January 20, 2009, a National Day of Renewal and Reconciliation
Snit
President of the United States is asking for a day when we can all offer a
renewal and a reconciliation.
Let bygones be bygones. End the silly flaming, at least the flames that are
tied to the past.
I know I certainly would love to see it.
--
"In order to discover who you are, first learn who everybody else is. You're
what's left." - Skip Hansen
Don Zeigler
> What do you say, folks? I have asked for peace before... and now the
> President of the United States is asking for a day when we can all offer a
> renewal and a reconciliation.
>
> Let bygones be bygones. End the silly flaming, at least the flames that are
> tied to the past.
>
> I know I certainly would love to see it.
Go to hell. You're a troll and a worthless liar, and everyone except your
fellow trolls hates your guts.
There is no reconciliation or "renewal" with human garbage like you. The
sooner you shuffle off this mortal coil, the better.
--
A clean desk is a sign of a cluttered desk drawer.
Regards,
[dmz]
Owner and proprietor, Trollus Amongus, LLC
Snit
20090121081809...@this.domain.or.that on 1/21/09 1:18 AM:
> Snit wrote:
>
>> What do you say, folks? I have asked for peace before... and now the
>> President of the United States is asking for a day when we can all offer a
>> renewal and a reconciliation.
>>
>> Let bygones be bygones. End the silly flaming, at least the flames that are
>> tied to the past.
>>
>> I know I certainly would love to see it.
>
> Go to hell. You're a troll and a worthless liar, and everyone except your
> fellow trolls hates your guts.
>
> There is no reconciliation or "renewal" with human garbage like you. The
> sooner you shuffle off this mortal coil, the better.
I will welcome you into adulthood if you are willing to make the leap.
--
"And so, in no sense, is stability a reason to move to a new version. It零
never a reason." - Bill Gates
Peter Köhlmann
> Snit wrote:
>
>> What do you say, folks? I have asked for peace before... and now the
>> President of the United States is asking for a day when we can all offer
>> a renewal and a reconciliation.
>>
>> Let bygones be bygones. End the silly flaming, at least the flames that
>> are tied to the past.
>>
>> I know I certainly would love to see it.
>
> Go to hell. You're a troll and a worthless liar, and everyone except your
> fellow trolls hates your guts.
>
> There is no reconciliation or "renewal" with human garbage like you. The
> sooner you shuffle off this mortal coil, the better.
>
It is not that this would be a first for Snot Michael Glasser.
He has (just like flatfish with his empty promises) repeatedly "called" for
a "new start". Even with the limited "visibility" of that killfiled twit I
got to see several of them quoted
His "proposal" in reality means that others should stop pointing out what
an incredible dishonest lying asshole Michael Glasser really is. The
hundreds (if not thousands) of incriminating posts where it is proven what
kind of cretin Glasser really is are haunting him, and he would like to
have them vanish
--
Eternity is a very long time, especially towards the end
Phil Da Lick!
> Snit wrote:
>
>> What do you say, folks? I have asked for peace before... and now the
>> President of the United States is asking for a day when we can all offer a
>> renewal and a reconciliation.
>>
>> Let bygones be bygones. End the silly flaming, at least the flames that are
>> tied to the past.
>>
>> I know I certainly would love to see it.
>
> Go to hell. You're a troll and a worthless liar, and everyone except your
> fellow trolls hates your guts.
>
> There is no reconciliation or "renewal" with human garbage like you. The
> sooner you shuffle off this mortal coil, the better.
>
On the point of Obama, you yanks must be happy to finally be rid of that
retard bush. I can't wait until we've got the chance to whittle away at
the dead wood running the UK.
Don Zeigler
> I will welcome you into adulthood if you are willing to make the leap.
Go leap off a cliff, retard.
--
Blessed are the censors; they shall inhibit the earth.
Don Zeigler
> On the point of Obama, you yanks must be happy to finally be rid of that
> retard bush.
Yes, most of us are. :-)
--
Time is what keeps things from happening all at once
William Poaster
trolls, Don Zeigler was heard to say:
> Phil Da Lick! wrote:
>
>> On the point of Obama, you yanks must be happy to finally be rid of that
>> retard bush.
>
> Yes, most of us are. :-)
Or as my American other-half refers to him as, "Shrub" :-)
She absolutely hated him.
Phil Da Lick!
So did the rest of the world. And understandbly so given his foreign and
energy "policies".
High Plains Thumper
> What do you say, folks? I have asked for peace before... and
> now the President of the United States is asking for a day
> when we can all offer a renewal and a reconciliation.
>
> Let bygones be bygones. End the silly flaming, at least the
> flames that are tied to the past.
>
> I know I certainly would love to see it.
You sure beg for my attention a lot.
--
HPT
Quando omni flunkus moritati
(If all else fails, play dead)
- "Red" Green
Steve Carroll
> What do you say, folks? I have asked for peace before... and now the
> President of the United States is asking for a day when we can all offer a
> renewal and a reconciliation.
Like any sane, honest and honorable person I say that actions speak
louder than words, especially when the words come from the likes of
you. I also say that, contrary to your obvious delusion, people just
aren't stupid enough to believe you when you 'ask for peace'. You've
amply proven you have no intention of conducting yourself in a
reasonable manner on usenet, therefore, you will continue to reap what
you sow. The idea that your lying and trolling should have an
expiration date is absurd... something only a child would push...
which is why we find you pushing it.
(snip Snit's tired ol' lies)
ray
> What do you say, folks? I have asked for peace before... and now the
> President of the United States is asking for a day when we can all offer
> a renewal and a reconciliation.
>
> Let bygones be bygones. End the silly flaming, at least the flames that
> are tied to the past.
>
> I know I certainly would love to see it.
How sweet. I'm sure that's all it will take.
Steve Mackay
> What do you say, folks? I have asked for peace before... and now the
> President of the United States is asking for a day when we can all offer a
> renewal and a reconciliation.
>
> Let bygones be bygones. End the silly flaming, at least the flames that are
> tied to the past.
>
> I know I certainly would love to see it.
>
>
It's really quite easy Michael. Takes a simple 4 steps.
1.) Stop lying.
2.) Stop your baseless claims.
3.) Own up to your actions. Past and present.
4.) Stop trolling and flaming others for attention.
Any denial on your part show you're simply not ready, willing or able to
honestly honor your own request.
MuahMan
Snit
49772d21$0$3339$6e1e...@read.cnntp.org on 1/21/09 7:11 AM:
> Snit wrote:
>> What do you say, folks? I have asked for peace before... and
>> now the President of the United States is asking for a day
>> when we can all offer a renewal and a reconciliation.
>>
>> Let bygones be bygones. End the silly flaming, at least the
>> flames that are tied to the past.
>>
>> I know I certainly would love to see it.
>
> You sure beg for my attention a lot.
If you see this as me begging for peace then so be it. What do you say?
Are you up to it?
--
Look, this is silly. It's not an argument, it's an armor plated walrus with
walnut paneling and an all leather interior.
Snit
1/21/09 9:10 AM:
People in this forum do not seem capable, at least for now. I hope it had
more of an effect in the country. :)
--
You really have to give credit to Apple for driving innovation.
- Mark Shuttleworth (founded Canonical Ltd. / Ubuntu Linux)
Snit
GZHdl.9315$pr6....@flpi149.ffdc.sbc.com on 1/21/09 9:15 AM:
You keep making accusations you cannot support. If you decided to become an
adult I will welcome you to it. Seriously, even after all the BS of the
past from you, I would not hold it against you. If you can post in a way
that is mature, unlike your above post, I will treat you as an adult.
--
I can't say we will succeed at this, but we will make a significant attempt
to elevate the Linux desktop to the point where it is as good or better than
Apple.
MuahMan
Why weren't you fucktard commies saying this 4 years ago? 8 years ago?
Snit
61984a90-859c-4e80...@l38g2000vba.googlegroups.com on 1/21/09
10:01 AM:
I have been asking for peace in this forum for at least that long. Sadly,
as in the world as a whole, merely acting peacefully and asking others to
join is often not enough.
In Usenet there is rarely any escalation these "terrorists" can rise to that
do real harm - though they can do harm. In the real world, of course, the
risk is higher and more wide spread.
--
Do you ever wake up in a cold sweat wondering what the world would be
like if the Lamarckian view of evolution had ended up being accepted
over Darwin's?
Snit
> Snit wrote:
>
>> I will welcome you into adulthood if you are willing to make the leap.
>
> Go leap off a cliff, retard.
You sure name call a lot.
--
Projects should really look to the whole Linux desktop and see how they can
appeal to both sides.
Snit
post 07idnQI6d5T0ZOvU...@posted.plusnet on 1/21/09 3:31 AM:
No doubt: overall there is a sense of hope and trust in this country that
has not been seen in many years. Obama has a lot of problems to face, not
the least of which is living up to some very high expectations. Already,
though, he has made steps toward ensuring that the US government is more
closely tied to the people as a whole and less tied to special interests.
--
When I'm working on a problem, I never think about beauty. I think only how
to solve the problem. But when I have finished, if the solution is not
beautiful, I know it is wrong. -- R. Buckminster Fuller
Snit
4976ec62$0$30235$9b4e...@newsspool1.arcor-online.net on 1/21/09 2:35 AM:
Even with such above anger from you, Peter, I would still welcome you to
adulthood if you decided to join. I wish you well.
--
"If you have integrity, nothing else matters." - Alan Simpson
Steve Mackay
> "Steve Mackay" <mackay...@att.net> stated in post
> GZHdl.9315$pr6....@flpi149.ffdc.sbc.com on 1/21/09 9:15 AM:
>
>> Snit wrote:
>>> What do you say, folks? I have asked for peace before... and now the
>>> President of the United States is asking for a day when we can all offer a
>>> renewal and a reconciliation.
>>>
>>> Let bygones be bygones. End the silly flaming, at least the flames that are
>>> tied to the past.
>>>
>>> I know I certainly would love to see it.
>>>
>>>
>> It's really quite easy Michael. Takes a simple 4 steps.
>>
>> 1.) Stop lying.
>> 2.) Stop your baseless claims.
>> 3.) Own up to your actions. Past and present.
>> 4.) Stop trolling and flaming others for attention.
>>
>> Any denial on your part show you're simply not ready, willing or able to
>> honestly honor your own request.
>>
>>
> You keep making accusations you cannot support.
Nope.
> If you decided to become an
> adult I will welcome you to it.
No you wont, because you haven't. You treat everyone the same. You lie,
you troll, you flame for attention that you must be missing at home.
What a sorry, miserable existence you must lead.
> Seriously, even after all the BS of the
> past from you, I would not hold it against you.
I'm sorry I have have proven you to be such a dishonest, disgusting
individual. It's mighty nice of you to not hold it against me.<eye roll>
> If you can post in a way
> that is mature, unlike your above post, I will treat you as an adult.
No, you wont.
You'll still lie.
You'll still troll.
You'll still flame.
You'll still create sock puppets.
All to get the attention you're obviously missing in real life.
Snit
Sad how you feel the need to make up stories about others to try to excuse
your poor behavior. Really, I hope you find it in yourself to improve. I
have faith that people can improve, and that includes you. I will welcome
you to adulthood if you find you are capable and willing to join those of us
who are already here.
--
"If a million people believe a foolish thing, it is still a foolish thing."
- Anatole France
Sermo Malifer
> "Don Zeigler" <sit...@this.computer> stated in post
> 20090121124659...@this.domain.or.that on 1/21/09 5:47 AM:
>
>> Snit wrote:
>>
>>> I will welcome you into adulthood if you are willing to make the leap.
