GETTING BACK TO BASICS IN THE JOHN F. KENNEDY MURDER CASE:

================================================

A 24-year-old young man born in 1939 by the name of Lee Harvey Oswald
murdered two individuals in the early 1960s in Dallas, Texas, USA.

Oswald assassinated 46-year-old then-President John Fitzgerald Kennedy
on November the 22nd, 1963, and that very same day Oswald also fired
several bullets at a 39-year-old Dallas police officer named J.D.
Tippit, resulting in the officer's death as well.

John Kennedy was the father of two young children when his life was
brutally cut short on a Dallas city street in late 1963. Tippit was
also the father of young children. He left behind three of them when
he was shot in cold blood on 10th Street in Dallas a mere 45 minutes
after the President was slain.

Many conspiracy theorists have, for decades now, tried to establish
their case that Oswald didn't kill anyone that Friday in Dallas. But
such efforts have fallen pitifully short of proving any such thing.

Instead, what is left behind, is quite literally a trail of physical
evidence that leads right straight to that 24-year-old young man named
Oswald.

I'm still waiting for some super-skilled conspiracy believer to prove
beyond a reasonable doubt that somebody else besides Lee Oswald killed
John Kennedy and Officer Tippit. But, to date, such a thing has never
been accomplished. Nor will it ever be, I surmise, given the dozens of
pieces of physical evidence in the JFK and Tippit cases that bear the
unmistakable signature of Lee Harvey Oswald.

I fully realize that those "LNers" who favor Oswald's lone guilt in
the murders in question have the burden of proof with regard to
establishing Oswald's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt (which the LN
side HAS indeed accomplished without a shred of a doubt, IMO).

But the conspiracy ("CT") side, if they want to continue to chant
"Oswald is innocent!" from the rooftops must then prove (also beyond
the proverbial reasonable doubt) that the LN "case" against Oswald is
flawed and therefore totally inadequate and incorrect. And that, IMO,
has never been done.

And (again in my opinion) if the pro-conspiracy side wants to stomp
its collective feet and insist Oswald is innocent of killing JFK (and,
in many CT circles, innocent of murdering J.D. Tippit as well, which
is even more foolish on their part given the existing evidence to say
they're dead wrong), then some crackerjack conspiracist(s) somewhere
should be able to piece together enough evidence to tell the world who
DID kill John F. Kennedy that Friday in Dallas.*

* = Seems to me that that task should be able to be accomplished, via
the same cunning investigative skills that led those same CTers to
their current firm conclusion that the Lone-Nut case against Oswald
isn't worth a pile of cow chips at round-up time. But, alas, not one
conspiracy theorist to date has done so...and, thusly, the BEST
EVIDENCE in the case is still this -- Lee Harvey Oswald killed both
JFK and J.D. Tippit.

In short, if nobody can prove beyond reasonable doubt that all (or
most) of the physical evidence that shows Oswald to be a double-
murderer was somehow "faked" or manipulated after the fact, then any
reasonable, honest, and straight-thinking man or woman who has studied
and examined the physical evidence associated with the JFK murder case
literally has NO CHOICE (to paraphrase my main dude, Vincent T.
Bugliosi) but "to return to this courtroom with a verdict of 'Guilty'
against the defendant Lee Harvey Oswald!".

"Prove" (definition) -- "To establish the existence, truth, or
validity of (as by evidence or logic)."

http://webster.com/dictionary/prove

David Von Pein
May 2005

www.Amazon.com/review/R3V96ZYL75TFSG