Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.

Dismiss

The Nizkor Project Deals in Forged Documents and Smear Financed With Exempt Donations aka Re: COLORADO WOMAN FRIGHTENS SCOTT "bellville blimp" BRADBURY OUT OF HIS WITS

6 views

Skip to first unread message

Fred Rutherford

unread,

Jun 25, 2005, 4:23:33 PM6/25/05

On Sat, 25 Jun 2005 17:27:18 -0000, <11br4vm...@corp.supernews.com>
kmc...@shell.vex.net (Kenneth McVay OBC) wrote:

Has everyone notice how the director of The Nizkor Project based in British
Columbia Canada acts? If Ken McVay will repeatedly cite manufactured evidence
from a recent failed lawsuit against me why should he be trusted with documents
allegedly sixty years old? Why would anyone want to donate any money to a person
who runs his Nizkor Project in such a manner?

>In article <g23rb154fu7f8k5mc...@4ax.com>,
>Curiosityoffendsidiots <curio...@rock.com> wrote:
>
>[Bellville Blimp flushed down the bradbury]
>
>>Sir, you've spread your canine tracks across six newsgroups. Don't you
>>think it's about time to return to your kennel and cease with this
>>panting pursuit of Patrick?
>
>The SPCA threw him out - they couldn't find a kennel large enough to hold the morbidly
>obese inbred mongrel.
>
>Archive/File: people/b/bradbury.scott/Edeiken-v-Bradbury.C1
>Last-Modified: 2001/02/15

I am glad to see you prove that you deal in forgeries McVay and perhaps people
will wise up and your funding dribble to naught!

Here are some examples of McVay having forgeries at his web site:

> 24. That on December 5, 1998, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
>electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
>"You only want to blow Joe
>You want to suck Joe's Aryan cock, don't you Yale?
> Doc Tavish"
> Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
>hereof as Exhibit "A-1."

PROOF THE ABOVE SWORN STATEMENT IS PERJURED:

http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.flame.niggers/msg/a1fc86b713a7d8a7?q=&rnum=1
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.flame.niggers/msg/a1fc86b713a7d8a7?dmode=source
(Archived locally as: A-1Not1 and A-1Not2)
From: earlt...@my-dejanews.com
Subject: Re: Vapor, Fatelvis, Bull Conner & B9Predator. Prepare for the worst.
Date: 1999/01/08
Message-ID: <12018016...@unribbed.net>#1/1
X-Trace: news.rdc1.ct.home.com 915759892 24.65.203.77
(Thu, 07 Jan 1999 17:44:52 PDT)
Organization: @Home Network Canada
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 07 Jan 1999 17:44:52 PDT
Newsgroups: soc.culture.african.american,alt.flame.niggers
X-Complaints-To: ab...@home.net

> From: ya...@enter.net (Yale F. Edeiken)
> Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
> Subject: Re: PIN JOE DOWN AND SUCK HIS COCK
> > Isn't strange that Yale has only two little harmless posts to offer
> >in his insane attempts to slander?
>
> If they are harmless why are your associates so upset. Indeed you
> admit that. If they were "harmless" they could not be "slander" (they
> aren't, of course).
>
> > REMEMBER: THEY ONLY SMEAR THE ONES THEY FEAR.
>
> But I neither fear you or smear you.

you only want to blow joe

you want to suck joes aryan cock dont you yale

~~End of Exact GOOGLE Archive~~

Not sent by me, not signed "Doc Tavish" and it's from a regular ISP too!
That is perjury submitting falsified evidence!

> 31 That on December 6, 1998, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
>electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
>
> "So why do you still want to suck his cock?
>Do you think you'll become a man by ingesting his manhood?
>
> Doc Tavish"

PROOF THE ABOVE SWORN STATEMENT IS PERJURED:

http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.skinheads/msg/8e41a2016f1d1527?output=gplain
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.skinheads/msg/8e41a2016f1d1527?dmode=source
(Archived locally as: A-7Not1 and A-7Not2)
From: Laz <hell...@home.com>
Subject: I'm targeted for what? damn.
Date: 1999/01/05
Message-ID: <09018018...@hexer.org>#1/1
X-Trace: news.rdc1.ct.home.com 915502345 24.2.101.226 (Mon, 04 Jan 1999 18:12:25
PDT)
Organization: @Home Network
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 04 Jan 1999 18:12:25 PDT
Newsgroups: alt.skinheads
X-Complaints-To: ab...@home.net

> It is now 8 days since this lying nazi bragged that he would have my
> service with enter.net discontinued.
>
> My e-mail address is still ya...@enter.net,
>
> He is still a nazi.
>
> He is still a liar.
>
> He is still a punk.
>
>
> --YFE

so why do you still want to suck his cock

do you think you'll become a man by ingesting his manhood

~~End of Exact GOOGLE Archive~~

Yale got the author and date wrong too and the post was not signed
Doc Tavish as he claimed in his perjured statement. I also never had
an account at the regular ISP used either! CRIMINAL PERJURY!!!

> 34 That on December 8, 1998, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
>electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
>
>All Nizkooks need to be apprehended, interrogated, and placed in protective
>custody until a final solution can be made.
>
> Doc Tavish"
>
> Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
>hereof as Exhibit "A11."

PROOF THE ABOVE SWORN STATEMENT IS PERJURED:

http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.newsangels/msg/83b3e74bd83a5500?output=gplain
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.newsangels/msg/83b3e74bd83a5500?dmode=source
(Archived locally as: A-11Not1 and A-11Not2)
From: Pee Kitty <Pki...@mariner.cris.com>
Subject: Re: Furmanski is lame
Date: 1998/12/20
Message-ID:
<84C06A88F1507F28.B631F6D1...@library-proxy.airnews.net>
X-Orig-Message-ID: <20129820...@grinding.net>
NNTP-Posting-Time: Sun Dec 20 21:15:30 1998
Organization: Digital Highway (using Airnews.net!)
NNTP-Proxy-Relay: library3
Abuse-Reports-To: abuse at dhc.net to report improper postings
Newsgroups: alt.slack,alt.newsangels

> From: ya...@enter.net (Yale F. Edeiken)
> Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
> Subject: Re: Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Nizkook Band
> References: <19981207212932...@ng-cb1.aol.com>
> X-Newsreader: SPRY News 3.03 (SPRY, Inc.)
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 204.170.16.148
> X-NNTP-Posting-Host: 204.170.16.148
> Message-ID: <366ca...@news3.enter.net>
> Date: 7 Dec 1998 22:57:39 +0500

all nizkooks need to be apprehended, interrogated, and placed in protective
custody until a final solution can be made

~~End of Exact GOOGLE Archive~~

Here is the pinnacle example of lying and manufacturing of evidence by Shyster
Yale F. Edeiken who abuses the legal system and brings shame to LeHigh County
Pennsylvania. Count all the lies and idiotic assertions Yale F. Edeiken makes
in the following masterpiece of criminal felonious perjury. All of this is the
same material The Nizkor Project carries at its web site. If The Nizkor Project
will foist these forgeries off as authentic then how can the have any
credibility with documents from World War Two?

> 39 That on November 11, 1999, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
>electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
>
>"You are just as much of a filthy little cock sucker vermin as your butt
>buddy Jeff Brown. You have to rely on out of context quotes and character
>assassination. It would be a pleasure to see someone slowly work you over
>with an ice pick Yale!"
>
> --digsig
> Authentic Doc Tavish
>
> 191xllxyGtVQwy0mtCiBjivyX+knCUXYwdRt ptdrtqb
> qfQbXQtisWlB/E1+yWkYkw1Wr7mGiAFcJ w6Wl/aU
> 4GEbQtlQOHN/G3asOLBC9JmQXWuqXwj BnPCuOV9cd
>
> Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
>hereof as Exhibit "A-16."

Positive proof 100% that the Plaintiff willfully and most maliciously lied to a
civil court with the above accusation:

Xref:
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/311c0e402a65a351?output=gplain
Message-ID: <d0ic0v81gdhrd1djq...@4ax.com>

39 That on November 11, 1999, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
electronic communication stating in pertinent part:

"You are just as much of a filthy little cock sucker vermin as your butt
buddy Jeff Brown. You have to rely on out of context quotes and character
assassination. It would be a pleasure to see someone slowly work you over
with an ice pick Yale!"

--digsig
Authentic Doc Tavish

191xllxyGtVQwy0mtCiBjivyX+knCUXYwdRt ptdrtqb
qfQbXQtisWlB/E1+yWkYkw1Wr7mGiAFcJ w6Wl/aU
4GEbQtlQOHN/G3asOLBC9JmQXWuqXwj BnPCuOV9cd

Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
hereof as Exhibit "A-16."

Respectfully submitted,
________________________
Yale F. Edeiken

<end>

Notice what was said in an anonymous post (shown just below) and the date of the
post and compare it to what Yale F. Edeiken charges just above! Remember Yale
claimed I e-mailed the above to him and he claimed I signed it and had my
digital signature and this was done in a sworn document admitted to a civil
court of law!

http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.politics.white-power/msg/6143fb6ca32f003c
(Archived locally as: AnonIcePick1 and AnonIcePick2)
From: Anonymous (nob...@openpgp.net)
Subject: Re: Joe Bellinger, Proven Liar
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power
Date: 1999/02/17

> > >>It is thus established that:
> > >>
> > >> - Joe Bellinger stated that he does, in fact, "post deliberate
> > >>misinformation".
> > >> - Joe Bellinger denied having made said statement.
> > >> - Joe Bellinger is, therefore, a liar.
> > >>
> > >>To coin a phrase: GAME, SET, MATCH.
> > >Did anyone expect any different result?
> > LOL! For grown men, you are all so childish.
:
> Expecting some minimal level of honesty -- a low standard which
> you seem incapable of meeting -- is hardly "childish."
>
> It frightens me that, with attitudes like this, you are raising a
> child.
>
> In article <19990112213243...@ng31.aol.com>,
> deb...@aol.com
> (Debunks) wrote: "I post deliberate misinformation . . ."
>
> --YFE

You are just as much of a filthy little cock sucker vermin as your butt
buddy Jeff Brown. You have to rely on out of context quotes and character
assassination. It would be a pleasure to see someone slowly work you over
with an ice pick Yale!

~~End of GOOGLE aka DejaCom Archive~~

Notice the above was an anonymous post. It was not an e-mail and notice that it
had no digital signature signed by me! Also notice the big difference in dates
the above was posted February 17, 1999 yet Yale accuses me: "That on November
11, 1999, Defendant sent Plaintiff an electronic communication stating in
pertinent part (the above EXACT quoted text)"

Witness this:

http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/c022726f9fda38eb
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 22:07:41 -0600
Message-ID: <osjdbt41kq8ov7moq...@4ax.com>

http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy/msg/1cfabc9c7a7dd17e
(Archived locally as: LibelousPerjury)
From: kmc...@veritas.nizkor.org (Kenneth McVay, OBC)
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism,soc.culture.jewish,alt.conspiracy
Subject: "ALL FACTS IN THE COMPLAINT ... ARE DEEMED ADMITTED."
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 05:00:19 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: The Nizkor Project, http://www.nizkor.org/
Message-ID: <96fnp3$2bar$1...@news.tht.net>

Archive/File: people/b/bradbury.scott/Edeiken-v-Bradbury.C1
Last-Modified: 2001/02/14

--digsig
Authentic Doc Tavish

191xllxyGtVQwy0mtCiBjivyX+knCUXYwdRt ptdrtqb
qfQbXQtisWlB/E1+yWkYkw1Wr7mGiAFcJ w6Wl/aU
4GEbQtlQOHN/G3asOLBC9JmQXWuqXwj BnPCuOV9cd

Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
hereof as Exhibit "A-16."

<stop>

Crypto Kong does not insert blank lines in between "Authentic Doc Tavish"
and the crypto-text as confirmed by the software's author to both myself
and my attorney!

Here is the official reply to my inquiry:

X-Sender: jam...@shell11.ba.best.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 08:51:20 -0800
To: Scott Bradbury <xx...@flash.net>
From: "James A. Donald"
Subject: Re: Inquiry on Crypto-Kong Signatures
Cc: "Daylin B. Leach - Attorney at Law" <xxx...@aol.com>

--
At 0412 AM 2/23/2001 -0600, Scott Bradbury wrote
> The above forged digital signataure is verbatim and is exactly which was
> presented to the court.

To be presented to the court, it must be alleged to have signed
something. A digital signature without the text that it signed is of no
significance.

(Note: I did not include Yale's fabricated e-mail- I just sent Mr. Donald
the forged digital signature.)

> The digsig also has a blank line in between "Authentic Doc
> Tavish" and the bogus crypto-text. Your software does not do this in
> ANY example I've ever seen.

That is perfectly true. My program does not emit such blank lines, which
suggest fabrication, but not strong evidence of anything much, since the
blank line could have arisen from various accidents in transferring text
from one program to another.

> I do this for the benefit of my attorney. -)

--digsig
James A. Donald
6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG
GnwV4rmsIA8faEZwt0YOXUiSSJflZjiLd/kTrWIn
4F1jg73LTqhfLPw9BVz2uDGwa7v2WYBG0wNGHSkoM

<END>

--
As for Mr. Donald's statement: "the blank line could have arisen from
various accidents in transferring text from one program to another"-
the above fabricated signature from Edeiken's complaint is verbatim in the
group of false accusations known as "ALL FACTS IN THE COMPLAINT ... ARE
DEEMED ADMITTED." Notice Mr. Donald's digsig? No spaces and blank lines!
Notice my digsig made on this paragraph alone?

--digsig
Authentic Doc Tavish
Chyeer+xvAMg6mRtq2niuMN+bMnEkGsy0ShVPm2xATn
ejnWmIh1JCyv0DNQedTMFE/cAfXBLuqdxSAkk9w/
4O0CysIswhm2G04W2mJFeW7C7K5RHQkNr3oFBzH6X

NO BLANK LINES AND SPACES!

What are the penalties for submitting manufactured evidence?

[...]

Here is Yale making his false accusation in public forum:

http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/96a78cfbc2f2fdb5
(Archived locally as: YalesLies)
Subject: Yale's Anonymous Post Signed By Me?! What an Oaf! aka Re: Bradbury
Caught in a Psychotic Delusional Rage
Date: 2000/05/16
Message-ID: <3920d160....@news.flash.net>

On Tue, 16 May 2000 04:12:22 GMT, "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
<GU3U4.3347$v%5.24...@newshog.newsread.com> wrote:
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/ffe37666e47d760a
(Archived locally as: YaleLied1 and YaleLied2)
>Doc Tavish <doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com> wrote in message
>news:3920c22c....@news.flash.net...

[...]