>> Go leap off a cliff, retard.
>
> You sure name call a lot.
Did you expect something pleasant in return for your insult?
Andrew Halliwell
>> It's really quite easy Michael. Takes a simple 4 steps.
>>
>> 1.) Stop lying.
>> 2.) Stop your baseless claims.
>> 3.) Own up to your actions. Past and present.
>> 4.) Stop trolling and flaming others for attention.
>>
>> Any denial on your part show you're simply not ready, willing or able to
>> honestly honor your own request.
>>
>>
> You keep making accusations you cannot support.
*ding*
> If you decided to become an
> adult I will welcome you to it.
*ding*
> Seriously, even after all the BS of the
> past from you
*ding*
, I would not hold it against you. If you can post in a way
> that is mature, unlike your above post
*ding*
, I will treat you as an adult.
*ding*
His post, a simple 4 step process you should take before attempting to
expect it from others, was not childish...
However...
With all those bells your post rang, peace was the last thing on your mind.
As we said to mr flatfish the other week when HE tried the same thing...
YOU show willing by cleaning up YOUR act before even making the proposition.
--
| spi...@freenet.co.uk | Windows95 (noun): 32 bit extensions and a |
| | graphical shell for a 16 bit patch to an 8 bit |
| Andrew Halliwell BSc | operating system originally coded for a 4 bit |
| in |microprocessor, written by a 2 bit company, that|
| Computer Science | can't stand 1 bit of competition. |
Steve Carroll
> "MuahMan" <muah...@gmail.com> stated in post
> 61984a90-859c-4e80-9f3c-7d1c81fc8...@l38g2000vba.googlegroups.com on 1/21/09
> 10:01 AM:
>
>
>
> > On Jan 20, 11:42 pm, Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> >> What do you say, folks? I have asked for peace before... and now the
> >> President of the United States is asking for a day when we can all offer a
> >> renewal and a reconciliation.
>
> >> Let bygones be bygones. End the silly flaming, at least the flames that are
> >> tied to the past.
>
> >> I know I certainly would love to see it.
>
> >> --
> >> "In order to discover who you are, first learn who everybody else is. You're
> >> what's left." - Skip Hansen
>
> > Why weren't you fucktard commies saying this 4 years ago? 8 years ago?
>
> I have been asking for peace in this forum for at least that long. Sadly,
> as in the world as a whole, merely acting peacefully and asking others to
> join is often not enough.
Why do you think people are so stupid as to believe that you have been
"acting peacefully"? I keep telling you... people just aren't as
stupid as you need them to be.
(snip additional feeble and dishonest attempts by Snit to use his
"psych degree" on people that obviously know better)
Steve Carroll
> "ray" <r...@zianet.com> stated in post 6tovnqFbvuj...@mid.individual.net on
> 1/21/09 9:10 AM:
>
> > On Tue, 20 Jan 2009 21:42:17 -0700, Snit wrote:
>
> >> What do you say, folks? I have asked for peace before... and now the
> >> President of the United States is asking for a day when we can all offer
> >> a renewal and a reconciliation.
>
> >> Let bygones be bygones. End the silly flaming, at least the flames that
> >> are tied to the past.
>
> >> I know I certainly would love to see it.
>
>
> People in this forum do not seem capable, at least for now. I hope it had
> more of an effect in the country.
Amazingly, you "actually" seem to believe that people are so stupid
that they wouldn't notice your childish attempt to ride Obama's
coattails to somehow save your ruined credibility. Why do you believe
you're so much smarter than everyone else, Snit? It's very strange...
cuz you're about as stupid as they come.
Snit
lh2k46-...@ponder.sky.com on 1/21/09 10:27 AM:
He made a bunch of accusations he will never support. The game he and his
"crew" play is to make accusations and wait for me to ask for them to
support them... they then claim that they have supported them many times
but, for some reason, they cannot find a single example in the Usenet
record. Finally one of the "crew" will bring something up from 2004
(really, they are obsessed with that year... why not anything since then?)
Then they ask me to support some comment from way back then... and claim
that if I do not then I am saying honesty has a time limit and that I should
obsess over the past as they do.
This has been going on, literally, for years. I would love to see it stop.
It is absurd.
--
Picture of a tuna soda: http://snipurl.com/f351
Feel free to ask for the recipe.
Snit
gl7los$8ak$1...@news.albasani.net on 1/21/09 10:24 AM:
What insult? I noted his poor behavior without insulting him for it.
--
Never stand between a dog and the hydrant. - John Peers
Snit
Bush is generally seen as one of the worst presidents in, at least, modern
history. He has been a disaster for the country. There are still a few
people who defend him, but you will have that with anyone... strong
partisans who refuse to accept that someone in their party could be such a
humiliation.
There is no doubt that Bush ignored and trampled the law to an extent not
seen in recent years, made choices that will have damaging effects on the
country (and world) for years, and otherwise just was a mistake for the
country.
Hard to see Obama being anything other than a step in the right direction.
Snit
> Phil Da Lick! wrote:
>
>> On the point of Obama, you yanks must be happy to finally be rid of that
>> retard bush.
>
> Yes, most of us are. :-)
No doubt!
--
The answer to the water shortage is to dilute it.
Steve Mackay
All previously supported YEARS ago. Yet, unsurprising falsely denied by
the liar known as snit/Michael Glasser/sigmond, and many other sock
puppet names.
> The game he and his
> "crew" play is to make accusations and wait for me to ask for them to
> support them... they then claim that they have supported them many times
> but, for some reason, they cannot find a single example in the Usenet
> record.
I haven't 'claimed' anything. It's a well supported fact that you are a
liar and sock-puppeteer. A fact that was supported NOT using conspiracy
theories, conjecture, and assumptions.
Facts.
Something you fail to understand. Something you fail to ever bother
producing yourself.
> Finally one of the "crew" will bring something up from 2004
> (really, they are obsessed with that year... why not anything since then?)
Michael. 1st you say support it, then you say we're obsessed for
supporting it? Make up your mind... At least what's left of it. So
according to you, facts have a time limit?
> Then they ask me to support some comment from way back then... and claim
> that if I do not then I am saying honesty has a time limit and that I should
> obsess over the past as they do.
No, you just *REALLY* try hard to avoid the truth. You're not fooling
anyone.
>
> This has been going on, literally, for years.
Yup.
> I would love to see it stop.
Nope.
> It is absurd.
Yup.
Snit
You keep going on and on and on... making accusation after accusation. As I
noted, though, when asked to support your claims you either run, claim that
you already have supported them (but cannot find any evidence to show this),
or run back to ancient debates from 2004... bringing up long dead debates
where you and your "crew" first started these games. Above you act as if
bringing up a long dead debate from 2004 somehow supports your claims about
me now... as if even if you were right then (which you never showed) that
this would be relevant to my current comments. Nope. You made some bizarre
accusations in *2004*, failed to support them, and have not been able to let
go of your past. I say let it go. Move on with your life. Focus on
today... not your past errors. It is not like you killed someone or
something... you made a few mistakes in a public forum. Oh well. I am sure
I did, too... and someday you and your crew will find those mistakes, point
them out, and pretend they have meaning.
It is boring.
--
"The music is not inside the piano." - Alan Kay
John
"Snit" <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote in message
news:C59CD0B7.EBCED%use...@gallopinginsanity.com...
Steve MacKay sounds like a right wing nutjob clone of Steve Carroll. LOL!!
Snit
HaCdnXwjI5-LGerU...@giganews.com on 1/21/09 1:22 PM:
>> You keep going on and on and on... making accusation after accusation. As I
>> noted, though, when asked to support your claims you either run, claim that
>> you already have supported them (but cannot find any evidence to show this),
>> or run back to ancient debates from 2004... bringing up long dead debates
>> where you and your "crew" first started these games. Above you act as if
>> bringing up a long dead debate from 2004 somehow supports your claims about
>> me now... as if even if you were right then (which you never showed) that
>> this would be relevant to my current comments. Nope. You made some bizarre
>> accusations in *2004*, failed to support them, and have not been able to let
>> go of your past. I say let it go. Move on with your life. Focus on today...
>> not your past errors. It is not like you killed someone or something... you
>> made a few mistakes in a public forum. Oh well. I am sure I did, too... and
>> someday you and your crew will find those mistakes, point them out, and
>> pretend they have meaning.
>>
>> It is boring.
>
> Steve MacKay sounds like a right wing nutjob clone of Steve Carroll. LOL!!
It is sad. Steve Mackay, Steve Carroll, Tim Adams, and Wally seem genuinely
convinced that some time in 2004 (!) I posted or did something horrible ...
something so bad they cannot even talk about it in specifics, apparently...
something they cannot find a link to a post to support. Sure, they find
some typos and the like, but, really, what are the obsessing over?
So no, in 2009, they still are filled with utter hatred for some alleged
wrong doing that, I suspect, not even they are sure what it was any more.
I have asked, again, for peace. Move on. Let the past go... and I
sincerely hope they can find it in themselves to give up the anger and hated
that consumes them.
Clogwog
news:20090121081809...@this.domain.or.that...
> Snit wrote:
>
>> What do you say, folks? I have asked for peace before... and now the
>> President of the United States is asking for a day when we can all offer
>> a
>> renewal and a reconciliation.
>>
>> Let bygones be bygones. End the silly flaming, at least the flames that
>> are
>> tied to the past.
>>
>> I know I certainly would love to see it.
>
> fellow trolls hates your guts.
>
> There is no reconciliation or "renewal" with human garbage like you. The
> sooner you shuffle off this mortal coil, the better.
* Cola loons** ensure that their posts are littered with lots of swear
words.
** meet the Cola loons: http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/
Clogwog
> Snit wrote:
>
>> I will welcome you into adulthood if you are willing to make the leap.
>
> Go leap off a cliff, retard.
* Cola loons** ensure that their posts are littered with lots of swear
words.
** meet the Cola loons: http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/
--
Tattoo Vampire AKA Don Zeigler, Windows user by day, Linux user, windows
basher by night!
"intelligent" (West Virginia < lol > ), "humoristic" quotes from Don Zeigler
AKA Tattoo Vampire in COLA "advocating" Linux:
[quote]
"Wow - you're a useless idiot. Que surprise!"
"And the asshole Wintrolls hijack yet another thread.Why don't all you
idiots just drop dead?"
"Too bad you're not. Filth like you deserves to drop dead."
"Go fuck yourself, twat."
"It's a tagline, you humorless scrotum."
"There are literally hundreds of them, you sniveling little wretch."
"And you keep right on reading and responding to us, you sad bastard."
"You made a public post in a public forum, so it's everyone's business.Now
fuck off and die."
"In regards to your smartass comment above, go fuck yourself, you snotnosed
twat."
"When's the last time you posted something that wasn't sniveling or whining?
You disgust me."
"Why does it worry you so much, you worthless meatsack?"
"BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! You inbred, toothless slapnuts."
"How much does d00FuS pay you to lick his ass, Quack?"
"Leave it to Hadron and his fellow assholes to hijack another thread."
"DFS: Why such a queer?"
"Now crawl back to the Windoze newsgroups where you belong, fuckrod."
"How old are you? 12? You and your butt buddies can go screw yourselves."
"Please die soon. And do it slowly."
"Speaking of hotlines, d00Fus and Mushie have been trying to locate you.
They asked for someone to remind you that in tonight's Wintroll circle jerk,
you're the designated pivot man again."
"Too bad your mother didn't know of uses for a coathanger other than for
hanging up clothes."
"How's the Distro Approval Committee coming along, shitstain?"
