Information About Ren
Evergreen
turn me into his puppet.
I wonder what the problem is?
Oh yeh. I forgot. He doesn't know any magick.
Where ren threatens to scramble people's brains, etc., if they
have him investigated:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.religion.wicca/msg/7645f9930048bea2
Where I post the fact that I had a P.I. investigate him:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.religion.wicca/msg/7a284067566c6e96
Where ren responds to that post:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.religion.wicca/msg/b92ecce7e3499e27
There you have it. A portrait of a charlatan.
If you have a question about anything related to magick, just use
google. That's all ren does:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.religion.wicca/msg/c07bc5628ca15554
And don't believe a word he posts. He's a pathological liar:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.religion.wicca/msg/5c1d7c1bb5afea7d
Sid
--
Wiccan Priest and Apprentice Magician
http://tinyurl.com/7vs9zb
Hope
> I keep waiting for ren to scramble my brains and
> turn me into his puppet.
>
> I wonder what the problem is?
>
> Oh yeh. I forgot. He doesn't know any magick.
>
> Where ren threatens to scramble people's brains, etc., if they
> have him investigated:
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.religion.wicca/msg/7645f9930048bea2
>
> Where I post the fact that I had a P.I. investigate him:
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.religion.wicca/msg/7a284067566c6e96
>
> Where ren responds to that post:
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.religion.wicca/msg/b92ecce7e3499e27
>
> There you have it. A portrait of a charlatan.
>
> If you have a question about anything related to magick, just use
> google. That's all ren does:
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.religion.wicca/msg/c07bc5628ca15554
>
> And don't believe a word he posts. He's a pathological liar:
>
A "pathological liar" that you are hopelessly obsessed with, for some
reason. Why do you not simply cut the cord that bind you to him? Do
you not want to, because of the negative charge this gives you? Or
are you *unable* to?
Noinden
Evergreen
> I call bullshit on the PI ! Post proof
Why? It hardly matters. What matters here is that I _told_ him
I did it. At that point he would have harmed me with magick in
such a way that I could no longer post here, to uphold his repution.
_if_ he had any magickal skills. Which he obviously doesn't.
At that point he lost all credibility with anyone but his own
sockpuppets and idiots.
Furthermore, that would mean posting private information about "ren" and I
don't publish people's private information.
(If I saw evidence of a crime being committed, I'd send the info
to the authorities, however.)
You can easily get it yourself if you wish. Just pull a credit
card out of your wallet and use google to find an international
personal investigations firm and call them and explain what you
want.
They'll give you the URL to a secure website, and a username and
password, where you can upload all the information you have on
him. Send copies of the headers of a bunch of his usenet posts
using different news services.
That's it. You'll know more than you want to know about "ren" in
no time at all. Or anyone. Use an anonymous, pre-paid cellphone
and an anonymous, pre-paid debit card. Give the PI firm a false
name. They don't care. Use a computer at a college or library
when you send them the info and to retrieve what they come up
with.
These stinking trolls all think they are diabolical criminal
geniuses that no one can track down, but the only people who
can't track them down are losers who couldn't do anything
with the information if they had it.
The fact that "ren" hasn't done the above on me should tell you
what a fraud he is. It only costs a few hundred bucks and he
claims that he is wealthy. That scumbag would post my private
info in a blink if he had it.
Hope
> Noinden <noin...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I call bullshit on the PI ! Post proof
>
> Why? It hardly matters. What matters here is that I _told_ him
> I did it.
So you are admitting that you have been lying about this? So much for
YOUR credibility.
> At that point he would have harmed me with magick in
> such a way that I could no longer post here, to uphold his repution.
> _if_ he had any magickal skills.
IF he believed you. And considering YOUR reputation and lack of
credibility, that's hardly a given.
>
> Furthermore, that would mean posting private information about "ren" and I
> don't publish people's private information.
Yet you demand that other people publish their private information in
order to "prove" something to you. Curious.
>
> You can easily get it yourself if you wish. Just pull a credit
> card out of your wallet and use google to find an international
> personal investigations firm and call them and explain what you
> want.
>
> They'll give you the URL to a secure website, and a username and
> password, where you can upload all the information you have on
> him. Send copies of the headers of a bunch of his usenet posts
> using different news services.
>
> That's it. You'll know more than you want to know about "ren" in
> no time at all. Or anyone. Use an anonymous, pre-paid cellphone
> and an anonymous, pre-paid debit card. Give the PI firm a false
> name. They don't care. Use a computer at a college or library
> when you send them the info and to retrieve what they come up
> with.
So...did you do it, or not?? Why so coy suddenly? This sounds like
one of those "If I Did It..." PSEUDO (spelled correctly) confessions.
