Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: Lost 45 pounds

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Sep 27, 2006, 9:47:00 AM9/27/06
to
Alan S wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Sep 2006 04:25:25 GMT, "Gantlet"
> <NotS...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >Hello Kurt or RK.
> >
> >i dont remember seeing this person post here and yet they seem to have
> >been posting for a few months.
> >I also noticed that this poster was given a hard time by some of the
> >regulars here.
> >i am also sorry to say that on this thread not one person offered any
> >congratulations.
> >i wonder if it was because of the type of diet this person was on.
> >
> >would other diabetics turn their backs on another diabetic because they are
> >on another type of diet? NO
> >spammers on the other hand would.
> >Dont worry JJ you are probably doing much better than most here.
> >good luck on your diabetic journey.
> >perhaps if you were on a low carb diet you would have recieved a better
> >welcome.
> >
> >Tom
> >
> >"JJ Jones" <jamesjona...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> >news:1154470081.2...@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...
> >>I lost 45 pounds on a low-fat, medium-carb, hi-fiber diet. It has also
> >> helped by BG and lipids. As a public service it is outlined on my
> >> blog: http://jamesjonathanjones.blogspot.com
> >>
> >
> Hi Tom
>
> Thanks for posting this. I wasn't aware of JJ, who was here
> while I was away. You're right - it was an impressive
> achievement and deserved congratulations.
>
> Interesting diet, quite similar to the one that I used
> myself before I read Jennifer's advice and started testing
> accordingly. It worked very well for me for weight loss but
> only had limited success for BGs. However, it formed the
> base that developed to my present way of eating.
>
> I read back through some of the old threads; I don't think
> anyone chased JJ away - he seemed to give as good as he got
> but just didn't agree with some. Maybe I missed some
> threads.
>
> Did you notice the links at the foot of the page? Sadly,
> they disappeared when he re-posted in his August version.

Actually, folks in ASD simply ignored James because his method of
weight loss was definitely not low-carb.

Additional comments have been posted to his blog:

http://jamesjonathanjones.blogspot.com

May GOD continue to heal your heart by curing your diabetes, dear Alan
whom I love unconditionally.

Prayerfully in Christ's amazing love,

Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung
Cardiologist, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit

As for knowing who are the very elect, these you will know by the
unconditional love they have for everyone including their enemies
(Matthew 5:44-45, 1 Corinthians 13:3, James 2:14-17).

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/a77da2d26da0ab97?

TC

unread,
Sep 27, 2006, 2:38:10 PM9/27/06
to

Why the frig do you insist on crossposting discussions to smn that are
not originally posted to smn? Ya trolling, spamming piece of shit.

TC

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Sep 27, 2006, 4:14:51 PM9/27/06
to
> Why the frig do you insist on crossposting discussions to smn that are
> not originally posted to smn?

My choice made through the free will GOD has generously given all souls
including those belonging to fig trees (Mark 11:12-14,20).

>Ya trolling, spamming piece of shit.

Name-calling simply shows that you are lost.

May GOD continue to keep your heart beating, dear neighbor whom I love

Daedalus

unread,
Sep 27, 2006, 4:17:24 PM9/27/06
to
On 27 Sep 2006 13:14:51 -0700, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
<lo...@thetruth.com> wrote:

Is to be a drooling idiot.

Jade

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Sep 27, 2006, 5:44:40 PM9/27/06
to
Daedalus wrote:
<snip>

<snip...snip>

>My choice Is to be a drooling idiot.
>
> Jade

You have the free will that GOD has generously given you along with all
other souls including those belonging to fig trees (Mark 11:12-14, 20).

It is GOD's infinite will that we all retain our free wills:

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/b1957ab18d3c93f1?

May GOD continue to keep your heart beating, dear neighbor Jade whom I

Minister Rennasaince Faire-A-Con

unread,
Sep 27, 2006, 7:48:11 PM9/27/06
to
just out of curiosity... How did you discover AUK?

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Sep 27, 2006, 8:16:56 PM9/27/06
to

Through my continued walk with Christ Jesus, Whom I love with all my
heart, soul, mind, and strength.

