Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Understanding Political 'Science'
16 views
Skip to first unread message
NoEinstein
Jun 12, 2012, 10:15:28 PM6/12/12
to
Understanding Political “science”.
All discussions of ‘science’ will be moot if the USA continues to sink
into the socialist/communist mire. Our media is dominated by anti-
capitalism at every turn. That includes Fox News, which has about
half of their “fair and balanced“ air time voicing Alan Colmes type
poison. In addition, the majority of their newscasters are liberals.
it was looking like the last vestige of dependable free speech was the
Internet, and possibly “Google”. Even the latter has numerous cancers
of liberalism spread throughout that organization.
One might suppose that a Google news group called “Political Forum”
would be a ‘fair’ place to discuss serious solutions to the problems
facing America. And what “better sounding” site might there be for
revealing my personally composed labor of love: The New Constitution
of the United States of America? I’ve pinned and polished such
document, over the last 15 years, to address the weaknesses in the
original Constitution that are understandably “there”, because the
Founding Fathers didn’t have my advantage of hindsight—or seeing where
that document has consistently fallen short. And they didn’t have my
advantage of a lifetime of observing how the “vagueness” of the
original Constitution has shifted UNCONSTITUTIONAL (by the spirit of
such document) power to the US Supreme Court that gives a single
justice more power than either branch of Congress.
No one need fear that my document has removed the more important
Constitutional protections, such as in the primary wording of the Bill
of Rights. In all cases, except one, the Bill of Rights has been
retained, strengthened and expanded for the advantage of the vast
majority of Americans. The only change—necessitated by the clearly
unconstitutional power of the media in influencing the outcome of
elections—is in this excerpt:
“Bill of Rights and Amendments:
1st Amendment: No law shall be made regarding the establishment of
peaceable religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, but
government, its campaigns, processes, slogans, and disbursements shall
be secular. No law nor private or civil action shall abridge: ***the
freedom of speech of those Citizens who don’t work for the media; the
freedom of a fair and pro-democracy press or other medium; the right
of People to peaceably assemble; and the right of any Citizen or group
to petition government or any of its branches or departments for
redress of grievances. Citizens so petitioning government shall
receive appropriate, relevant, timely, comprehensive, helpful and just
responses from proper authorities who have thoroughly read,
understood, and addressed each salient aspect of the grievances or
requests for directions or clarifications. Failure to so respond to a
rightful petition for redress of a grievance shall, on a single
provable instance, terminate the apt one’s employment, especially
those in management or public office—including judges and justices—who
ignore, frustrate or give the run-around to any competent Citizen who
has been diligent in having a grievance properly addressed, or in
having his or her civil rights fully upheld.”
To restrict the undue influence of… “the media” in determining this
country‘s course, I have, without bias, disallowed any medium, or
person employed by a medium, from making any assessing comments,
whatsoever, regarding a pending election or referenda issue. The
latter does not, however, stop the unbiased COVERAGE of news as it
happens! There just won’t be any more in-your-face commentators
explaining the “significance” of what you have just been shown or
told, before you have had a chance to form your own opinion. And
there will not be a single “Meet the Press” type show nor any more
political columnists or magazines devoted to commenting about politics—
Charles Krauthammer and Rush Limbaugh included.
Last week the often insightful Pat Buchanan was a guest on John
Stossel’s program on Fox. Buchanan lamented, I think rightly, that
the USA is in a dangerous decline. He cited how divided the country
is, group-against-group. He felt allied with Glenn Beck who says that
our national decline could be unstoppable unless corrected before
2016. Pat also expressed concern that the white “core” population of
this country is loosing-out to minorities. Note: As I see it, the
major factor causing minorities to increase in population percentage
is economic inequity. The birthrates of the poorer minorities is much
higher. My New Constitution, by strengthening opportunities through
capitalism for all Americans, should stabilize the birthrates of
minorities to more closely match that of Caucasians. So, the racial
percentages should stop changing.
Stossel, with his often too flippant smirk, supposed that racial
diversity is our strength. He then claimed that this country is
’good’ because of our Constitution and Declaration of Independence.
Stossel just showed how shallowly he thinks! It has been the WEAKNESS
of the original Constitution that allowed the decline of the USA to
happen. The socialist crooks in Congress, not too different from
Stossel, readily praise the Constitution while they easily do end-runs
around its major precepts. With the present weak and largely ignored
Constitution in place, the USA will probably fail.
My “Freedom of Speech” to say these things was threatened, today, by a
red headed socialist from Costa Rica who goes by the handle the
Annointed (sic) One. Somehow, that attorney-used-to-be jerk became a
hired Google moderator to make sure capitalism doesn’t get promoted
too effectively. Since my New Constitution does just that, the
Annointed (sic) JERK has blocked the reply below. He did a similar
thing nine months ago. When I complained to Mr. Nikesh Arora, Senior
Vice President and Chief Business Officer at Google, about the
censorship, I got no reply. Should socialist minorities like Arora be
welcomed in the USA? Not if they violate anyone’s Free Speech Rights,
they shouldn’t be! Google, shame on you! Here is what I wrote that
so offended the red headed jerk, Mark M. Kahle ‘H’ (who must be kin to
Obama):
“Dear Tico (a person from Costa Rica): The original constitution had
as part of its "spirit" allowing people to determine their own
destinies with a minimum of government obstruction. Capitalism, or
determining ones on financial destiny in business, has been
increasingly pressured by monumental restrictions in how businesses
can function. And those pressures are coming from those who wrongly
see government as the "string puller" and provider of all necessities
from cradle to grave. The USA has fought a dozen wars expressly to
STOP allowing socialism, communism and Marxism to determine anything.
Now, our dumb-ass candidates for public office have this STUPID notion
that the number one topic of discussion is: How can government create
the most... jobs. Know this, idiots: It is NOT a function of
government to create a single job! The preface to my New Constitution
says:
“Preface:
The will of the People is the foundation of government. The
People must be represented faithfully and without bias so government
can properly and efficiently perform its functions in the coming
ages. Federal government shall be limited to functions that cannot be
better performed by local and state governments. Such shall be the
enabler of freedom, justice, *** fair commerce, climates of
opportunity ***, cooperative efforts, and national security both
internal and external. Such shall be businesslike yet human;
impartial yet focused; considerate of our environment, heritage, peace
and tranquillity; effective without boastfulness; and divorced from
politics. The Federal government shall not be considered to be
synonymous with the USA, and those therein are not a ruling class nor
are they dictators; rather they are the servants of the USA and shall
be answerable to it and to any law-abiding Citizen or Citizens
thereof. We honor these objectives for the benefit of ourselves and
our posterity.”
Government's DUTY is to enable FAIR commerce and 'climates of
opportunity' that will be conducive to capitalist prosperity. The
number one way government can do that is to GET OFF OF THE BACKS OF
BUSINESSES! If on day one, some President of the USA would remove ALL
taxes on businesses and ALL regulations not involving protection of
the environment, public safety, and fair business practices, the
number of JOBS created would increase by 25% the first year!
Businesses and commerce create jobs, NOT government! In the process
of removing all of those regulations, about 25% of the total
bureaucracies can be shut down. How sad (tongue-in-cheek!) it will be
to have highly paid public employees be out of jobs and OFF of
pensions. But not-to-worry. The thriving economy can take up the
slack in much the same way that millions easily found jobs after WWII
when our 'war machine' shut down. No person willing to work even a
little will starve! Isn’t that what self determination is all about?
Of course it is! — J. A. Armistead — Author and Patriot
I invite any of you patriotic Americans who value my cause of
improving the world to leave a positive comment. There are fewer and
fewer places where you are allowed to do that. — NoEinstein — AKA
John A. Armistead
All discussions of ‘science’ will be moot if the USA continues to sink
into the socialist/communist mire. Our media is dominated by anti-
capitalism at every turn. That includes Fox News, which has about
half of their “fair and balanced“ air time voicing Alan Colmes type
poison. In addition, the majority of their newscasters are liberals.
it was looking like the last vestige of dependable free speech was the
Internet, and possibly “Google”. Even the latter has numerous cancers
of liberalism spread throughout that organization.
One might suppose that a Google news group called “Political Forum”
would be a ‘fair’ place to discuss serious solutions to the problems
facing America. And what “better sounding” site might there be for
revealing my personally composed labor of love: The New Constitution
of the United States of America? I’ve pinned and polished such
document, over the last 15 years, to address the weaknesses in the
original Constitution that are understandably “there”, because the
Founding Fathers didn’t have my advantage of hindsight—or seeing where
that document has consistently fallen short. And they didn’t have my
advantage of a lifetime of observing how the “vagueness” of the
original Constitution has shifted UNCONSTITUTIONAL (by the spirit of
such document) power to the US Supreme Court that gives a single
justice more power than either branch of Congress.
No one need fear that my document has removed the more important
Constitutional protections, such as in the primary wording of the Bill
of Rights. In all cases, except one, the Bill of Rights has been
retained, strengthened and expanded for the advantage of the vast
majority of Americans. The only change—necessitated by the clearly
unconstitutional power of the media in influencing the outcome of
elections—is in this excerpt:
“Bill of Rights and Amendments:
1st Amendment: No law shall be made regarding the establishment of
peaceable religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, but
government, its campaigns, processes, slogans, and disbursements shall
be secular. No law nor private or civil action shall abridge: ***the
freedom of speech of those Citizens who don’t work for the media; the
freedom of a fair and pro-democracy press or other medium; the right
of People to peaceably assemble; and the right of any Citizen or group
to petition government or any of its branches or departments for
redress of grievances. Citizens so petitioning government shall
receive appropriate, relevant, timely, comprehensive, helpful and just
responses from proper authorities who have thoroughly read,
understood, and addressed each salient aspect of the grievances or
requests for directions or clarifications. Failure to so respond to a
rightful petition for redress of a grievance shall, on a single
provable instance, terminate the apt one’s employment, especially
those in management or public office—including judges and justices—who
ignore, frustrate or give the run-around to any competent Citizen who
has been diligent in having a grievance properly addressed, or in
having his or her civil rights fully upheld.”