>
> These stinking trolls all think they are diabolical criminal
> geniuses that no one can track down, but the only people who
> can't track them down are losers who couldn't do anything
> with the information if they had it.
Um...didn't you just say above that you don't do anything with
people's private information?
>
> The fact that "ren" hasn't done the above on me should tell you
> what a fraud he is. It only costs a few hundred bucks and he
> claims that he is wealthy. That scumbag would post my private
> info in a blink if he had it.
>
So here you are again, back to demanding that he do what you say you
would never do, because you have some kind of ethics. You wouldn't be
trying to trap him in a damned if you do, damned if you don't
situation, would you? Not an ethical person like you!
sarchasm
> "Eversock" <sidneyla...@nospam.invalid> trolled:> "Eversock":
> Why? It hardly matters. What matters here is that I _told_ him
> I did it.
"Hope":
So you are admitting that you have been lying about this? So much for
YOUR credibility.
>
"EverSidneyGreenLambe" has been lying since his 'arrival' to arw and never
did have any "credibility" as far as that goes.
>
> "Eversock":
> At that point he would have harmed me with magick in
> such a way that I could no longer post here, to uphold his repution.
> _if_ he had any magickal skills.
'Hope":
IF he believed you. And considering YOUR reputation and lack of
credibility, that's hardly a given.
>
"EverSidneyGreenLambe" labors (trolls) under many false assumptions.
>
> "Eversock":
> Furthermore, that would mean posting private information about "ren" and I
> don't publish people's private information.
"Hope":
Yet you demand that other people publish their private information in
order to "prove" something to you. Curious.
>
Also curious is that, evidently, "EverSidneyGreenLambe" does not post his
own private information in order to "prove" that he's not a fraud. Since he
is a fraud, it wouldn't matter if he did.
> "Eversock":
> You can easily get it yourself if you wish. Just pull a credit
> card out of your wallet and use google to find an international
> personal investigations firm and call them and explain what you
> want.
>
"Hope":
So...did you do it, or not?? Why so coy suddenly? This sounds like
one of those "If I Did It..." PSEUDO (spelled correctly) confessions.
>
O.J. Simpson is stalking ren? Sure hope ren isn't a white, blond-haired
woman.
>
> "Eversock":
> These stinking trolls all think they are diabolical criminal
> geniuses that no one can track down, but the only people who
> can't track them down are losers who couldn't do anything
> with the information if they had it.
"Hope":
Um...didn't you just say above that you don't do anything with
people's private information?
>
"EverSidneyGreenLambe" is implying that he has the information but, is a
"stinking troll loser" who "couldn't do anything with the information if
[he] had it."
>
> "Eversock":
> The fact that "ren" hasn't done the above on me should tell you
> what a fraud he is.
>
How does not hiring a PI make anyone a fraud? That's like irrationally
asserting that eating junkfood in front of a TV constitutes a 'shield'.
>
> "Eversock":
> It only costs a few hundred bucks and he
> claims that he is wealthy. That scumbag would post my private
> info in a blink if he had it.
>
"Hope":
So here you are again, back to demanding that he do what you say you
would never do, because you have some kind of ethics. You wouldn't be
trying to trap him in a damned if you do, damned if you don't
situation, would you? Not an ethical person like you!
>
Pulling a 'heads-I-win/tails-you-lose' troll tactic is not surprising for
"EverSidneyGreenLambe". It's just another patch on his threadbare sock.
sarchasm
> "Noinden" <noi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I call bullshit on the PI ! Post proof
>
> Why? It hardly matters. What matters here is that I _told_ him I did it.
>
>
No doubt noinden is reeling in shock that EverSidGreenLambe would dodge his
question. What with "sid's" sock, no smelling salts will be required.
Hope
> "Eversock" <sidneyla...@nospam.invalid> dodged:
>
> > "Noinden" <noin...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> I call bullshit on the PI ! Post proof
>
> > Why? It hardly matters. What matters here is that I _told_ him I did it.
>
> > Sid
>
> No doubt noinden is reeling in shock that EverSidGreenLambe would dodge his
> question. What with "sid's" sock, no smelling salts will be required.
*LOL* If we could bottle that "aroma," we could make some serious
money. However, I'm not sure it would be worth it. Ew.
sarchasm
Damn those Geneva Convention restrictions on chemical/biological weaponry!
ren
> Noinden <noin...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I call bullshit on the PI ! Post proof
>
> Why? It hardly matters. What matters here is that I _told_ him
> such a way that I could no longer post here, to uphold his repution.
Everyone has a bit of vanity that they must struggle with. But vanity
is our enemy. It would not be good to earn the reputation of hurting
people who post here. That is why there must be an element of doubt.
You make a lot of illogical assumptions as to what people will do in
certain situations.
> _if_ he had any magickal skills. Which he obviously doesn't.
