Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Calling Philip Mathews; pleeze answer your telephone when we call

2 views
Skip to first unread message

TwistyCreek

unread,
Mar 1, 2006, 7:45:40 PM3/1/06
to mail...@bananasplit.info, mail...@dizum.com, mail...@news.gradwell.net, mail...@remailer.org.uk
PHILIP S MATHEWS
154 REEDSDALE RD
MILTON, MA 02186 (617) 698-2802

How is Nancy doing Phyllis? Will you post a cheese-cake picture of her?

NANCY S MATHEWS
154 REEDSDALE RD
MILTON, MA 02186 (617) 698-2802

More people to come.


Dr. Gassen Burnham

unread,
Mar 1, 2006, 8:43:12 PM3/1/06
to
Is that old hater still around....I figures cirrosis of the liver would
have done the old sponge in by now.

Sara Salzman

unread,
Mar 1, 2006, 10:03:41 PM3/1/06
to
In article <1141263792.7...@e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>,

"Dr. Gassen Burnham" <gasenb...@dodo.com.au> wrote:

> Is that old hater still around....I figures cirrosis of the liver would
> have done the old sponge in by now.

One notes that Ross Cummins thinks posting Mr. Matthews' personal
information is a reasonable thing to do.

Sara

--
-My name is not "Fatbury Scumbag" you stupid lying Jew bastard. Name call
is all a pathetic loser like you has! You have yet to prove me wrong
you dirty filthy lying Jew bastard!
-I don't rely on personal attacks as my means of posting and the bulk of
my posts prove so! You can't discern the difference. BTW my name is not
Fatboy you stupid kike.
--Scott Bradbury, who completely misses the irony of the above

phil...@aol.com

unread,
Mar 1, 2006, 10:06:59 PM3/1/06
to

Sara Salzman wrote:

> In article <1141263792.7...@e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>,
> "Dr. Gassen Burnham" <gasenb...@dodo.com.au> wrote:
>
> > Is that old hater still around....I figures cirrosis of the liver would
> > have done the old sponge in by now.
>
> One notes that Ross Cummins thinks posting Mr. Matthews' personal
> information is a reasonable thing to do.

The information is about as accurate as Cummins spelling of cirrhosis.

But then, if they had a brain they would be less likely to be deniers.

--
Philip Mathews

Sara Salzman

unread,
Mar 1, 2006, 11:46:31 PM3/1/06
to
In article <1141268819....@i39g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
"phil...@aol.com" <phil...@aol.com> wrote:

True, of course.

But I still find it remarkable that, when asked why they post
anonymously, deniers always say "If I used my real name, I would be
harassed." It is deniers, 99-1, who post personal information when they
can stumble across it, or just make it up if they can't locate it.

TwistyCreek

unread,
Mar 2, 2006, 12:13:05 AM3/2/06
to mail...@bananasplit.info, mail...@dizum.com, mail...@news.gradwell.net, mail...@remailer.org.uk
On 1 Mar 2006 19:06:59 -0800, "phil...@aol.com" <phil...@aol.com> wrote:

Your e-mail address is a combo of your name and your bitch's name.

Don't cry Phyllis; it's about time you were outed and for you to get the same
deal your cohorts do to others.

>
>Sara Salzman wrote:
>
>> In article <1141263792.7...@e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>,
>> "Dr. Gassen Burnham" <gasenb...@dodo.com.au> wrote:
>>
>> > Is that old hater still around....I figures cirrosis of the liver would
>> > have done the old sponge in by now.
>>
>> One notes that Ross Cummins thinks posting Mr. Matthews' personal
>> information is a reasonable thing to do.
>
>The information is about as accurate as Cummins spelling of cirrhosis.
>
>But then, if they had a brain they would be less likely to be deniers.

Your address is correct Philip and you know it. You live in Milton, Massachusetts
with your wife Nancy and you two are very active in local politics.

http://www.townofmilton.org/Public_Documents/MiltonMA_WarrMin/S005502DF-005502E1
About Milton | Departments | Selectmen | Town Boards | Public Schools | Links

March 21, 2005

TWENTY-THIRD MEETING

The Committee discussed the appropriateness of Town Meeting to be considering citizens
petition known as Article 54, “A Resolution Affirming Civil Rights and Liberties.
Further discussion was deferred pending conference with both the proponents and opponents.

A conference was held with Nancy Mathews, Philip Mathews, Charles Winchester and Richard
Ward, four of the citizens who submitted an article, known as Article 53, “ Amend Bylaw
for Moderator’s Term”, who discussed with the Committee their reasons for submitting this
article. Following this discussion, the Committee voted 13-0-0 to Recommend a “Yes” vote
to Town Meeting.

PHILIP S MATHEWS
154 REEDSDALE RD
MILTON, MA 02186 (617) 698-2802

How is Nancy doing Phyllis? Will you post a cheese-cake picture of her? I'd like to
see some bush if it is okay with you.

NANCY S MATHEWS
154 REEDSDALE RD
MILTON, MA 02186 (617) 698-2802

Poor Phyllis; you knew the day was coming and now it has arrived. Pleeze answer
your telephone when we call. If you don't then we may just show up to pay you
a visit.


TwistyCreek

unread,
Mar 2, 2006, 12:48:16 AM3/2/06
to mail...@bananasplit.info, mail...@dizum.com, mail...@news.gradwell.net, mail...@remailer.org.uk, phil...@aol.com
On Wed, 01 Mar 2006 21:46:31 -0700, Sara Poofter Salzman <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:

>> Sara Salzman wrote:
>>
>> > In article <1141263792.7...@e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>,
>> > "Dr. Gassen Burnham" <gasenb...@dodo.com.au> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Is that old hater still around....I figures cirrosis of the liver would
>> > > have done the old sponge in by now.
>> >
>> > One notes that Ross Cummins thinks posting Mr. Matthews' personal
>> > information is a reasonable thing to do.
>>
>> The information is about as accurate as Cummins spelling of cirrhosis.
>>
>> But then, if they had a brain they would be less likely to be deniers.
>>

>> --
>> Philip Mathews
>
>True, of course.
>
>But I still find it remarkable that, when asked why they post
>anonymously, deniers always say "If I used my real name, I would be
>harassed." It is deniers, 99-1, who post personal information when they
>can stumble across it, or just make it up if they can't locate it.
>
>Sara
>
>--
>-My name is not "Fatbury Scumbag" you stupid lying Jew bastard. Name call
>is all a pathetic loser like you has! You have yet to prove me wrong
>you dirty filthy lying Jew bastard!
>-I don't rely on personal attacks as my means of posting and the bulk of
>my posts prove so! You can't discern the difference. BTW my name is not
>Fatboy you stupid kike.
> --Scott Bradbury, who completely misses the irony of the above

We have Philip's info as well as yours Poofter Salzman and there ain't no
gosh durned thing you can do about it. We may decide to pay you a visit soon.

