Mark Boucher LBW not given to SreeSanth by umpire Tony Hill
Villanova
105.5 Sreesanth to Boucher, no run, a massive massive appeal for lbw,
Sreesanth can't believe Tony Hill has given it not out, it was the
slower ball angling into off and middle stump, Boucher came forward and
tried to play across the line, he missed and the ball hit him low on the
front pad in line with the stumps, that was hitting middle stump
half-way down, unless there was a faint inside edge that was pretty plumb
There was no bat edge.
--
posted via www.usenetfast.com - Fastest downloads from $4.50/month !
ben.g...@hotmail.com
Haha, here we go again.
Regards,
Ben.
Andrew Dunford
<ben.g...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:9cf8137e-ef7d-402b...@u10g2000prn.googlegroups.com...
This is just the idiot's way of reminding us why the NZ v England series was
so enjoyable.
Andrew
Villanova
I am profusely sorry for not being subtle like Mr Andrew Dunford.
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.sport.cricket/msg/5dd3779ff4cdfbbe
--
posted via www.usenetfast.com - Fastest downloads from $4.50/month !
Villanova
I am profusely sorry for not being subtle like
you Andrew.
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.sport.cricket/msg/5dd3779ff4cdfbbe
--
posted via www.usenetfast.com - Fastest downloads from $4.50/month !
StraightDrive
>>Regards,
>>Ben.
May I know what is wrong in some one posting a thread
about a real bad umpiring incident ?
Bobs
Usually because you guys will start ranting about racist conspiracies.
StraightDrive
"Bobs" <shitstai...@yourplace.com> wrote in message
news:47eb365b$1...@news.orcon.net.nz...
Usually because you guys are paranoid, delusional and "denialal"
ben.g...@hotmail.com
wrote:
> "Bobs" <shitstainedba...@yourplace.com> wrote in message
>
> news:47eb365b$1...@news.orcon.net.nz...
>
>
>
>
>
> > StraightDrive wrote:
> >> <ben.gus...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >>news:9cf8137e-ef7d-402b...@u10g2000prn.googlegroups.com...
> >> On Mar 27, 5:26 pm, Villanova <Villan...@VillanovaUniv.Com> wrote:
> >>> 105.5 Sreesanth to Boucher, no run, a massive massive appeal for lbw,
> >>> Sreesanth can't believe Tony Hill has given it not out, it was the
> >>> slower ball angling into off and middle stump, Boucher came forward and
> >>> tried to play across the line, he missed and the ball hit him low on the
> >>> front pad in line with the stumps, that was hitting middle stump
> >>> half-way down, unless there was a faint inside edge that was pretty
> >>> plumb
>
> >>> There was no bat edge.
>
> >>> --
>
> >>>> Haha, here we go again.
>
> >>>> Regards,
> >>>> Ben.
>
> >> May I know what is wrong in some one posting a thread
> >> about a real bad umpiring incident ?
>
> > Usually because you guys will start ranting about racist conspiracies.
>
>
> - Show quoted text -
It took until day 2 this time, at least.
jzfredricks
the brainwashing we, the white overlords, put on the umpires must be
wearing off!!!
ben.g...@hotmail.com
It's good to see I have been recognised as your overlord.
Regards,
Ben.
jzfredricks
> > wearing off!!!
>
> It's good to see I have been recognised as your overlord.
I'm an international umpire now!?!
ben.g...@hotmail.com
No you're not, which is why I didn't not put a spell on you. I am
still your white overlord.
Regards,
Ben.
Paul Robson
>> posted viawww.usenetfast.com- Fastest downloads from $4.50/month !
>
> Haha, here we go again.
Is it my imagination or does all this whinging stop when India aren't
playing.....
Ærchie
any sense had already left town. Yet Paul Robson was standin' in the
doorway saying:
No. It doesn't stop.
Despite all their protestations about wanting India for the Indians and
needing to throw off the yoke of dead imperialism, the Indian psyche is
addicted to all things British.
Including whinging!
Ærchie
--
Don't visit my blog, it is private property!
http://archiearchive.wordpress.com/
Latest Post - Sort of Dunno Nothin Teenage Song
nit...@yahoo.com
> <ben.gus...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:9cf8137e-ef7d-402b...@u10g2000prn.googlegroups.com...
> On Mar 27, 5:26 pm, Villanova <Villan...@VillanovaUniv.Com> wrote:
>
> > 105.5 Sreesanth to Boucher, no run, a massive massive appeal for lbw,
> > Sreesanth can't believe Tony Hill has given it not out, it was the
> > slower ball angling into off and middle stump, Boucher came forward and
> > tried to play across the line, he missed and the ball hit him low on the
> > front pad in line with the stumps, that was hitting middle stump
> > half-way down, unless there was a faint inside edge that was pretty plumb
>
> > There was no bat edge.
>
> > --
> > Haha, here we go again.
>
> This is just the idiot's way of reminding us why the NZ v England series was
> so enjoyable.
I'm not sure this post should have elicited such a response from you.
Granted, you are reaqcting to this based on past Indian whinging about
umpires, but taken in isolation, this is post no better or worse than
your whinge about Koertzen losing it and Vettori getting out as a
result.
Incidentally, for those who have not seen the LBW in question, this
was about as plumb as it gets.
Cheers,
Satya
Graeme
> On Mar 27, 1:33 am, "Andrew Dunford" <adunf...@artifax.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> > <ben.gus...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
> >news:9cf8137e-ef7d-402b...@u10g2000prn.googlegroups.com...
> > On Mar 27, 5:26 pm, Villanova <Villan...@VillanovaUniv.Com> wrote:
>
> > > 105.5 Sreesanth to Boucher, no run, a massive massive appeal for lbw,
> > > Sreesanth can't believe Tony Hill has given it not out, it was the
> > > slower ball angling into off and middle stump, Boucher came forward and
> > > tried to play across the line, he missed and the ball hit him low on the
> > > front pad in line with the stumps, that was hitting middle stump
> > > half-way down, unless there was a faint inside edge that was pretty plumb
>
> > > There was no bat edge.
>
> > > --
> > > Haha, here we go again.
>
> > This is just the idiot's way of reminding us why the NZ v England series was
> > so enjoyable.
>
> I'm not sure this post should have elicited such a response from you.
> Granted, you are reaqcting to this based on past Indian whinging about
> umpires, but taken in isolation, this is post no better or worse than
> your whinge about Koertzen losing it and Vettori getting out as a
> result.
>
> Incidentally, for those who have not seen the LBW in question, this
> was about as plumb as it gets.
>
> Cheers,
> Satya
I didn't see it but from the description, if the ball was "angling in"
and he came forward, this creates doubt about whether the ball will
slip down the leg side. It doesn't mention straightening off the
pitch, and without doing that it's quite difficult to angle in, hit
someone in line, and still be hitting middle unless they have played
back. Any further details?
BTW... anyone who suggests that Tony Hill could be racist doesn't know
him. I do know him, and he's not.
Dave (SA)
Er Ærchie...?
I have noticed that Aussies tend to suffer from the whinging virus as well.
Must be because you have not shaken of the British??
When will Australia become a Republic?
And why isn't it one already?
John Eales would agree.
pks-gm
wrote:
> Ærchie wrote:
> > The curfew had been lifted and the gamblin' wheel shut down, Anyone with
> > any sense had already left town. Yet Paul Robson was standin' in the
> > doorway saying:
>
> >> On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 22:28:35 -0700, ben.gussey wrote:
>
> >>> Haha, here we go again.
> >> Is it my imagination or does all this whinging stop when India aren't
> >> playing.....
>
> > No. It doesn't stop.
>
> > Despite all their protestations about wanting India for the Indians and
> > needing to throw off the yoke of dead imperialism, the Indian psyche is
> > addicted to all things British.
>
> > Including whinging!
> > Ærchie
> > --
> > Don't visit my blog, it is private property!
> >http://archiearchive.wordpress.com/
> > Latest Post - Sort of Dunno Nothin Teenage Song
>
> Er Ærchie...?
>
> I have noticed that Aussies tend to suffer from the whinging virus as well.
>
> Must be because you have not shaken of the British??
>
> When will Australia become a Republic?
> And why isn't it one already?
>
> John Eales would agree.
LOL
shineything
wrote:
> "Bobs" <shitstainedba...@yourplace.com> wrote in message
>
> news:47eb365b$1...@news.orcon.net.nz...
>
>
>
> > StraightDrive wrote:
> >> <ben.gus...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >>news:9cf8137e-ef7d-402b...@u10g2000prn.googlegroups.com...
> >> On Mar 27, 5:26 pm, Villanova <Villan...@VillanovaUniv.Com> wrote:
> >>> 105.5 Sreesanth to Boucher, no run, a massive massive appeal for lbw,
> >>> Sreesanth can't believe Tony Hill has given it not out, it was the
> >>> slower ball angling into off and middle stump, Boucher came forward and
> >>> tried to play across the line, he missed and the ball hit him low on the
> >>> front pad in line with the stumps, that was hitting middle stump
> >>> half-way down, unless there was a faint inside edge that was pretty
> >>> plumb
>
> >>> There was no bat edge.
>
> >>> --
>
> >>>> Haha, here we go again.
>
> >>>> Regards,
> >>>> Ben.
>
> >> May I know what is wrong in some one posting a thread
> >> about a real bad umpiring incident ?
>
> > Usually because you guys will start ranting about racist conspiracies.
>
> Usually because you guys are paranoid, delusional and "denialal"
Stone the crows - talk about pots, kettles and all that!
nit...@yahoo.com
> On 27 Mar, 14:23, nitt...@yahoo.com wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Mar 27, 1:33 am, "Andrew Dunford" <adunf...@artifax.net> wrote:
>
> > > <ben.gus...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
> > >news:9cf8137e-ef7d-402b...@u10g2000prn.googlegroups.com...
