OBAMA’S NOMINATION OF SOTOMAYOR BETRAYS DEMOCRACY
0 views
Skip to first unread message
NoEinstein
May 28, 2009, 12:02:22 AM5/28/09
to Views
Judge Sonia Sotomayor evoked my ire the moment I heard that she had
dismissed a clear-cut case of reverse discrimination. Such had been
brought by a white firefighter who was seeking to get a job promotion
through self-education and by scoring high grades on a written test.
An (unconstitutional) affirmative action law had required that a
certain percentage of… minorities be considered at the time any
promotions are made. But because there were no minorities scoring
high enough on the tests to be considered, this white firefighter was
refused consideration, as well.
Apparently, Judge Sotomayor has no qualms with reverse
discrimination. She and her mother smiled while Obama read his
teleprompter and patted himself on the back as being a supporter of
the Constitution and of democracy. But in order to get ‘elected’,
Obama had willingly violated every single principle of democracy and
fair play. If he had had even a modicum of the latter, either Hillary
Clinton or John McCain would be our president, now.
The SAD state of affairs in the USA is highlighted by the fact that a
fair, representative government in this country is so nonexistent that
the People will elect a president simply because he or she promises to
make changes by way of their judicial appointments. But the Founding
Fathers never intended for any judge, justice or court to effectively
“make laws” by their rulings!
Commentator and news columnist Charles Krauthammer eloquently
expresses the American ideal by pointing out that “Justice is Blind.”
If so, then how can Sotomayor favor minorities who were unable to
score high enough on the identical test that was given to the white
firefighter? The Equal Protection of the Law clause of the 14th
Amendment doesn’t say: ‘More equal protection for minorities than for
whites.” Sotomayor is disqualified to become a Justice, because she
doesn’t support the Constitution, nor does she agree with its
principle foundation: that democracy and fair play are the ideals!
Nearly fourteen years ago, I became incensed by the gradual erosion
of our civil liberties—mostly brought about by more and more corrupt-
seeming judicial rulings. I didn’t like that justices of the Supreme
Court were at the top of the pecking order, for the rest of their
lives, when they had no more moral sensibilities than any salt-of-the-
Earth man (or woman) on the street. Words wasted in lamenting our
problems abound from so many. But I decided that rather than just…
bellyaching about things, I would CHANGE things! That’s why I have
pinned and polished a New Constitution of the United States of
America!
Heretofore, our federal government has been composed of “three
separate but equal branches”: the Executive, Congress, and the
Judiciary. The following excerpts from my New Constitution is about
1/4th of the put-things-right Article III dealing with the judiciary
and the courts. Parts of it should be enlightening to readers.
__________
Article III:
Section 1: The lesser Judicial Branch consists of a Supreme Court and
such inferior courts as the House establishes. Its major duty is to
interpret laws. It has no power to command enforcement of any of its
rulings unless so mandated in prior, formally stipulated and apt
laws. Judges and justices are technicians of the law and of this New
Constitution. They shall perform their duties as individuals, never
as part of any perceived culture of the lesser Judicial Branch, nor
from any consultation whatsoever with past or present members of
such. Additionally, they shall not have held state or federal
executive or legislative office.
The President shall nominate new justices who are between the ages of
50 and 60 years old, and may on good behavior, serve a single term of
up to 10 years. Judges and justices shall be selected for their
intellect, high moral character, compassion, knowledge of the law,
likable nature, and for their proficiency and expediency in office.
Such shall not be aloft nor considered infallible in all their
judgments, yet shall be respected if they right injustices quickly.
They shall make decisions based on apt laws and this New Constitution—
never on their personal ideologies.
Every two years an unbiased review panel shall apprise the Citizens
of the job performance grade, as herein, of seated judges and
justices. With the assent of 60% of the voters nationwide, the latter
can be unseated. Judges and justices aren’t royalty, nor do they have
an implied moral judgment inherently superior to public macro-
consensus. They shall not be chambered lavishly, sit in throne-like
chairs, wear robes on the job, nor dress in a style that
differentiates them from the People. They shall not socialize with,
nor privately be in conference with, members of the Executive or
Legislative branches of government; nor shall they attend State of the
Union Addresses or similar events.
The Public shall not stand for entering or exiting judges or justices
who shall be addressed only as: judge or justice. Judges and justices
not respecting such provisions, or who exhibit excessive arrogance or
pomposity on the job shall be removed. Sessions of all trials shall
begin with the judge(s) or justice(s) saying: “The justice system is
on trial.” All assent five-to-four Supreme Court decisions are for
one year only, or shall be invalid; and the same nine justices shall
not—on their own—reconsider such issue. Courtrooms shall be devoid of
gavels, seals, flags and oppressive art, and no design feature nor
process shall imply that judges or justices represent government or
respond patly or collectively. It is TREASON for a judge or justice
to rule with disfavor on the supremacy of a fair democracy…
The above is a sampling of the changes necessary to return the
control of government to the American People, as by ratifying my New
Constitution. If there’s enough interest, additional samplings of my
document will be presented. Free discussion of the items covered is
encouraged. Only by talking-up New Government, can the necessary
support be garnered to bring such about!
Respectfully submitted,
John A. Armistead
AKA NoEinstein
__________
dismissed a clear-cut case of reverse discrimination. Such had been
brought by a white firefighter who was seeking to get a job promotion
through self-education and by scoring high grades on a written test.
An (unconstitutional) affirmative action law had required that a
certain percentage of… minorities be considered at the time any
promotions are made. But because there were no minorities scoring
high enough on the tests to be considered, this white firefighter was
refused consideration, as well.
Apparently, Judge Sotomayor has no qualms with reverse
discrimination. She and her mother smiled while Obama read his
teleprompter and patted himself on the back as being a supporter of
the Constitution and of democracy. But in order to get ‘elected’,
Obama had willingly violated every single principle of democracy and
fair play. If he had had even a modicum of the latter, either Hillary
Clinton or John McCain would be our president, now.
The SAD state of affairs in the USA is highlighted by the fact that a
fair, representative government in this country is so nonexistent that
the People will elect a president simply because he or she promises to
make changes by way of their judicial appointments. But the Founding
Fathers never intended for any judge, justice or court to effectively
“make laws” by their rulings!
Commentator and news columnist Charles Krauthammer eloquently
expresses the American ideal by pointing out that “Justice is Blind.”