To restrict the undue influence of… “the media” in determining this
country‘s course, I have, without bias, disallowed any medium, or
person employed by a medium, from making any assessing comments,
whatsoever, regarding a pending election or referenda issue. The
latter does not, however, stop the unbiased COVERAGE of news as it
happens! There just won’t be any more in-your-face commentators
explaining the “significance” of what you have just been shown or
told, before you have had a chance to form your own opinion. And
there will not be a single “Meet the Press” type show nor any more
political columnists or magazines devoted to commenting about politics—
Charles Krauthammer and Rush Limbaugh included.
Last week the often insightful Pat Buchanan was a guest on John
Stossel’s program on Fox. Buchanan lamented, I think rightly, that
the USA is in a dangerous decline. He cited how divided the country
is, group-against-group. He felt allied with Glenn Beck who says that
our national decline could be unstoppable unless corrected before
2016. Pat also expressed concern that the white “core” population of
this country is loosing-out to minorities. Note: As I see it, the
major factor causing minorities to increase in population percentage
is economic inequity. The birthrates of the poorer minorities is much
higher. My New Constitution, by strengthening opportunities through
capitalism for all Americans, should stabilize the birthrates of
minorities to more closely match that of Caucasians. So, the racial
percentages should stop changing.
Stossel, with his often too flippant smirk, supposed that racial
diversity is our strength. He then claimed that this country is
’good’ because of our Constitution and Declaration of Independence.
Stossel just showed how shallowly he thinks! It has been the WEAKNESS
of the original Constitution that allowed the decline of the USA to
happen. The socialist crooks in Congress, not too different from
Stossel, readily praise the Constitution while they easily do end-runs
around its major precepts. With the present weak and largely ignored
Constitution in place, the USA will probably fail.
My “Freedom of Speech” to say these things was threatened, today, by a
red headed socialist from Costa Rica who goes by the handle the
Annointed (sic) One. Somehow, that attorney-used-to-be jerk became a
hired Google moderator to make sure capitalism doesn’t get promoted
too effectively. Since my New Constitution does just that, the
Annointed (sic) JERK has blocked the reply below. He did a similar
thing nine months ago. When I complained to Mr. Nikesh Arora, Senior
Vice President and Chief Business Officer at Google, about the
censorship, I got no reply. Should socialist minorities like Arora be
welcomed in the USA? Not if they violate anyone’s Free Speech Rights,
they shouldn’t be! Google, shame on you! Here is what I wrote that
so offended the red headed jerk, Mark M. Kahle ‘H’ (who must be kin to
Obama):
“Dear Tico (a person from Costa Rica): The original constitution had
as part of its "spirit" allowing people to determine their own
destinies with a minimum of government obstruction. Capitalism, or
determining ones on financial destiny in business, has been
increasingly pressured by monumental restrictions in how businesses
can function. And those pressures are coming from those who wrongly
see government as the "string puller" and provider of all necessities
from cradle to grave. The USA has fought a dozen wars expressly to
STOP allowing socialism, communism and Marxism to determine anything.
Now, our dumb-ass candidates for public office have this STUPID notion
that the number one topic of discussion is: How can government create
the most... jobs. Know this, idiots: It is NOT a function of
government to create a single job! The preface to my New Constitution
says:
“Preface:
The will of the People is the foundation of government. The
People must be represented faithfully and without bias so government
can properly and efficiently perform its functions in the coming
ages. Federal government shall be limited to functions that cannot be
better performed by local and state governments. Such shall be the
enabler of freedom, justice, *** fair commerce, climates of
opportunity ***, cooperative efforts, and national security both
internal and external. Such shall be businesslike yet human;
impartial yet focused; considerate of our environment, heritage, peace
and tranquillity; effective without boastfulness; and divorced from
politics. The Federal government shall not be considered to be
synonymous with the USA, and those therein are not a ruling class nor
are they dictators; rather they are the servants of the USA and shall
be answerable to it and to any law-abiding Citizen or Citizens
thereof. We honor these objectives for the benefit of ourselves and
our posterity.”
Government's DUTY is to enable FAIR commerce and 'climates of
opportunity' that will be conducive to capitalist prosperity. The
number one way government can do that is to GET OFF OF THE BACKS OF
BUSINESSES! If on day one, some President of the USA would remove ALL
taxes on businesses and ALL regulations not involving protection of
the environment, public safety, and fair business practices, the
number of JOBS created would increase by 25% the first year!
Businesses and commerce create jobs, NOT government! In the process
of removing all of those regulations, about 25% of the total
bureaucracies can be shut down. How sad (tongue-in-cheek!) it will be
to have highly paid public employees be out of jobs and OFF of
pensions. But not-to-worry. The thriving economy can take up the
slack in much the same way that millions easily found jobs after WWII
when our 'war machine' shut down. No person willing to work even a
little will starve! Isn’t that what self determination is all about?
Of course it is! — J. A. Armistead — Author and Patriot
I invite any of you patriotic Americans who value my cause of
improving the world to leave a positive comment. There are fewer and
fewer places where you are allowed to do that. — NoEinstein — AKA
John A. Armistead
Igor
Jun 13, 2012, 9:48:47 AM6/13/12
to
problems, dumbass!
Sam Wormley
Jun 13, 2012, 12:25:06 PM6/13/12
to
On 6/12/12 9:15 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
> All discussions of �science� will be moot if the USA continues to sink
> into the socialist/communist mire.
Actually no discussions of any type will transpire among humans
if we extinct ourselves due to unchecked global warming.
> Ocean acidification on track to be among the worst of the last 300 million years
> http://arstechnica.com/science/news/2012/03/ocean-acidification-could-become-worst-in-at-least-300-million-years.ars
>
> Global Warming Leads to 150,000 Deaths Every Year
> http://environment.about.com/od/globalwarmingandhealth/a/gw_deaths.htm
>
> Climate Armageddon: How the World's Weather Could Quickly Run Amok [Excerpt]
> http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=how-worlds-weather-could-quickly-run-amok
>
> Physics Today | Humans may be driving Earth toward catastrophe
> http://blogs.physicstoday.org/newspicks/2012/06/humans-may-be-driving-earth-toward-catastrophe/
>
> All discussions of �science� will be moot if the USA continues to sink
> into the socialist/communist mire.
Actually no discussions of any type will transpire among humans
if we extinct ourselves due to unchecked global warming.
> Ocean acidification on track to be among the worst of the last 300 million years
> http://arstechnica.com/science/news/2012/03/ocean-acidification-could-become-worst-in-at-least-300-million-years.ars
>
> Global Warming Leads to 150,000 Deaths Every Year
> http://environment.about.com/od/globalwarmingandhealth/a/gw_deaths.htm
>
> Climate Armageddon: How the World's Weather Could Quickly Run Amok [Excerpt]
> http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=how-worlds-weather-could-quickly-run-amok
>
> Physics Today | Humans may be driving Earth toward catastrophe
> http://blogs.physicstoday.org/newspicks/2012/06/humans-may-be-driving-earth-toward-catastrophe/
>
NoEinstein
Jun 13, 2012, 9:17:35 PM6/13/12
to
out your comment a bit. The readers will either find what you say to
be informative or humorous. So, try very hard; OK? — NoEinstein —
NoEinstein
Jun 13, 2012, 9:34:42 PM6/13/12
to
On Jun 13, 12:25 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 6/12/12 9:15 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
>
> > All discussions of ‘science’ will be moot if the USA continues to sink
> On 6/12/12 9:15 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
>
> > into the socialist/communist mire.
>
> Actually no discussions of any type will transpire among humans
> if we extinct ourselves due to unchecked global warming.
>
>
>
> > Ocean acidification on track to be among the worst of the last 300 million years
> > http://arstechnica.com/science/news/2012/03/ocean-acidification-could...
>
> Actually no discussions of any type will transpire among humans
> if we extinct ourselves due to unchecked global warming.
>
>
>
> > Ocean acidification on track to be among the worst of the last 300 million years
>
> > Global Warming Leads to 150,000 Deaths Every Year
> > http://environment.about.com/od/globalwarmingandhealth/a/gw_deaths.htm
>
> > Climate Armageddon: How the World's Weather Could Quickly Run Amok [Excerpt]
> > http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=how-worlds-weather-c...
> > Global Warming Leads to 150,000 Deaths Every Year
> > http://environment.about.com/od/globalwarmingandhealth/a/gw_deaths.htm
>
> > Climate Armageddon: How the World's Weather Could Quickly Run Amok [Excerpt]
>
> > Physics Today | Humans may be driving Earth toward catastrophe
> > http://blogs.physicstoday.org/newspicks/2012/06/humans-may-be-driving...- Hide quoted text -
> > Physics Today | Humans may be driving Earth toward catastrophe
>
> - Show quoted text -
Wow Sam! For the first time in years you contribute to a thread by,
first, saying something truthful that more people should be getting!
Government regulations can't correct global warming. But my logical
attacks on the symptoms of G. W. can start reducing that trend in as
little as 10 years. One or two of these processes will involve the
deployment of a large number of proprietary devices that will reduce
the solar gain. A non-proprietary solution to rising ocean levels is
simply to begin collecting non-brackish river water and piping it to
the poles where such can be allowed to freeze miles deep. There are
other "engineering projects" already in the works, like tunneling
under the Bering Sea, that will cost more money that putting in the
necessary pipes. Remember, that during the last ice age, the northern
parts were miles thick. All we would be doing is duplicating nature’s
own correction for global warming.
— NoEinstein —
NoEinstein
Jun 13, 2012, 9:44:54 PM6/13/12
to
On Jun 13, 9:17 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> On Jun 13, 9:48 am, Igor <thoov...@excite.com> wrote:
>
> > On Jun 12, 10:15 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
Typo CORRECTIONS: Spending too much time sitting close to monitors
> On Jun 13, 9:48 am, Igor <thoov...@excite.com> wrote:
>
> > On Jun 12, 10:15 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
has my eyes focusing poorly. Somewhere in my initial post, below, I
say: "ones on" when I should have said "one's own". Most errors that
I fail to see are homophonic ones. But know that I try to be as
accurate in my documents as in my grammar. — NoEinstein —
Sam Wormley
Jun 13, 2012, 10:10:36 PM6/13/12
to
On 6/13/12 8:34 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
> On Jun 13, 12:25 pm, Sam Wormley<sworml...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 6/12/12 9:15 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
>>
>>> All discussions of �science� will be moot if the USA continues to sink
> On Jun 13, 12:25 pm, Sam Wormley<sworml...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 6/12/12 9:15 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
>>
> own correction for global warming.