> > > On Mar 27, 5:26 pm, Villanova <Villan...@VillanovaUniv.Com> wrote:
>
> > > > 105.5 Sreesanth to Boucher, no run, a massive massive appeal for lbw,
> > > > Sreesanth can't believe Tony Hill has given it not out, it was the
> > > > slower ball angling into off and middle stump, Boucher came forward and
> > > > tried to play across the line, he missed and the ball hit him low on the
> > > > front pad in line with the stumps, that was hitting middle stump
> > > > half-way down, unless there was a faint inside edge that was pretty plumb
>
> > > > There was no bat edge.
>
> > > > --
> > > > Haha, here we go again.
>
> > > This is just the idiot's way of reminding us why the NZ v England series was
> > > so enjoyable.
>
> > I'm not sure this post should have elicited such a response from you.
> > Granted, you are reaqcting to this based on past Indian whinging about
> > umpires, but taken in isolation, this is post no better or worse than
> > your whinge about Koertzen losing it and Vettori getting out as a
> > result.
>
> > Incidentally, for those who have not seen the LBW in question, this
> > was about as plumb as it gets.
>
> > Cheers,
> > Satya
>
> I didn't see it but from the description, if the ball was "angling in"
> and he came forward, this creates doubt about whether the ball will
> slip down the leg side. It doesn't mention straightening off the
> pitch, and without doing that it's quite difficult to angle in, hit
> someone in line, and still be hitting middle unless they have played
> back. Any further details?
Boucher was caught on the crease. It was a full slower ball which
pitched on off and cut in slightly. He was hit in line with off and
part of middle. It was definitely going to miss off. It was also
almost certainly going to miss leg. But it had a solid appointment
with the middle stump. Hawkeye showed it hitting middle squarely about
a 3rd of the way up from it's base. In other words, it was plumb. It
looked dead on at full speed and all the comms thought he was a goner.
There was no element of doubt here. The only mitigating factor is that
it came out of the blue on a bloody hot and humd day and one cannot
condemn Hill for taking a bit of a mental break under these
conditions.
>
> BTW... anyone who suggests that Tony Hill could be racist doesn't know
> him. I do know him, and he's not.- Hide quoted text -
>
You really should get that chip on your shoulder removed surgically.
The only people who scream racism are the trolls and most people
ignore them anyway.
Cheers,
Satya
Andrew Dunford
<nit...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:b66f5560-1afd-44ca...@n75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
Fair point, but I see no good reason to take one post in isolation when the
poster is a serial pest who is still now trying to stir up trouble weeks
after the Australia v India series ended. I would have written that
Koertzen's behaviour was silly whichever team lost the wicket, whereas the
OP here has a chip on his shoulder the size of Africa.
You may be jumping to conclusions about what I am reacting to. The
Australia v India series featured non-stop whinging here from so-called fans
of both teams: I would certainly not lay all the blame at the door of Indian
fans, even if the OP and a couple of other conspiracy theorists were
responsible for a large chunk of the rubbish.
Andrew
StraightDrive
"shineything" <shine...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:af6017d8-40d0-4891...@d4g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
Read history books. Thats the best medicine for your mole brain.
Paul Robson
> You may be jumping to conclusions about what I am reacting to. The
> Australia v India series featured non-stop whinging here from so-called fans
> of both teams: I would certainly not lay all the blame at the door of Indian
> fans, even if the OP and a couple of other conspiracy theorists were
> responsible for a large chunk of the rubbish.
No, but I'd lay 90% of the blame at the door of Indian fans. Whenever
India play the whinging and whining here always grows spectacularly.
Mike Holmans
<pa...@robsons.muralichucks.org.uk> tapped the keyboard and brought
forth:
Presumably the Indian cricket fan leaves the ground and repairs to a
local tavern for an evening of whines, whingeing and Bongs.
Cheers,
Mike
--
kenh...@hotmail.com
wrote:
I don't believe that's true at all.
Most fans whinge when their team loses and complain about the
umpiring.
Of course, the real serial pests are those who complain and whinge
even when their team wins
Higgs
Mike Holmans
the keyboard and brought forth:
>On Mar 28, 8:50 pm, Paul Robson <p...@robsons.muralichucks.org.uk>
>wrote:
>> On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 16:56:34 +1300, Andrew Dunford wrote:
>> > You may be jumping to conclusions about what I am reacting to. The
>> > Australia v India series featured non-stop whinging here from so-called fans
>> > of both teams: I would certainly not lay all the blame at the door of Indian
>> > fans, even if the OP and a couple of other conspiracy theorists were
>> > responsible for a large chunk of the rubbish.
>>
>> No, but I'd lay 90% of the blame at the door of Indian fans. Whenever
>> India play the whinging and whining here always grows spectacularly.
>
>I don't believe that's true at all.
>
>Most fans whinge when their team loses and complain about the
>umpiring.
That's not the rsc experience. Here, Indians and Australians whinge
about umpiring the whole bloody time whether their team is winning or
losing, while the rest hardly ever bother.
Of course, since you only ever pay attention to threads where there is
an opportunity to bash the Aussies, you wouldn't know about what goes
on in the rest of the world.
Cheers,
Mike
--
kenh...@hotmail.com
> On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 04:49:32 -0700 (PDT), kenhig...@hotmail.com tapped
> the keyboard and brought forth:
>
>
>
>
>
> >On Mar 28, 8:50 pm, Paul Robson <p...@robsons.muralichucks.org.uk>
> >wrote:
> >> On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 16:56:34 +1300, Andrew Dunford wrote:
> >> > You may be jumping to conclusions about what I am reacting to. The
> >> > Australia v India series featured non-stop whinging here from so-called fans
> >> > of both teams: I would certainly not lay all the blame at the door of Indian
> >> > fans, even if the OP and a couple of other conspiracy theorists were
> >> > responsible for a large chunk of the rubbish.
>
> >> No, but I'd lay 90% of the blame at the door of Indian fans. Whenever
> >> India play the whinging and whining here always grows spectacularly.
>
> >I don't believe that's true at all.
>
> >Most fans whinge when their team loses and complain about the
> >umpiring.
>
> That's not the rsc experience. Here, Indians and Australians whinge
> about umpiring the whole bloody time whether their team is winning or
> losing, while the rest hardly ever bother.
>
Actually, Mike, it is the rsc experience here.
If you're trying to defend Autisms claim that 90% of the whinging is
down to the Indians here, I can only assume that you have forgotten
what went on these past few months.
I know you saw it, because you contirbuted to many of the threads
yourself.
> Of course, since you only ever pay attention to threads where there is
> an opportunity to bash the Aussies, you wouldn't know about what goes
> on in the rest of the world.
>
I didn't mention the Aussies at all, I merely pointed out that plenty
of people here whinge, especially when their team loses.
Aussies and Indians included.
I'll stand by that statement and challenge you to prove otherwise.
But don't let facts get in the way of yet another of your attempted
misrepresentations
Higgs
-
Sanjiv Karmarkar
wrote:
> No, but I'd lay 90% of the blame at the door of Indian fans. Whenever
> India play the whinging and whining here always grows spectacularly.
But you are so wrong! Just go back and check the volume of posts
created by Australian fans. The number is staggering especially
considering the fact that Australian posters are fewer in number. The
mistake you perhaps are making is counting one poster - with his
innumerable sock puppets - as a large group of posters.
As a matter of fact, even as the whole discussion was dying down,
Australian fans kept in ratcheting it up time and again - I suspect
often simply for their own entertainment.
Sanjiv Karmarkar
jzfredricks
> created by Australian fans. The number is staggering especially
> considering the fact that Australian posters are fewer in number. The
> mistake you perhaps are making is counting one poster - with his
> innumerable sock puppets - as a large group of posters.
>
> As a matter of fact, even as the whole discussion was dying down,
> Australian fans kept in ratcheting it up time and again - I suspect
> often simply for their own entertainment.
I HATE to feed the trolls... and my SECOND favourite team after
England is India.. but even I have to admit that shit that comes out
of so many pro-indian RSC posters is simply too much to stomach. It is
so DRULL... I just can't stand it.
No. I'm not blind. Sure, there's plenty of "murali is a chucker, warne
is a legend" crap, but it is positively drowned by the 'omg-sydney!!!-
white-overlord-cheat' crap.
pks-gm
Interesting they killfile them but still read them, say what??
Sanjiv Karmarkar
> No. I'm not blind. Sure, there's plenty of "murali is a chucker, warne
> is a legend" crap, but it is positively drowned by the 'omg-sydney!!!-
> white-overlord-cheat' crap.
Then - I hate to say - you are mighty dense. After all, it does not
take much to realize that all that !@#$ about white-overlord-BS
originates from one poster only.
Unless you too are yet another of his sock-puppets? In which case,
the joke is on me...
Sanjiv Karmarkar
jzfredricks
> take much to realize that all that !@#$ about white-overlord-BS
> originates from one poster only.
I'd gladly be wrong, trust me
it's more than one poster, that's for sure.
Sanjiv Karmarkar
> I'd gladly be wrong, trust me
>
> it's more than one poster, that's for sure.
Site?
SK
Graeme
> The only people who scream racism are the trolls and most people
> ignore them anyway.
>
> Cheers,
> Satya
No chip here. I'd like to see anyone show an example of me
contributing to the many pervious threads on the alleged racism topic.
I was simple sharing an insight into the character of someone I know
pretty well (although admittedly I haven't seen Tony for a few years).
He's a good bloke, as fair and honest as they come, and if he made a
mistake or had a lapse in concentration (as humans are prone to do
sometimes) then he'd be the first to admit it.
jzfredricks
>
> Site?
are you seriously asking me to find "omg-sydney!!!-white-overlord-
cheat crap" from two different posters?
ok, you win
Mike Holmans
<s_kar...@hotmail.com> tapped the keyboard and brought forth:
Serial bigots like Skootti, raghu.sakleshpur, subirwa, Govandi and
Prathead Madlooni. Not all of them are pseudonyms of
Jaived/Sampath/Villanova, that's for sure.
And given that backdrop, your own posts can seem as though they are
joining in to the theme: you seemed outraged that Sadiq could even
think that Harbhajan might be guilty or that the process could be
deemed remotely fair, you rounded on him for quoting Len Hutton
instead of an Indian journo, and regularly seem to bang the "Indian is
best and everything else is bad" drum. You may not be a frothing loon,
but you seem to play footsie with those who are.