"Speaking of fat heads, did d00FuS scream in pain when you finally managed
to free yours from his lower intestine?"
"Do you know what "Hadron is a fuckknob" means?"
"Please, Hadron, try not to be such a useless pimple on the buttocks of
COLA."
"Fuck you, coward. I've posted my real name and location to Usenet on
numerous occasions, and never attempted to hide my identity."
"No fuckup, asshole, I didn't even attempt to hide who it was from."
"You pitiful freak. Die, quickly."
<emulating Kadaitcha Man>
"Get a job, dork."
"You're a lying piece of dung, Snit."
"Take your own advice, buttnugget."
"Answer MY question, Quirk: Why are you such a useless, whining, lying,
cowardly, pitiful excuse for a human being?"
"Why should I be jealous of a ponytailed hippie wannabe who runs a fake
business?"
"Hey, fuck you, asshole. For whatever reason, your URL was redirecting to
prescottcomputer.com, another computer guy in Prescott. Why the hell would I
say it was if it wasn't? Now stick your head back up Flatfish's rectum."
"Lick the sweat off my balls, Quack. I don't give a hoot about any study
that Snit posted and I'm entitled to my opinion. If you don't like my
opinion, then STFU and don't read my posts anymore, you sniveling, sneering,
uncouth, inept, bungling waste of human DNA."
"You and your butt buddies can go screw yourselves."
[/quote]
More to com, the list is endless!
Snit
200901212047...@mta-fe.casema.nl on 1/21/09 1:47 PM:
I hope that someday, soon, Don understands what his post says about him.
--
If A = B and B = C, then A = C, except where void or prohibited by law.
Roy Santoro, Psycho Proverb Zone (http://snipurl.com/BurdenOfProof)
Steve Mackay
Showing that you're a liar, yes, I do. Thank you for noticing.
> making accusation after accusation.
I'm sure you mean well supported claims. Right Mikey?
> As I
> noted, though, when asked to support your claims you either run, claim that
> you already have supported them (but cannot find any evidence to show this)
Michael, just because *YOU* deny facts, doesn't mean they aren't facts.
> or run back to ancient debates from 2004...
Ahh, so your lies and sockpuppetry expire after 4-5 years? Sorry
Michael, that just isn't the case.
> bringing up long dead debates
> where you and your "crew" first started these games.
The only games that were started, is by you and your well proven, well
supported sock puppets. Sure you denied it, tried to present conspiracy
theories, etc... But in the end, it was proven, beyond a shadow of a
doubt that you created sock puppets, and forged documents. And spent
MONTHS trying to deny hard facts. All the while, the laughing stock of
CSMA. Now I see you're the laughing stock of COLA as well. Well done
mikey, well done.
> Above you act as if
> bringing up a long dead debate from 2004 somehow supports your claims about
> me now...
It always has been supported. You lied about it then, you lie about it
now, and you'll lie about it in the future. What a dishonest, lonely
life you must lead. Needing to post to usenet 24/7 with lies.
> as if even if you were right then (which you never showed) that
> this would be relevant to my current comments.
Awww, wook at whittle mikey continue to deny it, as if someone believes
him. Please find me /someone/, besides the brain dead John that
actually believes your tall tails. Come one mikey, ANYONE that believes
you. Maybe you can create another sock puppet to help you on that one!
> Nope. You made some bizarre
> accusations in *2004*
No.
> failed to support them,
No.
> and have not been able to let
> go of your past.
Stop denying your lies, and we'll let it go. You claimed to want peace,
but the reality is, you just want the attention. For now, you are
entertaining me. So I'll lead you around like the little bitch you are,
and whip you with the reality of your lies whenever I please. And when
I'm sick of you, I'll stop responding to your lies.
> I say let it go. Move on with your life.
See, that is something I have. A life. I don't *NEED* to post to usenet
24/7. But right now, I have time to kill, and you're entertaining me.
> Focus on
> today...
I am focusing on today. Your dishonesty. But then again, dishonesty is
everyday life for Michael Glasser.
> not your past errors.
> It is not like you killed someone or
> something... you made a few mistakes in a public forum.
I'm sure I've made a few mistakes. I'm not afraid to admit them. I don't
*NEED* to resort to your tactics(creating sock puppets, forging
documents, lying, etc...) JUST to win an argument.
> Oh well. I am sure
> I did, too... and someday you and your crew will find those mistakes, point
> them out, and pretend they have meaning.
>
> It is boring.
But yet you continue to respond with lies. Color me shocked.
Snit
--
I am one of only .3% of people who have avoided becoming a statistic.
Snit
> Snit wrote:
Amazing how far out of your way you go to prove me right:
You keep going on and on and on... making accusation after
accusation. As I noted, though, when asked to support your
claims you either run, claim that you already have supported
them (but cannot find any evidence to show this), or run back
to ancient debates from 2004... bringing up long dead debates
where you and your "crew" first started these games. Above
you act as if bringing up a long dead debate from 2004
somehow supports your claims about me now... as if even if
you were right then (which you never showed) that this would
be relevant to my current comments. Nope. You made some
bizarre accusations in *2004*, failed to support them, and
have not been able to let go of your past. I say let it go.
Move on with your life. Focus on today... not your past
errors. It is not like you killed someone or something...
you made a few mistakes in a public forum. Oh well. I am
sure I did, too... and someday you and your crew will find
those mistakes, point them out, and pretend they have
meaning.
It is boring.
Do you realize how perfectly your post fits my description?
Steve Mackay
Hey don't you have some wikipedia articles to go try and edit?
Snit
>>> You keep going on and on and on... making accusation after accusation. As I
>>> noted, though, when asked to support your claims you either run, claim that
>>> you already have supported them (but cannot find any evidence to show this),
>>> or run back to ancient debates from 2004... bringing up long dead debates
>>> where you and your "crew" first started these games. Above you act as if
>>> bringing up a long dead debate from 2004 somehow supports your claims about
>>> me now... as if even if you were right then (which you never showed) that
>>> this would be relevant to my current comments. Nope. You made some bizarre
>>> accusations in *2004*, failed to support them, and have not been able to let
>>> go of your past. I say let it go. Move on with your life. Focus on
>>> today... not your past errors. It is not like you killed someone or
>>> something... you made a few mistakes in a public forum. Oh well. I am sure
>>> I did, too... and someday you and your crew will find those mistakes, point
>>> them out, and pretend they have meaning.
>>>
>>> It is boring.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Steve MacKay sounds like a right wing nutjob clone of Steve Carroll. LOL!!
>>
> Hey don't you have some wikipedia articles to go try and edit?
See how you bring up off-topic and, I suspect, ancient debates. Even in a
discussion about how you and your "crew" do this and cannot let go of past
debates you cannot help but continue your poor actions.
You talked about how you will soon leave this debate. Again. If that is
the only way you can find for yourself to act in an honorable way then I
encourage you to do so. Sandman has had a fair amount of success with that
method. I commend him for it.
--
"Uh... ask me after we ship the next version of Windows [laughs] then I'll
be more open to give you a blunt answer." - Bill Gates
<http://tmp.gallopinginsanity.com/gates/>
Steve Mackay
Look boys and girls, mikey learned how to cut and paste!!!
Now if only he could learn how to tell the truth...
we can hope...
Snit
>> Amazing how far out of your way you go to prove me right:
>>
>> You keep going on and on and on... making accusation after
>> accusation. As I noted, though, when asked to support your
>> claims you either run, claim that you already have supported
>> them (but cannot find any evidence to show this), or run back
>> to ancient debates from 2004... bringing up long dead debates
>> where you and your "crew" first started these games. Above
>> you act as if bringing up a long dead debate from 2004
>> somehow supports your claims about me now... as if even if
>> you were right then (which you never showed) that this would
>> be relevant to my current comments. Nope. You made some
>> bizarre accusations in *2004*, failed to support them, and
>> have not been able to let go of your past. I say let it go.
>> Move on with your life. Focus on today... not your past
>> errors. It is not like you killed someone or something...
>> you made a few mistakes in a public forum. Oh well. I am
>> sure I did, too... and someday you and your crew will find
>> those mistakes, point them out, and pretend they have
>> meaning.
>>
>> It is boring.
>>
>> Do you realize how perfectly your post fits my description?
>>
>>
>
> Look boys and girls, mikey learned how to cut and paste!!!
> Now if only he could learn how to tell the truth...
>
> we can hope...
Instead of focusing on the content, you instead post insults. Again, you
are proving me right about you. Presumably this is not how you want to
portray yourself in public. Are you unable to stop yourself? Just trying
to get the last word? Hoping to make me angry? What is your goal?
--
But what if the answer is in the box?
Steve Mackay
Mikey, post some content that isn't lies!
> Again, you
> are proving me right about you.
Nope.
> Presumably this is not how you want to
> portray yourself in public.
Showing how dishonest you are? Yup.
> Are you unable to stop yourself? Just trying
> to get the last word?
You keep digging yourself a larger hole with your lies, the more I'll
treat you like the little bitch that you are.
> Hoping to make me angry? What is your goal?
I thought it was perfectly clear.... This whole conversation proves
beyond a shadow of a doubt that you can't be honest, you can't stop with
your lies, and you weren't even close to being sincere about wanting
peace. You had 4 simple steps to take to achieve the peace that you said
you wanted. You couldn't do it. Now be a good little bitch and lie some
more(like I really need to tell you to do so. You just can't help
yourself but lie.)
Snit
You claim to have a goal to show me to be something you cannot show me to
be.
I feel sorry for you.
Chance Furlong
Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> "Steve Mackay" <mackay...@att.net> stated in post
> 1oMdl.18429$Ws1....@nlpi064.nbdc.sbc.com on 1/21/09 2:22 PM:
>
> >>> You keep going on and on and on, making accusation after accusation.
> >>> As I noted, though, when asked to support your claims you either run, claim
> >>> that you already have supported them (but cannot find any evidence to show
> >>> this), or run back to ancient debates from 2004, bringing up long dead debates
> >>> where you and your "crew" first started these games. Above you act as if
> >>> bringing up a long dead debate from 2004 somehow supports your claims
> >>> about me now, as if even if you were right then (which you never showed) that
> >>> this would be relevant to my current comments. Nope. You made some
> >>> bizarre accusations in 2004, failed to support them, and have not been able to
> >>> let go of your past. I say let it go. Move on with your life. Focus on
> >>> today, not your past errors. It is not like you killed someone or
> >>> something, you made a few mistakes in a public forum. Oh well. I am
> >>> sure I did too, and someday you and your crew will find those mistakes,
> >>> point them out, and pretend they have meaning.
> >>>
> >>> It is boring.
> See how you bring up off-topic and, I suspect, ancient debates. Even in a
> discussion about how you and your "crew" do this and cannot let go of past
> debates you cannot help but continue your poor actions.
>
> You talked about how you will soon leave this debate. Again. If that is
> the only way you can find for yourself to act in an honorable way then I
> encourage you to do so. Sandman has had a fair amount of success with that
> method. I commend him for it.
Begging for Steve MacKay's attention again?
--
God made me a furry, who am I to question His authority?
Chance Furlong
Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> Amazing how far out of your way you go to prove me right:
>
> You keep going on and on and on, making accusation after
> accusation. As I noted, though, when asked to support your
> claims you either run, claim that you already have supported
> them (but cannot find any evidence to show this), or run back
> to ancient debates from 2004, bringing up long dead debates
> where you and your "crew" first started these games. Above
> you act as if bringing up a long dead debate from 2004
> somehow supports your claims about me now, as if even if
> you were right then (which you never showed) that this would
> be relevant to my current comments. Nope. You made some
> bizarre accusations in 2004, failed to support them, and
> have not been able to let go of your past. I say let it go.
