More political philosophy about "The Social Dilemma"..

[Amine Moulay Ramdane]

Hello..


More political philosophy about "The Social Dilemma"..

I have just looked at the following video, i invite you to look at it:

"The Social Dilemma": Ex-Facebook/ex-Google tech lead reacts

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JVBQgx4_x34

I think this techlead in the above video is too pessimistic,
because he is saying that the social medias like Facebook
and youtube want only to maximize profit, but i think he
is not thinking correctly, because social medias want also
to organize people and to make people do business in them, so there is
like a "balance" there between making profit and organizing people
and doing business in them, so i think we have not to be pessimistic,
and this seeking like a balance looks like the seeking a balance between
competition and collaboration in my following thoughts:

About the jews and about capitalism and more ..

I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have invented many scalable algorithms..

Look at this very interesting video about the jews and capitalism

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jXceS6pfupc

You will notice that those jews in this video are primitive, since you will notice in the above video that those jews are not understanding local optimization of artificial intelligence(called exploitation) and global optimization of artificial intelligence(called exploration), i mean that they are for example neglecting the factor of nationalism(and nationalism of jews) , since i think that nationalism is too much competition that has the tendency to wanting to too much monopolize and it has the tendency to hurt competition and quality, so this is why the jews on the above video are using a primitive thinking that doesn't work correctly, this is why there must be laws against monopoly that hurts competition and that hurts quality.

And read my following thoughts that are related to my above thoughts:

More political philosophy about globalization and nationalism..

I am a white arab and i think i am more smart, so today i will
talk about a very important subject about Globalization and nationalism,
so i will invite you to look at the following video of Marine Le Pen of
the far-right political party in France:

Marine Le Pen explains why nationalism is important

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fNpI9wKnE8Q


As you notice that Marine Le Pen is saying in french that the
fight today is between nationalism and globalization, since
Marine Le Pen says that globalization is a treat to national
identity and is a treat to national sovereignty, but i think that Marine Le Pen is not understanding correctly globalization, since i think that nationalism is too much competition and communism and socialism is too much collaboration , so i think the best way is to seek like a balance between collaboration and competition and when we look
at globalization you will notice that we are collaborating with others by for example sharing Open Source softwares or Free softwares or PhD papers or knowledge on internet etc, and we are also competition by not collaborating with others, and with this new kind of model we are noticing that we are not just one identity like being french, but we are becoming multiple identities because this kind of new model is making a part of us that collaborate "universal", and this is why i think that Marine Le Pen is not understanding correctly this new kind of model of like seeking a balance between competition and collaboration , and i think that this new model is better because it is more efficient , because i think this partly collaboration of this new model is good and more efficient for creativity, innovation, adaptability and speed of progress, i also think in capitalism the price of internet has gotten cheap and the price of computers has gotten cheap, so we are able today to access internet with a low price and benefit from "collaboration" and also sharing in internet, for example look at me, i have invented many scalable algorithms and i have decided to share some of them with the others, and it is of course collaboration , so look for example at my following inventions of scalable algorithms that i have shared with others, here they are:

https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-mlock

https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-reference-counting-with-efficient-support-for-weak-references

https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-rwlock

https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-rwlock-that-works-accross-processes-and-threads

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.programming.threads/VaOo1WVACgs

https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/an-efficient-threadpool-engine-with-priorities-that-scales-very-well

Also i have decided to not share others of my scalable algorithms and it is competition, so i am seeking like a balance between collaboration and competition.

And read more all my following thoughts to understand better:


https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.culture.morocco/BMjK8Sq5nIw



And Read my following thoughts about productivity:

https://community.idera.com/developer-tools/general-development/f/getit-and-third-party/73133/about-productivity

And look at the following video, since i think that a good education system is the most important thing:

Top 10 Countries with Best Education Systems in the World

Read more here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6xhfnjEf8C0


More political philosophy about the mechanisms of Democracy..

I think that we have to be smart, since i have just written
the following about China and Russia of year 2010 and 2012:

----

More about China and Russia and other such countries education system..

I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have invented many scalable algorithms, read the following:

“Corruption is pervasive in every part of Chinese society, and education is no exception,” Mr. Li said.

A Chinese Education, for a Price

Read more here:

https://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/22/world/asia/in-china-schools-a-culture-of-bribery-spreads.html


I think we can not be confident with the Chinese education system,
and i don't think it is meritocratic !


It is the same problem in Russia, read the following to notice it:

Mark Levin, a professor at the Higher School of Economics in Moscow who has studied the issue, said corruption in universities took place not only during the entrance examinations but also those at the end of semesters. Levin said some students preferred to pay money to pass examinations and obtain a diploma.

RUSSIA: Rising corruption threatens universities

Read more here:

https://www.universityworldnews.com/post.php?story=20100514205552600#:~:text=According%20to%20necessarily%20rough%20estimates,in%202009%20totalled%20%241%20billion.&text=But%2C%20despite%20the%20country's%20increased,much%20the%20salaries%20actually%20are.

----


And also i have just posted about the today China after the anti-corruption compaign in China, read the following:

---

I invite you to read the following interesting article:

China’s Anti-Corruption Campaign and the Challenges of Political Meritocracy

https://americanaffairsjournal.org/2020/05/chinas-anti-corruption-campaign-and-the-challenges-of-political-meritocracy/

---


So as you are noticing from my above writing that corruption can corrupt
the education system and when education system is corrupt then the Meritocratic system is corrupt and this is dangerous. So even after the anti-corruption compaign in China , i think that Dictatorship of China is not so efficient at fighting corruption, because Democracy is much better at fighting corruption by competitive elections and free press, read my following thoughts to understand more:

From where people get a correct judgment in Democracy ?