HE has taught to love to unlovable.

May GOD continue to keep your heart beating, dear neighbor whom I love

percy

unread,
Sep 27, 2006, 9:26:47 PM9/27/06
to
Minister Rennasaince Faire-A-Con wrote:

>>
> just out of curiosity... How did you discover AUK?

He was "introduced" by a reader of the groups chung crossposts to.

His introductory foamfests netted him the 72 Raisins Award and the
Wollman Award for Easter, 2006.
Teh rest is history.

Vicki

Minister Rennasaince Faire-A-Con

unread,
Sep 27, 2006, 10:03:43 PM9/27/06
to

I assume you mean "HE has taught to love THE unloveable"

So I'm not loveable? I thought God loved all his children? So how could
I be unlovable?

Please explain...

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Sep 27, 2006, 11:51:25 PM9/27/06
to
> > HE has taught us to love the unlovable.

>
> I assume you mean "HE has taught to love THE unloveable"

No. See above.

> So I'm not loveable?

Because of GOD's infinite love in my heart, you are not unloveable to
me.

> I thought God loved all his children?

"GOD chooses those HE will love and those HE will hate" -- Holy Spirit

Amen.

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/b1957ab18d3c93f1?

> So how could I be unlovable?

Because of your sin. All the name-calling makes participants of AUK
partakers of bearing false witness.

> Please explain...

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/a77da2d26da0ab97?

May GOD continue to keep your heart beating, dear neighbor whom I love

The Demon Prince of Absurdity

unread,
Sep 28, 2006, 6:08:27 AM9/28/06
to
On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 02:41:24 +0000, Alan S did the cha-cha, and screamed:

> On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 02:03:43 GMT, Minister Rennasaince Faire-A-Con
> wrote:
>
>>I assume you mean "HE has taught to love THE unloveable"
>>
>>So I'm not loveable? I thought God loved all his children? So how could
>>I be unlovable?
>>
>>Please explain...
>
> God may or may not have loved you. However, I find it very difficult to
> love anyone who is dickhead enough to not only correspond with Chung -
> but doesn't snip and worst of all leaves in all the cross-posts.
>
> Alan, T2, Australia.

Cross-poasting of such k0oKery as Chung's is _essential_! AUK has a
tradition of impartiality WRT mocking k00ks to uphold, you know, and
without x-poasting, there's simply no way to prove it, or to gather
support for a nomination. Naturally, some will tell AUKers to go to
hell, but that's usenet. ASD is removed from followups.

--
________________________________________________________________________
Hail Eris! TM#5; COOSN-029-06-71069
Cardinal Snarky of the Fannish Inquisition
http://www6.kingdomofloathing.com/login.php
http://www.runescape.com/
No one expects the Fannish Inquisition!
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Cabal_of_the_Holy_Pretzel/join
"Etymology:
Argumentum ad Septicus : argument to putrefaction. Derived from Septicum
Argumentum : putrefaction of argument.

"Septic \Sep"tic\, Septical \Sep"tic*al\
a. [L. septicus to make putrid: cf. F. septique.]
Having power to promote putrefaction. Of or relating to or
caused by putrefaction." -- Kadaitcha Man, indirectly to
Donald "Skeptic"/"Septic" Alford, in MID: <a3svh.d...@news.alt.net>

"I never fail to be amazing" -- Looney Maroon for September 2006 nominee
William Barwell's ego knows no bounds. MID:
12ggt3q...@corp.supernews.com

"We are most nearly ourselves when we achieve the seriousness of the
child at play." -- Heraclitus

"And thats another mistake on your part. Your 'playing' games on usenet,
and I'm not playing...It has nothing to do with impressing you, it has
more to do with making sure you have the education you'll need to debate.
The debate is no fun for me if you are mentally incapable of it. I'm
giving you an opportunity to educate yourself. That's all." -- A trashy
former virus-writer turned Outer Filth doesn't know if he's playing or
working, in MID: <1159389579....@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Sep 28, 2006, 12:43:22 PM9/28/06
to
percy wrote:
> Minister Rennasaince Faire-A-Con wrote:
>
> > just out of curiosity... How did you discover AUK?
>
> He was "introduced" by a reader of the groups chung crossposts to.

