. What Obama has done for over
> six years is to BRIBE thevoterswith the money he expects to STEAL
> is down) must have resulted from the “promises” that those door-to-
> door Obama surrogates had made. People will vote for someone if a
> sympathetic-sounding person comes into their homes and tells them they
> will get ‘free stuff’, not to mention driving them to the polls on
> election day.
>
> Four years ago a Black woman in a throng was rejoicing over the Obama
> victory. A reporter asked her why she was rejoicing. She said:
> “Because of the money!” “Whose money are you talking about?” After a
> pause, she said, “Obama’s money!” If one took Obama’s entire personal
> worth and divided “Obama’s money” up between those who voted for him,
> they would get just a few cents, each. What Obama has done for over
>
> read more »
Message has been deleted
NoEinstein
Nov 20, 2012, 7:12:35 AM11/20/12
to
On Nov 18, 4:33 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
The Media, our mirror-of-doom.
Immediately after the HMS Titanic hit that iceberg 100 years ago,
there was a period of calm during which people looked about them to
observe the reactions of others. Since few people seemed to be in
panic and the ship was still traveling under her own power, people
continued with what they had been doing as though the collision was
just a thud and a grind in the night. Some of the passengers who had
been strolling near the front deck started kicking blocks of the ice
that had fallen down from the tall iceberg. It was all just an
amusing game of ice hockey.
Following the numbing thud and grind of the November 6th “election”,
the media immediately started talking about “the next four years”
under Obama. Since the popular vote total was about 3.5 million more
for Obama than for Romney, the mistaken conclusion seems to be that
the voters have just legitimized having our government keep growing,
like a cancer, to our very doom. *** In reality, well over 50% of the
votes for Obama were, essentially, votes for UNCONSTITUTIONAL
socialism, and thus SHALL NOT BE COUNTED! Nowhere in the Constitution
is government authorized to force half of the population, who are
successful, to pay even part of the living expenses of lazy and less
industrious freeloaders. Such a voter decision cannot be made,
because that would require the scrapping of our present Constitution.
And the latter can’t be done with just a 51% vote. It would require
ratification by 75% of the states. Based on the RED vs. BLUE map of
the states, Democrats have zero chance of changing our constitution to
outlaw the attainment of wealth. No ’gradual’ thud and grind can make
such doings constitutional!
There is a movement in Texas to have that ‘nation-size’ state secede
from the Union. Independent-minded Texans don’t like paying one penny
of their money to freeloaders. I would propose, for the sake of
arguing, that all BLUE states be required to secede! That way, those
living in the large urban areas, who ARE the cancer of America, will
be amputated before the rest of the USA dies from the blood poisoning
that the BLUE seems destined to cause.
Ron Paul had the right ideas, but he has, obviously, been corrupted—
because of being a political insider—to seek to make the needed
changes within our present, failed governmental system. He showed
himself to be too much of a wimp to lead the “revolution” that he once
had hinted he was preparing to lead. Why is it that so many should-be-
smart Republican politicians think that the “magical” solution to our
too big government is to mimic the Democrats—the way George Will,
Bobby Jindal and Newt Gingrich propose? Since Democratic voters have
been “bought’ or were given “gifts” (bribed), and since bribery is a
high CRIME, why is there not yet a single soul who is in the media
spotlight willing to say: The election is INVALID, because votes
obtained by making unconstitutional bribes and promises (of
entitlements) shall never be constitutional.
Obama, has been “acting presidential” by traveling to Burma. In a
speech, there, he stated that Burma is ’important’, because it is
located between two populous regions (China and India). He continues
to be guarded, at great expense, by the US Secret Service—that has yet
to exercise its duty to verify Obama’s “proof” of American
citizenship. As on the Titanic, the Secret Service looks around, and
seeing the liar-in-chief acting ”presidential”, they wrongly assume,
due to the normalness of their daily scene, that our sinking ship must
be safe to be on. In reality, every member of the Secret Service
takes an oath to support the Constitution. And the Constitution
REQUIRES that Presidents of the USA be natural born citizens. Arnold
Schwarzenegger would have liked to be President, but he wasn’t born in
the USA. Neither was Obama.
It is being stated that the reason Obama’s school records aren’t being
made public (probably indicating that he is a foreign exchange
student), is because of his… ’right to privacy’. Tell me, folks, does
the right to privacy of a CRIMINAL protect him from being brought to
justice? Isn’t the survival of the USA more important than the
privacy rights of the anti-Christ???
Many in the media, and in the country at large, are having their
attention drawn away from the should-never-happen 2013 swearing-in of
Obama. The crisis in the Middle East has shallows like Gov. Mike
Huckabee proclaiming, on his weekend Fox show, how justified the Jews
were in taking land that HAD been theirs, and in defending that land
as theirs, when much of it—by any stretch of the imagination—isn’t
legally theirs. Admittedly, Jews are less like “bulls in a china
shop” than Muslims. But such fact does not give Israel claim to a
nation that was improperly obtained by war. Repeated statements of
support for Israel, by many politicians in this country, are mainly
because of the huge, and largely unconstitutional, influence of biased
Jews who control most of the media in this country.
Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr., is probably rehearsing, over and
over, giving Obama the Oath of Office—which he had badly botched four
years ago. Roberts, like so many on the Washington scene, has been
seduced into believing that what gets done “must be right”, because it
keeps getting done. So long as our liar-in-chief keeps a pathologic
straight face while he plots our demise, Roberts will try to be… “all
smiles”, too. But if he gives Obama that oath, Roberts will, from the
first word, be committing capital TREASON. His earlier
characterization of the “fine” in Obama care as a “tax” shows Robert’s
corruptness. A “tax” that applies only to those who don’t do
something is exactly the same as a “fine”. The Constitution
authorizes (some) taxation, but not as punishment for not buying what
government has no authority to require anyone to buy.
So far, none of you media insiders have gotten angry enough about what
your bosses make you report to cause you to throw open the window and
yell, “I’m mad as hell, and I’m not going to take this any more!!!”
The effect of doing such a thing, on-the-air, would be to BREAK the
calm that continues to seduce this SINKING country into thinking… all
is well. Last week I got ‘not smiling’ vibes from Obama that
coincided with my descriptions of how he should be hanged, over the
Washington Mall reflection pool, in a most public way. Recently, I’ve
gotten vibes from Sen. Rand Paul and up-and-coming US Representative
Trey Gowdy, from SC. Might it be that those two, relative newcomers
value America more than they value our present failed system of
government? If so, then lead the charge, men; millions will follow
you!
The time has come for ACTION, not just thoughts, over our ACE IN THE
HOLE that is my penned and polished ‘New Constitution of the United
States of America‘. By its dictates, no person, left or right, will
be slighted, because: “Democracy and fair play shall have supremacy in
the USA!” Long live the USA!
Respectfully submitted,
John A. Armistead, Author and Patriot
> stated that Republicansshouldn’tbe saying that “Democrats were
> envisioned byourFounding Fathers—that is the very essence ofour
> purchasing power ofourmoney go into the tens of trillions of
> above, by saying that the ...
>
> read more »
>
The Media, our mirror-of-doom.
Immediately after the HMS Titanic hit that iceberg 100 years ago,
there was a period of calm during which people looked about them to
observe the reactions of others. Since few people seemed to be in
panic and the ship was still traveling under her own power, people
continued with what they had been doing as though the collision was
just a thud and a grind in the night. Some of the passengers who had
been strolling near the front deck started kicking blocks of the ice
that had fallen down from the tall iceberg. It was all just an
amusing game of ice hockey.
Following the numbing thud and grind of the November 6th “election”,
the media immediately started talking about “the next four years”
under Obama. Since the popular vote total was about 3.5 million more
for Obama than for Romney, the mistaken conclusion seems to be that
the voters have just legitimized having our government keep growing,
like a cancer, to our very doom. *** In reality, well over 50% of the
votes for Obama were, essentially, votes for UNCONSTITUTIONAL
socialism, and thus SHALL NOT BE COUNTED! Nowhere in the Constitution
is government authorized to force half of the population, who are
successful, to pay even part of the living expenses of lazy and less
industrious freeloaders. Such a voter decision cannot be made,
because that would require the scrapping of our present Constitution.
And the latter can’t be done with just a 51% vote. It would require
ratification by 75% of the states. Based on the RED vs. BLUE map of
the states, Democrats have zero chance of changing our constitution to
outlaw the attainment of wealth. No ’gradual’ thud and grind can make
such doings constitutional!
There is a movement in Texas to have that ‘nation-size’ state secede
from the Union. Independent-minded Texans don’t like paying one penny
of their money to freeloaders. I would propose, for the sake of
arguing, that all BLUE states be required to secede! That way, those
living in the large urban areas, who ARE the cancer of America, will
be amputated before the rest of the USA dies from the blood poisoning
that the BLUE seems destined to cause.
Ron Paul had the right ideas, but he has, obviously, been corrupted—
because of being a political insider—to seek to make the needed
changes within our present, failed governmental system. He showed
himself to be too much of a wimp to lead the “revolution” that he once
had hinted he was preparing to lead. Why is it that so many should-be-
smart Republican politicians think that the “magical” solution to our
too big government is to mimic the Democrats—the way George Will,
Bobby Jindal and Newt Gingrich propose? Since Democratic voters have
been “bought’ or were given “gifts” (bribed), and since bribery is a
high CRIME, why is there not yet a single soul who is in the media
spotlight willing to say: The election is INVALID, because votes
obtained by making unconstitutional bribes and promises (of
entitlements) shall never be constitutional.
Obama, has been “acting presidential” by traveling to Burma. In a
speech, there, he stated that Burma is ’important’, because it is
located between two populous regions (China and India). He continues
to be guarded, at great expense, by the US Secret Service—that has yet
to exercise its duty to verify Obama’s “proof” of American
citizenship. As on the Titanic, the Secret Service looks around, and
seeing the liar-in-chief acting ”presidential”, they wrongly assume,
due to the normalness of their daily scene, that our sinking ship must
be safe to be on. In reality, every member of the Secret Service
takes an oath to support the Constitution. And the Constitution
REQUIRES that Presidents of the USA be natural born citizens. Arnold
Schwarzenegger would have liked to be President, but he wasn’t born in
the USA. Neither was Obama.
It is being stated that the reason Obama’s school records aren’t being
made public (probably indicating that he is a foreign exchange
student), is because of his… ’right to privacy’. Tell me, folks, does
the right to privacy of a CRIMINAL protect him from being brought to
justice? Isn’t the survival of the USA more important than the
privacy rights of the anti-Christ???
Many in the media, and in the country at large, are having their
attention drawn away from the should-never-happen 2013 swearing-in of
Obama. The crisis in the Middle East has shallows like Gov. Mike
Huckabee proclaiming, on his weekend Fox show, how justified the Jews
were in taking land that HAD been theirs, and in defending that land
as theirs, when much of it—by any stretch of the imagination—isn’t
legally theirs. Admittedly, Jews are less like “bulls in a china
shop” than Muslims. But such fact does not give Israel claim to a
nation that was improperly obtained by war. Repeated statements of
support for Israel, by many politicians in this country, are mainly
because of the huge, and largely unconstitutional, influence of biased
Jews who control most of the media in this country.
Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr., is probably rehearsing, over and
over, giving Obama the Oath of Office—which he had badly botched four
years ago. Roberts, like so many on the Washington scene, has been
seduced into believing that what gets done “must be right”, because it
keeps getting done. So long as our liar-in-chief keeps a pathologic
straight face while he plots our demise, Roberts will try to be… “all
smiles”, too. But if he gives Obama that oath, Roberts will, from the
first word, be committing capital TREASON. His earlier
characterization of the “fine” in Obama care as a “tax” shows Robert’s
corruptness. A “tax” that applies only to those who don’t do
something is exactly the same as a “fine”. The Constitution
authorizes (some) taxation, but not as punishment for not buying what
government has no authority to require anyone to buy.
So far, none of you media insiders have gotten angry enough about what
your bosses make you report to cause you to throw open the window and
yell, “I’m mad as hell, and I’m not going to take this any more!!!”
The effect of doing such a thing, on-the-air, would be to BREAK the
calm that continues to seduce this SINKING country into thinking… all
is well. Last week I got ‘not smiling’ vibes from Obama that
coincided with my descriptions of how he should be hanged, over the
Washington Mall reflection pool, in a most public way. Recently, I’ve
gotten vibes from Sen. Rand Paul and up-and-coming US Representative
Trey Gowdy, from SC. Might it be that those two, relative newcomers
value America more than they value our present failed system of
government? If so, then lead the charge, men; millions will follow
you!
The time has come for ACTION, not just thoughts, over our ACE IN THE
HOLE that is my penned and polished ‘New Constitution of the United
States of America‘. By its dictates, no person, left or right, will
be slighted, because: “Democracy and fair play shall have supremacy in
the USA!” Long live the USA!
Respectfully submitted,
John A. Armistead, Author and Patriot
>
> read more »
NoEinstein
Nov 22, 2012, 8:27:57 PM11/22/12
to
On Nov 18, 5:11 pm, Morgoth Bauglir <Mel...@Mordor.com> wrote:
>
On Nov. 20, 2012 Morgoth Bauglir wrote, while seeking removal of his
reply after 'five days':
Hoo, boy!
And I thought _Hartung_ was crazy...
(Copied by J. A. A.)
>
> And I thought _Hartung_ was crazy...
>
On Nov. 20, 2012 Morgoth Bauglir wrote, while seeking removal of his
reply after 'five days':
Hoo, boy!
And I thought _Hartung_ was crazy...
(Copied by J. A. A.)
>
> > On Nov 16, 10:07 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > The spin of corruption.
>
> Hoo, boy!
> > On Nov 16, 10:07 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > The spin of corruption.
>
>
> And I thought _Hartung_ was crazy...
NoEinstein
Nov 22, 2012, 8:41:08 PM11/22/12
to
On Nov 20, 7:12 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
Patriotism vs. the Esprit de Corps.
Susan Rice, David Axelrod, “president” Obama, David Petraeus, Jay
Carney, Hillary Clinton and numbers of Democrats in Congress had each
had similar “hiccups” and/or frozen, stony expressions, before stating
that the Benghazi raid was due to a seldom-viewed video that mocked
Muhammad. Within minutes of the second attack, which included well-
aimed mortar rounds and RPGs, our military leaders knew that the lives
of Americans where being threatened. That was in the middle of the
night. On a Geraldo Rivera show, weeks later, a guest from the
military explained that American lives are never put in-harms-way
without having definitive intelligence. Two unmanned drones were
sent, but those weren’t equipped with weapons that might have helped
the situation. There were jet aircraft that could have reached the
scene within two hours, but the general being interviewed stated, I
think erroneously, that only the “President” could authorize the
sending of armed aircraft. Geraldo seemed happy to add that since all
of this was happening “at night” nothing could have been done, anyway.
I have never heard more ball-faced lies than the latter! Every
general has the authority to order armed reconnaissance flights to
protect Americans! If a sergeant sees terrorists about to blow up an
American installation, he is authorized to use deadly force to repel
the invasion! Why in hell is there “a chain-of-command” in the
military, if only our pseudo “president” can make a decision? For
Geraldo’s edification, our forces are superbly equipped to fight at
night—which has often been the preferred time for the launching of
attacks! Such was the case for the launching of paratroopers at the
beginning of the Normandy Invasion. That was nearly half a century
before the development of night vision goggles.
The general being interviewed, using just his authority as general,
should have SCRAMBLED and launched, say, two heavily armored ‘Warthog’
aircraft, with a total of four intelligent men on board. In a little
over two hours, those two planes could have been circling the embassy
compound, and upon seeing the attacking militants, could have, within
minutes, stopped that attack with their machine gun, cannon and rocket
fire. Due to the heavy armament and high survivability of those
Warthog aircraft, it would have been unlikely that the four men on
board would not have been able to arrive, safely, back at the base
from which they were launched. Once there, the commanding general
would have simply informed the White House that an invasion on a US
Embassy has just been repelled. Would that general have been court-
marshaled for not asking the “president”, first? Ha, ha, HA! It is
no laughing matter that so few, in the “chain-of-command” are willing
to even suggest that logical actions should prevail, when we have a
squatting, dictatorial “president” in the White House.
Patriotism, more often than not, involves independent, logical-minded
people who realize what needs to be done. Such will enlist more timid
souls to join the cause, or they will take action themselves. When
that iceberg was struck by the Titanic, people heard the thump and the
grind. Most just looked about at the reactions of others, and seeing
no panic, chose to dismiss the noise as harmless. Obama’s fraudulent
election, November 6, could be a mortal blow to the ship that is the
USA. But most in the media are talking about four more years as
though all-is-well. Every unwise suggestion of the latter can cause
millions of angry, suburban Americans to be resigned to the status quo
that is our FAILED system of government. On The Five, Greg Gutfeld
makes IQ veiling wisecracks, implying that “losing” is quite OK.
While socialist Bob Beckel seems almost embarrassed by Obama’s “win”.
My message to the Democrats: Be careful what you wish for: you just
might get it! The socialism-induced, economic collapse of the USA
should be the wish of no one.
Mitt Romney is, perhaps, the person most “locked into” his “defeat” in
the November 6 fraudulent election. Other than his saying,
rightfully, that Obama “won” because of millions of promises of
entitlement “gifts“, Romney should have said: Obama is a lying,
bribing traitor to the USA! Obama values his image with the Muslims
of the world more than he values the lives of Americans abroad! He
thinks Burma is important because that country is located between
populous China and India. Why is Obama so interested in those
countries when the USA is going down-the-tubes, because so many of our
manufacturing jobs are being shipped abroad? It is because Obama
wants his socialism to encompass the entire world. He is, slickly,
trying to lie his way to be the dictator-in-chief of every person in
the world! But he must be STOPPED!!!
Obama’s main defense, consistent with his criminal proclivity, is the
pathological way that he can keep a straight face, and un quivering
voice while lying at every turn. It is being claimed—as evidence of
USA normalcy following the thump and grind of the Nov. 6 “election”—
that Obama and Hillary have successfully “negotiated a ceasefire”
between Israelis and Palestinians. That largely tacit claim happened
after Israel massed their tanks and troops for a pending attack. The
less well armed Palestinians were cowering in fear. It was Israeli-
induced FEAR, and nothing that Obama nor Hillary have done that,
hopefully, will lead to a ceasefire.
The esprit de corps in Washington is not to make waves, lest some
other faction will make waves against you. The quickest resolution of
the USA-Obama collision, Nov. 6, would be for a lone member of the US
Secret Service to start getting his fellow agents to ask these
questions: Who do we work for, the government or the People? Is it
‘our duty’ to protect a ‘president’ if he isn’t, legally our
President? If, as Obama claims, he was born in Hawaii, just 50 years
ago, why isn’t his birth certificate, in paper form, available for
public scrutiny? If the security and economic future of the USA hangs
in the balance, doesn’t such a crisis mandate that Obama’s college
records, and his Social Security records be made public? Don’t the
People deserve to have the backgrounds of all candidates for President
thoroughly investigated? Why was no such investigation of Obama’s
background ever made?
The culture of the US Secret Service, at least those protecting high
public officials, mandates that they look immaculate in their tailor
made suits over Kevlar linings. They always seem life-and-death
serious, while the throngs are smiling just to be getting to see…
their idol and gift-giver, Obama. They are former athletes and/or
were trained in the military to do as they are commanded to do,
including risking their own lives to save the life of the President.
They are playing a life-or-death game, wherein the slip-up of even one
agent might bode the failure of their entire agency to… do its job.
So, they look the other way to talk of criminality, and give our
fraudulent president the same “respect” that Mitt Romney should be
given, as the only legally-voted-in President of the USA.
In the Spirit of our original Constitution, my New Constitution says:
“It is treason to foster corruption in any arm of government, to levy
war against the USA, adhere to her enemies, or to give them aid and
comfort. The former must show abuse of power that subverts the New
Constitution, such as by enlisting subordinates into unlawfulness that
violates the civil rights of any Citizen or group. No person shall be
convicted of treason unless on the testimony of two witnesses to the
same overt act, or by confession in court. The House sets punishment
for treason, if the civil rights of innocent relatives aren’t
affected.”
“Local, state and federal law enforcement, the courts, or any branch
or branches of the military or their respective parts shall at no time
be used in support of corruption in government by any public
official(s) at any level. Legal authority of law enforcement or the
courts over the Citizens is voided if used in support of corruption.
Local, state and federal law enforcement agencies shall not be
organizationally affiliated, and persons or groups, therein, shall not
be presumed by law enforcement to be acting lawfully solely because of
such auspices.”
“No employee nor office holder shall be sanctioned for making
When a ‘president’ is corrupt, it is crucial to report that fact to
the People, who have final authority over both the Executive Branch
and the Courts. *** Make you findings PUBLIC and all of those who are
corrupt, including the majority on the US Supreme Court, will be
brought to justice. Not reporting observed corruption will send those
of you, like blindly-loyal Secret Service agents, to prison for three
years. Are those custom tailored suits worth three years of your
lives?
As the country becomes caught up in the hustle and bustle of the
Holidays know this: Hear the Patriots call! The survival of the USA
depends on having as many of you as possible to act accordingly.
The Patriots’ Call
By: John A. Armistead
Hark! The patriots’ call.
Spring-up to our defense!
Stand tall to take the task anew;
Fear not unworthiness.
Feel strength within your veins,
From the blood of ancestors proud.
Feel strength to take and wield,
‘The blind-folded-one’s sword’.
Hark! The patriots’ call.
Be a match for any task.
Defend-not unworthiness.
Order-up our Nation’s best.
Fear not what need be done,
For God has made us all—
And God can still inspire;
So light-up the patriots’ fires!!
__________
Respectfully submitted,
John A. Armistead
Author and Patriot
>
> like a cancer, toourvery doom. *** In reality, well over 50% of the
> straight face while he plotsourdemise, Roberts will try to be… “all
>
Patriotism vs. the Esprit de Corps.
Susan Rice, David Axelrod, “president” Obama, David Petraeus, Jay
Carney, Hillary Clinton and numbers of Democrats in Congress had each
had similar “hiccups” and/or frozen, stony expressions, before stating
that the Benghazi raid was due to a seldom-viewed video that mocked
Muhammad. Within minutes of the second attack, which included well-
aimed mortar rounds and RPGs, our military leaders knew that the lives
of Americans where being threatened. That was in the middle of the
night. On a Geraldo Rivera show, weeks later, a guest from the
military explained that American lives are never put in-harms-way
without having definitive intelligence. Two unmanned drones were
sent, but those weren’t equipped with weapons that might have helped
the situation. There were jet aircraft that could have reached the
scene within two hours, but the general being interviewed stated, I
think erroneously, that only the “President” could authorize the
sending of armed aircraft. Geraldo seemed happy to add that since all
of this was happening “at night” nothing could have been done, anyway.
I have never heard more ball-faced lies than the latter! Every
general has the authority to order armed reconnaissance flights to
protect Americans! If a sergeant sees terrorists about to blow up an
American installation, he is authorized to use deadly force to repel
the invasion! Why in hell is there “a chain-of-command” in the
military, if only our pseudo “president” can make a decision? For
Geraldo’s edification, our forces are superbly equipped to fight at
night—which has often been the preferred time for the launching of
attacks! Such was the case for the launching of paratroopers at the
beginning of the Normandy Invasion. That was nearly half a century
before the development of night vision goggles.
The general being interviewed, using just his authority as general,
should have SCRAMBLED and launched, say, two heavily armored ‘Warthog’
aircraft, with a total of four intelligent men on board. In a little
over two hours, those two planes could have been circling the embassy
compound, and upon seeing the attacking militants, could have, within
minutes, stopped that attack with their machine gun, cannon and rocket
fire. Due to the heavy armament and high survivability of those
Warthog aircraft, it would have been unlikely that the four men on
board would not have been able to arrive, safely, back at the base
from which they were launched. Once there, the commanding general
would have simply informed the White House that an invasion on a US
Embassy has just been repelled. Would that general have been court-
marshaled for not asking the “president”, first? Ha, ha, HA! It is
no laughing matter that so few, in the “chain-of-command” are willing
to even suggest that logical actions should prevail, when we have a
squatting, dictatorial “president” in the White House.
Patriotism, more often than not, involves independent, logical-minded
people who realize what needs to be done. Such will enlist more timid
souls to join the cause, or they will take action themselves. When
that iceberg was struck by the Titanic, people heard the thump and the
grind. Most just looked about at the reactions of others, and seeing
no panic, chose to dismiss the noise as harmless. Obama’s fraudulent
election, November 6, could be a mortal blow to the ship that is the
USA. But most in the media are talking about four more years as
though all-is-well. Every unwise suggestion of the latter can cause
millions of angry, suburban Americans to be resigned to the status quo
that is our FAILED system of government. On The Five, Greg Gutfeld
makes IQ veiling wisecracks, implying that “losing” is quite OK.
While socialist Bob Beckel seems almost embarrassed by Obama’s “win”.
My message to the Democrats: Be careful what you wish for: you just
might get it! The socialism-induced, economic collapse of the USA
should be the wish of no one.
Mitt Romney is, perhaps, the person most “locked into” his “defeat” in
the November 6 fraudulent election. Other than his saying,
rightfully, that Obama “won” because of millions of promises of
entitlement “gifts“, Romney should have said: Obama is a lying,
bribing traitor to the USA! Obama values his image with the Muslims
of the world more than he values the lives of Americans abroad! He
thinks Burma is important because that country is located between
populous China and India. Why is Obama so interested in those
countries when the USA is going down-the-tubes, because so many of our
manufacturing jobs are being shipped abroad? It is because Obama
wants his socialism to encompass the entire world. He is, slickly,
trying to lie his way to be the dictator-in-chief of every person in
the world! But he must be STOPPED!!!
Obama’s main defense, consistent with his criminal proclivity, is the
pathological way that he can keep a straight face, and un quivering
voice while lying at every turn. It is being claimed—as evidence of
USA normalcy following the thump and grind of the Nov. 6 “election”—
that Obama and Hillary have successfully “negotiated a ceasefire”
between Israelis and Palestinians. That largely tacit claim happened
after Israel massed their tanks and troops for a pending attack. The
less well armed Palestinians were cowering in fear. It was Israeli-
induced FEAR, and nothing that Obama nor Hillary have done that,
hopefully, will lead to a ceasefire.
The esprit de corps in Washington is not to make waves, lest some
other faction will make waves against you. The quickest resolution of
the USA-Obama collision, Nov. 6, would be for a lone member of the US
Secret Service to start getting his fellow agents to ask these
questions: Who do we work for, the government or the People? Is it
‘our duty’ to protect a ‘president’ if he isn’t, legally our
President? If, as Obama claims, he was born in Hawaii, just 50 years
ago, why isn’t his birth certificate, in paper form, available for
public scrutiny? If the security and economic future of the USA hangs
in the balance, doesn’t such a crisis mandate that Obama’s college
records, and his Social Security records be made public? Don’t the
People deserve to have the backgrounds of all candidates for President
thoroughly investigated? Why was no such investigation of Obama’s
background ever made?
The culture of the US Secret Service, at least those protecting high
public officials, mandates that they look immaculate in their tailor
made suits over Kevlar linings. They always seem life-and-death
serious, while the throngs are smiling just to be getting to see…
their idol and gift-giver, Obama. They are former athletes and/or
were trained in the military to do as they are commanded to do,
including risking their own lives to save the life of the President.
They are playing a life-or-death game, wherein the slip-up of even one
agent might bode the failure of their entire agency to… do its job.
So, they look the other way to talk of criminality, and give our
fraudulent president the same “respect” that Mitt Romney should be
given, as the only legally-voted-in President of the USA.
In the Spirit of our original Constitution, my New Constitution says:
“It is treason to foster corruption in any arm of government, to levy
war against the USA, adhere to her enemies, or to give them aid and
comfort. The former must show abuse of power that subverts the New
Constitution, such as by enlisting subordinates into unlawfulness that
violates the civil rights of any Citizen or group. No person shall be
convicted of treason unless on the testimony of two witnesses to the
same overt act, or by confession in court. The House sets punishment
for treason, if the civil rights of innocent relatives aren’t
affected.”
“Local, state and federal law enforcement, the courts, or any branch
or branches of the military or their respective parts shall at no time
be used in support of corruption in government by any public
official(s) at any level. Legal authority of law enforcement or the
courts over the Citizens is voided if used in support of corruption.
Local, state and federal law enforcement agencies shall not be
organizationally affiliated, and persons or groups, therein, shall not
be presumed by law enforcement to be acting lawfully solely because of
such auspices.”
“No employee nor office holder shall be sanctioned for making
complaints against another office holder, employee or superior. No
government employee nor office holder shall be coerced into
wrongdoing, immoral action or non action, or illegality by a real or
implied threat of the loss of one’s job, promotion or benefits, nor by
any bribe or promise of promotion or benefits. Making such a threat,
bribe or promise is a felony carrying a minimum ten year prison
sentence—and if part of a pattern—making such threats, bribes or
promises is treason. Acquiescing to such is a felony. Government
officials, agents or employees who become aware of corruption in
government or in any of its departments shall notify the Executive
Branch and the courts; willful failure to do so is a felony. With
impunity, a government officer(s) or employee(s) shall enforce no law
nor perform any order or directive which violates their personal moral
conscience or their oath.”
Note: The important directive in the above is the mandate to ACT.
government employee nor office holder shall be coerced into
wrongdoing, immoral action or non action, or illegality by a real or
implied threat of the loss of one’s job, promotion or benefits, nor by
any bribe or promise of promotion or benefits. Making such a threat,
bribe or promise is a felony carrying a minimum ten year prison
sentence—and if part of a pattern—making such threats, bribes or
promises is treason. Acquiescing to such is a felony. Government
officials, agents or employees who become aware of corruption in
government or in any of its departments shall notify the Executive
Branch and the courts; willful failure to do so is a felony. With
impunity, a government officer(s) or employee(s) shall enforce no law
nor perform any order or directive which violates their personal moral
conscience or their oath.”
When a ‘president’ is corrupt, it is crucial to report that fact to
the People, who have final authority over both the Executive Branch
and the Courts. *** Make you findings PUBLIC and all of those who are
corrupt, including the majority on the US Supreme Court, will be
brought to justice. Not reporting observed corruption will send those
of you, like blindly-loyal Secret Service agents, to prison for three
years. Are those custom tailored suits worth three years of your
lives?
As the country becomes caught up in the hustle and bustle of the
Holidays know this: Hear the Patriots call! The survival of the USA
depends on having as many of you as possible to act accordingly.
The Patriots’ Call
By: John A. Armistead
Hark! The patriots’ call.
Spring-up to our defense!
Stand tall to take the task anew;
Fear not unworthiness.
Feel strength within your veins,
From the blood of ancestors proud.
Feel strength to take and wield,
‘The blind-folded-one’s sword’.
Hark! The patriots’ call.
Be a match for any task.
Defend-not unworthiness.
Order-up our Nation’s best.
Fear not what need be done,
For God has made us all—
And God can still inspire;
So light-up the patriots’ fires!!
__________
Respectfully submitted,
John A. Armistead
>
> On Nov 18, 4:33 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> The Media,ourmirror-of-doom.
>
> Immediately after the HMS Titanic hit that iceberg 100 years ago,
> there was a period of calm during which people looked about them to
> observe the reactions of others. Since few people seemed to be in
> panic and the ship was still traveling under her own power, people
> continued with what they had been doing as though the collision was
> just a thud and a grind in the night. Some of the passengers who had
> been strolling near the front deck started kicking blocks of the ice
> that had fallen down from the tall iceberg. It was all just an
> amusing game of ice hockey.
>
> Following the numbing thud and grind of the November 6th “election”,
> the media immediately started talking about “the next four years”
> under Obama. Since the popular vote total was about 3.5 million more
> for Obama than for Romney, the mistaken conclusion seems to be that
> thevotershave just legitimized havingourgovernment keep growing,
>
> The Media,ourmirror-of-doom.
>
> Immediately after the HMS Titanic hit that iceberg 100 years ago,
> there was a period of calm during which people looked about them to
> observe the reactions of others. Since few people seemed to be in
> panic and the ship was still traveling under her own power, people
> continued with what they had been doing as though the collision was
> just a thud and a grind in the night. Some of the passengers who had
> been strolling near the front deck started kicking blocks of the ice
> that had fallen down from the tall iceberg. It was all just an
> amusing game of ice hockey.
>
> Following the numbing thud and grind of the November 6th “election”,
> the media immediately started talking about “the next four years”
> under Obama. Since the popular vote total was about 3.5 million more
> for Obama than for Romney, the mistaken conclusion seems to be that
> like a cancer, toourvery doom. *** In reality, well over 50% of the
> votes for Obama were, essentially, votes for UNCONSTITUTIONAL
> socialism, and thus SHALL NOT BE COUNTED! Nowhere in the Constitution
> is government authorized to force half of the population, who are
> successful, to pay even part of the living expenses of lazy and less
> industrious freeloaders. Such a voter decision cannot be made,
> because that would require the scrapping ofourpresent Constitution.
> socialism, and thus SHALL NOT BE COUNTED! Nowhere in the Constitution
> is government authorized to force half of the population, who are
> successful, to pay even part of the living expenses of lazy and less
> industrious freeloaders. Such a voter decision cannot be made,
> And the latter can’t be done with just a 51% vote. It would require
> ratification by 75% of the states. Based on the RED vs. BLUE map of
> the states, Democrats have zero chance of changingourconstitution to
> ratification by 75% of the states. Based on the RED vs. BLUE map of
> outlaw the attainment of wealth. No ’gradual’ thud and grind can make
> such doings constitutional!
>
> There is a movement in Texas to have that ‘nation-size’ state secede
> from the Union. Independent-minded Texans don’t like paying one penny
> of their money to freeloaders. I would propose, for the sake of
> arguing, that all BLUE states be required to secede! That way, those
> living in the large urban areas, who ARE the cancer of America, will
> be amputated before the rest of the USA dies from the blood poisoning
> that the BLUE seems destined to cause.
>
> Ron Paul had the right ideas, but he has, obviously, been corrupted—
> because of being a political insider—to seek to make the needed
> changes withinourpresent, failed governmental system. He showed
> such doings constitutional!
>
> There is a movement in Texas to have that ‘nation-size’ state secede
> from the Union. Independent-minded Texans don’t like paying one penny
> of their money to freeloaders. I would propose, for the sake of
> arguing, that all BLUE states be required to secede! That way, those
> living in the large urban areas, who ARE the cancer of America, will
> be amputated before the rest of the USA dies from the blood poisoning
> that the BLUE seems destined to cause.
>
> Ron Paul had the right ideas, but he has, obviously, been corrupted—
> because of being a political insider—to seek to make the needed
> himself to be too much of a wimp to lead the “revolution” that he once
> had hinted he was preparing to lead. Why is it that so many should-be-
> smart Republican politicians think that the “magical” solution toour
> too big government is to mimic the Democrats—the way George Will,
> Bobby Jindal and Newt Gingrich propose? Since Democraticvotershave
> been “bought’ or were given “gifts” (bribed), and since bribery is a
> high CRIME, why is there not yet a single soul who is in the media
> spotlight willing to say: The election is INVALID, because votes
> obtained by making unconstitutional bribes and promises (of
> entitlements) shall never be constitutional.
>
> Obama, has been “acting presidential” by traveling to Burma. In a
> speech, there, he stated that Burma is ’important’, because it is
> located between two populous regions (China and India). He continues
> to be guarded, at great expense, by the US Secret Service—that has yet
> to exercise its duty to verify Obama’s “proof” of American
> citizenship. As on the Titanic, the Secret Service looks around, and
> seeing the liar-in-chief acting ”presidential”, they wrongly assume,
> due to the normalness of their daily scene, thatoursinking ship must
> had hinted he was preparing to lead. Why is it that so many should-be-
> smart Republican politicians think that the “magical” solution toour
> too big government is to mimic the Democrats—the way George Will,
> Bobby Jindal and Newt Gingrich propose? Since Democraticvotershave
> been “bought’ or were given “gifts” (bribed), and since bribery is a
> high CRIME, why is there not yet a single soul who is in the media
> spotlight willing to say: The election is INVALID, because votes
> obtained by making unconstitutional bribes and promises (of
> entitlements) shall never be constitutional.
>
> Obama, has been “acting presidential” by traveling to Burma. In a
> speech, there, he stated that Burma is ’important’, because it is
> located between two populous regions (China and India). He continues
> to be guarded, at great expense, by the US Secret Service—that has yet
> to exercise its duty to verify Obama’s “proof” of American
> citizenship. As on the Titanic, the Secret Service looks around, and
> seeing the liar-in-chief acting ”presidential”, they wrongly assume,
> be safe to be on. In reality, every member of the Secret Service
> takes an oath to support the Constitution. And the Constitution
> REQUIRES that Presidents of the USA be natural born citizens. Arnold
> Schwarzenegger would have liked to bePresident, but he wasn’t born in
> takes an oath to support the Constitution. And the Constitution
> REQUIRES that Presidents of the USA be natural born citizens. Arnold
> the USA. Neither was Obama.
>
> It is being stated that the reason Obama’s school records aren’t being
> made public (probably indicating that he is a foreign exchange
> student), is because of his… ’right to privacy’. Tell me, folks, does
> the right to privacy of a CRIMINAL protect him from being brought to
> justice? Isn’t the survival of the USA more important than the
> privacy rights of the anti-Christ???
>
> Many in the media, and in the country at large, are having their
> attention drawn away from the should-never-happen 2013 swearing-in of
> Obama. The crisis in the Middle East has shallows like Gov. Mike
> Huckabee proclaiming, on his weekend Fox show, how justified the Jews
> were in taking land that HAD been theirs, and in defending that land
> as theirs, when much of it—by any stretch of the imagination—isn’t
> legally theirs. Admittedly, Jews are less like “bulls in a china
> shop” than Muslims. But such fact does not give Israel claim to a
> nation that was improperly obtained by war. Repeated statements of
> support for Israel, by many politicians in this country, are mainly
> because of the huge, and largely unconstitutional, influence of biased
> Jews who control most of the media in this country.
>
> Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr., is probably rehearsing, over and
> over, giving Obama the Oath of Office—which he had badly botched four
> years ago. Roberts, like so many on the Washington scene, has been
> seduced into believing that what gets done “must be right”, because it
> keeps getting done. So long asourliar-in-chief keeps a pathologic
>
> It is being stated that the reason Obama’s school records aren’t being
> made public (probably indicating that he is a foreign exchange
> student), is because of his… ’right to privacy’. Tell me, folks, does
> the right to privacy of a CRIMINAL protect him from being brought to
> justice? Isn’t the survival of the USA more important than the
> privacy rights of the anti-Christ???
>
> Many in the media, and in the country at large, are having their
> attention drawn away from the should-never-happen 2013 swearing-in of
> Obama. The crisis in the Middle East has shallows like Gov. Mike
> Huckabee proclaiming, on his weekend Fox show, how justified the Jews
> were in taking land that HAD been theirs, and in defending that land
> as theirs, when much of it—by any stretch of the imagination—isn’t
> legally theirs. Admittedly, Jews are less like “bulls in a china
> shop” than Muslims. But such fact does not give Israel claim to a
> nation that was improperly obtained by war. Repeated statements of
> support for Israel, by many politicians in this country, are mainly
> because of the huge, and largely unconstitutional, influence of biased
> Jews who control most of the media in this country.
>
> Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr., is probably rehearsing, over and
> over, giving Obama the Oath of Office—which he had badly botched four
> years ago. Roberts, like so many on the Washington scene, has been
> seduced into believing that what gets done “must be right”, because it
> straight face while he plotsourdemise, Roberts will try to be… “all
> smiles”, too. But if he gives Obama that oath, Roberts will, from the
> first word, be committing capital TREASON. His earlier
> characterization of the “fine” in Obama care as a “tax” shows Robert’s
> corruptness. A “tax” that applies only to those who don’t do
> something is exactly the same as a “fine”. The Constitution
> authorizes (some) taxation, but not as punishment for not buying what
> government has no authority to require anyone to buy.
>
> So far, none of you media insiders have gotten angry enough about what
> your bosses make you report to cause you to throw open the window and
> yell, “I’m mad as hell, and I’m not going to take this any more!!!”
> The effect of doing such a thing, on-the-air, would be to BREAK the
> calm that continues to seduce this SINKING country into thinking… all
> is well. Last week I got ‘not smiling’ vibes from Obama that
> coincided with my descriptions of how he should be hanged, over the
> Washington Mall reflection pool, in a most public way. Recently, I’ve
> gotten vibes from Sen. Rand Paul and up-and-coming US Representative
> Trey Gowdy, from SC. Might it be that those two, relative newcomers
> value America more than they valueourpresent failed system of
> first word, be committing capital TREASON. His earlier
> characterization of the “fine” in Obama care as a “tax” shows Robert’s
> corruptness. A “tax” that applies only to those who don’t do
> something is exactly the same as a “fine”. The Constitution
> authorizes (some) taxation, but not as punishment for not buying what
> government has no authority to require anyone to buy.
>
> So far, none of you media insiders have gotten angry enough about what
> your bosses make you report to cause you to throw open the window and
> yell, “I’m mad as hell, and I’m not going to take this any more!!!”
> The effect of doing such a thing, on-the-air, would be to BREAK the
> calm that continues to seduce this SINKING country into thinking… all
> is well. Last week I got ‘not smiling’ vibes from Obama that
> coincided with my descriptions of how he should be hanged, over the
> Washington Mall reflection pool, in a most public way. Recently, I’ve
> gotten vibes from Sen. Rand Paul and up-and-coming US Representative
> Trey Gowdy, from SC. Might it be that those two, relative newcomers
> government? If so, then lead the charge, men; millions will follow
> you!
>
> The time has come for ACTION, not just thoughts, overourACE IN THE
> you!
>
NoEinstein
Nov 22, 2012, 9:02:58 PM11/22/12
to
On Nov 18, 5:11 pm, Morgoth Bauglir <Mel...@Mordor.com> wrote:
> > On Nov 16, 10:07 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > The spin of corruption.
>
>
> > The spin of corruption.
>
> Hoo, boy!
>
> And I thought _Hartung_ was crazy...
Dear M. B.: Most morons think intellectuals are 'crazy'. From a
>
> And I thought _Hartung_ was crazy...
brief search, it seems that David Hartung is an intellectual. I
invite him to reply, here. — John A. Armistead —
NoEinstein
Nov 24, 2012, 4:27:15 PM11/24/12
to
On Nov 22, 8:41 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
Of Stamps and Trash.
My primary civic goal is to save the USA from socialism and from
financial ruin. Both are being caused by the hugely mistaken notion
of close to half of the citizens that government is the cradle-to-
grave answer to all woes that might befall.
Last night I got vibes from Rudy Giuliani—probably relative to these
same essays which a great many people in-the-public-eye are reading.
There was a thoughtful, slightly smiling look on his face. In
thinking back about Rudy, beyond his historic connection to the events
and aftermath of 9/11, I recall how wise he must have been, as a
salesman, to garner the votes necessary to be elected Mayor of New
York in such a liberal stronghold as that city. I’m disappointed how
the pendulum-swing to Mayor Bloomberg has mostly fomented group-
against-group divisiveness. As in my New Constitution and as I
explained in my meaty little book, ‘The Shortest Distance; Harmony
Through Prosperity’, the secret of getting huge numbers of people to
peacefully coexist is by playing up the commonality while downplaying
the (group) differences. That is what Rudy had to have done very
well.
Another New Yorker I’ve gotten vibes from in the last few weeks is
Mort Zuckerman. In my mind, he had just his normal, stoic facial
expression. Since I’ve gotten none of those vides, recently, its
probably due to my “Hark the Patriots’ Call!” not reaching a high
enough threshold to get him to act for the sake of America. Zuckerman
is being tugged in three directions. Capitalism has made him
extremely wealthy. But since capitalism and socialism can’t
peacefully coexist, he is in a quandary. Jews are playing both ends
against the middle by wanting ’liberal’ influence in government,
because of their persecuted minority status, and because Jews have had
considerable capitalist successes due in large measure to nepotism.
Jews as individuals, I like. But Jews as a race-against-the-world, I
don’t like very much. If you want to be loved by yours truly, LOSE
your group identities and join together as members of the human
race! The third way Zuckerman is being tugged is to always be on
both sides of the fence on the issues of the day in order to reach the
widest possible audience with his otherwise excellent editorials. He
could start a peaceful revolution by simply stating in his magazine:
“A SC man has penned and polished a New Constitution of the United
States of America. From what I’ve seen in the excerpts, there has
been a huge amount of thought, by an obviously very intelligent man,
how to optimize government to have the maximum benefit for the largest
possible number of Americans, left and right.”
‘The Donald’ is a regular guest—sometimes electronically-linked—on
Greta Van Susteren’s Fox show. Prior to the election he offered to
pay five million dollars to the charity of Obama’s choice if Obama
would simply release his college records for public scrutiny. That,
of course, didn’t happen. But it is what I, as a law-abiding citizen
and Patriot, am demanding (to the US Secret Service) must happen
before anyone even considers that Obama meets (Ha!) the Constitution’s
requirement of his being a native born citizen. Valid SS numbers
reflect the state of residence and chronological placement of the
particular applicant. Can we have a “President” without a valid SS
number? Of course not! So, Secret Service, DO YOUR JOBS!! These
issues are NOT going to go away! Your protecting of Obama (as your
esprit de corps responsibility) will be less risky to your own lives,
if you will simply say to Obama: “You are under arrest for FRAUD
relative to your becoming President in 2009. And you are under arrest
for TREASON, for consistently subverting and bypassing the US
Constitution to the economic and social detriment of most of the US
population.” The citizens will see such actions as HEROIC! I know
that being strong, intelligent and having fast reactions are
requirements for becoming a Secret Service Agent. But as in any
“military engagement” failure to act, decisively, can spell doom. So
don’t keep burying-your-heads-in-the-sand, ACT!!!
I’ve may have gotten vibes from ‘The Donald’ numbers of times. But I
can’t be sure that is because he has read even one of my essays over
the last six years. I, as an architect, have a master plan for the
redevelopment of a large portion of the center of my hometown of
Easley, SC. His organizations (He’s an executive; you know!) have
real estate projects of all scales and types under way across
America. For a number of years I have supposed that if I can get
recognition for either my New Science (that has so easily disproved
Einstein and much of status quo physics and cosmology) or my New
Constitution, that I might could get up my nerve to ask Donald Trump
to buy the central portion of the town of Easley. My plan is pre1930
retro rather than obsolete-tomorrow, glass and brass. Big cities have
effective towns in single buildings. So, those who live in the latter
are able to shop for their major daily supplies without having to get
in cars or take cabs.
In the 1950s, two automobiles in every family killed the mercantile
mix of central downtowns all across America. Malls are sometimes-
successful alternatives to the balanced businesses in the downtowns of
old. My master plan is to place the entire ownership of the
commercial portion of the town center under a single ownership. That
way, the crucial MIX of businesses necessary to make people from far
and wide come to Easley can be assured. What present generation
family wouldn’t enjoy bringing their kids to see how charming and
authentic looking a 1920’s town can be? It would be like taking a
trip in a Time Machine! But fear not, demanding shoppers, beneath the
scene, linked by computers to automated warehousing, the product you
purchase will be delivered to central pickup stations convenient to
the two thousand, mostly on grade, new parking spaces. Those are
within easy walking distance. But people who prefer not to walk, can
catch free rides in stretch “Woody” Ford replicas that circle the
town. The police serving the central town will dress like ‘in the
movies’ and will drive authentic (but under-the-hood advanced) period
cars. The FLAVOR of the place will be incredible! The USA could be on
the verge of having wonderful things happening all over (!), if
socialism can forever be gotten off of capitalism’s back.
During the seemingly interminable presidential campaign, I happened to
be tuned-in with higher probability to Greta’s show than most of the
others. I would say that she does more behind-the-scenes research,
especially, relative to what questions she will ask her guests, than
perhaps any other host or hostess in the media. Initially, because
of the way she ‘grilled’ conservatives, I sensed that her heart was
liberal. However, as the campaign wore on, the simple economics of
socialism must have swayed her to the same conclusion that I reached
thirty years ago: The cost of having government continue to provide
more and more things is simply too great!
I, and my New Constitution, are very ’liberal’ regarding protecting
the environment and protecting our rights to control our own bodies.
For years I called myself a social liberal and a fiscal ULTRA
conservative.
“Preface:
The Will of the People is the foundation of government. The
People must be represented faithfully and without bias so that
government can properly and efficiently perform its functions in the
coming ages. Federal government shall be limited to functions that
cannot be better performed by local and state governments. Such shall
be the enabler of freedom, justice, fair commerce, climates of
opportunity, cooperative efforts, and national security both internal
and external. Such shall be businesslike yet human; impartial yet
focused; considerate of our environment, heritage, peace and
tranquillity; effective without boastfulness; and divorced from
politics. The federal government shall not be considered to be
synonymous with the USA, and those therein are not a ruling class nor
are they dictators; rather they are the servants of the USA and shall
be answerable to it and to any law-abiding Citizen or Citizens
thereof. We honor these objectives for the benefit of ourselves and
our posterity.”
“Only laws, rules, regulations and procedures that are in the best
interest of the People and the world environment shall be passed,
enacted or enforced, and no business contrary to such shall be allowed
to prosper.”
“Businesses and professions shall be fair to their employees and to
their customers. The wages, benefits and perks, as well as the
charges that are made for goods and services, shall not be
discriminatory nor exploitive of any person, group nor class, nor
shall such be overly influenced by the profit motive of those who
perform no actual work on an ongoing basis. Fair and honest business
practices require that management be forthright with employees and
customers without coercion.”
The USPS is offering for sale rolls of 100 stamps with the following
four words being alternated from stamp to stamp: Freedom; Liberty;
‘Equality’; and ‘Justice’. Fifty years ago the latter two words
would ring clear. But today, with the ungodly messages being
delivered by minority churches, Equality and Justice are catchwords
for… socialism. To liberals, Equality means having matching
lifestyles, however low. And Justice means punishing the successful
who must have somehow achieved success because… “You didn’t build
that.”
Quite literally, Barack Obama stole my catchphrase that government be
fair. A zillion times he said “…pay their fair share”. But there
never has been any fairness in STEALING from the rich to give to
freeloaders—such as those on food stamps—simply so that the
freeloaders will vote Democratic!!!!! Know this, liberals:
Republicans like Romney-Ryan have figured out how to continue to
protect those needing Social Security and Medicare in order to
survive. It will take at least a quarter century to phase out both of
those SOCIALIST programs so that the USA will be back on the right
course. For me, we’ll know the course is right when no more than 10%
of the GDP is being spent for the combined federal, state and local
taxes of hardworking Americans. I dream BIG, don’t I.
One of the more recent inclusions, relative to the above, that I’ve
put into my New Constitution is the following:
“The Will of the People is the foundation of government. So,
“Pay It Forward!” And… “Long live the USA!”
Respectfully submitted,
John A. Armistead
Author and Patriot
>
> Geraldo’s edification,ourforces are superbly equipped to fight at
> that isourFAILED system of government. On The Five, Greg Gutfeld
> ‘ourduty’ to protect a ‘president’ if he isn’t, legallyourPresident? If, as Obama claims, he was born in Hawaii, just 50 years
> given, as the only legally-voted-inPresidentof the USA.
> ...
>
> read more »
>
Of Stamps and Trash.
My primary civic goal is to save the USA from socialism and from
financial ruin. Both are being caused by the hugely mistaken notion
of close to half of the citizens that government is the cradle-to-
grave answer to all woes that might befall.
Last night I got vibes from Rudy Giuliani—probably relative to these
same essays which a great many people in-the-public-eye are reading.
There was a thoughtful, slightly smiling look on his face. In
thinking back about Rudy, beyond his historic connection to the events
and aftermath of 9/11, I recall how wise he must have been, as a
salesman, to garner the votes necessary to be elected Mayor of New
York in such a liberal stronghold as that city. I’m disappointed how
the pendulum-swing to Mayor Bloomberg has mostly fomented group-
against-group divisiveness. As in my New Constitution and as I
explained in my meaty little book, ‘The Shortest Distance; Harmony
Through Prosperity’, the secret of getting huge numbers of people to
peacefully coexist is by playing up the commonality while downplaying
the (group) differences. That is what Rudy had to have done very
well.
Another New Yorker I’ve gotten vibes from in the last few weeks is
Mort Zuckerman. In my mind, he had just his normal, stoic facial
expression. Since I’ve gotten none of those vides, recently, its
probably due to my “Hark the Patriots’ Call!” not reaching a high
enough threshold to get him to act for the sake of America. Zuckerman
is being tugged in three directions. Capitalism has made him
extremely wealthy. But since capitalism and socialism can’t
peacefully coexist, he is in a quandary. Jews are playing both ends
against the middle by wanting ’liberal’ influence in government,
because of their persecuted minority status, and because Jews have had
considerable capitalist successes due in large measure to nepotism.
Jews as individuals, I like. But Jews as a race-against-the-world, I
don’t like very much. If you want to be loved by yours truly, LOSE
your group identities and join together as members of the human
race! The third way Zuckerman is being tugged is to always be on
both sides of the fence on the issues of the day in order to reach the
widest possible audience with his otherwise excellent editorials. He
could start a peaceful revolution by simply stating in his magazine:
“A SC man has penned and polished a New Constitution of the United
States of America. From what I’ve seen in the excerpts, there has
been a huge amount of thought, by an obviously very intelligent man,
how to optimize government to have the maximum benefit for the largest
possible number of Americans, left and right.”
‘The Donald’ is a regular guest—sometimes electronically-linked—on
Greta Van Susteren’s Fox show. Prior to the election he offered to
pay five million dollars to the charity of Obama’s choice if Obama
would simply release his college records for public scrutiny. That,
of course, didn’t happen. But it is what I, as a law-abiding citizen
and Patriot, am demanding (to the US Secret Service) must happen
before anyone even considers that Obama meets (Ha!) the Constitution’s
requirement of his being a native born citizen. Valid SS numbers
reflect the state of residence and chronological placement of the
particular applicant. Can we have a “President” without a valid SS
number? Of course not! So, Secret Service, DO YOUR JOBS!! These
issues are NOT going to go away! Your protecting of Obama (as your
esprit de corps responsibility) will be less risky to your own lives,
if you will simply say to Obama: “You are under arrest for FRAUD
relative to your becoming President in 2009. And you are under arrest
for TREASON, for consistently subverting and bypassing the US
Constitution to the economic and social detriment of most of the US
population.” The citizens will see such actions as HEROIC! I know
that being strong, intelligent and having fast reactions are
requirements for becoming a Secret Service Agent. But as in any
“military engagement” failure to act, decisively, can spell doom. So
don’t keep burying-your-heads-in-the-sand, ACT!!!
I’ve may have gotten vibes from ‘The Donald’ numbers of times. But I
can’t be sure that is because he has read even one of my essays over
the last six years. I, as an architect, have a master plan for the
redevelopment of a large portion of the center of my hometown of
Easley, SC. His organizations (He’s an executive; you know!) have
real estate projects of all scales and types under way across
America. For a number of years I have supposed that if I can get
recognition for either my New Science (that has so easily disproved
Einstein and much of status quo physics and cosmology) or my New
Constitution, that I might could get up my nerve to ask Donald Trump
to buy the central portion of the town of Easley. My plan is pre1930
retro rather than obsolete-tomorrow, glass and brass. Big cities have
effective towns in single buildings. So, those who live in the latter
are able to shop for their major daily supplies without having to get
in cars or take cabs.