Cheers,
Mike
--
Rodney Ulyate
> On Mar 28, 5:50 am, Paul Robson <p...@robsons.muralichucks.org.uk>
> wrote:
>> No, but I'd lay 90% of the blame at the door of Indian fans. Whenever
>> India play the whinging and whining here always grows spectacularly.
> But you are so wrong! Just go back and check the volume of posts
> created by Australian fans. The number is staggering especially
> considering the fact that Australian posters are fewer in number.
Are you suggesting that they made more of these inflammatory posts than
their Indian similitudes?
I am probably poorly placed to judge -- of all the Aussies on R.S.C., I
read only Cicero, Kynoch, Alvey and Calvin --, but, even without Jaived
and his endless store of marionettes, the Indian whinges seemed
overwhelming.
That said, there were obviously justifiable grounds for the unfortunate
departure of Mr Rampriya.
<snip>
--
Rodney Ulyate
"Bla-bla."
Anon.
prabh...@hotmail.com
>
> Are you suggesting that they made more of these inflammatory posts than
> their Indian similitudes?
>
> I am probably poorly placed to judge -- of all the Aussies on R.S.C., I
> read only Cicero, Kynoch, Alvey and Calvin --, but, even without Jaived
> and his endless store of marionettes, the Indian whinges seemed
> overwhelming.
I suppose your endorsement of adult-bodied kids like Kynoch, Algae
could be attributed to your lack of experience on rsc. Kynoch was
frothing away at the start of the Ind-Aus 2003-04 tour about slow
batting from Indians in a tour....When the real thing came, Sehwag
whacked his butt with 195 in a day at Melbourne and the sedate Dravid-
Laxman pair nonchalantly scored 300+ a day.
Much of the "indian whinges" if you care to investigate are responses
to trolls like Robson and Dewanka who consistently averages 50 posts a
day in this ng.
Sanjiv Karmarkar
> are you seriously asking me to find "omg-sydney!!!-white-overlord-
> cheat crap" from two different posters?
Ah! You are mixing two entirely distinct topics. Methinks you are
completely drowned in the white noise. One way to enjoy this forum is
to be able to isolate a few good discussions from the shrill cacophony
the emanates from both banks of the river. You might get it
someday...
Sanjiv Karmarkar
Paul Robson
> Much of the "indian whinges" if you care to investigate are responses
> to trolls like Robson and Dewanka who consistently averages 50 posts a
> day in this ng.
Yes, obviously.
Spot the pattern.
England v Australia : no whining
England v India : mass whining
Australia v India : mass whining
Paul Robson
> Most fans whinge when their team loses and complain about the
> umpiring.
Do they ? Don't recall it happening in Ashes 2005 or Ashes 2006/7 ?
Sure, if there's a pretty awful decision or two it may attract some
comment, but you can pretty much guarantee the moment Whingia walk
on to the field there will be pages of WHITE RACSITS GIV SASHIN LBW WHEN
RADAR SHOWS IT MISSING BY 0.1MM. BAN THE UMPIRE FOR LIFE NOW !
Spaceman Spiff
imo, the worst of the lot are those who reflexively whinge and complain
about supporters of another team even when their own team is not involved.
exhibit "a" would be paul robson.
--
stay cool,
Spaceman Spiff
The pig go. Go is to the fountain. The pig put foot. Grunt. Foot in
what? ketchup. The dove fly. Fly is in sky. The dove drop something.
The something on the pig. The pig disgusting. The pig rattle. Rattle
with dove. The dove angry. The pig leave. The dove produce. Produce is
chicken wing. With wing bark. No Quack.
http://thedailywtf.com/Articles/No,_We_Need_a_Neural_Network.aspx
prabh...@hotmail.com
wrote:
> Spot the pattern.
>
> England v Australia : no whining
> England v India : mass whining
> Australia v India : mass whining
Seriously, would you whine even when Australia comprehensively
thrashes England 5-0???? Now *that* would have been something.
Sanjiv Karmarkar
Ah Mike. You make taking piss so enjoyable. It's Friday afternoon.
I don't start drinking for another 3 hours. So here you go...
> Serial bigots like Skootti, raghu.sakleshpur, subirwa, Govandi and
> Prathead Madlooni. Not all of them are pseudonyms of
> Jaived/Sampath/Villanova, that's for sure.
Govandi? He hardly contributes so I do not remember much of what he
writes - but I don't recall him writing anything racist. Don't know
who Subirwa and Prathead are. You apparently read a lot more posters
than I do. Raghu is simply pulling your legs. (He even succeeded in
trolling me - you sir are no contest for his intellect). I agree with
you on Skooty, although he is very readable due to his ready wit and
attractive writing style.
OTOH, several posts from Aussie posters were downright and blatantly
racist. You owe yourself an answer as to why you find only one set
objectionable. (And don't give me that crap again about protesting
outside SA consulate. They don't make violins small enough for that
tear-jerker :-) ).
BTW, you should read some of the posts *you* have written over the
last few months. You have fallen great heights from the Mike I knew
from yester-years. I'm not much for knee-jerk generalizations; if I
were, I could very easy dub your stereotyping, cookie-cutter responses
as racist just as you do you below!
> And given that backdrop, your own posts can seem as though they are
> joining in to the theme: you seemed outraged that Sadiq could even
> think that Harbhajan might be guilty or that the process could be
> deemed remotely fair, you rounded on him for quoting Len Hutton
> instead of an Indian journo,
You have no idea what you are talking about. The words 'outrage' and
'rounded on him' could not further from the spirit of my posts. My
posts directed at him were friendly banters making fun of his -
supposedly - high anglicized upbringing compared to mine highly Indian
one - again supposedly. We were just having fun at the expense of our
cultural differences. My suggestion is to stay away from it. Use the
principle used in advertising - if you don't understand it, it wasn't
meant for you. Trust me, Sadiq can fend for himself.
> and regularly seem to bang the "Indian is
> best and everything else is bad" drum. You may not be a frothing loon,
> but you seem to play footsie with those who are.
Again, so are so freaking off the mark. I am often very critical of
India - especially when it comes to politics and economic policy.
It's just that some of the views expressed on this forum about India
are so far removed from the ground reality that from that vantage
point any attempt to bring back a semblance of sanity seems skewed.
Sanjiv Karmarkar
Sanjiv Karmarkar
> and his endless store of marionettes, the Indian whinges seemed
> overwhelming.
You obviously cannot differentiate between legitimate protests and
'whinging'.
SK
jzfredricks
> 'whinging'.
can`t see the forest for the trees?
StraightDrive
"Graeme" <mrgc...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:e0fb77bb-c21a-49ef...@s13g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
> On 27 Mar, 14:23, nitt...@yahoo.com wrote:
>> On Mar 27, 1:33 am, "Andrew Dunford" <adunf...@artifax.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> > <ben.gus...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>
>> >news:9cf8137e-ef7d-402b...@u10g2000prn.googlegroups.com...
>> > On Mar 27, 5:26 pm, Villanova <Villan...@VillanovaUniv.Com> wrote:
>>
>> > > 105.5 Sreesanth to Boucher, no run, a massive massive appeal for lbw,
>> > > Sreesanth can't believe Tony Hill has given it not out, it was the
>> > > slower ball angling into off and middle stump, Boucher came forward
>> > > and
>> > > tried to play across the line, he missed and the ball hit him low on
>> > > the
>> > > front pad in line with the stumps, that was hitting middle stump
>> > > half-way down, unless there was a faint inside edge that was pretty
>> > > plumb
>>
>> > > There was no bat edge.
>>
>> > > --
>> > > Haha, here we go again.
>>
>> > series was
>> > so enjoyable.
>>
>> I'm not sure this post should have elicited such a response from you.
>> Granted, you are reaqcting to this based on past Indian whinging about
>> umpires, but taken in isolation, this is post no better or worse than
>> your whinge about Koertzen losing it and Vettori getting out as a
>> result.
>>
>> Incidentally, for those who have not seen the LBW in question, this
>> was about as plumb as it gets.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Satya
>
> I didn't see it but from the description, if the ball was "angling in"
> and he came forward, this creates doubt about whether the ball will
> slip down the leg side. It doesn't mention straightening off the
> pitch, and without doing that it's quite difficult to angle in, hit
> someone in line, and still be hitting middle unless they have played
> back. Any further details?
>
> BTW... anyone who suggests that Tony Hill could be racist doesn't know
> him. I do know him, and he's not.
No one accused Tony Hill of racism.
Its your hallucination.
StraightDrive
"Spaceman Spiff" <spacema...@nospammail.com> wrote in message
news:lr9Hj.18$bC6.7@trnddc08...
> kenh...@hotmail.com wrote:
>> On Mar 28, 8:50 pm, Paul Robson <p...@robsons.muralichucks.org.uk>
>> wrote:
>>> On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 16:56:34 +1300, Andrew Dunford wrote:
>>>> You may be jumping to conclusions about what I am reacting to. The
>>>> Australia v India series featured non-stop whinging here from
>>>> so-called fans of both teams: I would certainly not lay all the
>>>> blame at the door of Indian fans, even if the OP and a couple of
>>>> other conspiracy theorists were responsible for a large chunk of
>>>> the rubbish.
>>>
>>> No, but I'd lay 90% of the blame at the door of Indian fans. Whenever
>>> India play the whinging and whining here always grows spectacularly.
>>
>> I don't believe that's true at all.
>>
>> Most fans whinge when their team loses and complain about the
>> umpiring.
>>
>> Of course, the real serial pests are those who complain and whinge
>> even when their team wins
>>
>
> imo, the worst of the lot are those who reflexively whinge and complain
> about supporters of another team even when their own team is not involved.
> exhibit "a" would be paul robson.
>
> --
> stay cool,
> Spaceman Spiff
Facts dont matter to Andrew Dunford, Paul Robson, Rodney Ulyate and
the legions of their worshippers ie Slavish Indians.