If so, then how can Sotomayor favor minorities who were unable to
score high enough on the identical test that was given to the white
firefighter? The Equal Protection of the Law clause of the 14th
Amendment doesn’t say: ‘More equal protection for minorities than for
whites.” Sotomayor is disqualified to become a Justice, because she
doesn’t support the Constitution, nor does she agree with its
principle foundation: that democracy and fair play are the ideals!
Nearly fourteen years ago, I became incensed by the gradual erosion
of our civil liberties—mostly brought about by more and more corrupt-
seeming judicial rulings. I didn’t like that justices of the Supreme
Court were at the top of the pecking order, for the rest of their
lives, when they had no more moral sensibilities than any salt-of-the-
Earth man (or woman) on the street. Words wasted in lamenting our
problems abound from so many. But I decided that rather than just…
bellyaching about things, I would CHANGE things! That’s why I have
pinned and polished a New Constitution of the United States of
America!
Heretofore, our federal government has been composed of “three
separate but equal branches”: the Executive, Congress, and the
Judiciary. The following excerpts from my New Constitution is about
1/4th of the put-things-right Article III dealing with the judiciary
and the courts. Parts of it should be enlightening to readers.
__________
Article III:
Section 1: The lesser Judicial Branch consists of a Supreme Court and
such inferior courts as the House establishes. Its major duty is to
interpret laws. It has no power to command enforcement of any of its
rulings unless so mandated in prior, formally stipulated and apt
laws. Judges and justices are technicians of the law and of this New
Constitution. They shall perform their duties as individuals, never
as part of any perceived culture of the lesser Judicial Branch, nor
from any consultation whatsoever with past or present members of
such. Additionally, they shall not have held state or federal
executive or legislative office.
The President shall nominate new justices who are between the ages of
50 and 60 years old, and may on good behavior, serve a single term of
up to 10 years. Judges and justices shall be selected for their
intellect, high moral character, compassion, knowledge of the law,
likable nature, and for their proficiency and expediency in office.
Such shall not be aloft nor considered infallible in all their
judgments, yet shall be respected if they right injustices quickly.
They shall make decisions based on apt laws and this New Constitution—
never on their personal ideologies.
Every two years an unbiased review panel shall apprise the Citizens
of the job performance grade, as herein, of seated judges and
justices. With the assent of 60% of the voters nationwide, the latter
can be unseated. Judges and justices aren’t royalty, nor do they have
an implied moral judgment inherently superior to public macro-
consensus. They shall not be chambered lavishly, sit in throne-like
chairs, wear robes on the job, nor dress in a style that
differentiates them from the People. They shall not socialize with,
nor privately be in conference with, members of the Executive or
Legislative branches of government; nor shall they attend State of the
Union Addresses or similar events.
The Public shall not stand for entering or exiting judges or justices
who shall be addressed only as: judge or justice. Judges and justices
not respecting such provisions, or who exhibit excessive arrogance or
pomposity on the job shall be removed. Sessions of all trials shall
begin with the judge(s) or justice(s) saying: “The justice system is
on trial.” All assent five-to-four Supreme Court decisions are for
one year only, or shall be invalid; and the same nine justices shall
not—on their own—reconsider such issue. Courtrooms shall be devoid of
gavels, seals, flags and oppressive art, and no design feature nor
process shall imply that judges or justices represent government or
respond patly or collectively. It is TREASON for a judge or justice
to rule with disfavor on the supremacy of a fair democracy…
The above is a sampling of the changes necessary to return the
control of government to the American People, as by ratifying my New
Constitution. If there’s enough interest, additional samplings of my
document will be presented. Free discussion of the items covered is
encouraged. Only by talking-up New Government, can the necessary
support be garnered to bring such about!
Respectfully submitted,
John A. Armistead
AKA NoEinstein
__________
NoEinstein
May 30, 2009, 5:28:04 PM5/30/09
to Views
Dear Readers:
Some of you may recall my having actively worked (in verbal arguments
on Google) to have Hillary Clinton become the nominee of the
Democratic Party in 2008. That was before she 'gave up' her
constitutionally valid right to sue Barack Obama for how he had
handled his entire campaign—counter to high principles of democracy
and fair play. In effect, she betrayed most of those who had voted
for her in the (unconstitutional) spread-out primaries. Clinton
'dropped back' to her plan 'B'—probably having been BRIBED by Obama
with the promise of his making her Secretary of State.
From that moment on, I supported John McCain. Obama's lack of
fairness was evident in his ungentlemanly attacks on Sarah Palin; and
his not taking issue with the liberal media bias clearly favoring him,
also counter to high principles of democracy (where voters make up
their own minds, without brain-washing, and have their votes count,
equally). Unlike Obama, Palin knows that the USA is a REPUBLIC, NOT a
democracy! Nowhere in the Constitution is the word democracy
mentioned. But the IDEAL of having the closest possible approximation
of 'equal representation' is at the heart, soul, and SPIRIT of the
entire Constitution. Palin also knows, and she has repeated these
words in public: "Government isn't the solution, government is the
PROBLEM!” Obama's lack of understanding of that simple statement is
well on its way to... bringing down the USA, economically,
politically, and socially. As things now stand, Barack Obama is
public enemy number one.
Those who might be interested in reading some of my exhaustive essays
about the past election and about Obama's unfitness to be president
are encouraged to search my threads for any of the obvious key words.
The following post hits-the-nail-on-the-head where we now stand with
Obama in the driver's seat.
John A. Armistead
AKA NoEinstein (on Google)
Happy Days... 2
http://groups.google.com/group/views/browse_thread/thread/d63f04a059491122/579a48e380c75116?hl=en#579a48e380c75116
Some of you may recall my having actively worked (in verbal arguments
on Google) to have Hillary Clinton become the nominee of the
Democratic Party in 2008. That was before she 'gave up' her
constitutionally valid right to sue Barack Obama for how he had
handled his entire campaign—counter to high principles of democracy
and fair play. In effect, she betrayed most of those who had voted
for her in the (unconstitutional) spread-out primaries. Clinton
'dropped back' to her plan 'B'—probably having been BRIBED by Obama
with the promise of his making her Secretary of State.