> Move on with your life. Focus on today, not your past
> errors. It is not like you killed someone or something,
> you made a few mistakes in a public forum. Oh well. I am
> sure I did, too, and someday you and your crew will find
> those mistakes, point them out, and pretend they have
> meaning.
>
> It is boring.
>
> Do you realize how perfectly your post fits my description?
Begging for Steve MacKay's attention again?
Chance Furlong
Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> "Steve Mackay" <mackay...@att.net> stated in post
> lVMdl.9334$pr6....@flpi149.ffdc.sbc.com on 1/21/09 2:52 PM:
> >
> > Look, boys and girls, Mikey learned how to cut and paste!!!
> > Now if only he could learn how to tell the truth.
> >
> > We can hope.
>
> Instead of focusing on the content, you instead post insults. Again, you
> are proving me right about you. Presumably this is not how you want to
> portray yourself in public. Are you unable to stop yourself? Just trying
> to get the last word? Hoping to make me angry? What is your goal?
Begging for Steve MacKay's attention again?
Chance Furlong
Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> "Steve Mackay" <mackay...@att.net> stated in post
> WlNdl.11387$D32....@flpi146.ffdc.sbc.com on 1/21/09 3:33 PM:
> > I thought it was perfectly clear. This whole conversation proves
> > beyond a shadow of a doubt that you can't be honest, you can't stop with
> > your lies, and you weren't even close to being sincere about wanting
> > peace. You had 4 simple steps to take to achieve the peace that you said
> > you wanted. You couldn't do it. Now be a good little bitch and lie some
> > more(like I really need to tell you to do so. You just can't help
> > yourself but lie.)
>
> You claim to have a goal to show me to be something you cannot show me to
> be.
>
> I feel sorry for you.
Begging for Steve MacKay's attention again?
Sermo Malifer
> In article <C59CE1D5.EBD57%use...@gallopinginsanity.com>,
> Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>
>> "Steve Mackay" <mackay...@att.net> stated in post
>> 1oMdl.18429$Ws1....@nlpi064.nbdc.sbc.com on 1/21/09 2:22 PM:
> Begging for Steve MacKay's attention again?
If you must contribute to Snit's loony bin, would you at least trim COLA
out of your replies?
Snit
And CSMA. Please.
--
But if you are somebody who is not too concerned about price, who is not too
concerned about freedom, I don't think we can say the Linux desktop offers
the very best experience.
- Mark Shuttleworth (founded Canonical Ltd. / Ubuntu Linux)
High Plains Thumper
> Don Zeigler schreef...
>> Snit wrote:
>>
>>> I will welcome you into adulthood if you are willing to
>>> make the leap.
>>
>> Go leap off a cliff, retard.
>
> * Cola loons** ensure that their posts are littered with lots
Here's a better URL:
http://colatrolls.blogspot.com/2007/09/clogwog-troll.html
> Tattoo Vampire AKA Don Zeigler, Windows user by day, Linux
> user, windows basher by night! [knip idiootlampekap raast en
> tieren]
From the very one who posts much vulgarity as a sig:
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/2789128c8582abf9
Give it up, Rick, the more you post, the more stupid you look.
--
HPT
High Plains Thumper
> Snit wrote:
>
>> What do you say, folks? I have asked for peace before...
>> and now the President of the United States is asking for a
>> day when we can all offer a renewal and a reconciliation.
>>
>> Let bygones be bygones. End the silly flaming, at least the
>> flames that are tied to the past.
>>
>> I know I certainly would love to see it.
>
For the past 4+ years, Snit had many opportunities to carry out
what he is requesting here, without success. Instead, he
continues his incessant flame wars with every one he encounters.
Here are the latest:
121- RonB: "Snit is a crank fixated on one issue, who's thing is
twisting your words so he can win an argument against a straw
man. That's enough to killfile him." 1 Jan 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.usenet.kooks/msg/ce8550d4cc5b1b42
122- Sermo Malifer
Snit: "Why do so many people in COLA argue *against* me..."
Sermo Malifer: "Because you're a narcissistic troll who posts
trash just to get people talking about you." 21 Jan 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/5ddf14f502e9b3f1
Rest of the other 120 direct poster quotes regarding the Snit
Circus of pathological lies may be found at:
--
HPT
Quando omni flunkus moritati
(If all else fails, play dead)
- "Red" Green
chrisv
>Chance Furlong wrote:
>>
>> Begging for Steve MacKay's attention again?
>
>If you must contribute to Snit's loony bin, would you at least trim COLA
>out of your replies?
Exactly. He's on the verge of being plonked (again) for feeding Shit.
Snit
49787682$0$3336$6e1e...@read.cnntp.org on 1/22/09 6:37 AM:
> ray wrote:
>> Snit wrote:
>>
>>> What do you say, folks? I have asked for peace before...
>>> and now the President of the United States is asking for a
>>> day when we can all offer a renewal and a reconciliation.
>>>
>>> Let bygones be bygones. End the silly flaming, at least the
>>> flames that are tied to the past.
>>>
>>> I know I certainly would love to see it.
>>
>> How sweet. I'm sure that's all it will take.
>
> For the past 4+ years, Snit had many opportunities to carry out
> what he is requesting here, without success. Instead, he
> continues his incessant flame wars with every one he encounters.
>
> Here are the latest:
>
> 121- RonB: "Snit is a crank fixated on one issue, who's thing is
> twisting your words so he can win an argument against a straw
> man. That's enough to killfile him." 1 Jan 2009
I did not say that. As even you note, RonB did.
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.usenet.kooks/msg/ce8550d4cc5b1b42
>
> 122- Sermo Malifer
> Snit: "Why do so many people in COLA argue *against* me..."
> Sermo Malifer: "Because you're a narcissistic troll who posts
> trash just to get people talking about you." 21 Jan 2009
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/5ddf14f502e9b3f1
I did not day that. Even you note that.
> Rest of the other 120 direct poster quotes regarding the Snit
> Circus of pathological lies may be found at:
>
> http://tinyurl.com/9858jv
You made a claim about *me*, but then quoted others. In other words you
cannot find a single example of *me* doing as you say.
Not *one*.
So why not just let your mistake of pointing to others go? Why not move
forward in peace? I am willing to let your mistakes go if you are. Will
you?
Steve Carroll
> "Steve Mackay" <mackay.st...@att.net> stated in post
> 1oMdl.18429$Ws1.15...@nlpi064.nbdc.sbc.com on 1/21/09 2:22 PM:
>
>
>
> >>> You keep going on and on and on... making accusation after accusation. As I
> >>> noted, though, when asked to support your claims you either run, claim that
> >>> you already have supported them (but cannot find any evidence to show this),
> >>> or run back to ancient debates from 2004... bringing up long dead debates
> >>> where you and your "crew" first started these games. Above you act as if
> >>> bringing up a long dead debate from 2004 somehow supports your claims about
> >>> me now... as if even if you were right then (which you never showed) that
> >>> this would be relevant to my current comments. Nope. You made some bizarre
> >>> accusations in *2004*, failed to support them, and have not been able to let
> >>> go of your past. I say let it go. Move on with your life. Focus on
> >>> today... not your past errors. It is not like you killed someone or
> >>> something... you made a few mistakes in a public forum. Oh well. I am sure
> >>> I did, too... and someday you and your crew will find those mistakes, point
> >>> them out, and pretend they have meaning.
>
> >>> It is boring.
>
> >> Steve MacKay sounds like a right wing nutjob clone of Steve Carroll. LOL!!
>
> > Hey don't you have some wikipedia articles to go try and edit?
>
> See how you bring up off-topic and, I suspect, ancient debates.
What's 'on topic' and 'new' about you telling lies and spreading BS?
Stay away from open flames, gluehead;)
Steve Carroll
> "High Plains Thumper" <highplainsthum...@invalid.invalid> stated in post
> 49787682$0$3336$6e1ed...@read.cnntp.org on 1/22/09 6:37 AM:
>
>
>
> > ray wrote:
> >> Snit wrote:
>
> >>> What do you say, folks? I have asked for peace before...
> >>> and now the President of the United States is asking for a
> >>> day when we can all offer a renewal and a reconciliation.
>
> >>> Let bygones be bygones. End the silly flaming, at least the
> >>> flames that are tied to the past.
>
> >>> I know I certainly would love to see it.
>
> >> How sweet. I'm sure that's all it will take.
>
> > For the past 4+ years, Snit had many opportunities to carry out
> > what he is requesting here, without success. Instead, he
> > continues his incessant flame wars with every one he encounters.
>
> > Here are the latest:
>
> > 121- RonB: "Snit is a crank fixated on one issue, who's thing is
> > twisting your words so he can win an argument against a straw
> > man. That's enough to killfile him." 1 Jan 2009
>
> I did not say that. As even you note, RonB did.
>
>
>
> >http://groups.google.com/group/alt.usenet.kooks/msg/ce8550d4cc5b1b42
>
> > 122- Sermo Malifer
> > Snit: "Why do so many people in COLA argue *against* me..."
> > Sermo Malifer: "Because you're a narcissistic troll who posts
> > trash just to get people talking about you." 21 Jan 2009
>
>
> I did not day that. Even you note that.
>
> > Rest of the other 120 direct poster quotes regarding the Snit
> > Circus of pathological lies may be found at:
>
> >http://tinyurl.com/9858jv
>
> You made a claim about *me*, but then quoted others.
Yes, he's quoted what others have said about you. When people post the
proof of your crap, you deny it all. Now, it's much more fun (and
productive) to watch you whine about an entire ng or two full of
people noticing you being you. LOL!
> In other words
... you should get your money back on your "psych degree"? Yes;)
Rafael
> Snit wrote:
>> High Plains Thumper stated:
>>
>>> 122- Sermo Malifer
>>> Snit: "Why do so many people in COLA argue *against*
>>> me..."
>>> Sermo Malifer: "Because you're a narcissistic troll who
>>> posts trash just to get people talking about you."
>>> 21 Jan 2009
>>>
>>
>> I did not day that. Even you note that.
>>
>>> Rest of the other 120 direct poster quotes regarding the
>>> Snit Circus of pathological lies may be found at:
>>> http://tinyurl.com/9858jv
>>
>> You made a claim about *me*, but then quoted others.
>
> Yes, he's quoted what others have said about you. When people
> post the proof of your crap, you deny it all. Now, it's much
> more fun (and productive) to watch you whine about an entire
> ng or two full of people noticing you being you. LOL!
>
>> In other words
>
> ... you should get your money back on your "psych degree"?
> Yes;)
Here's a reason for a refund. :-)
Rhino Plastee (Snit): "Steve Carroll has many quotes from people
saying bad things about Snit and that is all the evidence one
needs! He is the anti-christ and is worthy of your contempt and
your hatred. Do not ever speak a good word of him or you will
face the wrath of the masses, and the masses make the truth in
this New World Order. Fuck evidence, POWER TO THE PEOPLE!"
Steve Mackay: "Snit, cut the shit. You're not fooling anyone."
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.usenet.kooks/msg/cc52598fa40aede8
--
HPT
Snit
1/22/09 12:34 PM:
Steve Carroll and Steve Mackay playing games does not say *anything* about
me.
--
What do you call people who are afraid of Santa Claus? Claustrophobic.