StraightDrive
<nit...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:b66f5560-1afd-44ca...@n75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
On Mar 27, 1:33 am, "Andrew Dunford" <adunf...@artifax.net> wrote:
> <ben.gus...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:9cf8137e-ef7d-402b...@u10g2000prn.googlegroups.com...
> On Mar 27, 5:26 pm, Villanova <Villan...@VillanovaUniv.Com> wrote:
>
> > 105.5 Sreesanth to Boucher, no run, a massive massive appeal for lbw,
> > Sreesanth can't believe Tony Hill has given it not out, it was the
> > slower ball angling into off and middle stump, Boucher came forward and
> > tried to play across the line, he missed and the ball hit him low on the
> > front pad in line with the stumps, that was hitting middle stump
> > half-way down, unless there was a faint inside edge that was pretty
> > plumb
>
> > There was no bat edge.
>
> > --
> > Haha, here we go again.
>
> This is just the idiot's way of reminding us why the NZ v England series
> was
> so enjoyable.
>>>I'm not sure this post should have elicited such a response from you.
>>>Granted, you are reaqcting to this based on past Indian whinging about
>>>umpires, but taken in isolation, this is post no better or worse than
>>>your whinge about Koertzen losing it and Vettori getting out as a
>>>result.
>>>Incidentally, for those who have not seen the LBW in question, this
>>>was about as plumb as it gets.
>>>Cheers,
>>>Satya
Andrew Dunford is from a culture and race that follows this
philosophy to the core.
If we do it, we are playing hard and fair
If you do it, you are "obnxious weeds"
If we tamper the ball, we are being naughty
If you do it, you are liars and cheats
If we complain about umpiring, we are justified
If you do it, you are whingers and whiners
If we do it, we are spreading democracy
If you do it, you are terrorists
If we do it, we are being progressive
If you do it, you are uncivilized
StraightDrive
"Sanjiv Karmarkar" <s_kar...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3317a4c7-44b0-4028...@s8g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
> No, but I'd lay 90% of the blame at the door of Indian fans. Whenever
> India play the whinging and whining here always grows spectacularly.
>>But you are so wrong! Just go back and check the volume of posts
>>created by Australian fans. The number is staggering especially
>>considering the fact that Australian posters are fewer in number.
>The
>>mistake you perhaps are making is counting one poster - with his
>>innumerable sock puppets - as a large group of posters.
That is very defensive.
>>As a matter of fact, even as the whole discussion was dying down,
>>Australian fans kept in ratcheting it up time and again - I suspect
>>often simply for their own entertainment.
>>Sanjiv Karmarkar
Nope, the Australian whingers do it because they can't stand
a subcontinental team beating them.
StraightDrive
On Mar 28, 11:06 am, Mike Holmans <m...@jackalope.demon.co.uk> wrote:
Ah Mike. You make taking piss so enjoyable. It's Friday afternoon.
I don't start drinking for another 3 hours. So here you go...
> Serial bigots like Skootti, raghu.sakleshpur, subirwa, Govandi and
> Prathead Madlooni. Not all of them are pseudonyms of
> Jaived/Sampath/Villanova, that's for sure.
>>OTOH, several posts from Aussie posters were downright and blatantly
.>racist. You owe yourself an answer as to why you find only one set
>>objectionable. (And don't give me that crap again about protesting
>>outside SA consulate. They don't make violins small enough for that
>>tear-jerker :-) ).
Roflmao
>> My suggestion is to stay away from it. Use the
>>principle used in advertising - if you don't understand it, it wasn't
>>meant for you.
>>Sanjiv Karmarkar
A "beauty" that should be read by every Australian and England
whingers and whiners on rsc.
I advised the same to all those idiots many times in the past
albeit without your analogy.
If you back off from your justified, rational and very reasonable
stand in the future, you will make those racists win.
StraightDrive
"Paul Robson" <pa...@robsons.muralichucks.org.uk> wrote in message
news:pan.2008.03.28....@robsons.muralichucks.org.uk...
Paul Robson,
There was lot of whining and whingeing
from England and Australian fans about
umpiring and ball tampering with candy
juice in the England vs Australia 2005 Ashes Series.
You are the same RACIST BASTARD who said this
when SreeSanth's beamer MISSED Kevin Pietersen by a foot.
Sir Paul Robson on SreeSanth's beamer to Kevin Pietersen
http://groups.google.co.in/group/rec.sport.cricket/msg/52be72124ca3b4ad
Sir Paul Robson ABSENT on Brett Lees beamer to Sachin Tendulkar
nit...@yahoo.com
But that is exactly what I was suggesting. He simply had a lapse in
concentration and it is perhaps understandable given the heat, the
nature of the surface and dominance of bat over ball. I am just
reacting to your defensive posture. The issue of racism would never
have crossed any reasonable poster's mind till you decided to be
proactively defensive about your man when no such defense was
indicated in the first place. In any case, it's not a big deal. Doubt
it will affect the result much anyway with the pitch playing the way
it is.
Cheers,
Satya
nit...@yahoo.com
> <nitt...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:b66f5560-1afd-44ca...@n75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
> On Mar 27, 1:33 am, "Andrew Dunford" <adunf...@artifax.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > <ben.gus...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
> >news:9cf8137e-ef7d-402b...@u10g2000prn.googlegroups.com...
> > On Mar 27, 5:26 pm, Villanova <Villan...@VillanovaUniv.Com> wrote:
>
> > > 105.5 Sreesanth to Boucher, no run, a massive massive appeal for lbw,
> > > Sreesanth can't believe Tony Hill has given it not out, it was the
> > > slower ball angling into off and middle stump, Boucher came forward and
> > > tried to play across the line, he missed and the ball hit him low on the
> > > front pad in line with the stumps, that was hitting middle stump
> > > half-way down, unless there was a faint inside edge that was pretty
> > > plumb
>
> > > There was no bat edge.
>
> > > --
> > > Haha, here we go again.
>
> > This is just the idiot's way of reminding us why the NZ v England series
> > was
> > so enjoyable.
> > I'm not sure this post should have elicited such a response from you.
> > Granted, you are reaqcting to this based on past Indian whinging about
> > umpires, but taken in isolation, this is post no better or worse than
> > your whinge about Koertzen losing it and Vettori getting out as a
> > result.
>
> poster is a serial pest who is still now trying to stir up trouble weeks
> after the Australia v India series ended. I would have written that
> Koertzen's behaviour was silly whichever team lost the wicket, whereas the
> OP here has a chip on his shoulder the size of Africa.
Ok I'll concede your point but I'll point to my ignorance of the OPs
posting history as a legitimate excuse. In general I don't read the
trolls of any nationality. I don't even know who the serial trolls
are. Thus they rarely ever get under my skin. It makes my rsc
experience so much more enjoyable. However, what does get under my
skin is when otherwise reasonable posters like you and Mike Holmans
start making (what could be construed as) disparaging blanket
generalizations about the nature of the Indian fan. I personally am
offended by such snide comments and I am sure I am not the only one
who has this response. I don't doubt that the provocation that led to
these digs was extreme in it's nature. However, I cannot control the
posters who do the provoking and I am not responsible for their
idiocy. So why normal posters like me be clubbed with those idiots and
be labeled as "whinging Indian fans" especially by people whose
opinion matters on this forum?
Satya
StraightDrive
"Rodney Ulyate" <rodney...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:fsj1up$7hr$1...@aioe.org...
> Sanjiv Karmarkar wrote:
>> On Mar 28, 5:50 am, Paul Robson <p...@robsons.muralichucks.org.uk>
>> wrote:
>>> No, but I'd lay 90% of the blame at the door of Indian fans. Whenever
>>> India play the whinging and whining here always grows spectacularly.
>> But you are so wrong! Just go back and check the volume of posts
>> created by Australian fans. The number is staggering especially
>> considering the fact that Australian posters are fewer in number.
>
> Are you suggesting that they made more of these inflammatory posts than
> their Indian similitudes?
>
> I am probably poorly placed to judge -- of all the Aussies on R.S.C., I
> read only Cicero, Kynoch, Alvey and Calvin --,
1)
Rodney Ulyate said in his comment above "it" only reads Cicero, Kynoch etc
In the following link the same Rodney Ulyate ADMITS "He is Colin Kynoch".
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.sport.cricket/msg/c249a18a338f9739
PROVED: Rodney Ulyate is a CUNNING LIAR and a MANIPULATOR
2)
Rodney Ulyate said in his comment "it" only reads Cicero, Kynoch, "Alvey"
and Calvin
Song for India by WHITE RACIST and Rodney's RACIST FRIEND Alvey
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.sport.cricket/msg/b68f75e1a23ad809
As a matter of fact c00ps, FiLtHy, Jack are sock puppets of Rodney Ulyate's
RACIST FRIEND Alvey.
PROVED: Rodney Ulyate is a RACIST FUCK
3)
Rodney Ulyate said in his comment "it" only reads Cicero, Kynoch, "Alvey"
and Calvin
Rodney Ulyate READS and RESPONDS to "dechuka" aka "dewanka"
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.sport.cricket/msg/2e46f014c286831c
Rodney Ulyate READS and RESPONDS to 'JPD"
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.sport.cricket/msg/d2a2753eea4adc33
PROVED: Rodney Ulyate is a BORN CUNNING LIAR and a MANIPULATOR.
>but, even without Jaived and his endless store of marionettes, the Indian
>whinges seemed overwhelming.
>
> That said, there were obviously justifiable grounds for the unfortunate
> departure of Mr Rampriya.
>
> <snip>
>
> --
> Rodney Ulyate
>
> "Bla-bla."
> Anon.
Rodney Ulyate, You must be an undercover FBI n NSA PSYCHOPATH
as accused by your FRIEND "Husband of ALL FBI n NSA Agents" since
you seem to know information that cannot be figured out WITHOUT the
POWER of US Government.
Aslam Siddique is a bangladeshi, he LIES as per Rodney Ulyate
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.sport.cricket/msg/10fdad243f600dec
StraightDrive
>> SK
Rodney Ulyate is an ENGLISH LANGUAGE GENIUS.