From that moment on, I supported John McCain. Obama's lack of
fairness was evident in his ungentlemanly attacks on Sarah Palin; and
his not taking issue with the liberal media bias clearly favoring him,
also counter to high principles of democracy (where voters make up
their own minds, without brain-washing, and have their votes count,
equally). Unlike Obama, Palin knows that the USA is a REPUBLIC, NOT a
democracy! Nowhere in the Constitution is the word democracy
mentioned. But the IDEAL of having the closest possible approximation
of 'equal representation' is at the heart, soul, and SPIRIT of the
entire Constitution. Palin also knows, and she has repeated these
words in public: "Government isn't the solution, government is the
PROBLEM!” Obama's lack of understanding of that simple statement is
well on its way to... bringing down the USA, economically,
politically, and socially. As things now stand, Barack Obama is
public enemy number one.
Those who might be interested in reading some of my exhaustive essays
about the past election and about Obama's unfitness to be president
are encouraged to search my threads for any of the obvious key words.
The following post hits-the-nail-on-the-head where we now stand with
Obama in the driver's seat.
John A. Armistead
AKA NoEinstein (on Google)
Happy Days... 2
http://groups.google.com/group/views/browse_thread/thread/d63f04a059491122/579a48e380c75116?hl=en#579a48e380c75116
NoEinstein
Jun 3, 2009, 9:33:38 PM6/3/09
to Views
On May 30, 5:28 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
Dear Readers: Every single day—either directly or indirectly—the
judiciary and the courts affect each one of us in the USA. For too
long our lives and futures have been subject to the whims of judges
and justices who, with few exceptions, have had no qualification more
important than their having had the connections necessary to get
nominated or appointed. But no individual, regardless of his or her
connection, should ever have more power than law abiding, moral
citizens who are knowledgeable of their civil rights and
constitutional privileges as well as their obligations to honor the
civil rights and privileges of others. Defining very clearly the
scope and limits of judicial power was the reason I began writing my
New Constitution of the United States of America about fourteen years
ago.
The attached excerpt is the last section of the Article 3 relating to
the judiciary. While reading such realize how individuals who are in
the right are empowered over the caprice of any court. Talk show
hosts like Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck can complain until they are
blue in the face about the shortfalls of government. My New
Constitution corrects the problems—and to the benefit of us all!
__________
Section 8: It’s a felony for any person, organization, group, or
special interest—publicly or privately—to lobby judges or justices for
influencing their rulings; also, for any judge or justice to accept a
bribe in exchange for a judicial favor. It’s a capital offense for
such to accept a bribe that directly results in a person’s death.
It’s a felony to extort an innocent defendant into pleading guilty by
threatening to try them for a greater crime; ipso facto, the greater
crime is excused.
Law enforcement and the courts shall be responsive rather than
proactive, protective without being subjugative, and shall enforce the
New Constitution ahead of any other laws or employment hierarchies.
Racial or other statistical profiling, preemptive arrests, detention
or sentencing are illegal if a person’s constitutional rights are
violated. In a national emergency the President may waive the latter.
It’s a felony for an attorney to acquiesce to their client’s ongoing
violations of this constitution, and/or their criminal conduct,
without censure; or for any reason to conspire to violate, or violate,
another person’s civil rights; or to stonewall the easy resolution of
justified complaints by non action, legal shenanigans or personal
bias. Similarly, it’s a civil offense for an individual, group or
business to require that a justified plaintiff have an attorney before
moving to make agreeable amends.
States shall license no attorney on the payroll or board of another
type business, organization or non-judicial governmental agency; nor
one who violates this constitution; nor one who because of personal
bias, fails to competently defend the civil rights of any Citizen.
Incorporation doesn’t protect those in such from personal
responsibility for maliciousness in: harming any person; irremediably
harming local or world environs; or endangering the likely health and
safety of local or world Citizens.
A crime’s seriousness shall be consistent with the mores of the People
and the apt juries rather than with government. Judges & justices
shall be well mannered, forthright and succinct; courtrooms aren’t
their property nor forums for venting their feelings. A Citizen can
sanction a judge or justice in court for deviating from this
constitution or its spirit. Rightful behavior by any law abiding
Citizen is appropriate, implicitly, and no Citizen so acting shall be
subordinate in or to any court, nor be made to defer to overly drawn-
out legal processes or pending rulings.
John A. Armistead
AKA NoEinstein (on Google)
>
> - Show quoted text -
NoEinstein
Jun 29, 2009, 6:03:17 PM6/29/09
to Views
Nearly half of a judges and justices in the USA are CLUELESS of the
overriding moral imperatives that should control their decision
making. By a vote of 5 to 4... the Supreme Court has overturned Judge
Sonia Sotomayor’s ruling which said that reverse discrimination
against white firefighters was perfectly OK. Such a ruling is a
’victory’ for justice, but it is a failing grade for the Supreme Court
as a whole.
The most fundamental principle on which the Constitution is based is:
“FAIRNESS and DEMOCRACY shall have supremacy in America.” At the time
the original Constitution was written, a ’Representative Republic” was
the closest, practical, approximation of a democracy. It simply isn’t
FAIR for any judge or justice to rule that those of a particular skin
color or nationality are entitled to better treatment. In fact, for a
judge or justice to have made such a ruling, they are, effectively,
subverting the Constitution. Under my “New Constitution” that would
be tantamount to TREASON!
Apparently, it took about six years for the white firefighters’
lawsuit to reach the Supreme Court. Under my New Constitution, the
maximum time for getting that ruling would be one and a half years.
But in actuality—for the particular case in question—it would only
have required six WEEKS. That is amount of time a given judge is
allowed for responding to a petition for a redress of a grievance.
And since any ruling against “FAIRNESS and DEMOCRACY having supremacy
in America” is TREASON, it would be a virtual certainty that any judge
or justice would rule correctly… rather than be put to death!
Today on FOX, I heard “TV Judge” Andrew Napolitano comment that he
thinks Judge Sonia Sotomayor will be ’confirmed’. His reason?
Napolitano considers that because Sotomayor’s ruling against the white
firefighters was… “In the mainstream of American legal thinking” that
she can’t be held accountable. Unfortunately, Napolitano sees
strength in numbers. Or… if enough people are WRONG, they all can’t
be held accountable. American Patriot Thomas Paine said: “Right is
right even if everyone is against it; and wrong is wrong even if
everyone is in favor of it!”
It is doubtful that Judge Sotomayor will have a change of thinking and
say: “You know, I was wrong not to consider the rights of whites,
too.” But unless she does so, and immediately, her continued
candidacy to become a justice of the Supreme Court directly subverts
the Constitution (both old and new) and is tantamount to treason!
