Sara Salzman Caught in More Libelous Lies! Is It Anything New? Watch Her Spew!!! V2.0 T_0807
Doc Tavish
<catamont-36C30C...@news.giganews.com>
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/bbe698a0d871c94c
(Archived locally as: SDS_Indigent_Libel_1)
Sara Salzman <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>In article <13g5f1p2629o1f2tr...@4ax.com>,
> Doc Tavish <rhc-tavish@tavish-central> wrote:
>
>[350+ lines of a bizarre obsession with someone who hasn't posted to
>Usenet in YEARS snipped]
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/71ab4c772fd493dc
Subject: Yale F. Edeiken Making False Claims About My Medical Records aka Re:
Steve Wolk's Cowardice... V2.0 T_0804
Message-ID: <13g5f1p2629o1f2tr...@4ax.com>
Date: 5 Aug 2005 02:45:34 GMT
Can't deal with facts can you- you liar and in this post I will document yet
another lie you have been caught in namely a lying smear!!
>For God's sake, Bradbury, get a hobby. Re-posting a 4-year-old claim
>that was stupid then is STILL stupid now.
>
>For instance:
>
>> This reply was originally posted by me on March 24, 2001.
>> http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/77a0ac9d3c56ab0e
>> Subject: Yale F. Edeiken Making False Claims About My Medical Records...
>> Message-ID: <4q0pbtc3gk6oour5o...@4ax.com>
>> Date: Mar 24 2001, 6:26 am
>>
>> I now will update some non-working old style GOOGLE/DejaCom links.
>>
>> Tavish August 4, 2005
>>
>> On 22 Mar 2001 03:19:00 GMT, Sara <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/fc25ba43fa4d10dc
>> Message-ID: <catamont-E9DF38...@news.concentric.net>
>> (Archived locally as: SDS-Indigent-Smear_1)
>>
>> >In article <s9hibtkha0hfu1edb...@4ax.com>,
>> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/2adf19ea24eb256f
>> >DELETE2MAI...@my-deja.com wrote:
>>
>> >> NEW CHALLENGE: I will offer $1000.00 to anyone who will step up and
>> >> substantiate what Yale F. Edeiken claimed in his post about my Hermann
>> >> Hospital discharge diagnosis numbered 50 04882 6 9356. I have a copy of
>> >> it and I know I am making a safe bet!
>> >>
>> >> <end>
>>
>> >This is a fascinating statement, Mr. Bradbury, since your attorney swore
>> >in Court that you are indigent.
>>
>> <<Tavish comment Aug 4, 2005: That is another lie Yale made up and started.>>
>
>Nope, it's a fact. Your attorney claimed you were indigent
That is a lie and you know it! You repeated the lie again with:
<start/quote>
What you snipped and refused to address:
> On 22 Mar 2001 03:19:00 GMT, Sara <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/fc25ba43fa4d10dc
> Message-ID: <catamont-E9DF38...@news.concentric.net>
> (Archived locally as: SDS-Indigent-Smear_1)
>
> >In article <s9hibtkha0hfu1edb...@4ax.com>,
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/2adf19ea24eb256f
> >DELETE2MAI...@my-deja.com wrote:
>
> >> NEW CHALLENGE: I will offer $1000.00 to anyone who will step up and
> >> substantiate what Yale F. Edeiken claimed in his post about my Hermann
> >> Hospital discharge diagnosis numbered 50 04882 6 9356. I have a copy of
> >> it and I know I am making a safe bet!
> >>
> >> <end>
>
> >This is a fascinating statement, Mr. Bradbury, since your attorney swore
> >in Court that you are indigent.
>
> <<Tavish comment Aug 4, 2005: That is another lie Yale made up and started.>>
Nope, it's a fact. Your attorney claimed you were indigent..
<end/quote>
From: Sara Salzman <cata...@concentric.net>
Subject: Re: Yale F. Edeiken Making False Claims About My Medical Records
aka Re: Steve Wolk's Cowardice... V2.0 T_0804
Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2005 00:24:55 -0500
Message-ID: <catamont-CDC8A8...@news.giganews.com>
(Archived locally as: SDS_Indigent_Libel_2)
My attorney did not state I was "indigent" which is a smear you and yours have
concocted to defame me more!