In the 1950s, two automobiles in every family killed the mercantile
mix of central downtowns all across America. Malls are sometimes-
successful alternatives to the balanced businesses in the downtowns of
old. My master plan is to place the entire ownership of the
commercial portion of the town center under a single ownership. That
way, the crucial MIX of businesses necessary to make people from far
and wide come to Easley can be assured. What present generation
family wouldn’t enjoy bringing their kids to see how charming and
authentic looking a 1920’s town can be? It would be like taking a
trip in a Time Machine! But fear not, demanding shoppers, beneath the
scene, linked by computers to automated warehousing, the product you
purchase will be delivered to central pickup stations convenient to
the two thousand, mostly on grade, new parking spaces. Those are
within easy walking distance. But people who prefer not to walk, can
catch free rides in stretch “Woody” Ford replicas that circle the
town. The police serving the central town will dress like ‘in the
movies’ and will drive authentic (but under-the-hood advanced) period
cars. The FLAVOR of the place will be incredible! The USA could be on
the verge of having wonderful things happening all over (!), if
socialism can forever be gotten off of capitalism’s back.
During the seemingly interminable presidential campaign, I happened to
be tuned-in with higher probability to Greta’s show than most of the
others. I would say that she does more behind-the-scenes research,
especially, relative to what questions she will ask her guests, than
perhaps any other host or hostess in the media. Initially, because
of the way she ‘grilled’ conservatives, I sensed that her heart was
liberal. However, as the campaign wore on, the simple economics of
socialism must have swayed her to the same conclusion that I reached
thirty years ago: The cost of having government continue to provide
more and more things is simply too great!
I, and my New Constitution, are very ’liberal’ regarding protecting
the environment and protecting our rights to control our own bodies.
For years I called myself a social liberal and a fiscal ULTRA
conservative.
“Preface:
The Will of the People is the foundation of government. The
People must be represented faithfully and without bias so that
government can properly and efficiently perform its functions in the
coming ages. Federal government shall be limited to functions that
cannot be better performed by local and state governments. Such shall
be the enabler of freedom, justice, fair commerce, climates of
opportunity, cooperative efforts, and national security both internal
and external. Such shall be businesslike yet human; impartial yet
focused; considerate of our environment, heritage, peace and
tranquillity; effective without boastfulness; and divorced from
politics. The federal government shall not be considered to be
synonymous with the USA, and those therein are not a ruling class nor
are they dictators; rather they are the servants of the USA and shall
be answerable to it and to any law-abiding Citizen or Citizens
thereof. We honor these objectives for the benefit of ourselves and
our posterity.”
“Only laws, rules, regulations and procedures that are in the best
interest of the People and the world environment shall be passed,
enacted or enforced, and no business contrary to such shall be allowed
to prosper.”
“Businesses and professions shall be fair to their employees and to
their customers. The wages, benefits and perks, as well as the
charges that are made for goods and services, shall not be
discriminatory nor exploitive of any person, group nor class, nor
shall such be overly influenced by the profit motive of those who
perform no actual work on an ongoing basis. Fair and honest business
practices require that management be forthright with employees and
customers without coercion.”
The USPS is offering for sale rolls of 100 stamps with the following
four words being alternated from stamp to stamp: Freedom; Liberty;
‘Equality’; and ‘Justice’. Fifty years ago the latter two words
would ring clear. But today, with the ungodly messages being
delivered by minority churches, Equality and Justice are catchwords
for… socialism. To liberals, Equality means having matching
lifestyles, however low. And Justice means punishing the successful
who must have somehow achieved success because… “You didn’t build
that.”
Quite literally, Barack Obama stole my catchphrase that government be
fair. A zillion times he said “…pay their fair share”. But there
never has been any fairness in STEALING from the rich to give to
freeloaders—such as those on food stamps—simply so that the
freeloaders will vote Democratic!!!!! Know this, liberals:
Republicans like Romney-Ryan have figured out how to continue to
protect those needing Social Security and Medicare in order to
survive. It will take at least a quarter century to phase out both of
those SOCIALIST programs so that the USA will be back on the right
course. For me, we’ll know the course is right when no more than 10%
of the GDP is being spent for the combined federal, state and local
taxes of hardworking Americans. I dream BIG, don’t I.
One of the more recent inclusions, relative to the above, that I’ve
put into my New Constitution is the following:
“The Will of the People is the foundation of government. So,
Citizens’ votes shall have parity without compromise. Principles of
fair play and democracy shall have supremacy in the USA. Any public
office holder who disavows or manifests disagreement with the latter
shall be guilty of treason. Those found guilty can be punished up to
and including the death penalty. Any government employee, media
figure or private person(s) who uses the authority or influence of
their job, or their celebrity, to argue against democracy and fair
play shall be guilty of a felony. *** Note: Fair play shall be
fair play and democracy shall have supremacy in the USA. Any public
office holder who disavows or manifests disagreement with the latter
shall be guilty of treason. Those found guilty can be punished up to
and including the death penalty. Any government employee, media
figure or private person(s) who uses the authority or influence of
their job, or their celebrity, to argue against democracy and fair
defined as any individual or group action that achieves positive
results without bias or partiality of the weak toward the strong nor
of the strong toward the weak and which doesn’t selfishly or
maliciously exploit any individual, group or class. None of the
latter shall be allowed to claim the personal property of others, or
to limit the rights of others—whether by government edict or private
business rules—without first obtaining the free consent of the
property holder, or of the person or group whose property is being
taken or whose rights are being limited. In no case shall fair play
be defined as an entitlement of an individual, group or class to have
equality of lifestyle, material possessions or any assisted living
equivalent thereof paid for by others. In the USA the ideal shall be
to have reasonable equality of opportunity for self determination of
one’s own lifestyle and level of personal achievement within our Free
Enterprise System without requiring government oversight.”
results without bias or partiality of the weak toward the strong nor
of the strong toward the weak and which doesn’t selfishly or
maliciously exploit any individual, group or class. None of the
latter shall be allowed to claim the personal property of others, or
to limit the rights of others—whether by government edict or private
business rules—without first obtaining the free consent of the
property holder, or of the person or group whose property is being
taken or whose rights are being limited. In no case shall fair play
be defined as an entitlement of an individual, group or class to have
equality of lifestyle, material possessions or any assisted living
equivalent thereof paid for by others. In the USA the ideal shall be
to have reasonable equality of opportunity for self determination of
one’s own lifestyle and level of personal achievement within our Free
“Pay It Forward!” And… “Long live the USA!”
Respectfully submitted,
John A. Armistead
Author and Patriot
>
> On Nov 20, 7:12 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> Patriotism vs. the Esprit de Corps.
>
> Susan Rice, David Axelrod, “president” Obama, David Petraeus, Jay
> Carney, Hillary Clinton and numbers of Democrats in Congress had each
> had similar “hiccups” and/or frozen, stony expressions, before stating
> that the Benghazi raid was due to a seldom-viewed video that mocked
> Muhammad. Within minutes of the second attack, which included well-
> aimed mortar rounds and RPGs,ourmilitary leaders knew that the lives
>
> Patriotism vs. the Esprit de Corps.
>
> Susan Rice, David Axelrod, “president” Obama, David Petraeus, Jay
> Carney, Hillary Clinton and numbers of Democrats in Congress had each
> had similar “hiccups” and/or frozen, stony expressions, before stating
> that the Benghazi raid was due to a seldom-viewed video that mocked
> Muhammad. Within minutes of the second attack, which included well-
> of Americans where being threatened. That was in the middle of the
> night. On a Geraldo Rivera show, weeks later, a guest from the
> military explained that American lives are never put in-harms-way
> without having definitive intelligence. Two unmanned drones were
> sent, but those weren’t equipped with weapons that might have helped
> the situation. There were jet aircraft that could have reached the
> scene within two hours, but the general being interviewed stated, I
> think erroneously, that only the “President” could authorize the
> sending of armed aircraft. Geraldo seemed happy to add that since all
> of this was happening “at night” nothing could have been done, anyway.
>
> I have never heard more ball-faced lies than the latter! Every
> general has the authority to order armed reconnaissance flights to
> protect Americans! If a sergeant sees terrorists about to blow up an
> American installation, he is authorized to use deadly force to repel
> the invasion! Why in hell is there “a chain-of-command” in the
> military, if onlyourpseudo “president” can make a decision? For
> night. On a Geraldo Rivera show, weeks later, a guest from the
> military explained that American lives are never put in-harms-way
> without having definitive intelligence. Two unmanned drones were
> sent, but those weren’t equipped with weapons that might have helped
> the situation. There were jet aircraft that could have reached the
> scene within two hours, but the general being interviewed stated, I
> think erroneously, that only the “President” could authorize the
> sending of armed aircraft. Geraldo seemed happy to add that since all
> of this was happening “at night” nothing could have been done, anyway.
>
> I have never heard more ball-faced lies than the latter! Every
> general has the authority to order armed reconnaissance flights to
> protect Americans! If a sergeant sees terrorists about to blow up an
> American installation, he is authorized to use deadly force to repel
> the invasion! Why in hell is there “a chain-of-command” in the
> Geraldo’s edification,ourforces are superbly equipped to fight at
> ago, why isn’t his birth certificate, in paper form, available for
> public scrutiny? If the security and economic future of the USA hangs
> in the balance, doesn’t such a crisis mandate that Obama’s college
> records, and his Social Security records be made public? Don’t the
> People deserve to have the backgrounds of all candidates forPresident
> thoroughly investigated? Why was no such investigation of Obama’s
> background ever made?
>
> The culture of the US Secret Service, at least those protecting high
> public officials, mandates that they look immaculate in their tailor
> made suits over Kevlar linings. They always seem life-and-death
> serious, while the throngs are smiling just to be getting to see…
> their idol and gift-giver, Obama. They are former athletes and/or
> were trained in the military to do as they are commanded to do,
> including risking their own lives to save the life of thePresident.
> They are playing a life-or-death game, wherein the slip-up of even one
> agent might bode the failure of their entire agency to… do its job.
> So, they look the other way to talk of criminality, and giveour
> fraudulentpresidentthe same “respect” that Mitt Romney should be
> public scrutiny? If the security and economic future of the USA hangs
> in the balance, doesn’t such a crisis mandate that Obama’s college
> records, and his Social Security records be made public? Don’t the
> People deserve to have the backgrounds of all candidates forPresident
> thoroughly investigated? Why was no such investigation of Obama’s
> background ever made?
>
> The culture of the US Secret Service, at least those protecting high
> public officials, mandates that they look immaculate in their tailor
> made suits over Kevlar linings. They always seem life-and-death
> serious, while the throngs are smiling just to be getting to see…
> their idol and gift-giver, Obama. They are former athletes and/or
> were trained in the military to do as they are commanded to do,
> including risking their own lives to save the life of thePresident.
> They are playing a life-or-death game, wherein the slip-up of even one
> agent might bode the failure of their entire agency to… do its job.
> So, they look the other way to talk of criminality, and giveour
> given, as the only legally-voted-inPresidentof the USA.
>
> read more »
NoEinstein
Nov 26, 2012, 8:57:00 PM11/26/12
to
On Nov 24, 4:27 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
The status quo inertia has most people afraid to consider better
alternatives.
It is symptomatic that Democrats are attacking John McCain for
questioning Susan Rice’s “qualifications” (HA!) to be Secretary of
State. They call him a racist for accepting Sarah Palin, a white, as
his VP choice, while rejecting Susan Rice, a semi-Black, as a possible
for Secretary of State. The rationale of the Democrats, with their
angry-seeming BLACK spokespersons, is that RACE is the only possible
determinate of why whites do or don’t do anything.
For me—an expert on reading a person’s body language—Susan rice KNEW
she was lying from hour one, regarding that spurious claim about the
Muhammad video. Her shallow defense, by Obama and a dozen others, is
that she only repeated what intelligence had told her. Yet, on those
five TV broadcasts, never once did she say: “I have been TOLD such and
such.” What she said was: “(hick-up) The raid was because of the
video, and only because of the video.” If anyone had told an honest
person to state “facts” without her having been given every detail,
then she knowingly LIED through her teeth!
Obama, that traitor to the USA, wants a Secretary of State who WILL
lie for him at every turn. He is already campaigning to assume
control of China and India. He couldn’t care less whether Burma votes
for Freedom and Democracy. In reality, without a Constitution, like
mine, that outlaws, under penalty of death, the promoting of anything
socialistic, a “democracy” will only allow ‘two wolves and a sheep to
decide what is for supper‘. But the latter shall not be allowed to
happen! My “NC” is a Democracy-on-demand Republic. Any issue, like
abortions and marijuana freedom will simply be voted on by the people—
no discussion needed. If the arguments are for more entitlements,
since that is unconstitutional, no such vote would be valid.
Some are wondering if Benghazi is Obama’s “Watergate”. Nixon resigned
over a break-in to get classified information on people he considered
to be his enemies. But his ego had wanted to document everything that
was said for the history books. When those tapes were realized to
obtain damning material, they were “erased”, or so they thought. The
tapes had enough of a ghost charge to still be understood. And so,
Nixon resigned.
There isn’t a soul in the world who supposes that Obama would resign
over anything. Hell, if this whole Benghazi fiasco breaks wide open
the night before Obama is to be sworn in, unless the Secret Service
arrests him, Obama will put on his bullet resistant black coat and go
out there amongst his lying Democrat friends on the capital steps to
get sworn in by his favorite co-traitor to the USA, Chief Justice John
G. Roberts, Jr. Both of those rascals are outlaws. Under my New
Constitution anyone who employs the $2.75 solution on either of those
men won’t even be detained by law enforcement for a single minute!
Their choice is death by bloodshed, or death by the hangman’s noose.
They get to choose.
The battle lines are now drawn between those who are being stolen from
by government edict, and thieves who have already been BOUGHT by
“gifts” (bribes). The status quo in Washington has been corrupt for
so long, the stone-heads, like most in the Secret Service, must
believe that wrong is right because the “leaders” say so. Well, in
the USA, the leaders in a REPUBLIC is the People! And at last count,
at least 65% of the People aren’t happy with the way government is
headed.
Mark Steyn is filling in for Limbaugh for a few days. He correctly
sees socialism as a cultural issue. He says there are 40 million
people getting (bribes) food stamps. In the supermarket checkout
lines I’ve not seen a one of those handing over those check-like
pieces of paper who doesn’t look fit enough to hold down a job. Most
have a born-out-of-wedlock child that “justifies”, at least in our
socialist government’s mind, having those who still work be slaves to
the immoral and the lazy. I can assure seniors that Granny shall
never be pushed over the cliff! But able bodied people who won’t work
can either sink or swim, because most will be thrown overboard on day
one. I’m willing to bet that 95% will swim quite well. They have
been like the “injured” person drawing disability checks. But when
videos show them playing tennis with their should-be-injured right
arm, their ruse falls through.
I’ve gotten vibes from that intelligent Jew, Ben Stein. He is wise-
seeming on economic issues, but I wonder: If Stein had to choose
between saving the USA from socialism and continuing to allow Jews to
have more Influence in Washington than their per capita allotment,
which would Ben Choose? People are so used to literally FIGHTING
group against group, few would know how to act if government gets
castrated, as it should be, and made to be DEFERENTIAL to the People
rather than lords OVER the people.
Right now we have a top-to-bottom corrupt Executive Branch; a majority
corrupt and minority impotent Supreme Court, and a totally
unconstitutional US Senate! That leaves us with just a ‘passable’
House of Representatives. Fortunately, the latter is all that is
required to keep the USA functioning! The original Constitution never
intended for the President to dictate a thing, when there is
sufficient time to allow Congress (now, just the House) to decide
issues. Since most of our woes are taxation related, my NC forever
removes from the House the power to increase taxes without a national
referendum of the people. And it removes from the Supreme Court the
authority to decide anything other than an appeal that has been passed
up through the courts. If 1/3 of the House concurs, the decision
regarding any appeal can be shifted to the vote of the People. And so
long as the People violate no provision of my “NC”, the Supreme Court
will finally be made an effective non entity! The following language
is most important:
“(Article III) Section 2 & 3: Judges and justices shall be answerable
to the People. On issues of internal criminality, misconduct or
corruption within any arm of government—including the entire judicial
system—judges and justices shall not, during a trial or during
sentencing, favor government officials, judges, justices, nor any
arm(s) of law enforcement, and shall hold government officials, fellow
judges, justices, or members of law enforcement as accountable for
wrongful acts as those outside of government. If a judge or justice
fails to respond to a rightful petition or complaint against any
government official or member of the justice system, such judge or
justice may be guilty of a felony. The determination of the above
status shall be made following a mandatory vote in the House. Upon a
yea vote of 1/3 of the House, a national public trial, televised from
the House, shall be held regarding all named parties—with judgment
being determined via referendum. Whenever 60% of the registered
voters who vote determine that there is guilt, the government
officials, judges, justices and/or members of law enforcement shall be
removed from their former positions and sentenced commensurate with
their crimes, up to and including the death penalty.”
“Judges & justices shall be well mannered, forthright and succinct;
courtrooms aren’t their property nor forums for venting their
feelings. A Citizen can sanction a judge or justice in court for
deviating from this constitution or its spirit. Rightful behavior by
any law-abiding Citizen is appropriate, implicitly, and no Citizen so
acting shall be subordinate in or to any court, nor be made to defer
to overly drawn-out legal processes or pending rulings.”
In communist countries, such as Russia, there were ‘eyes’ everywhere
watching the People. Those even suspected of doing a thing not
sanctioned by the powers-that-be would be arrested and sent to the
salt mines or to coldest Siberia. Others, who were more organized in
their disagreements with the state would get held by strong hands
while bullets are sent splashing through their heads. Sometimes I
think that the richer half of Americans are mostly spineless. They
get stolen from and must be thinking: “I have this bad-boy for making
E-Trades.” Since fighting for one’s rights is “frowned-upon in this
establishment”, those with wealth would make a very poor army. They
are just too damn respecting of “the system” which, though corrupt,
must, by some SICK logic, be respected. In other words, they just
don’t give a damn. If someone steals their home, they know insurance
will cover the cost of another one. My message is this: Unless those
who actually EARN their living are willing to speak up, and in unison,
the USA is doomed, 12/21/12 or not.
There aren’t enough prison cells to stop even 5% of the people if they
will decry unfairness, in unison. How many more words must I write to
get you status quo junkies off of your BUTTS to stand up for
taxpayer’s rights? Flip a coin! With 50% of you stepping forward,
the God damned Federal Government will never do an unfair thing
again!!!
Respectfully submitted,
John A. Armistead
Author and Patriot
>
> relative to your becomingPresidentin 2009. And you are under arrest
> the environment and protectingourrights to controlourown bodies.
> Quite literally, ...
>
> read more »
>
The status quo inertia has most people afraid to consider better
alternatives.
It is symptomatic that Democrats are attacking John McCain for
questioning Susan Rice’s “qualifications” (HA!) to be Secretary of
State. They call him a racist for accepting Sarah Palin, a white, as
his VP choice, while rejecting Susan Rice, a semi-Black, as a possible
for Secretary of State. The rationale of the Democrats, with their
angry-seeming BLACK spokespersons, is that RACE is the only possible
determinate of why whites do or don’t do anything.
For me—an expert on reading a person’s body language—Susan rice KNEW
she was lying from hour one, regarding that spurious claim about the
Muhammad video. Her shallow defense, by Obama and a dozen others, is
that she only repeated what intelligence had told her. Yet, on those
five TV broadcasts, never once did she say: “I have been TOLD such and
such.” What she said was: “(hick-up) The raid was because of the
video, and only because of the video.” If anyone had told an honest
person to state “facts” without her having been given every detail,
then she knowingly LIED through her teeth!
Obama, that traitor to the USA, wants a Secretary of State who WILL
lie for him at every turn. He is already campaigning to assume
control of China and India. He couldn’t care less whether Burma votes
for Freedom and Democracy. In reality, without a Constitution, like
mine, that outlaws, under penalty of death, the promoting of anything
socialistic, a “democracy” will only allow ‘two wolves and a sheep to
decide what is for supper‘. But the latter shall not be allowed to
happen! My “NC” is a Democracy-on-demand Republic. Any issue, like
abortions and marijuana freedom will simply be voted on by the people—
no discussion needed. If the arguments are for more entitlements,
since that is unconstitutional, no such vote would be valid.
Some are wondering if Benghazi is Obama’s “Watergate”. Nixon resigned
over a break-in to get classified information on people he considered
to be his enemies. But his ego had wanted to document everything that
was said for the history books. When those tapes were realized to
obtain damning material, they were “erased”, or so they thought. The
tapes had enough of a ghost charge to still be understood. And so,
Nixon resigned.
There isn’t a soul in the world who supposes that Obama would resign
over anything. Hell, if this whole Benghazi fiasco breaks wide open
the night before Obama is to be sworn in, unless the Secret Service
arrests him, Obama will put on his bullet resistant black coat and go
out there amongst his lying Democrat friends on the capital steps to
get sworn in by his favorite co-traitor to the USA, Chief Justice John
G. Roberts, Jr. Both of those rascals are outlaws. Under my New
Constitution anyone who employs the $2.75 solution on either of those
men won’t even be detained by law enforcement for a single minute!
Their choice is death by bloodshed, or death by the hangman’s noose.
They get to choose.
The battle lines are now drawn between those who are being stolen from
by government edict, and thieves who have already been BOUGHT by
“gifts” (bribes). The status quo in Washington has been corrupt for
so long, the stone-heads, like most in the Secret Service, must
believe that wrong is right because the “leaders” say so. Well, in
the USA, the leaders in a REPUBLIC is the People! And at last count,
at least 65% of the People aren’t happy with the way government is
headed.
Mark Steyn is filling in for Limbaugh for a few days. He correctly
sees socialism as a cultural issue. He says there are 40 million
people getting (bribes) food stamps. In the supermarket checkout
lines I’ve not seen a one of those handing over those check-like
pieces of paper who doesn’t look fit enough to hold down a job. Most
have a born-out-of-wedlock child that “justifies”, at least in our
socialist government’s mind, having those who still work be slaves to
the immoral and the lazy. I can assure seniors that Granny shall
never be pushed over the cliff! But able bodied people who won’t work
can either sink or swim, because most will be thrown overboard on day
one. I’m willing to bet that 95% will swim quite well. They have
been like the “injured” person drawing disability checks. But when
videos show them playing tennis with their should-be-injured right
arm, their ruse falls through.
I’ve gotten vibes from that intelligent Jew, Ben Stein. He is wise-
seeming on economic issues, but I wonder: If Stein had to choose
between saving the USA from socialism and continuing to allow Jews to
have more Influence in Washington than their per capita allotment,
which would Ben Choose? People are so used to literally FIGHTING
group against group, few would know how to act if government gets
castrated, as it should be, and made to be DEFERENTIAL to the People
rather than lords OVER the people.
Right now we have a top-to-bottom corrupt Executive Branch; a majority
corrupt and minority impotent Supreme Court, and a totally
unconstitutional US Senate! That leaves us with just a ‘passable’
House of Representatives. Fortunately, the latter is all that is
required to keep the USA functioning! The original Constitution never
intended for the President to dictate a thing, when there is
sufficient time to allow Congress (now, just the House) to decide
issues. Since most of our woes are taxation related, my NC forever
removes from the House the power to increase taxes without a national
referendum of the people. And it removes from the Supreme Court the
authority to decide anything other than an appeal that has been passed
up through the courts. If 1/3 of the House concurs, the decision
regarding any appeal can be shifted to the vote of the People. And so
long as the People violate no provision of my “NC”, the Supreme Court
will finally be made an effective non entity! The following language
is most important:
“(Article III) Section 2 & 3: Judges and justices shall be answerable
to the People. On issues of internal criminality, misconduct or
corruption within any arm of government—including the entire judicial
system—judges and justices shall not, during a trial or during
sentencing, favor government officials, judges, justices, nor any
arm(s) of law enforcement, and shall hold government officials, fellow
judges, justices, or members of law enforcement as accountable for
wrongful acts as those outside of government. If a judge or justice
fails to respond to a rightful petition or complaint against any
government official or member of the justice system, such judge or
justice may be guilty of a felony. The determination of the above
status shall be made following a mandatory vote in the House. Upon a
yea vote of 1/3 of the House, a national public trial, televised from
the House, shall be held regarding all named parties—with judgment
being determined via referendum. Whenever 60% of the registered
voters who vote determine that there is guilt, the government
officials, judges, justices and/or members of law enforcement shall be
removed from their former positions and sentenced commensurate with
their crimes, up to and including the death penalty.”
“Judges & justices shall be well mannered, forthright and succinct;
courtrooms aren’t their property nor forums for venting their
feelings. A Citizen can sanction a judge or justice in court for
deviating from this constitution or its spirit. Rightful behavior by
any law-abiding Citizen is appropriate, implicitly, and no Citizen so
acting shall be subordinate in or to any court, nor be made to defer
to overly drawn-out legal processes or pending rulings.”
In communist countries, such as Russia, there were ‘eyes’ everywhere
watching the People. Those even suspected of doing a thing not
sanctioned by the powers-that-be would be arrested and sent to the
salt mines or to coldest Siberia. Others, who were more organized in
their disagreements with the state would get held by strong hands
while bullets are sent splashing through their heads. Sometimes I
think that the richer half of Americans are mostly spineless. They
get stolen from and must be thinking: “I have this bad-boy for making
E-Trades.” Since fighting for one’s rights is “frowned-upon in this
establishment”, those with wealth would make a very poor army. They
are just too damn respecting of “the system” which, though corrupt,
must, by some SICK logic, be respected. In other words, they just
don’t give a damn. If someone steals their home, they know insurance
will cover the cost of another one. My message is this: Unless those
who actually EARN their living are willing to speak up, and in unison,
the USA is doomed, 12/21/12 or not.
There aren’t enough prison cells to stop even 5% of the people if they
will decry unfairness, in unison. How many more words must I write to
get you status quo junkies off of your BUTTS to stand up for
taxpayer’s rights? Flip a coin! With 50% of you stepping forward,
the God damned Federal Government will never do an unfair thing
again!!!
Respectfully submitted,
John A. Armistead
Author and Patriot
>
> For years I called myself a social liberal and a fiscal ULTRA
> conservative.
>
> “Preface:
> The Will of the People is the foundation of government. The
> People must be represented faithfully and without bias so that
> government can properly and efficiently perform its functions in the
> coming ages. Federal government shall be limited to functions that
> cannot be better performed by local and state governments. Such shall
> be the enabler of freedom, justice, fair commerce, climates of
> opportunity, cooperative efforts, and national security both internal
> and external. Such shall be businesslike yet human; impartial yet
> focused; considerate ofourenvironment, heritage, peace and
> conservative.
>
> “Preface:
> The Will of the People is the foundation of government. The
> People must be represented faithfully and without bias so that
> government can properly and efficiently perform its functions in the
> coming ages. Federal government shall be limited to functions that
> cannot be better performed by local and state governments. Such shall
> be the enabler of freedom, justice, fair commerce, climates of
> opportunity, cooperative efforts, and national security both internal
> and external. Such shall be businesslike yet human; impartial yet
>
> read more »
Tom Potter
Nov 27, 2012, 12:00:35 AM11/27/12
to
news:6ab5b058-02cc-4b2b...@c14g2000vbd.googlegroups.com...
like many people, has been manipulated by Jews in the Mass Media
and government to promote conflict, revolution and war.
I suggest that John should take a look at the situations
in all of the nations where The Mass Media has instigated
conflicts. revolutions, and wars,
and to read the autobiography of John Allan Wyeth,
a native of his own state who fought for the South during the Civil War,
and described the condition of the South's economy and situation
during and after the war.
As can be seen, most people in the South could not get enough food
to eat, and survived only because of help from relatives in the North,
and from people like Wyeth who worked in the North after the war
in order to survive and send food to his family.
And I might mention that although America and Britain
were so-called victors of W.W.II, that during the war,
there were no new cars, lousy food could be bought using food stamps,
as there were no tires, if one had a car, they could rarely use it,
and there were few decent things folks could buy,
and of course, hundreds of thousands of American and English people
were killed in the war.
And note that before their VICTORY, America was free and prosperous,
and was trusted, respected and emulated by most of the people on the planet,
and the "Sun never set on the British Empire."
It is interesting to see that in a victim-persecutor-rescuer situation,
the victim and the persecutor often turn on the rescuer,
but the world would be a much better place,
if the parties to a conflict turned on the instigator.
In fact, the best strategy for people, groups, and nations
being manipulated by instigators is to have assassination teams
take out the instigators, rather than engage in war or revolution.
For example if Americans had taken out Pulitzer,
there would have been no Spanish-American War, no W.W.I,
no W.W.I and no Cold War and all the associated wars.
It seems to me that people like Henry Ford, Ross Perot, Bill Gates, etc.
ought to find ways to identify the centers of conflict instigation
and go after them, rather than join sides with the left-right, Black-White,
Christian-Muslim, Rich-Poor, etc.
If Ford had had Bennett take out the leaders of the gang instigating
the conflicts in America, rather than confronting Jews and Labor directly,
America would likely be far richer, freer, more respected, productive and
peaceful.
If a few Mass Media heads were rolled,
it is likely that the world would be a much better place,
and the masses could regain control of government, education, and finance.
--
Tom Potter
http://tom-potter.tel
https://tdp1001.jux.com
http://prioritize.biz/the-cloud-machine.html
>
>There aren't enough prison cells to stop even 5% of the people if they
>will decry unfairness, in unison. How many more words must I write to
>get you status quo junkies off of your BUTTS to stand up for
>taxpayer's rights? Flip a coin! With 50% of you stepping forward,
>the God damned Federal Government will never do an unfair thing
>again!!!
>
>Respectfully submitted,
>
>
> John A. Armistead
> Author and Patriot
It is interesting to see that John A. Armistead,
>There aren't enough prison cells to stop even 5% of the people if they
>will decry unfairness, in unison. How many more words must I write to
>get you status quo junkies off of your BUTTS to stand up for
>taxpayer's rights? Flip a coin! With 50% of you stepping forward,
>the God damned Federal Government will never do an unfair thing
>again!!!
>
>Respectfully submitted,
>
>
> John A. Armistead
> Author and Patriot
like many people, has been manipulated by Jews in the Mass Media
and government to promote conflict, revolution and war.
I suggest that John should take a look at the situations
in all of the nations where The Mass Media has instigated
conflicts. revolutions, and wars,
and to read the autobiography of John Allan Wyeth,
a native of his own state who fought for the South during the Civil War,
and described the condition of the South's economy and situation
during and after the war.
As can be seen, most people in the South could not get enough food
to eat, and survived only because of help from relatives in the North,
and from people like Wyeth who worked in the North after the war
in order to survive and send food to his family.
And I might mention that although America and Britain
were so-called victors of W.W.II, that during the war,
there were no new cars, lousy food could be bought using food stamps,
as there were no tires, if one had a car, they could rarely use it,
and there were few decent things folks could buy,
and of course, hundreds of thousands of American and English people
were killed in the war.
And note that before their VICTORY, America was free and prosperous,
and was trusted, respected and emulated by most of the people on the planet,
and the "Sun never set on the British Empire."
It is interesting to see that in a victim-persecutor-rescuer situation,
the victim and the persecutor often turn on the rescuer,
but the world would be a much better place,
if the parties to a conflict turned on the instigator.
In fact, the best strategy for people, groups, and nations
being manipulated by instigators is to have assassination teams
take out the instigators, rather than engage in war or revolution.
For example if Americans had taken out Pulitzer,
there would have been no Spanish-American War, no W.W.I,
no W.W.I and no Cold War and all the associated wars.
It seems to me that people like Henry Ford, Ross Perot, Bill Gates, etc.
ought to find ways to identify the centers of conflict instigation
and go after them, rather than join sides with the left-right, Black-White,
Christian-Muslim, Rich-Poor, etc.
If Ford had had Bennett take out the leaders of the gang instigating
the conflicts in America, rather than confronting Jews and Labor directly,
America would likely be far richer, freer, more respected, productive and
peaceful.
If a few Mass Media heads were rolled,
it is likely that the world would be a much better place,
and the masses could regain control of government, education, and finance.
--
Tom Potter
http://tom-potter.tel
https://tdp1001.jux.com
http://prioritize.biz/the-cloud-machine.html
Klaus Schadenfreude
Nov 27, 2012, 7:18:08 AM11/27/12
to
>"Tom Potter" <tdp...@yahoo.com> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>
>"NoEinstein" <noein...@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
>news:6ab5b058-02cc-4b2b...@c14g2000vbd.googlegroups.com...
>>
>>There aren't enough prison cells to stop even 5% of the people if they
>>will decry unfairness, in unison. How many more words must I write to
>>get you status quo junkies off of your BUTTS to stand up for
>>taxpayer's rights? Flip a coin! With 50% of you stepping forward,
>>the God damned Federal Government will never do an unfair thing
>>again!!!
>>
>>Respectfully submitted,
>>
>>
>> John A. Armistead
>> Author and Patriot
>
>It is interesting to see that John A. Armistead,
>like many people, has been manipulated by Jews in the Mass Media
>and government to promote conflict, revolution and war.
It is interesting to see that Tom Potter is still around, claiming the
Jews control His World through their Secret Cabal.
>And I might mention that although America and Britain
>were so-called victors of W.W.II, that during the war,
>there were no new cars, lousy food could be bought using food stamps,
>as there were no tires, if one had a car, they could rarely use it,
>and there were few decent things folks could buy,
>and of course, hundreds of thousands of American and English people
>were killed in the war.
>
>And note that before their VICTORY, America was free and prosperous,
>and was trusted, respected and emulated by most of the people on the planet,
>and the "Sun never set on the British Empire."
This is- according to Tom Potter- because of the Jews.
>For example if Americans had taken out Pulitzer,
>there would have been no Spanish-American War, no W.W.I,
>no W.W.I and no Cold War and all the associated wars.
Because Potter feels information is dangerous.
>If a few Mass Media heads were rolled,
>it is likely that the world would be a much better place,
>and the masses could regain control of government, education, and finance.
All information should come through the Nazi Office of Propaganda and
Good News.
http://klausschadenfreude.110mb.com/Potter-family.htm
>
>"NoEinstein" <noein...@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
>news:6ab5b058-02cc-4b2b...@c14g2000vbd.googlegroups.com...
>>
>>There aren't enough prison cells to stop even 5% of the people if they
>>will decry unfairness, in unison. How many more words must I write to
>>get you status quo junkies off of your BUTTS to stand up for
>>taxpayer's rights? Flip a coin! With 50% of you stepping forward,
>>the God damned Federal Government will never do an unfair thing
>>again!!!
>>
>>Respectfully submitted,
>>
>>
>> John A. Armistead
>> Author and Patriot
>
>It is interesting to see that John A. Armistead,
>like many people, has been manipulated by Jews in the Mass Media
>and government to promote conflict, revolution and war.
Jews control His World through their Secret Cabal.
>And I might mention that although America and Britain
>were so-called victors of W.W.II, that during the war,
>there were no new cars, lousy food could be bought using food stamps,
>as there were no tires, if one had a car, they could rarely use it,
>and there were few decent things folks could buy,
>and of course, hundreds of thousands of American and English people
>were killed in the war.
>
>And note that before their VICTORY, America was free and prosperous,
>and was trusted, respected and emulated by most of the people on the planet,
>and the "Sun never set on the British Empire."
>For example if Americans had taken out Pulitzer,
>there would have been no Spanish-American War, no W.W.I,
>no W.W.I and no Cold War and all the associated wars.
>If a few Mass Media heads were rolled,
>it is likely that the world would be a much better place,
>and the masses could regain control of government, education, and finance.
Good News.
http://klausschadenfreude.110mb.com/Potter-family.htm
NoEinstein
Nov 27, 2012, 7:55:07 PM11/27/12
to
On Nov 27, 12:15 am, "Tom Potter" <tdp1...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
Dear Tom:
Your view regarding the media—largely control by, or sympathetic to
Jews—is a major reason my New Constitution, in the ten fold increased
1st Amendment, forever prevents anyone in the media from commenting on
elections and referenda. And it will throw in jail anyone working for
any medium who says a word, or invites guests to say a word, that will
sway voters in any election, because of some endorsement or negative
comment regarding any person running for office. COVERAGE of breaking
news is allowed, but comment by media elites is strictly forbidden.
You are "safely" in China, where the economy isn't as good as the
people there would like. That makes the possibility of having an
Obama type "Democracy" (a catchword for two wolves and a sheep
deciding what is for supper) possible. He is already planning such
takeovers from, likely, Burma. When talking about the USA, he always
says "Our great Democracy." We are a REPUBLIC. Simple democracies,
without strong Constitutions specifically prohibiting socialism, will
always decline into socialism. That is because those who are willing
to STEAL from the successful are given the same voting power as the
lesser-in-number successful.
My New Constitution could have simply banned having Democrats or
liberals vote. But the wisest way is to hang for TREASON any elected
official who even proposes anything socialist. FDR Social Security,
though "nice”, is 100% unconstitutional, because the money to pay for
it, when the population is declining, as now, must be STOLEN from
programs paid for by taxes. And WHO pays the taxes? Those who
actually work for a living rather than freeload.
I suggest that as many of you readers as will go back in this same
thread to read how my New Constitution will phase out all of the
socialistic aspects, and stop any more movement in the failed
socialistic directions. While what I say may seem harsh, flourishing
capitalism will soothe most of the hurts before too many tears can be
shed.
There need be no "assassination teams" like you mention if there is a
STRONG New Constitution, like I have penned and polished, to PREVENT
anyone from having undue influence over government. Jews, as a
'lobby‘, will be forever banned from having more than one-vote-per-
person-fairly-counted. I would love to hear Ben Stein (a Jew) tell us
which is more important, Jewish lobbying power, or eliminating
socialism from the USA, permanently.
The US Secret Service needs to realize that it is the LEGAL voters in
America (not the BRIBED ones) who are actually paying the taxes that
pay their government salaries. The Secret Service should only be
loyal to those taxpayers, and on their behalf, should arrest that
Kenyan SQUATTER in the White House, Barack Hussein Obama. That
bastard anti-Christ is already "campaigning" (in Burma) to take over
the world. When the Secret Service does arrest him, hopefully
yesterday (!), there need not be any bloodshed in America. Our future
as a nation could well be in the thus-far, wrongly-tied hands of those
men in the perfectly tailored gray suits. — John A. Armistead —
Author and Patriot
>
> "NoEinstein" <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
>
Dear Tom:
Your view regarding the media—largely control by, or sympathetic to
Jews—is a major reason my New Constitution, in the ten fold increased
1st Amendment, forever prevents anyone in the media from commenting on
elections and referenda. And it will throw in jail anyone working for
any medium who says a word, or invites guests to say a word, that will
sway voters in any election, because of some endorsement or negative
comment regarding any person running for office. COVERAGE of breaking
news is allowed, but comment by media elites is strictly forbidden.
You are "safely" in China, where the economy isn't as good as the
people there would like. That makes the possibility of having an
Obama type "Democracy" (a catchword for two wolves and a sheep
deciding what is for supper) possible. He is already planning such
takeovers from, likely, Burma. When talking about the USA, he always
says "Our great Democracy." We are a REPUBLIC. Simple democracies,
without strong Constitutions specifically prohibiting socialism, will
always decline into socialism. That is because those who are willing
to STEAL from the successful are given the same voting power as the
lesser-in-number successful.
My New Constitution could have simply banned having Democrats or
liberals vote. But the wisest way is to hang for TREASON any elected
official who even proposes anything socialist. FDR Social Security,
though "nice”, is 100% unconstitutional, because the money to pay for
it, when the population is declining, as now, must be STOLEN from
programs paid for by taxes. And WHO pays the taxes? Those who
actually work for a living rather than freeload.
I suggest that as many of you readers as will go back in this same
thread to read how my New Constitution will phase out all of the
socialistic aspects, and stop any more movement in the failed
socialistic directions. While what I say may seem harsh, flourishing
capitalism will soothe most of the hurts before too many tears can be
shed.
There need be no "assassination teams" like you mention if there is a
STRONG New Constitution, like I have penned and polished, to PREVENT
anyone from having undue influence over government. Jews, as a
'lobby‘, will be forever banned from having more than one-vote-per-
person-fairly-counted. I would love to hear Ben Stein (a Jew) tell us
which is more important, Jewish lobbying power, or eliminating
socialism from the USA, permanently.
The US Secret Service needs to realize that it is the LEGAL voters in
America (not the BRIBED ones) who are actually paying the taxes that
pay their government salaries. The Secret Service should only be
loyal to those taxpayers, and on their behalf, should arrest that
Kenyan SQUATTER in the White House, Barack Hussein Obama. That
bastard anti-Christ is already "campaigning" (in Burma) to take over
the world. When the Secret Service does arrest him, hopefully
yesterday (!), there need not be any bloodshed in America. Our future
as a nation could well be in the thus-far, wrongly-tied hands of those
men in the perfectly tailored gray suits. — John A. Armistead —
Author and Patriot
>
> "NoEinstein" <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
NoEinstein
Nov 27, 2012, 7:59:52 PM11/27/12
to
On Nov 27, 7:18 am, Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfre...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
> >"Tom Potter" <tdp1...@yahoo.com> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>
> >"NoEinstein" <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
> http://klausschadenfreude.110mb.com/Potter-family.htm- Hide quoted text -
speaking as an individual that is fine. But if he is a LOBBYIST, he
is guilty of a felony! — John A. Armistead —
wrote:
> >"Tom Potter" <tdp1...@yahoo.com> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>
> >"NoEinstein" <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
>
> - Show quoted text -
Apparently K. S. is a Jew or is sympathetic to Jews. If he is
> - Show quoted text -
speaking as an individual that is fine. But if he is a LOBBYIST, he
is guilty of a felony! — John A. Armistead —
Klaus Schadenfreude
Nov 27, 2012, 9:00:28 PM11/27/12
to
>NoEinstein <noein...@bellsouth.net> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
bedwetters.
>If he is
>speaking as an individual that is fine. But if he is a LOBBYIST, he
>is guilty of a felony! — John A. Armistead —
I'm a lobbyist. Call a cop.
[chuckle]
http://klausschadenfreude.110mb.com/potter.html
>Apparently K. S. is a Jew or is sympathetic to Jews.
Or, K.S. thinks nazis are a bunch of glue-huffing child molesting
bedwetters.
>If he is
>speaking as an individual that is fine. But if he is a LOBBYIST, he
>is guilty of a felony! — John A. Armistead —
[chuckle]
http://klausschadenfreude.110mb.com/potter.html
NoEinstein
Nov 28, 2012, 2:07:26 PM11/28/12
to
On Nov 27, 7:55 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
On Fox News, ‘Fair and Balanced’ means 50 plus % corrupt.
Numbers of times I have referred to the apparently mandatory “curl”
that those on Fox News put on their otherwise-might-have-been-
conservative stance against Obama’s socialism. Yesterday, on Bill
O’Reilly’s Fox show, that pretty, but apparently mushroom poison, Dana
Perino, said: “Obama won ‘fair and square‘…” so Republicans must do
this-and-that. ‘The Five’ had been moderately fun to watch, because
Bob Beckel was being required to keep repeating his obviously lying
defenses of Obama. For fat Slavs like Beckel, and nearly all of the
spinners for the Democrats, lying is an accepted ploy. For them, any
means—fraudulent citizenship documents, lies and innuendo against
opponents, and ballot box tampering—are acceptable. But those are
“acceptable” only if the SPIRIT of fairness in our Constitution is
ignored to the great detriment of the whole country! Here are
clarifications of acceptable campaign practices, consistent with the
SPIRIT of the original Constitution, and as are spelled-out in my New
Constitution:
“Article II, Section 4: The President, Vice Pres., representatives,
and civil officers of the USA shall be fired if they are convicted of
a high crime or felony, or if *** they willfully violate any provision
of this constitution [as, for example, not supporting the Constitution
after having taken the Oath of Office saying otherwise]. Such person
shall never again hold public office[!]. It is a felony for any of
the latter to use public services, departments or resources for their
personal purposes above what any Citizen can use.”
[To wit: Using Air force One and the US Secret Service while
campaigning for a second term is prohibited! That is what Obama did,
at least weekly, for four years, at hundreds of millions of dollars of
expense to the taxpayers!]
“No representative shall be transported nor boarded at public expense
without House assent. It is a felony [!] to give or receive money,
gifts, travel or board germane to an issue presently up for vote in
the House, or knowingly, which might be voted on in the foreseeable
future; *** or for a government official to defend unlawful acts [like
Obama’s overall Benghazi fiasco] that they or anyone they know has
committed or expects to commit by targeting any Citizen or group for
an investigation or suspicion of wrongdoing, or by denying to any
Citizen(s) full civil and constitutional rights.
[Note: Beginning in 1996, I was personally investigated by both the US
Secret Service AND by the FBI on the whim of a high elected official
whom I knew, with certainty, had committed a high crime that should
have sent such person to prison for LIFE! The rationale in most Law
Enforcement agencies is that Elected Officials are never to be held as
accountable for their actions as the Citizens “out there” would be.
So, effectively, Law Enforcement, is (prior to my from-experience-
written New Constitution!) the Gestapo of Government.]
“Law enforcement and the judiciary shall not *** favor wrongdoers—
within government or without—over a plaintiff or Citizen seeking
justice, and shall keep the latter up-to-date on an investigation’s
progress.”
[Oh… but are they ever favoring Obama out of “respect” (vomit!) for
our pseudo president!]
“The former have no authority to act in the support of wrongdoing or
corruption in government and shall suspicion such requests by anyone
in government at personal risk of a similar penalty. *** Exhibiting
ideological bias in a government job terminates the employment.”
[Note: Public officials are supposed to represent ALL of their
constituents, and to do what such want. So, at no point are the
‘ideologies’ of any President allowed to determine anything. The
President is the Chief Executive whose only authority is to see that
laws that have been passed by the House, and are agreeable to the
people, are executed efficiently. His job is ADMINISTRATIVE, never
dictatorial! Since ‘Obama Care’ isn’t agreeable to the People, such
is UNCONSTITUTIONAL!]
“It shall be a felony for any government official, celebrity or media
idol—past or present—to publicly endorse or campaign on behalf of any
candidate for public office or job. Candidates for public office
shall be disqualified for: *** soliciting the votes of any
[Note: Popular vote totals shall NEVER include the votes of those who
were BRIBED by promises of UNCONSTITUTIONAL entitlements, or who were
given “gifts”! Bribing is a FELONY that automatically disqualifies a
candidate for public office, on a single provable instance!!!!!]
“Therefore, any candidate for such offices shall be *** disqualified
intelligent commentator on Fox. I invite Dana Perino to explain, and
to defend, why anything at all was “fair and square” about the way
Democrats have campaigned, and to explain and defend anything at all
that “president” (finger-down-the-throat) Obama has ever done in his
entire God-damned-bastard life that was Constitutional! *** Wake up,
Secret Service, the time for ARRESTING Obama is now! ***
Respectfully Submitted,
John A. Armistead
Author and Patriot
>
> > Tom Potterhttp://tom-potter.telhttps://tdp1001.jux.comhttp://prioritize.biz/the...- Hide quoted text -
>
On Fox News, ‘Fair and Balanced’ means 50 plus % corrupt.
Numbers of times I have referred to the apparently mandatory “curl”
that those on Fox News put on their otherwise-might-have-been-
conservative stance against Obama’s socialism. Yesterday, on Bill
O’Reilly’s Fox show, that pretty, but apparently mushroom poison, Dana
Perino, said: “Obama won ‘fair and square‘…” so Republicans must do
this-and-that. ‘The Five’ had been moderately fun to watch, because
Bob Beckel was being required to keep repeating his obviously lying
defenses of Obama. For fat Slavs like Beckel, and nearly all of the
spinners for the Democrats, lying is an accepted ploy. For them, any
means—fraudulent citizenship documents, lies and innuendo against
opponents, and ballot box tampering—are acceptable. But those are
“acceptable” only if the SPIRIT of fairness in our Constitution is
ignored to the great detriment of the whole country! Here are
clarifications of acceptable campaign practices, consistent with the
SPIRIT of the original Constitution, and as are spelled-out in my New
Constitution:
“Article II, Section 4: The President, Vice Pres., representatives,
and civil officers of the USA shall be fired if they are convicted of
a high crime or felony, or if *** they willfully violate any provision
of this constitution [as, for example, not supporting the Constitution
after having taken the Oath of Office saying otherwise]. Such person
shall never again hold public office[!]. It is a felony for any of
the latter to use public services, departments or resources for their
personal purposes above what any Citizen can use.”
[To wit: Using Air force One and the US Secret Service while
campaigning for a second term is prohibited! That is what Obama did,
at least weekly, for four years, at hundreds of millions of dollars of
expense to the taxpayers!]
“No representative shall be transported nor boarded at public expense
without House assent. It is a felony [!] to give or receive money,
gifts, travel or board germane to an issue presently up for vote in
the House, or knowingly, which might be voted on in the foreseeable
future; *** or for a government official to defend unlawful acts [like
Obama’s overall Benghazi fiasco] that they or anyone they know has
committed or expects to commit by targeting any Citizen or group for
an investigation or suspicion of wrongdoing, or by denying to any
Citizen(s) full civil and constitutional rights.
[Note: Beginning in 1996, I was personally investigated by both the US
Secret Service AND by the FBI on the whim of a high elected official
whom I knew, with certainty, had committed a high crime that should
have sent such person to prison for LIFE! The rationale in most Law
Enforcement agencies is that Elected Officials are never to be held as
accountable for their actions as the Citizens “out there” would be.
So, effectively, Law Enforcement, is (prior to my from-experience-
written New Constitution!) the Gestapo of Government.]
“Law enforcement and the judiciary shall not *** favor wrongdoers—
within government or without—over a plaintiff or Citizen seeking
justice, and shall keep the latter up-to-date on an investigation’s
progress.”
[Oh… but are they ever favoring Obama out of “respect” (vomit!) for
our pseudo president!]
“The former have no authority to act in the support of wrongdoing or
corruption in government and shall suspicion such requests by anyone
in government at personal risk of a similar penalty. *** Exhibiting
ideological bias in a government job terminates the employment.”
[Note: Public officials are supposed to represent ALL of their
constituents, and to do what such want. So, at no point are the
‘ideologies’ of any President allowed to determine anything. The
President is the Chief Executive whose only authority is to see that
laws that have been passed by the House, and are agreeable to the
people, are executed efficiently. His job is ADMINISTRATIVE, never
dictatorial! Since ‘Obama Care’ isn’t agreeable to the People, such
is UNCONSTITUTIONAL!]
“It shall be a felony for any government official, celebrity or media
idol—past or present—to publicly endorse or campaign on behalf of any
candidate for public office or job. Candidates for public office
ideologically-biased group or working to obtain the endorsement of
such a group, as by addressing a gathering that is composed only of
the biased members of such; soliciting new voter registrants; and
aiding or organizing the transportation of voters to the polls. The
winners in national elections shall be determined only by the popular
vote totals, irrespective of State borders.”
such a group, as by addressing a gathering that is composed only of
the biased members of such; soliciting new voter registrants; and
aiding or organizing the transportation of voters to the polls. The
winners in national elections shall be determined only by the popular
[Note: Popular vote totals shall NEVER include the votes of those who
were BRIBED by promises of UNCONSTITUTIONAL entitlements, or who were
given “gifts”! Bribing is a FELONY that automatically disqualifies a
candidate for public office, on a single provable instance!!!!!]
“Therefore, any candidate for such offices shall be *** disqualified
for making campaign appearances to target the voters of any state,
county or city. Voters shall make their decisions based on non-media-
sponsored televised debates and on fair and unscripted candidate
interviews—televised nationally—and held no sooner than four months
before the specific election.”
Dana Perino, in a number of instances, has shown herself to be an
county or city. Voters shall make their decisions based on non-media-
sponsored televised debates and on fair and unscripted candidate
interviews—televised nationally—and held no sooner than four months
before the specific election.”
intelligent commentator on Fox. I invite Dana Perino to explain, and
to defend, why anything at all was “fair and square” about the way
Democrats have campaigned, and to explain and defend anything at all
that “president” (finger-down-the-throat) Obama has ever done in his
entire God-damned-bastard life that was Constitutional! *** Wake up,
Secret Service, the time for ARRESTING Obama is now! ***
Respectfully Submitted,
John A. Armistead
Author and Patriot
>
> On Nov 27, 12:15 am, "Tom Potter" <tdp1...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> Dear Tom:
>
> Your view regarding the media—largely control by, or sympathetic to
> Jews—is a major reason my New Constitution, in the ten fold increased
> 1st Amendment, forever prevents anyone in the media from commenting on
> elections and referenda. And it will throw in jail anyone working for
> any medium who says a word, or invites guests to say a word, that will
> swayvotersin any election, because of some endorsement or negative
>
> Dear Tom:
>
> Your view regarding the media—largely control by, or sympathetic to
> Jews—is a major reason my New Constitution, in the ten fold increased
> 1st Amendment, forever prevents anyone in the media from commenting on
> elections and referenda. And it will throw in jail anyone working for
> any medium who says a word, or invites guests to say a word, that will
> comment regarding any person running for office. COVERAGE of breaking
> news is allowed, but comment by media elites is strictly forbidden.
>
> You are "safely" in China, where the economy isn't as good as the
> people there would like. That makes the possibility of having an
> Obama type "Democracy" (a catchword for two wolves and a sheep
> deciding what is for supper) possible. He is already planning such
> takeovers from, likely, Burma. When talking about the USA, he always
> says "Ourgreat Democracy." We are a REPUBLIC. Simple democracies,
> news is allowed, but comment by media elites is strictly forbidden.
>
> You are "safely" in China, where the economy isn't as good as the
> people there would like. That makes the possibility of having an
> Obama type "Democracy" (a catchword for two wolves and a sheep
> deciding what is for supper) possible. He is already planning such
> takeovers from, likely, Burma. When talking about the USA, he always
Tom Potter
Dec 1, 2012, 2:32:37 AM12/1/12
to
"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:alb9b8dqr6qost8gu...@4ax.com...
continues to be a faithful reader of my posts
and that as my message was bullet proof
he was forced to lie and attack the messenger
in an effort to discredit it.
Unlike Schadenfreude, who uses the German word
which means to "Delight in another person's misfortune".
as his handle in an effort to appear German,
rather than an anti-German phychopath,
who ""Delights in misfortunes of others.".
I use my real name and
"delight in trying to optimize pleasure and minimize pain"
for the greatest number of people.
Considering that Jews have come into conflict with
all of their neighbors throughout history,
and most of the folks on the planet today don't like Jews,
I am surprised to see that Schadenfreude thinks that
portraying someone as anti-Semitic is evil,
unless of course, he thinks that the Germans, Spanish, Moslems,
Russians, and of course the English as their Magna Carte
prohibited Jews from taking advantage of widows and orphans,
are evil.
I might also point out that most folks on the planet
don't like liars, rapists, murderers, thieves, and "schadenfreudes",
and I don't think one would get much milage trying to smear folks
by calling them "anti-schadenfreudes".
Klaus Schadenfreude
Dec 1, 2012, 7:14:33 AM12/1/12
to
I was not "forced." I did it with my own free will.
>Unlike Schadenfreude, who uses the German word
>which means to "Delight in another person's misfortune".
your ridiculous, unproven conspiratorial nonsense, I can point out to
EVERYONE that you're just an old, impotent nazi wannabe.
>as his handle in an effort to appear German,
>rather than an anti-German phychopath,
>who ""Delights in misfortunes of others.".
>
>I use my real name and
>"delight in trying to optimize pleasure and minimize pain"
>for the greatest number of people.
the nazi's are, just like it's a pleasure to know where the
cockroaches are.
But I repeat myself.
http://klausschadenfreude.110mb.com/Potter-family.htm
NoEinstein
Dec 1, 2012, 9:26:17 AM12/1/12
to
On Dec 1, 2:32 am, "Tom Potter" <tdp1...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> "Klaus Schadenfreude" <klausschadenfre...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:alb9b8dqr6qost8gu...@4ax.com...
