Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: Perhaps the biggest lie ever told on this ng is...

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Rhino Plastee

unread,
Jan 11, 2009, 11:46:15 AM1/11/09
to
Snit wrote:
> "Rhino Plastee" <no...@nowhere.com> stated in post
> gkd6sg$8dq$1...@news.albasani.net on 1/11/09 9:31 AM:
>
>> Steve Carroll wrote:
>>> On Jan 10, 9:03 pm, "Randy MacPherson" <r...@todliopers.com> wrote:
>>>> "Steve Carroll" <fretw...@comcast.net> wrote in message
>>>>
>>>> news:c5aa3427-b097-4373...@t26g2000prh.googlegroups.com...>
>>>> "I do not focus on personalities over content".
>>>>
>>>>> Any guess as to who the author is of this lie?
>>>>
>>>>> ;)
>>>>
>>>> Does it really matter?
>>>
>>> Did you notice it was marked OT? I guess it must matter to you...
>>> you responded.
>>>
>>>> This is a Macintosh advocacy group, not the Jerry Springer show.
>>>>
>>>> How about taking the trash to private email and limiting
>>>> discussions to the
>>>> topic at hand?
>>>>
>>>> Is that asking too much?
>>>
>>> You're aware this isn't a moderated ng, right? Is it too much to
>>> ask for you to ignore what you seem to not want to read?
>>>
>>>> This goes for everyone.
>>>
>>> Perhaps it's escaped your attention...
>>>
>>> Fact: Snit has made it obvious that he doesn't wish to discuss
>>> things privately in email (as evidenced by ed's reply in this
>>> thread).
>
> Snit has made it clear not only that he does not want to discuss
> things with Steve Carroll in email, but does not want to listen to
> Steve's stupid ramblings in CSMA, COLA, ASAP, MD or any of the other
> forums Steve follows Snit around to spewing lies.
>
> Steve: get the hint. Your sick little obsession with me is not
> wanted.
>
>>> Fact: If you send Snit an email (I did so by accident recently) he
>>> quite likely will post it here and whine that he was contacted via
>>> email.
>
> You repeatedly emailed me. Not an accident. Well, unless you are a
> complete moron.
>
>>> Fact: Snit has pointed to his website on many occasions... but If
>>> you go to it he whines that you went to his website.
>
> Nope. I have noted how your claim to not visit my web site is a lie.
> I do not care who visits my sites.
>
>>> Fact: It's in csma that Snit does his dirty work, therefore, it's in
>>> csma that Snit should be confronted on it.
>
> And yet you cannot quote any of this "dirty work". Your best
> attempts are to dredge up debates from 2004 where you simply make a
> fool of yourself over and over.
>
>>> Snit is a hypocritical, lying, word weasel that is neither honest
>>> nor honorable. If you don't want to read about this I suggest you
>>> ignore/ killfile it.
>
> And yet you cannot find an example of a lie. Man, you must be
> incompetent!
>
>> Listen you fucking little twat, nobody gives a shit about much you
>> hate Snit.

In fifteen years plus of posting to Usenet I have never seen anyone so
fucked in the head and obsessed as Steve Carroll. Did his wife cheat on him
with you or something? Did you two know each other personally?


Snit

unread,
Jan 11, 2009, 11:54:51 AM1/11/09
to
"Rhino Plastee" <no...@nowhere.com> stated in post
gkd7op$9nk$1...@news.albasani.net on 1/11/09 9:46 AM:

Well, I never asked to be in his sick little love triangle, but years ago
(2004, the year he still lives in) he was cheating on his girlfriend with a
woman he bragged, publicly, that he could take 69 mile road trips to any
time he wanted. His girlfriend, who he sometimes called his wife though he
admitted he was not married, was - apparently - often out of the house... as
an airline stewardess or something.

This woman he was cheating with ended up obsessing over me... going so far
as to, when she found out my wife was pregnant, having a fit that I did not
include her in my family planning decisions. She also repeated things about
me from my work web site, tracked down the names of my neighbors, and even
repeated things said only in the *print* edition of my local paper.