The definition of indigent:
The adj indigent has 1 sense (no senses from tagged texts)
1. destitute, impoverished, indigent, necessitous, needy, poverty-stricken --
(poor enough to need help from others)
I am none of the above nor have I ever been! My attorney stated I was on medical
leave and was unable to travel. I told him I was receiving from my own company
full medical leave compensation at the time!
BTW as proof you can't keep track of your and/or your accomplices lying smear
you and/or your accomplices have stated my attorney claimed I was
"impoverished." And you and/or your accomplices had quite a field day with your
lies!!
Proof you and/or your accomplices have implied my attorney stated I was
"impoverished":
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/33012e6647ed70fd
(Archived locally as: McVay_Impoverished_Libel_1)
From: kmc...@veritas.nizkor.org (Kenneth McVay, OBC)
Subject: Re: Will Ken Lewis Name Just One Recipient to the Nizkor Endowment Fund
Other Than Ken McVay?
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2001 19:38:21 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: The Nizkor Project, http://www.nizkor.org/
Message-ID: <9pidrd$272q$1...@news.tht.net>
Exact quote: "He won't - no balls, no bet. (Besides, he's, er, "impoverished,"
you know... your basic welfare bum.)"
<END>
Now I wonder who started that evil rumour!
> -- AND too ill to travel. Yet you managed to come up with the cash -- and the
>strength -- to travel when I took you up on your offer to meet you at
>the Courthouse. (Insert Bradbury's "You didn't "fulfill the requirements
>of re-filing..." the case I never filed in the first place.)
That is right! You are lying about that too! I made no offer to hear a fat
hysterical lying pig like you rant and rave! (Anyone who doubts what sort of
beast Sara is this picture will speak a thousand words:
http://www.westword.com/issues/2000-08-10/news/feature3_4.gif )
Care to show where I ever stated I wanted to see your ugly mug and hear you
rant?
In fact I stated (and this was posted BEFORE you decided to pay me a visit):
On 11 Jul 2003 18:34:38 GMT, Sara Salzman <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
<catamont-A637E1...@spectator.sj.sys.us.xo.net>
"Day, time, place. I'm waiting. Sara"
My answer: Anytime and any day. The place: my local courthouse
(my jurisdiction).
You and Yale F. Edeiken re-file the same exact perjurious lawsuit against me
with those same perjurious accusations and YOUR same perjurious affidavit. I
would like for YOU to explain to a jury of my peers why YOU and Yale "bore false
witness" against me and why you two are not responsible for all of the criminal
harassment I have had done to me. I want YOU and Yale to deny causing the
harassment I have been subjected to because of my address being distributed and
the info being used criminally. I want Yale to state his motive for subpoenaing
my medical record and then lying about what it stated. I will show copies to the
jury and have Yale explain how he deduced it stated "morbid obesity" and that I
weighed well over 300 pounds when there are no height nor weight fields on it
and the diagnosis was: "sleep apnea, narcolepsy, vertigo." I want YOU to explain
why the telephone number YOU distributed was different than the one the subpoena
stated and how YOU knew it seeing how it was unlisted number. I want YOU and
Yale to prove what I ever actually did to either of you that I deserve all of
the ill treatment I have been subjected to because of legal system abuse. I want
YOU and Yale to explain why I am accountable for what a person in another state
and another country allegedly did so that I get harassed as a proxy of your
vindictiveness. I want YOU to explain why I, nor David Michael, or our attorneys
were never served with the complaints against us YET after the lawsuit was
dismissed in my favor then the "complaints" were posted and distributed giving
out my address and new telephone number. I want YOU to tell a jury of my peers
what the purpose was for YOU to do that to me. IF YOU TWO VILE EVIL SH*TS DON'T
RE-FILE THEN LET IT BE KNOWN FOREVER THAT YOU TWO ARE COWARDS AND THAT LAWSUIT
HAD NO REAL VALIDITY IN THE FIRST PLACE!! IF YOU DON'T DO ALL OF THIS THEN IT IS
YOU AND YALE WHO ARE THE COWARDS!! MAKE YOUR SAME ACCUSATIONS TO MY FACE IN
FRONT OF A JURY OF MY PEERS AT MY COURTHOUSE IN MY JURISDICTION!!