Similarly, any senator who votes FOR her confirmation would be
committing treason. The four justices who voted to uphold Sotomayor
should immediately resign, or, retroactively, be tried for treason
once my New Constitution is ratified. Under the latter, those white
firefighter would only have had to point out that their guaranteed
civil rights have been violated, and every single official, judge, law
officer, or attorney who did not defer to the will of those white
firefighters would be instantly out of a job! Violating principles of
fairness in America simply cannot be tolerated, if this nation is to
survive.
What all ‘minorities’ want is to be treated fairly. Under my New
Constitution they will get that, big time—but only if they will
abandon any idea that their group(s) should get favored treatment.
Band together as groups and we will fail. But band together as
individuals, and we shall prevail! — John A. Armistead —
overriding moral imperatives that should control their decision
making. By a vote of 5 to 4... the Supreme Court has overturned Judge
Sonia Sotomayor’s ruling which said that reverse discrimination
against white firefighters was perfectly OK. Such a ruling is a
’victory’ for justice, but it is a failing grade for the Supreme Court
as a whole.
The most fundamental principle on which the Constitution is based is:
“FAIRNESS and DEMOCRACY shall have supremacy in America.” At the time
the original Constitution was written, a ’Representative Republic” was
the closest, practical, approximation of a democracy. It simply isn’t
FAIR for any judge or justice to rule that those of a particular skin
color or nationality are entitled to better treatment. In fact, for a
judge or justice to have made such a ruling, they are, effectively,
subverting the Constitution. Under my “New Constitution” that would
be tantamount to TREASON!
Apparently, it took about six years for the white firefighters’
lawsuit to reach the Supreme Court. Under my New Constitution, the
maximum time for getting that ruling would be one and a half years.
But in actuality—for the particular case in question—it would only
have required six WEEKS. That is amount of time a given judge is
allowed for responding to a petition for a redress of a grievance.
And since any ruling against “FAIRNESS and DEMOCRACY having supremacy
in America” is TREASON, it would be a virtual certainty that any judge
or justice would rule correctly… rather than be put to death!
Today on FOX, I heard “TV Judge” Andrew Napolitano comment that he
thinks Judge Sonia Sotomayor will be ’confirmed’. His reason?
Napolitano considers that because Sotomayor’s ruling against the white
firefighters was… “In the mainstream of American legal thinking” that
she can’t be held accountable. Unfortunately, Napolitano sees
strength in numbers. Or… if enough people are WRONG, they all can’t
be held accountable. American Patriot Thomas Paine said: “Right is
right even if everyone is against it; and wrong is wrong even if
everyone is in favor of it!”
It is doubtful that Judge Sotomayor will have a change of thinking and
say: “You know, I was wrong not to consider the rights of whites,
too.” But unless she does so, and immediately, her continued
candidacy to become a justice of the Supreme Court directly subverts
the Constitution (both old and new) and is tantamount to treason!
Similarly, any senator who votes FOR her confirmation would be
committing treason. The four justices who voted to uphold Sotomayor
should immediately resign, or, retroactively, be tried for treason
once my New Constitution is ratified. Under the latter, those white
firefighter would only have had to point out that their guaranteed
civil rights have been violated, and every single official, judge, law
officer, or attorney who did not defer to the will of those white
firefighters would be instantly out of a job! Violating principles of
fairness in America simply cannot be tolerated, if this nation is to
survive.
What all ‘minorities’ want is to be treated fairly. Under my New
Constitution they will get that, big time—but only if they will
abandon any idea that their group(s) should get favored treatment.
Band together as groups and we will fail. But band together as
individuals, and we shall prevail! — John A. Armistead —
NoEinstein
Jul 6, 2009, 10:36:29 AM7/6/09
to Views
Dear Readers:
I am grateful to have received the following (direct) email reply. I
hope others of you will reply and/or talk-up what I am doing to save
this country. John A. Armistead
John,
We have the same beliefs and the same fears about where this country
is heading. I agree with you that it is not too late, I want
to see what we do in 2010, It is time to wake up and take our country
back. I am not an activist, never have been. But I am really angry
right now at the folks who got fooled by Obama's silver tongue,
How could everyone not have seen what was behind the mask? But you
also scare with the your push for a "New Constitution", These are
thoughts from someone who is out of touch the reality, I hope that
this is not the case. There is nothing wrong with our constitution.
And
I certainly do not think that anyone of us has the wisdom to rewrite
it. What is wrong is politicians who promote their own agendas
instead
of following the will of the American people. All we need to do is to
make sure that we vote them our of office at the next election, and
keep voting the rotten apples out until we clean the barrel. The
Constitution works. It is we the people who have let it down. I hope
that we can all use all our energy and good intentions to convince
Americans that it is time to turn our country around.
Dear Bernie:
Thanks for sharing your concerns regarding where this country is
heading. Your reply, if responded to point-by-point, could easily
become long and repetitive—mostly with logic which I‘ve already
explained. The understanding that you seek (or might like to hear)
concerning my motives would fill a tome. I recommend that you read
more of the following links. The ’spirit’ of my motives and the
rationale for my writing a New Constitution is evident in every
paragraph.
John A. Armistead
AKA NoEinstein on Google
Happy Days… !
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/9903367481ce7970/ae4338645fbefbf5?hl=en&lnk=st&q=Happy+Days...!#ae4338645fbefbf5
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/a83e59ee6ca4d1f5/b29f39ee45684d85?hl=en&lnk=st&q=#b29f39ee45684d85
OBAMA’S NOMINATION OF SOTOMAYOR BETRAYS DEMOCRACY
http://groups.google.com/group/views/browse_thread/thread/998870d93fd1a994?hl=en
USA IS BOTH SOOTHED AND BETRAYED BY RHETORIC
http://groups.google.com/group/views/browse_thread/thread/576e701e1d916343?hl=en
A Democracy Doesn’t Favor Media Figures and Celebrities
http://groups.google.com/group/views/browse_thread/
> ...
>
> read more »- Hide quoted text -
I am grateful to have received the following (direct) email reply. I
hope others of you will reply and/or talk-up what I am doing to save
this country. John A. Armistead
John,
We have the same beliefs and the same fears about where this country
is heading. I agree with you that it is not too late, I want
to see what we do in 2010, It is time to wake up and take our country
back. I am not an activist, never have been. But I am really angry
right now at the folks who got fooled by Obama's silver tongue,
How could everyone not have seen what was behind the mask? But you
also scare with the your push for a "New Constitution", These are
thoughts from someone who is out of touch the reality, I hope that
this is not the case. There is nothing wrong with our constitution.