>
> � NoEinstein �
>
Have you got any ideas how to pull existing CO2 out of the atmosphere,
such as genetically modified crops and such?
NoEinstein
Jun 15, 2012, 4:32:52 PM6/15/12
to
On Jun 13, 10:10 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 6/13/12 8:34 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jun 13, 12:25 pm, Sam Wormley<sworml...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On 6/12/12 9:15 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
>
> >>> All discussions of science will be moot if the USA continues to sink
> On 6/13/12 8:34 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jun 13, 12:25 pm, Sam Wormley<sworml...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On 6/12/12 9:15 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
>
> >>> into the socialist/communist mire.
>
> >> Actually no discussions of any type will transpire among humans
> >> if we extinct ourselves due to unchecked global warming.
>
> >>> Ocean acidification on track to be among the worst of the last 300 million years
> >>> http://arstechnica.com/science/news/2012/03/ocean-acidification-could...
>
> >>> Global Warming Leads to 150,000 Deaths Every Year
> >>> http://environment.about.com/od/globalwarmingandhealth/a/gw_deaths.htm
>
> >>> Climate Armageddon: How the World's Weather Could Quickly Run Amok [Excerpt]
> >>> http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=how-worlds-weather-c...
>
> >>> Physics Today | Humans may be driving Earth toward catastrophe
> >>> http://blogs.physicstoday.org/newspicks/2012/06/humans-may-be-driving...Hide quoted text -
>
> >> Actually no discussions of any type will transpire among humans
> >> if we extinct ourselves due to unchecked global warming.
>
> >>> Ocean acidification on track to be among the worst of the last 300 million years
> >>> http://arstechnica.com/science/news/2012/03/ocean-acidification-could...
>
> >>> Global Warming Leads to 150,000 Deaths Every Year
> >>> http://environment.about.com/od/globalwarmingandhealth/a/gw_deaths.htm
>
> >>> Climate Armageddon: How the World's Weather Could Quickly Run Amok [Excerpt]
> >>> http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=how-worlds-weather-c...
>
> >>> Physics Today | Humans may be driving Earth toward catastrophe
>
> >> - Show quoted text -
>
> > Wow Sam! For the first time in years you contribute to a thread by,
> > first, saying something truthful that more people should be getting!
> > Government regulations can't correct global warming. But my logical
> > attacks on the symptoms of G. W. can start reducing that trend in as
> > little as 10 years. One or two of these processes will involve the
> > deployment of a large number of proprietary devices that will reduce
> > the solar gain. A non-proprietary solution to rising ocean levels is
> > simply to begin collecting non-brackish river water and piping it to
> > the poles where such can be allowed to freeze miles deep. There are
> > other "engineering projects" already in the works, like tunneling
> > under the Bering Sea, that will cost more money that putting in the
> > necessary pipes. Remember, that during the last ice age, the northern
> > parts were miles thick. All we would be doing is duplicating nature s
> >> - Show quoted text -
>
> > Wow Sam! For the first time in years you contribute to a thread by,
> > first, saying something truthful that more people should be getting!
> > Government regulations can't correct global warming. But my logical
> > attacks on the symptoms of G. W. can start reducing that trend in as
> > little as 10 years. One or two of these processes will involve the
> > deployment of a large number of proprietary devices that will reduce
> > the solar gain. A non-proprietary solution to rising ocean levels is
> > simply to begin collecting non-brackish river water and piping it to
> > the poles where such can be allowed to freeze miles deep. There are
> > other "engineering projects" already in the works, like tunneling
> > under the Bering Sea, that will cost more money that putting in the
> > necessary pipes. Remember, that during the last ice age, the northern
> > own correction for global warming.
>
> > NoEinstein
>
>
> Have you got any ideas how to pull existing CO2 out of the atmosphere,
> such as genetically modified crops and such?- Hide quoted text -
> Have you got any ideas how to pull existing CO2 out of the atmosphere,
>
> - Show quoted text -
Dear Sam: YES, I do! If the world would plant HEMP as the primary
> - Show quoted text -
crop, the amount of CO^2 would drop 5% in the first year! Saving the
world is more important than saving the less than 1% from addictions;
don't you think? And, I propose a TAX on every man woman and child in
the world, requiring them to plant and nurture one new tree every five
years. Trees and HEMP will solve the CO^2 problem, and without
government restrictions on the emissions of CO^2 by cars and by
businesses. Additionally, I know how to control the weather so that
Northern Africa can be turned from a desert into a lush Garden! If
will be hard for Muslims living in such a beautiful place to hate the
rest of the world! Lastly, we should stop polluting our air and
water. Doing that reduces the oceans' plankton which absorbs CO^2 and
deposits such as limestone on the ocean floor. Start LOVING planet
Earth and protecting its systems, and we need not fear global warming,
nor the start of another ice age! — NoEinstein —
Sam Wormley
Jun 15, 2012, 4:38:20 PM6/15/12
to
bjacoby
Jun 16, 2012, 12:15:52 AM6/16/12
to
by looking up a link to Hemp and posting it...
Trees, "Sam", TREES. You know, those tall things your bosses cut down
everywhere for their own greed... Tons of CO2 stored per acre per year!
No ineffective taxes needed. Get the picture?
Sam Wormley
Jun 17, 2012, 9:20:15 AM6/17/12
to
On 6/15/12 11:15 PM, bjacoby wrote:
> Trees, "Sam", TREES. You know, those tall things your bosses cut down
> everywhere for their own greed... Tons of CO2 stored per acre per year!
> No ineffective taxes needed. Get the picture?
How many trees have you planed in your lifetime, Ben?
> Trees, "Sam", TREES. You know, those tall things your bosses cut down
> everywhere for their own greed... Tons of CO2 stored per acre per year!
> No ineffective taxes needed. Get the picture?
NoEinstein
Jun 17, 2012, 1:43:36 PM6/17/12
to
On Jun 15, 4:38 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 6/15/12 3:32 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jun 13, 10:10 pm, Sam Wormley<sworml...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On 6/13/12 8:34 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
>
> >>> On Jun 13, 12:25 pm, Sam Wormley<sworml...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> On 6/12/12 9:15 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
>
> >>>>> All discussions of science will be moot if the USA continues to sink
> >>>>> into the socialist/communist mire.
>
> >>>> Actually no discussions of any type will transpire among humans
> >>>> if we extinct ourselves due to unchecked global warming.
>
> >>>>> Ocean acidification on track to be among the worst of the last 300 million years
> >>>>> http://arstechnica.com/science/news/2012/03/ocean-acidification-could...
>
> >>>>> Global Warming Leads to 150,000 Deaths Every Year
> >>>>> http://environment.about.com/od/globalwarmingandhealth/a/gw_deaths.htm
>
> >>>>> Climate Armageddon: How the World's Weather Could Quickly Run Amok [Excerpt]
> >>>>> http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=how-worlds-weather-c...
>
> >>>>> Physics Today | Humans may be driving Earth toward catastrophe
> >>>>> http://blogs.physicstoday.org/newspicks/2012/06/humans-may-be-driving...quoted text -
> On 6/15/12 3:32 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jun 13, 10:10 pm, Sam Wormley<sworml...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On 6/13/12 8:34 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
>
> >>> On Jun 13, 12:25 pm, Sam Wormley<sworml...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> On 6/12/12 9:15 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
>
> >>>>> All discussions of science will be moot if the USA continues to sink
> >>>>> into the socialist/communist mire.
>
> >>>> Actually no discussions of any type will transpire among humans
> >>>> if we extinct ourselves due to unchecked global warming.
>
> >>>>> Ocean acidification on track to be among the worst of the last 300 million years
> >>>>> http://arstechnica.com/science/news/2012/03/ocean-acidification-could...
>
> >>>>> Global Warming Leads to 150,000 Deaths Every Year
> >>>>> http://environment.about.com/od/globalwarmingandhealth/a/gw_deaths.htm
>
> >>>>> Climate Armageddon: How the World's Weather Could Quickly Run Amok [Excerpt]
> >>>>> http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=how-worlds-weather-c...
>
> >>>>> Physics Today | Humans may be driving Earth toward catastrophe
>
> - Show quoted text -
Dear Sam: Since you, more than most, are concerned about global
> - Show quoted text -
warming answer this question: "Is the G. W. problem properly within
the realm of government to "forcibly" solve?" And: Can any free
society allow government to tell you what size soft drinks you can
have; what type light bulbs you can use; and how fast you can drive if
there is no documentable recklessness and no 'victim'? Know this:
When a people allow their government to "Serve" (warrants) and to
"Protect" (those in government) they have just given their assent to
be subjugated. Only when government stops "protecting" (other than
assuring we have safe foods, drugs, air and water) can a people be
truly free. *** By incrementally reducing government to 20% of its
present size will the USA have any hope of long-term survival. Think
about that and SAY what you readers think! — NoEinstein — AKA John A.
Armistead
NoEinstein
Jun 17, 2012, 1:47:36 PM6/17/12
to
>
> - Show quoted text -
Dear bjacoby: Thanks for agreeing with me! Would you care to answer
> - Show quoted text -
the same questions I just posed to Sam? Until we can get the God
Damned government OUT of the equation for solving anything, the USA
will continue to go down the tubes! — NoEinstein —
NoEinstein
Jun 17, 2012, 1:58:22 PM6/17/12
to
trees can buffer the wind. When I was a teen, my family took a trans
USA trip. At one place in the Rocky Mountains there was a section of
trees up a valley that the sign said had been knocked down by a
tornado. But that is very rare. If you've got open spaces without
crops, plant trees! — NoEinstein — P. S.: Those not living close to
open areas can hire others to plant and nurture their assigned trees.
A quicker way, of course, would simply be to plant hemp. Under my New
Constitution, if the PEOPLE agree with that premise, the government
will be powerless to enforce anything that says otherwise. Legalize
HEMP! — NoEinstein —
Sam Wormley
Jun 17, 2012, 2:29:23 PM6/17/12
to
On 6/17/12 12:43 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
> "Is the G. W. problem properly within
> the realm of government to "forcibly" solve?"