ARE YOU UP TO IT YOU PERJURIOUS COWARD!?
<END>
I know you didn't file the lawsuit hence you can't re-file what you didn't file
in the first place BUT you were an accomplice to the malicious prosecution and
harassment campaign still being waged against me!!!
You ranted to my District Attorney, to the Sheriff, and to the police YET you
made not one single solitary criminal charge or complaint. You drove over 3000
miles round trip to defame me! You have posted numerous times that my local law
enforcement said derogatory things about me which I know is a lie as well as
anyone else who knows your methods of smear! Care to deny you have done such?
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/6d3d379267eef3b1
(Archived locally as: SDS_DA_Libel_1)
From: Sara Salzman <catam...@concentric.net>
Subject: Re: Bradbury = Bald Faced Liar. NO surprise there!!
Date: 13 Aug 2003 03:21:26 GMT
Message-ID: <catamont-8C6715...@tribune.sj.sys.us.xo.net>
Sara
PS. Who ever said I was going to "file charges" against you? I went to
speak to your DA and your County Sheriff... and I did just that. And we
all had a very good laugh at YOUR expense.
<END>
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/1db5dda0dda3e752
(Archived locally as: SDS_DA_Libel_2)
From: Sara Salzman <catam...@concentric.net>
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: What is ONE Thing Ken McVay and Sara "The Fist" Salzman Have in
common Among Others? They Laugh at Scott Bradbury
Organization: Concentric Internet Services
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 13:52:53 -0700
Message-ID: <catamont-97055F...@news-60.giganews.com>
Of course, we also have this in common with a huge number of others,
including DA Koehn and the local police.
Sara
<END>
How about this for defamation:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/2a9b66595b986823
(Archived locally as: SDS_Defamation_1)
From: Sara Salzman <catam...@concentric.net>
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: Patrick L Humphrey laughing at R. Scott Bradbury again
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2004 13:18:59 -0700
Message-ID: <catamont-CC3054...@news-60.giganews.com>
In article <szkfze3olfp.fsf...@fnord.io.com>,
Patrick Humphrey <patr...@io.com> wrote:
> Howard Sprague <howard_sprague@mayberry01net> writes:
>
> >On 25 Jan 2004 09:33:09 -0800,
> ><e73f388a.0401250933.2986f...@posting.google.com>
> >donald...@myway.com (Donald Ray) wrote:
>
> >>>84 days, Blobbo.
>
> >>Get this, Humphrey is so much in love with Bradbury that he actually
> >>takes the time to count down the days until he rides through his town.
> >>Humphrey has had several years to show up in Bradbury's face directly,
>
> >Patjerk knows that I will use force against him such as a nine iron between
> >his eyes if he shows up on my front porch acting like a kook.
>
> Where did I say I was going to show up on YOUR alleged front porch, Fatbum?
> You're going to run away, like the 54-year-old Baby Huey you are, and I'll be
> a block away at the county park, talking to your DA -- and nothing you can do
> will stop that. Bet your worthless life on it.
He doesn't have a front porch. He can't even afford to pay for the
broken window.
> >>only to run and coward away each and every time. It even gets Humphrey
> >>sexually excited just to think of Bellville, talking about having a
> >>sexual fetish!
>
> >Patjerk has most likely peeped through my bathroom window too seeing how he
> >admits to being a peeping tom!
>
> Really? If you're so sure, take it to the cops. They need a laugh.
================================================================================
Tavish addition for August 6, 2005:
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.feminism/msg/729ac178ff1f8660
(Archived locally as: PatrickThePeeper)
Subject: Re: PATRICK "THE STALKER?"
