"Criminally Perjured Sworn Testimony" at the Web Site of Peter Outerbridge aka Paul Kneisel (He Supports Lies So He Can Use Them To Smear Me)
Tavish
Fascist Cyberthuggery
<<Tavish comment December 23, 2002: The fascist cyberthug is
Yale F. Edeiken and not me! Your implying I am one based on
evidence which is false/perjured is libelous and I have repeatedly
told you that Yale's accusations were lies. I have on file my
e-mails of complaint to you and your replies to me too so don't try
to say it's news to you- and you weren't warned.>>
Edeiken v. Bradbury
[Thanks to Nizkor for archiving this.
[Archive/File: people/b/bradbury.scott/Edeiken-v-Bradbury-RA.01
[Last-Modified: 2001/02/14]
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LEHIGH COUNTY
CIVIL DIVISION -- LAW
YALE F. EDEIKEN :
:
Plaintiff :
:
vs. : No. 99-C- 2786
:
SCOTT BRADBURY a/k/a :
"DOC TAVISH" a/k/a :
"doc_t...@bigfoot.com" a/k/a :
"sonnyboy@ flash.net" :
:
:
Defendant JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
COMPLAINT
1 Plaintiff Yale F. Edeiken (hereinafter "Plaintiff") is a an
adult citizen and resident of Lehigh County, Pennsylvania.
2. Defendant Scott Bradbury (hereinafter "Defendant") ...
3. At all times material hereto Defendant was supplied access to
the Internet and to electronic mail (hereinafter "e-mail")by Flash.net
Communications, Inc., (hereinafter "flash.net") an internet service
provider located in Forth Worth, Texas, and by other internet service
providers unknown to Plaintiff including several services which allowed
Defendant to publish and communicate by e-mail anonymously.
COUNT I: Harassment by Telephonic Communication
21. Plaintiff hereby incorporates by reference Paragraphs 1
through 20 of this Complaint as though set forth fully at length.
22. At various times Defendant has communicated with Plaintiff by
electronic mail (e-nail) which is sent through interstate telephone lines
and received through a telephone connection maintained by Plaintiff and, as
such, constitutes telephonic communication.
24. That on December 5, 1998, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
"You only want to blow Joe
You want to suck Joe's Aryan cock, don't you Yale?
Doc Tavish"
Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
hereof as Exhibit "A-1."
PROOF THE ABOVE SWORN STATEMENT IS PERJURED:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=1201801624195636%40unribbed.net&rnum=1
From: earlt...@my-dejanews.com
Subject: Re: Vapor, Fatelvis, Bull Conner & B9Predator. Prepare for the worst.
Date: 1999/01/08
Message-ID: <12018016...@unribbed.net>#1/1
X-Trace: news.rdc1.ct.home.com 915759892 24.65.203.77
(Thu, 07 Jan 1999 17:44:52 PDT)
Organization: @Home Network Canada
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 07 Jan 1999 17:44:52 PDT
Newsgroups: soc.culture.african.american,alt.flame.niggers
X-Complaints-To: ab...@home.net
> From: ya...@enter.net (Yale F. Edeiken)
> Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
> Subject: Re: PIN JOE DOWN AND SUCK HIS COCK
> > Isn't strange that Yale has only two little harmless posts to offer
> >in his insane attempts to slander?
>
> If they are harmless why are your associates so upset. Indeed yoiu
> admit that. If they were "harmless" they could not be "slander" (they >
aren't, of course).
>
> > REMEMBER: THEY ONLY SMEAR THE ONES THEY FEAR.
>
> But I neither fear you or smear you.
you only want to blow joe
you want to suck joes aryan cock dont you yale
~~End of Exact GOOGLE Archive~~
Not sent by me, not signed "Doc Tavish" and it's from a regular ISP too!
That is perjury submitting falsified evidence! COUNT 1
25 That on December 5, 1998, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
Joe me thinks Yale wants to suck your cock and you're right --Yale is a
queer -- he does suck cock
Doc Tavish"
Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
hereof as Exhibit "A-2."
PROOF THE ABOVE SWORN STATEMENT IS PERJURED:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=19981205232659.3493.qmail%40hades.rpini.com&output=gplain
From: Anonymous <nob...@remailer.ch>
Subject: Re: Teamwork: A Mystery to Joe
Date: 1998/12/05
Message-ID: <199812052326...@hades.rpini.com>#1/1
References: <19981204234321...@ng96.aol.com> <36695...@news3.ente
Organization: mail...@nym.alias.net
Mail-To-News-Contact: postm...@nym.alias.net
Comments: This message did not originate from the Sender address above. It was
remailed automatically by anonymizing remailer software. Please report problems
or inappropriate use to the remailer administrator at <ad...@remailer.ch>.
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
> From: ya...@enter.net (Yale F. Edeiken)
> Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
> Subject: Re: Teamwork: A Mystery to Joe
> > >> A typical smear from Yale.
> > > How can I smear someone by reprinting his own words.
>
>
> > They are not my words, so it remains a smear, and you remain a queer.
>
> They were published under your name.
joe me thinks yale wants to suck your cock and you're right --
yale is a queer -- he does suck cock
~~End if Exact GOOGLE Archive~~
Notice the post was anonymous and it was NOT signed "Doc Tavish" as Yale accused
in his perjured sworn statement. COUNT 2
26 That on December 5, 1998, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
"Are you homosexual, Yale?
Your last lines look like a faggot speaking or are you merely trying to
make trouble like a malicious fag does
Doc Tavish"
Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
hereof as Exhibit "A-3."
PROOF THE ABOVE SWORN STATEMENT IS PERJURED:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=486bdd608ea62beed680ad5921a2f402%40anonymous.poster&output=gplain
From: Secret Squirrel <an...@squirrel.owl.de>
Subject: Yale The FAG Burps
Date: 1998/12/06
Message-ID: <486bdd608ea62bee...@anonymous.poster>#1/1
References: <19981204233749...@ng96.aol.com> <36695...@news3.ente
Organization: mail...@nym.alias.net
Mail-To-News-Contact: postm...@nym.alias.net
Comments: Please report problems with this automated remailing service to
<postm...@squirrel.owl.de>. The message sender's identity is unknown,
unlogged, and not replyable.
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
> From: ya...@enter.net (Yale F. Edeiken)
> Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
> Subject: Re: Rabbi Bellinger Lectures the Jews on Judaism
> > THEY ONLY SMEAR THE ONES THEY FEAR.
>
> I neither smear you or fear you. I have very little to fear from a
> lying anti-Semite without even the nerve to defend his ideas before an >
impartial tribunal.
>
>
> "hello? antone out there 12-14 e-mail me. i am thirteen and . .
> .well if you e-mail me at jbel...@sprynet.com you can find out more
> about me i am a female."
>
> --YFE
are you homosexual yale
your last lines look like a faggot speaking or are you merely
trying to make trouble like a malicious fag does
~~End if Exact GOOGLE Archive~~
Again- an anonymous post and it was NOT signed Doc Tavish as Yale claimed in a
sworn statement. I wonder if he would deny he has perjured himself! COUNT 3
[...]
31 That on December 6, 1998, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
"So why do you still want to suck his cock?
Do you think you'll become a man by ingesting his manhood?
Doc Tavish"
PROOF THE ABOVE SWORN STATEMENT IS PERJURED:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=0901801802535739%40hexer.org&output=gplain
From: Laz <hell...@home.com>
Subject: I'm targeted for what? damn.
Date: 1999/01/05
Message-ID: <09018018...@hexer.org>#1/1
X-Trace: news.rdc1.ct.home.com 915502345 24.2.101.226 (Mon, 04 Jan 1999 18:12:25
PDT)
Organization: @Home Network
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 04 Jan 1999 18:12:25 PDT
Newsgroups: alt.skinheads
X-Complaints-To: ab...@home.net
> It is now 8 days since this lying nazi bragged that he would have my
> service with enter.net discontinued.
>
> My e-mail address is still ya...@enter.net,
>
> He is still a nazi.
>
> He is still a liar.
>
> He is still a punk.
>
>
> --YFE
so why do you still want to suck his cock
do you think you'll become a man by ingesting his manhood
~~End of Exact GOOGLE Archive~~
Yale got the author and date wrong too and the post was not signed
Doc Tavish as he claimed in his perjured statement. COUNT 4
[...]
33. That on December 6, 1998, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
"What are you doing, Yale trolling for young boys again ? We all know you
have homosexual tendencies and you call all people homophobes who
oppose"gay rights" We also know how you have slandered the most righteous
Rev Fred Phelps in the past for his stands against the homosexual
lifestyle.
When are you militant homosexuals going to stop your perversions and seek
to live a meaningful life with purpose? Why do you wish to portray
yourself as a thirteen year old female -- what would your neighbors in
Allentown Pennsylvania think of your current degradation -- have you no
pride at all?"
I guess all you want to do is suck some young boys cock -- typical
homosexual sympathist from Nizkor you are -- why are Nizkorians so
pro-homosexual -- is it because all of you or at least most of you are
homosexual. If any group is comprised of liars it has to be your group
because you all even stoop to trying to deceive nature -- now go play with
your Barbie doll faggot child molester
Doc Tavish:
Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
hereof as Exhibit "A-10."
PROOF THE ABOVE SWORN STATEMENT IS PERJURED:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=19981206172003.29681.qmail%40nym.alias.net&output=gplain
From: lcs Mixmaster Remailer <m...@anon.lcs.mit.edu>
Subject: Yale Edeiken a Trolling Chickenhawk?
Date: 1998/12/06
Message-ID: <1998120617200...@nym.alias.net>#1/1
References: <19981205163543...@ng115.aol.com> <3669b...@news3.ent
X-Comment1: This message did not originate from the
X-Comment2: above address. It was automatically remailed
X-Comment3: by an anonymous mail service. Please report
X-Comment4: problems or inappropriate use to
X-Comment5: <postm...@anon.lcs.mit.edu>
Organization: mail...@nym.alias.net
Mail-To-News-Contact: postm...@nym.alias.net
Newsgroups: alt.politics.libertarian.gay
> From: ya...@enter.net (Yale F. Edeiken)
> Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
> Subject: Re: Rabbi Bellinger Lectures the Jews on Judaism
> References: <19981205163543...@ng115.aol.com>
> X-Newsreader: SPRY News 3.03 (SPRY, Inc.)
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 204.170.16.51
> X-NNTP-Posting-Host: 204.170.16.51
> Message-ID: <3669b...@news3.enter.net>
yale edeiken's obvious chickenhawk troll lines:
> "hello? antone out there 12-14 e-mail me. i am thirteen and . .
> .well if you e-mail me at ya...@enter.net you can find out more
> about me i am a female."
>
> --YFE
what are you doing yale trolling for young boys again -- we all know you
have homosexual tendencies and you call all people homophobes who oppose
"gay rights" -- we also know how you have slandered the most
righteous rev fred phelps in the past for his stands against
the homosexual lifestyle
when are you militant homosexuals going to stop your perversions and
seek to live a meaningful life with purpose -- why do you wish to portray
yourself as a thirteen year old female -- what would your neighbors in
allentown pennsylvania think of your current degradation -- have you no
pride at all
i guess all you want to do is suck some young boys cock -- typical
homosexual sympathist from nizkor you are -- why are nizkorians so
pro-homosexual -- is it because all of you or at least most of you
are homosexual
if any group is comprised of liars it has to be your group because you
all even stoop to trying to deceive nature -- now go play with your
barbie doll faggot child molestor
aryan-american
~~End of Exact GOOGLE Archive~~
Once again an anonymous post which Yale perjured himself by signing my nym
"Doc Tavish" in his complaint and attributed it to me in a sworn statement.
That was COUNT 5
34 That on December 8, 1998, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
All Nizkooks need to be apprehended, interrogated, and placed in protective
custody until a final solution can be made.
Doc Tavish"
Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
hereof as Exhibit "A11."
PROOF THE ABOVE SWORN STATEMENT IS PERJURED:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=84C06A88F1507F28.B631F6D1B209C3CD.7C009BBF34A90591%40library-proxy.airnews.net&output=gplain
From: Pee Kitty <Pki...@mariner.cris.com>
Subject: Re: Furmanski is lame
Date: 1998/12/20
Message-ID:
<84C06A88F1507F28.B631F6D1...@library-proxy.airnews.net>#1/1
X-Orig-Message-ID: <20129820...@grinding.net>
NNTP-Posting-Time: Sun Dec 20 21:15:30 1998
Organization: Digital Highway (using Airnews.net!)
NNTP-Proxy-Relay: library3
Abuse-Reports-To: abuse at dhc.net to report improper postings
Newsgroups: alt.slack,alt.newsangels
> From: ya...@enter.net (Yale F. Edeiken)
> Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
> Subject: Re: Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Nizkook Band
> References: <19981207212932...@ng-cb1.aol.com>
> X-Newsreader: SPRY News 3.03 (SPRY, Inc.)
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 204.170.16.148
> X-NNTP-Posting-Host: 204.170.16.148
> Message-ID: <366ca...@news3.enter.net>
> Date: 7 Dec 1998 22:57:39 +0500
all nizkooks need to be apprehended, interrogated, and placed in protective
custody until a final solution can be made
~~End of Exact GOOGLE Archive~~
Once again a post Yale admitted in a sworn statement signed "Doc Tavish"
when it is obvious another person posted it! PERJURY!!!!! COUNT 6
[...]
39 That on November 11, 1999, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
"You are just as much of a filthy little cock sucker vermin as your butt
buddy Jeff Brown. You have to rely on out of context quotes and character
assassination. It would be a pleasure to see someone slowly work you over
with an ice pick Yale!"
--digsig
Authentic Doc Tavish
191xllxyGtVQwy0mtCiBjivyX+knCUXYwdRt ptdrtqb
qfQbXQtisWlB/E1+yWkYkw1Wr7mGiAFcJ w6Wl/aU
4GEbQtlQOHN/G3asOLBC9JmQXWuqXwj BnPCuOV9cd
Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
hereof as Exhibit "A-16."
Proof the above was a perjured manufactured piece if evidence contrived by the
plaintiff to use against the defendant. He screwed up when he faked a digital
signature from me and didn't observe the format. I have the e-mail from the
author listed below on file too! Manufacturing evidence is a criminal offense.
Yale manufactured a lot of evidence in this example post alone and don't forget
his "nazihunter" death threats against me everyone!! Compare Yale's sworn
complaint above to the FACTS!!
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=mqb40vgp83le5nd7obe5b1dcdvtu36crhu%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: What Peter Outerbridge and Other Deniers of Reality Won't Face About
the Malicious Prosecution Which Was Waged Against Me...
Message-ID: <mqb40vgp83le5nd7o...@4ax.com>
Date: 19 Dec 2002 20:42:19 GMT
(Excerpt)
39 That on November 11, 1999, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
"You are just as much of a filthy little cock sucker vermin as your butt
buddy Jeff Brown. You have to rely on out of context quotes and character
assassination. It would be a pleasure to see someone slowly work you over
with an ice pick Yale!"
--digsig
Authentic Doc Tavish
191xllxyGtVQwy0mtCiBjivyX+knCUXYwdRt ptdrtqb
qfQbXQtisWlB/E1+yWkYkw1Wr7mGiAFcJ w6Wl/aU
4GEbQtlQOHN/G3asOLBC9JmQXWuqXwj BnPCuOV9cd
Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
hereof as Exhibit "A-16."
Respectfully submitted,
________________________
Yale F. Edeiken
<end>
Notice what was said in an anonymous post (shown just below) and the date of the
post and compare it to what Yale F. Edeiken charges just above! Remember Yale
claimed I e-mailed the above to him and he claimed I signed it and had my
digital signature and this was done in a sworn document admitted to a civil
court of law!
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=1&ic=1&selm=199902171515.KAA08970%40domains.invweb.net
From: Anonymous (nob...@openpgp.net)
Subject: Re: Joe Bellinger, Proven Liar
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power
Date: 1999/02/17
> > >>It is thus established that:
> > >>
> > >> - Joe Bellinger stated that he does, in fact, "post deliberate
> > >>misinformation".
> > >> - Joe Bellinger denied having made said statement.
> > >> - Joe Bellinger is, therefore, a liar.
> > >>
> > >>To coin a phrase: GAME, SET, MATCH.
> > >Did anyone expect any different result?
> > LOL! For grown men, you are all so childish.
:
> Expecting some minimal level of honesty -- a low standard which
> you seem incapable of meeting -- is hardly "childish."
>
> It frightens me that, with attitudes like this, you are raising a
> child.
>
> In article <19990112213243...@ng31.aol.com>,
> deb...@aol.com
> (Debunks) wrote: "I post deliberate misinformation . . ."
>
> --YFE
You are just as much of a filthy little cock sucker vermin as your butt
buddy Jeff Brown. You have to rely on out of context quotes and character
assassination. It would be a pleasure to see someone slowly work you over
with an ice pick Yale!
~~End of GOOGLE aka DejaCom Archive~~
Notice the above was an anonymous post. It was not an e-mail and notice that it
had no digital signature signed by me! Also notice the big difference in dates
the above was posted February 17, 1999 yet Yale accuses me: "That on November
11, 1999, Defendant sent Plaintiff an electronic communication stating in
pertinent part (the above EXACT quoted text)"
Witness this:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=6&ic=1&selm=osjdbt41kq8ov7moqagjivihjnda67vadt%404ax.com
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 22:07:41 -0600
Message-ID: <osjdbt41kq8ov7moq...@4ax.com>
From: kmc...@veritas.nizkor.org (Kenneth McVay, OBC)
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism,soc.culture.jewish,alt.conspiracy
Subject: "ALL FACTS IN THE COMPLAINT ... ARE DEEMED ADMITTED."
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 05:00:19 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: The Nizkor Project, http://www.nizkor.org/
Message-ID: <96fnp3$2bar$1...@news.tht.net>
Archive/File: people/b/bradbury.scott/Edeiken-v-Bradbury.C1
Last-Modified: 2001/02/14
--digsig
Authentic Doc Tavish
191xllxyGtVQwy0mtCiBjivyX+knCUXYwdRt ptdrtqb
qfQbXQtisWlB/E1+yWkYkw1Wr7mGiAFcJ w6Wl/aU
4GEbQtlQOHN/G3asOLBC9JmQXWuqXwj BnPCuOV9cd
Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
hereof as Exhibit "A-16."
<stop>
Crypto Kong does not insert blank lines in between "Authentic Doc Tavish"
and the crypto-text as confirmed by the software's author to both myself
and my attorney!
Here is the official reply to my inquiry:
X-Sender: jam...@shell11.ba.best.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 08:51:20 -0800
To: Scott Bradbury <xx...@flash.net>
From: "James A. Donald"
Subject: Re: Inquiry on Crypto-Kong Signatures
Cc: "Daylin B. Leach - Attorney at Law" <xxx...@aol.com>
--
At 0412 AM 2/23/2001 -0600, Scott Bradbury wrote
> The above forged digital signataure is verbatim and is exactly which was
> presented to the court.
To be presented to the court, it must be alleged to have signed
something. A digital signature without the text that it signed is of no
significance.
(Note: I did not include Yale's fabricated e-mail- I just sent Mr. Donald
the forged digital signature.)
> The digsig also has a blank line in between "Authentic Doc
> Tavish" and the bogus crypto-text. Your software does not do this in
> ANY example I've ever seen.
That is perfectly true. My program does not emit such blank lines, which
suggest fabrication, but not strong evidence of anything much, since the
blank line could have arisen from various accidents in transferring text
from one program to another.
> I do this for the benefit of my attorney. -)
--digsig
James A. Donald
6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG
GnwV4rmsIA8faEZwt0YOXUiSSJflZjiLd/kTrWIn
4F1jg73LTqhfLPw9BVz2uDGwa7v2WYBG0wNGHSkoM
<END>
--
As for Mr. Donald's statement: "the blank line could have arisen from
various accidents in transferring text from one program to another"-
the above fabricated signature from Edeiken's complaint is verbatim in the
group of false accusations known as "ALL FACTS IN THE COMPLAINT ... ARE
DEEMED ADMITTED." Notice Mr. Donald's digsig? No spaces and blank lines!
Notice my digsig made on this paragraph alone?
--digsig
Authentic Doc Tavish
Chyeer+xvAMg6mRtq2niuMN+bMnEkGsy0ShVPm2xATn
ejnWmIh1JCyv0DNQedTMFE/cAfXBLuqdxSAkk9w/
4O0CysIswhm2G04W2mJFeW7C7K5RHQkNr3oFBzH6X
NO BLANK LINES AND SPACES!
What are the penalties for submitting manufactured evidence?
[...]
Here is Yale making his false accusation in public forum:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=3920d160.112256232%40news.flash.net&rnum=1
Subject: Yale's Anonymous Post Signed By Me?! What an Oaf! aka Re: Bradbury
Caught in a Psychotic Delusional Rage
Date: 2000/05/16
Message-ID: <3920d160....@news.flash.net>
On Tue, 16 May 2000 04:12:22 GMT, "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
<GU3U4.3347$v%5.24...@newshog.newsread.com> wrote:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=GU3U4.3347%24v%255.242633%40newshog.newsread.com&output=gplain
>Doc Tavish <doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com> wrote in message
>news:3920c22c....@news.flash.net...
[...]
>> > Perhaps you should ask your shrink about people who write anonumus
>> >notes to others like:
>> >
>> > " You are just as much of a filthy little cock sucker vermin as your
>> >butt buddy Jeff Brown. You have to rely on out of context quotes and
>> >character assassination. It would be a pleasure to see someone slowly
>> >work you over with an ice pick Yale!"
:
>> The above is just exactly what you said it is Yale, "anonumus" your word!
>> Just because you are a paranoid and have a psychotic dislike of me does
>> not mean every thing you imagine comes from me.
:
> It came from you
Then why didn't you show the headers which would show so Yale?
>and was signed by you.
Then why didn't you show my signature? If I signed it and it was from me
as you claim why do you call it "anonumus"? It would not be so if were
truly from me as headers would show and it actually had my signature!
What did you say in just another post about the "e-mail" above Yale? Your
own words again: "Perhaps you should ask your shrink about people who
write anonumus notes to others like:" It's ANONYMOUS Yale! You've said so!
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=Ms1U4.3324%24v%255.238968%40newshog.newsread.com&rnum=1
From: "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
Subject: Re: Nradbury Goes Off the Deep End
Date: 2000/05/16
Message-ID: <Ms1U4.3324$v%5.23...@newshog.newsread.com>
(Exact quote for the record)
" I think you need a good psychiatirc examination. Perhaps you should ask
your shrink about people who write anonumus notes to others like: " You
are just as much of a filthy little cock sucker vermin as your butt buddy
Jeff Brown. You have to rely on out of context quotes and character
assassination. It would be a pleasure to see someone slowly work you over
with an ice pick Yale!""
No headers and no signature.
I guess the above is fair proof that Yale likes to forge e-mail even if it
is in his word "anonumus."
>> Your failure to do the same is noted. And will be by the judge.
>> --YFE
~~End of GOOGLE Archive Excerpt (With updated GOOGLE links)~~
PERJURY!! COUNT 7 Manufactured evidence such as phoney digital signature
with my "Doc Tavish" nym on it!!
40. Said telephonic communications were intended and designed to
alarm, harass, intimidate, annoy, distress, and inflict emotional distress
upon Plaintiff and that such damages actually occurred.
41. As a result of which Plaintiff suffered great distress and
mental anguish and was deprived of the enjoyment of life's pleasures.
42, Said telephonic communications were received by the Plaintiff
within the City of Allentown, County of Lehigh, Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania whereby jurisdiction is vested in this Honorable Court.
43. Said telephonic communications were made in violation of the
criminal laws of the United States and the criminal laws of the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
44, Said telephonic communications were made in violation of the
laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania related to ethnic intimidation.
45. Said telephonic communications were made willfully, wantonly,
and in outrageous disregard of the rights of Plaintiff with the malicious
intent of harassing, alarming, annoying, and/or intimidating Plaintiff and
to have a chilling effect upon his exercise of his right of free speech.
WHEREFORE Plaintiff demands compensatory damages in an amount in
excess of the statutory limit for arbitration in the Court of Common Pleas
of Lehigh County, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania together with punitive
damages in excess of the statutory limits for arbitration in the Court of
Common Pleas of Lehigh County, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania together with
interest costs and a reasonable attorney's fee.
[...]
~~End of Perjured Testimony Peter Outerbridge Carries at His Web Site~~
SEVEN COUNTS OF PERJJURY IN THE EXAMPLES ABOVE AND YALE'S KOOK LAWSUIT IS FILLED
WITH THEM TOO!
The above is just a small portion of perjury Yale F. Edeiken submitted to
a court of law in sworn testimony. He can't get me legally or fair and square
so the criminal perjurious shyster manufactures evidence and forges my nym "Doc
Tavish" to his concoctions and presents them to court as sworn testimony against
me and then he is seeking damages based on lies!?
Thank you Peter Outerbridge for keep reminding me of the injustice done against
me. We will see what the New Year brings for a bastard who forges e-mails,
manufactures evidence, makes death threats using subpoenaed information etc.
Perjury and manufacturing evidence is a criminal offense and how much more
despicable that an attorney would do it!
Here is Yale F. Edeiken making death threats and his pals deny he did so and I
devised a simple test for Peter Outerbridge and Patrick L. Humphrey to help them
see that the shyster they defend made death threats against me in December 1999.
Courtesy of Ken McVay, director of Nizkor, and from Nizkor web site:
Archive/File: people/b/bradbury.scott/Edeiken-v-Bradbury.C1
Last-Modified: 2001/02/14
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LEHIGH COUNTY
CIVIL DIVISION -- LAW
YALE F. EDEIKEN :
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ :
Plaintiff :
^^^^^^^^^ :
vs. : No. 99-C- 2786
:
SCOTT BRADBURY a/k/a "DOC TAVISH" (Defendant)
COMPLAINT
1 Plaintiff Yale F. Edeiken (hereinafter "Plaintiff") is a an
adult citizen and resident of Lehigh County, Pennsylvania.
[...]
51. On December 18, 1999, Defendant published the following
threat to Plaintiff:
<<Tavish comment December 19, 2002: How could I have
threatened Yale F. Edeiken by posting what he considers
a personal threat if it weren't for a fact Yale in his
stupidity admitting he was the criminal bastard who posted
my address and telephone number with a death threat!?>>
Subject: Re: WHERE OR WHERE IS TAVISH - I'm standing behind you with my
Desert Eagle .50AE locked and loaded.. . . . . . . I'm standing behind you
with my Desert Eagle .50AE locked and loaded slowly squeezing the trigger
for an excellent one shot- one kill! :-) Sleep on that a whil
"nazihunter." Doc Tavish Knowing Time is on His Side"
[...]
Respectfully submitted,
________________________
Yale F. Edeiken
<END>
From the above admission to Lehigh County Civil Court and on public record as
sworn testimony I now ask these questions concerning the above "ADMISSION OF
FACT":
NEW ADDITION as of December 20, 2002:
Simple questions Patrick L. Humphrey and Peter Outerbridge
aka Paul Kneisel can't answer with the proven facts presented.
Everyone else who is not biased has been able to answer the
following simple questions so why ca't Patrick and Peter? I
will supply blanks so they may enter what they think are the
correct answers based on what Yale F. Edeiken submitted as
"Admissions of Fact."
1) Who identified himself as the Plaintiff?