No--However, some education of climate science to
> "Is the G. W. problem properly within
> the realm of government to "forcibly" solve?"
the public at large, would be helpful.
ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com
Jun 17, 2012, 3:11:28 PM6/17/12
to
bjacoby
Jun 18, 2012, 12:14:33 AM6/18/12
to
but rather "indoctrination".
NoEinstein
Jun 20, 2012, 2:02:24 PM6/20/12
to
must think G. W. is something that the People must "force" (Ha!)
government to correct. If businesses can start building tunnels under
oceans, businesses can sure as hell start piping river water to the
poles to freeze. Know this: The best solutions to problems are those
that can be done without government involvement! Except for groups
like the Army Corp of Engineers, few who are associated with anything
"government related" know their asses from holes in the ground! —
NoEinstein —
NoEinstein
Jun 20, 2012, 2:10:13 PM6/20/12
to
On Jun 17, 3:11 pm, j...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
Dear j...: Does your remark mean that you don't favor correcting
global warming? When the benefits of allowing the growing of hemp
have 1000 times more advantages than disadvantages, then if the People
understand and support that fact, no do-gooders in Washington can cry
about preventing a few addictions while the world is being destroyed
by global warming. Which is more important, the wishes of do-gooders
in Washington, or the survival of the HUMAN RACE????? — NoEinstein —
global warming? When the benefits of allowing the growing of hemp
have 1000 times more advantages than disadvantages, then if the People
understand and support that fact, no do-gooders in Washington can cry
about preventing a few addictions while the world is being destroyed
by global warming. Which is more important, the wishes of do-gooders
in Washington, or the survival of the HUMAN RACE????? — NoEinstein —
NoEinstein
Jun 20, 2012, 2:15:44 PM6/20/12
to
that can be done in international waters. You should be more
concerned with the principles in play than with the semantics of
anyone like Sam who clearly recognizes the G. W. problem. You
recognize that problem, too, I presume. — NoEinstein —
bjacoby
Jun 20, 2012, 5:45:18 PM6/20/12
to
you may not realize, however, is that "the problem" I recognize is not
one of fossil fuels or temperature, but of political usurpation and
exploitation of the public trust in science for political gains.
Therefore, my major concern IS with the semantics of a propagandist like
"Sam" who may actually recognize the problems of man's use of the
plantet, but who is clearly pretending that they are something other
than they actually are to further someone's (and probably including his)
political agenda. For that reason semantics are THE issue.
NoEinstein
Jun 22, 2012, 4:58:30 PM6/22/12
to
(results oriented) as I am. Typically, fewer than one person in a
thousand has the creativity to make much of a difference in any area
of endeavor. The only thing standing between having the human race
solve most or all of the problems in this world is the stymieing
effect of governments. It isn't necessary that the 999 out of a
thousand who aren't creative have any particular attitude. There are
two examples of attitudes that DO make sense to the 999. Those are:
Using seat belts to reduce injuries in car accidents, and recycling
waste to reduce the size of land fills and the energy required to make
"new" products. The laws 'mandating' those things are good ones. G.
W. has been much more politicized, because protecting the environment
has wrongly been presumed to hurt businesses. In the latter case,
doing what is right to save the planet, like planting hemp, are far
more important than batting heads trying to get the 999 to agree.
Sam's shortfall is in his shot-gunning of the links to the words of
others. That is like passing the buck. Where is Sam once a serious
discussion gets started? He's looking for more links to post so he
won't get pinned-down on his stand on anything. Thank you for at
least taking the time to write more than a sentence. Can't most 1st
graders do that? Ha, ha, HA! — NoEinstein
NoEinstein
Jun 26, 2012, 12:59:40 PM6/26/12
to
On Jun 12, 10:15 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> Understanding Political “science”
>
Dear Freedom-loving Americans: My civil rights have just been broken,
for the third time, by a LUNATIC working for Google, and living in
Costa Rica. He, unfortunately, is employed as an UNNEEDED monitor of
the flagging Google News Group 'Political Forum'. He goes by the
handle 'The Annointed One' and his name is Mark M. Kahle H. That JERK
has deleted my thoughtful replies regarding my 'New Constitution of
the United States of America'. The first time this happened was over
nine months ago. Then, I contacted, via the US mails, a top Google
executive who was originally from India. But I got no reply,
Kahle is unlawfully denying my freedom of speech. I say, unlawfully,
because Google is a USA based operation, and as such must work within
the laws of this country and of our present Constitution—which
guarantees in the Bill of Rights, freedom of speech. Even though I
personally own Google stock, I do not cotton to the LIBERAL leaning of
what was seeming like the last place on Earth where sensible talk can
be heard.
Here is what Kahle just emailed to me: "Your message to the
PoliticalForum group has been rejected. I have heard this same message
multiple times before. Until you have something new to say and or post
the "New Constitution" in its entirety to allow "in context"
comments... I will remove any and all of your posts on this or any
subject in which you cite the mystery document... at this point it is
simply SPAM."
If I wasn't such a busy person, I would be SUING Google over the
unjustified and hurtful actions of their devil-affiliated employee.
He is a CANCER to the human race! You honest readers of my posts can
help in my plight with Google if you will simply comment on, and keep
reading THIS post until such attracts their attention. I repeat:
Please comment on and keep reading THIS post until such attracts
Google's attention. The last vestige of free speech is on-the-line
here. Please pray for the survival of the USA.
Respectfully submitted,
John A. Armistead
AKA NoEinstein
P. S.: The following is my extemporaneously composed (not copied and
pasted) reply which “the Annointed One” doesn’t like. What do you
readers think about it?
“Dear PlainolAmerican: No person has the free speech to yell "FIRE"
in a crowded theatre if there isn't a fire! The standard is this: If
what is said is untrue and hurtful, the Constitution gives no
protection. When any person in the God Damned media makes an
"assessing" statement about government or politics, and their
CELEBRITY gives that person UNDUE credibility, then the processes of
our Republic are being circumvented. Though I like your being a
deeper thinker than most, I don't like your defending the free speech
of the INDIVIDUALS working for the media as though that is the same
thing as defending our having a “FREE PRESS”! My New Constitution
assures our having a PRO DEMOCRACY free press! To allow ANY
socialist, communist, or Marxist statements to be made in ANY medium
is to undermine the very reason that the USA came into existence in
the first place! If your "sport" is listening and watching while
people argue about government and about economic and social issues,
then why not start talking-away over your back fence?
Freedom of the press stops only when PAID commentators and PAID
contributors get to state their ho-hum notions about anything. Under
my New Constitution we can have 24/7 unbiased news coverage so long as
there are no "on location" media celebrities reading their
teleprompters and explaining the significance of things BEFORE the
viewers have had a chance to think anything through for themselves.
The choice is this: CONTROL and NEUTER the influence of those working
for ANY medium; or FALL as a nation. The G. D. media is responsible
for giving us... Career Politicians. Most of you readers should
realize how much trouble career politicians have caused our once great
nation. You should find another hobby, Plainol... Listening to
fights between liberals and conservatives who are being PAID to be on
the air or in print will be either felonies, for all who are so
involved, or will be TREASON.
— John A. Armistead —
NoEinstein
Jun 27, 2012, 12:25:32 AM6/27/12
to
nine months ago) that I complained about, and documented to Google,
the invasions of my free speech relative to my New Constitution. The
following is the complete text of what I formally mailed to Google.
The replies of those of you who value the Free Speech guaranteed by
our original US Constitution are requested. John A. Armistead
__________
June 15, 2011
Mr. Nikesh Arora, Senior Vice President
and Chief Business Officer
1600 Amphitheatre Parkway
Mountain View, CA 94043
Re: Google employee Mark M. Kahle H
Dear Mr. Arora:
Google’s huge success in US and world markets is a tribute to
successful capitalism. I can recall ’the early days’ when there was
genuine fear that individuals’ apprehension over using compu-ters
might limit the commercial potential of computers. From those
concerns arose news groups. It was hoped such would demystify the
human-to-computer interface.
For the past half century, I have observed the decline in individual
civil liberties and the rise in government over-intrusion into the
lives of individuals and in businesses. As Pres. Reagan said:
“Government isn’t the solution; government is the problem!” Being a
problem solver, in 1996 I began writing a stronger, clearer New
Constitution. Such has retained every aspect of the original
Constitution consistent with this premise: “Democracy and fair play
shall have supremacy in the USA!” Without any selfish motive, I
worked for over a decade to pen and polish my document before
beginning to explain some of its precepts to others via newsgroups. I
was miffed that the liberal media doesn’t consider a patriot writing a
better constitution to be as “newsworthy” as a boy bouncing a
basketball into a hoop from atop a three story building. I see
‘Google’ as the last and best hope for uncensored free speech in
America. I got ousted from a tiny news group “Views”, for being too
conservative. Almost immediately, I was invited by Bruce Majors to
join Google’s Political Forum. My Free Speech essays regarding my New
Constitution were going well until moderator “Mark” began accusing my
essays of being SPAM. Because my readership was high, he has also
accused me of… trolling. At no time have I sent any of my patriotic
works to others!
Mr. Aurora, I attach copies of some of the news group replies between
the moderator and me. In blue are comments of his supporting my
contention that he is deliberately and maliciously sabotaging my
thread to reduce my readership from 7,000 per week last year to 210 or
so a week, now. Mark’s disagreeing with me is fine. >>> But his
blatant tampering with my ’thread’ to reduce the access of others to
what I have written is a violation of my civil rights! I hope you—or
someone with immediate authority over an apparently deranged and
likely dangerous, anti-capitalistic person—will “remove this thorn
from me.”
Very truly yours,
John A. Armistead
— Patriot —
Spam is the use of electronic messaging systems (including
most broadcast media, digital delivery systems) to send unsolicited
bulk messages indiscriminately. While the most widely recognized form
of spam is e-mail spam, the term is applied to similar abuses in other
media: instant messaging spam, Usenet newsgroup spam, Web search
engine spam, spam in blogs, wiki spam, online classified
ads spam, mobile phone messaging spam, Internet forum spam, junk fax
transmissions, social networking spam, televisionadvertising and file
sharing network spam.