Date: 1996/09/03
Message-ID: <50ht24$l...@anarchy.io.com>
---Sad, but true, but at least it'll be a bit easier than I thought to
encounter "Shawn" when I'm in Austin next month--if I'm out at night, just look
for anyone peeking into windows... Patrick L. Humphrey
<<That looks like proof to me Patrick is a window peeper!!!
================================================================================
> >>The truth is, the Police Chief long ago told you and Psycho Sara to
> >>stop bothering them as they got real police work to work, they told
> >>you to sue him in civil court. So far, you have chickened out and
> >>refused to do so.
Wow... so many lies in four short lines.
1. Didn't speak to the Police Chief. Spoke to the Sheriff.
2. Police Chief didn't tell me anything of the sort (see above).
3. No one told me to sue you in civil court. The local Sheriff told us
that they have a name for you but "couldn't repeat it in mixed company."
4. The only person who "chickened out" is the one who did NOT show up at
the County courthouse.
> >Then District Attorney gave them the brush off as well and he advised me to
> >try to get Yale "Tubby" Edeiken to sue me in our county and he will prosecute
> >Tubby for perjury and death threats! The FBI told me to sue Tubby. My local
> >police say they can't touch Tubby because he is out of their jurisdiction. I
> >have done everything I can do to get Tubby to come here and try his crap BUT
> >he high tailed it when I said I wasn't going to fight his appeal and that I
> >was more than happy for the lawsuit to go back to square one and when Tubby
> >realized I was serious this is just what Tubby did:
>
> Thank you for once again confirming that you're not only brain-damaged, but
> delusional. You could have been present when we talked to the DA, but you ran
> like the gutless coward you are.
<<Tavish comment August 6, 2005: I did not agree to meet with you at my DA's
office, nor the Sheriff's office, nor at the local police. I agreed to meet with
you when you and Yale would come to town and re-try that perjured lawsuit in my
jurisdiction!!>>
> 83 days, Lardass. You're going to run like a rabbit again.
And I'm sure you and DA Koehn will have quite a laugh about it.
Sara
<END>
And I have caught you in another lie!
You stated above: "The local Sheriff told us that they have a name for you but
"couldn't repeat it in mixed company." on Sun, 25 Jan 2004 YET you later
claimed: "And the police folks we spoke to said they _did_ have a special name
for him, but they wouldn't repeat it in mixed company." Mon, 25 Jul 2005
So which is it you fat slob lying pig? The Sheriff or the "police folks"?
You can't even keep your lies straight you fat disgusting pig! No wonder
Attorney Leach stated outright that you're a "crackpot!" Care to deny it? You
swore in a civil court he did!
I.E.
From: (Kenneth McVay, OBC)
Subject: Edeiken v. Bradbury: Affidavit
Archive/File: people/b/bradbury.scott/Edeiken-v-Bradbury-A2.01
Last-Modified: 2001/02/07
AFFIDAVIT
I, Sara Salzman, being duly sworn, state as follows:
[...]
16. That in response to her complaint and concerns for the safety of
her immediate and extended family, Daylin Leach informed Deponent that she
was a "crackpot"... <END>
Xref:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/f273677f0a167b2d
(Archived locally as: SDS_Defamation_2)
From: Sara Salzman <catam...@concentric.net>
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: Scott Bradbury-He Is Still Active
References: <1116261155....@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
<4292ab2b...@news20.forteinc.com>
<hu5ae1l70mjekndod...@4ax.com> <OW8Fe.5734$U%6.3...@fe05.lga>
<catamont-0C470F...@news.giganews.com>
<Bm9Fe.5736$U%6.1...@fe05.lga>
<catamont-430388...@news.giganews.com> <g1aFe.8$si...@fe05.lga>
<5qdFe.145$Ie...@bignews1.bellsouth.net> <aheFe.6372$Sr2.3699@trndny03>
User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.4 (PPC Mac OS X)
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 18:16:47 -0600
Message-ID: <catamont-435AB9...@news.giganews.com>
"The District Attorney was very careful not to say anything defamatory
about Mr. Bradbury. And the police folks we spoke to said they _did_
have a special name for him, but they wouldn't repeat it in mixed
company." <END>
Look at how you contradict yourself again in your libelous smear:
(Archived locally as: SDS_Defamation_3)
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/ebdc63494ff3b481
From: Sara Salzman <catam...@concentric.net>
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: 3rd PING: Tommy... running away again?
Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2003 13:08:43 -0700
Message-ID: <catamont-72C6B6...@news-60.giganews.com>
In article <Z8Qqb.10092$Pg1.485...@news20.bellglobal.com>,
"Patrick Keenan" <d...@null.net> wrote:
> "Tommy" <T...@NoMail.com> wrote in message news:3885729.VEmTUV52op@FreeBSD...
> > Patrick Keenan wrote:
> > > "Tommy" <T...@NoMail.com> wrote in message
> news:8155340.f0uTj6H1vf@FreeBSD...
> > >> > Sara Salzman wrote:
> > >> I forgot to mention: You drove all the way down and talked to the D.A.
> > >> in Bradbury's town and the DA said you were a nut-case!
> > >
> > > You were in the room, were you?
> >
> > No, Were You?
>
> No. The people who *were* in the room say that it didn't happen. Whose
> word do you have that it did? Did *you* hear the term used by the D.A.?
I did! But it was in reference to a local resident, not to me.
The deputy sherrif we spoke to also had a name for Mr. Bradbury, but
said he wouldn't repeat it "in mixed company, and in front of children."
Sara
<END>
Two lies you are exposed in you fat disgusting libelous pig:
You claimed on Mon, 25 Jul 2005: "The District Attorney was very careful not to
say anything defamatory about Mr. Bradbury." YET On Fri, 07 Nov 2003 Yopu stated
in reply to: "You drove all the way down and talked to the D.A. in Bradbury's
town and the DA said you were a nut-case!... Did *you* hear the term used by the
D.A.?" WITH: "I did! But it was in reference to a local resident, not to me."
IOW you are now claiming my DA told you I was a nut-case! See how you lie
through your teeth you Child of the Father of Lies!
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/0d711ad4bced9b85
(Archived locally as: SDS_Defamation_4)
From: Sara Salzman <catam...@concentric.net>
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: We Have Met The Enemy...
Date: 22 Jul 2003 23:56:18 GMT
Message-ID: <catamont-6E8D44...@news.concentric.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.221.9.183
"...The Austin County police and DA, however, were there. And they had some
very interesting things to say. More interesting were some of the things
they wouldn't say. Like: Policeman: We have a name for Mr. Bradbury, but
I can't say it in mixed company." <END>
Now here are your libel lies lined up concerning speaking in mixed company:
1) "The local Sheriff told us that they have a name for you but "couldn't repeat
it in mixed company."
2) "[T]he police folks we spoke to said they _did_ have a special name for him,
but they wouldn't repeat it in mixed company."
3) "The deputy sherrif we spoke to also had a name for Mr. Bradbury, but
said he wouldn't repeat it "in mixed company, and in front of children."
4) "Policeman: We have a name for Mr. Bradbury, but I can't say it in mixed
company."
ALL FULLY DOCUMENTED AND DOWNLOADED AND ARCHIVED LOCALLY YOU FAT PIG!!!!!
Also above you stated: "The District Attorney was very careful not to say
anything defamatory about Mr. Bradbury." BUT your numerous other lying posts
contradict what you now claim!! How many lies have I caught you in so far you
disgusting pig?
>Face it. You scream about everyone who says "Belleville" in this
>newsgroup, and then go out of your way to post information on the places
>where people who have the temerity to disagree with you.
I have no problem with people who disagree with me! I have problems with fat
pigs who spread evil lies about me and perjure themselves in a civil court
against me!!
>You are a hypocrite of the first water, as well as an obsessed idiot.
>
>Care to deny it?
I deny both smears!!!
>And no, that's not a personal attack. It's called "Definition of
>Character."
I have resoundingly proven what your character is and here is some more!
On 07 Jul 2003 01:31:53 GMT, Sara Salzman <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
"How many times do I have to tell you-- I AM RETARDED!!!"