And
I certainly do not think that anyone of us has the wisdom to rewrite
it. What is wrong is politicians who promote their own agendas
instead
of following the will of the American people. All we need to do is to
make sure that we vote them our of office at the next election, and
keep voting the rotten apples out until we clean the barrel. The
Constitution works. It is we the people who have let it down. I hope
that we can all use all our energy and good intentions to convince
Americans that it is time to turn our country around.
Dear Bernie:
Thanks for sharing your concerns regarding where this country is
heading. Your reply, if responded to point-by-point, could easily
become long and repetitive—mostly with logic which I‘ve already
explained. The understanding that you seek (or might like to hear)
concerning my motives would fill a tome. I recommend that you read
more of the following links. The ’spirit’ of my motives and the
rationale for my writing a New Constitution is evident in every
paragraph.
John A. Armistead
AKA NoEinstein on Google
Happy Days… !
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/9903367481ce7970/ae4338645fbefbf5?hl=en&lnk=st&q=Happy+Days...!#ae4338645fbefbf5
Happy Days... 2
http://groups.google.com/group/views/browse_thread/thread/d63f04a059491122/579a48e380c75116?hl=en#579a48e380c75116
Campaigning is a Science, too.
http://groups.google.com/group/views/browse_thread/thread/d63f04a059491122/579a48e380c75116?hl=en#579a48e380c75116
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/a83e59ee6ca4d1f5/b29f39ee45684d85?hl=en&lnk=st&q=#b29f39ee45684d85
OBAMA’S NOMINATION OF SOTOMAYOR BETRAYS DEMOCRACY
http://groups.google.com/group/views/browse_thread/thread/998870d93fd1a994?hl=en
USA IS BOTH SOOTHED AND BETRAYED BY RHETORIC
http://groups.google.com/group/views/browse_thread/thread/576e701e1d916343?hl=en
A Democracy Doesn’t Favor Media Figures and Celebrities
http://groups.google.com/group/views/browse_thread/
>
> read more »- Hide quoted text -
NoEinstein
Jul 12, 2009, 1:48:13 PM7/12/09
to Views
On Face the Nation this morning Bob Schieffer had guests, Sen. Patrick
Leahe and Sen. Jeff Sessions, discussing whether or not there should
be a “fight” over the confirmation of Judge Sonia Sotomayor. Leahe
stated that he hopes her confirmation hearing doesn’t turn into a
“partisan” fight. The clear meaning of that statement is that Leahe
hopes Republicans will simply go along with whomever Barack Obama
nominates.
Schieffer countered Leahe’s assertion that the ’issue’ is that of ’a’
firefighter’s lawsuit, by stating that the petition was signed by the
entire firefighter group. Leahe immediately defended Sotomayor’s
ruling—which effectively uphold reverse discrimination—by stating that
Sotomayor is a “mainstream” judge who has repeatedly said… “The Law
Controls” (so long as Sotomayor or the liberal court gets to interpret
just what… the LAW means…).
I was thrilled to hear Sen. Jeff Sessions hit-the-nail-on-the-head
with all of the correct reasons why the confirmation issue is much
larger than the simple selection of a justice. If Session’s
constitutionally correct position is… just his being partisan, then
all Democrats who support Sotomayor are not only being partisan, they
are doing so counter to the most basic (tacit) premise of the
Constitution, which is: Principles of fairness and democracy shall
have supremacy in the USA.
Session’s morally and constitutionally correct summary of the issues
had clearly bettered Leahe’s assertions. So, Leahe ended by saying
that the Supreme Court’s ruling wasn’t unanimous. He implied that
four justices had been “correct”, and that five were wrong. Under my
New Constitution, Leahe would immediately be arrested and charged with
TREASON, because: He clearly doesn’t support the most basic tenet of
the Constitution that he is SWORN to uphold. Taking a position
counter to that most basic tenet subverts the Constitution. Leahe, by
his words, is a party to the destruction of the USA just as surely as
if he gave “… aid and comfort to the enemy“.
After the Supreme Court’s five-to-four ruling against Sotomayor was
handed down, President Barack Obama issued a formal statement
chastising the court for doing so. Obama—who supposedly taught
courses on the Constitution—apparently doesn’t know that the (present)
Constitution has a checks-and-balances separation of powers. The
Constitution clearly denies Obama the authority to chastise the
court. His doing so anyway is just another in a daily string of
affronts to the Constitution that has so marked his candidacy, and
his… “presidency”… Obama’s not realizing that reverse discrimination
against ANYONE is simply wrong, shows that he is guilty of TREASON!
That fact became evident beginning with his corrupt political
campaign. Obama has been, and continues to be a TRAITOR to the USA!
Speaking In Ghana, President Obama touted the virtues of “democracy”
in words. Yet, here in the USA, principles of democracy are little in
evidence. Someone said: “Do as I SAY, not as I do.” Obama TALKS
democracy while he stabs-it-in-the-back at every turn. During the
2008 campaign, Obama supported the “delegate count” while his lead was
slipping in the POPULAR vote—the IDEAL, that at the time of the
writing of the original Constitution, was not achievable on a national
scale. Such fact proves that Barack Obama not only is the… Manchurian
Candidate… who managed to become President, he is the Anti-Christ, who
keeps going around the World and talking with such… ‘charisma’ about
that which he does not believe.
It was laughable to hear President Obama say in Ghana: “No person
wants to live in a country where the government SKIMS 20% off-of-the-
top (of what businesses make). THAT is tyranny.” Most of you readers
should know that Obama has no qualms about allowing the US government
to SKIM well over 20% off-the-top simply by DEFLATING the value of the
dollar. In order to pay for his… country-busting programs, the
Federal Reserve keeps printing money that is not backed up by the
value of the goods and services produced. His doing so, rightly,
should make President Barack Obama Public Enemy Number ONE, over the
World!
It doesn’t look like Judge Sonia Sotomayor will express a change-of-
heart after having her pro reverse discrimination ruling be over-
turned by the Supreme Court. Sotomayor is positioning herself to help
Obama bring down this country in the fastest way possible. WAKE UP
AMERICA!! If this country can’t rally behind our having justice and
fair play for all citizens, regardless of their race or economic
status, then we will all be standing idly by while “Rome” burns. No
ego-maniacal President, however… suave, should be working so hard to
see that such a tragedy happens. — John A. Armistead —
> Happy Days… !http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/99033...