>> > Perhaps you should ask your shrink about people who write anonumus
>> >notes to others like:
>> >
>> > " You are just as much of a filthy little cock sucker vermin as your
>> >butt buddy Jeff Brown. You have to rely on out of context quotes and
>> >character assassination. It would be a pleasure to see someone slowly
>> >work you over with an ice pick Yale!"
>> The above is just exactly what you said it is Yale, "anonumus" your word!
>> Just because you are a paranoid and have a psychotic dislike of me does
>> not mean every thing you imagine comes from me.
:
> It came from you

Then why didn't you show the headers which would show so Yale?

>and was signed by you.

Then why didn't you show my signature? If I signed it and it was from me
as you claim why do you call it "anonumus"? It would not be so if were
truly from me as headers would show and it actually had my signature!

What did you say in just another post about the "e-mail" above Yale? Your
own words again: "Perhaps you should ask your shrink about people who
write anonumus notes to others like:" It's ANONYMOUS Yale! You've said so!

http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/8762ffcf9b7919f4
(Archived locally as: Nradbury1 and Nradbury2)
From: "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
Subject: Re: Nradbury Goes Off the Deep End
Date: 2000/05/16
Message-ID: <Ms1U4.3324$v%5.23...@newshog.newsread.com>

(Exact quote for the record)

" I think you need a good psychiatirc examination. Perhaps you should ask
your shrink about people who write anonumus notes to others like: " You
are just as much of a filthy little cock sucker vermin as your butt buddy
Jeff Brown. You have to rely on out of context quotes and character
assassination. It would be a pleasure to see someone slowly work you over
with an ice pick Yale!""

No headers and no signature.

I guess the above is fair proof that Yale likes to forge e-mail even if it
is in his word "anonumus."

>> Your failure to do the same is noted. And will be by the judge.
>> --YFE

~~End of GOOGLE Archive Excerpt (With updated GOOGLE links)~~

PERJURY!! How can the above examples not be criminal fabrications and perjury in
light of all the documented proof?

>IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LEHIGH COUNTY
>
>CIVIL DIVISION -- LAW
>
>YALE F. EDEIKEN :
> :
>Plaintiff :
> :
>vs. : No. 99-C- 2786
> :
>
>SCOTT BRADBURY a/k/a :
>"DOC TAVISH" a/k/a :
>"doc_t...@bigfoot.com" a/k/a :
>"sonnyboy@ flash.net" :

What Ken McVay also won't tell you:

That kook lawsuit against me was DISMISSED long ago!

CLERK OF COURTS OF LEHIGH COUNTY - CIVIL DIVISION
Lehigh County Courthouse
455 W. Hamilton Street
Allentown, PA 18101-1614
RE: Edeiken Vs Bradbury 1999-C-2786

Partial text of letter from Judge Reibman:

<START>

Copies of this order were mailed to all counsel of record and pro se litigants.
CC: Counsel for Plaintiff (Yale F. Edeiken): Yale F. Edeiken Esq.
Counsel for Defendant (Scott Bradbury) : Daylin B. Leach Esq.
ORDER
AND NOW, this 12th day of June, 2001, upon consideration of Defendant's
Petition for Relief from Judgment, filed on September 22, 2000,
Plaintiff's response thereto, and argument thereon on February 7, 2001,
IT IS ORDERED said petition is GRANTED, and the case is DISMISSED.

[...]

BY THE COURT:
(Signed) Edward J. Reibman, J.

<STOP>

<START>

September 26, 2001

Yale F. Edeiken
918 N Bayard Street
Allentown, PA 18104-3759
RE: Yale F. Edeiken, Appellant v. Scott Bradbury et al
1714 EDA 2001
Dear Mr. Edeiken:
This is to advise that the attached Order has been entered in the
above- captioned matters.
A Certified Copy of this Order together with the record will be
sent to the Prothonotary of Lehigh County in due course.

Very truly yours,

(Signed)
David A. Szewczak
Prothonotary
DAS/dag
Attachment
CC: Daylin B. Leach, Esquire
Scott Bradbury
Honorable Edward D. Reibman

The Attachment:

<Start>
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Eastern District Office

Yale F. Edeiken APPELLANT No. 1714 EDA 2001
V.
Scott Bradbury Et Al C.P. Civil Lehigh County
99-C-2786
ORDER
AND NOW, this 26th day of September, 2001, the within
appeal is DISMISSED for failure to file a brief."
PER CURIAM

<STOP>

And Sara Salzman does not scare me. Get her associate to re-file his lawsuit in
my jurisdiction and bring her along as his star witness and with her affidavit.
So far my offer has been declined so who is scared of who?

http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/d6444c67c90149a8
Subject: Why Does Sara Salzman Keep Evading The Real Reason Yale F. Edeiken Went
Into Hiding? aka Re: BLTN: Bradbury Lacking Twin Neurons
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 18:55:58 -0600
Message-ID: <sub721pbd4euqkjf1...@4ax.com>

http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/258e40f26884769f
Subject: Sara Salzman Won't Comment on These Forgeries - I Wonder Why!.. V2.0
Message-ID: <0neq10177ekocu899...@4ax.com>
Date: 1 Feb 2004 18:21:27 GMT

> Xxxxx Xxxxxx

Seeing how where I live keeps being brought up I will post where the unethical
and Publicly Censured attorney lives who made the info public in the 1st place:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I am being harassed by having my confidential information being posted along
with death threats, forged child porn ads being posted which give out my address
etc., having phoney sex offender lists posted which give out my address, having
magazine and catalog subscriptions forged in my identity etc. I am also being
stalked by psychotics such as Patrick Lee Humphrey. FOR A FACT it was Yale F.
Edeiken and Yale F. Edeiken alone who subpoenaed my confidential info from my
ISP and made the subpoenaed info public-- now let him receive justice under the
Law of Moses:
Just as has been done to me and is still being done to me and solely because
of Yale F. Edeiken exclusively I will apply the LAW he claims to observe to him:
Leviticus 24:19-20 :: New International Version (NIV)
19 If anyone injures his neighbor, whatever he has done must be done to him:
20 fracture for fracture, eye for eye, tooth for tooth. As he has injured the
other, so he is to be injured.
YALE F. EDEIKEN
885 COLD SPRING ROAD; APARTMENT 2
ALLENTOWN, PA 18103
610-435-9820
<Source: Pennsylvania State Attorney Registration>
If Yale does not like getting back in kind what he has dished out then he
should encourage his THUG allies to stop harassing me and invading my privacy!
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--->Yale F. Edeiken also abused the legal system by issuing a forged subpoena on
my ISP to get my identity, address, and telephone number which Ken McVay and the
rest of his thugs use illicitly. Distributing confidential subpoenaed
information is a felony and especially so when it was with a subpoena which was
not registered or issued by the court! For a fact the subpoena does not appear
on the court docket and for a fact Yale F. Edeiken denied doing so until I got
my ISP (Flash.net) to confess and send me a copy!!

http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.politics.nationalism.white/msg/66bfff2ad1c73c7b
(Archived locally as: YaleSubpoenaLie_C and YaleSubpoenaLie_D)
From: "Yale F. Edeiken" <y...@enter.net>
Subject: Re: --->Violation of USC Title 18, Chapter 13, Section 241?-- Edeiken's
Legal Troubles Deepen<---
Date: 2000/04/08
Message-ID: <b5JH4.301$%L6.2...@monger.newsread.com>#1/1

Defendant Bradbury <sonny...@flash.net> wrote in message
news:8cnap...@news2.newsguy.com...

> ((Tavish comment April 8, 2000-- Notice Yale denied "posting"
> my personal information however he did NOT deny getting it from
> my ISP (Flash Net) using his power of attorney! Very vital!))

Then I do so now.

~~End of GOOGLE Archival Excerpt~~

http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.politics.nationalism.white/msg/fc8982c1a3caec6f?output=gplain
(Archived locally as: YaleSubpoenaLie_A and YaleSubpoenaLie_B)
Subject: Bradbury Explains How He Made an Ass of Himself
Date: 04/06/2000
Author: Yale F. Edeiken <ya...@enter.net>
Message-ID: <x68H4.58$3r3....@monger.newsread.com>

> You maintain that you got my information from public domain--

That's a lie. I said it was in the public domain.

<<Tavish Comment March 1, 2005: That is a lie. Yale never turned the subpoena
over to make it public domain and the proof he did not turn it over is that it
does not appear on the docket!! IOW Yale used his power of an attorney
criminally to deny me my right to privacy!!>>

> you will be given the chance soon to tell how you got my otherwise unobtainable
> info from any other source than by intimidating my ISP to surrender it to you.
> Flash Net of Dallas Texas has been requested to answer as to whether or not you
> used your power of attorney to obtain otherwise not obtainable information.

<<Tavish Comment March 1, 2005: For a fact Yale F. Edeiken badgered my ISP and
threatened to sue them numerous times if they wouldn't turn over my confidential
information. Flash.net attorney Matthew Terrell told Edeiken finally they would
only do so if a subpoena was served. Proof on file.>>

Nope. I won't.

~~End of GOOGLE Archive~~

The "subpoena" was plain looking and looked home made and here is the text it
contained:

Flash Net Communications
File number 99-C-2786
Yale F. Edeiken Vs Scott Bradbury aka sonn...@flash.net
demanding: "(1) Application for services and all other written materials
including e-mails, complaints or memoranda of internal investigation of
sonn...@flash.net"
This subpoena was issued at the request of the following person:
Yale F. Edeiken, Allentown, PA 18104 Supreme Court ID# 40290
Issued November 30, 1999
Yale F. Edeiken, 918 North Bayard Street, Allentown, PA 18104
<end/quote>

The return address given was not the court but Yale's own residence at the time!
If that subpoena was legal and legit by being issued from the court it would be
on the court docket of the court clerk!

Clerk Civil Court
Lehigh County Court House
Room 202
4555 West Hamilton Street
Allentown, Pennsylvania 18101-1614
and "Request Docket Printout for Edeiken Vs Bradbury 1999-C-2786
and you will see for yourself among the following:
03-Nov-1999 PRAE FOR SUMMONS
17-Dec-1999 PRAE TO REISSUE WRIT OF SUMMONS
06-Jan-2000 SHRF RTN SUMMONS... DELIVERY DATE 30-Dec-1999
[...]
25-Apr-2000 Y F Edeiken ESQ's NOTICE OF INTENT TO SERVE SUBPOENA..
To SouthWestern Bell
---------------------
First court issued and documented subpoena being issued was April 25, 2000.
No entry is made for the subpoena issued on Flash Net on November 30, 1999!
Why would this be? It does exp;lain why Yale lied about serving one on Falsh.Net
twice doesn't it? He thought I would never find out! Anyone can get a copy of
that docket for $3.00 and see for themselves!

Here is Yale F. Edeiken whose word The Nizkor Project accepts as fact lying
about his unethical activity:

http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=3870...@news3.enter.net&lr=&hl=en
Archived locally as: YaleSuedTwice
From: "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
Subject: KOOK WEBSITE
Date: 2000/01/02
Message-ID: <3870...@news3.enter.net>
"I have never been charged with any unethical activity relating to the
practice of law..."

IS THAT SO? Here you are caught lying once again Yale:

http://padisciplinaryboard.org/attdiscdcd.php?id=40290
(Link active October 29, 2003. Archived locally as: shyster_censured)
Attorney ID - 40290
Edeiken, Yale F.
^^^^^^^ ^^^^ ^
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Attorney Inquiry
Attorney ID Case County District
40290 122 DB 95 Lehigh II Public Censure Administered 10/20/98

BEFORE THE DISCIPLINARY BOARD OF THE
SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 403, Disciplinary Docket No.3
Petitioner :
: No. 122DB1995
v. :
:
Attorney Registration No. 40290 :
Yale F. Edeiken Esq., :
885 COLD SPRING ROAD; APARTMENT 2 :
ALLENTOWN, PA 18103 :
610-435-9820 :
Respondent : Lehigh County

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE DISCIPLINARY BOARD OF
THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

TO THE HONORABLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND JUSTICES
OF THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA:

Pursuant to Rule 208( d)(2)(iii) of the Pennsylvania Rules of
Disciplinary Enforcement, The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of
Pennsylvania ("Board") herewith submits its findings and recommendations to your
Honorable Court with respect to the above-captioned Petition for Discipline.

I. HISTORY OF PROCEEDINGS

A Petition for Discipline was filed on May 24, 1996 against Respondent,
Yale F. Edeiken, Esquire.

The Petition alleged that Respondent failed to appear for a Private Reprimand
scheduled for December 7, 1995. The Petition charged Respondent with violation
ofPa.R.D.E. 203(b)(2), as well as Rules of Professional Conduct 8.4(d), 1.1 ,
1.3, 1.15(b), and 1.16(d).

A hearing was held on January 9, 1997, before Hearing Committee [ ]
comprised of Chair [ ], Esquire, and Member [ ], Esquire. Respondent was
represented at the hearing by [ ], Esquire. Petitioner was represented by [ ],
Esquire. The Committee filed a Report on September 22, 1997 and recommended a
public censure. No exceptions were filed by the parties.

This matter was adjudicated by the Disciplinary Board at the meeting held on
November 14, 1997.

II. FINDINGS OF FACT

The Board makes the following findings of fact:

1. Petitioner, whose principal office is now located at Suite 3710, One
Oxford Centre, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, is invested, pursuant to Rule 207 of
the Pennsylvania Rules of Disciplinary Enforcement (hereafter Pa.R.D.E.), with
the power and the duty to investigate all matters involving alleged misconduct
of an attorney admitted to practice law in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and
to prosecute all disciplinary proceedings brought in accordance with the various
provisions of the aforesaid Rules.

2. Respondent was admitted to practice law in the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania on March 29, 1984.

3. In accordance with Rule 208(a)(5), Pa.R.D.E., it was determined that
Respondent should receive a Private Reprimand with condition as a result of
misconduct arising from his representation of [A] by his grandmother and legal
guardian, [B].

4. By notice dated August 28, 1995, the Secretary of the Disciplinary
Board notified Respondent that a three member panel of the Board had determined
that Respondent should receive a Private Reprimand with condition.

5. The Notice of August 28, 1995, also informed Respondent that he had
the option of attending the Private Reprimand or notifying the Secretary, in
writing, within twenty days of the date of the Notice, that Respondent wished
the matter to be referred for institution of formal proceedings.

6. The Notice included a copy of the Board's Order directing the Private
Reprimand with the following condition:

At least ten days prior to the scheduled private reprimand,
Respondent shall submit proof that he has:

1. Delivered to [B] each and every document relating to his
representation of [B] or her grandson.

2. Provided to [B] the name of his professional malpractice carrier
and policy number, if any.

3. Costs, if any, are to be paid by Respondent.

7. Respondent did not demand that formal proceedings be instituted
against him.

8. As a result of Respondent's failure to demand formal proceedings,
Respondent is deemed to have conclusively violated Rules of Professional Conduct
1.1, 1.3, 1.15(b), and 1. 16(d), as set forth in the Notice of August 28, 1995.

9. By Notice dated November 3, 1995, Respondent was directed to appear
before the Board on December 7, 1995 to receive a Private Reprimand.