SARA D SALZMAN
4015 S KILLARNEY WAY
AURORA, CO 80013 (303) 617-9412
http://www.westword.com/issues/2000-08-10/news/feature3_4.gif

PHILIP S MATHEWS
154 REEDSDALE RD
MILTON, MA 02186 (617) 698-2802

NANCY S MATHEWS


154 REEDSDALE RD
MILTON, MA 02186 (617) 698-2802

We even have cunt's info as well.

On Thu, 01:55:36 GMT, fla...@verizon.net wrote:

>
> Roger <roger@.> wrote:
>
>> someone claiming to be TwistyCreek wrote
>> in message <RSBR5W3M3868...@twistycreek.com>:
>>
>> >All entries below collated from various sources and are
>> >public domain.
>>
>> <snip to>
>>
>> >Roger@ . Is suspected nym of Yale Edeiken
>>
>> Really? What public domain source backs *this* bit of delusion?
>
>I just feel sorry for all the Susan Cohens who may have been bothered
>by these jackasses - in fact, I almost wish I *had* been, because *I*
>would prosecute!!
>>
>> Hey, idiot child -- here's another chance to demonstrate your double
>> standard...
>
>Too late :-)
>

WE GOT YOUR NUMBER YOU HO'.

>Susan

http://www.zabasearch.com/

GARY A RUMAIN Born 1964
8112 GROVE ST
SILVER SPRING, MD (301) 565-9746

SUSAN E COHEN Born Nov 1962
8112 GROVE ST
SILVER SPRING, MD (301) 565-9746

ze...@smart.net (Gary Rumain)
Re: Bruneian Royal Harem: "Harem Scare 'Em?" Dateline NBC 9/23/97
1997/10/05
<617cpg$p9a$1...@news.smart.net>

In alt.talk.royalty Yet Another Steve <Steve_...@SPAM-FWDED2POSTMASTERSqmail4.nba.trw.com> wrote:
: In article <60snlk$hlc$9...@news.smart.net>, ze...@smart.net (Gary Rumain) wrote:
:
:
: Okay, you've managed to confuse me now, too. You post under the name
: "Gary Rumain" and sign your postings "Susan Cohen." Is this an instance
: of someone "hiding his/her identity" as well?

No. If I wanted to hide my identity, would I sign each & every post with
my name? We haven't been able to change the post-name so it includes mine
as well as my husband's. However, I was under the impression that this was
a common enough occurence on Usenet.

And, the "anonymity" to which I referred was the fact that, while mine is
genuine, the original poster's was a false e-mail address. You can reach
me at ze...@smart.net any time you feel like tyoing. There was no way to
reach the original poster. I find that very suspicious, if only because
it is a perennial practise of the worst trolls.

Susan Cohen


Dr. Gassen Burnham

unread,
Mar 2, 2006, 5:44:11 AM3/2/06
to
From: Sara Salzman

"One notes that Ross Cummins thinks posting Mr. Matthews' personal
information is a reasonable thing to do. "

Sara

Where did you get that idea from Hog Gal?...the tea leaves in the
bottom of your swill bucket?

I neither think it is reasonable or unreasonable....any repercussions
the old sponge can't handle he has only himself to blame for...it's all
about karma...he has made his bed so to speak.

You hypocritical porsine lardass...you routinely post my name, you did
it above, even though I use a nym...do I give a fuk, do I run around Oy
Veying and renting my garments....ROTFL

You should study the concept of 'dependent origination'...hog gal...you
would then perhaps...after it was explained to you a number of times,
understand where your self imposed victimhood comes from..

Dr. Gassen Burnham

unread,
Mar 2, 2006, 5:54:55 AM3/2/06
to
OOOOPS.....looks like Twistys got you by those parched and empty
gonads..Philthy.

LOL...what are the odds of there being 2 Philthy troublemakers...?

Better start checkin under the bed for 'deniers' Philthy.

Sara Salzman

unread,
Mar 2, 2006, 7:08:21 AM3/2/06
to
In article <05W9IRAB3877...@twistycreek.com>,
TwistyCreek <an...@comments.header> wrote:


OOooh, an Anonymous Coward is threatening me.

Pull the other one, Anonymous Moron.

Doc Tavish

unread,
Mar 2, 2006, 1:00:13 PM3/2/06
to
On Wed, 01 Mar 2006 20:03:41 -0700,
<catamont-C5A936...@news.giganews.com> Sara Salzman
<cata...@concentric.net> wrote:

>In article <1141263792.7...@e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>,
> "Dr. Gassen Burnham" <gasenb...@dodo.com.au> wrote:
>
>> Is that old hater still around....I figures cirrosis of the liver would
>> have done the old sponge in by now.
>
>One notes that Ross Cummins thinks posting Mr. Matthews' personal
>information is a reasonable thing to do.

You certainly thought posting my address and telephone number was a reasonable
thing to do and you are on record as stating:

"There's no crime in posting someone's publicly-available personal
information." cata...@concentric.net (Sara Salzman)
Subject: Pot. Kettle. Tavish.
Date: 1999/12/19
Message-ID: <catamont-191...@ts010d34.den-co.concentric.net>
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/a6ab7af06ae55141
(Archived locally as: SDSpublicInfoPostingOkay_1)

That was in regard to my address etc. being posted by Edeiken. BTW if my
information was "publicly-available" then why did Yale issue a forged subpoena
(which was NOT issued by the court and NOT registered with the court) to get my
not in public domain info? Care to answer that one you dirty swine?