> At that point he lost all credibility with anyone but his own
> sockpuppets and idiots.
I think you are convinced that I do have magickal skills. You are just
like all the others who badger me into revealing some arcane secret
that they already possess somewhere within their own lucid dreams. You
said so yourself. The knowledge is already within you. Not.
> Furthermore, that would mean posting private information about "ren" and I
> don't publish people's private information.
Aren't you noble and grand.
> (If I saw evidence of a crime being committed, I'd send the info
> to the authorities, however.)
Please do. Don't forget to use one of your fake identities with the
authorities so they don't find out about your stalking activities.
> That's it. You'll know more than you want to know about "ren" in
> no time at all. Or anyone. Use an anonymous, pre-paid cellphone
> and an anonymous, pre-paid debit card. Give the PI firm a false
> name. They don't care. Use a computer at a college or library
> when you send them the info and to retrieve what they come up
> with.
That is how BBDD got himself into trouble. He went around bragging
that he had multiple ID's and multiple wives in different states. A PI
doesn't care. In fact, use one of the many PI's hired by $cientology
to investigate people for different reasons. Use one of the PI's that
$cientology used to investigate you.
http://fairgamestop.org/rogues/main.php?g2_itemId=425
> These stinking trolls all think they are diabolical criminal
> geniuses that no one can track down, but the only people who
> can't track them down are losers who couldn't do anything
> with the information if they had it.
I have a team of Japanese lawyers that are working with me to see if
you can be served papers for harrassing and threatening me. They are
quite interested to see if foreign nationals such as yourself can be
legally dealt with. 18 Japanese people were recently charged for libel
when slandering a comedian friend of mine by calling him a murderer.
They are all facing criminal charges. One woman will serve time in
prison for posting to his blog that she was going to murder him. This
is a great victory against cyber-stalking. You could be next. We'll
see.
> The fact that "ren" hasn't done the above on me should tell you
> what a fraud he is. It only costs a few hundred bucks and he
> claims that he is wealthy. That scumbag would post my private
> info in a blink if he had it.
You have no business finding out if I am rich or not. Anyone can say
they are rich on the Internet. It can't be proven. However, if you try
to prove it, that would involve getting a hold of my financial
records. It is illegal. Don't do it.
Evergreen
> From: ren <ren...@hotmail.com>
> Newsgroups: alt.religion.wicca
> Subject: Re: Information About Ren
> Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 17:41:12 -0800 (PST)
> Organization: http://groups.google.com
> Lines: 80
> Message-ID: <f11b1e19-1e61-4320...@x11g2000pro.googlegroups.com>
> References: erlj66x...@magick.net
Oh look. Ren removed the <> from my post's MID so that newsreaders
won't even see it, and all of the rest of the MIDs that are
supposed to be there.
Lame. I've reinstated the proper References header.
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 122.219.70.229
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> X-Trace: posting.google.com 1234662072 9208 127.0.0.1 (15 Feb 2009 01:41:12 GMT)
> X-Complaints-To: groups...@google.com
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 01:41:12 +0000 (UTC)
> Complaints-To: groups...@google.com
> Injection-Info: x11g2000pro.googlegroups.com; posting-host=122.219.70.229; posting-account=XzvX-QoAAADDrw3zcqGz-EK_PsEJ9L8_
> User-Agent: G2/1.0
> X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.0.6) Gecko/2009011913 Firefox/3.0.6,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
> Path: x-privat.org!news.glorb.com!news2.glorb.com!postnews.google.com!x11g2000pro.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
> Xref: magick.net alt.religion.wicca:3735
>
> On Feb 15, 5:23=A0am, Evergreen <sidneyla...@nospam.invalid> wrote:
>> Noinden <noin...@gmail.com> wrote:
[delete]
I've simply deleted whatever "ren" had to say without bothering to read
it.
I do not accept bullshit in place of magick and neither does any
other rational person. Unfortunately for "ren", this puts him out
of business. Although he is obviously too stupid to comprehend
this simple fact.
Did you get that, "ren"? Will you _ever_ get that?
Bullshit does not equal magick.
sarchasm
>
> Bullshit does not equal magick.
>
If all of nature is a result of 'magick' and bullshit exists within nature,
then the bullshit you post is just as magical as anything else. If not,
it's not and when the chips are down, the bull is empty.
>
> Sid-eversock-lambe (pre-bullshit, before the bull has eaten)
Hope
> "Eversock" <sidneyla...@nospam.invalid> wrote:
>
> > Bullshit does not equal magick.
>
> If all of nature is a result of 'magick' and bullshit exists within nature,
> then the bullshit you post is just as magical as anything else. If not,
> it's not and when the chips are down, the bull is empty.