High Plains Thumper
>> Here's a reason for a refund. :-)
>>
>> Rhino Plastee (Snit): "Steve Carroll has many quotes from
>> people saying bad things about Snit and that is all the
>> evidence one needs! He is the anti-christ and is worthy of
>> your contempt and your hatred. Do not ever speak a good word
>> of him or you will face the wrath of the masses, and the
>> masses make the truth in this New World Order. Fuck
>> evidence, POWER TO THE PEOPLE!"
>> Steve Mackay: "Snit, cut the shit. You're not fooling
>> anyone."
>>
>> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.usenet.kooks/msg/cc52598fa40aede8
>
> Steve Carroll and Steve Mackay playing games does not say
> *anything* about me.
You sure beg for my attention a lot.
--
HPT
Picture of a tuna soda: http://snipurl.com/f351
Feel free to ask for the recipe.
Snit
glajk0$m8q$1...@news.motzarella.org on 1/22/09 1:06 PM:
> Snit wrote:
>
>>> Here's a reason for a refund. :-)
>>>
>>> Rhino Plastee (Snit): "Steve Carroll has many quotes from
>>> people saying bad things about Snit and that is all the
>>> evidence one needs! He is the anti-christ and is worthy of
>>> your contempt and your hatred. Do not ever speak a good word
>>> of him or you will face the wrath of the masses, and the
>>> masses make the truth in this New World Order. Fuck
>>> evidence, POWER TO THE PEOPLE!"
>>> Steve Mackay: "Snit, cut the shit. You're not fooling
>>> anyone."
>>>
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.usenet.kooks/msg/cc52598fa40aede8
>>
>> Steve Carroll and Steve Mackay playing games does not say
>> *anything* about me.
>
> You sure beg for my attention a lot.
LOL! You have no idea why I post that phrase... no ability to defend your
accusation that I am doing so... you are just blathering.
Like you always do when I call you on your BS. Why is it you quote Steve
and Steve and others but never *me* when you want to show something about
me?
How can you possibly be so incompetent as to always miss your target and
actually get a quote from me? Sad to see you so humiliated by your failure.
Steve Mackay
Since when does pointing out your overly obvious sockpuppets, NOT say
anything about you?
Snit
Making absurd accusations, as you do above, is a very pathetic way to beg
for my attention. Try something more clever!
--
Picture of a tuna milkshake: http://snipurl.com/f34z
High Plains Thumper
> "High Plains Thumper stated:
>>
>>>> Here's a reason for a refund. :-)
>>>>
>>>> Rhino Plastee (Snit): "Steve Carroll has many quotes
>>>> from people saying bad things about Snit and that is all
>>>> the evidence one needs! He is the anti-christ and is
>>>> worthy of your contempt and your hatred. Do not ever
>>>> speak a good word of him or you will face the wrath of
>>>> the masses, and the masses make the truth in this New
>>>> World Order. Fuck evidence, POWER TO THE PEOPLE!"
>>>> Steve Mackay: "Snit, cut the shit. You're not fooling
>>>> anyone."
>>>>
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.usenet.kooks/msg/cc52598fa40aede8
>>>
>>> Steve Carroll and Steve Mackay playing games does not say
>>> *anything* about me.
>>
>> You sure beg for my attention a lot.
>
> LOL! You have no idea why I post that phrase...
Oh yes, we do....
> no ability to defend your accusation that I am doing so...
Y - A - W - N ....
> you are just blathering.
Do tell?
> Like you always do when I call you on your BS.
Oh, really?
> Why is it you quote Steve and Steve and others but never *me*
> when you want to show something about me?
Snit simply has nothing worthy to quote, that is why. However,
the observations of 122 posters about the Snit Circus of
Pathological liars are worthy of quoting.
121- RonB: "Snit is a crank fixated on one issue, who's thing is
twisting your words so he can win an argument against a straw
man. That's enough to killfile him." 1 Jan 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.usenet.kooks/msg/ce8550d4cc5b1b42
122- Sermo Malifer
Snit: "Why do so many people in COLA argue *against* me..."
Sermo Malifer: "Because you're a narcissistic troll who posts
trash just to get people talking about you." 21 Jan 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/5ddf14f502e9b3f1
Rest of the other 120 direct poster quotes regarding the Snit
Circus of pathological lies may be found at:
> How can you possibly be so incompetent as to always miss your
> target and actually get a quote from me?
I hit the bullseye every time. Problem is you can't get yours up.
> Sad to see you so humiliated by your failure.
Chortling in Hadron's footsteps, I see.
[quote]
Hadron wrote:
> It IS because of him and two other useless people in
> particular (CBFalconer and Harold "old school" Stevens
> (probably both Willy nyms) that I started to drift from the
> Ubuntu fan boy zone.
"I got my ass kicked up around my shoulders in AOLU, so in a lame
attempt to hide the ass-kicking I received and deserved, I puffed
out my hollow chest, chortled 'victory' and acted like I walked
away from the group."
[/quote]
Snit
--
Never stand between a dog and the hydrant. - John Peers
Snit
> Snit wrote:
All this effort from you, *trying*... trying to find some shred of evidence
against me... some tiny sliver of data to back up your accusations... and
you cannot find it. Like a poor marksman you keep quoting *other* people
but not me... not in any way that supports your claims.
And I mock you. I laugh at you. I note your failure. Clearly, if you
could have you would have quoted these alleged lies of mine. But you
cannot.
You are a failure, and, clearly, a liar.
And it just eats you up to know that I am right... that you cannot respond
with a "gotcha" quoting some lie from me. It has been clearly bothering you
for some time - look at how you cannot let it go and you just keep doing the
same thing over and over and over, perhaps hoping - beyond hope - that you
will catch me in some actual lie you can slap in my face and say "I told you
so!"
You think you are a clever bully... but you are not even as creative or
clever with your BS as many others who have failed just as badly before you.
You are simply not going to ever succeed.
And I laugh.
--
God made me an atheist - who are you to question his authority?
Steve Mackay
As hard as I look, I don't see any accusations that aren't proven beyond
a shadow of a doubt, much less "absurd".
> is a very pathetic way to beg
> for my attention. Try something more clever!
Aww, Michael Glasser, the poor little bitch. Just CAN'T help himself to
lie, flame and troll.
High Plains Thumper
>
> All this effort from you, *trying*...
No, with you it is easy, there is little effort.
> trying to find some shred of evidence against me...
Testimony is a powerful messenger, ask the courts.
> some tiny sliver of data to back up your accusations...
Oh, oh dear, here is another!
123- cc (COLA): "Snit posts all the time. You don't have to dig
up months old articles where he brings up years old topics. Just
respond to a current message." 22 Jan 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/5a712e3312ba9f8a
> and you cannot find it.
See above, LOL!
> Like a poor marksman you keep quoting *other* people but not
> me...
In a court of law, there would be no need to have you testify.
The evidence is there all in its glory, archived by Google Groups
and other Usenet archives. Rather, it is YOU that missed the mark.
> not in any way that supports your claims.
See above, see these 123 testimonies, all in their glory along
with all your posts in response to and in their reaction to!
> And I mock you.
*Y - A - W - N*
> I laugh at you.
Try again, luser.
> I note your failure.
Failed? You're serious, LOL! I get a kick out of you getting
peeved at the likes of people posting the truth about you, to the
extent you must continue your myths!
> Clearly, if you could have you would have quoted these alleged
> lies of mine.
"Clearly" is a Snit definition for "M - U - D - D - Y" !
> But you cannot.
Bwaaahaaahaahaaahaahaahaahaa!
> You are a failure, and, clearly, a liar.
(Places hand underneath armpit) "Pbfffft - Pbfffft - Pbfffft" !
> And it just eats you up to know that I am right...
Sure, it eats me up, LOLROTF, I'm cleaning the soup spray off my
monitor!
> that you cannot respond with a "gotcha" quoting some lie from
> me.
See the 123 "gotcha" quotes above.
> It has been clearly bothering you for some time - look at how
> you cannot let it go and you just keep doing the same thing
> over and over and over, perhaps hoping - beyond hope - that
> you will catch me in some actual lie you can slap in my face
> and say "I told you so!"
Over and over and over, LOL! Like this statement by Snit, guffaw!
Snit: "You sure beg for my attention a lot." Examples (and these
are only a tip of the iceberg):
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/027fc8d042f08bf9
Don Zeigler: "It's amusing watching you suck face with the
Clogwog troll."
Snit: "You sure beg for my attention a lot." 17 Jan 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/1dddff78460ca82d
Peter Köhlmann: "In addition to making up stories about teaching,
that is"
Snit: "You sure beg for my attention a lot." 19 Jan 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/4b2e6e23a6638a7b
Peter Köhlmann: "So you are actually too damn stupid to realize
that I still see Snot Michael Glassers shite by quoting? Are you
too cretinous to realize that it is Michael Glasser, the dumbest
"IT teacher" in all of history, who continues to reply to me,
although he knows damn well that I don't see his garbage except
when it gets quoted? Who would have guessed that there are
actually vermin even dumber than Glasser or Hadron Quark?"
Snit: "You sure beg for my attention a lot." 20 Jan 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/7851ac3ff0b80cd9
Peter Köhlmann (to Hadron): "Well, Snot Michael Glasser *is*
lying. He is not just "in denial". He claims that those posts of
the list are "fabrications". That is absolutely a lie. All of
those posts are from different people, and none of them a
fabricated. Keep on defending the worst troll which ever hounded
CSMA and COLA, but that just makes you someone defending a liar.
And it does not change the facts in the slightest"
Snit: "You sure beg for my attention a lot." 08 Jan 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/984ae4b3b1e1d005
Wally: "debate"? LOL Hey Snit, here's a word for the dictionary
you're compiling ... You know the one you need because you can't
understand any regular one. The word is ... 'Hyposnite'. It
means the same as hypocrite only hyposnite refers to a person
whose inherent dishonesty makes them 'choose' to be one!"
Snit: "You sure beg for my attention a lot." 08 Jan 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/ab52d66cd368cb4f
Snit: "Seriously, have you no shame? No honor? No sense of
self worth?"
Don Zeigler: "Who are you, Dr. Phil?"
Snit: "You sure beg for my attention a lot." 20 Jan 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/e9b06d16bb16330f
William Poaster: "Well I for one am certainly *not* desperate
for some attention from a blackmailer like Michael Snit Glasser.
If I was, I wouldn't have the twat killfiled. Funny how the
troll keeps mentioning being "honorable" too. As if a blackmailer
would know what it means."
Snit: "You sure beg for my attention a lot." 12 Jan 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/eff96f1472713b6a
Peter Köhlmann: "Certainly, Hadron Quark. After you supported
your claims for the very first time with so much as a shred of
evidence. Now shout "EXIF" like your ass-buddy Snot Michael
Glasser did."
Snit: "You sure beg for my attention a lot." 04 Jan 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/f7acc0c3aca016bc
Tim Adams: "We are indeed serious. While snit tries now to pass
it off as a 'joke', the real joke is on him because of the
disgusting web site he posted he created and linked to when
posting as sigmond. When people pointed out to him that both
sigmond's and snit's IP were identical, he claimed it had to have
been an intruder."
Snit: "You sure beg for my attention a lot." 20 Jan 2009
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/96cd99fdc9af5226
Snit: "Comcast made it clear that problem users such as Steve
Carroll were a part of what lead them to stop supporting Usenet.
High Plains Thumper: "Comcast made no such alibis. Steve Carroll
made no such abuses. This is only a very sorry and futile
attempt by Snit to blame Steve's truthful exposure of his
trolling by attacking Steve."
Snit: "If you do not like that or do not believe it or just want
to be a pain about it then call Comcast and leave me and CSMA out
of your concerns!"