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics.nationalism.white/msg/393e3320dd44fda3?fwc=1
Subject: ...Forging Subpoenas and Fabrication of Evidence? Aren't Those Criminal
Acts? aka Re: Why won't Sara Salzman respond to her challenge being met by proof
being provided? V2.0 T_0931
Message-ID: <d06sj1h7s0d7hte8d...@4ax.com>
Date: 1 Oct 2005 05:06:24 GMT

My but you Yids always want two standards but when the people your revile and
defame turn the tables on you devils then you all get indignant.

Tavish

~~Advice Which Sara Salzman Needs BUT Won't Heed~~
"Fat, high on drugs, and retarded is no way for you to go through life Sara D.
Salzman" and here is what I recommend:
1) Go on a diet and get some exercise which you need desperately. Sitting at
your computer and annoying people is not helping your waste line one bit.
2) Stop doing drugs. They are affecting your mind in a most negative way.
3) Practice the two suggestions above and perhaps your retardation won't be so
severe but one can't expect miracles from years of abuse.
4) Stop telling lies to end your continually being shamed by the lies being
exposed. Don't you have any pride at all?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Compelling proofs all of the above are rightful observations:
1) Sara D. Salzman being fat:
http://www.westword.com/issues/2000-08-10/news/feature3_4.gif
2) Sara D. Salzman is a drug user:
"The funniest part of this is that, although I do smoke cigarettes (as
did my ex-husband), HE was the one who abused drugs." - Sara Salzman
Message-ID: <catamont-D20A99...@news.concentric.net>
(Archived locally as: SDSdruggieHome)

Funny that Sara denies doing drugs above BUT she states such as shown below!

"Please let me know what drugs you're taking. They sound wonderful!" - Sara
Salzman Message-ID: <schwartz-180...@cmh-p028.infinet.com>
(Archived locally as: SaraSplainsAll_3 and SaraSplainsAll_4)
3) Sara D. Salzman is retarded:
"How many times do I have to tell you-- I AM RETARDED!!!" - Sara Salzman
Message ID: <catamont-548CA8...@spectator.sj.sys.us.xo.net>
(Archived locally as: RetardSara and RetardSara2)
4) Sara D. Salzman is a pathological liar who has also perjured herself.
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics.nationalism.white/msg/74d17effed6ddec?fwc=1
Subject: Sara Salzman's Recent Lies Documented and Archived. V2.0 T_0807
Message-ID: <9sedf1tc6173cb8ko...@4ax.com>
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/514d1e8240b88a7c?fwc=1
Subject: Sara Salzman's "Day, time, place. I'm waiting" and From Whence It Came!
V5.0 (Corrections Made) T_0822
Message-ID: <ukojg1d6n0obssupo...@4ax.com>
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/ddf877bf49b153c2?fwc=1
Subject: Sara Salzman's Affidavit Perjury. One Example of Criminality Revealed.
Message-ID: <o3vfe1tnijjcpqq44...@4ax.com>
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/c1ab5163934419f4?fwc=1
Subject: Sara Salzman Lies about her Being a Crackpot As Well as Other Lies
V2.0 U_0121
Message-ID: <qok5t1tf5hev7f7m6...@4ax.com>
~~Sara Salzman Caught Lying About Using The Media For Her Own Agenda~~
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/86055f63edf2cd18?fwc=1
(Archived locally as: TAV_1 and TAV_2)
Subject: Re: Why does Sara Salzman run from her challenge of wanting proof
after it has been provided? Why won't she own up to her lies?
Message-ID: <5qcpb1t3fg49vpv5q...@4ax.com>
References: <42bc922e...@news20.forteinc.com><<Steve Talbot Post
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/5ed7d1622b3bfa20?fwc=1
(Archived locally as: TALBOT_1 and TALBOT_1b)
<<The above post by Steve Talbot shows the origin of the Miss Cheeseburger
post example as coming from Ken McVay (which could be a forgery but then
again it may not be seeing how the two of them like media attention.>>
Many more lies are documented and are on file.

>
>Sara


_______________________________________________________________________________
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com
<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <><><><><><><><>

Doc Tavish

unread,
Mar 2, 2006, 1:01:39 PM3/2/06
to
On Thu, 02 Mar 2006 05:08:21 -0700,
<catamont-1B0BF2...@news.giganews.com> Sara Salzman
<cata...@concentric.net> wrote:

>In article <05W9IRAB3877...@twistycreek.com>,
> TwistyCreek <an...@comments.header> wrote:
>
>
>OOooh, an Anonymous Coward is threatening me.

How were you threatened you squealing sow?

>Pull the other one, Anonymous Moron.

~~Sara Salzman = (Crack)Pot Who Called the Kettle Black~~
TinyURL to GOOGLE search: http://tinyurl.com/dpwnu
(Archived locally as: Pot_Kettle_Black_Hypocrisy)
Searched all groups Results 1 - 100 of 621 for "Idiot"
author:cata...@concentric.net

Sample Returns:

Irving: not only an idiot -- but downright crazy?
alt.revisionism - Oct 16 2004, 7:42 pm by Sara Salzman

R. Scott Bradbury - Moronic Idiot
alt.revisionism - May 5 2004, 1:12 pm by Sara Salzman

Bradbury - a Moron or an Idiot?
alt.revisionism - Dec 4 2005, 9:54 am by Sara Salzman

Blandish to world: I'm an idiot.
alt.revisionism - Jun 26 2005, 12:03 am by Sara Salzman

Why Kurt Knoll is an idiot
can.general - Mar 9 2005, 9:05 pm by Sara Salzman

<End of Sample Returns>

My honest observations:

Funny thing that a self confessed mental retard who squeezed out not one BUT two
"Village Idiots" would be referring to other people as idiots! Sara's children
were not born twins either and they had separate births years apart from one
another. The odds of parents having one "mentally challenged" offspring is
minuscule BUT for the same parents to have two "mentally challenged" offspring
birthed to them is astronomical and as such speaks volumes of the parents'
lifestyles and genetics. Photos of the "Mother Village Idiot":
http://www.westword.com/issues/2000-08-10/news/feature3_2.gif
http://www.westword.com/issues/2000-08-10/news/feature3_4.gif

Sara's children can't be held accountable for the losers they have as father and
mother and they are victims of a perverted S&M Bondage Lifestyle as well as drug
abuse in the home environment all detailed in the archive below:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/345c6d04bdaa93e4?fwc=1
Subject: Did Sara "The Fist" Salzman's S&M/Drug HomeLife Result in Two "GIFTED"
Children? I.E. Genetics/Lifestyles? V2.0
Message-ID: <v78mt1def3trm00k8...@4ax.com>
Date: 28 Jan 2006 08:50:39 GMT
------------------------------


On 07 Jul 2003 01:31:53 GMT, Sara Salzman <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
"How many times do I have to tell you-- I AM RETARDED!!!"

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------


Message ID: <catamont-548CA8...@spectator.sj.sys.us.xo.net>
(Archived locally as: RetardSara and RetardSara2)

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/c1ab5163934419f4?fwc=1
Subject: Sara Salzman Lies about her Being a Crackpot As Well as Other Lies

V2.0 U_0121 Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 18:35:11 -0600
Message-ID: <qok5t1tf5hev7f7m6...@4ax.com>

Doc Tavish

unread,
Mar 2, 2006, 1:14:43 PM3/2/06
to
On 1 Mar 2006 19:06:59 -0800,
<1141268819....@i39g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> "phil...@aol.com"
<phil...@aol.com> wrote:

Looks like you have been outed Philip yesireeee! The evidence is compelling.
How does it feel to get a dose of what your "Jews" have been doing to others for
years?

Tavish

~~Kenneth McVay's Famous Lying Tax Cheating Words Open to Scrutiny~~
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/19272a44fd2c3cec?fwc=1
From: kmc...@veritas.nizkor.org (Kenneth McVay, OBC)
Date: 5 Jan 2001 00:32:08 GMT (Archived locally as: McVayEXHIBIT1)
Message-ID: <9334m8$1nm1$1...@news.tht.net>
"Mr. Bradbury, wishing to demonstrate how ill-equipped he is to deal with
evidence of any sort... What Mr. Bradbury has failed to demonstrate is that The
Nizkor Project, which I direct, has any association whatsoever with the "San
Antonio Area Foundation - Nizkor Fund." That is because Mr. Bradbury is not very
bright... Neither The Nizkor Project nor Ken McVay has ever received any money
from the "San Antonio Area Foundation - Nizkor Fund" <end/quote>
http://groups.google.com/group/can.general/msg/8db801fb548cdb26?fwc=1
From: kmc...@veritas.nizkor.org (Kenneth McVay, OBC)
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2002 17:57:49 GMT (Archived locally McVay-12-30-2002DENIAL)
Message-ID: <xO%P9.1985$C43.13...@news.nnrp.ca>
"Neither The Nizkor Project nor Ken McVay has ever received any money from the
"San Antonio Area Foundation - Nizkor Fund"...The San Antonio Area Foundation
has never paid me... Get used to it." <end/quote>
PROOF ALL OF THE ABOVE CLAIMS ARE ALL LIES
Some info on Harry W. Mazal aka San Antonio Area Foundation - Nizkor Fund c/o
BASIC (MAZAL2-DOM):
http://www3.telus.net/myssiwyg/mcvay.html
(Archived locally as: mcvay-internet_fighter)
mc...@internet.fighter
Note to the reader: This article, written by Michelle Betz, was published in
the March 9, 1995 issue of The Jewish Western Bulletin.
...McVay's Internet work, now known officially as the Nizkor Project, began as a
one-man show...
McVay has also found some outside backing - an American who will provide
"some pretty solid financial backing for the project." A 77-year-old businessman
and Holocaust scholar from Texas will fund legal expenses incurred in setting up
the project. McVay will then further establish the Nizkor Project in Canada.
"We are in the process of establishing a non-profit organization in the U.S.
That should be operational within a month or six weeks and that foundation will
undoubtedly fund the establishment of the Canadian foundation by the same name,"
he explained, referring to the Nizkor Project..."
| Hilary's Home Page http://www3.telus.net/myssiwyg/hropage.html <END>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The person referred to above with the sentence: "A 77-year-old businessman and
Holocaust scholar from Texas will fund legal expenses incurred in setting
up the project." is Harry W. Mazal who is based in San Antonio, Texas and who
also administered the San Antonio Area Foundation - Nizkor Fund"!!
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/cfa0944d81241a6d?fwc=1
(Archived locally as: WhoIsSAAFmazal)
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 23:19:26 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <14152-3D1...@storefull-2253.public.lawson.webtv.net>
You are Here:WHOIS -> Search Results
Search Results
Registrant:
San Antonio Area Foundation - Nizkor Fund c/o BASIC (MAZAL2-DOM)
600 Sandau Suite 400
San Antonio, TX 78216 US
Domain Name: MAZAL.ORG
Administrative Contact, Technical Contact:
Mazal, Harry (HM1296) hma...@TXDIRECT.NET
The Mazal Library 600 Sandau, Suite 400 San Antonio, TX 78216 US
210-377-2742
Record expires on 28-Jun-2006.
~~End of GOOGLE Archival Excerpt~~
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/e6e8f845002483a1?fwc=1
(Archived locally as: SAAF_1)
From: kmc...@nizkor.almanac.bc.ca (Ken McVay OBC)
Subject: The Nizkor Project appreciates your support
Date: 1996/09/05 Message-ID: <50n608$9...@nizkor.almanac.bc.ca>
"..In the United States, checks should be made payable to:
"SAN ANTONIO AREA FOUNDATION - Nizkor Fund"
We thank all of you who have sent your donations in support of the Nizkor
Project."