>
magnet out of it. *LMAO*
Evergreen
I should add here that I don't trust _anything_ "ren" says. Ever.
He has no morals at all. He simply posts whatever he wants to
believe as if it was true. Maybe he actually believes it.
He hides his identity like a cybercriminal so that no one can
look into his real life.
I can easily prove that he's a pathological liar using his own
posts.
Some or all of his supporters are his own sockpuppets. I'd bet
my life on it.
What he is, basically, is a troll. One of the characteristics of
serious trolls is that they expect everyone to believe everything
they post, even though they are obviously the least trustworthy
people on the planet. This is highly neurotic. Clinically
neurotic. At best.
I see that "ren's" little trick with the headers still has the
threading screwed up. So here's a link to my original post,
which he doesn't want you to see:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.religion.wicca/msg/bddb8c59f894a2a5
ren
> If all of nature is a result of 'magick' and bullshit exists within nature,
> then the bullshit you post is just as magical as anything else. If not,
> it's not and when the chips are down, the bull is empty.
He, he.
ren
> Some or all of his supporters are his own sockpuppets. I'd bet
> my life on it.
You claim to understand USENET post headers yet you bet things like
this on your life? I don't have time for sock-puppets. I don't use
sock-puppets. My ex-girlfriend pretended to be me with my email
address one or two times. It was just a silly experiment.
sarchasm
>
> He has no morals at all. He simply posts whatever he wants to
> believe as if it was true. Maybe he actually believes it.
>
> He hides his identity like a cybercriminal so that no one can
> look into his real life.
>
>
This much is already known about EverSidGreenLambe so, what will he do to
change besides berate himself this way?
Evergreen
Oh my. The troll denies being a troll. What a surprise.
Sure I understand NNTP headers. I also understand that it's easy as
pie to use have more than one ISP and more than one newsserver and
to use web proxies and shell accounts and so forth.
You understand these things even better than I do, even though you
pretend to be relatively ignorant of them. You have posted using at least
two newsservers on this newsgroup under "ren" alone.
One example of you using a free newsserver, motzarella.org and a pro
newsreader:
#X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118 trialware
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.religion.wicca/msg/ff82a7a44d5ace45?dmode=source
No one who could do that would use google unless they had a very good
reason for doing so. Like a web proxy in Japan, for example. And who
do we have using motzarella after "ren" apparently quit using it?
"sarchasm" who attacks anyone that you have expressed a disliking for.
What a coincidence!
More bullshit from someone who doesn't do anything else. He thinks
he's clever, too. All trolls do. Even though they are losers.
Information About Ren
ren
> "sarchasm" who attacks anyone that you have expressed a disliking for.
> What a coincidence!
So you think I am Sarchasm still? Sarchasm is Sarchasm's own agent.
You're getting a bit stale, Evergreen. I'm growing bored with you.
RavenBlackBane was funner.
CorrieWhite was funner.
NatGreenMedJeans was funner.
BigBoyDoomDaddy was funner.
Even Mum was funner than you.
You're too mentally and emotionally challenged to be a good troll. I
know you keep asking me to scramble your brains and put your lights
out for good. What, is it for the insurance for your family?
Well, your death will not originate from my curses. You can post here
until you rot for all I care.
You're so repetitive that your spiritual energy is very weak and
bland. It is almost not worth the effort.
Evergeen, don't you have any friends with souls? I mean, is there
anyone you know that will help you troll this newsgroup with emotion,
feelings, passion for something? Come on! I'm starving for
communication here.
You're an empty bucket. You're a landfill. Somebody already snatched
most of the life out of you a long time ago. I don't want a scrap like
you.
Very well. I'm done with you. Go away or stay. I really don't care
what you do. If you want to make yourself useful, you'll bring more
trolls to me.
In fact, I command you to do this.
Hope
>
> I should add here that I don't trust _anything_ "ren" says. Ever.
> He has no morals at all. He simply posts whatever he wants to
> believe as if it was true. Maybe he actually believes it.
>
Do you have any inkling of how pathetic this makes YOU sound? You are
obsessed with someone you claim to have zero respect for. You claim
you believe NOTHING he says, yet you continue to post to him, begging
for his responses. You need professional help in breaking your
addictive cycle. How can you have any healthy self-respect when so
much of your reality centers around someone you detest?
> He hides his identity like a cybercriminal so that no one can
> look into his real life.
How many strangers do you invite to dig around in your personal life,
sidneystone? Are we all invited over for tea and crumpets? Post
directions.
>
> I can easily prove that he's a pathological liar using his own
> posts.
Nay, not so. You can easily prove that you CLAIM he's a pathological
liar. Unless you are a psychiatrist, you are not qualified to
diagnose anything, let alone prove it, especially from internet
posts. Duh. How stupid do you think people are? Or perhaps the
question should be, how stupid are you?
>
> Some or all of his supporters are his own sockpuppets. I'd bet
> my life on it.
>
That was a very foolish thing to say. Do you really hold your life in
so little regard? Because you are WRONG. I wonder if you can take it
back? This should be interesting.
> What he is, basically, is a troll. One of the characteristics of
> serious trolls is that they expect everyone to believe everything
> they post, even though they are obviously the least trustworthy
> people on the planet. This is highly neurotic. Clinically
> neurotic. At best.
Oh, the irony... *ROTFLMAO* Here for the viewing pleasure and
amusement of all, we have "Self Portrait by the Artist Formerly Known
as---" Oh yeah, I forgot. It's a secret. ;-)
>
Hope
> ren <ren1...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > On Feb 15, 3:51=A0pm, Evergreen <sidneyla...@nospam.invalid> wrote:
>
> >> Some or all of his supporters are his own sockpuppets. I'd bet
> >> my life on it.
>
> > You claim to understand USENET post headers yet you bet things like
> > this on your life? I don't have time for sock-puppets. I don't use
> > sock-puppets. My ex-girlfriend pretended to be me with my email
> > address one or two times. It was just a silly experiment.
>
> Oh my. The troll denies being a troll. What a surprise.
>
> Sure I understand NNTP headers. I also understand that it's easy as
> pie to use have more than one ISP and more than one newsserver and
> to use web proxies and shell accounts and so forth.
>
> You understand these things even better than I do, even though you
> pretend to be relatively ignorant of them. You have posted using at least
> two newsservers on this newsgroup under "ren" alone.
>
> One example of you using a free newsserver, motzarella.org and a pro
> newsreader:
>
> #X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118 trialware
>
>
> No one who could do that would use google unless they had a very good
> reason for doing so. Like a web proxy in Japan, for example. And who
> do we have using motzarella after "ren" apparently quit using it?
> "sarchasm" who attacks anyone that you have expressed a disliking for.
> What a coincidence!
This is too funny. Surely a big techie like you is not this thick. I
used to use Free Agent, but it crapped out. I used recgroups for
awhile, but it doesn't carry all the groups I want to access. So I
use Google. It's free and easy, and the format is simple. But I
don't like some things about it. Three different people from
different groups have recently told me about Motzarella.
I suppose, using your "logic" this means all those people are really
ren, or a sock of--even though I've known one of them for 10 years.
And those of us who use Google are doing so all for the purpose of
fooling *you,* because you are central to all our lives. And if I do
start using Motzarella, I will automatically become a ren sock. Have
I got it right?
Did you bother to check with the guys at alt . sports . football .
pro . oak-raiders to verify who I am? No, of course you didn't. Why
let a little thing like facts get in the way of your obsession, eh?
Spoils all the fun.
>
> More bullshit from someone who doesn't do anything else. He thinks
> he's clever, too. All trolls do. Even though they are losers.
Another "Self Portrait by the Artist Formerly Known As..." How sad
you are, devoting such a large chunk of your finite human life to this
obsession. You have tuned a molehill into Mt. Everest. And obviously
the thin air has affected your mind. Ren doesn't need to scramble
your brains. You're a self-scrambler.
sarchasm
Bullshit Doesn't Just Happen?
Hope
sarchasm
>>
>>> Some or all of his supporters are his own sockpuppets. I'd bet
>>> my life on it.
>>
>> You claim to understand USENET post headers yet you bet things like
>> this on your life? I don't have time for sock-puppets. I don't use
>> sock-puppets. My ex-girlfriend pretended to be me with my email
>> address one or two times. It was just a silly experiment.
>>
>
> Oh my. The troll denies being a troll. What a surprise.
>
Pay closer attention, Eversock. He wrote that he doesn't use sockpuppets,
not a denial concerning trolling your trolling at times. You, however, have
been trolling extensively and denying it all the while. That makes you a
hypocritical liar, (who presumably believes that lying is a means justified
by your agenda's ends).
>
> And who do we have using motzarella after "ren" apparently quit using it?
> "sarchasm" who attacks anyone that you have expressed a disliking for.
> What a coincidence!
>
Several posters on arw have and do use motzarella.org both prior to, and
after ren used it. Additionally, I've debated those who ren has expressed
neither a dislike nor, a liking for, (such as "storm"), before your obvious
trolling began. Your "reasoning" is specious and transparently inaccurate.
As usual.
sarchasm
> "Eversock" <sidneyla...@nospam.invalid> wrote:
>
> No one who could do that would use google unless they had a very good
> reason for doing so. Like a web proxy in Japan, for example. And who
> do we have using motzarella after "ren" apparently quit using it?
> "sarchasm" who attacks anyone that you have expressed a disliking for.
> What a coincidence!
This is too funny. Surely a big techie like you is not this thick. I
used to use Free Agent, but it crapped out. I used recgroups for
awhile, but it doesn't carry all the groups I want to access. So I
use Google. It's free and easy, and the format is simple. But I
don't like some things about it. Three different people from
different groups have recently told me about Motzarella.
>
If at least two of those three know nothing of ren and sadsack-sid, then
using motzarella has nothing to do with sadsack-sid's faulty
characterizations. Of course, sadsack-sid would have to accuse you of
lying, since the alternative would be that he's wrong. Again. That's
unthinkable for sadsack.
>
I suppose, using your "logic" this means all those people are really
ren, or a sock of--even though I've known one of them for 10 years.
And those of us who use Google are doing so all for the purpose of
fooling *you,* because you are central to all our lives. And if I do
start using Motzarella, I will automatically become a ren sock. Have
I got it right?
>
There are other newsreaders available but, he'd still believe that anyone
who opposes the content of his trolling is a sock. That would make Eversock
look like some kind of extreme narcissistic personality in even a layman's
view.
>
Did you bother to check with the guys at alt . sports . football .
pro . oak-raiders to verify who I am? No, of course you didn't. Why
let a little thing like facts get in the way of your obsession, eh?
Spoils all the fun.
>
> More bullshit from someone who doesn't do anything else. He thinks
> he's clever, too. All trolls do. Even though they are losers.
Another "Self Portrait by the Artist Formerly Known As..." How sad
you are, devoting such a large chunk of your finite human life to this
obsession. You have tuned a molehill into Mt. Everest. And obviously
the thin air has affected your mind. Ren doesn't need to scramble
your brains. You're a self-scrambler.
>
Sadsack-sid seems to have 'arrived' here pre-scrambled, like powered eggs.
Hope
> Your "reasoning" is specious and transparently inaccurate.
> As usual.
I'm beginning to think sidneystone is from another specious
entirely! ;-p
Hope
>
> Sadsack-sid seems to have 'arrived' here pre-scrambled, like powered eggs.
"Surely only one person in the universe is stupid enough to disagree
with me. Therefore, if it seems more than one person disagrees or
doesn't like me, it must mean they are all socks of the one. Yeah,
that's the ticket!"
So here you and I are really just ren talking to himself here. I
wonder if ren minds that I colored our hair brunette today? What if
it means we all have less fun?? *LMAO*
sarchasm
> "sarchasm" <sar.ch...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> Sadsack-sid seems to have 'arrived' here pre-scrambled, like powered eggs.
>
>"Surely only one person in the universe is stupid enough to disagree
>with me. Therefore, if it seems more than one person disagrees or
>doesn't like me, it must mean they are all socks of the one. Yeah,
>that's the ticket!"
>
Only if that's sadsack-sid's ticket to ride the ghost train of
self-delusions.
>
>So here you and I are really just ren talking to himself here.
>
Sadsack claims that "zayton" and "seamus" and possibly "aine" are also ren
talking to himself and to sadsack-sid. So much for his ability to discern
correctly.
>I wonder if ren minds that I colored our hair brunette today? What if
>it means we all have less fun?? *LMAO*
>
As long as he doesn't mind that seamus got a tatt, zayton went to church and
that I punched sadsack's ticket on the ghost train.
sarchasm
>
>I'm beginning to think sidneystone is from another specious entirely! ;-p
>
If he were, it'd be a sub-specious. ;>
He shouldn't be that difficult to tag and release now that he's a brunette
with a tatoo who goes to church and rides ghost trains of delusions.
Hope
Evergreen
> On Feb 15, 9:47=A0pm, Evergreen <sidneyla...@nospam.invalid> wrote:
>
>> "sarchasm" who attacks anyone that you have expressed a disliking for.
>> What a coincidence!
>
> So you think I am Sarchasm still? Sarchasm is Sarchasm's own agent.
Gee. I expected you to just admit to being sarchasm. That's what
all trolls do. <snicker>
>
> You're getting a bit stale, Evergreen. I'm growing bored with you.
Ahh. I am bothering you. Good. What are you going to do about it?
Or rather, what would you do if you weren't a cowardly and impotent
loser hiding in a room who can't do anything but run his punk mouth?
>
> RavenBlackBane was funner.
> CorrieWhite was funner.
> NatGreenMedJeans was funner.
> BigBoyDoomDaddy was funner.
>
> Even Mum was funner than you.
Gee. Things are rough all over.
>
> You're too mentally and emotionally challenged to be a good troll. I
> know you keep asking me to scramble your brains and put your lights
> out for good. What, is it for the insurance for your family?
<snicker>
>
> Well, your death will not originate from my curses. You can post here
> until you rot for all I care.