Roflmao
Remember "Systemic" vs "Systematic" ?
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.sport.cricket/msg/695df46b1a4e7045
FiLThy
"StraightDrive" <Straig...@Tendulkar.com> wrote in message
news:fsk422$48s$1...@aioe.org...
lol - its the Sth Africans now huh? Do you fucking Indian supporters ever
stop the fucking whining? I apologize to all the Poms Ive called whingers in
the past, there is new champion in the whining stakes, and its the fucking
Indians...
StraightDrive
"FiLThy" <but...@yourindianass.com> wrote in message
news:47edd703$0$3063$afc3...@news.optusnet.com.au...
Alvey aka FiLtHy aka c00ps,
When did Andrew Dunford take up South African citizenship ?
You fucking Aussie racists are hilarious.
StraightDrive
<nit...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:a7515494-6c7d-48e6...@d45g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
There is a PRIVATE club on rsc that is headed by RACISTS Andrew
Dunford, Mike Holmans, Alvey and Rodney Ulyate.
Any Indian who makes rational arguments will be BANNED from
that club.
>> However, what does get under my
>>skin is when otherwise reasonable posters like you and Mike Holmans
>>start making (what could be construed as) disparaging blanket
>>generalizations about the nature of the Indian fan.
This should be the biggest joke ever in rsc.
Andrew Dunford and Mike Holmans are reasonable posters ?
Roflmao
Google rsc for Tomato Soup, Andrew Dunford, Killfile, Remote jungle
and any of those combinations and you will find plenty of Dunford
posts which are utterly idiotic, moronic and plain eccentric and self
touting.
Some idiot that works for cricinfo mentioned Andrew Dunford's expertize of
calling Habibul Bashar as Habitual Basher in one of their columns and the
rsc junta WORSHIPS Andrew Dunford as a cricket expert.
I have NOT read a single post from Andrew Dunford or Mike Holmans
from which I learned anything.
Most of their posts are past stats, scores and other baloney.
Rodney Ulyate
Obviously not. And, going by your hostile, flippant and hypersensitive
tone -- you are, after all, among the whingers --, I doubt that you'll
see fit to enlighten me. Pity.
--
Rodney Ulyate
"Let me enjoy the earth no less
"Because the all-enacting Might
"That fashioned forth its loneliness
"Had other aims than my delight."
Thomas Hardy
StraightDrive
> Sanjiv Karmarkar wrote:
>> On Mar 28, 11:13 am, Rodney Ulyate <rodney.uly...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> and his endless store of marionettes, the Indian whinges seemed
>>> overwhelming.
>> You obviously cannot differentiate between legitimate protests and
>> 'whinging'.
>
> Obviously not. And, going by your hostile, flippant and hypersensitive
> tone -- you are, after all, among the whingers --, I doubt that you'll see
> fit to enlighten me. Pity.
>
> --
> Rodney Ulyate
>
Racist Rodney Ulyate,
Keep attacking every one to make yourself look like the
victim. That has been the age old tactic used by cunning
racist, liars and manipulators like you.
Racist Alvey who HATES and RACIALLY ABUSES Indians
is a GREAT FRIEND of Rodney Ulyate.
PROOF Rodney Ulyate is a CUNNING LIAR, RACIST and a MANIPULATOR.
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.sport.cricket/msg/3b415f91f710755c
You can see the SUPERIOR INTELLECT of Rodney Ulyate who accused
Raghu to be a "bigot" for a simple comment about Darrell Hair.
Proves ALL YOU AUSSIES have severe psychiatric problems of accusing
the victims to be racist when in fact YOU are the REAL RACISTS.
Rodney Ulyate accuses Raghu to be a "bigot"
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.sport.cricket/msg/8159f9b9dce38c63
None of these facts matter and the stupid Indians still keep sucking this
alleged PSYCHOPATH Rodney Ulyate's dick.
Rodney Ulyate
[...]
> One way to enjoy this forum is to be able to isolate a few
> good discussions from the shrill cacophony the emanates
> from both banks of the river.
That is feeble. Whether it be a good whine or a bad whine is
irrelevant; it is still, to every intent and purpose, a whine.
This debate is about the Jaived-barring quantity of whines; the quality
is quite beside the point. And, as far as Indian whines go, R.S.C. has
never reaped a greater harvest than that it brought in during the
Indo-Australian rubber.
If you are adamant, though, why not list the whining Aussies? I would
happily reciprocate with the whining Indians, and we could both base our
points on fact rather than selective memory. Waddaya say?
<snip>
StraightDrive
"jzfredricks" <jzfre...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:6b78dca3-f31b-4e9d...@i7g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
>> But you are so wrong! Just go back and check the volume of posts
>> created by Australian fans. The number is staggering especially
>> mistake you perhaps are making is counting one poster - with his
>> innumerable sock puppets - as a large group of posters.
>>
>> Australian fans kept in ratcheting it up time and again - I suspect
>> often simply for their own entertainment.
>
> England is India.. but even I have to admit that shit that comes out
> of so many pro-indian RSC posters is simply too much to stomach. It is
> so DRULL... I just can't stand it.
>
> No. I'm not blind. Sure, there's plenty of "murali is a chucker, warne
> is a legend" crap, but it is positively drowned by the 'omg-sydney!!!-
> white-overlord-cheat' crap.
jzfredericks,
How come you were NOT drowned by the 'omg-India!!!-
stinking cheating curry munchers' crap ?
with cheating, lies, deception & force - stinky Indians rob the Game
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.sport.cricket/msg/f50697413d55bb1e
Fuck off home curry munchers - by WHITE RACIST c00ps
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.sport.cricket/msg/7b06914a1408d5ac
Indians shit is yellow - by WHITE RACIST FiLthY
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.sport.cricket/msg/40b395341e765e0f
Song for India by WHITE RACIST alvey
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.sport.cricket/msg/b68f75e1a23ad809
Indians are the JEWS OF ASIA - WHITE RACIST Australian will_s
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.sport.cricket/msg/1f104410edc53a99
Indian Harbhajan is wearing a CONDOM ON HIS HEAD - WHITE RACIST Darkfalz
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.sport.cricket/msg/2940043e5f07f9a2
Indian fan assaulted by racist Australian supporters at Gabba
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.sport.cricket/msg/8e2c833e10ce47fb
Curry Munching Stinky cheating Indians - by WHITE RACIST AUSSIE
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.sport.cricket/msg/f50697413d55bb1e
Australian racist wipes his back with INDIAN FLAG
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.sport.cricket/msg/293c6b22649670d8
StraightDrive
> Sanjiv Karmarkar wrote:
> [...]
>> One way to enjoy this forum is to be able to isolate a few
>> good discussions from the shrill cacophony the emanates
>> from both banks of the river.
>
> That is feeble. Whether it be a good whine or a bad whine is irrelevant;
> it is still, to every intent and purpose, a whine.
>
> This debate is about the Jaived-barring quantity of whines; the quality is
> quite beside the point. And, as far as Indian whines go, R.S.C. has never
> reaped a greater harvest than that it brought in during the
> Indo-Australian rubber.
>
> If you are adamant, though, why not list the whining Aussies? I would
> happily reciprocate with the whining Indians, and we could both base our
> points on fact rather than selective memory. Waddaya say?
>
> <snip>
>
> --
> Rodney Ulyate
RACIST Rodney Ulyate,
You have already been PROVEN as a FUCKING RACIST, LIAR and a
MANIPULATOR.
jzfredricks
>
> How come you were NOT drowned by the 'omg-India!!!-
> stinking cheating curry munchers' crap ?
I'm sure there's plenty of what you say. Thing is, if I see a post is
blatantly racist I stop reading it. I also don't pay heaps of
attention to the name of the poster. That's not to say I'm blind.
If someone was to ask me to describe the ng, over the last 4 months,
i'd say;
25% decent cricket discussions
25% boring stuff
35% crap about anti-sub-continent umpires, white racists (ie anti-Aus)
15% crap about murali chucks, you're all monkeys (ie anti-Indian)
this ofc ignores blatant "get cheap nike shoes" spam.
also, this is not topics, but posts. Some topics start out clever, and
quickly degrade into 'waaaa, sydney' crap.
StraightDrive
<ben.g...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:5f72cb2b-e5bb-428a...@e10g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
On Mar 27, 5:58 pm, "StraightDrive" <StraightDr...@Tendulkar.com>
wrote:
> "Bobs" <shitstainedba...@yourplace.com> wrote in message
>
> news:47eb365b$1...@news.orcon.net.nz...
>
>
>
>
>
> > StraightDrive wrote:
> >> <ben.gus...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >>news:9cf8137e-ef7d-402b...@u10g2000prn.googlegroups.com...
> >> On Mar 27, 5:26 pm, Villanova <Villan...@VillanovaUniv.Com> wrote:
> >>> 105.5 Sreesanth to Boucher, no run, a massive massive appeal for lbw,
> >>> Sreesanth can't believe Tony Hill has given it not out, it was the
> >>> slower ball angling into off and middle stump, Boucher came forward
> >>> and
> >>> tried to play across the line, he missed and the ball hit him low on
> >>> the
> >>> front pad in line with the stumps, that was hitting middle stump
> >>> half-way down, unless there was a faint inside edge that was pretty
> >>> plumb
>
> >>> There was no bat edge.
>
> >>> --
>
> >>>> Haha, here we go again.
>
> >>>> Ben.
>
> >> May I know what is wrong in some one posting a thread
> >> about a real bad umpiring incident ?
>
> > Usually because you guys will start ranting about racist conspiracies.
>
> Usually because you guys are paranoid, delusional and "denialal"- Hide
> quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
>>It took until day 2 this time, at least.
Ben,
It took you just one post to come out of the woodwork and accuse
the op of racist conspiracies.
StraightDrive
>> jzfredericks,
>>
>> How come you were NOT drowned by the 'omg-India!!!-
>> stinking cheating curry munchers' crap ?
>
> I'm sure there's plenty of what you say. Thing is, if I see a post is
> blatantly racist I stop reading it. I also don't pay heaps of
> attention to the name of the poster. That's not to say I'm blind.
> If someone was to ask me to describe the ng, over the last 4 months,
> i'd say;
>
> 25% decent cricket discussions
> 25% boring stuff
> 35% crap about anti-sub-continent umpires, white racists (ie anti-Aus)
> 15% crap about murali chucks, you're all monkeys (ie anti-Indian)
This is where your typical bias shows up.
The last two categories are 25% and 25% but you choose to
criticize only the anti-sydney crowd for obvious reasons.
> this ofc ignores blatant "get cheap nike shoes" spam.
What about all the comments posted by FBI n NSA psychopaths
who themselves bragged that HALF of all the posts on rsc are being
posted by their undercover operatives ?
Alleged FBI n NSA psychopath bhandava's bragging
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.sport.cricket/msg/bdd4802d0b3921b9
> also, this is not topics, but posts. Some topics start out clever, and
> quickly degrade into 'waaaa, sydney' crap.
What about 'waaaa India' crap ?
Again as usual your bias shows up in your comments.
How come Andrew Dunford, Mike Holmans, Rodney Ulyate and the rest
of the Aussies and England fans ENJOY these DEATH THREATS to
posters from THEIR RACIST FRIEND Alvey ?
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.sport.cricket/msg/3dbb34904912fcd1
How come they dont ask the readers to KILLFILE their
RACIST FRIEND "Alvey" who also has many other sock
puppets "c00ps", "FiLtHy", "Jack" ??
with cheating, lies, deception & force - stinky Indians rob the Game - Kim
Barnett
kenh...@hotmail.com
wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 04:49:32 -0700, kenhiggs8 wrote:
> > Most fans whinge when their team loses and complain about the
> > umpiring.
>
>
Of course you don't, Robbo.
But then again, you do rather have a reputation for excessive
dishonesty.
I'd suggest you type in
Ashes 2005' and 'Dave Turner' or 'bounce it' or any number of
Australian posters who were posting at the time and you'll see plenty
of whinging.
About umpiring.
Or cheating.
Or playing the game in the wrong spirit.
Or having AN UNFAIR FUCKING WEATHER ADVANTAGE.
The first post that came up was 'A new Low' , followed by 'Martyn's
exit'.
How many examples would suffice to convince you that you're talking
out of your arse?
Higgs
kenh...@hotmail.com
wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 08:42:25 -0700, prabhu_r77 wrote:
> > Much of the "indian whinges" if you care to investigate are responses
> > to trolls like Robson and Dewanka who consistently averages 50 posts a
> > day in this ng.
>
> Yes, obviously.
>
> Spot the pattern.
>
> England v Australia : no whining
Bullshit
Higgs
Rodney Ulyate
[...]
> No, but I'd lay 90% of the blame at the door of Indian fans. Whenever
> India play the whinging and whining here always grows spectacularly.
To be fair, though, there are rather a lot of Indian fans.
--
Rodney Ulyate
"But it is our common lot to die, and the gods themselves cannot rescue
even one they love, when Death that stretches all men out lays its dread
hand upon him."
Pallas Athena (as Mentor)
Graeme
> But that is exactly what I was suggesting. He simply had a lapse in
> concentration and it is perhaps understandable given the heat, the
> nature of the surface and dominance of bat over ball. I am just
> reacting to your defensive posture. The issue of racism would never
> have crossed any reasonable poster's mind till you decided to be
> proactively defensive about your man when no such defense was
> indicated in the first place. In any case, it's not a big deal. Doubt
> it will affect the result much anyway with the pitch playing the way
> it is.
>
> Cheers,
> Satya
That's just how I saw the thread seemed to be heading... and reading
some of the other posts I'd say it has decended to that level. I think
it would have whether or not I spoke up in Tony's defense. Looks like
you and I can agree though on something though. As you said, no big
deal.
Cheers
Graeme
Paul Robson
>> Spot the pattern.
>>
>> England v Australia : no whining
>
> Bullshit
>
> Higgs
Yes, that's a very obvious pattern Ken, but I meant for you to look at my
patterns,not make your own up.
Paul Robson
> On Mar 28, 12:41 pm, Paul Robson <p...@robsons.muralichucks.org.uk>
> wrote:
>
>> Spot the pattern.
>>
>> England v Australia : no whining
>> England v India : mass whining
>> Australia v India : mass whining
>
> Seriously, would you whine even when Australia comprehensively
> thrashes England 5-0???? Now *that* would have been something.
Oh, there's always something to complain about, some dodgy decision,
always *something*.
subi...@notmail.com
> Sanjiv Karmarkar wrote:
> > On Mar 28, 11:13 am, Rodney Ulyate <rodney.uly...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> and his endless store of marionettes, the Indian whinges seemed
> >> overwhelming.
> > You obviously cannot differentiate between legitimate protests and
> > 'whinging'.
>
> Obviously not. And, going by your hostile, flippant and hypersensitive
> tone -- you are, after all, among the whingers --, I doubt that you'll
> see fit to enlighten me. Pity.
rodders, you are getting almost holmansesque in your windbaggery.
before you know it you will become a thatcher-loving oxbridge libdem
twit saying what-ho at private dinner clubs choking over your
blancmange.
Sanjiv Karmarkar
> rodders, you are getting almost holmansesque in your windbaggery.
> before you know it you will become a thatcher-loving oxbridge libdem
> twit saying what-ho at private dinner clubs choking over your blancmange.
LOL!
BTW, are you the Subirwa Mike speaks of with so much disdain? If you
are, why are you a racist? ;-) :-)
Sanjiv Karmarkar
subi...@notmail.com
the mind of He Who Loves The Game are mysterious. ask Him.
Sanjiv Karmarkar
> Sanjiv Karmarkar wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > One way to enjoy this forum is to be able to isolate a few
> > good discussions from the shrill cacophony the emanates
> > from both banks of the river.
>
> That is feeble. Whether it be a good whine or a bad whine is
> irrelevant; it is still, to every intent and purpose, a whine.
>
> This debate is about the Jaived-barring quantity of whines; the quality
> is quite beside the point. And, as far as Indian whines go, R.S.C. has
> never reaped a greater harvest than that it brought in during the
> Indo-Australian rubber.
>
> If you are adamant, though, why not list the whining Aussies? I would
> happily reciprocate with the whining Indians, and we could both base our
> points on fact rather than selective memory. Waddaya say?
Again, as I said earlier, you are confusing legitimate protests with
whining. Theodore Roosevelt was not whining when he said that the
monopolies are bad for the well-being of the nation. Samuel Adams was
not whining when he said that the taxation on the colonies was
unfair. Mandela was not whining when he said that Apartheid was
unjust and inhuman.
What I'm saying is that complaining about what transpired at Sydney is
not whining; it was demonstration of intolerance for injustice. Don't
get me wrong, I'm not equating the enormity of mass exploitation with
a mundane game of cricket. But this forum itself is mundane. This
forum is meant only to discuss cricket. It's a small community; I
doubt if more than a few hundred people read it. And therefore
pointing out on this forum the total travesty of the Sydney test is
not whining. I'd go as far as saying that it *had* to be done to
prevent such ridiculous happenings from transpiring again.
Why do you think some highly rational posters like Samarth, Bharat,
Fran et al participated in this so called whinging? They have never
written such posts before and probably will never again. Even the
Aussie press and several Aussie ex-players agreed with us. Were they
all 'whinging'? (What a horrible word, BTW).
As a matter of fact, the raw racism that emanated from the posts of
the likes of c00p, Will_s, darkfaltz, Fish etc absolutely shocked me;
because - truth be told - we encounter no overt racism here in the
US. Even if you were to incorrectly classify the Sydney protests as
whining, there is no way any rational person should use that to
justify the cruelty of those posts and I'm very disappointed that you
do not see that.
Sanjiv Karmarkar
Sanjiv Karmarkar
> Sanjiv Karmarkar wrote:
> > On Mar 28, 11:13 am, Rodney Ulyate <rodney.uly...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> and his endless store of marionettes, the Indian whinges seemed
> >> overwhelming.
> > You obviously cannot differentiate between legitimate protests and
> > 'whinging'.
>
> Obviously not. And, going by your hostile, flippant and hypersensitive
> tone -- you are, after all, among the whingers --, I doubt that you'll
> see fit to enlighten me. Pity.
Well, there is some talk of you being a middle-aged Aussie and not a
college-going South African. :-) Anyways, let me give you a benefit
of doubt and try to - as you say - enlighten you. I'll start with a
piece of advice, if you need something from someone, you do not start
by calling that person hostile, flippant, and hypersensitive! :-)
(Although, you are probably right about the flippant part).
I responded to some other post of yours somewhere else, I'm CnPing my
response in entirety below; and this is your lesson and your
enlightenment for the day - worth about 3 credits.
=====================
Sanjiv Karmarkar
=====================
jzfredricks
> pointing out on this forum the total travesty of the Sydney test is
> not whining. I'd go as far as saying that it *had* to be done to
> prevent such ridiculous happenings from transpiring again.
Riiiiiiight....
you keep telling yourself, please, that the crap posted in this ng has
any effect on world cricket.
You know what I'd like to hear more Indian fans saying;
1) It was spectacularly bad umpiring. Bad enough to directly effect
the result. But not biased, nor deliberate, nor racist.
2) The Indian team's threats to withdraw from the series were an over-
reaction, and a mistake.
3) If the Indian team played any part in getting Bucknor sent home,
then that also was an over-reaction and a mistake. I for one am
certain phone calls were made, and they shouldn't have (been made).
StraightDrive
>> And therefore
>> pointing out on this forum the total travesty of the Sydney test is
>> not whining. I'd go as far as saying that it *had* to be done to
>> prevent such ridiculous happenings from transpiring again.
>
> Riiiiiiight....
>
> you keep telling yourself, please, that the crap posted in this ng has
> any effect on world cricket.
jzfredericks,
You just proved your stupidity.
If injustice is accepted and tolerated, changes wont be made
and human society wont move forward.
If you believe in what you said, then why do you care if
people whine and whinge on rsc since their whinging and
whining had no effect ?
> You know what I'd like to hear more Indian fans saying;
>
> 1) It was spectacularly bad umpiring. Bad enough to directly effect
> the result. But not biased, nor deliberate, nor racist.
Why should Indian fans post comments that SATISFY "YOUR"
opinion and conform to "YOUR" standards ?
LOL
Steve Bucknor is BIASED, DELIBERATE and RACIST since
he had a HISTORY of giving egregious and horrendous decisions
against India.
Is your mind rational and logical enough to get this simple fact is
the zillion dollar question.
> 2) The Indian team's threats to withdraw from the series were an over-
> reaction, and a mistake.
Indian team reaction was NOT an over reaction and NOT a mistake
since the RACIST ELEPHANT Mike Proctor INSULTED, INSINUATED
and ABUSED Indian team members Kumble and Tendulkar to be
LIARS in the hearing.
RACIST ELEPHANT Mike Proctor was subsequently PROVED to
be a RACIST FUCK by Justice Hansen who took Michael Clarke, Ponting
and Symonds to task and called them liars.
> 3) If the Indian team played any part in getting Bucknor sent home,
> then that also was an over-reaction and a mistake. I for one am
> certain phone calls were made, and they shouldn't have (been made).
Why should any one give a damn about WHAT YOU "THINK" ?
ROFLMAO
You morons are ACCUSED of RACISM and BIGOTRY for the
RIGHT REASONS because you fuckwits REFUSE to SEE the
FACTS of many former Australian players, commentators, columnists
and other former players, commentators and columnists from
UK, India, Pak, NZ, SA criticizing Sydney test umpiring and
Mike Proctor FIASCO.
Sanjiv Karmarkar
> You know what I'd like to hear more Indian fans saying;
--== SNIP ==--
What are you, nuts? Why would they say things that are so obviously
false? Do you want them to say that the earth is flat too? :-)
SK
Rodney Ulyate
Well I say! Come, come, Subeerwahh, old bean! You, toohhh, would be ah
smidgeohn grumpy at the prospect of your vaycaytiohn coming to an
eaaarly end and ah two-month univearsitee semestah setting upohn you,
would you not? Which, alas, is wot is happening to yours truulay
todeeay, doan't you knoh? Ohh, stop it! You tease! Wot?
--
Rodney Ulyate
"No man is an island unto himself, but each a part of the continent."
John Dunne
Mike Holmans
<rodney...@gmail.com> tapped the keyboard and brought forth:
Well, at least if you become thatcher-loving, go to oxbridge or eat
blancmange, you won't be anything like me, so that'll be a comfort for
you.
Cheers,
Mike
--
Rodney Ulyate
[...]
> Well, at least if you become thatcher-loving, go to oxbridge or eat
> blancmange, you won't be anything like me, so that'll be a comfort for
> you.
Hardly. I happen to think very highly of you, if that's any comfort to you.
--
Rodney Ulyate
"The labouring man, that tills the fertile soil,
"And reaps the harvest fruit, hath not in deed
"The gain, but pain; and if for all his toil
"He gets the straw, the lord will have the seed."
Edward De Vere
FiLThy
> Indians shit is yellow - by WHITE RACIST FiLthY
> http://groups.google.com/group/rec.sport.cricket/msg/40b395341e765e0f
>
Go and have another read of that link, who is the one that actually says
shit is yellow?
> Everyday is a learning experience. Is that what you racists say to Indians
> ? Actually shit matches the australia ODI gear color and color of Brett
> Lee's hair , so i didn't get the logic. We are brown-black and shit color
> is yellow..
StraightDrive
"FiLThy" <but...@yourindianass.com> wrote in message
news:47ef362e$0$24086$afc3...@news.optusnet.com.au...
>
>> Indians shit is yellow - by WHITE RACIST FiLthY
>> http://groups.google.com/group/rec.sport.cricket/msg/40b395341e765e0f
>>
> You are really stupid arent you? Do you have an education?
> Go and have another read of that link, who is the one that actually says
> shit is yellow?
>
Racist fuckface Alvey aka FiLThy aka c00ps,
What difference does it make ?
You are a RACIST FUCK, thats all that matters.
Your email id is but...@yourindianass.com
Your fellow Aussie Mad Hamish kicked your STUPID RACIST ASS royally.
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.sport.cricket/msg/dcca13f9086bf77a
Dont worry, the cricinfo geniuses Uday Rajan or Jayen will mention you
as a cricket expert in one of their cricinfo columns like they did to
the clown Andrew Dunford.
LOL
kenh...@hotmail.com
rodney...@gmail.com
[...]
> Well I say! Come, come, Subeerwahh, old bean! You, toohhh, would be ah
> smidgeohn grumpy at the prospect of your vaycaytiohn coming to an
> eaaarly end and ah two-month univearsitee semestah setting upohn you,
> would you not? Which, alas, is wot is happening to yours truulay
> todeeay, doan't you knoh? Ohh, stop it! You tease! Wot?
By the way, if any of you are keen on having your text hacked into
pieces and mixed into a similarly hideous combo of pomposity and
incoherence, just pop on over here:
rodney...@gmail.com
> > >> and his endless store of marionettes, the Indian whinges seemed
> > >> overwhelming.
> > > You obviously cannot differentiate between legitimate protests and
> > > 'whinging'.
> > Obviously not. And, going by your hostile, flippant and hypersensitive
> > tone -- you are, after all, among the whingers --, I doubt that you'll
> > see fit to enlighten me. Pity.
> Well, there is some talk of you being a middle-aged Aussie and not a
> college-going South African. :-) Anyways, let me give you a benefit
> of doubt
I understand that you are pulling my fibula, but, just to be clear, it
is rather more than "doubt", no?
> and try to - as you say - enlighten you. I'll start with a
> piece of advice, if you need something from someone, you do not start
> by calling that person hostile, flippant, and hypersensitive! :-)
> (Although, you are probably right about the flippant part).
I was narked by the slight on my noesis. So, from one hostile,
flippant and hypersensitive bucko to another, here is some advice-
giving reciprocation: if you do not want to be dubbed hostile,
flippant and hypersensitive, you would do well not to oppugn the brain
of one who is similarly hostile, flippant and hypersensitive.
> I responded to some other post of yours somewhere else, I'm CnPing my
> response in entirety below; and this is your lesson and your
> enlightenment for the day - worth about 3 credits.
I'm warning you, mister: if this continues, I may have to uncork a
politically-incorrect old-person caper.
> Again, as I said earlier, you are confusing legitimate protests with
> whining. Theodore Roosevelt was not whining when he said that the
> monopolies are bad for the well-being of the nation. Samuel Adams was
> not whining when he said that the taxation on the colonies was
> unfair. Mandela was not whining when he said that Apartheid was
> unjust and inhuman.
> What I'm saying is that complaining about what transpired at Sydney is
> not whining; it was demonstration of intolerance for injustice.
It was not a demonstration; it was a flaming riot. And your analogy
with the altogether more demo-suited likes of monopolies, colonial
taxes and the evils of apartheid is decidedly inappropriate.
> Don't get me wrong, I'm not equating the enormity of mass
> exploitation with a mundane game of cricket.
In which case (being far too lazy to scroll up and delete it), I
retract the majority of my last sentence.
> But this forum itself is mundane. This forum is meant only to
> discuss cricket. It's a small community; I doubt if more than a few hundred
> people read it. And therefore pointing out on this forum the total travesty
> of the Sydney test is not whining.
Your logic confounds. Even on this mundane, specified platform, the
whining was totally disproportionate. For over a month,
"rec.sport.cricket" was a misnomer; the place was more suited to
something like "alt.whine". I recall remarking at one stage on how
more than five threads were bewhining the same umpiring blunder.
Surely that's a bit much?
> I'd go as far as saying that it *had* to be done to prevent such ridiculous
> happenings from transpiring again.
Your conspirative tone suggests that you suspect a conspiracy. That
is the only way that such mass whining could be seen as preventative.
> Why do you think some highly rational posters like Samarth
He's rational.
> Bharat
So is he.
> Fran
Come now. Seen her take on the follow on?
> et al participated in this so called whinging? They have never
> written such posts before and probably will never again. Even the
> Aussie press and several Aussie ex-players agreed with us. Were they
> all 'whinging'? (What a horrible word, BTW).
> As a matter of fact, the raw racism that emanated from the posts of
> the likes of c00p
I presume you mean c00ps. His was a unfortunate case. It began with
a spot of not-entirely-P.C.-but-no-doubt-completely-in-jest exchanges
with an Indian who was more than happy to play ball. Sadly, c00ps
reacted to the frenzy by employing his jestful comments
vituperatively.
> Will_s
A dunce, yes, but a racist?
> darkfaltz
Wouldn't surprise me.
> Fish
Just because he (or she) clashed with you does not mean that he (or
she) was being a racist. Indeed, if there was any bigotry in the
exchange, it emanated solely (if humorously) from your "old people"
jibes.
[...]
> because - truth be told - we encounter no overt racism here in the
> US. Even if you were to incorrectly classify the Sydney protests as
> whining, there is no way any rational person should use that to
> justify the cruelty of those posts and I'm very disappointed that you
> do not see that.
I fail to recall where I said, or even intimated, that racist obloquy
is justified by mass whinging. I should hope that you have grounds
for that insinuation. If, however, as is likely the case, you do not,
I should strongly suggest that you take your disappointment and shove
it.
Nowhere in this thread have I attempted to justify anything; my sole
concern has been the disapprobation of whinging.
SultanOfSwing
> On Mar 29, 10:24 pm, Sanjiv Karmarkar <s_karmar...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Mar 29, 5:08 am,RodneyUlyate <rodney.uly...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Sanjiv Karmarkar wrote:
> > > > On Mar 28, 11:13 am,RodneyUlyate <rodney.uly...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >> and his endless store of marionettes, the Indian whinges seemed
> > > >> overwhelming.
> > > > You obviously cannot differentiate between legitimate protests and
> > > > 'whinging'.