High Plains Thumper: "Oh, this is rich. Snit nymshifts as Rhino
Plastee to post his poisonous diatribe against Steve in CSMA,
blaming Steve for the demise of Comcast's direct support of
Usenet. Then crossposts to COLA and a slew of other non-related
groups. Now he asks to be left out. Snit made his bed, it is
time for Snit to sleep in it. Yup, the Snit Circus of
pathological lies continues ...."
Snit: "I *never* said you were not a liar. Please do not go out
of your way to prove it!"
High Plains Thumper: "Oh, so now I am a liar according to Snit.
Rather, the proof is on Snit. The burden is captured in all its
glory in this thread.
http://www.healthmad.com/Mental-Health/How-to-Spot-a-Pathological-Liar.171119
or http://tinyurl.com/85owde "
Steve Mackay: "Snit, the poster boy for pathological liars
everywhere."
Snit: "You sure beg for my attention a lot." 31 Dec 2008
> You think you are a clever bully...
Oh, so now I am a mean, bully, LOL!
> but you are not even as creative or clever with your BS as many
> others who have failed just as badly before you.
Like the observations of 123 posters on the Snit (Michael
Glasser) Circus of pathological lies?
> You are simply not going to ever succeed.
Rather, it is you that has failed.
> And I laugh.
You sure beg for my attention a lot, LOL!
--
HPT
Steve Carroll
> Snit wrote:
> > High Plains Thumper stated:
> >> Snit wrote:
>
> >>> Why is it you quote Steve and Steve and others but never
> >>> *me* when you want to show something about me?
>
> >> Snit simply has nothing worthy to quote, that is why.
> >> However, the observations of 122 posters about the Snit
> >> Circus of Pathological liars are worthy of quoting.
>
> >> 121- RonB: "Snit is a crank fixated on one issue, who's
> >> thing is twisting your words so he can win an argument
> >> against a straw man. That's enough to killfile him."
> >> 1 Jan 2009
>
> >>http://groups.google.com/group/alt.usenet.kooks/msg/ce8550d4cc5b1b42
>
> >> 122- Sermo Malifer Snit: "Why do so many people in COLA
> >> argue *against* me..." Sermo Malifer: "Because you're a
> >> narcissistic troll who posts trash just to get people
> >> talking about you." 21 Jan 2009
>
>
> >> Rest of the other 120 direct poster quotes regarding the
> >> Snit Circus of pathological lies may be found at:
>
> >>http://tinyurl.com/9858jv
>
> >>> How can you possibly be so incompetent as to always miss
> >>> your target and actually get a quote from me?
>
> >> I hit the bullseye every time. Problem is you can't get
> >> yours up.
>
> >>> Sad to see you so humiliated by your failure.
>
> >> Chortling in Hadron's footsteps, I see.
>
> >>http://tinyurl.com/5fyhev[...]
>
> > All this effort from you, *trying*...
>
> No, with you it is easy, there is little effort.
>
> > trying to find some shred of evidence against me...
>
> Testimony is a powerful messenger, ask the courts.
Snit is sort of like the Casey Anthony of usenet... and I'm really
glad I was given the opportunity to help him get there;)
> > some tiny sliver of data to back up your accusations...
>
> Oh, oh dear, here is another!
>
> 123- cc (COLA): "Snit posts all the time. You don't have to dig
> up months old articles where he brings up years old topics. Just
> respond to a current message." 22 Jan 2009
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/5a712e3312b...
>
> > and you cannot find it.
>
> See above, LOL!
>
> > Like a poor marksman you keep quoting *other* people but not
> > me...
>
> In a court of law, there would be no need to have you testify.
> The evidence is there all in its glory, archived by Google Groups
> and other Usenet archives. Rather, it is YOU that missed the mark.
Exactly. Snit obviously believes that people are so stupid that he can
convince them of his innocence based on his defense of ignoring all
proof and all testimony that surrounds that proof. As all sane, honest
and honorable people know... reality just doesn't work this way...
which is why it's so damned funny to watch Snit try to pretend that it
does as he tries to sell himself as an honest and honorable "adult".
You can't buy this kind of comedy;)
> > not in any way that supports your claims.
>
> See above, see these 123 testimonies, all in their glory along
> with all your posts in response to and in their reaction to!
>
> > And I mock you.
>
> *Y - A - W - N*
>
> > I laugh at you.
>
> Try again, luser.
>
> > I note your failure.
>
> Failed? You're serious, LOL! I get a kick out of you getting
> peeved at the likes of people posting the truth about you, to the
> extent you must continue your myths!
>
Someday his children will search on "Michael Glasser" and find out
that he and Snit are the same person. LOL!
> > Clearly, if you could have you would have quoted these alleged
> > lies of mine.
>
> "Clearly" is a Snit definition for "M - U - D - D - Y" !
>
> > But you cannot.
>
> Bwaaahaaahaahaaahaahaahaahaa!
>
> > You are a failure, and, clearly, a liar.
>
> (Places hand underneath armpit) "Pbfffft - Pbfffft - Pbfffft" !
>
> > And it just eats you up to know that I am right...
>
> Sure, it eats me up, LOLROTF, I'm cleaning the soup spray off my
> monitor!
>
> > that you cannot respond with a "gotcha" quoting some lie from
> > me.
>
> See the 123 "gotcha" quotes above.
>
> > It has been clearly bothering you for some time - look at how
> > you cannot let it go and you just keep doing the same thing
> > over and over and over, perhaps hoping - beyond hope - that
> > you will catch me in some actual lie you can slap in my face
> > and say "I told you so!"
>
> Over and over and over, LOL! Like this statement by Snit, guffaw!
>
> Snit: "You sure beg for my attention a lot." Examples (and these
> are only a tip of the iceberg):
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/027fc8d042f...
>
> Don Zeigler: "It's amusing watching you suck face with the
> Clogwog troll."
> Snit: "You sure beg for my attention a lot." 17 Jan 2009
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/1dddff78460...
>
> Peter Köhlmann: "In addition to making up stories about teaching,
> that is"
> Snit: "You sure beg for my attention a lot." 19 Jan 2009
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/4b2e6e23a66...
>
> Peter Köhlmann: "So you are actually too damn stupid to realize
> that I still see Snot Michael Glassers shite by quoting? Are you
> too cretinous to realize that it is Michael Glasser, the dumbest
> "IT teacher" in all of history, who continues to reply to me,
> although he knows damn well that I don't see his garbage except
> when it gets quoted? Who would have guessed that there are
> actually vermin even dumber than Glasser or Hadron Quark?"
>
> Snit: "You sure beg for my attention a lot." 20 Jan 2009
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/7851ac3ff0b...
>
> Peter Köhlmann (to Hadron): "Well, Snot Michael Glasser *is*
> lying. He is not just "in denial". He claims that those posts of
> the list are "fabrications". That is absolutely a lie. All of
> those posts are from different people, and none of them a
> fabricated. Keep on defending the worst troll which ever hounded
> CSMA and COLA, but that just makes you someone defending a liar.
> And it does not change the facts in the slightest"
>
> Snit: "You sure beg for my attention a lot." 08 Jan 2009
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/984ae4b3b1e...
>
> Wally: "debate"? LOL Hey Snit, here's a word for the dictionary
> you're compiling ... You know the one you need because you can't
> understand any regular one. The word is ... 'Hyposnite'. It
> means the same as hypocrite only hyposnite refers to a person
> whose inherent dishonesty makes them 'choose' to be one!"
>
> Snit: "You sure beg for my attention a lot." 08 Jan 2009
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/ab52d66cd36...
>
> Snit: "Seriously, have you no shame? No honor? No sense of
> self worth?"
> Don Zeigler: "Who are you, Dr. Phil?"
> Snit: "You sure beg for my attention a lot." 20 Jan 2009
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/e9b06d16bb1...
>
> William Poaster: "Well I for one am certainly *not* desperate
> for some attention from a blackmailer like Michael Snit Glasser.
> If I was, I wouldn't have the twat killfiled. Funny how the
> troll keeps mentioning being "honorable" too. As if a blackmailer
> would know what it means."
>
> Snit: "You sure beg for my attention a lot." 12 Jan 2009
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/eff96f14727...
>
> Peter Köhlmann: "Certainly, Hadron Quark. After you supported
> your claims for the very first time with so much as a shred of
> evidence. Now shout "EXIF" like your ass-buddy Snot Michael
> Glasser did."
>
> Snit: "You sure beg for my attention a lot." 04 Jan 2009
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/f7acc0c3aca...
>
> Tim Adams: "We are indeed serious. While snit tries now to pass
> it off as a 'joke', the real joke is on him because of the
> disgusting web site he posted he created and linked to when
> posting as sigmond. When people pointed out to him that both
> sigmond's and snit's IP were identical, he claimed it had to have
> been an intruder."
>
> Snit: "You sure beg for my attention a lot." 20 Jan 2009
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/96cd99fdc9af...
>
> Snit: "Comcast made it clear that problem users such as Steve
> Carroll were a part of what lead them to stop supporting Usenet.
>
> High Plains Thumper: "Comcast made no such alibis. Steve Carroll
> made no such abuses. This is only a very sorry and futile
> attempt by Snit to blame Steve's truthful exposure of his
> trolling by attacking Steve."
You should have seen Snit imply that GoDaddy had a "special" contract
with him... really funny stuff. Snit obviously has so little self
confidence that he's forced to pretend that companies have taken
notice of him in "special" ways;)
>
> Snit: "If you do not like that or do not believe it or just want
> to be a pain about it then call Comcast and leave me and CSMA out
> of your concerns!"
>
> High Plains Thumper: "Oh, this is rich. Snit nymshifts as Rhino
> Plastee to post his poisonous diatribe against Steve in CSMA,
> blaming Steve for the demise of Comcast's direct support of
> Usenet. Then crossposts to COLA and a slew of other non-related
> groups. Now he asks to be left out. Snit made his bed, it is
> time for Snit to sleep in it. Yup, the Snit Circus of
> pathological lies continues ...."
>
> Snit: "I *never* said you were not a liar. Please do not go out
> of your way to prove it!"
>
> High Plains Thumper: "Oh, so now I am a liar according to Snit.
> Rather, the proof is on Snit. The burden is captured in all its
> glory in this thread.
>
> http://www.healthmad.com/Mental-Health/How-to-Spot-a-Pathological-Lia...
>
> orhttp://tinyurl.com/85owde"
>
> Steve Mackay: "Snit, the poster boy for pathological liars
> everywhere."
>
> Snit: "You sure beg for my attention a lot." 31 Dec 2008
>
> > You think you are a clever bully...
>
> Oh, so now I am a mean, bully, LOL!
Snit really should consider trying to get his money back on his "psych
degree";)
Snit
All this BS from you... simply because of your complete and utter
humiliation at finding a single comment of mine to back up your accusations.
Seriously: I wish you well before you have a break down. Steve Carroll has,
clearly, had several... he makes the same type of idiotic attacks as you do.
--
Snit
Man, you really should just relax and not get so uptight over your failure
to find *any* evidence to back up your accusations.
--
"If you have integrity, nothing else matters." - Alan Simpson
Wally
"Snit" <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
Hey teacher!
You do realize that you have just stated that High Plains Thumper is
humiliated because he found a comment of yours to back up his accusations
don't you! LOL
ROTFLMAO! Seriously Snit are you ever going to be able put down in words
what it is that you are actually trying so desperately to say?