> Happy Days... 2http://groups.google.com/group/views/browse_thread/thread/d63f04a0594...
> Campaigning is a Science, too.http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/a83e5...
> OBAMA’S NOMINATION OF SOTOMAYOR BETRAYS DEMOCRACYhttp://groups.google.com/group/views/browse_thread/thread/998870d93fd...
> USA IS BOTH SOOTHED AND BETRAYED BY RHETORIChttp://groups.google.com/group/views/browse_thread/thread/576e701e1d9...
> A Democracy Doesn’t Favor Media Figures and Celebritieshttp://groups.google.com/group/views/browse_thread/
Leahe and Sen. Jeff Sessions, discussing whether or not there should
be a “fight” over the confirmation of Judge Sonia Sotomayor. Leahe
stated that he hopes her confirmation hearing doesn’t turn into a
“partisan” fight. The clear meaning of that statement is that Leahe
hopes Republicans will simply go along with whomever Barack Obama
nominates.
Schieffer countered Leahe’s assertion that the ’issue’ is that of ’a’
firefighter’s lawsuit, by stating that the petition was signed by the
entire firefighter group. Leahe immediately defended Sotomayor’s
ruling—which effectively uphold reverse discrimination—by stating that
Sotomayor is a “mainstream” judge who has repeatedly said… “The Law
Controls” (so long as Sotomayor or the liberal court gets to interpret
just what… the LAW means…).
I was thrilled to hear Sen. Jeff Sessions hit-the-nail-on-the-head
with all of the correct reasons why the confirmation issue is much
larger than the simple selection of a justice. If Session’s
constitutionally correct position is… just his being partisan, then
all Democrats who support Sotomayor are not only being partisan, they
are doing so counter to the most basic (tacit) premise of the
Constitution, which is: Principles of fairness and democracy shall
have supremacy in the USA.
Session’s morally and constitutionally correct summary of the issues
had clearly bettered Leahe’s assertions. So, Leahe ended by saying
that the Supreme Court’s ruling wasn’t unanimous. He implied that
four justices had been “correct”, and that five were wrong. Under my
New Constitution, Leahe would immediately be arrested and charged with
TREASON, because: He clearly doesn’t support the most basic tenet of
the Constitution that he is SWORN to uphold. Taking a position
counter to that most basic tenet subverts the Constitution. Leahe, by
his words, is a party to the destruction of the USA just as surely as
if he gave “… aid and comfort to the enemy“.
After the Supreme Court’s five-to-four ruling against Sotomayor was
handed down, President Barack Obama issued a formal statement
chastising the court for doing so. Obama—who supposedly taught
courses on the Constitution—apparently doesn’t know that the (present)
Constitution has a checks-and-balances separation of powers. The
Constitution clearly denies Obama the authority to chastise the
court. His doing so anyway is just another in a daily string of
affronts to the Constitution that has so marked his candidacy, and
his… “presidency”… Obama’s not realizing that reverse discrimination
against ANYONE is simply wrong, shows that he is guilty of TREASON!
That fact became evident beginning with his corrupt political
campaign. Obama has been, and continues to be a TRAITOR to the USA!
Speaking In Ghana, President Obama touted the virtues of “democracy”
in words. Yet, here in the USA, principles of democracy are little in
evidence. Someone said: “Do as I SAY, not as I do.” Obama TALKS
democracy while he stabs-it-in-the-back at every turn. During the
2008 campaign, Obama supported the “delegate count” while his lead was
slipping in the POPULAR vote—the IDEAL, that at the time of the
writing of the original Constitution, was not achievable on a national
scale. Such fact proves that Barack Obama not only is the… Manchurian
Candidate… who managed to become President, he is the Anti-Christ, who
keeps going around the World and talking with such… ‘charisma’ about
that which he does not believe.
It was laughable to hear President Obama say in Ghana: “No person
wants to live in a country where the government SKIMS 20% off-of-the-
top (of what businesses make). THAT is tyranny.” Most of you readers
should know that Obama has no qualms about allowing the US government
to SKIM well over 20% off-the-top simply by DEFLATING the value of the
dollar. In order to pay for his… country-busting programs, the
Federal Reserve keeps printing money that is not backed up by the
value of the goods and services produced. His doing so, rightly,
should make President Barack Obama Public Enemy Number ONE, over the
World!
It doesn’t look like Judge Sonia Sotomayor will express a change-of-
heart after having her pro reverse discrimination ruling be over-
turned by the Supreme Court. Sotomayor is positioning herself to help
Obama bring down this country in the fastest way possible. WAKE UP
AMERICA!! If this country can’t rally behind our having justice and
fair play for all citizens, regardless of their race or economic
status, then we will all be standing idly by while “Rome” burns. No
ego-maniacal President, however… suave, should be working so hard to
see that such a tragedy happens. — John A. Armistead —
> Happy Days... 2http://groups.google.com/group/views/browse_thread/thread/d63f04a0594...
> Campaigning is a Science, too.http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/a83e5...
> OBAMA’S NOMINATION OF SOTOMAYOR BETRAYS DEMOCRACYhttp://groups.google.com/group/views/browse_thread/thread/998870d93fd...
> USA IS BOTH SOOTHED AND BETRAYED BY RHETORIChttp://groups.google.com/group/views/browse_thread/thread/576e701e1d9...
> A Democracy Doesn’t Favor Media Figures and Celebritieshttp://groups.google.com/group/views/browse_thread/
NoEinstein
Jul 19, 2009, 12:40:26 PM7/19/09
to Views
During Judge Sonia Sotomayor’s confirmation hearings this past week,
she side-stepped two major questions: The first concerned her repeated
statements that a wise Latino woman should be able to make better
informed decisions, as a judge, than a white man. The second was her
matter-of-fact rejection, without just comment, that the New Haven
firefighters shouldn’t be subject to reverse discrimination. Her
spurious rationale on both of those not only should disqualify her
from ever becoming a justice, it should tag both her, and President
Barack Obama who nominated her, as traitors to the USA, tantamount to
TREASON.