Actually, during my continued walk with Christ Jesus, WE have
encountered many lost souls who are offended by the truth. Therefore,
it is the walk that has led to discovering AUK where lost souls gather
in the shadows. Here is the "reader of the groups" that Vicki believes
was instrumental rather that the walk itself:

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/4aaa48e04be6b0de?

As should be clearly evident, this "reader of the groups" would need
GOD's help to be instrumental at doing anything. Nonetheless, he
remains in my prayers.

May GOD continue to heal your heart by curing your diabetes, dear

neighbor Vicki whom I love unconditionally.

Pastor Kutchie

unread,
Sep 28, 2006, 1:35:32 PM9/28/06
to

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
> Minister Rennasaince Faire-A-Con wrote:
> > just out of curiosity... How did you discover AUK?
>
> Through my continued walk with Christ Jesus, Whom I love with all my
> heart, soul, mind, and strength.
>

ROTFLMAO.

Daedalus

unread,
Sep 28, 2006, 2:36:09 PM9/28/06
to
On 27 Sep 2006 17:16:56 -0700, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
<lo...@thetruth.com> wrote:

>Minister Rennasaince Faire-A-Con wrote:

>> just out of curiosity... How did you discover AUK?
>
>Through my continued walk with Christ Jesus,

This belongs on the Web site.

We now have proof Jesus is a k00kologist.

Jade

Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted

Daedalus

unread,
Sep 28, 2006, 3:50:08 PM9/28/06
to
On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 19:27:51 GMT, Grand Moff Robert Buchanan
<gran...@deathstar.galacticempire> wrote:

>I will now respond to a post accessible as
>news:pan.2006.09.28....@nntp.sun-meatplow.local by Meat Plow
><me...@meatplow.local>:
>
>> On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 14:36:09 -0400, Daedalus Has Frothed:

>> Funny you mention this. Last night I had a dream about Jesus and Chung
>> walking through auk.
>
>Do tell.

Yes, please. ( Hope there's a moving dance number in this one.)

Jade

Peter J Ross

unread,
Sep 28, 2006, 4:55:44 PM9/28/06
to
On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 14:36:09 -0400, Daedalus <ja...@netk00ks.org> wrote
in alt.usenet.kooks:

So? Did I ever say I wasn't?


Jesus :-)
--
_ _(o)_(o)_ _ | The fool hath said in his heart, "There is no Cabal."
._\`:_ F S M _:' \_, | FSM: <http://www.venganza.org/>
/ (`---'\ `-. | AUK: <http://www.netcabal.com/auk/>
,-` _) (_, F_P | PJR: <http://insurgent.org/~pjr/>

Phoebee Caulfield

unread,
Sep 28, 2006, 5:10:32 PM9/28/06
to
In article <v85oh25tou19ce80e...@4ax.com>,
Daedalus says...

I think it more likely that he was a k00k.

Think about it.

He believed his mother was a virgin.
He beleived he was the Son of God.
He believed he could raise the dead.

If'n any other poster made such claims, they'd be appropriately
branded as a k00k immediately.

--

"Meanwhile, somewhere in the twenty-first century, a young
girl named Phoebee Caulfield plops herself down on the sofa,
pops open a soda, and watches ... YOU!"
...PK

Message has been deleted

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Sep 28, 2006, 9:45:35 PM9/28/06
to
Ozgirl wrote:
> Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
>
> > http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/370715cecbc034d6?
>
> Strangely Jesus never stayed in one place very long, wasn't
> his style

Actually, as the Son of Man, HE resided in Nazareth for awhile before
starting HIS ministry here on earth. Thus, many have know HIM as Jesus
of Nazareth.

> - perhaps you could take a leaf out of his book?

LORD Jesus Christ did not author the Holy Bible though HE is the Source
of it.