10. Respondent received the Board's Notice, which was sent by regular
and certified mail, return receipt requested, to Respondent's office address.

11. Respondent knew he was to appear on December 7, 1995 to receive a
Private Reprimand.

12. Respondent failed to appear and failed to provide proof of his
compliance with the condition.

13. By letter of December 11, 1995, Respondent was directed by James J.
Powell, then Board Chair, to provide good cause for his failure to appear and
noncompliance with the condition.

14. Respondent received the letter, which was sent regular and certified
mail, return receipt requested, to Respondent's address.

15. Respondent was to reply to Board Chair Powell's letter on or before
December 29, 1995.

16. As of the date of the filing of the Petition for Discipline in this
matter, Respondent has not replied to the December 11, 1995 letter.

17. At the disciplinary hearing, Respondent made a statement of remorse
for his actions and testified that he did not show the respect that was owed to
the profession. (N.T. 11)

18. Respondent received an Informal Admonition in 1995 and a Private
Reprimand in 1993.

III. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

By his actions as set forth above, Respondent violated the following Rule
of Disciplinary Enforcement and Rules of Professional Conduct:

1. Pa.R.D.E. 203(b)(2) - willful failure to appear before the Board for a
Private Reprimand is grounds for discipline.

2. RPC 8.4{ d) - It is professional misconduct for a lawyer to engage in
conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice.

3. RPC 1.1 - A lawyer shall provide competent representation to a client.

4. RPC 1.3 - A lawyer shall act with reasonable diligence and promptness
in representing a client.

5. RPC I.I5(b) - A lawyer shall promptly deliver to the client or third
person any funds or other property the client or third person is entitled to
receive. Upon request from the client or third person, the lawyer shall promptly
render a full accounting.

6. RPC 1.16( d) - Upon termination of representation, a lawyer shall take
steps to the extent reasonable to protect the client's interests, such as
surrendering papers and property to which the client is entitled and refunding
advance payment of fees that has not been earned.

IV. DISCUSSION

This matter is before the Board upon a Petition for Discipline charging
Respondent with violation of Rule 203(b )(2), Pa.R.D.E., because of his failure
to appear for a Private Reprimand. The Petition also alleged violations of Rules
of Professional Conduct based on Respondent's misconduct during the course of
representation of a client, which misconduct led to the original determination
of a Private Reprimand. Respondent stipulated to his failure to appear and the,
underlying misconduct. The issue before the Board is the extent of discipline
warranted by Respondent's misconduct.

Respondent was hired by [B] in 1990 to represent her grandson, [A], with
regard to claims of abuse while in foster care. Respondent never filed an action
of any kind for over two years. In 1992 Respondent was contacted by Attorney
[C], who requested Respondent to turn over the [A] file to him. Respondent
agreed to do this but never returned the file. [C] attempted to contact
Respondent, but he could not be reached although many attempts were made. [B]
filed a complaint against Respondent with the Office of Disciplinary Counsel.
Petitioner recommended a Private Reprimand. A three member panel of the
Board determined that a Private Reprimand with condition was appropriate.
Respondent was notified of this determination by Notice of August 25, 1995.
Respondent was advised that he could request formal proceedings if he did not
want to receive the Private Reprimand. Respondent did not request formal
proceedings. By Notice of November 3, 1995, Respondent was notified that the
date of the Private Reprimand was December 7, 1995. Respondent failed to appear
nor did he provide any explanation for his absence.

Respondent's failure to appear before the Board for a Private Reprimand
constitutes an infraction of the Rules of Disciplinary Enforcement and warrants
discipline. Although the underlying misconduct was not egregious, Respondent
further entangled himself in the disciplinary system by avoiding his Private
Reprimand. Respondent admits that his actions were arrogant and arose out of his
belief that the Board was wrong. Respondent further admits that he did not show
the respect that was due to the Board and the profession. Respondent testified
that he appreciates that his failure to appear was a dereliction of his duty as
an attorney.

The facts of this case demonstrate to the Board that public discipline is
appropriate.

Previous cases recognized the necessity for public discipline in
situations such as the instant matter.

In the cases of In re Anonymous No. 67 DB 87,9 Pa. D. & C. 4th 479
(1991) and In re Anonymous No.3 DB 85, 41 Pa. D. & C. 3d 70 (1986), the
attorneys failed to appear for a private reprimands.

Neither attorney had a feasible explanation for the failure to appear
and received a public censure.

Public discipline emphasizes to the attorney that the rules governing
the legal profession may not be trivialized through avoidance of a sanction. The
Board recommends a public censure.

V. RECOMMENDATION

The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania recommends
that the Respondent, Yale F. Edeiken, Esquire receive a public censure from the
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

It is further recommended that the expenses incurred in the
investigation and prosecution of this matter are to be paid by the Respondent.

Respectfully submitted,
THE DISCIPLINARY BOARD OF THE
SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

By:__________________________
Thomas J. Elliott, Member
Date: February 26, 1998

Board Members Saltz, Nix and Carson recused themselves.

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 20th day of April, 1998, upon consideration of the Report and
Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board dated February 26, 1998, it is hereby
ORDERED that Yale F. Edeiken, Esquire be subjected to a PUBLIC CENSURE by the
Supreme Court.
It is further ORDERED that Respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary
Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.

--end of 122DB1995.PDF--

The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania plainly ruled: "AND
NOW, this 20th day of April, 1998, upon consideration of the Report and
Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board dated February 26, 1998, it is hereby
ORDERED that Yale F. Edeiken, Esquire be subjected to a PUBLIC CENSURE by the
Supreme Court." YET Yale "Fatboy Edeiken has claimed AFTER the date of his
PUBLIC CENSURE: "I have never been charged with any unethical activity relating
to the practice of law..."

Did anyone count all of the "Rules of Professional Conduct" or ethics documented
above Yale F. Edeiken violated?

And let us not forget Yale F. Edeiken in fact was charged and convicted for
assaulting a female deputy sheriff right in his own county courthouse!

http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=8cgk8901c82%40news1.newsguy.com&rnum=1
Subject: John Morris Confirms Authenticity of: LEHIGH DEPUTY SAYS LAWYER
HARASSED HER IN SHOVING INCIDENT
Date: 2000/04/06
Message-ID: <8cgk8...@news1.newsguy.com>
References: <26b33bde...@usw-ex0101-005.remarq.com>
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=26b33bde...@usw-ex0101-005.remarq.com&lr=&hl=en
(Archived locally as: 26b33bde)
<7remes8f7fgvc8lq0...@4ax.com>
<1f6neso4j4ujdp6q7...@4ax.com>

From: John Morris <John....@UAlberta.CA>
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: LEHIGH DEPUTY SAYS LAWYER HARASSED HER IN SHOVING INCIDENT
Organization: University of Alberta
Reply-To: John....@UAlberta.CA
Message-ID: <1f6neso4j4ujdp6q7...@4ax.com>
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=1f6neso4j4ujdp6q7...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
(Archived locally as: JohnConfirmsShoving_1 and JohnConfirmsShoving_2)

> In <7remes8f7fgvc8lq0...@4ax.com> in alt.revisionism,
> on Wed, 05 Apr 2000 09:17:26 -0400, RiP <Ri...@up.com> wrote:
>
> [snip]
:.
> >First it was Ragland who made the 'funny papers' as a criminal and
> >now Yale!
:.
> Now? There's one little part "Brimstone" forgot to include, the date
> of the article:
>
> Date: Wednesday, September 19, 1990
> Page: B02
> Edition: FIFTH
> Section: LOCAL/REGION

Thanks for verifying the authenticity of the article John. Doesn't matter
to me the date it occurred. It establishes that Edeiken gives in to fits
of rage and that is good enough for me as well as any trial held against him.
His history is admissible evidence too you should know!

Lurkers here is the article:

(FREE Preview: http://tinyurl.com/35rhv active May 28, 2004)

LEHIGH DEPUTY SAYS LAWYER HARASSED HER IN SHOVING INCIDENT

by VALERIE HILDEBEITEL, The Morning Call

A Lehigh County deputy sheriff has filed harassment charges
against an Allentown attorney over a courthouse confrontation
that happened last month, Sheriff Ron Neimeyer has confirmed.

The charges against attorney Yale F. Edeiken were filed in the
district attorney's office Wednesday, according to the deputy
involved.

Deputy Brenda Hartman said Edeiken shoved her as she was taking
a female prisoner from a courtroom to a holding cell to await
probation processing on the afternoon of June 12.

Hartman said she took the prisoner into an elevator and Edeiken
and another man followed.

The deputy said Edeiken confronted the man, who was later
identified as the woman's ex-husband, and she ordered both to
stop and that one man leave the elevator.

The ex-husband complied and as he exited, Hartman said, Edeiken
shoved her to the back of the elevator and swung his briefcase
at the man.

Sheriff Neimeyer said the deputy reported the incident to him,
and he sent her to the district attorney's office.

"It certainly was conduct that is not expected," Neimeyer said
Friday. "We're on the same side. My officers are officers of the
court, as is Mr. Edeiken.

"We won't brook that type of conduct from anyone else," the
sheriff said. "Why should we (take it) from him?"

---end of article---

Care to verify that this article is authentic as well John?

http://www.mcall.com/cgi-bin/slwebsto.cgi?DBLIST=mc90&DOCNUM=39046 <Now dead
http://web.archive.org/web/20001120101500re_/www.mcall.com/cgi-bin/slwebsto.cgi?DBLIST=mc90&DOCNUM=39046
(Link active February 1, 2004, Archived locally as: DOCNUM39046)

Date: Wednesday, September 19, 1990
Page: B02
Edition: FIFTH
Section: LOCAL/REGION

Column:

Corrections:

Memo:

CITY ATTORNEY FOUND GUILTY IN ELEVATOR CONFRONTATION
by KRISTIN CASLER, The Morning Call

Allentown attorney Yale F. Edeiken was found guilty and fined $600 plus
costs for a confrontation with a Lehigh County deputy sheriff and another
man in a courthouse elevator.

During the June 12 incident, Edeiken struck Deputy Brenda Hartman with his
briefcase and allegedly threatened the man by saying he had a gun,
according to District Justice Diane Jepsen, who heard the case. Edeiken
later was found to have a permit for and was carrying a .357 Magnum.

Jepsen ordered Edeiken, whose office is at 39 N. 5th St., to pay the fine
after a hearing Monday on charges of harassment and disorderly conduct
filed by Hartman. Jepsen said Edeiken no longer has a permit for his gun.

According to the complaint, Hartman was in the courthouse side elevator,
which usually is reserved for prisoner transport, with Joanne Keller.
Keller, who was not handcuffed, had just been sentenced and Hartman was
taking her to pay fines and costs before her release.

Also on the elevator were Edeiken, David Raymond, public defender Earl
Supplee and county courier Bill Bichel.

Edeiken told Jepsen that Raymond, a convicted felon who had burglarized
him, pushed his way onto the elevator.

But Jepsen said other witnesses testified that Raymond already was on the
elevator when Edeiken boarded and started a shoving match. Witnesses
varied on what was said.

Witnesses said Edeiken called Hartman a whore, but Edeiken said he was
referring to Keller.

Raymond is a friend of Keller, and Keller once resided at a house owned by
Edeiken. Edeiken was at the courthouse as a character witness for Keller
at her sentencing.

Edeiken swung his briefcase at Raymond, striking him and Hartman,
according to testimony.

Hartman opened the elevator doors on the third floor and ordered Edeiken
to get out. He refused, and as Raymond attempted to exit, Edeiken told
Raymond he had a gun and moved as if he was going to draw it. No weapon
was seen.

Raymond and Supplee then went downstairs for help, and Hartman took
Edeiken and Keller to the bullpen where prisoners are held pending their
proceedings, Jepsen said. Hartman told them to stay until she got help.
When she returned, Edeiken was gone.

---end---

~~End of GOOGLE Archive~~

http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=6nnnjts00vnb4kfovfuekvejvq8k7pau4j%404ax.com&rnum=5
Subject: How Can I Retract What an Allentown Newspaper Reported and has Been
"Admitted as Fact?" IT'S THEIR WORDS NOT MINE!!!!
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 20:53:26 -0500
Message-ID: <6nnnjts00vnb4kfov...@4ax.com>
(Excerpted)

Return-Path: <ya...@enter.net>
Received: from mail1.enter.net (sourcenat1.bigmailbox.com [209.132.220.250]) by
mailrecv11.bigmailbox.com (8.10.0/8.10.0) with ESMTP id f5SH6MI09103 for
<doc_t...@my-deja.com> ; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 10:06:23 -0700
Received: from oemcomputer (mat-4-8.enter.net [207.16.155.156]) by
mail1.enter.net (8.11.3/8.11.3) with SMTP id f5SH6LY27630 for
<doc_t...@my-deja.com> ; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 13:06:21 -0400
From: ya...@enter.net
Message-ID: <001601c0fff6$31c67020$9c9b10cf@oemcomputer>
To: <doc_t...@my-deja.com>
Subject: Fw: Allentown Attorney Goes Amuck in County Courthouse and Goes on a
Spree of Violence
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 13:17:21 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This publication contains defamatory material.

An immediate retraction is demanded.

<<Doc Tavish comment June 28, 2001: Take it up with The Morning Call- they
reported your shoving match and resultant conviction. I am only showing the
link to their archive which has (excerpt) as text...>>

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Need I say more?
Tavish

----NIZKOR.ORG'S Ken McVay's Numerous Documented Lies Regarding His Funding----
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/can.general/msg/8e50a4a0edaf49ea
Subject: $50,000 Not Reported to CCRA by The Nizkor Project? Ken McVay is Lying
About Funds He Has Apparently NOT Reported to CCRA!! SAAF Report for 2002 Is
Further Proof! V2.5 Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 09:13:30 -0500
Message-ID: <miqil05i42imr45pd...@4ax.com>

http://groups-beta.google.com/group/tor.general/msg/a199aa5b45c20203
Subject: Nizkor LHR Fund; Just Another Self Serving FUND Like the Nizkor
Endowment and Trust Funds?
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 10:56:49 -0600
Message-ID: <rhao2v4fbuij94mcm...@4ax.com>

http://groups-beta.google.com/group/can.general/msg/ad2c41710e77f3fd
Subject: Is NIZKOR Running a Self Serving Endowment Fund Scam?
Message-ID: <3e060...@news2.uncensored-news.com>
Date: 22 Dec 2002 18:46:15 GMT

http://groups-beta.google.com/group/can.general/msg/d9ec34ce6d803428
Subject: V2.0 NIZKOR.ORG and B'nai Brith's Apparent Funding Kick Backs and Tax
Scam R_1121
Message-ID: <qa5trvoa3c6ella1o...@4ax.com>
Date: 21 Nov 2003 23:56:36 GMT
B'nai Brith has also funded communist David Lethbridge:
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/can.general/msg/56c62b82ce6a0edb?q=&rnum=1
Subject: UPDATED! B'nai Brith Allies Itself With Communist David Lethbridge
Against Capitalism, and Christianity V2.0 R_1207
Message-ID: <4186tvsr4d3oiodp2...@4ax.com>
Date: 7 Dec 2003 12:48:39 GMT

http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.fraud/msg/25d222360346b64a?q=&rnum=7
Subject: NIZKOR.ORG Director Ken McVay Caught Lying About San Antonio
Connection! (Those Two U.S. Servers!) V2.0
Date: 30 Mar 2003 03:49:12 GMT
Message-ID: <67qc8v8192tumoaiv...@4ax.com>

_______________________________________________________________________________
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com
<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <><><><><><><><>

Doc Tavish

unread,

Sep 29, 2005, 7:52:59 AM9/29/05

On Sat, 25 Jun 2005 17:27:18 -0000, <11br4vm...@corp.supernews.com>
kmc...@shell.vex.net (Kenneth McVay OBC) wrote:

Has everyone noticed how the director of The Nizkor Project based in British
Columbia, Canada acts? If Ken McVay will repeatedly cite manufactured evidence

from a recent failed lawsuit against me why should he be trusted with documents

allegedly sixty years old related to World War Two? Why would anyone want to
donate any money to a person who runs his Nizkor Project in such a manner and
who can only hurl insults and engage in name calling when he is caught in his
dishonesty? His claims concerning historical events should have no credit seeing
how he passes off forgeries as authentic as proven beyond any doubt below. His
source of the forged documents is a shyster who has been convicted of assaulting
a female deputy sheriff and has had a PUBLIC CENSURE from the Supreme Court of
Pennsylvania State and at the same time claimed: "I have never been charged with
any unethical activity relating to the practice of law..." AFTER he has been
disciplined more than once by the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of
Pennsylvania.

Insults instead of facts are all you have McVay.

>Archive/File: people/b/bradbury.scott/Edeiken-v-Bradbury.C1
>Last-Modified: 2001/02/15

I am glad to see you prove that you deal in forgeries McVay and perhaps people
will wise up and your funding dribble to naught!

Here are some examples of McVay having forgeries at his web site:

PROOF THE ABOVE SWORN STATEMENT IS PERJURED:

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.flame.niggers/msg/a1fc86b713a7d8a7
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.flame.niggers/msg/a1fc86b713a7d8a7?dmode=source

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.skinheads/msg/8e41a2016f1d1527
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.skinheads/msg/8e41a2016f1d1527?dmode=source

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.newsangels/msg/83b3e74bd83a5500
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.newsangels/msg/83b3e74bd83a5500?dmode=source

will foist these forgeries off as authentic then how can they have any

credibility with documents from World War Two?

Positive proof 100% that the Plaintiff willfully and most maliciously lied to a
civil court with the above accusation:

Xref: http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/311c0e402a65a351
Message-ID: <d0ic0v81gdhrd1djq...@4ax.com>

39 That on November 11, 1999, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
electronic communication stating in pertinent part:

--digsig
Authentic Doc Tavish

191xllxyGtVQwy0mtCiBjivyX+knCUXYwdRt ptdrtqb
qfQbXQtisWlB/E1+yWkYkw1Wr7mGiAFcJ w6Wl/aU
4GEbQtlQOHN/G3asOLBC9JmQXWuqXwj BnPCuOV9cd

Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
hereof as Exhibit "A-16."

Respectfully submitted,
________________________
Yale F. Edeiken

<end>

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics.white-power/msg/6143fb6ca32f003c

Witness this:

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/c022726f9fda38eb

Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 22:07:41 -0600
Message-ID: <osjdbt41kq8ov7moq...@4ax.com>

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy/msg/1cfabc9c7a7dd17e

Archive/File: people/b/bradbury.scott/Edeiken-v-Bradbury.C1
Last-Modified: 2001/02/14

--digsig
Authentic Doc Tavish

<stop>

<END>

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/96a78cfbc2f2fdb5

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/8762ffcf9b7919f4

(Archived locally as: Nradbury1 and Nradbury2)
From: "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
Subject: Re: Nradbury Goes Off the Deep End
Date: 2000/05/16
Message-ID: <Ms1U4.3324$v%5.23...@newshog.newsread.com>

(Exact quote for the record)

"I think you need a good psychiatirc examination. Perhaps you should ask
your shrink about people who write anonumus notes to others like: " You
are just as much of a filthy little cock sucker vermin as your butt buddy
Jeff Brown. You have to rely on out of context quotes and character
assassination. It would be a pleasure to see someone slowly work you over
with an ice pick Yale!""

No headers and no signature.

I guess the above is fair proof that Yale likes to forge e-mail even if it
is in his word "anonumus."

>> Your failure to do the same is noted. And will be by the judge.
>> --YFE

~~End of GOOGLE Archive Excerpt (With updated GOOGLE links)~~

PERJURY!! How can the above examples not be criminal fabrications and perjury
in light of all the documented proof?

-->>How can Ken McVay and his Nizkor Project and Yale F. Edeiken who is a
contributor to The Holocaust History Project have any credibility after they
pass off perjured documents as authentic!? I have many more examples from
Edeiken's failed lawsuit against me too!<<--

What Ken McVay also won't tell you:

That kook lawsuit and ALL claims of damages against me was DISMISSED long ago!

<START>

[...]

<STOP>

<START>

September 26, 2001

Very truly yours,

The Attachment:

<STOP>

The reason why Yale didn't file his brief is explained in this archive and the
fact Yale didn't want the above perjured statements of his exposed to light:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/7771395b27c10fe6

Subject: Why Does Sara Salzman Keep Evading The Real Reason Yale F. Edeiken Went

Into Hiding? aka Re: BLTN: Bradbury Lacking Twin Neurons V2.0 T_0802
Message-ID: <53b0f1d2m70eln84u...@4ax.com>
Date: 3 Aug 2005 02:47:09 GMT
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/58210ba65c45c1aa
Subject: Why Yale F. Edeiken LOST His Appeal. (Updated Links) V2-0
Reply-To: rhc-tavish@tavish-central
Message-ID: <it34c154u8rau67d3...@4ax.com>
Date: 29 Jun 2005 03:53:01 GMT

Yale F. Edeiken also abused the legal system by issuing a forged subpoena on my
ISP to get my identity, address, and telephone number which Ken McVay and the
rest of his thugs use illicitly.

http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/c7d6394427adce0f
Subject: ...Forging Subpoenas and Fabrication of Evidence? Aren't Those
Criminal Acts?...
Message-ID: <rsb1c154lppiqupi1...@4ax.com>
Date: 28 Jun 2005 02:03:08 GMT

Distributing confidential subpoenaed information is a felony and especially so
when it was with a subpoena which was not registered or issued by the court! For
a fact the subpoena does not appear on the court docket and for a fact Yale F.
Edeiken denied doing so until I got my ISP (Flash.net) to confess and send me a
copy!!

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics.nationalism.white/msg/66bfff2ad1c73c7b

(Archived locally as: YaleSubpoenaLie_C and YaleSubpoenaLie_D)
From: "Yale F. Edeiken" <y...@enter.net>
Subject: Re: --->Violation of USC Title 18, Chapter 13, Section 241?-- Edeiken's
Legal Troubles Deepen<---
Date: 2000/04/08
Message-ID: <b5JH4.301$%L6.2...@monger.newsread.com>

Defendant Bradbury <sonny...@flash.net> wrote in message
news:8cnap...@news2.newsguy.com...

> ((Tavish comment April 8, 2000-- Notice Yale denied "posting"
> my personal information however he did NOT deny getting it from
> my ISP (Flash Net) using his power of attorney! Very vital!))

Then I do so now.

~~End of GOOGLE Archival Excerpt~~

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics.nationalism.white/msg/fc8982c1a3caec6f

~~End of GOOGLE Archive~~

Why would this be? It does explain why Yale lied about serving one on Flash.Net

twice doesn't it? He thought I would never find out! Anyone can get a copy of

that docket for $3.00 and see for themselves! Yale turned over my address etc.
to his band of thugs and ever since to this very day (September 29, 2005) I
still get death threats, my property vandalized, and where I live posted! That
subpoena positively was not issued by the court and it is a forgery just like
Yale's fabrications shown higher up.

Here is Yale F. Edeiken whose word The Nizkor Project accepts as fact lying
about his unethical activity:

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/cdfddbb68d1d5b39

I. HISTORY OF PROCEEDINGS

II. FINDINGS OF FACT

III. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

IV. DISCUSSION

V. RECOMMENDATION

PER CURIAM:

--end of 122DB1995.PDF--

Just as Yale didn't do above in that he should have handed over all materials
etc. he did to my attorney. I was not allowed to defend myself against his
perjury because he never served the complaints!

I.E.

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/77682e500f0a2f33
Subject: The "RETURN TO STALKER" Myth Debunked V2-0 S_1030
Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2004 19:38:40 -0500
Message-ID: <u498o0l1ogkcqga2q...@4ax.com>

CLERK OF COURTS OF LEHIGH COUNTY - CIVIL DIVISION
Lehigh County Courthouse
455 W. Hamilton Street
Allentown, PA 18101-1614
RE: Edeiken Vs Bradbury 1999-C-2786

Filed September 22, 2000
PETTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT
COMES NOW, the defendant, Scott Bradbury, by and through his counsel Daylin B.
Leach, Esquire, to petition this honorable court for Relief from Judgment,
pursuant to Pa. R.C.P. 237.3. In support of this petition, the defendant avers
the following:
On August 25, 2000, the Plaintiff filed a Praecipe for Default Judgment with
this court. A true and correct copy of which is hereto and marked as "Exhibit
A."
Since a complaint has never been filed or served, the defendant is unable to
attach a copy of preliminary objections he would file if the judgment was opened
pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. 237.3 (a).

"[The] plaintiff engage[d] in a vendetta against the defendant. The court has
heard telephone messages left on the defendant's answering machine, in which
the plaintiff admits dedicating himself to making the defendant's life a "living
hell." He refers to the defendant as a "miserable piece of shit" among other
charming epithets... Even after the defendant is represented by counsel, mail is
still sent directly to the defendant addressed to "Defendant Bradbury." ...When
attorney Leach asked Mr. Edeiken for a copy of the complaint when he first
becomes involved in the case, he is told "Fuck You" via e-mail. In plain
English, this is not a lawsuit, it is a bizarre war waged by Mr. Edeiken on a
man he has never met. The court should not be a party to this."
Respectfully submitted
Daylin B. Leach Esquire
<END>

The key statements above were: "Since a complaint has never been filed or
served, the defendant is unable to attach a copy of preliminary objections he
would file if the judgment was opened pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. 237.3 (a)." AND
"When attorney Leach asked Mr. Edeiken for a copy of the complaint when he first
becomes involved in the case, he is told "Fuck You" via e-mail." IOW I was not
given my right to due process by Edeiken to defend myself from his numerous
documented perjurious fabrications!

BTW Did anyone count all of the "Rules of Professional Conduct" or ethics
documented above Yale F. Edeiken violated in his PUBLIC CENSURE?

And let us not forget Yale F. Edeiken in fact was charged and convicted for
assaulting a female deputy sheriff right in his own county courthouse!

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics.nationalism.white/msg/9541cb34d1b20618

Subject: John Morris Confirms Authenticity of: LEHIGH DEPUTY SAYS LAWYER
HARASSED HER IN SHOVING INCIDENT
Date: 2000/04/06
Message-ID: <8cgk8...@news1.newsguy.com>
References: <26b33bde...@usw-ex0101-005.remarq.com>

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/afc5f4d32ed53c98

---end of article---

Column:

Corrections:

Memo:

---end---

~~End of GOOGLE Archive~~

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/5c2d866929781bdc

Subject: How Can I Retract What an Allentown Newspaper Reported and has Been
"Admitted as Fact?" IT'S THEIR WORDS NOT MINE!!!!
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 20:53:26 -0500
Message-ID: <6nnnjts00vnb4kfov...@4ax.com>
(Excerpted)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This publication contains defamatory material.

An immediate retraction is demanded.

<<Doc Tavish comment: Take it up with The Morning Call- they

reported your shoving match and resultant conviction.>>

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Bonus: If McVay and his Nizkor will deal in forgeries and consort with an
unethical perjurious attorney who has been PUBLICLY CENSURED and convicted for
assault then is it any surprise Ken McVay lies about his funding as shown here:

Here is The Nizkor Project director Ken McVay plainly making it public that he
receives funding through the "San Antonio Area Foundation" and further down you
will see him denying ever receiving money from said group!

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/902eaf428653b71
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/0902eaf428653b71?dmode=source
(Archived locally as: McVayAdmitsSAAF_1 and McVayAdmitsSAAF_2)
From: kmc...@veritas.nizkor.org (Ken McVay)
Subject: Re: McVay Confirms Nizkor's ADL Connection: Mossad and ARA Also Allies.
Date: 1997/06/05
Message-ID: <5n6ib9$f3h$1...@eclipse.txdirect.net>
X-Remember: http://www.nizkor.org/
Organization: The Nizkor Project

In article (William "Ian McKinney Roger Hughes" Scott) wrote:

>McVay admits the ADL collects and disburses the money to Nizkor. Just

The ADL is an American organization. American funds donated to The
Nizkor Project are handled by the San Antonio Area Foundation, which
has no ties to the ADL. (Sorry, no banana)...

--
Nizkor Canada | http://www.nizkor.org

~~End of GOOGLE Archival Excerpt~~

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/1319c49b6e1ed5fe
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/1319c49b6e1ed5fe?dmode=source
(Archived locally as: McVayAdmitsSAAF_3 and McVayAdmitsSAAF_4)
From: km...@veritas.nizkor.org (Ken McVay)
Subject: Re: Nizkor under B'nai B'rith auspices?!
Date: 1997/05/22
Message-ID: <5m1sqg$rse$1...@eclipse.txdirect.net>
Organization: The Nizkor Project

In article <5m11au$...@access1.digex.net>, mst...@access.digex.net wrote:

> As you could tell from the Nizkor web page, Nizkor's funding in Canada
>is now coordinated through the Zikaron Tolerance and Remembrance Society,
>an independent organization. In the United States, it is channeled
>through the Nizkor Fund of the San Antonio Area Foundation, which is a San
>Antonio umbrella organization something like the United Way.

Zikaron remains a supporter of the Nizkor Project, but Canadian
_national_ funding is now managed by the B'nai Brith Foundation, in
Toronto. B'nai Brith Foundation does not, however, support Nizkor
financially - it simply receives donations from the public, issues
receipts if the donations exceed $10, and disperses donated funds as
required.

In short, the B'nai Brith Foundation operates exactly as does the San
Antonio Area Foundation - as an umbrella organization dealing with
human rights organizations like Nizkor...

Frankly, I am gratified when Nizkor's data is attacked on the basis
of our funding partners - it is a clear indication that Holocaust
deniers would rather not deal with the convergence of data which
defines the event.

Posted and emailed.

--
Nizkor Canada | http://www.nizkor.org

~~End of GOOGLE Archival Excerpt~~

Here is Ken McVay contradicting what he publicly posted above!!

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/19272a44fd2c3cec
(Archived locally as: McVayEXHIBIT1 and McVayEXHIBIT1b)

From: kmc...@veritas.nizkor.org (Kenneth McVay, OBC)
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism

Subject: STILL Waiting for Donnie..... (Or "Bradbury: Wrong Again")
Date: 5 Jan 2001 00:32:08 GMT
Organization: The Nizkor Project
Message-ID: <9334m8$1nm1$1...@news.tht.net>

"What Mr. Bradbury has failed to demonstrate is that The Nizkor Project, which I
direct, has any association whatsoever with the "San Antonio Area Foundation -
Nizkor Fund."

That is because Mr. Bradbury is not very bright.

The Nizkor Project has no operations of any sort whatsoever within the United
States. Neither The Nizkor Project nor Ken McVay has ever received any money
from the "San Antonio Area Foundation - Nizkor Fund"

~~End of GOOGLE Archival Excerpt~~

Notice who engages in personal attacks and notice who shows documented fact that
his opponent contradicts himself!

http://groups.google.com/group/can.general/msg/8db801fb548cdb26
(Archived locally McVay-12-30-2002DENIAL)
Subject: Re: What did Kenny McVay do with money he claims he never got?
Reply-To: kmc...@nizkor.org

Organization: The Nizkor Project, http://www.nizkor.org/

Message-ID: <xO%P9.1985$C43.13...@news.nnrp.ca>
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2002 17:57:49 GMT

>Larry "I'm really not TubbyBlubber" Mondello wrote:
>
>Question for Ken McVay; What Happened to the SAAF Funds You Denied Receiving?
>In the following two archives you claim as late as January 4, 2001:
>"The Nizkor Project has no operations of any sort whatsoever within the
>United States. Neither The Nizkor Project nor Ken McVay has ever received any
>money from the "San Antonio Area Foundation - Nizkor Fund" AND you are also
>on record as stating: "...The San Antonio Area Foundation has never paid
>me - or anyone else, to my knowledge... I have no connection in San Antonio,
>and neither does Nizkor. Get used to it" on June 2, 2000.

...The Nizkor Project has no operations of any sort whatsoever within the
United States. Neither The Nizkor Project nor Ken McVay has ever received any
money from the "San Antonio Area Foundation - Nizkor Fund" ...The San Antonio
Area Foundation has never paid me - or anyone else, to my knowledge... I have no
connection in San Antonio, and neither does Nizkor. Get used to it...

(This is kind of fun. You keep making an ass of yourself, and I'll keep
laughing at you.)
The Nizkor Project: http://www.nizkor.org

~~End of GOOGLE Archive~~

More on McVay's dishonesty about his funding:

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics.nationalism.white/msg/5863ead7b3942e76?fwc=1

Subject: $50,000 Not Reported to CCRA by The Nizkor Project? Ken McVay is Lying
About Funds He Has Apparently NOT Reported to CCRA!! SAAF Report for 2002 Is

Further Proof! V3.5 T_0929
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 04:41:48 -0500
Message-ID: <cddnj19c6bscsc3o4...@4ax.com>
Companion Piece:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.skeptic/msg/af974e5ec5085cce?fwc=1
(Archived locally as: McVaySlamDunked_A5 and McVaySlamDunked_A6)
Subject: SAAF San Antonio Area Foundation - Nizkor Fund -- Some New Archives
and The Same Funding Lie by Ken McVay Exposed V3-0 T_0822
Message-ID: <3i9lg1p8efhpoda0r...@4ax.com>
Date: 23 Aug 2005 04:32:17 GMT
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://groups.google.com/group/can.general/msg/8a5017cb6fa55b20
Subject: Is NIZKOR.ORG Running a Self Serving Endowment Fund Scam? You All be
the Judges! V2-0
Message-ID: <6vttb1hmmg9m76457...@4ax.com>
Date: 26 Jun 2005 18:49:41 GMT

http://groups.google.com/group/can.general/msg/a8a3cb995ab2448f
Subject: NIZKOR.ORG and B'nai Brith's Apparent Funding Kick Backs and Tax Scam
V2.0 Message-ID: <s45sb1lsas4r52dtu...@4ax.com>
Date: 26 Jun 2005 03:06:12 GMT

http://groups.google.com/group/can.general/msg/2a8fb4468666dd3

Subject: NIZKOR.ORG Director Ken McVay Caught Lying About San Antonio

Connection! (Those Two U.S. Servers!) V3.0 Updated Links T_0625
Message-ID: <vd4sb1d8mo7qs9np0...@4ax.com>
Date: 26 Jun 2005 02:36:20 GMT

All Ken McVay has is making personal attacks, name calling, and hurling insults
which doesn't refute the fact that he has been caught lying about his funding!
Why would anyone want to donate their money to a man who is a liar and who
passes off forged documents as being authentic?

Bonus #2 Here is Ken McVay caught lying about his arrest for the crime of car
theft and notice how he ridiculed the person who pointed it out!

http://groups.google.com/group/can.taxes/msg/2ba3f0891b79cf80
(Archived locally as: McVayCarThief_1 AND McVayCarThief_2)
From: "Ken McVay, OBC" <spam...@nizkor.org>
Newsgroups: edm.general,edm.politics,ab.general,can.taxes
Subject: Re: Bracegirdles Both Deserve Jail,Also Auditors-Crown Appeals
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 10:46:13 -0800
Organization: The Nizkor Project http://www.nizkor.org

"Ken McVay, OBC" <spam...@nizkor.org> did write:

>It seems Bill Grosvenor is still afraid to publish under his own name.
>That's because he has no evidence that I have ever been arrested, let alone
>convicted, of any crime,

Is that so? Did this Jewish web site lie when it reported this?

http://www.ajc.org/InTheMedia/Publications.asp?did=135&pid=21
(Link active February 11, 2004. Archived locally as JailbirdMcVay)
Also: http://www.ajc.org/InTheMedia/PublicationsPrint.asp?did=135
(Link active February 23, 2004. Archived locally as JailbirdMcVay2)

The American Jewish Committee

"Hate and the Internet by Kenneth S. Stern
On-Line Approaches
"My whole agenda is to try and remove their market, as it were. They have an
agenda to sell. If, by demonstrating that they are lying about a specific issue,
I can remove a few hundred people from their potential market place, then I’ve
done them some harm." – Ken McVay, Project Nizkor In 1956 Ken McVay stole his
father’s car and ran away from home. Apprehended, he spent his 16th birthday in
a Bellingham, Washington, jail.... <END>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Oooops looks like you have been caught lying again McVay! The "American Jewish
Committee" reported: "Ken McVay, Project Nizkor In 1956 Ken McVay stole his
father’s car and ran away from home. Apprehended, he spent his 16th birthday in
a Bellingham, Washington, jail" YET you stated above: "he has no evidence that I
have ever been arrested, let alone convicted, of any crime"!
Isn't being "Apprehended" the same thing as being "arrested"?
WordNet 2.0 Vocabulary Helper: apprehended
The verb apprehend has 3 senses (first 2 from tagged texts)
1. (2) get the picture, comprehend, savvy, dig, grasp, compass, apprehend -- get
the meaning of something; ``Do you comprehend the meaning of this letter?''
2. (1) collar, nail, apprehend, arrest, pick up, nab, cop -- (take into custody;
``the police nabbed the suspected criminals'' )
3. apprehend, quail at -- (anticipate with dread or anxiety)
-----
Which sense of "apprehended" applies to you Ken McVay? ANSWER: "collar, nail,
apprehend, arrest, pick up, nab, cop -- (take into custody; ``the police
nabbed the suspected criminals'' )

YOU NOW HAVE A POLICE RECORD TOO KEN! Care to deny it Jail Bird McVay?
Here's laughing at you!! You did state: "he has no evidence that I have ever
been arrested, let alone convicted, of any crime.." BUT you were apprehended
or arrested for the crime of car theft and you were jailed! Once again you are
exposed as a liar! You weren't convicted because charges evidently weren't
pressed by your father!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Is Ken McVay, the director of The Nizkor Project, an honest person in light of
all of the above? Why should his Nizkor Project have credibility when he has
been caught lying about many things?
Tavish

Roger

unread,

Sep 29, 2005, 9:40:54 AM9/29/05

In one age, called the Second Age by some,
(an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
someone claiming to be Doc Tavish wrote
in message <b6knj1tdlcsdenc4g...@4ax.com>:

>On Sat, 25 Jun 2005 17:27:18 -0000, <11br4vm...@corp.supernews.com>
>kmc...@shell.vex.net (Kenneth McVay OBC) wrote:
>
>Has everyone noticed how the director of The Nizkor Project based in British
>Columbia, Canada acts? If Ken McVay will repeatedly cite manufactured evidence
>from a recent failed lawsuit against me why should he be trusted with documents
>allegedly sixty years old related to World War Two?

Of course, that lawsuit is not "failed," it was reversed on a
technicality.

The Findings of Fact which are reposted here occasionally remain in
full force and effect.

And everyone *has* noticed how you continue to lie about this.

Now, when are you going to escrow that $10k you owe me?

Doc Tavish

unread,

Sep 29, 2005, 11:25:41 AM9/29/05

On Thu, 29 Sep 2005 13:40:54 GMT, <dkrnj1hgis993tdof...@4ax.com>
Roger <roger@.> wrote:

>In one age, called the Second Age by some,
> (an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
> someone claiming to be Doc Tavish wrote
> in message <b6knj1tdlcsdenc4g...@4ax.com>:
>
>>On Sat, 25 Jun 2005 17:27:18 -0000, <11br4vm...@corp.supernews.com>
>>kmc...@shell.vex.net (Kenneth McVay OBC) wrote:
>>
>>Has everyone noticed how the director of The Nizkor Project based in British
>>Columbia, Canada acts? If Ken McVay will repeatedly cite manufactured evidence
>>from a recent failed lawsuit against me why should he be trusted with documents
>>allegedly sixty years old related to World War Two?
>
>Of course, that lawsuit is not "failed," it was reversed on a
>technicality.

It was DISMISSED! Thrown out- judgment overturned.

>The Findings of Fact which are reposted here occasionally remain in
>full force and effect.

Those finding of fact were called such initially because I made no response. I
made no response because neither my attorney nor myself were ever served. When
the court was made aware of this the lawsuit was thrown out to your dismay and
that is why Yale Tubby Edeiken wanted to appeal the judgment reversal BUT he
chickened out and went into hiding when he found out his perjury was going to be
exposed in the same court before the same judge!

I.E.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/7771395b27c10fe6
Subject: Why Does Sara Salzman Keep Evading The Real Reason Yale F. Edeiken Went
Into Hiding? aka Re: BLTN: Bradbury Lacking Twin Neurons V2.0 T_0802
Message-ID: <53b0f1d2m70eln84u...@4ax.com>
Date: 3 Aug 2005 02:47:09 GMT
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/58210ba65c45c1aa

Subject: Why Yale F. Edeiken LOST His Appeal. (Updated Links) V2-0
Reply-To: rhc-tavish@tavish-central
Message-ID: <it34c154u8rau67d3...@4ax.com>
Date: 29 Jun 2005 03:53:01 GMT

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Why is it none of my foes wants to discuss why Yale F. Edeiken dropped his
appeal and went into hiding rather than having his alleged "Findings of Fact"
go back before the judge!? I was more than willing BUT he went into hiding
and hasn't been heard from since though he "speaks" through his numerous
cretinous supporters who approve of his criminal behavior!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yale knew his forgeries and perjury were about to be exposed! That is why he
fled from getting justice like the coward he truly is!
------------------------------------------------------
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/c7d6394427adce0f
Subject: Patrick Keenan Approving of Forging Subpoenas and Fabrication of
Evidence? Aren't Those Criminal Acts?....

Message-ID: <rsb1c154lppiqupi1...@4ax.com>
Date: 28 Jun 2005 02:03:08 GMT

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

>And everyone *has* noticed how you continue to lie about this.

It is you and yours who keep passing off perjured documents as facts and who are
the liars.

ALL EXPLAINED IN WHAT YOU STUPIDLY CHOOSE TO IGNORE!!

http://groups.google.com/group/can.general/msg/8a93113d28c1cfb2
Subject: The Nizkor Project Deals in Forged Documents and Smear Financed With
Exempt Donations V3-0 T_0929
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 06:52:59 -0500
Message-ID: <b6knj1tdlcsdenc4g...@4ax.com>

Roger

unread,

Sep 29, 2005, 4:11:47 PM9/29/05

In one age, called the Second Age by some,
(an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
someone claiming to be Doc Tavish wrote

in message <791oj1hkdudv0kp86...@4ax.com>:

>On Thu, 29 Sep 2005 13:40:54 GMT, <dkrnj1hgis993tdof...@4ax.com>
>Roger <roger@.> wrote:

>>>Has everyone noticed how the director of The Nizkor Project based in British
>>>Columbia, Canada acts? If Ken McVay will repeatedly cite manufactured evidence
>>>from a recent failed lawsuit against me why should he be trusted with documents
>>>allegedly sixty years old related to World War Two?

>>Of course, that lawsuit is not "failed," it was reversed on a
>>technicality.

>It was DISMISSED! Thrown out- judgment overturned.

... on a technicality.

>>The Findings of Fact which are reposted here occasionally remain in
>>full force and effect.

>Those finding of fact were called such initially because I made no response.

*Chose* to make no response.

>I made no response because neither my attorney nor myself were ever served.

A lie. you boasted right here about returning those envelopes marked
"return to stalker."

>When
>the court was made aware of this the lawsuit was thrown out to your dismay and
>that is why Yale Tubby Edeiken wanted to appeal the judgment reversal BUT he
>chickened out and went into hiding when he found out his perjury was going to be
>exposed in the same court before the same judge!

Funny that this was never even mentioned in the judgment vacating the
judgment -- only a narrow jurisdictional matter.

Why do you think that you will be able to lie about why the verdict
was reversed?

>I.E.

< snip several links which do not quote the actual judgment >

>>And everyone *has* noticed how you continue to lie about this.

>It is you and yours who keep passing off perjured documents as facts and who are
>the liars.

Funny that you never get around to actually *proving* perjury the only
place it matters...

Now, about my $10k -- when are you going to arrange that escrow and
stop hypocritically trying to post what you mistakenly feel is my
address?

Doc Tavish

unread,

Sep 29, 2005, 11:42:07 PM9/29/05

On Fri, 30 Sep 2005 00:29:07 -0000, <11jp1mj...@corp.supernews.com>
kmc...@shell.vex.net (Kenneth McVay OBC) of The Nizkor Project in Nanaimo,
British Columbia wrote:

>In article <szkoe6b...@tempest.prismnet.com>,
>The Chief Instigator <pat...@io.com> wrote:
>
>[tavish vomitus flushed down the bradbury]

Can't deal in facts especially when the former subject title was:

"The Nizkor Project Deals in Forged Documents and Smear Financed With Exempt

Donations.."

>>Fatburyectomy performed...and the Findings of Fact are a permanent part of the
>>court record. Maybe a posting of the URL of that will help to remind you of
>>your appalling stupidity.
>
>Why bother with a link when whole thing will do?

It must really hurt to be you because trotting out a failed lawsuit which was
filled with perjury is all you have other than the immature snide remarks you
two made above which does not refute the fact that you are a liar McVay.

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics.nationalism.white/msg/5863ead7b3942e76?fwc=1
Subject: $50,000 Not Reported to CCRA by The Nizkor Project? Ken McVay is Lying
About Funds He Has Apparently NOT Reported to CCRA!! SAAF Report for 2002 Is
Further Proof! V3.5 T_0929
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 04:41:48 -0500
Message-ID: <cddnj19c6bscsc3o4...@4ax.com>

BTW McVay the above updated archive really shows you for a criminal tax dodger
seeing how you have stated: "What Mr. Bradbury has failed to demonstrate is that

The Nizkor Project, which I direct, has any association whatsoever with the "San
Antonio Area Foundation - Nizkor Fund. That is because Mr. Bradbury is not very
bright. The Nizkor Project has no operations of any sort whatsoever within the
United States. Neither The Nizkor Project nor Ken McVay has ever received any

money from the "San Antonio Area Foundation - Nizkor Fund" YET the very same San
Antonio Area Foundation you now make such false claims about shows you receiving
money in 2000, 2002, 2003, and 2004!! All included in the above archive and
links provided for downloading the PDF files!!

You have even stated contradictory words to what you claimed above:

http://groups.google.com/group/quebec.general/msg/46868da0ffff43e5
(Archived locally as: SAAF_2)
From: kmc...@nizkor.almanac.bc.ca (Ken McVay OBC)
Subject: Re: McVay's Addresses & Phone Numbers again
Date: 1996/09/15
Message-ID: <51hqme$b...@nizkor.almanac.bc.ca>
organization: The Nizkor Project

... The correct information for donations is as
follows:
Canada

Donations for the Project's efforts may be made payable to...

In the United States, checks should be made payable to:

"SAN ANTONIO AREA FOUNDATION - Nizkor Fund"

and should be mailed to:

San Antonio Area Foundation
Nizkor Fund
P.O. Box 120366
San Antonio, TX 78212-9566

Tel: (210) 225-2243
Fax: (210) 225-1980

<<Tavish comment September 28, 2005: Those phone numbers are the same ones that
San Antonio Area Foundation gives out at its web site YET McVay claims to have
no connection with then SAAF or to have ever received any funding from them!!!
http://www.saafdn.org/
San Antonio Area Foundation
110 Broadway, Suite 230 | San Antonio, Texas 78205
Phone: 210.225.2243 Fax: 210.225.1980 Email: in...@saafdn.org >>

<END>

Everyone look at this and pay attention to the subject title!

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/7ed1cee6db046212
(Archived locally as: SAAF_3)
From: kmc...@nizkor.almanac.bc.ca (Ken McVay OBC)
Subject: American funding for the Nizkor Project
Date: 1996/06/15
Message-ID: <4pvl6g$c...@nizkor.almanac.bc.ca>
X-Deja-AN: 160389285
references: <4or264$1a...@useneta1.news.prodigy.com>
<31c2fa3a...@news.annap.infi.net> <4pv7ht$7...@dfw-ixnews9.ix.netcom.com>
<4pvcb1$d...@boris.eden.com>
organization: The Nizkor Project

In article <4pvcb1$...@boris.eden.com>, mcur...@eden.com (Mike Curtis) wrote:

>mgi...@ix.netcom.com (Matt Giwer) wrote:

"Supposedly a synagogue is collected tax free
contributions for Nizkor even though Nizkor does not
have tax exempt status. "

>This is the Troll who has to put his stamp on every thread no matter
>what.

But he's our troll :-)

Let him explain this one:

In the United States, checks in support of the work of The
Nizkor Project should be made payable to:

SAN ANTONIO AREA FOUNDATION - Nizkor Fund

and should be mailed to:

San Antonio Area Foundation
Nizkor Fund
P.O. Box 120366
San Antonio, TX 78212-9566

[...]

<END>

IOW KEN MCVAY YOU ARE VERY DISHONEST!! When you lie about your funding and
present forgeries to smear me when I present facts you are hurting yourself. I
hope people wise up to you real soon and your funding dries up. You can call me
names all you want and spread evil lies about me BUT I will keep telling the
truth about you!!!

Everyone compare what Ken McVay has claimed and I challenge anyone to prove Ken
McVay is not a liar who evidently hasn't paid taxes on all that money he has
received under the table!

1) Ken McVay did state: "What Mr. Bradbury has failed to demonstrate is that The

Nizkor Project, which I direct, has any association whatsoever with the "San
Antonio Area Foundation - Nizkor Fund. That is because Mr. Bradbury is not very
bright. The Nizkor Project has no operations of any sort whatsoever within the
United States. Neither The Nizkor Project nor Ken McVay has ever received any
money from the "San Antonio Area Foundation - Nizkor Fund"

2) Ken McVay did state: "Subject: American funding for the Nizkor Project...
In the United States, checks in support of the work of The Nizkor Project should
be made payable to: SAN ANTONIO AREA FOUNDATION - Nizkor Fund and should be
mailed to: San Antonio Area Foundation Nizkor Fund, P.O. Box 120366,
San Antonio, TX 78212-9566"

Yet Ken McVay arrogantly stated concerning me: "What Mr. Bradbury has failed to

demonstrate is that The Nizkor Project, which I direct, has any association
whatsoever with the "San Antonio Area Foundation - Nizkor Fund. That is because
Mr. Bradbury is not very bright."

YOU ARE THE ONE WHO ISN"T VERY BRIGHT KEN MCVAY AND SOONER OR LATER CANADIANS
WILL DEMAND AN ACCOUNTING FROM YOU!!!

I show the facts and all you have is petty personal attacks and a failed lawsuit
by a shyster who can't practice law in his state anymore and who has been
convicted for assaulting a female deputy sheriff right in the county courthouse
in which formerly a piss poor "Office of the Court." Snakes travel in pairs and
you a Liedeiken are a perfect coupling of serpents.

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.skeptic/msg/af974e5ec5085cce?fwc=1
(Archived locally as: McVaySlamDunked_A5 and McVaySlamDunked_A6)
Subject: SAAF San Antonio Area Foundation - Nizkor Fund -- Some New Archives
and The Same Funding Lie by Ken McVay Exposed V3-0 T_0822
Message-ID: <3i9lg1p8efhpoda0r...@4ax.com>
Date: 23 Aug 2005 04:32:17 GMT

More proof Ken McVay lies about his funding in the archive above.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

>Archive/File: people/b/bradbury.scott/Edeiken-v-Bradbury-RA.01
>Last-Modified: 2001/02/14
>
> REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION
>
> NOW COMES Plaintiff Yale F. Edeiken
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
An attorney who has been removed from the practice of law for his numerous
unethical and criminal acts and who has been disciplined three times by the
Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. A shyster who actually
forged a subpoena to issue on my ISP to get my address and telephone number so I
would be subjected to years of criminal harassment and who fabricated evidence
he used against me in his failed kook lawsuit against me. That is the sort of
person you cite as "fact."

>and demands that, pursuant to Rule
>4014, Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure, Defendant Scott Bradbury
>admit or deny the truth of the following within thirty (30) days of service
>or, by failing to do so, admit the truth of the matters asserted:

That lawsuit's perjurious forgeries were never served on myself NOR my attorney
which was a major reason why the Criminal who filed it lost his kook lawsuit
against me. He also lost his appeal because he didn't file a brief. Why? He knew
I wasn't going to contest the appeal and that I wanted the failed lawsuit to go
back before the same judge so I could expose his perjury and that is fact.

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics.nationalism.white/msg/56a1a43fe4f9d61d?fwc=1

Subject: The Nizkor Project Deals in Forged Documents and Smear Financed With

Exempt Donations V3-2 T_0929
Message-ID: <ot1oj19c03emm99l0...@4ax.com>
Date: 29 Sep 2005 15:34:29 GMT

More on Criminal Perjurer and assaulter of female deputy sheriff's contained
here:

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/7771395b27c10fe6
Subject: Why Does Sara Salzman Keep Evading The Real Reason Yale F. Edeiken Went
Into Hiding? aka Re: BLTN: Bradbury Lacking Twin Neurons V2.0 T_0802
Message-ID: <53b0f1d2m70eln84u...@4ax.com>
Date: 3 Aug 2005 02:47:09 GMT
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/58210ba65c45c1aa
Subject: Why Yale F. Edeiken LOST His Appeal. (Updated Links) V2-0
Reply-To: rhc-tavish@tavish-central
Message-ID: <it34c154u8rau67d3...@4ax.com>
Date: 29 Jun 2005 03:53:01 GMT
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Why is it none of my foes wants to discuss why Yale F. Edeiken dropped his
appeal and went into hiding rather than having his alleged "Findings of Fact"
go back before the judge!? I was more than willing BUT he went into hiding
and hasn't been heard from since though he "speaks" through his numerous
cretinous supporters who approve of his criminal behavior!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yale knew his forgeries and perjury were about to be exposed! That is why he
fled from getting justice like the coward he truly is!
------------------------------------------------------

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics.nationalism.white/msg/56a1a43fe4f9d61d?fwc=1

Subject: The Nizkor Project Deals in Forged Documents and Smear Financed With

Exempt Donations V3-2 T_0929
Message-ID: <ot1oj19c03emm99l0...@4ax.com>
Date: 29 Sep 2005 15:34:29 GMT
--------------------------------------------------------

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/c7d6394427adce0f
Subject: Patrick Keenan Approving of Forging Subpoenas and Fabrication of
Evidence? Aren't Those Criminal Acts?....
Message-ID: <rsb1c154lppiqupi1...@4ax.com>
Date: 28 Jun 2005 02:03:08 GMT
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/77682e500f0a2f33
Subject: The "RETURN TO STALKER" Myth Debunked V2-0 S_1030
Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2004 19:38:40 -0500
Message-ID: <u498o0l1ogkcqga2q...@4ax.com>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.lawyers/msg/2f77a3ec0377ec81
Subject: Yale F. Edeiken PUBLIC CENSURE Text and Links V2.0
Message-ID: <ipqmb15sgvqt5i20u...@4ax.com>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attorney Inquiry:
ID Last First Middle City Status
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
40290 Edeiken Yale F. Allentown INACTIVE <-------!
3102 Miller XXXX Arthur Philadelphia DECEASED
X7XXX Miller Adrienne XXXXX XXXXXX ACTIVE
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proof Shyster Yale F. Edeiken is now "INACTIVE." Here is what the Pennsylvania
State Supreme Court Attorney Registration shows:
http://padisciplinaryboard.org/office_of_sec.html
"The Office of the Secretary serves as the Controller, Personnel/Administrative
Office, Attorney Registration Office, Prothonotary and Secretary of the Board,
and is Liaison between the Supreme Court, the Board, the Hearing Committees, and
the Office of Disciplinary Counsel." At the web page you are given these links:
Pennsylvania Attorneys:
http://padisciplinaryboard.org/pa_attorney.html
Disciplined Attorneys:
http://padisciplinaryboard.org/disciplined_attorneys.html
Click that top link and enter in Yale's Supreme Court ID: 40290 and you will
get:
Attorney Inquiry
ID Last First Middle City Status
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
40290 Edeiken Yale F. Allentown INACTIVE Discipline
http://padisciplinaryboard.org/attsearchdc2.php?ss=40290&st=Attorney_ID&Submit=Submit
(Archived locally as: TubbyIsINACTIVE)
Click "Discipline" <http://padisciplinaryboard.org/attdiscdc.php?id=40290> and
you will get:

Attorney ID - 40290
Edeiken, Yale F.

Case County District Censured ... Comment
122 DB 95 Lehigh II 04/20/1998 Administered 10/20/98
(Archived locally as: shyster_censured)
For full details on Yale's Discipline read:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.lawyers/msg/2231c59be0f8464b
Subject: Yale F. Edeiken PUBLIC CENSURE Text and Links V4-0 T_0803
Message-ID: <ag63f19prg9qhbmh4...@4ax.com>

Yale tried to act like he was associated with Paul Trainor and Todd Miller and
they both show "ACTIVE" and no "Discipline" shows up when links are queried!

ID Last First Middle City Status
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
21242 Miller Todd Stuart Allentown ACTIVE Discipline
35627 Trainor Paul E. Allentown ACTIVE Discipline

Yale F. Edeiken Esq. of Allentown, Pennsylvania- Supreme Court
ID# 40290 has falsely asserted he was associated with the two law firms
mentioned below-- Todd Miller & Associates and Trainor Law Offices. Both law
firms told me first hand that Yale F. Edeiken was never an attorney at their
firms!! That is fact! (Archived locally as: YaleTheNut)
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/79dab24b047e1e68

From: "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>

Subject: Re: The Common Thread To All These Cancel Announcements...
Message-ID: <SH9g7.634$7d.2...@newshog.newsread.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 15:06:26 GMT

Defendant Bradshit <rdoc_...@my-deja.cpm, tavi...@ix.netcom,com> wrote
in message news:7lp1otkrsh37k7ioi...@4ax.com...

> Care to tell all of us why both Todd Miller and Paul Trainor distanced
> themselves from you

Because they were dealing with someone who was "mentally unstable"
(their dscription) and a "crazy man" (again, their description) who they
wanted to go away as quckly as possible.

~~End of GOOGLE Archive~~

Doc Tavish

unread,

Oct 1, 2005, 8:16:52 AM10/1/05

On Fri, 30 Sep 2005 00:29:07 -0000, <11jp1mj...@corp.supernews.com>
kmc...@shell.vex.net (Kenneth McVay OBC) of The Nizkor Project in Nanaimo,

British Columbia smeared me with:

>In article <szkoe6b...@tempest.prismnet.com>,
>The Chief Instigator <pat...@io.com> wrote:
>
>[tavish vomitus flushed down the bradbury]

Can't deal in facts especially when the former subject title was: "The Nizkor
Project Deals in Forged Documents and Smear Financed With Exempt Donations.."
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics.nationalism.white/msg/56a1a43fe4f9d61d?fwc=1
Message-ID: <ot1oj19c03emm99l0...@4ax.com>

BTW McVay the above updated archive really shows you for a criminal tax dodger
seeing how you have stated: "What Mr. Bradbury has failed to demonstrate is that
The Nizkor Project, which I direct, has any association whatsoever with the "San
Antonio Area Foundation - Nizkor Fund. That is because Mr. Bradbury is not very
bright. The Nizkor Project has no operations of any sort whatsoever within the
United States. Neither The Nizkor Project nor Ken McVay has ever received any
money from the "San Antonio Area Foundation - Nizkor Fund" YET the very same San
Antonio Area Foundation you now make such false claims about shows you receiving
money in 2000, 2002, 2003, and 2004!! All included in the above archive and
links provided for downloading the PDF files!!