No! ...I doubt it too! :-)
Snit
C59FB5D3.FF37%Wa...@wally.world.net on 1/23/09 1:58 AM:
>> All this BS from you... simply because of your complete and utter
>> humiliation at finding a single comment of mine to back up your accusations.
>
> Hey teacher!
>
> You do realize that you have just stated that High Plains Thumper is
> humiliated because he found a comment of yours to back up his accusations
> don't you! LOL
>
> ROTFLMAO! Seriously Snit are you ever going to be able put down in words
> what it is that you are actually trying so desperately to say?
>
> No! ...I doubt it too! :-)
Oh no! I made a typo! Man oh man oh man. Better save that in your file to
pull out and use against me over and over and over as if there was actually
a comment of mine he had found to back up his accusations.
But, yes, you are good at harping on typos and the like... better than a
third grader would likely be... I suppose I have to grant you that.
--
BU__SH__
Wally
"Snit" <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> Why is it you quote Steve
> and Steve and others but never *me* when you want to show something about
> me?
Because a person found to be insane would not be expected to admit to it!
Snit
Of course he will not *admit* to his failure... just as you will not. But
why do you two always fail?
Oh.
Because your claims are not based on what I actually do... they are based on
your wishes... your fantasies. Your lies.
Oh well.
Maybe someday you will actually catch me in some morally wrong action and
then you will be able to let go of your obsessive need to try to find an
example!
But, really, you have spent years looking... are you going to be really that
fulfilled if you finally find one example? Seems your goals are just
absurd.
--
"In order to discover who you are, first learn who everybody else is. You're
what's left." - Skip Hansen
The Lost Packet
Hey. I'm insane. I rather enjoy it, too.
Steve Mackay
I see you *STILL* can't help yourself to lie. Poor little bitch, Michael
Glasser. Now be a good little bitch and troll, lie, and flame somewhere
else.
Steve Mackay
Sorry Michael, I don't follow your career path. You do it so well,
you've cornered the market! Well done, well done!
Steve Mackay
Actually, it's not HPT's humiliation, it's yours. And he found more than
one comment of yours to back up his accusations.
>
> Seriously: I wish you well before you have a break down. Steve Carroll has,
> clearly, had several... he makes the same type of idiotic attacks as you do.
Yeah, clearly slapping the little bitch, michael with reality is
attacks.<eye roll>
Wally
"Snit" <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> "Wally" <Wa...@wally.world.net> stated in post
> C59FB7B7.FF3A%Wa...@wally.world.net on 1/23/09 2:06 AM:
>
>> On 23/1/09 5:26 AM, in article C59E2498.EC0BE%use...@gallopinginsanity.com,
>> "Snit" <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Why is it you quote Steve
>>> and Steve and others but never *me* when you want to show something about
>>> me?
>>
>> Because a person found to be insane would not be expected to admit to it!
>>
>>
> Of course he will not *admit* to his failure... just as you will not. But
> why do you two always fail?
There is only one area that I would concede having failed Snit, and that is
getting you to explain your support for any of your claims after they have
been shown to be bogus!
Instead you will either lace up, or post one of your "you are sure begging
... " Replies!
But there is only so much your detractors can do Snit, we can point out your
lies (and we do), prove they are lies (which we do), and ask you to explain
why you lied (which we constantly do), and we do all of that extremely
effectively as seen by your constant inability to counter the points made
against you! but after that we all know the course of action that you will
take Snit and the lengths you will go to!
But that's OK Snit, as I said to you I wouldnšt expect someone found to be
insane to admit to it!
As long as your dishonesty is noticed and commented on by an increasing
number of people...
To quote Farmer Hoggett:
"That'll do, pig. That'll do."
Wally
"Snit" <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
Another Snit back down! once upon a time that would have been worth
something Snit... But now everyone seems to have one! LOL
Wally
Packet" <jmthelo...@googlemail.com> wrote:
Self appraisal is a healthy thing, but I think you are being way too hard on
yourself!
:-)
High Plains Thumper
> Snit wrote:
>> Wally stated:
>>
>>>> All this BS from you... simply because of your complete
>>>> and utter humiliation at finding a single comment of
>>>> mine to back up your accusations.
>>>
>>> Hey teacher!
>>>
>>> You do realize that you have just stated that High Plains
>>> Thumper is humiliated because he found a comment of yours
>>> to back up his accusations don't you! LOL
>>>
>>> ROTFLMAO! Seriously Snit are you ever going to be able put
>>> down in words what it is that you are actually trying so
>>> desperately to say?
>>>
>>> No! ...I doubt it too! :-)
>>
>> Oh no! I made a typo! Man oh man oh man. Better save that
>> in your file to pull out and use against me over and over
>> and over as if there was actually a comment of mine he had
>> found to back up his accusations.
Over and over typos with a Snit comment like?
Snit: "You sure beg for my attention a lot."
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/027fc8d042f08bf9
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/1dddff78460ca82d
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/4b2e6e23a6638a7b
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/7851ac3ff0b80cd9
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/984ae4b3b1e1d005
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/ab52d66cd368cb4f
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/e9b06d16bb16330f
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/eff96f1472713b6a
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/f7acc0c3aca016bc
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/c224ec0067ae687e
Rising conversational typos such as?
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/96cd99fdc9af5226
http://www.healthmad.com/Mental-Health/How-to-Spot-a-Pathological-Liar.171119
or http://tinyurl.com/85owde "
>> But, yes, you are good at harping on typos and the like...
>> better than a third grader would likely be... I suppose I
>> have to grant you that.
Snit has made his bed, perhaps it is time also that he drink his
typo here?
Snit: "Picture of a tuna soda: http://snipurl.com/f351
Feel free to ask for the recipe."
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/490609df1d7b310b
> Another Snit back down! once upon a time that would have been
> worth something Snit... But now everyone seems to have one!
> LOL
--
Steve Carroll
> "High Plains Thumper" <h...@invalid.invalid> stated in post
>
>
>
> > Snit wrote:
> >> High Plains Thumper stated:
> >>> Snit wrote:
>
> >>>> Why is it you quote Steve and Steve and others but never
> >>>> *me* when you want to show something about me?
>
> >>> Snit simply has nothing worthy to quote, that is why.
> >>> However, the observations of 122 posters about the Snit
> >>> Circus of Pathological liars are worthy of quoting.
>
> >>> 121- RonB: "Snit is a crank fixated on one issue, who's
> >>> thing is twisting your words so he can win an argument
> >>> against a straw man. That's enough to killfile him."
> >>> 1 Jan 2009
>
> >>>http://groups.google.com/group/alt.usenet.kooks/msg/ce8550d4cc5b1b42
>
> >>> 122- Sermo Malifer Snit: "Why do so many people in COLA
> >>> argue *against* me..." Sermo Malifer: "Because you're a
> >>> narcissistic troll who posts trash just to get people
> >>> talking about you." 21 Jan 2009
>
>
> >>> Rest of the other 120 direct poster quotes regarding the
> >>> Snit Circus of pathological lies may be found at:
>
> >>>http://tinyurl.com/9858jv
>
> >>>> How can you possibly be so incompetent as to always miss
> >>>> your target and actually get a quote from me?
>
> >>> I hit the bullseye every time. Problem is you can't get
> >>> yours up.
>
> >>>> Sad to see you so humiliated by your failure.
>
> >>> Chortling in Hadron's footsteps, I see.
>
> >>>http://tinyurl.com/5fyhev[...]
>
> >> All this effort from you, *trying*...
>
> > No, with you it is easy, there is little effort.
>
> >> trying to find some shred of evidence against me...
>
> > Testimony is a powerful messenger, ask the courts.
>
> >> some tiny sliver of data to back up your accusations...
>
> > Oh, oh dear, here is another!
>
> > 123- cc (COLA): "Snit posts all the time. You don't have to dig
> > up months old articles where he brings up years old topics. Just
> > respond to a current message." 22 Jan 2009
>
>
> > Don Zeigler: "It's amusing watching you suck face with the
> > Clogwog troll."
> > Snit: "You sure beg for my attention a lot." 17 Jan 2009
>
>
> > Peter Köhlmann: "In addition to making up stories about teaching,
> > that is"
> > Snit: "You sure beg for my attention a lot." 19 Jan 2009
>
>
> > Peter Köhlmann: "So you are actually too damn stupid to realize
> > that I still see Snot Michael Glassers shite by quoting? Are you
> > too cretinous to realize that it is Michael Glasser, the dumbest
> > "IT teacher" in all of history, who continues to reply to me,
> > although he knows damn well that I don't see his garbage except
> > when it gets quoted? Who would have guessed that there are
> > actually vermin even dumber than Glasser or Hadron Quark?"
>
> > Snit: "You sure beg for my attention a lot." 20 Jan 2009
>
>
> > Peter Köhlmann (to Hadron): "Well, Snot Michael Glasser *is*
> > lying. He is not just "in denial". He claims that those posts of
> > the list are "fabrications". That is absolutely a lie. All of
> > those posts are from different people, and none of them a
> > fabricated. Keep on defending the worst troll which ever hounded
> > CSMA and COLA, but that just makes you someone defending a liar.
> > And it does not change the facts in the slightest"
>
> > Snit: "You sure beg for my attention a lot." 08 Jan 2009
>
>
> > Wally: "debate"? LOL Hey Snit, here's a word for the dictionary
> > you're compiling ... You know the one you need because you can't
> > understand any regular one. The word is ... 'Hyposnite'. It
> > means the same as hypocrite only hyposnite refers to a person
> > whose inherent dishonesty makes them 'choose' to be one!"
>
> > Snit: "You sure beg for my attention a lot." 08 Jan 2009
>
>
> > Snit: "Seriously, have you no shame? No honor? No sense of
> > self worth?"
> > Don Zeigler: "Who are you, Dr. Phil?"
> > Snit: "You sure beg for my attention a lot." 20 Jan 2009
>
>
> > William Poaster: "Well I for one am certainly *not* desperate
> > for some attention from a blackmailer like Michael Snit Glasser.
> > If I was, I wouldn't have the twat killfiled. Funny how the
> > troll keeps mentioning being "honorable" too. As if a blackmailer
> > would know what it means."
>
> > Snit: "You sure beg for my attention a lot." 12 Jan 2009
>
>
> > Peter Köhlmann: "Certainly, Hadron Quark. After you supported
> > your claims for the very first time with so much as a shred of
> > evidence. Now shout "EXIF" like your ass-buddy Snot Michael
> > Glasser did."
>
> > Snit: "You sure beg for my attention a lot." 04 Jan 2009
>
>
> > Tim Adams: "We are indeed serious. While snit tries now to pass
> > it off as a 'joke', the real joke is on him because of the
> > disgusting web site he posted he created and linked to when
> > posting as sigmond. When people pointed out to him that both
> > sigmond's and snit's IP were identical, he claimed it had to have
> > been an intruder."
>
> > Snit: "You sure beg for my attention a lot." 20 Jan 2009
>
>
> > Snit: "Comcast made it clear that problem users such as Steve
> > Carroll were a part of what lead them to stop supporting Usenet.
>
> > High Plains Thumper: "Comcast made no such alibis. Steve Carroll
> > made no such abuses. This is only a very sorry and futile
> > attempt by Snit to blame Steve's truthful exposure of his
> > trolling by attacking Steve."
>
> > Snit: "If you do not like that or do not believe it or just want
> > to be a pain about it then call Comcast and leave me and CSMA out
> > of your concerns!"