>
>
>
>
>
> >>"NoEinstein" <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
> Tom Potterhttp://tom-potter.telhttps://tdp1001.jux.comhttp://prioritize.biz/the-cloud-machine.html- Hide quoted text -
>
Dear Tom: You are one of the more clear thinkers in the world. My
initial run-in with Jews was after I tried to get several Jew-
published science texts to correctly show that Einstein's SRT is
wrong. I got no reply. After realizing that none of the 22 USA
universities was interested in correcting what the Jew-published
textbooks were saying, I realized that Jews are one of if not THE
major problem facing the world. Oh, a lot of them are smart, like Ben
Stein, but because of their secretive, behind-the-scenes dealings to
control far more of the world than they have a right to control, I am
against Jews as a race but NOT as individuals! The theme of my little
book, 'The Shortest Distance; Harmony Through Prosperity’ is that
groups should have little or no influence over anything. If only
INDIVIDUALS voted their minds (with socialism not being on-the-table)
there would only be peace and prosperity in the world! Groups always
divide and anger the masses because of perceived inequities.
My guess is that you butted heads with the Jewish administrators when
you were a teacher. Something really bad had to happen to make you
move to China. Though we seem to talk only about... Jews, I do thank
you for at least reading some of what I work so hard writing. Between
us, maybe the world can be saved. Cross your fingers on that! — John
A. Armistead — AKA NoEinstein
> "Klaus Schadenfreude" <klausschadenfre...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:alb9b8dqr6qost8gu...@4ax.com...
>
>
>
>
>
> >>"NoEinstein" <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
>
Dear Tom: You are one of the more clear thinkers in the world. My
initial run-in with Jews was after I tried to get several Jew-
published science texts to correctly show that Einstein's SRT is
wrong. I got no reply. After realizing that none of the 22 USA
universities was interested in correcting what the Jew-published
textbooks were saying, I realized that Jews are one of if not THE
major problem facing the world. Oh, a lot of them are smart, like Ben
Stein, but because of their secretive, behind-the-scenes dealings to
control far more of the world than they have a right to control, I am
against Jews as a race but NOT as individuals! The theme of my little
book, 'The Shortest Distance; Harmony Through Prosperity’ is that
groups should have little or no influence over anything. If only
INDIVIDUALS voted their minds (with socialism not being on-the-table)
there would only be peace and prosperity in the world! Groups always
divide and anger the masses because of perceived inequities.
My guess is that you butted heads with the Jewish administrators when
you were a teacher. Something really bad had to happen to make you
move to China. Though we seem to talk only about... Jews, I do thank
you for at least reading some of what I work so hard writing. Between
us, maybe the world can be saved. Cross your fingers on that! — John
A. Armistead — AKA NoEinstein
1treePetrifiedForestLane
Dec 1, 2012, 6:06:01 PM12/1/12
to
if "Huyghens, Liebniz and Coriolis were wrong about kinetic energy,"
as you haltingly insist without even knowing what a linear equation
is,
then Einstein would, of course, have to also be wrong.
however, that is not even wrongsville.
anyway, like I said on the other item, if
you are not going to bother to actually address *any*
of the criticisms, I will not reply.
end of sad story, I hope.
as you haltingly insist without even knowing what a linear equation
is,
then Einstein would, of course, have to also be wrong.
however, that is not even wrongsville.
anyway, like I said on the other item, if
you are not going to bother to actually address *any*
of the criticisms, I will not reply.
end of sad story, I hope.
1treePetrifiedForestLane
Dec 1, 2012, 6:53:32 PM12/1/12
to
NB, "armistead" is, like, the opposite of "armistice;"
tres etrange' -- n'est-ce pas?
tres etrange' -- n'est-ce pas?
G=EMC^2
Dec 1, 2012, 7:11:32 PM12/1/12
to
On Dec 1, 2:32 am, "Tom Potter" <tdp1...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> "Klaus Schadenfreude" <klausschadenfre...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:alb9b8dqr6qost8gu...@4ax.com...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >>"NoEinstein" <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
start,and Bush the finish. Gastapo fits,fo America is Nazi Germany
1937.You goose step to the Godfather or get Tanged TeBet
bjacoby
Dec 2, 2012, 2:04:40 AM12/2/12
to
On 12/1/2012 7:11 PM, G=EMC^2 wrote:
> Its GOP Mafia that turned USA into a fascist republic . Nixon gave the
> start,and Bush the finish. Gastapo fits,fo America is Nazi Germany
> 1937.You goose step to the Godfather or get Tanged TeBet
When you end up as Soilent Green, Treeb, a LOT of people are going to
> Its GOP Mafia that turned USA into a fascist republic . Nixon gave the
> start,and Bush the finish. Gastapo fits,fo America is Nazi Germany
> 1937.You goose step to the Godfather or get Tanged TeBet
get sick!
SaPeIsMa
Dec 2, 2012, 11:06:04 AM12/2/12
to
"G=EMC^2" <herbert...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:896a13d6-b3de-4c3c...@bq2g2000vbb.googlegroups.com...
#
#
# Its GOP Mafia that turned USA into a fascist republic . Nixon gave the
# start,and Bush the finish. Gastapo fits,fo America is Nazi Germany
# 1937.You goose step to the Godfather or get Tanged TeBet
<sigh>
Another pinky idiot suffering from the delusion that stringing a bunch of
emotion-loaded words together will automatically make sense and be true
NoEinstein
Dec 2, 2012, 9:05:02 PM12/2/12
to
On Dec 1, 6:06 pm, 1treePetrifiedForestLane <Space...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
Dear 1tree:
For you 'science' is just banter and armchair recreation. For me it
is save-the-human race serious. Vector analysis is a big portion of
structural design, my major in architecture. Linear equations plot as
straight lines. When you try to "dumb-me-out" you only make yourself
look stupid. Have a nice Holiday, and as a resolution, you should
give up on attacking the number one science mind in the world, me. I
am unassailable. — NoEinstein — AKA John A. Armistead
wrote:
For you 'science' is just banter and armchair recreation. For me it
is save-the-human race serious. Vector analysis is a big portion of
structural design, my major in architecture. Linear equations plot as
straight lines. When you try to "dumb-me-out" you only make yourself
look stupid. Have a nice Holiday, and as a resolution, you should
give up on attacking the number one science mind in the world, me. I
am unassailable. — NoEinstein — AKA John A. Armistead
NoEinstein
Dec 2, 2012, 9:34:04 PM12/2/12
to
>
> Its GOP Mafia that turned USA into a fascist republic . Nixon gave the
> start,and Bush the finish. Gastapo fits,fo America is Nazi Germany
> 1937.You goose step to the Godfather or get Tanged TeBet- Hide quoted text -
> Its GOP Mafia that turned USA into a fascist republic . Nixon gave the
> start,and Bush the finish. Gastapo fits,fo America is Nazi Germany
>
> - Show quoted text -
Dear "G": Effectively, law enforcement functions like the Gestapo.
> - Show quoted text -
But that is mostly because of the cultural misunderstanding of law
enforcement just who their "bosses" are. There is a wrong motion that
those in tailored suits and power ties, who are so much in the media
eye, are the "good guys". And those in torn jeans and tie-died tee
shirts are the crooks. They also wrongly believe that the victors in
elections are somehow validated as being above the law. One reason
that so few in politics will blow the whistle on another politician,
is because they know that their "goodness" couldn't stand scrutiny,
either. So those in government just look the other way to corruption.
Another reason that law enforcement sometimes goofs is because of the
perception that there is this "game" between the good guys and the bad
guys. That black or white classification, causes individuals in L. E.
to put too much devotion to the often wrong esprit de corps. At least
10% of my New Constitution is for correcting the overbearing nature of
both L. E. and the courts. In fact, it was because of unforgivable
mistakes in L. E., like sending innocent people to jail for crimes
they didn't commit, that inspired me to start writing us a new and
better (stronger and more deferential to the People) constitution in
the first place.
After our government is fixed, I know how to attack global warming
WITHOUT stopping the use of fossil fuels. It's a shame, that there
are so few who know a true fix for our broken government when they see
it. The nutshell: We must STOP supposing that continuing to play
politics as usual, when that is what got us into our mess in the first
place, will magically 'fix' things in the next 2, 4 or 6 years. That
ain't happening. So, wake up America. My New Constitution is ON YOUR
SIDE! — John A. Armistead —
NoEinstein
Dec 2, 2012, 9:43:32 PM12/2/12
to
if the profit motive is still functioning. With so many getting food
stamps, those who make the groceries have less and less movie to stay
in the business. In cold war Russia, a person had to stand in line
for an hour or more just to buy a loaf of bread. We aren't quite to
the point of eating "human" cookies. But we need to FIX our broken
government BEFORE things get any worse. My "NC" will do that in a
single day! Read back into the thread. Writing is my forte
(pronounced FORT!). — John A. Armistead —
NoEinstein
Dec 2, 2012, 9:52:56 PM12/2/12
to
On Dec 2, 11:06 am, "SaPeIsMa" <SaPeI...@Hotmail.com> wrote:
> "G=EMC^2" <herbertglazi...@gmail.com> wrote in message
Dear SPM: Words are better than bullets, don't you think? My "NC" is
the ONLY plan out there while will allow at least 90% of the people to
be better off. Capitalism caused the flourishing economy in the
1950s, and such can save us again, IF government will simply get off
the backs of businesses and (non-polluting) industries. If businesses
knew, tomorrow, that Obama Care has been nixed, there would be a mini
boom from that, alone! Read ‘Atlas Shrugged’, and LEARN. — John A.
Armistead —
> "G=EMC^2" <herbertglazi...@gmail.com> wrote in message
the ONLY plan out there while will allow at least 90% of the people to
be better off. Capitalism caused the flourishing economy in the
1950s, and such can save us again, IF government will simply get off
the backs of businesses and (non-polluting) industries. If businesses
knew, tomorrow, that Obama Care has been nixed, there would be a mini
boom from that, alone! Read ‘Atlas Shrugged’, and LEARN. — John A.
Armistead —
Tom Potter
Dec 2, 2012, 9:47:27 PM12/2/12
to
>news:6113e0f8-2bc7-4474...@e25g2000vbm.googlegroups.com...
>us, maybe the world can be saved. Cross your fingers on that! - John
>A. Armistead - AKA NoEinstein
I suggest that one does not have to be a "clear thinker"
to understand why Jews have come into conflict with all of their neighbors
throughout history and that most folks on the planet today don't like Jews.
All one has to do is read history books and current events with an open
mind,
read what Jews post on the Internet, observe what Jews in government and the
Mass Media say and do, and observe who is trashing the culture and
how Jews interact with their neighbors when there are no constraints on
them, and they can understand that Judaism why Jews come into conflict
with all of their neighbors.
I have observed that most Muslims, Blacks, Latinos and Asians pretty much
understand what Jews are like. ( Maybe most Whites are not "clear
thinkers??? )
I have also observed that people in the nations where Jews dominate the Mass
Media are afraid to speak the truth about Jews because they know that Jews
will
"Henry Ford", "Jimmy Carter", "Mel Gibson" and "Helen Brown" them.
( Damage their business, get them fired, smear them, sue them, etc.)
Observe that even Henry Ford was compelled to quit trying to
call attention to the fact that Jews were using Russia as a base from
where to train terrorists and instigate the Class Wars that caused
the Great Depression, W.W.II, the Cold War, etc.
as Jews had targeted him, his business, and perhaps his family,
rather than address the points he raised.
I have never "butted heads" with any of my supervisors or co-workers
in the service, in the various jobs I have held,
nor when operating my own businesses.
In fact, in all of my jobs, including the service,
and in my teaching jobs at the Military school, high school,
college and seminar levels, I got along very well with my
supervisors and they generally let me do as I liked.
Until 911, and clashing with the Jews in the newsgroups
who were working hard to get America to invade Iraq,
I gave Jews the benefit of the doubt,
and turned the other cheek,
The world is too small and dangerous to continue to allow
Jews to continue to instigate conflicts, revolutions and wars.
Some GOOD things compelled me to move to China.
I married a beautiful, intelligent, Chinese TV Director,
and to top it off, China is the most dynamic nation on the planet,
has great food, great massages, numerous fantastic sights,
and there are thousands of interesting things to do.
China is like Disney World every day.
Also China is safer, more free market oriented,
and there is less government intrusion into the
private lives of the citizens. If you don't commit a crime
or try to disrupt society, you can do pretty much what
you like in China.
For example, Chinese cops don't carry guns and clubs
and they are very helpful and non-threatening,
and government employees in China work hard and serve the people,
rather than demand higher pay, greater benefits, early retirement,
and immunity from their errors, omissions, commissions,
and from actually doing useful work.
In America, the government contracts out the dirty work
to folks who do not get the income, benefits, and early retirement
that government employees get, and most cops
are on sick leave, vacation, desk duty, or operating speed traps
rather than fighting crime in high crime areas at high crime times.
I might also point out that China has better overall
health care, dental care and transportation systems.
China is now what America was like
before the Class Wars screwed up America.
I suggest that rational, intelligent, MORAL folks
should resist the urge to engage in revolutions and wars.
Just look at what happened, and what is happening,
in the nations that allow the Mass Media and outsiders
instigate conflicts, revolutions and wars.
Instigating revolutions and wars should be a capital crime in all nations.
>A. Armistead - AKA NoEinstein
I suggest that one does not have to be a "clear thinker"
to understand why Jews have come into conflict with all of their neighbors
throughout history and that most folks on the planet today don't like Jews.
All one has to do is read history books and current events with an open
mind,
read what Jews post on the Internet, observe what Jews in government and the
Mass Media say and do, and observe who is trashing the culture and
how Jews interact with their neighbors when there are no constraints on
them, and they can understand that Judaism why Jews come into conflict
with all of their neighbors.
I have observed that most Muslims, Blacks, Latinos and Asians pretty much
understand what Jews are like. ( Maybe most Whites are not "clear
thinkers??? )
I have also observed that people in the nations where Jews dominate the Mass
Media are afraid to speak the truth about Jews because they know that Jews
will
"Henry Ford", "Jimmy Carter", "Mel Gibson" and "Helen Brown" them.
( Damage their business, get them fired, smear them, sue them, etc.)
Observe that even Henry Ford was compelled to quit trying to
call attention to the fact that Jews were using Russia as a base from
where to train terrorists and instigate the Class Wars that caused
the Great Depression, W.W.II, the Cold War, etc.
as Jews had targeted him, his business, and perhaps his family,
rather than address the points he raised.
I have never "butted heads" with any of my supervisors or co-workers
in the service, in the various jobs I have held,
nor when operating my own businesses.
In fact, in all of my jobs, including the service,
and in my teaching jobs at the Military school, high school,
college and seminar levels, I got along very well with my
supervisors and they generally let me do as I liked.
Until 911, and clashing with the Jews in the newsgroups
who were working hard to get America to invade Iraq,
I gave Jews the benefit of the doubt,
and turned the other cheek,
The world is too small and dangerous to continue to allow
Jews to continue to instigate conflicts, revolutions and wars.
Some GOOD things compelled me to move to China.
I married a beautiful, intelligent, Chinese TV Director,
and to top it off, China is the most dynamic nation on the planet,
has great food, great massages, numerous fantastic sights,
and there are thousands of interesting things to do.
China is like Disney World every day.
Also China is safer, more free market oriented,
and there is less government intrusion into the
private lives of the citizens. If you don't commit a crime
or try to disrupt society, you can do pretty much what
you like in China.
For example, Chinese cops don't carry guns and clubs
and they are very helpful and non-threatening,
and government employees in China work hard and serve the people,
rather than demand higher pay, greater benefits, early retirement,
and immunity from their errors, omissions, commissions,
and from actually doing useful work.
In America, the government contracts out the dirty work
to folks who do not get the income, benefits, and early retirement
that government employees get, and most cops
are on sick leave, vacation, desk duty, or operating speed traps
rather than fighting crime in high crime areas at high crime times.
I might also point out that China has better overall
health care, dental care and transportation systems.
China is now what America was like
before the Class Wars screwed up America.
I suggest that rational, intelligent, MORAL folks
should resist the urge to engage in revolutions and wars.
Just look at what happened, and what is happening,
in the nations that allow the Mass Media and outsiders
instigate conflicts, revolutions and wars.
Instigating revolutions and wars should be a capital crime in all nations.
Tom Potter
Dec 2, 2012, 10:26:30 PM12/2/12
to
news:nusjb8dqf9ukba6gp...@4ax.com...
It appears that my psychotic pal Schadenfreude,
who uses the German word Schadenfreude
has been brainwashed by Jews in the Mass Media
to equate Nazi with evil,
and to lie, distort, and smear folks who express facts
that he has been conditioned to reject.
The fact of the matter is that the Nazi Party
was franchised and supported by the vast majority
of the German people to take a stand against the gang
that had massacred the Russian Royal Family,
co-opted the Russian government,
and were using Russia as a base from where to
train terrorists and instigate Class Wars all over the world.
It is clear that the German people franchised the Nazi Party
because it vowed to prevent the Class Wars Instigators
from doing to the German people
what they had done to the Russian people.
take away their wealth, liberties and lives.
As can be seen that the Nazi Party performed well.
In three years they transformed Germany from a divided nation
with the highest unemployment to full employment,
improved the infrastructure, built homes and vacation homes
for the workers, united the German people,
and into becoming the most united, most dynamic, most
powerful nation on the planet.
all while the nations
whose leaders had sold out to the Class Wars Instigators
were sinking deeper and deeper into the Great Depression.
I suggest that my psychotic pal Schadenfreude
should make an effort to prevent the Mass Media
from brainwashing him to a slanted, self-serving
view of reality.
As can be seen by his posts,
Schadenfreude is not a German,
but is a psychotic hater of Germans,
and an opponent of truth, civility, and morality.
who uses the German word Schadenfreude
which means to "Delight in another person's misfortune".
as his handle,
has been brainwashed by Jews in the Mass Media
to equate Nazi with evil,
and to lie, distort, and smear folks who express facts
that he has been conditioned to reject.
The fact of the matter is that the Nazi Party
was franchised and supported by the vast majority
of the German people to take a stand against the gang
that had massacred the Russian Royal Family,
co-opted the Russian government,
and were using Russia as a base from where to
train terrorists and instigate Class Wars all over the world.
It is clear that the German people franchised the Nazi Party
because it vowed to prevent the Class Wars Instigators
from doing to the German people
what they had done to the Russian people.
take away their wealth, liberties and lives.
As can be seen that the Nazi Party performed well.
In three years they transformed Germany from a divided nation
with the highest unemployment to full employment,
improved the infrastructure, built homes and vacation homes
for the workers, united the German people,
and into becoming the most united, most dynamic, most
powerful nation on the planet.
all while the nations
whose leaders had sold out to the Class Wars Instigators
were sinking deeper and deeper into the Great Depression.
I suggest that my psychotic pal Schadenfreude
should make an effort to prevent the Mass Media
from brainwashing him to a slanted, self-serving
view of reality.
As can be seen by his posts,
Schadenfreude is not a German,
but is a psychotic hater of Germans,
and an opponent of truth, civility, and morality.
Klaus Schadenfreude
Dec 3, 2012, 7:59:23 AM12/3/12
to
>> And you *are* providing pleasure. It's always a pleasure to know where
>> the nazi's are, just like it's a pleasure to know where the
>> cockroaches are.
>>
>> But I repeat myself.
>>
>> http://klausschadenfreude.110mb.com/Potter-family.htm
>
>It appears that my psychotic pal Schadenfreude,
>who uses the German word Schadenfreude
>which means to "Delight in another person's misfortune".
>as his handle,
You're repeating yourself, old man.
>> the nazi's are, just like it's a pleasure to know where the
>> cockroaches are.
>>
>> But I repeat myself.
>>
>> http://klausschadenfreude.110mb.com/Potter-family.htm
>
>It appears that my psychotic pal Schadenfreude,
>who uses the German word Schadenfreude
>which means to "Delight in another person's misfortune".
>as his handle,
>has been brainwashed by Jews in the Mass Media
>to equate Nazi with evil,
they're NOT evil by being STUPID, and while that works well for you,
Tommy, if doesn't work for the organization.
>and to lie, distort, and smear folks who express facts
>that he has been conditioned to reject.
>As can be seen by his posts,
>Schadenfreude is not a German,
>but is a psychotic hater of Germans,
>and an opponent of truth, civility, and morality.
your nazi propaganda telling you what to believe, but you see how
idiotic you sound?
Luckily for the world, nazis have been bitch-slapped into submission
forever. They only exist on the internet now, where they cower behind
their keyboards murmuring about the things they'd LIKE to do if
only... if only..... if only they had the balls to do them.
Then they go back to huffing glue out of a sock and beating off to the
kiddie porn, huh Tommy?
Klaus Schadenfreude
Dec 3, 2012, 8:00:52 AM12/3/12
to
>Also China is safer, more free market oriented,
>and there is less government intrusion into the
>private lives of the citizens.
More proof that Tom Potter huffs glue.
>and there is less government intrusion into the
>private lives of the citizens.
http://klausschadenfreude.110mb.com/Potter-family.htm
Tom Potter
Dec 4, 2012, 4:58:23 AM12/4/12
to
news:268pb81g0tavkk7pi...@4ax.com...
More proof that my psychotic pal "Klaus Schadenfreude"
who uses the phony handle "Schadenfreude"
which means a psycho who enjoys the pains of others,
is ignorant about the German Nazi Party of the 1930s.
is also dishonest and goes to great lengths
to find and photoshop pictures that he can use
to try to discredit folks who post FACTS
that his handlers do not want the public exposed to,
like the FACTS below.
Observe that the policies of the Nazi Party
achieved an economic miracle in three years,
while the nations whose political leaders sold out
to the gang that had massacred the Russian Family,
were sinking deeper and deeper into the Great Depression.
http://www.ihr.org/other/economyhitler2011.html
"Two days after taking office as Chancellor, Hitler addressed the nation by
radio. Although he and other leaders of his movement had made clear their
intention to reorganize the nation's social, political, cultural and
educational life in accord with National Socialist principles, everyone knew
that, with some six million jobless and the national economy in paralysis,
the great priority of the moment was to restore the nation's economic life,
above all by tackling unemployment and providing productive work.
"The misery of our people is horrible to behold!," said Hitler in this
inaugural address. / 5 "Along with the hungry unemployed millions of
industrial workers there is the impoverishment of the whole middle class and
the artisans. If this collapse finally also finishes off the German farmers
we will face a catastrophe of incalculable dimension. For that would be not
just the collapse of a nation, but of a two-thousand-year-old inheritance of
some of the greatest achievements of human culture and civilization ."
The new government, Hitler said, would "achieve the great task of
reorganizing our nation's economy by means of two great four-year plans. The
German farmer must be rescued to maintain the nation's food supply and, in
consequence, the nation's vital foundation. The German worker will be saved
from ruin with a concerted and all-embracing attack against unemployment."
"Within four years," he pledged, "unemployment must be decisively overcome .
The Marxist parties and their allies have had 14 years to show what they can
do. The result is a heap of ruins. Now, people of Germany, give us four
years and then pass judgment upon us!"
Rejecting the cloudy and impractical economic views of some radical
activists in his Party, Hitler turned to men of proven ability and
competence. Most notably, he enlisted the help of Hjalmar Schacht, a
prominent banker and financier with an impressive record in both private
business and public service. Even though Schacht was certainly no National
Socialist, Hitler appointed him President of Germany's central bank, the
Reichsbank, and then as Minister of Economics.
After taking power, writes Prof. John Garraty, a prominent American
historian, Hitler and his new government "immediately launched an all-out
assault on unemployment . They stimulated private industry through subsidies
and tax rebates, encouraged consumer spending by such means as marriage
loans, and plunged into the massive public-works program that produced the
autobahn [highway system], and housing, railroad and navigation projects." /
6
The regime's new leaders also succeeded in persuading formerly skeptical and
even hostile Germans of their sincerity, resolve and ability. This fostered
trust and confidence, which in turn encouraged businessmen to hire and
invest, and consumers to spend with an eye to the future.
As he had promised, Hitler and his National Socialist government banished
unemployment within four years. The number of jobless was cut from six
million at the beginning of 1933, when he took power, to one million by
1936. / 7 So rapidly was the jobless rate reduced that by 1937-38 there was
a national labor shortage. / 8
For the great mass of Germans, wages and working conditions improved
steadily. From 1932 to 1938 gross real weekly earnings increased by 21
percent. After taking into account tax and insurance deductions and
adjustments to the cost of living, the increase in real weekly earnings
during this period was 14 percent. At the same time, rents remained stable,
and there was a relative decline in the costs of heating and light. Prices
actually declined for some consumer goods, such as electrical appliances,
clocks and watches, as well as for some foods. "Consumer prices rose at an
average annual rate of just 1.2 percent between 1933 and 1939," notes
British historian Niall Ferguson. "This meant that Germans workers were
better off in real as well as nominal terms: between 1933 and 1938, weekly
net earnings (after tax) rose by 22 percent, while the cost of living rose
by just seven percent." Even after the outbreak of war in September 1939,
workers' income continued to rise. By 1943 average hourly earnings of German
workers had risen by 25 percent, and weekly earnings by 41 percent. / 9
The "normal" work day for most Germans was eight hours, and pay for overtime
work was generous. / 10 In addition to higher wages, benefits included
markedly improved working conditions, such as better health and safety
conditions, canteens with subsidized hot meals, athletic fields, parks,
subsidized theater performances and concerts, exhibitions, sports and hiking
groups, dances, adult education courses, and subsidized tourism. / 11 An
already extensive network of social welfare programs, including old age
insurance and a national health care program, was expanded.
Hitler wanted Germans to have "the highest possible standard of living," he
said in an interview with an American journalist in early 1934. "In my
opinion, the Americans are right in not wanting to make everyone the same
but rather in upholding the principle of the ladder. However, every single
person must be granted the opportunity to climb up the ladder." / 12 In
keeping with this outlook, Hitler's government promoted social mobility,
with wide opportunities to improve and advance. As Prof. Garraty notes: "It
is beyond argument that the Nazis encouraged working-class social and
economic mobility." To encourage acquisition of new skills, the government
greatly expanded vocational training programs, and offered generous
incentives for further advancement of efficient workers. / 13
Both National Socialist ideology and Hitler's basic outlook, writes
historian John Garraty, "inclined the regime to favor the ordinary German
over any elite group. Workers . had an honored place in the system." In
accord with this, the regime provided substantive fringe benefits for
workers that included subsidized housing, low-cost excursions, sports
programs, and more pleasing factory facilities. / 14
In his detailed and critical biography of Hitler, historian Joachim Fest
acknowledged: "The regime insisted that it was not the rule of one social
class above all others, and by granting everyone opportunities to rise, it
in fact demonstrated class neutrality . These measures did indeed break
through the old, petrified social structures. They tangibly improved the
material condition of much of the population." / 15
A few figures give an idea of how the quality of life improved. Between
1932, the last year of the pre-Hitler era, and 1938, the last full year
before the outbreak of war, food consumption increased by one sixth, while
clothing and textile turnover increased by more than a quarter, and of
furniture and household goods by 50 percent. / 16 During the Third Reich's
peacetime years, wine consumption rose by 50 percent, and champagne
consumption increased five-fold. / 17 Between 1932 and 1938, the volume of
tourism more than doubled, while automobile ownership during the 1930s
tripled. / 18 German motor vehicle production, which included cars made by
the US-owned Ford and General Motors (Opel) works, doubled in the five years
of 1932 to 1937, while Germany's motor vehicle exports increased eight-fold.
Air passenger traffic in Germany more than tripled from 1933 to 1937. / 19
German business revived and prospered. During the first four years of the
National Socialist era, net profits of large corporations quadrupled, and
managerial and entrepreneurial income rose by nearly 50 percent. / 20
Between 1933 and 1938, notes historian Niall Ferguson, Germany's "gross
domestic product grew, on average, by a remarkable eleven percent a year,"
with no significant increase in the rate of inflation. / 21 "Things were to
get even better," writes Jewish historian Richard Grunberger in his detailed
study, The Twelve-Year Reich. "In the three years between 1939 and 1942
German industry expanded as much as it had during the preceding fifty
years." / 20
Although German businesses flourished, profits were controlled and by law
were kept within moderate limits. / 21 Beginning in 1934, dividends for
stockholders of German corporations were limited to six percent annually.
Undistributed profits were invested in Reich government bonds, which had an
annual interest yield of six percent, and then, after 1935, of four and a
half percent. This policy had the predictable effect of encouraging
corporate reinvestment and self-financing, and thereby of reducing borrowing
from banks and, more generally, of diminishing the influence of commercial
capital. / 22
Corporation tax rates were steadily raised, from 20 percent in 1934 to 25
percent in 1936, and to 40 percent in 1939-40. Directors of German companies
could grant bonuses to managers, but only if these were directly
proportionate to profits and they also authorized corresponding bonuses or
"voluntary social contributions" to employees. / 23
Between 1934 and 1938, the gross taxable income of German businessmen
increased by 148 percent, and overall tax volume increased during this
period by 232 percent. The number of taxpayers in the highest income tax
bracket -- those earning more than 100,000 marks annually -- increased
during this period by 445 percent. (By contrast, the number of taxpayers in
the lowest income bracket -- those earning less than 1500 marks yearly --
increased by only five percent.) / 24
Taxation in National Socialist Germany was sharply "progressive," with those
of higher income paying proportionately more than those in the lower income
brackets. Between 1934 and 1938, the average tax rate on incomes of more
than 100,000 marks rose from 37.4 percent to 38.2 percent. In 1938 Germans
in the lowest tax brackets were 49 percent of the population and had 14
percent of the national income, but paid only 4.7 percent of the tax burden.
Those in the highest income category, who were just one percent of the
population but with 21 percent of the income, paid 45 percent of the tax
burden. / 25
Jews made up about one percent of Germany's total population when Hitler
came to power. While the new government moved quickly to remove them from
the nation's political and cultural life, Jews were permitted to carry on in
economic life, at least for several years. In fact, many Jews benefited from
the regime's recovery measures and the general economic revival. In June
1933, for example, Hitler approved a large-scale government investment of
14.5 million marks in the Jewish-owned firm Hertie, a Berlin department
store chain. This "bail out" was done to prevent the ruin of the large
firm's suppliers, financiers, and, above all, its 14,000 employees."
It does not take a system engineer to comprehend, that
the ignorance and prejudice of German haters like "Klaus Schadenfreude"
not only prevents the public from being exposed to FACTS,
they prevent the most effective social, government and economic models
from being rtionally considered and used.
The Nazi Party was the most successful and most popular
political party of all time, because they worked social and economic
miracles, and prevented the gang that had massacred the Russian Royal Family
and co-opted the Russian government and were using Russia
what they did to the Native Russians,
take away their wealth, lives, limbs and liberties.
It is interesting to see that after their Class Wars were discredited
and the Native Russians regained control of their government,
the Gang instituted a phony "Free Jews" scam and millions
migrated to Israel, America, and England with trillions of dollars in loot,
from where they began to instigate Religious Wars between
Christians and Muslims.
As can be seen, the "Klaus Schadenfreudes" of the world
get all bent out of shape and resort to all kinds of lies
and distortions when anyone expresses FACTS
that they don't want the public exposed to.
who uses the phony handle "Schadenfreude"
which means a psycho who enjoys the pains of others,
is ignorant about the German Nazi Party of the 1930s.
is also dishonest and goes to great lengths
to find and photoshop pictures that he can use
to try to discredit folks who post FACTS
that his handlers do not want the public exposed to,
like the FACTS below.
Observe that the policies of the Nazi Party
achieved an economic miracle in three years,
while the nations whose political leaders sold out
to the gang that had massacred the Russian Family,
co-opted the Russian government,
and were using Russia as a base from where to train terrorists
and instigate Class Wars all over the world,
and were using Russia as a base from where to train terrorists
were sinking deeper and deeper into the Great Depression.
"Two days after taking office as Chancellor, Hitler addressed the nation by
radio. Although he and other leaders of his movement had made clear their
intention to reorganize the nation's social, political, cultural and
educational life in accord with National Socialist principles, everyone knew
that, with some six million jobless and the national economy in paralysis,
the great priority of the moment was to restore the nation's economic life,
above all by tackling unemployment and providing productive work.
"The misery of our people is horrible to behold!," said Hitler in this
inaugural address. / 5 "Along with the hungry unemployed millions of
industrial workers there is the impoverishment of the whole middle class and
the artisans. If this collapse finally also finishes off the German farmers
we will face a catastrophe of incalculable dimension. For that would be not
just the collapse of a nation, but of a two-thousand-year-old inheritance of
some of the greatest achievements of human culture and civilization ."
The new government, Hitler said, would "achieve the great task of
reorganizing our nation's economy by means of two great four-year plans. The
German farmer must be rescued to maintain the nation's food supply and, in
consequence, the nation's vital foundation. The German worker will be saved
from ruin with a concerted and all-embracing attack against unemployment."
"Within four years," he pledged, "unemployment must be decisively overcome .
The Marxist parties and their allies have had 14 years to show what they can
do. The result is a heap of ruins. Now, people of Germany, give us four
years and then pass judgment upon us!"
Rejecting the cloudy and impractical economic views of some radical
activists in his Party, Hitler turned to men of proven ability and
competence. Most notably, he enlisted the help of Hjalmar Schacht, a
prominent banker and financier with an impressive record in both private
business and public service. Even though Schacht was certainly no National
Socialist, Hitler appointed him President of Germany's central bank, the
Reichsbank, and then as Minister of Economics.
After taking power, writes Prof. John Garraty, a prominent American
historian, Hitler and his new government "immediately launched an all-out
assault on unemployment . They stimulated private industry through subsidies
and tax rebates, encouraged consumer spending by such means as marriage
loans, and plunged into the massive public-works program that produced the
autobahn [highway system], and housing, railroad and navigation projects." /
6
The regime's new leaders also succeeded in persuading formerly skeptical and
even hostile Germans of their sincerity, resolve and ability. This fostered
trust and confidence, which in turn encouraged businessmen to hire and
invest, and consumers to spend with an eye to the future.
As he had promised, Hitler and his National Socialist government banished
unemployment within four years. The number of jobless was cut from six
million at the beginning of 1933, when he took power, to one million by
1936. / 7 So rapidly was the jobless rate reduced that by 1937-38 there was
a national labor shortage. / 8
For the great mass of Germans, wages and working conditions improved
steadily. From 1932 to 1938 gross real weekly earnings increased by 21
percent. After taking into account tax and insurance deductions and
adjustments to the cost of living, the increase in real weekly earnings
during this period was 14 percent. At the same time, rents remained stable,
and there was a relative decline in the costs of heating and light. Prices
actually declined for some consumer goods, such as electrical appliances,
clocks and watches, as well as for some foods. "Consumer prices rose at an
average annual rate of just 1.2 percent between 1933 and 1939," notes
British historian Niall Ferguson. "This meant that Germans workers were
better off in real as well as nominal terms: between 1933 and 1938, weekly
net earnings (after tax) rose by 22 percent, while the cost of living rose
by just seven percent." Even after the outbreak of war in September 1939,
workers' income continued to rise. By 1943 average hourly earnings of German
workers had risen by 25 percent, and weekly earnings by 41 percent. / 9
The "normal" work day for most Germans was eight hours, and pay for overtime
work was generous. / 10 In addition to higher wages, benefits included
markedly improved working conditions, such as better health and safety
conditions, canteens with subsidized hot meals, athletic fields, parks,
subsidized theater performances and concerts, exhibitions, sports and hiking
groups, dances, adult education courses, and subsidized tourism. / 11 An
already extensive network of social welfare programs, including old age
insurance and a national health care program, was expanded.
Hitler wanted Germans to have "the highest possible standard of living," he
said in an interview with an American journalist in early 1934. "In my
opinion, the Americans are right in not wanting to make everyone the same
but rather in upholding the principle of the ladder. However, every single
person must be granted the opportunity to climb up the ladder." / 12 In
keeping with this outlook, Hitler's government promoted social mobility,
with wide opportunities to improve and advance. As Prof. Garraty notes: "It
is beyond argument that the Nazis encouraged working-class social and
economic mobility." To encourage acquisition of new skills, the government
greatly expanded vocational training programs, and offered generous
incentives for further advancement of efficient workers. / 13
Both National Socialist ideology and Hitler's basic outlook, writes
historian John Garraty, "inclined the regime to favor the ordinary German
over any elite group. Workers . had an honored place in the system." In
accord with this, the regime provided substantive fringe benefits for
workers that included subsidized housing, low-cost excursions, sports
programs, and more pleasing factory facilities. / 14
In his detailed and critical biography of Hitler, historian Joachim Fest
acknowledged: "The regime insisted that it was not the rule of one social
class above all others, and by granting everyone opportunities to rise, it
in fact demonstrated class neutrality . These measures did indeed break
through the old, petrified social structures. They tangibly improved the
material condition of much of the population." / 15
A few figures give an idea of how the quality of life improved. Between
1932, the last year of the pre-Hitler era, and 1938, the last full year
before the outbreak of war, food consumption increased by one sixth, while
clothing and textile turnover increased by more than a quarter, and of
furniture and household goods by 50 percent. / 16 During the Third Reich's
peacetime years, wine consumption rose by 50 percent, and champagne
consumption increased five-fold. / 17 Between 1932 and 1938, the volume of
tourism more than doubled, while automobile ownership during the 1930s
tripled. / 18 German motor vehicle production, which included cars made by
the US-owned Ford and General Motors (Opel) works, doubled in the five years
of 1932 to 1937, while Germany's motor vehicle exports increased eight-fold.
Air passenger traffic in Germany more than tripled from 1933 to 1937. / 19
German business revived and prospered. During the first four years of the
National Socialist era, net profits of large corporations quadrupled, and
managerial and entrepreneurial income rose by nearly 50 percent. / 20
Between 1933 and 1938, notes historian Niall Ferguson, Germany's "gross
domestic product grew, on average, by a remarkable eleven percent a year,"
with no significant increase in the rate of inflation. / 21 "Things were to
get even better," writes Jewish historian Richard Grunberger in his detailed
study, The Twelve-Year Reich. "In the three years between 1939 and 1942
German industry expanded as much as it had during the preceding fifty
years." / 20
Although German businesses flourished, profits were controlled and by law
were kept within moderate limits. / 21 Beginning in 1934, dividends for
stockholders of German corporations were limited to six percent annually.
Undistributed profits were invested in Reich government bonds, which had an
annual interest yield of six percent, and then, after 1935, of four and a
half percent. This policy had the predictable effect of encouraging
corporate reinvestment and self-financing, and thereby of reducing borrowing
from banks and, more generally, of diminishing the influence of commercial
capital. / 22
Corporation tax rates were steadily raised, from 20 percent in 1934 to 25
percent in 1936, and to 40 percent in 1939-40. Directors of German companies
could grant bonuses to managers, but only if these were directly
proportionate to profits and they also authorized corresponding bonuses or
"voluntary social contributions" to employees. / 23
Between 1934 and 1938, the gross taxable income of German businessmen
increased by 148 percent, and overall tax volume increased during this
period by 232 percent. The number of taxpayers in the highest income tax
bracket -- those earning more than 100,000 marks annually -- increased
during this period by 445 percent. (By contrast, the number of taxpayers in
the lowest income bracket -- those earning less than 1500 marks yearly --
increased by only five percent.) / 24
Taxation in National Socialist Germany was sharply "progressive," with those
of higher income paying proportionately more than those in the lower income
brackets. Between 1934 and 1938, the average tax rate on incomes of more
than 100,000 marks rose from 37.4 percent to 38.2 percent. In 1938 Germans
in the lowest tax brackets were 49 percent of the population and had 14
percent of the national income, but paid only 4.7 percent of the tax burden.
Those in the highest income category, who were just one percent of the
population but with 21 percent of the income, paid 45 percent of the tax
burden. / 25
Jews made up about one percent of Germany's total population when Hitler
came to power. While the new government moved quickly to remove them from
the nation's political and cultural life, Jews were permitted to carry on in
economic life, at least for several years. In fact, many Jews benefited from
the regime's recovery measures and the general economic revival. In June
1933, for example, Hitler approved a large-scale government investment of
14.5 million marks in the Jewish-owned firm Hertie, a Berlin department
store chain. This "bail out" was done to prevent the ruin of the large
firm's suppliers, financiers, and, above all, its 14,000 employees."
It does not take a system engineer to comprehend, that
the ignorance and prejudice of German haters like "Klaus Schadenfreude"
not only prevents the public from being exposed to FACTS,
they prevent the most effective social, government and economic models
from being rtionally considered and used.
The Nazi Party was the most successful and most popular
political party of all time, because they worked social and economic
miracles, and prevented the gang that had massacred the Russian Royal Family
and co-opted the Russian government and were using Russia
as a base from where to train terrorists and instigate Class Wars all over
the world from taking over Germany and doing to the German people
what they did to the Native Russians,
take away their wealth, lives, limbs and liberties.
It is interesting to see that after their Class Wars were discredited
and the Native Russians regained control of their government,
the Gang instituted a phony "Free Jews" scam and millions
migrated to Israel, America, and England with trillions of dollars in loot,
from where they began to instigate Religious Wars between
Christians and Muslims.
As can be seen, the "Klaus Schadenfreudes" of the world
get all bent out of shape and resort to all kinds of lies
and distortions when anyone expresses FACTS
that they don't want the public exposed to.
Tom Potter
Dec 4, 2012, 4:59:39 AM12/4/12
to
news:3j8pb89ri43g7uo15...@4ax.com...
and the German Nazi Party of the 1930s.
he is also dishonest and goes to great lengths
from being examined and used.
More proof that my psychotic pal "Klaus Schadenfreude"
who uses the phony handle "Schadenfreude"
which means a psycho who enjoys the pains of others,
is not only ignorant about China
who uses the phony handle "Schadenfreude"
which means a psycho who enjoys the pains of others,
and the German Nazi Party of the 1930s.
he is also dishonest and goes to great lengths
Klaus Schadenfreude
Dec 4, 2012, 7:13:22 AM12/4/12
to
>More proof that my psychotic pal "Klaus Schadenfreude"
>who uses the phony handle "Schadenfreude"
Prove it's a phony handle, "Tom Potter."
>who uses the phony handle "Schadenfreude"
>which means a psycho who enjoys the pains of others
,
>is ignorant about the German Nazi Party of the 1930s.
Not too many people are ignorant about the nazis. You people are all
>is ignorant about the German Nazi Party of the 1930s.
unemployable, glue-huffing pedophiles.
http://klaus.webege.com/nazi/dead_nazis.html
Klaus Schadenfreude
Dec 4, 2012, 7:18:58 AM12/4/12
to
>"Tom Potter" <tdp...@yahoo.com> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>
>"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>news:3j8pb89ri43g7uo15...@4ax.com...
>> >"Tom Potter" <tdp...@yahoo.com> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>>
>>>Also China is safer, more free market oriented,
>>>and there is less government intrusion into the
>>>private lives of the citizens.
>>
>> More proof that Tom Potter huffs glue.
>>
>> http://klausschadenfreude.110mb.com/Potter-family.htm
>
>More proof that my psychotic pal "Klaus Schadenfreude"
>who uses the phony handle "Schadenfreude"
>which means a psycho who enjoys the pains of others,
"Tom Potter" lies when he claims I'm using a "phony handle."
>
>"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>news:3j8pb89ri43g7uo15...@4ax.com...
>> >"Tom Potter" <tdp...@yahoo.com> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>>
>>>Also China is safer, more free market oriented,
>>>and there is less government intrusion into the
>>>private lives of the citizens.
>>
>> More proof that Tom Potter huffs glue.
>>
>> http://klausschadenfreude.110mb.com/Potter-family.htm
>
>More proof that my psychotic pal "Klaus Schadenfreude"
>who uses the phony handle "Schadenfreude"
>which means a psycho who enjoys the pains of others,
>is not only ignorant about China
>and the German Nazi Party of the 1930s.
>he is also dishonest and goes to great lengths
>to find and photoshop pictures that he can use
>to try to discredit folks who post FACTS
>that his handlers do not want the public exposed to,
>like the FACTS below.
>Observe that the policies of the Nazi Party
>achieved an economic miracle in three years,
Between February 1933 and the start of World War
Two, Nazi Germany underwent an 'economic miracle' - or so the leaders
of Nazi Germany wanted their people to believe. Not only was the idea
of an economic miracle sold to the people of Germany,
the propaganda element also wanted the idea sold to Europe and to the
wider world. But was there really an economic miracle in Nazi Germany
or was it merely a card trick - one that appeared to happen but really
did not?
Using the most basic of statistics, Nazi Germany certainly underwent
major economic change. Like most other countries in
Europe, Weimar Germany had suffered from a very high unemployment
record and Nazi Germany inherited this. By the time World War Two
started the unemployment rate in Germany had tumbled: trade unionshad
been tamed, the work force had seemingly developed a positive work
ethic and job prospects were better - on paper at least.
But when certain data is factored into the equation, the issue of job
creation is not quite as clear cut.
Between January 1933 and 1939, a series of laws were introduced that
made it effectively impossible for Jews to work in Nazi Germany. Those
that fled abroad in fear of their lives left behind jobs that were
filled. Those who remained in Germany simply could not work and once
again their previous employment was taken over by 'approved' Germans.
Over time, many women were also excluded from many areas of work.
Hitler had made it clear where his beliefs were: women true to the
Aryan race should stay at home and look after children. This again
reduced the unemployment rate.
Another 'card trick' was the introduction of compulsory military
service for young men. If you wanted to attend a university, for
example, you had to have done some form of either youth service or
military training before attending university. Once again, those who
were engaged in compulsory military service were removed from
unemployment figures.
The final factor with regards to the huge drop in unemployment was
fear - anyone who was found guilty of being 'work shy' could be
condemned to the concentration camps that were found throughout Nazi
Germany. While Hitler frequently referred to the "economic miracle" of
Nazi Germany, people previously employed in what could be classed as
professional employment ended up doing manual labour on the autobahns,
for example. If such a job was refused, you could be accused of being
'work shy' with the known associated punishments.
Therefore, when the above is taken into account, it is true that
unemployment figures tumbled. In 1932, in the dying days of the Weimar
Republic, 5.6 million people were unemployed - many of whom gave their
support to the Nazi Party as the only party that offered them hope. By
1934, this figure had fallen to 2.7 million - a seemingly impossible
decrease. By 1936, only 1.6 million people were unemployed and by 1938
the figure was 0.4 million. Therefore in five years, unemployment had
fallen by 5.4 million - 96%. No other west European country came
anywhere near this figure - hence why it was labelled a "miracle".
Possibly the only surprise in this is that 400,000 remained
unemployed.
Another issue that has to be studied to explain this 'economic
miracle' is the simple fact that Hitler put Nazi Germany onto a war
economy much earlier than the September 1939 outbreak of war. From
1935 on, a huge proportion of government spending was on the military.
Therefore labour intensive industries such as steel production and
coal mining prospered as there were needed in very large amounts to
fuel the expansion of the military. In 1933, Krupp's made a profit of
6.65 million Reichmarks. In just one year this had nearly doubled to
11.40 million Reichmarks. By 1937, the company had an annual profit of
17.80 million Reichmarks.
In 1933, Germany spent just 3% of her GDP on the military. By 1939,
this had grown to 32% and 22% of the work force was directly employed
in an industry somehow associated with military production. However,
the production of consumer goods was not ignored - on the orders of
Hitler. He wanted the German people to believe that they themselves
were directly benefitting from the 'economic miracle' that he had
fostered. For this reason there was a steady increase in consumer
goods as 1939 approached, which continued into World War Two. It led
to one unnamed general stating that Nazi Germany had to fight the war
with refrigerators.
If Nazi Germany underwent an 'economic miracle' then a logical
assumption was that the workers themselves benefitted in material
terms. Many had employment under Hitler - but few dared to refuse what
was offered. In fact if the figures are analysed in terms of the wages
paid, workers were worse off under Hitler than they had been before
the Wall Street Crash. 1934 was the only year from 1933 to 1939 when
the wages paid to the workers equalled what an employed person earned
in 1928. Other than this year, in every other year they got paid less.
So while there was a steady increase in the production of consumer
goods, how many workers could afford them? When compared to workers in
America, the UK, Sweden and France, workers in Nazi Germany were paid
the least.
However, in the area of imports/exports, Nazi Germany did quite well.
In 1933, 1935, 1936 and 1937 there was a trade surplus while the
annual trade deficit of 1934 and 1937 were relatively small.
However, whether Nazi Germany experienced an "economic miracle"
depends on what stance you make. Was it merely a card trick whereby
industry was mainly stimulated by the vast growth in the requirements
of the military? Was it an "economic miracle" that the unemployment
figures fell so drastically when groups were excluded from the data
and others forcibly made to work in areas they were not trained for?
Nazis. Glue huffing, child-molesting liars, every single one of them.
http://klausschadenfreude.110mb.com/Potter-family.htm
NoEinstein
Dec 4, 2012, 12:04:05 PM12/4/12
to
On Dec 4, 4:58 am, "Tom Potter" <tdp1...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> "Klaus Schadenfreude" <klausschadenfre...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:268pb81g0tavkk7pi...@4ax.com...
>
> > >"Tom Potter" <tdp1...@yahoo.com> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
> "The misery ofourpeople is horrible to behold!," said Hitler in this
Dear Tom: Thanks for showing the "good", but earlier side of Hitler.
The conditions leading to war must have come on quickly, because there
was high unemployment and social dissatisfaction that Hitler was able
to blame on outsiders. His taxing, so highly, the top money earners
probably caused businesses to start closing. The latter were then
forced to remain open manufacturing the machinery of war. Doing that
was financed by an inflationary over-printing of money, and the
devaluing of currency. It was the latter that made Hitler fall over
the loony edge and see going to war as a "solution". Because Germany
had an oil deficit, they planned war on the eastern front as a quick
fix. But when that didn't come quick enough, a protracted war was
their doom.
It is true that there is some good in even the worst person. But the
proof of one's worth is in whether or not there are many sincere
mourners when one dies. Hitler had next to none.
Your friend, John A. Armistead
> "Klaus Schadenfreude" <klausschadenfre...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:268pb81g0tavkk7pi...@4ax.com...
>
> > >"Tom Potter" <tdp1...@yahoo.com> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
> inaugural address. / 5 "Along with the hungry unemployed millions of
> industrial workers there is the impoverishment of the whole middle class and
> the artisans. If this collapse finally also finishes off the German farmers
> we will face a catastrophe of incalculable dimension. For that would be not
> just the collapse of a nation, but of a two-thousand-year-old inheritance of
> some of the greatest achievements of human culture and civilization ."
>
> The new government, Hitler said, would "achieve the great task of
> reorganizingournation's economy by means of two great four-year plans. The
> industrial workers there is the impoverishment of the whole middle class and
> the artisans. If this collapse finally also finishes off the German farmers
> we will face a catastrophe of incalculable dimension. For that would be not
> just the collapse of a nation, but of a two-thousand-year-old inheritance of
> some of the greatest achievements of human culture and civilization ."
>
> The new government, Hitler said, would "achieve the great task of
> German farmer must be rescued to maintain the nation's food supply and, in
> consequence, the nation's vital foundation. The German worker will be saved
> from ruin with a concerted and all-embracing attack against unemployment."
>
> "Within four years," he pledged, "unemployment must be decisively overcome .
> The Marxist parties and their allies have had 14 years to show what they can
> do. The result is a heap of ruins. Now, people of Germany, give us four
> years and then pass judgment upon us!"
>
> Rejecting the cloudy and impractical economic views of some radical
> activists in his Party, Hitler turned to men of proven ability and
> competence. Most notably, he enlisted the help of Hjalmar Schacht, a
> prominent banker and financier with an impressive record in both private
> business and public service. Even though Schacht was certainly no National
> Socialist, Hitler appointed himPresidentof Germany's central bank, the
> consequence, the nation's vital foundation. The German worker will be saved
> from ruin with a concerted and all-embracing attack against unemployment."
>
> "Within four years," he pledged, "unemployment must be decisively overcome .
> The Marxist parties and their allies have had 14 years to show what they can
> do. The result is a heap of ruins. Now, people of Germany, give us four
> years and then pass judgment upon us!"
>
> Rejecting the cloudy and impractical economic views of some radical
> activists in his Party, Hitler turned to men of proven ability and
> competence. Most notably, he enlisted the help of Hjalmar Schacht, a
> prominent banker and financier with an impressive record in both private
> business and public service. Even though Schacht was certainly no National
The conditions leading to war must have come on quickly, because there
was high unemployment and social dissatisfaction that Hitler was able
to blame on outsiders. His taxing, so highly, the top money earners
probably caused businesses to start closing. The latter were then
forced to remain open manufacturing the machinery of war. Doing that
was financed by an inflationary over-printing of money, and the
devaluing of currency. It was the latter that made Hitler fall over
the loony edge and see going to war as a "solution". Because Germany
had an oil deficit, they planned war on the eastern front as a quick
fix. But when that didn't come quick enough, a protracted war was
their doom.
It is true that there is some good in even the worst person. But the
proof of one's worth is in whether or not there are many sincere
mourners when one dies. Hitler had next to none.
Your friend, John A. Armistead
Tom Potter
Dec 6, 2012, 3:02:50 AM12/6/12
to
news:r7qrb8plhq9bvv23p...@4ax.com...
has been well condition by the Mass Media,
and by his handlers in the boiler room he operates from.
He did make a good point when he pointed out
that after Jews migrated out of Germany,
and were prohibited from engaging in activities
that harmed the larger community,
and after women were encouraged to stay home
and take care of the children,
in spite of having fewer people doing the work,
the infrastructure and economy of Germany soared.
They built expressways, impressive government buildings,
many homes and vacation homes for industrial workers,
and in spite of this, were able to design and build and staff
the most powerful military on the planet.
And why did the German people build a powerful military?
Because the Jews that had assassinated the Russian Royal Family
and co-opted the Russian government were using Russia as a base
and would be waging war against them if the Mass Media was able
to make war acceptable to the masses.
Here are some of the FACTS that "Klaus Schadenfreude" is ignorant of
or is trying to obscure as demanded by his handlers.
http://www.ihr.org/other/economyhitler2011.html
"A few figures give an idea of how the quality of life improved. Between
1932, the last year of the pre-Hitler era, and 1938, the last full year
before the outbreak of war, food consumption increased by one sixth, while
clothing and textile turnover increased by more than a quarter, and of
furniture and household goods by 50 percent. / 16 During the Third Reich's
peacetime years, wine consumption rose by 50 percent, and champagne
consumption increased five-fold. / 17 Between 1932 and 1938, the volume of
tourism more than doubled, while automobile ownership during the 1930s
tripled. / 18 German motor vehicle production, which included cars made by
the US-owned Ford and General Motors (Opel) works, doubled in the five years
of 1932 to 1937, while Germany's motor vehicle exports increased eight-fold.
Air passenger traffic in Germany more than tripled from 1933 to 1937. / 19
German business revived and prospered. During the first four years of the
National Socialist era, net profits of large corporations quadrupled, and
managerial and entrepreneurial income rose by nearly 50 percent. / 20
Between 1933 and 1938, notes historian Niall Ferguson, Germany's "gross
domestic product grew, on average, by a remarkable eleven percent a year,"
with no significant increase in the rate of inflation. / 21 "Things were to
get even better," writes Jewish historian Richard Grunberger in his detailed
study, The Twelve-Year Reich. "In the three years between 1939 and 1942
German industry expanded as much as it had during the preceding fifty
years."
If FDR and Churchill had opposed the War-for-profit gang,
rather than sell out to them,
and joined with the German people in
going after the Class War instigators,
W.W.II would have lasted six months,
and there would have been no Great Depression,
no Cold War, no nuclear weapons,
no Korean War, no Vietnam War, no 911, no Religious Wars, etc.