You have even publicly stated contradictory words to what you claimed above:

... The correct information for donations is as
follows:
Canada

Tel: (210) 225-2243
Fax: (210) 225-1980

<<Tavish comment October 1, 2005: Those phone numbers are the same ones that San

Antonio Area Foundation gives out at its web site YET McVay claims to have no

connection with the S.A.A.F. or to have ever received any funding from them!!!

http://www.saafdn.org/
San Antonio Area Foundation
110 Broadway, Suite 230 | San Antonio, Texas 78205
Phone: 210.225.2243 Fax: 210.225.1980 Email: in...@saafdn.org >>

<END>

Everyone look at this and pay real close attention to the subject title!

In article <4pvcb1$...@boris.eden.com>, mcur...@eden.com (Mike Curtis) wrote:

>mgi...@ix.netcom.com (Matt Giwer) wrote:

"Supposedly a synagogue is collected tax free
contributions for Nizkor even though Nizkor does not
have tax exempt status. "

<<Tavish comment October 1, 2005: Nizkor does receive exempt donations BUT it
does not have a tax exempt status. Nizkor and B'nai Brith have an elaborate
money laundering tax scheme which circumvents McVay having to pay tax on his ill
gotten booty. Read about it here:
http://groups.google.com/group/can.general/msg/a8a3cb995ab2448f?fwc=1

Subject: NIZKOR.ORG and B'nai Brith's Apparent Funding Kick Backs and Tax Scam

Message-ID: <s45sb1lsas4r52dtu...@4ax.com>>>

>This is the Troll who has to put his stamp on every thread no matter
>what.

But he's our troll :-)

<<Tavish comment October 1, 2005: You two call him a troll because he exposes
you for what you are.>>

Let him explain this one:

In the United States, checks in support of the work of The
Nizkor Project should be made payable to:

SAN ANTONIO AREA FOUNDATION - Nizkor Fund

<<Tavish comment October 1, 2005: Yet you now claim: "What Mr. Bradbury has

failed to demonstrate is that The Nizkor Project, which I direct, has any
association whatsoever with the "San Antonio Area Foundation - Nizkor Fund. That
is because Mr. Bradbury is not very bright. The Nizkor Project has no operations
of any sort whatsoever within the United States. Neither The Nizkor Project nor
Ken McVay has ever received any money from the "San Antonio Area Foundation -
Nizkor Fund">>

and should be mailed to:

[...]

<END>

in which he was formerly a psychotic "Office of the Court." Snakes travel in
pairs and you and Yale F. Edeiken are a perfect coupling of serpents.

More proof Ken McVay lies about his funding in the archive above.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics.nationalism.white/msg/393e3320dd44fda3?fwc=1
Subject: ...Forging Subpoenas and Fabrication of Evidence... Aren't Those
Criminal Acts? Message-ID: <d06sj1h7s0d7hte8d...@4ax.com>

>and demands that, pursuant to Rule 4014, Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure,
>Defendant Scott Bradbury admit or deny the truth of the following within thirty (30)
>days of service or, by failing to do so, admit the truth of the matters asserted:

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics.nationalism.white/msg/56a1a43fe4f9d61d?fwc=1

Subject: The Nizkor Project Deals in Forged Documents and Smear Financed With

Exempt Donations V3-2 T_0929
Message-ID: <ot1oj19c03emm99l0...@4ax.com>
Date: 29 Sep 2005 15:34:29 GMT

More on Criminal Perjurer Yale F. Edeiken and assaulter of a female deputy
sheriff contained here:

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics.nationalism.white/msg/56a1a43fe4f9d61d?fwc=1

Subject: The Nizkor Project Deals in Forged Documents and Smear Financed With

Exempt Donations V3-2 T_0929
Message-ID: <ot1oj19c03emm99l0...@4ax.com>
Date: 29 Sep 2005 15:34:29 GMT
--------------------------------------------------------

~~End of GOOGLE Archive~~

Tavish

"Does it bother you at all that you are forced to tell transparent lies
about your opposition, while they can undermine your efforts merely by
telling the truth about you?" -Jim Alder 01 Jun 2005
Message ID: Xns96687CF5C4150...@216.196.97.142

Doc Tavish

unread,

Oct 2, 2005, 9:45:46 PM10/2/05

On 02 Oct 2005 12:52:05 -0500, <szk64sf...@eris.io.com> The Chief
Instigator <pat...@io.com> wrote:

>Gord McFee <gord....@rogers.com> writes:
>
>>On 10/1/2005 9:27 AM, The Chief Instigator wrote:
>
>>> (Newsgroups de-spammed)

Restored!!

>>> R. Scott Bradbury <rhc-tavish@tavish-central> writes:
>
>>>> On Fri, 30 Sep 2005 00:29:07 -0000, <11jp1mj...@corp.supernews.com>
>>>> kmc...@shell.vex.net (Kenneth McVay OBC) of The Nizkor Project in Nanaimo,
>>>> British Columbia smeared me with:
>
>>>>> In article <szkoe6b...@tempest.prismnet.com>,
>>>>> The Chief Instigator <pat...@io.com> wrote:
>
>>>>> [tavish vomitus flushed down the bradbury]

What the insult hurlers can't refute:

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics.nationalism.white/msg/dd0676138caa0fb4?fwc=1
Subject: Nizkor's "Findings of FACT" Originated from a Perjurer and Convicted
Criminal aka Re: Tubbyblubber Scumbury: Findings of FACT
Date: Sat, 01 Oct 2005 07:16:52 -0500
Message-ID: <jgusj1d9hdo1jiud8...@4ax.com>

>>>> Can't deal in facts especially when the former subject title was: "The
>>>> Nizkor
>

>>> *PAF*
>>> chiefinstigator.us.tt/tavish.php - it's the Bozo of Bellville's future.
>
>>Or even http://chiefinstigator.us.tt/tavish.php :-)

That is not my picture. Hate to disappoint you and your web page devoted to me
proves what a loser you are too.

>I'm waiting for his discovery that The Internet is conspiring against him.

I'm waiting for you losers to explain why McVay is not a liar about his funding
as the evidence shows which I provide and you all keep deleting:

<END>

>mgi...@ix.netcom.com (Matt Giwer) wrote:

[...]

<END>

ADDED BONUS FOR OCTOBER 2, 2005:

Ken McVay has stated in public forum against me: "What Mr. Bradbury has failed

to demonstrate is that The Nizkor Project, which I direct, has any association
whatsoever with the "San Antonio Area Foundation - Nizkor Fund. That is because

Mr. Bradbury is not very bright... Neither The Nizkor Project nor Ken McVay has

ever received any money from the "San Antonio Area Foundation - Nizkor Fund" YET

his own Nizkor web site shows this:

http://www.nizkor.org/ftp.cgi/people/m/mcvay.ken/press/express-news.960803
(Link November 20, 2003 and no disclaimers are made!! Archived locally as:
11-20-2003SAAF2NIZKOR)

Shofar FTP Archive File: people/m/mcvay.ken/press/express-news.960803

San Antonio Express-News
August 3, 1996
Page 10B

"Internet project won't let Holocaust be forgotten"
By Thomas Edwards
Express-News Staff Writer

"Nizkor" in Hebrew means "we will remember," but it is also a
solemn promise Holocaust researcher Kenneth McVay has taken to
the Internet so that people will never forget the atrocities of
Nazi Germany.

Now his task has gotten a little easier with a $50,000 grant from
the philanthropic San Antonio Area Foundation to the Nizkor
Project, an international computer web site directed by the 55-
year-old McVay from his home in Vancouver Island, Canada... <END>

Once again everyone pay attention to the subject title and compare what McVay
has posted to what he says about me not being very bright!

In article <4pvcb1$...@boris.eden.com>, mcur...@eden.com (Mike Curtis) wrote:

>mgi...@ix.netcom.com (Matt Giwer) wrote:

"Supposedly a synagogue is collected tax free
contributions for Nizkor even though Nizkor does not
have tax exempt status. "

>This is the Troll who has to put his stamp on every thread no matter
>what.

But he's our troll :-)

Let him explain this one:

In the United States, checks in support of the work of The
Nizkor Project should be made payable to:

SAN ANTONIO AREA FOUNDATION - Nizkor Fund

and should be mailed to:

San Antonio Area Foundation
Nizkor Fund
P.O. Box 120366
San Antonio, TX 78212-9566

[...]

<END>

Does everyone see how Ken McVay lies through his teeth about his funding?

[...]

Stay stupid Patrick and Gourd because you two make me look good! All my
opposition can do to this very day is hurl insults at me and call me names and
post where I live and I continue posting what I post in the manner above so who
is telling the truth?

Tavish

>--
> Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (pat...@io.com) Houston, Texas
> chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros)
> LAST GAME: Chicago 5, Houston 3 (April 26)
> NEXT GAME: Friday, October 7 vs. San Antonio, 7:35

Sara Salzman

unread,

Oct 2, 2005, 10:31:09 PM10/2/05

In article <ld21k11mqrg2jauqi...@4ax.com>,
Doc Tavish <rhc-tavish@tavish-central> wrote:

Because no one gives a rat's ass about it. Not the American tax
officials, not the Canadian tax officials, not American law enforcement,
not Canadian law enforcement, no one in alt.history.what-if, no one in
can.general, no one in bc.general, no one in can.taxes, no one in
ab.general, no one is tor.general, and expecially no one in
alt.revisionism, where we've seen you post the same garbage for YEARS.

Got it? No one CARES. No one believes you. You're a pathetic old man
shouting from your rented shack, and NO ONE CARES.

No one cares about your personal attacks. No one cares about your
attempts to drive people from alt.revisionism. No one cares about your
hysterical screeds about Yale Edeiken. No one cares about your claims
that I am a Communist. NO ONE CARES.

You're a sorry old loser, you live alone, and someday, you'll die alone.
And NO ONE WILL CARE.

Hope that helps.

Sara

followups set to alt.revisionism -- because no one else needs to read
Bradbury drivel.

--
The Jews may think all people are stupid when I reality the are watch ever
move you people make.

An old German saying is the Jews will give nothing for what you did have
before. The Jews supporting poor black people means there will be absolutely
no return of some of the money this alone speaks for itself.
-- Kurt Knoll.

Wally Cleaver

unread,

Dec 21, 2005, 12:29:58 AM12/21/05

On Sat, 25 Jun 2005 17:27:18 -0000, <11br4vm...@corp.supernews.com>

kmc...@shell.vex.net (Kenneth McVay OBC) wrote:

Has everyone noticed how the director of The Nizkor Project based in Nanaimo,
British Columbia - Canada acts? If Ken McVay will repeatedly cite manufactured
evidence from a recent failed lawsuit against me as being factual then why

should he be trusted with documents allegedly sixty years old related to World

War Two? Why would anyone want to donate any money to a person who runs his
Nizkor Project in such a manner and who can only hurl insults and engage in name
calling when he is caught in his dishonesty? His claims concerning historical

events should have no credit seeing how he passes off perjured forgeries
submitted in a civil court of law as authentic as proven beyond any doubt below.

His source of the forged documents is a shyster who has been convicted of

assaulting a female deputy sheriff and has had a PUBLIC CENSURE from the Supreme

Court of Pennsylvania State and at the same time claimed: "I have never been
charged with any unethical activity relating to the practice of law..." AFTER he

has been disciplined more than once by the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme
Court of Pennsylvania. The shyster has also forged subpoenas to issue to ISPs to
get the personal information of his opposition so he can distribute it and have
his targets criminally harassed such as he had done to me. ALL PROVEN BELOW.

Insults instead of facts are all you have McVay.

>Archive/File: people/b/bradbury.scott/Edeiken-v-Bradbury.C1
>Last-Modified: 2001/02/15

I am glad to see you prove that you deal in forgeries McVay and perhaps people
will wise up and your funding dribble to naught!

Here are some examples of McVay having forgeries at his web site:

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Special Note: The Plaintiff (the kook who sued me and lost and whom Kenneth
McVay likes to quote as a "factual" source) admitted in public forum that he is
a "mentally unstable crazy man" as proven here- Yale F. Edeiken Esq. of

Allentown, Pennsylvania- Supreme Court ID# 40290 has falsely asserted he was

associated with the two law firms mentioned below (Todd Miller & Associates and
Trainor Law Offices). Both law firms told me first hand that Yale F. Edeiken was

never an attorney at their firms!! That is fact!

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/79dab24b047e1e68
From: "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
Subject: Re: The Common Thread To All These Cancel Announcements...
Message-ID: <SH9g7.634$7d.2...@newshog.newsread.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 15:06:26 GMT
Defendant Bradshit <rdoc_...@my-deja.cpm, tavi...@ix.netcom,com> wrote
in message news:7lp1otkrsh37k7ioi...@4ax.com...

[...]

> Care to tell all of us why both Todd Miller and Paul Trainor distanced
> themselves from you

Because they were dealing with someone who was "mentally unstable"
(their dscription) and a "crazy man" (again, their description) who they

wanted to go away as quckly as possible. <end>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Xref: http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/311c0e402a65a351
Message-ID: <d0ic0v81gdhrd1djq...@4ax.com>

--digsig
Authentic Doc Tavish

<end>

Witness this:

Archive/File: people/b/bradbury.scott/Edeiken-v-Bradbury.C1
Last-Modified: 2001/02/14

--digsig
Authentic Doc Tavish

<stop>

<END>

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/ffe37666e47d760a

(Archived locally as: YaleLied1 and YaleLied2)
>Doc Tavish <doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com> wrote in message
>news:3920c22c....@news.flash.net...

[...]

>> > Perhaps you should ask your shrink about people who write anonumus
>> >notes to others like:
>> >
>> > " You are just as much of a filthy little cock sucker vermin as your
>> >butt buddy Jeff Brown. You have to rely on out of context quotes and
>> >character assassination. It would be a pleasure to see someone slowly
>> >work you over with an ice pick Yale!"
>> The above is just exactly what you said it is Yale, "anonumus" your word!
>> Just because you are a paranoid and have a psychotic dislike of me does
>> not mean every thing you imagine comes from me.
:
> It came from you

Then why didn't you show the headers which would show so Yale?

>and was signed by you.

Then why didn't you show my signature? If I signed it and it was from me
as you claim why do you call it "anonumus"? It would not be so if were
truly from me as headers would show and it actually had my signature!

What did you say in just another post about the "e-mail" above Yale? Your
own words again: "Perhaps you should ask your shrink about people who
write anonumus notes to others like:" It's ANONYMOUS Yale! You've said so!