In Internet slang, a troll is someone who posts inflammatory[citation
needed],extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community, such
as an online discussion forum, chat room, or blog, with the primary
intent of provoking readers into an emotional response[2] or of
otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion.[3] The noun troll may
refer to the provocative message itself, as in: "That was an excellent
troll you posted". While the word troll and its associated
verb trolling are associated with Internet discourse, media attention
in recent years has made such labels subjective, with trolling
describing intentionally provocative actions outside of an online
context. For example, mass media uses troll to describe "a person who
defaces Internet tribute sites with the aim of causing grief to
families."[4][5
From: "John A. Armistead" <armis...@bellsouth.net>
To: <politic...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: My Formal Complaint against Moderator Mark, in Costa Rica.
Date: Sunday, May 08, 2011 4:44 PM
05/08/11
From: John A. Armistead; 306 East First Avenue; Easley, SC;
29640-3064; USA;
phone: (864) 859-9572
To whom it may concern:
Over a year ago, I got invited by "Bruce" to join Political Forum. To
be accepted as a member I had to submit a sample of my writing. I
also explained that I wished to post similar essays every one and a
half to two weeks. I did just that, without problems, for about a
year. Several months ago, four individuals using the handles MJ, Mark
(AKA, The Annointed One), Jonathan, and Keith started making mostly
short replies that seemed to be attacking me, personally. Since I am,
I think, a very patriotic, conservative American, I easily reasoned
that anyone attacking me-often by a tone of negativity-would have to
be my diametric opposite: a socialist-communist.
Not wishing to be involved in arguing any issues with those having a
negative intent, I began to reply, simply, "that 'Mark' (for example)
is undeserving of being replied to." Mark, without identifying
himself as a moderator, threatened to cite me for "spamming" for
copying that short sentence. Note: I felt that sentence was necessary
in order to let other readers know that I at least "knew" what Mark
had written and considered him to be unworthy of comment. I chose to
type (not copy and paste) the same short reply hoping that Mark would
simply go away. But he did not.
'Keith of Tampa' seemed to come to Mark's defense by telling me that
Mark, like Keith, is a moderator. It was at that point that I sensed
there was a conspiracy among those four to denigrate my posts.
Though, for Keith, I felt his negativity was more proforma relative to
his job, than philosophical.
Today, I looked up Political Forum, "About this group." It says:
"Political Forum is a non-biased, non-partisan political forum. The
Group treats each and every member's position and viewpoint equally.
All members are encouraged to share and discuss viewpoints on a broad
spectrum of subject matter." >>> Sir, most prudent observers would
conclude that when "Mark" threatens to delete my 'thread' if I repeat
anything, he has overstepped the bounds of fairness that is suggested
in the description of Political Forum, as copied above.
Attached to this email are some of the more recent exchanges between
Mark and me. His replies have a venomous tone and a stridency that
isn't too becoming of Google. Doesn't Google have a reputation for
having a lot of nice people who work for a fair and considerate
corporation? This is the first time I have ever made a formal
complaint against a person living and working in another country. At
the very least, I would appreciate your having my posts be off-limits
for comment or... "moderation" by Mark. His personality issues must,
of necessity, be internal matters of your company—as is apt for
maintaining your desired corporate image.
Very truly yours,
John A. Armistead
A patriotic, concerned American
and a Google stockholder
May 1, 8:28 am
Folks: I've posted my various essays, separately, under the apt Title
Lines. In order to make all of those be easily locatable by you
readers, I have subsequently added each one, like 'replies to myself'
under this "folder post": Wringing-the-Neck of Empty Ritual. When I
attempted to do that... again, I am angered to learn that someone at
Google has deleted all of my "collective" essays which include 85% of
my New Constitution. If the deletion of "duplicate" files is Google's
Objective, they should have removed the separately-named, and lesser
read, New Posts, but RETAINED the collective posts that most of my
readers would like to be able to see in ONE LOCATION. Below, is my
most recent, and crucially important, post directed to the US Secret
Service.
Building Obama's Gallows
http://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/ca...
The USA is lost in the "Corn" of politics.
http://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/62...
+in+the+‘Corn’+of+po
<<<<<<<<<<
May 3, 10:58 am
[From “Mark” or “the Annointed one”]
Einstein... here is your latest post.... it did not post when
moderated. I have checked and there are indeed large portions of your
former posts missing... our local moderators did NOT do that. If you
check though you will find that each section of your constitution that
was posted is still there at least ONCE. Gee, I warned you against
spam... Talk to your buddies at Google...ONLY they can do that, and it
is an auto response accomplished within the servers to save space. As
to my "lowly" "job" here... I enjoy reading different points of view
and am not so stupid that I need things CONSTANTLY repeated to me;
neither are the other posters.
<<<<<<<<<<
May 2, 11:55 pm
Folks: One of the supposed "moderators" of Political Forum, 'The
Annointed (sic) One', must be feeling the need to feel powerful.
(Meaning that he isn't powerful.) He's from Costa Rica; has monkeys
in his back yard; claims to be an attorney and an international peace
negotiator; but for some reason he's stuck in the lowly job of trying
to keep "spam" off of this group. I can virtually guarantee you that
none of the 'other' readers consider my copying apt excerpts from my
New Constitution—so that more and more people can understand what I
have done on their behalf—to be "spam". If the only thing that
'powerful attorney' has to do is to read word-for-word what everyone
on this groups writes, then it is understandable that he would tire of
reading the same thing. However, I know that everyday there are first-
time visitors who haven't seen even a small part of my New
Constitution. When I reply to a particular point, I copy the adjunct
block of text so people can sense how my document reads. There are
many interesting things in those blocks, put there to make the lives
of average Americans better.
It seems to me that 'Mark', The Annointed (sic) One, has had a fall-
from-grace in his profession. Moderating a Google news group isn't
part of the career path of... "normal" attorneys. I am sympathetic to
the computer storage problems associated with active posts. Several
months ago, out-of-the-blue, MJ, Mark, Jonathan and Keith popped-in
sounding negative to my efforts, as though in concert to defend...
socialism and communism. The VOLUME of my writing went up, because
those guys were skimming rather than reading-for-understanding what I
was explaining. One of the best ways to reduce repetition would be
for Mark, MJ and Jonathan to simply go away. However, they hang
around because I have readers, and they like the exposure. Copied
below is the email that 'Mark" sent to me directly. The "off" tone
and exaggeration near the end hint of a troubled mind. *** As a
Google stockholder, I will complain to the proper people in CA, if
Mark interferes again, with THE most important post in the history of
Political Forum.
— John A. Armistead — Patriot
[The following Email was received from The Annointed (sic) One, today,
5/2/2011]
Posting your thoughts and ideas is a wonderful thing. It is a JOY to
read every single posting every single day.
There has been a problem of late, though. The posting of three or four
original sentences that is followed by several paragraphs that are
simply cut and paste that can also be found numerous times throughout
that same thread and other threads as well is not what we do here.
Well, thats SPAM !!! I have no problem reading the same material once
or twice but on some threads it is becoming ridiculously
repetitive..... when that action spreads to other threads and the
supposed posting either originates or answers in that (or those)
threads using the same cut and paste diatribe it is against our rules.
WE DO NOT ACCEPT SPAM from outside sources or from
members !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
So BASTA, GENUG, ENOUGH !!!! In the future said posts will be removed,
the explanation is here.
<<<<<<<<<<
May 3, 12:21 pm
Nor has anyone else to my knowledge.
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 9:59 AM, Jonathan
<jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>wrote:
<<<<<<<<<<
May 4, 4:29 pm
Mark (The Annointed One). When you start "editing out of the thread"
those replies of mine that include excerpts from my New Constitution,
and when you THREATEN me for posting 'spam' on my OWN post, that’s
actually copies of portions of that same New Constitution, you are
clearly a wolf-in-sheep's-clothing, i.e., a socialist-communist.
Google's original motive for starting (free) news groups was to get
people used to using computers so that those same people would also
switch to doing e-commerce. E-commerce—with Google getting small
pieces of a lot of pies—is what pays your salary. Since posts on
which I reply regularly tend to appear at the top of the most active
list, I am accomplishing Google's objective more than you suppose, or
have said or implied: "News groups are for the enjoyment of those who
reply (you, J. Ashley and MJ)." No, they are there for the (magnet)
enjoyment of as many people as possible. Readers of News Groups
eventually buy on e-commerce, and Google's shareholders, like me, make
more money. *** I've given you fair warning, Mark; threaten me again
at your own peril. I've caused the firing of more people than you
would realize. — J. A. A. —
<<<<<<<<<<
May 4, 4:45 pm
Dear Mark: It's one thing to enjoy reading different points of view.
It's another one, entirely, to use your unlimited response time to
attack, often by TONE, the ideas of others. Though you are in Costa
Rica, you aren't above having to conform to the Free Speech
requirements of the US Constitution. Google is, first and foremost, a
US corporation. When you violate MY civil rights, Google becomes
responsible. Political Forum bragged that all political points of
view are accepted. When you cited me for rightfully demanding that
Barack Obama be made to account (hang by the neck until dead) for his
anti-America actions, you sided with the LEFT, socialist-communists.
You show yourself to have been using your... "moderator" job to
promote your personal political objectives. I don't think... "that"
was part of your job description. I highly recommend that you just
fade into the woodwork, like Keith has tended to do. The readership
of "Wringing-the-neck... " isn't going up because you keep popping
in. — J. A. Armistead —
<<<<<<<<<<
May 4, 5:11 pm
[From “Mark”, the “Annointed One”]
Dear Einstein,
I fully comply with "Google, Costa Rica" and WTO rules and in no way
am I subject to ANY part of your governments rules, regulations, or
Constitution. Just how ignorant are you that you would think so??
I could care less that Google is a US Corporation... It is also a
Costa Rican S.A. and those are the rules that cover me and those ONLY.
Please read OUR constitution.
All political points of view are accepted here.... we just do not
accept SPAM regardless of how it is cloaked. Your civil rights are
exactly what MY constitution says they are at MY ISP address. Welcome
to the world!!!!!!
If "wringing the neck" continues to be a source of ad nausea SPAM the
thread will be shut down and removed.