And if Bush had gone after the Religious War Instigators,
rather than getting in bed with them and Sharon,
there would have been no 9/11, no movement of America
toward a police and military state,
no loss of freedoms to Americans,
no danger to Americans at home and abroad,
no collapse of the economy,
no shattering of the national budget,
no war against the Iraqi people,
no hyping of war against the Iranian people,
with its' attendant cost, depletion of
non-renewable resources, environmental damage, etc.,
no loss of trust by most nations of the world,
no hatred of America by hundreds of millions of Muslims,
no raid on Social Security,
no freeze of Civil Service employees salaries,
no bankruptcy of major airlines,
no dollar flight,
no meltdown of the dollar,
no meltdown of America,
no weakening of the United Nations,
no weakening of NATO, and the G8,
no independent European GPS system,
no independent Chinese GPS system,
no loss of trillion dollar markets by Boeing, G.E. and other American firms,
etc.
The fact that the masses can be conned
into actually believing the Jewish version of religion and history
confirms Frank Zappa's assertion
that the most abundant thing in the universe is "stupidity".
>
> Nazis. Glue huffing, child-molesting liars, every single one of them.
> http://klausschadenfreude.110mb.com/Potter-family.htm
It is interesting to see that my psychotic pal "Klaus Schadenfreude"
> Nazis. Glue huffing, child-molesting liars, every single one of them.
> http://klausschadenfreude.110mb.com/Potter-family.htm
has been well condition by the Mass Media,
and by his handlers in the boiler room he operates from.
He did make a good point when he pointed out
that after Jews migrated out of Germany,
and were prohibited from engaging in activities
that harmed the larger community,
and after women were encouraged to stay home
and take care of the children,
in spite of having fewer people doing the work,
the infrastructure and economy of Germany soared.
They built expressways, impressive government buildings,
many homes and vacation homes for industrial workers,
and in spite of this, were able to design and build and staff
the most powerful military on the planet.
And why did the German people build a powerful military?
Because the Jews that had assassinated the Russian Royal Family
and co-opted the Russian government were using Russia as a base
from where to train terrorists and instigate Class Wars all over the world,
and because they knew that FDR and Churchill had sold out to Jews,
and would be waging war against them if the Mass Media was able
to make war acceptable to the masses.
Here are some of the FACTS that "Klaus Schadenfreude" is ignorant of
or is trying to obscure as demanded by his handlers.
http://www.ihr.org/other/economyhitler2011.html
"A few figures give an idea of how the quality of life improved. Between
1932, the last year of the pre-Hitler era, and 1938, the last full year
before the outbreak of war, food consumption increased by one sixth, while
clothing and textile turnover increased by more than a quarter, and of
furniture and household goods by 50 percent. / 16 During the Third Reich's
peacetime years, wine consumption rose by 50 percent, and champagne
consumption increased five-fold. / 17 Between 1932 and 1938, the volume of
tourism more than doubled, while automobile ownership during the 1930s
tripled. / 18 German motor vehicle production, which included cars made by
the US-owned Ford and General Motors (Opel) works, doubled in the five years
of 1932 to 1937, while Germany's motor vehicle exports increased eight-fold.
Air passenger traffic in Germany more than tripled from 1933 to 1937. / 19
German business revived and prospered. During the first four years of the
National Socialist era, net profits of large corporations quadrupled, and
managerial and entrepreneurial income rose by nearly 50 percent. / 20
Between 1933 and 1938, notes historian Niall Ferguson, Germany's "gross
domestic product grew, on average, by a remarkable eleven percent a year,"
with no significant increase in the rate of inflation. / 21 "Things were to
get even better," writes Jewish historian Richard Grunberger in his detailed
study, The Twelve-Year Reich. "In the three years between 1939 and 1942
German industry expanded as much as it had during the preceding fifty
years."
rather than sell out to them,
and joined with the German people in
going after the Class War instigators,
W.W.II would have lasted six months,
and there would have been no Great Depression,
no Cold War, no nuclear weapons,
no Korean War, no Vietnam War, no 911, no Religious Wars, etc.
And if Bush had gone after the Religious War Instigators,
rather than getting in bed with them and Sharon,
there would have been no 9/11, no movement of America
toward a police and military state,
no loss of freedoms to Americans,
no danger to Americans at home and abroad,
no collapse of the economy,
no shattering of the national budget,
no war against the Iraqi people,
no hyping of war against the Iranian people,
with its' attendant cost, depletion of
non-renewable resources, environmental damage, etc.,
no loss of trust by most nations of the world,
no hatred of America by hundreds of millions of Muslims,
no raid on Social Security,
no freeze of Civil Service employees salaries,
no bankruptcy of major airlines,
no dollar flight,
no meltdown of the dollar,
no meltdown of America,
no weakening of the United Nations,
no weakening of NATO, and the G8,
no independent European GPS system,
no independent Chinese GPS system,
no loss of trillion dollar markets by Boeing, G.E. and other American firms,
etc.
The fact that the masses can be conned
into actually believing the Jewish version of religion and history
confirms Frank Zappa's assertion
that the most abundant thing in the universe is "stupidity".
Tom Potter
Dec 6, 2012, 3:54:37 AM12/6/12
to
news:c3qrb815f9po9m26c...@4ax.com...
As my psychotic, dishonest pal "Klaus Schadenfreude"
stated that all Nazi were "unemployable, glue-huffing pedophiles.",
perhaps he will explain how the Nazi
propelled Germany from the poorest nation in Europe
with the most unemployment,
to the richest and most powerful nation on the planet
in three years, with full employment,
if all the Nazi were "unemployable, glue-huffing pedophiles."
I suspect that "Klaus Schadenfreude" hates the Nazi Party
because they not only found a way to unite and energize a nation,
but because they recognized that the Jews who had assassinated
the Russian Family and co-opted the Russian government
were using Russia as a base from were to train terrorists
and instigate Class revolutions and wars all over the world,
much as they are instigating religious wars and revolutions today.
I suggest to Klaus that he shouldn't hate the German people
nor their culture just because they didn't want the gang in Russia
to do to them, what they were doing to the Native Russians.
stated that all Nazi were "unemployable, glue-huffing pedophiles.",
perhaps he will explain how the Nazi
propelled Germany from the poorest nation in Europe
with the most unemployment,
to the richest and most powerful nation on the planet
in three years, with full employment,
if all the Nazi were "unemployable, glue-huffing pedophiles."
I suspect that "Klaus Schadenfreude" hates the Nazi Party
because they not only found a way to unite and energize a nation,
but because they recognized that the Jews who had assassinated
the Russian Family and co-opted the Russian government
were using Russia as a base from were to train terrorists
and instigate Class revolutions and wars all over the world,
much as they are instigating religious wars and revolutions today.
I suggest to Klaus that he shouldn't hate the German people
nor their culture just because they didn't want the gang in Russia
to do to them, what they were doing to the Native Russians.
patmp...@gmail.com
Dec 6, 2012, 6:45:41 AM12/6/12
to
It's nice that there is a place where insane people can express themselves openly.
NoEinstein
Dec 6, 2012, 6:56:18 AM12/6/12
to
On Dec 6, 3:54 am, "Tom Potter" <tdp1...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> "Klaus Schadenfreude" <klausschadenfre...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:c3qrb815f9po9m26c...@4ax.com...
>
>
>
>
>
> > >"Tom Potter" <tdp1...@yahoo.com> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
> I suggest to Klaus that heshouldn'thate the German people
Dear Tom: Perhaps the best form of government is a wise and
benevolent dictatorship. I can assure you that the writer of your pro
Nazi book was a Nazi sympathizer. If you are hoping to change the
world's impression that Hitler was a "good" guy, you will have a tough
road to hoe. I never learned why you are so anti Jew. Hatred can
adversely affect one's physical health. I realize that my readers—
most of them, I think, from the media—are wondering "where I'm coming
from". I've been working to save America (better than Nazis) for a
long while. The following essay was written over four years ago, but
most of my message is still apt. — John A. Armistead —
6/07/08
A MIDCOURSE CORRECTION FOR AMERICA
Eighteen million men and women, all across America, have recently
voted for a qualified woman to be President. By doing so, those same
men and women, all across America, voted AGAINST Barack Obama to be
President. NOTHING that has happened this day—6/07/08—regardless of
any whoop-de-do—automatically changes the ideals of those eighteen
million men and women! Their gut feelings—when they went into those
voting booths—surely, helped to guide them in making their decisions.
Now, gut feelings should aid them in deciding WHERE their loyalties
should lie.
New candidates who vie for public office often play-up the fact that
they are political outsiders. There’s a very real, implied corrupting-
influence if an office holder is seen to be one of the political
insiders. Yet, the ‘power’ of being an incumbent favors having the
insiders get re elected. That’s in spite of the fact that those
insiders have been part and parcel to the implied corruption. These
days, corrupt dealings are largely accepted as… the way that things
are done in politics.
I was raised by a Southern Gentleman, to BE a Southern Gentleman.
Having good manners was stressed to me. All of my life I’ve willingly
embraced the virtues—not only of being a gentleman—but of abiding with
the associated formalities. PLAYING FAIR is a big part of being a
gentleman, as is respecting and protecting… the weaker sex.
All during the Democratic Party’s primaries, Hillary Clinton had to
take—without complaint—the many slights to her candidacy. Those were
made on a continual basis by: A biased media; their ideologically
screened pundits; the choose-the-candidate-that-WE-want democratic
party leadership; by Barack Obama, himself; and by his many selfish
endorsers. Clinton couldn’t defend herself… “like a man”, because she
isn’t a man. She knows that a successful nominee for President will
need to have ‘fair and balanced’ media coverage, if such person hopes
to have any chance of being elected. And she knows that only a
Democrat or Republican seems to have much chance of winning the
presidency.
Probably, Ron Paul is the most ideologically well-qualified man in
America to be President. When discussing the Washington scene, Paul
is quite open in placing-blame-where-blame-is-due. Effectively, Paul
is a lamb among wolves. Yet, because of his good character, he won’t
allow his simple, common sense principles to be compromised. Clinton,
on the other hand, is a diplomat. She knows that in order to gain…
power, she must be able to work with both friends and enemies alike.
Often, that means… (symbolically at least), sleeping with the enemy.
Today, Clinton said: “I will be on the FRONTLINES of democracy!” Last
Tuesday she said: “This is an important day for democracy!” Yet,
Hillary Clinton is urging those eighteen million men and women, all
across America, to disregard the win-at-any-cost, anti FAIR play, and
anti democracy tactics of the Obama campaign. All along, Clinton’s
plan “B” must have been: “If I don’t win, outright, (She DID, but
won’t fight for it…) I will just switch over to… ‘the enemy’—and all
of my supporters will follow along.”
I’m one of those (former) supporters of Hillary Clinton who won’t be
voting for ‘her choice’ for President. EACH of those eighteen million
men and women who voted for Clinton probably did so—ether because she
has executive experience; she’s the more mature and stable candidate;
or because they liked the wisdom of her various visions for America.
Folks, every one of those, and other, valid motives for your having
voted are still waiting to be served! NONE of you fine people should
automatically switch to the candidate of Clinton’s whim—unless your
own hopes and aspirations for America can be made closer to being a
reality! Believe me: “Voting for Barack Obama will doom the hopes of
the majority to have their situations get better… or, at least, not
get any worse.”
Essentially, the problems with our government are personnel issues.
We just keep “hiring” too many, egotistical and out-of-touch
politicians. Those need to be weeded out and/or fired. And… we’ve
allowed powerful business influences that use: Lobbying; “golf course”
and back-room deal making; and media advertising dollars to bias the
media, and to negatively sway the decisions that our government makes—
supposedly on our behalves. Our government should be an
approximation of a true democracy. But instead, it’s a closer
approximation of a dictatorship… run by selfish, big-business
interests.
The ‘threat’ to the USA by having Obama be elected President probably
won’t result from anything that Obama, himself, does. Instead, his
election just gives the all-clear to continue business-as-usual in
Washington. That means group-against-group, party-against-party, and
class-against-class fights. The REAL threat to the USA that could
bring on more terrorism and even… nuclear war, results from our
government having given businesses, here, a Gold Pass Key to conduct
their dealings in other countries any way that they see fit.
If there’s a ‘pollution problem’ in this country that’s causing
Americans to die due to cancer… our government thinks it’s quite OK to
“solve” those issues by letting that industry move to another
country. By so doing, it will be those people in the other countries
who die, not people, here… When, cigarettes became recognized as… a
killer of millions, the tobacco companies maintained their sales by
sending their products to places like China—where there are no
“warning labels” required. Whenever mining, here, starts killing the
land and sea wildlife due to runoff, those companies find alternative
sites in developing countries that have no restrictions.
The reason that the World Trade Center got brought down, was because
NYC and those tall buildings are (or were) symbols of American
capitalism. The have-not nations of the World—that our government
lets our businesses freely exploit—sees how little we care about their
being treated FAIRLY. When our leaders keep swearing to ‘protect and
defend’ Israel, we are siding with, and selling weapons to, a nation
that kicked Muslims off of their land without fair compensation. And
we are siding with a nation that over-reacts to any, understandable,
minor violence—by killing and maiming more Muslims than was the number
of Jews who were hurt or killed.
So, is it any wonder that many Muslim’s hate the USA? The great
number of Muslims in the world—and their concentration in countries
that American businesses gladly exploit—is setting the stage for
increasing terrorism in the USA and among our allies. But there’s a
most simple solution! CLEAN UP our own act in this country to have
FAIRNESS. Then, put RESTRICTIONS on allowing our businesses to RAPE
(figuratively of course) any other country’s natural resources; labor
pool; environment; or general health and safety. Because the US has
already been doing those bad things, we must begin making generous
concessions. If we’ll do the latter, suddenly, the “motive” for
having our much needed businesses, here, move to other countries, just
isn’t there any more. The “economy”—that is issue number one with the
voters—will start to improve, soon!
Much of the 85% discontent of Americans with the direction that this
country is heading results, directly or indirectly, from a
dissatisfaction with the LAWS that are in place, or which just got
enacted. Simply put, the main cause of our discontent is: We have too
many ill-conceived and downright unfair LAWS! My New Constitution,
when ratified, will MANDATE a review and revote of every single law on
that is on the books! And the vote for passage for all laws, old or
new, becomes: 55 percent! Never again will laws get passed that
aren’t liked by more than half of the people. And 55 percent is only
a ‘probationary’ passage. Unless a law passes by 60% or more, it must
be reviewed and revoted every four years. And, if at any time, one
third of the House, or the President alone, thinks that a
controversial law doesn’t meet with the approval of the Citizens, such
law will be put in a referendum—bypassing House authority, completely.
Most Americans will like this: The House will have a ceiling on the
amount of taxes it can raise. Such will be a percentage of the GNP.
And those taxes will be billed, just once a year, to the STATES based
on a state’s population. (Folks, please don’t worry about ‘poor’
states. There will be compensations to even out most inequities.)
Never again will the Federal government keep financial records on any
citizen! And within several years, all of the taxation in the USA
will be sales taxes only. Food and medicines will be tax exempt. The
combined total of all taxes can’t exceed the ceiling without an
amendment to the New Constitution!
The above tidbits from my New Constitution should hint that I want
such document to be user friendly to the People. But it will be:
“Violate at your own peril.” to those in government. There are more
than a dozen circumstances, spelled out, in which a government
official may be either fired, or charged with a felony. Screwing with
democracy in America will have very serious consequences!
My hints of ‘doom’ are mostly cautionary. I’m not walking around with
‘a sign’ saying: “The World will end…” in so many days. On the
contrary, for the past twelve years, I’ve worked to be sure that the
relationships among nations and peoples can become favorable ones.
Simply by ratifying my New Constitution, things will begin to improve,
here. If US companies want to stay in business, the New Constitution
mandates, that such had better start CARING about how those hard
working people in other nations are being treated, and about how World
resources and the environment are being treated. I hope, in the not
too distant future, when FAIRNESS becomes the watchword throughout the
World, that the threat of terrorism and wars will be out-the-window.
At least THAT is my fervent dream!
For now, that plan “B” of Hillary Clinton won’t harm this country,
unless… Barack Obama becomes President. I’m recommending that Obama
and McCain be ignored. Because voters can surely write, when election
day comes, punch or check where it says “Write-In” and print these
clear letters: “RON PAUL” for President of the United States of
America! Those of you who agree with that wisdom, go to Paul’s WEB
page and make a contribution! Ron said, “… a revolution will take
longer.” Hopefully, my New Constitution will speed things up!
Respectfully Submitted,
— NoEinstein —
> "Klaus Schadenfreude" <klausschadenfre...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:c3qrb815f9po9m26c...@4ax.com...
>
>
>
>
>
> > >"Tom Potter" <tdp1...@yahoo.com> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
> nor their culture just because they didn't want the gang in Russia
> to do to them, what they were doing to the Native Russians.
>
> --
> to do to them, what they were doing to the Native Russians.
>
> --
> Tom Potterhttp://tom-potter.telhttps://tdp1001.jux.comhttp://prioritize.biz/the-cloud-machine.html- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
>
Dear Tom: Perhaps the best form of government is a wise and
benevolent dictatorship. I can assure you that the writer of your pro
Nazi book was a Nazi sympathizer. If you are hoping to change the
world's impression that Hitler was a "good" guy, you will have a tough
road to hoe. I never learned why you are so anti Jew. Hatred can
adversely affect one's physical health. I realize that my readers—
most of them, I think, from the media—are wondering "where I'm coming
from". I've been working to save America (better than Nazis) for a
long while. The following essay was written over four years ago, but
most of my message is still apt. — John A. Armistead —
6/07/08
A MIDCOURSE CORRECTION FOR AMERICA
Eighteen million men and women, all across America, have recently
voted for a qualified woman to be President. By doing so, those same
men and women, all across America, voted AGAINST Barack Obama to be
President. NOTHING that has happened this day—6/07/08—regardless of
any whoop-de-do—automatically changes the ideals of those eighteen
million men and women! Their gut feelings—when they went into those
voting booths—surely, helped to guide them in making their decisions.
Now, gut feelings should aid them in deciding WHERE their loyalties
should lie.
New candidates who vie for public office often play-up the fact that
they are political outsiders. There’s a very real, implied corrupting-
influence if an office holder is seen to be one of the political
insiders. Yet, the ‘power’ of being an incumbent favors having the
insiders get re elected. That’s in spite of the fact that those
insiders have been part and parcel to the implied corruption. These
days, corrupt dealings are largely accepted as… the way that things
are done in politics.
I was raised by a Southern Gentleman, to BE a Southern Gentleman.
Having good manners was stressed to me. All of my life I’ve willingly
embraced the virtues—not only of being a gentleman—but of abiding with
the associated formalities. PLAYING FAIR is a big part of being a
gentleman, as is respecting and protecting… the weaker sex.
All during the Democratic Party’s primaries, Hillary Clinton had to
take—without complaint—the many slights to her candidacy. Those were
made on a continual basis by: A biased media; their ideologically
screened pundits; the choose-the-candidate-that-WE-want democratic
party leadership; by Barack Obama, himself; and by his many selfish
endorsers. Clinton couldn’t defend herself… “like a man”, because she
isn’t a man. She knows that a successful nominee for President will
need to have ‘fair and balanced’ media coverage, if such person hopes
to have any chance of being elected. And she knows that only a
Democrat or Republican seems to have much chance of winning the
presidency.
Probably, Ron Paul is the most ideologically well-qualified man in
America to be President. When discussing the Washington scene, Paul
is quite open in placing-blame-where-blame-is-due. Effectively, Paul
is a lamb among wolves. Yet, because of his good character, he won’t
allow his simple, common sense principles to be compromised. Clinton,
on the other hand, is a diplomat. She knows that in order to gain…
power, she must be able to work with both friends and enemies alike.
Often, that means… (symbolically at least), sleeping with the enemy.
Today, Clinton said: “I will be on the FRONTLINES of democracy!” Last
Tuesday she said: “This is an important day for democracy!” Yet,
Hillary Clinton is urging those eighteen million men and women, all
across America, to disregard the win-at-any-cost, anti FAIR play, and
anti democracy tactics of the Obama campaign. All along, Clinton’s
plan “B” must have been: “If I don’t win, outright, (She DID, but
won’t fight for it…) I will just switch over to… ‘the enemy’—and all
of my supporters will follow along.”
I’m one of those (former) supporters of Hillary Clinton who won’t be
voting for ‘her choice’ for President. EACH of those eighteen million
men and women who voted for Clinton probably did so—ether because she
has executive experience; she’s the more mature and stable candidate;
or because they liked the wisdom of her various visions for America.
Folks, every one of those, and other, valid motives for your having
voted are still waiting to be served! NONE of you fine people should
automatically switch to the candidate of Clinton’s whim—unless your
own hopes and aspirations for America can be made closer to being a
reality! Believe me: “Voting for Barack Obama will doom the hopes of
the majority to have their situations get better… or, at least, not
get any worse.”
Essentially, the problems with our government are personnel issues.
We just keep “hiring” too many, egotistical and out-of-touch
politicians. Those need to be weeded out and/or fired. And… we’ve
allowed powerful business influences that use: Lobbying; “golf course”
and back-room deal making; and media advertising dollars to bias the
media, and to negatively sway the decisions that our government makes—
supposedly on our behalves. Our government should be an
approximation of a true democracy. But instead, it’s a closer
approximation of a dictatorship… run by selfish, big-business
interests.
The ‘threat’ to the USA by having Obama be elected President probably
won’t result from anything that Obama, himself, does. Instead, his
election just gives the all-clear to continue business-as-usual in
Washington. That means group-against-group, party-against-party, and
class-against-class fights. The REAL threat to the USA that could
bring on more terrorism and even… nuclear war, results from our
government having given businesses, here, a Gold Pass Key to conduct
their dealings in other countries any way that they see fit.
If there’s a ‘pollution problem’ in this country that’s causing
Americans to die due to cancer… our government thinks it’s quite OK to
“solve” those issues by letting that industry move to another
country. By so doing, it will be those people in the other countries
who die, not people, here… When, cigarettes became recognized as… a
killer of millions, the tobacco companies maintained their sales by
sending their products to places like China—where there are no
“warning labels” required. Whenever mining, here, starts killing the
land and sea wildlife due to runoff, those companies find alternative
sites in developing countries that have no restrictions.
The reason that the World Trade Center got brought down, was because
NYC and those tall buildings are (or were) symbols of American
capitalism. The have-not nations of the World—that our government
lets our businesses freely exploit—sees how little we care about their
being treated FAIRLY. When our leaders keep swearing to ‘protect and
defend’ Israel, we are siding with, and selling weapons to, a nation
that kicked Muslims off of their land without fair compensation. And
we are siding with a nation that over-reacts to any, understandable,
minor violence—by killing and maiming more Muslims than was the number
of Jews who were hurt or killed.
So, is it any wonder that many Muslim’s hate the USA? The great
number of Muslims in the world—and their concentration in countries
that American businesses gladly exploit—is setting the stage for
increasing terrorism in the USA and among our allies. But there’s a
most simple solution! CLEAN UP our own act in this country to have
FAIRNESS. Then, put RESTRICTIONS on allowing our businesses to RAPE
(figuratively of course) any other country’s natural resources; labor
pool; environment; or general health and safety. Because the US has
already been doing those bad things, we must begin making generous
concessions. If we’ll do the latter, suddenly, the “motive” for
having our much needed businesses, here, move to other countries, just
isn’t there any more. The “economy”—that is issue number one with the
voters—will start to improve, soon!
Much of the 85% discontent of Americans with the direction that this
country is heading results, directly or indirectly, from a
dissatisfaction with the LAWS that are in place, or which just got
enacted. Simply put, the main cause of our discontent is: We have too
many ill-conceived and downright unfair LAWS! My New Constitution,
when ratified, will MANDATE a review and revote of every single law on
that is on the books! And the vote for passage for all laws, old or
new, becomes: 55 percent! Never again will laws get passed that
aren’t liked by more than half of the people. And 55 percent is only
a ‘probationary’ passage. Unless a law passes by 60% or more, it must
be reviewed and revoted every four years. And, if at any time, one
third of the House, or the President alone, thinks that a
controversial law doesn’t meet with the approval of the Citizens, such
law will be put in a referendum—bypassing House authority, completely.
Most Americans will like this: The House will have a ceiling on the
amount of taxes it can raise. Such will be a percentage of the GNP.
And those taxes will be billed, just once a year, to the STATES based
on a state’s population. (Folks, please don’t worry about ‘poor’
states. There will be compensations to even out most inequities.)
Never again will the Federal government keep financial records on any
citizen! And within several years, all of the taxation in the USA
will be sales taxes only. Food and medicines will be tax exempt. The
combined total of all taxes can’t exceed the ceiling without an
amendment to the New Constitution!
The above tidbits from my New Constitution should hint that I want
such document to be user friendly to the People. But it will be:
“Violate at your own peril.” to those in government. There are more
than a dozen circumstances, spelled out, in which a government
official may be either fired, or charged with a felony. Screwing with
democracy in America will have very serious consequences!
My hints of ‘doom’ are mostly cautionary. I’m not walking around with
‘a sign’ saying: “The World will end…” in so many days. On the
contrary, for the past twelve years, I’ve worked to be sure that the
relationships among nations and peoples can become favorable ones.
Simply by ratifying my New Constitution, things will begin to improve,
here. If US companies want to stay in business, the New Constitution
mandates, that such had better start CARING about how those hard
working people in other nations are being treated, and about how World
resources and the environment are being treated. I hope, in the not
too distant future, when FAIRNESS becomes the watchword throughout the
World, that the threat of terrorism and wars will be out-the-window.
At least THAT is my fervent dream!
For now, that plan “B” of Hillary Clinton won’t harm this country,
unless… Barack Obama becomes President. I’m recommending that Obama
and McCain be ignored. Because voters can surely write, when election
day comes, punch or check where it says “Write-In” and print these
clear letters: “RON PAUL” for President of the United States of
America! Those of you who agree with that wisdom, go to Paul’s WEB
page and make a contribution! Ron said, “… a revolution will take
longer.” Hopefully, my New Constitution will speed things up!
Respectfully Submitted,
— NoEinstein —
Klaus Schadenfreude
Dec 6, 2012, 7:52:24 AM12/6/12
to
>"Tom Potter" <tdp...@yahoo.com> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>
>"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>news:c3qrb815f9po9m26c...@4ax.com...
>> >"Tom Potter" <tdp...@yahoo.com> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>>
>>>More proof that my psychotic pal "Klaus Schadenfreude"
>>>who uses the phony handle "Schadenfreude"
>>
>> Prove it's a phony handle, "Tom Potter."
>
>
[goose-stepping-crickets.wav]
>
>"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>news:c3qrb815f9po9m26c...@4ax.com...
>> >"Tom Potter" <tdp...@yahoo.com> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>>
>>>More proof that my psychotic pal "Klaus Schadenfreude"
>>>who uses the phony handle "Schadenfreude"
>>
>> Prove it's a phony handle, "Tom Potter."
>
>
>
>
>>>which means a psycho who enjoys the pains of others
>>
>> Thanks for demonstrating your ignorance yet again.
>
>
[goose-stepping-crickets.wav]
>
>>>which means a psycho who enjoys the pains of others
>>
>> Thanks for demonstrating your ignorance yet again.
>
>
>
>
>>>is ignorant about the German Nazi Party of the 1930s.
>>
>> Not too many people are ignorant about the nazis. You people are all
>> unemployable, glue-huffing pedophiles.
>>
>> http://klaus.webege.com/nazi/dead_nazis.html
>
>As my psychotic, dishonest pal "Klaus Schadenfreude"
>stated that all Nazi were "unemployable, glue-huffing pedophiles.",
>perhaps he will explain how the Nazi
>propelled Germany from the poorest nation in Europe
>with the most unemployment,
>to the richest and most powerful nation on the planet
>in three years, with full employment,
>if all the Nazi were "unemployable, glue-huffing pedophiles."
They didn't. Perhaps my glue-sniffing pedophile friend Tom Potter will
>
>>>is ignorant about the German Nazi Party of the 1930s.
>>
>> Not too many people are ignorant about the nazis. You people are all
>> unemployable, glue-huffing pedophiles.
>>
>> http://klaus.webege.com/nazi/dead_nazis.html
>
>As my psychotic, dishonest pal "Klaus Schadenfreude"
>stated that all Nazi were "unemployable, glue-huffing pedophiles.",
>perhaps he will explain how the Nazi
>propelled Germany from the poorest nation in Europe
>with the most unemployment,
>to the richest and most powerful nation on the planet
>in three years, with full employment,
>if all the Nazi were "unemployable, glue-huffing pedophiles."
explain how the Nazi Party propelled Germany into one of the most
devastated nations just a few years later.
"Laugh laugh laugh laugh."
©Lee Harrison 1957-2012, RIP
Klaus Schadenfreude
Dec 6, 2012, 7:55:40 AM12/6/12
to
>"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>news:r7qrb8plhq9bvv23p...@4ax.com...
>>
>> Nazis. Glue huffing, child-molesting liars, every single one of them.
>> http://klausschadenfreude.110mb.com/Potter-family.htm
>
>It is interesting to see that my psychotic pal "Klaus Schadenfreude"
>has been well condition by the Mass Media,
>and by his handlers in the boiler room he operates from.
It's interesting to see that Tom Potter is well-conditioned by his
>news:r7qrb8plhq9bvv23p...@4ax.com...
>>
>> Nazis. Glue huffing, child-molesting liars, every single one of them.
>> http://klausschadenfreude.110mb.com/Potter-family.htm
>
>It is interesting to see that my psychotic pal "Klaus Schadenfreude"
>has been well condition by the Mass Media,
>and by his handlers in the boiler room he operates from.
Nazi Masters to accept only their propaganda.
>They built expressways, impressive government buildings,
>many homes and vacation homes for industrial workers,
>and in spite of this, were able to design and build and staff
>the most powerful military on the planet.
http://cdn.theatlantic.com/static/infocus/ww2_17/w20_95490389.jpg
http://www.zeitzeugenboerse-koeln.de/uploads/pics/00012002.jbh_01.jpg
I guarantee you he will blame it all on the Jews. That's all his tiny
mind can handle after all those years of huffing glue and beating off
to kiddie porn.
Panda Bear
Dec 6, 2012, 1:50:42 PM12/6/12
to
On Dec 6, 12:54 am, "Tom Potter" <tdp1...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> "Klaus Schadenfreude" <klausschadenfre...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:c3qrb815f9po9m26c...@4ax.com...
> > >"Tom Potter" <tdp1...@yahoo.com> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
Heil Haby!
Thanks a lot Tom. I admire your energy as State Minister for Public
Enlightenment in the NSDAP I formed. You're a real inspiration!
Fuehrer, the Gang of Three: Haby
> "Klaus Schadenfreude" <klausschadenfre...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:c3qrb815f9po9m26c...@4ax.com...
> > >"Tom Potter" <tdp1...@yahoo.com> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
Thanks a lot Tom. I admire your energy as State Minister for Public
Enlightenment in the NSDAP I formed. You're a real inspiration!
Fuehrer, the Gang of Three: Haby
Tom Potter
Dec 6, 2012, 11:55:26 PM12/6/12
to
>news:186666d4-b33b-489b...@r20g2000yql.googlegroups.com...
>adversely affect one's physical health. I realize that my readers-
>most of them, I think, from the media-are wondering "where I'm coming
Dear Mr. NoEinstein:
You and I both have ideas on how to make America
and the world better places.
I base my ideas on an exhaustive examination of history,
and you seem to base your's on the fact that
a Black man is president.
Regarding your comment:
"Hate the sin, not the sinner."
and that is what I do.
Some of my best friends and employees were Jewish,
and I personally have never had any particularly bad relationships with
Jews.
In fact some of my favorite comics, Grocho Marx, Milton Berle, George Burns,
Rodney Dangerfield, Chaplin, etc. were/are Jews, and I liked Al Jolson.
I must admit that I never thought that Jack Benny was entertaining.
I am not concerned about why and how you came to your
personal approach to saving the world,
or for that matter why anyone comes to hold the opinions they have.
I am only concerned with causes and effects
and how they affect the lives of ALL people.
I make an effort to find and promote what I consider to be
good causes, and to find and call attention to causes
that I think will have a negative affect on mankind.
I am not interested in parroting, getting on bandwagons,
or massive stable systems. I am only interested in
change and momentum.
I aggressively promoted George Bush when he first ran for office,
but within two months, it was clear to me that he was going
to cause America a lot of trouble.
If you check out my old posts from around 2002
you will see that I and a few people where trying
to call attention to the folly of waging war on Iraq,
and a number of people, who no longer post
were aggressively hyping the war,
just as some are trying to promote a needless war with
Iran at this time.
I was against Jimmy Carter until I came to realize that
he was the most intelligent, honest, loyal. and moral president
that America has ever had.
I was brainwashed to believe that FDR was a great man,
but after getting at the facts and analyzing them,
it became obvious to me that he was the worst president
that America ever had.
You don't have to worry about
"Hatred adversely affect<ing> my physical health."
I am 80 years old and in great health,
and I have no "Hatred" for any thing or anyone.
If you feel the compulsion to analyze me,
all you have to do is note that I try to focus on
things that are growing or diminishing exponentially,
and will have a big impact on the lives of people.
Things like electronics, TV, integrated circuits, microprocessors,
cell phones, GPS, search engines, DNA, war, revolution, China,
smart cards, flash memory, the Internet, Intel's new transducers, etc.
And I take momentum into account,
like the negative momentum that the Bushes and FDR
imparted to America, and the positive momentum
that Jimmy Carter imparted to America.
Where you, I, tj frazir, Archimedes Plutonium, etc.
get our ideas is of no importance.
Maybe you hate Blacks or maybe you don't'
Maybe I hate Jews or maybe I don't.
Maybe Jews hate non-Jews or maybe they don't.
What is important is
"Are the ideas valid and useful?"
The "source" of an idea is not useful
unless one is interested in the "source"
rather than the "idea".
>most of them, I think, from the media-are wondering "where I'm coming
>from". I've been working to save America (better than Nazis) for a
>long while. The following essay was written over four years ago, but
>most of my message is still apt. - John A. Armistead -
>long while. The following essay was written over four years ago, but
Dear Mr. NoEinstein:
You and I both have ideas on how to make America
and the world better places.
I base my ideas on an exhaustive examination of history,
and you seem to base your's on the fact that
a Black man is president.
Regarding your comment:
"I never learned why you are so anti Jew.
Hatred can adversely affect one's physical health."
My Pappy use to say
Hatred can adversely affect one's physical health."
"Hate the sin, not the sinner."
and that is what I do.
Some of my best friends and employees were Jewish,
and I personally have never had any particularly bad relationships with
Jews.
In fact some of my favorite comics, Grocho Marx, Milton Berle, George Burns,
Rodney Dangerfield, Chaplin, etc. were/are Jews, and I liked Al Jolson.
I must admit that I never thought that Jack Benny was entertaining.
I am not concerned about why and how you came to your
personal approach to saving the world,
or for that matter why anyone comes to hold the opinions they have.
I am only concerned with causes and effects
and how they affect the lives of ALL people.
I make an effort to find and promote what I consider to be
good causes, and to find and call attention to causes
that I think will have a negative affect on mankind.
I am not interested in parroting, getting on bandwagons,
or massive stable systems. I am only interested in
change and momentum.
I aggressively promoted George Bush when he first ran for office,
but within two months, it was clear to me that he was going
to cause America a lot of trouble.
If you check out my old posts from around 2002
you will see that I and a few people where trying
to call attention to the folly of waging war on Iraq,
and a number of people, who no longer post
were aggressively hyping the war,
just as some are trying to promote a needless war with
Iran at this time.
I was against Jimmy Carter until I came to realize that
he was the most intelligent, honest, loyal. and moral president
that America has ever had.
I was brainwashed to believe that FDR was a great man,
but after getting at the facts and analyzing them,
it became obvious to me that he was the worst president
that America ever had.
You don't have to worry about
"Hatred adversely affect<ing> my physical health."
I am 80 years old and in great health,
and I have no "Hatred" for any thing or anyone.
If you feel the compulsion to analyze me,
all you have to do is note that I try to focus on
things that are growing or diminishing exponentially,
and will have a big impact on the lives of people.
Things like electronics, TV, integrated circuits, microprocessors,
cell phones, GPS, search engines, DNA, war, revolution, China,
smart cards, flash memory, the Internet, Intel's new transducers, etc.
And I take momentum into account,
like the negative momentum that the Bushes and FDR
imparted to America, and the positive momentum
that Jimmy Carter imparted to America.
Where you, I, tj frazir, Archimedes Plutonium, etc.
get our ideas is of no importance.
Maybe you hate Blacks or maybe you don't'
Maybe I hate Jews or maybe I don't.
Maybe Jews hate non-Jews or maybe they don't.
What is important is
"Are the ideas valid and useful?"
The "source" of an idea is not useful
unless one is interested in the "source"
rather than the "idea".
Tom Potter
Dec 6, 2012, 11:55:37 PM12/6/12
to
news:u351c89a1n4o0lhan...@4ax.com...
It is interesting to see that my psychotic, obscene pal "Klaus
Schadenfreude"
projects actions onto me that must be common to him.
Observe that one never sees people
who have no knowledge of a thing or action,
project these things and actions onto others.
And as rational, intelligent folks
who have studied history with an open mind know,
that FDR and Churchill sold out to the Jews
who had massacred the Russian family and co-opted
the Russian government and were using Russia as a base from
where to train terrorists and instigate revolutions and
and there would have been no Cold War, no nuclear weapons,
And if Bush had gone after the Religious War Instigators,
rather than getting in bed with them and Sharon,
there would have been no 9/11, no movement of America
toward a police and military state,
no loss of freedoms to Americans,
no danger to Americans at home and abroad,
no collapse of the economy,
no shattering of the national budget,
no war against the Iraqi people,
Schadenfreude"
projects actions onto me that must be common to him.
Observe that one never sees people
who have no knowledge of a thing or action,
project these things and actions onto others.
And as rational, intelligent folks
who have studied history with an open mind know,
that FDR and Churchill sold out to the Jews
who had massacred the Russian family and co-opted
the Russian government and were using Russia as a base from
where to train terrorists and instigate revolutions and
wars all over the world
and if FDR had opposed the War-for-profit gang,
rather than sell out to them,
WWII would have lasted six months,
and there would have been no Cold War, no nuclear weapons,
no Korean War, no Vietnam War, no 911, no Religious Wars,
no destruction and looting of Germany, etc.
And if Bush had gone after the Religious War Instigators,
rather than getting in bed with them and Sharon,
there would have been no 9/11, no movement of America
toward a police and military state,
no loss of freedoms to Americans,
no danger to Americans at home and abroad,
no collapse of the economy,
no shattering of the national budget,
no war against the Iraqi people,
with its' attendant cost, depletion of
non-renewable resources, environmental damage, etc,
no loss of trust by most nations of the world,
no hatred of America by hundreds of millions of Muslims,
no raid on Social Security,
no freeze of Civil Service employees salaries,
no bankruptcy of major airlines,
no dollar flight,
no meltdown of the dollar,
no meltdown of America,
no weakening of the United Nations,
no weakening of NATO, the G8,
no hatred of America by hundreds of millions of Muslims,
no raid on Social Security,
no freeze of Civil Service employees salaries,
no bankruptcy of major airlines,
no dollar flight,
no meltdown of the dollar,
no meltdown of America,
no weakening of the United Nations,
no independent European GPS system,
no loss of trillion dollar markets by Boeing, G.E. and other American firms,
etc.
The fact that the masses can be conned
into actually believing the Jewish version of religion and history
confirms Frank Zappa's assertion
that the most abundant thing in the universe is "stupidity".
etc.
The fact that the masses can be conned
into actually believing the Jewish version of religion and history
confirms Frank Zappa's assertion
that the most abundant thing in the universe is "stupidity".
Tom Potter
Dec 6, 2012, 11:55:43 PM12/6/12
to
news:l851c8560e24513q1...@4ax.com...
people who instigate revolution and war
end up like this.
http://www.codrosu.ro/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/auschwitz.jpg
and people who oppose the instigation of war and revolution
end up like this ------ if they lose in their effort.
http://cdn.theatlantic.com/static/infocus/ww2_17/w20_95490389.jpg
It seems to me that the best course for both
is not to tolerate the instigation of revolutions and wars.
It is interesting to see that my psychotic, obscene pal "Klaus
Schadenfreude"
projects actions onto me that must be common to him.
Observe that one never sees people
who have no knowledge of a thing or action,
project these things and actions onto others.
Klaus also seems to be asserting that
Schadenfreude"
projects actions onto me that must be common to him.
Observe that one never sees people
who have no knowledge of a thing or action,
project these things and actions onto others.
people who instigate revolution and war
end up like this.
http://www.codrosu.ro/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/auschwitz.jpg
and people who oppose the instigation of war and revolution
end up like this ------ if they lose in their effort.
http://cdn.theatlantic.com/static/infocus/ww2_17/w20_95490389.jpg
It seems to me that the best course for both
is not to tolerate the instigation of revolutions and wars.
Klaus Schadenfreude
Dec 7, 2012, 7:58:17 AM12/7/12
to
most interested in.
His inability to prove I'm using what his nazi masters have told him
to refer to as a "phony handle..."
His inability to even discuss the ravaged state of Germany after
WWII...
His inability to even understand what "Schadenfreude" means.....
...All point to excessive abuse of inhalants.
Klaus Schadenfreude
Dec 7, 2012, 7:59:36 AM12/7/12
to
>"Tom Potter" <tdp...@yahoo.com> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>
>"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>news:l851c8560e24513q1...@4ax.com...
>> >"Tom Potter" <tdp...@yahoo.com> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>>
>>>
>>>"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>>news:r7qrb8plhq9bvv23p...@4ax.com...
>>>>
>>>> Nazis. Glue huffing, child-molesting liars, every single one of them.
>>>> http://klausschadenfreude.110mb.com/Potter-family.htm
>>>
>>>It is interesting to see that my psychotic pal "Klaus Schadenfreude"
>>>has been well condition by the Mass Media,
>>>and by his handlers in the boiler room he operates from.
>>
>> It's interesting to see that Tom Potter is well-conditioned by his
>> Nazi Masters to accept only their propaganda.
>>
>>>They built expressways, impressive government buildings,
>>>many homes and vacation homes for industrial workers,
>>>and in spite of this, were able to design and build and staff
>>>the most powerful military on the planet.
>>
>> Here is how Nazi Germany ended up:
>>
>> http://cdn.theatlantic.com/static/infocus/ww2_17/w20_95490389.jpg
>>
>> http://www.zeitzeugenboerse-koeln.de/uploads/pics/00012002.jbh_01.jpg
>>
>> I guarantee you he will blame it all on the Jews. That's all his tiny
>> mind can handle after all those years of huffing glue and beating off
>> to kiddie porn.
>
>It is interesting to see that [..]
>
>"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>news:l851c8560e24513q1...@4ax.com...
>> >"Tom Potter" <tdp...@yahoo.com> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>>
>>>
>>>"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>>news:r7qrb8plhq9bvv23p...@4ax.com...
>>>>
>>>> Nazis. Glue huffing, child-molesting liars, every single one of them.
>>>> http://klausschadenfreude.110mb.com/Potter-family.htm
>>>
>>>It is interesting to see that my psychotic pal "Klaus Schadenfreude"
>>>has been well condition by the Mass Media,
>>>and by his handlers in the boiler room he operates from.
>>
>> It's interesting to see that Tom Potter is well-conditioned by his
>> Nazi Masters to accept only their propaganda.
>>
>>>They built expressways, impressive government buildings,
>>>many homes and vacation homes for industrial workers,
>>>and in spite of this, were able to design and build and staff
>>>the most powerful military on the planet.
>>
>> Here is how Nazi Germany ended up:
>>
>> http://cdn.theatlantic.com/static/infocus/ww2_17/w20_95490389.jpg
>>
>> http://www.zeitzeugenboerse-koeln.de/uploads/pics/00012002.jbh_01.jpg
>>
>> I guarantee you he will blame it all on the Jews. That's all his tiny
>> mind can handle after all those years of huffing glue and beating off
>> to kiddie porn.
>
It is interesting to see that "Tom Potter" doesn't deny that Hitler
destroyed Germany in exchange for a few years of fun.
NoEinstein
Dec 7, 2012, 5:46:03 PM12/7/12
to
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> Dear Tom: Perhaps the best form of government is a wise and
> benevolent dictatorship. I can assure you that the writer of your pro
> Nazi book was a Nazi sympathizer. If you are hoping to change the
> world's impression that Hitler was a "good" guy, you will have a tough
> road to hoe. I never learned why you are so anti Jew. Hatred can
> adversely affect one's physical health. I realize that my readers—
> most of them, I think, from the media—are wondering "where I'm coming
> from". I've been working to save America (better than Nazis) for a
> long while. The following essay was written over four years ago, but
> most of my message is still apt. — John A. Armistead —
>
> 6/07/08
>
> A MIDCOURSE CORRECTION FOR AMERICA
>
> Eighteen million men and women, all across America, have recently
> voted for a qualified woman to bePresident. By doing so, those same
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> Dear Tom: Perhaps the best form of government is a wise and
> benevolent dictatorship. I can assure you that the writer of your pro
> Nazi book was a Nazi sympathizer. If you are hoping to change the
> world's impression that Hitler was a "good" guy, you will have a tough
> road to hoe. I never learned why you are so anti Jew. Hatred can
> adversely affect one's physical health. I realize that my readers—
> most of them, I think, from the media—are wondering "where I'm coming
> from". I've been working to save America (better than Nazis) for a
> long while. The following essay was written over four years ago, but
> most of my message is still apt. — John A. Armistead —
>
> 6/07/08
>
> A MIDCOURSE CORRECTION FOR AMERICA
>
> Eighteen million men and women, all across America, have recently
> men and women, all across America, voted AGAINST Barack Obama to bePresident. NOTHING that has happened this day—6/07/08—regardless of
> is quite open in placing-blame-where-blame-is-due. Effectively, Paul
> is a lamb among wolves. Yet, because of his good character, he won’t
> allow his simple, common sense principles to be compromised. Clinton,
> on the other hand, is a diplomat. She knows that in order to gain…
> power, she must be able to work with both friends and enemies alike.
> Often, that means… (symbolically at least), sleeping with the enemy.
>
> Today, Clinton said: “I will be on the FRONTLINES of democracy!” Last
> Tuesday she said: “This is an important day for democracy!” Yet,
> Hillary Clinton is urging those eighteen million men and women, all
> across America, to disregard the win-at-any-cost, anti FAIR play, and
> anti democracy tactics of the Obama campaign. All along, Clinton’s
> plan “B” must have been: “If I don’t win, outright, (She DID, but
> won’t fight for it…) I will just switch over to… ‘the enemy’—and all
> of my supporters will follow along.”
>
> I’m one of those (former) supporters of Hillary Clinton who won’t be
> voting for ‘her choice’ forPresident. EACH of those eighteen million
> is a lamb among wolves. Yet, because of his good character, he won’t
> allow his simple, common sense principles to be compromised. Clinton,
> on the other hand, is a diplomat. She knows that in order to gain…
> power, she must be able to work with both friends and enemies alike.
> Often, that means… (symbolically at least), sleeping with the enemy.
>
> Today, Clinton said: “I will be on the FRONTLINES of democracy!” Last
> Tuesday she said: “This is an important day for democracy!” Yet,
> Hillary Clinton is urging those eighteen million men and women, all
> across America, to disregard the win-at-any-cost, anti FAIR play, and
> anti democracy tactics of the Obama campaign. All along, Clinton’s
> plan “B” must have been: “If I don’t win, outright, (She DID, but
> won’t fight for it…) I will just switch over to… ‘the enemy’—and all
> of my supporters will follow along.”
>
> I’m one of those (former) supporters of Hillary Clinton who won’t be
> men and women who voted for Clinton probably did so—ether because she
> has executive experience; she’s the more mature and stable candidate;
> or because they liked the wisdom of her various visions for America.
> Folks, every one of those, and other, valid motives for your having
> voted are still waiting to be served! NONE of you fine people should
> automatically switch to the candidate of Clinton’s whim—unless your
> own hopes and aspirations for America can be made closer to being a
> reality! Believe me: “Voting for Barack Obama will doom the hopes of
> the majority to have their situations get better… or, at least, not
> get any worse.”
>
> Essentially, the problems withourgovernment are personnel issues.
> has executive experience; she’s the more mature and stable candidate;
> or because they liked the wisdom of her various visions for America.
> Folks, every one of those, and other, valid motives for your having
> voted are still waiting to be served! NONE of you fine people should
> automatically switch to the candidate of Clinton’s whim—unless your
> own hopes and aspirations for America can be made closer to being a
> reality! Believe me: “Voting for Barack Obama will doom the hopes of
> the majority to have their situations get better… or, at least, not
> get any worse.”
>
> We just keep “hiring” too many, egotistical and out-of-touch
> politicians. Those need to be weeded out and/or fired. And… we’ve
> allowed powerful business influences that use: Lobbying; “golf course”
> and back-room deal making; and media advertising dollars to bias the
> media, and to negatively sway the decisions thatourgovernment makes—
> supposedly onourbehalves. Ourgovernment should be an
> politicians. Those need to be weeded out and/or fired. And… we’ve
> allowed powerful business influences that use: Lobbying; “golf course”
> and back-room deal making; and media advertising dollars to bias the
> media, and to negatively sway the decisions thatourgovernment makes—
> approximation of a true democracy. But instead, it’s a closer
> approximation of a dictatorship… run by selfish, big-business
> interests.
>
> The ‘threat’ to the USA by having Obama be electedPresidentprobably
> won’t result from anything that Obama, himself, does. Instead, his
> election just gives the all-clear to continue business-as-usual in
> Washington. That means group-against-group, party-against-party, and
> class-against-class fights. The REAL threat to the USA that could
> bring on more terrorism and even… nuclear war, results fromour
> government having given businesses, here, a Gold Pass Key to conduct
> their dealings in other countries any way that they see fit.
>
> If there’s a ‘pollution problem’ in this country that’s causing
> Americans to die due to cancer…ourgovernment thinks it’s quite OK to
> approximation of a dictatorship… run by selfish, big-business
> interests.
>
> The ‘threat’ to the USA by having Obama be electedPresidentprobably
> won’t result from anything that Obama, himself, does. Instead, his
> election just gives the all-clear to continue business-as-usual in
> Washington. That means group-against-group, party-against-party, and
> class-against-class fights. The REAL threat to the USA that could
> bring on more terrorism and even… nuclear war, results fromour
> government having given businesses, here, a Gold Pass Key to conduct
> their dealings in other countries any way that they see fit.
>
> If there’s a ‘pollution problem’ in this country that’s causing
> “solve” those issues by letting that industry move to another
> country. By so doing, it will be those people in the other countries
> who die, not people, here… When, cigarettes became recognized as… a
> killer of millions, the tobacco companies maintained their sales by
> sending their products to places like China—where there are no
> “warning labels” required. Whenever mining, here, starts killing the
> land and sea wildlife due to runoff, those companies find alternative
> sites in developing countries that have no restrictions.
>
> The reason that the World Trade Center got brought down, was because
> NYC and those tall buildings are (or were) symbols of American
> capitalism. The have-not nations of the World—thatourgovernment
> letsourbusinesses freely exploit—sees how little we care about their
> country. By so doing, it will be those people in the other countries
> who die, not people, here… When, cigarettes became recognized as… a
> killer of millions, the tobacco companies maintained their sales by
> sending their products to places like China—where there are no
> “warning labels” required. Whenever mining, here, starts killing the
> land and sea wildlife due to runoff, those companies find alternative
> sites in developing countries that have no restrictions.
>
> The reason that the World Trade Center got brought down, was because
> NYC and those tall buildings are (or were) symbols of American
> capitalism. The have-not nations of the World—thatourgovernment
> being treated FAIRLY. Whenourleaders keep swearing to ‘protect and
> defend’ Israel, we are siding with, and selling weapons to, a nation
> that kicked Muslims off of their land without fair compensation. And
> we are siding with a nation that over-reacts to any, understandable,
> minor violence—by killing and maiming more Muslims than was the number
> of Jews who were hurt or killed.
>
> So, is it any wonder that many Muslim’s hate the USA? The great
> number of Muslims in the world—and their concentration in countries
> that American businesses gladly exploit—is setting the stage for
> increasing terrorism in the USA and amongourallies. But there’s a
> that kicked Muslims off of their land without fair compensation. And
> we are siding with a nation that over-reacts to any, understandable,
> minor violence—by killing and maiming more Muslims than was the number
> of Jews who were hurt or killed.
>
> So, is it any wonder that many Muslim’s hate the USA? The great
> number of Muslims in the world—and their concentration in countries
> that American businesses gladly exploit—is setting the stage for
> most simple solution! CLEAN UPourown act in this country to have
> FAIRNESS. Then, put RESTRICTIONS on allowingourbusinesses to RAPE
> (figuratively of course) any other country’s natural resources; labor
> pool; environment; or general health and safety. Because the US
> ...
> pool; environment; or general health and safety. Because the US
>
> read more »- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
CORRECTION: Make that tough ROW to hoe; not "road"! J. A. A.
> - Show quoted text -
NoEinstein
Dec 7, 2012, 5:51:48 PM12/7/12
to
> > nor their culture just because they didn't want the gang in Russia
> > to do to them, what they were doing to the Native Russians.
>
> > --
> > Tom Potterhttp://tom-potter.telhttps://tdp1001.jux.comhttp://prioritize.biz/the...
> > to do to them, what they were doing to the Native Russians.
>
> > --
>
> Heil Haby!
> Thanks a lot Tom. I admire your energy as State Minister for Public
> Enlightenment in the NSDAP I formed. You're a real inspiration!
> Fuehrer, the Gang of Three: Haby- Hide quoted text -
> Heil Haby!
> Thanks a lot Tom. I admire your energy as State Minister for Public
> Enlightenment in the NSDAP I formed. You're a real inspiration!
>
> - Show quoted text -
With people I don't know, talk using "insider" wording, I can only
> - Show quoted text -
stand to the side and wonder whether the message is good or bad. J.
A. Armistead
NoEinstein
Dec 7, 2012, 6:09:36 PM12/7/12
to
Seduced by smiles.
Exactly four years ago, Obama’s “support” jumped from 53% to about 70%
after the election. That brings to mind a cartoon I once saw in
PLAYBOY. Such showed two side-by-side drawings of the outside of a
large football stadium. In the left-most drawing, the fans entering
the stadium were waving about equal numbers of yellow and blue
banners. But in the right hand drawing, the fans exiting the stadium
were waving only blue banners. For perhaps the majority of Americans,
their desire to be identified with the “winner” exceeds their desire
to back any particular ideology, good or bad.
In the so-called battleground states, like Ohio, it was the
‘undecided’ voters who were being most courted. Basically, undecided
voters are those people having such repressed moral judgment, that
they hang-in-there until they can be nearly certain who the victor
will be—very late into the ‘game‘—just so they will have leverage to
expect special treatment from the one who will be… “elected”.
Hillary Rodham Clinton had been waving a “village” banner prior to the
2008 Democratic National Convention. Because of that, she had the
unwavering support of about 18 million voters, including me—who
favored her over Obama. But Hillary’s ‘Plan B’, rather than her,
rightfully, contesting the constitutionality of the Democrats corrupt
nomination processes—as I was so urging—was to “give aid and comfort
to the enemy” by talking about… the “glass ceiling”… That’s why
Hillary, much too readily, abandoned her ’yellow’ banner. And it is
why she used her celebrity to coerce her 18 million supporters to be
SPINELESS and to abandon their yellow banners and principles as well.
Hillary did all of that because of Obama’s BRIBE (to her, and to three
or four others) of her ’possibly’ becoming his choice for Vice
President. The last time I checked, bribery, for undeserved personal
gain is a FELONY. Since felonies are high crimes that the
Constitution says disqualify a person from remaining in office, then
it doesn’t take a super genius, like me, to know that Obama WASN’T
QUALIFIED to take the Oath of Office. And that’s without even
considering the fact he is a principle-less FRAUD who has never
supported the Constitution, and who isn’t even an American citizen,
like the Constitution requires! Is it any wonder that Chief Justice
John G. Roberts, Jr. is guilty of TREASON for his having disregarded
is sworn duty and in so token a way, “sworn in” Obama—the anti-Christ?