Sotomayor’s rationale for claiming that the life experiences of Latino
women can make them better qualified judges, was that she was “…
addressing audiences composed mostly of Latino women.” In short,
Sotomayor was trying to motivate those women to believe that they can
‘succeed’ like she herself has ‘succeeded’. But what she was actually
doing was revealing her true, BIASED colors. For Sotomayor, people
are black, white, or Latino; rich, poor, or disadvantaged. For her,
it is the judges ’responsibility’ to even-the-score because of any
disparity in one’s life situation. She had said, “…the Appeals Courts
are where ‘laws’ are made.” For her, the ‘authority’ is there to
legislate-from-the-bench to favor those groups or individuals with
whom she herself has the most empathy. Since having GROUP BIAS runs
counter to every principle of democracy and fair play, then Sotomayor,
by her continued public employment, is subverting the most basic
premise of the Constitution, and is thus committing TREASON!
Sotomayor’s rationale for voting against the New Haven firefighters
was: She was just following the “precedent” of… the court. She has
chosen to hide behind the accrued errors from the past, in order to
accomplish her own personal agendas. I’m sure that if the people who
brought the lawsuit had been… “Latinos”, Sotomayor would have reached
a completely different decision. That’s because Sotomayor’s MOTIVE IN
LIFE is to favor the most disadvantaged in any court decision that she
makes. Again, her belief that her own personal bias is acceptable,
disqualifies her to be a justice, and makes her ‘guilty’—until proven
innocent, of course—of TREASON! Barack Obama wants Sotomayor on the
Supreme Court to aid him in “evening the score” for Blacks—without
regard to principles of democracy and fair play. So, Barack Obama is
also committing TREASON!
My New Constitution contains the following ***crucial change in how
justices are to make decisions:
“Article III:
Section 1: The lesser Judicial Branch consists of a Supreme Court and
such inferior courts as the House establishes. Its major duty is to
interpret laws. It has no power to command enforcement of any of its
rulings unless so mandated in prior, formally stipulated and apt
laws. Judges and justices are technicians of the law and of this New
Constitution. ***They shall perform their duties as individuals,
Today on Meet the Press, Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health and
Human Services, was the guest. David Gregory repeatedly pressured her
to explain how the health care bill that is now before Congress—and is
projected to cost taxpayers a trillion dollars—is ‘accomplishing’
Barack Obama’s stated objective of providing cheaper and better health
care for all citizens. Sebelius refused to answer that question,
because her ’boss’, Obama, hasn’t come out and said that the “more
taxes on the wealthy” bill isn’t acceptable. In short her clear…
“loyalty” is to President Obama, not to the American People. My New
Constitution contains the following important “loyalty oath” to the
People:
“All local, state and federal officer holders and employees—upon
taking office or assuming employment—shall take the following oath:
“I, (Name), promise to serve the People fairly and to the best of my
ability, and I will expect my coworkers and superiors [even the
President of the United States] to do the same.” No employee nor
office holder shall be sanctioned for making complaints in such regard
against another office holder, employee or superior. No government
employee, nor any office holder shall be coerced into wrongdoing,
immoral action or non action, or illegality by a real or implied
threat of the loss of one’s job, promotion or benefits, etc., nor by
any bribe or promise of promotion or benefits. Making such a threat,
bribe or promise is a felony carrying a minimum ten year prison
sentence—and if part of a pattern—making such threats, bribes or
promises is treason. Acquiescing to such is a felony. Government
officials, agents or employees who become aware of corruption in
government or in any of its departments shall notify the Executive
Branch and the courts; willful failure to do so is a felony. With
impunity, a government officer(s) or employee(s) shall enforce no law
nor perform any order or directive which violates their personal moral
conscience or their oath.”
Senator Mitch McConnell, the Republican Minority Leader, was an
excellent guest on Meet the Press, today. His only ‘slip-up’ was to
praise Sonia Sotomayor in any way in her quest to become a justice of
the Supreme Court. Though McConnell said he won’t vote for her, he
sounded much too civil. However, the senator is perfectly correct
that no health care bill presently before congress makes sense. The
extremely high cost of defending against… frivolous malpractice
lawsuits, and the “free” care being given in emergency rooms, surely
need to be addressed.
This past week, a poll showed that by a margin of 47% to 41% the
American People are AGAINST any health care bill that costs the
taxpayers more money. Intended or not, sampling polls of the People
come closer to being what a DEMOCRACY should be than the… “Defer to
your ELECTED DICTATORS” system of government that this country has for
too long accepted as… the norm.
From the outset, the American People—as evinced by polls—have been
AGAINST the ‘stimulus bills’ and bailouts which inflate the dollar and
threaten the economic survival of this country. Yet, President Barack
Obama, the Antichrist, is blind to any reality other than his own
delusions of grandeur that he alone is qualified to make the changes
necessary to correct our problems— WITHOUT his ever having to consider
the will of the People, nor the ‘Red Flags’ being thrown up by
economists and thinking Republicans and Democrats.
Like that computer “Hal” in ‘2001, A Space Odyssey’, our present
system of government needs to be TURNED OFF! In just a single DAY,
the American People can ratify my New Constitution of the United
States of America! Doing so will send home (!) all of the blind
career politicians who have duped us into believing they have any
Earthly idea whatsoever those things needing to be done to right this
country’s course away from its oblivion. Wake UP, America! The
status quo of government fails all of us! Obama’s “hundred days” is
past. Are any of you… better off? Start demanding Obama’s
resignation! With him there is only doom… Without him there can be
new life! — John A. Armistead —
she side-stepped two major questions: The first concerned her repeated
statements that a wise Latino woman should be able to make better
informed decisions, as a judge, than a white man. The second was her
matter-of-fact rejection, without just comment, that the New Haven
firefighters shouldn’t be subject to reverse discrimination. Her
spurious rationale on both of those not only should disqualify her
from ever becoming a justice, it should tag both her, and President
Barack Obama who nominated her, as traitors to the USA, tantamount to
TREASON.
Sotomayor’s rationale for claiming that the life experiences of Latino
women can make them better qualified judges, was that she was “…
addressing audiences composed mostly of Latino women.” In short,
Sotomayor was trying to motivate those women to believe that they can
‘succeed’ like she herself has ‘succeeded’. But what she was actually
doing was revealing her true, BIASED colors. For Sotomayor, people
are black, white, or Latino; rich, poor, or disadvantaged. For her,
it is the judges ’responsibility’ to even-the-score because of any
disparity in one’s life situation. She had said, “…the Appeals Courts
are where ‘laws’ are made.” For her, the ‘authority’ is there to
legislate-from-the-bench to favor those groups or individuals with
whom she herself has the most empathy. Since having GROUP BIAS runs
counter to every principle of democracy and fair play, then Sotomayor,
by her continued public employment, is subverting the most basic
premise of the Constitution, and is thus committing TREASON!