Patrick L. Humphrey's answer:______________________________________
Peter Outerbridge aka Paul Kneisel's answer:_______________________________
2) Who claimed that he was threatened when I posted these words as he
stated them in his "complaint": <I'm standing behind you with my
Desert Eagle .50AE locked and loaded.. . . . . . . I'm standing behind you
with my Desert Eagle .50AE locked and loaded slowly squeezing the trigger
for an excellent one shot- one kill! :-) Sleep on that a whil
"nazihunter." :-) Doc Tavish Knowing Time is on His Side">
Patrick L. Humphrey's answer:______________________________________
Peter Outerbridge aka Paul Kneisel's answer:_______________________________
Before I ask the third question I want to make sure you all know the answers
to 1 & 2. Do you? Everyone I've showed this to has answered:
Yale F. Edeiken
3) Who did I address my remark to as a matter of legal fact? I state such
in my reply to which Yale F. Edeiken charged: "On December 18, 1999,
Defendant published the following threat to Plaintiff:"?
Patrick L. Humphrey's answer:______________________________________
Peter Outerbridge aka Paul Kneisel's answer:_______________________________
I addressed as shown in my reply- "nazihunter" YET Yale F. Edeiken charges
that I threatened him! Now I ask:
a) Who claimed to be threatened by me? <Yale F. Edeiken>
Patrick L. Humphrey's answer:______________________________________
Peter Outerbridge aka Paul Kneisel's answer:_______________________________
b) Who was I, in fact, replying to? <nazihunter>
Patrick L. Humphrey's answer:______________________________________
Peter Outerbridge aka Paul Kneisel's answer:_______________________________
4) Is it not logical to conclude that Yale F. Edeiken was nazihunter on
the night of December 14th? Everyone of sound mind and reasoning thinks
so!
Patrick L. Humphrey's answer:______________________________________
Peter Outerbridge aka Paul Kneisel's answer:_______________________________
Here is the post and how I replied in actual context:
Subject: Re: WHERE OR WHERE IS TAVISH - I'm standing behind you with my
Desert Eagle .50AE locked and loaded..
Date: 12/18/1999
Author: Tavish <doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com>
On 15-Dec-1999, "nazihunter" <anon...@cotse.com> wrote:
> It seems that ever since Tavish's address was published, he
> seems to have disappeared.
> Has he fled?
> Or, better yet, has someone paid him a visit?
I'm standing behind you with my Desert Eagle .50AE locked and loaded
slowly squeezing the trigger for an excellent one shot- one kill! :-)
Sleep on that a while "nazihunter."
Doc Tavish Knowing Time is on His Side
<END>
<<Tavish comment December 19, 2002: By Yale F. Edeiken,
Allentown, PA 18104 Supreme Court ID# 40290 claiming the
above post was threatening him personally (which he swore
to in a "admissions of fact" which he, himself, submitted)
then he is admitting he was the bastard who posted my
address along with this death threat: "why not visit him.
...with a baseball bat.">>
Did Yale F. Edeiken or did he not implicate himself as being:
"nazihunter" <anon...@cotse.com>?
Patrick L. Humphrey's answer:______________________________________
Peter Outerbridge aka Paul Kneisel's answer:_______________________________
If he did not implicate himself then why would he be personally threatened
with my reply to "nazihunter" who at that time was just a mentally unbalanced
poster who on the night before made a criminal death threat against me? The
above is in court records and was filed as a sworn complaint against me, the
Defendant, who on just the night before had his name, address, and telephone
number posted with an incitement to murder!
Patrick L. Humphrey's answer:______________________________________
Peter Outerbridge aka Paul Kneisel's answer:_______________________________
Did "nazihunter" <anon...@cotse.com> post this just the night before?
Patrick L. Humphrey's answer:______________________________________
Peter Outerbridge aka Paul Kneisel's answer:_______________________________
From: "nazihunter"
Subject: WHY NOT GIVE THE NAZI SHITHEAD TAVISH A CALL
Date: 14 Dec 1999 00:00:00 GMT
Message-ID: <1999121500...@cotse.com>
X-Abuse-to: ab...@cotse.com
Organization: cotse
X-Abuse-goto: http://packetderm.cotse.com/cgi-bin/blockit.cgi
X-Comments: Anonymous mail2news gate web interface -
www.cotse.com/anonnews.htm.
X-Mail-To-News-Contact: ab...@zedz.net
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Anonymously posted.
The following is the address for Doc Tavish
Scott Bradbury
<address and telephone number deleted>
Why not call him and tell him what a nazi prick he is.
Better yet, why not visit him.......with a baseball bat.
<END>
Also on record is John Morris making comment on the "nazihunter" post of
December 14, 1999 with these words:
From: John Morris <John....@UAlberta.CA>
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: WHY NOT GIVE THE NAZI SHITHEAD TAVISH A CALL
Date: Sat, 18 Dec 1999 03:53:59 -0700
Organization: University of Alberta
Reply-To: John....@UAlberta.CA
Message-ID: <gbpm5sskjsi6t3pls...@4ax.com>
References: <1999121500...@cotse.com> <83ei53$i3r$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>
X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.7/32.534
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-UIDL: 17fc94b3bcce63f6d0de4bddc530dedb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
In <83ei53$i3r$1...@nnrp1.deja.com> in alt.revisionism, on Fri, 17 Dec
1999 23:48:52 GMT, doc_t...@my-deja.com wrote:
>In article <1999121500...@cotse.com>,
> "nazihunter" <anon...@cotse.com> wrote:
>> Anonymously posted.