So you are noticing that to be able to be good judgment in Democracy,
you have to be correct "Elitism" that guides people, and you have to be
Meritocracy to be able to be the necessary quality or perfection, but
then you are noticing that to be able to be Meritocracy there must be
a reward for the merit, by for example rewarding by giving more
money.

Now why to be Democracy ?

I think that we have to be more smart and notice that
Democracy is also smart, the big benefits of democracy that it is also
like a morality that is a diversity that prioritize by giving weights to
some important things and processes to be able to succeed, for example
if i ask a question of how to be less corruption ? i think
that Democracy is an enhanced system that fights corruption
more efficiently than dictatorship, i think this is
understandable because to be able to "escape" a local maximum
towards a global maximum(like in artificial intelligence) on efficiency
of fighting corruption (and corruption also means lack of efficiency),
we have to be able to vote for another political party that is more apt
and more efficient at fighting corruption, this is why i think that
democracy is better at fighting corruption, also i think that in
democracy the governance must be a "competent" governance
this is how we will enhance democracy to be the best.
---


And read my following thoughts in the following links to understand better my thoughts:

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.culture.morocco/gjConWuxl24


And read also my following thoughts:

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.culture.morocco/R0NfDCtni00


And to know more about economy and capitalism, please read my following thoughts:

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.culture.morocco/wlJu5j1xhPk


And read more of my thoughts of my political philosophy here:

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.culture.morocco/8j-rboLzi38



More political philosophy about technopopulism..


I have just read the following from Christopher Bickerton a University Lecturer in Politics from University of Cambridge:

"Democratic politics has undergone a profound transformation in recent decades. The structuring logic of political competition is no longer the ideological struggle between left and right. Political actors today compete in their appeals to ‘the people’ and to competence and expertise as supreme political virtues. The substance of contemporary democratic politics is these populist and technocratic claims, giving rise to a political field which we call technopopulism."

Read more here:

https://ces.fas.harvard.edu/events/2020/02/techno-populism-italy-spain


Notice that he is saying the following:

"The structuring logic of political competition is no longer the ideological struggle between left and right."


I think he is not right since populism of today is about national "identity" and about the treat of globalization to national sovereignty, and it is pushed by the political right, read my following thoughts to notice it:

More about our identity and about globalization and nationalism..

I have just read the following very interesting webpage:

What’s Wrong with Liberalism?

https://www.historytoday.com/archive/feature/what%E2%80%99s-wrong-liberalism

And he says the following:

"Populism marks a new phase in identity politics for the simple reason
that people fear not only poverty, but also identity deprivation."

and:

"Our gains have been gains in efficiency, transparency and utility; the
gains that Bentham hoped to see by the construction of his Panopticon,
in which a single guard would be able to look straight into every prison
cell. Our losses have been losses in purpose and meaning."


But i think that he is too pessimistic, but i am positive, because we
have to know about the purpose and meaning of life, and we have to know
more about our identity, since i think that we have to seek like a
"balance" between competition and collaboration, and about the meaning
and purpose of life, i am talking about it in my thoughts of my
political philosophy about morality, read it carefully here:

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.culture.morocco/7UmkfURwoU4


Also here is what i just said about our identity and about globalization
and nationalism:

More political philosophy about globalization and nationalism..

I am a white arab and i think i am more smart, so today i will
talk about a very important subject about Globalization and nationalism,
so i will invite you to look at the following video of Marine Le Pen of
the far-right political party in France:

Marine Le Pen explains why nationalism is important

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fNpI9wKnE8Q


As you notice that Marine Le Pen is saying in french that the
fight today is between nationalism and globalization, since
Marine Le Pen says that globalization is a treat to national
identity and is a treat to national sovereignty, but i think that Marine
Le Pen is not understanding correctly globalization, since i think that
nationalism is too much competition and communism and socialism is too
much collaboration , so i think the best way is to seek like a balance
between collaboration and competition and when we look
at globalization you will notice that we are collaborating with others
by for example sharing Open Source softwares or Free softwares or PhD
papers or knowledge on internet etc, and we are also competition by not
collaborating with others, and with this new kind of model we are
noticing that we are not just one identity like being french, but we are
becoming multiple identities because this kind of new model is making a
part of us that collaborate "universal", and this is why i think that
Marine Le Pen is not understanding correctly this new kind of model of
like seeking a balance between competition and collaboration , and i
think that this new model is better because it is more efficient ,
because think this partly collaboration of this new model is good and
more efficient for creativity, innovation, adaptability and speed of
progress, i also think in capitalism the price of internet has gotten
cheap and the price of computers has gotten cheap, so we are able today
to access internet with a low price and benefit from "collaboration" and
also sharing in internet, for example look at me, i have invented many
scalable algorithms and i have decided to share some of them with the
others, and it is of course collaboration , so look for example at my
following inventions of scalable algorithms that i have shared with
others, here they are:

https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-mlock

https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-reference-counting-with-efficient-support-for-weak-references

https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-rwlock

https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-rwlock-that-works-accross-processes-and-threads

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.programming.threads/VaOo1WVACgs

https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/an-efficient-threadpool-engine-with-priorities-that-scales-very-well

Also i have decided to not share others of my scalable algorithms and it
is competition, so i am seeking like a balance between collaboration and
competition.


And read all my following thoughts to understand more:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/TkYaQrwIM_g



Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.