When I showed no returned interest in her she threatened to call my local
police and make false reports about me (of course, admitting to that
publicly was stupid... and I showed the posts to my local police). She
ended up being asked to not post to CSMA for six months (or a year...
whatever). She complied and then posted a couple times... I did not
respond and she left.

Steve has not been able to let go of this... he is *still* freaking out. In
the meantime he claims he actually went and married his girlfriend. If he
did, I seriously feel very, very sorry for his wife.


--
"And so, in no sense, is stability a reason to move to a new version. It零
never a reason." - Bill Gates

Peter Köhlmann

unread,
Jan 11, 2009, 11:58:28 AM1/11/09
to
Rhino Plastee (Snot Michael Glasser) nymshifted:

< snip typical Michael Glasser idiocy >

Pray tell, dumbest POS imginable, why do you crosspost this bullshit to
half of usenet?
You are probably again shown in CSA what utterly dishonest lying asshole
you are, so you start your typical revenge threads in groups having
nothing to do with you POS
--
Law of Probable Dispersal:
Whatever it is that hits the fan will not be evenly distributed.

Rhino Plastee

unread,
Jan 11, 2009, 11:59:09 AM1/11/09
to

Want to get rid of this shit head? Call his wife and talk to her about his
crap. Better yet, print some of his posts and mail them to her. Certified
mail so the shit stain does not hide them from her.


Don Zeigler

unread,
Jan 11, 2009, 12:01:02 PM1/11/09
to
Rhino Plastee wrote:

> Want to get rid of this shit head? Call his wife and talk to her about his
> crap. Better yet, print some of his posts and mail them to her. Certified
> mail so the shit stain does not hide them from her.

Talking to yourself again, Michael? I guess you have no choice, since you have
no friends and your wife isn't speaking to your lazy ass.

--
Average landing party: Kirk, McCoy, Spock and Ensign Monsterbait.

Regards,
[dmz]

Owner and proprietor, Trollus Amongus, LLC

Don Zeigler

unread,
Jan 11, 2009, 12:02:25 PM1/11/09
to
Snit wrote:

> This woman he was cheating with ended up obsessing over me

Sure, Michael, sure.

Women just love men with ponytails and girlish voices.
--
IBM -- Inferior But Marketable.

Snit

unread,
Jan 11, 2009, 12:04:20 PM1/11/09
to
"Peter Köhlmann" <peter.k...@arcor.de> stated in post
496a2534$0$31333$9b4e...@newsspool4.arcor-online.net on 1/11/09 9:58 AM:

> Rhino Plastee (Snot Michael Glasser) nymshifted:
>
> < snip typical Michael Glasser idiocy >
>
> Pray tell, dumbest POS imginable, why do you crosspost this bullshit to
> half of usenet?
> You are probably again shown in CSA what utterly dishonest lying asshole
> you are, so you start your typical revenge threads in groups having
> nothing to do with you POS

Gee, Peter, I point out how you made a fool of yourself in talking about
GIMP and Photoshop and you freak out:

Snit:
What about all the other stuff Photoshop does that Gimp does
not? Layer sets, adjustment layers, smart filters, even 3D
stuff now.

Peter Köhlmann, proving he has no idea what those even are:
Nevermind that Gimp has layers since years And one naturally
has to ignore totally that Gimp has quite an impressive array
of filters

PS: I am not the one who cross posted... other than to respond to posts that
were cross posted. Learn to read headers.


--
I don't know the key to success, but the key to failure is to try to please
everyone. -- Bill Cosby

Snit

unread,
Jan 11, 2009, 12:04:59 PM1/11/09
to
"Rhino Plastee" <no...@nowhere.com> stated in post
gkd8gu$b0o$1...@news.albasani.net on 1/11/09 9:59 AM:

...

I have no idea who his wife is or even if she really exists. Even if I did,
I have no desire to take things out of Usenet. Steve, though, is so scared
that I might contact her he deluded himself into thinking I had... or at
least publically accused me of doing so.