Sotomayor’s rationale for voting against the New Haven firefighters
was: She was just following the “precedent” of… the court. She has
chosen to hide behind the accrued errors from the past, in order to
accomplish her own personal agendas. I’m sure that if the people who
brought the lawsuit had been… “Latinos”, Sotomayor would have reached
a completely different decision. That’s because Sotomayor’s MOTIVE IN
LIFE is to favor the most disadvantaged in any court decision that she
makes. Again, her belief that her own personal bias is acceptable,
disqualifies her to be a justice, and makes her ‘guilty’—until proven
innocent, of course—of TREASON! Barack Obama wants Sotomayor on the
Supreme Court to aid him in “evening the score” for Blacks—without
regard to principles of democracy and fair play. So, Barack Obama is
also committing TREASON!
My New Constitution contains the following ***crucial change in how
justices are to make decisions:
“Article III:
Section 1: The lesser Judicial Branch consists of a Supreme Court and
such inferior courts as the House establishes. Its major duty is to
interpret laws. It has no power to command enforcement of any of its
rulings unless so mandated in prior, formally stipulated and apt
laws. Judges and justices are technicians of the law and of this New
never as part of any perceived culture of the lesser Judicial Branch,
nor from any consultation whatsoever with past or present members of
such [and that includes researching… precedents].*** Additionally,
nor from any consultation whatsoever with past or present members of
they shall not have held state or federal executive or legislative
office. The President shall nominate new justices who are between the
ages of 50 and 60 years old, and may on good behavior, serve a single
term of up to 10 years. Judges and justices shall be selected for
their intellect, high moral character, compassion, knowledge of the
law, likable nature, and for their proficiency and expediency in
office. Such shall not be aloft nor considered infallible in all
their judgments, yet shall be respected if they right injustices
quickly. They shall make decisions based on apt laws and this New
Constitution—never on their personal ideologies. Every two years an
unbiased review panel shall apprise the Citizens of the job
performance grade, as herein, of seated judges and justices. With the
assent of 60% of the voters nationwide, the latter can be unseated…”
office. The President shall nominate new justices who are between the
ages of 50 and 60 years old, and may on good behavior, serve a single
term of up to 10 years. Judges and justices shall be selected for
their intellect, high moral character, compassion, knowledge of the
law, likable nature, and for their proficiency and expediency in
office. Such shall not be aloft nor considered infallible in all
their judgments, yet shall be respected if they right injustices
quickly. They shall make decisions based on apt laws and this New
Constitution—never on their personal ideologies. Every two years an
unbiased review panel shall apprise the Citizens of the job
performance grade, as herein, of seated judges and justices. With the
Today on Meet the Press, Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health and
Human Services, was the guest. David Gregory repeatedly pressured her
to explain how the health care bill that is now before Congress—and is
projected to cost taxpayers a trillion dollars—is ‘accomplishing’
Barack Obama’s stated objective of providing cheaper and better health
care for all citizens. Sebelius refused to answer that question,
because her ’boss’, Obama, hasn’t come out and said that the “more
taxes on the wealthy” bill isn’t acceptable. In short her clear…
“loyalty” is to President Obama, not to the American People. My New
Constitution contains the following important “loyalty oath” to the
People:
“All local, state and federal officer holders and employees—upon
taking office or assuming employment—shall take the following oath:
“I, (Name), promise to serve the People fairly and to the best of my
ability, and I will expect my coworkers and superiors [even the
President of the United States] to do the same.” No employee nor
office holder shall be sanctioned for making complaints in such regard
against another office holder, employee or superior. No government
employee, nor any office holder shall be coerced into wrongdoing,
immoral action or non action, or illegality by a real or implied
threat of the loss of one’s job, promotion or benefits, etc., nor by
any bribe or promise of promotion or benefits. Making such a threat,
bribe or promise is a felony carrying a minimum ten year prison
sentence—and if part of a pattern—making such threats, bribes or
promises is treason. Acquiescing to such is a felony. Government
officials, agents or employees who become aware of corruption in
government or in any of its departments shall notify the Executive
Branch and the courts; willful failure to do so is a felony. With
impunity, a government officer(s) or employee(s) shall enforce no law
nor perform any order or directive which violates their personal moral
conscience or their oath.”
Senator Mitch McConnell, the Republican Minority Leader, was an
excellent guest on Meet the Press, today. His only ‘slip-up’ was to
praise Sonia Sotomayor in any way in her quest to become a justice of
the Supreme Court. Though McConnell said he won’t vote for her, he
sounded much too civil. However, the senator is perfectly correct
that no health care bill presently before congress makes sense. The
extremely high cost of defending against… frivolous malpractice
lawsuits, and the “free” care being given in emergency rooms, surely
need to be addressed.
This past week, a poll showed that by a margin of 47% to 41% the
American People are AGAINST any health care bill that costs the
taxpayers more money. Intended or not, sampling polls of the People
come closer to being what a DEMOCRACY should be than the… “Defer to
your ELECTED DICTATORS” system of government that this country has for
too long accepted as… the norm.
From the outset, the American People—as evinced by polls—have been
AGAINST the ‘stimulus bills’ and bailouts which inflate the dollar and
threaten the economic survival of this country. Yet, President Barack
Obama, the Antichrist, is blind to any reality other than his own
delusions of grandeur that he alone is qualified to make the changes
necessary to correct our problems— WITHOUT his ever having to consider
the will of the People, nor the ‘Red Flags’ being thrown up by
economists and thinking Republicans and Democrats.
Like that computer “Hal” in ‘2001, A Space Odyssey’, our present
system of government needs to be TURNED OFF! In just a single DAY,
the American People can ratify my New Constitution of the United
States of America! Doing so will send home (!) all of the blind
career politicians who have duped us into believing they have any
Earthly idea whatsoever those things needing to be done to right this
country’s course away from its oblivion. Wake UP, America! The
status quo of government fails all of us! Obama’s “hundred days” is
past. Are any of you… better off? Start demanding Obama’s
resignation! With him there is only doom… Without him there can be
new life! — John A. Armistead —
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages