Handwriting Analysis of Clinton, Obama, McCain & Einstein (is Copyrighted)
NoEinstein
are someone's personality and their core value system. Expert
handwriting analysis can ascertain such qualities in a person--and
without being overly influenced by their sometimes put-on public
personas.
Obviously, Einstein isn't running for President. But he keeps
getting "re elected" by those in Ivory Towers; in government; and in
our very nearsighted media to be: The Poster Boy of Intellect. This
past year my various posts on sci.physics have documented my complete
and total disproof of Einstein. In those posts, and in my replies to
the comments of others, I've often referred to the man as: "...moronic
Einstein". The latter isn't some all-too-convenient putdown of
someone with whom I have disagreement. Rather, it is the result of a
lifetime of having been a keen observer of human nature.
This past year I wrote to President Bush urging him to reduce, by
about two billion dollars, his 2008 budget request for the National
Science Foundation. That's the approximate amount of money such
agency is wasting each and every year on grants to universities to
"research" anything and everything to do with Einstein's ideas about
the Universe. Of course, I also sent detailed descriptions of my
findings to the science and technology committee chairmen; the budget
committee chairmen; as well as to my congressman and one of my
senators. The latter two wrote me token reply letters. But I never
heard from the President, nor from those four committee chairmen.
The 2008 budget got approved... But President Bush didn't veto the
NSF's portion--as I had urged him to do. So, another two billion
dollars of taxpayers' money is being wasted. Now, the correction of
the inflated National Science Foundation's budget will likely fall on
either Clinton, Obama, or McCain to correct.
Last spring TIME Magazine ran a simplistic and amateurish
handwriting analysis of the six frontrunners for President. The
signatures of all were shown. So, I did my own professional level
analysis of each candidate's writing, and immediately sent such to
TIME. But true to form, TIME won't acknowledge that anything in its
pages has ever been less than... "perfection" (as seen in the eyes of
their management).
One of my fascinating hobbies is graphology, or handwriting
analysis. I began doing such at age twelve. Most of the books that I
read on the subject said that if the various letters in a person's
writing are shaped a certain way it will mean this or that. To do an
analysis of someone's writing, a person either has to memorize the
meanings of the letter forms, or they must use a book(s) for
reference. My favorite book, a paperback, came loose at the binding
because I used it so much. I realized that most books that are
written about graphology either don't want to explain how to analyze
writing, or they simply don't know how to do it. Several of the books
I read were written my people who analyzed celebrity's writing. But
since most celebrities are known personalities from the outset, what
is said doesn't necessarily result from what is learned just from the
handwriting. Those books have a lot of pictures of handwriting
samples. Often there were arrows pointing here and there at the
letters. The inference is that the explanations in the text correlate
to the peculiarities being pointed to on the samples.
After about ten years of using my books for making analyses, I
realized I had learned more from those people that I had done analyses
of, than from those I had read about. So, I didn't need reference
books any more. Now, my unique perspective is understanding the
meaning of the dynamics of the hand as it moves across the paper. I
can be across a room, and still discern the personality of a person
who is writing. I do that by watching how their hand, arm and pen
move! Of course I can make a more thorough analysis if I can see the
actual writing.
My favorite impromptu subjects are: waitresses, bank tellers and
clerks whom I see writing for the first time. Often, before I've
finished an analysis, a crowd is standing around in awe urging me to
analyze some of their writing, too! More serious analyses involve the
handwritings of those with emotional problems; lonely, and perhaps
suicidal people; and criminals. Samples of the writing of the latter
are sometimes reproduced in newspapers or magazines.
I enjoy analyzing the corporate culture of an entire business. I
can do so by studying the writing of those who have signed posters or
large cards to an employee. And I can usually pick out who the
leadership is just by how (and where) they sign their names on the
card. Guest registries are another fruitful source for writing
samples, as are high school and college annuals, if they have lots of
autographs. Doodles also indicate personality. Their often-
spontaneous nature is closely tied to brain activity.
The name "Albert Einstein" is known to millions, but as a
personality he's known to very few. I have only one signature of
Einstein. It's inside 'Relativity, the Special and the General
Theory' (by Albert Einstein) but translated dutifully by Robert W.
Lawson, University of Sheffield. I say that it was translated
"dutifully" because I have also seen the word-for-word translation
from German to English. What I saw, in its grammar, syntax and
sentence structure hints of the mind--not of a genius--but of one
struggling to communicate verbally at all... Einstein was known as a
man who communicated using equations.