The problem with living as Steve does is he is in constant fear his wife, if
she exists, will find out about his past. There is no doubt he would not be
open about it.


--
Dear Aunt, let's set so double the killer delete select all

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1123221217782777472

Snit

unread,
Jan 11, 2009, 12:06:01 PM1/11/09
to
"Don Zeigler" <sit...@this.computer> stated in post
20090111170224...@this.domain.or.that on 1/11/09 10:02 AM:

> Snit wrote:
>
>> This woman he was cheating with ended up obsessing over me
>
> Sure, Michael, sure.
>
> Women just love men with ponytails and girlish voices.

You sure beg for my attention a lot.


--
"For example, user interfaces are _usually_ better in commercial software.
I'm not saying that this is always true, but in many cases the user
interface to a program is the most important part for a commercial
company..." Linus Torvalds <http://www.tlug.jp/docs/linus.html>

Snit

unread,
Jan 11, 2009, 12:06:07 PM1/11/09
to
"Don Zeigler" <sit...@this.computer> stated in post
20090111170101...@this.domain.or.that on 1/11/09 10:01 AM:

> Rhino Plastee wrote:
>
>> Want to get rid of this shit head? Call his wife and talk to her about his
>> crap. Better yet, print some of his posts and mail them to her. Certified
>> mail so the shit stain does not hide them from her.
>
> Talking to yourself again, Michael? I guess you have no choice, since you have
> no friends and your wife isn't speaking to your lazy ass.

You sure beg for my attention a lot.


--

William Poaster

unread,
Jan 12, 2009, 7:00:48 AM1/12/09
to
On Sun, 11 Jan 2009 17:01:02 +0000, Don Zeigler wrote:

> Rhino Plastee wrote:
>
>> Want to get rid of this shit head? Call his wife and talk to her about his
>> crap. Better yet, print some of his posts and mail them to her. Certified
>> mail so the shit stain does not hide them from her.
>
> Talking to yourself again, Michael? I guess you have no choice, since you have
> no friends and your wife isn't speaking to your lazy ass.

Seems that Micheal Snit Glasser is also advocating blackmail again,
through one of his socks. Oh, what a surprise.

Peter Köhlmann

unread,
Jan 12, 2009, 7:10:00 AM1/12/09
to
William Poaster wrote:

What would Snot Michael Glasser say if *his* "endeavours" in COLA and CSMA
are printed out and then the parcel (a letter would not hold 1% of his
shit) is sent to *his* wife?

Would she still be willing to support him then? After all, letting him make
worthless "videos" to keep him off the customers isn't working all too
well, as we can see day in and out
--
We may not return the affection of those who like us,
but we always respect their good judgement.

William Poaster

unread,
Jan 12, 2009, 7:36:52 AM1/12/09
to

I imagine the Prescott Computer Guy hadn't thought of *that* one!
(We now await denials & frothing from Michael Snit Glasser)

Snit

unread,
Jan 12, 2009, 11:13:34 AM1/12/09
to
"William Poaster" <w...@ubuntu-hardy64.org> stated in post
pan.2009.01.12....@ubuntu-hardy64.org on 1/12/09 5:00 AM:

You sure beg for my attention a lot.


--
Try not to become a man of success, but rather try to become a man of value.
--Albert Einstein

Snit

unread,
Jan 12, 2009, 11:13:47 AM1/12/09
to
"Peter Köhlmann" <peter.k...@arcor.de> stated in post
496b3318$0$30234$9b4e...@newsspool1.arcor-online.net on 1/12/09 5:10 AM:

You sure beg for my attention a lot.


--
When I'm working on a problem, I never think about beauty. I think only how
to solve the problem. But when I have finished, if the solution is not
beautiful, I know it is wrong. -- R. Buckminster Fuller

Snit

unread,
Jan 12, 2009, 11:21:31 AM1/12/09
to
"William Poaster" <w...@ubuntu-hardy64.org> stated in post
pan.2009.01.12....@ubuntu-hardy64.org on 1/12/09 5:36 AM:

You sure beg for my attention a lot.