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/8762ffcf9b7919f4
(Archived locally as: Nradbury1 and Nradbury2)

From: "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>

<START>

[...]

<STOP>

<START>

September 26, 2001

Very truly yours,

The Attachment:

<STOP>

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/7771395b27c10fe6?fwc=1

Subject: Why Does Sara Salzman Keep Evading The Real Reason Yale F. Edeiken Went
Into Hiding? aka Re: BLTN: Bradbury Lacking Twin Neurons V2.0 T_0802
Message-ID: <53b0f1d2m70eln84u...@4ax.com>
Date: 3 Aug 2005 02:47:09 GMT
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/58210ba65c45c1aa?fwc=1

Subject: Why Yale F. Edeiken LOST His Appeal. (Updated Links) V2-0
Reply-To: rhc-tavish@tavish-central
Message-ID: <it34c154u8rau67d3...@4ax.com>
Date: 29 Jun 2005 03:53:01 GMT

Yale F. Edeiken also abused the legal system by issuing a forged subpoena on my

ISP to get my identity, address, and telephone number which Ken McVay and the
rest of his thugs use illicitly.

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics.nationalism.white/msg/393e3320dd44fda3?fwc=1
Subject: ...Forging Subpoenas and Fabrication of Evidence? Aren't Those Criminal
Acts?...
Message-ID: <d06sj1h7s0d7hte8d...@4ax.com>
Date: 1 Oct 2005 05:06:24 GMT

~~End of GOOGLE Archive~~

From: "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>

Subject: KOOK WEBSITE
Date: 2000/01/02
Message-ID: <3870...@news3.enter.net>
"I have never been charged with any unethical activity relating to the
practice of law..."

IS THAT SO? Here you are caught lying once again Yale:

http://padisciplinaryboard.org/attdiscdcd.php?id=40290
(Link active October 29, 2003. Archived locally as: shyster_censured)

Attorney ID - 40290
Edeiken, Yale F.

I. HISTORY OF PROCEEDINGS

II. FINDINGS OF FACT

III. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

IV. DISCUSSION

V. RECOMMENDATION

that the Respondent, Yale F. Edeiken, Esquire receive a public censure from the
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

It is further recommended that the expenses incurred in the

investigation and prosecution of this matter are to be paid by the Respondent.

Respectfully submitted,
THE DISCIPLINARY BOARD OF THE
SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

By:__________________________
Thomas J. Elliott, Member
Date: February 26, 1998

Board Members Saltz, Nix and Carson recused themselves.

PER CURIAM:

--end of 122DB1995.PDF--

I.E.

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/77682e500f0a2f33

Subject: The "RETURN TO STALKER" Myth Debunked V2-0 S_1030
Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2004 19:38:40 -0500
Message-ID: <u498o0l1ogkcqga2q...@4ax.com>

CLERK OF COURTS OF LEHIGH COUNTY - CIVIL DIVISION

---end of article---

Column:

Corrections:

Memo:

---end---

~~End of GOOGLE Archive~~

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/db0f907c2a8ef411?fwc=1
Subject: Yale F. Edeiken Admits Sending Death Threats Over The Internet is a
Federal Crime (Which He Has Done!) V2.0 (Links Updated) T_0926
Message-ID: <fk2fj15kvtvqjupej...@4ax.com>
Date: 26 Sep 2005 06:24:03 GMT
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yale tried to have me whacked and applying The Law of Moses which he
claims to adhere to as a Jew- I add:

Leviticus 24:19-20 :: New International Version (NIV)
19 If anyone injures his neighbor, whatever he has done must be done to him:
20 fracture for fracture, eye for eye, tooth for tooth. As he has injured the
other, so he is to be injured.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yale afterall did post my real name, address, and telephone number with the
incitement to murder by people visiting me with baseball bats!!!

Bonus: If McVay and his Nizkor will deal in forgeries and consort with an
unethical perjurious attorney who has been PUBLICLY CENSURED and convicted for

assault then is it any surprise Ken McVay lies about his funding as shown here:

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics.nationalism.white/msg/22fb984323b82be9?fwc=1

Subject: $50,000 Not Reported to CCRA by The Nizkor Project? Ken McVay is Lying
About Funds He Has Apparently NOT Reported to CCRA!! SAAF Report for 2002 Is

Further Proof! V4.0 T_1018
Message-ID: <ov2bl1tfmaclduina...@4ax.com>
Date: 19 Oct 2005 00:23:53 GMT

Short takes:

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/19272a44fd2c3cec?fwc=1

From: kmc...@veritas.nizkor.org (Kenneth McVay, OBC)

Subject: STILL Waiting for Donnie..... (Or "Bradbury: Wrong Again")
Date: 5 Jan 2001 00:32:08 GMT
Organization: The Nizkor Project
Message-ID: <9334m8$1nm1$1...@news.tht.net>

(Archived locally as: McVayEXHIBIT1)
Mr. Bradbury, wishing to demonstrate how ill-equipped he is to deal with
evidence of any sort... What Mr. Bradbury has failed to demonstrate is that The

Nizkor Project, which I direct, has any association whatsoever with the "San
Antonio Area Foundation - Nizkor Fund." That is because Mr. Bradbury is not very
bright... Neither The Nizkor Project nor Ken McVay has ever received any money
from the "San Antonio Area Foundation - Nizkor Fund"

As for Ken McVay's bold faced lie: "What Mr. Bradbury has failed to demonstrate

is that The Nizkor Project, which I direct, has any association whatsoever with

the San Antonio Area Foundation - Nizkor Fund." BUT I have "demonstrated" the
association between the Nizkor Project and the San Antonio Area Foundation -
Nizkor Fund and all with Ken McVay's very own words below!

organization: The Nizkor Project

In the United States, checks in support of the work of The

Nizkor Project should be made payable to:
SAN ANTONIO AREA FOUNDATION - Nizkor Fund
and should be mailed to:
San Antonio Area Foundation
Nizkor Fund
P.O. Box 120366
San Antonio, TX 78212-9566

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/e6e8f845002483a1
(Archived locally as: SAAF_1)

From: kmc...@nizkor.almanac.bc.ca (Ken McVay OBC)

Subject: The Nizkor Project appreciates your support
Date: 1996/09/05
Message-ID: <50n608$9...@nizkor.almanac.bc.ca>
x-network: http://www.nizkor.org/
organization: The Nizkor Project

..In the United States, checks should be made payable to:

"SAN ANTONIO AREA FOUNDATION - Nizkor Fund"
and should be mailed to:
San Antonio Area Foundation
Nizkor Fund
P.O. Box 120366
San Antonio, TX 78212-9566

We thank all of you who have sent your donations in support of the Nizkor
Project. The funds you have provided have been used to provide substantial
improvements in service.
<end/quote>

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/72d376fef3c983cf?fwc=1

From: kmc...@nizkor.almanac.bc.ca (Ken McVay OBC)

Subject: Nizkor Project financing and Kleinsorg's slandering Germans
Date: 1996/06/15
Message-ID: <4pvbkg$a...@nizkor.almanac.bc.ca>

In article <31c2fa3a...@news.annap.infi.net>,
h...@annap.infi.net (Horst Kleinsorg) wrote:

>First tell us who is financing your Nizkor, then we perahps can
>talk.

Thank you for bringing that up, Mr. Kleinsorg. I am financed
by thousands of "just plain folks" who wish to support my
work... In the United States, they make their cheques payable to:

SAN ANTONIO AREA FOUNDATION - Nizkor Fund

and mail them to:

San Antonio Area Foundation
Nizkor Fund
P.O. Box 120366
San Antonio, TX 78212-9566

...By the way, Mr. Kleinsorg... now that I have responded openly
and honestly to your question, perhaps you can tell us what
difference it makes who finances my work... I fail to see
how my financing changes that.
<end/quote>

"[W]hen you're living a lie, the lie has to get more complicated-they're always
contradicting themselves...so that the lie itself becomes self-evident."
-- Ken McVay, director of the Nizkor Project
http://www.peacemagazine.org/fulltext/all-vol13no2.html
(Link active November 20, 2003. Archived locally as: peacenik13_2)

Supplemental to the above:

http://www.ghwk.de/engl/linksengl1.htm
(Archived locally as: linksengl)
House of the Wannsee Conference
Memorial and Educational Site
-------------------------------

[...]

The Mazal Library - A Holocaust Resource
c/o The San Antonio Area Foundation - Nizkor Fund
600 Sandau, San Antonio, Tx 78216
<end/quote>

http://www.nizkor.org/hweb/people/m/mcvay-ken/put-up-shut-up.html
Put up or shut up, Mr. Giwer
... scientific standards, Mr. Giwer will agree to the immediate release of the
trust funds to the San Antonio Area Foundation Nizkor Fund as a tax-exempt
donation. ... <<Tavish comment December 20, 2005: I thought Ken McVay has
claimed to not be associated with "the San Antonio Area Foundation Nizkor Fund"
yet there is Ken McVay trying to get Mr. Giwer to donate!!>>

[PDF] Financials 2000 3-01 http://www.saafdn.org/pdf/Fin2000.pdf
File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - View as HTML
http://216.239.57.104/search?q=cache:sAnpRlOX1HAJ:www.saafdn.org/pdf/Fin2000.pdf+Nizkor++%22San+Antonio+Area+Foundation%22&hl=en&ie=UTF-8
... 3 Fund Types The San Antonio Area Foundation is dedicated to improving the
quality of ... Katz Memorial Trust Beta and Melvin Leazar Memorial Fund Nizkor
Fund Mary ...
[PDF] 2002 Annual Report http://www.saafdn.org/pdf/AnnRpt2002.pdf
File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - View as HTML
http://216.239.57.104/search?q=cache:MHtPsNgO884J:www.saafdn.org/pdf/AnnRpt2002.pdf+Nizkor++%22San+Antonio+Area+Foundation%22&hl=en&ie=UTF-8
... Lemuel G. Hodgkins Trust Dan and Gloria Oppenheimer Fund San Antonio Area
Foundation Community Fund ... Fund Beta and Melvin Leazar Memorial Fund Nizkor
(USA) Fund ...
[PDF] 2003 Annual ReportFile Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat
http://www.saafdn.org/docs/annual_report/AnnRpt2003.pdf
(Archived locally as: AnnRpt2003)
San Antonio Area Foundation Strategic Initiative Fund. George Weldon Sheffield
Fund ... Nizkor (USA) Fund to Combat Racism & Anti-Semitism in Mass Media ...
-->Here is the San Antonio Area Foundation web site showing again in 2004 that
Nizkor received funding:
http://sitelevel.whatuseek.com/query.go?crid=56a9e3b448c11dd2&query=Nizkor&slice_title=&page=1&fo=1
(Archived locally as: SAAF_NizkorFund_2004)
http://sl.wus0.com/quclk.go?rd=http://www.saafdn.org/docs/annual_report/annualReport_current.pdf&res=1&crid=56a9e3b448c11dd2&pos=1&mr=10&qu=Nizkor
Results from This Site: 1 - 1 of 1 total results for Nizkor
... M. and Felix J. Katz Memorial Trust Ruth Lang Charitable Fund Beta and
Melvin Leazar Memorial Fund Nizkor (USA) Fund to Combat Racism & Anti-Semitism
in Mass Media James and Alberta Otterpohl Fund ...
http://www.saafdn.org/docs/annual_report/annualReport_current.pdf - 384k -
2004-09-10
(Archived locally as: annualReport_current.pdf)
I have reports on file for years 2000, 2002, 2003, and 2004 proving San Antonio
Area Foundation doled out money to the Nizkor Fund which Ken McVay was the
recipient!! Anyone wanting the pdf files need only download them or if they get
pulled I can post them to alt.binaries.
-------------
<start/quote>
http://www.nizkor.org/ftp.cgi/people/s/streicher.julius/streicher-pornographer-03
(Archived locally as: NizkorUSA)
Shofar FTP Archive File: people/s/streicher.julius/streicher-pornographer-03

--
Nizkor (USA) - An Electronic Holocaust Educational Resource
Anonymous ftp: http://ftp.nizkor.org/ftp.cgi?
European mirror: http://www1.de.nizkor.org/~nizkor/
Nizkor Web: http://www.nizkor.org/
<end/quote>

<<Tavish comment December 20, 2005: The above is from the Nizkor Project web
site solely operated by Ken McVay and the sig line plainly shows: "Nizkor (USA)
- An Electronic Holocaust Educational Resource" which contradicts Ken McVay's
statement: "The Nizkor Project has no operations of any sort whatsoever within
the United States." and "I have no connection in San Antonio, and neither does

Nizkor. Get used to it">>

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Is Ken McVay, the director of The Nizkor Project, an honest person in light of
all of the above? Why should his Nizkor Project have credibility when he has
been caught lying about many things?
Tavish

The Nizkor Project -- Ken McVay Director
P.O. Box 244, Station A
Nanaimo, B.C. V9R 5K9 Canada
1-250-616-9431
1-416-966-0461
1-417-781-3282
wpg...@kenmcvay.com
kmc...@nizkor.org
KMC...@VERITAS.NIZKOR.ORG

http://groups.google.com/group/can.general/msg/8a5017cb6fa55b20?fwc=1

Subject: Is NIZKOR.ORG Running a Self Serving Endowment Fund Scam? You All be
the Judges! V2-0
Message-ID: <6vttb1hmmg9m76457...@4ax.com>
Date: 26 Jun 2005 18:49:41 GMT

(Actually the Nizkor Endowment Fund and the Nizkor Trust Fund should both be
renamed the Kenneth McVay Endowment Fund and the Kenneth McVay Trust Fund seeing
how the Nizkor Project is a web site solely operated by Kenneth McVay from a
back room of his personal residence. McVay is the sole recipient and beneficiary
of those two "bogus" funds!)

http://groups.google.com/group/can.general/msg/a8a3cb995ab2448f?fwc=1
Subject: NIZKOR.ORG and B'nai Brith's Apparent Funding Kick Backs and Tax Scam

V2.0 Message-ID: <s45sb1lsas4r52dtu...@4ax.com>
Date: 26 Jun 2005 03:06:12 GMT

(The above details and documents the tax scheme invented and currently
perpetrated by B'nai Brith Canada and Kenneth McVay's Nizkor Project in which
B'nai Brith launders exempt donations and passes them to McVay as tax free even
though Ken McVay is not legally allowed to receive exempt donations. This is
more or less a similar tax scheme which resulted in criminal prosecutions.)

http://groups.google.com/group/ab.general/msg/5c06fd75fb21497d?fwc=1

Subject: Nizkor LHR Fund; Just Another Self Serving FUND Like the Nizkor

Endowment and Trust Funds? V2.0 T_1002
Message-ID: <k991k1lr0j9n5n15i...@4ax.com>
Date: 3 Oct 2005 03:33:01 GMT

0 new messages