It is no fluke that Obama is this smooth-talking, GQ-looking man with
“headlight” teeth. When he flashes those teeth—almost as if hypnotized
—every person that he sticks his basketball-gripping hand out to (He’s
a screwed-up-brain ‘lefty’.) will smile back and shake that evil right
hand of his almost as if doing so is an honor. One of the top actors,
Dustin Hoffman—a man I’m hoping will accept a crucial role in the
movie I have authored—smiled graciously at ceremonies honoring
Hoffman’s life-long contribution to motion pictures by shaking the
hand of a traitor. But I don’t hold that against Hoffman. Smiles,
even fraudulent ones, can seduce. Isn’t that why used-car salesmen
and politicians smile so much?
In the second Romney-Obama televised debate, us voters got to see what
Obama is actually like… under his skin. But when the voters are
angry, they will tend to favor the candidate who sounds angry, too.
Adolph Hitler, Obama’s voice and bearing model, certainly sounded
angry, a lot. When Hitler explained that the reason for the high gas
prices was the Russians ‘unfair’ control of the eastern oil fields,
rather than the reduced value of the currency due to Hitler’s
policies, they believed him. Tone of voice and bearing always mean
more to those of average and sub-average IQs—that constitute the large
majority of the 51% of Americans who voted for Obama, November 6,
2012. Close to half of that number voted for Obama because they were
BRIBED with “stuff”, “gifts”, entitlements and favoritism, just for
the MIDDLE class, rather than for all Americans. Nowhere in the
Constitution is class-against-class divisiveness sanctioned. Check it
out!
The USA has been bitten by the same DOG, Obama, twice. The poles are
showing his popularity, again, jumping toward that 70% approval
rating. That means that there are only 30% of the people having
either the analytical ability, or the morals to stick-to-their-guns
and keep working for what is best for all Americans. The middle class
has become an all-too-convenient-pawn that Democrats have championed
in total disregard of the Constitution.
I continue to appeal to “a” US Secret Service agent to HONOR his sworn
oath to support and defend the Constitution. Yet, I’m aware that
those who are trying to make very important moral judgments often tend
to look at others, or at the masses, in order to get a sense of what
the prevailing mood is. Those who are “now” waving blue banners are
hoping that each of them will get at least co-ownership of one of the
“free” Super-Ball lottery tickets that Obama bribed his way with, back
into the White House. Because of the required quick reflexes and
clear thinking necessary to become a Secret Service agent, I can place
those brave men’s average IQ at about 125—much higher than those
lacking moral fortitude, who are “polling” as now backing Obama. I
urge you to think clearly, just by yourselves, without being seduced
by the… smiles of those waiting for the Power-Balls to be drawn. It
is only AFTER all of those people lose, with Obama, that there will be
few smiling people of the Democratic ilk left.
Perhaps Tom Hanks is (now) a had-been Barack Obama supporter. Quite
constitutionally, Hanks had officiated at one or more fund-raisers for
Obama. But if such had been an expressly for-the-media event(s),
Hanks would have been committing a felony—under my New Constitution,
that is always within the SPIRIT of our present Constitution. [Note:
Using one’s celebrity to sway voters makes the ’voice’ of celebrities
greater than one-person-one-vote-fairly-counted. No democracy nor
republic can allow media celebrities nor entertainment celebrities to
have more influence on the outcome of an election than the American
man (or woman) on the street.] To wit:
“1st Amendment: No law shall be made regarding the establishment of
peaceable religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, but
government, its campaigns, processes, slogans, and disbursements shall
be secular. No law nor private or civil action shall abridge: the
freedom of speech *** of those Citizens who don’t work for the media;
the freedom of a fair and pro-democracy press or other medium; the
right of People to peaceably assemble; and the right of any Citizen or
group to petition government or any of its branches or departments for
redress of grievances… ” [Note: Unedited coverage of news, as it
happens, is always allowed. But those working for any medium shall
never assess or comment on the news as political leverage to
promulgate their personal biased notions or the notions of
management. Doing so is made a serious felony, and willful violation
will CLOSE an offending news medium, permanently.]
On a recent David Letterman Show, Hanks came on stage seeming more
nervous than usual. After sitting down, he joked that he needed the
$300 that the guests on such shows get. Judging by Letterman’s self-
assured, almost gleeful aplomb, it was obvious that Hanks was about to
be asked, within that public medium: “How do you feel, now that ‘your
man’ has won the election? Hanks, having anticipated the question
that would be asked, started volunteering: “I was supporting Newt
Gingrich! When I heard Gingrich delivering a speech suggesting that
the USA should again back the Space Program, and set up a Moon Colony,
THAT is exactly what I’ve wanted since I was a kid—big helmet and all!
…”
There is no higher VIRTUE in any man than to admit having been wrong.
I hope ‘that’ was what Tom Hanks was doing on Letterman’s show. All
of the social ideals of the left won’t matter one wit when, and I hope
only “if”, the USA goes down-the-greasy-financial-tubes. But fear
not! My New Constitution will protect both the social ideals of the
left and the economic ideals of the right. Please read back in this
thread for more excerpts from my “NC”. And… You SMART Secret Service
agents should begin thoroughly investigating Osama’s “evidence” of
citizenship, NOW! Many of you will be in Hawaii for three weeks.
While there, do your sworn DUTY!
May God be with us all! Pay It Forward! And … Long live the USA!
Respectfully submitted,
John A. Armistead
Author and Patriot
>
> > Tom Potterhttp://tom-potter.telhttps://tdp1001.jux.comhttp://prioritize.biz/the...Hide quoted text -
> men and women, all across America, voted AGAINST Barack Obama to bePresident. NOTHING that has happened this day—6/07/08—regardless of
> America to bePresident. When discussing the Washington scene, Paul
> being treated FAIRLY. Whenourleaders keep swearing to ‘protect and
> most simple solution! CLEAN UPourown act in this country to have
> FAIRNESS. Then, put RESTRICTIONS on allowingourbusinesses to RAPE
>
> read more »- Hide quoted text -
Exactly four years ago, Obama’s “support” jumped from 53% to about 70%
after the election. That brings to mind a cartoon I once saw in
PLAYBOY. Such showed two side-by-side drawings of the outside of a
large football stadium. In the left-most drawing, the fans entering
the stadium were waving about equal numbers of yellow and blue
banners. But in the right hand drawing, the fans exiting the stadium
were waving only blue banners. For perhaps the majority of Americans,
their desire to be identified with the “winner” exceeds their desire
to back any particular ideology, good or bad.
In the so-called battleground states, like Ohio, it was the
‘undecided’ voters who were being most courted. Basically, undecided
voters are those people having such repressed moral judgment, that
they hang-in-there until they can be nearly certain who the victor
will be—very late into the ‘game‘—just so they will have leverage to
expect special treatment from the one who will be… “elected”.
Hillary Rodham Clinton had been waving a “village” banner prior to the
2008 Democratic National Convention. Because of that, she had the
unwavering support of about 18 million voters, including me—who
favored her over Obama. But Hillary’s ‘Plan B’, rather than her,
rightfully, contesting the constitutionality of the Democrats corrupt
nomination processes—as I was so urging—was to “give aid and comfort
to the enemy” by talking about… the “glass ceiling”… That’s why
Hillary, much too readily, abandoned her ’yellow’ banner. And it is
why she used her celebrity to coerce her 18 million supporters to be
SPINELESS and to abandon their yellow banners and principles as well.
Hillary did all of that because of Obama’s BRIBE (to her, and to three
or four others) of her ’possibly’ becoming his choice for Vice
President. The last time I checked, bribery, for undeserved personal
gain is a FELONY. Since felonies are high crimes that the
Constitution says disqualify a person from remaining in office, then
it doesn’t take a super genius, like me, to know that Obama WASN’T
QUALIFIED to take the Oath of Office. And that’s without even
considering the fact he is a principle-less FRAUD who has never
supported the Constitution, and who isn’t even an American citizen,
like the Constitution requires! Is it any wonder that Chief Justice
John G. Roberts, Jr. is guilty of TREASON for his having disregarded
is sworn duty and in so token a way, “sworn in” Obama—the anti-Christ?
It is no fluke that Obama is this smooth-talking, GQ-looking man with
“headlight” teeth. When he flashes those teeth—almost as if hypnotized
—every person that he sticks his basketball-gripping hand out to (He’s
a screwed-up-brain ‘lefty’.) will smile back and shake that evil right
hand of his almost as if doing so is an honor. One of the top actors,
Dustin Hoffman—a man I’m hoping will accept a crucial role in the
movie I have authored—smiled graciously at ceremonies honoring
Hoffman’s life-long contribution to motion pictures by shaking the
hand of a traitor. But I don’t hold that against Hoffman. Smiles,
even fraudulent ones, can seduce. Isn’t that why used-car salesmen
and politicians smile so much?
In the second Romney-Obama televised debate, us voters got to see what
Obama is actually like… under his skin. But when the voters are
angry, they will tend to favor the candidate who sounds angry, too.
Adolph Hitler, Obama’s voice and bearing model, certainly sounded
angry, a lot. When Hitler explained that the reason for the high gas
prices was the Russians ‘unfair’ control of the eastern oil fields,
rather than the reduced value of the currency due to Hitler’s
policies, they believed him. Tone of voice and bearing always mean
more to those of average and sub-average IQs—that constitute the large
majority of the 51% of Americans who voted for Obama, November 6,
2012. Close to half of that number voted for Obama because they were
BRIBED with “stuff”, “gifts”, entitlements and favoritism, just for
the MIDDLE class, rather than for all Americans. Nowhere in the
Constitution is class-against-class divisiveness sanctioned. Check it
out!
The USA has been bitten by the same DOG, Obama, twice. The poles are
showing his popularity, again, jumping toward that 70% approval
rating. That means that there are only 30% of the people having
either the analytical ability, or the morals to stick-to-their-guns
and keep working for what is best for all Americans. The middle class
has become an all-too-convenient-pawn that Democrats have championed
in total disregard of the Constitution.
I continue to appeal to “a” US Secret Service agent to HONOR his sworn
oath to support and defend the Constitution. Yet, I’m aware that
those who are trying to make very important moral judgments often tend
to look at others, or at the masses, in order to get a sense of what
the prevailing mood is. Those who are “now” waving blue banners are
hoping that each of them will get at least co-ownership of one of the
“free” Super-Ball lottery tickets that Obama bribed his way with, back
into the White House. Because of the required quick reflexes and
clear thinking necessary to become a Secret Service agent, I can place
those brave men’s average IQ at about 125—much higher than those
lacking moral fortitude, who are “polling” as now backing Obama. I
urge you to think clearly, just by yourselves, without being seduced
by the… smiles of those waiting for the Power-Balls to be drawn. It
is only AFTER all of those people lose, with Obama, that there will be
few smiling people of the Democratic ilk left.
Perhaps Tom Hanks is (now) a had-been Barack Obama supporter. Quite
constitutionally, Hanks had officiated at one or more fund-raisers for
Obama. But if such had been an expressly for-the-media event(s),
Hanks would have been committing a felony—under my New Constitution,
that is always within the SPIRIT of our present Constitution. [Note:
Using one’s celebrity to sway voters makes the ’voice’ of celebrities
greater than one-person-one-vote-fairly-counted. No democracy nor
republic can allow media celebrities nor entertainment celebrities to
have more influence on the outcome of an election than the American
man (or woman) on the street.] To wit:
“1st Amendment: No law shall be made regarding the establishment of
peaceable religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, but
government, its campaigns, processes, slogans, and disbursements shall
be secular. No law nor private or civil action shall abridge: the
freedom of speech *** of those Citizens who don’t work for the media;
the freedom of a fair and pro-democracy press or other medium; the
right of People to peaceably assemble; and the right of any Citizen or
group to petition government or any of its branches or departments for
redress of grievances… ” [Note: Unedited coverage of news, as it
happens, is always allowed. But those working for any medium shall
never assess or comment on the news as political leverage to
promulgate their personal biased notions or the notions of
management. Doing so is made a serious felony, and willful violation
will CLOSE an offending news medium, permanently.]
On a recent David Letterman Show, Hanks came on stage seeming more
nervous than usual. After sitting down, he joked that he needed the
$300 that the guests on such shows get. Judging by Letterman’s self-
assured, almost gleeful aplomb, it was obvious that Hanks was about to
be asked, within that public medium: “How do you feel, now that ‘your
man’ has won the election? Hanks, having anticipated the question
that would be asked, started volunteering: “I was supporting Newt
Gingrich! When I heard Gingrich delivering a speech suggesting that
the USA should again back the Space Program, and set up a Moon Colony,
THAT is exactly what I’ve wanted since I was a kid—big helmet and all!
…”
There is no higher VIRTUE in any man than to admit having been wrong.
I hope ‘that’ was what Tom Hanks was doing on Letterman’s show. All
of the social ideals of the left won’t matter one wit when, and I hope
only “if”, the USA goes down-the-greasy-financial-tubes. But fear
not! My New Constitution will protect both the social ideals of the
left and the economic ideals of the right. Please read back in this
thread for more excerpts from my “NC”. And… You SMART Secret Service
agents should begin thoroughly investigating Osama’s “evidence” of
citizenship, NOW! Many of you will be in Hawaii for three weeks.
While there, do your sworn DUTY!
May God be with us all! Pay It Forward! And … Long live the USA!
Respectfully submitted,
John A. Armistead
Author and Patriot
>
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> Dear Tom: Perhaps the best form of government is a wise and
> benevolent dictatorship. I can assure you that the writer of your pro
> Nazi book was a Nazi sympathizer. If you are hoping to change the
> world's impression that Hitler was a "good" guy, you will have a tough
> road to hoe. I never learned why you are so anti Jew. Hatred can
> adversely affect one's physical health. I realize that my readers—
> most of them, I think, from the media—are wondering "where I'm coming
> from". I've been working to save America (better than Nazis) for a
> long while. The following essay was written over four years ago, but
> most of my message is still apt. — John A. Armistead —
>
> 6/07/08
>
> A MIDCOURSE CORRECTION FOR AMERICA
>
> Eighteen million men and women, all across America, have recently
> voted for a qualified woman to bePresident. By doing so, those same
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> Dear Tom: Perhaps the best form of government is a wise and
> benevolent dictatorship. I can assure you that the writer of your pro
> Nazi book was a Nazi sympathizer. If you are hoping to change the
> world's impression that Hitler was a "good" guy, you will have a tough
> road to hoe. I never learned why you are so anti Jew. Hatred can
> adversely affect one's physical health. I realize that my readers—
> most of them, I think, from the media—are wondering "where I'm coming
> from". I've been working to save America (better than Nazis) for a
> long while. The following essay was written over four years ago, but
> most of my message is still apt. — John A. Armistead —
>
> 6/07/08
>
> A MIDCOURSE CORRECTION FOR AMERICA
>
> Eighteen million men and women, all across America, have recently
> men and women, all across America, voted AGAINST Barack Obama to bePresident. NOTHING that has happened this day—6/07/08—regardless of
> is quite open in placing-blame-where-blame-is-due. Effectively, Paul
> is a lamb among wolves. Yet, because of his good character, he won’t
> allow his simple, common sense principles to be compromised. Clinton,
> on the other hand, is a diplomat. She knows that in order to gain…
> power, she must be able to work with both friends and enemies alike.
> Often, that means… (symbolically at least), sleeping with the enemy.
>
> Today, Clinton said: “I will be on the FRONTLINES of democracy!” Last
> Tuesday she said: “This is an important day for democracy!” Yet,
> Hillary Clinton is urging those eighteen million men and women, all
> across America, to disregard the win-at-any-cost, anti FAIR play, and
> anti democracy tactics of the Obama campaign. All along, Clinton’s
> plan “B” must have been: “If I don’t win, outright, (She DID, but
> won’t fight for it…) I will just switch over to… ‘the enemy’—and all
> of my supporters will follow along.”
>
> I’m one of those (former) supporters of Hillary Clinton who won’t be
> voting for ‘her choice’ forPresident. EACH of those eighteen million
> is a lamb among wolves. Yet, because of his good character, he won’t
> allow his simple, common sense principles to be compromised. Clinton,
> on the other hand, is a diplomat. She knows that in order to gain…
> power, she must be able to work with both friends and enemies alike.
> Often, that means… (symbolically at least), sleeping with the enemy.
>
> Today, Clinton said: “I will be on the FRONTLINES of democracy!” Last
> Tuesday she said: “This is an important day for democracy!” Yet,
> Hillary Clinton is urging those eighteen million men and women, all
> across America, to disregard the win-at-any-cost, anti FAIR play, and
> anti democracy tactics of the Obama campaign. All along, Clinton’s
> plan “B” must have been: “If I don’t win, outright, (She DID, but
> won’t fight for it…) I will just switch over to… ‘the enemy’—and all
> of my supporters will follow along.”
>
> I’m one of those (former) supporters of Hillary Clinton who won’t be
> men and women who voted for Clinton probably did so—ether because she
> has executive experience; she’s the more mature and stable candidate;
> or because they liked the wisdom of her various visions for America.
> Folks, every one of those, and other, valid motives for your having
> voted are still waiting to be served! NONE of you fine people should
> automatically switch to the candidate of Clinton’s whim—unless your
> own hopes and aspirations for America can be made closer to being a
> reality! Believe me: “Voting for Barack Obama will doom the hopes of
> the majority to have their situations get better… or, at least, not
> get any worse.”
>
> Essentially, the problems withourgovernment are personnel issues.
> has executive experience; she’s the more mature and stable candidate;
> or because they liked the wisdom of her various visions for America.
> Folks, every one of those, and other, valid motives for your having
> voted are still waiting to be served! NONE of you fine people should
> automatically switch to the candidate of Clinton’s whim—unless your
> own hopes and aspirations for America can be made closer to being a
> reality! Believe me: “Voting for Barack Obama will doom the hopes of
> the majority to have their situations get better… or, at least, not
> get any worse.”
>
> We just keep “hiring” too many, egotistical and out-of-touch
> politicians. Those need to be weeded out and/or fired. And… we’ve
> allowed powerful business influences that use: Lobbying; “golf course”
> and back-room deal making; and media advertising dollars to bias the
> politicians. Those need to be weeded out and/or fired. And… we’ve
> allowed powerful business influences that use: Lobbying; “golf course”
> and back-room deal making; and media advertising dollars to bias the
> media, and to negatively sway the decisions thatourgovernment makes—
> supposedly onourbehalves. Ourgovernment should be an
> approximation of a true democracy. But instead, it’s a closer
> approximation of a dictatorship… run by selfish, big-business
> interests.
>
> The ‘threat’ to the USA by having Obama be electedPresidentprobably
> won’t result from anything that Obama, himself, does. Instead, his
> election just gives the all-clear to continue business-as-usual in
> Washington. That means group-against-group, party-against-party, and
> class-against-class fights. The REAL threat to the USA that could
> bring on more terrorism and even… nuclear war, results fromour
> government having given businesses, here, a Gold Pass Key to conduct
> their dealings in other countries any way that they see fit.
>
> If there’s a ‘pollution problem’ in this country that’s causing
> Americans to die due to cancer…ourgovernment thinks it’s quite OK to
> approximation of a dictatorship… run by selfish, big-business
> interests.
>
> The ‘threat’ to the USA by having Obama be electedPresidentprobably
> won’t result from anything that Obama, himself, does. Instead, his
> election just gives the all-clear to continue business-as-usual in
> Washington. That means group-against-group, party-against-party, and
> class-against-class fights. The REAL threat to the USA that could
> bring on more terrorism and even… nuclear war, results fromour
> government having given businesses, here, a Gold Pass Key to conduct
> their dealings in other countries any way that they see fit.
>
> If there’s a ‘pollution problem’ in this country that’s causing
> “solve” those issues by letting that industry move to another
> country. By so doing, it will be those people in the other countries
> who die, not people, here… When, cigarettes became recognized as… a
> killer of millions, the tobacco companies maintained their sales by
> sending their products to places like China—where there are no
> “warning labels” required. Whenever mining, here, starts killing the
> land and sea wildlife due to runoff, those companies find alternative
> sites in developing countries that have no restrictions.
>
> The reason that the World Trade Center got brought down, was because
> NYC and those tall buildings are (or were) symbols of American
> capitalism. The have-not nations of the World—thatourgovernment
> letsourbusinesses freely exploit—sees how little we care about their
> country. By so doing, it will be those people in the other countries
> who die, not people, here… When, cigarettes became recognized as… a
> killer of millions, the tobacco companies maintained their sales by
> sending their products to places like China—where there are no
> “warning labels” required. Whenever mining, here, starts killing the
> land and sea wildlife due to runoff, those companies find alternative
> sites in developing countries that have no restrictions.
>
> The reason that the World Trade Center got brought down, was because
> NYC and those tall buildings are (or were) symbols of American
> capitalism. The have-not nations of the World—thatourgovernment
> being treated FAIRLY. Whenourleaders keep swearing to ‘protect and
> defend’ Israel, we are siding with, and selling weapons to, a nation
> that kicked Muslims off of their land without fair compensation. And
> we are siding with a nation that over-reacts to any, understandable,
> minor violence—by killing and maiming more Muslims than was the number
> of Jews who were hurt or killed.
>
> So, is it any wonder that many Muslim’s hate the USA? The great
> number of Muslims in the world—and their concentration in countries
> that American businesses gladly exploit—is setting the stage for
> increasing terrorism in the USA and amongourallies. But there’s a
> that kicked Muslims off of their land without fair compensation. And
> we are siding with a nation that over-reacts to any, understandable,
> minor violence—by killing and maiming more Muslims than was the number
> of Jews who were hurt or killed.
>
> So, is it any wonder that many Muslim’s hate the USA? The great
> number of Muslims in the world—and their concentration in countries
> that American businesses gladly exploit—is setting the stage for
> most simple solution! CLEAN UPourown act in this country to have
> FAIRNESS. Then, put RESTRICTIONS on allowingourbusinesses to RAPE
> (figuratively of course) any other country’s natural resources; labor
> pool; environment; or general health and safety. Because the US
> ...
> pool; environment; or general health and safety. Because the US
>
> read more »- Hide quoted text -
NoEinstein
Dec 7, 2012, 7:14:46 PM12/7/12
to
On Dec 6, 11:55 pm, "Tom Potter" <tdp1...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
Dear Tom: Thanks for your long narrative!
Like many from academia, you enjoy throwing out Ideas to get others to
agree or disagree. What you are doing is motivated more because of
the "joy" of having a discussion, than because of the ideals you are
pushing or faulting. College debate teams often never know what
position they will be asked to argue. My "NC" requires that attorneys
be open to defending the constitutional rights of anyone entering
their doors—not just those they agree with, philosophically. I had a
bad personal experience in which I wanted to sue government for
protecting a public figure who should have been sent to prison for
life. In those efforts, I went all the way to the, then, Chief
Justice of the Supreme Court, but my "petition" was ignored because
public figures are perceived as being above the law. It was those
personal insights that allowed me to perfect those aspects of my "NC"
that will permanently neutralize our broken courts and remove the off-
base esprit de corps that law enforcement works for government'
When I appeal to the US Secret Service, those guys KNOW that I have
passed their strictest tests of being one of the "good guys"! I know,
that in their hearts, there is goodness, too. I only wish that I had
been standing in the crowd beside John Hinkley when he pulled out his
gun on Reagan. The quick reflexes that go with being a super genius
would have allowed me to assess what was about to happen and to ACT
with the swift pressure of my body to knock Hinkley to the ground. If
enough people are vigilant, many mass murders and terrorists can be
stopped in their tracts. Think, people!
I too, realized Carter was smart. His main weakness was his not
having learned what Newt Gingrich "over-learned"—and that is 'how to
work within the system'. Making wonderful addresses to the people and
asking THEM to pressure Congress isn't the way things are "presently"
done in Washington.
I always said Jimmy Carter would make a great neighbor, but he never
should have figured he could be President. I feel the same way about
George Bush "Jr." Any person who likes fishing, hiking and biking,
and has a huge ranch would make a great friend. He was also amazingly
candid. Enough so, that he could laugh at himself. I always figured
he got "pushed" to be elected because Republicans wanted to show they
can be all things to all people, just like Democrats were claiming to
be. That just ain't so. As a result Bush's economic policies were a
failure.
It is hard to realize that FDR, a man held in high esteem by my
Grandfather Hamilton, was so unwise in his "anti-depression"
policies. When a small plane goes into a tail spin, sometime it is
better to let go of the controls and allow the design characteristics
of the plane to solve the problems. FDR’s big mistake was in having
government do a thing. His actions stretched-out the depression by at
least five years. The lesson: LESS government is always best!
Jews are "bad" as a holier-than-thou race, not because individual Jews
are bad. The over-riding principle of my "NC" is that groups are
always fighting other groups for power, and for control of
government! At our 'personal universe' levels, what we have in common
with other the world over is so great, that there need never again be
any terrorism nor wars!
Blacks are "bad" only because they use racism as a lever to control
the "gifts" and "stuff" from government. I know for a fact, that if
it wasn't for the HARD WORK of blacks, our country would slow to a
crawl in two weeks time. There is a work ethic in Blacks that is
downplayed so that the voting and lobbying power of blacks will be
highest. Blacks, more than Hispanics, have already been assimilated
into our capitalist system. If their "ministers" would just shut up,
things would get friendly PDQ.
I invite others, like Tom, to reveal enough about what drives them to
allow objective comment. Discussion IS a good thing! — John A.
Armistead —
>
> >"NoEinstein" <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
> >> Potterhttp://tom-potter.telhttps://tdp1001.jux.comhttp://prioritize.biz/the...
> getourideas is of no importance.
>
Dear Tom: Thanks for your long narrative!
Like many from academia, you enjoy throwing out Ideas to get others to
agree or disagree. What you are doing is motivated more because of
the "joy" of having a discussion, than because of the ideals you are
pushing or faulting. College debate teams often never know what
position they will be asked to argue. My "NC" requires that attorneys
be open to defending the constitutional rights of anyone entering
their doors—not just those they agree with, philosophically. I had a
bad personal experience in which I wanted to sue government for
protecting a public figure who should have been sent to prison for
life. In those efforts, I went all the way to the, then, Chief
Justice of the Supreme Court, but my "petition" was ignored because
public figures are perceived as being above the law. It was those
personal insights that allowed me to perfect those aspects of my "NC"
that will permanently neutralize our broken courts and remove the off-
base esprit de corps that law enforcement works for government'
When I appeal to the US Secret Service, those guys KNOW that I have
passed their strictest tests of being one of the "good guys"! I know,
that in their hearts, there is goodness, too. I only wish that I had
been standing in the crowd beside John Hinkley when he pulled out his
gun on Reagan. The quick reflexes that go with being a super genius
would have allowed me to assess what was about to happen and to ACT
with the swift pressure of my body to knock Hinkley to the ground. If
enough people are vigilant, many mass murders and terrorists can be
stopped in their tracts. Think, people!
I too, realized Carter was smart. His main weakness was his not
having learned what Newt Gingrich "over-learned"—and that is 'how to
work within the system'. Making wonderful addresses to the people and
asking THEM to pressure Congress isn't the way things are "presently"
done in Washington.
I always said Jimmy Carter would make a great neighbor, but he never
should have figured he could be President. I feel the same way about
George Bush "Jr." Any person who likes fishing, hiking and biking,
and has a huge ranch would make a great friend. He was also amazingly
candid. Enough so, that he could laugh at himself. I always figured
he got "pushed" to be elected because Republicans wanted to show they
can be all things to all people, just like Democrats were claiming to
be. That just ain't so. As a result Bush's economic policies were a
failure.
It is hard to realize that FDR, a man held in high esteem by my
Grandfather Hamilton, was so unwise in his "anti-depression"
policies. When a small plane goes into a tail spin, sometime it is
better to let go of the controls and allow the design characteristics
of the plane to solve the problems. FDR’s big mistake was in having
government do a thing. His actions stretched-out the depression by at
least five years. The lesson: LESS government is always best!
Jews are "bad" as a holier-than-thou race, not because individual Jews
are bad. The over-riding principle of my "NC" is that groups are
always fighting other groups for power, and for control of
government! At our 'personal universe' levels, what we have in common
with other the world over is so great, that there need never again be
any terrorism nor wars!
Blacks are "bad" only because they use racism as a lever to control
the "gifts" and "stuff" from government. I know for a fact, that if
it wasn't for the HARD WORK of blacks, our country would slow to a
crawl in two weeks time. There is a work ethic in Blacks that is
downplayed so that the voting and lobbying power of blacks will be
highest. Blacks, more than Hispanics, have already been assimilated
into our capitalist system. If their "ministers" would just shut up,
things would get friendly PDQ.
I invite others, like Tom, to reveal enough about what drives them to
allow objective comment. Discussion IS a good thing! — John A.
Armistead —
>
> >"NoEinstein" <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
>
> Maybe you hate Blacks or maybe you don't'
> Maybe I hate Jews or maybe I don't.
> Maybe Jews hate non-Jews or maybe they don't.
>
> What is important is
> "Are the ideas valid and useful?"
>
> The "source" of an idea is not useful
> unless one is interested in the "source"
> rather than the "idea".
>
> --
> Maybe you hate Blacks or maybe you don't'
> Maybe I hate Jews or maybe I don't.
> Maybe Jews hate non-Jews or maybe they don't.
>
> What is important is
> "Are the ideas valid and useful?"
>
> The "source" of an idea is not useful
> unless one is interested in the "source"
> rather than the "idea".
>
> --
1treePetrifiedForestLane
Dec 7, 2012, 8:24:58 PM12/7/12
to
Jimmy Carter was the first Trilateral Commission President,
because of Zbigniew B.; see larouchepub.com, thank you.
because of Zbigniew B.; see larouchepub.com, thank you.
1treePetrifiedForestLane
Dec 7, 2012, 8:28:28 PM12/7/12
to
um, I have never "assailed" you;
I am merely arguing with your inability
to "do fractions."
if you are not going to even try to discover
what the original scientists did to uncover kinetic energy,
or *vis viva*, how can you clain to refute it?
armistead; never give up, no matter how silly it looks!
> am unassailable.
I am merely arguing with your inability
to "do fractions."
if you are not going to even try to discover
what the original scientists did to uncover kinetic energy,
or *vis viva*, how can you clain to refute it?
armistead; never give up, no matter how silly it looks!
> am unassailable.
NoEinstein
Dec 9, 2012, 3:37:35 PM12/9/12
to
On Dec 7, 6:09 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
Layers of Reasoning in Science, Government and Life.
Erskine Bowles was a guest on a Sunday news commentary show this
morning. Several decades ago, in Charlotte, NC, I contacted him
regarding obtaining venture capital for my invention, Plen-E-Air Slab
floor system. [See my book: ’The Shortest Distance; Harmony Through
Prosperity’.] He was most impressed. But being, primarily, a
‘finances’ person, he urged me to get back in touch after I’d done
more development. Some years later, when, by chance, another ‘John
Armistead’ happened to contact him, he phoned me, by mistake, and we
had another nice chat. It wouldn’t be too long before he was made
President of the University of NC. Since obtaining finances for
inventions, obviously, wasn’t my forte (pronounced ‘fort’), I decided
to write to Bowles and explain about my subsequent odyssey to get my
(easy) disproofs of Einstein’s theories recognized. I never got a
reply, probably because—once again—he is primarily a finances person.
I’ve explained the above to illustrate how those with niche expertise
can easily be over their heads when trying to solve (seemingly) too-
complex problems—like correcting our live-or-die governmental crises.
Over the last century, because of the undue influence of the media
regarding who our elected officials can be, it is mostly ego maniacs
craving the doting attention that the media gives to public figures,
who are willing to devote their lives to getting elected and trying to
stay in office. Rating “high” in the hierarchy of public officials
requires that one be a convincing speech maker. As a result, what we
have in Washington, for good or bad (mostly bad) is a bunch of ego-
maniacs whose main, and too often, only, talent is burning the
speechmaking candle at both ends, while the pressing problems, in-the-
main, go unsolved.
By its nature, architecture requires making myriad decisions wisely
and quickly. Not all architects have that ability, however. Many has
been the time that one of my bosses would propose making such-and-such
(supposed) improvement. But because of my deep understanding how
changes to one aspect of a building or its grounds can affect other
aspects, I could, within seconds, explain numbers of reasons why the
proposal wouldn’t work. To those with IQs mostly in the center part
of the Bell Curve, I probably seemed to be a rude and not too
considerate person. I once got fired from a Charlotte company with
three principals, because I was correcting my boss’s (initials R. M.)
mistakes with such ease, that he was afraid I would squeeze him out of
his job. It was at that point that I realized the best usage of my
very high talents was by inventing improve-the-world products, not by
batting heads with intellectual underlings who so greatly outnumbered
me.
To solve most problems well, at least four or five layers of reasoning
need to be used. Consider each layer to be like a computer program
that only analyzes one small aspect of an issue. Time and again, I
realize that most “average” people, including the majority of in-you-
face media elites, and those in government, are able to apply no more
than 2 to 2½ layers of reasoning. So, what they keep arguing is “the”
solution, won’t correct the problem at all! The near fatal decline of
our government(s) is due to the errant notion that 500 plus ego-
maniacs, who can make good speeches, should be able to solve even a
single problem!!! One super genius, like me, has already SOLVED all
of the problems being argued-over, so pointlessly. Those solutions
are embodied in my ready-to-be-ratified ‘New Constitution of the
United States of America.’ The main reason so few people have heard
about it is because those of average IQs, like the majority in the
media—many of whom, every day, read what I write, without taking
action, are “control valves” of what gets to be considered “News”. A
round-faced South Korean who pretends to be riding a pony (or etc.) is
considered news worthy. But a New Constitution, written by a super
genius, apparently doesn’t rise to the threshold of being mentioned.
That is why I keep soliciting just ONE person in the public eye; and
just ONE agent in the Secret Service.
Albert Einstein was estimated to have an IQ of 220. Yet, I so easily
saw-through his shallow reasoning, that it only took me ONE HOUR, in
my public library, to invalidate the 1887 Michelson-Morley Experiment
on which Einstein based his Special Relativity Theory or SRT! The
actual M-M apparatus that was used for the initial experiment is in a
basement on the campus of Case Western Reserve University in
Cleveland. Probably, because of the “embarrassing” loss of status
that would result from having a “mere” (HA!) architect invalidate an
experiment looked at by tens of thousands, that University has turned
a deaf ear to my discoveries. Is it any wonder that I recommend that
75% of (supposed) universities be CLOSED and only those students
wishing to major in chemistry, industrial and bio-medical or medical
fields ever attend a USELESS university at all!!!
A big news item concerns the (brainless, criminal and
unconstitutional) Supreme Court agreeing to “consider” the gay
“marriage” issue. My “NC” has already SOLVED that problem to the
optimum best interests of all involved! Here is how:
“Except regarding the military, federal, state and local governments
shall make no laws nor have any regulations sanctioning private, or
predominately private, interpersonal relationships. Also, governments
shall not prohibit peaceable sanctions of private interpersonal
relationships of persons or groups, nor prohibit the application of
written, oral or implied contracts to such. The resolution of
disputes related to the above can be through civil courts. Except
regarding the military, no person shall be compelled by any employer
or any court, etc., to testify about their own or another's private
interpersonal relationships, nor shall such be excluded from
employment or punished for being private. Marriage (married) is a
contractual heterosexual union; gaygement (gayged) is a contractual
homosexual union. Personal fitness can be a condition of
employment. No person shall be refused employment for being over-
qualified for a job sought; rather, the more qualified shall be
favored.”
Another, I think laughable, comment in the media today, is how well
(finger-down-the-throat) Hillary Clinton is ‘positioned’ for the 2016
presidential election. First, Hillary is a TURNCOAT who accepted a
BRIBE from Barack Obama to get her to concede to him before the 2008
Democratic National Convention and, subsequently, to endorse him at
that convention, in order to “unify the party”. The first part of the
bribe was her being teased with her being Obama’s VP choice, if she
would concede. The second part of the bribe was her being told
(perhaps tacitly) that if she makes a good-enough convention speech,
she will get to become Secretary of State.
Perhaps it is a sign of “progress” that Mike Huckabee said on his
weekend show what I’ve been saying for 4.5 YEARS: (I paraphrase.) “In
most states it is a felony to offer anything of value (“stuff”,
“gifts”, entitlements) in exchange for votes. Saying: ‘Endorse me and
I’ll appoint you to such-and-such high paying job,’ isn’t right.”
Isn’t it amazing that I am, apparently, the only person with enough
character, patriotism and backbone to say: “Barack Obama has BRIBED
HIS WAY INTO OFFICE TWICE!!! Since Obama, obviously, has never
believed in the Constitution that he took an empty oath to defend; and
since his dictatorial ways have caused THE most social and economic
damage to the USA of any person in our entire history, that TRAITOR
should immediately be arrested and hanged for TREASON!!!!!” Glenn
Beck gets one or two chances to say those words on the air five days a
week. But because he is YELLOW, that seems most unlikely.
The Donald told Gretta Van Susteren that “’Someone’ got elected.” For
me, and perhaps for The Donald, that someone—elected LEGALLY, without
bribes—was Mitt Romney. Trump told Gretta that he continues to stand
by his belief that Obama isn’t a US born citizen as required by the
Constitution. *** So, US Secret Service, consider this: Donald Trump—
who is arguably one of the ten top executives in the country; together
with me, THE most patriotic man in the country, whose relative, Major
George Armistead saved the USA from being overthrown by the British at
Fort McHenry, during the War of 1812, CHALLENGE one or more smarter
and more moral agents among you to leave-no-stone-unturned to either
prove or disprove Obama’s place of birth. Do the latter, and my New
Constitution is ready, willing and able to make things better for the
vast majority of Americans, left and right! Pay It Forward! And…
Long Live the USA!
Respectfully submitted
John A. Armistead
Author and Patriot
>
> that is always within the SPIRIT ofourpresent Constitution. [Note:
> Using one’s celebrity to swayvotersmakes the ’voice’ of celebrities
>
Layers of Reasoning in Science, Government and Life.
Erskine Bowles was a guest on a Sunday news commentary show this
morning. Several decades ago, in Charlotte, NC, I contacted him
regarding obtaining venture capital for my invention, Plen-E-Air Slab
floor system. [See my book: ’The Shortest Distance; Harmony Through
Prosperity’.] He was most impressed. But being, primarily, a
‘finances’ person, he urged me to get back in touch after I’d done
more development. Some years later, when, by chance, another ‘John
Armistead’ happened to contact him, he phoned me, by mistake, and we
had another nice chat. It wouldn’t be too long before he was made
President of the University of NC. Since obtaining finances for
inventions, obviously, wasn’t my forte (pronounced ‘fort’), I decided
to write to Bowles and explain about my subsequent odyssey to get my
(easy) disproofs of Einstein’s theories recognized. I never got a
reply, probably because—once again—he is primarily a finances person.
I’ve explained the above to illustrate how those with niche expertise
can easily be over their heads when trying to solve (seemingly) too-
complex problems—like correcting our live-or-die governmental crises.
Over the last century, because of the undue influence of the media
regarding who our elected officials can be, it is mostly ego maniacs
craving the doting attention that the media gives to public figures,
who are willing to devote their lives to getting elected and trying to
stay in office. Rating “high” in the hierarchy of public officials
requires that one be a convincing speech maker. As a result, what we
have in Washington, for good or bad (mostly bad) is a bunch of ego-
maniacs whose main, and too often, only, talent is burning the
speechmaking candle at both ends, while the pressing problems, in-the-
main, go unsolved.
By its nature, architecture requires making myriad decisions wisely
and quickly. Not all architects have that ability, however. Many has
been the time that one of my bosses would propose making such-and-such
(supposed) improvement. But because of my deep understanding how
changes to one aspect of a building or its grounds can affect other
aspects, I could, within seconds, explain numbers of reasons why the
proposal wouldn’t work. To those with IQs mostly in the center part
of the Bell Curve, I probably seemed to be a rude and not too
considerate person. I once got fired from a Charlotte company with
three principals, because I was correcting my boss’s (initials R. M.)
mistakes with such ease, that he was afraid I would squeeze him out of
his job. It was at that point that I realized the best usage of my
very high talents was by inventing improve-the-world products, not by
batting heads with intellectual underlings who so greatly outnumbered
me.
To solve most problems well, at least four or five layers of reasoning
need to be used. Consider each layer to be like a computer program
that only analyzes one small aspect of an issue. Time and again, I
realize that most “average” people, including the majority of in-you-
face media elites, and those in government, are able to apply no more
than 2 to 2½ layers of reasoning. So, what they keep arguing is “the”
solution, won’t correct the problem at all! The near fatal decline of
our government(s) is due to the errant notion that 500 plus ego-
maniacs, who can make good speeches, should be able to solve even a
single problem!!! One super genius, like me, has already SOLVED all
of the problems being argued-over, so pointlessly. Those solutions
are embodied in my ready-to-be-ratified ‘New Constitution of the
United States of America.’ The main reason so few people have heard
about it is because those of average IQs, like the majority in the
media—many of whom, every day, read what I write, without taking
action, are “control valves” of what gets to be considered “News”. A
round-faced South Korean who pretends to be riding a pony (or etc.) is
considered news worthy. But a New Constitution, written by a super
genius, apparently doesn’t rise to the threshold of being mentioned.
That is why I keep soliciting just ONE person in the public eye; and
just ONE agent in the Secret Service.
Albert Einstein was estimated to have an IQ of 220. Yet, I so easily
saw-through his shallow reasoning, that it only took me ONE HOUR, in
my public library, to invalidate the 1887 Michelson-Morley Experiment
on which Einstein based his Special Relativity Theory or SRT! The
actual M-M apparatus that was used for the initial experiment is in a
basement on the campus of Case Western Reserve University in
Cleveland. Probably, because of the “embarrassing” loss of status
that would result from having a “mere” (HA!) architect invalidate an
experiment looked at by tens of thousands, that University has turned
a deaf ear to my discoveries. Is it any wonder that I recommend that
75% of (supposed) universities be CLOSED and only those students
wishing to major in chemistry, industrial and bio-medical or medical
fields ever attend a USELESS university at all!!!
A big news item concerns the (brainless, criminal and
unconstitutional) Supreme Court agreeing to “consider” the gay
“marriage” issue. My “NC” has already SOLVED that problem to the
optimum best interests of all involved! Here is how:
“Except regarding the military, federal, state and local governments
shall make no laws nor have any regulations sanctioning private, or
predominately private, interpersonal relationships. Also, governments
shall not prohibit peaceable sanctions of private interpersonal
relationships of persons or groups, nor prohibit the application of
written, oral or implied contracts to such. The resolution of
disputes related to the above can be through civil courts. Except
regarding the military, no person shall be compelled by any employer
or any court, etc., to testify about their own or another's private
interpersonal relationships, nor shall such be excluded from
employment or punished for being private. Marriage (married) is a
contractual heterosexual union; gaygement (gayged) is a contractual
homosexual union. Personal fitness can be a condition of
employment. No person shall be refused employment for being over-
qualified for a job sought; rather, the more qualified shall be
favored.”
Another, I think laughable, comment in the media today, is how well
(finger-down-the-throat) Hillary Clinton is ‘positioned’ for the 2016
presidential election. First, Hillary is a TURNCOAT who accepted a
BRIBE from Barack Obama to get her to concede to him before the 2008
Democratic National Convention and, subsequently, to endorse him at
that convention, in order to “unify the party”. The first part of the
bribe was her being teased with her being Obama’s VP choice, if she
would concede. The second part of the bribe was her being told
(perhaps tacitly) that if she makes a good-enough convention speech,
she will get to become Secretary of State.
Perhaps it is a sign of “progress” that Mike Huckabee said on his
weekend show what I’ve been saying for 4.5 YEARS: (I paraphrase.) “In
most states it is a felony to offer anything of value (“stuff”,
“gifts”, entitlements) in exchange for votes. Saying: ‘Endorse me and
I’ll appoint you to such-and-such high paying job,’ isn’t right.”
Isn’t it amazing that I am, apparently, the only person with enough
character, patriotism and backbone to say: “Barack Obama has BRIBED
HIS WAY INTO OFFICE TWICE!!! Since Obama, obviously, has never
believed in the Constitution that he took an empty oath to defend; and
since his dictatorial ways have caused THE most social and economic
damage to the USA of any person in our entire history, that TRAITOR
should immediately be arrested and hanged for TREASON!!!!!” Glenn
Beck gets one or two chances to say those words on the air five days a
week. But because he is YELLOW, that seems most unlikely.
The Donald told Gretta Van Susteren that “’Someone’ got elected.” For
me, and perhaps for The Donald, that someone—elected LEGALLY, without
bribes—was Mitt Romney. Trump told Gretta that he continues to stand
by his belief that Obama isn’t a US born citizen as required by the
Constitution. *** So, US Secret Service, consider this: Donald Trump—
who is arguably one of the ten top executives in the country; together
with me, THE most patriotic man in the country, whose relative, Major
George Armistead saved the USA from being overthrown by the British at
Fort McHenry, during the War of 1812, CHALLENGE one or more smarter
and more moral agents among you to leave-no-stone-unturned to either
prove or disprove Obama’s place of birth. Do the latter, and my New
Constitution is ready, willing and able to make things better for the
vast majority of Americans, left and right! Pay It Forward! And…
Long Live the USA!
Respectfully submitted
John A. Armistead
Author and Patriot
>
> On Dec 6, 6:56 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> Seduced by smiles.
>
> Exactly four years ago, Obama’s “support” jumped from 53% to about 70%
> after the election. That brings to mind a cartoon I once saw in
> PLAYBOY. Such showed two side-by-side drawings of the outside of a
> large football stadium. In the left-most drawing, the fans entering
> the stadium were waving about equal numbers of yellow and blue
> banners. But in the right hand drawing, the fans exiting the stadium
> were waving only blue banners. For perhaps the majority of Americans,
> their desire to be identified with the “winner” exceeds their desire
> to back any particular ideology, good or bad.
>
> In the so-called battleground states, like Ohio, it was the
> ‘undecided’voterswho were being most courted. Basically, undecidedvotersare those people having such repressed moral judgment, that
>
> Seduced by smiles.
>
> Exactly four years ago, Obama’s “support” jumped from 53% to about 70%
> after the election. That brings to mind a cartoon I once saw in
> PLAYBOY. Such showed two side-by-side drawings of the outside of a
> large football stadium. In the left-most drawing, the fans entering
> the stadium were waving about equal numbers of yellow and blue
> banners. But in the right hand drawing, the fans exiting the stadium
> were waving only blue banners. For perhaps the majority of Americans,
> their desire to be identified with the “winner” exceeds their desire
> to back any particular ideology, good or bad.
>
> In the so-called battleground states, like Ohio, it was the
> they hang-in-there until they can be nearly certain who the victor
> will be—very late into the ‘game‘—just so they will have leverage to
> expect special treatment from the one who will be… “elected”.
>
> Hillary Rodham Clinton had been waving a “village” banner prior to the
> 2008 Democratic National Convention. Because of that, she had the
> unwavering support of about 18 millionvoters, including me—who
> will be—very late into the ‘game‘—just so they will have leverage to
> expect special treatment from the one who will be… “elected”.
>
> Hillary Rodham Clinton had been waving a “village” banner prior to the
> 2008 Democratic National Convention. Because of that, she had the
> favored her over Obama. But Hillary’s ‘Plan B’, rather than her,
> rightfully, contesting the constitutionality of the Democrats corrupt
> nomination processes—as I was so urging—was to “give aid and comfort
> to the enemy” by talking about… the “glass ceiling”… That’s why
> Hillary, much too readily, abandoned her ’yellow’ banner. And it is
> why she used her celebrity to coerce her 18 million supporters to be
> SPINELESS and to abandon their yellow banners and principles as well.
> Hillary did all of that because of Obama’s BRIBE (to her, and to three
> or four others) of her ’possibly’ becoming his choice for VicePresident. The last time I checked, bribery, for undeserved personal
> rightfully, contesting the constitutionality of the Democrats corrupt
> nomination processes—as I was so urging—was to “give aid and comfort
> to the enemy” by talking about… the “glass ceiling”… That’s why
> Hillary, much too readily, abandoned her ’yellow’ banner. And it is
> why she used her celebrity to coerce her 18 million supporters to be
> SPINELESS and to abandon their yellow banners and principles as well.
> Hillary did all of that because of Obama’s BRIBE (to her, and to three
> gain is a FELONY. Since felonies are high crimes that the
> Constitution says disqualify a person from remaining in office, then
> it doesn’t take a super genius, like me, to know that Obama WASN’T
> QUALIFIED to take the Oath of Office. And that’s without even
> considering the fact he is a principle-less FRAUD who has never
> supported the Constitution, and who isn’t even an American citizen,
> like the Constitution requires! Is it any wonder that Chief Justice
> John G. Roberts, Jr. is guilty of TREASON for his having disregarded
> is sworn duty and in so token a way, “sworn in” Obama—the anti-Christ?
>
> It is no fluke that Obama is this smooth-talking, GQ-looking man with
> “headlight” teeth. When he flashes those teeth—almost as if hypnotized
> —every person that he sticks his basketball-gripping hand out to (He’s
> a screwed-up-brain ‘lefty’.) will smile back and shake that evil right
> hand of his almost as if doing so is an honor. One of the top actors,
> Dustin Hoffman—a man I’m hoping will accept a crucial role in the
> movie I have authored—smiled graciously at ceremonies honoring
> Hoffman’s life-long contribution to motion pictures by shaking the
> hand of a traitor. But I don’t hold that against Hoffman. Smiles,
> even fraudulent ones, can seduce. Isn’t that why used-car salesmen
> and politicians smile so much?
>
> In the second Romney-Obama televised debate, usvotersgot to see what
> Constitution says disqualify a person from remaining in office, then
> it doesn’t take a super genius, like me, to know that Obama WASN’T
> QUALIFIED to take the Oath of Office. And that’s without even
> considering the fact he is a principle-less FRAUD who has never
> supported the Constitution, and who isn’t even an American citizen,
> like the Constitution requires! Is it any wonder that Chief Justice
> John G. Roberts, Jr. is guilty of TREASON for his having disregarded
> is sworn duty and in so token a way, “sworn in” Obama—the anti-Christ?
>
> It is no fluke that Obama is this smooth-talking, GQ-looking man with
> “headlight” teeth. When he flashes those teeth—almost as if hypnotized
> —every person that he sticks his basketball-gripping hand out to (He’s
> a screwed-up-brain ‘lefty’.) will smile back and shake that evil right
> hand of his almost as if doing so is an honor. One of the top actors,
> Dustin Hoffman—a man I’m hoping will accept a crucial role in the
> movie I have authored—smiled graciously at ceremonies honoring
> Hoffman’s life-long contribution to motion pictures by shaking the
> hand of a traitor. But I don’t hold that against Hoffman. Smiles,
> even fraudulent ones, can seduce. Isn’t that why used-car salesmen
> and politicians smile so much?
>
> Using one’s celebrity to swayvotersmakes the ’voice’ of celebrities
Johann Sebastian Drosselmeyer
Dec 9, 2012, 9:48:27 PM12/9/12
to
On Dec 6, 8:55 pm, "Tom Potter" <tdp1...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> "Klaus Schadenfreude" <klausschadenfre...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:u351c89a1n4o0lhan...@4ax.com...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > >"Tom Potter" <tdp1...@yahoo.com> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>
> >>"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klausschadenfre...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> >>news:c3qrb815f9po9m26c...@4ax.com...
> >>> >"Tom Potter" <tdp1...@yahoo.com> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
storming!
The Fuehrer of the Gang of Three: Haby
> "Klaus Schadenfreude" <klausschadenfre...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:u351c89a1n4o0lhan...@4ax.com...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > >"Tom Potter" <tdp1...@yahoo.com> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>
> >>"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klausschadenfre...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> >>news:c3qrb815f9po9m26c...@4ax.com...
> >>> >"Tom Potter" <tdp1...@yahoo.com> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
> Tom Potterhttp://tom-potter.telhttps://tdp1001.jux.comhttp://prioritize.biz/the-cloud-machine.html
Heil Haby! Thanks Mr. Tom Potter. The NSDAP loves you. Carry on
storming!
The Fuehrer of the Gang of Three: Haby
NoEinstein
Dec 10, 2012, 10:50:00 PM12/10/12
to
On Dec 9, 3:37 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
Attitude will determine the outcome.
One should have expected that Fox News big wigs (or should I say:
‘toupees‘), like Britt Hume and Bret Baier, would be reveling to say
“the President” and “the next four years” while talking about the
ILLEGAL and UNCONSTITUTIONAL would-be administration under Obama. The
media, that will so justly be put in its place under my New
Constitution, is trying to set the “attitude” tone by being all smiles
that Obama’s dictatorial demands to increase taxes on the rich now has
a mandate. But nothing could be further from the truth!
The pioneer era US Constitution authorized the collection of taxes and
import duties, in particular instances. Following the move westward,
it could typically be miles between homesteads. But people wanted
things that way. They could clear their fields, plant their crops and
shoot their game in almost total self-sufficiency. It was
inconceivable that the Founding Fathers, in any way consented, by
mentioning “taxes”, to allow future vote-hungry socialists to greatly
exceed the for-function-only taxes needed by a minimum government, and
to in fact STEAL the hard earned money of those expected to “respect”
the authority of their soon to be run-away government. To wit: It is
the DEGREE of taxation, not the ‘concept’ of taxation that is
unconstitutional. Why? Because the tone and SPIRIT of our
Constitution is to have the PEOPLE be in charge of government, not to
have government be in charge of the people! Nothing about our
founding document sanctions allowing the governing power to go to any
‘group’, simply because their numbers exceed those of another group.
Changing from a fair Representative Republic (sought but never
realized) to a socialist or communist form of government would require
scrapping our present Constitution—and THAT will require ratification
by 75% of the states. The latter isn’t likely to happen considering
that socialism demands are concentrated in densely populated urban
regions. People, there, are as far removed from the “homestead
mentality” of the Founding Fathers as could be possible.
The liberal media, including Fox News—to its rotten core—enjoy showing
our pseudo president in meetings with sick-at-their-stomach-looking
invites breathing the same tainted air as Obama. How “presidential”
will Obama look when he is dangling by his broken neck from a 1” hemp
rope, 300 feet above the reflection pools on the Washington Mall.
Millions of onlookers will either cry or CHEER watching his lifeless
body kick-off his signature wingtip shoes. Souvenir hunters will wade
out and fight over the shoes of THE most dastardly man ever to set
foot on American soil. Such a demise is what will await any elected
official—local, state or federal—who ever presumes that Governments
have a right to take the property of any hardworking person for
distribution to those unwilling to work at all. Entitlements are
SOCIALISM; so entitlements are UNCONSTITUTIONAL!
No person can be validated for public office by the illegal votes of
those who were BRIBED, as close to half of Obama’s voters were. That
means that Romney-Ryan won by a whopping 14%! Within the SPIRIT of
our Constitution, the Democrats and Obama were disqualified for public
office(s) the second the “Push Granny over the cliff” video aired.
Obama repeated that spurious and libelous innuendo about Republicans
hundreds of times. Since making spurious claims for personal gain is
fraud, and since fraud is a High Crime that the Constitution says can
remove public officials from office, Obama is disqualified for this
and at least a dozen other reasons from ever being allowed to FOUL the
sewers of the White House with his CRAP!!!!!
Protecting the people from ever again facing run-away taxation by a
non-deferential government, my New Constitution has these strict
limits on Government’s authority:
“The federal government’s only revenue tax shall be a single item tax
of the individual states and territories, in total, not to exceed 15%
of the previous year’s gross national product. The tax rate shall be
uniform for states in proportion to the total population of each
state, but may be adjusted downward for territories, only, if such
receive greatly reduced services. The House authors bills of
revenue, but no increase in federal taxes on the states shall be made
without 55% of the voters so approving on election day, and no
increase beyond 15% of the previous year’s gross national product
shall be allowed without an amendment to this constitution ratified in
a referendum by 75% of the People voting. Accounting methods for
determining gross national product shall be consistent and untampered
with for any purpose of tax increase. Government shall function
within its means, without an inflationary over-printing of currency.
The stated rate of return on government guaranteed bonds, and/or tax
exempt bonds, shall always be—at the time of purchase—15% lower than
similar non guaranteed, or non tax exempt bonds in the private
sector.* Publicly traded stocks shall be valued, at time of purchase
or sale, at the average worth in the prior six months.* The House
shall author bills of appropriation within budget; in addition, the
President shall have Line Item Veto power on all such bills, except if
overruled by a 60% vote of the House. 12 years from the adoption of
this New Constitution, and following a successful two year test in two
or more states, taxation in the USA shall be changed to sales tax and
fuel tax, only—at a max. conglomerate rate per annum of 35% of the GNP—
home food and medicines excluded. In addition, cities and counties
may charge the employers therein a nominal head tax on their full time
adult employees.*
Section 6: The House shall have the power to collect taxes, customs
duties and user fees that are due from the states and territories,
with the proviso that user fees shall not be applied to major areas of
government services so that the total cost of federal government
exceeds 15% of the previous year’s GNP. …”
“Except as allowed elsewhere in this constitution, there shall be no
taxes, fees, licenses or other payments that are prorated based on
income or personal property; nor taxes on the free transfer of estates
to rightful heirs and/or assigns.”
It is amazing how panic-stricken those on the right (who are in-the-
right) are because of the much discussed ’fiscal cliff’. First, that
law is a non law because such raises taxes without first having gotten
THE CONSENT OF THE GOVERNED! And as with 95% of the other laws that
shackle the workers, that law isn’t constitutional because such got
passed with the involvement of the US Senate, which is an OLIGARCHY.
Instead of worrying about short-term cash flow problems, ignore Obama
Care and REMOVE all taxation on businesses and over-regulation of
businesses—except those things necessary to protect the world
environment and the public health and safety. *** Unshackling
businesses will cause an immediate spurt in hiring and will cause the
GNP to increase so fast, there will be enough new cash flow to allow
time to devise FAIR and unthreatening private phase-ins to replace
Social Security and Medicare over the next 25 to 30 years. No
“Granny” needs to worry. The USA will honor our naively-made
promises, while allowing our booming, rejuvenated capitalist system to
correct 95% of our economic woes WITHOUT government involvement.
I would like to point out, that by my requiring stock purchases and
sales to be based on the average value in the previous six months
time, that most hurtful speculation of stocks, that can cause sudden
downturns in value, will be eliminated! This is especially important
to seniors, who, because of an illness or death of a spouse must sell
their stocks… regardless of when prudent insiders would recommend. I
have dozens of short clause or one sentence descriptions of business
restrictions that will benefit Americans far and wide. For example:
“Without a signed sales order coerced, baited or unsolicited goods are
free to the addressee. Any bank billing such goods shall pay the
addressee $25.00 per instance. Persons profiting from scam, confusing
promos, advertising or contracts, trickery, high-pressure sales
tactics, continuing charges for difficult-to-cancel, no longer desired
goods or services or any other willful dishonesty are committing a
felony. It is a 5-year felony to dictate or authorize—for undeserved
gain—the dunning, threatening or extorting of any Citizen. Banks or
businesses that loan or sell on credit shall not discriminate, nor
punitively vary charges, interest rates or fees.”
In the last two days I have gotten vibes from Senator Mitch McConnell
(wasn’t smiling); Alan Simpson (smiling) and Rudy Giuliani (smiling
big!) Since so few of you will openly acknowledge your media or
political affiliations, I am heartened that a few of you—some I know
the faces but can’t associate a name—are encouraging me to keep typing
away about my save-the-USA efforts. Whether you yourselves are
willing to act for my cause, please do tell others the location of
this niche where my thoughts can be read. My sincere thanks to
Google, a company in which I own a bit of stock, for giving me,
perhaps the last forum on Earth where my this-way-to-safety messages
can be gotten out. Pray that the US Secret Service will honor their
OATHS over their too-robot-like esprit de corps, and bring Barack
Obama to justice. Don’t place any credence on anything that the
Supreme Court does or doesn’t do—that body is criminal and rotten to
the core, just like the White House.
“Local, state and federal law enforcement, the courts, or any branch
or branches of the military or their respective parts shall at no time
be used in support of corruption in government by any public
official(s) at any level. *** Legal authority of law enforcement or
the courts [and the White House!] over the Citizens is voided if used
in support of corruption. Local, state and federal law enforcement
agencies shall not be organizationally affiliated, and persons or
groups, therein, shall not be presumed by law enforcement to be acting
lawfully solely because of such auspices.”
I’ve just gotten a Sarah Palin vibe. She does have her unique twist
on what the crux of our problems are. Keep thinking about me, folks.
Emotional thought is the same thing that powers prayers! “Pay It
Forward.” and … Long Live the USA!
Respectfully submitted,
John A. Armistead
Author and Patriot
>
> solution, won’t correct the problem at all! The near fatal decline ofourgovernment(s) is due to the errant notion that 500 plus ego-
> damage to the USA of any person inourentire history, that TRAITOR
>
Attitude will determine the outcome.
One should have expected that Fox News big wigs (or should I say:
‘toupees‘), like Britt Hume and Bret Baier, would be reveling to say
“the President” and “the next four years” while talking about the
ILLEGAL and UNCONSTITUTIONAL would-be administration under Obama. The
media, that will so justly be put in its place under my New
Constitution, is trying to set the “attitude” tone by being all smiles
that Obama’s dictatorial demands to increase taxes on the rich now has
a mandate. But nothing could be further from the truth!
The pioneer era US Constitution authorized the collection of taxes and
import duties, in particular instances. Following the move westward,
it could typically be miles between homesteads. But people wanted
things that way. They could clear their fields, plant their crops and
shoot their game in almost total self-sufficiency. It was
inconceivable that the Founding Fathers, in any way consented, by
mentioning “taxes”, to allow future vote-hungry socialists to greatly
exceed the for-function-only taxes needed by a minimum government, and
to in fact STEAL the hard earned money of those expected to “respect”
the authority of their soon to be run-away government. To wit: It is
the DEGREE of taxation, not the ‘concept’ of taxation that is
unconstitutional. Why? Because the tone and SPIRIT of our
Constitution is to have the PEOPLE be in charge of government, not to
have government be in charge of the people! Nothing about our
founding document sanctions allowing the governing power to go to any
‘group’, simply because their numbers exceed those of another group.
Changing from a fair Representative Republic (sought but never
realized) to a socialist or communist form of government would require
scrapping our present Constitution—and THAT will require ratification
by 75% of the states. The latter isn’t likely to happen considering
that socialism demands are concentrated in densely populated urban
regions. People, there, are as far removed from the “homestead
mentality” of the Founding Fathers as could be possible.
The liberal media, including Fox News—to its rotten core—enjoy showing
our pseudo president in meetings with sick-at-their-stomach-looking
invites breathing the same tainted air as Obama. How “presidential”
will Obama look when he is dangling by his broken neck from a 1” hemp
rope, 300 feet above the reflection pools on the Washington Mall.
Millions of onlookers will either cry or CHEER watching his lifeless
body kick-off his signature wingtip shoes. Souvenir hunters will wade
out and fight over the shoes of THE most dastardly man ever to set
foot on American soil. Such a demise is what will await any elected
official—local, state or federal—who ever presumes that Governments
have a right to take the property of any hardworking person for
distribution to those unwilling to work at all. Entitlements are
SOCIALISM; so entitlements are UNCONSTITUTIONAL!
No person can be validated for public office by the illegal votes of
those who were BRIBED, as close to half of Obama’s voters were. That
means that Romney-Ryan won by a whopping 14%! Within the SPIRIT of
our Constitution, the Democrats and Obama were disqualified for public
office(s) the second the “Push Granny over the cliff” video aired.
Obama repeated that spurious and libelous innuendo about Republicans
hundreds of times. Since making spurious claims for personal gain is
fraud, and since fraud is a High Crime that the Constitution says can
remove public officials from office, Obama is disqualified for this
and at least a dozen other reasons from ever being allowed to FOUL the
sewers of the White House with his CRAP!!!!!
Protecting the people from ever again facing run-away taxation by a
non-deferential government, my New Constitution has these strict
limits on Government’s authority:
“The federal government’s only revenue tax shall be a single item tax
of the individual states and territories, in total, not to exceed 15%
of the previous year’s gross national product. The tax rate shall be
uniform for states in proportion to the total population of each
state, but may be adjusted downward for territories, only, if such
receive greatly reduced services. The House authors bills of
revenue, but no increase in federal taxes on the states shall be made
without 55% of the voters so approving on election day, and no
increase beyond 15% of the previous year’s gross national product
shall be allowed without an amendment to this constitution ratified in
a referendum by 75% of the People voting. Accounting methods for
determining gross national product shall be consistent and untampered
with for any purpose of tax increase. Government shall function
within its means, without an inflationary over-printing of currency.
The stated rate of return on government guaranteed bonds, and/or tax
exempt bonds, shall always be—at the time of purchase—15% lower than
similar non guaranteed, or non tax exempt bonds in the private
sector.* Publicly traded stocks shall be valued, at time of purchase
or sale, at the average worth in the prior six months.* The House
shall author bills of appropriation within budget; in addition, the
President shall have Line Item Veto power on all such bills, except if
overruled by a 60% vote of the House. 12 years from the adoption of
this New Constitution, and following a successful two year test in two
or more states, taxation in the USA shall be changed to sales tax and
fuel tax, only—at a max. conglomerate rate per annum of 35% of the GNP—
home food and medicines excluded. In addition, cities and counties
may charge the employers therein a nominal head tax on their full time
adult employees.*
Section 6: The House shall have the power to collect taxes, customs
duties and user fees that are due from the states and territories,
with the proviso that user fees shall not be applied to major areas of
government services so that the total cost of federal government
exceeds 15% of the previous year’s GNP. …”
“Except as allowed elsewhere in this constitution, there shall be no
taxes, fees, licenses or other payments that are prorated based on
income or personal property; nor taxes on the free transfer of estates
to rightful heirs and/or assigns.”
It is amazing how panic-stricken those on the right (who are in-the-
right) are because of the much discussed ’fiscal cliff’. First, that
law is a non law because such raises taxes without first having gotten
THE CONSENT OF THE GOVERNED! And as with 95% of the other laws that
shackle the workers, that law isn’t constitutional because such got
passed with the involvement of the US Senate, which is an OLIGARCHY.
Instead of worrying about short-term cash flow problems, ignore Obama
Care and REMOVE all taxation on businesses and over-regulation of
businesses—except those things necessary to protect the world
environment and the public health and safety. *** Unshackling
businesses will cause an immediate spurt in hiring and will cause the
GNP to increase so fast, there will be enough new cash flow to allow
time to devise FAIR and unthreatening private phase-ins to replace
Social Security and Medicare over the next 25 to 30 years. No
“Granny” needs to worry. The USA will honor our naively-made
promises, while allowing our booming, rejuvenated capitalist system to
correct 95% of our economic woes WITHOUT government involvement.
I would like to point out, that by my requiring stock purchases and
sales to be based on the average value in the previous six months
time, that most hurtful speculation of stocks, that can cause sudden
downturns in value, will be eliminated! This is especially important
to seniors, who, because of an illness or death of a spouse must sell
their stocks… regardless of when prudent insiders would recommend. I
have dozens of short clause or one sentence descriptions of business
restrictions that will benefit Americans far and wide. For example:
“Without a signed sales order coerced, baited or unsolicited goods are
free to the addressee. Any bank billing such goods shall pay the
addressee $25.00 per instance. Persons profiting from scam, confusing
promos, advertising or contracts, trickery, high-pressure sales
tactics, continuing charges for difficult-to-cancel, no longer desired
goods or services or any other willful dishonesty are committing a
felony. It is a 5-year felony to dictate or authorize—for undeserved
gain—the dunning, threatening or extorting of any Citizen. Banks or
businesses that loan or sell on credit shall not discriminate, nor
punitively vary charges, interest rates or fees.”
In the last two days I have gotten vibes from Senator Mitch McConnell
(wasn’t smiling); Alan Simpson (smiling) and Rudy Giuliani (smiling
big!) Since so few of you will openly acknowledge your media or
political affiliations, I am heartened that a few of you—some I know
the faces but can’t associate a name—are encouraging me to keep typing
away about my save-the-USA efforts. Whether you yourselves are
willing to act for my cause, please do tell others the location of
this niche where my thoughts can be read. My sincere thanks to
Google, a company in which I own a bit of stock, for giving me,
perhaps the last forum on Earth where my this-way-to-safety messages
can be gotten out. Pray that the US Secret Service will honor their
OATHS over their too-robot-like esprit de corps, and bring Barack
Obama to justice. Don’t place any credence on anything that the
Supreme Court does or doesn’t do—that body is criminal and rotten to
the core, just like the White House.
“Local, state and federal law enforcement, the courts, or any branch
or branches of the military or their respective parts shall at no time
be used in support of corruption in government by any public
official(s) at any level. *** Legal authority of law enforcement or
the courts [and the White House!] over the Citizens is voided if used
in support of corruption. Local, state and federal law enforcement
agencies shall not be organizationally affiliated, and persons or
groups, therein, shall not be presumed by law enforcement to be acting
lawfully solely because of such auspices.”
I’ve just gotten a Sarah Palin vibe. She does have her unique twist
on what the crux of our problems are. Keep thinking about me, folks.
Emotional thought is the same thing that powers prayers! “Pay It
Forward.” and … Long Live the USA!
Respectfully submitted,
John A. Armistead
Author and Patriot
>
> On Dec 7, 6:09 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> Layers of Reasoning in Science, Government and Life.
>
> Erskine Bowles was a guest on a Sunday news commentary show this
> morning. Several decades ago, in Charlotte, NC, I contacted him
> regarding obtaining venture capital for my invention, Plen-E-Air Slab
> floor system. [See my book: ’The Shortest Distance; Harmony Through
> Prosperity’.] He was most impressed. But being, primarily, a
> ‘finances’ person, he urged me to get back in touch after I’d done
> more development. Some years later, when, by chance, another ‘John
> Armistead’ happened to contact him, he phoned me, by mistake, and we
> had another nice chat. It wouldn’t be too long before he was madePresidentof the University of NC. Since obtaining finances for
>
> Layers of Reasoning in Science, Government and Life.
>
> Erskine Bowles was a guest on a Sunday news commentary show this
> morning. Several decades ago, in Charlotte, NC, I contacted him
> regarding obtaining venture capital for my invention, Plen-E-Air Slab
> floor system. [See my book: ’The Shortest Distance; Harmony Through
> Prosperity’.] He was most impressed. But being, primarily, a
> ‘finances’ person, he urged me to get back in touch after I’d done
> more development. Some years later, when, by chance, another ‘John
> Armistead’ happened to contact him, he phoned me, by mistake, and we
> inventions, obviously, wasn’t my forte (pronounced ‘fort’), I decided
> to write to Bowles and explain about my subsequent odyssey to get my
> (easy) disproofs of Einstein’s theories recognized. I never got a
> reply, probably because—once again—he is primarily a finances person.
>
> I’ve explained the above to illustrate how those with niche expertise
> can easily be over their heads when trying to solve (seemingly) too-
> complex problems—like correctingourlive-or-die governmental crises.
> to write to Bowles and explain about my subsequent odyssey to get my
> (easy) disproofs of Einstein’s theories recognized. I never got a
> reply, probably because—once again—he is primarily a finances person.
>
> I’ve explained the above to illustrate how those with niche expertise
> can easily be over their heads when trying to solve (seemingly) too-
> Over the last century, because of the undue influence of the media
> regarding whoourelected officials can be, it is mostly ego maniacs
NoEinstein
Dec 11, 2012, 8:07:24 PM12/11/12
to
On Dec 10, 10:50 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
Dear Readers: Even a highly motivated writer like me must, at times,
attend to the necessities of life—like grocery shopping. I have
gotten “vibes”, today, from John McCain and of all people Hillary R.
Clinton. She is scheduled to testify about Benghazi before some
committee next year. Since she certainly knows what Obama knew from
the first minutes of that fatal raid, she has it in her power to be
like George Washington and say: “I cannot tell a lie…” Barack Obama
did much more than just cut-down a cherry tree—he has cut-down the
entire US economy!
Like the master of Zen that he is, Obama manages to keep up
“appearances” of normalcy around him, by calmly looking (pseudo)
presidential. But I sense that those in the media and in politics are
beginning to talk about my had-been hush-hush charges of TREASON
against Obama. Realize that thousands of USA servicemen have been
wounded or died trying to protect other nations from socialist-
communistic leanings. I agree with Victoria Jackson that “though
(she) sing(s) like a mouse, there is a Communist in the White House.”
I also got vibes, today, from that fast talking Chris Mathews and that
other Chris, Wallace. Strangely, both were smiling. Oh, David
Axelrod was a not-happy vibe sender. Since he orchestrated the
unconstitutional “ground game” that he credits with giving Democrats
their “win”, he should probably be charged with treason, too. It
seems apt that he has an almost Hitler-like mustache. Hitler doesn’t
have an un violated grave, nor any marker. Such is the justice that
befalls all tyrants.
People, think SOLUTIONS rather than obstacles. My “NC”—which used our
present Constitution as its spine—can and will make the economy and
social climate in America much better for the vast majority of the
people, left and right. With love-for-humanity in your hearts, “Pay
It Forward!” and… Long Live the USA!
Respectfully submitted,
John A. Armistead
Author and Patriot
>
> means that Romney-Ryan won by a whopping 14%! Within the SPIRIT ofourConstitution, the Democrats and Obama were disqualified for public
> promises, while allowingourbooming, rejuvenated capitalist system to
> correct 95% ofoureconomic woes WITHOUT government involvement.
> the core, just like the White ...
>
> read more »
>
Dear Readers: Even a highly motivated writer like me must, at times,
attend to the necessities of life—like grocery shopping. I have
gotten “vibes”, today, from John McCain and of all people Hillary R.
Clinton. She is scheduled to testify about Benghazi before some
committee next year. Since she certainly knows what Obama knew from
the first minutes of that fatal raid, she has it in her power to be
like George Washington and say: “I cannot tell a lie…” Barack Obama
did much more than just cut-down a cherry tree—he has cut-down the
entire US economy!
Like the master of Zen that he is, Obama manages to keep up
“appearances” of normalcy around him, by calmly looking (pseudo)
presidential. But I sense that those in the media and in politics are
beginning to talk about my had-been hush-hush charges of TREASON
against Obama. Realize that thousands of USA servicemen have been
wounded or died trying to protect other nations from socialist-
communistic leanings. I agree with Victoria Jackson that “though
(she) sing(s) like a mouse, there is a Communist in the White House.”
I also got vibes, today, from that fast talking Chris Mathews and that
other Chris, Wallace. Strangely, both were smiling. Oh, David
Axelrod was a not-happy vibe sender. Since he orchestrated the
unconstitutional “ground game” that he credits with giving Democrats
their “win”, he should probably be charged with treason, too. It
seems apt that he has an almost Hitler-like mustache. Hitler doesn’t
have an un violated grave, nor any marker. Such is the justice that
befalls all tyrants.
People, think SOLUTIONS rather than obstacles. My “NC”—which used our
present Constitution as its spine—can and will make the economy and
social climate in America much better for the vast majority of the
people, left and right. With love-for-humanity in your hearts, “Pay
It Forward!” and… Long Live the USA!
Respectfully submitted,
John A. Armistead
Author and Patriot
>
> On Dec 9, 3:37 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> Attitude will determine the outcome.
>
> One should have expected that Fox News big wigs (or should I say:
> ‘toupees‘), like Britt Hume and Bret Baier, would be reveling to say
> “thePresident” and “the next four years” while talking about the
>
> Attitude will determine the outcome.
>
> One should have expected that Fox News big wigs (or should I say:
> ‘toupees‘), like Britt Hume and Bret Baier, would be reveling to say
> ILLEGAL and UNCONSTITUTIONAL would-be administration under Obama. The
> media, that will so justly be put in its place under my New
> Constitution, is trying to set the “attitude” tone by being all smiles
> that Obama’s dictatorial demands to increase taxes on the rich now has
> a mandate. But nothing could be further from the truth!
>
> The pioneer era US Constitution authorized the collection of taxes and
> import duties, in particular instances. Following the move westward,
> it could typically be miles between homesteads. But people wanted
> things that way. They could clear their fields, plant their crops and
> shoot their game in almost total self-sufficiency. It was
> inconceivable that the Founding Fathers, in any way consented, by
> mentioning “taxes”, to allow future vote-hungry socialists to greatly
> exceed the for-function-only taxes needed by a minimum government, and
> to in fact STEAL the hard earned money of those expected to “respect”
> the authority of their soon to be run-away government. To wit: It is
> the DEGREE of taxation, not the ‘concept’ of taxation that is
> unconstitutional. Why? Because the tone and SPIRIT ofour
> Constitution is to have the PEOPLE be in charge of government, not to
> have government be in charge of the people! Nothing aboutour
> founding document sanctions allowing the governing power to go to any
> ‘group’, simply because their numbers exceed those of another group.
> Changing from a fair Representative Republic (sought but never
> realized) to a socialist or communist form of government would require
> scrappingourpresent Constitution—and THAT will require ratification
> media, that will so justly be put in its place under my New
> Constitution, is trying to set the “attitude” tone by being all smiles
> that Obama’s dictatorial demands to increase taxes on the rich now has
> a mandate. But nothing could be further from the truth!
>
> The pioneer era US Constitution authorized the collection of taxes and
> import duties, in particular instances. Following the move westward,
> it could typically be miles between homesteads. But people wanted
> things that way. They could clear their fields, plant their crops and
> shoot their game in almost total self-sufficiency. It was
> inconceivable that the Founding Fathers, in any way consented, by
> mentioning “taxes”, to allow future vote-hungry socialists to greatly
> exceed the for-function-only taxes needed by a minimum government, and
> to in fact STEAL the hard earned money of those expected to “respect”
> the authority of their soon to be run-away government. To wit: It is
> the DEGREE of taxation, not the ‘concept’ of taxation that is
> unconstitutional. Why? Because the tone and SPIRIT ofour
> Constitution is to have the PEOPLE be in charge of government, not to
> have government be in charge of the people! Nothing aboutour
> founding document sanctions allowing the governing power to go to any
> ‘group’, simply because their numbers exceed those of another group.
> Changing from a fair Representative Republic (sought but never
> realized) to a socialist or communist form of government would require
> by 75% of the states. The latter isn’t likely to happen considering
> that socialism demands are concentrated in densely populated urban
> regions. People, there, are as far removed from the “homestead
> mentality” of the Founding Fathers as could be possible.
>
> The liberal media, including Fox News—to its rotten core—enjoy showingourpseudopresidentin meetings with sick-at-their-stomach-looking
> that socialism demands are concentrated in densely populated urban
> regions. People, there, are as far removed from the “homestead
> mentality” of the Founding Fathers as could be possible.
>
> invites breathing the same tainted air as Obama. How “presidential”
> will Obama look when he is dangling by his broken neck from a 1” hemp
> rope, 300 feet above the reflection pools on the Washington Mall.
> Millions of onlookers will either cry or CHEER watching his lifeless
> body kick-off his signature wingtip shoes. Souvenir hunters will wade
> out and fight over the shoes of THE most dastardly man ever to set
> foot on American soil. Such a demise is what will await any elected
> official—local, state or federal—who ever presumes that Governments
> have a right to take the property of any hardworking person for
> distribution to those unwilling to work at all. Entitlements are
> SOCIALISM; so entitlements are UNCONSTITUTIONAL!
>
> No person can be validated for public office by the illegal votes of
> those who were BRIBED, as close to half of Obama’svoterswere. That
> will Obama look when he is dangling by his broken neck from a 1” hemp
> rope, 300 feet above the reflection pools on the Washington Mall.
> Millions of onlookers will either cry or CHEER watching his lifeless
> body kick-off his signature wingtip shoes. Souvenir hunters will wade
> out and fight over the shoes of THE most dastardly man ever to set
> foot on American soil. Such a demise is what will await any elected
> official—local, state or federal—who ever presumes that Governments
> have a right to take the property of any hardworking person for
> distribution to those unwilling to work at all. Entitlements are
> SOCIALISM; so entitlements are UNCONSTITUTIONAL!
>
> No person can be validated for public office by the illegal votes of
> means that Romney-Ryan won by a whopping 14%! Within the SPIRIT ofourConstitution, the Democrats and Obama were disqualified for public
> office(s) the second the “Push Granny over the cliff” video aired.
> Obama repeated that spurious and libelous innuendo about Republicans
> hundreds of times. Since making spurious claims for personal gain is
> fraud, and since fraud is a High Crime that the Constitution says can
> remove public officials from office, Obama is disqualified for this
> and at least a dozen other reasons from ever being allowed to FOUL the
> sewers of the White House with his CRAP!!!!!
>
> Protecting the people from ever again facing run-away taxation by a
> non-deferential government, my New Constitution has these strict
> limits on Government’s authority:
>
> “The federal government’s only revenue tax shall be a single item tax
> of the individual states and territories, in total, not to exceed 15%
> of the previous year’s gross national product. The tax rate shall be
> uniform for states in proportion to the total population of each
> state, but may be adjusted downward for territories, only, if such
> receive greatly reduced services. The House authors bills of
> revenue, but no increase in federal taxes on the states shall be made
> without 55% of thevotersso approving on election day, and no
> Obama repeated that spurious and libelous innuendo about Republicans
> hundreds of times. Since making spurious claims for personal gain is
> fraud, and since fraud is a High Crime that the Constitution says can
> remove public officials from office, Obama is disqualified for this
> and at least a dozen other reasons from ever being allowed to FOUL the
> sewers of the White House with his CRAP!!!!!
>
> Protecting the people from ever again facing run-away taxation by a
> non-deferential government, my New Constitution has these strict
> limits on Government’s authority:
>
> “The federal government’s only revenue tax shall be a single item tax
> of the individual states and territories, in total, not to exceed 15%
> of the previous year’s gross national product. The tax rate shall be
> uniform for states in proportion to the total population of each
> state, but may be adjusted downward for territories, only, if such
> receive greatly reduced services. The House authors bills of
> revenue, but no increase in federal taxes on the states shall be made
> increase beyond 15% of the previous year’s gross national product
> shall be allowed without an amendment to this constitution ratified in
> a referendum by 75% of the People voting. Accounting methods for
> determining gross national product shall be consistent and untampered
> with for any purpose of tax increase. Government shall function
> within its means, without an inflationary over-printing of currency.
> The stated rate of return on government guaranteed bonds, and/or tax
> exempt bonds, shall always be—at the time of purchase—15% lower than
> similar non guaranteed, or non tax exempt bonds in the private
> sector.* Publicly traded stocks shall be valued, at time of purchase
> or sale, at the average worth in the prior six months.* The House
> shall author bills of appropriation within budget; in addition, thePresidentshall have Line Item Veto power on all such bills, except if
> shall be allowed without an amendment to this constitution ratified in
> a referendum by 75% of the People voting. Accounting methods for
> determining gross national product shall be consistent and untampered
> with for any purpose of tax increase. Government shall function
> within its means, without an inflationary over-printing of currency.
> The stated rate of return on government guaranteed bonds, and/or tax
> exempt bonds, shall always be—at the time of purchase—15% lower than
> similar non guaranteed, or non tax exempt bonds in the private
> sector.* Publicly traded stocks shall be valued, at time of purchase
> or sale, at the average worth in the prior six months.* The House
> correct 95% ofoureconomic woes WITHOUT government involvement.
>
> read more »
NoEinstein
Dec 12, 2012, 11:23:01 AM12/12/12
to
On Dec 11, 8:07 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
… the usual suspects.
For good or bad, Fox News is my main window-on-the-world. Though I’m
a very busy person, I leave that show running-in-the-background while
I work on other tasks. I can do that, because super geniuses, like
me, can think polyphasically. That means making decisions on more
than one thing while thinking about another. Recently, when I went
for my six month dental checkup, the dental technician asked her
perfunctory, “How are you? Have you had any problems?” Most people
going to the dentist would—from years of habit—be thinking about their
teeth and their likelihood of needing an uncomfortable and expensive
procedure. But because I am polyphasic, I was thinking, perhaps,
about the turn-a-deaf-ear nature of our media to any news story that
might require their commentators to use more than the maximum two to
two and a half levels of reasoning that they are capable of. Any
“news” discussion, such as my New Constitution, would require eight or
nine layers of reasoning—totally over the heads of anyone but me (when
considered as a TOTAL document, but not as a series of more or less
isolated parts).
I was so deep in thought upon hearing that nice lady’s questions that
I had to ask her to repeat what she had just said. Even then, I was
still hearing those questions with only a tiny part of my brain.
Because I am a highly moral person—as geniuses of all degrees usually
are—I was in an absolute quandary whether to answer, truthfully, about
my trials and tribulations in trying to save-the-world; giving her my
detailed personal dental assessment based on my flossing and brushing
rituals, and sometimes sensitivity to hot or cold; or giving her a
piece-of-my-mind for interrupting my thought processes. After, what
must have seemed, to her, a long time for me to answer such simple
questions, I looked her straight in the face—probably with a slightly
perturbed look befitting my complex reasoning—and said, “As far as I
know, I am fine.”
Since I am an inventor as well as a highly-motivated and energetic
person, it is rare that I can sincerely tell the world I am “fine”.
That is because those wishing to “improve things” must be capable of
seeing the flaws in most that is going on around them, in order to
form creative concepts for improving things. I am “fine” only after
the solution to some pressing problem has been determined, Then, I am
not just “fine”, I am jubilant! I LIVE for those moments when I can
feel jubilant like that! One such moment was when I realized that the
group-against-group fights that are constantly polarizing the citizens
of this country and undermining our social and economic fabric, can
forever be purged from our governmental processes. How? By the
simple expedient of requiring all public office holders to take the
following oath (that is expanded, in a separate location, to be under
penalty of DEATH for elected officials (but not employees):
“All local, state and federal office holders and employees—upon taking
office or assuming employment—shall take the following oath: “I,
(Name), promise to serve and be deferential to the People, and to be
unbiased toward any group with a pro democracy, pro fairness
ideology. I swear to honor and uphold the full civil rights of the
citizens, as guaranteed by the New Constitution, and I shall expect my
coworkers and superiors to do the same. I understand that my
employment in or by government is conditional upon my adherence to
this oath.”
And… “The Will of the People is the foundation of government. So,
Citizens’ votes shall have parity without compromise. *** Principles
of fair play and democracy shall have supremacy in the USA. *** Any
public office holder who disavows or manifests disagreement with the
latter shall be guilty of treason. Those found guilty can be punished
up to and including the *** death penalty ***. Any government
employee, media figure or private person(s) who uses the authority or
influence of their job, or their celebrity, to argue against democracy
and fair play shall be guilty of a felony. Note: Fair play shall be
defined as any individual or group action that achieves positive
results without bias or partiality of the weak toward the strong nor
of the strong toward the weak and which doesn’t selfishly or
maliciously exploit any individual, group or class. None of the
latter shall be allowed to claim the personal property of others, or
to limit the rights of others—whether by government edict or private
business rules—without first obtaining the free consent of the
property holder, or of the person or group whose property is being
taken or whose rights are being limited. In no case shall fair play
be defined as an entitlement of an individual, group or class to have
equality of lifestyle, material possessions or any assisted living
equivalent thereof paid for by others. In the USA the ideal shall be
to have reasonable equality of *** opportunity *** for self
determination of one’s own lifestyle and level of personal achievement
within our Free Enterprise System *** without requiring government
oversight.”
Since socialism isn’t fair, by the above most clear definition, any
elected official who proposes a bill or a governmental procedure that
is in any way socialistic will be arrested and tried for treason. My
hope is, that after Obama and a few others are so hanged, that
socialism will become a non issue in this country.
Unions, that are mostly in their death throes, are physically fighting
to have more power than their members are entitled to have. Since
that isn’t FAIR, then those who lobby for favoritism for unions (or
for any faction whatsoever!) will be arrested and charged with a
felony. Once people realize that there is nothing to be gained by
joining any union, those will just fade away. My “NC” requires that
employees be treated fairly, so businesses should start being more
considerate. Once the economy is flourishing again, few will be
fretting that their standards of living aren’t high enough.
I’ve gotten Charles Krauthammer vibes the last two days. He had his
usual drug-numbed facial expression manifesting the Tourette’s
Syndrome he has had to deal with. I place his IQ at about 135, close
to the threshold where moral sensibilities start dominating business
or societal dictates. Numbers of times I have expressed my desire to
see him out of the media. That isn’t because I disagree with his
“almost there” conservative assessments, but because he always stops
just short of saying: “Send the rascals to jail! They are in
violation of the very principles on which this country was founded!”
Instead, he must always appear innocuous to his liberal bosses both at
Fox, and at the newspapers that run his syndicated columns. In short,
he has been bought. If he had to choose between leading a REVOLUTION
to save the USA from socialism, or to continue to get paid high
salaries for compromising his principles, he will always choose the
latter, and to hell with what happens to the USA.
Judy Miller, with her locked-in surgical and botox petrified smile, is
placed on the left (viewed first) on those Fox commentary panels of
experts. That is done so that casual viewers will suppose that the
world is just fine, and continue to tune in rather than jump over the
nearest fiscal cliff. There must be red neon signs all over Fox that
flash SMILE, SMILE so those like Jon Scott will get out of his “red
pickup truck” blues and make the viewers feel all warm and cozy
inside. One thing Scott did a couple of weeks ago was to congratulate
Joe Biden on the occasion of Biden’s 70th birthday. That is about the
same as putting on funny hats and blowing Chinese snake whistles to
celebrate one of Hitler’s birthdays. Does Scott have no un bought
moral sensibilities?
Sheppard Smith has the right idea by mostly just reciting the news
rather than giving instant assessments according to the liberal spin,
as most on Fox do. He has disappointed me just once when he was
“covering” the story of a woman whose husband disappeared while they
were jet-skiing in the Rio Grande. Smith, apparently, is an avid jet-
skier. He presumed to act as a lie-detector to the wife’s story that
her husband had been shot by Mexicans, and that she had had to flee to
save her life. Whether she was telling the truth or not, no one
working for the “news” should give their personal opinions on
ANYTHING! Under my “NC”, those working for the media have no freedom
of speech! To wit:
“1st Amendment: No law shall be made regarding the establishment of
peaceable religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, but
government, its campaigns, processes, slogans, and disbursements shall
be secular. *** No law nor private or civil action shall abridge: the
freedom of speech of those Citizens who don’t work for the media; the
I hate it that Fox chooses to show, with regularity, that intended-
only-for-his-clique “mean looking” photo of Travon Martin, the
brutally murdered FL teen. The “racist” sentiment at Fox—from Geraldo
Rivera on down—is that George Zimmerman was acting in self defense.
Megyn Kelly, who comes close to being rational most days, chides the
police for not releasing the color photo sooner, that shows blood on
Zimmerman’s upper lip. Blood is, of course, likely to be the final
clue sending Zimmerman to jail for life! Why so? Because there was
zero blood found on the concrete sidewalk where Zimmerman says he was
held down and punched repeatedly. And there were zero splatters of
Zimmerman’s blood on Martin’s hand and clothing. Zimmerman also
claimed that his head was scratched by rubbing against the sidewalk.
Yet there were no abrasions on his head at all—only short lacerations
likely caused by his own needing-to-be-trimmed fingernails well AFTER
Martin had been shot and killed. And that broken nose? It was broken
from the right side of his face, unlike the way right-handed Martin
would have delivered the nose-breaking blow. So, it is a near
certainty that Zimmerman punched himself in the nose trying to FAKE
his having acted in self defense. The police know this and they will
win their case without much difficulty.
When I wish that Barack Obama be hanged, bloodlessly, for his treason,
I will feel neither joy nor remorse. For a millennia to come, his
death will be recognized as the world’s turning point away from group-
against-group, and nation-against-nation divisiveness and jealousy,
and toward the “like” if not LOVE of our neighbors the world over.
Consider LOSING your biases, people. “Pay It Forward!” and… “Long
Author and Patriot
[and *1/32 Daniel Boone!]
>
… the usual suspects.
For good or bad, Fox News is my main window-on-the-world. Though I’m
a very busy person, I leave that show running-in-the-background while
I work on other tasks. I can do that, because super geniuses, like
me, can think polyphasically. That means making decisions on more
than one thing while thinking about another. Recently, when I went
for my six month dental checkup, the dental technician asked her
perfunctory, “How are you? Have you had any problems?” Most people
going to the dentist would—from years of habit—be thinking about their
teeth and their likelihood of needing an uncomfortable and expensive
procedure. But because I am polyphasic, I was thinking, perhaps,
about the turn-a-deaf-ear nature of our media to any news story that
might require their commentators to use more than the maximum two to
two and a half levels of reasoning that they are capable of. Any
“news” discussion, such as my New Constitution, would require eight or
nine layers of reasoning—totally over the heads of anyone but me (when
considered as a TOTAL document, but not as a series of more or less
isolated parts).
I was so deep in thought upon hearing that nice lady’s questions that
I had to ask her to repeat what she had just said. Even then, I was
still hearing those questions with only a tiny part of my brain.
Because I am a highly moral person—as geniuses of all degrees usually
are—I was in an absolute quandary whether to answer, truthfully, about
my trials and tribulations in trying to save-the-world; giving her my
detailed personal dental assessment based on my flossing and brushing
rituals, and sometimes sensitivity to hot or cold; or giving her a
piece-of-my-mind for interrupting my thought processes. After, what
must have seemed, to her, a long time for me to answer such simple
questions, I looked her straight in the face—probably with a slightly
perturbed look befitting my complex reasoning—and said, “As far as I
know, I am fine.”
Since I am an inventor as well as a highly-motivated and energetic
person, it is rare that I can sincerely tell the world I am “fine”.
That is because those wishing to “improve things” must be capable of
seeing the flaws in most that is going on around them, in order to
form creative concepts for improving things. I am “fine” only after
the solution to some pressing problem has been determined, Then, I am
not just “fine”, I am jubilant! I LIVE for those moments when I can
feel jubilant like that! One such moment was when I realized that the
group-against-group fights that are constantly polarizing the citizens
of this country and undermining our social and economic fabric, can
forever be purged from our governmental processes. How? By the
simple expedient of requiring all public office holders to take the
following oath (that is expanded, in a separate location, to be under
penalty of DEATH for elected officials (but not employees):
“All local, state and federal office holders and employees—upon taking
office or assuming employment—shall take the following oath: “I,
(Name), promise to serve and be deferential to the People, and to be
unbiased toward any group with a pro democracy, pro fairness
ideology. I swear to honor and uphold the full civil rights of the
citizens, as guaranteed by the New Constitution, and I shall expect my
coworkers and superiors to do the same. I understand that my
employment in or by government is conditional upon my adherence to
this oath.”
And… “The Will of the People is the foundation of government. So,
Citizens’ votes shall have parity without compromise. *** Principles
of fair play and democracy shall have supremacy in the USA. *** Any
public office holder who disavows or manifests disagreement with the
latter shall be guilty of treason. Those found guilty can be punished
up to and including the *** death penalty ***. Any government
employee, media figure or private person(s) who uses the authority or
influence of their job, or their celebrity, to argue against democracy
and fair play shall be guilty of a felony. Note: Fair play shall be
defined as any individual or group action that achieves positive
results without bias or partiality of the weak toward the strong nor
of the strong toward the weak and which doesn’t selfishly or
maliciously exploit any individual, group or class. None of the
latter shall be allowed to claim the personal property of others, or
to limit the rights of others—whether by government edict or private
business rules—without first obtaining the free consent of the
property holder, or of the person or group whose property is being
taken or whose rights are being limited. In no case shall fair play
be defined as an entitlement of an individual, group or class to have
equality of lifestyle, material possessions or any assisted living
equivalent thereof paid for by others. In the USA the ideal shall be
to have reasonable equality of *** opportunity *** for self
determination of one’s own lifestyle and level of personal achievement
within our Free Enterprise System *** without requiring government
oversight.”
Since socialism isn’t fair, by the above most clear definition, any
elected official who proposes a bill or a governmental procedure that
is in any way socialistic will be arrested and tried for treason. My
hope is, that after Obama and a few others are so hanged, that
socialism will become a non issue in this country.
Unions, that are mostly in their death throes, are physically fighting
to have more power than their members are entitled to have. Since
that isn’t FAIR, then those who lobby for favoritism for unions (or
for any faction whatsoever!) will be arrested and charged with a
felony. Once people realize that there is nothing to be gained by
joining any union, those will just fade away. My “NC” requires that
employees be treated fairly, so businesses should start being more
considerate. Once the economy is flourishing again, few will be
fretting that their standards of living aren’t high enough.
I’ve gotten Charles Krauthammer vibes the last two days. He had his
usual drug-numbed facial expression manifesting the Tourette’s
Syndrome he has had to deal with. I place his IQ at about 135, close
to the threshold where moral sensibilities start dominating business
or societal dictates. Numbers of times I have expressed my desire to
see him out of the media. That isn’t because I disagree with his
“almost there” conservative assessments, but because he always stops
just short of saying: “Send the rascals to jail! They are in
violation of the very principles on which this country was founded!”
Instead, he must always appear innocuous to his liberal bosses both at
Fox, and at the newspapers that run his syndicated columns. In short,
he has been bought. If he had to choose between leading a REVOLUTION
to save the USA from socialism, or to continue to get paid high
salaries for compromising his principles, he will always choose the
latter, and to hell with what happens to the USA.
Judy Miller, with her locked-in surgical and botox petrified smile, is
placed on the left (viewed first) on those Fox commentary panels of
experts. That is done so that casual viewers will suppose that the
world is just fine, and continue to tune in rather than jump over the
nearest fiscal cliff. There must be red neon signs all over Fox that
flash SMILE, SMILE so those like Jon Scott will get out of his “red
pickup truck” blues and make the viewers feel all warm and cozy
inside. One thing Scott did a couple of weeks ago was to congratulate
Joe Biden on the occasion of Biden’s 70th birthday. That is about the
same as putting on funny hats and blowing Chinese snake whistles to
celebrate one of Hitler’s birthdays. Does Scott have no un bought
moral sensibilities?
Sheppard Smith has the right idea by mostly just reciting the news
rather than giving instant assessments according to the liberal spin,
as most on Fox do. He has disappointed me just once when he was
“covering” the story of a woman whose husband disappeared while they
were jet-skiing in the Rio Grande. Smith, apparently, is an avid jet-
skier. He presumed to act as a lie-detector to the wife’s story that
her husband had been shot by Mexicans, and that she had had to flee to
save her life. Whether she was telling the truth or not, no one
working for the “news” should give their personal opinions on
ANYTHING! Under my “NC”, those working for the media have no freedom
of speech! To wit:
“1st Amendment: No law shall be made regarding the establishment of
peaceable religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, but
government, its campaigns, processes, slogans, and disbursements shall
freedom of speech of those Citizens who don’t work for the media; the
freedom of a fair and pro-democracy press or other medium; the right
of People to peaceably assemble; and the right of any Citizen or group
to petition government or any of its branches or departments for
redress of grievances.”
of People to peaceably assemble; and the right of any Citizen or group
to petition government or any of its branches or departments for
I hate it that Fox chooses to show, with regularity, that intended-
only-for-his-clique “mean looking” photo of Travon Martin, the
brutally murdered FL teen. The “racist” sentiment at Fox—from Geraldo
Rivera on down—is that George Zimmerman was acting in self defense.
Megyn Kelly, who comes close to being rational most days, chides the
police for not releasing the color photo sooner, that shows blood on
Zimmerman’s upper lip. Blood is, of course, likely to be the final
clue sending Zimmerman to jail for life! Why so? Because there was
zero blood found on the concrete sidewalk where Zimmerman says he was
held down and punched repeatedly. And there were zero splatters of
Zimmerman’s blood on Martin’s hand and clothing. Zimmerman also
claimed that his head was scratched by rubbing against the sidewalk.
Yet there were no abrasions on his head at all—only short lacerations
likely caused by his own needing-to-be-trimmed fingernails well AFTER
Martin had been shot and killed. And that broken nose? It was broken
from the right side of his face, unlike the way right-handed Martin
would have delivered the nose-breaking blow. So, it is a near
certainty that Zimmerman punched himself in the nose trying to FAKE
his having acted in self defense. The police know this and they will
win their case without much difficulty.
When I wish that Barack Obama be hanged, bloodlessly, for his treason,
I will feel neither joy nor remorse. For a millennia to come, his
death will be recognized as the world’s turning point away from group-
against-group, and nation-against-nation divisiveness and jealousy,
and toward the “like” if not LOVE of our neighbors the world over.
Consider LOSING your biases, people. “Pay It Forward!” and… “Long
Live the USA!”
Respectfully submitted,
*John A. Armistead
Respectfully submitted,
Author and Patriot
[and *1/32 Daniel Boone!]
NoEinstein
Dec 13, 2012, 6:28:55 AM12/13/12
to
On Dec 12, 11:23 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
Me thinks the ‘plot’ thickens.
Obama is pinning his hopes for surviving as the anti-Christ on his
being successful in convincing the media, and the airheads in
Washington, that everything is ’normal.’ He does that by pretending
to be his suave self. The latter is signified by his pathologically
unwavering voice under stress and by the artificially casual way that
he walks down the steps of Air Force One, or strides across the White
House Lawn, while waving with his basketball-size hands. He seems so
at ease, that few would suspect that his house-of-cards, the entire
Executive Branch, is beginning to come tumbling down.
Since his criminally corrupt “election”, Obama is more dictatorial
than we had almost gotten used to. Most, who have ever actually read
the, yes mostly boring, Constitution all-the-way-through will realize
that the president isn’t authorized to dictate to Congress at all.
Obama supposes that because he campaigned on raising taxes on the rich
that such is a foregone conclusion. But nothing is a forgone
conclusion simply because spineless John Boehner seems resigned to be
dictated to. Yes, Boehner talks about wanting a balanced approach
that includes huge tax reductions. But that is the same-ol’-same-ol’
that isn’t likely to convince the Democrats to back off. And it is
angering the Republican House majority that the economic condition of
this country is being tampered with.
There are a number of divisive “social platform issues”. But the only
issue threatening to bring down this country is our finances. Either
we solve the money issues or die as a nation. Because of literal
blackmail by the huge senior citizen voting bloc, both parties have
reasoned, wrongly, that they can only get elected by appeasing seniors
and finding ways to continue to finance Social Security and Medicare.
Obama’s way is to tax the rich into poverty—which is of course
unconstitutional. The Republicans’ maximum two layers of reasoning is
to “continue”-but-cut entitlements. By applying about six layers of
reasoning, as only a super genius like me can do, there is a solution
that protects seniors AND starts lowering our deficit, immediately.
The nutshell of that is as follows:
As quickly as possible, the private sector should devise conglomerate,
SINGLE PAYMENT insurance plans that will cover the medical and
survival-level finances of individuals for life, regardless of their
present health. For those over the age of 55, the government will
continue to honor the promises made to them; confirm that fact in an
official, mailed-out contract; and continue to send SS payments and
make the same level of Medicare payments as are presently covered—once
those people reach age 65. Those younger than age 55 and still
working (in our to-be flourishing economy) will be required, by a new
law, to take the money that used to be withheld for SS and put such
into (conditionally) un tapable escrow accounts.
Those individual accounts will be mutual funds that invest in the
stock and/or bond markets. The objective is to require each person to
accumulate enough money so that, statistically, they will never be a
burden to friends, relatives nor government for their health or
survival necessities for life. The escrow accounts can’t be tapped
until the above-mentioned conglomerate, single payment insurance and
living expenses plan has been purchased. The cost of the latter will
vary favoring the following: Those who already own their own home will
have only their utility bills and home repair bills to pay. That is
because my “NC” forbids property taxes. In the latter’s place will be
a ‘head tax’ ONLY on those people who are working. So, the objective
of most people should be to get an acceptable place to live that can
be paid for in full. Even if such a person becomes unemployed along
the way, there will be no taxes on the food and medicines they buy,
under my “NC”. Having a paid-for place to live should lower the
single payment insurance and living necessities policy to about,
perhaps (my guesstimate) $200,000.00 per person. Once Americans
realize the importance of paying-off their mortgages and getting
enough money to purchase that SINGLE PAYMENT insurance and living
necessities policy, they will be inspired to put a higher percentage
of their earnings into their escrow accounts. These last two
paragraphs explain how governments, after a 25 to 30 year phase-out
period for SS and Medicare, will never again be burdened with insuring
or caring for anyone!
The first order of business, informally or formally, will be for the
House to realize that such is the ONLY still-functioning branch of
government. The US Senate is unconstitutional and choked with
criminal, socialist Democrats, negating any authority it ever
“assumed” that it had. The Executive Branch and the Judicial Branch
are rotten-to-the-core, and shall not be respected nor deferred to in
any wise.
Perhaps the reason Mitch McConnell seemed so somber in that ‘vibe’
that I got from him is because he knows he is no longer needed in
Washington. I’m continuing to get smiling vibes from Alan Simpson,
however. My reasoning is that he values having solutions be found to
fix our broken government more than he desires being caught in the
mire that is the Senate. It would be the joy of his life to see
government finally be fixed! Now that’s patriotic!
The second order of business of the House is to vote mentally ill John
Boehner out of his speaker-ship. The NEW speaker should declare to
the world that no rulings made by the US Supreme court since Obama
wormed-his-way-into-office are valid. That means Obama Care is
permanently DEAD! Upon the announcement of such fact, the stock
market should skyrocket!
The third order of business of the House is to demand that Barack
Obama show PHYSICAL PROOF of his being a US Citizen. Since he,
obviously, can’t do that—or he would have already done so—Obama shall
immediately be arrested for treason along with Joe Biden and a to-be-
assembled list of his most vocal socialist cohorts. That list shall
include Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid. Since Bill Clinton knowingly
lied about the US job and economic situation, dozens of times, in
campaigning for Obama, and since Clinton is credited with Obama’s
“winning” (ha!) then Bill Clinton should be tried for treason, too.
Hillary Clinton “may” can save her husband’s neck if she will
immediately BLOW THE WHISTLE on Obama regarding her having been BRIBED
with an implied 2008 promise of her being considered as his VP. She
can also come clean about how, from the first hours, Obama instructed
Susan Rice to LIE about the motivation for the Benghazi raid being
because of a barely-ever-viewed video—so that his “image” with Muslims
wouldn’t be tarnished.
Realize, people, that it is the SPIRIT of the original Constitution
that demands that all of these things be done. My “NC” is just a
clarified and expanded version of the original that will require no
court, ever, to explain what such means! So, the Supreme Court can go
to hell! And I say that sincerely!
With Obama physically EXTRACTED from the White House, and Mitt Romney
expeditiously moved in before the end of the year, 2013 should be the
year of REBIRTH of the USA as THE Greatest Nation in the World! “Pay
> of this country and underminingoursocial and economic fabric, can
> forever be purged fromourgovernmental processes. How? By the
> withinourFree Enterprise System *** without requiring government
> ...
>
> read more »
>
Me thinks the ‘plot’ thickens.
Obama is pinning his hopes for surviving as the anti-Christ on his
being successful in convincing the media, and the airheads in
Washington, that everything is ’normal.’ He does that by pretending
to be his suave self. The latter is signified by his pathologically
unwavering voice under stress and by the artificially casual way that
he walks down the steps of Air Force One, or strides across the White
House Lawn, while waving with his basketball-size hands. He seems so
at ease, that few would suspect that his house-of-cards, the entire
Executive Branch, is beginning to come tumbling down.
Since his criminally corrupt “election”, Obama is more dictatorial
than we had almost gotten used to. Most, who have ever actually read
the, yes mostly boring, Constitution all-the-way-through will realize
that the president isn’t authorized to dictate to Congress at all.
Obama supposes that because he campaigned on raising taxes on the rich
that such is a foregone conclusion. But nothing is a forgone
conclusion simply because spineless John Boehner seems resigned to be
dictated to. Yes, Boehner talks about wanting a balanced approach
that includes huge tax reductions. But that is the same-ol’-same-ol’
that isn’t likely to convince the Democrats to back off. And it is
angering the Republican House majority that the economic condition of
this country is being tampered with.
There are a number of divisive “social platform issues”. But the only
issue threatening to bring down this country is our finances. Either
we solve the money issues or die as a nation. Because of literal
blackmail by the huge senior citizen voting bloc, both parties have
reasoned, wrongly, that they can only get elected by appeasing seniors
and finding ways to continue to finance Social Security and Medicare.
Obama’s way is to tax the rich into poverty—which is of course
unconstitutional. The Republicans’ maximum two layers of reasoning is
to “continue”-but-cut entitlements. By applying about six layers of
reasoning, as only a super genius like me can do, there is a solution
that protects seniors AND starts lowering our deficit, immediately.
The nutshell of that is as follows:
As quickly as possible, the private sector should devise conglomerate,
SINGLE PAYMENT insurance plans that will cover the medical and
survival-level finances of individuals for life, regardless of their
present health. For those over the age of 55, the government will
continue to honor the promises made to them; confirm that fact in an
official, mailed-out contract; and continue to send SS payments and
make the same level of Medicare payments as are presently covered—once
those people reach age 65. Those younger than age 55 and still
working (in our to-be flourishing economy) will be required, by a new
law, to take the money that used to be withheld for SS and put such
into (conditionally) un tapable escrow accounts.
Those individual accounts will be mutual funds that invest in the
stock and/or bond markets. The objective is to require each person to
accumulate enough money so that, statistically, they will never be a
burden to friends, relatives nor government for their health or
survival necessities for life. The escrow accounts can’t be tapped
until the above-mentioned conglomerate, single payment insurance and
living expenses plan has been purchased. The cost of the latter will
vary favoring the following: Those who already own their own home will
have only their utility bills and home repair bills to pay. That is
because my “NC” forbids property taxes. In the latter’s place will be
a ‘head tax’ ONLY on those people who are working. So, the objective
of most people should be to get an acceptable place to live that can
be paid for in full. Even if such a person becomes unemployed along
the way, there will be no taxes on the food and medicines they buy,
under my “NC”. Having a paid-for place to live should lower the
single payment insurance and living necessities policy to about,
perhaps (my guesstimate) $200,000.00 per person. Once Americans
realize the importance of paying-off their mortgages and getting
enough money to purchase that SINGLE PAYMENT insurance and living
necessities policy, they will be inspired to put a higher percentage
of their earnings into their escrow accounts. These last two
paragraphs explain how governments, after a 25 to 30 year phase-out
period for SS and Medicare, will never again be burdened with insuring
or caring for anyone!
The first order of business, informally or formally, will be for the
House to realize that such is the ONLY still-functioning branch of
government. The US Senate is unconstitutional and choked with
criminal, socialist Democrats, negating any authority it ever
“assumed” that it had. The Executive Branch and the Judicial Branch
are rotten-to-the-core, and shall not be respected nor deferred to in
any wise.
Perhaps the reason Mitch McConnell seemed so somber in that ‘vibe’
that I got from him is because he knows he is no longer needed in
Washington. I’m continuing to get smiling vibes from Alan Simpson,
however. My reasoning is that he values having solutions be found to
fix our broken government more than he desires being caught in the
mire that is the Senate. It would be the joy of his life to see
government finally be fixed! Now that’s patriotic!
The second order of business of the House is to vote mentally ill John
Boehner out of his speaker-ship. The NEW speaker should declare to
the world that no rulings made by the US Supreme court since Obama
wormed-his-way-into-office are valid. That means Obama Care is
permanently DEAD! Upon the announcement of such fact, the stock
market should skyrocket!
The third order of business of the House is to demand that Barack
Obama show PHYSICAL PROOF of his being a US Citizen. Since he,
obviously, can’t do that—or he would have already done so—Obama shall
immediately be arrested for treason along with Joe Biden and a to-be-
assembled list of his most vocal socialist cohorts. That list shall
include Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid. Since Bill Clinton knowingly
lied about the US job and economic situation, dozens of times, in
campaigning for Obama, and since Clinton is credited with Obama’s
“winning” (ha!) then Bill Clinton should be tried for treason, too.
Hillary Clinton “may” can save her husband’s neck if she will
immediately BLOW THE WHISTLE on Obama regarding her having been BRIBED
with an implied 2008 promise of her being considered as his VP. She
can also come clean about how, from the first hours, Obama instructed
Susan Rice to LIE about the motivation for the Benghazi raid being
because of a barely-ever-viewed video—so that his “image” with Muslims
wouldn’t be tarnished.
Realize, people, that it is the SPIRIT of the original Constitution
that demands that all of these things be done. My “NC” is just a
clarified and expanded version of the original that will require no
court, ever, to explain what such means! So, the Supreme Court can go
to hell! And I say that sincerely!
With Obama physically EXTRACTED from the White House, and Mitt Romney
expeditiously moved in before the end of the year, 2013 should be the
year of REBIRTH of the USA as THE Greatest Nation in the World! “Pay
It Forward!” and “Long Live the USA!”
Respectfully submitted,
John A. Armistead
Author and Patriot
>
Respectfully submitted,
John A. Armistead
Author and Patriot
>
> On Dec 11, 8:07 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> … the usual suspects.
>
> For good or bad, Fox News is my main window-on-the-world. Though I’m
> a very busy person, I leave that show running-in-the-background while
> I work on other tasks. I can do that, because super geniuses, like
> me, can think polyphasically. That means making decisions on more
> than one thing while thinking about another. Recently, when I went
> for my six month dental checkup, the dental technician asked her
> perfunctory, “How are you? Have you had any problems?” Most people
> going to the dentist would—from years of habit—be thinking about their
> teeth and their likelihood of needing an uncomfortable and expensive
> procedure. But because I am polyphasic, I was thinking, perhaps,
> about the turn-a-deaf-ear nature ofourmedia to any news story that
>
> … the usual suspects.
>
> For good or bad, Fox News is my main window-on-the-world. Though I’m
> a very busy person, I leave that show running-in-the-background while
> I work on other tasks. I can do that, because super geniuses, like
> me, can think polyphasically. That means making decisions on more
> than one thing while thinking about another. Recently, when I went
> for my six month dental checkup, the dental technician asked her
> perfunctory, “How are you? Have you had any problems?” Most people
> going to the dentist would—from years of habit—be thinking about their
> teeth and their likelihood of needing an uncomfortable and expensive
> procedure. But because I am polyphasic, I was thinking, perhaps,
> forever be purged fromourgovernmental processes. How? By the
>
> read more »
NoEinstein
Dec 13, 2012, 6:43:20 AM12/13/12
to
On Dec 13, 6:28 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
CORRECTION: In the second paragraph, change the apt sentence to read:
> fixourbroken government more than he desires being caught in the
>
CORRECTION: In the second paragraph, change the apt sentence to read:
"Yes, Boehner talks about wanting a balanced approach that includes
huge SPENDING reductions." [not TAX reductions] Thanks! J. A. A.
>
> On Dec 12, 11:23 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> Me thinks the ‘plot’ thickens.
>
> Obama is pinning his hopes for surviving as the anti-Christ on his
> being successful in convincing the media, and the airheads in
> Washington, that everything is ’normal.’ He does that by pretending
> to be his suave self. The latter is signified by his pathologically
> unwavering voice under stress and by the artificially casual way that
> he walks down the steps of Air Force One, or strides across the White
> House Lawn, while waving with his basketball-size hands. He seems so
> at ease, that few would suspect that his house-of-cards, the entire
> Executive Branch, is beginning to come tumbling down.
>
> Since his criminally corrupt “election”, Obama is more dictatorial
> than we had almost gotten used to. Most, who have ever actually read
> the, yes mostly boring, Constitution all-the-way-through will realize
> that thepresidentisn’t authorized to dictate to Congress at all.
> On Dec 12, 11:23 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> Me thinks the ‘plot’ thickens.
>
> Obama is pinning his hopes for surviving as the anti-Christ on his
> being successful in convincing the media, and the airheads in
> Washington, that everything is ’normal.’ He does that by pretending
> to be his suave self. The latter is signified by his pathologically
> unwavering voice under stress and by the artificially casual way that
> he walks down the steps of Air Force One, or strides across the White
> House Lawn, while waving with his basketball-size hands. He seems so
> at ease, that few would suspect that his house-of-cards, the entire
> Executive Branch, is beginning to come tumbling down.
>
> Since his criminally corrupt “election”, Obama is more dictatorial
> than we had almost gotten used to. Most, who have ever actually read
> the, yes mostly boring, Constitution all-the-way-through will realize
> Obama supposes that because he campaigned on raising taxes on the rich
> that such is a foregone conclusion. But nothing is a forgone
> conclusion simply because spineless John Boehner seems resigned to be
> dictated to. Yes, Boehner talks about wanting a balanced approach
> that includes huge tax reductions. But that is the same-ol’-same-ol’
> that isn’t likely to convince the Democrats to back off. And it is
> angering the Republican House majority that the economic condition of
> this country is being tampered with.
>
> There are a number of divisive “social platform issues”. But the only
> issue threatening to bring down this country isourfinances. Either
> that such is a foregone conclusion. But nothing is a forgone
> conclusion simply because spineless John Boehner seems resigned to be
> dictated to. Yes, Boehner talks about wanting a balanced approach
> that includes huge tax reductions. But that is the same-ol’-same-ol’
> that isn’t likely to convince the Democrats to back off. And it is
> angering the Republican House majority that the economic condition of
> this country is being tampered with.
>
> There are a number of divisive “social platform issues”. But the only
> we solve the money issues or die as a nation. Because of literal
> blackmail by the huge senior citizen voting bloc, both parties have
> reasoned, wrongly, that they can only get elected by appeasing seniors
> and finding ways to continue to finance Social Security and Medicare.
> Obama’s way is to tax the rich into poverty—which is of course
> unconstitutional. The Republicans’ maximum two layers of reasoning is
> to “continue”-but-cut entitlements. By applying about six layers of
> reasoning, as only a super genius like me can do, there is a solution
> that protects seniors AND starts loweringourdeficit, immediately.
> blackmail by the huge senior citizen voting bloc, both parties have
> reasoned, wrongly, that they can only get elected by appeasing seniors
> and finding ways to continue to finance Social Security and Medicare.
> Obama’s way is to tax the rich into poverty—which is of course
> unconstitutional. The Republicans’ maximum two layers of reasoning is
> to “continue”-but-cut entitlements. By applying about six layers of
> reasoning, as only a super genius like me can do, there is a solution
> The nutshell of that is as follows:
>
> As quickly as possible, the private sector should devise conglomerate,
> SINGLE PAYMENT insurance plans that will cover the medical and
> survival-level finances of individuals for life, regardless of their
> present health. For those over the age of 55, the government will
> continue to honor the promises made to them; confirm that fact in an
> official, mailed-out contract; and continue to send SS payments and
> make the same level of Medicare payments as are presently covered—once
> those people reach age 65. Those younger than age 55 and still
> working (inourto-be flourishing economy) will be required, by a new
>
> As quickly as possible, the private sector should devise conglomerate,
> SINGLE PAYMENT insurance plans that will cover the medical and
> survival-level finances of individuals for life, regardless of their
> present health. For those over the age of 55, the government will
> continue to honor the promises made to them; confirm that fact in an
> official, mailed-out contract; and continue to send SS payments and
> make the same level of Medicare payments as are presently covered—once
> those people reach age 65. Those younger than age 55 and still
NoEinstein
Dec 13, 2012, 5:45:52 PM12/13/12
to
Be Not Kings
By John A. Armistead
Leaders, many, who come and go,
Claim the voters’ will to know.
Leaders, many, that we elect,
Straddle the fences of our respect.
Public will vs. party due,
‘Mr. Smiths’ are, oh, so few...
Leaders abide in the public’s trust.
Is it for duty, or the power-lust?
Proud offices of celebrity,
Too soon, an addictive notoriety.
How quickly are the right things done?
How surely will the next election be won?
See the worthy jobs to do,
For ‘Mr. Smiths’ are, oh, so few.
In the public trust abide.
From the public’s will ne’r hide.
When your pride dictates other things,
Be not kings.
_______________
> fixourbroken government more than he desires being caught in the
By John A. Armistead
Leaders, many, who come and go,
Claim the voters’ will to know.
Leaders, many, that we elect,
Straddle the fences of our respect.
Public will vs. party due,
‘Mr. Smiths’ are, oh, so few...
Leaders abide in the public’s trust.
Is it for duty, or the power-lust?
Proud offices of celebrity,
Too soon, an addictive notoriety.
How quickly are the right things done?
How surely will the next election be won?
See the worthy jobs to do,
For ‘Mr. Smiths’ are, oh, so few.
In the public trust abide.
From the public’s will ne’r hide.
When your pride dictates other things,
Be not kings.
_______________
>
> On Dec 12, 11:23 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> Me thinks the ‘plot’ thickens.
>
> Obama is pinning his hopes for surviving as the anti-Christ on his
> being successful in convincing the media, and the airheads in
> Washington, that everything is ’normal.’ He does that by pretending
> to be his suave self. The latter is signified by his pathologically
> unwavering voice under stress and by the artificially casual way that
> he walks down the steps of Air Force One, or strides across the White
> House Lawn, while waving with his basketball-size hands. He seems so
> at ease, that few would suspect that his house-of-cards, the entire
> Executive Branch, is beginning to come tumbling down.
>
> Since his criminally corrupt “election”, Obama is more dictatorial
> than we had almost gotten used to. Most, who have ever actually read
> the, yes mostly boring, Constitution all-the-way-through will realize
> that thepresidentisn’t authorized to dictate to Congress at all.
> On Dec 12, 11:23 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> Me thinks the ‘plot’ thickens.
>
> Obama is pinning his hopes for surviving as the anti-Christ on his
> being successful in convincing the media, and the airheads in
> Washington, that everything is ’normal.’ He does that by pretending
> to be his suave self. The latter is signified by his pathologically
> unwavering voice under stress and by the artificially casual way that
> he walks down the steps of Air Force One, or strides across the White
> House Lawn, while waving with his basketball-size hands. He seems so
> at ease, that few would suspect that his house-of-cards, the entire
> Executive Branch, is beginning to come tumbling down.
>
> Since his criminally corrupt “election”, Obama is more dictatorial
> than we had almost gotten used to. Most, who have ever actually read
> the, yes mostly boring, Constitution all-the-way-through will realize
> Obama supposes that because he campaigned on raising taxes on the rich
> that such is a foregone conclusion. But nothing is a forgone
> conclusion simply because spineless John Boehner seems resigned to be
> dictated to. Yes, Boehner talks about wanting a balanced approach
> that includes huge tax reductions. But that is the same-ol’-same-ol’
> that isn’t likely to convince the Democrats to back off. And it is
> angering the Republican House majority that the economic condition of
> this country is being tampered with.
>
> There are a number of divisive “social platform issues”. But the only
> issue threatening to bring down this country isourfinances. Either
> that such is a foregone conclusion. But nothing is a forgone
> conclusion simply because spineless John Boehner seems resigned to be
> dictated to. Yes, Boehner talks about wanting a balanced approach
> that includes huge tax reductions. But that is the same-ol’-same-ol’
> that isn’t likely to convince the Democrats to back off. And it is
> angering the Republican House majority that the economic condition of
> this country is being tampered with.
>
> There are a number of divisive “social platform issues”. But the only
> we solve the money issues or die as a nation. Because of literal
> blackmail by the huge senior citizen voting bloc, both parties have
> reasoned, wrongly, that they can only get elected by appeasing seniors
> and finding ways to continue to finance Social Security and Medicare.
> Obama’s way is to tax the rich into poverty—which is of course
> unconstitutional. The Republicans’ maximum two layers of reasoning is
> to “continue”-but-cut entitlements. By applying about six layers of
> reasoning, as only a super genius like me can do, there is a solution
> that protects seniors AND starts loweringourdeficit, immediately.
> blackmail by the huge senior citizen voting bloc, both parties have
> reasoned, wrongly, that they can only get elected by appeasing seniors
> and finding ways to continue to finance Social Security and Medicare.
> Obama’s way is to tax the rich into poverty—which is of course
> unconstitutional. The Republicans’ maximum two layers of reasoning is
> to “continue”-but-cut entitlements. By applying about six layers of
> reasoning, as only a super genius like me can do, there is a solution
> The nutshell of that is as follows:
>
> As quickly as possible, the private sector should devise conglomerate,
> SINGLE PAYMENT insurance plans that will cover the medical and
> survival-level finances of individuals for life, regardless of their
> present health. For those over the age of 55, the government will
> continue to honor the promises made to them; confirm that fact in an
> official, mailed-out contract; and continue to send SS payments and
> make the same level of Medicare payments as are presently covered—once
> those people reach age 65. Those younger than age 55 and still
> working (inourto-be flourishing economy) will be required, by a new
>
> As quickly as possible, the private sector should devise conglomerate,
> SINGLE PAYMENT insurance plans that will cover the medical and
> survival-level finances of individuals for life, regardless of their
> present health. For those over the age of 55, the government will
> continue to honor the promises made to them; confirm that fact in an
> official, mailed-out contract; and continue to send SS payments and
> make the same level of Medicare payments as are presently covered—once
> those people reach age 65. Those younger than age 55 and still
1treePetrifiedForestLane
Dec 13, 2012, 6:34:04 PM12/13/12
to
well, I haven't volunteered, yet;
still studying fractions!
still studying fractions!
1treePetrifiedForestLane
Dec 13, 2012, 10:56:45 PM12/13/12
to
speaking of fractions,
here is an easy problem that no-one can "get"
over in alt.global-warming:
as it pertains to the arctic & antarctic circles (toward the poles,
not the equator),
how do you calculate the "angle of total reflection of sunlight
off of water (by refraction; that is by using Snell's law,
plugging-in the indices of refraction for air (1) and water
(1.3?)
this is to show that the whole discussion of "the albedo and
the arctic ice" is no where, there.
here is an easy problem that no-one can "get"
over in alt.global-warming:
as it pertains to the arctic & antarctic circles (toward the poles,
not the equator),
how do you calculate the "angle of total reflection of sunlight
off of water (by refraction; that is by using Snell's law,
plugging-in the indices of refraction for air (1) and water
(1.3?)
this is to show that the whole discussion of "the albedo and
the arctic ice" is no where, there.
SaPeIsMa
Dec 14, 2012, 12:15:34 PM12/14/12
to
"1treePetrifiedForestLane" <Spac...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:bb3baed3-a810-47bf...@ut5g2000pbb.googlegroups.com...
NOT have a perfect surface for reflection
Light absorption/reflection varies with the "chop"
1treePetrifiedForestLane
Dec 14, 2012, 8:06:40 PM12/14/12
to
in deed; it is not unlike the problem for optical density
of clouds, but that doesn't negate the essential thing ...
which I am not going to reveal at this moment-being.
> NOT have a perfect surface for reflection
> Light absorption/reflection varies with the "chop"
thus:
it may simply be an artifact of Newton's "theory" of light,
not of Young's experimental apparatus.
> No one has ever modulated a signal at one end and
> affected the other end.
thus:
there are technically no "fossilized" fuels; I mean,
just say, No, thank you, Geoffery -- I have no idea whatsoever
what the category of the question is; thank you.
--Snell's law for interferometers; thank you
of clouds, but that doesn't negate the essential thing ...
which I am not going to reveal at this moment-being.
> NOT have a perfect surface for reflection
> Light absorption/reflection varies with the "chop"
it may simply be an artifact of Newton's "theory" of light,
not of Young's experimental apparatus.
> No one has ever modulated a signal at one end and
> affected the other end.
thus:
there are technically no "fossilized" fuels; I mean,
just say, No, thank you, Geoffery -- I have no idea whatsoever
what the category of the question is; thank you.
--Snell's law for interferometers; thank you
NoEinstein
Dec 14, 2012, 10:33:20 PM12/14/12
to
On Dec 13, 5:45 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
The economic component of senseless murders.
During the presidential campaign, a leftist group aligned with the
Democrats ran an ad claiming that because Romney had laid-off workers
at a business, a woman working there lost her health insurance. And
since she was unable to obtain another policy, she subsequently died
of, I think, cancer. The implication (actually CRIMINAL, innuendo
libel) was that Romney was an uncaring murderer more interested in
material gains than human lives (sic!!!). The time line later showed
that Romney wasn’t even running that business when the layoff
happened. But great personal damage had already been done by
typically immoral Democrats who see winning by any means as their
“entitlement”. Please know that under my New Constitution those
producing or even referencing such a video as being truthful—including
the leftist media showing such—would all be guilty of a serious
felony. Every one of those would now be surrounded by cold hard
masonry, concrete and steel bars or doors. Know this: Lying for
personal gain will not be tolerated in the USA!
At the time Democrats, like Juan Williams, were reveling that such
(unjustifiable) harm had been done to Romney, I thought: ‘Even if
Romney had done something that chanced to cause the death of one
person (Of course he had never done so!), Obama is guilty of killing
HUNDREDS, if not thousands all across this once great country. Who
are those? They were the distraught, out-of-work people who got
evicted from their homes, and who, being unable to care for their
families, took their own lives… because of Obama’s failed economic
policies.
The senseless mass murder, today, that has killed 20 young and
defenseless children, and eight adults, apparently, was the result of
bottled-up hatred of a son for his own mother. It is easy to imagine
that that mother had been giving her son “tough love” over his not
being determined enough to pay his own way in the world. Because of
his having, repeatedly, turned to her for financial help, she probably
told him she only had (I speculate) a teacher’s salary. He may have
countered by saying… “You love those other children MORE than you love
me, your own child.” Hearing that she may have told him too… “get
out”. In a rage, and unable to accept his own failings, he rushed to
get her own guns and shot her in the face.
I’ve read that murdering one’s own mother is the most soul-tearing of
all human actions. Unable to accept responsibility for his own sin,
he turned his anger on those innocent school children that,
apparently, were more important than he was. He reasoned, with
shallowness, that if there were no children for his mother to love
more than him, then she might have been more considerate of his
requests for aid.
Again and again, senseless violence has an economic component. People—
too often minorities—become involved in crime because they don’t see
economic opportunities otherwise. Once convicted and imprisoned for,
say, drug dealing, that person is stigmatized for life. That means
businesses are less likely to hire him. And the combined stresses of
his life are more likely to cause tragedy.
But imagine if our sick and depressed US economy could start
flourishing such that businesses are practically begging for workers
to fill the jobs needing to be filled. Instead of waiting on street
corners for the next welfare check to arrive, unemployed youths and
adults would see others of their had-been numbers beginning to become
better off because of the sweat of their own brows. Eventually, most
will realize that working is more personally satisfying than shooting
hoops at the local park, just to seem to be busy, when the opposite is
true.
It may be soothing to our collective, saddened hearts to have our… God
damned “president” express the national sorrow. But the one saying
those things is guilty of the murder of four Americans in Benghazi,
simply because he wouldn’t authorize the easy defense of the embassy,
there. Obama could not possibly be expressing national sorrow over
the killings, today, because he was actually feeling JUBILATION that
“something” is taking attention away from his own criminal and
treasonous actions that have characterized every single day that he
has squatted in, grunted and soiled the White House and the Executive
Branch of government.
Hurricane Sandy allowed Obama to pretend empathy for those on the
Jersey shore. Chris Christie embraced that tyrant, because Christie
needed to seem to be happy for his constituents. Christie’s embrace,
rather than being a prelude to a justifiable stab-in-the-back for
Obama, was instead, the final stab that cost Romney a win—that would
have been in spite of the rampant criminality of Obama and the
Democrats. However, Romney DID win big among those voters who had not
been bribed by entitlements or promises of favoritism for the ’middle’
class at the expense of the soon-not-to-be upper class—if Obama isn’t
EXTRACTED from his fowled offices PDQ.
Today, I got a solicitation from George and Laura Bush to contribute
to his Presidential Center. It was explained that there will be
conferences, therein, of thoughtful people on improving the national
condition. I thought: Why do there need to be conferences (of a lot
of people) if I—the most intelligent and analytical person in the world
—have already figured out how to solve most of the world’s problems
through fairly-liberated capitalism? After making a small ‘charter
member’ contribution, I was wishing to get on with other
responsibilities. Suddenly, I began getting smiling vibes from Laura
Bush. I thought: “Well!” Five or ten minutes later I started getting
smiling vibes from George as well. This lasted for ten to fifteen
minutes.
My supposition is that Laura heard about my economic proposal for
phasing-out SS and Medicare; read what I wrote; and liked it. She may
have pointed this out to George, who started liking it, too. I have
always been psychic. But I never expected my talent to become my
primary link to the mostly uncommunicative readers of what I write.
I’m aware of the courage and patriotism required for even a single
Secret Service agent; a single public or media figure; or a single
politician to HONOR the SPIRIT of US Constitution and demand that
Obama produce PHYSICAL proof that he is a legal United States, native-
born citizen. Since—as has already been stated—the HOUSE is the only,
present, legally-functioning branch of government, *** such should
immediately notify Obama, in writing, of his having an ample 72-hours
to produce PHYSICAL proof, delivered to the primary House chamber, or
to be arrested for treason. No one needs to make any speeches, or
even mention my “NC” (which is a well-clarified, updated and expanded
version of the original). Just have House couriers hand-deliver the
stated requirement to Obama. Simultaneous with the delivery of such
requirement, notify the Head of the US Secret Service that Obama shall
not be allowed to fly in Air Force One, nor to be transported via
motorcade to any other place until he has produced, or found others
who can produce, PHYSICAL proof (not digital) of his being born in
Hawaii.
I invite those of you who can feel my energy to let such well-up
inside of you as patriotism for saving this country from socialism!
Tell others about this hard-to-find site, and thank-your-lucky-stars
that GOOGLE hasn’t been shackled by the demands of tyrants. “Pay It
>
The economic component of senseless murders.
During the presidential campaign, a leftist group aligned with the
Democrats ran an ad claiming that because Romney had laid-off workers
at a business, a woman working there lost her health insurance. And
since she was unable to obtain another policy, she subsequently died
of, I think, cancer. The implication (actually CRIMINAL, innuendo
libel) was that Romney was an uncaring murderer more interested in
material gains than human lives (sic!!!). The time line later showed
that Romney wasn’t even running that business when the layoff
happened. But great personal damage had already been done by
typically immoral Democrats who see winning by any means as their
“entitlement”. Please know that under my New Constitution those
producing or even referencing such a video as being truthful—including
the leftist media showing such—would all be guilty of a serious
felony. Every one of those would now be surrounded by cold hard
masonry, concrete and steel bars or doors. Know this: Lying for
personal gain will not be tolerated in the USA!
At the time Democrats, like Juan Williams, were reveling that such
(unjustifiable) harm had been done to Romney, I thought: ‘Even if
Romney had done something that chanced to cause the death of one
person (Of course he had never done so!), Obama is guilty of killing
HUNDREDS, if not thousands all across this once great country. Who
are those? They were the distraught, out-of-work people who got
evicted from their homes, and who, being unable to care for their
families, took their own lives… because of Obama’s failed economic
policies.
The senseless mass murder, today, that has killed 20 young and
defenseless children, and eight adults, apparently, was the result of
bottled-up hatred of a son for his own mother. It is easy to imagine
that that mother had been giving her son “tough love” over his not
being determined enough to pay his own way in the world. Because of
his having, repeatedly, turned to her for financial help, she probably
told him she only had (I speculate) a teacher’s salary. He may have
countered by saying… “You love those other children MORE than you love
me, your own child.” Hearing that she may have told him too… “get
out”. In a rage, and unable to accept his own failings, he rushed to
get her own guns and shot her in the face.
I’ve read that murdering one’s own mother is the most soul-tearing of
all human actions. Unable to accept responsibility for his own sin,
he turned his anger on those innocent school children that,
apparently, were more important than he was. He reasoned, with
shallowness, that if there were no children for his mother to love
more than him, then she might have been more considerate of his
requests for aid.
Again and again, senseless violence has an economic component. People—
too often minorities—become involved in crime because they don’t see
economic opportunities otherwise. Once convicted and imprisoned for,
say, drug dealing, that person is stigmatized for life. That means
businesses are less likely to hire him. And the combined stresses of
his life are more likely to cause tragedy.
But imagine if our sick and depressed US economy could start
flourishing such that businesses are practically begging for workers
to fill the jobs needing to be filled. Instead of waiting on street
corners for the next welfare check to arrive, unemployed youths and
adults would see others of their had-been numbers beginning to become
better off because of the sweat of their own brows. Eventually, most
will realize that working is more personally satisfying than shooting
hoops at the local park, just to seem to be busy, when the opposite is
true.
It may be soothing to our collective, saddened hearts to have our… God
damned “president” express the national sorrow. But the one saying
those things is guilty of the murder of four Americans in Benghazi,
simply because he wouldn’t authorize the easy defense of the embassy,
there. Obama could not possibly be expressing national sorrow over
the killings, today, because he was actually feeling JUBILATION that
“something” is taking attention away from his own criminal and
treasonous actions that have characterized every single day that he
has squatted in, grunted and soiled the White House and the Executive
Branch of government.
Hurricane Sandy allowed Obama to pretend empathy for those on the
Jersey shore. Chris Christie embraced that tyrant, because Christie
needed to seem to be happy for his constituents. Christie’s embrace,
rather than being a prelude to a justifiable stab-in-the-back for
Obama, was instead, the final stab that cost Romney a win—that would
have been in spite of the rampant criminality of Obama and the
Democrats. However, Romney DID win big among those voters who had not
been bribed by entitlements or promises of favoritism for the ’middle’
class at the expense of the soon-not-to-be upper class—if Obama isn’t
EXTRACTED from his fowled offices PDQ.
Today, I got a solicitation from George and Laura Bush to contribute
to his Presidential Center. It was explained that there will be
conferences, therein, of thoughtful people on improving the national
condition. I thought: Why do there need to be conferences (of a lot
of people) if I—the most intelligent and analytical person in the world
—have already figured out how to solve most of the world’s problems
through fairly-liberated capitalism? After making a small ‘charter
member’ contribution, I was wishing to get on with other
responsibilities. Suddenly, I began getting smiling vibes from Laura
Bush. I thought: “Well!” Five or ten minutes later I started getting
smiling vibes from George as well. This lasted for ten to fifteen
minutes.
My supposition is that Laura heard about my economic proposal for
phasing-out SS and Medicare; read what I wrote; and liked it. She may
have pointed this out to George, who started liking it, too. I have
always been psychic. But I never expected my talent to become my
primary link to the mostly uncommunicative readers of what I write.
I’m aware of the courage and patriotism required for even a single
Secret Service agent; a single public or media figure; or a single
politician to HONOR the SPIRIT of US Constitution and demand that
Obama produce PHYSICAL proof that he is a legal United States, native-
born citizen. Since—as has already been stated—the HOUSE is the only,
present, legally-functioning branch of government, *** such should
immediately notify Obama, in writing, of his having an ample 72-hours
to produce PHYSICAL proof, delivered to the primary House chamber, or
to be arrested for treason. No one needs to make any speeches, or
even mention my “NC” (which is a well-clarified, updated and expanded
version of the original). Just have House couriers hand-deliver the
stated requirement to Obama. Simultaneous with the delivery of such
requirement, notify the Head of the US Secret Service that Obama shall
not be allowed to fly in Air Force One, nor to be transported via
motorcade to any other place until he has produced, or found others
who can produce, PHYSICAL proof (not digital) of his being born in
Hawaii.
I invite those of you who can feel my energy to let such well-up
inside of you as patriotism for saving this country from socialism!
Tell others about this hard-to-find site, and thank-your-lucky-stars
that GOOGLE hasn’t been shackled by the demands of tyrants. “Pay It
Forward!” and… “Long Live the USA!”
Respectfully submitted,
John A. Armistead
Author and Patriot
>
Respectfully submitted,
John A. Armistead
Author and Patriot
>
> On Dec 13, 6:28 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> Be Not Kings
> By John A. Armistead
>
> Leaders, many, who come and go,
> Claim thevoters’ will to know.
>
> Be Not Kings
> By John A. Armistead
>
> Leaders, many, who come and go,
NoEinstein
Dec 14, 2012, 10:34:30 PM12/14/12
to
On Dec 13, 6:34 pm, 1treePetrifiedForestLane <Space...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
wrote:
> well, I haven't volunteered, yet;
> still studying fractions!
>
>
>
> > > > “news” discussion, such as my New Constitution, would require eight or
> > > > nine layers of reasoning—totally over the heads of anyone- Hide quoted text -
> still studying fractions!
>
>
>
> > > > “news” discussion, such as my New Constitution, would require eight or
NoEinstein
Dec 14, 2012, 10:38:14 PM12/14/12
to
> well, I haven't volunteered, yet;
> still studying fractions!
>
>
>
> > > > “news” discussion, such as my New Constitution, would require eight or
> > > > nine layers of reasoning—totally over the heads of anyone- Hide quoted text -
> still studying fractions!
>
>
>
> > > > “news” discussion, such as my New Constitution, would require eight or
>
> - Show quoted text -
Dear 1tree: What I have done both in science and for patriotism don't
> - Show quoted text -
have any historic precedent to help you decide. So, just trust your
gut and get-on-board! — NoEinstein — AKA John A. Armistead
NoEinstein
Dec 14, 2012, 10:45:10 PM12/14/12
to
On Dec 13, 10:56 pm, 1treePetrifiedForestLane <Space...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
Dear 1tree: Most of the equations relating to optics result from
empirical equations fitted to the observed parameters. Though I know
more about the physics of light and of gravity than any other person
who has ever lived, my present attention must be directed toward
saving the USA, because if I don't "science" will be down-the-tubes,
anyway. — NoEinstein —
wrote:
empirical equations fitted to the observed parameters. Though I know
more about the physics of light and of gravity than any other person
who has ever lived, my present attention must be directed toward
saving the USA, because if I don't "science" will be down-the-tubes,
anyway. — NoEinstein —
NoEinstein
Dec 14, 2012, 10:55:55 PM12/14/12
to
On Dec 14, 12:15 pm, "SaPeIsMa" <SaPeI...@Hotmail.com> wrote:
> "1treePetrifiedForestLane" <Space...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
Dear SPM: 1tree, a mathematician, gets comfort knowing that mostly
unneeded data can at least be correctly calculated. I'm a
pragmatist. My disproving Newton, Coriolis, Lorentz and Einstein is
about enough of my time spent on "just" science, don't you think? I
should be spending my time on practical inventions to stop global
warming, and lower sea levels without stopping using fossil fuels.
Obama wouldn't like that. But the world has no use for a "community
organizer" (communist) from Chicago who got to teach the Constitution,
but never has believed one word of what he taught. My guess is that
his students are now very disillusioned Democrats. — NoEinstein —
> "1treePetrifiedForestLane" <Space...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
unneeded data can at least be correctly calculated. I'm a
pragmatist. My disproving Newton, Coriolis, Lorentz and Einstein is
about enough of my time spent on "just" science, don't you think? I
should be spending my time on practical inventions to stop global
warming, and lower sea levels without stopping using fossil fuels.
Obama wouldn't like that. But the world has no use for a "community
organizer" (communist) from Chicago who got to teach the Constitution,
but never has believed one word of what he taught. My guess is that
his students are now very disillusioned Democrats. — NoEinstein —
NoEinstein
Dec 14, 2012, 11:01:12 PM12/14/12
to
On Dec 14, 8:06 pm, 1treePetrifiedForestLane <Space...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
1tree: The most simple thing you need to learn about light is that
such is composed only of photons—pancake-like tangles of IOTA energy—
and never of waves. Except in physical solids and fluids there are no
waves anywhere in the Universe. — NoEinstein —
wrote:
such is composed only of photons—pancake-like tangles of IOTA energy—
and never of waves. Except in physical solids and fluids there are no
waves anywhere in the Universe. — NoEinstein —
NoEinstein
Dec 15, 2012, 4:25:35 PM12/15/12
to
On Dec 14, 10:33 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
Katie, Bar the Door!
For well over four years, the liberal media—including “UNFAIR and
balanced” Fox News—has ignored my Herculean efforts that will, in
short order, correct our broken government(s). Going back much more
than four years, Britt Hume, who at the time was a give-presidents-
HELL investigative reporter, ignored my well-explained exposé that a
certain notorious US Senator was guilty of crimes that would have sent
his ass to prison. Hume wasn’t alone in being so informed. George
Will, who was covering one of that senator’s re election campaigns,
didn’t consider my exposé to be passable with his liberal bosses, so
he acted like a clearinghouse of “news worthiness.” Cal Thomas, that
ink-black for hair “contributor” on the news commentary shows, also,
considered himself to be more of a clearinghouse for news worthiness,
than a reporter. As a result, my New Constitution now has extremely
strict limits placed on what our, generally, finger-down-the-throat
media will be allowed to do, or not do, in the future.
“The media shall not solicit public officials’ opinions over those of
the People.”
“Section 9: Other than the President or his agents, no person, news
medium, organization, group, their envoys, or any lobby, within
government or without, shall be allowed to contact representatives
while such are in Washington. However, invited persons or groups can
make scheduled depositions provided they don’t communicate with the
representatives otherwise. A representative’s constituents shall be
allowed to contact them for the purpose of influencing their votes
only while they are in their home states or districts.
Representatives shall regularly contact their district offices or
return to their districts to be informed of the wishes of their
constituents, and their constituents only, and shall be held
accountable for the representativeness of their votes. The
solicitation of Citizen support is permitted, but the targeted
solicitation of representatives in any place, by any person,
organization, group, or lobby within government or without, is
prohibited. Overt solicitation, feting, or laudatory ceremony, as
above, is a felony—defined as any crime requiring a minimum three year
prison sentence, but time off for good behavior is allowed.”
“English, that is grammatically written and correctly spoken, is the
official language of the USA and shall be the model for every medium
and every public discourse.”
“Bill of Rights and Amendments:
1st Amendment: No law shall be made regarding the establishment of
peaceable religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, but
government, its campaigns, processes, slogans, and disbursements shall
be secular. No law nor private or civil action shall abridge: the
receive appropriate, relevant, timely, comprehensive, helpful and just
responses from proper authorities who have thoroughly read,
understood, and addressed each salient aspect of the grievances or
requests for directions or clarifications. Failure to so respond to a
rightful petition for redress of a grievance shall, on a single
provable instance, terminate the apt one’s employment, especially
those in management or public office—including judges and justices—who
ignore, frustrate or give the run-around to any competent Citizen who
has been diligent in having a grievance properly addressed, or in
having his or her civil rights fully upheld. No judge or justice
shall presume that by performing the above required duties, that they
in any way might be compromising their objectivity or fairness in
court; justice be not “blind”, but well informed. Freedom of the
press or other medium mandates that there be reasonable truthfulness
in reporting. *** Wanton distortion of the truth, or deliberate
omission of the truth—except in cases of obvious fiction or satire—is
prohibited. Stating or implying that a particular news medium has a
collective voice (we) or position on any issue is prohibited, as for
example via: anonymous editorials; regularly occurring accompanying
comments; commentary programs financed by, or ideologically screened
by, the same news medium; editorials named as being authored by
management; editorial comments by others that are in any way
ideologically censored, omitted or screened; or by comments occurring
at specific times or designated locations that most would come to
associate with the management of such medium, even if such are
innocuous. No medium shall be a forum for promoting the ideology of
its management or owners, nor shall they employ anyone who uses such
job to hawk their personal political preferences—at risk of loss of
license or closure of the business. Flagrantly editing news to
promote the ideology of management is a felony. No medium shall
analyze, assess, summarize, or make subjective judgments about any
pending election or referendum, nor badger a candidate or office-
holder with acrid questions, nor violate the latter’s right to privacy
by intentionally revealing non criminal interpersonal dealings. Any
person(s) who does the latter is committing a felony. However,
factual, thorough coverage of the candidates or referenda issues—on an
as occurs basis—is allowed, provided there are no comments nor
actions, as above, and provided the same unbiased coverage is given to
all of the candidates or to all of the referenda issues. No medium’s
programs or formats, nor the status of any of its associated employees
shall unduly influence any election or governmental process, or the
business shall be closed. It shall be a 10 year felony to repress
truthful news reporting in any medium by threatening legal action. No
medium can be sued for libel for presenting material authored by
others, but if a person is harmed by the medium’s content, they shall
be allowed to reply—without editing—in that medium. Each medium shall
respond to breaking news without considering the response of any other
medium. *** Injuries due to improper news coverage or non coverage
shall not be excused by the media response. A medium reporting on
government shall do so thoroughly, objectively, and with detachment—
being neither laudatory nor critical by form, and not repressing
thoughtful dissent nor its coverage. Every medium shall favor the
truth over supposition, without parity nor bias. False or deceptive
commercial advertising is prohibited. Deliberate use by any
candidate, their staffs or election committees, of false or deceptive
campaign speeches, slogans, advertisements, humor, or innuendo is a
felony. No organization, nor part of the media, nor any special
interest group(s) shall in any way endorse a slate of candidates for
public office; flagrant violation is a felony. No medium shall
display active public records without the free consent of the apt
parties.”
“Conclusion: This New Constitution, together with any and all
subsequent amendments, shall set the tone for all other laws that are
made or that shall be allowed to remain in force. The
constitutionality of laws may be brought into question by any law-
abiding, prudent Citizen conversant on the whole New Constitution.
When a law’s constitutionality is justifiably questioned,
determination of constitutionality shall be made by a qualified judge
or justice—thoughtfully and without bias—within six weeks. Any such
ruling by a judge or justice can be appealed to an upper court or to
the entire High Court on a first-come-first-serve basis.
This New Constitution empowers every Citizen with broad civil
rights that they may invoke at will without the necessity of the prior
involvement of counsel or of a judicial authority. Those in or
working for governments shall be subordinate to any Citizen demanding
civil rights. The rightfulness of any such demand may be brought into
question only by just and comprehensive proof—delivered at a later
date in writing—with the apt named official(s) being in full jeopardy
of such punishments as are herein defined, if they are in error.
Notes: (1.) *Italicized text represents portions of the New
Constitution which shall be omitted unless separately and specifically
approved by 60% of the voters. Voting to approve the New Constitution
shall not be a vote on italicized portions. (2.) Any person, group or
business which polls the People on their support or non support of
this New Constitution or its parts prior to the national referendum,
shall, retroactively, be guilty of a felony(s). (3.) The news media
standards required, herein, as relates to coverage concerning this
document, shall, following ratification of the New Constitution by the
People, be retroactively applied to any news medium or person therein—
including the full punishments relating thereto—for non compliance
with the standards. Likewise, any judge or justice acting counter to
this New Constitution regarding news coverage issues or any part of
the ratification process shall be held fully accountable. The macro-
will of the Citizens shall be Supreme!” [End of the New
Constitution.]
People, realize that most of the TEETH now included in my (our) New
Constitution have been included because of my first-hand-experience
with the unconstitutional top-down power hierarchy in our governments,
all the way to the Supreme (soon-to-be-in-name-only) Court. That
includes my having thoroughly and unconstitutionally been vetted by
both the US Secret Service and the FBI. Such was probably done
because I “might have been” a threat to a criminal, seated US
Senator. Law enforcement felt that it was their duty to defend
elected officials, criminal or not.
When I say that the USA shall never again be a POLICE STATE—with law
enforcement acting as the Gestapos of government—know that such fact
will benefit ALL Americans from ever being fearful of being unfairly
treated by Law Enforcement or the Courts, as I have been! By reading
between the lines, there will never again be an arrest of anyone for
driving over the posted speed limit, if that was ALL the driver was
doing. Under my “NC” fines shall NEVER be used to defray the cost of
government. So no municipality in the USA can give their law officers
“quotas” of how many speeders they are required to stop per day, in
order to pay that officer’s salary.
The original Constitution was intended to be (but was never realized
to be) a Representative Republic. In such a government, the people
determine what can or cannot be done—that is, those things that are
above and beyond what is spelled-out in the Constitution. The
accurately-proportioned-to-the-population representatives only have
the authority to do the will of their constituents. They are NOT our
elected dictators! [Be Not Kings!]
The House, by (unconstitutional) rules, dictates that the chairmen of
its committees and the Speaker of the House shall be from the 'party’
that won the majority. Since that gives “the leaders” more power than
the other members, it is 100% unconstitutional, as are political
parties themselves!!!!! The Speaker and the committee chairmen only
have the “honor”—not the power. Their duty is primarily that of
parliamentarians to make sure that things proceed smoothly.
There are so many disparate power structures in Washington, that most—
even those who have been there a long time—still have no idea who is
in charge. [Read my book, ‘The Shortest Distance; Harmony Through
Prosperity’, to better understand.] House members who are smart
enough to comprehend the powerful rationale that I am making that
Barack Obama is a TRAITOR to this nation and to the whole human race,
are still concerned about what “all-of-this” will do to their chances
of being re elected two years from now. They know, from hard
personal experience, that the liberal media will be shoving
microphones down-their-throats and demanding that they justify their
having done a single thing that isn’t like the “traditional” [and
unconstitutional status quo] way.
I’ve anticipated all of that and include in my “NC” these
requirements, which I highly recommend the House mandate, immediately:
“Representatives shall not intentionally communicate with any news
medium whose coverage area is predominately outside of their home
district. Nor shall they, or any government official, cultivate a
media personae, or make petty public speeches, introductions or
comments lauding any person, living or dead, nor any civil or private
projects or those responsible. Comments to media by representatives
or government employees shall be germane to pending legislation, or to
the exercise of their jobs. The media shall not solicit public
officials’ opinions over those of the People.”
“Felons are prohibited from holding public office. By this amendment,
likewise, it becomes a felony for anyone in government—past, present
or future—to support, or to have supported, any person for public
office if such person being supported would prudently be suspected to
be, or privately be known to be, a felon. Actively campaigning for,
giving financing for, or shielding the truth from the general Public
about a personally known probable felony by any office holder or any
candidate shall likewise be a felony.”
“29th Amendment: Governments shall pass no laws intended to exclude
themselves, their elected or appointed officials, their depts.,
agencies, agents or employees from criminal or civil actions arising
from any claim by any Citizen. Crimes committed against elected or
appointed officials or against any government employee shall carry the
same punishment as similar crimes committed against any Citizen.
Systematic record keeping by law enforcement on law-abiding Citizens
is prohibited by this New Constitution. However, record keeping by
other depts. or agencies shall be thorough and accurate concerning
dealings with any Citizen, group or business, but no common data base
is allowed, nor inter departmental data exchange—except by court
order. The intentional destruction, altering, exclusion or
misrepresentation of official correspondence or other records by any
government employee, elected or appointed officials or their agents in
an attempt to influence any present or future criminal or civil
proceeding is hereby made a felony on all so acting. It shall be
unlawful for law enforcement to endanger the Public in the reckless
pursuit of a real or supposed wrongdoer, or to batter anyone already
apprehended, or to allow another to batter such person without
restraint. No Citizen can be stopped, detained, forced to show ID,
nor required to explain any activity—including running—without there
being substantial proof of their involvement in a felony. Petty crime
commitment does not give law enforcement license to make unreasonable
searches nor seizures.”
“14th Amendment: Persons born within the USA, if their mothers are
Citizens or legal residents, and those persons who have attained
naturalization, are Citizens of the USA and the state where they
reside. No government, court nor public vote shall make, continue, or
enforce any law or combination of laws that abridges the civil rights,
privileges or immunities of Citizens of the USA; nor shall anyone
deprive a person of life, liberty or property without due process of
law, nor deny to any Citizen the equal protection of the laws.”
It is obvious that my “NC” is a long and exceedingly well thought-out
document. I will try to include smaller excerpts, later, if those
will adequately explain what I have done. I should mention that in
the process of my butting heads with Government over my exposé
regarding that criminal US Senator, that I wrote a detailed, small
font, legal page description of all that had transpired. I sent the
latter to every single governor in this country—including to George W.
Bush, then Governor of Texas. There was a conference of governors
scheduled, and I was hoping that those people would discuss what had
happened and perhaps make enough waves to start turning things around
in this country. Because I know that governors have mail readers, I
have no way of knowing if the younger Bush was ever informed of my
travail. But I can reason, with near certainty, that the detailed
letter I later sent to Mrs. Barbara Bush urging that she and her
husband not make a scheduled campaign appearance for the criminal US
Senator, contributed to my being arrested at the behest of the FBI.
I hope that by my candidly revealing all of these things, that you
readers will realize how exceedingly well-positioned I am to, single-
handedly, pen-and-polish our ‘New Constitution of the United States of
America’. The US Secret Service and the FBI know that fact, too. So,
I don’t expect any of the more intelligent people in those agencies to
stand in the way of having the House DEMAND the following: “Barack
Obama shall, within 72 hours, deliver to the Main House of
Representatives Chamber, PHYSICAL proof of his having been born in
Hawaii or face arrest for capital treason against the USA.”
Author and Patriot
>
> But imagine ifoursick and depressed US economy could start
>
Katie, Bar the Door!
For well over four years, the liberal media—including “UNFAIR and
balanced” Fox News—has ignored my Herculean efforts that will, in
short order, correct our broken government(s). Going back much more
than four years, Britt Hume, who at the time was a give-presidents-
HELL investigative reporter, ignored my well-explained exposé that a
certain notorious US Senator was guilty of crimes that would have sent
his ass to prison. Hume wasn’t alone in being so informed. George
Will, who was covering one of that senator’s re election campaigns,
didn’t consider my exposé to be passable with his liberal bosses, so
he acted like a clearinghouse of “news worthiness.” Cal Thomas, that
ink-black for hair “contributor” on the news commentary shows, also,
considered himself to be more of a clearinghouse for news worthiness,
than a reporter. As a result, my New Constitution now has extremely
strict limits placed on what our, generally, finger-down-the-throat
media will be allowed to do, or not do, in the future.
“The media shall not solicit public officials’ opinions over those of
the People.”
“Section 9: Other than the President or his agents, no person, news
medium, organization, group, their envoys, or any lobby, within
government or without, shall be allowed to contact representatives
while such are in Washington. However, invited persons or groups can
make scheduled depositions provided they don’t communicate with the
representatives otherwise. A representative’s constituents shall be
allowed to contact them for the purpose of influencing their votes
only while they are in their home states or districts.
Representatives shall regularly contact their district offices or
return to their districts to be informed of the wishes of their
constituents, and their constituents only, and shall be held
accountable for the representativeness of their votes. The
solicitation of Citizen support is permitted, but the targeted
solicitation of representatives in any place, by any person,
organization, group, or lobby within government or without, is
prohibited. Overt solicitation, feting, or laudatory ceremony, as
above, is a felony—defined as any crime requiring a minimum three year
prison sentence, but time off for good behavior is allowed.”
“English, that is grammatically written and correctly spoken, is the
official language of the USA and shall be the model for every medium
and every public discourse.”
“Bill of Rights and Amendments:
1st Amendment: No law shall be made regarding the establishment of
peaceable religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, but
government, its campaigns, processes, slogans, and disbursements shall
freedom of speech of those Citizens who don’t work for the media; the
freedom of a fair and pro-democracy press or other medium; the right
of People to peaceably assemble; and the right of any Citizen or group
to petition government or any of its branches or departments for
redress of grievances. Citizens so petitioning government shall
freedom of a fair and pro-democracy press or other medium; the right
of People to peaceably assemble; and the right of any Citizen or group
to petition government or any of its branches or departments for
receive appropriate, relevant, timely, comprehensive, helpful and just
responses from proper authorities who have thoroughly read,
understood, and addressed each salient aspect of the grievances or
requests for directions or clarifications. Failure to so respond to a
rightful petition for redress of a grievance shall, on a single
provable instance, terminate the apt one’s employment, especially
those in management or public office—including judges and justices—who
ignore, frustrate or give the run-around to any competent Citizen who
has been diligent in having a grievance properly addressed, or in
having his or her civil rights fully upheld. No judge or justice
shall presume that by performing the above required duties, that they
in any way might be compromising their objectivity or fairness in
court; justice be not “blind”, but well informed. Freedom of the
press or other medium mandates that there be reasonable truthfulness
in reporting. *** Wanton distortion of the truth, or deliberate
omission of the truth—except in cases of obvious fiction or satire—is
prohibited. Stating or implying that a particular news medium has a
collective voice (we) or position on any issue is prohibited, as for
example via: anonymous editorials; regularly occurring accompanying
comments; commentary programs financed by, or ideologically screened
by, the same news medium; editorials named as being authored by
management; editorial comments by others that are in any way
ideologically censored, omitted or screened; or by comments occurring
at specific times or designated locations that most would come to
associate with the management of such medium, even if such are
innocuous. No medium shall be a forum for promoting the ideology of
its management or owners, nor shall they employ anyone who uses such
job to hawk their personal political preferences—at risk of loss of
license or closure of the business. Flagrantly editing news to
promote the ideology of management is a felony. No medium shall
analyze, assess, summarize, or make subjective judgments about any
pending election or referendum, nor badger a candidate or office-
holder with acrid questions, nor violate the latter’s right to privacy
by intentionally revealing non criminal interpersonal dealings. Any
person(s) who does the latter is committing a felony. However,
factual, thorough coverage of the candidates or referenda issues—on an
as occurs basis—is allowed, provided there are no comments nor
actions, as above, and provided the same unbiased coverage is given to
all of the candidates or to all of the referenda issues. No medium’s
programs or formats, nor the status of any of its associated employees
shall unduly influence any election or governmental process, or the
business shall be closed. It shall be a 10 year felony to repress
truthful news reporting in any medium by threatening legal action. No
medium can be sued for libel for presenting material authored by
others, but if a person is harmed by the medium’s content, they shall
be allowed to reply—without editing—in that medium. Each medium shall
respond to breaking news without considering the response of any other
medium. *** Injuries due to improper news coverage or non coverage
shall not be excused by the media response. A medium reporting on
government shall do so thoroughly, objectively, and with detachment—
being neither laudatory nor critical by form, and not repressing
thoughtful dissent nor its coverage. Every medium shall favor the
truth over supposition, without parity nor bias. False or deceptive
commercial advertising is prohibited. Deliberate use by any
candidate, their staffs or election committees, of false or deceptive
campaign speeches, slogans, advertisements, humor, or innuendo is a
felony. No organization, nor part of the media, nor any special
interest group(s) shall in any way endorse a slate of candidates for
public office; flagrant violation is a felony. No medium shall
display active public records without the free consent of the apt
parties.”
“Conclusion: This New Constitution, together with any and all
subsequent amendments, shall set the tone for all other laws that are
made or that shall be allowed to remain in force. The
constitutionality of laws may be brought into question by any law-
abiding, prudent Citizen conversant on the whole New Constitution.
When a law’s constitutionality is justifiably questioned,
determination of constitutionality shall be made by a qualified judge
or justice—thoughtfully and without bias—within six weeks. Any such
ruling by a judge or justice can be appealed to an upper court or to
the entire High Court on a first-come-first-serve basis.
This New Constitution empowers every Citizen with broad civil
rights that they may invoke at will without the necessity of the prior
involvement of counsel or of a judicial authority. Those in or
working for governments shall be subordinate to any Citizen demanding
civil rights. The rightfulness of any such demand may be brought into
question only by just and comprehensive proof—delivered at a later
date in writing—with the apt named official(s) being in full jeopardy
of such punishments as are herein defined, if they are in error.
Notes: (1.) *Italicized text represents portions of the New
Constitution which shall be omitted unless separately and specifically
approved by 60% of the voters. Voting to approve the New Constitution
shall not be a vote on italicized portions. (2.) Any person, group or
business which polls the People on their support or non support of
this New Constitution or its parts prior to the national referendum,
shall, retroactively, be guilty of a felony(s). (3.) The news media
standards required, herein, as relates to coverage concerning this
document, shall, following ratification of the New Constitution by the
People, be retroactively applied to any news medium or person therein—
including the full punishments relating thereto—for non compliance
with the standards. Likewise, any judge or justice acting counter to
this New Constitution regarding news coverage issues or any part of
the ratification process shall be held fully accountable. The macro-
will of the Citizens shall be Supreme!” [End of the New
Constitution.]
People, realize that most of the TEETH now included in my (our) New
Constitution have been included because of my first-hand-experience
with the unconstitutional top-down power hierarchy in our governments,
all the way to the Supreme (soon-to-be-in-name-only) Court. That
includes my having thoroughly and unconstitutionally been vetted by
both the US Secret Service and the FBI. Such was probably done
because I “might have been” a threat to a criminal, seated US
Senator. Law enforcement felt that it was their duty to defend
elected officials, criminal or not.
When I say that the USA shall never again be a POLICE STATE—with law
enforcement acting as the Gestapos of government—know that such fact
will benefit ALL Americans from ever being fearful of being unfairly
treated by Law Enforcement or the Courts, as I have been! By reading
between the lines, there will never again be an arrest of anyone for
driving over the posted speed limit, if that was ALL the driver was
doing. Under my “NC” fines shall NEVER be used to defray the cost of
government. So no municipality in the USA can give their law officers
“quotas” of how many speeders they are required to stop per day, in
order to pay that officer’s salary.
The original Constitution was intended to be (but was never realized
to be) a Representative Republic. In such a government, the people
determine what can or cannot be done—that is, those things that are
above and beyond what is spelled-out in the Constitution. The
accurately-proportioned-to-the-population representatives only have
the authority to do the will of their constituents. They are NOT our
elected dictators! [Be Not Kings!]
The House, by (unconstitutional) rules, dictates that the chairmen of
its committees and the Speaker of the House shall be from the 'party’
that won the majority. Since that gives “the leaders” more power than
the other members, it is 100% unconstitutional, as are political
parties themselves!!!!! The Speaker and the committee chairmen only
have the “honor”—not the power. Their duty is primarily that of
parliamentarians to make sure that things proceed smoothly.
There are so many disparate power structures in Washington, that most—
even those who have been there a long time—still have no idea who is
in charge. [Read my book, ‘The Shortest Distance; Harmony Through
Prosperity’, to better understand.] House members who are smart
enough to comprehend the powerful rationale that I am making that
Barack Obama is a TRAITOR to this nation and to the whole human race,
are still concerned about what “all-of-this” will do to their chances
of being re elected two years from now. They know, from hard
personal experience, that the liberal media will be shoving
microphones down-their-throats and demanding that they justify their
having done a single thing that isn’t like the “traditional” [and
unconstitutional status quo] way.
I’ve anticipated all of that and include in my “NC” these
requirements, which I highly recommend the House mandate, immediately:
“Representatives shall not intentionally communicate with any news
medium whose coverage area is predominately outside of their home
district. Nor shall they, or any government official, cultivate a
media personae, or make petty public speeches, introductions or
comments lauding any person, living or dead, nor any civil or private
projects or those responsible. Comments to media by representatives
or government employees shall be germane to pending legislation, or to
the exercise of their jobs. The media shall not solicit public
officials’ opinions over those of the People.”
“Felons are prohibited from holding public office. By this amendment,
likewise, it becomes a felony for anyone in government—past, present
or future—to support, or to have supported, any person for public
office if such person being supported would prudently be suspected to
be, or privately be known to be, a felon. Actively campaigning for,
giving financing for, or shielding the truth from the general Public
about a personally known probable felony by any office holder or any
candidate shall likewise be a felony.”
“29th Amendment: Governments shall pass no laws intended to exclude
themselves, their elected or appointed officials, their depts.,
agencies, agents or employees from criminal or civil actions arising
from any claim by any Citizen. Crimes committed against elected or
appointed officials or against any government employee shall carry the
same punishment as similar crimes committed against any Citizen.
Systematic record keeping by law enforcement on law-abiding Citizens
is prohibited by this New Constitution. However, record keeping by
other depts. or agencies shall be thorough and accurate concerning
dealings with any Citizen, group or business, but no common data base
is allowed, nor inter departmental data exchange—except by court
order. The intentional destruction, altering, exclusion or
misrepresentation of official correspondence or other records by any
government employee, elected or appointed officials or their agents in
an attempt to influence any present or future criminal or civil
proceeding is hereby made a felony on all so acting. It shall be
unlawful for law enforcement to endanger the Public in the reckless
pursuit of a real or supposed wrongdoer, or to batter anyone already
apprehended, or to allow another to batter such person without
restraint. No Citizen can be stopped, detained, forced to show ID,
nor required to explain any activity—including running—without there
being substantial proof of their involvement in a felony. Petty crime
commitment does not give law enforcement license to make unreasonable
searches nor seizures.”
“14th Amendment: Persons born within the USA, if their mothers are
Citizens or legal residents, and those persons who have attained
naturalization, are Citizens of the USA and the state where they
reside. No government, court nor public vote shall make, continue, or
enforce any law or combination of laws that abridges the civil rights,
privileges or immunities of Citizens of the USA; nor shall anyone
deprive a person of life, liberty or property without due process of
law, nor deny to any Citizen the equal protection of the laws.”
It is obvious that my “NC” is a long and exceedingly well thought-out
document. I will try to include smaller excerpts, later, if those
will adequately explain what I have done. I should mention that in
the process of my butting heads with Government over my exposé
regarding that criminal US Senator, that I wrote a detailed, small
font, legal page description of all that had transpired. I sent the
latter to every single governor in this country—including to George W.
Bush, then Governor of Texas. There was a conference of governors
scheduled, and I was hoping that those people would discuss what had
happened and perhaps make enough waves to start turning things around
in this country. Because I know that governors have mail readers, I
have no way of knowing if the younger Bush was ever informed of my
travail. But I can reason, with near certainty, that the detailed
letter I later sent to Mrs. Barbara Bush urging that she and her
husband not make a scheduled campaign appearance for the criminal US
Senator, contributed to my being arrested at the behest of the FBI.
I hope that by my candidly revealing all of these things, that you
readers will realize how exceedingly well-positioned I am to, single-
handedly, pen-and-polish our ‘New Constitution of the United States of
America’. The US Secret Service and the FBI know that fact, too. So,
I don’t expect any of the more intelligent people in those agencies to
stand in the way of having the House DEMAND the following: “Barack
Obama shall, within 72 hours, deliver to the Main House of
Representatives Chamber, PHYSICAL proof of his having been born in
Hawaii or face arrest for capital treason against the USA.”
“Pay It Forward!” and… “Long Live the USA!”
Respectfully submitted,
John A. Armistead,
Respectfully submitted,
Author and Patriot
>
> flourishing such that businesses are practically begging for workers
> to fill the jobs needing to be filled. Instead of waiting on street
> corners for the next welfare check to arrive, unemployed youths and
> adults would see others of their had-been numbers beginning to become
> better off because of the sweat of their own brows. Eventually, most
> will realize that working is more personally satisfying than shooting
> hoops at the local park, just to seem to be busy, when the opposite is
> true.
>
> It may be soothing toourcollective, saddened hearts to haveour… God
> to fill the jobs needing to be filled. Instead of waiting on street
> corners for the next welfare check to arrive, unemployed youths and
> adults would see others of their had-been numbers beginning to become
> better off because of the sweat of their own brows. Eventually, most
> will realize that working is more personally satisfying than shooting
> hoops at the local park, just to seem to be busy, when the opposite is
> true.
>
> damned “president” express the national sorrow. But the one saying
> those things is guilty of the murder of four Americans in Benghazi,
> simply because he wouldn’t authorize the easy defense of the embassy,
> there. Obama could not possibly be expressing national sorrow over
> the killings, today, because he was actually feeling JUBILATION that
> “something” is taking attention away from his own criminal and
> treasonous actions that have characterized every single day that he
> has squatted in, grunted and soiled the White House and the Executive
> Branch of government.
>
> Hurricane Sandy allowed Obama to pretend empathy for those on the
> Jersey shore. Chris Christie embraced that tyrant, because Christie
> needed to seem to be happy for his constituents. Christie’s embrace,
> rather than being a prelude to a justifiable stab-in-the-back for
> Obama, was instead, the final stab that cost Romney a win—that would
> have been in spite of the rampant criminality of Obama and the
> Democrats. However, Romney DID win big among thosevoterswho had not
> those things is guilty of the murder of four Americans in Benghazi,
> simply because he wouldn’t authorize the easy defense of the embassy,
> there. Obama could not possibly be expressing national sorrow over
> the killings, today, because he was actually feeling JUBILATION that
> “something” is taking attention away from his own criminal and
> treasonous actions that have characterized every single day that he
> has squatted in, grunted and soiled the White House and the Executive
> Branch of government.
>
> Hurricane Sandy allowed Obama to pretend empathy for those on the
> Jersey shore. Chris Christie embraced that tyrant, because Christie
> needed to seem to be happy for his constituents. Christie’s embrace,
> rather than being a prelude to a justifiable stab-in-the-back for
> Obama, was instead, the final stab that cost Romney a win—that would
> have been in spite of the rampant criminality of Obama and the
NoEinstein
Dec 16, 2012, 10:14:06 AM12/16/12
to
On Dec 15, 4:25 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
Honor Not Thieves!
By John A. Armistead
Lose a little or a lot,
That’s snatched before your very eyes,
Then feign disbelief,
At the wiles of the thief.
Robyn Hoods in disguise,
Claim that they are for others caring.
While so few of those others,
Ever escape their dependencies.
Is the motive of the thieves to aid?
Or is it to control by illicit generosity?
Democrats they call themselves,
While treading on any democracy that’s fair.
Our decline to the brink happened slow,
So, the populace would hardly even know,
That our Constitution has long been denied,
Because so few will acknowledge what’s inside.
Is the President our authority?
Or shouldn’t he our servant be?
Obama surely “plays” the role,
While his socialist policies take their toll.
There are communists in the White House—
sound the alarm!
They hide behind Obama’s suavity and charm,
Can’t anyone see through his ruse,
While they all continue to do great harm?
Is the Secret Service bound to protect,
The scoundrels in our midst,
While they honor not their sworn oaths,
To the Constitution that they allow to fail?
The Supreme Court doesn’t give a rip,
That fair people have lost any sway.
Their loyalty is to their own biases,
Not to the Constitution they don’t comprehend.
Their black robes are covers for their deceit.
And their tall chairs are their thrones-over-all.
Like ducks-in-a-row they enter through one door.
Imagine the crap that must be on that floor!
The US Senate is a model of low efficiency.
From day one it’s violated the citizens’ parity,
While attracting mostly egotists,
Because the media has held those on high.
Our corrupt media is the bane of a fair democracy,
That brainwashes us 24/7,
With polls and well-chosen video bites,
And commentators hired to deceive.
Though the House is nearly split-down-the-aisle,
Reason has a good chance to prevail,
If each one of them will disregard any fear.
Those people can save our USA dear!
They can block the media at the door,
And all quickly come to agree,
That Obama is the cause,
Of the USA teetering-on-the-brink.
No law shall ever be respected,
That respected not the people.
And no court shall be respected,
That respected not the Constitution.
That document clearly requires:
“No person except a natural born citizen…”
But Obama was never vetted,
And the country is now so indebted.
Obama will surely hang,
For not respecting our Constitution dear.
He’s the Robyn Hood in disguise,
Bent on causing our country’s demise.
72 hours is all it will take,
To prove Obama is a fake.
While some in the nation will grieve,
The USA shall honor not thieves!
“Pay It Forward!” … and “Long Live the USA!”
>
> approved by 60% of thevoters. Voting to approve the New Constitution
>
> read more »
>
Honor Not Thieves!
By John A. Armistead
Lose a little or a lot,
That’s snatched before your very eyes,
Then feign disbelief,
At the wiles of the thief.
Robyn Hoods in disguise,
Claim that they are for others caring.
While so few of those others,
Ever escape their dependencies.
Is the motive of the thieves to aid?
Or is it to control by illicit generosity?
Democrats they call themselves,
While treading on any democracy that’s fair.
Our decline to the brink happened slow,
So, the populace would hardly even know,
That our Constitution has long been denied,
Because so few will acknowledge what’s inside.
Is the President our authority?
Or shouldn’t he our servant be?
Obama surely “plays” the role,
While his socialist policies take their toll.
There are communists in the White House—
sound the alarm!
They hide behind Obama’s suavity and charm,
Can’t anyone see through his ruse,
While they all continue to do great harm?
Is the Secret Service bound to protect,
The scoundrels in our midst,
While they honor not their sworn oaths,
To the Constitution that they allow to fail?
The Supreme Court doesn’t give a rip,
That fair people have lost any sway.
Their loyalty is to their own biases,
Not to the Constitution they don’t comprehend.
Their black robes are covers for their deceit.
And their tall chairs are their thrones-over-all.
Like ducks-in-a-row they enter through one door.
Imagine the crap that must be on that floor!
The US Senate is a model of low efficiency.
From day one it’s violated the citizens’ parity,
While attracting mostly egotists,
Because the media has held those on high.
Our corrupt media is the bane of a fair democracy,
That brainwashes us 24/7,
With polls and well-chosen video bites,
And commentators hired to deceive.
Though the House is nearly split-down-the-aisle,
Reason has a good chance to prevail,
If each one of them will disregard any fear.
Those people can save our USA dear!
They can block the media at the door,
And all quickly come to agree,
That Obama is the cause,
Of the USA teetering-on-the-brink.
No law shall ever be respected,
That respected not the people.
And no court shall be respected,
That respected not the Constitution.
That document clearly requires:
“No person except a natural born citizen…”
But Obama was never vetted,
And the country is now so indebted.
Obama will surely hang,
For not respecting our Constitution dear.
He’s the Robyn Hood in disguise,
Bent on causing our country’s demise.
72 hours is all it will take,
To prove Obama is a fake.
While some in the nation will grieve,
The USA shall honor not thieves!
“Pay It Forward!” … and “Long Live the USA!”
>
> On Dec 14, 10:33 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> Katie, Bar the Door!
>
> For well over four years, the liberal media—including “UNFAIR and
> balanced” Fox News—has ignored my Herculean efforts that will, in
> short order, correctourbroken government(s). Going back much more
>
> Katie, Bar the Door!
>
> For well over four years, the liberal media—including “UNFAIR and
> balanced” Fox News—has ignored my Herculean efforts that will, in
> than four years, Britt Hume, who at the time was a give-presidents-
> HELL investigative reporter, ignored my well-explained exposé that a
> certain notorious US Senator was guilty of crimes that would have sent
> his ass to prison. Hume wasn’t alone in being so informed. George
> Will, who was covering one of that senator’s re election campaigns,
> didn’t consider my exposé to be passable with his liberal bosses, so
> he acted like a clearinghouse of “news worthiness.” Cal Thomas, that
> ink-black for hair “contributor” on the news commentary shows, also,
> considered himself to be more of a clearinghouse for news worthiness,
> than a reporter. As a result, my New Constitution now has extremely
> strict limits placed on whatour, generally, finger-down-the-throat
> HELL investigative reporter, ignored my well-explained exposé that a
> certain notorious US Senator was guilty of crimes that would have sent
> his ass to prison. Hume wasn’t alone in being so informed. George
> Will, who was covering one of that senator’s re election campaigns,
> didn’t consider my exposé to be passable with his liberal bosses, so
> he acted like a clearinghouse of “news worthiness.” Cal Thomas, that
> ink-black for hair “contributor” on the news commentary shows, also,
> considered himself to be more of a clearinghouse for news worthiness,
> than a reporter. As a result, my New Constitution now has extremely
> media will be allowed to do, or not do, in the future.
>
> “The media shall not solicit public officials’ opinions over those of
> the People.”
>
> “Section 9: Other than thePresidentor his agents, no person, news
>
> “The media shall not solicit public officials’ opinions over those of
> the People.”
>
> shall not be a vote on italicized portions. (2.) Any person, group or
> business which polls the People on their support or non support of
> this New Constitution or its parts prior to the national referendum,
> shall, retroactively, be guilty of a felony(s). (3.) The news media
> standards required, herein, as relates to coverage concerning this
> document, shall, following ratification of the New Constitution by the
> People, be retroactively applied to any news medium or person therein—
> including the full punishments relating thereto—for non compliance
> with the standards. Likewise, any judge or justice acting counter to
> this New Constitution regarding news coverage issues or any part of
> the ratification process shall be held fully accountable. The macro-
> will of the Citizens shall be Supreme!” [End of the New
> Constitution.]
>
> People, realize that most of the TEETH now included in my (our) New
> Constitution have been included because of my first-hand-experience
> with the unconstitutional top-down power hierarchy inourgovernments,
> all the way to the Supreme (soon-to-be-in-name-only) Court. That
> includes my ...
> business which polls the People on their support or non support of
> this New Constitution or its parts prior to the national referendum,
> shall, retroactively, be guilty of a felony(s). (3.) The news media
> standards required, herein, as relates to coverage concerning this
> document, shall, following ratification of the New Constitution by the
> People, be retroactively applied to any news medium or person therein—
> including the full punishments relating thereto—for non compliance
> with the standards. Likewise, any judge or justice acting counter to
> this New Constitution regarding news coverage issues or any part of
> the ratification process shall be held fully accountable. The macro-
> will of the Citizens shall be Supreme!” [End of the New
> Constitution.]
>
> People, realize that most of the TEETH now included in my (our) New
> Constitution have been included because of my first-hand-experience
> with the unconstitutional top-down power hierarchy inourgovernments,
> all the way to the Supreme (soon-to-be-in-name-only) Court. That
>
> read more »
NoEinstein
Dec 17, 2012, 6:59:06 PM12/17/12
to
On Dec 16, 10:14 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
Negotiate not with thieves!
John Boehner—the maximum 1.5-layers-of-reasoning, stone head, Speaker
of the House—keeps negotiating with, Obama—that criminal,
illegitimate, pseudo “president” who is holding this entire nation
(except me!) hostage! If international terrorists make demands that
our country do such-and-such, our standard reply is: “The USA does
NOT negotiate with terrorists (nor with thieves)!” So, why is Boehner
even speaking to that traitor, who is so soiling the White House?
By applying just one or two additional layers of reasoning, anyone
with an IQ over 105 should be able to comprehend the following:
1. Obama has not and does not support our as-written US Constitution.
2. Obama has not at any time in the last four years “preserved,
protected, and defended” the Constitution, as his Oath (finger-down-
the-throat) required. Instead, he has tried to invalidate that
document by constantly trying to make the USA into a socialist nation.
3. Obama has assumed the attitude of a DICTATOR (Be not Kings!) that
our Founding Fathers were bound-and-determined should NEVER control
this Country!
4. Obama committed FRAUD when he campaigned in 2008 on bringing this
country together, and reducing the deficit, but he has never done a
single thing in those directions!
5. Obama committed bribery numerous times when he teased those like
Gov. Bill Richardson, Colen Powell, and Hillary Clinton into endorsing
him for president, in exchange for their being “considered” for VP.
6. Obama bribed the entire voting population in 2008 by promising a
large rebate on purchased gasoline.
7. Obama nominated two extremely liberal women to the US Supreme
Court as an “alternate” way to get his unconstitutional proposals
enacted.
8. In 2012, Obama committed the continual HIGH CRIMES of fraud, libel
and slander of Mitt Romney and Republicans, as evidenced by his “Push
Granny over the cliff” commercials, and his Romney is a murderer,
commercials.
9. Obama, through his now-criminal surrogate, ex president Bill
Clinton, committed almost daily fraud by giving false information
regarding the job statistics and the country’s economic status.
10. Obama used fraudulent “scare tactics” to get seniors to believe
that Republicans will make all of them fend for themselves.
11. Obama bribed younger voters with grand speeches claiming college
educations should be free to all.
12. Obama bribed those on food stamps by stating those (useless
people) will never have to prove they are seeking work in order to get
paid.
13. Obama chose to let four Americans DIE in Benghazi rather than
have it appear that he is angry at Muslims for what they were about to
do. Note: The latter, non action, is tantamount to CAPITAL
MURDER!!!!!
14. Obama proffered a fraudulent digital document as proof of his
being a native born citizen.
15. Obama has suppressed the rights of the individual states to
protect their borders from illegal immigrants. And he has done so to
garner the “conflict of interest” votes of legal Hispanics in this
country, who can’t, however, under the Constitution get to “legalize”
what is so clearly illegal, simply because the people are Hispanic!
Knowing just the above tip-of-the-iceberg, not a SOUL in the House of
Representatives should even answer a phone call from anyone in the
(supposed) executive branch!!!!! Since I’m, well, a very, very
intelligent person, I know that Laws, in the main, depend on the
willful acceptance of those laws by the People in order for such to be
enforceable. The ONLY reason it is ’presumed’ that taxes will go up
Jan. 1, 2013, is because those hardheaded people in the House don’t
realize that they, as the ONLY legally functioning branch, have it
within their POWER to say that such “law:” is UNCONSTITUTIONAL—because
it isn’t FAIR, and because such has never had the consent-of-the-
governed!
By the simple expedient of having the House proclaim that ‘Obama Care’
is as UNCONSTITUTIONAL as the CRIMINAL Supreme Court that supposedly
confirmed it, the economic climate in this country will improve over
night! Businesses will be confident enough to start hiring again, and
tax revenues will start going up. And with my simple and workable
solution to the SS and Medicare problems in the offing, the cost of
government will start going down every year until socialism is DEAD,
once-and-for-all in America!
After I wrote my to-the-point poem, “Honor not thieves!” I got some
long and not happy vibes from none other than our TRAITOR IN
RESIDENCE, Barack Obama. About half an hour later, I got similar,
“(unmarked) grave” looking vibes from Obama’s co-traitor, David
Axelrod. Both of those men KNOW that the only way their necks can
survive, is for the “Washington Way” to be so entrenched that no one
dares make any waves. However, it will take only ONE “Mr. Smith Goes
to Washington” to break through that calcified veil. Might that be
‘dancing’ Senator Alan Simpson? Mitch McConnell, who is, apparently,
close to emotional burnout, might get pumped up enough to say: “Enough
is enough, People! We as a nation shall never again honor thieves,
crooks and treasonous BASTARDS like Barack Obama. Arrest his ass!”
I am most surprised and pleased that President George W. Bush is
sending me so many smiling vibes. His energy to be hiking and bike
riding, apparently, is matched by the emotional energy to send out
strong vibes. George has had to take-on-the-chin for four years
having Obama blaming Bush’s economic policies for Obama’s own failed
presidency. While neither of us will enjoy when Obama is hanged, we
know that that is only fit and proper for an out-and-out traitor.
Some years ago, I read or heard that in the State of Texas, it is
considered to be a viable criminal defense to claim that the person
who was killed was so wicked that he SHOULD have been killed. Since
Obama—through his devaluing of the purchasing power of the dollar,
alone—has STOLEN at least $5,000 from every household in America, I
think that it is most appropriate that he be declared by me, and by
the whole Constitution in SPIRIT, to be an outlaw.
The majority of those now in the House went there to improve things.
By the simple expedient of giving Obama 72 hours to deliver PHYSICAL
proof of his having been born in Hawaii, the USA can begin to be
righted on its course as a nation! No needy person needs to fear
being snubbed in any way. With our economy flourishing, again, the
avenues for having our needy be helped will be wide and many.
“Pay It Forward!” …and “Long Live the USA!”
>
Negotiate not with thieves!
John Boehner—the maximum 1.5-layers-of-reasoning, stone head, Speaker
of the House—keeps negotiating with, Obama—that criminal,
illegitimate, pseudo “president” who is holding this entire nation
(except me!) hostage! If international terrorists make demands that
our country do such-and-such, our standard reply is: “The USA does
NOT negotiate with terrorists (nor with thieves)!” So, why is Boehner
even speaking to that traitor, who is so soiling the White House?
By applying just one or two additional layers of reasoning, anyone
with an IQ over 105 should be able to comprehend the following:
1. Obama has not and does not support our as-written US Constitution.
2. Obama has not at any time in the last four years “preserved,
protected, and defended” the Constitution, as his Oath (finger-down-
the-throat) required. Instead, he has tried to invalidate that
document by constantly trying to make the USA into a socialist nation.
3. Obama has assumed the attitude of a DICTATOR (Be not Kings!) that
our Founding Fathers were bound-and-determined should NEVER control
this Country!
4. Obama committed FRAUD when he campaigned in 2008 on bringing this
country together, and reducing the deficit, but he has never done a
single thing in those directions!
5. Obama committed bribery numerous times when he teased those like
Gov. Bill Richardson, Colen Powell, and Hillary Clinton into endorsing
him for president, in exchange for their being “considered” for VP.
6. Obama bribed the entire voting population in 2008 by promising a
large rebate on purchased gasoline.
7. Obama nominated two extremely liberal women to the US Supreme
Court as an “alternate” way to get his unconstitutional proposals
enacted.
8. In 2012, Obama committed the continual HIGH CRIMES of fraud, libel
and slander of Mitt Romney and Republicans, as evidenced by his “Push
Granny over the cliff” commercials, and his Romney is a murderer,
commercials.
9. Obama, through his now-criminal surrogate, ex president Bill
Clinton, committed almost daily fraud by giving false information
regarding the job statistics and the country’s economic status.
10. Obama used fraudulent “scare tactics” to get seniors to believe
that Republicans will make all of them fend for themselves.
11. Obama bribed younger voters with grand speeches claiming college
educations should be free to all.
12. Obama bribed those on food stamps by stating those (useless
people) will never have to prove they are seeking work in order to get
paid.
13. Obama chose to let four Americans DIE in Benghazi rather than
have it appear that he is angry at Muslims for what they were about to
do. Note: The latter, non action, is tantamount to CAPITAL
MURDER!!!!!
14. Obama proffered a fraudulent digital document as proof of his
being a native born citizen.
15. Obama has suppressed the rights of the individual states to
protect their borders from illegal immigrants. And he has done so to
garner the “conflict of interest” votes of legal Hispanics in this
country, who can’t, however, under the Constitution get to “legalize”
what is so clearly illegal, simply because the people are Hispanic!
Knowing just the above tip-of-the-iceberg, not a SOUL in the House of
Representatives should even answer a phone call from anyone in the
(supposed) executive branch!!!!! Since I’m, well, a very, very
intelligent person, I know that Laws, in the main, depend on the
willful acceptance of those laws by the People in order for such to be
enforceable. The ONLY reason it is ’presumed’ that taxes will go up
Jan. 1, 2013, is because those hardheaded people in the House don’t
realize that they, as the ONLY legally functioning branch, have it
within their POWER to say that such “law:” is UNCONSTITUTIONAL—because
it isn’t FAIR, and because such has never had the consent-of-the-
governed!
By the simple expedient of having the House proclaim that ‘Obama Care’
is as UNCONSTITUTIONAL as the CRIMINAL Supreme Court that supposedly
confirmed it, the economic climate in this country will improve over
night! Businesses will be confident enough to start hiring again, and
tax revenues will start going up. And with my simple and workable
solution to the SS and Medicare problems in the offing, the cost of
government will start going down every year until socialism is DEAD,
once-and-for-all in America!
After I wrote my to-the-point poem, “Honor not thieves!” I got some
long and not happy vibes from none other than our TRAITOR IN
RESIDENCE, Barack Obama. About half an hour later, I got similar,
“(unmarked) grave” looking vibes from Obama’s co-traitor, David
Axelrod. Both of those men KNOW that the only way their necks can
survive, is for the “Washington Way” to be so entrenched that no one
dares make any waves. However, it will take only ONE “Mr. Smith Goes
to Washington” to break through that calcified veil. Might that be
‘dancing’ Senator Alan Simpson? Mitch McConnell, who is, apparently,
close to emotional burnout, might get pumped up enough to say: “Enough
is enough, People! We as a nation shall never again honor thieves,
crooks and treasonous BASTARDS like Barack Obama. Arrest his ass!”
I am most surprised and pleased that President George W. Bush is
sending me so many smiling vibes. His energy to be hiking and bike
riding, apparently, is matched by the emotional energy to send out
strong vibes. George has had to take-on-the-chin for four years
having Obama blaming Bush’s economic policies for Obama’s own failed
presidency. While neither of us will enjoy when Obama is hanged, we
know that that is only fit and proper for an out-and-out traitor.
Some years ago, I read or heard that in the State of Texas, it is
considered to be a viable criminal defense to claim that the person
who was killed was so wicked that he SHOULD have been killed. Since
Obama—through his devaluing of the purchasing power of the dollar,
alone—has STOLEN at least $5,000 from every household in America, I
think that it is most appropriate that he be declared by me, and by
the whole Constitution in SPIRIT, to be an outlaw.
The majority of those now in the House went there to improve things.
By the simple expedient of giving Obama 72 hours to deliver PHYSICAL
proof of his having been born in Hawaii, the USA can begin to be
righted on its course as a nation! No needy person needs to fear
being snubbed in any way. With our economy flourishing, again, the
avenues for having our needy be helped will be wide and many.
“Pay It Forward!” …and “Long Live the USA!”
Respectfully submitted,
John A. Armistead,
Author and Patriot
>
John A. Armistead,
Author and Patriot
>
> On Dec 15, 4:25 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> Honor Not Thieves!
> By John A. Armistead
>
> Lose a little or a lot,
> That’s snatched before your very eyes,
> Then feign disbelief,
> At the wiles of the thief.
>
> Robyn Hoods in disguise,
> Claim that they are for others caring.
> While so few of those others,
> Ever escape their dependencies.
>
> Is the motive of the thieves to aid?
> Or is it to control by illicit generosity?
> Democrats they call themselves,
> While treading on any democracy that’s fair.
>
> Our decline to the brink happened slow,
> So, the populace would hardly even know,
> That our Constitution has long been denied,
> Because so few will acknowledge what’s inside.
>
> Is the President our authority?
> Orshouldn’the our servant be?
>
> Honor Not Thieves!
> By John A. Armistead
>
> Lose a little or a lot,
> That’s snatched before your very eyes,
> Then feign disbelief,
> At the wiles of the thief.
>
> Robyn Hoods in disguise,
> Claim that they are for others caring.
> While so few of those others,
> Ever escape their dependencies.
>
> Is the motive of the thieves to aid?
> Or is it to control by illicit generosity?
> Democrats they call themselves,
> While treading on any democracy that’s fair.
>
> Our decline to the brink happened slow,
> So, the populace would hardly even know,
> That our Constitution has long been denied,
> Because so few will acknowledge what’s inside.
>
> Is the President our authority?
Tommy
Dec 17, 2012, 7:23:02 PM12/17/12
to
"NoEinstein" <noein...@bellsouth.net> wrote a load of crap in message
news:e82354d2-
I waded through this crap diligently, waiting for the freeware -
Ohh well, you have to listen to thunder -
Or you put your fingers in your ears and go nyahh nyahh nyahhh nyahh -
indeed :-|
Cheers
Tommy
news:e82354d2-
I waded through this crap diligently, waiting for the freeware -
Ohh well, you have to listen to thunder -
Or you put your fingers in your ears and go nyahh nyahh nyahhh nyahh -
indeed :-|
Cheers
Tommy
NoEinstein
Dec 18, 2012, 1:13:59 PM12/18/12
to
On Dec 17, 6:59 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
Getting Through to the Timid Ones and Hardheads!
1. There is no validity to the “winning” of an election wherein the
candidate claiming to have so done intentionally used FRAUD, threats,
BRIBERY, favoritism and general unconstitutional unfairness in even a
SINGLE provable instance of either one!!!!!
2. There is no validity in any existing or proposed “law” that works
counter to the SPIRIT of the Constitution so as to, in any way,
restrict the personal civil liberties of any citizen or class.
3. There is no validity in any existing or proposed “law” that
substitutes governmental actions for the constitutionally guaranteed
right of all citizens to determine their own fair destiny without
government interference.
4. There is no Constitutionality to political parties of ANY
ideology, because such seek group-against-group ’power’ that always
unfairly treats 50% of the population!!!!!
5. There is no constitutionality nor validity to any ideology that
supports the THEFT of the assets of one class to give to another
class.
6. Realize that personal property rights are the primary bone-of-
contention in government, and not petty social issues. Therefore,
since the primary thrust of the Democratic party is to TAKE the
personal property of another constitutionally-protected CLASS, by the
“force” of unconstitutional, socialist laws, then, the votes of anyone—
in government or without—who was, or is now, a God Damned Democrat is,
and always shall be, INVALID!!!!!
7. Republicans, based on their CONSERVATIVE economic positions,
alone, and on NONE of their unconstitutional social issues, are the
only voices of REASON (after yours truly) in this country. Therefore,
the ONLY valid votes in determining any action taken on economic
issues prior to the ratification of my (our) New Constitution, are
those cast by CONSERVATIVES!!!
8. Since our courts—primarily from the top down—have evolved to be
extensions of the unconstitutionally divisive political parties that
are so represented, then the decisions of ALL higher courts have no
legality nor validity, and shall not be respected.
9. Since the ENTIRE Executive Branch, and major portions of the top
Judicial Branch are corrupt Democratic socialists, bent on destroying
the USA, then, no action nor non action by either of the latter shall
have the force of law!!!!!
10. Therefore, be it known: The CONSERVATIVES in the House of
Representatives, relative to all economic issues, but NOT to a single
social issue, is now the sole, constitutionally-functioning body
qualified to direct the economic course of the USA. Conservative
voices all across this great country are URGED to rally behind House
Conservatives!
The order of business of the NEW House shall be: (Democrats go home
for the Holidays and never come back!)
1. Bar the doors leading to the House side of the Capital, with the
objective of blocking entry by a single member of the media!!!!! Turn
off broadcasting (but not recording) of what is transpiring in the
House, and confiscate all cell phones with cameras!!!
2. Vote Boehner OUT as Speaker!!!!! He is much too stigmatized for
having ‘negotiated’ to allow the USA to keep creeping toward 100%
‘Atlas Shrugged’ socialism.
3. Send a “House ORDER” (a new term!) to Barack Obama informing him
that he has just 72 hours to deliver to the House main chamber
PHYSICAL proof of his having been born in Hawaii, or to be arrested
for capital, hang-by-the-neck-until-dead treason.
4. Send a “House ORDER” to the head of the US Secret Service
informing them that Barack Obama shall not be allowed to fly on Air
Force One, nor to be motorcaded to another location.
5. After the 72 hours explained in 3, above, have the NEW Speaker of
the House go out onto the Capital steps and announce, (A) that,
because the Executive Branch and the upper Judicial Branch are
unconstitutionally corrupt, the NEW House—composed only of economic
CONSERVATIVES—declares that ‘Obama Care’ is UNCONSTITUTIONAL and
invalid!!!!! (B) Declare that the tax laws that were in effect for
2012 shall REMAIN in effect for at least the entire 2013 fiscal
year!!!! (So there is no looming fiscal cliff!!!) (C) Inform the
country that no ruling by the Supreme Court has any validity since
Barack Obama, fraudulently, assumed the role of president. (D)
Explain that Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan are our legally-elected
President and Vice President and shall be moving into the Chief
Executive Offices, immediately!!!!! (E) Explain that Barack Obama
and his top White House Staff have been arrested for TREASON, and that
Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid have been similarly arrested. (F)
Reassure the Nation and the World that what is being done is to
REINSTALL our Constitution—that has been so grossly neglected for the
last century—as our ruling document in SPIRIT, until our STRENGTHENED,
CLARIFIED and much more COMPREHENSIVE ‘New Constitution of the United
States of America’ can rightly be ratified.
I hope “the above” is defined clearly enough for our last-saving-grace
House of Representatives to understand. Since I’ve recently gotten
some good, smiling vibes from Fox’s Chris Wallace, and subsequently, a
brief, disbelieving smiling vibe from Bret Baier, I’m wondering if
either or both of those men are up-to-the-task of covering some REAL
breaking news like I’m proposing should soon come to be. People,
please realize that John A. Armistead, THE most intelligent person on
Earth today, who is in the league with Da Vinci and Christ Jesus—my
personal hero and savior—has unselfishly devoted 17 years of his life
to defining OPTIMUM government. Such will allow the maximum amount of
fairly-achieved prosperity for the maximum number of people, the world
over—including Muslims.
In order to allow “believers”—or those who agree with my high
objectives for the USA—to ‘subtly’ be KNOWN to one another, I ask that
each of you, who are sincerely willing to put aside petty group-
against-group divisiveness in favor of genuine love-of-humanity
NEIGHBORLINESS (for all races, creeds and nations), do the following:
Reach into your pocket or purse, or look into the back of your desk
drawers; locate and place a ballpoint pen in your left shirt or coat
pocket. Anyone, like me… in my turtleneck shirt, without a chest
pocket, clip a small safety pin to your blouse or jacket. Such
innocuous signals will—if we will… “Pay It Forward!”—soon light up the
world!
At this Christmas season, I would like to champion, and to urge
millions more to champion, the world-wide efforts of the Reverend
Franklin Graham, who by DEEDS, not just words, is working to change
the “caring” climate in our troubled world. I urge all who will to
pray that those mired down in our dysfunctional government will see-
the-Holy-light. And pray for those in our severely biased media to
take long vacations. Enough hurtful words have been said already!
*** “Four things I know for sure: It is better to love than to hate;
it is better to give than to take; it is better to help rather than to
hinder; and it is better to forgive rather than to hold a grudge.”
“Pay It Forward!” … and “Long Live the USA!”
Respectfully submitted,
John A. Armistead
Author and Patriot
>
> long and not happy vibes from none other thanourTRAITOR IN
> avenues for havingourneedy be helped will be wide and many.
>
Getting Through to the Timid Ones and Hardheads!
1. There is no validity to the “winning” of an election wherein the
candidate claiming to have so done intentionally used FRAUD, threats,
BRIBERY, favoritism and general unconstitutional unfairness in even a
SINGLE provable instance of either one!!!!!
2. There is no validity in any existing or proposed “law” that works
counter to the SPIRIT of the Constitution so as to, in any way,
restrict the personal civil liberties of any citizen or class.
3. There is no validity in any existing or proposed “law” that
substitutes governmental actions for the constitutionally guaranteed
right of all citizens to determine their own fair destiny without
government interference.
4. There is no Constitutionality to political parties of ANY
ideology, because such seek group-against-group ’power’ that always
unfairly treats 50% of the population!!!!!
5. There is no constitutionality nor validity to any ideology that
supports the THEFT of the assets of one class to give to another
class.
6. Realize that personal property rights are the primary bone-of-
contention in government, and not petty social issues. Therefore,
since the primary thrust of the Democratic party is to TAKE the
personal property of another constitutionally-protected CLASS, by the
“force” of unconstitutional, socialist laws, then, the votes of anyone—
in government or without—who was, or is now, a God Damned Democrat is,
and always shall be, INVALID!!!!!
7. Republicans, based on their CONSERVATIVE economic positions,
alone, and on NONE of their unconstitutional social issues, are the
only voices of REASON (after yours truly) in this country. Therefore,
the ONLY valid votes in determining any action taken on economic
issues prior to the ratification of my (our) New Constitution, are
those cast by CONSERVATIVES!!!
8. Since our courts—primarily from the top down—have evolved to be
extensions of the unconstitutionally divisive political parties that
are so represented, then the decisions of ALL higher courts have no
legality nor validity, and shall not be respected.
9. Since the ENTIRE Executive Branch, and major portions of the top
Judicial Branch are corrupt Democratic socialists, bent on destroying
the USA, then, no action nor non action by either of the latter shall
have the force of law!!!!!
10. Therefore, be it known: The CONSERVATIVES in the House of
Representatives, relative to all economic issues, but NOT to a single
social issue, is now the sole, constitutionally-functioning body
qualified to direct the economic course of the USA. Conservative
voices all across this great country are URGED to rally behind House
Conservatives!
The order of business of the NEW House shall be: (Democrats go home
for the Holidays and never come back!)
1. Bar the doors leading to the House side of the Capital, with the
objective of blocking entry by a single member of the media!!!!! Turn
off broadcasting (but not recording) of what is transpiring in the
House, and confiscate all cell phones with cameras!!!
2. Vote Boehner OUT as Speaker!!!!! He is much too stigmatized for
having ‘negotiated’ to allow the USA to keep creeping toward 100%
‘Atlas Shrugged’ socialism.
3. Send a “House ORDER” (a new term!) to Barack Obama informing him
that he has just 72 hours to deliver to the House main chamber
PHYSICAL proof of his having been born in Hawaii, or to be arrested
for capital, hang-by-the-neck-until-dead treason.
4. Send a “House ORDER” to the head of the US Secret Service
informing them that Barack Obama shall not be allowed to fly on Air
Force One, nor to be motorcaded to another location.
5. After the 72 hours explained in 3, above, have the NEW Speaker of
the House go out onto the Capital steps and announce, (A) that,
because the Executive Branch and the upper Judicial Branch are
unconstitutionally corrupt, the NEW House—composed only of economic
CONSERVATIVES—declares that ‘Obama Care’ is UNCONSTITUTIONAL and
invalid!!!!! (B) Declare that the tax laws that were in effect for
2012 shall REMAIN in effect for at least the entire 2013 fiscal
year!!!! (So there is no looming fiscal cliff!!!) (C) Inform the
country that no ruling by the Supreme Court has any validity since
Barack Obama, fraudulently, assumed the role of president. (D)
Explain that Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan are our legally-elected
President and Vice President and shall be moving into the Chief
Executive Offices, immediately!!!!! (E) Explain that Barack Obama
and his top White House Staff have been arrested for TREASON, and that
Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid have been similarly arrested. (F)
Reassure the Nation and the World that what is being done is to
REINSTALL our Constitution—that has been so grossly neglected for the
last century—as our ruling document in SPIRIT, until our STRENGTHENED,
CLARIFIED and much more COMPREHENSIVE ‘New Constitution of the United
States of America’ can rightly be ratified.
I hope “the above” is defined clearly enough for our last-saving-grace
House of Representatives to understand. Since I’ve recently gotten
some good, smiling vibes from Fox’s Chris Wallace, and subsequently, a
brief, disbelieving smiling vibe from Bret Baier, I’m wondering if
either or both of those men are up-to-the-task of covering some REAL
breaking news like I’m proposing should soon come to be. People,
please realize that John A. Armistead, THE most intelligent person on
Earth today, who is in the league with Da Vinci and Christ Jesus—my
personal hero and savior—has unselfishly devoted 17 years of his life
to defining OPTIMUM government. Such will allow the maximum amount of
fairly-achieved prosperity for the maximum number of people, the world
over—including Muslims.
In order to allow “believers”—or those who agree with my high
objectives for the USA—to ‘subtly’ be KNOWN to one another, I ask that
each of you, who are sincerely willing to put aside petty group-
against-group divisiveness in favor of genuine love-of-humanity
NEIGHBORLINESS (for all races, creeds and nations), do the following:
Reach into your pocket or purse, or look into the back of your desk
drawers; locate and place a ballpoint pen in your left shirt or coat
pocket. Anyone, like me… in my turtleneck shirt, without a chest
pocket, clip a small safety pin to your blouse or jacket. Such
innocuous signals will—if we will… “Pay It Forward!”—soon light up the
world!
At this Christmas season, I would like to champion, and to urge
millions more to champion, the world-wide efforts of the Reverend
Franklin Graham, who by DEEDS, not just words, is working to change
the “caring” climate in our troubled world. I urge all who will to
pray that those mired down in our dysfunctional government will see-
the-Holy-light. And pray for those in our severely biased media to
take long vacations. Enough hurtful words have been said already!
*** “Four things I know for sure: It is better to love than to hate;
it is better to give than to take; it is better to help rather than to
hinder; and it is better to forgive rather than to hold a grudge.”
“Pay It Forward!” … and “Long Live the USA!”
Respectfully submitted,
John A. Armistead
>
> On Dec 16, 10:14 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> Negotiate not with thieves!
>
> John Boehner—the maximum 1.5-layers-of-reasoning, stone head, Speaker
> of the House—keeps negotiating with, Obama—that criminal,
> illegitimate, pseudo “president” who is holding this entire nation
> (except me!) hostage! If international terrorists make demands thatourcountry do such-and-such,ourstandard reply is: “The USA does
>
> Negotiate not with thieves!
>
> John Boehner—the maximum 1.5-layers-of-reasoning, stone head, Speaker
> of the House—keeps negotiating with, Obama—that criminal,
> illegitimate, pseudo “president” who is holding this entire nation
> NOT negotiate with terrorists (nor with thieves)!” So, why is Boehner
> even speaking to that traitor, who is so soiling the White House?
>
> By applying just one or two additional layers of reasoning, anyone
> with an IQ over 105 should be able to comprehend the following:
>
> 1. Obama has not and does not supportouras-written US Constitution.
> even speaking to that traitor, who is so soiling the White House?
>
> By applying just one or two additional layers of reasoning, anyone
> with an IQ over 105 should be able to comprehend the following:
>
>
> 2. Obama has not at any time in the last four years “preserved,
> protected, and defended” the Constitution, as his Oath (finger-down-
> the-throat) required. Instead, he has tried to invalidate that
> document by constantly trying to make the USA into a socialist nation.
>
> 3. Obama has assumed the attitude of a DICTATOR (Be not Kings!) thatourFounding Fathers were bound-and-determined should NEVER control
> 2. Obama has not at any time in the last four years “preserved,
> protected, and defended” the Constitution, as his Oath (finger-down-
> the-throat) required. Instead, he has tried to invalidate that
> document by constantly trying to make the USA into a socialist nation.
>
> this Country!
>
> 4. Obama committed FRAUD when he campaigned in 2008 on bringing this
> country together, and reducing the deficit, but he has never done a
> single thing in those directions!
>
> 5. Obama committed bribery numerous times when he teased those like
> Gov. Bill Richardson, Colen Powell, and Hillary Clinton into endorsing
> him forpresident, in exchange for their being “considered” for VP.
>
> 4. Obama committed FRAUD when he campaigned in 2008 on bringing this
> country together, and reducing the deficit, but he has never done a
> single thing in those directions!
>
> 5. Obama committed bribery numerous times when he teased those like
> Gov. Bill Richardson, Colen Powell, and Hillary Clinton into endorsing
>
> 6. Obama bribed the entire voting population in 2008 by promising a
> large rebate on purchased gasoline.
>
> 7. Obama nominated two extremely liberal women to the US Supreme
> Court as an “alternate” way to get his unconstitutional proposals
> enacted.
>
> 8. In 2012, Obama committed the continual HIGH CRIMES of fraud, libel
> and slander of Mitt Romney and Republicans, as evidenced by his “Push
> Granny over the cliff” commercials, and his Romney is a murderer,
> commercials.
>
> 9. Obama, through his now-criminal surrogate, expresidentBill
> Clinton, committed almost daily fraud by giving false information
> regarding the job statistics and the country’s economic status.
>
> 10. Obama used fraudulent “scare tactics” to get seniors to believe
> that Republicans will make all of them fend for themselves.
>
> 11. Obama bribed youngervoterswith grand speeches claiming college
> 6. Obama bribed the entire voting population in 2008 by promising a
> large rebate on purchased gasoline.
>
> 7. Obama nominated two extremely liberal women to the US Supreme
> Court as an “alternate” way to get his unconstitutional proposals
> enacted.
>
> 8. In 2012, Obama committed the continual HIGH CRIMES of fraud, libel
> and slander of Mitt Romney and Republicans, as evidenced by his “Push
> Granny over the cliff” commercials, and his Romney is a murderer,
> commercials.
>
> 9. Obama, through his now-criminal surrogate, expresidentBill
> Clinton, committed almost daily fraud by giving false information
> regarding the job statistics and the country’s economic status.
>
> 10. Obama used fraudulent “scare tactics” to get seniors to believe
> that Republicans will make all of them fend for themselves.
>
> RESIDENCE, Barack Obama. About half an hour later, I got similar,
> “(unmarked) grave” looking vibes from Obama’s co-traitor, David
> Axelrod. Both of those men KNOW that the only way their necks can
> survive, is for the “Washington Way” to be so entrenched that no one
> dares make any waves. However, it will take only ONE “Mr. Smith Goes
> to Washington” to break through that calcified veil. Might that be
> ‘dancing’ Senator Alan Simpson? Mitch McConnell, who is, apparently,
> close to emotional burnout, might get pumped up enough to say: “Enough
> is enough, People! We as a nation shall never again honor thieves,
> crooks and treasonous BASTARDS like Barack Obama. Arrest his ass!”
>
> I am most surprised and pleased thatPresidentGeorge W. Bush is
> “(unmarked) grave” looking vibes from Obama’s co-traitor, David
> Axelrod. Both of those men KNOW that the only way their necks can
> survive, is for the “Washington Way” to be so entrenched that no one
> dares make any waves. However, it will take only ONE “Mr. Smith Goes
> to Washington” to break through that calcified veil. Might that be
> ‘dancing’ Senator Alan Simpson? Mitch McConnell, who is, apparently,
> close to emotional burnout, might get pumped up enough to say: “Enough
> is enough, People! We as a nation shall never again honor thieves,
> crooks and treasonous BASTARDS like Barack Obama. Arrest his ass!”
>
> sending me so many smiling vibes. His energy to be hiking and bike
> riding, apparently, is matched by the emotional energy to send out
> strong vibes. George has had to take-on-the-chin for four years
> having Obama blaming Bush’s economic policies for Obama’s own failed
> presidency. While neither of us will enjoy when Obama is hanged, we
> know that that is only fit and proper for an out-and-out traitor.
>
> Some years ago, I read or heard that in the State of Texas, it is
> considered to be a viable criminal defense to claim that the person
> who was killed was so wicked that he SHOULD have been killed. Since
> Obama—through his devaluing of the purchasing power of the dollar,
> alone—has STOLEN at least $5,000 from every household in America, I
> think that it is most appropriate that he be declared by me, and by
> the whole Constitution in SPIRIT, to be an outlaw.
>
> The majority of those now in the House went there to improve things.
> By the simple expedient of giving Obama 72 hours to deliver PHYSICAL
> proof of his having been born in Hawaii, the USA can begin to be
> righted on its course as a nation! No needy person needs to fear
> being snubbed in any way. Withoureconomy flourishing, again, the
> riding, apparently, is matched by the emotional energy to send out
> strong vibes. George has had to take-on-the-chin for four years
> having Obama blaming Bush’s economic policies for Obama’s own failed
> presidency. While neither of us will enjoy when Obama is hanged, we
> know that that is only fit and proper for an out-and-out traitor.
>
> Some years ago, I read or heard that in the State of Texas, it is
> considered to be a viable criminal defense to claim that the person
> who was killed was so wicked that he SHOULD have been killed. Since
> Obama—through his devaluing of the purchasing power of the dollar,
> alone—has STOLEN at least $5,000 from every household in America, I
> think that it is most appropriate that he be declared by me, and by
> the whole Constitution in SPIRIT, to be an outlaw.
>
> The majority of those now in the House went there to improve things.
> By the simple expedient of giving Obama 72 hours to deliver PHYSICAL
> proof of his having been born in Hawaii, the USA can begin to be
> righted on its course as a nation! No needy person needs to fear
> avenues for havingourneedy be helped will be wide and many.
>
> “Pay It Forward!” …and “Long Live the USA!”
>
> Respectfully submitted,
>
> John A. Armistead,
> Author and Patriot
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Dec 15, 4:25 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > Honor Not Thieves!
> > By John A. Armistead
>
> > Lose a little or a lot,
> > That’s snatched before your very eyes,
> > Then feign disbelief,
> > At the wiles of the thief.
>
> > Robyn Hoods in disguise,
> > Claim that they are for others caring.
> > While so few of those others,
> > Ever escape their dependencies.
>
> > Is the motive of the thieves to aid?
> > Or is it to control by illicit generosity?
> > Democrats they call themselves,
> > While treading on any democracy that’s fair.
>
> >Ourdecline to the brink happened slow,
> “Pay It Forward!” …and “Long Live the USA!”
>
> Respectfully submitted,
>
> John A. Armistead,
> Author and Patriot
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Dec 15, 4:25 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > Honor Not Thieves!
> > By John A. Armistead
>
> > Lose a little or a lot,
> > That’s snatched before your very eyes,
> > Then feign disbelief,
> > At the wiles of the thief.
>
> > Robyn Hoods in disguise,
> > Claim that they are for others caring.
> > While so few of those others,
> > Ever escape their dependencies.
>
> > Is the motive of the thieves to aid?
> > Or is it to control by illicit generosity?
> > Democrats they call themselves,
> > While treading on any democracy that’s fair.
>
> > So, the populace would hardly even know,
> > ThatourConstitution has long been denied,
> > Because so few will acknowledge what’s inside.
>
> > Is thePresidentourauthority?
> > Orshouldn’theourservant be?
>
> > Is thePresidentourauthority?
> > Obama surely “plays” the role,
> > While his socialist policies take their toll.
>
> > There are communists in the White House—
> > sound the alarm!
> > They hide behind Obama’s suavity and charm,
> > Can’t anyone see through his ruse,
> > While they all continue to do great harm?
>
> > Is the Secret Service bound to protect,
> > The scoundrels inourmidst,
> > While they honor not their sworn oaths,
> > To the Constitution that they allow to fail?
>
> > The Supreme Court doesn’t give a rip,
> > That fair people have lost any sway.
> > Their loyalty is to their own biases,
> > Not to the Constitution they don’t comprehend.
>
> > Their black robes are covers for their deceit.
> > And their tall chairs are their thrones-over-all.
> > Like ducks-in-a-row they enter through one door.
> > Imagine the crap that must be on that floor!
>
> > The US Senate is a model of low efficiency.
> > From day one it’s violated the citizens’ parity,
> > While attracting mostly egotists,
> > Because the media has held those on high.
>
> >Ourcorrupt media is the bane of a fair democracy,
> > While his socialist policies take their toll.
>
> > There are communists in the White House—
> > sound the alarm!
> > They hide behind Obama’s suavity and charm,
> > Can’t anyone see through his ruse,
> > While they all continue to do great harm?
>
> > Is the Secret Service bound to protect,
> > The scoundrels inourmidst,
> > While they honor not their sworn oaths,
> > To the Constitution that they allow to fail?
>
> > The Supreme Court doesn’t give a rip,
> > That fair people have lost any sway.
> > Their loyalty is to their own biases,
> > Not to the Constitution they don’t comprehend.
>
> > Their black robes are covers for their deceit.
> > And their tall chairs are their thrones-over-all.
> > Like ducks-in-a-row they enter through one door.
> > Imagine the crap that must be on that floor!
>
> > The US Senate is a model of low efficiency.
> > From day one it’s violated the citizens’ parity,
> > While attracting mostly egotists,
> > Because the media has held those on high.
>
> > That brainwashes us 24/7,
> > With polls and well-chosen video bites,
> > And commentators hired to deceive.
>
> > Though the House is nearly split-down-the-aisle,
> > Reason has a good chance to prevail,
> > If each one of them will disregard any fear.
> > Those people can saveourUSA dear!
> > With polls and well-chosen video bites,
> > And commentators hired to deceive.
>
> > Though the House is nearly split-down-the-aisle,
> > Reason has a good chance to prevail,
> > If each one of them will disregard any fear.
>
> > They can block the media at the door,
> > And all quickly come to agree,
> > That Obama is the cause,
> > Of the USA teetering-on-the-brink.
>
> > No law shall ever be respected,
> > That respected not the people.
> > And no court shall be respected,
> > That respected not the Constitution.
>
> > That document clearly requires:
> > “No person except a natural born citizen…”
> > But Obama was never vetted,
> > And the country is now so indebted.
>
> > Obama will surely hang,
> > For not respectingourConstitution dear.
> > They can block the media at the door,
> > And all quickly come to agree,
> > That Obama is the cause,
> > Of the USA teetering-on-the-brink.
>
> > No law shall ever be respected,
> > That respected not the people.
> > And no court shall be respected,
> > That respected not the Constitution.
>
> > That document clearly requires:
> > “No person except a natural born citizen…”
> > But Obama was never vetted,
> > And the country is now so indebted.
>
> > Obama will surely hang,
> > He’s the Robyn Hood in disguise,
> > Bent on causingourcountry’s demise.
>
> > 72 hours is all it will take,
> > To prove Obama is a fake.
> > While some in the nation will grieve,
> > The USA shall honor not thieves!
>
> > “Pay It Forward!” … and
>
> > 72 hours is all it will take,
> > To prove Obama is a fake.
> > While some in the nation will grieve,
> > The USA shall honor not thieves!
>
> > “Pay It Forward!” … and
>
NoEinstein
Dec 18, 2012, 1:18:42 PM12/18/12
to
On Dec 17, 7:23 pm, "Tommy" <tommyleprech...@geemale.com> wrote:
> "NoEinstein" <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote a load of crap in message
Dear Tommy: For every socialist who feels crapped on, I have achieved
one more satisfying relief! — John A. Armistead —
> "NoEinstein" <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote a load of crap in message
one more satisfying relief! — John A. Armistead —
NoEinstein
Dec 18, 2012, 2:16:50 PM12/18/12
to
On Dec 18, 1:13 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
The following link is to a prayer inspired by the terrible CT
shootings. Know that our hope is in the simplist things: "Ask and it
shall be given; knock, and the door will be opened."
http://www.christianpost.com/news/max-lucados-prayer-in-response-to-conn-school-shooting-86681/#vqllSYSvoh82hBQT.99
> 8. Sinceourcourts—primarily from the top down—have evolved to be
> Barack Obama, fraudulently, assumed the role ofpresident. (D)
> Explain that Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan areourlegally-electedPresidentand VicePresidentand shall be moving into the Chief
> the “caring” climate inourtroubled world. I urge all who will to
> pray that those mired down inourdysfunctional government will see-
> the-Holy-light. And pray for those inourseverely biased media to
>
The following link is to a prayer inspired by the terrible CT
shootings. Know that our hope is in the simplist things: "Ask and it
shall be given; knock, and the door will be opened."
http://www.christianpost.com/news/max-lucados-prayer-in-response-to-conn-school-shooting-86681/#vqllSYSvoh82hBQT.99
> Explain that Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan areourlegally-electedPresidentand VicePresidentand shall be moving into the Chief
> Executive Offices, immediately!!!!! (E) Explain that Barack Obama
> and his top White House Staff have been arrested for TREASON, and that
> Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid have been similarly arrested. (F)
> Reassure the Nation and the World that what is being done is to
> REINSTALLourConstitution—that has been so grossly neglected for the
> and his top White House Staff have been arrested for TREASON, and that
> Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid have been similarly arrested. (F)
> Reassure the Nation and the World that what is being done is to
> pray that those mired down inourdysfunctional government will see-
> the-Holy-light. And pray for those inourseverely biased media to
Tommy
Dec 18, 2012, 2:38:24 PM12/18/12
to
"NoEinstein" <noein...@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:cf5501fe-34c4-4a9a...@g6g2000vbk.googlegroups.com...
one more satisfying relief! � John A. Armistead �
----
I'm a Nationalist - and I recognise crap before it 'falls' on me, or is
thrown at me -
I get satisfactory relief from a good thunderous fart though -
Thunder
Wonder
Alarm
Stink
Strife
Smell
Peace
Ease
and
Pleasure
Cheers
Tommy
news:cf5501fe-34c4-4a9a...@g6g2000vbk.googlegroups.com...
----
I'm a Nationalist - and I recognise crap before it 'falls' on me, or is
thrown at me -
I get satisfactory relief from a good thunderous fart though -
Thunder
Wonder
Alarm
Stink
Strife
Smell
Peace
Ease
and
Pleasure
Cheers
Tommy
It is loading more messages.
0 new messages