>
> > High Plains Thumper: "Oh, this is rich. Snit nymshifts as Rhino
> > Plastee to post his poisonous diatribe against Steve in CSMA,
> > blaming Steve for the demise of Comcast's direct support of
> > Usenet. Then crossposts to COLA and a slew of other non-related
> > groups. Now he asks to be left out. Snit made his bed, it is
> > time for Snit to sleep in it. Yup, the Snit Circus of
> > pathological lies continues ...."
>
> > Snit: "I *never* said you were not a liar. Please do not go out
> > of your way to prove it!"
>
> > High Plains Thumper: "Oh, so now I am a liar according to Snit.
> > Rather, the proof is on Snit. The burden is captured in all its
> > glory in this thread.
>
>
> > orhttp://tinyurl.com/85owde"
>
> > Steve Mackay: "Snit, the poster boy for pathological liars
> > everywhere."
>
> > Snit: "You sure beg for my attention a lot." 31 Dec 2008
>
> >> You think you are a clever bully...
>
> > Oh, so now I am a mean, bully, LOL!
>
> >> but you are not even as creative or clever with your BS as many
> >> others who have failed just as badly before you.
>
> > Like the observations of 123 posters on the Snit (Michael
> > Glasser) Circus of pathological lies?
>
> >> You are simply not going to ever succeed.
>
> > Rather, it is you that has failed.
>
> >> And I laugh.
>
> > You sure beg for my attention a lot, LOL!
>
> All this
... reality and you can't offer any defense for your actions. You have
now been whittled down to the repeating of your tired denial mantra
while pretending it protects you from having people spot what you are
(despite having had two ng of people comment on it;)
(snip Snit's delusions)
Clogwog
news:glaho4$jg2$1...@aioe.org...
> Steve Carroll wrote:
>> Snit wrote:
>>> High Plains Thumper stated:
>>>
>>>> Snit: "Why do so many people in COLA argue *against*
>>>> me..."
>>>> Sermo Malifer: "Because you're a narcissistic troll who
>>>> posts trash just to get people talking about you."
>>>> 21 Jan 2009
>>>>
>>>
>>> I did not day that. Even you note that.
>>>
>>>> Snit Circus of pathological lies may be found at:
>>>> http://tinyurl.com/9858jv
>>>
>>
>> Yes, he's quoted what others have said about you. When people
>> post the proof of your crap, you deny it all. Now, it's much
>> more fun (and productive) to watch you whine about an entire
>> ng or two full of people noticing you being you. LOL!
>>
>>> In other words
>>
>> ... you should get your money back on your "psych degree"?
>> Yes;)
>
> Here's a reason for a refund. :-)
>
> Rhino Plastee (Snit): "Steve Carroll has many quotes from people
> saying bad things about Snit and that is all the evidence one
> needs! He is the anti-christ and is worthy of your contempt and
> your hatred. Do not ever speak a good word of him or you will
> face the wrath of the masses, and the masses make the truth in
> this New World Order. Fuck evidence, POWER TO THE PEOPLE!"
> Steve Mackay: "Snit, cut the shit. You're not fooling anyone."
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.usenet.kooks/msg/cc52598fa40aede8
>
> HPT
HPT nymshifting again, wazzup Wendy?
Snit
Yeah, I admit to my errors. No excuses. No lies. Such a different
philosophy than what you and your "crew" have. And you think my willingness
to admit to errors is a weakness.
Sad.
Snit
All that... and you "forgot" to actually quote one of these alleged lies
from me.
Bet you won't correct that mistake... see, you will not admit to your
mistakes - no less try to correct them.
--
Dear Aunt, let's set so double the killer delete select all
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1123221217782777472
Snit
>> All this BS from you... simply because of your complete and utter
>> humiliation at finding a single comment of mine to back up your accusations.
>
> Actually, it's not HPT's humiliation, it's yours. And he found more than
> one comment of yours to back up his accusations.
>
>>
>> Seriously: I wish you well before you have a break down. Steve Carroll has,
>> clearly, had several... he makes the same type of idiotic attacks as you do.
>
> Yeah, clearly slapping the little bitch, michael with reality is
> attacks.<eye roll>
>
Maybe you are so used to failure that you no longer find it humiliating.
Either way, the fact is you utterly failed to actually quote one of these
alleged lies of mine.
Utterly failed.
And I laugh at you and mock you. Heck, if you are going to obsess over
trying to find some sign of dishonesty in my posts then I might as well have
some fun, right?
--
"The music is not inside the piano." - Alan Kay
Snit
You sure beg for my attention a lot.
--
One who makes no mistakes, never makes anything.
Snit
You sure beg for my attention a lot.
--
Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored.
--Aldous Huxley
Snit
--
When thinking changes your mind, that's philosophy.
When God changes your mind, that's faith.
When facts change your mind, that's science.
Steve Mackay
> "Steve Mackay" <mackay...@att.net> stated in post
> %Zgel.18574$Ws1....@nlpi064.nbdc.sbc.com on 1/23/09 3:27 AM:
>
>>> All this BS from you... simply because of your complete and utter
>>> humiliation at finding a single comment of mine to back up your accusations.
>> Actually, it's not HPT's humiliation, it's yours. And he found more than
>> one comment of yours to back up his accusations.
>>
>>> Seriously: I wish you well before you have a break down. Steve Carroll has,
>>> clearly, had several... he makes the same type of idiotic attacks as you do.
>> Yeah, clearly slapping the little bitch, michael with reality is
>> attacks.<eye roll>
>>
> Maybe you are so used to failure that you no longer find it humiliating.
Hey Mikey, I'd have to actually FAIL to find it humiliating. Which I
haven't done.
> Either way, the fact is you utterly failed to actually quote one of these
> alleged lies of mine.
Naah. But, I'm sure you'll continue your trend of lying. Now be a good
little bitch and run along and troll some other news group.
>
> Utterly failed.
Naah.
> And I laugh at you and mock you.
Coming from the likes of you? Who cares.
> Heck, if you are going to obsess over
> trying to find some sign of dishonesty in my posts then I might as well have
> some fun, right?
I'm not obsessing over anything. I've proven YEARS ago what a piece of
elephant dung you are.
See obsessing would be posting to usenet THOUSANDS of posts a month.
Wow, that would take some kind of loser, eh Mikey? Woops. That would be
you! It's so much fun when the irony meter just twirls 'round and 'round
with every post you make.
Now, like I said, be a good little bitch and run along and troll some
other news group.
Snit
So sad that you lash out so much against me but cannot find a single post to
support your accusations.
No worries... you will slink back under a rock soon to lick your wounded
ego. Not like you have not played this exact same BS game in the past...
you lash out in anger and support of your little co-troll buddies... but
when you realize you cannot support your claims you suddenly find that your
burst of energy is short lived. You run away, tend to your wounds, and then
come back another day.
You just hope some day that your game will actually succeed in making me
upset ... or, even better yet, you hope to someday be able to prove your
accusations correct. That is why you and your co-trolls spend massive
amounts of time examining my every word back to 2004... hoping beyond hope
to find some shred of evidence against me.
And failing.
How pathetic.
--
Nothing in all the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and
conscientious stupidity. -- Martin Luther King, Jr.
Steve Mackay
Naah.
>
> No worries... you will slink back under a rock soon to lick your wounded
> ego.
Naah. Your entertainment value may diminish, and I'll stop replying to
your lies. But in no way, shape or form is that to be construed as
"slink back under a rock". But, you'll still claim victory. As empty as
it may be<shrug>
> Not like you have not played this exact same BS game in the past...
Naah.
> you lash out in anger and support of your little co-troll buddies...
Naah. I don't get angry at you Michael. You're not smart enough to make
me angry.
> but
> when you realize you cannot support your claims you suddenly find that your
> burst of energy is short lived.
Naah. I've already supported my claims Michael. Just because you try and
deny them, create smoke screens around them, and create conspiracy
theories to try and discredit them, doesn't mean they aren't true. What
a poor little bitch, you just can't stand the fact that you've been
proven to be such a cowardly little liar.
> You run away, tend to your wounds, and then
> come back another day.
Naah. I just lose interest in you. There is only so much entertainment
value a retarded little bitch like you has.
>
> You just hope some day that your game will actually succeed in making me
> upset ...
Naah, I don't care if you get upset Mikey. Besides, morally bankrupt
people like you tend not to get upset when shown their lies.
> or, even better yet, you hope to someday be able to prove your
> accusations correct.
Already have Mikey, already have. YEARS ago.
> That is why you and your co-trolls spend massive
> amounts of time examining my every word back to 2004...
Your every word? Heck mikey, I don't ever expect you to examine your
every word. I'm sure you'd have trouble recognizing all your sock
puppets, much less your every word.
> hoping beyond hope
> to find some shred of evidence against me.
I already have mikey. YEARS ago.
> And failing.
Naah.
> How pathetic.
Why yes, you are. Hence your 24/7/365 postings to Usenet for the past 5
years. You have no life. You're addicted to your lies on Usenet. You
just can't stop yourself. Usenet is your crack mikey. There is no
denying that. That is truly pathetic.
Now be a good little bitch and post lies to some other news group.
Snit
All that from you... accusations, denials, whining... and not a single
example to support your claims about me.
Yeah... you'll be slinking under a rock again soon... utterly humiliated.
But you will lick your wounds and come back. Maybe the next time your
co-trolls really make idiots of themselves and you want to help them change
the topic.
--
I can't say we will succeed at this, but we will make a significant attempt
to elevate the Linux desktop to the point where it is as good or better than
Apple.
- Mark Shuttleworth (founded Canonical Ltd. / Ubuntu Linux)
Steve Carroll
> Snit wrote:
> > "Steve Mackay" <mackay.st...@att.net> stated in post
> > b2pel.9379$hc1.3...@flpi150.ffdc.sbc.com on 1/23/09 12:37 PM:
>
(snip)
> Naah. I don't get angry at you Michael. You're not smart enough to make
> me angry.
>
Glasser needs to believe that people are pissed at him or that they
hate him or some such... anything is better than them laughing at his
hypocrisy, lies and assorted BS (which, as we know, is what all sane,
honest and honorable people do). Here's something that Snit will run
from... consider...
Snit has posted many negative things about Bush... regardless of what
any of us feels about Bush, these things are fact where Snit is
concerned:
1 - Snit has posted results of polls of people that opine about how
bad they feel Bush has been as a president.
2 - Snit has touted how 300+ lawyers have all opined how Bush has
broken this or that law... some have even given testimony in court.
Both of the above are based on opinions of people and their testimony
of what they think is true based on the facts as they believe them to
be.
It is also a fact that while embracing the above and pointing to it as
"evidence" or "support" for his many parroted arguments, Snit
simultaneously and hypocritically denies the opinions and testimony of
those in cola and csma that have all labeled him a liar, troll or
worse. If you want to watch him dance some more just ask him to
explain his blatant hypocrisy here.
My prediction (if you bother to bring this up with him): Snit will
avoid his hypocrisy while trying to refocus you on ANYTHING else. For
starters... if you even mention this Snit will automatically label you
as a Bush 'supporter' or 'defender' (he'll do ANYTHING to steer you
away from his hypocrisy) and he'll do about 9647 posts on that alone.
You just can't buy this kind of comedy;)
(snip)
> Why yes, you are. Hence your 24/7/365 postings to Usenet for the past 5
> years. You have no life. You're addicted to your lies on Usenet. You
> just can't stop yourself. Usenet is your crack mikey.
Michael Glasser's new home...
Steve Mackay
MULTIPLE examples given YEARS ago.
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/d7ce9da83186354f?dmode=source
And no mikey, your lies don't have an expiration date. Since you
foolishly try and pass yourself off as someone who is honest.
<snipage of Michael Glasser's usenet crack infested delusions>