Google's posting protocol won't allow me to reproduce Einstein's
signature for you to see. But I'll describe it well enough that most
of you should be able to imagine what his signature looks like:
Einstein signs his name:
A. Einst ein. (PERIOD)
He purposefully puts a PERIOD after his sir name! He has a slight
break between the 't' and the 'e'. His 'A.' is just a three line
triangle with a too long crossbar. His capital 'E' contains three
loops or knots. His 't' is very short and has a too high, long
crossbar that extends nearly to the last 'n'. The seven lower case
letters have a total of eight pointed top (or bottom) forms [where
most people would write with rounded letters]. His capital 'A.' is
formed more slowly than the letters in 'Einst ein'. His 'i dots' are
well placed, but slightly high. His 's' is an inverted v. His last
letter 'n' is larger than the starting size of the lower case
letters. His writing size is medium. His baseline wavers up and down
in a normal range. And his signature is legible.
Note: The characteristics that can be assigned to qualities of
writing will vary according to the 'general overall impression'. Most
of Einstein's signature has negative characteristics... It is important
that those reading this should not infer--if they, or someone they know
has a particular feature--that the meaning will be the same for them as
for Einstein. Good characteristics can cancel one or more bad ones!
Einstein's dominant writing characteristic is the pointed top
'A.' and those eight very sharply pointed, or angular places on the
lower case letters. Angular shapes denote: aggressiveness;
defensiveness; antisocial behavior; unfriendliness; crankiness;
dictatorial feelings; temperamental nature; schizophrenia; and a
general unhappiness in one's life. Angular shapes are made using just
the fingers on an unmoving hand. And an unmoving hand making angular
shapes denotes: self-centeredness; exaggerated ego; selfishness;
tightness (with money and affection); simple-mindedness; and
listlessness. One of those eight angular shapes is the letter 's'
that looks like an inverted v. Letters that should be closed on the
bottom, but aren't, denote: deceit; corruption; dishonesty; and
untrustworthiness.
The small break in his last name is caused by his unmoving hand
and arm. People with normal personalities move their hand and arm as
they write. People who don't are extremely introverted and out of
touch. That period after his name is saying: "Notice me; notice me!"
But it is also a sadistic jabbing of the point, like someone poking
you in the chest to make an issue of something. Albert Einstein was a
VERY unpleasant person to be around...
That first letter 'A.' is most revealing. The deliberateness
with which it was written suggests that Einstein is a pedant--or one
who makes a showy display of knowledge. Pedants are those who like to
impress you with trivial memorized facts and figures. Often, their
doing so is just a mechanism to cover up their extreme inferiority
complex. Einstein inferior? You had better believe it!
One's openness to ideas is shown by the loops or non-loops of Bs,
Ds, Fs, Hs, Ks, Ls, and Ts. Einstein's lower case 't' is as short as
an i. This means that he was absolutely closed minded. People with
schizophrenia are very closed minded to anything but their imagined
reality, or delusions. Those loops or knots in the capital 'E' denote
tenacity--a good trait, IF one is tenacious for the right things. That
larger 'n' at the end of his name denotes talkativeness and inability
to keep a secret. The high-placed and too long 't' bar denotes self-
protectiveness and proficiency with verbal put-downs (as in... chop-your-
head-off). Einstein used a protracted (in time and space) 'A.' Such
letter looks like a teacher's proudly marked "A." on a test paper--a
grade he never made in school.
Handwriting is a marvelous indicator of IQ! Speed, fluidity,
simplification, and legibility indicate intelligence. Angular forms
are slower to write than curved forms and suggest a lower
intelligence. Einstein's writing is bogged down with aggressive,
angular forms...
So, how did Einstein manage to "accomplish" so much? He had the
work ethic of a man possessed! He devoted himself, untiringly, to
compensating for his intellectual frailty. In math, his IQ was about
120. But his overall IQ was probably 85 or 90. For obvious reasons,
I don't like the man. But my assessment of him, intelligence wise, is
probably accurate.
To end on a positive note: Einstein was a simple, what-you-see-is-
what-you-get person. If more people could have that man's devoted
work ethic, the world would be a better place.
__________
April 10, 2007
Editor
TIME, Inc.
Time & Life Building
Rockefeller Center
New York, NY 10020-1393
Dear Sir:
In your 4/09/07 issue you showed the signatures of six major
candidates for president. Accurate graphoanalysis of all candidates
for public office should become the norm. But the analyses given were
made by a tyro. Since knowing the candidates is so very important to
having a better-functioning political process, I offer my own
professional quality handwriting analyses of the candidates. I have
decades of experience in these areas.
Very truly yours,
-- NoEinstein -- (actual name was used here and below)
__________
GRAPHOANALYSIS OF SIX CANDIDATES FOR PRESIDENT
By NoEinstein
BARACK OBAMA: Obama has great artistry, flair, charisma, and
intellect. But his ego motivates him more than his oneness with the
people. He tends to be secretive, sly, and a behind-closed-doors
type. He gets too involved in details rather than working for broad
objectives and letting others handle the more petty things that he
should be delegating to them.
RUDY GIULIANI: Giuliani is an idealist who tends to be closed-
minded. But he is honest, forthright and trustworthy. His energies
tend to be focused on narrow issues, but he is a good organizer who
knows how to use the talents of others to reach goals. He is more
modern than conventional in his thinking. He is actually shy and has
difficulty relating to more than a few people at a time. But he is a
person with good social graces.
HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON: Like Giuliani, Clinton is honest and
forthright. But she tends to be cool and too calculating rather than
trusting and genuinely friendly. That "D loop" actually means that
she is open to new ideas and she enjoys learning of such. The
roundness of most of her letters indicates that she gets the Big
Picture. She is also versatile and practical. But her intellect is
the second lowest (but still above average) of the group. She may not
have the ability, nor the energy to motivate others.
MITT ROMNEY: He has flair, style, and intellect. But he tends to be
dictatorial and closed minded. He is also the most materialistic of
the group. The illegibility of his last name indicates secretiveness,
impatience, and a self-protective nature. He isn't very friendly, so
his motives are more likely to be idealistic than ego determined. The
increasing size as he writes tells of talkativeness and
untrustworthiness with the confidences of others.
JOHN EDWARDS: That "low loop" in the J actually means he is a modest,
self-effacing, self-starter interested in getting the job done. He is
practical, enthusiastic, efficient, and very idealistic--but not to the
ideas of others that he hasn't thought out, critically, for himself.
This man cannot be bought. That illegible last name suggests
impatience, but also a lack of family pride. His enthusiasm can
inspire others. The smaller size of his last name denotes
trustworthiness.
JOHN MCCAIN: His writing has predominately negative characteristics
gleaned from the illegibility of his last name combined with the
partial illegibility of his first name. He is weak minded, overly
emotional (which he tries to repress), lacking in commitment, has a
poor self image, and is likely the most physically and mentally unfit
candidate of the group. The overall illegibility in his writing
denotes deception and dishonesty, and his overly varied writing
denotes someone trying to be all things to all people. He is near the
breaking point because of it. He compensates for his excessive
nervousness by speaking slowly and in sound bites.
__________
The two links to my recent posts, that follow, will allow those
of you who are interested to access my 'original posts' this past year--
and without having to weed through the sometimes shallow replies of
those with 'Einstein's disease'.
Only about 5% of the readers of my comments are replying. I want
to hear from more of you! My findings aren't limited to just (not so)
difficult "science", but now include these discoveries as well: (1.)
Our nation's universities need revamping. (2.) Our governments need
to be less deferential to universities. (3.) And our supposed media
isn't doing the job.
As things now stand: OUR NON FUNCTIONING MEDIA IS THREATENING THE
VERY SURVIVAL OF THE USA! Please re read the last sentence. Note:
The media has become this play-by-play announcer on the mass-mined
'issue of the moment'. Folks, democracy is dead in America... because
politics is seen as just a game. The taking of polls on candidates
and on referenda must be stopped! And all of the primary elections
should be held on the SAME DAY. And 'the delegates' (as long as
"conventions" are in place) should be apportioned relative to the
votes that a candidate gets, never going just to the top vote getter.
Because most Americans like to side with... the 'likely winner'--
that's with someone whom they hope will be beholden to them for their
votes--they tend to select the most persuasive talker, and/or the most
energetic seeming candidate. Such person might not be the best
qualified executive, nor the one with the best ideas and philosophies
for managing government. Because Americans start rallying behind a
'likely winner', hugely qualified candidates get knocked out of the
race, unfairly.
Be it known: Our elected officials should be determined on
election days, NOT determined by the pollsters; by nearsighted and
biased media; and by primaries that favor... Iowa, or any other such
places. When my Einstein disproofs are finally acknowledged, the
solutions to numbers of our nation's problems will be forthcoming.
Stay tuned! -- NoEinstein --
Puppet_Sock
> Two of the strongest indicators of suitability for public office
This guy's posting style looks very familiar. Is it a Min clone?
A Retic clone? A mimic?
Socks
NoEinstein
Dear Puppet S...: My "style" is to be as clear as possible about my
science and about how I have discovered that major "trusted"
institutions in this country are screwing up not only science, but the
prospects that the USA will make it another two or three centuries.
On the other hand, (Puppet Sock), your "style" is to avoid discussing
the issues that I have raised in my post. Instead, you disparage the
fact that I am not only a better and more energetic communicator than
you, but I have worthy things to be communicated. If you will, please
itemize YOUR worthy objectives for... anything in this Universe of
ours! -- NoEinstein --
NoEinstein
>
This present post should have included a link to the original
"handwriting related" post regarding Obama, Clinton, and McCain. The
letters to President Bush, at the end of the former, were intended to
be included at the end of another of my posts, last year: "NC Governor
Should Resign Over Science". The reason I was putting most of those
letters there--all lumped under that one post--is because NC has six of
those 22 universities. Included beneath that same post is a
'sampling' of the national media that I've contacted concerning the
same subject. I've repeatedly informed the media not only about my
complete and total disproof of Einstein's theories, but about my
discovery of the widespread corruption and inertia in our
universities; as well as, the couldn't-care-less attitudes of our
governments toward wasteful spending. A prime example of the latter:
the MAJORITY of the National Science Foundation's approximate seven
billion dollar annual budget.
I used to live in NC, so I know the huge emphasis that NC puts on
attracting new industries. Part of it was due to their so-called
Research Triangle Park near Raleigh. The larger part, now, is that NC
happens to have those six highly regarded universities--at about three
times the national average for a large state. NC Governor Mike Easley
uses every opportunity he can to tout the 'excellence' of teaching
available in his state; and the latitude of "research" going on
there. But it's a BLACK EYE to NC universities, and to that whole
state, that those universities are REPRESSING having my Einstein
disproofs acknowledged.
Folks the "good news" is: NC has highly 'respected' universities;
the "bad news" is: What those universities teach, and much of what
they... research is fraudulently wrong! And the media, there, won't
allow the citizens of NC to learn about the CRIMES of Governor Easley,
and so many others... ***Other states which have lost industries to NC,
because of such fraud, should sue NC for the full monetary value of
their combined losses!***
Due to the age of the above mentioned "NC..." post, the "Reply"
button no longer makes such available to Google's larger readership.
So, I had to add the present post in order to get my letters to
President Bush 'on-the-record'. Equally important to those two
letters is my 'personality' assessment of Obama, Clinton, and McCain.
Because I've had 'graphology' as a hobby since I was a teen, I have
been most attuned to people's personalities. I've either contacted,
or have seen the signatures of, many top executives in my life. So, I
know pretty well what type people will make good executives. A goodly
number of top executives have either "risen to the level of their own
incompetence", or they are the 'limp fish' puppets of the executive
board. Some presidents of universities fit that category, like the
head of Georgia Tech. If, under the most unfortunate circumstances
that John McCain were to become president, he would be such a puppet
of the Republican Party.
Barack Obama is a very smart, detail oriented, egotistical,
LONER. Because of his stature and confident speaking style, people
are rallying behind him. But they're still rallying behind a LONER
with very few people skills, and no executive experience. When it was
revealed that Obama expresses different ideas about NAFTA publicly,
than privately; and that he is more "clinging" to the war in Iraq
privately, than publicly; doubt is cast on the man's integrity.
That's part of the reason that Hillary Rodham Clinton won Texas and
Ohio.
Shamefully, those revelations that Obama isn't as 'truthful' as
his confident speeches imply, DID NOT reduce his getting 90% of the
"block vote of blacks" in subsequent states. Though Obama has more in
common with WHITES than blacks, he has become the figurehead for black
causes. Such status will not only ruin his presidency, it will
reinstate segregation as 'an issue' in this country--if there is even
one instance of... reverse discrimination because of what that man says
or does.
***It is crucial that I clarify that I love ALL people,
regardless of their race or color! Time and again on these posts I
point the finger at... GROUP IDENTITIES as being the main causes of the
world's problems. When blacks vote as a block, and often against
reason, their group identities are hurting the entire world. Blacks,
PLEASE become color blind! Jews and Muslims, PLEASE become religion
blind! Representatives, PLEASE become political party blind!***
Only by disregarding our differences, and by recognizing those
many things that we of the world have in common, can wars; terrorism;
poverty; and strife be eliminated, and thereby restore HOPE for the
future of life on this beautiful planet of ours!
PLEASE ELECT: Hillary Rodham Clinton President of the United
States of America! -- NoEinstein --
NC Governor Should Resign Over Science
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/2e892e00156d4d92?hl=en#
Handwriting Analysis of Clinton, Obama, McCain and Einstein (is
Copyrighted.)
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/eed2bb0cf762e015/6173e270dee543b3?hl=en#6173e270dee543b3
Dropping Einstein Like a Stone
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/989e16c59967db2b?hl=en#
Plotting the Curves of Coriolis, Einstein, and NoEinstein (is
Copyrighted.)
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/713f8a62f17f8274?hl=en#
Cleaning Away Einstein's Mishmash
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/5d847a9cb50de7f0/739aef0aee462d26?hl=en&lnk=st&q=#739aef0aee462d26
> compensating for his intellectual ...
>
> read more >>