Sara Salzman

unread,
Mar 2, 2006, 3:02:01 PM3/2/06
to
In article <mtce02hqav2ap1hul...@4ax.com>,
Doc Tavish <Doc_T...@Tavish-Central01.net> wrote:

> On Thu, 02 Mar 2006 05:08:21 -0700,
> <catamont-1B0BF2...@news.giganews.com> Sara Salzman
> <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>
> >In article <05W9IRAB3877...@twistycreek.com>,
> > TwistyCreek <an...@comments.header> wrote:
> >
> >
> >OOooh, an Anonymous Coward is threatening me.
>
> How were you threatened you squealing sow?

If you are too stupid to read simple sentences, I'm not going to explain
them to you.

Sara

--

The Chief Instigator

unread,
Mar 2, 2006, 4:23:02 PM3/2/06
to
R. Scott Bradbury <Doc_T...@Tavish-Central01.net> writes:

>On Wed, 01 Mar 2006 20:03:41 -0700,
><catamont-C5A936...@news.giganews.com> Sara Salzman
><cata...@concentric.net> wrote:

>>In article <1141263792.7...@e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>,
>> "Dr. Gassen Burnham" <gasenb...@dodo.com.au> wrote:

>>> Is that old hater still around....I figures cirrosis of the liver would
>>> have done the old sponge in by now.

>>One notes that Ross Cummins thinks posting Mr. Matthews' personal
>>information is a reasonable thing to do.

>You certainly thought posting my address and telephone number was a reasonable
>thing to do and you are on record as stating:

*blip!*

You certainly are eager to avoid the fact that your own lover Don Ellis outed
your personal address and home phone, Blimp Boy. That hasn't prevented you
from going even more insane and blaming it on Yale, who has a life and hasn't
posted here in going on five years...but Ellis outed you while we were still
laughing at your faked suicide.

--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (pat...@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Houston 5, Milwaukee 2 (February 26)
NEXT GAME: Thursday, March 2 vs. Hamilton, 7:05

Yosar...@hotmail.com

unread,
Mar 2, 2006, 7:04:25 PM3/2/06
to
On 2 Mar 2006 18:00:13 GMT, Doc Tavish
<Doc_T...@Tavish-Central01.net> wrote:

>
>That was in regard to my address etc. being posted by Edeiken. BTW if my
>information was "publicly-available" then why did Yale issue a forged subpoena
>(which was NOT issued by the court and NOT registered with the court) to get my
>not in public domain info? Care to answer that one you dirty swine?

How do you KNOW it was a forged Subpoena? Who received this FORGED
SUBPOENA? You ever see this FORGED SUBPOENA?

Sara Salzman

unread,
Mar 2, 2006, 9:38:39 PM3/2/06
to
In article <es1f0255rkh3cqut8...@4ax.com>,
Yosar...@hotmail.com wrote:

And, of course, if the subpoena was FORGED, Yale would have been
disbarred and sent to jail.

But he wasn't, and he wasn't.

Doc Tavish

unread,
Mar 2, 2006, 10:44:40 PM3/2/06
to
On Fri, 03 Mar 2006 00:04:25 GMT, <es1f0255rkh3cqut8...@4ax.com>
Yosar...@hotmail.com wrote:

>On 2 Mar 2006 18:00:13 GMT, Doc Tavish
><Doc_T...@Tavish-Central01.net> wrote:
>
>>
>>That was in regard to my address etc. being posted by Edeiken. BTW if my
>>information was "publicly-available" then why did Yale issue a forged subpoena
>>(which was NOT issued by the court and NOT registered with the court) to get my
>>not in public domain info? Care to answer that one you dirty swine?
>
>How do you KNOW it was a forged Subpoena?

1) Yale lied about issuing pone on my ISP.
2) When the court issues a subpoena it is on the docket of the court clerk and
Yale's subpoena does not show.

>Who received this FORGED SUBPOENA?

My ISP.

> You ever see this FORGED SUBPOENA?

My ISP sent me a copy of it and it has no court seal etc. I fully documented the
criminal act too.

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics.nationalism.white/msg/393e3320dd44fda3?fwc=1
Subject: Patrick Keenan Approving of Forging Subpoenas and Fabrication of


Evidence? Aren't Those Criminal Acts? aka Re: Why won't Sara Salzman respond to
her challenge being met by proof being provided? V2.0 T_0931
Message-ID: <d06sj1h7s0d7hte8d...@4ax.com>
Date: 1 Oct 2005 05:06:24 GMT

Tavish

---------------------Yosarian----Vs----Tavish-----------------------
0 SCORE 2
--------------------------------------------------------------------
First Win: Tavish
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/08c0b8209f5eb357?fwc=1
Subject: Re: Ken McVay Would Rather Hurl Insults Than to Admit His MASTERS are
Anti-Free-Speech Totalitarians...
Message-ID: <8o8kt1hcgqpi8u06h...@4ax.com>
Date: 27 Jan 2006 13:49:32 GMT
------------------------------
Second Win: Tavish
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.law-enforcement/msg/593561cc690486db?fwc=1
Subject: Re: Yale F. Edeiken Inciting Violence Against Me In USENET Posts He
Signed!! (From My Archives) v2-0 U_0216
Message-ID: <21jfv11c03o5k01jl...@4ax.com>
References: <2ds8v1tofi9q7faou...@4ax.com>
<6sfcv1lbtmkclmfr7...@4ax.com>
Date: 19 Feb 2006 02:36:38 GMT
------------------------------
Third Win:

Doc Tavish

unread,
Mar 2, 2006, 10:49:58 PM3/2/06
to
On 02 Mar 2006 15:23:02 -0600, <szkpsl4...@fnord.io.com> The Chief
Instigator <pat...@io.com> wrote:

>R. Scott Bradbury <Doc_T...@Tavish-Central01.net> writes:
>
>>On Wed, 01 Mar 2006 20:03:41 -0700,
>><catamont-C5A936...@news.giganews.com> Sara Salzman
>><cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>
>>>In article <1141263792.7...@e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>,
>>> "Dr. Gassen Burnham" <gasenb...@dodo.com.au> wrote:
>
>>>> Is that old hater still around....I figures cirrosis of the liver would
>>>> have done the old sponge in by now.
>
>>>One notes that Ross Cummins thinks posting Mr. Matthews' personal
>>>information is a reasonable thing to do.
>
>>You certainly thought posting my address and telephone number was a reasonable
>>thing to do and you are on record as stating:
>
>*blip!*
>
>You certainly are eager to avoid the fact that your own lover Don Ellis outed
>your personal address and home phone, Blimp Boy. That hasn't prevented you
>from going even more insane and blaming it on Yale,

Why do you keep lying when it is widely known Yale F. Edeiken did the act and
not Ellis? Yale subpoenaed my ISP on November 30, 1999 and he posted my
confidential info numerous times starting on December 14, 1999 and it is all
documented here:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/93263479c9c0be6c?fwc=1
Subject: Yale F. Edeiken Admits Sending Death Threats Over The Internet is a
Federal Crime (Which He Has Done!) V3.0 U_0101
Message-ID: <fh3gr19kqo8jhoqgu...@4ax.com>
Date: 1 Jan 2006 18:33:33 GMT

>who has a life and hasn't posted here in going on five years...but Ellis outed you
>while we were still laughing at your faked suicide.

The Feds told me that Ellis's identity was stolen. Also care to show proof that
Ellis posted my info prior to 2001? You can't!

Tavish

>
>--
> Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (pat...@io.com) Houston, Texas
> chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros)
> LAST GAME: Houston 5, Milwaukee 2 (February 26)
> NEXT GAME: Thursday, March 2 vs. Hamilton, 7:05

The Chief Instigator

unread,
Mar 3, 2006, 1:23:37 AM3/3/06
to
Doc Tavish <Doc_T...@Tavish-Central01.net> writes:

>On 02 Mar 2006 15:23:02 -0600, <szkpsl4...@fnord.io.com> The Chief
>Instigator <pat...@io.com> wrote:

>>R. Scott Bradbury <Doc_T...@Tavish-Central01.net> writes:

>>>On Wed, 01 Mar 2006 20:03:41 -0700,
>>><catamont-C5A936...@news.giganews.com> Sara Salzman
>>><cata...@concentric.net> wrote:

>>>>In article <1141263792.7...@e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>,
>>>> "Dr. Gassen Burnham" <gasenb...@dodo.com.au> wrote:

>>>>> Is that old hater still around....I figures cirrosis of the liver would
>>>>> have done the old sponge in by now.

>>>>One notes that Ross Cummins thinks posting Mr. Matthews' personal
>>>>information is a reasonable thing to do.

>>>You certainly thought posting my address and telephone number was a
>>>reasonable thing to do and you are on record as stating:

>>*blip!*

>>You certainly are eager to avoid the fact that your own lover Don Ellis
>>outed your personal address and home phone, Blimp Boy. That hasn't

>>prevented you from going even more insane and blaming it on Yale, who has a


>>life and hasn't posted here in going on five years...but Ellis outed you
>>while we were still laughing at your faked suicide.

>Why do you keep lying when it is widely known Yale F. Edeiken did the act and


>not Ellis? Yale subpoenaed my ISP on November 30, 1999 and he posted my
>confidential info numerous times starting on December 14, 1999 and it is all
>documented here:

*blip!*

Sorry, but you're delusional, as always...and you cry like the 56-year-old
baby you are when the facts are mentioned.

>The Feds told me that Ellis's identity was stolen. Also care to show proof
>that Ellis posted my info prior to 2001? You can't!

Really? Post this supposed proof of what the Federals supposedly told you.
(Given that you have a record of making things up about known facts, I'm not
expecting anything from you but your usual obsessive bullshit.)

--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (pat...@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros)

LAST GAME: Houston 3, Hamilton 2 (March 2)
NEXT GAME: Saturday, March 4 vs. Hartford, 7:35

The Chief Instigator

unread,
Mar 3, 2006, 1:25:27 AM3/3/06
to
Doc Tavish <Doc_T...@Tavish-Central01.net> writes:

>On Fri, 03 Mar 2006 00:04:25 GMT, <es1f0255rkh3cqut8...@4ax.com>
>Yosar...@hotmail.com wrote:

>>On 2 Mar 2006 18:00:13 GMT, Doc Tavish
>><Doc_T...@Tavish-Central01.net> wrote:

>>>That was in regard to my address etc. being posted by Edeiken. BTW if my
>>>information was "publicly-available" then why did Yale issue a forged subpoena
>>>(which was NOT issued by the court and NOT registered with the court) to get my
>>>not in public domain info? Care to answer that one you dirty swine?

>>How do you KNOW it was a forged Subpoena?

>1) Yale lied about issuing pone on my ISP.

You *know* pone, as in corn.

>2) When the court issues a subpoena it is on the docket of the court clerk and
>Yale's subpoena does not show.

>>Who received this FORGED SUBPOENA?

>My ISP.

...which is?

>> You ever see this FORGED SUBPOENA?

>My ISP sent me a copy of it and it has no court seal etc. I fully documented the
>criminal act too.

...which explains why you never made a formal complaint about it, and I
suspect your "subpoena" is just another one of your hallucinations.

Ben Cramer

unread,
Mar 3, 2006, 2:45:53 AM3/3/06
to

"Sara Salzman" <cata...@concentric.net> wrote in message
news:catamont-4129B7...@news.giganews.com...

> In article <es1f0255rkh3cqut8...@4ax.com>,
> Yosar...@hotmail.com wrote:
>
>> On 2 Mar 2006 18:00:13 GMT, Doc Tavish
>> <Doc_T...@Tavish-Central01.net> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >That was in regard to my address etc. being posted by Edeiken. BTW if my
>> >information was "publicly-available" then why did Yale issue a forged
>> >subpoena
>> >(which was NOT issued by the court and NOT registered with the court) to
>> >get
>> >my
>> >not in public domain info? Care to answer that one you dirty swine?
>>
>> How do you KNOW it was a forged Subpoena? Who received this FORGED
>> SUBPOENA? You ever see this FORGED SUBPOENA?
>
> And, of course, if the subpoena was FORGED, Yale would have been
> disbarred and sent to jail.
>
> But he wasn't, and he wasn't.