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Message ID: <catamont-548CA8...@spectator.sj.sys.us.xo.net>
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.politics.nationalism.white/msg/9d9e9b42701ff692
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.politics.nationalism.white/msg/9d9e9b42701ff692?dmode=source
Date: 07 Jul 2003 01:31:53 GMT
(Archived locally as: RetardSara and RetardSara2)
<<Tavish comment: You don't have to tell me numerous times you're retarded Sara-
I have known you to be a retard for many years! Picture of the self confessed
mental retardee: http://www.westword.com/issues/2000-08-10/news/feature3_4.gif
~~Sara Salzman's "CPS" Affidavit Perjury Documented~~
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/ddf877bf49b153c2?fwc=1
Subject: Sara Salzman's Affidavit Perjury. One Example of Criminality Revealed.
Message-ID: <o3vfe1tnijjcpqq44...@4ax.com>
Date: 27 Jul 2005 22:18:07 GMT
Sara Salzman's poor damage control and diversion countered with:
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/6ffc6ccf93e09d37?fwc=1
Subject: Re: Sara Salzman's Affidavit Perjury. One Example of Criminality
Revealed.
Message-ID: <9qphe1ttfrdjeu9hs...@4ax.com>
References: <o3vfe1tnijjcpqq44...@4ax.com>
<catamont-18678C...@news.giganews.com>
Date: 28 Jul 2005 14:18:58 GMT
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Perjury is also a criminal offense which makes Sara a criminal by definition!
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Overview of noun perjurer
The noun perjurer has 1 sense (no senses from tagged texts)
perjurer, false witness -- (a person who deliberately gives false testimony)
Coordinate Terms (sisters) of noun perjurer
storyteller, fibber, fabricator -- (someone who tells lies)
liar, prevaricator -- (a person who has lied or who lies repeatedly)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Also Sara perjured herself with other false swearings:
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/3b72f880c1b7eee4
(Archived locally as: SDSmasterPoem7)
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/3b72f880c1b7eee4?dmode=source
(Archived locally as: SDSmasterPoem8)
Subject: Sara Salzman's S&M Bondage-Torture Fantasies Result in Perjury!...
Message-ID: <3rjn01ltdsm4lh74f...@4ax.com>
Date: 10 Feb 2005 23:16:32 GMT
------------------------------
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/059391fa55b74c0b
Subject: Derek Bell Proves Sara Salzman to be Both a Liar and a Perjurer..
Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 10:33:20 -0600
Message-ID: <e58121h7stsg1q6al...@4ax.com>
~~Sara Salzman Caught Lying About Using The Media For Her Own Agenda~~
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/86055f63edf2cd18
(Archived locally as: TAV_1 and TAV_2)
Subject: Re: Why does Sara Salzman run from her challenge of wanting proof after
it has been provided? Why won't she own up to her lies?
Message-ID: <5qcpb1t3fg49vpv5q...@4ax.com>
Date: 25 Jun 2005 01:51:51 GMT
~~Sara Salzman Caught Lying About her Fisting and S&M Postings~~
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/5bc0e5365a935cd0
Subject: Sara "The Fist" Salzman Now Claims Those Fisting Posts are Her Sex
Life!!! (Classic Repost Originally Posted December 22, 2003)
Message-ID: <inrfe11jdcqdh14p9...@4ax.com>
Date: 27 Jul 2005 21:16:04 GMT
Compare a snippet from the above to the second snippet to see how Sara has
been caught lying about her fisting and s&m postings!
First Snippet:
> Beaver Cleaver <beaver_cleaver@mayfield01net> wrote:
>> On Thu, 18 Dec 2003 08:04:45 -0700,
>> <catamont-9743CA.08044518122...@news-60.giganews.com> Sara Salzman
>> <catam...@concentric.net> wrote:
>> >[ALTERED AND FORGED HEADERS DELETED]
>>
>> ---Sara Salzman's irony of pointing out features on posts she claims don't
>> exist. If they don't exist and never existed then why does she know so much
>> about them!?