> > > Obviously not. And, going by your hostile, flippant and hypersensitive
> > > tone -- you are, after all, among the whingers --, I doubt that you'll
> > > see fit to enlighten me. Pity.
> > Well, there is some talk of you being a middle-aged Aussie and not a
> > college-going South African. :-) Anyways, let me give you a benefit
> > of doubt
>
> I understand that you are pulling my fibula, but, just to be clear, it
> is rather more than "doubt", no?
Prakash Melwani was repsonsible for that. My opinion --
How could one confuse a 19 year old pipsqueak with
curmudgeonly CDK? (Have I killed 2 birds with 1 stone?)
<snip verbose>
> > I responded to some other post of yours somewhere else, I'm CnPing my
> > response in entirety below; and this is your lesson and your
> > enlightenment for the day - worth about 3 credits.
>
> I'm warning you, mister: if this continues, I may have to uncork a
> politically-incorrect old-person caper.
Aha, so you do admit to have two personas.
> > Again, as I said earlier, you are confusing legitimate protests with
> > whining. Theodore Roosevelt was not whining when he said that the
> > monopolies are bad for the well-being of the nation. Samuel Adams was
> > not whining when he said that the taxation on the colonies was
> > unfair. Mandela was not whining when he said that Apartheid was
> > unjust and inhuman.
> > What I'm saying is that complaining about what transpired at Sydney is
> > not whining; it was demonstration of intolerance for injustice.
>
> It was not a demonstration; it was a flaming riot. And your analogy
> with the altogether more demo-suited likes of monopolies, colonial
> taxes and the evils of apartheid is decidedly inappropriate.
I see. So all the posts in the month of January on the poor
umpiring of the Buckson combo in the Sydney Test are a
"flaming riot". It clearly shows which side of the fence your
sympathies lie.
> > But this forum itself is mundane. This forum is meant only to
> > discuss cricket. It's a small community; I doubt if more than a few hundred
> > people read it. And therefore pointing out on this forum the total travesty
> > of the Sydney test is not whining.
>
> Your logic confounds. Even on this mundane, specified platform, the
> whining was totally disproportionate. For over a month,
> "rec.sport.cricket" was a misnomer; the place was more suited to
> something like "alt.whine". I recall remarking at one stage on how
> more than five threads were bewhining the same umpiring blunder.
> Surely that's a bit much?
Provide proof or retract. Can you produce a URL for the five
threads
which were bemoaning the *same* umpiring blunder, as you put it?
> > Why do you think some highly rational posters like Samarth
>
> He's rational.
>
> > Bharat
>
> So is he.
>
> > Fran
>
> Come now. Seen her take on the follow on?
Fran has rather unconventional views on enforcing follow-ons
in Test cricket, Shahid Afridi, Damien Martyn and other cricketers.
For Fran's views on Afridi, google for the thread "Shahid Afridi
and heavy hitting". But Fran definitely falls into the category of
"rational" posters.
> > et al participated in this so called whinging? They have never
> > written such posts before and probably will never again. Even the
> > Aussie press and several Aussie ex-players agreed with us. Were they
> > all 'whinging'? (What a horrible word, BTW).
> > As a matter of fact, the raw racism that emanated from the posts of
> > the likes of c00p
>
> I presume you mean c00ps. His was a unfortunate case. It began with
> a spot of not-entirely-P.C.-but-no-doubt-completely-in-jest exchanges
> with an Indian who was more than happy to play ball. Sadly, c00ps
> reacted to the frenzy by employing his jestful comments
> vituperatively.
c00ps is a racist, pure and simple.
> > Will_s
>
> A dunce, yes, but a racist?
Of course, Will_s is a racist. Ask Vicky Vigneswaran, who's
interacted a lot with Will Sutton. I also recall a post from Will
Sutton asking for the annihilation of Pakistan in the aftermath
of the Oval Test fiasco in August 2005. I can't find that post
right now but some googling would definitely yield results.
> > darkfaltz
>
> Wouldn't surprise me.
Confirmed racist. Case closed.
StraightDrive
"SultanOfSwing" <asla...@yahoo.co.in> wrote in message
news:612d3e36-1abb-46be...@w8g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
Rodney Ulyate is a MUCH WORSE RACIST than the idiots
will_s and its ilk.
The only difference is Rodney Ulyate is very cunning, deceptive and
manipulative.
rodney...@gmail.com
> On May 6, 8:47 am, rodney.uly...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Mar 29, 10:24 pm, Sanjiv Karmarkar <s_karmar...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Mar 29, 5:08 am,RodneyUlyate <rodney.uly...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Sanjiv Karmarkar wrote:
> > > > > On Mar 28, 11:13 am,RodneyUlyate <rodney.uly...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >> and his endless store of marionettes, the Indian whinges seemed
> > > > >> overwhelming.
> > > > > You obviously cannot differentiate between legitimate protests and
> > > > > 'whinging'.
> > > > Obviously not. And, going by your hostile, flippant and hypersensitive
> > > > tone -- you are, after all, among the whingers --, I doubt that you'll
> > > > see fit to enlighten me. Pity.
> > > Well, there is some talk of you being a middle-aged Aussie and not a
> > > college-going South African. :-) Anyways, let me give you a benefit
> > > of doubt
> > I understand that you are pulling my fibula, but, just to be clear, it
> > is rather more than "doubt", no?
> Prakash Melwani was repsonsible for that. My opinion --
> How could one confuse a 19 year old pipsqueak
Aside from being barbate, I am over six feet tall and quite partial to
scotch. Don't be callin' me a pipsqueak.
> with
> curmudgeonly CDK? (Have I killed 2 birds with 1 stone?)
> <snip verbose>
I have taken lately to searching for shorter synonyms for almost every
word that I type, so how in the name of long-winded turgidity was that
verbose?
> > > I responded to some other post of yours somewhere else, I'm CnPing my
> > > response in entirety below; and this is your lesson and your
> > > enlightenment for the day - worth about 3 credits.
> > I'm warning you, mister: if this continues, I may have to uncork a
> > politically-incorrect old-person caper.
> Aha, so you do admit to have two personas.
Come again?
> > > Again, as I said earlier, you are confusing legitimate protests with
> > > whining. Theodore Roosevelt was not whining when he said that the
> > > monopolies are bad for the well-being of the nation. Samuel Adams was
> > > not whining when he said that the taxation on the colonies was
> > > unfair. Mandela was not whining when he said that Apartheid was
> > > unjust and inhuman.
> > > What I'm saying is that complaining about what transpired at Sydney is
> > > not whining; it was demonstration of intolerance for injustice.
> > It was not a demonstration; it was a flaming riot. And your analogy
> > with the altogether more demo-suited likes of monopolies, colonial
> > taxes and the evils of apartheid is decidedly inappropriate.
> I see. So all the posts in the month of January on the poor
> umpiring of the Buckson combo in the Sydney Test are a
> "flaming riot".
> It clearly shows which side of the fence your sympathies lie.
Presumably you are referring to the fence that separates pro-whiners
from anti-whiners, because no Jarpie cheered louder for India than I
during the series in question.
> > > But this forum itself is mundane. This forum is meant only to
> > > discuss cricket. It's a small community; I doubt if more than a few hundred
> > > people read it. And therefore pointing out on this forum the total travesty
> > > of the Sydney test is not whining.
> > Your logic confounds. Even on this mundane, specified platform, the
> > whining was totally disproportionate. For over a month,
> > "rec.sport.cricket" was a misnomer; the place was more suited to
> > something like "alt.whine". I recall remarking at one stage on how
> > more than five threads were bewhining the same umpiring blunder.
> > Surely that's a bit much?
> Provide proof or retract. Can you produce a URL for the five
> threads which were bemoaning the *same* umpiring blunder, as
> you put it?
1) "3 extra cock suckers playing for Australia - Benson,Bucknor, and
the 3rd Umpire !": http://groups.google.com/group/rec.sport.cricket/browse_thread/thread/48a5bb55e2c83fdb
2) "Symonds (almost) stumping":
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.sport.cricket/browse_thread/thread/5158cec1f6e9068c
3) "Symonds umpiring error+ U3 stumping decision--cruel for India":
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.sport.cricket/browse_thread/thread/c12a050ed855b9ed
4) " Oxenford ...": http://groups.google.com/group/rec.sport.cricket/browse_thread/thread/731b9f450d39bbb2
5) "Technology Wont Help Umpiring":
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.sport.cricket/browse_thread/thread/12ad36bf294ac736
> > > Why do you think some highly rational posters like [...] Fran
> > Come now. Seen her take on the follow on?
> Fran has rather unconventional views on enforcing follow-ons
> in Test cricket, Shahid Afridi, Damien Martyn and other cricketers.
> For Fran's views on Afridi, google for the thread "Shahid Afridi
> and heavy hitting". But Fran definitely falls into the category of
> "rational" posters.
I was being jocular.
> > > et al participated in this so called whinging? They have never
> > > written such posts before and probably will never again. Even the
> > > Aussie press and several Aussie ex-players agreed with us. Were they
> > > all 'whinging'? (What a horrible word, BTW).
> > > As a matter of fact, the raw racism that emanated from the posts of
> > > the likes of c00p
> > I presume you mean c00ps. His was a unfortunate case. It began with
> > a spot of not-entirely-P.C.-but-no-doubt-completely-in-jest exchanges
> > with an Indian who was more than happy to play ball. Sadly, c00ps
> > reacted to the frenzy by employing his jestful comments
> > vituperatively.
> c00ps is a racist, pure and simple.
I should like to give him the benefit of the doubt.
> > > Will_s
> > A dunce, yes, but a racist?
> Of course, Will_s is a racist. Ask Vicky Vigneswaran, who's
> interacted a lot with Will Sutton. I also recall a post from Will
> Sutton asking for the annihilation of Pakistan in the aftermath
> of the Oval Test fiasco in August 2005. I can't find that post
> right now but some googling would definitely yield results.
Will Sutton and Will_s are different posters.
> > > darkfaltz
> > Wouldn't surprise me.
> Confirmed racist. Case closed.
If you say so.
Kindest,
Rodney Ulyate