In short, you are on a WORLD forum.... NOT a USA forum..... get used
to it.
The posters here are not stupid nor are they ignorant. Constant
repetition is a standard tool of the communist/socialist left and you,
more than anyone else seem to be perfectly comfortable using it.... I
wonder why.
<<<<<<<<<<
May 5, 9:46 pm
Dear Mark: You may be "safe" from prosecution, but not safe from
being fired. Most of the readers I'm attracting are conservatives in
the USA. Few of those take kindly to your attacking me for
periodically copying parts of my precisely-worded New Constitution.
That document isn't something that can be paraphrased, repeatedly.
I'm sure you would enjoy discussing each little point. But like I've
told J. Ashley, not one word of my document is in flux. — J. A. A. —
<<<<<<<<<<
[From “Mark”, the “Annointed One”]
noeinstein,
Of course I am safe from prosecution...I have not come close to
breaking any law. It has NOTHING to do with my location. I can also
NOT be fired. Periodically copying identical material from identical
sources with near or identical comments is the very definition of
*SPAM. *
***
*Your supposed "reason" for spamming is not relevant and is obviously
more important to you than anyone else. I could care less if its your
"new constitution" or a treatise on scratching your ass... spam is
spam is spam.
As to people taking umbrage with what YOU and you ALONE alone call an
attack... they have pills and psychiatrists for that... this is not
the place..maybe a little inpatient care for a while....seek help.
As to the rules governing this Forum.... repeated use of it and
TROLLING just to keep the thread alive so it drives search engines to
your personal blog through keywords is SPAMMING....
Keep it up and the thread you have been so careful to groom will
disappear. As to your unabashed advertising of your "Book".... that
too, has been stopped. there is an area supplied on our "pages"
section for such tripe. Play by the rules.... no lobbyists
allowed.... no unsolicited ads for personal gain...
<<<<<<<<<<
Dear Moderator Mark: Some of the arguments on other groups have been
going on for years. Not a week goes by that the same explanations are
made over and over. Precisely worded material, like my New
Constitution, cannot be paraphrased. Anyone reading the same thing
ten times can find something new and important with each reading.
Only a socialist-communist like you, would be offended reading a
document that will outlaw your kind in the USA. So, stay a Tico. The
cost of living down there is low enough you should be able to survive
on a moderator's stipend. — J. A. A. —
<<<<<<<<<<
[From “Mark”, the “Annointed One”]
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 8:53 PM, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net>
wrote:
> Dear Moderator Mark: Some of the arguments on other groups have been
> going on for years.
How nice for them, just how does that apply here??
> Not a week goes by that the same explanations are made over and over.
Explanations are just fine, how does that apply to your trolling and
spamming??
> Precisely worded material, like my New Constitution, cannot be paraphrased.
*Your tripe has precise words but is definitely NOT precisely worded.
*
> Anyone reading the same thing ten times can find something new and important with each reading.
Not according to you... there is but ONE definition... yours and ANY
disagreement with the worlds premier "Patriot" is received with cries
of "Communist/Socialist" the very things your supposed super document
promotes.....right down to Stalinesque systems of denouncements on the
street.
> Only a socialist-communist like you, would be offended reading a document that will outlaw your kind in the USA.
See, it proves point above. Absolute Stalinism
> So, stay a Tico.
You say that as though there is a choice. There is not. (Look it up
before thinking or saying something really stupid....AGAIN)
> The cost of living down there is low enough you should be able to survive on a
>.moderator's stipend.
Thanks to the US policy of simply printing more cash (and idiots like
you DOING nothing about it) to pay its bills the Dollar has lost about
20% of it value outside the US (read in the real world). The US is now
just as affordable for someone from outside. And to end this......
Keep *Spamming* the board with something that is simply an invention
(and a poor one at that) of you mind while simply *trolling* to get
your blog search numbers up and I will simply delete the thread.
Keep advertising your book(s) in your posts and the thread will
disappear.
*LAST Warning.*
*[The following are additional attacks by “Moderator” Mark or the
Annointed One.]
May 11, 2011
>>>>> MJ, Johnathon and the world of fairness need to go the next step......
It is ABSOLUTELY UNFAIR that the public should pay one cent more than
the actual cost of a product. *Why is there a "profit". All a "Profit
does is to rip off the consumer. <<<<<
*Mark M. Kahle H.*
June 13, 2011
Einstein,
There will be NO MORE "ritual" (or any other titles) strings posted
that do nothing more than refer back to an argument made for your "New
Constitution".
There are several active now. Use them. This is simple trolling. We do
not do that here. We will not allow that. By "We" I of course mean
"Me".
This string will be closed tonight or tomorrow.... Time for your
outraged and unfounded comments on censorship.
[End of replies as of 06/14/11]
Partial summary of Essays written:
Handwriting Analysis of Clinton, Obama, McCain and Einstein (is
Copyrighted.)
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/eed2bb0cf762e015/6173e270dee543b3?hl=en#6173e270dee543b3
Happy Days… !
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/9903367481ce7970/ae4338645fbefbf5?hl=en&lnk=st&q=Happy+Days...!#ae4338645fbefbf5
Happy Days... 2
http://groups.google.com/group/views/browse_thread/thread/d63f04a059491122/579a48e380c75116?hl=en#579a48e380c75116
Campaigning is a Science, too.
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/a83e59ee6ca4d1f5/b29f39ee45684d85?hl=en&lnk=st&q=#b29f39ee45684d85
OBAMA’S NOMINATION OF SOTOMAYOR BETRAYS DEMOCRACY
http://groups.google.com/group/views/browse_thread/thread/998870d93fd1a994?hl=en
USA IS BOTH SOOTHED AND BETRAYED BY RHETORIC
http://groups.google.com/group/views/browse_thread/thread/576e701e1d916343?hl=en
A Democracy Doesn’t Favor Media Figures and Celebrities
http://groups.google.com/group/views/browse_thread/thread/e6230d6402064fbd?hl=en
Changing the USA from a Police State
http://groups.google.com/group/views/browse_thread/thread/4b4b7fbd47ddbee6?hl=en
A Line Is Drawn in the Sand for the USA
http://groups.google.com/group/views/browse_thread/thread/11704cf2bc723291?hl=en
A TIME FOR TRUTH AND A TIME FOR LIES
http://groups.google.com/group/views/browse_thread/thread/d93ce51a4db71bcc?hl=en
Government ‘As You Like It’
http://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/ae6e586e2406bf76/0a27c2c9e0ab3902?hl=en#0a27c2c9e0ab3902
THE FOUNDING FATHERS WOULD NOT RECOGNIZE OUR GOVERNMENT, TODAY.
http://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/f3571de031791f1e/1ad0ffb427f2d671?hl=en#1ad0ffb427f2d671
PLAYING THE GAME TO BRING DOWN AMERICA
http://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/351908b1ce584e2b/de2b3c61d914bed1?hl=en#de2b3c61d914bed1
There’s Only One Way for the Tea Party Movement to WIN.
http://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/8ecb9014d9b7d3df/cbf5ac1d0ea558bd?hl=en#cbf5ac1d0ea558bd
Start the Revolution! Government is out-of-touch with the People!
http://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/c6047e7611e3f2db/4ed5ce8feba4bb37?hl=en#4ed5ce8feba4bb37
Wringing-the-Neck of Empty Ritual.
http://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/5ad27d8545a23076/3a6e4c81efd1074d?hl=en#3a6e4c81efd1074d
Building Obama’s Gallows.
http://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/caef7db016310d60/5300df2a461e1aeb?hl=en#5300df2a461e1aeb
The USA is lost in the "Corn" of politics.
http://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/62032166072f9168/c1b14fcc9ddfd1ad?hl=en&lnk=gst&q=The+USA+is+lost+in+the+%E2%80%98Corn%E2%80%99+of+politics.#c1b14fcc9ddfd1ad
Democrats won’t be laughing for long.
http://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/78e57e299f62d5a8/93228d8aefd31c7c?hl=en&q=Democrats+won%27t+be+laughing+for+long.#93228d8aefd31c7c
Can Donald Trump fix the thin ice the USA is skating on?
http://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/4fe6e7e22bb629da/4787411ab88d014d?hl=en&q=Can+Donald+Trump+fix+the+thin+ice+the+USA+is+skating+on%3F#478
Building Obama’s Gallows
http://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/caef7db016310d60/5300df2a461e1aeb?hl=en%20\%205300df2a461e1aeb
Empty ritual is stymieing America’s hopes.
http://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/eaa28e46972c5466/44c5fa90d7a12b07?hl=en#44c5fa90d7a12b07
Save America by kicking all political rituals in the ass!
http://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/bf5b24a93a67bfe6/4711d3b984e5a4ff?hl=en#4711d3b984e5a4ff
Brainwashed by religious rituals
http://groups.google.com/group/politicalforum/browse_thread/thread/ebfad09eae27c37a/a8f5c9c30280cd30?hl=en#a8f5c9c30280cd30
>
> read more »- Hide quoted text -
NoEinstein
Jun 28, 2012, 8:06:35 PM6/28/12
to
On Jun 27, 12:25 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> On Jun 26, 12:59 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jun 12, 10:15 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:> UnderstandingPolitical“science”
> On Jun 26, 12:59 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> > Dear Freedom-loving Americans: My civil rights have just been broken,
> > for the third time, by a LUNATIC working for Google, and living in
> > Costa Rica. He, unfortunately, is employed as an UNNEEDED monitor of
> > the flagging Google News Group 'PoliticalForum'. He goes by the
> > Dear Freedom-loving Americans: My civil rights have just been broken,
> > for the third time, by a LUNATIC working for Google, and living in
> > Costa Rica. He, unfortunately, is employed as an UNNEEDED monitor of
> From: "John A. Armistead" <armistea...@bellsouth.net>
> To: <politic...@googlegroups.com>
> Subject: My Formal Complaint against Moderator Mark, in Costa Rica.
> Date: Sunday, May 08, 2011 4:44 PM
>
> 05/08/11
>
> From: John A. Armistead; 306 East First Avenue; Easley, SC;
> 29640-3064; USA;
> phone: (864) 859-9572
>
> To whom it may concern:
>
> Over a year ago, I got invited by "Bruce" to joinPoliticalForum. To
> To: <politic...@googlegroups.com>
> Subject: My Formal Complaint against Moderator Mark, in Costa Rica.