>> The following is the address for Doc Tavish
[snip]
>> Why not call him and tell him what a nazi prick he is.
>> Better yet, why not visit him.......with a baseball bat.
>Now that is what I call a threat.
Indeed it is a threat. It also a criminal offence to utter such a
threat.
[...]
- --
John Morris <John....@UAlberta.CA>
at University of Alberta <Multi pertransibunt & augebitur scientia>
Is John Morris correct in his observation above? Yes or No? If NO then
why not?
Patrick L. Humphrey's answer:______________________________________
Peter Outerbridge aka Paul Kneisel's answer:_______________________________
[...]
As for Yale's lie that my unlisted telephone number and it's address were public
domain that night--taint so! If it were in public domain he would not have had
to issue that subpoena in the first place would he!? Also he lied about it being
submitted to court thus making it public record-- he did not submit it because
it would be listed among all the others in the docket!! Care to remain in
denial? Care to deny Yale committed grievous criminal acts against me on
December 14, 1999 (multiple counts at that!)? He broke the law when he did not
do as what he stated was lawful about subpoenas:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=8OSy5.1269%24mC.69080%40monger.newsread.com&rnum=3
Message-ID: <8OSy5.1269$mC.6...@monger.newsread.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2000 00:27:48 GMT
"Materail that is subpoenaed must be turned over... The material becomes public
information unless a court orders otherwise. Subpoenas are NOT automatically
issued and the other side has an opportnuity to ogject ("quash") any subpoena."
<END>
1) Yale stated regarding subpoenas: "Materail that is subpoenaed must be turned
over..." Yale did NOT turn it over even though he knew it was required and the
fact that the subpoena is not on the docket proves he did not follow legal
procedure. He instead decided to commit criminal acts instead!!
2) Yale stated regarding subpoenas: "The material becomes public
information.." It did not become public information because he never turned it
over!!
3) Yale stated regarding subpoenas: "the other side has an opportnuity to ogject
("quash") any subpoena." I never had a chance to quash the subpoena and he could
have let me know by e-mail (seeing how he was harassing me profusely by e-mail
at that time) and allow me a chance (as required by law) to object it!
If that subpoena had been turned over then it would show on the docket printout
that I got months after Yale filed his kook lawsuit against me and here is a
partial printout:
Docket details of Edeiken Vs Bradbury 1999-C-2786--
Anyone may obtain the docket for $3.00 and here is how and
partially what it shows:
Andrea Naugle -- Clerk Civil Court
Lehigh County Court House
Room 202
4555 West Hamilton Street
Allentown, Pennsylvania 18101-1614
and "Request Docket Printout for Edeiken Vs Bradbury 1999-C-2786" and you
will see for yourself among the following:
03-Nov-1999 PRAE FOR SUMMONS
17-Dec-1999 PRAE TO REISSUE WRIT OF SUMMONS
06-Jan-2000 SHRF RTN SUMMONS... DELIVERY DATE 30-Dec-1999
[...]
25-Apr-2000 Y F Edeiken ESQ's NOTICE OF INTENT TO SERVE SUBPOENA..
[...]
[No subpoena to Flash Net shows! This is FACT!]
Here is what the subpoena said (I have copies of all of this stuff too!)
"Flash Net Communications, File number 99-C-2786 with a heading: Yale F.
Edeiken Vs Scott Bradbury aka sonn...@flash.net demanding: "(1)
Application for services and all other written materials including
e-mails, complaints or memoranda of internal investigation of
sonn...@flash.net" "This subpoena was issued at the request of the
following person: Yale F. Edeiken, Allentown, PA 18104 Supreme Court ID#
40290"
{Issued November 30, 1999 and the return address was:
Yale F. Edeiken
918 North Bayard Street
Allentown, PA 18104]
<END>
Black Knight
> http://www.anti-fascism.org/special/cyberstalking/bradbury-evb.html
> Fascist Cyberthuggery
>
> <<Tavish comment December 23, 2002: The fascist cyberthug is
> Yale F. Edeiken and not me! Your implying I am one based on
> evidence which is false/perjured is libelous and I have repeatedly
> told you that Yale's accusations were lies. I have on file my
> e-mails of complaint to you and your replies to me too so don't try
> to say it's news to you- and you weren't warned.>>
>
One technical comment about your subject line is relevant: All Perjury
is a crime. As a matter of fact, it's a felony.
Bruno