Is he still practising law?


Yosar...@hotmail.com

unread,
Mar 3, 2006, 12:47:51 PM3/3/06
to
On 3 Mar 2006 03:44:40 GMT, Doc Tavish
<Doc_T...@Tavish-Central01.net> wrote:

>On Fri, 03 Mar 2006 00:04:25 GMT, <es1f0255rkh3cqut8...@4ax.com>
>Yosar...@hotmail.com wrote:
>
>>On 2 Mar 2006 18:00:13 GMT, Doc Tavish
>><Doc_T...@Tavish-Central01.net> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>That was in regard to my address etc. being posted by Edeiken. BTW if my
>>>information was "publicly-available" then why did Yale issue a forged subpoena
>>>(which was NOT issued by the court and NOT registered with the court) to get my
>>>not in public domain info? Care to answer that one you dirty swine?
>>
>>How do you KNOW it was a forged Subpoena?
>
>1) Yale lied about issuing pone on my ISP.

What a persons says in public as opposed to what is actually done is
of course two different issues. Who did he lie to? You?

>2) When the court issues a subpoena it is on the docket of the court clerk and
>Yale's subpoena does not show.

You of course have a copy that you are referenceing, right? You did
show this to your lawyer, right? This was before you retained your
lawyer, right?


>
>>Who received this FORGED SUBPOENA?
>
>My ISP.

How do you know this? Did your ISP give you a copy, it would seem that
they did give you something as you make a reference to knowing what it
should say as opposed to what it actually says, right?


>
>> You ever see this FORGED SUBPOENA?
>
>My ISP sent me a copy of it and it has no court seal etc. I fully documented the
>criminal act too.

Ok, so they sent you a copy of something. Does the document in
question say it is a Subpoena? or does it make reference to one?
Could it be that your ISP caved in and gave out information based up
this document and that it is not an actual subpoena?

Finally this isn't about winning or losing, "damage control" what ever
that is, or any number of other things you may think up. I believe
that truth always wins out in the end, and that is what I seek,
nothing more or less.

Yosar...@hotmail.com

unread,
Mar 3, 2006, 12:51:07 PM3/3/06
to

And if he isn't? Does that mean he doesn't have a license to practice?
People change careers all the time, who knows. The issue is of course
that if the document in question was forged, then of course charges
could be brought, but to date it looks like they haven't been, why is
that?

Dr. Gassen Burnham

unread,
Mar 3, 2006, 8:24:46 PM3/3/06
to
From: Yosaria...@hotmail.com

"The issue is of course
that if the document in question was forged, then of course charges
could be brought, but to date it looks like they haven't been, why is
that? "


Perhaps Yale used his obvious mental illness to evade criminal charges
and has been suspended from practicing law until he is proven to be
sane enough to do so !
Lets face it, his actions have not been those of a well adjusted,
copetent legal practitioner, have they?

I mean the guy is almost as looney as the hog gal.
His only saving grace being he has refrained from posting intimate
details about his malevolent sexual deviations....unlike Sara.

Doc Tavish

unread,
Mar 3, 2006, 10:42:07 PM3/3/06
to
On Fri, 03 Mar 2006 17:47:51 GMT, <iqvg02hn23864otg4...@4ax.com>
Yosar...@hotmail.com wrote:

>On 3 Mar 2006 03:44:40 GMT, Doc Tavish
><Doc_T...@Tavish-Central01.net> wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 03 Mar 2006 00:04:25 GMT, <es1f0255rkh3cqut8...@4ax.com>
>>Yosar...@hotmail.com wrote:
>>
>>>On 2 Mar 2006 18:00:13 GMT, Doc Tavish
>>><Doc_T...@Tavish-Central01.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>That was in regard to my address etc. being posted by Edeiken. BTW if my
>>>>information was "publicly-available" then why did Yale issue a forged subpoena
>>>>(which was NOT issued by the court and NOT registered with the court) to get my
>>>>not in public domain info? Care to answer that one you dirty swine?
>>>
>>>How do you KNOW it was a forged Subpoena?
>>

>>1) Yale lied about issuing one on my ISP.


>
>What a persons says in public as opposed to what is actually done is
>of course two different issues. Who did he lie to? You?
>
>>2) When the court issues a subpoena it is on the docket of the court clerk and
>>Yale's subpoena does not show.
>
>You of course have a copy that you are referenceing, right? You did
>show this to your lawyer, right? This was before you retained your
>lawyer, right?
>>
>>>Who received this FORGED SUBPOENA?
>>
>>My ISP.
>
>How do you know this? Did your ISP give you a copy, it would seem that
>they did give you something as you make a reference to knowing what it
>should say as opposed to what it actually says, right?
>>
>>> You ever see this FORGED SUBPOENA?
>>
>>My ISP sent me a copy of it and it has no court seal etc. I fully documented the
>>criminal act too.
>
>Ok, so they sent you a copy of something. Does the document in
>question say it is a Subpoena? or does it make reference to one?
>Could it be that your ISP caved in and gave out information based up
>this document and that it is not an actual subpoena?
>
>Finally this isn't about winning or losing, "damage control" what ever
>that is, or any number of other things you may think up. I believe
>that truth always wins out in the end, and that is what I seek,
>nothing more or less.

All of your questions are answered in the archive you chose to ignore!