> Date: Sunday, May 08, 2011 4:44 PM
>
> 05/08/11
>
> From: John A. Armistead; 306 East First Avenue; Easley, SC;
> 29640-3064; USA;
> phone: (864) 859-9572
>
> To whom it may concern:
>
> be accepted as a member I had to submit a sample of my writing. I
> also explained that I wished to post similar essays every one and a
> half to two weeks. I did just that, without problems, for about a
> year. Several months ago, four individuals using the handles MJ, Mark
> (AKA, The Annointed One), Jonathan, and Keith started making mostly
> short replies that seemed to be attacking me, ...
> also explained that I wished to post similar essays every one and a
> half to two weeks. I did just that, without problems, for about a
> year. Several months ago, four individuals using the handles MJ, Mark
> (AKA, The Annointed One), Jonathan, and Keith started making mostly
>
> read more »- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Folks: You are either reading my words because that's like recreation
> read more »- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
to you, or you read to get insights either into science, or into the
psychology of my daily having to deal with mostly shallows as I try to
get my Improve the World message out. Am I asking too much to have
some of you say a few words in reply? I can assure you, I'm not
writing about science or about our mixed up government just to be
entertaining. Those of you who want your children and theirs to have
the best life possible are asked to side with me. The INERTIA against
doing the right things is incredible. Today, I have removed from my
New Constitution the word "Supreme" Court. The only supreme court in
America shall be the macro will of the American People. Pray for
America, and support my causes, if your can. — John A. Armistead —
AKA NoEinstein
NoEinstein
Jun 29, 2012, 5:08:20 PM6/29/12
to
On Jun 28, 8:06 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
Folks: You are either reading my words because that's like recreation
to you, or you read to get insights either into science, or into the
psychology of my daily having to deal with mostly shallows as I try to
get my Improve the World message out. Am I asking too much to have
some of you say a few words in reply? I can assure you, I'm not
writing about science or about our mixed up government just to be
entertaining. Those of you who want your children and theirs to have
the best life possible are asked to side with me. The INERTIA against
doing the right things is incredible. Today, I have removed from my
New Constitution the word "Supreme" Court. The only supreme court in
America shall be the macro will of the American People. Pray for
America, and support my causes, if your can. — John A. Armistead —
AKA NoEinstein
Folks: In the past, the errant premise was: “If the Supreme Court
>
Folks: You are either reading my words because that's like recreation
to you, or you read to get insights either into science, or into the
psychology of my daily having to deal with mostly shallows as I try to
get my Improve the World message out. Am I asking too much to have
some of you say a few words in reply? I can assure you, I'm not
writing about science or about our mixed up government just to be
entertaining. Those of you who want your children and theirs to have
the best life possible are asked to side with me. The INERTIA against
doing the right things is incredible. Today, I have removed from my
New Constitution the word "Supreme" Court. The only supreme court in
America shall be the macro will of the American People. Pray for
America, and support my causes, if your can. — John A. Armistead —
AKA NoEinstein
makes a ruling, that is what We the People must live by.” Nearly 15
years ago I was inspired to begin writing my New Constitution of the
United States of America, because of what I saw as the consistent
excess power being exercised by the Supreme Court. I was also
incensed over the near total loss of deference of law enforcement to
the People who are, effectively, paying their salaries. And I was
amazed how ’racial’ the courts were, especially, regarding the too-
high percentage of Blacks who wind up filling our jails, when in too
many instances, the hard evidence supporting guilt simply isn’t
there. I had once, single-handedly, set free a Black man being
charged with 2nd degree murder. My rationale, as an architect, was
that the confines of the front porch and the screened doorway into the
small duplex was simply too small a space for the defendant to have
wielded the 36” long 2x4 that was purported to be the murder weapon.
If not for me, that Black man would still be in jail for a crime he
didn’t commit.
Of all the racial minorities, Blacks come the closest to being
accepted on the merits of their often high work ethic as opposed to
being ’pigeon-holed’ because of the color of their skin. Since I was
committed to writing a most comprehensive New Constitution, I knew
that my document would need the support of a very high percentage of
Blacks in order to obtain the 60%, one-day support of all USA voters
needed to be ratified. So, while I penned and polished my document, I
kept asking two questions: “Would the Founding Fathers, and James
Madison in particular, have agreed with what I just wrote?” And…
“Will Blacks, who think as Americans first, and as a racial minority,
second, realize that their lots in life will be better, and the
possible discrimination against them, less, if they will support my
document?”
The main hurtle to my obtaining a high percentage of individual Black
support is the too-prevalent ’group mentality’ that Blacks should
stick together and vote together without considering the ‘Big
Picture’. Their “Al Sharpton” type leaders are, essentially,
lobbyists who are blackmailing having things be done, by government,
that will favor Blacks, regardless of who might get hurt in that
process. In a way, that is like handicapping Black players three
extra points on college and professional basketball teams, because the
needs of Blacks are greater than the needs of whites. But can their
be glory in any ‘victory’ if the rules of the game aren’t the same for
all of the players regardless of their race?
The rules of the game aren’t close to being equal, if the supposed
highest court in the land is called “Supreme”; and the justices wear
the cloaks of kings and queens; sit in thrown-like chairs, all lined-
up in a row, inside of a hypostyle, Temple-like building chiseled in
stone; and give a single justice the “power” to control the course of
this country—when there is no proof that those justices are
intellectually or morally superior. Their primary “virtue”, or
detriment, is their having been nominated and confirmed to the court
in the first place. In all other regards, those justices are just
typical college graduates who managed to make few enough waves
throughout their careers to get confirmed. And it doesn’t hurt that
each of them have at least a subliminal, philosophical agreement with
that of the presidents who nominated them.
Amazingly, amid all of the hype about how systematically the justices
make their varied decisions, probably not a single justice has
considered this hard fact: The Constitution had as the prime
objective, to have the government be agreeable to the majority of
Americans. That pivotal fact demands that nothing merely passed
through Congress and signed into law has any constitutionality,
whatsoever, unless the majority of Americans ALSO agree with the law!
From day one, about 55% of the voters don’t like Obama Care! That
mandate, however questionable pole results might me, automatically
disallows having the so-called supreme court “say” that that law is
constitutional. It never was, and never shall be!
Today—as tweaking of my New Constitution is being needed less often—I
have forever REMOVED the word “Supreme” in defining the SECOND highest
court in the land. Since my document will allow the one-day vote of
the People to decide non financial questions on most controversial
issues, the “High Court” (formerly the ’Supreme’ Court) won’t get the
final say on anything that the People feel is in great dispute. I
would call our resulting form of government a “Democracy-on-demand
Republic”!
The following Article 3 has monumental for-the-People advantages, with
our courts, rightly, being relegated to be servants of the People,
rather than Lords over even a single Law-abiding Citizen in any
court. Never again will any court not be deferential to the MACRO
will of the voters!
Article III:
Section 1: The lesser Judicial Branch consists of a High Court and
such inferior courts as the House establishes. Its major duty is to
interpret laws. It has no power to command enforcement of any of its
rulings unless so mandated in prior, formally stipulated and apt
laws. Judges and justices are technicians of the law and of this New
Constitution. They shall perform their duties as individuals, never
as part of any perceived culture of the lesser Judicial Branch, nor
from any consultation whatsoever with past or present members of
such. Additionally, they shall not have held state or federal
executive or legislative office. The President shall nominate new
justices who are between the ages of 50 and 60 years old, and may on
good behavior, serve a single term of up to 10 years. The President,
or his agents, shall not work to win the confirmation of any
nominee. Judges and justices shall be selected for their intellect,
high moral character, compassion, knowledge of the law, likable
nature, and for their proficiency and expediency in office. Such
shall not be aloft nor considered infallible in all their judgments,
yet shall be respected if they right injustices quickly. They shall
make decisions based on apt laws and this New Constitution—never on
their personal ideologies. Every two years an unbiased review panel
shall apprise the Citizens of the job performance grade, as herein, of
seated judges and justices. With the assent of 60% of the voters
nationwide, the latter can be unseated. Judges and justices aren’t
royalty, nor do they have an implied moral judgment inherently
superior to public macro-consensus. They shall not be chambered
lavishly, sit in throne-like chairs, wear robes on the job, nor dress
in a style that differentiates them from the People. They shall not
socialize with, nor privately be in conference with, members of the
Executive or Legislative branches of government; nor shall they attend
State of the Union Addresses or similar events. The Public shall not
stand for entering or exiting judges or justices who shall be
addressed only as: judge or justice. Judges and justices not
respecting such provisions, or who exhibit excessive arrogance or
pomposity on the job shall be removed. Sessions of all trials shall
begin with the judge(s) or justice(s) saying: “The justice system is
on trial.” All assent five-to-four High Court decisions are for one
year only, or shall be invalid; and the same nine justices shall not—
on their own—reconsider such issue. Courtrooms shall be devoid of
gavels, seals, flags and oppressive art, and no design feature nor
process shall imply that judges or justices represent government or
respond patly or collectively. It is TREASON for a judge or justice
to rule with disfavor on the supremacy of a fair democracy.
Section 2 & 3: Judges and justices shall be answerable to the
People. On issues of internal criminality, misconduct or corruption
within any arm of government—including the entire judicial system—
judges and justices shall not, during a trial or during sentencing,
favor government officials, judges, justices, nor any arm(s) of law
enforcement, and shall hold government officials, fellow judges,
justices, or members of law enforcement as accountable for wrongful
acts as those outside of government. If a judge or justice fails to
respond to a rightful petition or complaint against any government
official or member of the justice system, such judge or justice may be
guilty of a felony. The determination of the above status shall be
made following a mandatory vote in the House. Upon a yea vote of 1/3
of the House, a national public trial, televised from the House, shall
be held regarding all named parties—with judgment being determined via
referendum. Whenever 60% of the registered voters who vote determine
that there is guilt, the government officials, judges, justices and/or
members of law enforcement shall be removed from their former
positions and sentenced commensurate with their crimes, up to and
including the death penalty.