HE is the living Word of GOD.

> If you were in another's house and they requested you not
> smoke inside, you would agree?

Don't smoke in the firstplace.

> No?

Correct... no smoking.

> Many have requested that
> you don't crosspost as it is against the charter of the
> particular groups you offend in.

Charters, "which usually mostly means how news groups are created," are
not rules of governance.

"In Usenet, the ultimate authority lies with news server
administrators,
who decide which newsgroups their servers carry, who is allowed to use
their servers, etc."

Source:

http://groups.google.com/group/news.groups.questions/msg/f0166305b1f94514?

> Do you have a problem
> agreeing with the "rules" of other people's "houses"?

Unmoderated Usenet newsgroups are not like homes but more like the
bulletin boards in Central Park in the midst of the soapboxes people
are standing on to yell out their opinions.

> Do you like to be deliberately offensive?

No. If I did, I would opt for the soapbox instead of the bulletin
board.

> Does that make you a better person in God's eyes?

No. It remains my choice made via the free will that GOD has
generously given all souls including those belonging to fig trees (Mark
11:12-14, 20).

> I couldn't give a fig about your religious postings but I do
> find it offensive that you crosspost continuously when you
> have been asked both politely and impolitely not to.

In truth, without opening my posts, you would not have known they were
crossposts.

Sorry the contents of my posts continue to bother you so terribly.
Please forgive all my iniquities.

> How about a bit of respect for other people?

Certainly.

This should be evident in the fact I have not chosen to stand on a soap
box with a bull horn.

> You never know, you
> may reach the ears of the unresponsive in your witnessing if
> you showed you can be inoffensive in other areas.

The LORD's purpose for me here remains to inform and neither to witness
nor to convert.

> Crossposted this one time only.

Crossposted to relevant newsgroups.

May GOD continue to heal your heart by curing your diabetes, dear

neighbor Ozgirl whom I love unconditionally.

Archie Leach

unread,
Sep 28, 2006, 9:53:28 PM9/28/06
to
"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <lo...@thetruth.com> wrote:

"Curst be the trolls, for theirs is the kingdom of killfiles." - Holy
Spirit


Message has been deleted

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Sep 28, 2006, 10:52:07 PM9/28/06
to
Archie Leach wrote:
> >> > <snip>

> >> >
> >> just out of curiosity... How did you discover AUK?
> >
> >Through my continued walk with Christ Jesus, Whom I love with all my
> >heart, soul, mind, and strength.
> >
> >HE has taught us to love the unlovable.

>
> "Curst be the trolls, for theirs is the kingdom of killfiles."

"You write from firsthand experience." -- Holy Spirit.

http://groups.google.com/group/soc.men/msg/580309dc23b7b981?

> - Holy Spirit

Yes, HE is.

Laus Deo ! !

May GOD continue to keep your heart beating, dear neighbor Archie whom

Minister Rennasaince Faire-A-Con

unread,
Sep 28, 2006, 11:43:46 PM9/28/06
to
<snip>

> As for knowing who are the very elect, these you will know by the
> unconditional love they have for everyone including their enemies
> (Matthew 5:44-45, 1 Corinthians 13:3, James 2:14-17).
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/a77da2d26da0ab97?
>

someone just got read!

Charlotte L. Blackmer

unread,
Oct 7, 2006, 3:42:51 PM10/7/06
to
In article <1159388091.1...@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com>,

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD <lo...@thetruth.com> wrote:
>My choice made through the free will GOD has generously given all souls
>including those belonging to fig trees (Mark 11:12-14,20).

*boggle*

Chung is claiming that fig trees have souls?

*boggle*

Charlotte

--

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Oct 7, 2006, 3:49:11 PM10/7/06
to
Charlotte L. Blackmer wrote:
> In article <1159388091.1...@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com>,
> Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD <lo...@thetruth.com> wrote:
> >My choice made through the free will GOD has generously given all souls
> >including those belonging to fig trees (Mark 11:12-14,20).
>
> Chung is claiming that fig trees have souls?