Wouldn't matter if you cared or not. You couldn't stop me if your
life depended on it. We all know that.
Of course, if you were the magickal adept you claimed to be you could,
but you aren't, and all of your trolling hasn't worked.
You just can't get rid of me by sitting on your pudgy butt and running
your punk mouth, and that's a fact, although you are obviously too
stupid to see it.
> You're so repetitive that your spiritual energy is very weak and
> bland. It is almost not worth the effort.
Poor baby.
>
> Evergeen, don't you have any friends with souls? I mean, is there
> anyone you know that will help you troll this newsgroup with emotion,
> feelings, passion for something? Come on! I'm starving for
> communication here.
I do what I what I want and you live with it. I do not seek or
require the approval or permission of creeps like you.
I walk all over creeps like you. Just as I have been doing for
months on this group.
> You're an empty bucket. You're a landfill. Somebody already snatched
> most of the life out of you a long time ago. I don't want a scrap like
> you.
>
> Very well. I'm done with you. Go away or stay. I really don't care
> what you do. If you want to make yourself useful, you'll bring more
> trolls to me.
>
> In fact, I command you to do this.
Oh no! "ren" has commanded me to do something again! Doesn't that make
him look masterful?
ROTFLMAO!!!
I wonder if he takes off the big red nose when he's typing bullshit
on his computer (and typing bullshit is his entire life).
sarchasm
Apparently, brunettes do have more fun.
sarchasm
Maybe but, I'm not the travel agent who booked sadsack-sid on his ghost
train.
ren
Three souls sharing the same body. Oh, how awkward.
ren
Three souls sharing the same body. Oh, how awkward.
Sar, Hope and Ren are legion! Who else wants to join this party???
ren
On Feb 16, 7:24 am, Evergreen <sidneyla...@nospam.invalid> wrote:
> <snicker>
> Ahh. I am bothering you. Good. What are you going to do about it?
> Gee. Things are rough all over.
> <snicker>
> Poor baby.
> I do what I what I want and you live with it. I do not seek or
> require the approval or permission of creeps like you.
> I walk all over creeps like you. Just as I have been doing for
> months on this group.
> ROTFLMAO!!!
> Sid
storm
> Three souls sharing the same body. Oh, how awkward.
Piers Anthony once used the concept for a depiction of Mother Earth in
his series Incarnations of Immortality. It was a reflection of the
Maiden, Mother, Crone model. For the three folk involved, it wasn't
clumsy at all.
>
> Sar, Hope and Ren are legion! Who else wants to join this party???
No thank you. I don't need to join the sock hop. I am rather proud
of being strange enough in my own wierd and gentle way not be confused
as anyone's fake personality but my own. :-) But, do enjoy
yourself, or yourselves, or whatever pronoun applies.
Then again, I could be just a sock for someone else and not know it
myself. In that case, in Usenet terms, how could I prove to myself
that I was myself and myself alone? All my denials could be looked at
as proving how desperately wrong I was about being who I say I am.
This could be worse than the "dreaming I am a butterfly dreaming I am
a human" paradox. Now I have to convince myself I am not lying to
myself. Again.
-storm
Noinden
> Noinden <noin...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Why? It hardly matters.
You claim to have proof. THUS post it. Or retract it.
Noinden
> "Hope" <holleratwal...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > "sarchasm" <sar.ch...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > Sid
>
> > No doubt noinden is reeling in shock that EverSidGreenLambe would dodge
> > his
> > question. What with "sid's" sock, no smelling salts will be required.
>
> >*LOL* If we could bottle that "aroma," we could make some serious
> >money. However, I'm not sure it would be worth it. Ew.
>
> Damn those Geneva Convention restrictions on chemical/biological weaponry!- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
oi! Working as a Chemist here.....
aine
> On Feb 15, 5:45 pm, ren <ren1...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > Sar, Hope and Ren are legion! Who else wants to join this party???
>
> No thank you. I don't need to join the sock hop. I am rather proud
> of being strange enough in my own wierd and gentle way not be confused
> as anyone's fake personality but my own. :-) <
I agree. Could you print up some bumper stickers with that?
aine
> Three souls sharing the same body. Oh, how awkward.
>
> Sar, Hope and Ren are legion! Who else wants to join this party???<
No thank-you. This is too far over the top for me except an occasional
jab.
I come with a price and no one so far has been able to come up with
the entry fee.
sarchasm
> "sarchasm" <sar.ch...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> "Hope" <holleratwal...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > "sarchasm" <sar.ch...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> "Eversock" <sidneyla...@nospam.invalid> dodged:
> > > "Noinden" <noin...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > >> I call bullshit on the PI ! Post proof
>
> > > Why? It hardly matters. What matters here is that I _told_ him I did
> > > it.