Judicial authority shall extend to all cases in law and equity
arising under this New Constitution, the laws of the United States,
treaties made or which shall be made under their authority, to all
cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls, to
all cases of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, to controversies in
which the United States is a party, to controversies between two or
more states, between a state and Citizens of another state, between
Citizens of different states, between Citizens of the same state
claiming lands under grants of different states or the Citizens
thereof, and foreign states, Citizens or subjects. The High Court
shall have original jurisdiction in all cases affecting ambassadors
and consuls, and those in which a state is a party. In all other
cases, the High Court shall have appellate jurisdiction both as to law
and to fact—with such exceptions and under such regulations as the
House shall make. Except in cases of impeachment, trials shall be by
jury in the state where the crimes were allegedly committed, or if
otherwise, where the House directs. Misdemeanors and crimes occurring
conjunctively shall be tried with the more serious crime, unless the
disproving of the misdemeanor would excuse the crime. If either
occurred in multiple jurisdictions, the trial shall be at a single
common venue that is least compromising to the defense. But capital
murder cases may be tried consecutively.
Section 4: New trials shall be granted to anyone previously found
guilty if there is substantive new evidence for innocence, or if there
was an improper collection of, suppression of, or distortion of the
facts by law enforcement, the prosecution, or by the courts. The
resolution of such matters shall be the top priority of the courts.
If a person is tried in a civil court for substantially the same
offense that they previously or subsequently be acquitted of in a
criminal case, a unanimous verdict of nine jurors shall be required
for the civil judgment to stand. No civil agency nor governmental
body shall independently seek to punish any person acquitted, as by
denying to such person any fundamental rights or privileges. In civil
trials monetary awards determined by juries shall stand. Achieving
justice being the primary objective, such shall take precedence over
petty procedural or legal technicalities, except those restrictions
placed on government(s) or protecting the full civil rights of any
citizen shall never be waived.
Obtaining a lawyer in civil cases is as fundamental to justice as
obtaining a lawyer in criminal cases. No statute of limitation shall
apply to any case in which a plaintiff or defendant diligently seeks
but can’t find a lawyer. Upon request to the court, an unbiased
lawyer shall be appointed. In federal cases licensed lawyers from any
state or territory may be used regardless of where the trial takes
place. The right of the People to obtain justice for any criminal or
civil injury is funda-mental. Justice departments, law enforcement
agencies, and/or the courts shall be the instruments of justice.
Should such in any way obstruct justice by improper procedure, bias,
or intentional neglect of duty, such persons shall be held as
criminally accountable as anyone else for obstruction of justice—a
felony. Undue delay by a defendant or their counsel in a civil case—
as a defensive tactic—is prohibited, and if present may be considered
as evidence supporting guilt. Causing undue delay of appeals,
similarly, is prohibited.
Section 5 & 6: It is treason to foster corruption in any arm of
government, to levy war against the USA, adhere to her enemies, or to
give them aid and comfort. The former must show abuse of power that
subverts the New Constitution, such as by enlisting subordinates into
unlawfulness that violates the civil rights of any Citizen or group.
No person shall be convicted of treason unless on the testimony of two
witnesses to the same overt act, or by confession in court. The House
sets punishment for treason, if the civil rights of innocent relatives
aren’t affected.
Witnesses in court shall be asked: “Do you promise that the
testimony you are about to give will be truthful to the best of your
knowledge?” No religious help or association shall be required during
the asking of such question. The truthfulness of a witness’s
testimony can be limited by the manner, sequence, and extent of
questioning, so witnesses always have the right to volunteer apt,
truthful testimony without fear of sanction by the court. Perjury
shall be punished commensurate with the negative effects resulting
therefrom. Judges shall have discretionary sentencing power below the
maximum, but felonies carry a min. 3-year sentence, or as stated
herein. The accrued negative effects of any criminal sentence shall
not exceed the accrued negative effects of the crime. Fines or
monetary judgments shall not be used to allay government costs. If
the public isn’t injured, it’s not a crime to flee or hide from
injustice, nor to aid another, therewith. Nor is it a crime, or proof
of a crime, for an innocent person to lie to protect their own
privacy, or the privacy of an innocent person. The House or states
shall pass no law nor approve any regulation requiring that a
convicted person admit to guilt in order to get a fair sentence or to
be considered for parole. During incarceration, if a jailed person’s
behavior has been good, at the appointed time, parole shall be
granted. When a conviction is appealed, adjudication shall occur
within six months, without public pressure, bias, or a presumption of
the correctness of the conviction. A rightful decision in such shall
be based only on the facts in the case while respecting the continuing
constitutional rights of the one convicted. The appeal(s) of a
conviction shall never place the appealer in jeopardy of a worse
sentence. A reasonable daily frequency of unmonitored phone calls and
unopened mail (external sniffing and/or x-raying accepted) shall be
allowed for persons held against their will.
Section 7: Judges and justices shall not selectively interpret,
limit, or exclude existing laws so as to effectively make new laws.
No judge or justice shall be appointed based on their ideology, nor
shall ideology be considered in confirmation processes. As to the
nominating or appointing of judges or justices: No candidate for
public office, member of the Executive Branch nor the House, shall
state nor imply that a nominee will hold, or does hold, a particular
ideology, because by so stating or implying, such candidate shall be
disqualified, the apt one’s governmental job shall be lost, and the
apt nominee disqualified. Criminal cases shall be processed as a
named, titleless person v. a named person(s). The defense can choose
to sit on either side of the court. Judges and justices shall not
anthropomorphize “the Court”, nor seek out “historical” court
positions on which to base decisions; rather, decisions shall be
theirs alone.
Section 8: It’s a felony for any person, organization, group, or
special interest—publicly or privately—to lobby judges or justices for
influencing their rulings; also, for any judge or justice to accept a
bribe in exchange for a judicial favor. It’s a capital offense for
such to accept a bribe that directly results in a person’s death.
It’s a felony to extort an innocent defendant into pleading guilty by
threatening to try them for a greater crime; ipso facto, the greater
crime is excused. Law enforcement and the courts shall be responsive
rather than proactive, protective without being subjugative, and shall
enforce the New Constitution ahead of any other laws or employment
hierarchies. Racial or other statistical profiling, preemptive
arrests, detention or sentencing are illegal if a person’s
constitutional rights are violated. But in an emergency, the President
—or when apt, a state governor(s)—may temporarily waive the latter.
It’s a felony for an attorney to acquiesce to their client’s ongoing
violations of this constitution, and/or their criminal conduct,
without censure; or for any reason to conspire to violate, or violate,
another person’s civil rights; or to stonewall the easy resolution of
justified complaints by non action, legal shenanigans or personal
bias. Similarly, it’s a civil offense for an individual, group or
business to require that a justified plaintiff have an attorney before
moving to make agreeable amends. States shall license no attorney on
the payroll or board of another type business, organization or non-
judicial governmental agency; nor one who violates this constitution;
nor one who because of personal bias, fails to competently defend the
civil rights of any Citizen. Incorporation doesn’t protect those in
such from personal responsibility for maliciousness in: harming any
person; irremediably harming local or world environs; or endangering
the likely health and safety of local or world Citizens. A crime’s
seriousness shall be consistent with the mores of the People and the
apt juries rather than with government. Judges & justices shall be
well mannered, forthright and succinct; courtrooms aren’t their
property nor forums for venting their feelings. A Citizen can
sanction a judge or justice in court for deviating from this
constitution or its spirit. Rightful behavior by any law-abiding
Citizen is appropriate, implicitly, and no Citizen so acting shall be
subordinate in or to any court, nor be made to defer to overly drawn-
out legal processes or pending rulings. “
Respectfully submitted,
John A. Armistead
> psychology of my daily having to deal with mostly shallows as I try to
> get my Improve the World message out. Am I asking too much to have
> some of you say a few words in reply? I can assure you, I'm not
> writing aboutscienceor about our mixed up government just to be
> get my Improve the World message out. Am I asking too much to have
> some of you say a few words in reply? I can assure you, I'm not
NoEinstein
Jul 5, 2012, 7:24:29 AM7/5/12
to
>
> - Show quoted text -
Folks: My New Constitution will 'right' the majority of
> - Show quoted text -
discriminination against any law-abiding person in the USA, but such
can have little effect if Google—a capitalist enterprise headquartered
in this country—willfully, and I think maliciously, has allowed one of
their un needed monitors on Political Forum to delete my 'thread'
developed for revealing and explaining approximately 85% of my
document. Please, People, go to the opening post on this link and
read how a high excecutive in Google, Nikesh Arora, Senior Vice
President and Chief Business Officer, refused to sanction a socialist-
communist named Mark M. Kahle H, who lives in Costa Rica. And Arora
did nothing in spite of my informing him I was a shareholder in
Google. If you will continue reading my subsequent replies, I show a
copy of that letter to Arora (from India) as well as include salient
email exchanges with Kahle indicating how deranged that man is. Those
of you with 'backbone" are urged to reply, with me or against me. But
when you do, remember that my goals are to improve the world; and that
is for every "nice" person on Earth! — John A. Armistead — AKA
NoEinstein
NoEinstein
Jul 5, 2012, 9:26:45 PM7/5/12
to
NoEinstein
Jul 9, 2012, 9:37:27 PM7/9/12
to
On Jul 5, 9:26 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
Folks: The content of this post can be supremely important to you and
yours. I urge as many of you as will to make comments not only about
my New Constitution, but about my bad treatment by Google in wishing
to explain these things on PoliticalForum. Getting moral support will
keep me motivated for the common good. Want you join me? — John A.
>
Folks: The content of this post can be supremely important to you and
yours. I urge as many of you as will to make comments not only about
my New Constitution, but about my bad treatment by Google in wishing
to explain these things on PoliticalForum. Getting moral support will
keep me motivated for the common good. Want you join me? — John A.
NoEinstein
Jul 12, 2012, 8:59:22 PM7/12/12
to
> ...
>
> read more »- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Earth to readers; Earth to readers: Are you there? If so, are you all
>
> read more »- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
socialists, communists or Marxists? Do any of you care whether the
USA goes down-the-tubes? Then, stand up and be counted! Talking to
thin air isn't very appealing as a use of my time. — John A.
Armistead —
NoEinstein
Jul 16, 2012, 4:42:07 PM7/16/12
to
0 new messages