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/ddb25eb1d5cf468a?

May GOD continue to keep your heart beating, dear neighbor Charlotte

Gene Goldman

unread,
Oct 7, 2006, 5:05:38 PM10/7/06
to
On Sat, 7 Oct 2006 19:42:51 +0000 (UTC), c...@green.rahul.net
(Charlotte L. Blackmer) wrote:

>Chung is claiming that fig trees have souls?

Unsurprising, really. Mr. Chung is every bit as much a Christian as
he is a doctor, equally knowledgeable about both topics.

--
The 10mg Lizard-Spit Approach is not a diet.

It does help people manage their Diabetes Mellitus (DM) possibly preventing long-term complications resulting from poor control.
Bottomline: I remain peanut-free.
May your BG and A1c get better, dear neighbor whom I communicate with unconditionally.
Gratefully, in Lizard-Spit's amazing love,

Consuming copious amounts of Aspertame-laden soft drinks with reckless abandon!

Be well, travel with a light heart and a low A1c [Gene, 3:16]

Gene Goldman
T2
Metformin, Lizard-Spit, Aspertame, Nutrisweet, Sacarin

Give me NutraSweet over peanuts any day!
Internet newsgroup posting. Copyright 2006. All rights reserved.

Jeff

unread,
Oct 7, 2006, 6:10:51 PM10/7/06
to

"Gene Goldman" <brG...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:4i5gi21bols1fal53...@4ax.com...

> On Sat, 7 Oct 2006 19:42:51 +0000 (UTC), c...@green.rahul.net
> (Charlotte L. Blackmer) wrote:
>
>>Chung is claiming that fig trees have souls?
>
> Unsurprising, really. Mr. Chung is every bit as much a Christian as
> he is a doctor, equally knowledgeable about both topics.

In Mark 11:12-14,20, Jesus cursed a fig tree and it dried up. It said
nothing about souls.

I am not going to question how much knowledge Chung has about either
subject. IMHO, his understanding of both subjects is lacking.

Jeff

Gene Goldman

unread,
Oct 7, 2006, 6:30:00 PM10/7/06
to
On Sat, 07 Oct 2006 22:10:51 GMT, "Jeff" <je...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>>>Chung is claiming that fig trees have souls?
>> Unsurprising, really. Mr. Chung is every bit as much a Christian as
>> he is a doctor, equally knowledgeable about both topics.
>
>In Mark 11:12-14,20, Jesus cursed a fig tree and it dried up. It said
>nothing about souls.

Well, that must be an omission. In the Gospel according to Chung,
Jesus said they have souls.

>I am not going to question how much knowledge Chung has about either
>subject. IMHO, his understanding of both subjects is lacking.

Exactly. I am neither a Christian nor a doctor, but I have admiration
and respect for both, and more than a little awareness of each. Mr
Chung pretends to be both, but in fact displays none of the
characteristics of either.

Charlotte L. Blackmer

unread,
Oct 7, 2006, 9:35:10 PM10/7/06
to
In article <LBVVg.4327$Lv3....@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>,

Jeff <je...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>"Gene Goldman" <brG...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:4i5gi21bols1fal53...@4ax.com...
>> On Sat, 7 Oct 2006 19:42:51 +0000 (UTC), c...@green.rahul.net
>> (Charlotte L. Blackmer) wrote:
>>
>>>Chung is claiming that fig trees have souls?
>>
>> Unsurprising, really. Mr. Chung is every bit as much a Christian as
>> he is a doctor, equally knowledgeable about both topics.

Yes, the idea is rather animist, is it not?

Love your parody sig, btw!

>In Mark 11:12-14,20, Jesus cursed a fig tree and it dried up. It said
>nothing about souls.

That is indeed correct.

>I am not going to question how much knowledge Chung has about either
>subject. IMHO, his understanding of both subjects is lacking.

I think that's a diplomatic way of putting it.

My sincere apologies to ASD for forgetting to trim the xpost - trimmed in
followups. (Set to auk only, where Chungianity is actually on topic.)

Charlotte
--

0 new messages