--
Teachers open the door but you must walk through it yourself.

Hadron

unread,
Jan 12, 2009, 11:42:26 AM1/12/09
to
Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> writes:

They really are three nasty pieces of work.

--
"Of course, by the time Gnash gets its act together, we'll
probably all have to start all over again with Silverlight
(or Moonlight)."
-- The Ghost In The Machine <ew...@sirius.tg00suus7038.net> in comp.os.linux.advocacy

Snit

unread,
Jan 12, 2009, 12:48:34 PM1/12/09
to
"Hadron" <hadro...@gmail.com> stated in post
gkfrtm$aam$1...@hadronquark.motzarella.org on 1/12/09 9:42 AM:

They are *desperate* to get some attention. No desire to make a point or
to be accurate or to be honorable... just little kids begging for attention.


--
I can't say we will succeed at this, but we will make a significant attempt
to elevate the Linux desktop to the point where it is as good or better than
Apple.
- Mark Shuttleworth (founded Canonical Ltd. / Ubuntu Linux)

Don Zeigler

unread,
Jan 12, 2009, 5:54:14 PM1/12/09
to
Snit wrote:

> They are *desperate* to get some attention. No desire to make a point or
> to be accurate or to be honorable... just little kids begging for attention.
>

Said the guy who revives threads from month or years ago, crossposts them to
non-relevant groups, and often posts the same exact thing dozens of times.

--
Just as easy as 3.141592653589793238462643383279502884197169

William Poaster

unread,
Jan 12, 2009, 6:09:40 PM1/12/09
to
On Mon, 12 Jan 2009 22:54:14 +0000, Don Zeigler wrote:

> Snit wrote:
>
>> They are *desperate* to get some attention. No desire to make a point
>> or to be accurate or to be honorable... just little kids begging for
>> attention.
>>
> Said the guy who revives threads from month or years ago, crossposts them
> to non-relevant groups, and often posts the same exact thing dozens of
> times.

Well I for one am certainly *not* desperate for some attention from a
blackmailer like Michael Snit Glasser. If I was, I wouldn't have the twat
killfiled.

Funny how the troll keeps mentioning being "honorable" too. As if a
blackmailer would know what it means.

--
No room for the horrors
of Micro$oft here!
-- Stephen Fry - Room 101 --

Snit

unread,
Jan 12, 2009, 8:14:24 PM1/12/09
to
"William Poaster" <w...@ubuntu-intrepid.eu> stated in post
pan.2009.01.12....@ubuntu-intrepid.eu on 1/12/09 4:09 PM:

> On Mon, 12 Jan 2009 22:54:14 +0000, Don Zeigler wrote:
>
>> Snit wrote:
>>
>>> They are *desperate* to get some attention. No desire to make a point
>>> or to be accurate or to be honorable... just little kids begging for
>>> attention.
>>>
>> Said the guy who revives threads from month or years ago, crossposts them
>> to non-relevant groups, and often posts the same exact thing dozens of
>> times.
>
> Well I for one am certainly *not* desperate for some attention from a
> blackmailer like Michael Snit Glasser. If I was, I wouldn't have the twat
> killfiled.
>
> Funny how the troll keeps mentioning being "honorable" too. As if a
> blackmailer would know what it means.

You sure beg for my attention a lot.


Snit

unread,
Jan 12, 2009, 8:14:46 PM1/12/09
to
"Don Zeigler" <sit...@this.computer> stated in post
20090112225412...@this.domain.or.that on 1/12/09 3:54 PM:

> Snit wrote:
>
>> They are *desperate* to get some attention. No desire to make a point or
>> to be accurate or to be honorable... just little kids begging for attention.
>>
> Said the guy who revives threads from month or years ago, crossposts them to
> non-relevant groups, and often posts the same exact thing dozens of times.

You sure beg for my attention a lot.


--
Look, this is silly. It's not an argument, it's an armor plated walrus with
walnut paneling and an all leather interior.

0 new messages