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics.nationalism.white/msg/393e3320dd44fda3?fwc=1
Subject: Patrick Keenan Approving of Forging Subpoenas and Fabrication of
Evidence? Aren't Those Criminal Acts? aka Re: Why won't Sara Salzman respond to
her challenge being met by proof being provided? V2.0 T_0931
Message-ID: <d06sj1h7s0d7hte8d...@4ax.com>
Date: 1 Oct 2005 05:06:24 GMT

Tavish

---------------------Yosarian----Vs----Tavish-----------------------
0 SCORE 3
--------------------------------------------------------------------
First Win: Tavish
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/101d3c11470c0f7a?fwc=1
Subject: Instant Replay -- Yosarian's First Defeat aka Re: Ken McVay Would


Rather Hurl Insults Than to Admit His MASTERS are Anti-Free-Speech Totalitarians

aka Re: BlubberBlather rejects democratic process
Message-ID: <79iiv19siiuvveors...@4ax.com>
Date: 20 Feb 2006 04:48:28 GMT


------------------------------
Second Win: Tavish
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.law-enforcement/msg/593561cc690486db?fwc=1
Subject: Re: Yale F. Edeiken Inciting Violence Against Me In USENET Posts He
Signed!! (From My Archives) v2-0 U_0216
Message-ID: <21jfv11c03o5k01jl...@4ax.com>
References: <2ds8v1tofi9q7faou...@4ax.com>
<6sfcv1lbtmkclmfr7...@4ax.com>
Date: 19 Feb 2006 02:36:38 GMT
------------------------------

Third Win: Tavish
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/2d3fb0ccc6b5c308?fwc=1
Subject: Re: Scott Bradbury: Christian hating filth bag
Message-ID: <ch2g02hli0mg9o56o...@4ax.com>
Date: 3 Mar 2006 09:56:30 GMT
-----------------------------
Fourth Win:

Doc Tavish

unread,
Mar 3, 2006, 10:44:11 PM3/3/06
to
On Fri, 03 Mar 2006 17:51:07 GMT, <eb0h02tdmg815ivtd...@4ax.com>
Yosar...@hotmail.com wrote:

>>Is he still practising law?
>>
>And if he isn't? Does that mean he doesn't have a license to practice?
>People change careers all the time, who knows. The issue is of course
>that if the document in question was forged, then of course charges
>could be brought, but to date it looks like they haven't been, why is
>that?

I filed complaints but not one thing was done! THAT IS FACT!!

~~Yale F.Edeiken's ICEPICK Death Threat Post He Addressed to Me~~
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.skeptic/msg/92bdb523cee12857?fwc=1
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.skeptic/msg/92bdb523cee12857?dmode=source&hl=en
(Archived locally as: YFE_ice-pick_Threat_1 and YFE_ice-pick_Threat_2 and
YFE_ice-pick_Threat_2.jpg)
From: "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
Subject: I am going to ruin Scott Bradbury's life.
Date: 2000/07/07
Message-ID: <3965E489...@enter.net>
X-Complaints-To: Abuse Role <ab...@enter.net>, We Care <ab...@newsread.com>
X-Trace: newshog.newsread.com 962978958 207.16.155.112 (Fri, 07 Jul 2000
10:09:18 EDT)
Organization: ENTER.net (enter.net)
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism,sci.skeptic

Hey you little shit, that forgery was the last straw. I am going to
forever fuck up your life and I hope that someone takes an icepick and
works you over from head to toe. Fuck, I might evne do it you little
fuckhead or pay someone to do it.

--YFE

The Holocaust History Project is at http://www.holocaust-history.org/
The Einsatzgruppen page is at http://www.pgonline.com/electriczen/
The Cybrary of the Holocaust is at http://www.remember.org/

~~End of Exact GOOGLE Archive~~
(For a fact I made no forgery and Yale "Fatboy" Edeiken is a "mentally unstable
crazy man" who suffers from schizoid paranoia.) That isn't the only death threat
that the criminal shyster posted either! In December 1999 Yale F. Edeiken posted
my unlisted telephone number, address etc he obtained using a forged subpoena
not issued by the court with the invitation that people pay me a visit with
baseball bats as described in full detail here:


http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/93263479c9c0be6c?fwc=1
Subject: Yale F. Edeiken Admits Sending Death Threats Over The Internet is a
Federal Crime (Which He Has Done!) V3.0 U_0101
Message-ID: <fh3gr19kqo8jhoqgu...@4ax.com>
Date: 1 Jan 2006 18:33:33 GMT

------------------------------


http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics.nationalism.white/msg/393e3320dd44fda3?fwc=1
Subject: ...Forging Subpoenas and Fabrication of Evidence? Aren't Those Criminal

Acts?... Message-ID: <d06sj1h7s0d7hte8d...@4ax.com>


Date: 1 Oct 2005 05:06:24 GMT

-----------------------------
To this day no District Attorney nor State Attorney General will prosecute those
criminal acts and I filed the original complaints well within the statute of
limitations. If a Gentile did to Jewish Yale F. Edeiken what he did to me the
Gentile would be charged and convicted for "hate crimes" and be put behind
prison bars and be labeled as a "neo-nazi hate monger." Does anyone wish to deny
the hypocrisy of the justice system and its selective prosecutions on who gets
prosecuted and who doesn't? Tavish

Sara Salzman

unread,
Mar 3, 2006, 11:34:45 PM3/3/06
to
In article <4e3i0296h3bt4793p...@4ax.com>,
Doc Tavish <Doc_T...@Tavish-Central01.net> wrote:

> On Fri, 03 Mar 2006 17:51:07 GMT,
> <eb0h02tdmg815ivtd...@4ax.com>
> Yosar...@hotmail.com wrote:
>
> >>Is he still practising law?
> >>
> >And if he isn't? Does that mean he doesn't have a license to practice?
> >People change careers all the time, who knows. The issue is of course
> >that if the document in question was forged, then of course charges
> >could be brought, but to date it looks like they haven't been, why is
> >that?
>
> I filed complaints but not one thing was done! THAT IS FACT!!

Because your complaints (if in fact you ever filed any) were SPECIOUS!!
THAT IS A FACT!

--

Ben Cramer

unread,
Mar 4, 2006, 12:08:09 AM3/4/06
to

"Dr. Gassen Burnham" <gasenb...@dodo.com.au> wrote in message
news:1141435486....@j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...

Is she the one who posted the classic "My master holds the whip/rope just
so"?


>


Herr Doktor Tavische

unread,
Mar 4, 2006, 4:16:21 PM3/4/06
to
On Thu, 02 Mar 2006 13:02:01 -0700,
<catamont-8AC747...@news.giganews.com> Sara Salzman
<cata...@concentric.net> wrote:

>


_______________________________________________________________________________

0 new messages