>
> > > Sid
>
> > No doubt noinden is reeling in shock that EverSidGreenLambe would dodge
> > his question. What with "sid's" sock, no smelling salts will be
> > required.
>
> >*LOL* If we could bottle that "aroma," we could make some serious
> >money. However, I'm not sure it would be worth it. Ew.
>
> Damn those Geneva Convention restrictions on chemical/biological weaponry!
>
>
>oi! Working as a Chemist here.....
>
Yes but, has your company been assigned to the project of alleviating the
stinky factor of sid's sock?
Evergreen
Another clown giving orders he can't possibly enforce.
But what can one expect of a ren supporter? You have
to be clueless to take him seriously.
And that's the real issue here, ren's credibility. He
has none.
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.religion.wicca/msg/bddb8c59f894a2a5
He's really just another stinking troll weaving feeble illusions
with words on the usenet.
sarchasm
> "Noinden" <huath...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> "Everdumber" <sidneyla...@nospam.invalid> wrote:
>>> "Noinden" <noin...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>> > I call bullshit on the PI ! Post proof
>>>
>>> Why? It hardly matters.
>>
>> You claim to have proof. THUS post it. Or retract it.
>
> Another clown giving orders he can't possibly enforce.
>
Another dodge from "EvergreenBehindTheEars" who makes numerous unsupported
claims. Insurance adjusters should take note, should "sid" pull that
schtick with them.
>
> But what can one expect of a ren supporter? You have
> to be clueless to take him seriously.
>
"EvergreenBehindTheEars" own posts contradict himself.
>
> And that's the real issue here, ren's credibility. He has none.
>
Only for "EvergreenBehindTheEars", and he never has had any "credibility".
>
> He's really just another stinking troll weaving feeble illusions
> with words on the usenet.
>
> Sid
>
Amazingly, that sounds just like "EvergreenBehindTheEars", (except 'feeble
delusions' would be more apt in his case).
ren
It would be cool to have a bumper sticker that wraps around the entire
car.
Noinden
not agreeing yet we co-exist!
Hope
But then it wouldn't be a bumper sticker, ya big silly. It would be
something more like a car belt or...hey, I know, lets have a car
condom!
Noinden
>
> - Show quoted text -
Yeah it's called Hydrofluoric acid :)
sarchasm
>Yeah it's called Hydrofluoric acid :)
>
Excellent. Then despite the sid-sock's dodging your question, it'll all
come out in the hydrofluoric wash.
Noinden
>
> - Show quoted text -
Including the glass :) (look it up if you have not.... HF is one of
the three chemicals that always worry me. The others are nickle
carbonyl and Phosgene, I've used them all and still get antsy)
sarchasm
> > the
> > stinky factor of sid's sock?
>
> >Yeah it's called Hydrofluoric acid :)
>
> Excellent. Then despite the sid-sock's dodging your question, it'll all
> come out in the hydrofluoric wash.
>
>
>the three chemicals that always worry me. The others are nickle
>carbonyl and Phosgene, I've used them all and still get antsy)
>
That meets the parameters of the experiment, toss the sock in the wash.
Noinden
>
> - Show quoted text -
On three?
sarchasm
>On three?
>
Okay but, it looks like the Mayan long-count is being used.
ren
> We are Legion. And we are busy. ;-)
Join the Legion!
sarchasm
Hope
> "ren" <ren1...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >Join the Legion!
>
> That's a Foreign concept to me. Is it French?
HARRR! That's a tickler.
sarchasm
> "sarchasm" <sar.ch...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> "ren" <ren1...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >Join the Legion!
>
> That's a Foreign concept to me. Is it French?
>
>HARRR! That's a tickler.
>
Now that sounds more like the covert ops unit; the French Foreign Tickler
Legion, however, I maintain plausible deniability in this regard.
samvaknin
http://samvak.tripod.master.com/texis/master/search/?q=schizotypal
The Narcissist and Psychopath as Criminals
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/narcissisticabuse/message/5003
The Narcissist is Above the Law
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/narcissisticabuse/message/4983
The Narcissist as Liar and Con-man
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/narcissisticabuse/message/4951
Does the Narcissist Have a Multiple Personality (Dissociative Identity
Disorder)?
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/narcissisticabuse/message/4950
Narcissists as Drama Queens
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/narcissisticabuse/message/4948
The Narcissist as Know-it-all
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/narcissisticabuse/message/4945
Violent, Vindictive, Sadistic, and Psychopathic Narcissists
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/narcissisticabuse/message/4938
Grandiosity, Fantasies, and Narcissism
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/narcissisticabuse/message/4923
Narcissists and Emotions
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/narcissisticabuse/message/5248
Narcissists and Mood Disorders
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/narcissisticabuse/message/5067