Second Snippet:
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/1eff49e9514d013a
(Archived locally as: SaraNdenial)
Message-ID: <catamont-A5678F...@news-60.giganews.com>
> >[FORGED, ALTERED POSTS DELETED]
>
> FORGED, ALTERED!? I did no such thing you lying pig! Those are YOUR posts so
> I did not forge them! THAT IS FACT!
No it isn't. One of your cronies sent them to you and said there were in
the google archives. But they aren't, are they?
~~End of GOOGLE Archival Snippet~~
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.politics.nationalism.white/msg/8d45deebd3f9ecf2
Subject: V2.0b Sara "The Fist" Salzman's Attempt at Revisionism FAILS- She Wrote
The FIST Postings! Date: 17 Dec 2003 19:40:10 GMT
Message-ID: <hpa1uv0m63koaqbo4...@4ax.com>
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.politics.nationalism.white/msg/e899d098f6e21d41
Subject: Re: V2.0b Sara "The Fist" Salzman's Attempt at Revisionism FAILS- She
Wrote The FIST Postings! Date: 18 Dec 2003 06:13:32 GMT
Message-ID: <ige2uvsjk0bfi54at...@4ax.com>
Despite overwhelming evidence Sara "The Fist" will keep repeating
her lies and remain in denial.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/eed8a94c0cac521e
Subject: Ken McVay Agrees With Us That "My Master Holds The Ropes Just So" is
"Sara's story"... Message-ID: <qjtn01dbb9pgck7g7...@4ax.com>
Date: 11 Feb 2005 00:18:26 GMT
THUS SPOKE SARA SALZMAN
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/d8e53f32472be522
Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 13:30:24 GMT
Message-ID: <42bd5c55...@news20.forteinc.com>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/aa0bb25abdd0f236
Date: 5 Feb 2004 13:55:58 GMT
Message-ID: <9ti42055o5h7ktuss...@4ax.com>
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.politics.nationalism.white/msg/d872ba879eb31358
Subject: Sara Salzman- A Communist Subversive and Operative and What About
NIZKOR and B'nai Brith? You All Judge for Yourselves! aka Re: Sara digs a hole.
Message-ID: <17mde196vmpmdg7ds...@4ax.com>
Date: 27 Jul 2005 02:07:54 GMT
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics.nationalism.white/msg/2b766e113b358b64
Subject: Sara Salzman Admitting She is an Anti-Christ by Her Non-Reply? Still
No Response! T_0803 Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2005 15:42:24 -0500
Message-ID: <pla2f1t5hmua4ut0u...@4ax.com>
"[T]he fact that a Communist is anti-Christian makes perfect sense, since
Marx called religion the "opiate of the people."" - Sara Salzman
Message-ID: <schwartz-ya023180...@news.infinet.com>
(Archived locally as: SaraSplainsAll_5 and SaraSplainsAll_6)
-------
"I have never made an "imflammatory" [sic] attack on Communism. I have never
made ANY attack on Communism." - Sara Salzman
Message-ID: <schwartz-ya023180...@news.infinet.com>
(Archived locally as: SaraSplainsAll_7 and SaraSplainsAll_8)
The reason why Sara has "never made ANY attack on Communism" is because she is
anti-christic which explains why she stated: "[T]he fact that a Communist is
anti-Christian makes perfect sense."
From: (Kenneth McVay, OBC)
Subject: Edeiken v. Bradbury: Affidavit
Archive/File: people/b/bradbury.scott/Edeiken-v-Bradbury-A2.01
Last-Modified: 2001/02/07
In a NUT shell:
AFFIDAVIT
I, Sara Salzman, being duly sworn, state as follows:
[...]
15. That Daylin Leach.. stated...Deponent should "stop bothering" Defendant
Bradbury...
16. ...Daylin Leach informed Deponent that she was a "crackpot"...
Tavish
>Sara
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/83e90e971b704600
Subject: Is Sara "The Whipped" Salzman Still Being Whipped by Her Husband's
Electric Whipping Machine?
Message-ID: <0ap6uv43dm8uefmm3...@4ax.com>
Date: 19 Dec 2003 22:00:00 GMT
_______________________________________________________________________________
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com
<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <><><><><><><><>